K». GENE-^L-OGY COLLECTION JOHN Ona £WliNj6r GiWtAlDOLfc'/vl CVfir\3\ 3 1833 02696 3832 A SYSTEM OF HERALDRY, SPECULATIVE AND PRACTICAL-. WITH Till TRUE ART OF BLAZON, ACCORDING TO THE MOST APPROVED HERALDS IN EUROPE: MARKS OF CADENCY, MARSHALLING OF DIVERS COATS IN ONE SHIELD, EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS, bfc. ARE FULLY TREATED OF : TO WHICH ARE SUBJOINED SEFERAL CVRIOVS FAHtlCUZjIXS RELATIfE TO FUNERAL ESCUTCHEONS, PUBLIC PROCESSIONS AND CAVALCADES, CORONATIONS OF OUR KINGS, PRECEDENCY OF OUR NOBILITY AND GENTRY ; RETURN OF THE LORDS OF SESSION TO AN ORDER OF THE LORDS SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED, REQIIIRING THEM TO MAKE UP A ROLL OR LIST OF THE PEERS OF SCOTLAND; AND MEMORIALS OF MANY ANCIENT AND HONOURABLE FAM1L1£S OF THE SCOTS NATION. CRITICAL AND HISTORICAL REMARKS ON THAT PART OF PRTNNE S BISTORT, KNOWN BY THE NAME OF THE llAGMAN-ROLL. By ALEXANDER NISBE T, Gent. THE SECOND EDITION. VOL. IL EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY AND FOR ALEX. LAWRIE AND COMPANY: ■^OLD BY ALEX. LAWRIE, W. LAING, MANNERS AND MILLER, ARCH. CONSTABLE (S* C0» AND LONGMAN} HURST, REES, AND ORME, LONDOIT. 1804. 1304323 Uk'/^^''' TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE JAMES Earl of MORTON, J^ (iovn\/cu/u. LORD DALKEITH AND ABERDOUR, Heritable Sheriff, Steward mid Justiciary of the Isles of Orkney and Zetland^ Vice-Admiral of the same, and Knight of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the thistle and St Andrew, Is'c. My Lord, THE First Volume of this work was dedicated to the illustrious House of Hamilton : The second claims the patronage of your Lordship, a branch of the no less illustrious House of Douglas. Had its valuable author been alive, he muft have approved the choire. Vol. IL b . DEDICATION. Were I permitted, it were easy to enlarge on the antiquity and glori- ous actions of your illustrious ancestors, some of whom were matched with the blood royal. But neither these, nor your Lordship's personal qualifications dai'e I adventure on : The world knows them ; and your Lordship's modesty, great as it is, cannot conceal them. I must, however, be allowed to say, that your Lordship's knowledge in antiquities and polite learning, renders you a fit patron for a work of this kind : And if it shall be so lucky as to meet with your Lordship's approbation, the editor need not fear the ill-nature of the most severe critic. That your Lordship may long remain an ornament to your noble House, for your true attachment to justice, learning, and every viraie, is the sincere desire of, My Lord, Your Lordship's most obedient, And most devoted humble servant, Robert Fleming. PREFACE, THE learned and ingenious Mr Alexander Nisbet, author of this Sys- tem of Heraldry, has, in his Preface to the First Volume, so fully ac- counted for the original and progress of Armorial Bearings with us, and other nations, and, in the Treatise itself, so elaborately and accurately described and exemplified the several branches of the Science of Heraldry, that it will be equally superfluous to add any thing to wljat he has said in the former, or bestow any encomiums on his performance in the latter, which has suiSciently recommended Itself to all who rightly understand the noble science there treated of. But Mr Nisbet not being able to overtake his whole design in one volume, as at first he intended, for the several reasons set forth in the said Preface, he therefore promises an Appendix, or Second Volume, wherein the several branches of heraldry, not there treated of, were to be illustrated ; and, as this viadertaking is now finished, and presents itself to the public, it will be necessary that the editor should say something in behalf of the performance. In the First Part of this Volume, the following branches of Heraldry, viz. Marks of Cadency, Marshalling of Divers Coats in one Shield, Ex- terior Ornaments, &c. are fully treated of, and illustrated by proper ex- amples, all which were executed by the author himself in his own life- time ; the manuscript copy of which, in his own hand-writing, the edi- tor has preserved for the satisfaction of the curious. The other parts handled in this undertaking, are inserted because of their coincidency with the principal subject treated of in this Volume. Of this kind is the chapter of Funeral Escutcheons, which was composed by Roderick Chalmers, herald, and herald-painter in Edinburgh, whose un- derstanding and practice in these matters is well known ; and the other chapters, such as that of Precedency, the Office and Dignity of Heralds, &c. and that concerning Public Processions and Cavalcades, which gives an idea of the grandeur of this ancient and once flourishing kingdom, were all carefully collected from MSS. in the Lawyers' Library, and the writings of the learned Sir George Mackenzie, &c. To render this work the more useful and complete, the editor has given the Return of the Lords of Session, to an order of the House of Peers, concerning the Scots peerage ; which cannot fail to give satisfaction, as it was the I'esult of the inquiries of that august Court into the records of the nation, and is a most exact and authentic state of our peerage at this day. The editor observing that no body had ever yet published an exact draught of these monuments of the antiquity and Independency of this kingdom, the Regalia, viz. Crown, Sceptre and Sword ; and, as the ori- ginals are not now to be seen, he has embellished the work with a plate ii , PREFACE. of them, which the ingenious Mr Richard Cooper has engraven, with preat pains and exactness, from the description given of them in the in- strument taken by that true lover of his country, Mr WiUiam Wilson, at depositing them in the castle of Edinburgh. But what takes up a great part of this Volume, is the memorials of private f;imilies, which neither Mr Nisbet nor the publisher are any ways answerable for ; they must stand upon the faith of those who gave them in, and the vouchers they adduce for their support. Many of those printed in Mr Nisbet's lifetime were signed by the parties concerned ; but that practice was afterwards neglected, since every one, no doubt, will be ready to support what he has advanced for the honour and an- tiquity of his family. From what is above set forth, it will be evident that the editor has nei- ther spared pains nor expences to render this book useful and valuable. It may now be expected that he should give some account to the sub- scribers for the delay in the publication ; and indeed this, in part, may be ascribed to Mr Nisbet's death, and the property of it going through many different hands, and likewise to the dilatoriness of the subscribers in giving in memorials of their families : However, as it now comes abroad into the world, it is hoped it will give general satisfaction, and meet with a favourable reception, both as it completes the design of its worthy author, who was the most learned in the noble Science of He- raldry of any that ever appeared in this country, yea, perhaps, not in- ferior to any ; and, as it contains many curious things, which tend to illustrate the honour and dignity of the nation, either never before print- ed, or only to be found in loose papers in the hands of the curious, not to mention the memorials of many ancient and noble families who have deserved well of their country, the executing of which has far exceeded the number of sheets at first proposed. Since finishing the impression of this work, the editor coming to the knowledge, that a learned antiquarian had written Historical and Critical Remarks on the surna:mes and families of those whose predecessors sware fealty to Edward I. of England, in 1292, &c. inserted in a writing com- monly known by the name of Ragman Roll, he purchased the same at a considerable expence, and has printed it in a size fit to be bound up with this volume : And, as it proves the antiquity of many of the sur- names, and most of the great families of this kingdom, and in a great measure supphes the want of particular memorials of many of these fa- milies, it is hoped, such as would have it bound up with their copy, will not grudge a particular allowance for it, as well as for the supernitmerary sheets above the number mentioned in the proposals. Robert Fleming. SYSTEM OF HERALDRY, SPECULATIVE AND PRACTICAL: WITH THE TRUE ART OF BLAZON. PAR T THIRD. CHAP. I. OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, OR MARKS OF CADENCY. }N the First Part of this System I have given an account of the Rise and Art of Biaiun of Arms, of their Tinctures, Figures, Proper, Natural, and Artificial; in their Terms, Regular Positions, Dispositions, and Situations, illustrated by a nu- merous train of examples. And now, for the further prosecution of my System, it will not be unusetul to repeat my definition of arms, given in the former part, Chap. 2. ^rmj- are hereditary marks of honour, regularly composed of certain tinctures and figures, granted or authorised by sovereigns, for distinguishing, diftereiicing, and illustrating persons, famihes, and communities. To which I shall add a defini- tion given bv a very eminent author, John Baptista Christyn, Chancellor of Bra- bant, in his famous treatise, titled. Jiinspn/dentiu Heroica, de Jure Belgitrum circa NobiUtatem. page 78. " Signa. summi principis autoritate, alicui concessa, aut pro- " pria voluntatp assumpta, personam a persona, familias a familiis, civitates a " civitatibus, coll-gia a col'egiis, varie distinguentia." From these definitions the use of arms is obvious, viz. Cbesides their being. hb- nouiable rewards of virtue) to distinguish and difference persons, fam'li' s and ccn nnmities : So as, first, to distinguish the nobihty an'l gentry from the vul- gar. S,-condly, to distinguish principal families of nobihty and gentry amongst Vol. II. A i OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, i^c. themselves. And, thirdly, to difference descendants of each particular family amongst themselves, conform to then- seniority. As to the first of these uses, viz. the distmction of the nobility from the vulgar; it is plain from the foresaid definition, that no person or family are entitled to carry arms, but such as have received, or assumed the same by approbation ot so- vereign authority, which is sufficient to distinguish the vulgar from the nobility and gentry, so that I need not further to insist on that use of arms. As to the second, I hope I have sufficiently accounted for the same in the First Part of this System. The third shall be the subject of this chapter, in which 1 shall give the several differences that have been used by the descendants of nobility and gentry, to dif- ference themselves from their original and principal families, that their degrees of descent may be known, which are as necessary as the former, for diflerencing younger brothers and their issue from the eldest, that the order and degrees of both, in the lines of the descendants from one stem, may be known, to prevent confusion and contention amongst them ; all which hath been carefully looked to by sovereign princes their laws and edicts. With us, our king and parliament, in the year 1590, for regulating the dif- ferences of descendants, made an act, impowering the Lyon King at Arms, and his brethren heralds, to visit the whole arms of noblemen, barons, and gentlemen, within Scotland, and to distinguish them with congruent differences, and to matriculate them in their books. As also to inhibit all such as bear arms, as by the law of arms ought not to bear them, under high penalties; as the act more particularly bears. And, in the year 1672, chap. 21. the foresaid act of Parlia- ment is renewed and ratified, and the Lyon King at Arms is impowered to dis- tinguish arms, and to matriculate them in his books or registers, from whence I have taken, and do take most of my examples in this System, which are marked L. R. Our above-mentioned author gives us the edict of Albert and Isabel, Sovereign Princes of the Netherlands, published in the year i6r6, with his Commentary thereon, in his above-named book, Juiisprud. Her. or Be Jure Belgarum circa Nobilitatem y Injignia, in the 5th article concerning Brisures, or Marks of Cadency, has these words, " Ut altercationibus jurgiisque, quae ex planorum insignium de- " latione oriri solent, obviam eatur, jubemus, familiarum omnium natu minimos, " imo vel maximos spirante patre, gentilitiis insignibus quoddam addere discerni- " culum, moribus usitatum, ut inde geniturae ordo pateat, &- perpetuo lineae dig- " nosci possint, idque donee anteriores defecerint, aliter facientibus, indicta est " poena 50 Florenorum." Which is to this purpose by the foresaid article, " To " remedy the debates (which may as they have been seen to fall out in time by- " gone) touching the seniority, and carrying che plain arms, we will and ordain, " that the youngest sons (and even the eldest sons in their fathers' lifetimej shall " be hoiden to place in their arms some brisure, in the accustoriied form, for a •' distinction from the eldest, and to continue such brisure as long time as the " branches of the eldest remain ; to the end, that the descendants of the one or " other branch may be known and discerned, under the pain of 50 Florinses. On the laws and edicts of France, Spain, and other nations, I forbear to insist ; but show some of their practices in this matter, which are various. The differences, or additional figures, used by cadets, to difference themselves from their original families, are termed by us in Britain, differences, or marks of cadency; by the French, brisures, upon the account they break the principal bearing of the family : And those who write in Latin, call them armorum discerni- cula, and ordinarily say, priinogenitus arma hcibet Integra, cceteri nota quadam dis- creta. It is many years since I published an Essay of Marks of Cadency, in which I was as full as the practice of our nation allowed me, and took in such foreign examples as were suitable to illustrate that work; some part of which I am obliged to repeat in this chapter as curtly as possible, the rules thereof being sufficiently exemphfied in that Essay, and many of them in the former part of this System. But now 1 shall proceed to the universal practice of differencing the arms of de- scendants, which are, and have been very various through all Europe : And I OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, i^c. 3 think the same may be reduced to these nine ways : First, the change of tlie tinc- tures of the field : Secondly, the change of the tinctures of the principal or es- seinial figures : Thirdly, by dividing the field, by the partition lines, under acci- dental forms: Fourtlily, the displacaig the figures, or altering their positions or situations in the shield : Fifthly, the diminishing the number of them: Sixthly^ by increasing the number of the principal or original figuies: Seventhly, by adding duierent figures to the principal ones: Eighthly, by quartering the paternal arms with other ones: And, Ninthly, by transposing the quarters, or changing the crest; to each of which I shall speak. First then, as for altering the tinctures of the field, it was anciently used : John Baptista. in his forecited Treatise, Art. 5th, says, " Olim Belgi & Galli sola " c^'lorum variatione arma discernebant ;" and adds, •' Imo £t apud Britannos mos " hie cognitus." Of old the Belgians and French differenced arms by changing only the tinctures of the field ; and this practice was with the Britons. He gives us instances of this practice in Flanders, in the 1120, that oi Anwldus Arescoti Comes, who had five sons; the eldest carried the plain arms of his father, being or, three flower-de-luces sable; the second son, Baron of WosemaJe, altered the tinctures, and carried, gules, three flower-de-luces argent; the third son, Baron of Roteslakie, counter-changed his immediate brother's bearing, by making them, argent, three flower-de-luces gules; the fourth son took argent, three flower-de- luces sable; and the fifth, gules, three flower-de-luces or. Our author proceeds to give many instances of this kind, not only in Flanders, but in France, and disap- proves of this way of difterencing, that it altogether changes and confuses arms ; his words are, " Puto quippe mos ille non adeo insignia distinguendo, quam in " totum immutando subserviit, ex quo plurimum gentilium cunfusio &- perturba- " tio demanavit." And in that paragraph he tells us, that the lamble, orle, and bordure, were not then known to the Belgians for differences, till they got them from the French. Sir WiUiam Dugdale, Garter King at Arms in England, in his book, titled, The Ancient Usage in Bearing Arms, says. The differences that antiquity used for distinguishing descendants were by changing the colour of the field, figures, or charges; and, for instances, he gives us the practice of the family of Basset in England, in the reigns of Edwards I. II. and 111. and in the families of the name of L'Estrange there. I have given several instances of the same practice of old, by the Royal issue of the kings of France, England, and Scotland, in my former Essay on this subject, and shall only mention again a few witli us. The Homes, as descended of the old Earls of March, who carried gules, a lion rampant argen' , their paternal ensign, (the bordure which surromided, and charged with roses, being the badge of their comital office) carried the same white lion, but placed it in a green field, for diffirence, as .relative to their first designation, from their lands of Greenlaw, which they first possessed, as in the old charter of IViriielmuf Jilius Cospatricii Comitis Djminis de Greenlaw. His posterity having purchased the lands of Home, were after. v aids designed Domini de Home; from whence came the surname. Of whicn, more fully, in an essay of mine on thib suDJect, page 20, and in the first part of this System, fmge 270. The same way, of oil, the progenitors of the family of Dundas of that Ilk, as descended of a younger son of CospMricius Comes, the fi st Earl of March, (of wliich mui'e fully in the Append. x) dilTerenced themselves by a transmutation of the tinctures of the old Earls of March, gules, a lion argent, into argent, a lion gules; whicli the principal family still continues, and a'l the branches of the faaiily, with suitable marks of cadency. The principal family of the name of Douglas carried argent, a chief azure, charged, with three stars of the field. Hugh Douglas Earl of Ormonq, in the reign of Kiny James II. fourth son of James Earl of Douglas, to diflference himself, changed the tincture of the field of Douglas to ermine. Campbell of Loudon differenced himself from his chief, the family of Argyle, which carried, gironne of eight, jr and sable, by changing the tinctures of the girons into ermine and gules; which two tinctures also th^y took to show their relation to the Cravvfurds of Loudon, with whom they married, bear- ing gules, a fesse ermine. ^ OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, i^c. The second way proposed in differencing, by changing the tinctures of the prin- cipal or essential figures of arms, falls frequently out by changing the tinctures of the field ; especially when cadets divide the field of their arms, for a difference, into two distinct tinctures of metal colours. And when there is but one tincture in the principal bearing, then the cadets are necessitated to alter the tinctuie of some of their figures, by counter^changing them with the field, that metal lie not upon metal, nor colour upon colour. The field, when it is divided into two halves by any of the four principal partition lines, which are called by the English, part- ed per pale, per /esse, per bend, dexter and sinister; by the French, parti, coupe, tranche, taille, which I have explained and demonstrated in the 7th chapter of the First Part of this System. Of this practice with us, amongst many examples, I shall add one from the Lyon Register. Laurence Oliphant, Writer to the Signet, descended of a second son of Oliphant of Gask, a second son of the Lord Oliphant, carries, parted per fesse, ^;^/fj- and argent, three crescents, 2 and i, counter-changed of the same tinctures, to difference him from Gask, who had his field but 01 one tincture, viz. gules, three crescents argent, 2 and i. This way of dividing the field into two difterent tinctures, and counter-changing the charge, (the principal fa- mily having his figures in a field of one tincture) is a remote brisure suitable for cadets of cadets. The third way of differencing by the partition lines, under accidental forms, is done, when the chief of the name and family has the field of his arms divided into two tinctures, by any of the partition lines, plain and straight, then their descendants ordinarily have the same, but makes the partition line crooked, that is, by patting the same under some accidental form ; such as, iiigrailed, ivaved, nebule, embattled, &c. The Right Honourable the Earl of Panmure, chief of the name of Maule, carries, parted per pale, argent and gules, a bordure charged with eight escalops, all counter-changed of the same. Of which family in the follow- ing chapter. The cadets of this family differenced themselves from their chief only by having the partition hne waved, or nebule, as in the Register of the He- rald-Office. Fourth way of differencing, is, by diminishing the principal figures, by carrying fewer of them than the chief family. In Jurisprudentia, Art. 5th, there are in- stances given us of this practice. The family of Clermont Tallart, in Dau- phiny, carries gules, two keys in saltier argent. The family of Chatto, descended of it, was obliged to ciixxy gules, one key in bend argent: And the House of Urre, in the same province, carries a bend charged with three stars : The cadets of this House carry, on the bend, but one star. Chassanteus, in his Catal. Glor. Mundi, is for this way of differencing, and says, " Quilibet primo genitus solet portare " arma plena &- Integra ipsius domus sine diminutione, alii vero posteriores &■ " postea geniti descendentes portant ea cum aliqua differentia, diminutione & " distinctione." The author of Jurisprudentia says, " Alium &- veterem, sed per- " rarum insignia frangendi morem observo, quo minores natu aliquam in insigni- " bus particulam ad distinctionem primogenitorum omittere soliti erant." This way of differencing, by diminishing the principal figures, by younger sons, is very rare, and seldom to be met with ; few or none of the arms in Great Britain, upon the account of this way of differencing, has occurred to me. The fifth way, by altering the position and situation of the principal and essen- tial figures, by cadets, is more frequent with us than the former. In England I find this practice, from the learned Camden, in his book entitled. Remains Con- cerning Britain, chapter Of Armories; who says, In past ages those who were de- scended from one stem, reserving the principal charge, and commonly the colour of the coat, made some addition or alteration of the figures; as, for example, the fi.- t Lord Clifford bare, cheque, or and azure, a bendlet gules, which the eldest sons of that family kept as long as they continued. A second son of the family made the bendlet a bend, and thereupon placed three lionceaux passant; from whom the Cliffords of Frampton are descended. Roger Clifford, a second son of Walter Cliftord, the first lord, for the bendlet took a fesse gules, keeping still the tincture, as the Earl of Cumberland, from him descended, beareth now: And the Cliffords of Kent, branched out of that House, took the same, with a bordure gules. Whereas, also, the Lord Gobham did bertr, gules, on a cheveron or, three OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, W^-. 5 lionceaux rampant sablf. The younger brethren of that House, viz. Couiiams of Steiburv. of Bluckbury, of Billockly, took, for the three honceaux, tiiree cstoils; the second, three eaglets ; the last, three crescents. Berkeley of Wymoadhani, m thecountyof Leicester, descended from the Lord Berkeley, who carried a cheveron betwixt ten cross patees, changed these ten crosses into as many cinquefoils. The same practice is with us, for cadets to change and alter the position of the principal figures. The Herrikos of Gilmcrton bare gules, on a bend argent, a rose betwixt two lions rampant of the field. Herring of Lethendy added another rose, but Herring of Carswell turned the bend to a fesse. Scot r of Bevelaw turned the bend, carried by Scot of Buccleugh, into a fesse, for ditference, without any other addition, or, on a fesse azure, a star of six points, between two crescents of the field. The same did Leslie of Balquhain, in turning his cliief's bend uito a fesse, without any other addition. The sixth method or way of differencing cadets, is by adding figures to the arms of chiefs of families, which is now most frequently used, diverse ways, by different nations: But when these additional figures began, what they are, and how to be disposed, for differencing the numerous issue of descendants, is the subject of the following discourse: For it seems the variation of the tinctures of field, and figures, was not sufficient without additional ones, which we find first used by the French ; and from them the Belgians, with whom arms were very soon used, and regular, took the lambel, orle, bordure, as additional figures. The author of Jiirisprudentin Heroica, article 5th, paragraph 6th, says, " Varii tamen a variis nationibus scut;; " diffringendi modi observati sunt: Apud primes Brabantos &- Belgas incognita " fuere, tigilla, liinbi, margines, Gallice, lambeaux, orles, bordures, qu;c tunc tem- " poris a Gallis mutuati sunt, sed ipsa arma quidam ab uxoribus, quidam a terri- " toi'iis, gloriffi sibi duxerunt; plerique tamen familiaria retinuere insignia, colo- " rum dumtaxat adhibita variatione." Divers nations used different ways antl" marks, in distinguishing the arms of descendants of one family from another: For, of old, the Brabantines and Belgians did not know the lambel, bordure, orle, whicli were then used by the French, for differences, but took figures from their mothers, wives, territories, and feudal ensigns, to difference themselves; and many kepi the arms of the family entire, only making some alteration of the tinctures or fi- gures. When the French began to use those above-mentioned, and other additional figures to the lilies of France, by younger sons, is uncertain. Some say, (as one Paradin) that Robert tlie first Earl of Anjou, descended of Hugh Capet, carried azure, seme oi Ao\\tv-Ae.-\ac'jnee, &- ita de caeteris." 0£ the bordure compone 1 shall here treat more paiticila^ly. The bordure compone, as the French say, and gobonated by the English, is when the bordure or any other .igure is filled with one rank of square pieces, alternately oi" netal and colour, as that going round the arms of Lundin of that Ilk, to be seen Plate XVil. in the First Fart of this System. This bordure was of old honourable, but of late fallen into disgrace : how it came, I cannot give a particular account, but shall here give my observes of its use. Philip Duke of Burgundy, surnamed the Hardy, the youngest lawful son of John King of France, siuTounded the arms of France with a bordure gobonated, argent and gules, which were the ensigns of Burgundy modern ; and so stands yet quartered with Burgundy ancient, bendy of six, or and gules, within a bordure of tile last : Which arms have been marshalled with these of Spain, and has prece- dency of all the other arms of dukedoms and provinces marshalled in the achieve- ment of that kingdom. The first bordure compone, or gobonated,. I find- in England, was used by the children of John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster, fourth son of Edward UI. pro- create on Katharine Roet, \vidow of Sir Otes Swinford, in the lifetime of his former wives. This Katharine he married last, (as Sandford in his Genealogical History) but could not free his three sons, John, Henry, and Thomas, begot upon her, from bastardy, till he obtained an act of Parhament for their legitimation ; and before that act of legitimation, which was obtained the 20th year of the reign of Richard II. the three brothers, says Sandford, carried, parted per pale, argent and azure; over all, on a htni gules, three lions passant gardant or, the figures of England. The first brother differenced his arms with a lambel; the second, the same arms by a crescent ; and the third, Thomas, by a mullet. But after the act of legitimation of these three brothers, says our author, their distinction of bastardy was discontinued; which, it seems, was their placing their father's arms on a bend, and the field of two tinctures : For John Beaufort, the eldest, was Earl of Somer- set,, and after the legitimation did bear the arms of France and England quarterly, within a bordure gohone, argent and azure. The second brother, Henry Beau- fort, Cardinal and Bishop of Winchester, carried the same arms with his elder brother: And the last, Thomas, had a bordure gohone, ermine laxdi azure : But when he was made Duke of Exeter, he made his bordure round the arms of England, gohone, argent and azure; the last charged with flower-de-luces, because hemarried the daughter of Holland Duke of Exeter, and whose bordure was azu7'e, seme of flower-de-luces or. Those brothers were surnamed Beauforts, from the castle of Beaufort in Anjou, where they were born, and used the portcullis of that castle for their badge ; which figure, with these of tiie thistle and rose, the badges of Scotland and England, are yet to be seen upon old buildings with us, since the marriage of King James I. of Scotland with Jean, daughter of John Beaufort Earl of Somerset. And her arms being the same with her father's, before blazoned, are so illuminated in our old books of blaxons. The bordure compone, or gobonated, was Iwked on then as an honourable figure to distinguish lawful children; fori find Humphrey Duke of Gloucester, fourth lawful son of King Henry IV. of England, carried the royal arms of England, within a bordure gobonated, argent axiA sable; which bordure, says Sandford, he was advised to take, in imitation of that of the Duki of Burgundy above mentioned, by Nicol Upton a herald. But afterwards this Duke Humphrey laid aside the bordure compone, and took a bor- dure argent, as more honourable, in imitation of Edmond Earl of Kent, and Thomas Duke of Gloucester, younger sons of Edward I. and Edward III. Our author says, the ingratitude of those of this latter age to the memory of those illustrious families above mentioned, have converted the bordure gobone to no other use, than in distinguishing the illegitimate issue from those lawfully begot- ten. But this saying of his will hardly clear it from the aspersion of bastardy, even by the instances he gives us; and that it was looked upon by heralds as .such; as by Spelman, in his Notes upon Nicol Upton, who says, That in England the batton-sinister, and the bordure gobonated, were, of old, the marks of illegiti- J 2 OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES/c?f. ination in England. And the author of Jurisprudentia Heroica, Article i2tli, paragraph 17th, says the same trom Spelnian, thus, " Bacillus sinister extrema " scuti non attingens, &- fimbria quandoque striata, sed plerumque gobiata (ut " fecialibus fari visum est) hodierns nobis illegitimi notae sunt, &- antiquitus " etiam fuisse apud Anglos nothorum dift'erentiam, notatu dignum censens." Charles Earl of Worcester, Lord Herbert (so dignified by King Henry Vlll.) was a natural son of Henry Beaufort Duke of Somerset, eldest son of Edmund Duke of Somerset, third son of John Beaufort Earl of Somerset, eldest son of John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster, by Katharine Rouet his third wife; which Charles bare the coat of his fatlier, viz. France and England, quarterly, within a bordure ^obone, argent and azure, with the addition of a batton-sinister. He was succeed- ed by his lawful eldest son, who carried the arms of his father, but disused the batton, and after, all the descendants of this family were in use to do the same; and carry the arms of France and England within a hovAwK- gobone ; as the present Henry Somerset Duke of Beaufort, sprung from the above-mentioned John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster. The bordure compone, or gobonated, was, of old, in great esteem, in differencing lawful sons with us; as by Sir William Wallace of Ellerslie, ^r^/^'j, a lion rampant argent, within a bordure compone azure, and of the second. It is used promiscuously in the arms of many families with us, whether legitimate or illegitimate, as an honourable brisure, and also round the arms of ancient fa- milies sprung from the natural sons of some of our kings ; as that carried by Stewart Earl of Murray, descended of a natural son of King James V. and of late by Lundie, or Lundin, of that Ilk, as an honourable additament from the crown, who having laid aside their old arms, viz. paly of six pieces, argent and gules, surmounted of a bend azure, charged with three cushions or, carry now only the arms of Scotland, within a bordure gobonated, argent and azure, as sprung from a natural issue of King William the Lion. John Lundin of Baldester, whose great-grandfather was a lawful brother of the ancient family of Lundin, assumed the new coat of Lundie, and quartered it with the old arms of Lundie, thus recorded in the Lyon Register, quarterly, first and fourth the arms of Scotland within a bordure gobonated, argent and azure, as be- ing the arms granted by King Charles II. to the family of Lundin ; and specially adapted to their descent from Robert of Lundin, natural son to William the Lion King of Scotland, and brother to King Alexander II. The second and third quarters are, paly of six, argent and gules, on a bend azure, three cushions of the first, as the coat formerly used and borne by these of the name, all with a bordure azure; crest, a dexter hand open, and charged in the palm with an eye, all na- tural: motto, Certior dutn cerno; so recorded in the Lyon Register, 14th January 1698. This bordure has not- only been used by the issue of bastards, (of which I could give several instances) but even by bastards themselves; so that the bordure go- bonated is become more suspicious of being a sign of illegitimation than any other figure in heraldry, except the batton sinister. The natural sons of King Charles II. and King James VII. have been in use to carry the arms of Britain within such bordures ; as Charles Duke of Richmond, natural son to King Charles II. carries Britain, within a bordure gobonated, argent and gules, on the first roses of the second. James Duke of Berwick, natural son to King James VII. carried the arms of Britain within a bordure compone, gules and azure; the first charged with the lions of England, and the second with the flower-de-luces of France: And so much for the bordure compone, or gobonated. I proceed to other bordures, composed of more than one range or tract of square pieces of difierent tinctures, which have never been attached as any sign of illegitimation by birth or descent, but have everywhere been used as regular and honourable brisures, so far as I know. Bordure counter-compone, which some call counter-gobone, and the French call it often echiquete of deux traits: It consists only of two ranges or tracts of square pieces, alternately of different tinctures, and is always carried as a brisure or mark of cadency for lawful younger brothers and their issue. OF ADDITIONAL nCURES, Wc. ij John Carmichael, Portioner of Little-Blackbuin, as descended of Carmichael of that Ilk, carries rt;y«i;, a fesse wreathed, azun- and ^u/cs ; and, for his dilfer- ence, within a bordure crmnter-compMi of the second and first. Lyon Register. Mr James Garden, sometime mmister of the gospel at Balmerino, descended of the family of Garden of Leys, argent, a boar's head erased sable, betwixt three cross croslets fitched gules, all within a borduie counter-componed of the second and first; crest, a rose slipped, jvoper: motto, Siutine, dbstiiu-. L. R. Bordure cheque consists of three ranges or tracts of square pieces, alternatively of metal and colour. There are many good families with us, who, as cadets, brise their chief's arms with this bordure; of whom I have given several examples in the First Part of this System, and shall here add t\\ o. Leslie of Findvassie carried the quartered arms of the Earl of Rothes, within a bordure cheque, gules and or. L. R. John Irvine of Kingoussie, descended of Drum, bears two coats ; quarterly, first argent, tliree holly branches, each consisting of as many leaves, proper, hmwl- ed gules, within a bordure cheque vert, and of the first, for the name of Irvine; second argent, an eagle displayed sable, for Ramsav ; third as second, fourth as first. L. R. The more the bordure is varied from plain ones, of which we have given ex- amples, the more they show their bearers to be removed from their principal house: As likewise, the bordures which are divided by the partition lines, as parted per pale, per fesse, bend dexter, and sinister, are suitable differences of cadets; of which I have given examples in the First Part of this System. The bordure is often charged with small figures, such as crescents, besants, martlets. &c. frequently taken, especially by the younger sons, some of them be- ing the figures of their mother's arms, to show their descent, and to difference themselves from their elder brothers, by charging their bordures. The cheveron, counted by some, as aforesaid, one of the principal differences, is never carried in a coat of arms, but to difference the bearer from the chief. This does not hold in our practice, nor in that of the French ; but sometimes it is car- ried as a principal and essential figure, and one of the ordinaries, to difference one principal family from another. Of its form and signification I have treated before, in the First Part of this System. It cannot be denied but it is often used with us and other nations as a mark of cadency, to distinguish younger sons from the principal family, and cadets from one another. It has been carried as a principal and essential figure by the ancient surname of Fleming, of which before; and by the surname of Hepburn, and several others. The cheveron, as I said, is very frequently made use of as a principal or dif- ferencing figure by us: Yea, there is no principal figure in armory, whether pro- per or natural, but has been added by cadets to the principal bearing of their fa- milies. I shall add two or three instances of the cheveron being carried as a mark of cadency. It is said by heralds, especially the English, that it represents the couples or rafters of a house, such as wrights set on the highest part of the house, which is not complete till it be set up; for which they Latin the cheveron, tignum: In which sense. Gordon Earl of Aboyne, third son to George Marquis of Huntlv, for his difference, took a cheveron, and so carries, azure, a cheveron betwixt three boars' heads couped, within a double tressure, flowered with flower-de-luces within, and adorned with crescents without, or ; and, for motto, took these words, Slant Cietna f'l^no, to show himself a cadet by the cheveron. Hay of Seafield, descend- ed of Hay of Fudy, who was a son of the House of Errol, argent, a cheveron be- twixt three escutcheons f///f/. When the cheveron is of the tincture of the prin- cipal figures, such as the escutcheons last mentioned, which accompanies the che- veron, it shows the bearer to be more near the chief house than those cadets who carry the cheveron of a different tincture from the principal figures. And the same may be ^aid of all the other ordinaries, when they are added by cadets to the arms of their chiefs for differences. Vol. II. D. 14 OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, "i^c. I shall here only add the arms of Robert Fullerton of Craighall, Writer to the Signet, and Comptroller of his Majesty's Customs at Leith, eldest son of Robert Fullerton of Craighall, who was son of Mr William Fullerton of Craighall, a third lawful son of the family of Fullerton of that Ilk, so matriculated in the Public Register of the Lyon Office, and thus blazoned, viz. argent, a cheveron betwixt three otters' heads erased gules; crest, a camel's head and neck erased, proper: motto. Lux in tencbris; the crest and motto of the chief family. Of which before, in the First Part of this System. The cheveron, when as a brisure, and put under accidental forms, such as in- gr ailed, invected, &-c. or when charged with other figures than these in the princi- pal bearing, shoiv the bearers to be degrees removed from the principal house, ex- cept the figures that charge the cheveron belonging to the mother of the cadet, to show what marriage he came from. What I have said of the variety of the bordure, in differencing descendants, the same may be applied to the cheveron. Having now treated of the label, batton, bordure, and cheveron, as principal differences or additional figures, added by cadets, in all their varieties, I now proceed to other figures frequently used to difference descendants of one family, in their different degrees of birth, when added to their paternal bearing. There are other sorts of differences given us by heralds, such as differentite con- sanguineorum, and differentia extraneorum; the differences of the first being these of consanguinity ; which are, the crescent, mullet, martlet, annulet, flower-de-luce, and such like minute figures, which are given to younger sons whilst they are in their fathers' family ; to show their primogeniture, descent, and degrees of birth, when added to their paternal l)earing. But it is to be observed, when these younger sons come to erect and be heads of distinct families, with issue, they or- dinarily leave these minute and petty differences, and take differentias extraneorum, large and conspicuous figures, such as bordures, bends, cbeverons, ciuarters, &c. By such like conspicuous figures, whilst they were in the field of battle, they were the more eminently distinguished by their banners, ensigns, and other utensils of war whereon were their arms. Having spoken of some of those before, I shall now proceed to treat of those differences of consanguinity, by some called the minute differences, or modern, and temporary ones. The label, of which before, is counted one of them; but then it is frequently only temporary by the eldest son during the father's life, and seldom is carried by the second son as hereditary, unless when the fortune of his eldest brother goes off with the inheritance of the family to his daughter; of which before. The second son (his elder brother continuing) adds a crescent to his paternal coat for difference, (and some heralds tell us, that this figure, as the other figures following, hath a symbolical sense and representation) to put him in mind to in- crease in fortune and honour. The third son carries a mullet, (which properly signifies a spur-rowel, though some take it for a star) to incite him to chivalry. The fourth a martlet, being a little bird in armories, represented without feet and. beak, to make him mindful to trust to the wings of virtue and merit, and not to his own legs, having Httle land to put his feet on. The fifth, an annulet, or ring, to remember him to achieve great actions. And the sixth, a flower-de-luce, to mind him of his country and prince. The Italian, Sylvester Petra Sancta, takes this martlet to be a swallow, when he speaks of the differences of Britain, thus : " At in Britannice regno feciales tri- " buunt secundo genitis addititiam lunulam, tertio genitis merulam, similemve " hirundini aviculam, quarto genitis stellulam ; annulum quinto genitis, sexto " genitis lilium. These differences are now frequent with the English, of which I shall add some instances. William Cavendish Duke of Newcastle, representative of a second son of Cavendish Earl of Devonshire, sable, three harts' heads cabossed argent, attired or, with a crescent in the centre of the second, for difference. The same had the Duke of Schomberg and Lemster, Marquis of Harwich, &-c. argent, an escutcheon sable, over all a carbuncle of eight rays or, with a crescent for differ- ence. And the present Howard Earl of Suffolk, Cecil Earl of Salisbury, have QF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, y<-. 15 crescents for their diflerences, and several others of the English nobility, as bj- the late English books of arms. John Digby Earl of Bristol, descended of u third brother, gives azure, a flower-de-luce argent, with a mullet, for difference, in the dexter chief point of the second. The same does Montague Earl of Sand- wich, of whom before. George Villiers Duke of Buckingham, argent, on a cross gules, five escalops or, with a martlet of the second, in the dexter canton. James Bertie Earl of Abingdon, argent, three battering rams, bar-\\ ays in pale, proper, armed and garnished azure, with an annulet for diiference, being a fifth brother, or descended of a fifth. Charles Howard, Baron Howard of Escrick, gules, on u bend, betwixt six cross croslets jitche argent, an escutcheon or, thereon a demi- lion rampant, pierced through the mouth with an arrow, within a double tressure, counter-tlo\vered^f;//t'j-; being the bearing of the name and family of Howard, and, as a cadet, adds, for difterence, a flower-de-luce. Most of the arms of the gentry of England are stuffed with these figures. Sandford, in his Genealogical History, says these ditTerences began in the reign of Richard II. The same differences were used in Holland with some variation ; the eldest car- ried as his father, the second son used the label, third son a crescent, fourth son a mullet, or star, and so forth, as John Baptista, in his Jurispnidentia, Art. 5. " In HoUandia, vicinisque provinciis, paulo aliter insignia distinguuntur, ita ut " primogenitus vivente patre, aut eo mortuo; secundo genitus tigillum, sen 1am- " bellum retineat; tertius lunulam crescentem ; quartus molulam seu asterculum; " &• alii qui sequuntur merulam, annulum aut hlium insignibus, in disciimen ali- " orum adhibeant." The same practice of these figures is to be found with us as with the English, of which I shall subjoin a few instances. Monteith of Millhall, as descended of a second son of Monteith of Kerse, carries, quarterly, first and fourth or, a bend cheque, sable and argent, for Monteith; second and third azure, three buckles or; and, for his difference, has a crescent in the centre of the quartered arms, as in the First Part of this Treatise, and Plate of Achievements. Robert Udney of Auchterallan, a second son of Udney of that Ilk, bears the arms of Udney, Viz. gules, two greyhounds counter-salient, argent collared of the field; in the honour point, a stag's head couped, attired with ten tynes, all betwixt three flower-de-luces, two in chief, and one in base or; with a crescent for his difterence. And John Udney of Coultercallan, a third son of Udney of that Ilk, carries the same arms, with a mullet for his difference. Arthur Udney, a fourth son of the fa- mily of Udney, bears the same with Udney of that Ilk, with a martlet for his dif- ference. As all of them in the Lyon Register. The annulet, the difterence of a fifth son, was made use of by Sir William Hamilton of Whitelaw, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, a fifth sou of Bangour, ^!//ej-, a mullet betwixt three cinquefoils argent, on a chief of the last,, an annulet of the first. Mr William Hamilton of Orbiston, a younger son of James Lord Hamilton, gules, an annulet betwixt three cinquefoils ermine. John Nairne of Segden, descended of the House of Sandford, carries, parted per pale, sable and argent, on a chaplet, four quatrefoils, all counterchanged ; and, for his difference, he had a martlet. L. R. The. flower-de-luce, the difference of a sixth son, carried by Patrick. Fraser of Broadland, Advocate, descended of Fraser of Philorth, whose quartered coat he carries, viz. first and fourth azure, three frases argent ; second and third Sfules, a lion rampant argent, armed and langued sable; with a flower-de-luce for difterence. Alexander Napier, descended of a sixth son of Napier of that Ilk, bears argent, on a saltier ingrailed, between four roses gules, a flower-de-luce for differ- ence; crest, a dexter hand erected per pale, holding a cxesctnt argent : motto. Sans tache. L. R. These are called the differences of the first house, when made use of by sons of principal families. The second house is the second son and his children. The eldest son of the se- cond house bears his father's coat, with such differences as he did ; but if his fa- ther be in life, and his difference from his elder brother be a crescent, then the crescent is charged with a label, which is temporary during his father's life. The second son of the second liouse a crescent charged with another crescent, as Howard Earl of Berkshire, Viscount Andoyer, and Baron Howard of Charles- i6 OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, Sit. ton, second son of Thomas Howard Earl of Suffolk, who was descended of a second son of the Duke of Norfolk, gules, a bend betwixt six cross cmsitls Jiiche argent; in the middle of the bend, on an escutcheon or, a demi-hon rampant, pierced through the mouth with an arrow, within a double tressure counter-flowered gules. Which escutcheon the Duke of Norfolk got from the King of England, as an ho- nourable additament for the victory he obtained over the Scots at Flodden. Suf- folk adds a crescent, as a second son, and Berkshire charges it with another, as a se- cond son of a second son. With us, David Forrester of Denoven, a second son of a second son of Forrester of Garden, argent, three hunting-horns sable, garnished gules, a crescent surmounted of another for difference. Thomas Nairne, second son to the deceased William Nairne of Langside, who also was a second son of the fa- mily of Sandford, bears, parted per pale, argent and sable, on a chaplet four mullets, all counter-changed ; and, for a brotherly difference, in the middle fesse point a crescent surmounted of another, both counter-changed as the former; crest, a celestial sphere, or and azure, standing on a foot gules : motto, Spes ultra, and be- neath, rEsperance me comforte. L. R. The third son of the second house has the crescent surmounted with a mullet ; the fourth son of that house with a martlet; the fifth with an annulet, and the sixth son the crescent, charged with a flower-de-luce. The third son and his issue makes the third house. The difference belonging thereto is the mullet, and the second son of that house surmounts it with a crescent. William FLw, merchant and bailie in Edinburgh, descended of the Earl of Tweeddale, whose quartered coat he carried, bruised the surtout with a mullet, sur- mounted of a crescent, being the second son of a third brother of that family. The third son of the third house, surmounts the mullet with another, the fourth son with a martlet, and the fifth with an annulet; as Drummond of Garlowrie, or, three bars waved gules, in chief a mullet of the last, charged with an annulet of the first. The martlet, annulet, and flower-de-luce, being charged, as I have said of the crescent and mullet, are the diflerences of the fourth, fifth, and sixth houses. Besides those six differences, some heralds add other three; to the seventh son they give a rose. With us several famihes carry roses for differences, as younger sons or brothers. Scott of Harden, or, on a bend azure, a star of six points be- twixt two crescents of the field, in the sinister chief point a rose gules, stalked and barbed, proper, being a cadet of Scott of Sinton : But now he carries the coat of that family, viz. or, two mullets in chief, and a crescent in base azure. Scott of High-Ghester, as a second son of Harden, the foresaid old coat of Harden, and sur- mounts the rose with a crescent (7/ye/i/. ScoTT of Thirleton, near Kelso, a third son of Harden, charges the rose of Harden with a martlet ; and Scott of Wooll the same, with an annulet. It is strange, that these families of the name of Scott, descended of Sinton, should have carried the arms of Buccleugh, with additional figures, and not added them to the arms of Sinton. Cunningham of Brownhill, argent, a shake-fork sable, in chief a rose gules, sur- mounted of a mullet of the field. To the eighth son they give across moline, or anchor; and to the ninth a double quatrefoil, /. e. a flower with eight leaves, to express that he is removed from his elder brother and the succession by eight degrees. These distinctions, as we have said, were called differences of consanguinity; be- cause they were primarily invented for the use of younger sons, whilst in familia patris, in their fathers' family, as marks of their primogeniture, or degrees of birth; and not to distinguish their families, when erected, distinct, and separate from the principal house, they taking other regular and conspicuous marks; such as the dijferentiir extraneorum, of which immediately. The differences of these who erect new distinct families, and which they trans- mit to their posterity, will not only serve to distinguish their families and issue from one another, but from the principal house whereof they are descended, and the time of their descent, which can never be done by those minute figures to the third generation : For though a second son, descended of a second son, take a cres- cent upon a crescent, how bi^ second son shall distinguish is hardly conceivable. And they are so far from showing the time of their bearer's descent, that they can • OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, ^c; ^7 not distinguish the uncle from the nephew, that is the second brother from his eldest brother's second son, who would both carry the same thing : But to what our worthy countryman Sir George Mackenzie has written of them, 1 refer the reader. I shall here add what the elaborate Sn- William Dugdale, Garter King at Arms in England, has written in his book, The Ancient Usage of Arms ; who says, " As for these minute ones, they do not show the time of the descent; for we cannot " know which of the crescent bearers are the uncle or nephew. And. further, it " is a very usual matter for every new riser at this day, that can find a man of his " surname that hath a coat of arms, presently to assume it, by adding a crescent, " or any other of these minute difterences, which (says he) I seldom credit such " kmd of ditferences, nor the bearers, unless it be by some other testimony, or " proof made manifest, which cannot be counterfeited so well in the other difler- " ences, except the assumer should be thoroughly acquainted with the descent of " him whose line he seeks to intrude himself into." We have reason to complain of the like practice with us, and of oar goldsmiths, engravers, painters, masons and carpenters, who are very ready, though altogether ignorant of this science, to give to those who employ them in any piece of v:ovk, coats of arms, with some of the foresaid differences ; not only to those who have right to carry arms, but even to some who ought not to be honoured with armorial bearings, although they be of some ancient surname. To which irregular and unwarrantable practice, I v/is!: the Lyon King at x\rms would put a stop, by putting the acts of Parliament in execution against such persons, by which the arms of our old gentry will be better known and more easily distinguished from new upstarts. I conclude with what Sir Henry Spehnan, a learned herald, has wrote of these differences, " Rideo " igitur, &- rejicio minutas istas iconculas, quibus nee error defuit nee periculum," I. e. I therefore smile and despise these petty ditferences, in which there is both error and danger. It is, and has been an ancient custom with us and other nations, (since that a few certain differences could not be sufficient to distinguish the numerous issues of many families, and suit with their various bearings) that all persons who had right to carry arms, might add any figures for differences, which they affected, being agreeable with their paternal bearings, by the allowance of the Lyon King at Arms. So that not only the honourable ordinaries, and sub-ordinaries, which we call proper figures in heraldry, but even all other figures, and representations of things natural and artificial, are made use of for marks of cadency; which some- times not only serve to distinguish cadets from principal famihes, but also to ex- press some honourable action, aUiance, or descent, from other honourable houses, which have occasioned many composed and quartered coats. Of the last in the following chapter. These additional figures are either proper or natural. The proper figures are these which have their names and being from the Science of Heraldry, as the honourable ordinaries, and sub-ordinaries, viz. pale, /esse, bar, chief, bend-dexter, bend-sinister, cross, saltier, and cbeveron; which I have fully described in all their varieties, and illustrated them by examples in the First Part of this System.. As also the sub-ordinaries, the bordure, orle, essonier and tressure, inescutcheon, franc-quar- tier, canton, cheque, billets and billet, pairle, point, girons, piles, Jiasque, flanque and voider, lozenge, riistre, mascles, fujils, fret and fretty, besants, torteauxes, vires, an- nulets, gutte, papelonne and diapre; of which I have treated in the First Part. As also of the natural figures, which are the representation of all things animate or inanimate, and are called natural, because they keep their own proper names in this science, but have additional terms from their positions, dispositions, and situa- tions. All these figures, whether proper or natural, are sometimes carried as principal, and sometimes as additional. By principal figures we understand those heredi- tary fixed marks carried by the chiefs of families, (which serve to distinguish chief families from one another) and are transmitted to all the descendants. By addi- tional figures, we understand these, whether proper or natural, which cadets add as marks of cadency, and differences to the principal, hereditary, fixed figures of the family; that they may be distinguished from the chief, and from one another. Vol. II. E 1 S OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, Wc. which are called differentia extraneorum. The differences of these that are ex- traneous, such as younger sons, brothers, and other descendants, extra familiam pa~ tris, and so erect new distinct famihes, add to their paternal figures one or other of the proper and natural figures above mentioned, which I have given before in all their varieties, both as principal and additional figures. These figures have been assumed by cadets, which they added to their paternal bearing, to perpetuate the memory of some noble action, lucky event, honourable employment, or office; or to show their gratitude and acknowledgment of benefits received from some honourable friend or superior; or else to express their aUiance with other familie';. We have instances of differences assumed by cadets upon such accounts and occasions, of which I shall add a few examples. This we have intimated to us by the additional figure in the armorial bearing of Graham of Inchbraikie, descended of an eldest son of a second marriage of the first Earl of Montrose, w ho gives or, a dike or wall fesse-ways azure, broken down in several parts, and in base a rose ^ules, on a chief sable three escalops of the first. The dike here is assumed to difference the bearer from his chief, and to perpetuate that action of Gramus, (one of the predecessors of the noble family of Graham) in pulling down the wall built by one of tlie Roman emperors, which was thereafter called Graham's Dike. Seaton of Barns, a second son of George Lord Seaton, added to his paternal figures, the three crescents, a sword erect in pale supporting an imperial crown, for his difference, to perpetuate the special and seasonable services performed by one of his progenitors. Sir Christopher Seaton of that Ilk, to King Robert the Bruce ; who gave these figures with the lands of Barns to Sir Alexander Seaton, son of Sir Christopher, for his and his father's good services ; as Sir George Mac- kenzie in his Science of Heraldry, and of which before, more fully, in the First Part of this System. We have several instances of honourable employments and offices represented by additional differencing figures, as in the bearings of some of the surname of Wood, the paternal coat being azure, an oak tree, proper, growing out of a mount: Wood of Balbigno, as descended of the principal family, added, for difference, two keys tied with strings to a branch of the tree, to show his office as Thane of Fettercairn. And Wood of Largo placed his tree betwixt two ships under sail, to difference himself from other families of the name, as being admiral to King James III. and IV. Forbes of Waterton, descended of Tolquhon, carries over Tolquhon's quartered coat, an escutcheon argent, charged with a sword, a key in saltier gules, as the badge of his office, being Constable of Aberdeen. These who were advanced by kings, princes, or other great lords, did many time bear their whole coats, or some part of the arms of those who advanced them, and joined them with their own paternal bearing ; which served very aptly, not only to difference them from the principal families whereof they were cadets, but also to show their gratitude and acknowledgment of benefits received from some ho- nourable friend or superior; and by reason thereof they are united together in a kind of friendship, and is a great strengthening to both Houses. I shall add here what Camden says in his Remains of Britain, page iiS. " Gentlemen began to " bear arms by borrowing from their lords' arms, of whom they held in fee, or to " whom they were most devoted ; so, whereas the Earl of Chester bare garbs, or " v,'heat sheaves, many gentlemen of that country took wheat sheaves. Whereas " the old Earls of Warwick bare cheque, or and azure, a cheveron ermine, many '' thereabout took ermine and cheque. In Leicester, and the country confining, ■' divers bear cinquefoils, for that the ancient Earls of Leicester bare gules, a " cinquefoil ermine. In Cumberland, and thereabout, where the old Baron of " Kendal bare argent, two bars gules, and a lion passant or, in a canton of the " second, many gentlemen thereabout took the same in different colours and " charges in the canton." And as Sir George Mackenzie observes, in his Science of Heraldry, page 5. That most of the surnames in Annandale carry the Bruges' arms, being a saltier, and chief gules, which the Bruces had from the old lords of Annan when they married with the heiress of Annandale. The Johnstons OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, 5^.. u, carry tlie same figures. The Right Honourable William ?.Iarquis of Annakdale carries argent, a iAlncx sable on a c\-i\ti gules, three cushions or. The Kirk.patr.icics. carry the same figures with the Johnstons, but ditier only in tincture. Sir Thomas K1RK.PATRICK. of Cioseburn gives argent, a saltier and chief azure, the last charged with three cushions or. Jardine of Applegirth, argent, a saltier and chief gules, charged with three mullets of the first; so that the saltier and chief are armoria.1 figures taken from the Annans, the old Earls of Annandale. In the shire of Murray, many families carry stars, the figures of the name of Murray. As Lnn£s of that Ilk, argent, three stars of six points waved azure. And many families in Douglasdale, Teviotdale, and other countries which the Douglases possessed in property or superiority carry stars. In the shires where the Stewarts, of old, had interest, many gentlemen who have been old possessors there, carry fesses chequered, the figure of the Stewarts, or other figures cliequer- ed, as cheveroiis and bends. With us it IS a frequent practice for younger brothers to add to their paternal bearings some part of their mothers' arras, to diflference themselv.es, and show their alliance with other famiHes. And these coats are all called composed arms, because there are two coats joined in one shield, without distinction of quarters. This v/ay of difference is much approven of by Dugdale, in his Ajicient Use of Arms, who recommends this way to his countrymen . " For" says he, " it not only serveth " to unite the families who have matched together in love and amity, and thereby " workedi the like etiect, but, beside, it showcth the certainty of the descending " of the said younger brothers out of both the houses, and giveth knowledge of " the time thereof." It is true, this way may show the time of the descent, but cannot show the seniority of many younger brothers, without the assistance of the minute differences. The Right Honourable the Lord Balmerino is known by his difference to be descended of a younger son of Robert Lord Elphinstone and his lady, Sarah Mon- teith, daughter to Sir John Monteith of Kerse, because he charges his cheveron with buckles, which was a part of his mother's bearing. His lordship's bearing- is argjent, oa a cheveron sable, betwixt three boars' heads gules, as many buckles or. Arbuthnot of Fiddes, descended of a younger son of Arbuthnot of that Ilk, and his lady, Margaret Fraser, carries the arms of the Viscount of Ai-buthnot, viz. azure, a crescent betwixt three stars argent, within an orle of frases of the last. Arbuthnot of Catherlan, descended of a third son, procreate betwixt Sir Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk, and Dame Margaret Fraser, daughter to the Lord Lovat, carries Arbuthnot within a bordure argent, charged with eight frases, or cinquefoils, azure. NicoL Sutherl.\nd of Torboll, thereafter of Duffus, a second son of Kenneth Earl of Sutherland, that was killed at the battle of Halidon-hill, rtw;o i :533, and his lady, a daughter of Donald Earl of Marr, married Cheyne, heiress of Duffus, with whom he got the barony of Duffus. His lady's bearing was gules, three cross croslets fitched or. He added them to his paternal coat, viz. gules, three stars or. Thereafter this family matched with another heiress of the name of Chisholm, who carried azure, three boars' heads erased or. With these figures they com- pose the coat as now borne by the present Lord Duffus, viz. gules, a boar's head erased, betwixt three stars, 2 and i, and as many cross croslets, i and 2, or. Mr George Keith of Arthurhouse, sometime Depute of the Sheriffdom of Kin- cardine, descended of the Earl Marischal, gives a composed coat thus, argent, a saltier and chief gules, for Bruce, the last charged with three pallets or, for Keith, all within a bordure gobonated azure, and of the first. Thus I have treated of the ancient and modern marks of cadency, as fully as any hitherto, and of other additional differencing figures, taken to perpetuate some honourable action, event, employment, and alliances with other families: Which additional figures being joined with the principal figures of the chief families in one shield, encumbered them, and made a confused order in their description, not suitable to the regular disposition and situation of figures, according to the rules of blazon, which gave occasion to separate and marshal them into distinct quarters. 20 OF ADDITIONAL nCURES, ^c. by the principal partition lines. And this is the eight way proposed to difterencc descendants trom the principal house, and one from another. There are ten or twelve principal causes which have given ground for multi- plying of coats of arms, and rightly marshalling them into distinct quarters in one shield : On which I am not to insist here, but in the following chapter. I shall mention here one of the principal causes of quartering coats, which is the necessity that younger brothers or sons lie under to distinguish themselves from the princi- pal houses they are descended of. By my proposed order 1 begin with the partition line called parted per pale, the French only parti. The husband ordinarily impales his own coat on the dex- ter with that of his wife's on the sinister, which the English call baron zndfemme. If the husband be a younger brother, he ought to curry his brotherly difference, notwithstanding he impales with his wife. If the wife be a younger sister, she needs no dilference, but may carry her father's coat as he did : For all nations agree that sisters should carry no marks of difference, though they have brothers^ and when they have no brothers,- and be heirs-portioners : yea, although the estates, dominion, and dignity come to the eldest sister. For which I shall here add the opinion of several lawyers, given us by John Baptista Chnstyn, Chancellor of Brabant, in his Jurispriidentia Heroica, Art. 5. paragraph in. " An etiam filije " &• sorores insignia paterna rumpere debeant, ad hoc, ut a fratribus distinguantur, " & certum est quod non, cum vere sunt familiae suk finis, &. nubendo transeant " in aliam familiam :" For which he cites several authors, and adds, " Licet feu- " dum &- dominium prEEcipuum ad majorem duntaxat pertineat," they may all of them carry their father's arms entire; and if he be a second son, or any other descendant, having his arms with a mark of cadency, they must continue the same bruised' aiTns; as our author, " Si earum pater anna sua ruperit, veluti secundo " genitus, tunc etiam filise eandem rupturam patris agnoscent, & in insignibus " propriis retinebunt." The reason which Guillim in his Display gives, that sisters should carry no marks of differences, that when married they lose their surname, and receive that of their husbands. But that is no reason at all ; for I have shown by learned authorities, and regular practices, that, in some cases, they may use their father's, arms ; and of which more particularly in the following chapters. Nor does this reason of his prove that daughters, before their marriage, should not bear their paternal coat with differences; seeing, till then, they lose not their own surname. But the learned Sir George Mackenzie gives a better reason for this rule, " That " albeit among sons the eldest exclude all the younger from the succession, and " therefore differences are given for clearing the right of succession amongst " brothers and their descendants ; yet sisters succeed equally, and are heirs-por- " tioners; and so there is no use of differences amongst them, seeing seniority in- •* fers no privilege." Churchmen, who are obliged to impale their paternal coat with that of their ofSce, place their coat of office in the dexter, parti, with their paternal on the sinister; which is not to be bruised with any mark of cadency, although descend- ed of a cadet, because anciently they were not supposed to have succession. But since the Reformation the practice is otherwise, not only with us, but in other protestant countries. The ecclesiastics are obliged to carry the coat of their fa- milies with suitable marks of differences, whether they impale or not impale with a coat of office: because they may have lawful issue to transmit their arms ta their descendants, that they may be distinguished from the chief house, and other collaterals. As to the eight way proposed of differencing, by quartering of two coats in one shield, it is done by dividing the shield into four parts, by a parti and coupe hne, placing the one coat in the first and fourth area, or quarter, and the other in the second or third area or quarter. It is questioned by some, whether it be a sufficient difference. These who will not have it one, argue, that the paternal coat is not bruised, and twice repeated, as entire as that of the eldest brother : Besides, the heads of principal families quarter and marshal other coats with their own, so that a second brother cannot be distinguished from the eldest. It is true they do so v\pon several other accounts, as to show their dignified feus, &.c. of which after- OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, l^c. 21 wards ; yet by the practice of all nations younger brothers difference themselves from their elder brother, by quartering with their paternal arms those of others, such as their mother's, without diminution or addition to the arms of their fiuher, but must still continue their father's brisure, if he be a cadet of a principal family. Of this opinion is the above-mentioned author, whose words I here subjoin, being an answer to the above question : " Abunde satisfit dum primogenitus plana portat " avita insignia, alter vero iUorum maternis cumulata in distinctionis notam:" And afterwards, " Et ita mores passim observant, ut ilia scuti quadripartitio, se- " cundo genito videatur esse peculiaris:" And gives for examples, " Sic Rymmer- " swallii insignia cum Gauriis, a secundo genito cumulata vidimus: Sic Mont- " morenciaca cum Egmondanis & Bossuviis: Sic Henninia cum Burgundicis, & " plura alia quorum enumeratio ta;dium pariat." The same is practised with us; for a younger son or brother, by way of quar- tering another coat with his paternal, is looked upon as a sufficient and regidar brisure, in the best of our families, and especially by second sons; which way seems to be peculiar to them, not only by quartering the arms of their mothers, but other arms, upon account of honourable actions, offices, titles, alliances, Stc. Of which practice, many examples might be given, but I shall here only add a few. Sir George Mackenzie says, in his Science of Heraldry, chap. 21. " These ca- " dets, who have their arms quartered with other arms, need no difference, (sup- " posing them to be immediate sons of principal families, as I imderstand) for the " quartering or impaling is a sufficient difference; and therefore it was unne- " cessary for the Earl of Kelly to have borne a crescent for a mark of difference, " as second son of the Earl of Marr, seeing he bears, quarterly, with the arms of " Erskine, first and fourth an imperial crown within a double tressure or: bestow - " ed upon him for his assistance given to King James, in Cowrie's Conspiracy." The Right Honourable the Earl of Northesk, whose predecessor was a second brother to David Carnegie Earl of Southesk, was first created Earl of Ethie, who then carried, or, an eagle displayed azure, within a bordure gules, for his differ- ence : But thereafter changing the title of Ethie for Northesli, quartered the pa- ternal coat of Carnegie (witlxout the bordure) with argent, a pale gules, for Northesk. The Right Honourable the Viscount of Stormont, quarters the principal coat of Murray, as descended of TuUibardin, with the arms of Barclay, for his differ- ence, without any other brisure. Hume of Wedderburn, descended of a second son of Sir Thomas Home of that Ilk, one of the progenitors of the Earls of Home, and his lady, Nicolas Pepdic. heiress of Dunglass, has been in use, since the reign of King James I. to carry the principal bearijig of the family of Home, viz. quarterly, first vert, a lion rampant argent, armed and langued gules, for Home; second argent, three papingoes vert, beaked and membred ^tf/c".r, for Pepdie of Dunglass; third argent, a saltier ingrail- ed azure, for Sinclair of Polwarth, added for his difference from the Earl of Home, and the fourth quarter as the first. Hume Earl of Marchmont, descended from a second son of Wedderburn, car- ries as Wedderburn; but, for his difference, adds another quarter, the arms of Pol- warth, being argent, three piles ingrailed gules. Hepburn of Humbie, descended from a second son of Hepburn of Waughton, carries the principal coat of Hepburn, viz. gules, on a cheveron argent, a rose be- twixt two lions rampant of the first ; and, for his difference, quarters them with argent, three laurel leaves vert, for marrying with a daughter of Foulis of Coi- lington. Ker of Littledean, descended of a second brother of Cessford, quarterly, first and fourth vert, on a cheveron argent, three sttLXS gules; and in base, an unicorn's head erased of the second, for Ker; second and third azure, three crosses moline argent, for Ainslie, which differences him from others of the name of Ker. I shall not trouble my reader with more examples of this kind : But it is to be still observed, that a second brother, though he differences himself by quartering another coat with his paternal, yet he must always continue his father's brisure, he being a younger son of a principal family : For, how shall we otherwise distinguish Vol. II. E aa OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, 'dSc . principal families from those descended of them, if the cadets do not continue that mark of the families from whom they are descended ? For, if cadets should be allowed to lay aside their father's or grandfather's brisures, in their paternal bear- ings, when they quarter them with the coats of other families, by the same allow- ance, they will leave out the marks of cadency of these coats with whom they quarter, and then we shall not know the particular families they are descended from, nor with what family they are allied. If a Douglas should quarter with another family of the name of Douglas, and Stewart with a Stewart, the differ- ences of these families being laid aside, we shall not know what Douglases or Stewarts they are come from. Our ancient practice was not so, but of late practised by some. The clearest way then to make known the descents of fa- milies by arms, is for them to retain the congruent differences of their progenitors, although they quarter with the coats of other families as their own particular difference. Th.- ninth way of differencing, as proposed, is by transposition of the quarters, by making the first, second, and third, first, and by adding different crests ; which practice is not frequently used but in Germany, as Menestrier observes, page 389, That several branches of great families distinguish themselves only by different crests, without inserting any addition in the arms themselves, where there will be many crests timbering one shield : of which more particularly in the chapter of Crests. The above differences I have been treating of, they make use of sometimes, but not so frequently and regularly as the Britons, French, Spaniards, Flandrians, and other nations; for with the Germans, all the younger brothers do succeed equally to the titles of dignity and honour of the families from which they are descended, which is not ordinary in other nations ; besides their differencing by crests, of which they have many and various on their shields. The autlior of Jurisprudentia Heroica, Art. 2. speaking of the Germans, says, That it is necessary for brothers to distinguish themselves from one another, which they sometimes do, by different crests; his words are, " Etiam inter fratres armorum distinctio necessaria est: In- •' terdum arma solo cimerio discrepant;" and instances the families descended from the House of Burgundy, who carry all one arms, but difference by crests; some have flower-de-luces, others owls, and some trees. They do also difference themselves oi-dinarily by addition or diminution of quarters, of which they use many in one shield. The Electoral Dukes of Saxony have twenty-one quarters in one shield, which they timber with eight helmets, and as many crests. The other branches of that family not only distinguish themselves by different crests, and disuse the Electoral ensign, but add or diminish the number of their quarters for difference; as Jacob Imhoff, in Notitia, S. Rom. Germanici Imperii Genealogica, lib. 2. cap. 7. " Caete- " rum Sasoniae ducum, quorum hoc capite mentio facta est, clypei in eo tantum, " ab illo quem modo deumbravimus, differunt, quod Electorali symbolo carent, " aliudque ferunt." The above-mentioned author of "jurisprudentia tells us, Art. 5. paragraph 15. " In Germania omnes eadem cum pnmogenito insignia portant, " nisi quo tres principes Electores Saeculares, ad differentiam illorum, qui cum illis " ejusdem gentis &- originis sunt, ea qua imperatori in ordine processionis prae- " ferunt insignia, clypeis electoralibus insculpta habeant." It is to be observed, that the badges which the Secular Electors use in each of their arms, are marks of their offices, and not there placed for differences. The Elector Palatine gives for his achievement three shields Ue%, i. e. tied together; the first sable, a lion rampant or, for the Palatine; second, lozenge, argent and azure, for Bavaria; the third shield betwixt these two is only gules, for the electoral office. The families branched from the Elector Palatine's carry the same arms marshalled with more coats, but never use the electoral ensign, that being forbid them. The Palatine of Rangrave carries, quarterly, first and fourth iht: lion of Palatine; second and third the lozenges, for Bavaria; and, for ■ difference, adds the arms of Degenfield by way of surtout. The Counts Palatine of the Neuburg line, add more quarters, viz. coupe one, parti three, which make eight quarters, and the arms of Palatine in surtout makes the ninth quarter. The Spanheiman line carries, quarterly, first and fourth Palatine, second Bavaria; third. OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, i^c: 2^ dieque, argent and gules, for Spanheim: But the Bipontin branch, which is next to the Count Palatine Neuburg, carries the same nine quarters of Palatine Neu- burg; but, for ditrerence, otherwise disposes or transposes the quarters thus, coupe in chief. Palatine and Bavaria quarterly, and in surtout Valencia, which are three coats; and in base, coupe one, parti two, which make six quarters, and so nine of the whole. Which differencing way by transposition of the quarters is very singu- lar with the Germans, as Imhoff takes notice: But with the French and English I have met with no such practice allowed by our heralds. For, if transposing of quarters be received for a way of differencing cadets, it would not only prejudge principal faraihes, and frustrate the end and design of marks of cadency, wheieby we may know the degrees of consanguinity, but likewise destroys heraldry, by rendering all its witty contrivances useless: For the transposition of four or six quarters may be so many ways, that we shall never know the principal stem, whereot they are come, nor primogeniture amongst themselves, nor degrees of consangui- nity by their bearings. And likewise, the transposing arms which are marshalled in one shield is dangerous; for thereby the arms, which in one bearing have pre- cedency, lose it in another; so that we cannot know the precedency due to arms, of which in the following chapter. And I shall conclude this with a short ac- count of the practice of differences in Italy, which the eminentest families most religiously observe, as the author of Jurisprudentia Heroica, that they difference by the lambel, bordure, batton, and quartering other coats with the paternal, as by the examples he gives us, whose words follow: " Ab aliquibus illustribus in Italia " familiis, mos ille ultra religiose fuerit observatus. Ipsa Neapolitani regni in- " signia, tigillum coccineum praeferunt, ut & ipsi Sicilia; reges," i. e. azure, seme of fiower-de-luces or, a lambel of five points gules, being the arms of their princes, who were the younger sons of France. So Peter Medici carries the arms of Medici, quartered with these of Toletani, to difference from his elder brother the Duke of Etruria: " Sic Petrus Mediceus insignia quadripartita ex Mediceis & " Toletanis armis gessit, in discrimen fratris natu majoris, magnae Etrurias Ducis. " Peirus Antoninus Sanctevernus, Sancti Marci Dux, limbum gestavit cyaneum," i. e. a bordure azure round the principal bearing of the family, being argent, a fesse gules. " Tiberius Caraffa familia; suae insignia plana & Integra gessit, ejus " frater Fabricius Roccellfe princeps, baculo ilia prasino & spinoso a fraternis " discrevit, unde prosapia ilia nomen de la Spina attraxit," i. e. Fabricius Prince of Rocceili distinguished his arms from the plain ones used by his elder brother by adding a bend green bordered with thorns, so that his family is named Spinosa, or de la Spina. Sylvester Petra Sancta the Italian, in his Tessera Gentilitice, cap. 67J De guttatis tigiUis tesserarii, i. e. lambels; cap. 68. de clabula, i. e. batton; and cap. G<^. de limbo, the bordure: Of all which he treats, and illustrates by examples in all their varieties, in tinctures and forms of figures, of differences, or additional figures, to difference descendants, to whom I refer the curious. In the Dukedom of Milan it is somewhat odd that younger brothers use no differences, but carry the entire arms with their elder brothers, as by a declaratioa of the senate, 23d of May 1663, which is fully set down in Jurisprudentia Heroica. And the same practice is in the country of Piedmont, where all brothers carry the same arms with their elder, except they be counts; and then they place above their arms a comital bonnet, or crown, which the younger brothers are discharged to use on their arms. So much then for the general practice in Europe, for differencing lawful younger ons or brothers from principal families, and from one another. But before I proceed to treat of marshalling, or quartering many coats of arms in one shield, upon several accounts and occasions in the following chapters, I shall end this with the marks used by the most polite nations, in distinguishing unlaw- ful issue, or bastards, from the lawful. OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, isfc MARKS OF BASTARDY, Carried by such as are not born in lawful marriage; who are divided by law- yers, in naturales, spurios, W ex dtimnatis comphxibus procreatos\ but by our style all of those go now under the general name oi bastards. With the most polite nations in Europe arms have been looked upon as sacred signs of families, and could not descend but to the lawful issue; so that bastards, as some say, cannot carry the name in arms of their supposed fathers, not being of the family or kindred : Nam de jure patrem demonstrare neqveunt. Therefore, see- mg the common law determines not who is their father, it were absurd that the laws of heraldry should allow them to bear any man's arms as their paternal coat : As Bartolus, " Non enira sunt de familia sive agnitione, &- hoc jure communi " verum est." And the same is said by Hopingius, " De insignium prisco &- " novo jure, cap. 7. Cum haec scilicet arma sunt prsecipuum agnitionis &- fa- " mili^e indicium." And it was also a received rule amongst heralds, that bastards should not bear the paternal coat, nor name of their supposed fathers, and this was strictly observed of old. We do not find the natural sons of princes and great men to have carried the name and arms of iheir fathers, of old, in Britain: A few instances 1 sliall here re- peat. William Peverll, natural son of William the Conquerer, carried nothing of his father's arms (1 mean these of Normandy) however so highly dignified; neither did Robert, natural son of Henry I. of England, but other arms, viz. or, three chevronels ^;//fj-; and the same was carried by his lawful son Williaj.i Earl of Gloucester. William Long-espee, natural son of Henry II. begot on the fair Rosamond, who was made Earl of Salisbury by King Richard I. anno 1196, car- ried for his armorial figure a long sword, as relative to his name; and his son, another William Long-espee, took the arms of his mother Ela, the daughter and heir of William Fitzpatrick Earl of Salisbury, viz. a%ure, six lions argent, 3, 2 and I, as Sandford in his Genealogical History. Where he also tells us, that Sir John Clermont, natural son of Thomas Duke of Clarence, (who gave France quartered with England, with a label ermine charged with cantons ^w/^-j-) carried parted per cheveron, gules and azure, in chief two lions rampant gardant, and affronte or. By which bearing it seems he was the first natural son, at least I observe, in England, who began to carry arms resembling those of his father ; the lions being little different from those of England. -His father, the duke, was a second son of Henry IV. The natural sons of our kings anciently had neither name nor arms of their fa- thers, but such as were altogether different ; and these they obtained upon several accounts. As, by marriage, Robert, natural son of King William the Lion, having married the heiress of Lundie of that Ilk, he and his issue took upon them the name and arms of that family, and which they continued to carry, till of late they took the arms of Scotland within a bordure gobonated, argent and azure, as the natural sons of our kings, who have been in use to take such bordures^ since the reign of King James II. of Scotland: But what other marks of illegitimation they had before, 1 cannot learn. How soon the bastards of our nobility and gentry were allowed to carry the arms of their supposed fathers I cannot be positive; but, of old, in France, Spain, Italy, and Flanders, bustards were allowed to carry their alleged fathers' arms with some singular mark, invented to distinguish them and their issue from the lawful children and their descendants. I shall here add an article relating to bastards, from the edict or law of the Archduke Albert, and Isabel, concerning the ensigns of the nobility of the Belgians, proclaimed the 14th of December 161 6, as in Prudentia Heroica. " To repress the abuses which have fallen out with respect to bastards, and their " descendants, v/ho have presumed to can-y the surname of the lawful family, as " also the arms of the same, without placing therein any mark of bastardy; so " that in process of time, the descendants of some natural or unlawful sons, come " often to put themselves in rank with the lawful, and pretend to their successions, " rights and prerogatives, on account, that neither by the name, nor by the arms, " there can be known any difference or distinction, betwixt the lawfid children OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, ^c. 25 " and the descendants of bastards: We will, and expressly command, that to the " arms of bastards and unlawful children, (unless they be legituuaLe by letters " from us or our predecessors) and their descendants, shall be adJed a ditlerence, " and notable special mark, to wit, to the arms of the said bastardi or unlawful " children, a bar, and to that of their descendants, a remarkable note from these " used by the younger descendants of lawful children, under the pain," Cxc. The bar above mentioned, called by us the bastard bar, is well known througli all Europe as a mark of illegitmiation. It is a traverse, which comes from the upper left corner of the shield, passing to the right corner in the lowest part ; it surmounts, or comes over the essential or principal figures, and is called by the Germans barra, and with them it is somewhat broad, near almost as the bend- sinister. If it be narrow, it is called by the Latin writers Jilum, a hne or thread : " Filum vero in eo tantum differt a barra, quod sit linea quarta parte ea an- " gustior." But with us and the English, the bastard bar, or batton, is the fourth part of the bend-sinister, as GuiUim and other English writers describe it, and now carried coupe; that is, cut short, and does not touch the extremities of the shield, called by the English, batton-sinister couped, and by the French, baton peri, be- ing very small and short with them. It is said by some to represent a cudgel; and is given to bastards, to show that they were not freemen, but liable, as slaves of old were, and servants yet are, to be beat and cudgelled. This mark of lUegiti- mation is so well known, and generally practised by all nations, that 1 need not add examples here of domestic and foreign bearings. But to proceed to other marks of illegitimation in certain countries. In Brabant, Flanders, and some other dominions in Germany, the bastard (if he has not the bar) is obliged to carry his father's arms in a canton dexter or sinister, and all the other part of the shield is blank. As the author of yurispriidentia He roica, " Illegitimorum indicium, si quis in ea parte scuti, quam heraldi canton " vocant, paternum gestet insigne, rehqua scuti parte vacua rehcta;" of which practice he gives us several examples, as a remarkable note of illegitimation : But I have not met Vtith such a practice in Britain. Some write, that when the helmet and crest, which timbers the shield of arms, are turned looking to the left, it is a sign of bastardy. But this does not hold by a general practice ; for when achievements of arms are hung up in churches at the sides of the altar, the helmet and crest look to the altar ; so that some look to the right, and some to the left. And the same custom is used where the sove- reign's arms are, as our above-mentioned author, whose words are, " Hoc vero non " ita obtinet in Bslgio, infinitis ubique exemplis posset verificari, £t in omnibus " templis ubi capitula seu commitia aurei velleris celebrata fuerunt, videntur " galeas equitum ab una parte versus levam ab alia versus dextram versa, sic ut " omnes aram sacram aspiciunt." And it does not hold in Germany, where they have many helmets and crests upon one shield ; these on the right and left look to one placed affrrmte in the middle betwixt them. The bordure gobonated, or compone, is now a mark of bastardy in Britain, by our late practices, which I have already spoken to in this chapter. These then, being the ordinary marks of illegitimation which I have met with us, to distinguish un- lawful children from the lawful ones. When there are many bastards in one family, they are obliged to carry these marks, and to difterence themselvtfS from one another, having them of difl'erent tinctures, as the five natural sons of King Charles 11. James Duke of Monmouth had over the arms of Great Britain a batton-sinister or. Henry Fitzrov Duke of Grafton carried the same, with his batton-sinister compone, azure and argent. Charles Fitzroy his batton was all ermine. George Fitzroy Duke of Northum- berland, his batton-sinister was compone, a'zure and ermine. And George Beau- clerk Duke of St Albans had his batton-sinister gjdes. All which were placed over the arms of Great Britain. What were the marks that were added to the arms of the bastard and his lawful descendants, the batton being dispensed with, is difficult to give a satisfactory ac- count. By the edict above mentioned, where the lawful descendants of a bastard were to have remarkable notes, different from these used by the descendants of lawful progenitors, it could not be by quartering their arms with their maternal, Vol. XL G z6 OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, iJc. which is a fit difference for the descendants of lawful children, except the bastard bar was placed on the paternal arms: But the bar and bordure gobonated being dis- pensed with, what could these other marks be? John Baptista Christyn, author of Jurisprudentia Heroica, gives us from Scohier five sorts of differences (besides the batton for difference) used by bastards, and their lawful descendants. I. La pr/inte de I'ecu coupee de metal mi coiileur, i. e. the point of the shield coupe of metal or colour. II. Le chif de I'ecu coupe Si d' autre metal on couleur que les armes, i. e. the chief of the shield coupe, and of other metal or colour than the arms. III. La poiitte de Vecu trianglie de metal on de couleur, i. e. the point of the shield triartgled of metal or colour. IV. Le cheftaille IS tranche, on autrement se blasonne escloppe a dextre et sinistre, ou de run seul, i. e. the chief taille and tranche, or otherwise blazoned, slopping to the right or left, or of one alone, of a tranche or taiUe line. V. Uassiete des armes sur Vecu en forme de chevron, i. e. the situation of the arms, or the shield, in form of a cheveron. The reason which is given by lav^yers, especially by Tiraquel, de Jure prin. Quest. 12. ver. 13. is, that it is necessary to give to the lawful children of bastards different marks, to distinguish them from children of lawful descent: For the first mentioned not being of the house and family, nor existing as successors to the grandfather, there can be no lawful consequence from an unlawful beginning of birth, and corrupt root, with those of lavv'ful descent. What these different marks are, I cannot learn, nor of such a practice in Britain, or anywhere ; but that the lawful issue of bastards, keeping their fathers' or grandfathers' marks of illegi- timation, distinguish themselves to show the seniority of their births by the same marks of cadency (of which I have been speaking) used by those of lawful descent. But to return to the above marks of illegitimation given by Scohier, which I shall explain a little, though their practice is hardly to be met with in Britain. And as to the first of them, that is, when the under part of the shield is blank, and separate by a coupe line from the arms above. And as to the second, when the upper part of the shield is blank, and the arms below. Of the first, our cele- brated author of Prudentia Heroica, gives, for instance of such practice, the arms of Charles, a natural son of the Duke of Burgundy; his words are, Scuto iiempe in- tegro, infernis fracto; and tells us, that this way of differencing is yet in use in Brabant, and there strictly observed, not only by bastards, but also by their law- ful issue: And further tells us, that a bastard of a bastard must have as many marks of illegitimation as there are illegitimate generations descending in a right line : For which he gives us the seal of arms of Anthony Baron of Wacken, na- tural son of Anthony Lord Roche, of the House of Burgundy, called for his valour Le Grand Bastard. The first mentioned Anthony carried the arms of Burgundy, coupe en chef, and en pointe, that is, the upper part of the shield and the lower part was blank, and the arms of Burgundy were placed fesse-ways; so there were two marks of illegitimation in chief and base, as our author says. Sic duobus ille- gitimis discerniculis notatum, sive bis ruptum. The bastards of the House of Burgundy differenced themselves variously, as the four bastards of Duke Philip the Good ; the first, Anthony Lord of Roche carried the arms of Burgundy with a traverse line, or bar-sinister. The second carried the arms of Burgundy in bend, (as our author) ilia in bahheo, vulgo en bend. The third the same, in fascia, vulgo en face, that is, in fesse, or fesse-ways. The fourth bastard had the same arms of Burgundy, in cheveron, or cheveron-ways ; and all the other parts of the shield being of gold, were void of other figures; as our author says, Scuti partibus aureis iS vacuis vulgo escloppe relictis: And their seals of arms are also given us by Olivarus Uredus de Sigillis Comitum Flandriie; where it is also to be observed, that the lawful descendants of those bastards carried the arms of Burgundy quartered with those of their mothers, or with these of their dominions and territories; and some of them had sinister, and some dexter traverse lines over the quarters of Burgundy. These ways of distinguishing natural sons from lawful ones I cannot say I have met with in Britain, except that one used by Henry Beaufort Earl of Somerset, OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, b'f. 27 and Lord Herbert, lawful son of Charles Earl of Worcester, and Lord Herbert, who was a natural son of Henry Beaufort Duke of Somerset: which Charles car- ried the arms of his father Duke Henry, being, quarterly, France and England, within a bordure gobonated, argent and azure, and bruised them beside w ith a batton-sinister fl^jTc.;;?^ as a mark of illegitimation : But his lavvfid son, the 'above mentioned Earl Henry, laid aside the batton-sinister, used by his father, and car- ried the arms of Beaufort, with a new diilerence, (one of them, as I observe, above- mentioned) coupe en chef, and en pointe, i. e. the arms in fesse, or fesse-ways: And his son and successor, \Villiam Earl of Worcester, Lord Herbert, carried as his father, which were so placed on his stall at Windsor, being a Knight of the Gar- ter, as Sandford tells us in his Genealogical History of England. He was succeed- ed by his son Edward Somerset Earl of Worcester, Lord Herbert, who was the first of the line of Somerset that left that way of placing the arms of Beaufort in fesse, or fesse-ways, and filled the whole shield with the arms of Beaufort, viz. France and England, quarterly, within a bordure gobonated, argent ^nd azure ; and ever since are so continued by the family. It is without controversy that there were laws made and observed through all Europe relative to nobility, and even concerning the discernicula, the brisures of lawful children, and the marks and distinctions given to bastards. John le Fevre Sti Rcniige Dynasta, Chief King of Arms to the Duke of Burgundy, in the year 1463, in a manuscript of his in French, givv.n us by the author oi Jurispritdentia Heroica, has some general rules relating to the distinction of bastards from lawful children, which I here add. None ought to carry the arms, nor the sign of another, to the prejudice of others to whom they belong. None can sell nor alienate the arms of his family or lineage. A bastard may carry the arms of his father with a traverse, i. e. a batton-sinister; and take his surname from the lordship from whence his father titles himself, and not the surname of his father, unless he had such title and surname as the said arms signify. The bastard cannot lay aside the traverse without liberty and licence from the chief of the name and arms, and from these of the family carrying the same arms, unless it be that he place them in a faux ecu, i. e. false shield ; which we take for a cartouch, of which 1 have treated, and given its figure in the First Part of this System. The sons of a bastard born and procreate in lawful marriage, if their mother is a gentlewoman, may carry the arms of their father and mother quarterly, always having the traverse in the quarter of the father's arms ; or, if otherwise they would carry them without the traverse, they must place them in a/a//x ecu. If a woman be a bastard, or the daughter of one, she may carry her father's arms, Vi'ith the traverse. I shall here give an instance of this rule from Sandford's Genealogical History of England : Antigone, natural daughter of Humphrey Duke of Gloucester, fourth son of King Henry IV. whose arms were France and England, quarterly, within a bordure componi, argent and sable. Flis natural daughter, Antigone, carried the same as her father, bruised with a batton-sinister a%ure. Some are of opinion, that a bastard woman marrying a gentleman, is by his quality legitimate, as Guil . Benedict. " Si fcemina bastarda nupserit viro legitimo, " propter qualitatem mariti, etEcitur legitima, quia capacitas viri ad uxorem por- " rigitur." And the same says Scohier, that a female bastard married to a gen- tleman lawfully begotten, the children of such marriage shall not receive any dishonourable spot, because that by the quality of the husband she is freed, in so far as the capacity of the husband is contributed to his bastard wife. Churchmen of the highest orders, if bastards, are obliged by the law of armories to have on their fathers' arms a mark of illegitimation, though they be impaled or quartered with the arms of their ecclesiastical dignities, and even legitimate by the Pope: Of which practice the author of Jur'uprudentia Heroica gives us these two examples: John, natural son of John Intrepidus Duke of Burgundy, carried the arms of his father, with the batton-sinister, though quartered with those of the Episcopal See of Cameracensi; and the same was done by Anthonie, a bastard of 28 OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, ^c?c. Burgundy, though he was legitimate by the Pope, whose legitimation qualifies the person for holy orders, yet in temporals he behoved to be legitimate by the prince, whose subject he is; and, in the letters of legitimation, there must be orders ex- pressly to remove the mark of bastardy, else it will continue in the arms, says our author. And other lawyers tell us, as the learned Sir George Mackenz.ie, in his Science of Heraldry, chap. 22. of Bastards, that legitimation by the prince does not empower the person who is legitimated to bear his father's coat, except that power were expressly contained in his legitimation; " Nisi legitimatio expresse " ad delationem armorum facta fuerit," Hoppingius de Jure Insigninm, cap. 7. Yet it is certain, that such as were once bastards, but are legitimated by subse- quent marriage, may bear the father's arms without any such diminution; for there is more reason and force in legitimation by subsequent marriage, because it is natural, than in that by the prince, inferior to nature, and only fictitious, as, Hoppingius de Jure Insigniiim, paragraph 4. " Major merito vis legitimationis " fact:E per subsequens matrimonium, quam ei, qui per rescriptum principis inesse " debet, cum ilia natura; hsec a lege natura satis inferiore, proveniat; ilia ex sub- " secuto matrimonio sit vera & propria, \\xc ficta & impropria dicatur." OF ABATEMENTS. Since I am speaking of the diminution of arms, I shall only mention here some figures, which English heralds and others call ahatements of honour, lest I seem wilfully to omit any thing relating to heraldry : The figures of which abatements of honour were to be added to the arms of those that are convicted of vice, and acts of dishonour. As to those who boast in martial acts, to a coward, to him that killeth his prisoner, to an adulterer, to a liar, and to a traitor. The figures and names of these abatements I think are not worth the pains to name, much less to engrave them; they may be seen in English books, and repre- sented by Sir George Mackenzie in his Science of Heraldry, chap. 23. The French know no such figures; and the learned Menestrier calls them English fancies; and Sir George Mackenzie says. Who would bear such abatements.' and that he never saw such borne by any : neither have I met with them anywhere. It is true, by the custom of Scotland, reversing of the arms of traitors is prac- tised ; for Sir George gives a distinct account in his time, that when any person, is forfaulted by parliament, or Lords of Justiciary, the Lyon King at Arms, and his brethren Lyon Heralds come into these judicatures in their coats, and other for- malities, where the Lyon does publicly tear the arms of the person forfaulted : And if he be a cadet of a family, the Lyon proclaims openly, at the tearing of these arms, that it shall be without prejudice to the nobleman or chief whose arms they are. After which he and his brethren go to the cross, and there hang up the shield of arms reversed, turning the base or lowest point upwards. I know not what the custom of England has been in this point. But, of late, there was no such formality used in the pronouncing the sentence of forfaulture upon the no- bility and gentry there. ^ The learned Sir George, in the above-mentioned chapter adds, that it is debated among lawyers, whether the children of forfaulted traitors lose thus the arms of their predecessors? The ordinary solution is, that if the father, who was forfeited, was the first that got arms, these could not be transmitted to his issue: But if his arms pertained formerly to his family, then his crimes do not debar his posterity from using them: For crimes should only infer punishment against the committer; for which our author cites several lawyers. But they advise them to- erave restitution as the safer way. With us the children of forfeited parents, do* use their predecessors' arms without being restored. VolJl i'/alc ■-. J'm CHAPTER II. Of CoTnpaf^ a^zd Marf/uiIIz ^f^Sf^m!^i^s>my^^'^'s^^m^mimm^^mmmm^ V OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, 5i<,-. 29 CHAP. II. OF COMPOSING AND MARSHALLING OF ARMS. HAVING given before the three ends and designs of armories, I am come now to the fourth ; which is, to iUustrate persons, families and communities, with marks of noble descent, and other additaments of honour, within or •without the shield. Of those within, I am to treat in this, and of those without, in the follow- ing chapters. These w ithin the shield are added to the paternal figures, by way of composing, or marshalling. The first is done by adding marks of honour, or some part of the arms of ano- ther family, to the paternal arms, without any distinction of quarters. Marsh.''linj of arms is when ensigns of honour, or the entire arms of other fa- milies, are joined with the paternal ones of the bearer, by partition lines, making distinct areas or quadras in one shield. Composing of arms is frequent with us, not only to chiefs, heads of families, and thers, to show their alliance with other families, but also to cadets; by adding to their paternal bearings some part of their mother's arms, to show their maternal descent, and to difference themselves from other descendants of the same family ; Oi' vvhich I have treated in the former chapter. Anciently arms were single and plain, consisting of few figures; but in later times they are not only looked upon as hereditary ensigns of honour, but as marks of noble descent, alliance, property, or right to territories and lands, oflices, and o;her valuable things in their possession, or of their right and pretension to the sa^ne. These arms, or marks of alliance, offices, and property, were not carried of old iii 'Ue shield as now, but in different shields, using sometimes one shield of paternal aiiii^, and another of alliance, &c. as occasion required. UpoQ their seals appended to deeds and evidents, we find several shields (which we caii collateral ones) with distinct arms, to show their right and pretensions to different feoffs; which gave occasion for seals to be made with two sides, a face a.id a reverse, as we see the ancient seals of sovereigns and great men. The face is that where a man is represented enthroned, or on horseback with a shield of arms, called the royal or equestrian side or face of the shield : And on the other side, the reverse of the seal, are ordinarily the seal of the owner's proper arms. Upon the equestrian side of the seal a man is ordinarily represented on horse- back in his surcoat, upon which wtre ordinarily depicted his coat of arms. On the caparison of his horse were other arms. On the shield and buckler, which he holds by his left arm, were likewise different arms: And on the reverse of the seal, another shield of arms, accompanied with several other shields of arms, commonly called collateral shields, because at the sides of the principal or paternal shield, which they accompany; as are to be seen on foreign coins, such as dollars, &c. To illustrate this practice, I shall bring a few examples from Olivarius Uredus his Collections of the Seals of the Earls of Flanders, from our own country, and from Sandford's Genealogical History of England. Baldwin Count of Hainault and Marquis of Namur., his seal of arms had two sides, face and reverse: on the first was a man on horseback, brandishing a sword, about whose neck hung a shield of the arms of the Earldom of Hainault ; and on the reverse, was a shield of arms of the iVIarquis of Namur, in the year 11 78. He having married Margaret, sistei-jand heir of Philip Ear! of Flanders, she bore to him Baldwin Earl of Flanders, who carried on his seal the arms of Flanders, and the arms of Lusitania, and those of Hannonia, indistinct shields: So it app.-ars that the custom of marshalling several arms in one shield was not then in use with the Earls of Flanders, till the Burgundian race, which began in Philip Duke of Bur- gundy, a younger son of John King of France, who was observed to be the first that quartered the arms of Burgundy modern with these of Burgundy ancient. He married Margaret the daughter and heir of Lodovick Farl of Flanders, and impaled her arms with his own in one shield. Other great men in that country, Vol. II. H i«> OF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, 'i^c. and in the countries near thereto, in imitation, began to marshal other arms witli their own in one shield. The practice of collateral shields was also in Scotland before the use of mar- shalling was frequent, as appears by the seal of arms of Walter Leslie, who mar- ried Euphame Ross, eldest daughter and one of the co-heirs of William Earl of Ross, appended to a charter of his, in the year 1375, upon which were three shields of arms; That in the middle, between two collateral ones, had the arms of the Earldom of R.oss, three lions rampant; that on the right side was the shield of the amis of Leslie, having a bend charged with three buckles; and on the left was a shield with three garbs, for Ciunin, or the country of Buchan. Those three arms were quartered formally in one shield a few years after, when marshalling of arms came in use. Another instance of collateral shields of arms with us is that one of William Keith, Marischal of Scotland, and Margaret Fraser his spouse, appended to a char- ter of theirs to Robert Keith their son, of the barony of Strachan, in the sheriff- dom of Kincardine, loth September 1375, which ends thus. In cujus rei testimoniimi sigilla nostra consimiUter sunt appensa; which I caused engrave in an Essay of the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories, page 36. Upon which seal were three shields ; that on the right had a chief paly of six pieces, the arms of Keith Ma- rischal ; on the second, six cinquefoils disposed 3, 2 and i, which was for his lady; and the third had more figures; but being defaced, I cannot tell upon what ac- count it was there placed. Euphame Ross, second wife to King Robert II. is represented on her seal sitting in a chair of state; at her right hand, is the shield of the arms of Scotland, and at her left that of the earldom of Ross, her paternal coat. I have also seen the seal of Euphame Stewart, daughter and heir of David Earl of Strathern, by his second wife, appended to a charter of the date 1389, wherein she is designed Eupham Senescal, Comitissa Palatina de Strathern : on which seal was the picture of a woman at length, holding by each hand a shield ; that in the right was charged with two cheverons, for Strathern ; upon the other, by the left, was a fesse cheque, for Stewart: Which two arms v/ere afterwards composed to- gether in one shield by her successors of the name of Graham, Earls of Strathern and Monteith, and quartered with the arms of Graham. The same practice of carrying different arms in distinct shields was with the English, as in Sandford's Genealogical History of England : There he gives the seal of arms of Eleanor queen to Edward I. of England, being a daughter of the King of Castile and Leon : upon the one side of the seal was her effigies, at her right side was a castle, and below it a lion ; and at her left side a lion, and below it a castle, so disposed as they were marshalled in her father's arms, (the way of marshalling not being fhen known in England) and upon the reverse of her seal ■was the escutcheon of England. Isabel, daughter of Philip IV. of France, queen to Edward 11. of England, had her effigies on her seal between two shields: That on the right hand had the arms of England, and the other, on the left, the arms of France, impaled with the arms of Navarre, being those of her mother Joan Qiieen of France, who was the daugh- ter and heir of Henry I. King of Navarre. This practice, says our author, of having the arms of husband and wife on diiFerent shields, was before the method of impaling arms; but the practice was then in France, as by the foresaid example of France impaled with Navarre. From the practice of collateral shields with distinct arms came the custom of carrying two shields accoUe; that is, when two shields of different arms are joined together, as Plate I. fig. 3. The Kings of France have been, and are in use still to carry their arms accoUi with those of the kingdom of Navarre, since the union of those two crowns in the person of Henry IV. of France : But, however, I doubt not but this method of joining two shields of arms together, of the husband and wife, proceeded from the ancient use of collateral shields, before the way of mar- shaUing or impaling husband and wife came in use ; of which there is a particular in- stance, in Sandford's History, of the seal of Margaret Dutchess of Norfolk, daughter of '^dward I. and widow of two successive husbands, in the reign of her brother Edward II. Upon her seal she had her own shield of arms, being those of spF ADDITIONAL FIGURES, iJc 31 England between two other shields accolU; that on the right containing the arms of !ier first hu.^band John Lord Segkavk, viz. a lion rampant; on the other, on the left, the arms of iier second husband Sir Walter Mannay, or, three cheverons sable. This way of carrying liusband and wife's arms accollt lias been practised in France and England, as also in Scotland, on old paintings and carvings on the eatnes of old houses, which 1 have seen, though not frequently now practised. Before I proceed to regular marshalling of several arms in one shield, it will not be much out of the way to give here the division of arms occasioned by the fore- said practice of carrying many coats of arms in distinct shields, upon dilVerent reasons; and thereafter marshalling many in one shield, which has given occasion to lawyers to divide arms into several kinds, as the famous Hopingius dc Jure Iii- signium, gives nine sorts of arms, imo, plain arms, arma simplicia, are these whicii have no addition of any other figure; but being plain, as carried by the first of the family, such as these of kings, princes, and earls of old, without composition or marshalling; such as these of Burgundy, says our author, were of old, or, a lion rampant gules, crowned azure. The Princes of Henneburg carried only a hen, without the eagle as now. The Duke of Brunswick carried, of old, only one lion, but afterwards more. And the like simple or plain arms, says our autlior, had the nobles of Denmark and Sweden from the Goths and Vandals. The same practice was with our sovereigns and nobles. At first our kings carried only or, a lion rampant gules; but afterwards the double tressure was added by a gift of Charles the Great of France. The princely family of Stewart had only a fesse cheque, but afterwards accompanied or marshalled with other figures; and the same I may say of the rest of our nobility, who have some figures or other accompanying or quartering with their ancient ones; except the Earls Marischal, and Hay Earl of Errol, Constable of Scotland, who have their ancient, simple, and plain arms. Our author likewise tells us, that the ancient Celti distinguished their shields only with various colours, and the Germans arms were paly, bendy, cheque, or lozengy, without other figures which are plain arms: His words are, " Nobiles homines " apud priscos Celtos lectissimis tantum coloribus sua singulos distinxisse scuta ; " unde etiamnum ea omnium antiqinssima ac maxime genuina apud Germanos " nobilitatis dicuntur insignia, quce omnium simplicissima, certis duntaxat spaciis " ac coloribus distincta, in quibus sunt ilia quae Latini, laterculos, &- virgas, &. " rhombos appellarunt:" For which he cites Limneus. ido. Composed arms, compojita insignia, when other figures or quarters are added to plain or simple arms ; of which I have given many instances in this System first and last. 3?/o, Ancient Arms, antiqua sen fumosa insignia, are those carried by old families, and transmitted down to their successors in honour and dignity ; and the longer the progression is, they are the more noble, as our author says of nobihty ; " Et " quo longius procedit, eo magis augetur S*- cum generis vetustate primorum orna- " mentorum conjunctim habet." The English call these perfect arms; by which they understand these of a hereditary descent, though no further transmitted but from the first obtainer to his grandson ; which are ensigns with them of a perfect and complete nobility, begun in the grandfather, (as heralds say) growing in the son, complete in the grandson, or rather great-grandson, as some will have it : from which rises the distinction of gentlemen of coat-armour in the father and the son ; and gentlemen of blood in the grandson, or great-grandson ; and from the last descend gentlemen of ancestry. 4fo, By Imperfect Arms they do not understand irregular or defective arms in rer.pect of tincture or figure, but of new ones granted to the first receiver, who had none before, and are but signs of imperfect nobility in the receiver ; upon which he is called a gentleman of coat-armour, being the same with the Novus Homo with the Romans ; the first obtainer of Jus Imaginum, i. e. the right of erecting his own image or statue, as a sign of begun nobility ; as the first concession of arms was afterwards with other nations. These may be likewise said to be new arms, though ancient in some families, which have been lately assumed by others, by right of adoption, marriage or disposition ; called nova insignia, qua noviter per ipsos novas nobiles sunt qucesita. 32 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, iSc. e,to. Proper or Paternal Arms, are these which are the fixed figures of the family and surname, and distinguished from additional ones : " Propria insignia," says our author, " sunt ea qua: de jure pertinent ad propriam familiam vel personam." 6to, Strange Arms, aliena insignia, are these belonging to another family or person, carried by those who have right to use or quarter them with their own. imo. True Arms, vera insignia, are these which are granted by authority, or any other legal way, upon the account of virtue and glorious efforts. '^vo. False Anns, falsa insignia, are to be understood in two respects, first, these granted or disponed by those who have no right. Secondly, These granted to one beyond his merit, nobility and dignity, fit and competent for those of higher degrees ; as our author, " Quod non sunt competentia, quod altiorem respiciant " ordinem, atque inde altioris ordinis insignia." g;;o. More Noble Arms, nohiJiora insignia, are not so by the nature of the figures they have (as some think) but as they fitly represent the biave actions of some of their progenitors, regularly disposed, and artfully situate in the shield, to incite posterity to imitate the virtuous actions of their predecessors ; as our author, " Nobiliora insignia, non ex nobiliori imagine (ut vulgo creditur) sed ex rebus a " quopiam proavorum prreclare gestis ac clypeo inscriptis, dijudicanda veniunt, ita " utquando habeant plus artis, ingenii Siefficaciae, ad amnios monitu suocontuendos, " tanto excellentiora reputentur." Sir John Feme, in his Glory of Generosity, divides arms into abstract and ter- minal ones : the first are the same with the above-mentioned perfect arms, being abstracted and carried down by the heirs and representatives of the first obtainer, without alteration, diminution or addition ; and are these which we now call original, principal and paternal arms. By terminal arms, he understands these of younger sons and cadets, who have right to carry their paternal arms, terminate and difierenced with congruous marks of cadency, to show the time and seniority of their descents. There are several other sorts of arms named, from the causes of their bearing ; as these oi marriage, of office, arms of alliance, arms of adoption, arms of patronage, of gratitude, of religion, concessions general and special ; arms of sovereignties, feudal ones, and pretensions to the same. All which I shall treat separately, and show the precedei'.cy due to them in their respective quarters with other arms, when marshalled together. ARMS MAP.SHALLED TOGETHER IN ONE SHIELD, UPON THE ACCOUNT OF MARRIAGE AND OKFICES. Marriage has be'en one of the chief causes of marshalling different coats of arms in one shield. The practice is but late ; and lawyers of old tell us that women cannot carry arms, for that is a manly and not a feminine office, they not being exercised in war, nor in the use of military instruments, upon which arms were first to be seen ; besides, they are looked upon as the end of their own family, and these married go into another family, and are incapable of the name and arms of their paternal family, as lawyers say, especially Ulpian and others ; " Soroiem " etiam dictam putat quasi seorsum nascatur ab eaque domo separetur, qua nata " est." But by the custom of nations, daughters are allowed to use the arms of their lathers: Hoppingius de Jure Insignium, proposes a difference between daughters married and unmarried : the first, being incorporate in another family, do not carry their father's arms, as these .unmarried, who may carry them to the effect to show their name and agnition in their father's family ; whereas those married do not carry their paternal arms to that effect, but only for ostentation of their descent, as our author, " Ad originis claritatem, antiquitatem generis, memoriamque inde " arguendam 8^ conservandam, introductum est." Neither can their children properly carry their arms : " Matris insignia Hberi regulariter deferri nequeunt." For, being in their father's fainily, they have their rise and surname from it, and not from their mother. " Et ha;c sunt praecipuum agnitionis &- familiae indicium :" The descendants of a daughter cannot regularly carry the paternal arms of their mother, except they be heiresses, or be allowed by those of their mother's side, who OF MARSHALLING ARMS, isic. 33 have right to dispose of the arms by way of testament or disposition, or else they be allowed by the laws and customs of the country. Our author citeth another lawyer, Andreas Aliciatus, who says, that a son cannot carry the arms of his mother ; yet when the nobility of his mother is more eminent than his father's, and illustrate by it, he may carry the arms of his mother with those of his father's, according to the custom of many countries and kingdoms ; as in Italy and Spain, and I may say the same is practised in Britain. His words I shall here add, cap. ii. " Q\iam vis Andreas Aliciatus dicat lilio matris insignia " gerere concessum non esse ; attamen cum nobilitas paterna ex nobilitate materna " splendidior illustriorque efficiatur, consuetudme nonnullarum provinciarum i^. " regnorum, turn Hispania; tum Italian, arma gentilitia, paterna ac materna, simu! " colligari observatur." By the custom of nations, wives may use the arms of their husbands ; for being in their families they have a right to the honour and privileges of the same : as Hoppingius^f Jure Insignium, par. 8. " Ratio, qui transit m alterius tamiliam, is ejus " origine, nomme &- privilegiis, gaudet, nobilitatisque & dignitatis fit particeps, " adeo ut insignia deferendi jus transeunti denegari non posse, atqui omnis uxoi: " transit in familiam mariti ; ergo uxori jus deferendi insignia mariti recte dene- " gari non poterit." Though the wife be ignoble and a bastard, she has right to make use of the arms of her husband ; as our author, " Non impedit, quod uxor ignobilis &• plebeia, " maritus vero nobilis extat ; similiter non refert, quod mulier spuria ; nam nulla " major unio quam conjugalis, nee negamus, quin oleum non consecratum, conse- " crato possit oleo commisceri." But it is not so with the ignoble husband who has a noble wife ; by her he is not nobilitate, nor can properly carry her arms, because wives receive honour from their husbands, but do not give it ; as our author, " Vir ignobilis, ducendo uxorem nobilem, non nobilitetur per earn, cum " accipiant, non adferant nubentes mulieres dignitatem." After the husband's decease the widow may continue to have the arms of her husband upon all her utensils ; but if she proves vicious or unchaste, she loses the honours of her husband, says our author ; and if she marry again, she must follow the condition of her second husband, and cannot use the arms of her first husband, especially when she marries again one of an inferior quality to her first husband, whose honour she loses ; which holds with us, and in England ; as Sir George Mackenzie in his Precedency, " Yet sometimes the king allows her the same pre- " cedency and honours of her first husband, or these of her father, by a letter ; as " he does also to the daughters of dukes and others, who have lost their honour bj " marriage : which letters or warrants are directed to the Herald Office, and regis- " trate there." Having shown the right women have to carry arms, I shall now proceed to show in what form and manner they have been in use to carry them. When arms came to be hereditary to all the issue of great men, as tesseras, and marks of a noble descent, women then began to make use of those of their fathers, on their habits, and to have them in square figures, called lozenges, qx fusile shields, to show their descent, and at length to join tliem with those of their husbands. The practice seems to be ancient, by women placing their paternal arms upon their habits, such as mantles and kirtles, as may be seen in old illuminate books of heraldry, and other paintings. Eminent ladies are there represented with arms on their mantles and kirtles : and heralds tell us, when the same arms are both on mantle and kiitle, they are then the arms of their fathers ; but when there are arms on the mantle different from these on the under habit, the kirtle, she is then mar- ried. These on the mantle belong to her husband, who is as a cloak or mantle to shroud the wife from all violence ; and the other arms on the kirtle belong to her father ; for women have no proper arms of their own, but these of their fathers : yet, in later times, we meet with some concessions of arms granted by sovereigns to virtuous ladies : of which afterwards. By the universal practice of Europe, unmarried women must place their pater- nal arms in lozenges or fusile shields, and cannot place them in formal triangular shields as men do, except they be sovereign queens or princesses, ^lia nat^tram nobilioris sexus participant, says Sir Tohn Feme in his Glorv of Generosity; and that VoL.U. ^ ^ • ^ J I 34 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. sovereign princesses may trim their shield of arms with all the exterior ornaments belonging to a king or sovereign prince : as Mary, Queen of Scotland, carried the royal achievement of that kingdom entire ; and the same did Queen Elizabeth that of England. Qiieen dowagers, it seems, are not allowed to carry the sovereign arms, though impaled with their own, but in a lozenge : for an instance I shall mention the seal of arms of Jean, Queen Dowager of King James L mother of King James IE a daughter of John Earl of Somerset, appended to an indenture betwixt her and Sir Alexander Livingston of Callendar, anent the delivery of her son, the young king, to be kept by tlie said Sir Alexander in the castle of Stirling, of date the 4th September 1439. On her seal was a lozenge shield, with the arms of Scotland on the right, impaled with her own on the left side, having France and England quarterly within a border gobonated. Custom, in some countries, has allowed wives to place their arms within a formal shield, provided it be close joined on the left of their husband's ; which way is called accolle, or impaled with the arms of their husband in one formal shield, either by dimidiation or impalement, or by way of escutcheon over the husband's arms, while the husband is in life. The way of carrying husband and wife's arms accolle has been practised in France, though not frequently, as fvlenestner observes, and very seldom to be met with among us. The impaling of husband and wife's arms in one shield is more frequent; which is done two ways, the first by dimidiation, the second by an entire impalement. Dimidiation is when the wife's entU'C arms are placed irpon the left half of the husband's arms ; as by the seal of arms of Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, in the year 1381, who carried quarterly. Burgundy, modern and ancient. Upon his marriage with the daughter and heiress of Lodovick Earl of Flanders, his arms were dimidiate with his wife's, being argent, a lion rampant sable ; which were placed upon the left half of her husband's quartered arms, so that the second and fourth quarters were absconded, and the first and third quarters of the husband's only seen ; which I have caused engrave in an essay of armories, Plate U. fig. 2. Mary, Qiieen of Scotland, when married to Francis IL of France, on her great seal had the arms of Scotland and France dimidiate ; the arms of Scotland lying on the left half of the French arms, being azure, three fiower-de-luces or, two in chief, and one in base ; so that the flower-de-luce in the sinister chief point, ancJ half of the flower-de-luce in base, are absconded by the arms of Scotland. Many other instances of this practice I have given in a former essay. Entire impalement is by dividing the field of arms into two equal parts by a paler line or purfle of a pencil. The husband's arms are entire on the right, and the wife's so on the left, which make an entire whole ; and these are called by the English baron iindfem?ne. By this way of impaling, which is now frequently used, no figure is absconded or cut off, except sometimes that side of the border of the husband's or wife's arms that is next to the paler or dividing line. The English, as Guillim, make a distinction of marriage, single and hereditary; the one bring off no hereditary possessions, the other do, being married with heiresses : the first has these forms above mentioned of marshalling ; but their children shall have no further to do with the mother's coat (says our author) than to set up the same in their house pale-ways, after the foresaid manner, so to conti- nue the memorial of their father's match with such a family. But, as I have said before, the children of the single match have right to take a part of their mother's coat, and compose with their paternal figures, to show their descent, and difference tliemselves from other branches of the family. The hereditary marriage (says our author) has a prerogative which the former has not : that the baron, having re- ceived issue from the femme, it is in his choice whether he will bear her coat by impalement, or else in an escutcheon upon his own ; and the heir of these two in- heritors shall bear these two hereditary coats of his father and mother to himself and his heirs quarterly, to show that the inheritance as well of the possession, as of the coat of arms, are invested in them and their posterity. There are three rules observed in impaling the arms of husband and wife : First, that the husband's arms are always placed on the right, as baron, and these of the ^emme on the left side. Secondly, Herald.s tell us that no husband can impale his or MARSHALLING ARMS, "isc. ;5- wife's anr.s with his own on the surcoat of his arms, ensignb and banners, upon the account of baran and femme only ; but when they are the arms of dignified feus, to which he has right by his wife, he may then use them on such utensils as arms of pretension, and of feudal ones. Thirdly, when the husband impales the wife's arms with his own, he cannot surround the shield with his royal order of knight- hood, as that of the thistle and garter, &.c. as Sandford observes : for this reason, though a husband may give the equal half of his escutcheon and hereditary honour, yet he cannot share his temporary order of knighthood with her; so that the knights-companions of any sovereign order cannot, by the practice of heraldry, surround their shield of arms with collars of sovereign orders, when their wives' arms are impaled with them, merely upon account of baron and femme. Yet, in my opinion, the collar may be placed at the side of the husband's part of the shield, for his honour, except they be sovereigns of these orders, who have an here- ditary right, whether mala or female. The kings of England and Scotland have been in use to surround their arms impaled with their queens, with their respective orders of knighthood, of which they were sovereigns. 1 have seen the arms of Francis King of France, impaled with those of his Queen, Mary of Scotland, surrounded with the collar of the Order of St Michael, and also her arms alone, surrounded with the Order of the Thistle, of which she was sovereign ; and are so engraven on the boxing of the chimney in the great hall of the palace of Seaton, (called palace in our kings' charters to the Earls of Winton), and on the other side ■AXi the arms of George Lord Seaton, surrounded with the collar of the Order of St Andrew or Thistle. 1304323 Mary Queen of England had her arms impaled witli those of her husband, Philip of Spain, surrounded with the Order of the Garter. Those instances cannot be a precedent for any less concerned ; for Francis and Mary were sovereigns of orders, and Philip only a knight of the last. It seems by this practice that the widows of sovereigns, though their arms continue impaled with their deceased prin- ces's, are not surrounded with the collars of their orders : for, as I observed, albeit the Archduke of Austria, and Duke of Burgundy, sovereign of the Order of the Golden Fleece, having married Isabel Infanta, daughter and heir of Philip II. of Spain, marshalled her arms with his own, and surrounded them with the collar of the Golden Fleece, when alive, being sovereign of that order ; but after his death, his princess carried the arms of her deceased husband impaled with her own, and, instead of being surrounded with the foresaid collar, it was only with a cordelier, as on her seal, in OHvarius Uredus's Collections. Since I am speaking of Isabel Infanta of Spain, and the fashion of her armorial bearing when a wife, and a widow, I think it not improper here to show her shield of arms when a maid, being some- thing singular to us, though ordinary in her own country. She had on her seal of arms, while unmarried, a lozenge shield, parted per pale ; on the left half the arms of her father, for her own ; and the right side was blank, (without arms for a hus- band) called arms of expectation ; which, it seems, was then a custom in Spain for young ladies that were resolved to marry : which shield of Isabel, Olivarins Ure- dus gives in his Collections, with these words : " In Isabella; insignibus dextrum " scuti latus vacuum, quod expectativum vocant, indicat Isabellam adhuc innuptam, " &- in illo insignia mariti expectantem, sinistrum autem aucupant insignia patris " ejus Philippi secundi." Here it is to be observed that the wife gives always the right hand in the shield to the husband, though she does not know what quality he may be of. When one marries an heiress, he may either impale or quarter her paternal coat with his own, or place her arms, by way of an escutcheon, over his own arms; as Sir Thomas Brand, Gentleman Usher of the Green Rod of the most ancient Order of the Thistle, places in the centre of his quartered coat an escutcheon of his v^jife's arms, gironni of eight, ermine and gules, within a bordure ingrailed of the last, for Campbell of Lundie, whose daughter, (it seems an heiress) he married. For which see Plate XXII. in the First Part of this System. It is a frequent custom with the English of late to place the arms of the wife, heiress or not heiress, in an inescutcheon, in the centre of the husband's arms which they call an escutcheon of pretence, because he pretendeth right to that coat upon marrying an heiress: As Guillim says, in his Display of Heraldry, where he 36 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. gives several examples, to which I refer the reader: But how to call that on the husband's coat, who has not married an heiress, I know not. When a husband has had two wives, heiresses or not heiresses, and would have their arms marshalled with his own, the husband's shield may be then tierced in pale, i, e. divided into three equal parts perpendicularly; the husband's arms placed in the middle area, and the wives' two coats on the right and left areas : Or they may be otherwise disposed thus, parti mi-covpe to the sinister, i. e. the shield being divided in two equal halfs by a paler line, the husband's arms on the right side, and the left side divided by a horizontal line ; above and below are placed the arms of the two wives, as frequently practised v/ith us upon funeral escutcheons; of which partitions I have treated in the 7th chapter of the First Part of this Sys- tem, and illustrated by examples in my Essay on the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories. When a wife would have the arms of her two husbands represented in one shield with her own, then it is divided thus, parti ini-coupe to the dexter; of which I have given examples in my last mentioned book. Mr Kent, in his Grammar of Heraldry, says, if a man do marry three wives, the first two shall have the chief part, and the third all the base: So the husband's arms is in the middle, or fesse part; and if he have a fourth wife, she must, says he, participate of the base with the third wife : And Guillim, in his Display of Heraldry, gives us an example of the arms of a gentleman of the nameof CLiFroN, impaled in the middle with the arms of his seven wives; four on the dexter side, and three on the sinister, all bar-ways, that is to say, the shield is tierced, i. e. divided into three equal parts perpendicular, the first part on the right is coupi three, which make four areas, where the first four wives' arms are placed one above another ; in the second part, which is the middle, are only the arms of Chfton the husband ; the third part, on the left hand, is coupe two, which makes three areas, in which are his other three wives' arms, one above another ; for which see our author. And these are the ways of marshaUing many wives and husband to- gether. Besides impaling by way of haron and femme, the husband, by a frequent cus- tom with us, quarters the wife's coat with his own, upon the account that she is an heiress; i. e. by dividing of the shield into four equal parts, which makes four areas : In the first and fourth are the husband's arms, in the second and third are the wife's. But this custom is not so frequent in other countries as with us of late: For the husband, in that condition, properly placed his wife's arms by way of sur- tout over his own, that is, an inescutcheon in the centre of his own, which I have said above, to be an escutcheon of pretence ; because he pretendeth to bear the arms of his wife, and his right to her inheritance, which his issue should enjoy, and that their successors may freely quarter their paternal and maternal coats to- gether. As for the custom of the husband quartering his wife's arms with his owm, I shall add the instance of the Right Honourable William Johnston Marquis of Annandale, Earl of Hartfield, and Lord Johnston, chief pf his name, who car- ried argent, a saltier sable, on a chief gules, three cushions ur: But upon his mar- riage with the heiress of Craigiehall of the name of Fairholme, he quartered her arms with his own, being or, an anchor in pale gules: And the same is still carried by their son and heir, the present Marquis of Annandale. Sir James Dalrymple, President of the Session, and afterwards advanced to the dignity of Viscount of Stair, quartered the coat of his lady with his own, who was Margaret, eldest daughter and co-heir of James Ross of Balnall and Carsecreuch, near Glenluce in Galloway, (as in our New Register of Arms) carried, quarterly, first or, on a saltier azure, nine lozenges of the first; second or, a cheveron cheque, sable and argent, between three water-budgets of the second, for Ross; third as the second, and fourth as the first. Their eldest son, Sir John Dalrymple Earl of Stair, married Elizabeth Dun- das, heiress of Newliston, and placed her arms, argent, a lion rampant gules, on an inescutcheon over his .^atiiei's quartered arms, as above. He was created Earl of Stair, Viscount of Dalrymple, and Lord Newliston, omio 1703. His son again, the present Earl, marshalls his mother's coat with these of his grandfather and grandmother. OF MARSHALLING ARMS, iJc. h is to be observed, that when a gentleman marries a gentlewoman, whose fa- ther did bear any marks of cadency in his coat, the same ought to be continued in the impalement and quartering of the daughter's arms with her husband's, w hich is just and reasonable: For, by the mark of cadency of her father, she will be known from what branch of the stem of the principal house she is come of. I have shown before, when a coat of arms, surrounded with a bordure, is marshalled pale-ways with another, then that part of the bordure which is next to the other coat impaled with it, must be exempted, and not seen. Again, it is to be ob- served, if a bordured coat be marshalled with other coats quarterly, then shall no part of the bordure be omitted, but the bordure shall environ the same round. Having treated, I think, sufficiently of the several ways of marshalling husband's and wife's arms, I shall now proceed to treat of the method of marshalling arms of offices. MARSHALLING ARMS UPON THE ACCOUNT OF OFFICES AND EMPLOYMENTS'. Amongst the several causes and occasions of assuming arms, lawyers, and writers on the science of armories, give offices for one, as well used by ecclesiastics as laics. I gave out before, page 20. that the Romish churchmen are not obliged to bruise their paternal arms with marks of cadency, although younger sons, or de- scendants of such, because they are not allowed to marry, and so have no lawful succession: And some lawyers of this opinion tell us, that the end and design of marks of cadency, to bruise the principal bearing; was to difference the descendants of younger sons; so that there is no need of brisures in the arms of ecclesiastics, since they can have no issue. Secondly, They say, that churchmen have no need of additional figures to bruise their paternal bearings; for their arms are suffi- ciently distinguished from the laics, being only adorned with cherubims, or angels, and not timbred with a military dress, which are marks of greatness and pride, such as the helmet, mantlings, wreaths, and crests. But more rightly others reason with Scohier, in his Compartment of Arms, cap. 17. "'That differences or brisures were not invented by law and custom to dis- " tinguish the descendants of younger brothers, but to difference brothers them- " selves." The words of our author, with these of yurispriidentia Heroica, in an- swer to the former two reasons, are, " Nee obstat prima, nee secunda ratio, quan- " doquidem discerni colorum usus non solum sit inventus, ad ipsos descendentes " ex diversis fratribus dignoscendos, verum etiam ad ipsos inter se discernendos." Neither can churchmen be said to be the end of the family; because, by the Pope's dispensation, they may marry, whose issue may begin and continue their family; so that they must have differencing figures added to the principal or plain arms of the principal family, which only belong to the primogeniture. And as for the other reason, that ecclesiastics are sufficiently distinguished from the laics, in not having their arms timbred with helmet, volets, and crests; yet when they fall into noble feus and jurisdictions they then timbre their shields, as was found in the Council of Brabant; as our author, " Nee obstet alia ratio, quia illud " discerniculum, non ipsa arma aut insignia, sed exteriora ornamenta afficit, quan- " qu^ni etiam ab ecclesiasticis, prsesertim nobilibus, &• jurisdictione aliqua imbutis, " thymbrum militarem fastum aJhiberi vidimus. Et banc opinionein nuper sum- " mum Brabantias concilium amplexum est." When a churchman marshals the arms of a dignified feu, or these of his office, I mean those of the church, with his paternal arms, he needs no other brisure: And this is the general practice in Eu- rope, of which I proceed to give some examples. Cardinals, bishops, abbots, priors, and other church officers, in imitation of the laics, when marshaUing was in use, began to take some remarkable figures of their offices, and to compose or marshal them with their paternal arms, after the order or method now in use, parti, coupe, and quarterly: Of which I shall add a few instances of the practice of prelates abroad, and then return to those in Britain. Vol. IL K 33 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, We. The Jirst way mentioned, parti, which the English call parted per pale, is by impalement, as before, of husband and wife's arms ; but with this difference, tlie arms of office are placed on the right side of the shield partly with the paternal arms of those in office. And though a bishop, or any other prelate, be called maritus ecclesiie, the husband of the church, by the canon law, yet he is but one, in a figurative speech; and the church's arms take place as the more noble, as also do those of secular offices. The second method of prelates marshalling their ^rms by way of eoupe, that is, /)rtrterf ^fr y^w^", by dividing the shield into two equal parts horizontally, is by placing the coat of the office above, and that of the incumbent below; a frequent practice in Italy. The third method by quartering, is done by a palar, and horizontal line divid- ing the shield into four quarters; which way is frequently used by the French and Germans; especially when those high churchmen are temporal princes, as the ecclesiastic peers of France. The Archbishop and Duke of Rheims, for his. office, carries azure, seme flower-de-luces or, a cross gules. The Bishop and Duke of Langres, axure, seme flower-de-luces or, a saltier gules. The Bishop of Laon, seme oi France, a crosier in pale gules. The Bishop Count of Bbauvais, or, a cross gules, cantoned with four keys of the last. Which arms of offices are placed in the first and fourth quarters, with the paternal ones of those in office. The three Archbishops, Electors of the Empire, do also marshal their arms of offices with their paternal ones, which are sometimes placed by way of surtout, apon the account of many coats of offices, which they marshal together. The Archbishop and Elector of Mayence, or Mentz, Great Chancellor of the Empire in Germany, carries, quarterly, first and fourth gules, a wheel with white spokes or, for his Episcopal See ; second and third, the paternal arms of the bishop in possession. The wheel is storied to have been at first assumed by one Willigis, who was chosen archbishop for his eminent piety; and he, out of humility, be- ing the son of a wheelwright, took the wheel, which his successors have con- tinued for the arms of that See. This Willigis (says Hoppingius de Jure Insignium) to shov/ his humility, caused paint on all the rooms of his house the wheel of a waggon, with this pentameter, " WiUigis recolas, quis es, S^ unde venis," i. e. Willigis, consider what you are, and whence you came. " Hsc rota postea, " insigne successorum in hoc archiepiscopatu permansit, confirmante illud Henrico " imperatore." The Archbishops of Treves, Great Chancellors of the Empire in France, and Electors, have been in use to carry four coats of offices, thus, (as by Jacob Imhoff) quarterly, first argent, a cross gules, for the Arch-See of Treves; second gules, a paschal lamb, proper, standing upon a mount in base vert, carrying a flag over its shoulder, as abbot of Pruym; third gules, a castle argent, masoned sable, sur- mounted of a crosier in pale, and below, a crown or, as prepositor and overseer of Weissenburg; i'ourth azure, a cross argent, as Bishop of Spires; and over ail, by way of surtout, an escutcheon of the paternal arms of the archbishop for the time But to come home to Britain with some observes of the ancient and modern practice of our prelates in Scotland, in carrying of their arms on their seals of office, and on other places, I observe, of old, they neither did compose, impale, nor quarter their ensigns of office with their paternal ones till after the Reforma- tion from the church of Rome; for before, their seals of arms were formed after the fashion of oblong ovals, upon which are only to be seen the frontispieces of churches, with the image of their patron-saints standing in the porches, or in fine carved niches; and below them small triangular shields, with the incumbent pre- late's arms, sometimes adorned with mitre, crosier, or cross-staff: Of which I shall here add some instances. I have seen several seals of the archbishops of St Andrews, which have the image of St Andrew with his cross, standing in the porch of a church, and below his feet a little shield, with the paternal arms of the archbishop thereon ; as especially that of William, Archbishop of that See, in the reign of Robert tlie Bruce, who has on his shield three cinquefoils, or frasiers, being of the name of Fraser, and the shield timbred with a mitre below the feet of St Andrew. OF MARSHALLING ARMS. isc. 39 I have seen the seal of John Bishop of Glasgow, which had upon it the image of St Mungo standing in the portico of the church, and below liis feet the shield of arms of that prelate, charged with, three bars, to show he was of tlic name of Ca- meron, timbred with a mitre; and at the sides of the shield were two salmons with rings in their mouths, and on the legend round the seal, Sigilhwi Joannis Episcopi Glasgiien. Which seal is appended to an indenture or agreement betwixt Jean Dowager Queen of Scotland, inother of King James II. and Sir Alexander Livingston of Calder, a'nent the delivery of the young king's person: which in- denture 1 have mentioned before with the queen's seal. The seal of John Bishop of Ross had on it the figure of a. bishop, with a mitre on his head, standing in a portico of a church; and, at his feet, a shiekl ciiarged with a bull's head cabossed, being the paternal figure of the name of Turnbull. Besides these, I have seen several other bishops' seals after the same form, witii their shields of arms below images of saints, or mitred bishops, supported by angels, and adorned with mitres and crosiers. Andrf.w, Commendator of Jedburgh, upon his seal appended to several evident?, which I have seen, had the image of a saint standing in a fine carved nich ; at the foot of which is his shield of arms, quarterly, first and fourth a lion rampant, second and third three papingoes, he being of the name of Home; and behind the shield, a crosier turned to the right. Upon the buildings of several churches, we find the paternal arms of bishops and abbots only adorned with mitres and crosiers; as these of Gavin Dunbar Archbishop of Glasgow, having only three cushions within a double tressure countev-iiowered, adorned with a mitre,, for the name of Dunbar, descended of Dunbar of Westfield. On the wall that surrounds the castle of Glasgow, on several places there, as I am informed, are the arms of James Beaton, the last Romish Bishop of that Sec, being these of Beaton quartered with Balfour, as a nephew of Beaton of Balfour; and below these arras is a salmon, with a ring in his mouth, which some of his predecessors carried also, to perpetuate a miracle said to be performed by St Mungo, patron saint of the church of Glasgow. Upon the beautiful abbey of Paisley, as I am informed, are the arms of the Abbot George Shaw, a brother of Shaw of Sauchie, carrying his arms, three covered cups; and, to show his ecclesiastical dignity, a crosier behind the shields. On the abbacy of Holyroodhouse are to be seen the arms of Archibald Craw- FURD, treasurer to King James III. He was a brother of Crawfurd of Henning, where are only his paternal bearing, viz. a fesse ermine, with a star in chief, and the shield adorned on the top with a mitre. I find none of our Romish prelates ever marshalled the figures of their respective sees (I mean the images of their patron saints, their crosses, crosiers, mitres, or such remarkable things belonging to them) with their paternal bearings, by impaling or quartering of them in one shield, though they have adorned the outer sides of their shields with such figures. And I am of opinion that the custom with us of mar- shalling arms of episcopal sees, and other ecclesiastical offices, with the paternal arms of the incumbents, is not much older than the Reformation from the Romish Ghcrch ; and the figures of which they are now formed and made up of are taken from the old seals ;- such as the images of saints and bishops, their crosses, mitres, crosiers, pastoral staffs, and other such things, which will appear to the curious by their blazons : a few of which I shall here give. The arms now used for the Archiepiscopal See of St Andrews, azure, a St Andrew's Cross (/. e. a saltier) wgent, taken from the old seal of that See, before described, which have been impaled with the arms of those that have been in office. The Archiepiscopal See of the Church of Glasgow has for arms, argent, a tree growing out of a mount vert, with a bell hanging on a branch, and a salmon lying , fesse-ways thwart the trunk of the tree, with a ring in its mouth, proper. The salmon, as I observed before, was carried by the Romish prelates, at the sides, and below their shield of arms. Alexander Cairncross, by divine providence. Arch- bishop of Glasgow, had on his seal of office the above blazon, impaled on the right. 40 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. with his paternal coat on the left, viz. argent, a stag's head erased with a cross patee fitehe, between his attire, gules. The BisHOPRicK of Galloway has for arms, the image of St Ninian, holding in his right hand a cross. The BisHOPRicK of Dumblane, a saltier ingrailed. The BisHopRiCK. of Argyle, azure, two crosiers in saltier adosse, and in chief a mitre or. The arms of the Bishoprick of Ross are two men, the one on the right hand, representing St Boniface in a white habit, his hands lying cross on his breast ; the other a bishop, pointing to St Boniface with his right hand, and by his left holding a crosier or, with a mitre on his head. The arms of these bishopricks are impaled with the arms of those who have pos- sessed these offices. The Bishoprick of Edinburgh was erected out of the Bishoprick of St Andrews by King Charles L anno 1633; so that that See has almost the same arms with St Andrews, and in chief a mitre or ; which were impaled with the arms of the incumbents. I shall add no more of them here to incumber my reader, but proceed to a few such bearings of those in England. The Archiepiscopal See of Canterbury has, azure, a pastoral staff in pale argent, topped with a cross patee or, and surmounted of an episcopal pall, (/. e. an- episcopal ornament, and not an armorial pale), of the second, edged and fringed of the third, charged with four crosses fitched sable. The Archiepiscopal See of York, gules, two keys adosse argent ; and in chief an imperial crown or. The Bishoprick of London, gules, two swords in saltier, points upward, proper, iked and pommelled or. The Episcopal See of Worcester, ten torteauxes sable, 4, 3, 2, and i. Carlisle, argent on a cross sable, a mitre with labels or. The Episcopal See of St Asaph, sable, a key in bend sinister, and a crosier in bend dexter argent. The See of Salisbury, azure, the Virgin Mary (being dedicate to her) crowned, holding the holy babe in her right arm, and a sceptre with her left hand, all gold. All which ensigns are impaled on the right side of the shields, with the paternal arms of those in office on the left side. For more ecclesiastical arms the reader may see the British Compendium of Arms lately published in taille douce. As for these orders of knighthood, which are both spiritual and temporal, such as the Knights Templars and Hospitallers, and others of such institution, they com- pose, impale, or quarter the arms of their respective orders with their paternal ones ; as do at present the Grand Masters of the Knights of Malta ; who quarter, in the first place, the arms of that order, being gules, a cross argent, with their proper arms : but the rest of the knights of that order, in distinction from the Grand Master, do not quarter but compose them with their own, by placing them in chief, or on a chief, which has occasioned one coat of arms to have two chiefs, the one above the other. So much then for ecclesiastical arms. I shall now proceed to the arms of secular offices ; some of which I shall here mention. Seculars, who enjoy high offices, military or civil, sometimes impale or quarter the arms of their offices with their own. The electoral princes of the empire quarter in their shields of arms, the arms or badges of their offices, being the figures of the regalia they carry before the emperor, by virtue of their high posts, as Beckmannus says, dissert, cap. 5. " In insignibus suis seculares clinodium istud " inserunt, cui ratione officii portando destinati sunt." The King of Bohemia, as principal cup-bearer to the Emperor, charged the breast of his lion with a cup. The Duke of Saxony, as one of the electors of the empire, carried over his a- chievement of many quarters, by way of surtout, an escutcheon parted per fesse, argent and sable, two swords in saltier gides, hiked and pommelled or, as Elector Marischal of the empire. OF MARSHALLING ARMS, l^c. - 41 The Duke of Bavaria and Palatine carries three shields tied together, the first on the right side, sable, a hon rampant or, armed and kmgued ^ules contourne, (/. e. looking to the other's shield on the left)tbr the Palatinate ; the second shield, fusile in bend, urgent and azure, of twenty-one pieces, for Bavaria; the third shield, below the above two, gules, charged with the imperial mend or, which he carries in solemnity before the emperor. The Eleccor Paxatine of the Rhine carries parted per pale, first the Palatinate, second Bavaria, and in base a point gules, as third Elector. See book Jcu D' Ar- mories des Sovereigns. The Duke and Marquis of Brandenburg, (now King of Prussia) as Elector, car- ries over his achievement of many quarters, by way of surtout, azure, a sceptre pale-ways or. The Duke of Brunswick., (now King of Great Britain) as Elector of the Empire, carries over tlie fourth quarter of his majesty's arms, an inescutcheon, Charlemagne's crown ; of whose imperial achievement afterwards. Other nobles in the empire, upon account of their employments or offices, carried figures to represent them; as the Earls of Oldenburg, principal architects in the empire, carried in one of the quarters of their arms two beams of wood, blazoned bars. The Eails of Spigelberg, as master-hunters, carry a hart, proper. And the Earls of Wernegeroda, as master-fishers, carry in their achievement a fish; as 'Ko'^^mgwxs ile Jure Insignium: so that offices and employments are not only the causes of obtauiing arms at first, but also of multiplying several arms in one shield ; which was a practice with the Romans, Germans, French, English, &-C. In France those who had offices of the crown, of old, under the first, second, and third races of the Kings of France, not only took their names from their offices, but their arms, as Hoppingius cie jure Insignuan, cap. 4. " In Gallia, omnes offi- " ciales corona; Francis sub regibus, imse, zdx &- jtice generationis, non assume- " bant aliunde cognomina & insignia, quam ab offigio quod gerebant ; cujus me- " moriaii suis liberis &- de'.cendentibus reliquerunt, qui eadem insignia &- cogno- " mina retinebant." And, for example, he gives the family of Mussini, who, of old, were Earls of Senlis, and chief butlers of France, for which they carried, to perpetuate their office, a shield quarterly, or and gules; the first to represent the king's gold cup, and the second the wine; so that the family had the name of Butlers of Senlis. To please some curious, I shall add our author's words, " In " cujus rei memoriam (Pincernas) portaverunt pro insignibus clypeum divisum in " quadras, ex auro &• colore rubro, quod representabat poculum St cantherium " regis, & colore rubro, vinum hacque de causa appeUati sunt Pincerns Silvanec- " tini, i. e. Baateliers de Senlis." In England, another ancient family descended of Argentius, and Brionini a Norman, became chief butlers in the reign of William II. of England, and took for arms, gules, three cups or, to show their office, and introduced it as a surname to their posterity. The words of our author are, " Hi, a Davido Argentinio Nor- " mano viro militari, qui sub Gulielmo Secundo meruit, &- nomen & stemma duxe- " runt; &-' in huj us rei testimonium tribus scyphis argenteis in rubro clypeo usi " sunt:" A\'hich coat of office is quartered with their paternal coat, viz. or, a chief indented azure. From this noble stock of worthies, in a direct line, was descend- ed J.\]MES Butler Marquis of Ormond, and Earl of Ossory in Ireland, of which he was Lord Lieutenant, and by King Charles II. created a peer of England, by the titls of Lord Butler of Lanthony, and Earl of Brecknock, and the 13th year of that king's reign, Duke of Ormond in Ireland, and also a Knight of the Garter: He married the Lady Elizabetli Preston, daughter to Richard Lord Dingwall in Scotland, and Earl of Desmond in Ireland, by whom he had three sons, Thomas Earl of Ossory, Richard Earl of Arran, and John. Richard died without issue, Thomas was summoned to the English Parliament by the title of Lord Butler of Moorpark, and was also a Knight of the Garter, and Rear- Admiral of his Majesty's Fleet : He married Lady Amelia Nassau, daughter to Lewis de Nassau, son to Maurice Prince of Orange, and Count of Nassau; by whom he had issue three sons, James Duke of Ormond in England, Charles Earl of Arran, created Lord Butler of Weston in England, who carries the above quartered arms, with a crescent for dif- ference ; and another, James, who died young. Vol. U. L 42 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. Carnegie Earl of Southesk, whose arms are or, an eagle displayed azure, beak- ed, raembred, and armed y///w; his predecessors, Carnegie of K.innaird, were cup- bearers to our kings, for v/hich, of old, they carried a gold cup on the breast of their eagle, to show their office. Many civil and politic offices, which have symbols and badges, are not placed within the shield of arms of those in office, as those above mentioned, but at the back, sides, or foot of the shield ; such as the marischal's battons, the constable's swords, the admiral's anchors, the master-household's battons, the chamberlain's keys, &c. Of which more fully in the Treatise of Exterior Ornaments. To put an end to this section, I shall mention here the arms of the Herald Offices 111 Scotland and England. Those of Scotland are now argent, a lion seiant, full-faced gules, (being the crest of the royal achievement of Scotland) holding in his dexter paw a thistle slipped vert; in the sinister, an escutcheon of the second, and on a chief azure a St Andrew's cross of the first. Which arms are impaled on the right side with the paternal bearing of Sir Alexander Erskine of Cambo, the present Lyon King at Arms, being these of the Earl of Marr, with a crescent for difference, as a cadet of the family. This seal of office is no older than himself; for his father, Sir Charles, also Lyon King at Arms, had on his seal appended to patents of arms given out by him, only his paternal arms; and any particular seal or badge our principal heralds had before, was the sovereign achievement of the kingdom, (called by other nations I'esmail) which was hung by a chain of gold about the neck of the principal herald, and on the breast of his brethren heralds and pursuivants, by a ribbon, as their cognizance and badge : And the same, as I read, was practised by the heralds in England. The principal heralds in England, in the reign of Qiieen Elizabeth, and especially the Garter King at Arms, wore a badge of gold daily, whereon were enamelled only the sovereign's arms ; as Ashmole, in his Institution of the Garter, page 2g8, and 253, and had no proper seal for the office, till Sir Edward Walker, then Gar- ter King at Arms, obtained a licence from the Queen to distinguish himself from the other Kings at Arms, to impale St George's arms, viz. argent, a cross gides on the right side, with those of the sovereign's on the left: And about that time the ■^eal of the office was formed thus, argent, a cross guJes, and, on a chief azure, a crown imperial, environed with a garter, buckled and nuved, betwixt a lion passant gardant, and a flower-de-luce or, which were impaled with the arms of Sir Edward Walker, as they were afterwards with those of his successors in that office. The heralds in Germany, Flanders, and elsewhere, have the arms of their so- vereigns, enamelled or depicted on gold, affixed to their breasts: But I take them to be principal and learned heralds, by royal authority, and not such, as with us, who know nothing of the matter. As Sir John Baptista Chrystin, Chan- cellor of Brabant, in his curious book entitled Jurisprudentla Heroica, sive de jure Be!garum, circa nobUiiatem et indgnia, whose words are those, in the Spanish Flanders, from paragraph 8. after he had given an account of those of Germany and France, viz. " Qua;libet deinde provincia apud Belgas suum habet " fecialem, ejus titulo celebrem, qui tesseram sive laminam insignibus ejusdem " decoratam (vulgo I'esmail d'office) pectori assutam gerit, & in festive quovis " apparatu ejusdem provincial rege armorum tunica indutus (vulgo la cottee " d'arms du roy) dextra caduceum gestans assistit." But more of this afterwards, when I come to speak of the Rise, Nature, and Office of Heralds. ARMS OF ALLI.VNCES. Besides the arms of offices, as I said before, there are other causes of marshalling many coats of arms in one shield, given us by eminent lawyers and heralds, which they call cumuhitio, or multipHcatio insigniu?n. As Hoppingius de Jure Insignium, page 782, " De quarteriis sive sectionibus, campis sive areis," called with us mar- shalled or quartered arms; and are marks of honour and greatness, esteemed by all nations upon many accounts, especially upon honourable alliances, and succession to noble feus: A practice frequent with the French; as Hoppingius, " Eifectus " vero hujus accumulationis, sive conjunctionis insignium est augere dignitatem ; OF MARSHALLING ARMS, Uc. 43 " etenim hie mos &■ usus, maxime receptus est Gallis, quo sciaiit S<- iiitelligant his " niutation;bus jure natura;, regnique legibus non derogari, seJ augmentum esse " nobilitatis." ^ quartered coat of arms is when the shield is divided into four quarters, or areas, by a perpendicular and horizontal line cutting the centre; and sometimes again ttiese quarters or areas are alto divided into as many quadras by the same hues, aai are tilled up with the arms of dilTerent families upon several occasions : by heralds and lawyers called cumulatio armorum, of old latined scutum quarteria- tiim, and of late, scutum quadripartitum: But Mr Gibbon, an English herald, for quartered arms, says, scutum in quatuor partes, lineis ad cruris 7nodum ductis, scctuin ; after some old heralds, who blaioned a quartered s\\\e\A, parted per cross. Heralds who write m Latin, call one of these quarters quarteria; Chiflletius and Uredus make use of the word quadraiis; Jacob Imhoff the German, tiic word quadra; and others say area, for a quarter. Sir John Feme, in his Glory of Generosity, gives us three sorts of quartered coats of arms; the first he calls a plain quartered coat, the second a quartered coat, and the third a quarterly quartered coat: 'Which 1 shall explain, and give examples by whom carried with us, and other nations. As to the first, a plain quartered coat is when the superficies or field is divided into four quarters or areas; and when the first and fourth quarters contain one coat of arms, the second and third another: so that there are but two different coats of arms twice repeated in a quartered shield ; which, says our author, is a suitable disposition of the arms of the son and heir of a gentleman who had to wife an heiress: the father's arms are placed in the first and fourth quarters, and the mother's in the second and third. It is to be observed, that in marshalHng arms with others, upon the account of alliance, and if both houses be cadets, their marks of cadencies must be continued upon both their coats. Alliances then by marriages has occasioned the multiplication of many arms in one shield, not only al.noit by all the princes in Europe, but even by nobles high and low, to show their noble descent; and especially by the issue of those who have married heiresses, to show the right they have to territories and lands. I shall begin with one of the ancientest examples of this kind 1 have met with in my reading. Abaut the year 1117, Ferdinandus, eldest son of Sanctius, to- named the Great King of Navarre, and Elivira, daughter of Ferdinand the VI. and last Earl of Castile, being the first that was honoured with the title of King of Castile, married Sanctia, daughter of Alphonsus King of Leon, sister and heir of Beremond who died without issue. This Ferdinand, upon account of his wife Sanctia, got the kingdom of Leon; so that he became both Kurg of Castile and Leon about the year ii6o, and quar- tered the arms of those kingdoms thus; first and fourth ^ules, a castle triple, towered and embattled or, masoned sable, for the kingdom of Castile; second and th\\-d. argsnt, a lion ra upant ^.v/w, armed or, for the kingdom of Leon. Tlius blazoned by Hoppingius, " Reges CasteUi:^ &- Legionis, in insignibus, ferunt scutum " in parte superiori dextra, & in inferiori sinistra Castellum aureum in campo " rubeo ; in parte superiori sinistra &- inferiori dextra, leonem fulvum in campo " albo exhibens." The kingdom of Leon was a more ancient kingdom than Castile for many ages ; for when Pelagius took that country and town from the Moors, about the year 722, it was always called a kingdom; and he took for his arms a Hon, because it is said to be the King of Beasts: As our author, " Pelagius Legionis rex primus, circa " annum 722, eripiens Legionem civitatem a Mauris, leonem pro insigniis assumpsit, " quia leo est, & interpretatur, rex omnium bestiarum." Many are of opinion, that the arms of Leon, being those of the ancientest king- dom, should be placed in the first and fourth quarters ; and so to have the pre- cedency of the arms of Castile. Ludovicus Molina, a famous lawyer, defends the method of marshalling, as above blazoned, imo. That the greatest kingdom should be preferred to the ancientest. ido, Ferdinand was King of Castile by right of his father, and got Leon by right of his wife, nomine dotis ; and that in his titles he was named first King of Castile and Leon, preferring the title of the man 44 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. to the woman, and the mother's titles ought to follow the father's : His words are, " Turn quod virilis stirpis imperium prajterri debuit foemineo, maternaque insig- " nia paternis insignibus cedere debuerunt." The like practice v\as used in England by Edward III. the first of that kingdom, who quartered his arms with those of France. He placed France in the second and third quarters, as arms of alliance, upon the account of his mother Isabel, daughter and heir of Philip IV. of France, and of her brothers, Charles IV. Philip V. and Lewis XI. successive kings of France, who died without any issue. Theu' cousin-german Philip de Valois, as heir-male, ascended the throne : and, as Ed- ward Howes tell us, in his History of England, King Edward's ambassadors, who came to congratulate his accession to the crown, were questioned, Why the King of England placed the leopards of that kingdom in the first quarter before the lilies of France in the second ? To which Sir John Shorditch, the ambassador, made answer, That it was the custom of the times to set the title and arms of the fathers before those of the mothers ; which their king had, in reason and duty, dune. From which it is to be observed, that arms of alHance, upon the account of ma- ternal descent, were then quartered with the paternal, which had the precedency of the maternal; and which is yet the ordinary custom in Europe, excepting for some special reasons, as that of the same King Edward III. who, upon no other account, at first, quartered the arms of France, but upon the reason of his alliance : yet afterwards, in the i4th year of his reign, when he was encouraged by his aUies, to claim the kingdom of France in right of his mother, he placed those of France, as arms of dominion and pretension, in the first quarter, before the arms of England ; which his predecessors have continued. About the latter end of this king's reign, the English nobility began, in imita- tion of him, to quarter with their own arms coats of alliances. John Hastings, Earl of Pembroke, who married Margaret, youngest daughter of Edward III. was the first subject in England, (says Sandford, in his genealogical History of that kingdom) who, in imitation of liis king, had quartered arms, viz. first and fourth or, a manche ^u!es ; second and third harry of t\\ elve pieces, argent and azure, with eight martlets orle-ways gules, as arms of alliance with the family of Val- lance : which quartered coat he impaled with the arms of his countess, being then the same with her father's, France and England quarterly. With us our great families did not all begin at one time to quarter their arms with other coats, upon account of alliance, and other considerations. The first practice of quartering I have met with upon seals, was in the reign of King Ro- bert II. who was crowned in Scoon the 27th of March 1371, as I have observed before. His sons, then, and Leslie, who married the heiress of Ross, withothers, began to marshal their arms with those of other families ; of which, m the first part of this system. As also did David Lindsay, first Earl of Crawford, assume the coat of Abernethy, and quartered it with his own, upon the account he was descended of that family by the mother's side : for his grandfather. Sir David Lindsay, in the reign of King Robert I. married one of the three co-heiresses of Alexander Lord Abernethy ; whose arms were or, a lion rampant gules, bruised with a ribbon snble, quartered with his paternal, gules, a fesse cbecjue, argent and azure. Which figures were upon David first Earl of Crawford his seal ; and ever since have been continued by the family. A long time after, the Earls of Douglas and Rothes being descended of the other two co-heiresses of the above Alexander Lord Abernethy, marshalled the arms of Abernethy with their own. The great and illustrious house of Douglas, for what I have seen, had no quar- tered coats before William, the first Earl of Douglas, married Margaret, daughter of Donald, sister and sole heir, at last, to her brother Thomas, Earl of Marr : for, before this match, he had only his single paternal coat on his seal of arms, which I have seen appended to a charter of his, of the church of Meikle Cavers, to the abbacy of Melrose ; but after the marriage with Margaret Marr, countess and heiress of Marr, he quartered his paternal coat with that of Marr, viz. first and fourth argent, a man's heart gules, (not ensigned with a crown as now) and, on a chief azure, three stars of the first ; second and third azure, a bend betwixt six cross croslets fitched or, for Marr : which arms I have seen, on his seal, appended OF M/VRSHALLING ARMS, i^a. 45 to his charter, dated at the Castle of Kildrunimy, the 22d of July 1377, wherein he is designed Earl of Douglas and Marr, of the lands of Easter-Foulis, lying in the Earldom of Marr, and shire of Aberdeen, granted to James Mowat. Theii shield of arms on the seal was couche, and quartered, as I have said, with Dougla^- aiid Marr, supported by one lion sciant, holding up the shield, his head in a helmet, created with a plume of feathers ; and, at each side of the shield, is a tree growing out of a mount, as a compartment, seme of cross croslets, and upon the compart- ment the right side of the shield rests. His son James, Earl of Djuglas and Marr, carried the same arms as his father, as is evident by his seals. He could not have carried Marr if he had not been the son of Margaret, Countess of Marr. It was this valiant Earl that overthrew Henry Percy, surnamed Hotspur, in a combat at Newcastle ; and again defeat him in the battle of Otteiburn, which was fought the 31st of July 1308. After the battle, this noble Earl James died in his tent. He had no issue but two natural sons ; and was succeeded by his half- brother Archibald, Lord of Galloway, in the earldom of Douglas ; and by his full sister Isabel Douglas, in the Earldom of Marr. Archibald Earl of Douglas and Galloway carried three coats quarterly, first azure, a lion rampant argent, being the feudal arms of Galloway ; second, the arms of Douglas as above for his paternal coat; third azure, three mullets argent, the arms of Elizabeth his wife, daughter and heir of Sir Thomas Murray, Lord of i>ot\wit\\, panitariiis Scotia, with whom he got the lordship of Bothwell ; and the fourth quarter as the first. It is to be observed, that this Earl and his father Earl William, quartered their wives' arms, being heiresses, with their own ; which it seems was our ancient practice, as well as to marshal them, as by impalement, or by way of inescutcheon. This Earl had nothing of the arms of Marr, so that they entirely belonged to Isabel Countess of Marr. Lady Isabel Douglas Countess of Marr, married Alexander Stewart, natural son of Alexander Stewart of Badenoch, Earl of Buchan, fourth son of King Robert II. He is nevertheless called the eldest son of the Earl of Buchan, in a charter granted to him anno 1404, by his lady Isabel Douglas Countess of Marr : by which charter she gives him the Earldom of Marr and Lordship of Garioch, in consideration of the marriage : and no doubt it was also in consideration of that marriage that he is said to be the eldest son of his father ; which does not follow that he was not a bastard : For if he had been £ lawful son, he had certainly succeeded his father in the earldom of Buchan, which earldom went to John Earl of Buchan, a younger son of Robert Duke of Albany. Alex.\.nder Stewart Earl of Marr, by right of his wife, as said is, carried for arms on his seal, which I have seen, quarterly, first and fourth or, a fcbse cheque (for Stewart), between three open crowns gules, which were the figures of the lordship of Garioch, and in these quarters he had no mark of illegitimation ; second and third, the arms of Marr as before, azure, a bend betwixt six cross croslets fitched or : He was commander in chief at the battle of Harlaw anno 141 1, a man of great honour, an ornament to his country, and died without issue aiaw 1426. The earldom afterwards fell into the king's hands, and the sons of the royal family were afterwards designed Earls of Marr. Many of our ancient families, since the reign of King Robert II. have been in use to quarter the arms of other families with their own, upon account of alliances and other considerations. Many of our ancient and principal families, as tveith Earl Marischal, Hay Earl of Errol, Ogilvie Earl of Au-he, Carnegie Earl of Sduth- esk, Forbes Lord Forbes, and many great barons too numerous here to mention, have only been in use, and to this day, to carry their single paternal coats. Perhaps many of them have had no occasion to marshal their arms with others, and some of them have had good right to quaiter the arms of other families, upon the ac- count of alliances and other considerations ; but upon what reason they have forborne them I cannot pretend to know. Perhaps, upon the mibtaken notion, that the more single and plain the coat of arms be, it is the more honourable, and shows a principal family. But what does it lose of that appearance of honour, when marshalled plain and simple with other arms, upon the account of an ho- nourable alHance, noble feus, and other additaments of honour .' Since it has been, for many ages, the general practice of kings, princes, and nobles, to marshal other Vol. II. M 46 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c . arms with their own, as rather an additament of honour than a diminution of it, and which does not in the least alter the quality of the bearer, according to the opinion of lawyers ; as Hoppingius de Jure Insigiiium, cap n. " Cumulatio insig- " nium est argumentum aucti honoris; insignium siquidem auctione, honor et " dignitas personae superveniens, ejus qualitatem nunquam mutat aut extin- " guit." That some of our ancient families, as I just now said, have had right to quarter the arms of other families with their own, upon the account of marriage, and have not done it till of late, appears from what follows. The ancient and noble family of Maule, who carry, for their paternal arms, parti, argent and gules, a bordure charged with eight escalops, all counter-changed of the same, is originally French ; and have their name from the Lordship of Maule, near Paris, their first and original lands, in latter times erected into a mar- quisate. [Description of the Generality of Paris.] Ansold Lord of Maule, and Rectrude his wife, made a donation to the priory of St Martine des Camps, at Paris, in the year 1015, mentioned by Laboureur in his History of Chamont ; and his son Guarin Lord of Maule, with Hersende his wife, is named in a charter of Robert King of France, to William abbot of St Germains, before the year 103 1. (History of Montmorency by Du Chesne.) He was succeeded by his son Ansold, called by Ordericus Vitalis, for his great riches, Dives Parisietuis ; who left Peter, his heir, and Stephen, grandfather to Grimald de Maule, who, says Ordericus, was at the taking of Jerusalem in 1098, with Godfrey of Boulogne. Peter, next Lord of Maule, made a very great figure, with consent of his proceres et 7iiilites, says the above author, who lived near that time. He founded a priory at his town of Maule, for Benedictine monks of St Euvroul, to whom he gave his churches of St Mary, St Germain, and St Vincent, with many lands ; by his charter dated in the 1077, printed at length in the Histories Normanwjrum Scriptures, p. 587 ; and in the year 1098 he was general of the French army against King William IL of England, who had invaded France, and obliged that Prince to raise the siege of Mountfort, and conclude a truce and re- turn to England. (Du Moulin's History of Normandy, page 267.) By Guindes- moth his w'ife, of a noble family in Champagne, he had four sons and as many daughters. Of the last, one was married to Baudry Count of Dreux, son to Baudry Constable of France ; another to Gaucher Lord of Poissy, whose descen- dants were heritable Pantriers of Normandy ; and a third to Hugh Lord Voisins, pre- decessor to the Seneschals of Toulouse. Ansold Lord of Maule, his eldest son, was a great captain, and famous in the wars of Italy and Greece : he was with Robert Duke of Apuha at the siege of Durrazzo, and distinguished himself at that great battle where Alexis Emperor of Constantinople was overthrown, anno 1106. He confirmed his father's donations to the priory of Maule, in presence of his barons and knights,' whom he caused do homage to his eldest son Peter. (Orderi- cus Vitalis, page 589, 590.) He married Odeiine Mauvoisine, daughter to Ra- dulph Lord of Rony, Governor of Mante, and died anno 11 18. His son Peter de Maule, was one of the powerfullest lords of that time ; he was one of the P'rench generals at the battle of Brenville, fought in 11 19 against King Henry I. of Eng- land, and, in the year 1138, he went to the siege of Breteuil, accompanied with forty knights ; but, his power rendering him suspected. King Lewis le Gros came and demolished his strong castle of Maule. (Ordericus and Du Moulin.) He married Ade daughter to the Earl of Guines, and niece to the Lord of Montmo- rency, and was succeeded by his son Roger, who married Idone daughter to Wa- lon Viscount of Chaumont, and Matilde de Montmorency his wife. She is men- tioned with him in an agreement he made with the Chapter of Paris in the 1195. (Grand Pastoral of Paris.) He had Peter, Robert, and Simon de Maule, abbot of loinville. (Gallia Christiana). Peter III. of that name gave certain vineyards lying in his Lordship of Maule to the abbacy of Joinville, by his charter in the year 1224. Of which I have seen an attested copy from the writs of that abbacy, having his seal appended to it, which is very large ; and thereon a shield of his arms, being a parti, with a bordure of nine escalops, and the legend SigiUwn Petri de Maulia.\ He is also mentioned by De la Rocque in his treatise Bu Ban et Arriereban, among the Seigneurs of France summoned to attend the King in his OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ef. . 47 wars anno 1236, and again in 1242. He was succeeded by his brother Robert, who was in thj expedition to the holy land with the Duke of Brittany and many French lords anno 1237, where he was taken prisoner by tiie Turks ; and, at his return, founded the priory of St Leonard, in his barony of Panmure, which hes contiguous to Maule. His arms are done in ancient painting in the church of Maule ; the shield coiiche, parti, ardent ^nd gules, within a bordure j.7/;/r, of twelve escalops of the first, with helmet, mantling, and wreath ; upon which are three ostrich feathers or, for crest, and supported by two savages, proper, wreathed about the middle ; which ancient arms are cut in the Plate of Achievements. Below the arms is this inscription in old French : " Messire Robert de Maule, lequel fut " prisonnier en Turquie, &■ a son retour fonda le perieure de St Leonard, assis dans " la Baronnie de Panmor, comme ill se veoit par les lettres de !a fondation dudit " prieure datte de Fan mil. " The arms of his son Bartholomew Lord of Maule, are also painted in the church, differing nothing from his father's, save that the supporters are two lions, proper ; and below are the following words : " Messieur Bartholemy de Maule, filz de Robert, lequel dona aux religieux de " Joyenval le fief de Andeleu, assis en cette Baronnie, comme il se veoit par la " Chartre de don en L'Abbaye dudit Joyenval, datte de 1' an mil deux cent." He died in anno 124B, according to the obituary of the abbey of Joinville, and was succeeded by his son WiUiam, who to a deed in favours of that abbey, dated 1263, appends his seal, of which 1 have seen a copy, being a shield a. parti, as be- fore, and a bordure of eight escalops ; the fixed number now born by the family of Panmure, and the legend, S. Giiill. de Maule ^rmigeri ;+ He married Sidelene, daughter to John Lord of Torotte, Governor and hereditary Butler of Champagne, by whom he had Hugh, father to Peter Lord of Maule, who gives a charter to the priory of Maule, dated anno 1306 ; and has his arms also painted in the church, wiih lions for supporters, attended with an ancient inscription, such as those al- ready given. Another Peter, his grandson, married Julietta des Essars, daughter to the Lord of Ambleville, and had Bertauld his heir, and Robert de Maule, Master of Requests, and Counsellor to Charles VI. King of France, in his Parliament of. Pans. (Extract out of the Register of the Parliament of Paris ad annum 1388.) Bertauld, in the inscription on his tomb, stiled Seigneur de Maule et Mon- tainville, is frequently mentioned in the wars during the reign of King Charles V. who beat tlie English out of France ; he married Jacqueline, daughter to the Seigneur de Blainville, Marischal of France, by whom he had Robert last Lord of Maule in France, whose arms are yet to be seen in the Notre Dame Church of Maule, with two eagles, proper, for supporters, accompanied with the following inscription: " Messire Robert de Maule, fik de Berthault, lequel fut marie a Dame Anne, '• d'Anguilliers, ainsi qui'l se veoit parle traite' de leur mariage datte de V an mil '• III"- IIIF'^- VII. &- mourut au voyage d' Hongrie." He died at the battle of NicopoUs in Hungary, fought against the Turk in the year 1398, being then possessed of the Lordships of Maule, Panmure, Mon^ tainville, and HerbviUe : all which great estate went to his daughter and heir Reginolde de Maule, married to Simon de Morainvilliers, Lord of Flacourt, Pan- trier to the Dauphin, and Governor of Chartres and Mante. Her arms, in lozenge, are also painted in the church with those of her husband, which are argent, nine martlets sable, accompanied with an inscription ; part of which I have given in the first volume of this work, page 359. Her descendants the Morainvilliers Lords of Maule, carried the coat of Maule quartered with their own, from whom it went, by marriage, to the Harlays of Sancy, stiled in their titles Barons of Maule : and their heiress again was married to the Marquis of Villeroy, grand- father to the present Marischal and Duke of Villeroy. This account of the Lords of Maule in France, beside the printed authors above cited, is taken from their charters, donations to abbeys, and other authentic deeds, to many of which their seals are appended ; whereof I have seen copies attested by the Sieur Clarembalt, Genealogist to the King of France : I have also seen draughts of their arms that are in the church, and the inscriptions given above, with a great many more on the glass-windows and tombs in the church, and others on the old castle of Maule,. 48 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, iJc. too long to nienlioii liere, all taken and panited upon the place, with an instru- ment thereupon by Mr Chevillard, Genealogist of Faris. A son of the Lord of Maule came over to England with William the Conqueror; as appears by the list of that Prince's followers hi Hollin^lied, Vol. IL page 296 ; and was rewarded by the Conqueror with the Lordsliip of Hattoun de Cleveland in Yorkshire, out of which Robert and Stephen del Maule make donations to the abbey of Whitby, in the reign of King Henry 1. about the year 1130. (Mo- nasticon Anghcaii-.mi, Vol. U. page 75. _) They were great barons of England, and flourished several generations ia that kingdom : The last of them I find there is Serlo de Maule, one of the peers at the coronation of King Henry HI. anno 1216, mentioned by John Fox. This name having come out of England soon after the conquest, with several other Normans and French, is found among the earliest with us in Scotland. Wil- liam de Maule is witness to several charters in the chartulary of St Andrews, in the reign of King David L before the year 1152. He got fro'm King David the lordship of Fouhs in Perthshire, out of which he made several donations to the priory ot St Andrews. (Chartulary of St Andrews.) Sir Richard de Maule is wit- ness to William Lord of Foulis's donations, who designs him Nepote meo ; and also to other charters in King William and King Alexander's reigns ; He seems to be father to Sir Peter and William de Maule, Archdeacon of Lothian, witness to some of King Alexander's charters in the chartulary of Newbottle. Sir Peter de Maule married Christian de Valoins, daughter and heir of William de Valoins, Lord Panmure, and great Chamberlain of Scotland; and got with her the baronies of Panmure and Benvie; for which the family of Panmure carry, with their pa- ternal arms, those of Valoins, blazoned in the First Part of this Work. There is in the chartulary of Arbroath a solemn agreement of this Sir Peter de Maulia, Dominu% de Fanmure, and Christian his wife, with the Abbot of Arbroath, in pre- sence of Alexander Earl of Buclian, Justiciar of Scotland, dated 1254. And that same year, after his death. Christian de Valoins granted a charter for homage and service, to John de Liddel of her lands of Balbenny and Panlathy, which Bomtnus Petnis de iMauita, her husband, had formerly granted to Thomas de Liddel his father : to which charter her seal was appended, having thereon a lady in a long vesture, with a ialcoii on her hand, without any armorial ligure, and the legend S. Christine de I'aloirs, D — e de Panmore. They left two sons. Sir William and Sir Thomas de Maule, Governor of the Castle of Brechin, which Matthew V\^est- mmster says, '■ He long and gallantly defended against King Edward L of Eng- land, till be was slain in anno 1303." Sir IVitiiam de Maule, Bomimis de Panmore, is one of the barons of Scotland who swore fealty to King Edward I. in the year 1 291. (Rymer's Foedera, Tom. H. page 57c.) In anno 1293 he grants a charter of his lands of Benvie and Ballrutherie to Rodolph de Dundee ; which the Scrim- geuurs. Constables of Dundee, held long of the family of Panmure. He married Etham, daughter to John de Vaus Lord Dirleton, and Sherit^" of Edinburgh, by whom he had Sir Henry de Maule, who sided with King Robert Bruce, by whom he was knighted, and is designed Henriciis de Muide, miles, Jiliiis IVillielmi de Maule, mitttis, Domini de Panmore, in a charter of that King's, dated at Dundee the 24th year of King Robert 1. his reign. He gives his lands of Carmylie, lying- in the barony of Panmure, to Alexander de Strachan, by a charter sine data, testi- hus Joanne Episcopo Brechin, IViliielmo de Montealto, &-c. ; to which his seal of arms is appended, being of the same size with those of the barons, affixed to the letter to tiic Pope, anno 1320 ; and thereupon a shield couche, the field parti, and a bordure of eight escalops, without any exterior ornament or legend. His son Walter de Maule, next Baron of\Panmure, gave a charter of his lands of Carnegie, lying in the barony of Panmure, to John de Banhaird, to be held of him and his heirs, confirmed by King David U. (Haddington's Coll. p. 574.) He grants also his lands of Moncur to Henry Strachan de Carmylie, by a charter, anno 1346, to which his seal is appended, being much larger than his father's, and thereon a shield couche charged with the same bearing, viz. a parti, and a border of eight escalops, and honourably trimmed with helmet, mantle, and wreath; upon which is a dragon's head spouting out fire, and the wings erected, and the legend round the seal, S. Gault. de MaulL The seal with which this was impressed, though much OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. 49. worn, is yet extant, being of silver, and cut in the Plate of Achievements, and is the most ancient seal that 1 have seen. He died in the year 1348. (Chartulary of Brechin.) William, Baron of Paumure, his son, married Marion Fleming, daughter to Sir David Fleming, predecessor to the Earl of Wigton, by his first wife Jean, daughter to the Lord Brechin, and was father to Su Thomas Maule, who was killed, with all his name, at the bloody battle of Harlaw anno 1411; by which this family would have been extinguished, if his lady, a daughter of the Lord Gray's, had not been with child, who, after her husband's death, bore a son. Sir Thomas Maule, designed Lord of Panmm'e in a deed betwixt him and John Lyon Lord of Glammis. It was this Sir Thomas, as heir to his grandmother, who laid claim, at the Earl of Atlijol's death, to the Lordship of Brechin ; which being included in Athol's forfeiture. Sir Thomas recovered only the lands of Hcdder- wick, Jackstoun, and Staddockmoor, with Leuchland's part of the lordship of Brechin ; but afterwards the timiily of Panmure came to enjoy tlie whole lord- ship, with the title of Lord Brechin, and carried the Lord Brechin's arms with those of Maule and Valoins ; as marshalled in the First Part of this Work. His son Sir Thomas, third of that name, was very eminent in the reign of King James III. being stiled in many writs, Nobilis et potens Domiruis Thomas Mxiuh,. Dominus de Panmure, and married Elizabeth Lindsaj', daughter to Alexander Earl of Craw- ford ; whose mother was the Lady Margaret, lawful daughter to King Robert II. His eldest son, Alexander, married Elizabeth, daughter to Sir David Guthrie of that Ilk, Lord High-Treasurer of Scotland, and was designed of Camcstoun and Hed- derwick, in several charters, (which I have seen) before the year 1491, to which his seal is appended, and on the shield a parti, with a bordure of eight escalops, and a label of three points in chief, as a difference; for he died before his father, who was succeeded by his grandson Sir Thomas Maule, fourth of the name, killed With King James IV. at the fatal battle of Flodden, a?ina 1513, whose son was Robert next Baron of Panmure, active in the wars during the minority of Queen Mary, being of the French faction, and against the union with England. His great-grandson was Patrick Maule Earl of Panmure, Gentleman of the Bed- chamber to King James VI. and King Charles I. Keeper of his Majesty's House and Park of Eltham in England, and Sheriil-Principal of Angus. He married three wives, first Frances Stanhope, daughter to Sir Edwai'd Stanhope, Lord President of the North. Secondly, Mary Waldrum, Maid of Honour to King Charles I. his queen, and a near cousin of the great Duke of Buckingham: And, lastly, Ladv Mary Erskine, daughter to John Earl of Marr, Lord High Treasurer of Scotland. His daughters were married to the Earls of Kinghorn, Linlithgow, and Northesk. His eldest son, George, second Earl of Panmure, served the king in the civil war as colonel of a regiment of horse, and married Lady Jean Campbell, eldest daugh- ter to John Earl of Loudon, Chancellor of Scotland, by whom he had George Lord Maule, James Maule of Balumbie, afterwards Earl of Panmure, Mr Hary Maule of Kelly, and Lady Mary, married to Charles Earl of Marr. George, tliird Earl of Panmure, was one of the Lords of the Privy-Council to King Charles H. and King James VII. and married Lady Jean Fleming, only daughter to John Earl of Wig- ton; but, dying without surviving issue, was succeeded by his brother James, fourth Earl of Panmure, who was of the Privy-Council of King James VII. and married Lady Margaret Hamilton, daughter to William Duke of Hamilton. I have al- ready given the full achievement of the Earls of Panmure in the First Volume of this Work, page 360, which I here repeat again, viz. quarterly, first parted per pale, argent and gules, a bordure charged with eight escalops, all counter-changed of the same, for Maule; second argent, three pallets waved gules, for the Valoins; third quarter, quarterly, first and fourth azure, a cheveron betwixt three crosses patee, argent; second and third or, three piles issuing from the chief, conjoined by the points in base gules, for Barclay Lord Brechin; and the fourth grand quarter as the first: Which arms are adorned with crown, helmet, and volets, befitting their quality; and, on a wreath of their tinctures, a dragon vert, spouting out fire before and behind, proper, for crest; with the motto, on an mcrol, dementia el animis; and supported by two greyhounds, proper, collared gules, charged with, escalops argent. Vol, IL N 50 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ISc The branches of this noble family that I have found are these following, accord- ing to the time of their descent from the principal stem, though many of them have neglected to register their arms with proper differences. The fast is Maule of Boath, descended of William Maule, second son to Sir Thomas Maule of Panmure, killed at Flodden: This William married Janet Car- negie, daughter to John Carnegie of Kinnaird, predecessor to the Earls of Southesk, by whom he had Thomas, killed at the battle of Pinky, and David Maule of Boath, who, by Katharine his wife, daughter to David Balfour of Tarry, had David Maule, also of Boath, whose wife was daughter of Lindsay of Kinnettles : His son, Hary Maule of Boath, married Grissel Seaton, daughter of Seaton of Touch. The lineal succession continued till the reign of King Charles L There are severals descend- ed of this firaily, as the Maules in Sweden, of whom James Maule was President of the Police, and Intendant-General of the Mines of that kingdom ; and another, a Major-General in the King of Denmark's service. Captain John Maule, whose father was a younger son of Boath, carried parted per pale, nehuU, argent and gules, a bordure of eight escalops, all counter-changed ; crest, a sheaf of corn, pro- per: motto, Iiidustria ditat. N. R. Maule of Melgum, parted per pale, argent and gules, on a bordure wavy eight escalops, all counter-changed. The first of this family was Hary Maule of Inner- peffer, eldest son of Robert, Baron of Panmure, by his second wife Isabel Arbuth- not, daughter of Sir Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk. He had Henry Maule of Mel- gum : His son, James Maule of Melgum, married Marion Ogilvie, daughter to Ogilvie of Innerquharity. Thomas Maule, who was a second son of Melgum, gave the partition line waved; thus, parted per pale wavy, argent and gules, on a bordure eight escalops, all coun- ter-changed. NL^ULE of Guildie. The first of this family was Andrew Maule, one of the Gen- tlemen Pensioners to King James VL and second son of the second marriage to Robert Maule Baron of Panmure. Maule of Pitlivie and Ardouny, descended of Thomas Maule, fifth son to Thomas, fifth of that name, Baron of Panmure. Of this branch there ha^e been several honourable persons, as Robert Maule, Esq. Page of Honour to King James VI. and Gentleman of the Privy-Chamber to King Charles I.; and Thomas iVIaule, Esq. Gentleman of the Bed-Chamber to Prince George of Denmark ; and a flourishing family of the Maules in Ireland, whose arms are not registrate in our hooks. Maule of Balmakelly, second son to Patrick Earl of Panmure, and Frances Stanhope his wife, was colonel of a regiment of foot in the service of King Charles U. He married a daughter of the Earl of Wemyss. James Maule of Balumbie, second son to George Earl of Panmure, before he was Earl, carried the simple arms of Maule, with a crescent for difference. And Mr Hary Maule of Kelly, the third son, carried first the paternal arms of Maule, with a mullet, and afterwards the quartered coat of Panmure, with a cres- cent for difference, with crest and supporters; the same with his brother the Earl of Panmure, being now the only representative of this noble family : motto, de- mentia et animis. The second way of marshalling arms in one shield, called by Sir John Feme a quartered coat, is when there are more than two coats quartered together ; then the fourth quarter is not always the same with the first, nor the third quarter the same with the second, but different arms; which shows the bearer's alliance to several families. The Stewarts Earls of Traquair carry four coats, quarterly, first Stewart, second Buchan, as descended of a younger son of Stewart of Buchan, a branch of the Stewarts Earls of Athol ; third sable, a mullet argent; and fourth argent, an orle gules, and in chief three martlets sable, for marrying one of the heiresses of Rutherford of that Ilk, in the reign of King James IV. Campbell Earl of Breadalbane carries three coats quarterly; first gironne oi eight pieces, or and sable, his paternal coat ; second argent, a galley sable, her sails trussed up, and oars in action, for Lorn; third or, a fesse cheque, azure and argent, OF MARSHALLING ARMS, i^c- 51 as descended of one of the heiresses of Stewart of Lorn; the fourth quarter as the first. ^lartered Arms have sometimes an inescutcheon surmounting them in the centre, which contain arms of alliance, paternal or feudal ones. Which httle shield or inescutcheon was called, of old, by our heralds, a moyen in fesse; by the English, an escutcheon of pretence; and by the French, a surtout; because it covers some part of all the four quarters ; and the Latins say, media re^'ioni incumhit parmula. As for the antiquity of bearing an inescutcheon over arms, we find it anciently used by the Emperors of Germany; for they always placed an inescutcheon of their paternal coat on the breast of the imperial eagle, to show that they were elective, and out of what family. Guillim observes, that in the reign of Richard IL of England, Simon Burly bare over his own arms an inescutcheon of the arms of Hussay. The first bearing of an inescutcheon over arras that Sandford gives us, is that of Richard Duke of Y(jrk, who, in the year 1442, carried, quarterly, quartered, first France and England quarterly, with a label of three points argent, charged with nine torteauxes; second Castile and Leon quarterly; third Mortimer and Burgh, quarterly; and fourth as the first. Which first quarter were his paternal arms, as descended of King Edward III. and the third quarter was his maternal : And over all an in- escutcheon gules, charged with three lions passant gardant or, within a bordure argent, for Holland, being these of his grandmother Eleanor Countess of March. The ancientest bearing of an inescutcheon or surtout that I have met with, was on the seal of arms of John Earl of FLANr^ns, son and heir of Philip the Bold Dulce of Burgundy, and his wife Margaret, Countess and heiress of Flanders. This Earl John carried the arms of his father, Burgundy modern and ancient, quarterly; and the arms of his mother, being those of Flanders, on an inescutcheon over all, anno 1404, which were continued so marshalled by his son and successor till the good Duke of Burgundy added more qu::rters. The ancient and honourable family of the Hays of Yester, now Marquis of TwEEDDALE, have carried anciently quartered arms; for, in the year 1420,' Sir William Hay, Knight, Sherift' of Peebles and Lord Yester, carried then quarterly the coats of Eraser of Olivercastle, and GiFFORD of Yester, upon the account of marriages with the heiresses of these lamilies, and placed his own paternal arms in an inescutcheon over all ; as appears by his seal of arms appended to the charter of foundation of the Collegiate Church of St Bathans, anno 1421. Livingston Earl of Linlithgow has his paternal arms quartered with those of Callender of that Ilk, as a coat of alliance; and that anciently, upon the account of marrying the heiress of Callender of Callender, viz. quarterly, first and fourth argent, three cinquefoils gules, within a double tressure counter-flowered vert, for Livingston ; second and third sable, a bend betwixt six billets or, for Callendar ; over all, on an inescutcheon azure, an oak tree or, within a bordure argent, charged with eight cinquefoils gules, as a coat of augmentation for the title of Linhthgow. This noble family had for some time of late gilliflowers, in place of cinquefoils; as in Sir George Mackenzie's Science of Heraldry. Sir Thomas Home of that Ilk, in the reign of King Robert III. married Nicola, Pepdie, heiress of Dunglass, with whom he got that barony, and impaled her arms with his own, which I have seen cut upon stone in the chapel of Dunglass. Their son and heir Sir Alexander Home quartered Home and Pepdie ; as appears by his seal appended to writs, anno 1445, which I have seen. • His son and heir again maiTied Margaret Landels, heir of the Lord Landels ; and his son Alex.ander first Lord Home, placed by way of surtout over his quartered arms, an inescutcheon of the arms of Landel, being or, an oiie azure. As for the marshalled arms of the families of the Earl of Marchmont, Home of Wedderburn, and others of the name, I have given an accoimt of them in the First Part of this System. It is to be observed, that in all arms quartered with coats of alliance, the paternal coat is either placed in the first quarter, or in surtout, as in the above examples of Hay of Tweeddale, Home, &.c. 52 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, "iSe. The third way of marshalling many coats of arms in one shield, by the above- named author, is called arms quarterly quartered; that is, when some or all the four areas of the shield, commonly called the grand quarters, are agaui quartered : an instance of such counter-quartered arms I have given a little before, being those of Richard Duke of York ; and I shall add, for another, the arms of VV illiam Earl of Selkirk, eldest son of William Marquis of Douglas, by his second lady, Mary Gordon, daughter to the Marquis of Huntly, who married Anne, eldest daughter and heiress of James Duke of Hamilton; upon which he was created Duke of Hamilton for life in the year 1661, and carried, quarterly, first grand quarter quartered, first and fourth gules, three cinquefoils ermine, for Hamilton; second and third argent, a ship with her sails trussed up sable, for the title of Arran, as carried by the family of Hamilton. Second grand quarter, the arms of Douglas, argent, a man's heart gules, ensigned with an imperial crown or, and, on a chief azure, three stars of the first. Third grand quarter as the second, and the fourth as the first. Here the arms of Hamilton are preferred to those of his own, being marshalled in the first quarter, upon the account, as I think, of the feudal dignity being invested in that dukedom only for life, and obliged to take upon him the name of the family; upon which account the wife's or mother's coat is sometimes placed in the first and fourth quarters, when the huiband or heir derive not only their heritage, but their title and dignity from the wife or mother ; as Sir George Mackenzie observes, who gives for instance the bearing of Ekskine Earl of Marr, as descended from the old Earls of Marr, who place the arms of Marr be- fore those of Erskine; as did also Lyle Lord Lyle, upon pretension to the Earldom of Marr, quarter the arms of Marr in the first place before his own : And Mr James Montgomery of Lainshaw, as representative of the family of Lainshaw, and Lord Lyle, takes upon him the title of Lord Lyle, whose descent see in the First Part of this System, page 216, and page 377, where he carries, quarterly, first grand quarter quartered ; first and fourth azure, a bend betwixt six cross croslets fitche or, for Marr Earl of Marr; second and third gules, a fret or, for Lyle Lord Lyle : second grand quarter, argent, on a fesse azure three stars of the first, for Muir of Skeldon: third grand quarter as the second, and fourth as the first; and over all, by way of surtout, the quartered coat of Montgomery Earl of Eglinton; crest, a cock rising; supporters, two leopards, proper: motto, An I may. This practice of placing the wife's or mother's arms before paternal ones, is upon account the wife or mother are of more eminent nobility than the husband or father. I shall add some instances here of this practice in England, in marshalling the arms of their wives and mothers as heiresses, on account of their eminency and dignity, before those of the father or son, which has been done by Knights Com- panions of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, as appears by their plates of arms on their stall in Windsor-Hall, so marshalled by the care of the Garter, principal King of Arms in England ; as Ashmole gives them in his Institution of that Order, chap. 26. sect. 4. p. 718. Richard Nevil, who married Eleanor-, daughter and heir of Thomas Montacute Earl of Salisbury, being created Earl of Salisbury, after his father-in-law's decease, bore for arms, as on the back of his stall in Windsor, as a Knight of the Garter, first and fourth quarter counter-quartered, viz. first urgent, three fusils in fesse gules, for Montacute; second or, an eagle displayed sable, for Monthermer; third as second, the fourth as first, being the quartered arms of his father-in-law, with his paternal ones in the second and third quarters, viz. gules, a saltier argent, and in chief a lambel of three points compone of the last, and azure. This Earl's eldest son, with his wife Eleanor, having married Anne, sister and sole heir of Henry Duke of Warwick, marshalled her arms first, and next his mother's; and both be- fore his own. After the same manner, William Nevil, who married Jean, daughter and heiress of Thomas Lord Falconbridge, placed her arms in the first quarter, or, a lion rampant azure; and his own in the second quarter, gules, a saltier argent, charged in the centre with a mullet sable, for his difference. He was idso a Knight of the Garter. The first quartered arms that I meet with, as I observed before, were no sooner than in the reign of King Robert II. ; for, before that time, there were only single coats to be seen; but after the custom of marshaUing once began, those who mar- OF NL\RSHALUNG ARMS, Wc. 53 ried' heiresses, and got honourable possessions by them, were fond tnough to show their aUiances, titles and dignities, and pretensions to the same. The ancient family of Ogilvie of that Ilk carried only, of old, oi\ a lion />«j-j-a«^ Sardant gules, collared and crowned with an open crown, and not with an arched one, as now represented ; for there were none of that form either in Scotland or England^when this family matched with the daughter and heiress of Ramsay of Auchterhouse, about the reign of King Robert II. and with her got the lands and designation of Lord Ogilvis; of Auchterhouse soon atter, as appears by their seaK appended to evidents, on which they quartered the arms of Ramsay, viz. argent, an eagle displayed sable, beaked and membred^/z/t-j, in the second and third quar- ters, with those of Ogilvie in the fust and fourth; And many of the brandies of this family carried the same, as Ogilvie of Innerquharity ; of whom before. Ogil- VIC of Inchmartin, by marrying Christian Glen, one of the daugiiters and co- heiresses of Sir John Glen of Inchmartin, in the reign of King Robert III. quarter- ed the arms of Glen, viz. argent, a lion rampant sable, armed and langued gules, in the second and third quarters with those of Ogilvie. Ogilvie of Findlater, married the heiress of Sinclair of Deskford, in the reign of King James II. carries now (luai'terly, first and fourth Ogilvie; second and third argent, a cross ingrailed sable, for Sinclair. These arms are illimiinated, with many other barons' arms in the House of Falahall, 1604, with this variation, that tlie lion in the first aiv.1 fourth quarters is not crowned, and below the Hon, in these tv/o quarters, is placed a crescent gules. The first of this family is said to be a third son of Sir Walter Ogilvie of Lintrathan, predecessor to the Earl of Airly, now chief of that name, who cai-ries only the plain coat of Ogilvie. Walter. Ogilvie of Banff gets a charter from George Earl of Huntly, (and is thirein designed Armiger noster) of the lands of Auchannachy, in the forestry of Boyne, anno 1491, and confirmed by King James IV., having married one of the co-heiresses of Home of Ayton, carries, quarterly, first and fourth Ogilvie; second and third argent, three papingoes vert. Sir William Forbes of Pitsligo, son to Sir John Forbes Lord Forbes, in the reign of King Robert III. married Margaret Fraser, only daughter of Sir William Eraser of Philorth, and his. wife Agnes Douglas, a lady of the family of the Douglasses ;. by her he got the barony of Pitsligo, whereupon that tamily have been in use to quarter the coat of Fraser with their owm. This family was dignified with the title of Lord by King Charles I. anno 1633. Forbes of Tolquhon, in Buchan, a younger son of Forbes Lord Forbes, for mar- rying the daughter and heir of Sir Henry Preston of Formartin, quarters the arms of Preston, argent, three unicorns' heads erased sable, with their own : And, upon the same account, Forbes of Riras, for marrying one of the daughters and co- heiresses of Wemyss of Rires, quartered the arms of Rires with the arms of Forbes. I think I have given a sufTicient number of examples of arms of alliances. All the quartered arms that I have met with belonging to Scots families, do not exceed six difterent coats of arms, which are marshalled after these three ways, plain quar- tering, quartering, counter-quartering, of which I have given examples with their surtouts, or inescutcheons. With other nations, especially the Germans, we will find thirty or forty diiferent coats of arms marshalled altogether in one shield ; of whose various dispositions and methods of marshalling I have treated elsewhere, and shall speak of them afterwards: But, first, I go on with the other causes of marshalling many coats of arms in. one shield.. OF ADOPTION AND SUBSTITUTION As THERE are many causes and occasions of obtaining at first a coat of arms, so are there several causes and ways of augmenting them, by marshalling others with them in one shield, as o^ces and alliances, of which before; and I pro- ceed to others ; and, first, of adoption. Anciently with many nations there was a custom, when the last person of a noble house died withoat issue or successors, and the family came to be extinct. Vol. II. O 54 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^r. the arms thereof were buried with him in the grave, as John Baptista Christyn, in his Juris prudentia Heroica, Art. 2. " Hinc recte institutum est, ut ultimo ejusdem " famiUae extinctae, ipsa insignia cum ipso cadavere inhumarentur;" of the prac- tices of which formality he gives several instances of old, and of late in Swedland ; and the reason he gives, " Ne ignobiles nobilium deferant arma, familiasque con- " turbent," i. e. that the ignoble should not assume the arms of an extinct fa- mily, lest they disturb and confuse others with a pretended nobility. A stranger, or ignoble person, according to our author, cannot assume the arms of an extinct family without the consent of the sovereign, or of being permitted to carry them by adoption, contract of marriage, testament, or other valid disposition from those of the said extinct families, having had power to make such concessions. I shall here add the second article about the same, from the edict of Albert, and Isabel Infanta of Spain, Archdukes of Austria, and Dukes of Burgundy, published the 14th December 1616, from the French copy. " We discharge all our subjects, " and the inhabitants of the countries under our obedience, of what quality or " condition soever they be, to carry or engrave the name or arms of other noble " houses or families, albeit the line masculine of the same be extinct, saving and " excepting the gentlemen to whom the same have been permitted by adoption, " contract of marriage, testament, or other valid disposition from those of the said " family, having power to make such concessions : Or those who carry the name " and arms of such extinct families, have from us obtained express consent, and " letters patent in due form, and caused registrate the same in tlie registers of our " officers of arms, as shall be after declared, under the pain, that who shall do " otherwise shall pay the fine of a 100 florins, over and above the reparation of " what shall be done in the contrary." Amongst the many ways of obtaining arms, of augmenting, multiplying and changing them, is adoption. Adoption, then, is a legal act, whereby one or many are brought into a family, as lawyers say, " Actus legitimus per quern quis in alienam recipitur familiam," invented for the comfort of those who have no isue; and in case of failing of one, others are substitute to succeed, according to the destination of the adopter. Adoption is commonly called by the French, adfiliation, sic adoptivi vocantur ad- filiati. It is a great comfort and solace for one dying without issue, to have the beneiit of a law or custom, to adopt other of his own kindred, or out of it, to perpetuate the grandeur of his family in his name and arms, lest they go to oblivion in the grave v/ith himself. And, as the custom is agreeable to nature, so is it of a very long standing : For Josephus, in his History of the Jews, tells, that Abraham adopted the son of Aram, his wife's full brother, before she had a son : And the Scripture tells us, that the daughter of Pharaoh adopted Moses, and Mordecai adopted Esther, the daughter of his uncle, Esth. chap. ii. ver. 7. It was the cus- tom alio of other nations, especially with the Romans, to sdopt, and that those whom they adopted went often under the name of the adopter. Octavius was called Caesar, from Julius Cssar who adopted him. Pomponius Atticus was sur- named Cecilius, from Q^ Cecilius his adoptive father, and the two sons of Paulus ^Smilius adopted by Fabius Maximus and Scipio Africanus, the one was named Fabius and the other Scipio; and the ensigns of the adopters, as v^•ell as names, passed from the adopters to those they adopted, by the custom of the Romans, as that golden chain or collar used by the family of Torquati, from w liich they had the name : which name and ensign descended to their posterity, as is to be seen on the Roman coins ; and that when one of another tribe was adopted into this family, he also did assume that badge or ensign of honour, as may be seen in another medal relating to D. Junius Silanus, sometime Pr^tor of Macedonia, who was adopted into the Manlian family of the Torquati ; as in Ashmole's Institu- tion, chap. 7. sect. 6. page 219. And these adoptions were made by public authority, and many ceremonies, which were used in several countries according to their different customs, where many illustrious persons used this way of instituting and naming their heirs to their estates, upon condition they take upon them the name and arms of their families, and to use them on all occasions as they had been their lawful begotten children, by a fiction of law. As Hoppingius de Jure OF MARSHALUNG ARMS, iSc: 55 Insignium, par. 5. speaking of adoption, " Quamvis fictionein inducat, tameu " quia fictio hasc legis est, St quidem accommodata ad, actum favorabilein, de quo ■' ipsa lex disponere posset, dicenduni vidctur, hoc perinde habeii, ac si vere &- " per naturam, nomen et insignia ista adoptatus ferret." So the adopted may carry the name and arms, as if they were their own, and as sons by nature. Cas- san. Cut. G/or. Aluud. part 1st. says, " Such assumption of name and arms may " be regularly made to the adopted, when there is no heir in the family, nor any " other that can pretend right to the name and arms ; but if otherwise, the " adopted cannot use them without the consent of all those in the family who have " right to them." Other lawyers are of the first opinion; and some say, that name and arms alone cannot be alienated, except the adopter and disponer give with them his estate : And they say, " Quod multa cum universitate transeunt, " qua: singulariter per se prohibentur." By the general custom of Europe, he who has no children may give away hi.s estate to a stranger, upon condition that he carry the name and arms of the granter ; as Jurisprudential Heroica, " Usu tamen obtinuit, ut qui liberos non ha- " bet, possit in alium transferre feuda sua & hereditatem, ea conditione, ut haeres " ille, sea totaliter adoptatus, nomen & arma ferat adoptantis : " For which he gives us two eminent instances ; one of them I shall here add, that is of the Prin- cipality of Orange, in so far, that he that is prince is obliged to carry the arms of -Chalon, or lose the pruicipality ; as appears by the testament of John deChalon, first Prince of 0ii.vn"ge of that family, of the date the 21st of October 1417 ; as also by testament of William Prince of Orange, the son of Lewis, the son of the foresaid John, 1459 ; also by the testament of Johji the son of William, dated the 6th of April 1 5^2 ; also by a testament of Philibert, the son of John, in the year 1520. Which ordinance was put in execution by Rene, the son of Henry Count de Nassau, and of Dame Clauda de Chalon, who leaving the name and arms of Nassau, retained the name and arms of Chalon; and, dying without issue 1544, with permission of the Emparor Charles V. instituted William Count of Nassau, his cousin-german. Prince of Orange, who carried his arms as his successors have done, quarterly, fiist azure, seme of billets, a lion rampant or, armed and langued gules, for Nassau ; second or, a lion rampant gardant gules, (the French say for a lion in this posture, leopard lioniie) crowned, armed, and langued azure, lor Cat- zellenbogen ; third gules, a fesse argent, for Vianden ; fourth gules, two huns passant gardar.t, or, (the French call them leopards) langued and armed azure, for Brunswick, some say for Dietz, ; over all, by way of an escutcheon, gules, a bend or, for Chalon, quartered with or, a hunting-horn azure, mouthed, ringed and stringed ^a/^-j, for Orange: which arms are surcharged with cheque of nine points, or and azure ; the French say Stir le tout du tout, cinque points cC or, equi- poles, a quct.re cl' azure, for Geneva. The other instance our author gives is from England, of the family of the name of Percy, whose arms were sable, a chief indented or : William Lord Percy having only a daugiiter, Agnes, who was married to Joceline de Lovaine, a younger son of Godfred Duke of Brabant, who carried sable, a lion rampant or : Lord William Percy adopted his son-in-law, who was obliged to disuse his own name and arms, and carry only the name and arms of Percy,, which he and his issue performed, tijl the practice of marshalling many arms in one shield ; Then the family quar- tered the arms of Joceline de Lovaine with those of the name of Percy : And again, Henry Percy Earl of Northumberland married the sister and heires of An- thony Lord Lucy, for his second wife, and got with her a great estate, but she had no issue to him ; he, with his lady's consent, gave that fortune to Henry Percy surnamed Hotspur, a son of a former marriage, upon condition that he marshalled the arms of Lucy, being gules, three lucy fishes, (/. e. pikes) haurient argent, with his own ; so that the Earls of Northumberland of the name of Percy carried after that, quarterly, first and fourth Joceline de Lovaine ; second and third Lucy ; and in an inescutcheon, by way of surtout, the arms of Percy. Lawyers tell us likewise. That when the adopter and the person adopted are both noble, the last loses nothing of his native nobility, Dignitas per adoptionetn ac-^ quiritur vel augetur, non minuitur. 56 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. If the adopter be ignoble and tlie person adopted noble, there is no detriment to. the last, who still keeps the nobility of his blood, Aioptio mutat gentem, non genus : and here there is no question about arms. But, When a noble person adopts an ignoble one, the question is. Whether the ignoble becomes noble by adoption ? Hoppingius de Jure Insignium, cap. 7. is for the affir- mative ; but generally all lawyers are for the negative, and tell us, Nobilem ex ig- nobili adoptio non facit ; and that the ignoble adopted has no right to use the armo- rial ensigns of the noble adopter. Sir John Feme, in his Glory of Generosity, page 67. says, " That the ignoble cannot succeed more to the honours of their " adoptive fathers, than bastards to their fathers ; " and regrets such a succession in England, where many of a base and ungentle state, as adopted sons, do inherit the names, possessions, and arms of their adoptive fathers, whereof some are in the counties of Hampton, Huntingdon, and Worcester. Adoption, says our last named author, is an alienation, and any man may give away his estate to a stranger ; but his arms, the ensigns of his nobility, he can- not, so long as any of his kindred are ahve, yea, if there be but a ba.stard remaining capable of the King's legitimation ; as in his forenamed book, page 299. This author adds three observatiojis, when a person leaves his estate to another, upon condition to use his name and arms. " First, That he who is so benefited " and enjoined must carry both name and arms, and so fulfil the testament. " Secondly, If the heir, a stranger, be of more noble blood and family than the " adopter, he is then not obliged by the testament to disuse his own name and " arms, but may quarter the arms of the disponer, if he pleases, after his own. " And thirdly. If the heir be of inferior blood and dignity, he is obliged to leave " his own name altogether, as also his proper arms, except he marshal them after " the adopter or disponer's arms." By our law we have no formal adoption, to speak properly, but materially, the same way of conveying of estates and possessions to strangers and others, who could not have otherwise succeeded but by alienation and disposition, with consent of authority, especially as to conveying of honours : which way I take for a kind' of adoption, and call the arnrs of such persons who enjoy the estate, name, and, arms of others so disponed to them, Anns of Adoption, to distinguish them immAiins of Alliances, treated of in the former title, which the bearers, as general heirs to them, may carry or not carry as they please : but here those who obtain estates by this way of adoption, are obliged, by the destination of the disponer, to carry his name and arms, or to marshal them with his own. What the learned Sir George Mackenzie says, as to this point, in his Science of Heraldry, page 80, I shall here add : " That the learnedest antiquaries and lawyers conclude, that when a " person leaves his estate to another, upon condition that he shall bear the disponer's " name and arms, he who is to succeed is not by condition obliged to lay aside his " own name and arms, but may quarter his own arms with those of the disponer, " except the disponer do, in the institution, prohibit the bearing of any arms be-. " sides his own, and the heir, in marshalling his own and the disponer's arms, may " use what order he pleases, by giving the first quarter either to his own or to the " disponer's, except the contrary be expressed in the institution." It is evident then, that adoption, and such way of leaving estates behind them, may be said to have been the cause not only of disusing arms, by carrying those only of the adopter or disponer, but also of marshalling or quartering the heirs' arms- with those of the adopter's or disponer's, whether of kindied or strangers. Some have relinquished both their name and arms, and only used those of the adopter's or disponer's, altogether strangers to one another; as of late with us John Biggar of Woolmet, nominate as his heir, Wallace, a nephew of Sir Thomas Wallace of Craigie, sometime one of the Senators of the College of Justice, to succeed him in his estate of Wolmet, upon condition that he use only the name and arms of Biggar of Woolmet, which he and his successors continue to do ; the arms being argent, a bend azure, betwixt two mullets gu/es. The same way Ranken of Orchard-head, who carried gules, three boars' heads erased argent, betwixt a lance issuing out of the dexter base, and a lochaber-axe issuing out of the sinister, both erected in pale of the last, was obliged to leave his OF MARSHALLING ARMS, bV. 57 name and arms, and use only, as heir adaptive of Little of Over-Libberton, Lis name and arms, being sable, a saltier ingrailed argent, though he was near of kin to Little of Libberton. Sir William Ballenden of Broughton, Treasurer-depute in the reign of King Charles IL and thereafter Lord Ballexden, having been unmanied, parsed by his sister's son David Lord Cardross, and adopted John Ker., younger son of WilUain Earl of Roxburgh, and settled his estate upon him, and got tiie title of honour conveyed to him ; and accordingly, upon the Lord Ballenden's death anno 1670, Mr Ker, as his adopted heir, did succeed him, and wore his coat of arm>, without any mixture or addition of his own paternal bearing, according to the destination, being guhs, a hart's head couped, between three cross croslets, all w ithin a double tressure, couater-flowered with flower-de-luces or ; and got likewise his heritable office of U^her to the Exchequer, which he officiate by a depute. Sir John Maxwell of Pollock, having no issue of his body, passed by his sister the Lady Kelburn, in the succession of his estate, and adopted Mr Geokge A'L^x- v.'ell, younger of Auldhouse, and accordingly put him in the fee of his estate in his own lifetime, whose son is the present Sir John Maxwell of Pollock, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, (and sometime Lord Justice-Clerk), carries argent, on a saltier sable, an annulet or, stoned azure ; of whom before in the First Part of this System. William Cochran of that Ilk, having but one daughter, he married her to Alexander Blair, son of John Blair of that Ilk, and in so much adopted him, that he was de-igned Cochran in the lifetime of his father-in-law, and carried the arms of Cochran, and not those of Blair ; as did his issue the Earls of Dundonald ; of which in the First Part of this System. Hugh Montgomery Earl of Eglinton, who died without any issue anno 161 2, had passed by his own nearest heir-male of the House of Montgomery, and settled his estate upon his cousin-german, Alexander Seaton, son of Robert first Earl of Winton, and his Lady Margaret Montgomery, daughter of Hugh Earl of Eglin- ton, aunt of the last Earl, who accordingly succeeded ; and, as he was obhged by the Earl of Eglinton's destination, assumed the name and arms of Montgomery, which were then, quarterly, first and fourth azure, three flower-de-luces or, for Montgomery; second and third j^wVj-, three annulets sr, stoned azure, for Eglin- ton. IMr Alexander Seaton, who was adopted into the family, left his own name for that of Montgomery, and carried the above arms, and placed over them an in- escutcheon of the arms of his father, viz. cr, three crescents within a double trcs- sure, counter-flowered ^a/c-j-, which are painted in a room in the house of Seaton: But though Montgomery Earl of Eglinton could dispose of his estate as he had a mind, yet he could not make over his honours to Mr Alexander Seaton ; and therefore it was sometime before King James VI. was prevailed on to confirm to him the titles of Earl of Eglinton and Lord. Montgomery, which was at last done by the intercession of the Queen, upon Mr Alexander Seaton's marrying Lady Anne Livingston, daughter to Alexander Earl of Linlithgow, who was one of the Queen's Maids of Honour, and the titles of honour and precedency of the Earls of Eglinton were confirmed to him, of whom is lineally descended the present Earl of Eg- linton : The inescutcheon with the arms of Seaton above mentioned, was dis- used, and the arms of the family were then marshalled as now, carried thus ; quarterly, first and fourth Montgomery ; second and third Eglinton ; all within a bordure or, charged with a double tressure counter-flowered ^//A'j-. See more of this in the first volume of this Treatise of Heraldry, page 375. Since 1 am speaking here of several ways and means of acquiring arms, and augmenting them, and since they are acquired by privileges, contracts, and dispo- sitions, I shall not altogether omit, but briefly speak of, these two ways following, yiz. Prescription, &c. prescription, custo.m, .and statute, of certain pl.aces. These have not only given new arms at first, but have been means of augment- ing and marshalling them with others ; for these things which are acquired by Vol. IL P 58 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, i^c. concessions, privileges, and contracts, can be Required hy Ptrscnptiou; as Hop- pingius, paragraph 2. " Quse enim privilegio sive pacto acquiri possunt, ea etiam " pr^scriptione acquiruntur ;" and again, N. 223. " Concessibile quod est per " principem, etiam prsescriptibile est." The time allowed by our author to complete Prescription of arms, is to be dis- t^^gui^bed; if the arms be used without the knowledge of authority, then time immemorial is required ; but if exposed to public view, and known to authority, not interrupting them, then forty years time gives a right to them. Nobility itself is acquired by immemorable prescription, much more the right of using arms in such a long time, " Cujus confrarii non extat memoria, acquiri et " prsEscribi posse sine titulo;" as also the regalia, parts of the sovereign authori- ty, in such a time are prescribable, as our author, " Regalia majora, aeque ac " minora, indistincte immemorabili praescriptione acquiruntur," Ibid. N 222. where he tells. That a bastard has no right to disuse his mark of illegitimation under the prescription of forty years. Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, page 12. says, " By our law, " where prescription is not allowed, except in the cases wherein it is introduced " by a special and express statute, it is probable that prescription might well have " defended the using of arms before the 125th act. Pari. 12. James VL But since " that time it should not, seeing the act ordains all arms to be matriculate in the " Lyon's books and registers." I think it very hard that a person cannot by right, /«r^ antecessorio, carry the arms which his progenitors used, legally perhaps, the authority and warrant being lost through time ; more especially when accounts of them were so indif- ferently taken and kept by our provincial heralds, and in latter times as indifferently preserved. By the customs and statutes of certain countries or cities, arms are acquired ; because a certain nobility is acquired by the same there, and arms necessarily fol- low : as our author, " Consuetudines &- statuta insignia tribuere ; ratio, nobilitas " enim, pro cujusque loci consuetudine, et statuta inducitur et asstimatur :" But this is only a nobihty at home, according to the customs and statutes of the place, c&WtA Nobilitas secundum quid, and not a general and true nobility' in all places; because it is not according to the laws and customs of nations, and their arms can- not be received without the consent and approbation of the sovereign, whose sub- jects they are : But more of this in another place. OF PATRONAGE. Arms of patronage are these of patrons and superiors, carried in part or in whole by their clients and vassals, to show their dependence. They'formed of old their arms after those of their patrons and over-lords, or took a part of them to compose or quarter with their own, as soon as these ways became fashionable. In many shires of our kingdom where our ancient earls, lords, and great men, had been patrons and superiors, there we find their armorial figures more frequent than others in the bearings of many of the present nobility and gentry, which show their progenitors to have been clients and vassals to them, though now living in other shires, to have been originally from such shires, where such figures do pre- dominate, as in Annandale, where the ancient Lords of Annan dwelt, carried a saltier and chief: There the Bruces, Murrays, Johnstons, Jardines, Kilpatricks, and several others, carry such figures of different tinctures accompanied with other figures, to distinguish themselves from one another. In Douglasdale and other countries which the Douglasses possessed in property or superiority, there many old families have stars. And in Fifeshire hons are carried upon account the lion was the armorial figure of the M'DufFs Earls and over-lords of Fife; and in Angus, lions, upon the account of their old earls. And in those shires where the Stewarts of old had interest, many families have their figures chequered, from the Stewarts' fesse cheque, which they have been in use to carry upon the account of patronage, as Ross Lord Ross, Semple Lord Semple, Houston of that Ilk, Brisbane of Bishop- OF MARSHALLING ARMS, 'iJc. 59 ton, Hall of Fulbar, Fleming of Barrochin, Shaw of Bargarran, and those of the name of Spmel, with several others, whose possessions were in the shire of Renfiew, and other countries belonging to t!ie Stewarts, where figures chequered are pre- sumed to be or.gmaliy so earned, upon the account of patronage; and tiie same I observe in many oiher shires with us; and the same practice was anciently used in England. Camden, in his Remains of Biitain, page iiS. says, " Gentlemen began to bear " arms, of whom they held in lee, or to whom they were most devoted; so, wheie- " as the Earl of Chester bare garbs, (wheat sheaves) many gentlemen of that " country took wheat sheaves. Whereas the old Earl of \Varwick. bare cbcqiic, or and " azure, a cheveron ermine, many thereabout took crintne and cheque. In Leices- " ter and the country confining, divers bare cinquefoils; for that the ancient Earls " Leicester bore gules, a cinque foil ermine; from which the family of Hamilton " with us, who carry the same. In Cumberland and thereabout, where the old " Barons of Jvendal bare argent, two bars gules, a lion passant or, in a canton of " the second ; many gentlemen thereabout took the same, in diiferent colours and " charges in the canton." The gentleman wlw wrote the introduction to the sixth edition of Guillim's Display of Heraldry, gives a handsome account of the Rise, Nature, and Progress of Arms, where, page 7. he citeth Camden, as I have done; and tells us, " That " there is no one acquainted in the History of England but knows, that, of old, " most of the great estates and commands of that kingdom were in the hands of " such families of the conqueror and his issue as they granted them to, who, by " tenure, in their persons, and with their tenants, servants and dependants, were to " attend their sovereigns in their wars. These great men granted parts of their " tenures to persons either related to them by match, service, or affection, upon " such terms as they themselves either were obliged to the first granter of them, " or else on other conditions of advantage to them; giving them also coat-ar- " mour, which were usually parts of their own, with the differences as best pleased " them: Thus, among others that bore arms by this bounty of lords, &c. or ac- " cording to Mr Camden's expression, by borrowing from their lords' arms, were " many of the principal gentry of England." And so our author goes on with several instances more than I have given above; and then tells us, " That now " touching the granting of arms from some great earls, and passing of coats from " one private person to another, which also was matter sometimes acted before the " reductions of the heralds under one regulation, the following precedents which I " take, says he, from the learned Mr Camden, may not be impertinent:" And so this gentleman gives us seven proper instances; the last of which I shall here add in his own words. " Another example of the like nature with the former is, from a grant of arras " from Barton to Booth, which you now have in the family of Booth, from " whence ttie Right Honourable the present Earl of Warrington is descended. '• Their arms were, anciently, a cheveron ingrailed, and a canton charged with a " mullet ; as appears by a charter of Thomas del Booth, bearing date 4 5d Edward III. " but at presen:, argent, three boars' heads erased and erected sable; which coat " was the ancient arms of the Bartons of Barton in Com. Lan. And granted to " John, the son of Thomas Booth of Barton^ per chartnm Thomce Barton de Barton " Prxdict. anno 5. Hen. IV. 1404." Our author here does not tell upon what account arms were thus transmit- ted from one to another, whether upon account of alliance, adoption, or feudal right, 8tc. but merely, as I take it, that as great men could give their arms to whom they pleased without consent of the sovereign or his heralds; so that there could be no regulation about that time of marks of nobility in England. But our author proceds: " Though it was usual for great men, both of the clergy and " laity, to give arms and titles, with places of dignity, to inferior gentry, or lesser " nobility, who did acquire arms at that time, and did gain them by that means: " yet Mr Camden informs us, that in this and succeeding ages, at every expedi- " tion, such as were gentlemen of blood would repair to the Earl Marischal, and " by his authority take coats of arms, which were registered always by officers of " arras in the rolls of arms made at every service, whereof many yet remain. 6o OF MARSHALLING ARMS, Wr. " (sayelli Camden) us that of the siege of Carlaverock, the battle of Stirling, the " siege of Calais, and divers tournaments." In Italy and Spain the practice of marshalling the arms of patrons or over-lords with those of their clients and vassals, has been anciently very much in use; as Menestrier tells us, " That in Piacenza, the four principal families there, viz. " Anguini, Fontani, Landi, and Scoti, had their arms impaled on the right side, as " coats of patronage, with those of other families in that country and city, who " associated and subjected themselves as vassals and clients to one or other of those " above-named four principal families." The book entitled Jeu des Armories des Soveraigns et Estats d'Europe gives us the blazon, and the reason of the armorial bearing of the Duke of Modena and Ferrara, thus blazoned by the French, tierce in pale, first or, a double eagle displayed suble, beaked, membred, and crowned gules, (the armorial figure of the empire, because that prince is under its protection) oiipe with azure, three flower- de-luces or, for France, within a bordure double indented, or and gules, for Fer- rara, (Nicolas Lord of Ferrara came under the protection of Charles Vll. of France) ; second gules, two keys placed in saltier, adosse, or and argent, lie azure,, and in chief the papal tiara, (upon the account that Ferrara is a vicarage of tlie See of Rome) and over the keys an escutcheon azure, charged with an eagle dis- played argent, crowned, beaked, and membred or, for the Marquisate of Este; third France, within the boidure of Ferrara, coupe with the empire, as before. These arms would, with us, be blazoned thus, quarterly, first and fourth tlie em- pire; second and third France, within a bordure double indented, or and gules\ and over all, a pale, charged with the papal ensigns, and surmounted with an escutcheon of Este. Cardinals have been in use to add to their paternal bearings, the paternal arms of the popes or other princes, by whose means they have attained to that dignity, and were called arms of patronage. The Kings of Sicily and Arragon quartered with their own the arms of the fa- mily of Suabia, as arms of patronage; as did also the Dukes of Parma, and the Princes of Mirandula, the arms of other potentates ; of which in another place. GRATITUDE AND AFFECTION Are observed by some heralds to be the cause of marshalling several coats of amis in one shield : of which there are but few instances to be found with us. The arms of the benefactor are sometimes found quartered with those of the beneficiary, upon the account of gratitude. The double tressure flowered within and without with flower-de-luces, the ar- morial figures of France, granted by Charlemagne to Achaius King of Scotland, and after confirmed by many Kings of France to those of ScotLmd, and car- ried by them as a figure of gratitude and aflection, to perpetuate the ancient and memorable league, the mutual friendship and assistance betwixt those kings and their subjects; which figure is still continued by their successors Kings of Great Britain, as one of the fixed and proper figures of the imperial ensign of Scot- land. Such other figures of gratitude and affection have been near these 6oo years carried in the armorial ensigns of the Dukes of Brunswick ; as Hoppingius tells us in his Treatise de Jure Insigninm, cap. 87. page 308. " De vaiiis acquirendi in- •■ signia modis," viz. That when Henry Duke of Brunswick, came to England to visit his ally Henry II. of that kingdom, who then carried for arms, gules, five leopards or. King Henry gave two of them to be carried by his friend the Duke ; which figures have been constantly carried by his successors : For which our author cites an ancient author, John Bangen Thuringisch, in anno Christi 11^^, page 58. " Refert, Ricardum Anglix regem quinque aureos leopardos insignium *' loco detuhsse, ac veniente ad eum affine suo Henrico Brunsuicensium duce, " duos clypeo leopardos detraxisse, illique donasse ;" which are now marshalled with other figures in the fourth quarter of the royal achievement of George, no\v King of Great Britain; of whose arms I shall be more particular afterwards. OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ef^. 6i Anciently it was a great sign of affection and kindness, for princes to grant to other princes parts of their imperial ensigns, which was not allowed even to their lawful issue, as I observed before in the chapter of Marks of Cadency. Menestrier tells us, that the Prince of Antioch addressing himself to Lewis XL of France, for supply to recover his dominions out of the hands of the infidels, was courteously received by that king, who supplied him with all thmgs necessary for the recovering of his principality, for which he quartered the arms of France, (which could not be without consent of the king) as a sign, of grateful acknow- ledgment, with his own. The arms of the Boyles of England, I may call them arms of affection; because David Earl of Glasgow quarters the;n with his own, upon the account of affection to Royle Earl of Burlington, and other branches of that name in England, who acknowledge their descent from his family in Scotland, which is of an old standing in the sheriffdom of Ayr: In the reign of Alexander 111. they possessed the lands of Kelburn ; for, in charters about that time, mention is made of Ricnrdus Boyl Domimis ck Kaulbunu i- e. Kelburn, and WaUerus Cummin Domiiuis de Rougallen, i. c. Rowallen ; as in the evidences of the charter-chest of Rowallen. Hugo Boyle, in 1399, makes a mortification to the monks of Paisley for the welfare of his soul. This family continued down in a direct male line till the reign of King Charles I. that John Boyle of Kelburn, having no male issue, mar- ried his only daughter and heir, Grissel Boyle, to David Boyle of Halkshill, a cadet of his own family, his great-grandfather being a brother of it, whose grand- child David Boyle of Kelburn was created Earl of Glasgow, Viscount of Kel- burn, Lord Boyle of Stewarton, and carries, quarterly, first and fourth or, an eagle displayed gules, as a coat of augmentation, upon his creation as Earl, being formerly the crest of his family; second and third parted per bend crenelle, argent and gules, for the surname of Boyle in England, as a coat of affection; and over all an inescutcheon or, three harts' horns gules, the paternal coat of Boyle of Kelburn, as is to be seen in the plates- of the First Volume of this Treatise. As I observed before, has given rise to many armorial figures, in the several' crusades, holy expeditions for the recovery of Jerusalem, and the Holy Land, from the Saracens, as c^w/w of divers forms, allerions, martlets, palms, escalops, piles, &c. which are frequently borrie in arms. But as for entire coats quartered with others, merely upon account of rehgion, I find but few instances, the custom of quarter- ing many coats of arms in one shield not being generally so old as the crusades. However, I have mentioned religion as one of the causes of mai'shalling, because churchmen are in use to quarter the ensigns of their high offices (as pitron saints, and other holy relics) upon accoiuit of devotion, with their own arms ; which knights also of rehgious orders also were in use to do. Besides, I observe kings have been in use to marshal arms, upon account of re- ligion, with their own, as the Kings of Hungary, harry of six pieces, argent and gules, with those of religion, viz. argent, a cross patriarchal gules, standing on a mount of three degrees sinople; which cross Stephen King of Hungary received from Pope Sylvester II. *^or bringing his subjects into the Christian faith. Sandford, in his History of England, tells us, that King Richard II. having chosen King Edward the Confessor for his patron saint, impaled that holy king's arms, being azure, a cross fleury betvveen five martlets or, in the first place, with those of his own in the second, being France and England, quarterly. His grandfather King Edward HI. made choice of several patrons, as Ashmole tells us, the Holy Trinity, the Virgin Mary, whose figure he and his Knights- Companions wore on the right shoulder on their habits for some time; Sr George of Cappadocia, a martyr, his ensign, argent, a cross gules, and St Edward the Con- fessor, sometime King of England, his arms as just now blazoned, under whose protection himself and all the Knights-Companions, together with the affairs of the Order, might be defended, conserved, and governed ; as is evident, says our author, by the charter of foundation of Windsor College, granted by that king : Vol. U. Q^ 62 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, Sic. and that the two last were his special patron saints whom he invoked in his cry ot war. Thomas Walsingham, in his History of England, page 159. tells, that at a skirmish near Calais, in 1349, King Edward seeing his soldiers put to a stand, and like to be worsted, in great heat of anger, drew his sword, and cried out. Ha Si Edward.' Ha St George.' which the soldiers hearing, ran presently to him and gained the victory. St George became the sole patron of the Order of the Garter, and from him it was called Ordo Divi Sancti Georgii, and the Companions, Eqidtes Georgiani; and that saint's picture on horseback, with a shield of silver, charged with a cross gules, became the badge of that Order, and these arms were advanced, both by land and sea, on the English standards. King. Henry VIIL ordained the Great Seal of that Order to have an escutcheon with the arms of St George impaled on the right side, with the quartered arm's of France and England, ensigned with an imperial crown, and encircled with the garter; which seal of the Order so formed continued till the reign of King James I. of Great Britain, who added to the arms of France and England those of Scotland and Ireland. It is to be observed, that in marshalling of arms, those of religion, and of patron faints, take place before other arms, and even those of dominion. Since I am here speaking of arms upon account of religion, and before of arms of churchmen, I thought it not far out of my road to add a paragraph (showing that in England arms granted to the clergy ought not to descend to their children) from a discourse of the duty and office of a herald of arms, written by Francis Thynne, Lancaster Herald, 3d day of March 1605, in a letter to a peer, taken from the Ashmolean Library, No. S35, and printed in the Supplement to Guil- lim's Display, the sixth edition. " Arms appointed for bishops ought not to descend to their children, for they are " not within the compass of the law of arms, which only takes notice of bishops " as officers of the church, and not as military men, or persons to be employed m " offices or affairs of laymen, though some of them have been very great soldiers; " for both canons and examples do forbid the same, since in temporal actions in " time past it was alleged against them. For it was objected to Hubert Walter, " Archbishop of Canterbury, being Chief-Justice and Chancellor in the time of " King John, that he intermeddled in lay-causes, and dealt in blood. As also " the same was laid against other clergymen for having of offices in the exchequer, " and the king's house, when some of them were clerks of the kitchen, some " treasurers of the household, &-c.: yea, so much did our ancestors derogate from " the arms of the bishops, as that the bishops which were interested in the arms " of their ancestors, might not bear the arms of their house, without some no- " torious difference, not answerable to the differences of ot'ner younger brethren; " as did the Bishop of Lincoln, Henry Burgensche, the Archbishop of Canterbury, •' Thomas Arundel, the Archbishop of York, Richard Scroop, the Bishop of Nor- " wich, Henry Spencer, and many others, who did not bear the common differ- " ences of arms of younger sons, but great and notorious differences, as bordures, " some ingrailed, some with mitres, or such like, whereof I can show your Lord- " ship many forms. And that it was not, before the time of Bartolus, the lawyer, " in the government of Charles the IV. Emperor, permitted to gown-men (or as " the French termeth them, of the long robe, for under that name learned men, " clergymen, and others, are comprehended) to bear armories. Or else why should " that great lawyer Bartolus argue the matter, Whether it were convenient that " he should take arms, (the peculiar reward and honour of military service in an- " cient time) or whether lie should refuse them at the emperor's hands? For, if it " had been then used that the long robe should have enjoyed the honour of arms, " Bartolus would never have doubted thereof. But since it was not then accus- " tomed, he made question whether he should take tho§e arms or not ; but in the " end concluded, tliat the fact of the prince was neither to be disputed nor re- " jected, and therefore was willing to assume the arms the emperor had given " hiin." I shall proceed to arms gnmted by sovereigns themselves, or their heralds empowered to grant them. OF MARSHALUNG ARMS, LV. 63 GENERAL AND SPECIAL CONCESSIONS OF ARMS. Arms are the proper ensigns of nobility, when they proceed from the concessions: of sovereigns, or their principal heralds empowered to that effect. Sovereign princes, who acknowledge no superior, without doubt, have the only right, not only to nobilitate their well-deserving subjects within their respective dominions, but to give them arms suitable to their merit, which will pass for en- signs of nobility in all kingdoms, which they may expose to show their honour ; as Hoppingius, " Is qui insignia a suo rege vel principe meruit, in alterius regis " principisve regno deferre possit." The emperor, kings, the pope, and even independent commonwealths, are in use not only to grant arms at first to their well-deserving subjects, but after, upon some emergent merit, and advancement to nobility, to augment them, to confirm, to change and adorn them in the shield ; as also the timbre of tlie shield with noble helmets, mantlings, crowns, crests, and other exterior ornaments, and even to adorn and augment both shield and timbre with honourable figures at one time ; of which afterwards. / The above mentioned author Hoppingius, cap. 87. memb. 5. in his Treatise de Jure Insignium : " Non solum conferendi nova insignia imperator, papa, regcs su- " periorem non recognoscentes, potestate uti possunt ; verum etiam certa de " causa augendi, mutandi, diminuendi, &- confirmandi, vetera facultate excellunt, " non quoad clypeum solum, sive scutum solum, sed quoad galeam, sive timbrum " tantuai, vel denique quoad utrumque, nunc propter bellicne virtutis gloriam, " nunc proper dignitatem &- officium, nunc propter successionem, aliasve infinitas " causas, fieri solet." Of which practice our author gives several instances, where- of I shall add a few. The Eaiperor Charles V. added to the arms of the Mennensi, {^^ue sunt decent cuhi sett scaci, which I take to be cheque of ten pieces, argent and sable) who had fought valiantly for the House of Burgundy, the cross of Burgundy, being that of St Andrew, trunked vert, to be placed in the base of the shield ; as the words of the diploma, " Crucem Burgundicam, sive S. Andrea, viridis colorls, trun- " catis seu mutatis utrinque ramis, deferendam, & posteris transmittendam, dedit;" as also the shield of arms was to be adorned with a helmet, and, for crest, a dog's head. Alphonsus King of Arragon, in the year 151 1, dignified Wistan Brown, an Englishman, with the Order of Knighthood, and added to his shield of arms a black eagle. As the shield of arms used to be augmented by sovereigns for special services, so they have been in use to adorn the timbre, helmet, and crest, with additaments of honour, of which I shall give one instance from our author. The Emperor Maxi;nilian I. honoured the crest of Eric Duke of Brunswick (being the train of a peacock) with a star, for his eminent valour in a battle against the Duke of Ba- varia: And the same practice is with us, as the crest of the Earl of Winton, be- ing a dragon vert , charged with a blazing star on its shoulder, for the eminent valour of the family; and the Duke of Lauderdale got from King Charles II. for crest, a lion sdnnt; of which more fully in the Chapter of Crests. Since I am here speaking of Arms of Concessit, I must distinguish betwixt ge- neral and special concessions. By the first, I understand those which the principal herr.ld is empowered to grant, by virtue of a general clause for that end, in many of the patents of our nobility: which ordinarily runs thus, or in such like words, " Mandamus Leoni nostro armorum, ut tale additamentum armorium prae- " sentibus insigniis prasfati Domini, &c. ut in talibus casibus usitatis det & prae- " scribat." Arms, again, of special concession, are particularly mentioned and blazoned in the diplomas, letters patent, or grants of the sovereign, and are ordinarily of some part of the sovereign's ensigns or regalia, which cannot be allowed or given by the principal herald without a special warrant from the sovereign. Both these arms of general and special concessions are commonly called coats of augmentation, because they augment the bearing. 64 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, i^c. The practice of giving coats of augmentation, by the general clause in the patents of nobility above mentioned, is no older than the reign of King James VI. given to those who were advanced to degrees of dignity; and the lands from which they had their title of lord, viscount, earl, &-c. not being noble feus with arms annexed to them, desired coats of augmentation as best pleased them, to supply the want of feudal ones ; of which afterwards. The first that I have met with is that used by the Earls of Winton, when, Robert Lord Seaton was created Earl of Winton with all solemnity at Holy- roodhouse, the loth of November 1601, he got a coat of augmentation from the herald suitable to the merit of the family, viz. for the title of Winton, azure, a blazing star of ten points, withm a doable tressure, flowered and counter-llowered or, (having right before to the tressure by special concession); with the motto. Lit amhiatis fidget bonoribiis; to show the constant loyalty and heroic virtue of the family. The next coat of this kind I meet with, is that of the Lord Livingston, who, when he was advanced to the dignity of Earl of Linlithgow, augmented h^s arms with an inescutcheon, azure, an oak tree within a bordure argtnt, charged with eight cinquefoils j^w/f J-, which he placed over his quartered arms of Livingston and Callender, by way of surtout, for the title of Linlithgow ; of which families in the First Part of this System, and elsewhere, in an Essay of the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories, I have given the several arms engraven on copperplate, with these following, viz. Seaton Earl of Dunfermline, Ker Marquis of Lothian, who, when he was created Earl of Lothian in the year 1606, took for a coat of augmen- tation, azure, the sun in its splendour, proper, which is quartered with the paternal coat of the family. As also Hamilton Lord Binning, when he was created Earl of Melrose, 13th March 1619, took for that title a coat of augmentation, viz. argent, a fesse waved between three roses gules, relative to his title of Melrose, which he quartered in the second and third quarters, with his paternal in the first and fourth quarters, and which are so earned by his successors, though he got his title altered to that of Earl of Haddington. Viscounts and lords of Parliament have also been in use, with us, to add coats of augmentation to their paternal ones. Sir Alexander Seaton, second son of George Lord Seaton Earl of Winton, and his countess. Lady Anne Hay, daughter to Fran- cis Earl of Errol, being created Viscount of Kingston, he quartered in the second and third places, with the paternal arms of Seaton, as a coat of augmentation, argent, a dragon vert, spouting out fire, being the crest of the family of Winton, which with others may be seen in my foresaid Essay. I have observed, that all coats of augmentation of this kind, through Europe, give place to the paternal arms; which order has been observed with us, except in the achievements of the Earl of Lothian, and the Lord Cardross : But the lieir of the last, David Erskine Earl of Buchan, has placed the coat of augmentation since more rightly in surtout ; which may be seen in taille douce in the First Part of this System. I can find no reason for such coats of general concession by the herald, to precede the paternal or other dignified feudal arms in one shield. Many of our nobility, who have the same right to assume coats of augmentation, liave never made use of them. But arms of special concession, being composed of the figures of the royal arms or regalia, have precedency in composing or marshalling to all other sorts of arms. Of which, Anns of special concession are those granted by princes and free states, not only to their subjects, but also to strangers, by a particular grant or patent, containing the blazon of such a coat, made up of some part of the figures of the sovereign's ensign, or regalia, to be added to the receiver's own proper arms. 1 am not here treating of the first grants of arms, as marks of honour, which I have said before, in the definition of arms, to have been granted by sovereigns, for distinguishing person and families, as their proper ones : But here I understand them new coats or additaments of honour, by special concessions of sovereigns to be joined with their proper ones. OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c-. 65 Such have been very frequently granted by our sovereigns, and those of other nations, to well-deserving persons, both of the high and low nobility; as also upon communities ecclesiastical and secular. Sir Joim Ferae tells us, in his fore-cited book, that when Charlemagne erected the six ecclesiastical peers of France, he granted to them arms of the same tinc- tures and figures with the royal ensign of France ; which, though they have been so carried, as I have shown before, yet I doubt very much of the antiquity of them. As for secular communities, there are several instances which may be given of such grants of other nations, and with us at home, which have been honoured with the favour of such royal badges; and I shall here but give one instance: The Town of Aberdeen got- the double tressure, a part of the royal bearing, added to their arms, by the order of King Robert the Bruce, for their fidelity and loyalty to him, being ^ules, three towers embattled argent, and masoned sable, within a double tressure, flowered and counter-floweied of the second. In this manner, sovereigns and free states have honoured and rewarded their fa- vourites and well-deserving subjects with a part of their ai-ms, as additaments of honour; of which I shall give some instances. Charles IV. Emperor of Germany and King of Bohemia, honoured his Chan- cellor Bartolus, the great lawyer, with a concession to him and his issue, for to carry the royal arms of Bohemia, or, a lion with two tails gules, as Bartolus tells himself^ in his Treatise de Insigniis, thus, " A Carolo Quarto, clarissimo principe, " Romanorum imperatore, nee non rege Bohemia:, mihi, tunc Cancellario ejus, " concessum est, inter cstera, ut ego & omnes de agnatione mea, leonem rubeum " cum caudis duabus in campo aureo portare." There are many ancient families in Germany who marshal with their own bear- ings the imperial eagle, by special concession from the emperor : But it is to be observed, that these eagles granted by the emperor have but one head ; and lawyers tell us, that the emperor, and other sovereign princes, cannot grant their entire imperial ensigns to any person; as John Limneus, " Licet ab imperatore sit insig- " nia concedendi potestas, ilia tamen limitata, ne alicui integram aquilam, maxime " vero imperialem, concedant." The Emperor Charles V. King of Spain, not only augmented the arms of Ro- bert DE Clusis within the shield, but also adorned the shield with exterior orna- ments, marks of a true nobility, as by letters patent icth of October 1543, with the complete achievement illuminate in the middle of the patent, which I thought fit here to blazon in English, and after give it in Latin, for its singularity, as in the diploma. Quarterly, first and fourth sable, three oak branches leaved and acorned or; 1 and I, his paternal arms; second and third azure, three stars of six points or: 1 and I, his maternal ones; and, on a chief or, an eagle displayed with one head sable: the shield is timbred with an open helmet, manihng of the tinctures of the arms, and the wreath of the same colours; upon which, for crest, are two wings expanded xflZ'/c', and betwixt them proceeds the Burgundian cross of St Andrew trunked or. Amongst several diplomas of nobility and arms which John Baptista Christyn, Chancellor of Brabant, gives in his excellent book, Jurisprudentia Hc- rolca, I shall add a part of the above-mentioned Robert's, that the curious may know somewhat of the form of blazon by concessions. After the titles of the emperor, and introduction, the diploma goes on thus, " Tibi prasfato Roberto de " Clusis gentilitia arma &- insignia tua, tarn paterna quam materna, non modo con- " firmanda 8^ approbanda, verum etiam augenda &- ornanda, duximus, ac tenore " prfesentium, confirmamus, approbamus, &- augemus, &- ornamus, atque ad hunc " modum deferenda & gestenda concedimus. ■ " Videlicet, scutum quadripartitum, cujus superior dextra, & inferior sinistra, in " campo nigro, tres ramusculos quemqs transversos, cum binis fohis, &- glande in " medio florum aurei sivecrocei coloris, sursum conversis, triangulari forma positos, " quae arma tua posita sunt; inferior vero dextra, & superior sinistra partes, in " area azurei sen coelesti coloris, materna tua armorum insignia, nimirum tres " Stellas sex radiis, singulas aurei sive crocei coloris, triangulari simihter forma " collocatas (/. e. 1 and i) nempe unam in basi, reliquas duas in superioribus an- " gulis, singulse complectuntur. Et in vertice scuti aurei seu crocei coloris, aqui- VoL. II. R 66 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, Uc. " lam nigram, unius capitis dextrorsum flexi a pectore supra, rostro aperto, lingua " vibrantc, &. alis extcnsis: Porro scuto incumbit galea aperta, nign &. aurei seu " crocci colorum, lacmiis redimita, in cujus cuno, super fascia tortili, eorundein " colorum, inter gemiiias alas nigras extensas, crux divi Andrea, sive Burgundicac, " truucata, aurei colons, eminet. Qiiemadmodum, ha;c omnia in medio prtesen- " tium accuratius depicta sunt, volentes &- hoc nostro CiEsario statuentes edicto, " quod posthac tu pra:tate Roberte, ac liberi & hceredes &- descendentes tui ante- " dicti, hujusmodi arma & insignia, insignium vera: nobilitatis, habeatis &- defera- " tis ubique locorum ac terrarum, in omnibus &• singulis honestis decentibusque " actibus &- expeditionibus, nobilium armigerorum more, tarn joco & serio, torna- " mentis, hastiludiis, bellis, duellis," &-c. By such royal concessions the receivers are not only nobilitate, but qualified to be admitted into military exercises, serious or in disport; such as combats, joustings and tournaments, where none are allowed but those that are truly noble. In France there are a considerable number of old families which enjoy the like favour, in carrying flower-de-luces, the imperial figures of France, by letters patent; for which see Menestrier and other French heralds. The Dukes of Savoy have made concessions of several quarters of their armorial ensigns to several families; as to the House of Viles of Ferrara, who carry, quar- terly, first and fourth the wild horse of Saxe, which belongs to Savoy, as his original arms; second and third the proper arms of the House of Viles, and over all, by way of surtout, the cross of Savoy. The Republic of Venice has made several concessions to their own subjects of their symbolical figure, the winged lion of St Mark, the armorial figure of that re- public; as also to strangers, as by that one granted by the senate to Rene de VoYFR. de Pauliny, Count de Argenson, the French king's ambassador to that re- public, which are to be seen on the monument erected for him there at St Job's church; as Menestrier gives us; quarterly, first and hunh (iziire, two leopards or, for Voyer de Pauliny; second and third ardent, a fesse sable, for the House de Ar- genson, and, by way of surtout, the arms of the republic, viz. azure, a lion seiant winged, and diademated or, holding a book open, with these words upon it. Pax tibi. Marce, tu evangelista mens. Other potentates have been in use to do the same honour, not only to their subjects, but to strangers. The Kings of France have honoured several Scots fa- milies for their valour, with their arms, as the Stewarts of Lennox, the Douglasses, and the Kennedys. Sir Hugh Kennedy of Ardistanshire, who, for h.is valour in the wars of France against England, being under the command of John Stewart Eaii of Buchan, was honoured by the King of France with his arms, viz. azure, three flower-de-luces or; which he and his successors marshalled in the first and fourth quarters with those of Kennedy in the second and third quarters, as those descended of him, viz. the Kennedys of Bargeny, the Kennedys of Kirkhill and Binning in the shire of Ayr ; of which more particularly in the First Vohime. Selden tells us, in his Titles of Honour, " That when Gustavus Adolphus King " of Sweden received the investiture of the Garter from Henry St George, Rich- " mond-Herald, and Peter Young, Gentleman Usher, at Darsavv in Prussia, the 27th " of September 1627, he conferred the honour of knighthood upon them; and, " by a particular grant in their patents of honour, allowed them to quarter the " arms of Sweden with their proper arms." King James I. of England, and VI. of Scotland, was graciously pleased to confer solemnly the dignity of knighthood upon Nicolas de Moline, a noble senator of Venice, sent by that state to his majesty ; as also, for a further honour, to ennoblish the coat-armour of the said Nicolas de Moline, being azure, the wheel of a water- mill or, (by way of augmentation) with a canton argent, charged with thebadges of the two kingdoms, viz. of the red rose of England, and thistle of Scotland, con- joined pale-ways; as by letters patent under his Majesty's Great Seal of England, appeareth in these words, " Eundem dominum Nicoluum de Moline, in frequenti " procerum noitrornm pra;sentia, equitem auratum merito creavimus, &- insuper " equestri huic dignirati in honoris accessionevn aiijecinius, ut in avito clypeo gen- " tilitio cantonem gestet argenteum, cum Anglue rosa rubente partita, &• Scotiie OF MARSHALLING ARMS, oV. 67 " carduo virente conjunctum : Qiur, ex insignibus iiostris regiis special! nostra " gratia, discerpsimus, ut viituti bene nierenti suus constaret honor; & nostra in " tHutuin benevolentia; testimonium in perpetuum extaret." As 1 hinted before, though sovereigns cannot grant their entire armorial ensigns (bein,^- marks of their authority) to subjects or strangers, which cannot but be in prc;i,idice or dishonour of their throne and kingdom, as lawyers tell us; yet we See th.y have granted their shields of arms to be quartered with the paternal coats of those they favoured : So that, in that case, they were not imperial arms, but signs of lionour and gratitude to the receivers. It is true the emperor seldom or never granted the eagle with two heads to any prince, but with one head only ; neither properly could he with two, because they are the proper and fLxed figures of the empire, and not these of his paternal family out of which he is elected: But other hereditary prmces seem to be at more freedom to give their own paternal bearings, though ensigns of their sovereignty, to be marshalled with others; but neither the emperor nor other princes ever did adorn the shields of their^ favourites with. their royal timbre, /. e. helmet, crown, crest, &c. Of late we find that the Emperor Leopold n. when he made; John Churchill Duke of Maklborough and Marquis of Blandford, one of the Princes of the Empire, by the title of Prince of Mix- DELHEiM in Swabia, anno 1705, he allowed to him and his heirs-male to carry the emperor's crest, viz. the imperial eagle diplayed with two head's diaddmate or, i. e. the heads encircled with rounds, or orbits of gold, as that of the emperor's ; but he placed his arms on the breast of the eagle as a supporter, being, as said is, a prince of the empire: But in Britain, as a peer thereof, he had his achievement otherwise ; as in the sixth edition of Guillim's Display, at the title of Dukes, page 99. thus given us, sahle, a lion rampant argent, a canton of St George, viz. argent, a cross gules, surrounded with the Order of the Garter; crest, on a wreath, a lion gardant couchant gules, sustaining a banner argent, charged with a hand of Ulster, viz. an hand sinister erect, and conped at the \^n%X. gules; supporters, two wiverns gules, that on the right having St George, or the English ensign, viz. argent, a cross gules, that on the left, St Andrew, or thj Scot's ensign, viz. azure, a saltier argent depicted on targets, or oval shields, upon each of their respective breasts, and sus- pended on their necks by collars of gold. He was first dignified with the title of Baron of Churchill of Eyemouth in Scotland, 16S2, and after. Baron Churchill of Sandridge in England, 1685, ^'^"^^ of Marlborough 1689, and Marquis and Duke 1702. Menestrier, in his Treatise of Arms, in the chapter of Grants and Concessions, gives an instance of a woman receiving a coat of augmentation, which was when the Emperor Charles IV. passing from Padua to get himself crowned at Rome, with his empress, who took in her train Jean Beanchittie, the widow of a famous lawyer: Amongst other favours, the empress gave her a grant to carry in the middle of her arms, in a lozenge shield, those of Lithuania, viz. gules, a chevalier armed in all points, on horseback argent, brandishing a sword ; and on his left arm a shield /2z«/r, charged with a cross, with double travesses of the second, being a part of the empress's bearing, a daughter of the King of Poland, and Duke of Li- thuania: which grant was confirmed by the emperor. Henry VIII. of England honoured his wives with additional arms; of which afterwards: and of late Charles II. of Great Britain gianted a coat of augmenta- tion to Anne Clarges, wife to George Monk Duke of Albemarle, viz. azure, a flower-de-luce or, within a bordure of the last, charged with eight roses gules, quartered in the first place, with her paternal coat in tire second, being barry of twelve pieces, argent and azure; and, on a canton sahle, a ram's head couped ar- gent, v.ith four horns or, as being descended of the family of Clarges in Hainault in Flanders. It is only sovereign princes and republics that can make such concessions of their pubhc ensigns, being more sacred than tliose of subjects, which may be more freely assumed, with less authority, upon the accounts before mentioned, by mar- riage, alliance, adoption, &.c. Which additaments of honour are either placed in one quarter, with the proper arms of families, or marshalled with them in distinct quarters : Which last way is the proper subject now in hand. 68 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, b'r. But since anciently there has been, and still continues a frequent practice of composing some one part or other of the royal ensigns or regalia with paternal arms, I shall here insist a little on them with their proper situation, with paternal figures in one shield or quarter, before I proceed to give further instances of mar- shalling arms of special concession with paternal ones in distinct quarters. The pieces or figures of sovereign ensigns or regalia claim a precedency in the most honourable place of the shield or quarter before the paternal figures, and are to be placed in chief in a dexter canton; and sometimes sovereigns ordain their achievement as a crest or supporters, if they be convenient for that end : Of which afterwards when 1 speak to exterior ornaments. Menestrier tells us, " That it is the general practice of Europe to give the most " honourable place of the shield to those royal figures; and that some princes, in " their concessions of them, expressly ordain them to be so placed; as John King " of Arragon and Sicily, rewarding two knights for there good services, and to " put a particular mark of respect upon them, allowed them to carry the armorial " figures of Arragon, Navarre, and Sicily, on condition they should place them on " a chief above the arms of their families ; and though they had a chief before, " they behoved to add another." And this is the reason we see foreign arms oft- times have two chiefs ; of which I have given instances in the First Volume of this System, and shall here add another. The Princes of Mass a in Italy, of the name of Cibo, have their paternal arms honoured with two concessions, placed upon two chiefs, the one soutenu of the other; that below contains the arms of Genoa, granted for the successful negotia- tion of William Cibo for that repubhc with Pope Clement VII. 1532; and above, another chief, with the arms of the empire, viz. the eagle with one head, granted by Maximilian the emperor when he made Alberick Cibo a prince of the empire, whose blazon is thus, quarterly, first and fourth or, a bend cJieque, argent and azure, (the paternal coat of Cibo) a chief argent, charged with a plain cross gules, (the arms of Genoa) surmounted of a chief of the empire or, a double eagle display- ed sable, and, (for diminution, and to difference it from that of the empire) on its breast, a scroll fesse-ways; on it the word Libert as; second quarter azure, an eagle displayed argent, crowned or, for Este, quartered with Ferrara, azure, three flower-de-luces or, within a bordure indented of the same, gules; third quarter, coupe, or and gules, the branch of a thorn tree sable, flowered argent in pale, for the family of Malespine; and over all, by way of surtout, on a lozenge escutcheon or, five torteauxes gules in orle, surmounted of the sixth azure, charged with three tlower-de-luces (??•, as a coat of alliance with the Medicis Dukes of Tuscany: Which arms are to be seen engraven in yeu d' Armories, and in my Essay of the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories, with several others, which I may have oc- casion here to mention. The Dukes of Tuscany and the Medici placed the arms of France upon one of their torteauxes above the rest, as all the families and cities in France, who carry flower-de-luces as additaments of honour, by concessions of the sovereign, place them in chief, or on a chief; and the same practice is used in Britain, by the fol- lowing examples. Sandford, in his before-mentioned History, tells us, " That Henry VIII. of " England honoured the arms of Thomas Manners, whom he created, Earl of Rut- " LAND, upon the account he was descended from a sister of King Edward IV." his paternal bearing being, or, two bars azure, and a c\i\ei gules; the chief was then formed, quarterly, azure and gules, on the first two flower-de-luces or; on the se- cond a lion passant gardant or; the third as second, and the fourth as first, which were parts of the armorial figures of England. Guillim says, " Sometimes these augmentations are found to be borne upon " a chief of the escutcheon above the paternal coat;" for which he gives the above example of the Earl of Rutland ; and then adds, " It is a form of bearing of " a part in part; for here is, says he, abated one flower-de-luce of the arms of '• France, and two lions of the arms of England, and both on the chief part of the " escutcheon:" Yet v^^e meet with sometimes the augmentation in the centre of the shield, as in the arms of Compton Earl of Northampton, viz. sable, a lion passant gardant or, between three helmets argent, garnished gold : which lion, being one OF MARSHALLING ARMS, Isc. 63 ijf those of England, is an augmentation. And he who adds the Blazons of the Nobility to Guillr.n's Display, gives us, page 314. an example of a coat of arms worthy to be mentioned, whoae words 1 shall here add, " viz. azure, a naval " croivn, within an orle of twelve anchors or, borne by the name of Lendon, and was " granted by Sir Edward Walker, Garter K.ing at Arms, by patent, dated at " Brussels the loth of May 1658, in the loth year of the reign of King Charles H. " to Captain Robert Lendon, born of honest parents at Allington, in the county of " Devon, who, m his youth, actively appUed himself to navigation; and being an " oilicer in the royal navy, anno 1648, (which, for some years before, had been, " and then was, possessed and employed by the usurped power of a rebellious par- " liament) had thereby the happy opportunity, out of a due and loyal sense of his " duty to his lawful sovereign Iving Charles II. to be tlie prime and active instru- " ment to induce twelve ships (which his anchors resemble) of the said navy, to " their duty and obedience, and to embrace his majesty's service against his re- " bellious subjects." There is no part of the imperial ensigns of sovereign princes, and even their re- galia, but have been granted by special concessions, as by our kings, to honour the arms of some of the best families of the kingdom, which have also been granted to strangers, as a testimony of our king's favour: Of all the pieces of honour in the arms of Scotland, the double tressure most frequently has been allowed to be car- ried, as a badge of a royal maternal descent, loyalty, and virtue; of which I shall give in short a few instances. Thomas Randolph Earl of Murray, Lord Annandale and Man, as a nephew to King Robert Bruce by his sister, was the first of his family who was allowed to place the double tressure round his paternal figures, the three cushions ^ti/es in a field or; as is evident by his seals of arms appended to charters. And Sir Alex- ander Seaton of that Ilk, being son of Sir Christopher Seaton, and Christian, sister to K.ing Robert Bruce, was the first of the progenitors of the noble family of the Earls of Winton and Lord Seaton, who encompassed the thj-ee crescents, the pater- nal figures of Seaton, with the double tressure counter-flowered ^u/es, in a field or, upon account of his royal maternal descent. There are many other noble fa- milies, upon the same account, on whom I cannot insist here, as Lyon Earl of Stvathmore: Nor of those who carry it upon account of merit and favour of our kinjs, as Douglas Duke of Queensberry, Erskine Earl of Kelly, Gordon Earl of Aberdeen, Gordon Earl of Aboyne, Scott of Thirlestane, &-c. of vs'hom before in tht. First Part of this System. The arms of several strangers have been honoured by our kings with the double tressuie: King James V. knighted and honoured one Nicol Combet, a Frenchman, with It, asd;d King James VI. Jacob Van Eiden, a Dutchman, and several others; as then- patents bear in the Chapel Rolls in England, titled, Diversi tractutus ainici- tianirn tempore Jacobi regis. Sylvester Petra Sancta, an Italian, in his Treatise of Arms, speaking of the double tres^ure, says, " Celebris est duplaris limbus, quern paralelte lines duae, ac simul " florentes, describunt in tessera regis Scotorum;" and gives us the arms of a Dutch and French family with the tressure. Another piece of our sovereign arms, I mean the lion, the figure of tlie ancient ensign of Scotland, has been allowed to be carried by several families of this king- dom, as a sign of their royal favour, within three shields; as that granted to Sir Alexander Carron, who carried the banner of Scotland before King Alexander I. in his expedition against the rebels in Mearns and Murray: Where, by Sir Alex- ander's conduct and eminent valour, the king obtained a notable victory over the rebels; for which his name was changed from Carron to Scrymgeour, which sig- nifies a hard fighter, (as our historians) and got a coat of arms suitable thereto, viz. gules, a lion rampant or, armed and langued azure, holding in his dexter paw a crooked sword, or scimitar, argent. (See Plate of Achievements, and more of this family in the Appendix.) And, in later times, favourites have been allowed to embellish the shield of arms with a lion, as a crest or supporter; as that allowed to the Duke of Lauderdale. And the same may be said of the unicorn, the sup- porter of the achievement of Scotland, the St Andrew's cross, the thistle, crown, sword and sceptre, the ensigns and regalia of the kingdom, have been granted by Vol. U. S ^ OF MARSHALLING ARMS, y;r continued most loyal, having married a sister of King Robert I. and daughter of Robert de Bruce Earl of Carnck, (Buchanan) by whom he had David his successor, Thomas Brechin of Lumquhat, forfeited with his brother, (Inventory of the Registers) and a daughter, Margaret, married to Sir David Barclay, knight, in 1315; as appears by his charter of that date, " Mar- " garetie filias domini David de Brechin, de terns de Cairny, Barclay, &c. pro ma- " trim.onio inter eos contrahendo." (Penes C. de Panmure.) Which David Lord Brechin, his son, called the Flower of Chivalry, in his youth went to the Holy Land, and signalized himself against the Saracens. (Buchanan.) In the 1323 he is one of the barous who wrote that bold letter to the pope, in be- half of King Robert Brace, and the independency of Scotland ; but next year, viz. 1321, he was unhappily made privy to the Countess of Strathern and the Lord Soulis' conspiracy against the king his uncle; for not discovering of which he was tried at the Fai-liament, called the Black Parliament, and sutfered death, to the universal regret of the people, being the king's nephew, " Et omnium aetatis suae " juvenum, ec b.;lli, St pacis artibus longe primus," says Buchanan. This power- ful lord, at his forfeiture, possessed the lordship of Brechin, the barony of Rothe- VoL. II. U 73 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, y^. may, the lands of Kinloch, and part of Glenesk; all which were given by King Robert Bruce to Sir Cvid Barclay, (Inventory of the Registers) who had mar- ried the Lord Brechin's sister. Which David Barchiy Lord Brechin had, for his paternal estate, the barony of old Lindores, and lanas of Cairny in Fife, out of which he and Margaret Brechin, his wife, gave a fishii/g in pure alms to the monks of Balmerino. (Regist. of Bal- merino.) He was H.gh Sheriff of Fife, (Sibbald's Hist, of Fife) and was famous in the wars of King I'.obert Bruce, with whom he was present at most of his battles, particularly Mtthven, where he was taken prisoner. (Barbour, p. 32.) He is also fre(]uently mentioned in the wars of King David Bruce, whom he faith- fully adhered to; and, in 1^41, by that king's command, seized Sir William Bullock, Chamberlain of Scotland, suspected of treason, and committed him to prison; but afterwards having a feud with the Douglasses, he was murdered at Aberdeen in 1350 by John of St Michael and his accomplices, at the instigation of William Douglas of Liddesdale; as related by Fordun, who calls him Nobilis vir et potens dominus David de Barclay miles. (Hearne's Scoticbronicon, Vol. IV. p. 1040.) By Margaret Brechin, his wife, he left David his heir, and Jean, mar- ried to Sir David Fleming of Biggar, by whom he had a daughter, Marion, the wife of Sir William Maule of Panmure; as appears by a charter of this Wil- liam to Marion Fleming, his wife, the daughter of Sir David Fleming, of his lands of Scryne, &.c. confirmed by King Robert II. ad annum 1381. {Penes C. de Panmure.) David, next Lord Brechin, by his charter sine data, grants his Lands of Kyndest- lyth, to be held of him and his heirs, to Hugh Barclay his cousin, son to David Barclay his uncle, from whom Collerny is descended : {Chart, penes Hen. Barclay de CuUerny.') And in 1363, he grants a charter of confirmation of the lands of Dunmure, lying in his barony of Lindores, to Roger Mortimer. {Penes C. de. Panmure.) He went to the wars of Pmssia, for which he obtained a safe conduct from Edward III. of King England, to pass through his dominions, attended with twelve esquires, an4 their horses and servants, dated in 1364, the 37th of Edward III. (Extract from the Tower of London.) And after his return he is also mentioned in the wars of King David Bruce. By Jean his wife he left one daughter, Mar- garet, his heir, who was married to Walter Stewart, second son to King Robert II. by Euphame Ross his queen. (Chart, in pub. .Archiv.) This Walter is first designed in charters Lord Brechin only; but afterwards he comes to have the titles of Palatine of Stratheru, Earl of Athol and Caithness, and Lord Brechin : And by the foresaid Margaret, his wife, he had David Stewart, who died an hostage in England for the ransom of King James I. and Allan Earl of Caithness, killed at the battle of Inverlochy in 1430, without issue. {Scoticbroni- con.) But the Earl of Athol, though his lady died before himself, kept possession of this lordship till the 1437, when he was executed for the murder of King James I.; at which time Sir Thomas Maule of Panmure laid claim to the estate of the Lord Brechin, as heir to Margaret Countess of Athol. heiress of Brechin, to whose heirs it had been provided by a charter 19th October 1378; {in pub. jirchiv.) and took instrument upon the Earl's declaration, before his execution, that he pos- sessed the lordship of Brechin only by the courtesy. {Instrum. Penes C. de Pan- mure.) And that same year Thomas Bisset of Bdwylo makes oath judicially, " That David Lord Brechin, father to the Countess of Athol, had no brothers, and " but one sister, Jean Barclay, the v/ife of Sir David Fleming, and grandmother " to Sir Thomas Maule, killed at the Harlaw." {Penes C. de Panmure.) And the said Sir Thomas Maule, in 1442, takes a notorial transumpt of the above charter of Dunmure by David Lord Brechin, to preserve and show his right to the su- periority of those lands, as heir to the said Lord Brechin; notwithstanding of which the family of Panmure got possession only of the lands of Hetherwick, Leuchlands, Jackston and Staddockmuir, parts of the Brechin estate; and the Privy Council in King James II. his minority, caused annex the lordship of Bre- chin to the crown, on pretence of Athol's forfeiture; (Acts of Parliament) and in 1487, James, the king's second son, amongst other titles, was created Lord Bre-- ehin. Of MARSHALLING ARMS, Wc. 79 But this lordship being sometime after again dissolved from tlie crown, has now been a considerable time enjoyed by the family of Panmure, who are heirs of olood to the ancient Lords Bkechin, whose title tliey carry, together with their arms, viz. quarterly, first and fourth azure, a cheveron betwixt three crosses patee a;yc77r, for Barclay; second and third s/-, three pdes issuing from the cliief, con- joined by tlie points in base gules, for Brechin, which are placed irL the third quarter of the Earls of Panmure's shield of arras, as blazoned page 49. of this volume. Most of our ancient earldoms, and some of our old. lordships have, as it were, armorial ensigns annexed to them ; which were eitlier those granted upon their erection, into noble feus, or those of the ancient possessors, and, by the favour of the sovereign, are transmitted with the dignity of the feu to other different families, who, by modern practice, quarter the arms of these dignities conferred on them with their proper arms, merely as feudal ones, and not upon the account of descent or alliance with the ancient possessors of these dignified feus, nor upon the ac- count of special concession, patronage, or otherwise, but only as invested in these noble feus : So that we meet with distinct families carrying one coat of arms, but upon different accounts ; as by many instances in tte former, and in this Vo- lume, to which I shall add a considerable number here, to show the honour and dignity of our ancient and modern families. I begin- with the name Cuming or Cumin, once a numerous and powerful fami- ly, whose arms were azure, three garbs or. The most emipent family of the name was dignified with the Earldom of Bochan ; which noble family came to a period in the reign of Robert Bruce, upon the account of their rebellion in adhering to the interest of England; (a branch of v.'hich family now remaining is Cumin of Coulter, wlio carries the above arms to show his descent; see Appendix, page 58. and Plate of Achievements) and their arms ever since became the feudal ensigns of the earldom of Buchan, to several different families who were honoured with the title of that earldom. The first that I have found to carry them, as such, was Alexander. Stewart, fourth son of King Robert II. when created Earl of Buch,\n by his father, who, by our old books of blazon, carried, quarterly, first and fourth Stewart, or, a fesse cheque, azure and argent ; second and thu'd azure, three garbs or, as the feudal arms of the earldom of Buchan : After his death, having no lawful issue, that dignity returned again to the crown. Afterwards King Robert III. invested John, second son to Robert Duke of Alb.any, Earl of Fife and Monteith, in the earl- dom of Buchan, who carried then the arms of Scotland, quartered with the feudal arms of Buchan ; as in the First Volume, page 48. King James II. bestowed the earldom of Buchan upon his uterine-brother James Stewart, second son to James Stewart, called the black Knight of Lorn, and his Lady, Jean Beaufort, Queen Dowager of King James I. Which James Earl of Buchan married Margaret, daughter and heiress of Ogil^ VIE of AucHTERHOusE : By her he had Alexander Earl of Buchan, and Lord Auchterhouse, who carried, as in our old books of blazon, quarterly, first and fourth or, a fesse cheque, azure and or; secopd and third azure, three garbs or, for the Earldom of Buchan: But the German writer Jacob Imhoff, upon what reason I know not, speaking of this family, makes the fesse cheque sable and argent, and accom.panies it with three wolves'^ heads erased ,f///cj-. Alexander Earl of Buchan's grandson, viz. John, Master of Buchan, was killed at the battle of Pinky : His estate and dignity came to Christian his daughter and sole heir, who was married to Robert Douglas, son of AViUiam Douglas of Lochleven, a younger brother of William Earl of Morton. Tiieir son was James Douglas Earl of Bucii.\n. who carried, quarterly, first and fourth Douglas of Lochleven, viz. argent, three piles issuing from a ch\&i gules, charged with two stars of the first; second azure, three garbs or, for the earldom of Buchan; third or, a fesse cheque, azure and argent, for Stewart. And he having but one daughter, Mary, his heir, who was wife to James Erskine, eldest son of John Earl of Marr, by hi.-; second lady Mary Stewart, daughter of Esme Duke of Lennox : James Er5kine, in his wife's riglit, was Earl of Buchan, and carried, quarterly, first Buchan; second Stewart; third Stewart of Lennox, upon the account of his mother; and fourth Douglas of Lochleven, upon the ac- ao OF MARSHALLING ARMS, iSc. count of his wife, as just now blazoned ; and over all, by way of an inescutcheon, the arms of Marr and Erskine, quarterly; as in Plate 7. fig. 3. in the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories : so that he carried both feudal coats of arms, arms of alliance and descent. The issue of this family failed, and David Erskine, eldest son of Henry Erskine Lord Cardross, whose progenitor was Henry, immediate younger brother of James Earl of Buchan, by his wife Mary Douglas, heiress of the earldom of Buchan as above, was, by the Parliament of Scotland, declared Earl of Buchan, and took his place in Parliament according to the seniority of the Earls of Buchan. But more of him and the cadets of the family with their arms, in the First Volume, page 40. and his achievements in tai/le douce, Plate IV. The old Earls of Athol carried paly of six pieces argent and sable. This an- cient and noble family, for want of issue-male or otherwise, came to the Cumins, and, upon their forfeiture, returned to the crown, the fountain of all honour. Ro- bert II. conferred that earldom upon Walter Stewart his second son. He carried the arms of Athol, quartered as feudal ones with his paternal : but being forfeited as one of the murderers of King James I, that earldom was again annexed to the crown. King James II. bestowed that earldom upon his uterine-brother John Stewart, the black Knight of Lorn, and Jean Queen Dowager : John the then Earl of Athol carried, quarterly, first and fourth Stewart ; second and third paly of six pieces, argent and sable, for the title of Athol ; as did his descendants, till that dignity came to Murray Earl of Tullibardin, now Duke of Athql, who now carries those arms as feudal ones j of which before. Volume First, page 50. and 248. The old Earls of Marr, of the same name, had for arms azure, a bend between- six cross croslets fitched or, vvhich became feudal ones to other families, who were honoured with the earldom of Marr ; for which see Volume First, page 127. The arms of the old Earls of March and Dunear became the feudal arms of that earldom to other families that were honoured with that dignity, after it was an- nexed to the crown by King Robert III. upon the forfeiture of George Dunbar Earl of March. King James II. created Alexander his second son Duke of Al- bany, Earl of March, Lord Annandale, and of the Isle of Man : Upon which ac- count he carried the arms of those dignities quarterly ; first the arms of Scotland entire ; second gules, a lion rampant argent, within a bordure of the last, charged with eight roses of the first, for the earldom of March ; third gules, three legs of a man armed proper, conjoined in the centre at the upper parts of the thighs, flexed in a triangle, garnished and spurred or, the arms of the Isle of Man ; fourth or, a saltier and ch\et' gules, the feudal arms of the Lordship of Annandale, which were on his seals ; and at this day are to be seen entire on the College-church of Edin- burgh, to which he was a benefactor. This duke was twice married ; first to Ka- tharine Sinclair, daughter to William Earl of Orkney : she bore to him a son Alexander, who married Margaret, daughter of the Lord Crichton, and had a daugh- ter married to David Lord Drummond. Alexander Duke of Albany, &.c. after his Biarriage, entered into religious orders, was abbot of Inchaffray and Scoon, and afterwards Bishop of Murray. He resigned his temporal honours in favours of his younger brother John Duke of Albany, son of the foresaid Alexander Duke of Albany, by his second wife, a daughter of the house of Bologne. This John Duke of Albany, Earl of March, Lord Annandale, of the Isle of Man, Count of Bologne, and Count of Auvergne, was Governor of Scotland for several years in the minority of King James V. He carried on his seal of arms as his father, before blazoned. I have seen a large piece of gold, coined in the year 1524 ; upon the one side is an eagle displayed, and diademate, and below, it an escutcheon, quarterly, as before, impaled with the arms of his dutchess, Anne de la Tour and Auvergne, viz. quarterly, first and fourth seme of France, a tower, for the Count de la Tour ; second and third argent, a gonfannon^w/ex, the gonfannon (/. e. the banner of the church, which I have described in the First Volume, page 406, and caused cut it in Copperplate IX. fig. 20.), and over all an inescutcheon, charged with three torteauxes, for Bologne ; which shield of arms was adorned with a ducal co- ronet, r OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^c. 8i This duke died without issue and his dignities returned to their respective so- vereigns ; but the titles of March and iVIan were given, with the arms of those dignities, to the family of Lennox and Lord Darnly ; so that I shall here add briefly these ensigns as an example of feudal arms. Henry Lord Darnly, the eldest son of Matthew Earl of Lennox, before he was married to Mary Queen of Scotland, being created Duke of Rothsay, Earl of Ross, and Lord of the Isle of Man, had the arms of the last two dignified feus marshall- ed with those of the family, and as husband to Queen Mary, viz. quarterly, first and fourth azure, three flower-de-luces or, within a bordure gules, charged with eight buckles of the second, for Aubigny and Evereux in France; second and third or, a fesse cheque azure and argent, for Stewart ; over all, by way of surtout, argent, a saltier ingrailed, cantoned with four roses gules, for the earldom of Lennox. But I shall here give Prince Henry's arms, as they stand cut and illuminate on his mother's tomb in Westminster, viz. quarterly, first quarter counter-quartered, Au- bigny (or Evereux as before) with Stewart, and in surtout the arms of Lennox, as his father before ; second quarter the arms of the Isle of Man, as before blazoned; third quarter gules, three lions rampant argent, for the earldom of Ross ; and in the fourth quarter the arms of Douglas Earl of Angus, being those of his mother. Upon what account the Enghsh placed them there I know not, for she was not an heiress ; but with us, in our books of blazons illuminate, they were counter-quar- tered as the first. All which are impaled with the royal arms of Scotland, sup- ported on the right side with a wolf, proper, and on the left by the unicorn of Scotland, and the achievement ensigned with the imperial crown of Scotland. The arms of the family of Lennox, more fully deduced, may be seen in my book of the Ancient and Modern Use of Arms, and there cut in copperplate, chap. 15. The estate and dignities of the earldom of Lennox devolved by right of succes- sion on Robert, who was Bishop of Caithness, and after him on his nephew Charles, second son of Matthew Earl of Lennox, who, as Earl Matthew's brother apd successor, carried both quarterly ; first Aubigny ; second Stewart ; third the arms of the earldom of March ; fourth as the first; and over all, in surtout, the arms of the earldom of Lennox, before blazoned, being feudal arms ; which may be seen in my forementioned book. So, as I observed before, feudal arms have been much frequented and used by our nobles. This Earl Robert resigned the earldom of Lennox into the King's hands ad remanentiam, who confirmed the earldom of March to him : but he died soon after without any issue, and that earldom returned also to the crown. King James VI. conferred the earldom of Lennox upon his cousin Esme Stewart, Lord Aubigny in France, son and heir of John Lord Aubigny, brother of Matthew Earl of Lennox, grandfather of King James VI. Es.me was High-Chancellor of Scotland, and created Duke of Lennox, and carried for arms, quarterly, first and fourth the feudal arms of Aubigny in France, second and third Stewart, and, by way of surtout, the feudal arms of Lennox ; w^hich may be seen in my forecited book, Plate VI. fig. 6. He married Catharine de Balsac, sister to the Sieur D'Ex TRAGNES, who borc to him two sons and as many daughters; Ludovick his successor, and Esme Lord Aubigny ; Henrietta married to John Gordon first Marquis of Huntly, and Mary to John Earl of Marr ; who had to their husbands many chil- dren, matched with noble families in Scotland ; which is the reason why we see so frequently the arms of Sieur d'Entragnes, viz. quarterly, first azure, three sal- tiers couped argent, and, on a chief or, as many salticrs couped of the first ; second argent, a fret sable; thndi gules, three buckles or; fourth as the first, and in sur- tout argent, a serpent gliding in pale azure vomiting out of its mouth a child gules . Which arms, I say, with these of Lennox, are frequently to be met with on the funeral escutcheons of our nobles, as proofs or branches of their maternal descents from the houses of Huntly and Marr. The male hne of Esme Duke of Lennox failed in Charles Duke of Lennox and Richmond in England, who died without issue in the year 1672, and the honours returned to King Charles II. who was served heir to him ; so that these noble feus with their arms returned to the crown. Vol. II. X 82 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, i^c. Of late the honours and arms of the earldoms of March were conferred upon William Douglas, second son to William Duke of Queensberry 1703; upon which account he quarters the arms of that earldom with those of his father's. The arms used by the Randolphs Earls of Murray, being argent, three cushions within a double tressure, flowered and counter-flowered with flower-de-luces gules, became the feudal arms of that earldom, when possessed by other families, with the title of Earl of Murray. Archibald Douglas, brother to James Earl of Douglas, who was, by King James n. created Earl of Murray 1449, carried, quarterly, first and fourth the above blazon of the earldom of Murray, second and third the paternal coat of Douglas : He was forfeited for his rebellion 1455. King James IV. bestowed that earldom on his natural son James Stewart, be- got on Jean Kennedy, daughter to the Earl of Cassilis, who carried, first and fourth, the ensign of Scotland, bruised with a batton sinister; second and third argent, three cushions within the double tressure ^u/w, for the earldom of Murray : He had no sons, but two daughters, and the earldom being a masculine feu at the time, returned to the crown. Mary Queen of Scotland conferred the dignity of the earldom of Murray on her natural brother James Stewart, Prior of St Andrews, by letters-patent of the date 10th February 1563, to him and his heirs whatsomever. The Earl of Murray, who was Regent of Scotland, carried the same quartered arms as his predecessors in that earldom. He was killed in the town of Linlithgow, and left behind him only one daughter, Isabel, his heir, who married James Stewart Lord Doune, who, in her right was Earl of Murray, of whom is descended the present Earl of Mur- ray, who carries, quarterly, first the arms of Scotland, within a bordure, gobonated argent and azure, as descended from the regent ; second or, a fesse cheque, azure and argent, for Stewart of Doune ; third argent, three cushions within a double tressure counter-flowered gules, for the earldom of Murray ; and the fourth as first. The ancient Earls of Douglas, when dignified with the titles of noble feus, as that of the Earldom of Galloway, carried the arms of that country, being azure, a lion rampant argent; and when dignified with the title of Duke of Touraine in France, and with the lordship of Annandale in Scotland, quartered the arms of those dignities with their paternal ones thus, quarterly; first azure, three flower-de-luces or, for the dukedom of Touraine in France ; second Douglas ; third azure, three stars argent, for Murray Lord of Bothwell ; fourth argent, a saltier and c\i\&i gules, for the lordshipof Annandale; sometimes they left out of their achievement the arms of Galloway, to a branch of the family dignified with the title of Earls of Gallo- way : And other younger sons of the family, who were Lords of Liddisdale, quar- tered the arms of that lordship, being sahle, a lion rampant argent, with the pater, nal coat of Douglas with suitable differences. But I cannot omit to give an account, in short, how this ancient and noble family of Douglas branched out in many honourable families, who carried all feudal arms, with which they were dignified, and marshalled them with their pa- ternal one. William first Earl of Douglas had three wives, the first, Margaret, heiress of MaiT, of whom James Douglas Earl of Marr ; which branch did not continue long, as I showed before. The second wife was a daughter of Dunbar Earl of March ; of her came the Earls of Douglas and Lords of Galloway, and their branches : And by the third wife, Margaret Stewart, daughter and heir of John Stewart Earl of Angus, their son was George, the first of the Douglasses Earls of Angus, in right of his mother. He married Mary, daughter to King Robert III. who bore to him James Earl of Angus, who carried, and his successors, by our old books of blazon, and on their seals of arms, quarterly, first gules, a lion rampant argent, for the earldom of Angus ; second Douglas ; third or, a fesse cheque azure and argent, surmounted of a bend gules, charged with three buckles of the first, for Stewart of Bonkill; fourth or, a lion rampant ^«/fx, surmounted of a bendlet sable, for Abernethy. This noble family of the Douglasses, Earls of Angus, car- ried sometimes the same coats of arms otherwise marslialled ; on which various marshaUing of arms I cannot now insist, but give you the arms of that noble fa- 2 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, ^r. 83 mily as tliey have been more constantly used, and now carried by tlie Duke of Douglas, viz. quarterly, azure, a lion rampant argent, for Galloway (if the field were red, as I think it should be, it would stand for the earldom of Angus, to which they had more right than to Galloway); second or, a lion rampant gules, sur- mounted of a bendlet sable, for Abernethy ; third argent, three piles issuing from the chief gules, for Wishart, and not for the Lords of Brechin, as some say ; fourth or, a fesse cheque argent and azure, surmounted of a bend gules, charged with three buckles of the first, for Stewart of Bonkill ; of which family were the Stewarts Earls of Angus ; and over all, by way of surtout, the arms of Douglas, which I have blazoned before, and caused them to be also engraven in the above mentioned book, the Ancient and Modern Use of Arms. The Town and Barony of Montrose carried arms relative to its name, viz,. argent, a rose gules ; and from that barony David Lord Lindsay Earl of Crawford was honoured with the title of Duke ot Montrose, by King James IIL; which dig- nity did not continue in the family. King James IV. honoured William Lord Graham with the dignity of Earl of Montrose in the year 1445, upon which he and his successors. Earls of Montrose, carried, quarterly, first and fourth argent, on a chief sable, three escalops or, for Graham ; second and third argent, three roses gules, for the title of Montrose, now carried by the present Duke of Montrose. The arms of the lordship of B.adenoch, or, three lions' heads erased gules, a* arms belonging to that feu ; which dignity was given by King James II. to the Lord Gordon for his special services, and have been marshalled in the achievement of his bearing, and is now carried by the Duke of Gordon ; of whom I have deduced the descent of the family in my former writings. To come to a close of this section of Feudal Arms, I shall only mention these of the earldoms of Arran, Orkney, Caithness, and lordship of Lorn. The arms properly belonging to these feus are shij)s or boats ; of which I spoke before at the beginning of this section. The arms of the Isle of Arran, argent, a ship with its sails furled up sable. King James III. erected that isle into an earldom, in favours of ThoiMas Boyd, son of Robert Lord Boyd, Chancellor of Scotland. Whether he quartered the arms of Arran with his own, I know not; for he enjoyed that earldom but a short time. King James IV. bestowed that earldom upon James Lord Hamilton, who was created Earl thereof the ninth of January 1503; for which the family since have been in use to quarter the arms of the earldom of Arran, as feudal ones, with their own. The Lordship of Lorn's arms are, a lymphad (an old-fashioned ship with one mast) sable, with flames of fire issuing out of the top of the mast, and from the fore and hinder parts of the ship ; as by our old paintings and blazons called St Anthony's fire. This Lordship belonged anciently to the M'Dowalls, who carried those arms for want of male issue, which came to an heiress, who was married to one of the name of Stewart of the family of Darnly, whose posterity were pos- sessors of Lorn: King James II. 1445, created John Stewart Lord of Lorn, who carried for arms, quarterly, first and fourth these of Lorn, as above ; second and third or, a fesse cheque, azure and argent, with a garb and chief azure. Lord John had no lawful sons, but a natural one, Dougal, predecessor of the Stewarts of Appin, and three daughters heirs-portioners ; the eldest, Isabel Stewart, was mar- ried to Colin Campbell Earl of Argyle ; Margaret, the second, to Sir John Camp- bell of Glenorchy ; and the third daughter to Archibald Campbell, the first of ths family of Ottar. William Stewart of Innermeatli, as heir-male to John Stewart Lord Lorn, claimed the lordship of Lorn, and accordingly, as heir-male, was seised in that lordship the 21st of March 1469 : and in the month of November, the same year, resigned that lordship in King James III. his hands, in fivours of Colin Earl of Argyle, for which the Earl gave him other lands, and the King dignified him with a title of Lord Innermeath. Since which time, the Earls of Argyle, as Lords of Lorn, have always been in use to quarter the arms of that lordshipi, as before described, (without the flames of 84 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, y'e Insigniuiii, cap. 87. speaking against assuming or usurping the arms of others, says, " Q^iis autem tain " alienus a civili conversatione inventus unquam, qui non ob indifferentem in- " signium delationem, dissidia, rixas, odia, injurias, certamina orta viderit, le- " geritve." The Kings of Denmark, amongst other reasons of pretending right to the supe- riority of the city of Hamburgh, has one, that the city had, on its public places, anciently the arms of Holsteint, and was a part of their dominions^ viz.. ^niles, a nettle stalk of three leaves expanded, and, on its middle, an escutcheon argi'iit ; as Beckmanus tells us, " Inter rationes prsetensionis regum Danire in civitatem Ham- " bergensem, una fuit, quod folium urticas, principmn Holsatias insignia, a tempore " Christiani tertii passim urbis insignibus, in Curiae portis, sigillo publico, ac moneta, " scripserunt;" which being the arms of the princes of Holstein, and the kings of Denmark succeeding to them, have had a pretension to that city by law; for arms being fixed upon moveables or immoveables, presume a right of property or superiority to these things : But how far that pretension will reach, I leave, to law- yers. The Swedes and Polanders engaged in a war upon the account of carrying the arms of Sweden, which Sigismund III. of Sweden used after he was deposed; and, when elected King of Poland, marshalled with the arms of Poland, to show, as it were, his right and civil possession of Sweden, and natural one of Poland : which was so hotly resented by the Swedes, that he was forced to come to an accommodation at the treaty of Oliva, in the year 1662, where he renounced his right to Sweden, its titles and arms, and that he should not use them in any affairs and letters to that kingdom ; but, as being once their king, he had liberty to use the title and arms of Sweden in his writs to other foreign states, princes, and private persons ; and that, in all time coming after his death, the kings of Poland should forbear the titles and arms of Sweden. As the use of aniu of pretension has been troublesome ; so the omission of using such has been no less prejudical to some. It was objected to Richard Duke of York, when he claimed the crown of England, as heir to Lionel Duke of Clarence, that he did not carry Clarence his arms, as heir to the crown. He answered, That he might have done it, but he forbore them, as he did also the claim to the crov\-n; which he also missed at the time : But he and his posterity were more careful to use them afterwards. The Dukes of Anjou, who were Titular Kings of Jerusalem, Sicily, Arragon, and Naples, quartered the arms of those dominions with their proper ones, upon the account of pretension ; and the Princes of Orange have been in use to do the same with the arms of Geneva. Many of our noble families in Scotland have been in practice anciently and now to quarter the ensigns of dignified feus with their own, upon account of right of pretension. Malise Graham, though he was deprived by King James I. of the earldom of Strathern, and, in place of it, got the earldom of Manteith ; yet he and his successors. Earls of Monteith, carried the armorial figures of the earldom of Strathern, viz. or, a fesse cheque, azure and argent, and, in chief, a clieveron gules, which were quartered with their paternal arms argent, on a chief gules, three escalops or, as always pretending right to that earldom. The Lords Erskine of the same name, upon their right of pretension to the earldom of Marr, quartered these of that earldom with their paternal arms, long before they attained to the possession and dignity of that earldom. The Lords of Seaton have been in a constant use to quarter the feudal arms of the earldom of Buchan, viz. a-zure, three garbs or, upon the account of pretension to that earldom, since the reign of King James II. being lineal heirs by descent to John Stewart Earl of Buchan, High Constable of France, second son of Robert Duke of Albany, Governor of Scotland. George Lord Seaton married Lady Jean Stewart, only daughter and heir of the said John Earl of Buchan, from whom were Vol. JI. Y 86 OF MARSHALLING ARMS, He. descended, in a right line, all the Lords of Seaton and Earls of Winton, who have been in use to quarter the arms of Buchan to show their right ; but more of this family in the first volume, page 231. Having treated of the various occasions and causes of marshalling many coats of arms in one shield, I proceed to these of dominions. ARMS OF DOMINION. As to arms of dominion, I have already given a full account in my Essay on the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories, chap. XIV. But that book being now al- most out of print, for the benefit of such of my readers as have not seen it, I think myself obliged to give a repetition of several things there advanced, and necessa- rily to be known in this System of Heraldry ; and particularly the variations of the armorial ensigns of Scotland and England, to which I shall add these ensigns after the union of the two kingdoms, as they were borne by our late sovereign Qiieen Anne ; and lastly, as they are now borne by his present Majesty. Arms of dominion are these which belong to sovereign princes and common- wealths by right of sovereignty; and these may be said, in a strict sense, not to be properly arms, as I have before defined them, but rather ensigns and badges of public authority, and of a longer antiquity ; for of old, the Persian, Grecian, and Roman monarchies had fixed ensigns of their sovereignties, as other monarchs have since used. In carrying such ensigns, there are three specialties to be observed, rising from the different way of obtaining sovereignty, by succession of blood, election, and con- quest ; of which in order. And first. The person who ascends the throne by legal succession, must be either a sovereign, or a subject descended of a private family ; if the first, he marshals his own sovereign ensigns with the arms of the dominion he succeeds to : and it is the opinion of some, in marshalling of them, to give the first quarter to the arms of the ancientest sovereignty, as the kings of England carry in the first quarter the arms of France before those of England. But the first practice I meet with in marshalling arms of dominion, is in the achievement of the kings of Spain, where the latest kingdom is preferred to the ancientest. About the year loi 7, Ferdinand, eldest son of Sanctius, to-named the Great, King of Navarre, and Elivira, daughter to the sixth and last Earl of Castile, who carried, in a red field, a castle of gold, because in a battle against Miramolin, King of the Moors, he recovered that country ; as Hoppingius tells us, " Castilia " sive Castelte insignia castrum aureum, rubro in campo, eo quod magno illo pra- " lio contra Miramolinum Maurorum regem victor extitisset perhibitur." This Ferdinand was the first that was honoured v.'ith the title of King of Cas- tile, and married Sanctia the daughter of Alphonsus, King of Leon, and sister to Beremund, who died without issue. Ferdinand, by this marriage, became king of Castile and Leon, and marshalled the arms of both these kingdoms in one shield, viz. first and fourth, Castile; second and third, Leon, argent, a lion rampant .f?^/«; thus blazoned as by the above author, " Reges Castellae et Legionis quadriparti- " turn in insignibus offerunt scutum, in parte superiori dextra et in inferiori sinis- " tra castellum aureum in campo rubeo; in parte superiori sinistra et inferiori dex- " tra leonem fulvum in campo albo exhibens." The kingdom of Leon was a more ancient kingdom than Castile for many ages; for, when Pelagius took that country and town from the Moors about the 722, it was called a kingdom, and he took for his arms a lion, because it is said to be the king of beasts ; as our author, " Pelagius Legionis Rex primus circa annum " 722, eripiens Lcgionem civitatem a Mauris leonem pro insigniis assumpsit, quia leo " est et interpretatur rex omnium bestiarum." Many are of opinion, that the arms of Leon, being those of the ancientest king- dom, should be placed in the first and fourth quarters ; and so to have the prece- dency of the arms of Castile. Ludovicus Mohna, a famous lawyer, defends the method of marshaUing as above blazoned : imo. That the greatest kingdom should- OF MARSHALLING ARMS, 5i.% 87- be preferred- to the ancientest : 2do, Ferdinand was king of Castile by right of his father, and got Leon by right of his wife nomine dotis ; and that in his title he was named first King of Castile,, and then by his wife, Leon,, preferring the title of the man to the woman, and the mother's title ought to follow the father's •. His words are, " Turn quod virilis stirpis iniperium preferri debuit foemineo, maternaque in- " signia paternis insignibus cedere debuerunt." Kmg James VI. of Scotland succeeded by his maternal descent to the king- dom of England, and these two kingdoms being united in his person, marshalled their arms quarterly, giving the precedency to the arms of Scotland as the ancient- est sovereignty, and as his paternal bearing on his ensigns and coins. If he who ascends the throne by succession be of the quality of a subject, de- scended'of a private family, he then lays aside his own paternal arms, and uses on- ly these of the dominion he succeeds to. As Robert the Bruce, when he, as first heir-male of David Earl of Huntingdon, brother to King William, succeeded to the crown of Scotland, disused his own pa- ternal bearing, or, a saltier and chief gules, and carried only the sovereign ensigns of the kingdom or, a lion rampant gules, armed and langued azure, within a dou- ble tressure, flowered and counter-tlowered of the second ; which were so carried by his son King David II. Whose grandson, Robert Stewart, by his daughter, Marjory Bruce, when he succeeded as heir to the crown, laid aside also his pater- nal arms, the fesse cheque, and carried only those of the kingdom, being the second Robert of that name, King of Scotland, and first of the surname of Stewart; and from him are lineally descended the Kings of Britain. The second way in attaining to sovereignty, which I have mentioned, is by elec- tion : these who ascend the throne that way, retain their own proper arms, and conmonly place them in an inescutcheon by way of surtout, over those of the dominions to which they are elected ; as the elective Emperors cf Germany, and as the Kings of Poland have been in use to do, to show out of what family they were chosen ; and William Prince of Orange placed his arms over these of Eng- land and Scotland, as an elective king, by way of surtout. The third way of ascending tlie throne is by conquest. It has been tlie ordinary custom for conquerors to beat down and bury in oblivion the ensigns of the con- quered dominions, and, in place of them, to set up their own ensigns to sliow their right and power. The Count of Barjolou, when he conquered the kingdom of Arragon, pulled down his arms, argent, a cross gules, cantoned with four Moors' heads, proper, and erected his own or, four pallets gules. And one of his successors, James King of Arragon, in the year 1229, when he conquered the islands of Majorca and Minorca, erected his standard with the pallets ; and having given those islands with the title of King to his younger son, he placed over the pallet a bendlet, the brisure of a younger son : and when another James King of Arragon conquered Sardinia, he gave for arms to that dominion the old conquered ensigns of Arragon, with these words for device, Trophaea Regni Arragonum, to show that,, when conqueror, he might give what ensigns he pleased. The family of Swabia, being in possession of the kingdom of Sicily, erected, their arms, viz. argent an eagle displayed sable, which continued the ensign of Si- cily, rill Charles of Anjou, a brother of France, conquered that kingdom with that of Naples, and beat down the foresaid arms of Swabia, and set up his own- azure, seme of flower-de-luces or, with a label of five points gules, for the sove- reign ensign of those kingdoms ; which arms continue there yet: But the Arra- gons having cut off the French in Sicily, pulled down the arms of Anjou, and again erected their own, as before blazoned, which afterwards they quartered per saltier with these of Arragon ; of which afterwards : And for which practice of conquerors, see Favine's Theatre of Honour, and "Jeu d' Armories des .So-jei-aigns. But to return from foreign territories and come nearer home, there is as large a field in Soutli Britain for instances of depredations, extirpations, and revolutions, which have attended and subjected the inhabitants to the different armorial bear- ings of their conquerors and pretenders, as any ; who, as witness the historians of that countrv', John Speed, Sir Winston CliurchUl in his Divi Britannici, and many others, in whose histories, and particularly in those two mentioned, are to be found many different armorial ensigns in taille douce plate, according to the various sub- SS Oh MARSHALLING ARMS, i^c: jections the English have been under. I shall only mention three, and insist upon the fovuth, in a detail of the succession of the Kings of England, and their arms from William the Conqueror, in their variations and augmentations, to the time of King James L of Great Britain, according to their best writers, and fo- reigners. 1 shall pass the fabulous story of Brutus, who is said by some to have possessed this island, from him called Britain; and that he divided it among his three sons a thousand years before the Incarnation of Christ: As also their ensigns, which are as uncertain as the story, and were beat down by the Romans when they conquer- ed the south part of Britain, since called England, having set up their own im- perial eagle in their place: But times of lesser antiquity will give us some more certainty of imperial ensigns. First, then, when the South Britons were overcome by the Saxons, as some reckon, about the year 475 of the Incarnation of our Saviour, who possessed the country now called England, the Saxons set up their ensigns, which were, by the most learned writers, said to be azure, a cross forme or; by some a cross fleury, which is the same; as Speed, Churchill, Gerard Leigh, Guillim, York, Morgan, and other English heralds. Secondly, the Danes began to molest the English Saxons about the year of God 787, and to take possession of England. At last Sueno the Dane conquered England, so that four Danish kings successively did reign: They beat down the Saxon ensign, and set up their own, being or, seme of hearts, three leopards ^«/«; as Spencer's Opus Heraldicum, and Chamberland in his Present State of England, and the learned German and famous antiquary. Jacobus Imhoff, in his Treatise entitled Blazonia Regum Pariumque Magnce Britannia, says, " Ex Danis autem " ortos reges, iisdem insignibusillo jam ssculo, usos esse, quibus Dania° reges hodie " uti solent, viz. leopardis tribus in area aurea, rubris cordibus sparsis, dictus " (Spencerus) Notitiae Anglise auctor, cum aliis affirmari solent." Thirdly, the Danish kings being dethroned, the English Saxon kings were again restored with their imperial ensign as before, azure, a cross fornne or, with the ad- dition of four martlets or; as the above-cited Chamberland: And were carried by King Edward the Confessor, with a martlet in base, which made five. After his death, Harold, the 'son of the Earl of Kent, usurped the crown : His arms were, as by the English books, argent, a bar betwixt three leopards' heads sable. William of Normandy invades England, defeats and kills Harold, and takes possession of the kingdom. Edgar Atheling, the lineal heir-male and representer of the Saxon English kings, was put aside from his just right: For, being the son of Edward, the son of King Edmund Ironside, elder brother to King Edward the Confessor, he was the undoubted heir of the crown of England, where, not being in safety to stay, he came to Scotland with his two sisters. Christian and Mar- garet. The last was married to Malcolm Canmore; her arms being the same with Edward the Confessor's, are to be seen in the monastery of Dunfermline, of which she was a founder. Her brother and sister dying without issue, she was the only heiress of the Saxon race, and from her are descended the Kings of Britain. Let these then be a suiBcient number of instances of the great revolutions and conquests of England, (besides lesser ones) and of their ensigns. The fourth period in which the English were obliged to receive the arms of a conqueror, was about the year of God 1066, when William, the seventh Duke of Normandy, being a victorious conqueror over England, his arms were set up, being gules, two leopards or, derived to him from his progenitors ; and, upon the conquest, were received as the banner and ensign of England, according to all historians and heralds, domestic and foreign. William II. succeeded his father in the kingdom of England, and had the same ensign and standard ; and he again was succeeded by his younger brother Henry I. in the kingdom of England, and dukedom of Normandy, who carried the same ensign. He married Maude, eldest daughter of Malcolm Canmore King of Scotland, and his queen, Margaret, sister and heir of Edgar Atheling, the representative of the English Saxon monarchs.. By this marriage the Saxon English blood was united OF MARSHALLING ARMS, \^c. 89 with the Nornian; and, in testimony of it. King Henry, on his seal, I mean his Sijil/um Imaji/iis, is represented in a throne, holding in his right hand a mond, or globe, with a bird upon it, being the martlet before mentioned in the arms of of tlie Saxon kings. And Sandford takes notice of it accordingly, saying, " It " was a token or emblem of the restoration in some sort of Edward the Confessoi's " kin and laws." This king survived his male issue, having only one daughter, Maude, named after her motlier, and was married first to Henry Emperor of Germany, for which she is called Maude the Empress, though she had no issue to him. And, secondly, she took for husband Geoffrey Plantagenet Earl of Anjou, and bore to him a son, Henry. The king, being sohcitous to secure the succession of the crown to his daughter and grandson, made all the estates of England swear fealty to them, as those who were to reign after him. Nevertheless Stephen Earl of Boulogne, son of the Earl of Blois, by Adela, William the Conqueror's daughter, got the crown ; and it is not likely that the English would have received him contrary to their oaths, unless the law had been for him ; for Henry the son of Maude, having the title by a woman, and Stephen the same, affirmed himself to be the tirst in succession, (William the Conqueror's male issue being extinct) because he was again the tirst male, though descended from a woman, the conqueror's daughter; and though Maude had been alive, he ought to have been preferred to her, much more to her son Henry ; and, as being the first male, he ought to be preferred, being conform to the constitutions of se- veral nations besides that of England. By which we may discover the unjust sen- tence of Edward I. in preferring Baliol to the Bruce, \?.io had the same, if not a better right than Stephen, who was looked upon by the English as the lawful heir and King of England. He carried the above royal ensign, with the two leopards, and, for a device, the sagittary, because he ascended the throne at that time when the sun entred that celestial sign ; and had for his queen, Matilda, daughter of Eustace Earl of Boulogne, by his countess, Mary, second daughter of Malcolm Can- more, and his queen, Margaret, with the same design to unite the Saxon and Nor- man blood together in his issue, which failed before himself; so that room was made for Henry, son of Maude the empress. Henry II. grandchild -tt/ifx. 32. Argent, a cheveron ^z/Zfj-. 33. Argent, two bars, and a canton azure. 34. And last coat is as the first. As also Henry, Lord Constable of Halsham in Holderness, (York E. R.) an- other of these English gentlemen who was, by letters patent of the said King James, raised to the peerage of Viscount of Dunbar in Scotland, divides the arms on his shield into coupe two, parti four, which makes fifteen areas of different bearings. The blazon of whose armorial bearing, as in Mr Pont's said Manuscript, is thus: The said Viscount of Dunbar, says he, beareth fifteen coats marshalled in one shield, viz. i. Barry of six, or and azure, his paternal coat for constable. 2. Argent, three garlands gules. 3. Crussalla of cinquefoils or, surmounted of a bend, in- grailed argent, by the name of Umfraville, sometime Earl of Angus. 4. Gules, a cheveron or, by the name of Kym, Lord of Kym. 5. Quarterly, or and gules, on a bend sable three e'scalops argent, for the name of Onarass. 6. Barry of six, vr and azure, on a canton gules, a cross fleury argent. 7. Or, a cross sable. 8. Gules, a saltier argent, with a mullet sable, for difference, for the name of Newell. 9. Or, fretty gules, on a canton parted per pale, ermine and or, the oars of a ship in cross sable. 10. Gules, a lion salient or. ii. Or, a chiei dancette azure, for the name of Glamnyll. 12. Azure, three crescents, and nine cross croslets argent, for the name Glanell of Conerhame. 13. Qiiarterly, or and gules, surmounted of ■d bend sable. 14. Sable, a bar between two garbs argent. The 15. and last, azure, a cross fleury or. But as for Sir Richard Graham of Netherby in Cumberland, baronet, who was descended from the Earls of Monteith in Scotland, another of these gentlemen ad- vanced to the Scotish Peerage by the said Kmg James, by the title of Lord Viscount of Preston, though he divides the shield of his arms by parti and eoupe lines, yet does not exceed in areas the regular number above mentioned ; for he only mar- shals his arms by coupe one, parti two, which makes but six areas, the first two being filled up with the arms of Graham, Earls of Monteith, and the rest with four other coats, which I presume his Lordship can very well account for. The blazon and figures of whose achievement will be found in Mr Guillim's Display of Heraldry. This way of marshalling arms by many coupe and parti lines in England, first began in the reign of King Edward IV. and has been much affected and followed by the English since. But though the above Queen Mary of Lorrain, and the foresaid English gentlemen, advanced by King James to be peers of this realm, give us examples of such bearings, yet I do not find that any of our Scots nobility or gentry have been fond to practise this method. And though the Germans, French, and many sovereign monarchs and princes abroad may have just grounds, for the reasons above rehearsed, to accumulate various coats of arms in one shield by a plurality of areas made up by many parti and coupe lines, yet the English heralds are to blame in so far degenerating from the regular rules of heraldry (laid down by the most intelligent heralds) in composing and marshalling arms by so many parti and coupe lines, which, when drawn, make up an unaccountable plu- rality of areas, and filling them up with such different arms as they are not able to give a just reason for. And the English have given us many such examples, which in my opinion, as 1 said before, are no more but genealogical pennons of families in England; particularly, Richard Blome has followed this method of marshaUing OF MARSHALLING ARMS, IJc. 109, arms, in a great number of examples that he gives us in his Treatise of Honour, Military and Civil, added to Mr Guillini's Display of Heraldry, some of which are but a heap of maternal descents, who have no right to carry the arms of these fa- milies, ot which their mothers and-grandmothers were neither heiresses nor repre- sentatives, and so cannot regularly or justly be marshalled, and transmitted to pos- terity as formal arms, but are and will be looked upon by all judicious heralds, and others known in the science, as a piece of maternal genealogy. Columbiere tells us, " That thirty-two areas is the greatest number used in France ; bu; tiie " English and Germans (says he) sometimes extend to forty :" as a tesimony of the truth whereof, he says, " He saw the escutcheon of the Earl of Leicester, am- " bassador extraordinary to France, in the year 1639, and 1640, divided into that " of forty ; and some, he affirms, do go on to sixty-four several coats." But that such a multitude rather make a confusion, than adds any beauty to the escutcheon. And though this method has been practised by many of the English nation, yet they have had many learned and judicious lieralds among them who ridicule such practices ; paiticularly, Sir William Dugdale, in his Ancient Usage of bearing arms, is of the same opinion with me, and much blames the quarteriiig of many marks, as he calls them, in one coat, shield, or banner ; " Because, (says he) those " marks being designed for commanders in leading their armies, and to be known " by, they ought to be apparent, plain, and easy to be discerned ; so that the " quartering of many together hinders the use for which they were designed ; for " no man can distinguish them at any distance, and ignorant persons can make " little of them near at hand." And, to confirm his assertion, he produces in- stances of fatal consequences that have happened by mistakes in not discerning the coat-armour. The first beginning of this practice in England was, as I said before, in the reign of King Edward IV. who fell in love with Elizabeth Widville, daughter to Sir Richard Widville, and widow of Sir John Grey of Groby, whom he married. And, to aggrandise and qualify her for the royal ensign and bed, she was allowed to marshal the arms of her maternal descent, being more noble than her paternal, hy coupe ons, parti two, making six areas, which is more regular by far tlian the ir- regular plurality of areas the Enghsh now aff'ect. Mr Sandford, in his Genealogi- cal History of the Kings of England, hatli, in page 285 of the said book, given the blazon of the arms of the said Q^ieen Elizabeth, which they that are curious will there find. i\nd now having gone through and treated fully, and I hope satisfyingly, of all the various methods of composing and marshalling arms of the internal parts of ar- mories contained within the shield, and the manner of forming regular arms there- in, I shall next proceed to speak to these figures which adorn the outer parts, com- monly called the exterior ornaments of the shield, with the several positions and additional trinvmings thereof Vol. II. E e Vojr Pi^'i'-y /'■<-' PAHTIV. Oj-tke^vteriirrOr?2amentiioftheShzeld. '^^^^'^^^>»^^>5^^^,-^^^^,^,^^^^^ SYSTEM OF HERALDRY. SPECULATIVE AND PRACTICAL: WITH THE TRUE ART OF BLAZON. PART FOURTH. CHAP. I. CONCERNING THE EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS OF THE SHIELD, WITH SEVERAL ADDITIONAL TRIMMINGS. HAVING treated fully of the inner pieces or figures of armories contained within the shield, I proceed to those which adorn the outer parts of the ar- morial shield, commonly called the exterior ornaments; such as helmets, mantlings, wreaths, crowns, crests, mottos, supporters, compartments, and other marks of dig- nities and offices, which are placed above, at the sides, below, and round the shield or escutcheon ; which so trimmed make a complete armorial achievement. Be- fore I treat of these figures separately, I shall speak a Httle to their rise and use in general. The shield being preferred by the ancients to other military instruments, not only for its then dignity and sign of nobility, and necessary use to cover a man's body in battle, but for the conveniency of its form to receive military marks and devices, which came at last to be the fixed hereditary marks of nobility placed within the shield, after the devised imaginary parts of a man; as in chief, collar, coeur, and Jlangue points, that is, the head, the neck, the heart, nombrial, or navel, and the thighs, or base points, which seem to relate to those parts of a man. And that the armorial shield might resemble a man the more, it is thought by some, that the custom of trimming it with crown, helmet, crest, and other marks of dig- 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. nities, was in imitation of the dress of the ancient heroes in time of war; and also after the fashion of the Roman images or statues, in place of which came arms as ensigns of nobility ; of which 1 have spoke before in the First Part of this System. Others again bring the rise of those exterior ornaments from the habit and dress of mihtary men in public military exercises, such as tournaments' and joust- ings. Which opinion seems most reasonable; for none were admitted into those exercises but such as were truly noble, and had arms as tesserae of their descent, which they adorned with exterior ornaments, to hold forth their present condi- tion and dignity, and which behoved, at their military exercise, to be exposed to public view before the time of jousting, that by those their owners might be known. Of the lav/s and forms of tournaments and joustings in several countries I spoke before, and shall only here add two laws anciently used by our neighbour nation, from a manuscript (in our Lawyers' Library) written by one John Caxton an Englishman, which he recommends to the reading of his king, Richard, and to the knights of Scotland, viz. " The victor may go out of the barriers of tournaments " and joustings with his basnet, (/. e. helmet) or he may have it placed on his " shield, or carried before him with his cognizance, motto, or cry of war. Item, " No man should wear his, cognizance or tynal {i. e. crest) upon a close basnet, " (?'. e. helmet) but he that has carried arms within the lists and barriers of mili- " tary exercises; and all other nobles should bear their tynal of their arms above " an heaum, (/. e. helmet) to show they had been at such exercises." As arms appear to have risen from military virtue, and came not in a sudden to their present perfection and beauty we now find them in, but by a long time gradually, and were of great esteem of old, being the reward of heroic action ; so they were also desired and obtained by others (not of the military employment) who justly thought they merited no less from their sovereigns, by services they performed in their civil than others in their military capacity, and so adorned their shields of arms with coronets, consular capes, battons, and Ciher such like signs of dignified offices; as did also the ecclesiastics with mitres, hats, crosiers, keys, and inher ecclesiastical marks; of which afterwards. In later times the men opulent of the vulgar, through ambition, began to place their marks in formal shields, which was not allowed to them of old, but in car- touches, ?. f. false shields; which presumption occasioned those that were truly noble by descent and military virtue, to be more diligent to distinguish themselves from the vulgar by timbring their shields of arms with the most eminent marks of their several degrees of nobility, which was not then presumed to by the ignoble. Charles de Grassalio, in his Treatise of the Regaha of France, gives the name timbre to all those marks of dignity and offices, whether military, civil, or ecclesias- tic, when placed upon the top of the shield; and which word is used also by the best of heralds. John Baptista Christyn, Chancellor of Brabant, in his Jurisprudentia Heroica, says the same. His words are, " Timbrum enim generali voce dicitur, " id omne qua; armis apponitur, aut ad significandum officii dignitatem, aut orna- " menti gratia." The crown, helmet, mantlings, wreath, crest, and other devices, the papal tiara, cardinal's hat, the patriarch's cross, the mitre, with several other things ensigning the top of the shield, are called the timbre; on all which I shall insist in the following chapters. Timbre, savs Guillim in his Display, chap. 6. Cometh from the word timmer; for that in the Allemagne tongue is the same that we in Latin call apex, or summitas acuminata, the crest. To timbre the arms is to adorn them with helmet, mantle, crest, &-C. as Chassenus noteth. Our author says, " Nulli licitum, nee solet, quis " timbrare arma sua, nisi sit saltem eques militaris vulgo clievalier," i. e. none did nor could timbre their arms but a knight, commonly called a chevalier: But with us the custom is otherwise; for, of late, every gentleman that has arms may timbre them; for each particular country have their own custom in bearing of arms; which custom seems to have the vigour of a law, " Qiiia consuetudo, ubi lex scripta non " est, valeat quantum lex, ubi scripta est." But it may seem that such bearings EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 3 timbred is rather tolerate through custom than allowed in the strict construction of the laws of arms and honour." Barnabe Moreau de Vargas makes the helmet a mark of nobility, and says it is the crest and helmet whicli distinguishes gentlemen from those that are not such. Menestrier, with other heralds, ascribes the custom of placing the helmet and crest upon shields of arms to tournaments and joustings, the arms bemg a sign of noble descent, and the helmet, crest, &-C. as marks of chivalry. And, 1 observe, the>- have been anciently so taken with us; for, of old, our nobility had only their arms in a shield without helmet or crest; as appears by their seals appended to ancient writs, and by our old paintings and manuscripts of blazons. But our high no- bility, and those famous for chivalry, had their arms, of old, timbred with helmet, crest, and other ornaments, when tournaments were in use with us; of which I have given an account in the First Volume of this System. And 1 shall here add, for my reader's better understanding, a short account of a formula in the festivals of arms, to show that the adorning of them, now in fashion, had its rise from those military exercises, viz.. " That they who came and were admitted behoved to be " gentlemen of name and armsi, and their shields hung up in public places some- " time before the prefixed day of joustings, with the helmets, crests, and other " devices placed above their shields of arms, to the end that those who came to " exercise might be known to each others, and challenges regularly given : As " also that the lords and ladies, who were to assist as judges at these exercises " might know, by the arms and devices, who had the advantage in such fights. " The shield of arms being thus exposed below the windows of houses and other " public places, which were next to the list of the barriers, were always pendent " by the left point of the shield ; upon which point were placed the helmets, " mantlings, crests," &-c. Which splendid ceremony was by the French called a Faire Fenestrie. It is then from this custom in the tournaments that we meet with so many old shields couche. i. e. pendent by the left corner upon old seals, with helmet, and other ornaments. And 1 shall give a few instances of the same practice, of old, with us, in the following chapters on the seals of our ancient nobility, which I have seen; and this position of the shield couche is taken, by antiquaries and he- ralds, as a sign that the owners of them had been at those military exercises, into which none were admitted but such as were truly noble by their paternal and ma- ternal proofs of nobility; ot wh.ch afteru'atds, vvith the other pieces of the exterior ornaments. And, firbt, of the bdmet. CHAP. n. OF THE HELMET, OR CASQ.UE. AS the head is the noblest part of the human body, so the helmet is doubtless the noblest part appertaining to the ornament of the arms of nobility. Witli the ancients it was an honourable ornament of the head called gnlta, from the Greek word r«ir, tlie skin of a beast, with which the ancients covered their heads to make th^m appear terrible in battle, as historians tell us,. Hoppingius the the lawyer says. That of old helmets were made of leather, fa/f^, mateiia prlmitus corium fiiit ; and afterwards, when^ it was made of any metal, it was called cassis, and distinguished from galea;, as our author, cassis de lamina, sit galea de corio: But at last they came to be both made of metal for the better defence of the head; so that galea and cassis are not distinguished now. The Helmet, by the Germans heien, or hellem, which imports to cover the head, as our author says, when it was adorned with a crest, the owners thereof were called .S/j/7'z/, or Brenrn; irova whence (says he, cap. g. de yure Iiisignium) the dukes of Brunswick and Brandenburg, whose predecessors were Brynni, i. e. galeati, having helmets crested ; and being governors of castles, as Brynswic, Arx Brynni, and Brandenburg, Castellum Breniii dictum fuerit. The Italians for helmet have the word elmo, which is the same with the German Vol. II. F f. 4 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. hellem; the Spaniards have the word celado, from the hatin eel are, because it hides the face. The French for helmet use the heaum, especially when they understand an old- fashioned close helmet, with holes for breathing and seeing through. But when the helmet is open, with bars, and adorned with lambrequins, crest, and other or- naments, they call it then the casque, or timbre: The last they use ordinarily for 3II the marks of dignity that are placed upon the top of the shield or escutcheon, whether military, civil, or ecclesiastic. I shall forbear here to insist upon the various forms of helmets in all ages and countries, and proceed to their matter and forms as now generally used in Europe. Heralds have observed three things in respect to the helmet, its matter, form, and situation. The matter of which they are supposed to be made is of the metals, gold, silver, and steel, which show three degrees of dignity j these of sovereign princes of gold; these of the high nobility of silver; and these of the lesser nobility, such as gen- tlemen, of polished steel. Which order is observed in Germany, but especially in Flanders, where, by an edict in the year 1616, it was not lawful for any to use a gold helmet on their shield, under the penalty of 300 florins: which was put in execution against a nobleman contravening that edict in the year 1658 ; as the author of the Observationes Eugene alogiccB et Heroica, lib. 1. cap. 8. observes, where he tells us also, that the emperor did sometimes dispense with that edict, by allowing some of his favourites, as a sign of great honoui", to use a gold hel- met; as to D. Simon de Fierlundtz, Chancellor of Brabant, by a diploma in the year 1664. As to their form, they are either close or open; some will have the first a sign of military nobility, and an open one of civil nobility. This distinction, says our author last mentioned, is not observed in Flanders, whether open or close, since both high and low nobles use them both ways; yet, in Germany, says he, a close helmet is a sign of a begun nobihty, and an open one of ancient nobility, and an helmet altogether open a sign of s&vereignty, and when with bars, of dignified no- bility, and when with a vizor with holes only, a sign of inferior nobihty. The Germans use also to distinguish the degrees of nobihty by the number of the bars; eleven of them show the sovereign dignity of an emperor and king, nine the dig- nity of a duke and marquis, seven that of an earl, five that of a lord, and three bars show the dignity of a knight, and a gentleman by descent; and the same form of helmets, with the number of bars for distinction, the Italian Sylvester Petra Sancta gives us in his Tessera Geniilitia. The situation of the helmet on the shield, fore-right, fronting, or side-ways, in- timates also the degrees of greatness and power, by the matter and form, as above: So that a close helmet, situate side-ways, is a mark, as heralds tell us, of a gentle- man or soldier, who has acquired honour by his assiduous services, being always ready to fight, and give attention to the commands of his superior. Wliether tlie side-standing helmet looks to the right or left it makes no difierence, neither is it any sign of illegitimation though tiirned to the left, though some heralds affirm it to be a mark of bastardy, as Marcus Gilbertus Dewarenius: But the most learned- heralds are not of that opinion, and look upon the side-standing helmet situate to the left to be as honourable as that to the right. For which I shall add the words of Sylvester Petra Sancta, " Obhquas versus levam statui cassides tesserarias dun- " taxat eorum, quibus desit honor legitimorum natalium, etenim utrumque per- " aeque decorum esse reor, atque est decorum, seuin dextro cornu exercitus, seu in " levo dimicare, militibusque in alterutro pra^esse." When a close helmet stands direct forward, it shows nobility altogether new, and acquired by some heroic action ; when barred and placed side-ways, the mark of some lord that has no command in battle or otherwise, but of his own vassals: But when placed fronting, intimates a chief command, not only of his own, but other companies; and when altogether open and fronting shows an absolute and independent power. I think I have said sufficiently, according to foreign heralds, a^nent the signification of the matter, situation, and form of helmets. I cannot but here add what Mene5trier says in his Origin of Exterior Ornaments, chap i.. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 5 " That all helmets were of old close and plain, until their metal, number of bars, " and situation, came to be taken notice of, and that not long ago; but since the " year 1559, when the French gave over the use of tournaments, upon the acci- " dent which happened to King Henry 11. of France, jousting in disport at a " tournament with Gilbert Earl of Montgomery, Captain of the Scots Guards, " who thereby was wounded in the eye with the splinter of a spear, of which his " majesty died." After which various forms of helmets were used, and placed upon shields of arms by the nobility, to show their degrees of dignity and quality, especially by the number of bars. The customs of France, from whence we had all our heraldry, and especially, of late, in distinguishing the degrees of nobility, by the matter, form, and situation of helmets on the shield, are, according to the French heralds, thus : The helmets of kings and emperors are all of gold damasked, fronting (as they say tarre de front) altogether open without bars and vizor; because they are to sec and know all things, and command all without contradiction. Dukes, marquises, and earls, have silver helmets damasked with gold, fronting with nine bars; the French say grille et mis df front. Viscounts, barons, and knights, iiave silver helmets with gold edges, standing in- profile, /. e. a little turned to the side with seven bars. Esquires and gentlemen of ancient descent have side-standing helmets of polish- ed steel, with five bars in the guard-vizor. To gentlemen of three descents they give a helmet in profile, i. e. standing side- ways, with three bars only. Which forms of helmets I have caused engrave in the first plate belonging to this chapter. To a Icnight they assign the helmet standing right forward with the beaver a little open, to signify direction and command. The Scots and the English have their helmets after one form, somewhat dif- ferent from those of the French. A gentleman and esquire have their helmets in profile, i. e. posited side-ways with the beaver close, to signify his attention and obedience. The helmet in profile, or placed side-ways, and open with bars, belong, to all noblemen in Britain, under the degree of a duke. The helmst right forward, and open with many bars, is assigned to dukes, princes of the blood royal, and monarchs. The monarchs of Great Britain have their helmets that same way fronting witlv bars; but the French give to their sovereigns a fore-standing helmet, open, without bars, and vizor of gold : But other sovereigns, as the emperor, have a fore-standing helmet with eleven bars of gold ; as Sylvester Petra Sancta, " Cassis penitus " aperta cum undenis clathris, est imperatoris, est regum, est principum supre- " morum." All agree that an open helmet is nobler than a close one, and a direct fore-stand- ing helmet than a side-standing one, upon the accounts above given ; yet, by our practice, a knight has a fore-standing helmet open, and our dignified nobility a side-standing helmet with bars. The reason of which seems to be, because bars are more noble than visors or beavers, though cast up ; and I think the bars should be numbered, to distinguish the degrees of our nobility. When they all go to battle, they have close helmets of steel or brass for the de- fence of the head, which are not of gold or silver, nor formed with a certain num- ber of bars, which are used for ostentation, and placed upon the top of the shield,- to show the degrees of nobility in public places, and at solemn assemblies. Our herald-painters, at funeral occasions, make the helmets of the deceased no- bility of pasteboard argaited, and parcel gilt with fine gold in oil ; and are fa- shioned after the forms mentioned with these of the English. Elias Ashm.ole, in his Institutions of the MostNoble Oi'der of the Garter, chap. XI. sect. 7. tells us, " That the Knights Companions of this Order have, besides their " escutcheon of arms, their helmet, crest, and sword hung up over their stalls in " the chappel of St George at Windsor, and ordained to remain there during the " lives of their possessors. The helmets used on this occasion (says our author) " are made of steel, large and fair, of a more than ordinary proportion, and are of " two sorts ; one appomted for sovereign princes gilded and formed open, with 6 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " bailes or bars ; the other for Knights Subjects in the reign of Henry VIII. were " parcel gilt : but in Queen EHzabeth's reign and since it is the custom to gild " the helmets all over, having close visors, and to place St George's red cross m " the middle before the visors ; and these are the form of the helmets of the Knights " of tiie Garter at Windsor : but their helmets placed on their shields of arms in " other places are after the form we have been speaking of, as all others of their " quality, without regard to them, as Knights of the garter." When there are two helmets placed on an escutcheon of arms, they look to one another of whatsomever quality the possessor be ; and when there are three hel- mets, that in the middle is placed fronting, and the other two contourne, i. e. turned to it : and if there be four helmets on a shield, two looks to two. The practice of multiplying helmets is frequent with the Germans, to show the number of their honourable feus, by which tiiey have as many votes in the circles. The helmet with them is a sign of eminent nobihty ; if there are four, six, or eight helmets, the one half of them are turned looking to the other with their mantlings and crests. OF THE ORNAMENTS OF THE HELMET, COMMONLY CALLED MANTLINGS, LAMBREQUINS, HACHEMENTS, VOLETS, 13".. ANTIQUARIES and historians tell us, as I said before, the helmets of he- roes at first were made of the skins of beasts, and afterwards, as more con- venient, of metal, which they covered with the skins of cruel and rapacious beasts, such as lions, tigers, bears, &-c. that they might appear terrible to their enemies, and stately and magnificent ; they covered not only their helmets, but also the armour of their bodies with taffeta, or other pieces of stuff, of such colours and fi- gures as they fancied, that they might be distinguislied and known in battle ; as Polyb. lib. 6. cap. 20. " Ut ejusmodi tegmentum &• ornatus pariter insigne sit, " per quod quisque, aut strenue, aut ignaviter, se in prselio gerens, a praefecto suo " agnosceretur." These coverings of the helmet are called by the Latin writers te^mtna galea,. from their use in preserving the helmets from rain and dust ; the Germans call it very fitly, helm decken, i. e. the cover or dress of the helmet, the English, mant- lings, by the French capelines, lambrequins, hachements, volets, &-c. This ornament of armory, by Guillim, is called improperly a mantle, from the French v.'ord manteau, with us taken for a long robe, a miUtary habit used in an- cient times by great commanders in the field, as well to manifest their high place, as also (being cast over their armour) to repel the extremity of wet, cold, and heat, and, withal, to preserve their armour from rust. The manteaux are different pieces of ornament of the achievement, upon which the whole achievement is laid, and called the ducal mantle, of which afterwards. But, by this ornament of the head, there remaineth neither shape nor shadow of a mantle ; for how can it be imagined, that a piece of cloth, or whatsoever other stuff, that is jagged and froun- ced after the manner of our common received mantlings, used for the adorning of the helmets, being imposed upon the shoulders of a man, should serve him to any of the purposes for which mantles were ordained. So that these being compared with those, may be more fitly termed flourishings than mantlings. Sir George Mackenzie tells us, " That the ornament of the helmet was never intended to re- " present a covering to the bearer or his shield, but only to his helmet, and carried " to show the variety of its jagged cuts sustained in battle, which was in some mea- " sure of their form, by the fluttering of the wind." The French heralds assure us, that these mantles were originally no other than short coverings, which commanders wore over their helmets to defend their heads from the weather ; and that going into battles with these, they were wont to come away with them hanging about them in a ragged manner, occasioned by the many cuts they had received on their heads ; and therefore, the mor? liacked they were, the more honourable they were accounted. When these hoods are entire and not cut, L EXTERIOR ORNAINIENTS, 7 the French call them capdines, (as that one upon the helmet of the arms of Cham . paign, so frequent m many books) and from which is a saying wiUi the French, un homme de cupeline, for a man resolute and ready to fight. Marc Voulosen de la Columbier, in the 42d chap, of his Science, says, " That " those trimmings of the helmet served as an ornament to accompany a coat of " arms, which would ha%-e had an evil grace, if the helmet had remained bare and " naked." The antientest practice of this hood, mantling or capeline, I have observed, is on the equestrian seals of the Earls of Flanders, given us by Olivarus Uredus de Si- gillis Cofnitum Flandrice, where, in that curious book, is tiie seal of Robert Earl of Flanders. He is represented iu armour on horseback, holding- on his left arm the armorial shield of Flanders ; and upon his helmet is a hood, or capeline, entire and uncut, hanging back over his neck ; and upon it was placed his crest in the years 1304, ar«i afterwards some of his successors were so trimmed with helmets on their heads, topped with their crests; which helmets, so trimmed, were not then placed on their shields of arms, until Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, and Earl of Flanders timbred his shield of arms with helmet, capeline, and crest in the year 1384, as by his seal to be seen in the fore-meptioned book, and which prac- tice continued with his successors. It is to be observed, that the trimming of the shield with helmet, mantling, and crest, came from the military dress of great men. Sandford, in his Genealogical History of the Kings of England, gives us the seal of arms of Thomas Earl of L^v^^caster, eldest son of Edmund, brother to Edward I. of England, where, upon the helmet, there is a capeline, and upon it a wiveron or dragon, for crest ; the capeline he calls an ancient mantling, and says the crest is the lirst he did see used by these of the royal family. Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, gives the equestrian side of the seal of IM'Duff Earl of Fife, where he is in armour on horseback, holding in his right hand a sword, and on his left arm his shield of arms, and upon his head his helmet affronte, and grille a capeline, with a long tail hanging over his back. In several herald books, and in one of the editions of Guillim's Display, there are entire hoods or capelines for mantlings. But I proceed to other forms of mant- lings, from which they have various names with other nations. When they are represented curiously cut like the leaves of parsley, such as those which top the pillars of Corinthian work, have made some heralds think the custom of using such on helmets to have come from garlands, made of such leaves, for which they call them feuilles. Others again, upon the account that mantlings be- ing cut and torn in several pieces and shreds, like labels hanging down, are taken for ribbands which tied crowns and garlands ; they term them lambrequins, from the latin word lemniscus, which signifies a label, piece of stuff, or ribband. The true rise of the present forms of mantlings jagged and frounced, is from the the heroes returning from battle with their hoods or capelines. Afterwards, in process of time, the same authors say, they were by degrees made deeper, and so from the helmet hung down below the whole shield, adorned according to the honour of the bearer, or the fancy of the painter: These things, which at first were regulate as marks of distinction, afterwards became common to all sorts of quality. Oliver de la March, describing the equipage of the King of the Romans, says, " That he carried a tood on his helmet, with laps hanging down to the. saddle, all " curiously cut like the leaves of parsley. Voulosen de la Columbier and Mencstrier, in their Treatises of Exterior Orna- mets, both eminent writers in this science, tell us, " That this ornament of the " helmet, sometimes represented hanging down by the sides of the shield, was of " old no other thing than the cover or hood of the helmet, (called, as before, the " capeline, when entire) which, being cut in battle, was a sign of military valour; " and, being so accidentally cut, was, by art, fashioned into the forms or shapes of " the leaves of trees or herbs, and other things that they best pleased ; and some- " times adorned with embroideries and precious stones, became a suitable dress for " true nobility, called by the French hticheinents, from the old French word ache- " vient, which signifies the ornament of the nead." And Chitiletius, in his Latin blazons of the Knights of the Golden Fleece, calls them facennunta, by changing Vol. II. G g & EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. the letter H to letter F, which ordinarily the Spainards do in other words, av Menestrier observes ; and other heralds;, who write in Latin, call them not only faceumenta, hnifascce, lacima, and p/.vikrte ; and when they do not hang down by. the sides of the shield, but riy out above the heads of the supporters, are then cal- led by the French volets. Having considered mantlings, I proceed now to their tinctures, which were of old with us, and are still with other nations, of the same with the armorial tinctures of the paternal arms of the bearers, though quartered with these of other families and dignities : and when theie are two casques, i. e. helmets, trimmed with such, then- they are of the tinctures of the quarters, for which they are the proper casques be- longing to these quarters ; as in the achievement of the Dukes of Bavaria ; quar- terly, first and fourth, sable, a lion crowned or, langued and armed gules ; second, and third, bendy lozengy, argent and azure, over all an escutcheon ^///fj-, charged with an imperial mond or : On the shield of those quartered arms are placed two helmets, adorned with their proper mantlings or hachements, viz. that on the right, sable and or ; and the other on the left, argent and azure; which two casques look to or.e another. I shall here mention the sculpture and blazon of the arms of Colonel Alexan- der M'DowALL, Baron of Lodvica in Swedland, as in the First Part of this System ; quarterly, first, azm-e, a lion rampant argent, crowned or ; second gules, an arm in. armour argent, holding a cross eroslet fitched azure ;. third, ar, a lymphad sable ; fourth, or, a rock snblc in base, and, in chief, tv.to salmons nalant, proper; and oven all, by way of surtout, an escutcheon as the first, ensigned with a double crown. The shield of his arms is timbred after the German and Swedish fashion v/ith three- crests, that in the middle being a ducal coronet, and upon it a dove,, all proper, between two helmets fronting one another, adorned with mantlings of the tinctures of the arms, and ensigned with ducal coronets in place of wreaths : out of that orr the right issueth a lion argent, crowned or ; and from that on the left, an arm in armour holding a cross eroslet fitched, as before. For which see the 5th Plate of Achievements taken from those arms finely illuminated in the middle of his patent of nobility granted by King Charles XI. of Sweden, to Colonel Gustavus Mac- dowall. Baron of Lodvica, in the year 1674, father of the above Colonel Alexander, in whose hands I have seen the patent ; as also a genealogical tree of the family, as descended of M'Dowall of MakM^ton. For more account of this family, see the First Part of this System, page 413. When many casques timbre the shield with relation to quarters, they are then of, the tinctures of those quarters they belong to ; as on the escutcheon of the Dukes of Saxony (which contain twenty-one quarters) are eight helmets, with mantlings of the tinctures of the quarters they belong to. These curtly blazoned by Imhoif, " Phalerarum quibus circumfusse sunt, has^galeae possunt ab areolis dignosci." The English have all the mantlings of gentlemen and knights red without, and lined or doubled with white within, and those of dignified nobility also red, but doubled with ermine ; and the mantlings of their sovereigns are of gold, doubled with ermine, to distinguish those degrees of nobility : so that in blazon they say, "■ Which shield is timbred with helmet and mantling befitting their quahty, with- " out naming the tinctures." Which practice of late our heralds have followed ; but by our old illuminated books of arms, I observe the mantlings to be of the tinc- tures of the arms within the shield. Ashmole, in his above-mentioned book, says, " The Knights Companions of the " Most Noble Order of the Garter have their helmets hung up in Windsor, with •' their mantlings of cloth of gold lined with white satin : at the bottom of these " mantlings hang a pair of gilt knobs burnished with gold, from which issue out " tassels either of gold or silver (according as is the metal in the king's coat •' armour) mixed with silk of the principal colours in the arms of the Knights " Companions; which tassels, being of the tincture of the arms, represent the an- •' cient mantlings; those tassels are called appendices in the statutes of Henry VIII. " No\y the knights of whatsoever dignity, as the companions with the sovereign in " this order, are allowed gold helmets, gold mantHngs, doubled ermine, as the " sovereigns; but their helmets and mantlings, in other places and oecasions, must " be after the degrees of their quality." EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. CHAP. IV. OF THE WREATH OR TORCE. THE wreath is made of two or more pieces of silk of divers colours, wreathed' or twisted together, and is called a ft/tr, quia torqiietur \ by the French, tortil, and by us, of old, the roll or ro~jii, because its pieces of dilFerent colours are stopped with flax to keep a round shape ; and for which the French call it bouilrt, from bourre, which signifies flax or wool, wherewith they stop cushions and other utensils. These were anciently called by the Latins, corolhK,plectiles, and were different of old from crowns and coronets, they being made of twisted silk of diverse colours, which fixed or tied the mantlings co the helmet, and was a part of the timbre as at this time ; but of old none was allowed to use them but these that were ho- noured -by the sovereign, or who had assisted at the coronation of kings ; as Hop- pingius, cap. 9. § I. " Qiiod jus portandi ejusmodi corollas non pertinent, nisi ad " iilos quibus ipsis collatus fuit, hie honor, aut aliquis ex illorum majoribus in coro- " natione regibus inserviret." Menestrier, speaking of this ornament, says, " That some hundred years ago " the French nobility used such garlands made of twisted silk, with which they " kept fast upon their heads their hoods and caps ; as may be seen, says the au- " thor, on ancient paintings, and especially on the images and pictures of the " old dukes of Burgundy and Milan; afterwards the use of it in armorieswas to " fasten the mantlings or lambrequins upon the helmet." Favin, in his Theatre of Honour, says, " Wreaths were made of cords of silk " twisted together, Vv'hich were of the colours of the arms, the liveries of the " owners or their mistresses, with which the ladies (says Menestrier) were wont to " tie and fix the mantlings of the knights to their helmets in the days of solem- " nizing of tournaments, for Vv'hich they are called in romances, ladies' favours ; " as in that formula of the tournament perfornied at Placenza by King Reynold. " Prom which also we learn, says our author, that the lambrequins were always of " the colours of the arms, and the wreaths might have been of any other colours. " But now-a-days the practice is otherwise in Britain, for the mantlings or 1am- " brequins are not of the colours of the arms as before ; but the wreaths are al- " ways of the armorial tinctures, and even so used by the Knights of the Garter " on their stars at Windsor." The mixture of the colours of the wreaths being taken from the metals and colours of the paternal arms, though quartered with many other coats of arms in one shield, for the more orderly disposing of the colours of the wreaths ; Gerartl Leigh gives this rule, " That the metal should be begun with first, and then " the colour :" But Sir George Mackenzie gives a more distinct rule, agreeable to the practice of other nations, " That the first tincture in the wreaths should be " that of the field, and then that of the immediate charge, and after that the next " mediate and so iforth, if there be supercharges : But yet, says he, there are " some old wreaths with us that are not of the tinctures of the arms, and possibly " they at first might have come from the colours of their mistresses' favours. By " old seals we cannot know the tinctures of the arms and wreaths ; but on the an- " cient seals of our High Stewards of Scotland they had their wreath cheque as " the armorial figure of the fesse cheque." The wreath in Camden's Latin Blazons is called tortile, in Imhoff's vitta, and sometimes tenia, and by others corolla, taking it for a garland, which the ancients used of old to adorn their hehnets with. The blazon then of such exterior ornaments already treated of runs thus: Which shield of arms is timbred with helmet and mantling suitable to the bearer's quality, and on a wreath of his tinctures for crest, &-c. If the colours of the wreath be not of these of the arms then they are to be named. Furrs used in arms are also to be found in the wreath. 10 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Wreaths are sometimes laid aside, and in their place crowns, ducal caps, or eccle- siastic tiars, upon which stand the crest ; of which I shall speak in the following chapters. When crests are used alone, as upon the sides of seals, coaches, and other uten- sils, we find them always placed on a wreath. Gerard Leigh says, " That in the " reiyn of Henry V. no man under a knight durst place his crest on a wreath, but " on an escrol ; but now he, who has liberty to timbre his arms with helmet and '-' mantlings, may place his crest on a wreath." C H A P. V. OF THE CREST OR CIMLER. THE crest is the highest part of the achievement, being placed upon the most eminent parts of the helmet, but yet so, as thai it admitteth an interposi- tion of tlie mantle, wreaths, chapeau, crowns, &c. It is named crest from crista, which signifies a comb or tuft, such as many birds have upon their heads ; as the cock, and peacock, lapwing, lark, &.c. The Persians called the Carians (an an- cient people in Asia) cocks, because they appeared in battle with crests on their helmets ; and to them some heralds ascribe the rise of arms and crests. The French heralds call them chniers, from cime, which signifies the height or top of any thing ; by the Latins, cimerium, quasi in cimo collocutum ; by the Ita- lians, ciniiero : and Minshew, in his Dictionary, calls it, conus galece, apex ; and adds, " Est in arraatura signum ad familiarum differentiam, quod gestant nobiles " in scuti suprema parte, has cristas vocant." Syl. P. S. calls it, acroteriiim, in his 72d chap, de variis tesserarix galece acroteriis. It is sometimes called by heralds, thimbnnn j but that is too general a term, for all the ornaments which adorn the helmet are called timbre of the shield. The word thimbrum or tymhrum, some derive from timbus a tomb, or monument of the dead or living, from which the verb timbrare, i. e. to timbre the shield with crown, helmet, mantlings, wreaths, crest, &c. as Hoppingius, cap. 9. " Nostri " timbri iituntur voce, facta forsan ad cimbri, hoc est busti analogium ; indeque " verbum timbrare, sive timbro galeam ornare." As for the antiquity of crests, it appears that the ancientest of the Heathen Gods- wore them even before the use of arms, and were made of iron or steel. Jupiter Ammon bore a ram's head for his crest ; Mars, that of a lion or tyger, casting out, fire at his mouth and nostrils ; and Minerva, the mistress of arts and goddess of victory, bore a sphinx between two griffins, the emblem- of secrecy ; Proteus, whom the fable represents to us in so many shapes, was a chevalier, who every day changed his crest, sometimes having the head of a lion, at other times the head of a boar, of a horse, of a bull, of a dragon, &-c. by which he was looked upon as a monster of many different forms; as the first horsemen were looked upon to be Centaurs, that is half men half horse. Hercules, for his crest, used the head of a lion, and with the skin covered his body ; Aventinus, as descended of him,, had the same ; Alexander the Great had also the head of a lion, and sometimes the head of a goat, to show that he was descended of Jupiter Ammon ; Julius Csesar carried sometimes a star, to show that he was come of Venus, at other times the head of a bull, elephant, and wolf; Marcus Corvinus, a noble Roman, had upon his helmet a raven, to commemorate a notable victory which he obtained ; because, in the time of a fight, the raven sat on his helmet, which his posterity per- petuated by such a figure. As Virgil, lib. 5. Corvir.iis plioebaea sedit cui casside fulva, Ostentans ales, preavitae insignia pugnte. Thus we see that crests are- derived from the remotest antiquity, though now not used in war, armour being laid aside ; but in coat-armour they still continue. For the ancients using them on their heads or helmets, historians and heralds give several reasons ; first, For the carrying the parts of fierce animals, that the mili- 1 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. ii tary men might appear fierce to strike terror in their enemies ; :•£ Tacitus speak- ing of the Parthiaiis ; -Ore ferarum, rictuque hotrificaiit galea?. And Virgil, lib. 8. Terribilem cristis galeam flammasque vomcntem. And, ^dly. To theend they might appear the more beautiful, and so much taller than they were, ^dly, Some earned crests out of superstition, as a token of respect and reverence; as the. Swedes, by the relation of Tacitus, who says they supersti- tiously carried the boar. His words ai-e, " Insigne superstitionis formas apronun " gestans." Hayton, in his History of the Tartars, tells, " That since the Em- " peror Zingi was delivered fiam his enemies by the meaus of an owl, which, " perching upon a tree in »/hch iie was hid, made his enemies believe there could " be no mau there, seeing the owl so tamely took- her rest: Upon which account, " as a lucky bird, the kings of that country bore the owl for their cres«; and the " Tartars had that bird after in great veneration, and thought themselves happy if " they could get any of its feathers to wear upon their heads." i^th'y, They were used to distinguish in time of battle, and to be known by their men, that they might stick fast -to them then, and rally again about them if dis- persed ; and, therefore, says an English writer, " Esquires, who had no notable " command, were not pennitted to wear such on their helmets." The primitive Christians, says Menestrier, had for their crests and cognizances burning crosses, i. e. crosses with rays. There is a resemblance of this custom yet with us in the Highlands; when invaded, the inhabitants send burntcrosses through the country to make all run to arms.. Of old none were allowed to use crests and cognizances, but those that were eminent; as Diodorus Siculus in his History of Egypt; neither did the Romans allow them to be used by any under the degree of a knight: And the Emperor Vespasian discharged the use of them from those that had not saved seven citizens, " Q^iii septem cives non servassent." Anciently those devices or cognizances were arbitrarily taken up, and laid down at pleasure, and were not fixed and hereditary marks of families as afterwards : .But we may say the first use of them became the seed and elements of armories, wiien they passed from the heads of heroes to their shields, banners, pennons, ahd gideons; but, in later times, these cognizances or devices, we may say, do now pass from the shield to the helmet first used upon it, having the same signification and import; as is observed by Hoppingius rfc J;/?-? Insignium, cap. 9. memb. 8. " lUud fere regulare est quod ea;dem galea; imponun- " tur figurse, qure scuto insertte conspiciuntur; quo casu, quae originis causa in " scuto, eadem ut plurimum & in galea erit, dixi ut plurimum, nam nobilissimi " collumniorum in Italia familia. illud quo galeae erat insignse, clypeo applicavit, " postea vero ad galeam revocavit." The family of Cclonni in Italy it seems used on their helmet a pillar for their cognizance, relative to their name Colonna, which they afterwards placed in tlie shield, as the armorial fi.gure of the family, and since have placed again for a crest. And, as I observed before, his Majesty George, King of Great Britain, has now in the royal achievement of Britain the wild horse of Saxony, ingrafted by way of ente, which before was the crest of the Dukes and Princes of Brunswick. But more of such changes immediately. The crest, of whatever figure, was first carried of old by heroes on the top of their helmets, anciently called by us and the English badges, and cognizances by the French and Italians, for their symbolical import. Devices and impresses are of an older use than arms; and some say, that those ancient badges being afterwards regulate, fixed, and made hereditary marks of honour, to the descendants of a fa- mily, placed on surcoats, banners, shields, and other military utensils, were from them called arms, and for a long time continued within the form of the shield, without any embellishments adorning the outer parts of it as now. The first rise of those embellishments in adorning the helmet were used in battlesat general musters; and especially in tournaments and joiistings in Franca Vol. II. H h 12 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. and Germany, where these military exercises first began ; and then proceeded to other countries, where great men desired to be known, and to signahze them- selves: And it being requisite that they should all bear different things to be known by, that great variety, among such a number of commanders, was very agreeable by the variety of crests, which were taken for some particular cause and motive; and accordingly they had some mysterious signification, to express some remarkable action, or other notable thing appertaining to their family or country. Our historians have mentioned some solemn tournaments holden with us in the reign of Alexander II. ; and much about the time that the English solemnized them in the reign of Richard I. where I doubt not but the armorial shields of knights were then trimmed fashionably, as those of France and Germany. Old seals apppended to evidents, especially those called sigilla imagims, do repre- sent the dresses of knights of old, having the image of the owner in a military dress, fashionable to the times, most frequently on horseback, brandishing a sword by the right hand; on tlie left arm the shield, and on the head a helmet, ensigned with his crest or cognizance, for which called an equestrian seal. The other side, or reverse, called sigilium armorian, which contains the shield of arms without any em- bellishments, and sometimes trimmed with exterior ornaments. A few of which. shields I shall here mention, appended to evidents and authentic deeds.. Equestrian seals were first used by great men represented on horseback, having their shields of arms on their left arm, and their heads covered with helmets, mantlings, wreaths, and crests; which trimmings came afterwards to timbre the shield of arms. As for the ancient use of them with us, I shall begin with Sir James Balfour, Lyon King at Arms in the reign of King Charles I. who, in a manuscript of Ex- terior Ornaments, said to be written by this author, the use of which manuscript I had from Balfour of Denmiln, a near relation of his, and have a copy of it by me, says, in his 12th chap. " That after all the enquiry and search he could make for " old seals in Scotland, he could find no seal timbred with helmet and crest, till " the reign of King David I. except one which belonged to Gilchrist Earl of " Angus, who lived in that king's reign, and had on his helmet a flourishing " branch of a palm tree; which seal was appended to a charter of his to the mo- " nastery of Dunfermline. And near about that time, says our aathor, the Earl " of Sutherland had on his seal a shield of arms timbred with a helmet, and " thereupon for crest a cat salient, which is carried to, this day by the family." William de la Haya, (one of the progenitors of the Earls of Errol, High Constable of Scotland) his seal of arms appended to a charter of donation, granted by him of the lands of Ederpnllis en le Carss, to the abbacy of Cupar, (which donation was confirmed by King Wilham, in the 7th year of his reign) had the shield of arms of Elay, as now carried, tin.bred with a helmet, and, for crest, a falcon volant: But it seems there were no supporters, otherwise our author had not omitted them. He tells us also of Sir Williasi Wallace, Governor of Scotland under John Baliol, the then pretended king, who had on his seal a shield of arms timbred with a helmet, and, for crest, a swan's head couped, appended to a grant of his, thus: " WiUielmus Wallace, miles, custos regni Scotia; sub Joanne rege, & cum con- '■ sensu communitatis ejusdem regni, dedisse oflicium Constabularitatis Jacobo ■' Scrymgeour de Dudop, militi regis vexillario :" He likewise gives the seal of Sir James Douglas, the Flower of Chivalry, having his shield of arms timbred with a helmet, and, for crest, a bird. He lived in the reign of Robert I. I have seen the armorial seal of James Earl of Douglas and Marr, Lord of the barony of Cavers, handsomely embellished, appended to a charter of his of the date the 27th of July 1389, where his arms were, quarterly, first and fourth a man's heart, and on a chief three stars for Douglas; second and third a bend betwixt six cross croslets fitched, for Marr, timbred with a helmet and hachements, and wreaths ; and, in place of a crest, topped with a plume of feathers : the achievement was supported with lions gardant, and at their backs a tree growing, all within a pale of wreathed wood. In the year 1442 there was a judicial tran- lumpt of this charter taken before the Abbot of Melrose, with the description of the seal by a notary, which 1 thought fit to insert here, and is as follows, " Charts. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. i^ " bon« meaioriffi domini Jacobi comitis de Douglas & de Mair, ac doniiiii h:i- " ronias de Cavers, cum i>ao vera sigillo, rotundo in cera rubra alb-x impressa, " modo chartarum penden. sigillatum, in ciijus quidem sigilli rotunditate sen cir- " cumferentia sculpebantur htec verba, sigillum Jacobi comitis de Douglas St- in- " fracircumferentiam sculpebaturclvpeu:. trianguhiris, St supra dictum clypeum le " timrale, S^- qui'dam bosca de pluniis, & ex utraque parte ijusdem clypei qua;dam " arbor cum ramis. Dictus vero clypeus gestus erat cum bestia sylvestri, ad mo- " dum leonis seu leopardi ;: &• intra dictum clypeum bculpcbuntur tres stellulae & " unum cor, &- in intima parte idem, &• in secunda fci iniima parte sculpebantur " sex cruciuncuL-E, vulgariter diet, croyslets cum Ic band in medio eorundem; &- " in duabus superioribus partibus dicti clypei erat sculptura facta modo contrario " ad inferiorem sculpturam." The last words import what heralds say, first quarter and fourth the same, second and third the same, being all counterposed in quartered bearings. I have added tliis bla/on for its antiquity given us by a common no- tar. If he had begun with a description of the shield before he had begun with the outer parts, it had been better. Let this instance be sufficient for the practice of our nobility having their hel- mets adorned with plumes of feathers (instead.of other things) for their crests, which was agreeable to the practice of other nations, who had feathers only for their crests ; as Lipsius observes, " Nescio quo naturEe ductu, ubique terrarum fere " bellatores hoc affectant, orientales passim atque etiam rudes isti in novo orbe, et " majores nostri et hinc insignia ista familiarum varia quibus superbimus." And Polybius, speaking of the exterior ornaments as we are doing, says, " Prncter ha;c " omnia adorantur corolla plumea, pennisque puniceis, albis &- nigris, erectis " longitudine fornia: cubitalis, quae in summo vertice ca:teris armis addide- " lint. " The ostrich feathers, most glorious, were more desired and sought after than others, for embellishing the helmets of great men. The cognizance and device of the Princes of Wales is a coronet adorned with these feathers, since the battle of Cressy in France, where. Edward the Black Prince of Wales took it from the head of John King of Bohemia fighting for the French. And such feathers became also, with some variation in their tinctures, 3. device to other sons of the royal family of England ; of which before in the First Part of this System. The tufts and plumes of feathers in old books of tournaments were called plum- ailes or plumars, says Menestrier, and were placed in pipes, which rose from the top of the helmet, frequently to be seen on the old helmets of the Germans, as also these of the Dukes of Savoy ; and these pipes have been by some writers taken for pillars. The Gern ans of old, and at this time, have their helmets adorned with the wings of birds, called voles, with the figure of some animal, a? also with winding horns, which they used in tournaments, and sometimes with high caps called spiteboods, ordinarily of the tincture of the arms, and charged with the proper figures after the partitions of the field, as parti, coupe, tranche, taille, and quarterly cheque, and h%engy, paly, and bendy ; as may be seen in their books of arms. But to return more particularly to crests, which were sooner used upon the hel- met of the chevalier in battle, and afterwards on heads of their images in equestrian seals, and then upon the helmets, which timbres now the shield, both with us, the English, and other nations, of which I shall add here a few instances. I have observed no crests on the equestrian seals of our ancient kings, but on their heads, helmets, and on their crowns : Neither are there any crests to be found, as 1 am informed, upon the seals of the kings of England, till Edward III. who began his reign 1327. " And as he was the first king," says Sandford in his Genealogical History of England, " that quartered the arms of France and Eng- " land in one shield; so he was the first that used a crest, viz. a lion passant gar- " dant, crowned upon a chapeau, with which his figure on horseback was adorn^- " ed, as on his royal seal. " The first crest to be met with on the seals of the Earls of Flanders, (given us by Olivarus Uredus de SigiUis Camitum Flaudriee') with whom arms were in high 14 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. esteem, is that of Philip Earl of Flanders, where he is represented in armour on horseback, supporting by his right hand a square banner, whereon was depicted the hon of Flrtuders, and on his left arm a shield with the same lion, and upon the top of the helmet on his head, for crest, a demi-hon. Which seal of arms was ap- pended to an evidence of his in the year iioi. One of his successors Robert Earl of Flanders, had on his .seal, in the year 1104, his own picture in armour on horseback, holding by his left arm the shield of arms of Flanders, the helmet on his head adorned with a capeline or manthng uncut, upon which stood, for crest, a dragon ; and another like unto it was placed upon the head of his horse : on the reverse, or other side of his seal, was the es- cutcheon of his arms, neither trimmed with crown, helmet, mantling, or crest. His successor Lodovick Cressiacensis Earl of Flanders 1329, had a lion seiant, between two horns, for a crest, on the equestrian side. And his son and successor Lodovick Maleanus Earl of Flanders, anno 1.346, had not only for crest the Hon upon the equestrian side, but on the^ other side or reverse a shield couche, charged with the lion of Flanders, and timbred with a helmet and capeline ermine, and upon it a demi-vole for crest : And upon another seal of his in the year 1382, there is a lion seiant, holding the escutcheon of Flanders, with its head in a helmet (in place of that which timbres the shield) and thereupon a crown relevate with flowers, and issuing out of it a demi-lion between two voles for crest. And this is the first practice of timbring escutcheons with helmet, capelines, crowns, and crests, upon the seals of the Earls of Flanders. As for the ancient seals of the nobility in Scotland, one side of them for the most part were equestrian, long before they timbred their escutcheon of arms with the above-mentioned ornaments ; of which I shall give three or four in- stances. On a seal of Rolland, Constable of Scotland, he is there- represented on horse- back in armour, with a sword in his right hand, and on his left arm a shield charged with a cheveron ; which figure was also on the caparisons of his horse, before and behind. This seal was appended to a charter of his, wherein he is designed RoUandus, Jilius Uthredi const ahularius regis Scotorum, granted to Allan Sinclair, and Matilda his spouse, of all the lands which William Morville, gave to them : which charter is in the custody of Sinclair of Herdmanston, Dr,. of Medicine. I. have seen several seals of the ancient Earls of Dunbar and March, appended to evidents and charters ; as that one belonging to Patrick Earl of Dunbar, v/ho married Ada, daughter to King William, granted by him to the abbacy of Mel- rose : which seal had but one side after the equestrian form, a man in armour on- horseback, holding in his right hand a sword, and on his left arm a shield charged with a lion rampant, within a bordure charged with roses. His grandson Patrick Earl of Dunbar had such another equestrian seal in the year 1251, with this vari- ation, that the arms of Dunbar, as above blazoned, were also on the capari- sons of his horse ; and on the back of the seal, or reverse, was the impression of a lesser seal, having a. shield charged with a lion rampant, and the legend round, Si~ giUum Annorum. His successor Patrick Earl of March and Dunbar, v/ho lived in the reign of King Robert I. had only a plain shield on his seal of arms, viz. a lion rampant, within a bordure, charged with eight roses, without helmet, crest, or any other exterior ornaments. The first of this family who had a shield of arms timbred, was that of George Earl of March Lord Annandale and Man, with a helmet, and for crest, issuing out of a wreath, the head and neck of a horse bridled ; the supporters of these arms were two lions seiant, and behind them two trees : which seal was appended to a charter of his of the lands and wood of Sorrowlsfield to the abbacy of Melrose, the 8th of May 1400. These charters and seals 1 did see in the custody of Mr David Simson, Historiographer for Scotland, who told me he had them from the Earl of Morton's charter-chest. Thomas Randolph, who married a sister of King Robert the Bruce, on his seal of arms appended to a donation of six merks out of the lands of Redpath, to the monks of Melrose, to say prayers for the soul of Alexander III. was only a shiekl' I EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS, 15 charged with three cushions, without any other exterior ornaments. His son Thomas EaiL of Muiikay, Lord ^Vnnandale and Man, had his shield ot'arms as his fatlier, without any exterior ornaments. Which two seals of arms were placed upcn a compartment like a rose, and are supposed to be si^illa piivata, their pri- vate seals, which are nut trimmed so as then- great seals. Six James Balfour, in his foresaid manuscript, says, " That lie has seen the seal of this Thomas Earl of " Murray, nephew to Kuig Robert I. which had the arms of Randolph, a shield " charged with tbrc»e cushions witlvn a double tressure, flowered and counter- " flowered, the shield timbred with helmet, raantlings, and wreath, out of the last "• issued a demi-lion gardant. " Roger Quincy Earl of Winchester in England, who came to Scotland in the reign of King William, and obtained great possessions, being Higii Constable there in ri.^ht of his wife, the eldest daughter of Allan of Galloway, Constable of Scot- land, granted several charters, one of which 1 have mentioned in the First Part of this System, to Sccher de Seaton, to which is appended his seal in red wa.x, with two sides ; the face is equestrian, having a man in armour on horseback brandish- ing a sword, and on his left arm a triangular shield, charged with seven mascles, three, three, and one, and had the same figure on the caparisons of his hor^e, and below its belly a winged dragon, with these words- round the seal, Sis'il. Rogeii dc ^li/icY comitis H'incestrite. On the other side of the seal, called the reverse, is a man standing in a coat of mail, with a sword in his right hand, and supporting a long triangular shield by his left, with the foresaid figures, being in a posture as if he were combating with a lion erect, having his two fore paws on the shield, and below his hinder feet a rose ; the man's head and face being covered with a close helmet, ensigned with a circular diadem, but not adorned with flowers; upon which stands a dragon with wings and tail nuved for crest ; and the legend round, Sigil- lum Rogeri de ^lincy constabularii Scotia: which charter and seal is in the Earl of W^inton's charter-chest : the charter has no date. This Roger is said by our historians to have died in the year 1264 : and on the account of his relation with the family of Seaton, it is thought that that family, being dignified with the title of Earl of Winton, carries the same dragon which Qumcy used for crest. Sandford, in his Genealogical History of England'; gives us the seal of arms of Thomas Earl of Lancaster, who died in the reign of Edward II. on which he is represented on horseback, in his coat of mail, with the surcoat of his arms ; upon his helmet stands a wiveron or dragon for his crest, and from it lambrequins. Our author says, " This is the first crest and mantle he obsened in the royal fa- " mily of England, his horse being also caparisoned with his arms, Viz. gules, three " Wons passant gardant or, the wiveron being also fixed on the head of his horse. " His seal had also a reverse, upon which was a large shield charged with the said " three lions, and a label of five points." But this shield was not timbred with helmet, mantling, and crest, as afterwards. For our author tells us in his fore- cited book, " That the first shield he observed timbred with helmet, mantling, and crest, was that of Thomas Mowbray, who was made Earl of No ttingh-VM by King Richard II. per juncttiram gladii ; and, by patent. Earl Marshal, the 12th of Fe- bruary 1382, being the fir^t Earl Marshal of England ; those befortr him were only marischals, without that title of dignity : And afterwards upon the 29th of Sep- tember 1397, he was advanced by the same king to the dignity of Duke of Nor- folk. His shield of arms was then timbred with helmet, mantlings, and cha- peau ; upon which stood a lion yxiXM/i/jl^a/rfiW?, gorged with a duke's cro.vn for crest. If this be the first practice for timbring shields of arms in England, the practice has been sooner with us, as is given by the fore-mentioned instance:. I shall add another well known, viz. the armorial seal of John Stewart Earl of Carkick, eldest lawful son of Robert High Steward of Scotland, who, before his father was king, had his shield ot arms timbred with a helmet, mantling, and wreath, and upon it for crest a demi-lion : Which seal was appended to a charter of his to the church of Glasgow, in the year 1360; and his seal of arms, after his father's accession to the crown, was not only timbred, but supported by two lions. Vol. IL Li x6 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. The figures of animals and other things placed upon the top of the helmet ot heroes for crest, in battle or in tournaments, were made of pasteboard, parchment, or boiled leather, formed and illuminate with colours suitable to the things they would have them represent, as Columbier tells : And that sometimes they were made of timber or thm uon ; but these being weighty, they were more frequently- made of the foresaid matter, and fixed to a piece of leather, which was also fixed to the top of the helmet, and which leather was covered with the capeline or mantlings. The crests of the Knights of the Garter set upon their stalls at Windsor, Ashmole says, are either placed upon the wreath, or on a crown or ducal cap turned up with ermine ; and of whatsoever form their crests be, they are neatly carved in wood,, and either gilt, or wrought in their proper colours- in oil. When placed on the heads of heroes they look straight forward ; but when, they top the helmet which timbres the escutcheon, they follow the position- of the helmet direct forward in profile or side-ways ; and when more hel- mets are on a shield than one, they look to one another, as before men- tioned. All who are allowed to place on their shield of arms a helmet, may adorn it with manthngs, wreath, and crest ; as Sir George Mackenzie in his Science of He- raldry, page 90. For men choose what crests they fancy ; only it is not proper to choose such things as could not stand, or be carried by warriors upon their hel- mets, as balances or other things, which cannot either stand fixed, nor wave handsomely. I proceed to give account of crests, whose various forms depend upon the fancy of the bearers, who made choice of such which best pleased them for the time ; yet, it is presumed, many has assumed crests upon divers considerations, of which I shall add some from the practice of armories. Many considerable persons have taken the armorial figure, the charge within the shield, or a part of it for crest ; then the helmet is said to be aniiet, as the di- minutive of the arms : Generally the German casques are so armet ; and when the crest with them is of no figure, or part of the charge, yet that it may show forth the tessera of the family, they make it of the tinctures of the field, or by the par- tition lines of the arms it timbres. The crest of Scotland is a lion (the armorial figure of the kingdom) seiant full- faced gules, crowned or, holding in his dexter paw a naked sword, and m the si- nister a sceptre, both erected. That of England is a leopard, or, as they call it, a lion passant gardant or, be- cause three of them are the armorial figures of that kingdom. The Emperor's crest is a double eagle ; the Kings of France have a flower-de- luce, and the Kings of Castile and Leon, a castle and lion, the proper charges of their imperial ensigns ; so that their helmets are armet, as the French say. The helmets of subjects are often ar?jiet with crests, being a part, or the haill, of their armorial figure. A few examples 1 shall here add ; as Home Eaii of Home has his helmet armet with a lion's head erased argent, his armorial figure being a lion. Ker Earl of Roxburgh, who carries in his paternal coat three unicorns' heads erased, takes one of them for a crest ; and Ker Earl of Lothian has for crest the sun in his glory, because he carries the same in his coat of augmentation. Seaton Earl of Dunfermline, the Earl of Melville, and the Lord Gathcart, have crescents for their crests, which are the armorial figures in their shields ; and Forrester Lord Forrester has a hunting-horn, having three for his arms. Many other in- stances might be added, which 1 omit for brevity's cause. Sometimes the crest is a part of one or other of the supporters, v>/hich are placed at the sides of the shield ; as that of Keith Earl Marischal, who carries for crest a hart's head proper, having two harts for supporters. The Earl of Lin- lithgow's crest is a demi-savage holding a batton, his lordship's supporters being two savages with battons. The Earl of Wemyss has for crest a swan, and for sup- porters two of the same. Supporters might have been as well said to have been taken from crests, being more ancient in armories than supporters : and I doubt not but some have been so, for crests have been used in armories before supporters. But, in a general way of speaking, as to their particular forms, and shapes, crests EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 17 might have been later in families; for every one may alter his crest as he thinks fit. The armorial figures within the shield are not all fit to be used for crests, espe- cially the honourable ordinaries, or such things as cannot stand fixed, or wave with beauty ; in which case they are necessitated to take other figures tit for that end ; as the principal family of the name of SitWAKT and its branches, carrying only a fesse cheque, took other figures for their crests ; as John Earl of Cakrick before mentioned, he and his predecessors had demi-lions, or lions' heads for their crest : The Stewarts Earls of Lennox a bull's head: Stewarts Earls of Athol a wolf's head, because many such creatures were in that country ; and the SrEWARrs Earls of BucHAN, a garb, the armorial figure of that kingdom; and tiie Stewarts Earls of Galloway and Murray have but one figure for their crest, viz. a pelican feed- ing her young, but with difierent mottos ; and the Stewarts of Ochiltree, for crest, a civet cat. I shall here mention the two seals of Robert Duke of Albany, Earl of Fife and Monteith, brother to King Robert II. which I have seen. Tlie first of them was appended to a precept of his to the abbacy of Melrose 26th of May 1399, befiire he was made a Duke. The shield of this seal was coucbe, charged with a fesse cheque, and surmounted with a lion rampant, and timbred with a helmet standing forward and open, adorned with a capeline, and upon it a wreath cheque of three tracts, out of which, for crest, issueth a wolf's head and neck with an arrow s-ticking in it, and holding in his mouth a rose. This achievement was supported by two Y\ons seiant &nCi gardant. His other seal, when Duke of Albany, was supported and timbred as the former, with this alteration only within the shield, tliat it was quartered first and fourth, a lion rampant ; second and third, a fesse cheque, with such a wreath as the former with the crest upon it, which does readily show to whom the crest belongs. Noblemen of old, in the solemnities of riding, of parliaments, creation of nobility, and other solemn meetings and processions, were in use to have their badges, be- ing their crests, embossed, or wrought out in plate of gold or silver, and placed upon their servants' coats or mantles, being of silk : And since these solemnities are in desuetude, their crests are placed on their silver plates, with the wreath and motto, by which silver plates or seals it is known to what family they belong, though their shield of arms be not there placed. Also the descendants of noble famihes carry the crest of their chief, which they have right to do, as well as their arms, but cannot be so well distinguished by tliese badges without some mark re- lative to their descent ; and, they not being willing to add such marks of cadency to their crests, as Sir George Mackenzie observes, they choosed rather to carry dif- ferent crests, which is the reason we see so many, vai'ious crests carried by gentle- men of one name and family. I am of opinion the vai'iety of crests might have been prevented, and may be for the future, by placing their marks of caden- cy on the crests of their families from which they are descended, and which has been formerly practised by some, and especially by the princes of the blood royal, kings' children, brothers, uncles^ and nephews, in Scotland, England, and France, who not only carry the royal arms, but their crests, with their marks of filiation ; and even the natural sons of kings do the same, having their marks of illegitima- tion, or placing them on their crests. No other subject of whatsoever quality is allowed to carry the crest of a sove- reign prince without licence from him. Thomas Mowbray Duke of Norfolk, Earl rvlar^hal of England, by concession of Richard II. of England, carried the crest of England. Howard Duke of Norfolk, as descended of a daughter and heir of the foresaid Mowbray Duke of Norfolk, carried the royal arms marshalled ■with his paternal; and for crest that of England a \:\on passant gardant ^ules, gorg- ed with a ducal crown, which descended to his successor Thomas Duke of Norfolk, and his son Henry Earl of Surrey, who w^re arraigned for treason upon several ar- ticles ; one of which was for quartering and using arms which belonged to the king and prince, which the Earl justifying that they pertained to his ancestors, by the records of the Herald Office, nevertheless was found guilty, and executed on ToWer- hill, by order of Henry VIII. of England ; as Sandford, in his Genealogical History. This family afterv.-ards being reponed to fortune and honours, carried the foresaid ' i8 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. royal ensign, and all the noble branches of that family cany them also ; as ire Guillim's Display of Heraldry. John Duke of Lauderdale obtained a special warrant from King Charles II. to bear the crest of Scotland, with a flower-de-luce in the sinister paw of the lion, in place of the sceptre : And others before him, for special services to the king and king- dom, have been rewarded with pieces of the sovereign's achievementtobe their ciests ; as John Ramsay Viscount of Haddington, and Earl of Holderness in England, carried, by royal permission, for his crest, the device of Scotland, viz. a thistle vertr ensigned with an imperial crown or : And the honourable family of Cunningham Earls of Glencairn have been in use, for a long time, to carry for crest an uni- corn's head couped argent, horned and maned or, being the head of the royal sup- porter of Scotland. As also Home of Wedderburn, for his frequent services against the English, carries the same, with the addition of being gorged with an open crown, as in the royal achievement, as may be seen on the church of Dunglass (if they have not been of late defaced) whereof he the said Wedderburn. was a founder, with the Earl of Home's progenitors ; as also on the frontispiece of the House of Wedderburn, and on a seal of arms in custody of his progenitor Sir David Home of Wedderburn, appended to a discharge of his to Sir Alexander Home of that Ilk, the 27th of January 1443. The Barons of Craigmiller, of the name of Preston, were in use of old to have for crest an unicorn's head and neck gorged with an open crown, and issuing out of a ducal one in place of a wreath ; which is still to be seen on the gate of ths House of Craigmiller, timbring the arms of Preston. These then that have not their crests from any part of the sovereign achieve- ment, or their own, take other figures that best pleases the assumers. Some, to show their alliance to honourable families, do take for crest that which best fits their design ; as that used by the Earl of Strathmore, being the bust of a lady, holding in her right hand the thistle of Scotland, and surroimded with a circle of laurel, in memory that one of the family married King Robert II. his daughter, of whom they are descended. Bethune of Baltbur, upon the account of marrying with the heiress of Balfour of that Ilk, not only quarters the Balfour's arms with their own, but also used their crest, viz. an otter's head erased. Crests are sometimes assumed to perpetuate some eminent action done by their progenitors or themselves. Dalziel Earl of Carnwath hath, for crest, a sword in pale, to perpetuate a martial deed of one of his progenitors ; of which story be- fore. The Lord Somzrville has had for crest, of old, a monstrous creature like a dra- gon, spouting out fire before and behind, standing on a wheel, upon the account (as the story goes) that John Somerville Baron of Linton in Teviotdale, (one of the progenitors of this noble family) in the reign of King William, killed a monstrous destructive creature in Teviotdale, by a little fiery wheel at the end of a spear ; and which crest has continued still in the family. The crest of Kikrpatricil of Closeburn is a hand couped, holding a bloody dagger in pale, upon the account that his progenitor Roger Kirkpatrick, who stood early tor the interest of Robert the Bruce, killed dead his enemy John Cumin, to-named Red, in Dumfries church ; and using a motto relative thereto, /'// make sicker. Sir William Scott of Thirlstane, baronet, or, a bend azure, charged with a mullet pierced betwixt two crescents of ths first, within a double tressure flowered and counter-flowered of the second. Which arms are timbred with helmet and mant- lings ; and upon a wreath of his tinctures has for crest a mural crown, and issuing thereout six horsemen's banners or spears, with pennons thereat, three and three disposed in saltier, with the motto. Ready ay ready, with suitable supporters, as in the 15th Plate of Achievements, Vol. I. King James V. was pleased to honour John Scott of Thirlstane, a gentleman of entire loyalty, for his frequent and ready services to his Majesty, with a special concession of a part of the royal ensign, the double tressure, and other suitable figures, to adorn his armorial bearing, which I have seen under his Majesty's hand, and the subscription of Sir Thomas Erskine of Brechin, secretary, which I have caused insert in the First Volume of this System, page 97. And a genea- 1 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 19 logical account of this family is to be seen in the Appendix annexed to this vo- lume. Sometimes crests are taken to represent the offices and employments of the bearers. The chancellors of France adorn their arms ordinarily with the proper crest of office, being the figure of a woman representing France, holding by lier right hand 'a sceptre, and by the left the great seal of the kingdom. The old Earls of Dunbar and March, who were hereditary keepers and wardens of the marches of Scotland and England, from which they had the title of March, had always, for crest, a horse-head bridled, to show their readinesss in prosecuting out-fang and in-fang theft. The Lords Johnsxons, now Mafquis of Annandale, as wardens of the West Marches of Scotland with England, took, for, crest a spur with wings, to show their readiness. And in Annandale, Jardine of Applegirth, an ancient Family, who joined with the Johnstons, has a spur-rowel for crest. Others in civil employments have, for crest, the chief instruments of their trades, as writing-pens carried by clerks and writers, to show their rise by these employ- ments; of such I have given several instances in the First Volume of this System from the Lyon K.egi:,ter. Crests are sometimes assumed as relative to the name and designation of the assumers. Cock.b'j.in of that Ilk, a cock; Craw of Heugh-head, a craw; Roch- HEADS of Craigleith and Innerleith, the head of a man in profile all rough or hairy: And such practice is used abroad by the Ursini in Italy, who carry a demi- bear for crest, in allusion to the name : And some have crests relative to their de- signation, as by the Scotts Earls of Buccleugh, and by the present dutchess, a buck's head erased, proper ; and Ross Lord Ross of Halkhead, a falcon's head erased, relative to his title. Such as change their arms upon just and honourable grounds retain ordinarily a figure of their old arms for their crest, to show their descent from the original house. Thus the Dukes of Brunswick, now known by the title of Prince Elector of Hakover, carried the wild horse for their crests in their old arms for West- phaha: But now, as I showed before, since King of Great Britain, ingrafts by way of ente the Westphalia horse in the arms of Great Britain. The Counts of Thoilouse carried anciently a sheep, which they use now for their crest, having got new arms, viz. gules, a cross clechi, vitide, and poniette or. The family of Colonnta, which formerly earned a mermaid for their arms, has now a pillar, and the old figure, the mermaid, for their crest. The Bruges of Skelton, in England, carried for arms argent, a lion rampant azure; and, when one of the family married the heiress of Annandale in Scotland, laid aside his paternal coat, and carried only those of his lady, viz. or, a saltier and chi&i gules, but retained the old figure, the lion, for a crest; as by Bruce Earl of Elgin, and many ancient families of that name with us, who have the lion, the old figure of the name, for crest. Stewart Earl of Traqliair, to show his descent, has a garb for crest, as come of the Stewarts Earls of Buchan; and some, to show their maternal descent, take a figure from their maternal coat for crest ; as Seaton of Touch has a boar's head couped or, (the figure of Gordon) being descended of Sir Alexander Seaton, and his lady the heiress of Gordon of that Ilk. And the same practice is in England, where Sturton Lord Sturton has for crest a monk in a Franciscan habit, holding in his right hand a scourge, or whip, carried formerly by the surname of Monk, whose heiress one of the progenitors of the Lord Sturton married ; and from them descended the family of Sturton. Though these instances make crests to appear to be hereditary and necessary to all the descendants, as well as arms, yet this science and its rules, by the practice of all nations, has allowed a freedom to change their crests, and alter them after the fancy and circumstances of the bearers, being but an ornament of coats of arms, and so more of the nature of a device than a fixed settled piece of hereditary armorial bearings. Hence it is we see so many families of one stock and name use different crests, to show their inclinations upon several accounts, as before mentioned. Vol. II. K k 20 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. We find, as before observed, that most part of crests used by the ancient heroes, and since by knights in their exercises, in tournaments, and other festivals, from which the use of timbring arms proceeded, were nothmg anciently but the devices and marks of gallantry and love, as Faulus Jovius tells us; who likewise says, " That when Charles VIII. and Lewis XII. of France marched into Italy with " glorious armies, the French officers being then fond of devices, and to distinguish '■ their companies, adorned ensigns and banners with such ; which amused the " Italians, who fell in love with such figures, and afterwards improved them to " greater perfection than any other nation, under certain nice rales and prescrip- " tions ; and so laid the foundation of the curious science of devices, in which they " excel." I am not to treat of that science here, being out of my road, but of armorial mnttos v/hich adorn arms. C H A P. VI. , or MOTTOS, CRIES OF WAR, AND DEVICES. THESE three are often taken for one another in this science, and all called devices; but to distipguish them, I shall treat of them separately in this chap- ter, and here to speak briefly of them. Mottos and cries of ixar consist of a word or words without any figure; and the device here mentioned is a figure without a word, being a representation and em- blem, or hieroglyphic, painted to express something that is to be kept in mind; and these were much in use among the Egyptians, and other ancient nations. The word without a figure, and the figure without a .word, are looked upon as imperfect devices; but when the word and figure are joined together, making an allusion, to show the inclination and humours of the assumers, or of something done, or to be done, though they be not easily understood by the vulgar, ars perfect devices, consisting of a body (the figure) and soul (the word), as heralds say. These were much used in former ages, and in later times they are more used, with the addition of a motto to explain the signification. Great and curious men have been in use to have them embroidered or painted on their furniture of military and civil dignities, and on their seals accompanying their armorial achievements, for which heralds reckon them amongst the ornaments of armories ; so that I shall treat of them separately here, with some few remarkable instances, which will not, I liope, be disagreeable to the reader. Motto is an Italian word signifying verhum, that is the word or saying which gentlemen carry in a scroll under or above their arms; it is likewise Latined dictum, a saying, from whence comes our old word ditton; as in our ancient books of blazon of arms. Camden, for motto, says inscriptio ; and some calls it epigraplj, because mottos are often of many words, which make proverbs, witty and religious sentences, most frequently relative and explanatory to the name and arms of the owners, and may be used by any person who has right to carry arms. When they have no relation to the name and aims of the owners, nor to the crests, they are then proper mottos, and cannot be called devices; of which I shall add a few instances. The family of Bourbon, in France, has the word Esperaiice, Hope; the House of Nevers, Fides: With us the Duke of Gordon has, for motto, Bydand; the Duke of Argyle, Ne obliviscaris ; the Marquis of Tweeddale, Spare naught; Dundas of that Ilk, Kssayez; Innes of that Ilk, Betraist; Home of Wed- derburn, the word Remember; and so of many others such like instances that have no relation to the name, or any part of the arms of the bearer, are to be found in our old records of the arms of the nobility and gentry, who have made choice of these mottos, to express their predominant passions, either of piety, love, or war, or upon some adventure befallen them ; and those short expressions having had aome such original, have been made hereditary in many families. However, mottos for the most part are relative to some part of the achievement, and especially to the crest; and from them arises a comparison, the one explaining the other, and so make a proper device; as by these following instances. The an- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. ;i cient motto of the Earls of Sutherxand, IVithout fear, speaks to the crest, a wild cat sitting. yirescil vtilnere virtus, the motto or ditton of S thwart Earl of Galloway, is re- lative to the crest, a pelican vulnered feeding her young in a nest, proper; which figure is an emblem of our Saviour: And the same figure, for crest, the SrEWARrs Earls of Murray use, with the motto, Sulus per Christum redemptorem. The Mar- quis of Seaforth's crest is a mountain in flames, with the motto, Luceo, non uro, I shine and not burn ; which ditton is used by Mackenzie Earl of Cromarty, and applied to his crest, the sun in his splendor. The motto Dyead God, relative to a hand holding a thunderbolt, by Carnegic Earl of SouTHESK. Gray Lord Gray has, for crest, an anchor, proper; with the motto, Anchor, fast anchor. Elphinston Lord Balmerino's crest, a dove ardent, crowned or, its feet en- vironed with a snake, proper; motto, Prudentia fraudis nescia. Honesty knows no guile. M'Kay Lord Rae has the words Manuforti, By the hand of a strong man; and, for the figure, a hand holding a sword, proper. Arbuthnot Viscount of Arbuthnot has the words Laus Dea; to his crest, a peacock's head and neck, proper: ARBUrHSioT of Eiddes to a peacock passant, proper, has these words, Tarn interna quam externa, to intimate that he desires to be both beautiful within and without: And Arbutilntot of Findowrie, lias for motto. Interna prestant, to the same figure. In cruce sains, a frequent motto used upon account of religion, as by those of the name of Abercromby, with a cross for tlie figure : But Abercromby of Glass- haugh has for motto, 1/ive ut vivas. Live that ye may live, relative to a bee volant, proper: And the same figure, the bee, has Beatson of Kilrie for crest; with the motto. Cum prudentia sfdulus: Ayton of that Ilk, in Fife, a hand pulling a rose, proper; with the motto, Decerpta dabuiit odorem, as other families of that name. Douglas of Caver's motto, Do or die; crest, a dexter hand holding a broken lance in bend. Di^ummond of Hawthornden's crest, a pegasus, proper, maned and winged or; with the motto, Hos gloria reddit honores. Drummond of Blair, for crest, a nest of young ravens, proper: motto, Beus pro- videbit, God will provide. Drummond of Innermay's crest, a hand holding a flaming heart ; with the motto, Loyal an mort. Many more such instances I could give, but refer the reader to tlie sculptures in the plates of the First and Second Volume of this System; and shall add more instances upon different accounts. All Europe over some mottos are assumed to relate to the name of the bearers. The family of Campi, in Placenza, have the words of the xcvi. Psalm, Gaude- bunt campi, et omnia quie in lis sunt, i. e. Let the fields be joyful, and all that is therein. The family of My-pont, in Burgundy, has for motto, Mv-pont difficile a passer, i. e. My bridge is hard to be passed. Vere Earl of Oxford, in England, had for motto, Vero nihil verius, i. e. Nothing truer than l^'ere; said by some to have been pronounced by Queen Edizabeth in commendation of the loyalty of that family. Conqueror of Frierton has the word I'ictoria, i. e. Victory, relative to his name. Calder of Liniger, Vigilans non cadet. Mottos are assumed also to show the origin of the bearers, either from the father or mother's side; As the M'Intoshes of that Ilk, Captains of Clan-Chatton, have, for crest, a cat salient, proper; with the motto. Touch not the cat but in glove; as descended from the Catti, by the mother's side, a German people, who came to Scotland, and said to have carried the said figure: And tlie Maci'hersons, as a branch of the Clan-Chattons, have the same crest and motto; for which see Ap- pendix, page 44. Stewart of Phisgall, as descended of John Stewart, who married the heiress of Bonkill, in the shire of Berwick, and had buckles for her armorial figure, has, for aa EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. crest, a demi-lion, holding in his dexter paw a buckle or; with the motto, Suffibu- lattis majores setjiior. Balnaves of Carnbody has, for crest, a hand holding a football; with the motto, Hinc origo, i. e. From thence my rise: because the first of this name (being for- merly called Naves) playing at the football before the king, who cried, Well balled Naves, took the surname Balnaves. Mottos do also perpetuate great and glorious actions of a family ; as that crest and motto of the Scrymceours of Dudop, a lion's paw, holding a sword, proper: motto. Dissipate ; from one of the ancestors of this family, who defeat the kings' enemies. See Appendix. Some families of the name of Crawfurd have, for motto, Tutum te robore redclam, i. e. I'll save thee by strengtli ; to perpetuate the seasonable action of one of the progenitors of the name, who opportunely relieved King David I. when dismount- ed from his horse by the stroke of a deer, when hunting near Edinburgh, where the abbey of Holyroodhouse now stands; and a deer's head, with a cross betwixt his horns, became the ensign of that abbacy, and all the baronies belonging to it, as the Canongate, S^c. As also the armorial figure of the Crawfurds descended from the above Crawfurd. Crawfurd of Jordanhill, descended of Captain Thomas Crawfurd, a younger son of Crawfurd of Kilbirnie, (which family carries a fesse ermine for arms) who sur- prised and took in the impregnable castle of Dumbarton, the 2d of April 1571, took, for crest, a castle; with the motto, Expugjiavi. Alexander Earl of Stirling, having planted Nova Scotia, took, for motto. Per mare et terras. Ramsay Viscount of Haddington, upon his happy rescuing King James VI. from the bad attempts of the Earl of Gowrie, and his brother, whom Ramsay killed, took, for motto, Hcec dextra vindex principis et patria. Ogilvie of Barras, who had a main hand in the preservation of the regalia of Scotland, till King Charles II. his Restoration, took then, for motto, Praclarum regi et regno servitium. Mottos are sometimes taken to perpetuate events and accidents of famihes : Thus the Lord Maxwell, being forfeited, and thereafter restored, took, for motto, Re- viresco, I stand in awe to otfend. Mackenzie's Heraldry. Mr David Watson of Sauchton having recovered these lands by purchase, after they had been sold by his progenitors upwards of a hundred years, upon recovery of them, took, for motto, Insperata floruit, relative to a branch sprouting out of an old stock of a tree, his crest. Mottos are also assumed to show offices and employments: Thus the Lord John- ston, of old, when Warden of the West Marches, had these words. Light thieves all ; that is, Light from your horses, and render yourselves; and since dignified with the title of Earl of Annandale, the family use, for motto, Nunquam non paratus, i. e. Always ready. These of the name of Forrester have ordinarily, for motto. Blow Hunter thy honi. Severals who have risen to honour and fortune by their employments, such as no- taries and writers, as I have observed before, have taken writing-pens for their crest, and mottos apposite thereto, to show their fidelity and sedulity in their em- ployments: As Mr Robert Alexander of Boghall took, for motto, Fide7n serva: And Sir James Elphinston of Craighouse, Sedulitate. Some mottos relate neither to the crests nor figures within the shield, but to the supporters ; As that of the House of Buccleugh have the word Amo ; their sup- porters, two women in rich apparel. The Earl of Rothes's motto Grip fast, alludes to his supporters, two griffins. Carnegie Earl of Northesk has, for supporters, two leopards spotted, proper; and, for motto, Tache sans tache. The mottos relative to crests are placed above them upon escrols, which sur- mount the achievement ; when they relate or speak to supporters, they should be placed upon the compartment on which the supporters stand; which the reader may see in the sculptures of achievements in the. First and Second Volumes of this System, of which I shall mention an example, the achievement of Sir John Lauder of Fountainhall, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, who has, for crest, a EXTERIOR ORNAMENT.-^. 23 tower argent, masoned sabU\ and a man looking over the embattlcracnts; and, for motto, relative to it, upon an escrol, Tunis prudctitia custos; and below the achieve- ment, upon the compartment, on which stand the supporters, these words, Ut mi- graturus hahita. When there are three mottos, or more, they are disposed about the parts of the achievement to which they relate; as those which adorned the achievements of the Earl of Winton's crest, a dragon, proper, spouting out fire; and above it an escrol, with the motto. Hazard zit fordwnrd: And upon another escrol, which passes over the middle of the supporters, and behind the middle of the shield, are these words, (relative to the blazmg star in svntont) Intaminatis ftilget homribiis; and, on the compartment, whereupon stands the supporters, (as relative to them) luvia virti/ti via nulla; as in the Plate of Achievements, Vol. I. The Spaniards have another method of placing their mottos within the shield, bordure-ways, of which I have seen severals, and shall here mention only that of the Archbishop of Tarragon in Spai.'i, whose name was John Tereys, who car- ried, for arms, a lion rampant holdmg a cross; and round the lion were these words, for his device, Hiijus virtute omnia. The Popes do the same on their seals of lead, where, on the one side, are the heads of St Peter and St Paul offronte ; and, on the other side, a shield quarterly ; in the first quarter, the words Sanctus Petrus, .in the second, Sanctus Paulus; and in the other two quarters the names of the present Pope; and round these quarters, bordure-ways, the device of the present Pope, being ordinarily a short sentence or vei-se taken from the Scripture when he is elected. Having treated I think sufficiently of mottos and devices as private epigraphs, 1 shall proceed to public ones, viz. cries of 'war. Cries of War were well known of old by the ancients, and much in request, 1 may say, by all nations; by the French called cris de guerre, and with us called slughorns. These have a great affinity with mottos and devices, and many times are taken for one another; so that the cry has become mottos to ancient families. Cries of war consist ordinarily of three or four words, called by the Italian Syl- vester Petra Sancta, cLunor miHtaris. It belonged anciently to none but to so- vereign princes, dukes, earls, great barons, and chiefs of potent famihes, who had the command of troops of men ; by which cry they gathered them, led them on to battle, and, when distressed or put to confusion, did rally them. Menestrier says, " That those who had right to carry a banner w ith the cry of " war, were taken for great gentlemen, who used them not only in real fights, " but in tournaments, where the heralds not only blazoned their arms, but pro- " claimed their cries before them that they might be known j as in xh& formula of " the tournaments of Shovanncy in the year 1282." These cries are either taken from the name of the chief commander of troops, from the place where they are to meet and rendezvous, or from the figure on the banner or standard. As for the first, the cry of the family of Bourbon, w"as Bourbon; and other great families besides the name added some eulogium, to show their best qualities; as the cry of the Counts of H.aikault, Hainault the Noble; the Duke of ]\1ilan, Milan the J'aliant ; and the King of Armenia, cried Armenia the Noble King. With us the cry of the old Earls of Douglas was, A Douglas, a Douglas, which was very formidable to their enemies who had found their valour. Cries from the place of rendezvousing were frequent with us ; as that of the Homes. A Rome, A Home, intimating the meeting at Home Castle ; the Macken- ziES have for cry, Tullochdar; the Clan-Chattons, Craig-gow, or Craig-owie; and the Gr.^nts, Ci aig-ellachie, &-c. which were cries taken from the places where those clans do rendezvous, and proclaimed through their countries by such as were ap- pointed carrying a cross of wood burnt at the end, called "n fiery cross; upon which all the vassals and dependents met at the respective places of their clans ; and the cry continued in their expeditions, and in action to distinguish their different troops. Cries or w.ir have been taken from the names of patron saints ; as the kings of Scotland had St Andrew ; the Kings of England, St George ; the Dukes of A.n- jou cried St Maurice; and the Kings of France Montjoye St Dennis. Severals have Vol. 11. L 1 ^4 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. endeavoured to explain this cry ; some calling it a joy, as Moult Joy ; some Latin it, vieum gaudium ; others, as Matthew Paris, montis gaitdhm. 'Menestrier, in his Treatise of Exterior Ornaments, calls it a cry of rallying, and signifies nothing but the standard of St Dennis, which the ancient kings of France did carry in their wars ; and montjoye, in old French, signified a mount or heap ot~ stones gathered together, for directing the high-ways from place to place, with crosses set upon them, especially in the way from Paris to St Dennis, and are still called the montjays of St Dennis ; so that the cry of France signifies nothing but the banner of St Dennis, after which the army marched, and to it rallied. The Dukes of Burgundy, who had the image of St Andrew on his cross upon their ensigns, cried also, montjoye St Andrew ; and the Dukes of Bourbon, who had the image of St Mary on their ensigns, cried, montjoye notre da?ne. This author, in his former treatise, gives us several sorts of cries of war, of which 1 shall mention a few. First, These of resolution, assumed by those who undertook I he holy war, cried Dicu le veut, i. e. God willeth it. Cries of invocation, such as that of the Lords of Montmorencv, Dieu aide au premier Crestien, i. e. God assist the first Christian, upon account the family was the first Christian one in France. Ashmole, on the Institutions of the Garter, says, " That the kings of •' England cried, montjoye notre dame St George, having the images of the Virgin •' Mary and St George on their standards." This author likewise observes in the fore-mentioned book, page 189, " That Edward III. of England, at a skirmish " near Calais 1349, had for his cry, ha St Edward, (meaning the Confessor) ha " St George. Menestrier gives us cries of exhortation ; as that of the emperor's, a dextre et a sinistre, to exhort the soldiers to fight valiantly on the right and left hand. For cries of rallying, he gives that of the Counts of Flanders, au lion, for the soldiers to follow or rally to the standard, upon which was the lion of Flanders. And our author says, that montjoye St Dennis was just another. And Barry, a French he- rald, observes, all the great men in France had for their cries, montjoye, who carried flower-de-luces. And hence the word montjoye is become the name of the princi- pal Herald of France. Cries of wars are ordinarily placed as mottos upon escrols above the crest ; as that of France, at this time, is placed over the pavilion of the arms of France ; as also that of the Dukes of Lennox, avant Darnly, ever since the old cry became the motto of the family. Many old families with us and abroad use their old cries in place of mottos, having no use for them of late, the way of fighting being al- tered; so that now they are only marks of greatness and power, and continued for the antiquity and honour of families. So much then for the devices which consist only of words. I shall proceed to devices of figures, which have no word or words, many of them being initial letters of the name, and others of them figures, with pious sentences added to explain them. Sovereigns have been for a long time, and are yet in use to place at the sides of their shields of arms, on their coins, the initial letters of their names; as our kings of the name of James had J. R. at the sides of their shields ; Queen Mary M. R. and for Charles C. R. The kings of France of the name of Charles had the let- ter K,. at the side of their shields ; and the four Henrys had the letter H. and these of the name of Lewis the letter L.; which letters were ensigned with crowns. The family of the Hotmans in Paris, place the letter H. on the collars of their supporters, being lions. The ancient device of the house of Guise, was an A. within a circle, which, as Menestrier says, signifies, chacun a son tour, i. e. every one to his turn. The let- ter P. the Mark of the Pope, and that letter surmounted with a saltier cross, the mark of a martyr, as pro Christo. The superscription which Pilate caused place upon the cross of the Holy Jesus, was the device of Constantine the Em- peror upon his signs and banners, as Menestrier. The device of the Order of the Jesuits consists of the letters J. H. S. Jesus bominum salvntor ; and when the addition of the three passion-nails, and a cross are added to them, they are then the complete ensign of that society. The Emperor Frederick III. took for his device the five vowels of the alphabet, \, E, I, O, U, interpreted, Jquila est imperium orbis uaiversa-. KXTERIOR ORNx\.MENTS. 2^ The device of Savoy consists of four letters, F, E, R, T, which, by some, signi- fies, Fortitudo ejus Rhodum teni/it, i. e. liis bravery preserved Rhodes. Others say these letters import, that his motto or cry was, J'rapprz, entrez, rompez tout, i. e. beat, enter, break all, which Amadeus of Savoy took with the white cross for hi'^ device when he assisted the knights of Rhodes against the Turks. The family of Felix, in Piedmont, have for their device three F's, to signify, Felices fuerunt fideles, i. e. the Felices were faithful, because they stood tirm and loyal for Amadeus Count of Savoy, anno, 11.^1, when all Piedmont revolted from the Count except the town of Rivoli, in which the family was the most consider,- able;. Devices which consist only of figures without words, are the same with the hieroglyphics and emblems used by tlie ancients, of old, to signify their minds, con- ceptions, and intentions ; and from such came orriginally crests,, and other armorial figures placed on the shield above, or at the side of it, some being temporary, and others of a longer duration. The thistle, an old device carried by the Kings of Scotland, and after assumed by the Dukes of Bourbon, in France, the foses in England by the houses of Yok.k. and Lancaster, the fusile by the Dukes of Burgundy, the porcupine and salaman- der by the Kings of Fr..\nce, weie properly their devices ; whose intentions and significations at first were not well known, till afterwards opposite words and sen- tences were applied to them, and were ordinarily, placed at the sides or below the shield : as the caltrapes of the Earls of Perth,, the salamander of Dundas of that Ilk, the thistle and rose in his Majesty's achievement issuing out of the compart- ment, the known devices of Scotland and England united in the person of King James VI. Before which time, Henry VII. of England, representer of the House of Lancaster, joined the red rose of Lancaster with the white one of the House of York, and placed them below his shield of arms issuing out of the compartment, to show the incorporate union of these two families, by his marrying Elizabeth the heiress of York ; so that the device of England was then a rose parted per pale, ^ules and argent. This king had also at the side of his shield of arms, for a device, a portcullis, to show his descent by his mother fi-om the family of Beaufort ; to which he added these words. Altera securitasy meaning thereby, tliat as the port- cullis, the device of the Duke of Somerset, the eldest son by the third wife of John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster, fourth son of Edward III. is an additional se- curity to a gate or porch of a fort, so his descent from his mother strengthened his other title ; and from this device he instituted a pursuivant by the name of Portcullis. The portcullis has been a device used by our kings since King James I. of that name in Scotland ; as may be seen on the old buildings and m .dais of our kings' bouses, since the marriage of the said king with Jane Beaufort, eldest daughter of John Earl of Somerset, eldest son of John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster, fourth son of Edward III. and righteous heiress of the House of Lancaster; as Sir George Mackenzie observes in his discourse concerning the three unions, page 25. to show their maternal descent from the royal family of England. Since 1 have fallen in v«th the devices of the royal family of England, which were very frequent upon the pretension of the Houses of York and Lancaster to that crown, I hope my reader will not be offended (since they adorned their achievement with such devices, which obscurely intimate their intents and de- signs) to give a short account of them witli tlieir several accessions to the crown. The tore-mentioned John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster (in the reign of Richard II. who had no issue) pretended a right to the crown, and that before the house of York ; He placed at each side of his achievement an eagle standing on a pad- lock, essaying to open t^e same, intimating, that by the king of birds he would, force oft his fetters of subjection; for which see Sandford's Genealogical History of England, who gives us his arms in sculpture, with that device adorning his achieve- ment. His son and successor Henry (surnamed Bolingbroke, from the place he was born) Duke of Lancaster, before lie usurped the crown, under the title of Henry IV. in a combat (allowed by Kin- Richard IL) with Mowbray Duke of Norfolk, appeared in his armorial hereditary ensigns, with devices accompanying them being swans and antelopes. The Duke of Norfolk, on the other hand,' ap- peared with his armorial ensigns, being lions and mulberry trees as rebuses to t!ir zb EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. name of Mowbray ; which hving creatures became the supporters of the descendants of these families. And here it may be observed, that the word lebuses is used, when a coat of arms or crest alludes to the name of the bearer, which the French call parlantcs, and the English, canting arms. Edmond Duke of York-, fifth son of King Edward III. upon his brother John Duke of Lancaster's aspiring to the crown, took a figui'e for device, resembling that of his brother's viz. a falcon in a fetter-lock, implying, that he was shut up from his right to the crown. He observing his sons viewing it one day, asked them, what was Latin for a. fetter-lock? who returning no answer, he said, /.?/<: bcec hoc tace- atis, advising them to be silent, for God knows what may come to pass. Which story his grandson King Edward IV. reported, and (as Sandford in his history) com- manded his younger son, Richard Duke of York to use that device, with the fet- ter lock opened ; and Camden, in his Remains, page 215. says the same. Edward IV. the first of the house of York that ascended the throne of England, to show his right and descent to the crown, used several devices ; as the white lion of the Earl of March, in whose right, by descent, he pretended to the crown ; as also by the line of the Burghs, Earls of Ulster, who have sometmies used a dragon seiant sable, crowned or, the cognizance of that family ; neither did he omit the device of the house of Clare, viz. a bull sable hoofed and horned or, with these words, ex honore de Clare, upon the account that Elizabeth, one of the co-heirs of Clare and earldom of Gloucester, was wife to John de Burgh, and mother of Wil- liam Earl of Ulster : and to complete the four probative proofs of his noble des- cent, he used also a white hart attired, accoUed and unguled or, standing on a mount vert, with the words, ex rege Ricardo, which was the device of Richard II. taken from that of his mother Princess Jean of Kent. This King Richard, anno 1387, nominated Roger Mortimer, his successor, who was grandfather to King Ed- ward IV. Richard III. of the family of York had a boar for his device, and was the last king of the House of York. Henry VII. of the House of Lancaster, married the heiress of the House of York; so that the red and white roses (as before) were united, to show the union of these two houses; and besides he had a red dragon for a device, which was used by Cad- wallader the last king of the Britons, from whom, by masculine line, he derived his pedigree ; and from this device the king made a pursuivant, called Rouge Dra- gon. Henry VIII. of England, son of Henry VII. bad for his device a greyhound collared. and courant, to show his descent from his mother, being one of the de- vices of the House of York ; and used also a red rose, a flower-de-luce, and a gol- den portcullis, which Sandford calls his hereditary devices or badges. His daughter Mary Queen of England had a red and white rose with a pome- granate knit together, to show her descent from Lancaster and Spain. But our au- thor tells us, that afterwards the English wits began to imitate the French and Ita- lians in their devices, by adding regular mottos, to show some temporary emer- gents ; and instances that of Henry VIII. who, upon the interview he had in France with Francis I. and the Emperor Charles V. as arbitrator in accommodating some difference betwixt them, took, for device, or impress, an English archer in a green coi'.t, drawing his arrow to the head, with the inscription Cui adhero praest, i, e. He to whom I adhere will prevail. But these temporary devices or impresses being the subject of another science, [ shaU go no further into them, and advertise my reader that those I have men- tioned of a longer duration, as hereditary cognizances of a high descent, adorn the achievements of noble families, and frequently become the supporters of these various ones which attended those royal achievements of England 1 have mentioned. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 27 CHAP.- VII. OF Sl'PPORTERS. THESE, as the former Exterior Ornaments which I have been treating of, were originally only ancient devices, which by custom came to embellish armorial ensigns, and formully to timbre and support them, from which they are generally called supporters, and by the Latins sustentacula, from their holding the shield : If they be of the hgures of angels, men or women, they are called lentnts by the French, because they' hold the shield of arms in their natural posture; but when the shield is supported by the figures of other creatures, such as beasts and fowls, as hons, bears, horses, iic. eagles, griffins, falcons, S^-c. being erect and out of their natural posture, they are called properly supporters : And those that write in Latin want not their fancy in calling them atlaiittdes, from the fable of Atlas sup- porting the world ; as also telamones, because painters represent Teiamon currying his mistress, called also by architects Co/osses, (I'ru. Hero.) '• Colossi isti &- susten- " tacula ahquum onus, quasi in sublimi sustinentes, nomen acceperunt ;" for sup- porting weighty things on high they have their name. But tclainanes may be said, as some will, to be composed of these two words, tdlus et homines, (the earth -and men) and understood for giants _/5/« terra. When inanimate things are placed at the sides of the shield by way of sup- porters, the English call them cottises, as if the shield were cotised with them ; which word the English bring from casta the ribs, in Guillim's Display ; but Sir George Mackenzie more properly from the French Word cote, the side; and for such things the Latins say, stipaiites latera scuti. I shall here add what the ingenious gentleman, the author of the new English Dictionary of Heraldry, printed in the year 1725, says in the title of Supporters: " Things placed on the sides of the achievements, representing sometimes things " living, and sometimes dead ; but these of some blazoners are termed supporters, " whose conceit therein I can hardly approve, quia diversorum diversa est ratio ; " and, therefore, the blazon that I would give unto things so different in nature, is, " that if things be living, and seize upon the shield, then shall they be called pro- " perly supporters, and if they are inanimate, and touch not the escutcheon, then " shall such arms be said to be not supported, but cottised of such and such things ; " for, how can those properly be said to support that touch not the thing said to " be supported by them ? To persons under the degree of bannerets it is not per- " mitted to bear their arms supported, that honour being peculiar to those that " are called nobiles miijores. And those cottises have their name agreeable to the " things whose quaUty they represent, and are so called of costa, the rib, either of " man or beast ; for it is proper to the rib to inclose the intrails of things animal, " and to add form and fashion to the body : In like manner do those inclose the " coat-armour whereunto they are annexed, and do give a comely grace and orna- " ment to the same. Having heard what is in that word concerning that impor- " tant part of armory; for the better understanding of it, here shall be added soine- " thing of what the French heralds, who were masters of the English, say to- this " purpose. These which we call supporters are no other than certain animals, " quadrupedes, birds, or reptiles ; as lions, leopards, dogs, unicorns, eagles, grif- " fins, dragons, and several others placed on the two sides of the escutcheons, as " if they were appointed to guard it, supporting and liffing it up with their paws or " claws. Asforthe tenents, which most men have confounded with the supporters, tak- " ing them for the same thing. I find this difference, that the supporters hold up, " and the tenents hold, and do not lift up the escutcheon, but hold it under their " hands; as we often find when they are angels or human creatures, or the like. " The supporters and tenents are generally taken fi\)iTi some parts of the coat- " armour, but sometimes are quite different from it, there being nothing to oblige " them to it." As for the origin and first use of supporters, as we now see them, there are dif- ferent opinions : First, as I said in the former chapter of emblems and devices, they were placed at the sides of the escutcheons by the owners, to show some Vol. U. M m 28 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. mystical meaning, and so through time became their supporters. But other eminent heralds brmg the first use of supporters from tournaments and joustings, and others from the solemnities of creating nobility, of which I shall give a full account. Mcnestrier treats of supporters fully, and brings them from tournaments and joustings, to which, by the laws of exercises, none were admitted but those that were truly noble, and who were obliged to expose their arms, as proofs of their nobility, which they then adorned with their helmets, mantlings, wreaths, crests-, and devices, sometime before the exercise began, to the end that they might the more easily be known and distinguished in time of battle. And as this was, as I mentioned before, the first rise of these exterior ornaments, so Menestrier and other French writers bring from thence the rise and progressive use of supporters. The knights nobles, qualified for such exercises, had their arms hung up on the barrier trees, palaces, and pavilions, near to the place of jousting, which were attended by their armour-bearers and esquires, to the end they might acquaint their masters what knight gave them a challenge to fight, which was done by touching the shield. Our author tells us the knights put their armour-bearers, pages, and ser- vants in such dresses as they fancied, making them sometimes appear hke Sa- vages, Saracens, Moors, Sirens, and with other odd dresses ; and sometimes under disguise with the skins of lions, bears, £tc. to guard their shields of arms, and to give an account of the names and arms of those who gave the challenge, by touch- ing the shields of their masters. I shall mention here the formula of a tournament given us by William Segar Norroy King at Arms in England, in his book of Honour, Military and Civil. This tournament was holden at Ingueluer in France 1389, which several French lords and gentlemen occasioned, by giving a challenge to as many Englishmen of the same quality. A part of the challenge from the French side I shall here add from our author. " We likewise give you to understand that such order is taken, " that every one of us shall have a shield of arms and impress, (i. e. device or " crest) hung on the outside of his pavilion, to the end, if any of you desire to " run at tilts, then, that the day before, ye may, with a lance, or such weapon " as you intend to joust with, touch the shield of the defendant ; and who intends " to try his fortune both with blunt and sharp, must touch the shield with both, " and signify his name and arms to them that attend, or have their shields in " keeping." From these attenders and keepers of their master's shields, heralds bring the first use of supporters occasioned by such exercises, into which all that were noble or gentle by father and mother's side were admitted, and had afterwards right to carry supporters. I cannot omit to mention a famous tournament proclaimed by the order of King James IV. of Scotland, through Germany, France, and England, under the title, In defence of the Savage Knight, to be holden at Edinburgh on the festival of his Majesty's marriage with Margaret, eldest daughter of Henry VII. of England. " The fame of which tournament (says Hawthornden in his History of the " Jameses, and other manuscripts, which I have seen in the lawyers' library) " brought many foreign lords and knights to Scotland, where challenges were *' given and received in defence of the Savage Knight, for several days before the " prefixt day of exercise. The shields of the nobility and gentry of Scotland, " that designed to joust or tilt, vi'ere hang up on the barrier and other places near " by, guarded with strong and robust Highlandmcn, in savage dress, whose figures " afterwards became the supporters of some families who jousted in this tourna- " ment, though long before this time we had tournaments in Alexander II. his " reign ; from which time I think supporters began with us, as by ancient seals, " where savages are placed as supporters at the sides of the shields." John Baptista Chancellor of Brabant, a learned gentleman in this science, in his commendable book Jurispnidentia Heroicn, chapter Of Supporters, tells us, " That " some are of the opinion that their rise and custom of hanging up shields was in " imitation of the Romans, who, after their return from victory, hanged up " shields, helmets, and other trophies, which they had taken from their enemies, " upon trees and public places, to show their valour and conquest." EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 29, " Others again, says our author, impute the use of supporters to the vanity and " ambition of men to embellish their arms, and the t-;sst:r(f of their descent, with " such figures as pleased them, till they were restricted by the laws of nations, " which allowed them to none but to those who were able to erect a banner ni the " field; such as hiyh barons, bannerets, and knights,who were allowed the figure " of any creature they fancied to support their banners; for they could not stand " properly at the sides of their shields of arras without supporters holding them " up. Banners are more frequent in Germany than elsewhere." I shall add here our author's words ; " Sed cum vexilla, hu:c per se subsistere, circa insignia ne- " quaquam possent, excogitavit industria hominum, vel ambitio tenentes sivc " sustentantes, quos cum icque atque vexilla ipsa indistincte assumere non eru- " besceret." Our author is much for the opinion, as most reasonable, that- supporters had their rise from tournaments and joustings, as 1 have given them from IVlenestrier and others ; for which 1 shall here add his own words from the supplement to his book, page 139. " Alii originem telamonuin venus derivant a certaminibus, ludi- " cris, seu hastdudiis, in quibus milites suas curabant deferri lanceas is- scuta per " ephebos &• pedissequos (youths and waiting-men) transformatos in ursos, leones, " silvestres, ethiopes, & id genus alias formas, ut videre est in antiquis historiis, " &■ memoriis Oliverii a Marca. Injungebatur his latoribus & pedissequis ut " campum martium aperirent, afllgerent scuti pendula arboribus aut columnis, in " viis pubficis, vel locis ad dimicandum assignatis, ut contra prodituri in campum " tangerent ilia scuta, quibus promiscue ut custodes adstabant, pigmei, gigantes, " silvestres, sarazeni, monstra, vel homines in forma animalium aderent &- feciales, " qui nomen inscriberent &- observarent illos, qui eorum scuta tangerent, atque " exinde nomen tenentium (gallice tenents) conflatum volunt." The import of which is the same which I brought from Menestrier in the former page, and needless here to be repeated, to wit, that the rise of supporters came from the customs of tournaments, in having the shields of the combatants attended by their esquires and pages in v/hatever dress they would. Those who were admitted into tournaments and joustings were obliged, to make a formal proof of their ancient nobility by both descents, paternal and maternal, before the heralds, who attended for that end ; and then their armorial ensigns with their crests and other devices were recorded, and formerly exposed with their pages and servants in several dresses or disguises. Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, chap. 31. Of supporters, gives another rise of them as follows. " Supporters (says he) are those exterior ornaments which are placed without " the shield at its sides, and were at first invented (as Petra Sancta observes) to " represent the armour-bearers of knights. But why then are they ordinarily two ? " And therefore 1 rather believe that their first origin and use was from the custom " whichever was and is, of leading such as are invested with any great honour to " die prince who confers it. Thus when any man is created a duke, marquis, or " knight of St Andrew, of the Garter, or any other order, either in Scotland or " elsewhere, he is supported by, and led to the prince betwixt two of the quality, " and so receives from him the symbols of that honour : And in remembrance of " that solemnity his arms are thereafter supported by any two creatures which he " chooses ; and therefore, in the received opinion of all heralds, only nohilcs majores " who have been so invested in these honours are allowed to have supporters : And " albeit chiefs of old families have used supporters with us, yet they owe these to •' prescription, and not to the original institution of heraldry, as shall be observed. " Others, as Menestiner, think that when knights hung up their shields to provoke " all passengers to this combat, they placed their pages or armour-bearers under " the disguises of wild-men, lions, bears, &-c. to watch who offered to touch them ; " and thereafter they used these figures as supporters. But beside that this " fancy seems as wild as the supporters, it may be asked, why some men use " fowls or fishes .•' To which nothing can be answered, save that beasts being once " allowed, each man choosed thereafter any living creature he pleased." I shall here subjoin what Sir George says in another place in the above-mentioned chapter. 3° EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " According to Chassaneus his opinion, an heritable sheriff, or an eminent " judge may take supporters : and I crave liberty to assert, that all our chiefs of " families and old barons of Scotland may use supporters : For, besides that to be " a chief, was of old; and is still, reputed an honour, though it be adorned with no " mark of nobility, yet these chiefs have prescribed a right to use supporters ; " and that such a right may be prescribed, I have proven formerly ; and what " warrant is for most of our rules in heraldry, but an aged custom : And that " they have constantly used supporters, past all memory of man, even when they " were knights, is clear from many hundred instances. Thus the lairds of Pncuii " did, and do use two wild cats for their supporters ; Fotherwgham of Powrie, " two naked men ; Irvine of Drum, two savages, wreathed about head and loins " with holland, and bearing battons in their hands ; Moncrief of that Ilk, two men " armed at all points, bearing picks on their shoulders: And many of our noble- " men have only retained the supporters which they formerly had. And that, of " old, barons might use supporters de jure, seems most certain ; for they were " members of parliament with us as such, and never lost that privilege, though " for their convenience they were allowed to be represented by two of their num- " her ; and therefore such as were barons before that time may have supporters, " as well as lord barons ; nor should we be governed in this by the custom of " England, seeing their is dispar ratio ; and this is now allowed by the principal " herald to judge at the time who have right. " Supporters are not so heritably fixed but they may be altered at pleasure, in their species and forms, by those who have right to carry supporters, as Colum- bier, Sir George Mackenzie, and others ; for it is fit that these extrinsic parts of achievements should not be heritably fixed, to the end men may have somewhat to assume or alter upon considerable emergents : But if cadets keep their chiefs' supporters, they use to adject some difference ; as is to be seen in the Earl of Kelly's achievement. Mackenzie. Before I proceed to give instances of arras with supporters, and the occasions upon which they were given and taken with us and other nations, I shall insist a little here of their ancient use in general. At first one supporter was used to carry up the shield ; as by our ancient documents and seals, which represented the armour- bearer of knights, and afterwards came to be two, one at each side of the shield : And for the verity that one supporter was used anciently, I shall add here the words of Jurisprudential page 369, par. 18. " Olim unicum duntaxat sustenta- " culum ad primores viros usurpatum fuisse Vetera nos decent monumenta. Ipsis " enim solummodo regibus, aut principibus bina assumere sustentacula licitum " erat. " For which our author cites many others. So then it is groundless to bring the first origin and use of supporters from the custom of leading such as are invested with any great honour to the prince, who conferred it as above shown. But from whence came the use of sovereigns having supporters, who were not led by their equals to receive their imperial rights and diadems, being attended only by their subjects, and sometimes by officers, as armour-bearers and esquires, in royal solemnities ? And I am much in the opinion with Menestrier and others, who bring the first use of supporters from the armour-bearers of kniglits. And of old none but one supporter was used by those that were not eminent princes, as by our above-mentioned author; of which I shall add a few instances. Our ancientest seals had only the image of the owner, sometimes with his shield of arms hung about his neck, or holden up by his left arm, and he the only sup- porter; but afterwards these arms came to be supported by one creature or an- other: And Menestrier tells us, " That he has seen the shield of arms of the •• old Dukes of Burgundy only supported by one lion, with its head in a hel- " met." Sandford, in his Genealogical History, gives us the seal of arms of Margaret Duchess of Norfolk, supported by an angel. Such another seal of arms I have seen, which belonged to Mary Queen of King James II. which had the arms of Scotland impaled with her paternal coat, viz. two Hons combatant, supported only by one angel. The imperial ensign of Scotland is yet to be seen on the frontispiece of the EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 3J outer entry to the abbey of HoIyroodhoUbC, the shield supported only by one uni- corn seiiiiit. Walter Leslik, designed Dominus de Ross, who married Elizabeth Ross, one of ths co-heirs of Walter Earl ot Ross, had on his seal of arms three shields lie, i. e. tied together, liolaen by the beak of an eagle for a supporter; of whose arms formerly. From Uredus's Collections of the Old Seals of the Earls of Flanders, we have many instances of arms supported only by one animal ; as that of Ludovick Ma- LJiANUs, appended to a diploma, whereupon is the shield of urms of Flanders sup- ported by one lion, anno 1 2,59- Philii' the Buld Duke of Bukgundy, son of John King of France, who married Margaret, daughter and heir of the above Lodovick Earl of lland'irs. on whose seal was a shield, quarterly, the arms of Burgundy Ancient and Modern, and supported only by one eagle : But his dutchess Maigaret had on her seal a lozenge shield, with her anus dimidiate w ith those of her hust)and Phiiip, viz. four animals supporters ; her husband's two supporters the eagles stood upon the upper two sides of the lozenge shield ; and two hons sciant, supported the two under sides of tlie lozenge, being these which her father used. The like of which I never met with in any book or seals; which seals, as 1 have described them, were appended to diplomas in the year 1384. As for the antiquity of using supporters with us, Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, gives us as uncouth an one as the last mentioned, being the shield of arms of Muriel Countess of Strathern, supported on the left side by a falcon standing upon the neck of a duck, lying under the base point of a formal shield, and all placed within a lozenge, which he dates from the year 1284, ^"^^ which is the oldest and ancientest that ever I met with. Sir James Balfour, in his Manuscript of Exterior Ornaments, says, " The first " use of supporters with us began about the end of the reign of Alexander 11. and " were frequent in the reign of Alexander III. which began in the year 1249, " and who reigned 37 years :" But gives us no instances who carried supporters, till the reign of John Baliol ; and- then tells us, "That John Cumin Earl of " BucHAN, and great Constable of Scotland, had his arms supported by two snakes " or vipers ; and that Thomas Randolph Earl of Murray (who hved in the reign " of King David Bruce, and who first began the use of supporters in England} " had his supported by two winged dragons. " The seal of John, .Senchal of Kyle, eldest son of Robert Stewart of Scotland, was appended with his father's (who were both successively kings of Scotland, by the name of Robert U. and III.) to a charter of theirs to the burgh of Glasgow, anno 1364. The shield of arms of the Lord Kyle was cotiche, and supported by two savages ; as by the absti-acts of the charter in the Scots College of Paris. I have seen the seal of arms of William Lord of Douglas, before he was Earl, upon which he had only the paternal coat of Douglas in a shield couche, supported by a lion seiant, with its head in a helmet, topped with a plume of feathers for crest, which timbredthe shield. Upon this Earl's marrying Margaret, Countess and heir of Marr, for his second wife, he quartered with his own the arms of Marr, supported as the former, with the addition of two trees growing at the sides of his achievement ; and below "the shield, by way of compartment, was a field seme of cross croslets and mullets, appended to a charter of his, in which he is designed Earl of Douglas and Marr, to James Mowat of the lands of Easter-Fouhs, dated at the Castle of Kildrumy, 26th of July, anno 1377- I have seen many of the seals of the Earls of Dunbar and M'VRCh, which were all equestrian till the year 1400, whose shields of arms were afterwards supported by two lions seiant, and behind their backs trees. I have likewise met with the seals of arms of our ancient barons; as that of Sir Alexander Home of tliat Ilk, whose shield was supported by two lions; Somer- viLLE of Linton and Cambusnethan supported with two greyhounds : And Cran- ston of that I:k supported his shield on the right side by a woman in rich attire, holding a bush of strawberries, and on the left by a roebuck. Those barons, with Vol. II. N n. 3- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. others, long before their famihes were dignified with the titles of lord or eari; kept still their old supporters. I have also seen those of other barons, whose families were never dignified ; as- that of David Home of Wedderburn, appended to a discharge to his nephew, the above Sir ALEXiVNDER Home of that Ilk, dated at Cockburnspath 27th of January 1443, supported with two falcons regardant; and Roger Kirkpatrick of Close- burn, one of the Barons of Inquest, in the service of William Lord Somerville, heir to his father Thomas Lord Somerville, had, on his seal appended to the retour, the loth of June 1435, the escutcheon of his arms supported with two lions gar- dant; and his son Thomas, in the year 1470, carried the same, though now the family use for supporters two hounds. And on the seal of William Murray of Touchadam, Constable and Governor of the Castle of Stirling, now designed of P'olmaise, his arms were supported with two lions. Many more examples of our gentry using supporters are to be met with in our old books of blazons, on their houses and tombs, as representers of the ancient barons and chiefs of families; a few of which I shall here mention. Dundas of that Ilk, for supporters, has two hons: Fullarton of that Ilk, in the shire of Ayr, has two savages wreathed about the head and middle, holding battons over their shoulders. Innes of that Ilk, two greyhounds collared azure, charged with three stars. Pollock of that Ilk two hounds, proper; and Maxwell of Pollock had his arras supported, in the reign of Robert III. by tv.'o monkies, as by his seal of arms which I have seen. Dunbar of Westfield, Heritable Sheriff of Murray, has two lions rampant argent. Halyburton of Pitcur two wild cats; and Farquharson of Invercauld carries the like creatures. Irvine of Drum two savages wreathed about the head and loins with laurel, proper, bearing battons in their hands. FoTHERiNGHAM of Powric two naked men. MoNCRiEF of that Ilk two men armed at all points, bearing pikes on their shoulders. Skene of that Ilk, two Highlandmen, the one on the dexter side in a Highland gentleman's dress, holding in his right hand a skein, point downward ; and the other, on the sinister, in a servant's dress, with his darlach, and a target on his left arm. Dalmahoy of that Ilk has two serpents cottising his arms. Sir John Nisbet of Dean, baronet, his family has been in use for a long time, by allowance of authority, to carry supporters, viz. on the right side of the shield a savage wreathed about the head and middle, holding a batton in his right hand, all proper; and on the left side a greyhound, proper: Which two supporters up- hold the principal arms of the family of Nisbet of that Ilk, viz. argent, three boars' heads erased sable, armed and langued gules, with the crest of the family, laying aside the cheveron, a mark of cadency, used formerly by the House of Dean: in regard that the family of Dean is the only family of the name in Scot- land that has right, by consent, to represent the old original family of the name of Nisbet; since the only lineal male representer (the author of this System) is like to go soon off the world, being an old man, and without issue-male or female. Edgar of Wadderly two greyhounds ; and Haig of Bemerside has, for supporters, two lions gules. In Workman's Illuminate Book of Arms there are several knights who have their arms supported; as Sir Patrick Barclay of Towie with two hounds: motto, Hi7tc honor et amor. Sir George Douglas of Redhouse's arms are there illuminate, being argent, a lion's head erased gules, in base a crescent of the last, and, on a chief azure, two stars argent, as descended of the House of Morton, and the crescent, as a vassal to the House of Seaton, supported by two griffins. Sir NiEL Montgomery of Langshaw's arms, a-zure, a stoned ring, proper, between three flower-dp-luces or; supporters, two dragons. Sir David Wood of Craigie, his arms supported by two savages wreathed about the middle with laurel. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 33 Sir John Graham of Ncrherness carried tlie arms of Montrose, with a label of three points for difference, supported on the right side by a hound, and on the left by a falcon, proper. Bruce of Airth had two savages wreathed about the head and middle, proper; crest, a horse-head; with the motto, Do well and doubt not. There are many more gentlemen, besides the ancient barons and chiefs of fa- milies, who have supporters add.:d to their blazons in our New Register of Arms, having right, as I suppose, by concession or prescription; of wliich 1 have given many examples in the Plates of Achievements in the First Part of tliis System, as also in this Second Part, to which I refer the reader. The right of using supporters is hereditary with us in the lineal heirs and re- presentatives of families; but not to the younger sons of collaterals, unless they become representatives of the family : neither in the greater or lesser nobility, which in the first seems strange, since the younger sons of dukes and marquises have the title of lord prefixed to their names, and take precedency of hereditary lords of Parliament. But though the titles they have be only temporary, and do not descend to tlieir posterity, yet I am of opinion they may use supporters by the same right that knights-bannerets did, whose dignity was also temporary, and that with their marks of cadency upon them, if agreeable, and if not with other addi- tior.al figures: For the same reason that they now of late place the coronets of the respective dignities of their fathers on their helmets, to show the eminency of their birth. It is not allowed to the nobility or gentry, who have right to carry supporters, to assume those of the sovereign's achievement, unless they be of the blood royal, or have obtained from the sovereign a special warrant for so doing, to show either the support and honour they had from the royal family, or for some special services they had performed to the same. Thus the Earl of Strathmore, being descend- ed of a daughter of King Robert II. has, for supporter, on the right side, an unicorn argent, maned, unguled, and horned or, (the royal supporter) and collar- ed vert, charged with a thistle or; and, on the left, a lion gules, armed. and lan- gued or. Bruce of Clackmanan was allowed the royal supporters; Ramsay Earl of Hol- DERNESS, and Viscount of Haddington, for his special service, besides other aug- mentations of honour, was allowed to support his arms with the unicorn of Scot- land on the riglit, and an antelope on the leff Carey Viscount of Falkland hid the like unicorn on the dexter, collared sable, charged with roses; and on the sinister a lion gardant argent, collared and cro\vned with a ducal crown ; and se- veral others have the hke. It is allowed, by the practice of heraldry, for many different families to carry the same supporters without any ground of offence, or concluding them to be of one descent and kin; which practice is frequent with us, especially in using savages for supporters. The Marquis of Douglas has one ; and the Earls of Athgl had two savages, though now but one, the other, a lion, being for Tullibardin; the Earls of Sutherland, Morton, Perth, Roxburgh, Galloway, Seaforth, Cromarty, Stirling, Elgin, Viscount of Kenmure, Lords Herries, Kinnaird, Elphinston, Blantyre, Maderty, and many old barons, carry savages, some of them with laurels about the heads, and battons in their hands. The frequency of which with us I presume had rise in imitation of John, Seneschal of Kyle, eldest son of Robert II. King of Scot- land, who was king after his father by the name of Robert III. or else proceeds from that tournament proclaimed, and holden by King James IV. in defence of the Savage Knight ; of which I have given account before, where many of our nobility, and gentry appeared with their servants in the dress of savages, which became the supporters of several families.. Supporters have been given and taken upon many ocasions ; sometimes from the armorial figure within the shield, as those of Spain, two lions, the armorial figure of the kingdom being a lion. The Prince Palatine of Bavaria, the Duke of Luxembourg, and other royal families in Europe, have lions for supporters, be- cause their armorial figure within the shield is such: And the same reason has occasioned our nobility to do the like; as Home Earl of Ho.me, Home Earl of Marchmonp, Crichton Earl of Dumfries, Ogilvie Earl of Findlater, Gray Lord 54 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Gray, Dundas of that Ilk, because their armorial figures are such. As also many other families vvho have eagles, griffins, boars and. bears, for their armoiial charges; and if they carry but a head of any of those creatures, they make use of their en- tire bodies for their supporters; as Forbes Lord Forbes, who carries for arms three bears' heads couped, has for supporters two bears, proper. When the armorial charges witliin the shield are not living creatures, nor figures fit to be supporters, I observe that lions are assumed by severals, but with some variation, upon the account, as I suppose, that the lion is the sovereign figure of the nation, or because he is said to be the king of beasts, and the most noble and fierce of all others. The family of Argyle has, for supporters, two lions gardant gules, armed or: Graham Earl of Monteith two lions gardant gules, armed and langued azure, collared sable, and charged with three escalops or, the figures of the paternal bearing. Murray Earl of Annandale supported his arms with two lions argent, crowned or, one of which the Lord Johnston took when he was honoured with that earldom. Murray Earl of Tollibardin two lions gules, collared ur, charged with three , " The girding with the sword is to put him in mind, that he is " hound to defend the king and kingdom in time of war ; and adorning the head " with a coronet of gold is a token that he was a counsellor to the king and king- " dom in time of peace. " Since these times all kings have created dukes, and they are still growing more numerous. The manner of creating a duke in England, according to English writers is thus : " The person to be created, having his hood and surcoat on, is led " betwixt a duke and a marquis, a marquis going before with his sword, and before " him an earl with the robe and mantle on his arms. The mantle is of crimson " velvet, guarded about the slioulders with four guards of frw/'/zf : on the right " hand an earl bears the cap of state, (the same as the mantle) doubled ermine, " but not indented, as those of the blood-royal are. The cap within a coronet of " gold, adorned with leaves without pearls. On the left hand another bears a " rod or verge of gold. All the said peers are to be in their robes, and thus to " conduct him to the presence-chamber, where, having made obeisance three " times to the king sitting in his chair, the person to be invested kneels down : " Then Garter King at Arms delivers the patent to the king's secretary, and he " to the king, who returns it to be read aloud ; and when they come to the word " investitnus, the king puts the ducal mantle upon him that is to be made a duke ; ■■' and at the v/oxA gladh cincturamus, girds on his sword: at the words cappce is! " chculi cLirei impositionem, the king likewise puts on his head the cap and coro- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 45 •' net of gold ; and at the words virgce aureee tradkionem, he gives the verge or rod " of gold into his hand. Then the rest of the charter being read, wherein he ia " declared duke, the king gives him the said charter or patent to be kept. " I shall not insist here upon the privileges of dukes, but refer the readers to the English writers upon that subject. The eldest sons of dukes are, by the courtesy of England, stiled marquisses ; and their younger sons lords, with the addition of their Christian name, as Lord John, Lord James, &-c. and take place of viscounts r and the same practice is with us, though not authorised by any laws of the land. A duke has the title of Grace ; and being wrote unto is stiled Most High, Potent^ and Noble Prince. Dukes of the blood-royal are stiled Most High, Most Mighty, and Illustrious Princes. The coronet of a duke with us, both of old and at this time, is a circle of gold adorned with precious stones, brightened with leaves like those of the oak tree, smallage, or great parsley: Such an one is to be seen adorning the shield of Alexander Duke of Albany, brother of King James IH. on several impressions of his seal of arms. The tiara or cap of the coronets of all the dukes of England, Scotland, and France, are of crimson velvet turned up eiinine ; but the turning up ermine is not indented, because that form belongs to the princes of the blood- royal. The Saxon word Marquis was anciently appropriate to the Lords of the Marches, frontiers countries, and towns upon the sea-coasts ; which has since become a title of special dignity next to that of a duke. The manner of creating a marquis differs little or nothing from that of a duke ; and it were too tedious here to men- tion them again, especially since these ceremonies are in desuetude. The first that was dignified with the title of marquis in England was Robert de, Verx Earl of Oxford, Marquis of Dublin in Ireland, by King Richard IL in the year 1337. And the first that enjoyed that title in Scotland were the Earls of Arran and HuNTLY, who were both solemnly invested in one day, (after the manner of a duke above mentioned) with sword and coronet, at Holyroodhouse, the 17th of April 1599, their titles being Marquis of Hamilton and Marquis of Huntly. The coronet of a marquis is a circle of gold, adorned with flowers or leaves, as a duke's, and points with pearls on them ; but the leaves are higher than the points pearled. A marquis's mantle has only three guards of ermine and a half, to distinguish it from a duke's, which has four. Tlie title given him in writing, is, Most Noble, Most Honourable, and Potent Prince. By the king they are stiled Our Right Trusty and Entirely Beloved Cousins. The honour is, like the others, hereditary; and the eldest son of a marquis is, by the courtesy of the land, called Earl or Lord of a place ; but the younger sons are called Lord John, Lord Thomas, or the like. The marquisses in France for their coronet have a circle of gold adorned with jewels, and brightened with four flowers (like those of the marquisses. in Britain) between twelve points, each topped with a pearl. The title of Earl is more ancient than thjit of a Duke, or any of the five titles of dignity before mentioned. It is said, by Selden and others, to have come from the Saxon word Ear-etbtl, which in time was abridged to Ear-el, and afterwards, by abbreviation, to Earl, signifying Noble of Honour. Some bring it from the Saxon word Elderman, a judge, being of the same degree with the Latin Comes, by some called a Count, when speaking of foreigners ; and the same is still preserved in the consorts of our Earls, who are called Countesses. Earls were very anciently with us, even in the time of King Malcolm U. as appears by several passages of our laws and histories. Torfaeus, in his History of Orkney, speaks of one Melbrigidus comes in Scotia, before the year 900, and of another Meldunus. Fordun, another historian of our country, tell us, " That " Kenneth III. King of Scotland, was killed by Finel, daughter of Gruchin Earl " of Angus. " And Sir James Dalrymple, in his Collections, is of opinion, " That " there might be such earls with us of old : But the dignity was not annexed to " their families, nor hereditary to their descendants, till the reign of .Malcolm " III. after whom there is frequent mention made of earls, and a constant succes- " sion of that honour in families, that possessed great lands and baronies in the " kingdom. " 46 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. By our old charters and evidents, it appears that the title Comes was only added to the Christian name, without mentioning then- lands ; as in the charter of Ivnig Alexander I. to the church of Scoon ; the witnesses there are Malus comes, Madncb comes, who were Earls of Strathern and Athol. This charter was about the year 1115 : as Sir James Dalrymple, Collect. Appendix, page 373. In England the same practice was, as Selden observes ; of which he gives several instances : A? AUunits comes, Rogerus comes, which continued to the reign of Richard I. who ascended the throne in the year 1180; and then the earls vi'ere designed after their countries and lands. In Britain there have been Earls, or Counts Palatines, who had a more eminent and royal authority within their territories than the ordinary earls ; as the Count Palatine of the Rhine in Germany is preferable to ordinary counts there. In Eng- land we find mentioned the Earls Palatines of Chester, Pembroke, and Durham : These, says Segar, had royal power within their own jurisdiction : The first of whom, Hugh Lupus, was made Earl of Chester by William the Conqueror, and the county of Lancaster was made Palatine by Edward III. as our last mentioned au- thor tells us, " That the Earl Palatine of Lancaster had under him barons, chan- " eery, and great seal ; and the same had the bishops of Durham and Ely. " The offices of the barons were to sit in council and parliament with their earls in their respective palaces ; and for magnificence these earls kept their grandeur and festi- val days in their provinces, as absolute princes. Our author here calls their place of residence a palace, which cannot be so said of ordmary earls : And I cannot but take notice, that King James VII. in his charter of erection of the earldom of Winton and lordship of Seaton into a free regality, through all the charter calls the house of Staton prilatiu?!!, a palace; and, with submission, I think that those earls whose earldoms are erected into a regality, may be understood Palatines. We find few or none called Earls Palatines, mentioned in our records, but Walterus Comes Pal atinus de Strachan; and Sir George Mackenzie gives this reason why they were so few, " Because the Lords of the Regality had the same power. " The manner of creation of earls is the same almost with that of a duke. The robes of state almost the same, and honoured by the cincture of the sword, impo- sition of a cap and coronet of gold on their beads, with a verge of gold put into their hands. The robes and mantles are of crimson velvet, doubled vi^ith ermine, as those of dukes or marquises, but have only three guards of ermine ; and the cap is also of crimson faced up ermine, called galerus or beretum, especially with the Germans : with the English the coronet is a circle of gold, enriched with stones of several colours, of old not brightened either with points or flowers, as Sandford ob- serves in his Genealogical History of the Kings and Nobles of England, as by those coronets on the effigies of the deceast Earls, Henry Lacy of Lincoln, and William de Valence, whose circles were not brightened. And that the first circle or coronet brightened with leaves or flowers, was that of John of Ekham second son to Edward II. who was created Earl of Cornwall by his brother Edward III. the second year of his reign. Of what forms, of old, were the coronets of our ordinary earls, I cannot be posi- tive ; but in latter times they are the same, as now used by the English, viz. a circle of gold adorned with jewels, and brightened with points topped with pearls, alter- nately with flowers, like these of the marquises, but the points are higher than the flowers, for difference. The title to an earl is. Right Honourable and Truly Noble Lord. French earls or counts, according to Columbier, wear only on their shield of arms, and not elsewhere, their coronets of gold, brightened with nine large pearls, raised on points above the rim. And other writers since Columbier tell us, " That the counts in France have their circles brightened with nine great " pearls only." The immediate degree of dignity next to that of an Earl is a Viscount, in Latin, Vicecomes, quasi Gubernaturiis coviitatum, a lieutenant -to an earl or count, and so was only officiary, and the same with sherifl" of a county or shire. Some of them (as Selden writes) having obtained a feudal gift by inheritance or usurpation, in their jurisdictions, by these means they obtained a setrl d dignity, which kings afterwards bestowed on others. For having in their hands old dutchies and coun- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 47 ties by forfeiture, recognition, or otherwise, they erected out of them this feudal dignity. In France and Spain there are several nobles of this dignity, but none in Germany ; nor were any with us till the year 1606, that King James VI. created Thomas Lord Erskine Viscount of Eenton, (now Earl ot Kelly), and John Ramsay Viscount of HADDiKoroN, afterwards Earl of HuLutRNESs in Eng- land. The reason Sir George Muckenz-ie gives for that dignity being so late with us, is, because our kings gave not the government of counties and shires to earls, but appointed sherids, who depended upon themselves. The cere- monies of creation of a viscount with us is the same almost with an earl, with this distinction, that the robes of a viscount have two burs and a half only. The coronets of viscounts with us are a circle of gold adorned with dia- monds, and brightened with thirteen great pearls only, without either points or flowers. Some French heralds give to their vi&counts only a plain circle of gold : but Favin brightens the rim of it with pearls, and ordinarily with four : as the author oi Obseivationes Kugdniulogicis:, thus, " Laminam auream nudam, vel quatuor tan- " turn unionibus conspicuam." Menestrier brightens their circles with nine pearls, 3, 3, and 3 together. To let us see what the Enghsh say, besides Segar, Guillim, and others, I shall give the words of the author of the New Dictionary of Heraldry lately printed. " Viscounts, in Latin Vicecomites, says he, are well known to have been no other " than deputies or lieutenants to earls or counts, as proconsuls were the degree " under consuls. There were no such in England before the reign of Henry VI. "who, in his i8th year, created John de Belmont a Viscount ; and it is since bc- " come a name of dignity between an earl and a baron, as the marquis is between " the duke and the earl ; whereas formerly it was only a name of office ; for the " sheriffs were called Vicecomites, as being vicegerents to the earls, on whom the " several counties depended. The ceremony of his creation is so much the same " with that of a baron that it is needless to repeat it here. He has also a sLir- " coat, hood, mantle, verge, cap, and coronet ; the doubling of the cap all white " without spots, as are the guards of his mantle, being two and a half, to dis- " tinguish him from a baron, who has but two ; and that fur is called miniver, " being made up of the bellies of squirrels. The rim of his coronet of gold is set " round with pearls, not confined to any number ; which is another distinction " from a baron, who has but six ; but they must not be raised above the said rim. " The title given him is Right Honourable, and Truly Noble, or Potent Lord. " He has the privilege of having a cover of essay held under his cup when he " drinks, and a traverse in his own house ; and a viscountess may have her gown " borne up in the presence of a countess by a woman, and out of it by a man. The " eldest son of a viscount has no title of peerage, nor are his daughters ladies ; but " his eldest son and daughter take place of all gentry, and before those of a baron. " In France, according to Columbier, viscounts have only a circle of gold, or a co- " ronet enamelled with four large pearls on it. " Again, the said Dictionary tells us, " That a viscount's coronet has neither " flowers, nor points raised above the circle, like the other superior degrees, but " only pearls placed on the circle itself, without any limited number, which is his " prerogative above the baron. " Matthew Carter narrates, " That this title of viscount is derived from the same " order in France : And that viscounts at first were only substitutes to earls ; " till getting themselves into power, got also to have the title Honorary and He- " reditary, between the earl and baron ;" it being the same word which signifieth our sheriff, and began not in England till about the i8th year of King Henry the VL who then created John Lord Beaumont Viscount of Beaumont, by letters patent. Though Sir John Feme tells us of it in the time of King Henry L and King Stephen ; and though the elder sons of dukes are stiled earls during their father's lifetime, as also the eldest sons of marquisses are stiled by their fathers viscounties and baronies, and called lords, and the younger sons saluted with lord, yet it is by courtesy only that they assume these titles. Vol. II. R r 4i EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. To this degree ot" a viscount was allowed (by the Parhament of England in the reign of King James I. monarch of Great Britain) a surcoat, mantle, hood, and a circulet, without either flowers or points as foresaid, and is created with the same ceremonies that those of a higher dignity and title of honour above him are. The last degree of our high nobihty is the Lord Baron, or Lord of Parhament. Which title of baron is as ancient in Britain as any of the titles before mentioned, and came in place of thane, as a barony did for thanedome ; since which time the word baron denoteth all kinds of lords of parliament, as well earls as others : And baronage is a collective of all dignities. For now there is no duke but is also mar- quis, earl, viscount, and baron, and so are those of the dignity of marquis, earls,' and viscounts ; and all of them are barons or possessors of honourable possessions, which is the root of all feudal dignities. The word baron is variously interpreted, as first coming from the Greek word baria, which signifies autboritas gravis, a wise and discreet man. Bracton inter- prets it, robur belli. Again, Sir Henry Spelman saith the Gothic word bar, barn, or bern, is the same in Latin with vir, whose derivation is from vi, force ; and from thence, sunt et alii potentes sub rege qui dicuntur barones, id est, robur belli. And taking it in that sense we now understand it. Sir Henry Spelman calls him aliens feodalis, and vassalus capitalis. " Husjusmodi sunt (saith he in his Glossary, page " 79.) qui pagos, urbes, castra, vel eximiam ruris portionem, cum jurisdictione " acceperant a rege ;" and the word vir or homo (as with the English, baron and femme, for man and wife) may be applied to those who had territories given them under the tenor of homage, as becoming a man to him that gave them, and were tailed barons. But not to insist farther on the derivation of the word baron, I shall give the words of the author of the new Dictionary of Heraldry, lately printed at London, 1725, in octavo, as follows : " Baron, from whence derived, is no easy point to determine ; the Romans hav- " ing had no such dignity among them, though they had the word : and Bracton " says the word barones imports men of valour. They are the lowest dignity " among the English peerage, but were of great power and authority in former " ages, as may be seen by those that read the barons' wars. All that is said about -' their original, being only guess work, we shall pass it by, and speak of what is •' evident. All the peers of England sit in Parliament by their baronies, though " they be besides, dukes, marquisses, or earls ; and the archbishops and bishops " have baronies annexed to them, as abbots had formerly, in right whereof they •' are said to sit among the peers. But there is no doubt of the spirituality being •' a distinct body from the temporahty, and so they were formerly reputed in " England, and are to this day in other nations, howsoever they may be here ••' looked upon now, which is not our business to discuss. Barons are divided into " three sorts, viz. barons by tenure, barons by writ, and barons by patent. The " barons by tenure are the bishops, who enjoy their baronies by virtue of their be- =' ing chosen to their sees. A baron by writ is he that is culled to sit in Parlia- " ment by the sovereign without any preceding title, of which there have been " many instances ; and the sons of noblemen during the lives of their fathers, ■' when they had no right as yet by their birth to sit among the p^ers, have been " often summoned to the House of Lords in this manner." " The manner of erecting a baron by patent is thus : He appears in court in his " long robe and hood, attended by several persons of quality, two heralds walk " before him followed by Garter King at Arms holding the king's writ ; a baron, " supported by two gentlemen of distinction, brings the robe or mantle, and so -' they come into the king's presence, kneeling three times. Garter delivers the " writ to the Lord Chamberlain, which is then read, and when they come to the " word therein, investimus, we have invested, the king puts on his mantle, and the " writ being read out, declares him and his heirs baions. The writ is gi\en to " the king, who delivers it to the new baron, who, after returning thanks for " the honour received, withdraws with the same attendance as he came, to enter- " tain the nobles that introduced him at dinner. When dinner is brought up, " Garter coming to the table with the heralds, cries largess, and repeats the king's " stile and titles, and then, at some farther distance, they again cry largess, and EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 49.- " proclaims the titles of the new made baron tlius : The most noble Lord N. N. " Baron of N, &-c. and then bowmg, they withdraw, crying, twice more, largess, " largess. Where note, that these declarations are made ni French. So Mr " Glover in his Nob^ Pol. et Civ. of Barons made by writ, he says thus. The new " baron having received his writ, when tlie Hovise of Lords is sat, Garter Knig at " Anns, bareheaded, and wearing his kingly coat, goes before the said baron, " who is led, by two of the last barons in their robes, into the House, and brouglu " before the Chancellor, to whom, after kneehng twice, he delivers his writ to " read. The Chancellor having read it, congratulates hmi upon his new honour, " and so dismisses him to take his seat, which is sliowed him. Garter still going be- " fore ; and the Chancellor delivers the writ to the clerk of the Parliament to be " laid up : After which the baron enjoys all the honours and prerogatives due to " a baron." Glover as above. King Richard the II. was the first that erected a baron by patent, in the year 1388, being the nth of his reign, wlien he conferred that honour on John Beau- champ of Holt, Baron of Kidderminster, investing liim with asurcoat, hood, mantle, cap, and verge, being all the same with those of a viscount, only with this diffe- rence, that a viscount has two guards and a half of miniver, and a baron but two. The baron is not girt with a sword, nor had they any coronets till the reign of King Charles II. who gave them a circle of gold with six. pearls set close to the rim. The title given a baron is Right Noble Lord, and it is allowed him to have the cover of his cup held underneath whilst he drinks : and a baroness may have her train held up by a woman in the presence of a viscountess : The eldest son of a baron has no particular title, nor are his daughters ladies, but the eldest son and eldest daughter take place of all other gentlemen and ladies : The coronet of a baron in France, says Columbier, is a circle of gold enamelled with a string of pearls round about it, which they place over their ai-ms. In former times great lords and knights of renown used ehaplets of pearls, and did set them on their heads in summer or hot weather ; such was the chaplet of pearls given by King Edward the III. of England to Eustache de Rjbeaumont, his prisoner of war, as to the person, that had fought best, and forgave him his ransom. For they mistake who think it was a count's coronet, the same being only a pre- sent and honom-able reward in token of valour and liberty, according to the custom of those days. The word baron, says Matthew Carter, is^ a general title in England (as it is al- so in Scotland) to all lords of the Great Council of Parliament, and in Naples ani Lombardy, where all those lords that aa'e called titulati are in general stiled barons. This word w'as used by the Danes in the stead of thane, which was among the Saxons a title of honour, and being next the king,, he was called the king's thane. And Selden tells us, folio 87. " That in the laws of William I. instead of the " earl, king's thane, and middle thane of the Saxon times, the title of count or " earl, of baron, and of valvasor are used." By which we understand it to have been, though not in the same name, yet notion, a feodal honour of great antiqui- ty. And Sir Henry Spelman says, " They were such as had not only castles, " towns, or great part countries in their juridiction, but they had their valvasores, " (minores, 1 conceive ; for there were then valvasores,. majores, et minores ; mUi- " tes, et libere tenenles') which should signify an honour of command in the com- " nion wealth." It has been a common opinion, that every earldom- in times past had under it ten barons, and every barony ten knights' fees holding of him : But those knights' fees (says other authors) were uncertain for number. However, we find many barons created in the times after the coming in of the Normans, that held both of knights' service, and of the crown in chief, which were either spiritual or tempo- ral ; and it is certain, th?J: all honorary barons, from the Conquest till the latter time of King John, were only barons by tenure. The spiritual barons were distinguished from the temporal thane, in time ot the Saxons, by holding their lands free from all secular service, excepting trinoda ne- cesshas, (as it was called) ; which was assistance in war in building of bridges and castles ;, and this continued till the fourth year of William I. who then made the so EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. bishopricks and abbies subject to knights' service in cliief, by creation of new tenures ; and so first turned their possessions into baronies, and thereby made them barons of the kingdom by tenure, as says Mr Selden in his Titles of Ho- nour, chap. V. fol. 699, 704. " That all bishops, abbots, priors, and the like, " that held in chief of the king, had their possessions as baronies, and were ac- " cordingly to do services, and to sit in judgment with the rest of the barons in " all cases, but cases of blood, from which they are prohibited by the canon " law." William the Conqueror of England distributed the lands there amongst his Nor- mans, into several possessions, called counties and baronies, to be holden of him for military services. As before him did our King Malcolm M'Kenneth his lands of Scotland, which he possessed by a hereditary right, to his native subjects, in- to earldoms and baronies, from which they had the honourable titles of earls and barons. And these again distributed parts of their lands to their followers, called mi/ites, who likewise give part of theirs to other men called vassals, each hold- ing subalternately of others, and the barons of the king for military services, and other feudal duties. So that these kings knew thereby the strength of their king- doms, and what number of horse and foot they could bring to the field in time of war. Barons were those who held their possessions immediately of the king, and were heritable members of the king's council, now called Parliament, by the tenure of their holdings, as well with us as in England ; where, about the end of the reign of King John of England, there arose a distinction of barons, majores et minores. To the first, as being more potent, particular writs were issued to each of them, summoning them to Parliament, and the minores were called by a general sum- mons executed by the sheriffs in their several counties, whose title of baron dwind- led into that of tenant in chief. From the reign of King John to the middle of King Richard II. anno 1387, there were two kinds of barons, as saith Selden, the one sort by writ and tenure, and the other barons by writ only. The first were those who were actual barons by possession, and had particular summons to Parliament ; the other barons by writ only were such as were called by virtue of summons to Parliament, though they possessed no baronies. Mr Carter's account of those two kinds of barons, as in his Analysis of Honour and Armory, page 44, 45, and 46, take as follows, " Barons (says he) by tenure " are barons spiritual, as I said before, which are reputed peers of the realm, and " were ever first in nomination, and take place on the prince's right hand in Par- " Hament, being capable of temporal dignities, and some of them are accounted " Count Palatines in their jurisdictions." " And by tenure temporal, which are such as hold their honour, castle, or ma- " nor, as the head of their barony, ^d-r baroniam, which is grand sergeantry : By which " tenure they ought to be summoned to Parliament. See Bracton, lib. 5. fol. 351' " and 357. But he is no lord of the Parhament until he be called by writ to the " Parliament." These barons by tenure, in the time of the Conqueror, and after, were very- numerous; and, in his time, as I conceive, distinguished into majores et minores, and summoned accordingly to Parliament: The majores by immediate writ from the king, the others by general writ from the high sheriff at the king's command. But they had also another distinction, which was, " The first were called only " barons by tenure, and the last tenants in chief, which were after quite excluded '' the Parliament, as Mr Camden says, fol. 122. in the reign of King Henry 111. " by a law made, that none of the barons should assemble in Parliament but such " as were summoned by special writ from the king. And that King Edward I. " summoned always those of ancient families that were most wise, but omitted " their sons after their death, if they were not answerable to their parents in un- " derstanding." But Mr Selden's opinion is, " That not long after the grand " charter of King John the law for excluding all tenants in chief was made." From whence came that other dignity of barons by writ, the king summoning whom he pleased, though he were a private gentleman, or knight, as many seculars, 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 5i priors, abbots, and deacons also; all which have been since omitted, that held nothing of the king in chief, or grand tenure. This title of baron by writ is by some esteemed only temporary pro termino par- liamenti. But that cannot be, for the ceremony of his admittance signifies more than a titular or temporary honour, which is 'this. He is first brought by the Garter King at Arms, in his sovereign coat, to the Lord Chancellor, between two of the youngest barons, who bear the robe of a baron; there he shows his prescript, which the chancellor reads, then congratulates him as a baron, and invests him with these robes, and sends him to take his place ; then the writ is delivered to the clerk of the Parliament, and he by the Garter showed to the barons, and placed in the house; and from thence is this title allowed him as hereditary. Since these two sorts of barons in the time of Richard II. another has been established, viz. barons by letters patent; which indeed are now more usual, and continue to this day, who are all lords of Parliament, and of the last degree ot our high nobility. For the said King Richard, in the nth year of his reign, first created John de Beauchamp, Steward of the Household, Baron of Kidderminster, him and the heirs-male of his body. And this coming afterwards to be the only way of creation, they had (says Selden) commonly creation-money granted them, as Sir Ralph Boteler, who had one hundred merks granted him annuity out of the county of Lincoln. Some of these minores do yet remain, as the barons of the cinque ports, barons of the exchequer, &-c, which are called barons, yet have not the honour; such are those that were created by Count Palatines, as the Baron of Kinderton, and some few others. As concerning the descent of this honour, and the extension of it, it many times descends to heirs-female, as when there is no special entail on the heirs-male; yet, then, no husband of that heir-female shall enjoy the title and honour, in right of his wife, unless he have issue by her; as was decreed by King Henry VIII. in the case of Mr Wimbry, for the stile of the Lord Talboys. With us here in Scotland there was no distinction of greater or lesser barons, but all were admitted to come to Parliament who had a free barony and power of pit and gallows; till about the end of the reign of King James I. when, by an act of Parliament, anno 1427, it was statuted and ordained, •' That small barons need- " ed not come to Parliament, but only two commissioners from each shire. All " prelates, dukes, earls, lords of Parliament, and bannerets, or banrents, to be sum- " moned by the king's special precept." Here we have the first distinction of small barons, and barons lords of Parliament, so called, because they were sum- moned out of the prime barons to come to Parliament. And, shortly after, follow- ed their solemn creation and letters patent for making them lords of Parliament ; the form and ceremony of their creation being thus : — He is brought in his robes of state before the king, or his commissioner, by two of that order, his friends car- rying before him a pinsel of taffeta rolled up, whereupon is his crest and motto, and next a banner also rolled up, whereupon is his whole achievement ; and after the ordinary oath is administered to him, the cincture of the belt and sword is performed by the king or his commissioner, who also puts into his hand a patent of his dignity ; then the Lyon King at Arms proclaims his titles. Sir A B of C, knight, baron, and banrent, lord of our sovereign's Parliament, lord ot D. But these ceremonies have been dispensed with, as also those in the creation of higher dignities these everal reigns by-past; and the delivery of letters patent, passing the seals, are sufficient now for that end. The robes of lords have two bars erjnitie. Lords or barons, with us, as well as in England, had no coronets till King Charles II. by a warrant under his hand, in June 1665, allowed to barons or lords of Parliament in Scotland a crimson velvet cap, with a golden circle decorated with six pearls on the top, equally distant one from another, being the same with the barons' coronets in England, a circle heightened with six pearls. The which war- rant being registrate in the books of his Majesty's Secret Council of Scotland, I here insert as follows. The signature following being presented and read in council, was ordained to be recorded. Edinburgh, June 29. 1665. " Our sovereigi^ lord ordains a letter to be made Vol. U. Ss 52 EXTERIOP. ORNAMENTS. " and passed under the Great Seal of this kingdom, mentioning, That whereas the " noblemen of higher degree of this kingdom, by titles of honour, were distinguish- " ed from gentlemen of lower quality, in all coronations and parliaments, by scar- " let robes and other marks of honour, wherewith they were adorned at their crea- " tion, many ages ago, witii no small lustre ; in their particular degrees and places " they were manifestly known to be different in their several stations : amongst " which distinctions, the divers forms of coronets ordained for, and appointed to " be carried by dukes, marquisses, earls, and viscounts, at the most magnificent " coronation of the kings of Scotland, added no small ornament and state : All " which considered, by reason the barons and lords of Parliament of this ancient " kingdom, most famous in former times, who had place and vote in Parliament, " and all other public conventions, by heritable right, have not had hitherto any " ornament to their head in such solemnities as became their rank : And because " it is just and reasonable that those of the degree of peers carry a mark of honour " suitable to that of the peers of a higher degree, his majesty, willing to show all " those of that degree, in time coming, his royal favour, doth by these presents or- " dain and appoint, that they and their heirs, barons and lords of Parliament, ■" made or to be made at any public or solemn conventions, shall have and carry " on their head a certain crimson velvet cap, with a golden circle decorated with " six pearls on the top, equally distant one from another, on the day of the coro- '• nation of his majesty's suc'cessors kings of Scotland; and also in all time and place, •' and after the same manner that the viscounts of this kingdom, and other peers " of higher degree of honour, carry and use their coronets, or may by right and " custom use and carry the same : As also, that they may set it on their coats of " arms, or anywhere else they please ; and his majesty ordains these his letters " patent, that they may be the better known, to be insert and registrate in the " registers of his chancery, together with the figure of the said cap: And also, " that they be forthwith insert in the public office of the Lyon King at Arms, " amongst the public acts thereof, whereby his servants, the Lyon, and the " heralds, may have the surer knowledge of his majesty's command and com- " mission, to observe and obey the same in all time coming, so often, and when- " soever it shall be necessary, or occasion shall require. And these presents shall *' be a sufficient warrant to the Director of the Chancellary to write, and the - Lord Chancellor, or Keeper of the Great Seal, to append the same thereto : As " also, to the Lyon King at Arms, to registrate the same in the books of his office, " and give out extracts thereof. Given at our Coui't of Whitehall the 2d day of " June 1665 years." The forecited M. Carter, in his Analysis of Honour, page 48. tells us, " That' a " baron of England, as a lord of Parliament, is reckoned among the peers of the " realm, and privileged amongst them in all those things. As first. In all trials " of criminal causes, he is not tried by a jury, but a bench of peers. If for treason " he be indicted, and shall stand mute, he shall be convicted, but not prest; but if " it be for felony, his standing silent shall not convict him. Upon any trial of " peers, the lords that are to give verdict are not, like a jury, put upon their " oaths, but upon their honour. A peer of the realm is not to be empannelled in " any jury but what concerns the king's inquiry. Neither are they to be arrcbt- " ed by any warrant of a justice of peace, either for the peace or good behavi- " our. Neither is he to be put upon his oath, upon any appearance he shall make " in court; but his !>onour to be esteemed as binding. And whereas all burgesses " of the commons are sworn to suprcmacy, the barons of the upper-bouse of Par- " liament are not, 5th Eliz. C. 1. with many other privileges." Mr Miege, in his State of Britain, tells us likewise, " That the nobility of Eng- " land, (now all those of Great Britain since the Union) are also free from all ar- " rests for debts, as bein^ the king's hereditary counsellors. Therefore a peer can- ' not be outlawed in anv civil action, and no attachment lies against his person : " But execution may be taken upon his lands and goods. For the same reason " they are free from all attendance at courts leet, or sheriff's turns : Or, in case " of a riot, from attending the service of the posse comitatus. And to secure the " honour of, and prevent the raising of any scandal upon peers by false reports, " there is an express law, called sctindahtm magnatum, by which any man convict '? of a false and scandalous report against a peer of the realm, is condemned on an EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 53 " arbitrary fine, and to remain in prison till the same be paiil. They have other " privileges which I pass by for brevity's sake ; yet none has that of the granilec- " of Spain, to 'be covered in the king's presence.*' The form of creating a baron by patent, according to the said Carter, ib. page 49. is in this manner. " The king sitting in state in the presence-chamber ; " first. The heralds by two and two, and their Garter Principal King, alone, pro- " ceed, bearing in his hand the patent of creation ; next to hmi a baron, bearing " tlie robes, and then the person to be created followetli betwixt two other barons. " Being entered the chamber of presence, they make their obeisance to the king . " three times. Ciarter then delivereth the patent to the Lord Chamberlain of the " Household, and he to the king, and the king to one of his principal secretaries " of state, who readeth it, and at tiie word iiivcstimus, the king putteth on him " the baron's robe. So soon as the pvitent is read, it is to be delivered to the king. " who gives it to him that is creatctl. Then he returning thanks for his great " honour, withdraws in the same manner he came in, the trumpets sounding ; " and so he goes to dinner, where, after the second service is gone up, the Garter, " with the rest of the iieralds, cometh near the table, where first pronouncing " largesse, with a loud voice, he declareth the king's stile in Latin, French, and " English ; and then standing somewhat further off, pronounceth largesse again, " with the stile of him that was newly created. In which form (says Mills) was " H'lLLiAM Cecil created Lord Burleigh, 15th of February, 13. Elizabeth." Silvanus Morgan, lib. 3. p. 24. observes, " That the circles of the crowns of " all the degrees of nobility are of one form (though variously heightened as bc- " fore described) to show them to be pares regni." The coronet of a lord in France is a golden circle adorned with bracelets of .small pearl. Our learned countryman. Sir George M'Kenzie, in his, Science of Heraldry, page 91, tells us, " That the first origin of crowns in arms, was from the Romans, " App. lib. 2. de Bell. Civil, for they rewarded the great actions of their citizens " and warriors with different and suitable crowns, which 1 here narrate out of the " ingenious Mr Cartwright." Corona muralis, this was due to him that was first seen upon the wall of the enemy. The forecited author of the new Dictionary says, " That a mural crown " or garland was of gold, being a circle, and on its battlements like those of a " wall, given to him that first mounted the breach, or any ways was the first that " broke into an enemy's town : which honour was due to the meanest soldier, " as well the greatest commander, if he could prove he had been the first that " entered the place. On the circle of this coronet there were lions engraved to " express the undaunted valour of the bearer. Again there was the corona cas- " trensis for him that made a breach in the camp of the enemy." The said dictionary says, " That a vallar-crown or garland, called also castrensis, was of '• gold, and consisted of palisadoes, or the likeness of them standing up all about the " gold circle, given by the general of the army to him that first broke into a for- " tified camp of an enemy, or forced any place pahsaded after the manner that '■ the outwards of strong places generally are, and therefore the palisades were re- " presented upon the coronet, to denote the exploit performed by the bearer." Again the Romans had the corona navalis, the naval crown or garland, which was of goLI, adorned with the heads and sterns of ships, or gallies. as aLo sails £cc. given to him that had first boarded an enemy's ship or galley, and been, by that means, the occasion that the same was taken. With such a coronet her late iSIa- jestv Queen Anne honoured Captain James Moodie commander of the ship Prince George, to ensign his helmet with, instead of a torce, and thereon to place his crest, for his merit and great services done to her, and, in particular for relieving the town and castle of Denia in Spain when besieged by the French in the year 1707 and 1708. As in the Appendix to this book, page 23. The Romans had also the corona triumphalis, or triumphal crown or garland, which was made of laurel, and granted only to generals who had vanquished their enemies and had the honour of a triumph granted them by the senate of Rome. This was said to have been taken from Apollo's crowning his head with laurel after killing of the Delphic serpent, and it was as much esteemed by the Romans as if it had been of gold. 54 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Corona ovalis, oval crown or garland, was made of myrtle, and granted to those who had obtamed a victory with little hazard ; and was first given to those that were victorious at the loHan games, instituted by the Thebans in memory of their hero lolus, near his tomb ; and therefore this was a mournful garland. The Romans bestowed the same sort of garland on their generals who had vanquished their enemies without bloodshed, or surprised some important place without strik- ing a stroke, as also on those that had subdued slaves or pirates, not reckoned worthy of the Roman valour, and consequently not to deserve a triumph. Corona obsldialis, or obsidional crown or garland was made of grass, and given to him that held out a siege, or caused it to be raised, repulsing the enemy, and de- livering the place. So Fabius Maximus had no greater reward than this crown, for hav- ing delivered the city of Rome from Hannibal, after the unfortunate battle of Cannx. Corona civica, or civic crown or garland, was given to a brave soldier who had saved the life of a fellow-citizen, or rescued him after being taken prisoner by the enemy, exposing himself to save another. And this was only made of oaken leaves with the acorns, if they could be so had; because that tree was dedicated to Jove, who was reckoned the protector of cities, and their inhabitants. This crown was made of oaken boughs, says Sir George M'Kenzie. Corona olivalis, olive crown or garland, was made of olive leaves ; and was given, among the Greeks, to those that came off victorious at the Olympic Games, kept in honour of Jupiter, at the foot of Mount Olympus. But, though highly valued amongst these people, this, and others like it, were only a reward for run- ning, wresthng, or such like exercises ; and therefore nothing comparable to the martial rewards among the Romans, who also gave this crown to those who had, by their wisdom, reconciled two enemies. The said Sir George M'Kenzie mentions also the corona populea, which, he says, was given to young men that were found industrious and studious in the exercises of virtue. But, amongst these rewards of honour, that of ivy, called corona hederalis, was only appropriated to the poets. The aforesaid Roman crowns or garlands, though made of leaves or grass, were as highly valued as if they had been of gold, because they were only bestowed on such as had purchased them by their singular bravery ; whereas, of late, golden coronets have been too frequently bestowed upon no other desert than wealth, and even that sometimes meanly gained. All the ancient rewards of garlands are now expired, and it is well they are when so little regard is had to real merit. Favour and affection are sufficient to advance the least deserving, and very often those who have done most are the least looked upon, if they have not some powerful interest to support them. He that runs away sometimes carries the prize from him that fought the battle. There is another ancient crown, being a circle with high points rising therefrom, called an open or antique crown, which Silvanus Morgan says is that crown borne by Homager Kings, and by John Baliol, when he held the crown of Scotland of Edward the I. of England. But I beg the gentleman's pardon (says Sir George M'Kenzie, ibid, page 92.) to tell him, that, of old. the Roman Emper- ors carried no other than these, after their apotheosis, and being numbered among the gods, Fulminibus manes radiisque oniobit & astris. LuCviN. And generally all kings of Christendom, of old, as I said before, carried theirs iii that shape, as L'Oseau also well observes. There is also a Turkish crown, if we may so call it ; for, in reality, the Grand Signior has no crown, but instead of it he wears on his head a great turban of fine muslin, held out by a wire that keeps it from falling together, and adorned on the sides by two rich jewels of diamonds and carbuncles, with fine heron's feathers standing up above, and costly pearls hanging below, and sometimes crescents, or half moons, two chains of gold and precious stones hanging at the two aforesaid jewels, and crossing the turban before. The Bashaws and other great men have turbans of another sort. The Doge of Venice wears for his crown a great pointed cap of cloth of gold ■encompassed with a gold circle, covered with precious stones, two long ears or lap- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 55 pets of the same cloth of gold hanging down on the sides of it pointed at the ends; though they have lately taken the close crown like monarchs. I shall only observe (and then have done with this chapter on crowns) that the name is originally derived from horns ; for the ancient Jews and Gentiles looked upon horns as tokens of supreme honour and power, and, in scripture, we often find the horn taken for royal dignity ; and therefore Moses's face is said to have been horned, the same word in the Hebrew fignifying a crown and a horn. The most ancient knights and warriors wore horns for their crests ; but, in process of time, great men left them otl", and, instead of them, took crowns. The most an- cient kings wore only wreaths, either white or purple, in nature of the present Turkish turbans, as a token of royalty, or else circles of gold with points rising from them like that of the open or antique crown ] before mentioned. And now having sufficiently treated on the crown and coronet, with its tiar or cap, 1 proceed to the ca() of state, which also adorns the achievement. CHAP. IX. OF THE CAP OF STATli. TO leave nothing untreated of that embellisheth hereditary achievements of families, I have added this chapter, wherein I shall describe this cap of state or di^nitv, and its ancient and modern use. It IS of crimson velvet faced up ermine, with two points turned to the back, nor unlike in figure to our Scots coivl, so called. It is frequently used in armories by the English, which they say is from, or in imitation of, the caps of the Roman generals, who having obtained a victory, and returning in triumph, had this cap of state carried before them, by their most worthy captive. It is now called a ducal cap. For the wearing of this cap had a beginning from the dux, or duke, who was so called, a ducendo, being leader in war, that is, ge- neral of an army to emperors and kings, and is now given to others of inferior dig- nities, and so cannot be an ensign of dignity, but given as a token of triumph and victory. Yet, of old, by the ancient practice of the English, and ourselves in Scotland, none but princes and dukes used to wear it on their heads or helmets, or timbred their achievements therewith as an ensign of royalty or dignity. iMr Sandford tells us in his Genealogical History of the Kings of England, " That King Ed- " WARD the III. and his successors Kings of England, down to King Edward the " VI. had on their seals of arms this cap of state. For on the cuts of their seals " there is to be seen on one side the figure of the several kings represented on " horseback in armour, with this cap of state on their heads, and the crest ol' " England set thereupon." Which helmet, cap, and crest adorn also their es- cutcheons. Prince Edward, eldest son of King Edward the III. had the same cap on his head, surmounted with the crest of England, and charged with a label of three points. And Henry Duke of Lancaster, the second of that dignity in England, carried on the helmet of his achievement such another cap, in place of a wreath, whereupon was placed his crest, being a lion passant gardant. The author of the dictionary to Guillim says, " That the word chapeau is the " common French word for a cap or hat ; but here it is taken for an ancient cap " of dignity worn by dukes, being scarlet coloured velvet on the outside, and lin- " ed with a fur ; of late frequently to be seen above a helmet instead of a wreath " under gentlemen's crests. But formerly (continues he) they were rarely to be " found the rijral of private families : They after became frequent, together with " ducal coronets by the grants of Robert Cock, Esq; Clarencieux, and others since " him, but by his in particular." Thus that author. But I do not find this ducal cap in any other called chapeau, except in the Display, where it. is more properly also called a cap of dignity ; and Columbier calls all sorts of such caps bonnets : but Vol. II. T t 56 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. gives the name of chapeau to that which we properly call a hat, and not to a cap or bonnet. With us Sir James Balfour, Lyon King at Arms, in his Manuscript of Exterior Ornaments, says, " That he has seen the seal of arms of Archibald Earl of Doug- " las, Duke of Touraine, Great Constable of France, appended to a charter grant- " ed by him to the progenitor of the Earls of Winton ;" which charter is supposed to be in their custody ; on which seal is the said duke's achievement, and the hel- met ensigned with a cap of the same form, as mentioned before. The present Duke of Douglas had the same on his achievement painted and illuminated on his coach, which I saw anno 1708 ; but observed that, through ignorance, the painter had drawn the points of the cap forward, which ought properly to be turned to the back or sinister side of the helmet. The said Sir James informs us, " That he had likewise seen the seal of arms of " John Stewart Duke of Albany, Earl of March, Lord Annandale, and the Isle of " Man, Governor of Scotland in the minority of King James the V. appended to " a treaty with King Henry the VIIL of England, upon which was his achieve- " ment, and on the helmet placed above the same, was set, instead of the wreath, " this cap of state." And the present Earl of Home, carrying in his armorial achievement for crest, a lion's head erased, with this cap of state, gules, turned up ermine. I could give several other examples ; but these may suiEce to prove its usage here in Scot- land. But now this chapeau, or cap of state, has lost its former eminent dignity, by the bad practice of some modern heralds, who not only give it to all the degrees of high nobility, wiiich is somewhat tolerable, but even to the lesser nobility, as may be seen in Richard Blome's Treatise of Honour, Military and Civil, subjoined to Mr Guilllm's Display of Heraldry. Where the achievements of knights, baron- ets, and batchelors and esquires are represented engraven on copperplate, having their helmets and other parts of their achievements ensigned with this cap of state, which ought not properly to be carried by any below nobility, considering that none but kings, dukes, and high nobility were allowed, of old, to carry the same in their armorial bearings. Yet the French have no such chapeau, as a sign of dignity and eminent virtue, though they have of another form, used by their chancellors, and presidents of Pailiament, as ensigns of their civil dignity, and with which they always adorn their arms ; of which after. But first of marks of ecclesiastic dignity, of which I ihall treat in the next chapter. CHAP. X. or ENSIGNS BELONGING TO ECCLESIASTICAL DIGNITIES. A ND first, as to the Pope, who is the supreme dignity in the church, being X~ 4. the head bishop, and, as it were, sole monarch in spirituals among Roman C^ iiolics, throughout the whole world. He is chosen by the cardinals, and his S(.e has always been at Rome, whence his orders, by the name oi briefs and bulls, are dispersed throughout the universe. The bulls are so called from bulla, a great leaden seal hanging to them. This may suffice concerning him, as being sufficient- ly known ; and yet the controversies about his authority are endless ; and there- fore it is needless to say any more of him, but only what relates to the exterior ornaments that he is in use to carry in adorning his armorial bearings. The Popes of Rome have been in use to carry and adorn their paternal arms, not OP a formal or ordinary shield, but an oval cartouch, as it is called, and the Italians, for the most part, have their shields of arms after an oval form, in imita- tion, it is thought, of those used by popes and other eminent churchmen. This oval cartouch the popes adorn with their papal ensigns, being the tiara, keys, and cross staffs. The tiara papalis is an ornament of the head, being a high cap of silk envi- roned with three crowns of gold, placed one ahove the other, adorned with pearls EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 57 and precidus stones. The top of the cap surmounted with a mond ot gold, or precious stone, ensigned with a cross, as that of the emperors ; having two labels or pendents at the sides of the tiar, hanging down, and again turned up; which tiar or triple crown, called the reirne, is the sign of sovereign supremacy, as they say, over the universal church, and is placed above the cartouch of the pope's arms. The author of the new Dictionary of Heraldry says, " That the papal crown is " hke a deep cap or mitre, of cloth of gold, encompassed with three coronets or " circles of gold, adorned with flowers, and all embellished with precious stones, " and on the top the globe, and on it the cross." There are several of these triplu crowns kept in the Roman sacristy, some say to the number of four, with as many rich mitres, which serve only for ornament and show, being too heavy to wear. The richest of which was made by Tope Julius the II. An account of which may be seen in Motraye's Travels, vol. I. page 346. The two keys, one of gold and the other of silver, are placed in saltier on the banner of the church, which is of red silk. And they were also placed behind the cartouch of the pope's arms saltier-v.ays, as symbols of their power in opening and shutting the gates of heaven and hell. The pope carries also, by way of supporters, two angels proper, who are placed in a sitting posture one on each side of the car- touch, and each with one of their hands supporting and bearing up the triple crown, and with their other hands holding each a long staff with three traverses near the top ; which traverses end in trefoils, and are of the same metal with the keys. The cardinals are now become ,the first of all the clergy of the popish church, next to the pope. That which raises them above bishops and patriarchs is the power they have during the vacancy of the see of Rome ; as having the right to choose a new pope, and being themselves the persons on one of whom that elec- tion falls. These high prerogatives have gained them the title of princes of tlie church ; and, as such, few princes in Italy contend with them for precedence, being reckoned little inferior to crowned heads : For this reason the popes have thought fit that they sliould be clothed in scarlet, especially upon public occa- sions, as kings and emperors commonly are, though that colour was given them, as they say, to put them in mind that they are always to be ready to shed their blood for the true faith. But though they wear red garments on ordinary days, that being the colour of blood, yet, on days of sorrow, they pat on violet or purple, which is more dark and mournful. Pope Innocent the IV. was the first that gave them the red hat. At the council of Lyons, in the year 1244, Boniface the VIII. granted leave to the secular cardinals to wear the scarlet robe, when the popes began to wear white. Paul the III. gave them the red cap ; and, lastly, Gre- gory the XIV. allowed the religious cardinals to wear it, but that they should still be clothed in the colour of their order. The creation of cardinals is wholly in the pope, who only communicates the same to other cardinals, and they give their approbation. 'Ihe new created cardinals go the same day to visit the pope, who puts the red cap on their heads, they kneeling, and the master of the cere- monies puts on their rochet ; then having taken off the cap, the new cardinal kisses the pope's foot and hand, and then they rise, and the pope embraces them ; after which, when the pope gives them audience, they sit down and are covered. The red hat is afterwards given them in a public consistory, on their knees, and then they go to church, and Te Dtimi is sung. The pope performs he ceremony of shutting their mouths in a private consistory, and they are opened again in the same manner a few days after ; that done, he gives each of them a title of bishop^ priest, and deacon, putting a gold ring on their fourth finger, to signify their be- ing married to the church. The cardinals that are absent when chosen have the cap sent them, and is set on their heads by the sovereign in whose dominions they reside. As for the red hat, and the other ceremonies, they cannot be performed anywhere but at Rome ; for the hat must be given by the pope himself, who al- so confers the title, after the ceremonies of shutting and opening the mouth. Thus many cardinals die without ever receiving the red hat, because not at Rome. The cardinals' exterior armorial murk of dignity is the red har, with wliich rbey timbre their shields, having red strappings, with fifteen tassels hanging; dowQ at 58 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. each side of the shield. Pope Innocent III. discharged them to use coronets or other badges of their secular dignities, but few complied therewith, save the Ita- lians, for those of France continued to carry in their achievements all their marks of dignity, politic, civil, and ecclesiastic. As Cardmal Richlieu, commonly design- ed the Cardinal, Duke, Peer, High Admiral of France, and Commander of the Royal Order of the Holy Ghost. For he in his armorial bearing carried below his cardi- nal hat a ducal crown placed upon his escutcheon, and round it the Order of the Holy Ghost, and behind the shield two anchors disposed in saltier, for his badge, as being High Admiral of France. Albert Archduke of Austria, son of Maximilian II. Emperor of Germany, who married Clara Eugenia, Infanta and daughter of Philip II. King of Spain, placed on his escutcheon an arched crown, and above it a cardinal's hat, with tifteen tassels hanging down at each side of the shield, which he carried as being a cardi- nal. See his seal of arms exhibited by Olivarus Uredus. Archbishops, primates, and legates, place a cross staff" with two traverses at the top, erected in pale in the middle of the back of their shields of arms, and above the same a green hat with ten tassels hanging down at each side of the shield ; as Monsieur Baron, in his Abrege Metbodique, blazons the achievement of Camille QE Neuville de Villeroy, Archbishop and Earl of Lyons, Primate of France, and Commander of the Royal Order of France, viz. azure, a cheveron between three anchors of the last : which shield of arms is environed with the blue ribbon, and thereto affixed the pendant of the royal order, and timbred with an earl's co- ronet ; and behind the shield is placed, in pale, a cross staff, with two traverses near the top, surmounted of an archbishop's green hat, with its proper number of tassels, being ten on each side. Bishops place on the dexter side, and on the top of their shields of arms, a mitre affronte, (i. e. looking forward) and behind the sinister side of the said shield they carry a crosier, erected in pale, with its hooked head appearing above the shield as high as the mitre, turned to the left, and the foot of it appearing below at the bottom of the left side thereof; and above all, a green hat with six tassels hanging down at each,:side of the shield. I do not find that our bishops in Britain have used to carry hats and tassels, as a part of their armorial ensigns, before the year 1520, but only mitres and crosiers ; for I have seen several seals of our ancient bishops, in formal shields placed below the images of saints or mitred bishops, supported by angels, and adorned with mitres and crosiers only. Particularly I have seen the seal of William Fraser Archbishop of St An- drews, who flourished in the reign of King Robert the Bruce, where the shield of his arms is only timbred with a mitre below the feet of St Andrew. And on the seal of John Cameron, Bishop of Glasgow and Chancellor of Scot- land, appended to an indenture between Jean, widow of King James I. and Sir Alexander Livingston of Callender, concerning Sir Alexander's keeping of the young king's person, dated 4th September 1439, where his arms are only timbred with a mitre, and at the sides of the shield are two salmons erected with rings in their mouths; and the legend round the seal is, Sigillum Joannis Episcopi Glasguen. The same arms are cut in stone, with a salmon below the shield, as they are to be seen on the vestry of the church of Glasgow, which that bishop built. The modern method that our British bishops use in adorning the shields of their arms, is. That our archbishops only place a mitre affronte on the top of their shields, with two labels or pendants fixed thereto, hanging down, waved and folded on each side of the shield ; and behind the same, two crosiers disposed in saltier, with their hooked heads appearing above, and the points of the same com- ing out below the bottom of the escutcheon. And, in most of paintings and he- raldry books, bishops only adorn their shields of arms with a mitre placed on the top thereof, with pendants hanging down as aforesaid, without making use of any other exterior ornaments. Abbots of the popish church timbre their arms with a mitre in profile, or stand- in,;:: sideways, on the dexter side of the top of their shields, and a crosier erected in pale, placed at the back of the sinister side thereof, with its hooked head appear- 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. S9 iiig above the shield, raised as high as the mitre, and turned to the right, and above both is a black hat, from which issueth a knotted cord, with six tassels hanging- down on each side of the shield. But on the beautiful abbey of Paisley are to be seen the arms of Gkorge Shaw, (a brother of the family of Sauchie) Abbot of the said abbey, wiio adorns only the shield of his arms with a crosier, erected in pale, at the back of the middle there- of, with its hooked head appearing above the same. As also on the abbey of Holyroodhouse is to be seen, cut on stone, the arms of Abbot Archibald Crawfurd, a brother of the house of Haining, and Treasurer to King James 111. where his shield of arms is only adorned with a mitre placed on the top thereof. But I never could find that any of our abbots of old made use of the black hat and tassels, as an addition of exterior ornaments to adorn their armo- rial bearings. On the seal of Andrew, Commendator of Jedburgh, I saw his arms cur, . adorned only with a crosier erected in pale, placed at the back of the middle of the shield, and the hooked head thereof appearing above the same, turned to the right. Abbesses carry their arms in a lozenge shield, and adorn the same with a crosier erected in pale, at the back of the middle thereof, with its head above the lozenge, turned to the right, and the shield is ordinarily either environed with a chaplet of flowers, two palm branches, or a crown of thorns tied to the foot of the crosier, that appears below the base point of the lozenge. Prothonotaries of the church of Rome timbre their shields of arms with a black hat, having three tassels hanging down at each side thereof. Priors and Provosts of the said church carry, behind the middle of their shields, erect in pale, a pastoral staff, like to that of a pilgrim's bourdon. And the shield is also adorned with two palm branches tied to the foot of the said staff, appear- ing below the shield, and raised on each side thereof as high as the top of the staff. Deans of that church carry a crosier erect in pale behind the middle of their shields, with its hooked head appearing at the top thereof, turned to the left, adorned with two palm branches, disposed after the same method as carried by the pnors above. Chanters of the same church carry the staff or mace of the chapter, erected in pale at the middle of the back of the shield, with the head thereof appearing at the top. Also tiiey adorn the shields of their arms with two palm branches dis- posed after the same method as the last. And other inferior ecclesiastics of the church of Rome abroad trim and adorn their shields of arms with cherubims, who are said to be the second of the nine orders of angels. As for the ancient use of these ecclesiastic marks in armories, Menestrier tells us, " That the cardinal's hat, the crosier, and cross staff, have been in armories " above three hundred years; and which figures have made up the arms of " many churchmen. " The custom of timbring archbishops' and bishops' arms with the hat was first practised in Spain, as some will, and the arms of Don Roderico Fernando, Bishop of Jaen, was so trimmed in the year 1400, which are still to be Seen at Basa. In Alimond's History of the Council of Constance, printed at Augsburg in the year 1483, are the arms of four patriarchs, viz. of Antioch, of Constantinople, of Venice, and of Jerusalem, timbred with green hats. The hat upon arms of bishops is not ancient in France, says Menestrier ; and the use of it was only brought in there by Tristan de Saladzes, Archbishop of Sens, a Spaniard, about the year 1520. But 1 find in England, out of Sandford's Genealogical History, that Henry Beaufort, (second son of John Duke of Lan- caster, by his wife Catharine Swinford) who was a cardinal, had his arms timbred with a hat. And with us in Scotland our ancient bishops carried mitres and cro- siers only ; but in all my readings 1 have not met with any of them to have car- ried hats before the year 1520, Vol. U. U u 00 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. The mitre is made forked, to intimate that those who have right to carry it, ought to be known boch in the Old and New Testament. And though very ancient, yet it is not universally to be met with on escutcheons of arms ; because upon sepulchral monuments, where they are most ordinarily to be found, we meet fre- quently with the representation of the person interred cut on stone, upon whose head is set the mitre, and not upon his shield of arms, just as we find crowns on the seals of kings, &.c. first on the bearers' heads, before they were placed on their shields of arms. As for the antiquity of prothonotaries, placing on their arms a black hat doubled with green, Charles de Grasaria, in his Treatise of such Ornaments, printed in the year i545, says, " Protonotarius timbrum addit ex pilio iiigro duplicate viridi co- lore. " And about this time chanters began to place the staff or mace of the chap- ter behind their shields of arms. It has also been the custom of the commanders of the religious orders to place the badges of these orders in their arms, by way of composition. But as to the antiquity of churchmen impaling and quartering their arms with those of their sees, -the same is to be found in the year 1329, and sooner. It is to be observed, that all the above churchmen who use and carry the exte- rior ornament of a hat above their arms, have also a cordeliere, (issuing out of the same) which is a cord with two running knots on each side, whereat hang down the foresaid tassels on both sides of the shield, and are always advanced in number according to the person's degree in ecclesiastical preferments, from a protonotary to a cardinal. Sir George Mackenzie tells us in his Precedency, pages 29 and 30, That the Roman patriarch was by Phocas the Emperor raised above all the rest in the year 606, since which time they have raised themselves by several degrees to the pa- pacy ; though it cannot be denied but, even before that time, the bishop of Rome had the first seat in all councils, as is clear by Justinian's Novella, 131. cap. 2. But the power of presiding did still belong to the emperors, as has been fully cleared by Cursius and others. And though it be pretended that Constantine the Great did, from Christian humility, prefer the successor of St Peter (as vicar of Jesus Christ) to himself, yet the Emperor Frederick I. did conscientiously debate this precedency V\'ith Pope Adrian IV. since which time it has been variously ac- quiesced in by popes and emperors. And though the legates be representatives of the popes, yet Thuanus tells us, lib. 98. that the learned Brissonius, President of the Parliament of Paris, would not suffer the pope's legate to precede him ; and at the coronation of the Emperor Charles V. the pope's legate was denied the prece- dency from the electors. The cardinals have debated for precedency with patriarchs ; though by the Novella 132. cap. 1. Justinian places patriarchs next to the pope; and Pauormit, in Cap. Antiqua. X. de PrivUeg. 13 Excess. Prcelat. prefers the patriarchs to the cardinals. But now, by the concession of Sixtus Quintus, that pope has raised the cardinals to an equal degree with kings ; and if kings be present at table or other solemnities with cardinals, if there be but one king, he is to sit after the first cardinal bishop; and if there be more kings, they sit mixtly with the cardinals; first a cardinal and then a king. But though this holds amongst popish princes, yet the author of Les Memoires des Ambassadeurs does observes, That Leicester, Trotius, and the other ambassadors of protestant princes, never yielded precedency to cardinals, till our countryman Sir William Lockhart, Ambassador for Oliver Cromwell to the Court of France in the year 1657, yielded it to Cardinal Mazarine; where he likewise observes, that the Prince of Conde yielded the precedency to Cardinal Richlieu, yet the Count of Soissons refused it. I find by a letter in the year 1625, that before King James went to England, the marquisses of Scotland took place of the archbishops ; but now the archbishops take place of all dukes and marquisses, in imitation of England. And by a letter in the year 1626, renewed in the year 1664, the Archbishop of St Andrews is to take place of all subjects, which is to be so limited as not to exclude the king's chil- dren and brothers, as I conceive ; and de facto the Archbishop of St Andrews gives place to the Chancellor, ever since the letter. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. CHAP. XI. ENSIGNS OF CIVIL AND MILITARY OFFICES, AND OTHER I'OLITIC ONES OF DIGNITY AND CHIVALRY. IN treating of tliese, I shall take occasion to mention all such dignitied persons as I have met with, who adorn the shield ot" then- arms with exterior ensigns and figures suitable to the offices and dignities they have been honoured v\ ith by the sovereign; with the manner ot" usage and situation of such badges of honour in and about the shield, as their symbola ailministrationis. And, first, as to the armorial ensigns of civil offices of dignity, I shall begin witli the Lord High Chancellor, or Keeper of the Great Seal, who is looked upon (says Mr Miege, in his State of South Britain) as the prime minister of state, and the highest person in the kingdom in civil affairs, after the king and princes of the blood, as the Archbishop of Canterbury is in England, and that of St Andrews in Scotland, in ecclesiastical affairs. His place is of great trust: He keeps a court, called tiie Court of Chancery, wherein he is sole judge. It is he that now keeps tlie Great Seal of Britain, without which and the mace he never appears abroad. All patents, commissions, and warrants, coming from the king, are perused by him. If they be lawful he signs them, and if not, he cancels them. By virtue of his office lie is one of the King's Privy Council, and ought to have a tender regard for the rights of the crown. He also bestows all benefices in the king's gift under twenty pound yearly, in the king's books. His office is durante beiieplacitu. The Lord Chancellor and Lord Keeper is the same in authority, power and precedency in England. All the difference is, that the Lord Chancellor is created by patent, ■which the Lord Keeper is not; and that the title of chancellor is a particular mark of the king's favour. The Lord Chancellor, with us, (says Sir George Mackenzie, in his Precedency, page 39.) is in effect the first officer in the nation, and is by his office, and by a particular statute, president in all courts. Act. I. Pari. i. Charles II.; which act was made to declare that he was president of the exchequer, as well as of other courts, this having been pretended to by the treasurer. He hath his title not from the power of cancelling, as the old Gloss says, that " Cancellarius est qui " habet officium scripta responsaque principis inspicere, & male scripta cancellare;" for it is not imaginable that he would take his title from what he destroys, and not from what he does; but from the canct-lli et banes, within which the judges did sit inclosed, as is clear from Cassiodor. lib. ii. epist. 1. These canceUani of old were in effect the clerks; and the chancellor is so called now because he signs all the public papers, and appends his seal. " Ideo quod ad eum universcE publicae- " referentur conscriptiones, ipseque eos annulo regis sive sigillo firmaret." Simaq. lib. I. calls him, " Questor legum, conditor regalis, consilii particeps, justitiae ar- " biter:" Which names I conceive are given to him, because Novel, 114. " Di- " vinas jussiones debent habere subscriptionem glorissimi questoris;" and many of the Novels are signed questor lejuin. The Lord Chancellor of Scotland doth not receive his authority as the Chancellor of England doth, who hath no other com- mission but merely by the delivery of the Great Seal of England, as the learned Coke observes: But with us the chancellor's place is always conferred by com • mission under the Great Seal, and very often during life; as also the Chancellor and Lord Keeper in England have the like jurisdiction. But we had a Lord Chancellor and a Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, who were distinct persons, as I could prove by a number of instances too prolix here to insert. By the laws of King Malcolm 11. I find ten pounds is ordained to be paid to the- King's Chancellor, for his fee of the seal appended to the charter of every hundred po".nd land. Where, observe, that every hundred pound land is set down for the least p-Dortion and measure of a barony, or holding of the king. Now we know that ai) hundred pound land, at least, will be thirty or forty, and some 50,000 merks ia g-' d rent; so that the barons of old were powerful, and had under them milites, and these had subvasores. Also in the laws of King Malcolm Canmore, the chan- cellor is placed before ail the officers, and sometimes many of the considerable earls 6; ' EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. are placed betwixt him and the vest of the officers. Thus King Alexander grants a charter, tesiibus Willu'lmo de Bosco Cancelturio meo, Mulcdmo Cumite de Fife, AJano Senescallte Scotia;, &.C. But it is observable, that the officers of state of old were in ancient writs oftimes ranked according to the quahty of the bearers, and not according to the precedency of the offices. The Lord Chancellor of England (says Sylvanus Morgan, in his Sphere of Gentry, lib. 4. cap. 6.) carries, as the badge of his office, in pale, behind the shield of his arms, a mace, being no other than a staff, ensigned with a crown. But his chief symbol (says he) is the purse which he places below his shield, and is open, with the strings pendent, fretted, nuved, buttoned, and tasselled gules, in a tield ardent, embroidered all over with the sovereign ensigns of his majesty, denoting the high magistracy of his office, being to confirm the gifts and grants of dignities, offices, franchises, privileges, and immunities: " Et in Francia duo sunt officia, " omnibus aliis excellentiora & principaliora, quorum unum est primum &- prius " in justitia, aliud autem jure militari," &-c. The Lord Chancellor taking place first for justice sake. This high officer, with us, has been in use to place behind his escutcheon of arms, as the badge of his office, two maces disposed in saltier, ensigned with imperial crowns, and, below his achievement, the said open purse, embroidered with the royal arms of the kingdom. The Chancellors in France, besides the two maces placed in saltier behind their shield of arms, carry also, as a particular badge of their office, a proper cap of gold, (/7« niortier d'or^ turned up ermine, which is placed on their helmet, out of which issues the crest of their office, being the figure of a queen representing France, holding in her right hand a sceptre, and in her left the Great Seal of the kingdom; and their achievements are ordinarily placed on a mantle of scarlet, adorned with rays of gold towards the top, and doubled with ermine, as Monsieur Baron tells us in his Art of Heraldry. But the chancellors there have not the usage of the purse, as with us in Britain. And Daniel Fewel says. That Chan- cellor Segnies was the first who had his arms so trimmed by the persuasion of the learned herald, Mark de Voulosen de la Columbier. The Presidents of the Parliaments in France place their proper ra/), being of black velvet, edged with gold galoun, above their coronets and helmets, when of temporal dignity, and of spiritual below their hats and mitres. And their achievements lie upon a scarlet mantle doubled with petit gris, i. e. a grey furr made of squirrels' tails, as set down by the fore-cifed Monsieur Baron. The Great Chamberlain in France is called Grand Chambrier, and was con- stantly possessed by the family of Bourbon. The Lord Great Chamberlain of Engl.\nd, (according to Mr Miege, in his State of South Britain) is an officer of great antiquity, and of special service at the coronation of our kings. Upon which day, before the king rises, he is to bring his shirt, coif, and wearing clothes; he dresses the king, puts on his royal robes, and serves his majesty that day before and after dinner with water to wash his hands. In the procession he marches with his coronet and a white staff in his hand. He disposes of the sword of state to what lord he pleases, to be carried be- fore the king when he comes to the Parliament ; at which time he goes himself on the right hand of the sword, next to the king's person, and the Earl Marshal on the left. The whole palace of Westminster being under his government, he issues out his warrants for the fitting and furnishing of Westminster-Hall against corona- tions, and trials of peers in Parliament time. He provides all things in the House of Lords in the time of Parliament, and to that end he has an apartment near that liouse, with the Gentleman-Usher of the Black Rod, the Yeoman-Usher, and door- keepers under his command. Upon all solemn occasions the keys of Westminster- Hall, of the Courts of Wards, and Requests, are delivered to him. At the coro- nation he has forty ells of crimson velvet allowed him for his own robes. After the king is dressed by him, and gone forth, his majesty's night apparel, his bed, and the furniture of his chamber, are his fees. The very bason the king washed his hands in, and the towels he has wiped them with, fall likewise to his share. There are also certain fees due to him from all peers of the realm at their creation, or when they do their homage ; and from all bishops, when they do their homage to 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 6^ the king. This office is hereditary in the family of the IVIarquis of Lindsay in England. The Great Chmiberl.un of Scotland, (says Sir George Mackenzie, in his Pre- cedency, page 40.) or Camerariiis Doinitu Regis, is the third great officer named in the statutes of K-iiig Malcolm Canmore. And i find him \n old writs placed as witness, before all the other officers, next to the chancellor. There was ALig/ius Cjmerarius, who was chief judge over all the burghs: And there were others un- der-chamberlains, who are oftentimes designed Camerarii, without the adjection of Magnus: And I find in a charter granted by King David, in the year 1495, the witnesses are Alexandro-- domino Huyine m.igno camcrmio nostra, yohanne domino Diamond justicinrio nostra, Ricardo Miirehead secretario nostra, et l/Valtero Driimand nostrorum rotulorum et registri uc a consiliis. This otlice is the same with Praepositus sacri cubiruli, mentioned by Justinian. By the fourth chapter oi Regiam Majesta- tem, we see the chamberlain's office hath been very great: For we find that his fees have amounted to no less than two hundred pounds per annum, which he had paid out of the profits of the escheats, fines, tolls, and customs accruing to the king out of the burgiis over wliom the Great Chamberlain exercised a particular juris- diction. The process and matters of inquiry that came before him is distinctly treated of by Sir John Skene, to whom I refer my reader. The Lord High Chamberlain in England, as the symbol of his office, carries two keys in saltier at the back of the escutcheon of his arms, as says Sylvanus Morgan, in his Sphere of Gentry, lib. 4. page 82. who also tells us, ibid. '■ That " the Lord Chamberlain of the King's Household, as a badge of that office, car- " ries one key in pale behind the middle of the shield of his arms, the same ap- " pearing above his shield and coronet, and the bowl is seen below the same." The Lord High Chamberlain, with us, is now hereditary in the family of the Duke of Lennox, whose achievement I have seen adorned with two keys of gold disposed in saltier behind the shield of his arms, having the bowls of the keys downwards, and ensigned with imperial crowns as the badge of his office, after the same form as those dignified with that high office in France; the figure and blazon whereof is to be seen in Monsieur Baron's Art of Heraldry. As also in an old paint- ing of the arms of the family of Lennox, 1 have observed their crests to have a golden key hanging thereat. The Lord Chief Justice of England (says Mr Miege in his State of Britain) is so named, because his jurisdiction extends over all England, and a warrant from him may fetch one from any part of it. He is also called Lord Chief Justice of the Kind's Bench, because anciently the king sat there sometimes in person on a high bench, and the judges on a low bench at his feet. This is the highest court in England at common law, next to the House of Lords in Parliament. Here the pleas are between the king and the subject; all treasons, felonies, breach of peace, oppression, and misgovernment, being commonly brought before this court ; as are also all errors of the judges and justices of England in their judgments and pro- ceedings, not only in pleas of the crown, but in all other pleas, the Exchequer ex- cepted. In this court, all young lawyers that have been called to the bar are allowed to plead and practise. There are four judges belonging to this court, who hold their office by writ, not by patent. But none may be judge in this court ex- cept a sergeant at law, who (upon taking his degree) is obliged to wear always a lawn coif under his cap at the bar. And the first of these judges is called Lord Chief Justice. The Lord Justice General, or Great Justiciar with us, (according to Sir George Mackenzie, in his Precedency, page 39.) is in the laws of King Malcolm Canmore placed nest the chancellor, though afterwards Scotland was divided into two justiciaries one upon the south side of Forth who was called Justtciarius Lo- thania, and in old charters Judex Laudonia; and the other on the north side of Forth. This place has been generally possessed by noblemen, and is now the same with us that the Chief Justice of the King's Bench is in England. His jurisdiction extends over all Scotland, and a warrant from him may fetch one from any part thereof. He keeps his court commonly at Edinburgh, called the Justiciary Court. There are five commissioners, called Lords of Justiciary, besides the Lord Justice General, and Lord Justice Clerk, that are judges in this court, where are tried all Vol. IL Xx 64 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. crimes tlsat reach to life and limb (as we express it) of the criminals, be they peera- or com'moiiers; aad the matter is submitted to the cogniiance of a jury, which is not allowed in civil courts in cases oi meum and tuum, excepting the High Court of Exchequer, of which afterwards. The jury consists of fifteen persons, and the foreman is called the cbLiiicellor of the assize, or jury. In case of the trial of a pf:!;r, the greatest part of tlie jury were to be peers; but they are now, since the Union, to be tried as peers ot Great Britain. The votes are collected by the chan- cellor, or foreman, and the major part determines the matter. This court siti everv tridav in the afternoon, during the time of the Session, or term. All cri- minals those accused of treason not excepted, are allowed the benefit of advocates or counsel to plead for them in this court. I have met with no author that mentions any figures or symbols made use of by the Lord Chief Justice of England, in his armorial bearing, as a badge of his office. But our Justice General in Scotland, once hereditary in the family of Argyle, who is also heritably Great Master-Household to his Majesty in Scotland, carries for the badges of these high oliices, (as matriculate in the Lord Lyon's Register of Arms in Scotland) saltier-ways, a batton and a sword suppressed of the shield, the first powdered with thistles, proper, and ensigned on the top with the imperial crown and crest of liis majesty set thereon; which symbol he bears as his particular badge of Master-Household. The sword is proper, hilted and pommelled oi\ with the point appearing above, and the pommel below the shield; which figure he car- ries as being Heritable Justice General of the sheriffdom of Argyle, the isles and others. But when our "justice General had no other high office beside the same, he carried as the ensigns of this office two naked swords disposed in saltier behind the escutcheon of arms, the points appearing above, and the pommels below tlie- same. And this jurisdiction was amongst others possessed at Rome by the Prafec- tus Pratori, who was their ch?ef magistrate. The Lord High Tkeasurer (according to the fore-cited Mr Miege, in his State of Britain) has under his charge and government all the king's revenue, which is kept in the Exchequer, and consequently the check of all oflicers any ways employ, ed in collecting the same, whose offices are also for the most part in his gift. This office was formerly conferred by the delivery of the golden keys of the treasury, and now by the delivery of a white staff, during the king's pleasure. This offi'cer of state, with us, (says Sir George Mackenzie in his Precedency, page 42.) is not mentioned amongst these officers of the crown under King Mal- cofm Canmore, and of old it has been thought but an ofiice of the king's house: For in a confirmation granted to the abbacy of Aberbrothock, in the year 1529, by King James V. after revereiidissimis episcopis, and clileetis consanguineis, are enu- merate as witnesses dilectis famUianbus nostris Roberto Barton nostra thcsaurario et computorum nostronm rotulatore. Nor do I find a treasurer designed as witness in any of the king's charters till then, though some foolishly think that Panetarius v/as treasurer. And though the word familiar counsellor be now given to all ofiicers of state, who are not earls-, because they cannot be called cousins; yet, of old, it was only 'given to those of the king's own family, and was derived « Jamilia, though noxi fumilinr is thought to be the same with intimate. But herein Sir' George is in a mistake ; for King James L established the office of High Treasurer in Scotland after his return from captivity in England. And I humbly think, that before this, the Lord Chamberlain was in effect treasurer; for after this the jurisdiction of the chan-iberlain was restricted to what more particularly related to the government of the burghs, the charge and management of the king's property, and the other casualties of the crown being committed to the care of the treasurer as a distinct officer of state, whom henceforth we find almost constantly mentioned as a witness in all the royal charters, grants, and commissions, that past the Great Seal, under the designatiim of Thesanrarius noster. The Court of Exchequer in Scotland (says Mr Miege in his State of North Britain) is e'^tablished by an act of Parliament of Great Britain, anno sexto Anna Regime, entituled, " An Act for settling and establishing a Court of Exchequer in " the north part of Great Britain called Scotland," pursuant to a clause or proviso for that p'H-pose in the 19th article of an act for an Union of the two kingdoms of Scotland and England. This court has the same power, authority, privilege, EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 6j and jurisdiction over the revenue of Scotland, as the Court of Exchequer in Eng- land has over the revenues there ; and all matters and things competent to the Court of Exchequer ui England relating thereto, is likewise competent to the Ex- chequer of Scotland. The judges are likewise invested with the power of passing signatures, g;fts, and tutories, and to revise and compound them in the same man- ner as was done by the Lord High Treasurer, Commissioners of the Treasury, and Court of Exchequer in Scotland before the Union, and to receive resignations in his majesty's name in the Exchequer at the time of the Union, and to appoint of- ficers, as was in use to be done before. A.11 sergeants at law, barristers at law, of five years standing, in any of the four Inns of Court of England, or such persons as shall be advocates in the College of Justice in Scotland for five years, are quali- fied to be made barons of this court. Their commissions are,, quamditi se ben,r gesseriiit. The Lord IliOri Treasurer of England, according to Sylvanus Morgan in his Sphere of Gentry, Ub. 4. page 82. carried a staff ensigned on the top with an im- perial crown, which he places in pale at the back of the middle part of his shield of his arms, as the pecuhar badge or ensign of the said office. And Sir George Mac- kenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, page 85, tells us, that the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland carried a white staff ensigned also on the top with an imperial crown, and placed in pale behind the escutcheon of his arms as the symbol of his office. And the Lord High Treasurer of Great Britain now makes use of the same figure as his badge in adorning his armorial bearing. The Master of the Household, or mngis'.er Icspitii, is an officer that surveys the accounts, and what related chietiy to the offices of the king's household or court, and seems to have come in the place of the Senescallus, since we are pretty sure %ve had no master of the household till after the most serene family of the Stewarts came to the crown, and not just then either ; for we have no vestige of such an officer, so far as I have been able to trace them, before the Restoration of King James 1. anno 1425. But whether this officer in England is in use to carry any distinguishing badge thereof in his armorial bearing, is what I have not as yet dis- covered. But I find that the fam.ily of the Earl of VVinton, as Master-Household to our kings of old, carried tv/o battons gules, powdered with thistles of gold, and ensigned on the top with an imperial crown, whereon is placed and set the royal crest of the kingdom, and disposed in saltier beftind the shield of their arms. And the family of Dalmahoy of that Ilk, as being Under Master-Household to King James^VI. and King Charles the I. which oflice he got by patent from the first, and confirmed by the second, (which I have seen) wherein he has the allowance to place one such batton erect in pale behind the middle of the escutcheon of his arms. This office of Great Master^Household is now hereditary in the family of the Duke of Argyle, who being both Great Master-Household to the king, and Justice-General i.f the kingdom, adorns his armorial ensigns with one of these bat- tons for the office of Master-Household, as is above narrated. The office of Cup-Bearer to our kings being of old hereditary in the predeces- sors of the family of the Earls of Southesk, they carried a golden cup in their arms as the badge of their olTiGe. But this figure being no exterior adornment of the shield, 1 pass it over, now treating on the Exterior Ornaments only. We had also of old in Scotland the office of Panetaiius, who commanded over all the bakers, and Buttelarius, who had the like command over all the keepers of taverns, £ic. and were inferior offices of the king's household under the High Stewart of Scotland. And I fijid in the letter directed from the nobility of Scotland to Pope John, in the reign of King Robert the Bruce, dated at the Monastery of Aberbrothock, the 6th of April 1320, that the Lord Souhs was Buttelanus Scotice. And I have seen a charter wherein John and Thomas Murrays, sons to Sir An- drew Murray, Governor of Scotland, were designed Panetani Scotia, upon the forfeiture of John Cuming Earl of Monteith. in the year 134S. And which Earl of Monteith was formerly designed Panetarius. .• Monsieur Baroa, in his Art of Heraldry, gives us the arms of the Comte de CossE, Grand Paneter of France, who, as the badge of that office, carries (says he) below his shield, on the dexter side thereof, a cup, and on the sinister a stan- dish with pen and ink. But whether these of that office with us ever carried such 66 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. symbols as the distinguishing marks thereof, to adorn their shield of arms, I have not discovered, though it is very probable they have borne the same, seeing in all our method of heraldry we commonly follow the usage of France. The King's Forester, in Scotland, (says Sir George Mackenzie, Science of Heraldry, page 3.) carried hunting-horns as the badge of that office. Ihus (con- tinues he) Burnet carries a hunting-horn in his shield, and a Highlander in a liunt- ing garb, and greyhounds for his supporters, to show he was his Majesty's Fo- rester in the Northern Forest, as Forrester of that Ilk is in the south : For which he also carries three hunting-horns. And the Grand Huntsman, or Veneur, in France, carries (says Monsieur Baron) as the badge of his office, two hunting-horns affronte, garnished and placed below the shield of his arms. I have seen the arms of Sir Alexander Erskine of Cambo, knight and baronet,. Lord Eyon King at Akms, cut on copper, and trimmed thus; — above the shield (whereon is his own paternal coat-armorial impaled with that of his office) is set an imperial crown, and behind the same two battons seme of thistles, and St Andrew's crosses disposed in saltier appearing at the foot, and at the top on each side of the crown, and round the shield the collar of the thistle. The Grand Aumonier, or Gre.vi- Almoner in France, is thought to be an officer of the crown, and places under his arms a book marked with the armorial shield of France for the badge of that office. And I have seen on the roof of a hall in the house of Seaton the arms of John Hamilton, Archbishop of St An- drews, where is placed behind the shield of nis arms, a cross staff erect in pale, and below his escutcheon a book expanded. No doubt on the same account as being Great Almoner in Scotland. The Almoner with us (says Sir George Mackenzie in his Precedency, page 44.) hath no precedency for ought we know, yet is very oft a witness in all charters granted by our kings, and some think that clericus noster was almoner. I come now, idly. To treat of the ensigns and badges of such military offices (as 1 have met with) used by those officers as symbols in adorning their escut- cheons. And shall begin with the Lord High Constable, of whom Mr Miege, in his State of South Britain, says, " That this officer in England, whose power " and jurisdiction was anciently so exorbitant, that it was thought too great tor " any subject. In short (continues he) this office has been discontinued ever since " the reign of King Henry the VII. Edward Bagot (or Stafford), then Duke of " Buckingham, anno 1521, having been the last High Constable in England." However, upon a coronation, a Lord High Constable is created /);o ilia vice, who,, at that ceremony, marches in his robes with his staff and coronet in his hand. In the Marshal Court he sat as judge, and took place of the Earl Marshal. This high office with us is the same office (says Sir George Mackenzie in his Precedency, page 41.) that the Comes Stab uli was under the Roman empire, which may be confirmed by two clear testimonies of great antiquity, one is of Aimon, lib. 3. cap. 7. " Landegesihs regahum propositus equorum, quern vulgo Comes " Stabuh vocant :" The other is from Rhegino, lib. 2. " Annalium Burchardum " Comitem Stabuli sui (quern corrupte constabulum appellabis) cum classe misit in ■' Corsicam :" Though the learned Cujacius does believe that this title comes from one that commands a company of men of war, ad lunic. de comit. ct tribun. scalar. And there are some who derive it from the word konhig, which signifies a king ; ■And staple, which signifies ahold, because some constables were commanders of the king's houses : Though I find that the High Constable did command the king's armies, but was expressly debarred from commanding either his houses or garrisons: But now, with us, the Constable and Marshal take not place as officers of the crown, but according to their creation as earls, the reason whereof I conceive to be, because, of old, offices did not prefer those who possessed them, but they took place according to their creation : For the Constable and Marshal, being now the only two officers of the crown that are heritable in Scotland, continue to possess as they did formerly. But in France, England, and all other places, the Constable and Marshal take place as officers of the crown ; and it seems strange that these who ride upon the king's right and left hand, when he returns from his Parlia- ments, and who guard the Parliament itself and the honours, should have no pre- cedency by their offices ; and yet I cannot deny, but that, of old, other earls were EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 67 placed before them in ancient cliaiters, wherein Malcolm Earl of Fife is named before tliem. The Constable with us was, by the laws ol K.ing Malcolm, cap. 6, judge of all crimes committed within twelve miles of tlic king's house or habita- tion; though Sir John Skene observes, that the best manuauipts bear only two leagues : But now his juiisdiction is only e.\ercised cither as to cnnies or breach of the peace during the time of the Tarharaent, which some extend bkewise to all general conventions. Upon a commission and warrant granted by King Charles 1. in the year 1631, to several commissioners therein named, to search and make trial anent tiie honouis and privileges belonging to the High Constable of Scotland, they, after a diligent scrutiny, returned their report to his Majesty heieanent. The tenor u hereof follows : The Double cf a Report of a Commission anent the Privileges of the High Constable oj i)COtland, which was registrate in Sir James Dalrymple's Chamber the 25th March 1707', the pi incipal of which is still keptinthv cusiaiy of the Lat I o/'Err.ol, hereditary High Constable of the Kingdom. Most Sacred Sovereign, " According to the warrant and direction of the commission granted by your " Majesty unto us for trial-taking of the honours and privileges due to the otfice " of High Constable within this kingdom, we have kept sundry diets and meet- " ings (wherein the now Eail of Enol was prcient) and having heard and consi- " dered his claims, and the instructions and warrants produced by him for verify- " of the same, and having likewise informed ourselves what the customs of other " countries allow in the like case, we have hereby thought good to set down our " articles, our opinion and judgment concerning the said privileges, and there- " withal to satisfy your Majesty of what we conceive to be due and belonging to " the said Constable in the right of his office. In all royal ai-mies and expeditions, " the Constable, in right of his office, is lieutenant-general, and supreme officer " next unto the King. He has the command, direction, and government in the " army, and is proper and sole judge in all military affairs, and in all actions con- " cerning the captains, lieutenants, their officers and companies, enduring their " employment or pay in the King's service, and that according to the custom uni- " ver^a!ly observed in other countries, ido, It appears that in former times, here, " the Constable had precedency and place next to the Chancellor with relation to " whatsomtver officers ; and, so tar as we can leain, they have been in possession " of the same till of late years that your Majesty's dearest father, of ever blessed " memory, was pleased to prefer the late Earl of Dumbar to be High Treasurer " of this kingdom, and that your Majesty's self sinsyne advanced the late Earl of " Montrose to be President of your Council, and the Earl of Haddingtoun to be " Lord Privy Seal, ordering them, in the right and warrant of their offices, to take " place successively in their order, next unto the Chancellor, like as their suc- " cessors in the said offices presently enjoy the same. y.io, The Constable is su- " preme judge in all matters of riot, disorder, blood, and slaughter, committed " within four miles of the King's person, or of the Parliament or Council repie- " senting the same, and the trial or punishment of such crimes and offences is " proper and due to the Constable and his deputies, and the provost and baillies " of that city or burgh ; and all other judges within the bounds where the said " facts are committed, are obliged to rise, concur, fortifie, and assist the Constable " and his deputies in taking the saids malefactors, to make their tolbooth patent " for receiving them therein ; as was clearly verified by production of warrants " granted by your Majesty's predecessors to that effect, and which likewise ap- " peared by exhibition of certain bonds made by the town of Edinburgh to the " Constable for the time concerning that purpose. 4/0, The Constable has the " cliarge of guarding the King's per^on in time of Parliament or Conventions, as " also the keeping of the Parliament House is committed to him, and the keys " thereof delivered to him for that effect ; he has likewise the chief command of " all guards and men at arms attending on the King's person at such times. 5/0, Vol. E. Y y 68 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " In time of Parliament the Constable rides on the King's right hand, and " carries a white batten in token of command, and accordingly sitteth apart froai " the rest of the nobility in the Parliament House on the King's right hand, " having the honours lying before him. 6to, Before the thirteenth Parliament of " King James II. the Constable was in possession of taking distress of all manner " 01 goods bought or sold in markets in time of Session, General Councils, ParLa- " ment or Conventions, which being at that time discharged till the Constable " should clear his right to the same in the next following Parliament ; we find " that in the table of the unprinted acts, of the fourteenth Parliament of the said " King, there is mention made of an act touching the taking of strysses by the *' Constable, but can find no record thereof extant in the register, 'jmo, In the " original charter granted by King Robert I. of glorious memory, to Gilbert Lord " Hay, first Constable of that name, and ancestor to Earl of Errol, we find the " office of Constabulary to be given unto him cum hostilagiis, as a main and prin- " cipal privilege belonging to the said office ; which being a word obsolete and " out of use, and we not knowing perfectly the genuine sense and meaning there- " of, and whether theti the same did import the liberty and right of a lodging duly " furnished and appointed within the king's house, (as many do suppose) or some " house in every town where the king did remain, or if there be any privilege or •' casuality imported, we have, in that regard, forborne to deliver our opinion " concerning the same. As also in putting the crown on the king's head at the " time of his coronation. Which, with sundry other privileges, are only made by " the Constable to be due to him in the right of his office, and whereof, as he al- " leges his predecessors has been prejudged, and the same brought into discoun- " tenance by reason of the many eclipses which that noble house from time to " time has suffered on occasion of the loyalty of the most part of his predecessors, " who, out of zeal to the king's service, and honour of their country, did in their " days die worthily in battle before they could gain the opportunity of time, or " ripeness of years, to settle their estates, to vindicate the liberties due to their " place and office. And this for an account of our proceeding in the execution " of the commission directed by your Majesty unto us, which we humbly lay to " your Majesty's royal consideration, praying God to bless your Majesty with " many long and happy years. From Holyroodhouse, the 27th day of July 1631. " Sk iubscribitur, Duplin, Wigtoun, Linlithgow, Wintoun, Naiper, Areskike, " Sir Thomas Hopj; of Balmano, Archibald Aitchison, A. Fletcher, Henry. " Bruce." Extracted by And, de facto, I find in the orders for the riding the Parliaments of Scotland at Edinburgh, in the year 1661, 1681, and 1703, the Lord High Constable and Marischal, are (in the morning of that day the Parliament is to be ridden) to wait on his Majesty's High Commissioner at the palace of Holyroodhouse, and to re- ceive his orders, and from thence, returning privately, the Constable is to come out of his lodging on foot, and having viewed the rooms under and above the Parliament House, put on his robes, and, having his batton in his hand, set him- self in a chair at the entry of the Parliament Close at the Lady's Steps, by the outmost of his guards, from which he is to rise and salute the members, as they alight from their horses, and to recommend them to the gentlemen of his guards to be conducted to the Marischal's guards. And at the Riding of the Parliament, anno 1661, Gilbert Earl of Errol Lord High Constable of Scotland, received the members of that Parliament (says the author of Mercurius Culcdonius, page 3.) at their arrival at the Parliament Yard, attended with his guard of one hundred gentlemen of his name, armed with swords, pistols, and gilded pole-axes. And, at the return of the members of Parliament back to the palace, the Constable rides on the High Commissioner's rig'nt hand with a cap of permission on his head. How soon his Majesty's High Commissioner alights from his horse, in his coming to the ParHament, the Lord Constable receives him, and attends him to the Marischal guards, and then both Constable and Marischal convey him bare-lieaded to the throne, and are in the same manner to attend him in his returning to horse. And always during the sitting of our Parliaments, the High Constable kept. his guards without EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 6g the Parliament House, and the Marischal his guards within tlie same; the one to keep the peace within, and the other without doors. The badge of this high olhce in England, according to Sylvanus Morgan in his Sphere of Gentry, /ib. 4. page B2. is a staff or batten, ensigned with an imperial crown, and, on a shield, below the same, on the batton, is the King's royal arms ; which batton, he carries erect, in pale, at the back of the middle of the escutcheon of his own armorial bearing, as the peculiar ensign of that high office. But commonly the badge of this office was, and is, a naked sword, which, in the Roman Empire, was the badge of the office, prafccti preetorio ; and the Em- peror Trajan giving the naked saord to Sure Licernius, who was his prafectus pfcvtorio, gives it with these words, /»ro me si nicreor in me; which words were thereafter put, by Buchanan, with a naked sword, on the money coined during the minority of King James VI. The first Lord Constable oi Scotland that I have discovered, was Richard Mor- ville, whom I find, in Sir James Balfour of Denmiln's Collections, to have flourish- ed in the reign of King William the Lion; and next David Cuming Earl of Athol and Lord Strathbogie, of whom 1 read also in the said Sir James Balfour's Genea- alos;ical Account of the Nobility of Scotland, who gave three merks of money yearly to the monks of Inchaffray in Perthshire by a donation under his seal, which beginneth thus, " David de Cumine Comes de Atholiae Dominus de Strath- " bolgie 6^ Constabularius Scotiae," 61-c. Which donation is confirmed by King Alexander IL in the year 1239. Afterwards this high office became heretable in the noble family of the Earl of Errol. For Gilbert de la Hay Lord Hay of Er- rol, (as says Sir George Mackenzie in his MS. Collections of the Scottish Famihes, and Lewis Moreri in his Lirge Historical Dictionary) closely adhering to King Robert L in all his troubles, when almost the whole nation had submitted to the Bali- ol; in consideration of his loyalty, was, by the favour of this warlike prince, creat- ed Lord High Constable of Scotland, in the sixtli year of his reign, which was A. Dom. 1312, and which office was granted to him and his heirs, and is still en- joyed by them. John, late Earl of Errol, having matriculated his armorial bear- ing in the Lord Lyon's New Register, carries as the symbol of his high office of Constable at the foot of his shield on each side thereof, an arm gauntlated fesse- ways issuing out of a cloud, and grasping a naked sword erected in pale at the dexter and sinister sides of his escutcheon of arms, all proper, hiked and pommelled or. The figure whereof, as cut on copper, the curious may see in Sir George Mackenzie's Science of Heraldry. The French High Constable makes use of the like badge as the ensign of his of- fice. And, as to the antiquity of this practice with them, Menestrier, in his Sci- ence of Heraldry, gives us an instance of the arms of Matthew Lord Montmo- rency, Constable of France, who died in the year 1239, on whose sepulchral mo- nument between two swords is placed his shield of arms ; and though, as he tells us, the monument appears not to be so old, yet (says he) I have seen other in- stances of the same as old. The same author, speaking of the King's Master of Horses in France, as an of- fice subaltern, and dependent of the High Constable, was in use to place at the sides of his shield of arms, two swords in their scabbards, azure, seme of flower- de-luces or, with their belts rolled round them, to difference them from these of the Constables. And Monsieur Baron, in his Art of Heraldry, gives us the shield of arms of Lewis de Loraine, Count de Armagnac, Grand Ecuyer de France to Lewis XIV. King of France, who, as the badge of his said office, carries below his shield two swords in their scabbards placed bend-ways, with their belts wrapt round them, seme of flower-de-luces, hilted and pommelled or. The Master of Horses is called there Ecuyer, from ecu, a shield, because, by his office, he carried one before the king. The High Marischal is a name which we have borrowed from the French, who, write it m'irechal, and they have several of them, being the generals of their armies. The Earl Marshal of England is a post of great Honour, and takes cog- nizance, as the High Constable did, of all matters of war and arms (says Miege) wherein he is commonly guided by the civil law. This post is now hereditary in the family of the Duke ot Norfolk. For Thomas Mowbray Earl of Nottingham, 70 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. was the first that was invested with the title and office of Eavl Marshal, by King. Richard II. in the year 1385; which dignified office continues now in the saidDake of Norfolk's family, who enjoys it at this day heritably, as being descended by the mother's side from the said Thomas Mowbray. Sir William Segar, Garter Principal King ol Arms, tells us, " That the Earl " Marshal of England a an Earl by office, and so is no other earl in England but " he." The Earls Marshal ha^'e sometimes been the king's lieutenant-generals in martial affairs, and, by their office of marshalship, have had power and authority to hear and determine judicially of questions, doubts, and difteiences between parties concerning honour and arms. And, to that end, tue Earl Marshal held a court of judicature, called the Earl Marshal's Court ; as when arms are usurped and un- justly borne, the Lail lias power to disclaim the same, and to punish the parties that shall falsely assume and take upon them the armories of another, by the name and title of a Gentleman, when tliey are not so to be approved. The Earl Marshal has power also, by special commission under the Great seal of England, over the College of Heralds, prohibiting the provincial kings of arms to give and grant any new coats of arms without his Lordship's consent. His Lordsliip estabhshes orders among the heralds, for their better rule and government ; and any doubt or question which they cannot decide among themselves, they reter that to the arbi- triment and judgment of the Earl Marshal. His Lordship gives them their solemn creations according to their degrees, viz. Kings ot Arms, Heralds, and Pursuivants. The Earl keeps his court either at Westminster, in the painted chamber adjoining to the Parliament House, or in his own house ; where, in the great hall, is a large square table, with rails about it, and benches within, and an half-pace raised abo\e the same. There the Earl sits in the midst, with divers noblemen, and sometimes judges on either side, according to the cause in hand, to the end that, with their advice and counsel, he may the more legally proceed. And here the College of Heralds sit as his council or assistants in their rich coats of arms. His Lordship has belonging to the said court a pui'suivant-messenger that serves his precepts and summons. He has also a crier that stands on a corner of the stage ; a doctor of the civil law, who sits within the rails over against the Earl, to resolve doubts. The register or clerk of the court sits before his Lordship's foot, on either side of whom the officers of arms are placed to give their opinions, being required. Without the rails stand the lawyers that plead, as sergeants and counsellors of the law, and sometimes doctors and proctors of the civil law, as the cause does re- quire. The messengers having returned the process and summons into the court, the crier calls the parties whom the cause concerns; they present their petition or bill of complaint; the register reads the same; the lawyers plead pio et contra thereunto. And before the decision the court takes bond ot the parties to stand to the award and order of the Court Marshal. When the court is to be dismissed and prorogued for that time, the register pronounces the prorogation, and the crier proclaims it aloud, appointing a day, as his Lordship shall please, for the pro- ducing of witnesses, for further hearing, or a final determination and judgment. But if the cause concerns the claim of dignities, as for baronies, or earldoms, or honour- able offices, which differences happen sometimes between heirs-male and . heirs- general, then the party plaintiff exhibits his or her petition to the King's Majesty, and the king refers that to be judicially heard in the Court Marshal. There, as that is found, the Earl Marshal advertises the king how he finds the right of the claim to be, and leaves the decision thereof to the king. In this case the warrants are set forth in the king's name, for the appearance of the parties in the Court Marshal, and are served or summoned by an officer of arms, with the other ibrmalities of the return ; and, if the cause be doubtful or ambiguous, it is some- times referred to be heard and determined by the House of Peers. The Earl Marshal bears a staff of metal, gilt with gold, at either end tipped with black, enamelled : Which staff King Richard II. in the twenty-first of his reign, granted to Tliomas Holland Duke of Surrey, Earl Marshal of England. In time of war, with this golden staff he marshals and orders battles in the field, and has the leading of the van-guard ; and in time of peace, he bears it usually at his plea- sure, but especially on festival days at the court, and in solemn and royal proceed- ings before the king, and takes his place ^vlth the Lord Great Chamberlain, or EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 71 the Constable, next before the sword. The Earl Marshal is placed, by act of Tar- liament, 31. Henry VIU. next after the Lord Great Chamberlain and the Con- stable, and before the Lord High Admiral, and the Lord Steward, and the Lord Chamberlain of the King's House. At the coronation of the king the Earl Mar- shal appear in liis robes, with his coronet in his hand and his statY, and has the ordering of the abbey of Westminster, and sees the regalities and robes of King Ed- ward the Confessor to be in a readiness. He appoints the building of the scallbld whereon the king is to be crowned, and gives orders to the gentlemen-ushers for the covering and furnishing thereof with hangings, chairs, traverses, carpets, cusiiions, &-C. especially the sie^e royal whereon the king is to be crowned. At which time the Earl Marshal is one of those that does all the nearest ollkes to the king's person, as to help to lead him, and to support his majesty in his chair, put 1 ting his hand, with others of the nobility, to set the crown on his majesty's head, doing his homage first, and then presenting all others of the nobility. The Earl Marshal appoints what number of Knights of the Bath are to be made at the coronation of the king, and makes election of them. The day being come, the Earl Marshal with the Lord Chamberlain, gives them their oath, after they are all bathed ; he also presents them to the king the same day to receive the Order of Knighthood. Of every Knight of the Bath the Earl Marshal receives a fee in money viz. five pounds for the horse the knight rides upon, and a merk for the horse's furniture, or composition for the same. And at the creation of a duke, marquis, or earl, the Earl Marshal ought to have his furniture, or composition for the same ; and by ancient custom he has had the same of archbishops, bishops, and abbots, at their consecrations. At the funeral obsequies of kings, queens, and princes, the Earl Marshal is a chief commissioner appointed with the Lord Treasurer, the Lord Chamberlain, &-c. to give orders to the wardrobe for the dis- tribution of black for the mourners, velvet for the hearse, palls of cloth of gold, escutcheons, banners, and hachements, giving charge to the officers of arms to give their attendance, and to see all things royally and princely performed. At com- bats, barriers, tournaments, and jousts royal, the Earl Marshal is the chiefest officer to see tljera duly performed, to appoint judges, and to ride round the lists and order all things ; at which time the Knight Marshal is but his attendant. Toucliing duels and private quarrels between gentlemen, growing upon disgraceful words, blows, or challenges, the Earl Marshal has power and authority to stay and commit the persons, confining them, and taking sufficient bonds for their good bearing and forthcoming, compelling the oft'enders to make satisfaction W the parties injured, according to the form and advice of a book published in print for that effect, by the appointment of King James L Mr Miege, in his State of South Britain, also tells us, " It is the Earl Marshal •' who, with the assistance of the Kings at Arms and Heralds, marshals and orders •' the proclamation and coronation of oui- kings, their marriages, funerals, caval- " cades, royal interviews, and feasts, Si-c. or when either peace or war with a " foreign power is proclaimed : And is also judge of the coats of arms, and of the " pedigrees of the nobility and gentry : and therefore keeps a court of chivalry in " the common hall of the college of heralds in London. And whoever desires a " coat of arms, must first apply himself to the Earl Marshal by petition, with a " certificate annexed as to his being qualified for it ; which being approved ot by " his Lordship, an order is directed by him to Gai-ter King at Arms, and another " of the Kings at Arms, being of that province where the petitioner resides, to " devise arms for him, and prepare him a grant, with the coat blazoned in colours " in the margin thereof: in which grant it is expressly said, that none at his peril " do presume to bear the same coat." Sir George Mackenzie, in his Precedency, page 42. tells us, " That the word " Mariscbal is a German word and office originally, as the learned Tillet proves •' fully, a marker of camps. And the axe which he bears as tlie badge of his ofiice, " is delegated to the Marechal du Camj). The Marshal commanded the horse, as "- Tillet proves ; whereas the Constable commanded both : but yet our learned " Craig calls the Constable only Prafectus Equitum ; and yet, as Tillet observes, " the Marshal was not under the Constable, else he could not be an officer of the Yql. IL 7, I. 72 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " crown, and officers of state do depend upon none but the king. Of old I find " the orders in mihtary cases run to our Constable and Marshal." It is presumable that our Earl Marischal in Scotland is honoured with the like privileges as the Earl Marshal of England : For the office of Marischal has never been out of the family of Keith: But the Earls of Athol and several others have been Constables of Scotland ; and therefore it is that the Earl Marischal with us hath no other title, whereas the High Constable designs himself Earl of Errol. Our High Marischal has been, like those of England, Lieutenant-General in martial affairs. And Sir Robert Keith, our great Marischal, accompanied Edward Bruce when he went to take possession of the crown of Ireland, and did him notable service at taking in of Dubhn Castle, and kept close to the interest of King Robert the Bruce in all his troubles: He was the chief instrument in gaining the battle of Inveruiy, which was the first that ever that great prince won ; And at the battle of Bannockburn he commanded 500 horse, being the person that gave the first onset, and defeat a party of the English horse sent to reinforce Philip Mowbray, Governor of Stirling, which made way for that glorious victory the Scots there obtained. And at last died fighting most valiantly at the battle of DupHn, " Cum " magno propinquorum &- clientium numero," says Buchanan. Sir Robert Keith was a man of great courage, and the main instrument of driving Edward Baliol out of the country, and restoring King David Bruce. And Sir William, Lord Keith, whose father, Sir Edward first Lord Keith, being indisposed when the battle of Otterburn was about to be foughten, supplied his father's place as High Maris- chal. And being a man of great valour, went to the said battle, where, after James the second Earl of Douglas, then General of the Scots army, was killed, and the English like to prove victors, he, as High Marischal, took on him the chief com- mand of the army : and being a nobleman of intrepid courage, recovered the battle, beat the English, and took Ralph Percy (brother to, and conjunct com- mander with, Henry Hotspur son to the Earl of Northumberland) prisoner with his own hand. But fearing I should prove too prolix in enumerating the valiant actions of the heroes of this noble and ancient family, I proceed to acquaint ray reader that our Earl Marischal kept also a court called the Marischal Const. In this court his Lordship hath power and authority to hear and determine ju- dicially of questions, doubts, and differences, between parties, concerning hon- our and arms ; as also touching duels and private quarrels between gentle- men, arising from disgraceful words, blows, or challenges. He also, as the Earl Marshal of England, has power and authority to stay and commit the persons, confining them, and taking sufficient bonds for their good a-bearing and forthcom- ing, compelling the offenders to make satisfaction to the parties injured. To prove this, I shall here insert an order of this court, taken from the principal copy, signed by the clerk of the said court, whereof the tenor follows. " The Marischal Court of the kingdom of Scotland, holden at Leith the 21st " June 1633, by a noble Earl William, Earl Marischal, Lord Keith and Altree, " &-C. Great Marischal of the kingdom, members of court chosen, suits called, the " court lawfully fenced and affirmed. " The which day anent the riot committed between Francis Stewart, son lawful " to John Stewart of Coldingham, and Malcom Crawfurd of Newtoun, in their " injuring of others, and appeilling others to combat contrary to the laws of this " realm, to the disturbance of his majesty's peace, and offence of his majesty, baith " the said parties being present, and confessing the same, the said Earl decerned " them to keep his majesty's peace in time coming; and for that effect to act them- " selves as follows, and to agree together, and chope hands, which they particular- " ly did. " The which day the said parties actit themselves, aither of them to others for " their indemnities, and for keeping his majesty's peace, aither of them to others, " under the penalty of one thousand pounds, toties quoiids. Sic subscribitur, F. Stewart, J. Caresburne. R. Keith, clerk of the said couit. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 7 V At the Riding of our Parliament I find the Constable and Marischal guards of partizans are to make a lane from that entry to the Parliament Close, called the Lady's Steps, to the Parliament House, those of the Constable's without, and those of the Marischal within the house, allowing the Constable six of his guard within doors, conform to ancient practice. And here I take occasion to insert what I should have mentioned before, viz. I find by the Privy Council Registers, anno 1633, that the foresaid report of a commission, concerning the privileges of the High Constable, was approved of by his majesty. But as to that part of it, alleging the Constable to be superior judge in all matters of riot, ' disorder, blood, and slaughter, committed within four miles of his majesty's person, or of the parliament, or coun- cil representing the royal authority in his absence ; and that the trying and punishing of such crimes and offences is only proper and due to him. The royal burghs of this kingdom pretended some prejudice to be done them in that report, particularly the city of Edinburgh, who produced charters from K.ing James HI. and other of our kings, ratified in parliament, by which the magistrates of that city are made and constitute heritable sheriffs within themselves, and afterwards justices of peace within Edinburgh and Leith ; whereupon his majesty was pleased by his letter to the Lords of his said Council, dated at Greenwich, May 14, 1633, to will them to call the commissioners of the burghs before them to hear their ob- jections concerning this affair, and to report. The council finding the Lords of Session judges competent thereto, remits the same to their solution. But as to their determination on the head, I refer to their decision about that time. The Constable and Marischal, in the morning of that day the Parliament is to be ridden, do wait on his majesty, or, in his absence,on his High Commissioner at the palace, to receive his orders : and from thence the Marischal returns privately, and goes and puts on his robes ; and being set in a chair at the head of his guards, near the entry to the Parliament House, he there attends in his robes with his bat- ton in his hand, and from his chair arises and receives the members as they enter the door. And when the king or his commissioner enters the house, then both the Constable and Marischal convoy him bareheaded to the throne, and are in the like manner to attend him in his return to horse : Afterwards the Marischal takes horse, and rides with him on his left hand to the palace, having on a cap of permission, and clothed in his robes. We had no Knight Marischal in Scotland, as they have in England, till Kinp- Charles I. his coronation in the year 1633, at which time it was erected by a letter to the Privy Council. And Sir George Mackenzie, in his Precedency, page 42, tells us, " That this officer, by his office, is to take place immediately after the " younger sons of lords." And after the restoration of King Charles II. January I, i66i, the Earl Marischal, accompanied with four hundred gentlemen of his own relations, marched on foot from his own lodgings to his majesty's palace of Holyrood- house, (then the residence of the Earl of Middleton, his Majesty's High Commis- sioner) with the honours of the kingdom, viz. he himself carrying the crown. Co- lonel George Keith his second brother the sceptre, and the youngest. Sir John Keith, the sword: And when the two eldest of these brothers were prisoners in England for their loyalty, by the particular care and industry of the youngest, the same honours (so much hunted after by the English then our enemies) were miracul- ously preserved: For which his said Majesty King Charles II. deservedly conferred upon him the honour of Knight Marischal of Scotland. Our Earl Marischal was also heritable keeper of the regalia of the kingdom, viz. the crown, sceptre, and sword. And after the rising of the Parliament, wherein the union with England was concluded, WiUiam Wilson, one of the under-clerks of Session, as Depute-Marischal of Scotland, upon his delivering up of the said ho- nours, took the following protest, viz. Protest taken by William Wilson, one of the under-clerks of Session, as De- pute-Marischal of Scotland, upon his delivering up of the honours to David Earl of Glasgow, Treasurer-depute, after the rising of the Union Parliament, anno 1707. " At the Castle of Edinburgh, within the crown-room there, betwixt the hours " of one and two afternoon of the 26th day of March, in the one thousand seven 74 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " hundred and seventh year of our Lord, and sixth year of the reign of her Ma- " jesty Anne, by the Grace of God Queen of Scotland, England, France, and Ire- " land, Defender of the Faith, &c. " The which day, in presence of us notars-public, and witnesses undersubscribing, " compeared personally William Wikon, one of the Under-Clerks of Session, " Depute-Marischal, for himself, and as procurator for, and in name and behalf of " William Earl Marischal, Lord Keith and Altree, Great Marischal of the King- " dom of Scotland, Heritable Keeper of the Regalia thereof, viz. crown, sceptre •' and sword; and there, in presence of David Earl of Glasgow, Lord Boyle, &.c. " Lord Treasarer-Depute, who, for himself, and in name of the remanent Lords " Commissioners of the Treasury, was present to receive the above regalia; the " said William Wilson, afterwards producing and reading a procuratory granted " by the said noble earl to him, of the contents therein and after mentioned, dated •' and registrated in the books of Council and Session, on the 25th of March in- " stant, did also produce to the said Lord Treasurer-Depute a schedule signed by " him and the notars-public undersubscribing, containing an inventory and par- " ticular description of the said regalia. " And thereafter, upon the delivery of the above regalia to the said Lord Trea- " surer-Depute, and upon lodging thereof, with the foresaid description of the " same, in an orderly manner, in a chest within the said crown-room, the said " William Wilson, as procurator foresaid, and in nam(f and behalf of the said Earl " Marischal, and in the terms of the said procuratory, protested, that the delivery " up of the regalia foresaid shall not invalidate, or be prejudicial to the said Earl " Marischal his heritable right of keeping thereof, both in time of Parliament and " intervals, either in the said earl his castle of Dunotter, as heretofore his ancestors " have done, or any other else within the kingdom of Scotland, that his lordship " and his successors shall think secure and convenient. Also in terms of the " act ratifying the Union between the kingdoms of Scotland and England, " whereby it is stipulated and agreed by both Parhaments, " That the crown, " sceptre, and sword of state, shall be continued to be kept as they are at present " within this kingdom of Scotland, and that they shall remain so in all time " coming, notwithstanding of the Union," protested. That they shall remain with- " in the said crown-room of the castle of Edinburgh : and in case the government " shall find the transportation thereof from Edinburgh castle, to any other secure. " place within this kingdorn, at any time thereafter necessary, protested also. That " the same may not be done until intimation be made to the said Earl Marischal " and his successors, to the effect his lordship or they may attend and see the " same safely transported, and securely lodged : And made due and lawful intima- " tion of the premisses to Colonel James Stewart, Depute-G.overnor of the said " Castle, then present, that he might pretend no ignorance. And also as procura- " tor foresaid, and likewise for himself, as continued keeper of the regalia, by de- " putation from the said Earl Marischal, and the deceased George Earl Marischal his " father, since the 3d day of August 1681 years, in the reigns of King Charles II. " King James VII. King William and Qiieen Mary, and her present Majesty " Queen Anne, declared, that the same were now delivered to the said David Earl " of Glasgow, Lord Treasurer-Depute, for himself, and in name foresaid, and in " the same state, case and condition he then received the same; and offered to " give his oath, that the said William Wilson, nor none to his knov/ledge, has ever " directly or indirectly embezzled or taken away from the said regalia any of the " jewels, pearls, or others appertaining thereto: And, therefore, seeing he had with " exact care, and continued fidelity and honesty, discharged the said trust reposed- " in him, did protest to be liberate and exonerate for his administration in the said " office, during the said bygone space, but prejudice to the said Earl Marischal of " keeping the same in all time coming as formerly, by himself, and the said Wil- " liam Wilson as his depute, or any other whom his Lordship shall appoint; and " upon all and sundry the premisses, the said William Wilson and his procurator " for, and in name and behalf of the said William Earl Marischal, asked, and took " instruments ane or mae in the hands of us notars-public undersubscribing. " Thir thin,:^s were done time and place above-mentioned, before and in presence " of Mr David LesUe, son to the Earl of Leven, Governor of the Castle of Edin- E-XTERIOR ORTSfAMENTS. 75 " burgh, Sir James Mackenzie, Knight and Baronet, Clerk of the Treasui-y, George " Allardice of that Ilk, Captain John Cockburn, son to the deceased Mr John " Cockburn, advocate, Francis Dunlop of that Ilk, William Morison of Preston- " grange, James Malcolm of Grange, and Captain Patrick Auchmoutie, two c-f " the Earl Marischal's battoneers, John Barclay of Culernie, Patrick Durham of " Omachie, Mr George Areskine, son to Sir John Areskine of Balgonie, deceased, " William Murray, writer to the signet, Thomas Gibson, writer in Edinburgh, son " to the deceased Sir Alexander Gibson of Pentland, one of the Clerks of Session, " Mungo Smith, John Reid, Walter Murray, and Robert Bull, merchants in Edin- "• burgh, Mr Johir Corsar, Alexander Keitii, George Forbes, Alexander Faiquhar- " son, and Alexander Johnston, writers in Edinburgh, John Hog and David " Graham, Macers of Privy Council, Charles Maitland, John Adam, Andrew " Graham of Jordanston, and Patrick Grant of Bunhard, four Macers of Session, " John Letham, her Majesty's- Smith, David Graham, eldest lawful son to Cap- " tain David Graham, Macerof Privy Council, William Robertson, non to William " Robertson, one of the Under-Clerks of Session, Robert Douglas, eldest lawful son " to Rohei't Douglas of Milcraig, merchant in Edinburgh, with divers other wit- " nesses specially called and required to the premisses. Et ego vero WiUielmus " Robertson, Georgius Cockbiini, ^-Uexandcr Alison, IVillielmus Brown, Alexander " BaiUie, Joannes Corss, and Robertas Bamiatityne, all notars-public subscribing " and subjoining their notes hereto." Several exact copies of this protest Mr Wilson sent to the four universities of the kingdom, also to the Faculty of Advocates, and College of Physicians, as also to the Earls of Errol and Marischal, who received the same as a great fayour done them, and returned him their several missives of thanks therefore. The Earl of Marischal's missive to him upon the foregoing account 1 subjoin as follows. " Affectionate Friend, " I received the instrument of the delivery of the regalia, which I acknowledge " a great service done by you to me and my family, and yet a greater to the na- " tion in general ; and, therefore, I will preserve it as carefully as any paper in my " charter-chest. 1 shall at present pass over in silence many other good offices you " have done me ; and conclude by assuring you, that as you think it an honour to " be descended of my family, so I think it happy to have such a friend as you : " You shall find on all occasions with how much reality I am your most atfec- " tionate friend to serve you." Sic subscribitur Marischal. Jnvenigie, July %tby Directed thus, to Mr William Wilson, 1709. one of the Clerks of Session. It is commonly thought, that about the beginning of King Robert the Bruce's reign, when Gilbert Hay Earl of Errol was made High Constable of Scotland, that Robert de Keith was made Marischal of the kingdom by that gallant prince, who gave the same office heritably to himself and bis successors: Yet I find by the chartulary of Kelso, that Simon Eraser gives the kirk of Keith, and some lands near Haddington, to the a'jbacy of Kelso, which is confirmed by Hugh Lorens, and Eda his wife, heiress of the said Simon, and Herveus filius Philippi Marescalli also confirms the same. He is sometimes designed Herveus de Keith, and some- times Harveus Marescallus. And John de Keith Marescallus filius Hervei Mares- calli, by an agreement with the Abbot of Kelso, confirms in his favours his said father's donation of the kirk of Keith; all which is confirmed by King Malcolm IV. who began his reign in the year 1153, which is a clear evidence that this noble family has been possessed of the office of Great Marischal of Scotland long before the reign of King Robert the Bruce. The High Manschals, of old, carried for the badge of this office an axe; Tillet says, on the account that they were the markers out of camps, and broke the ground with that instrument, as 1 before mentioned. But others say, as La Lonet, in his Treatise of Nobihty, lib. 1. cap. 8. that the marischals carried axes as the token and badge of power and royal authority, which, of old, kings themselves did use instead of a sceptre, as a mark uf their dignity, having got the investiture and Vol. II. 3 A 76 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. possession of their kingdoms by the tradition of an axe. But the Great Marischals now, instead of the axe, carry battons as the badge of this high office. Those in France bear behind the shield of their arms, as symbols of this office, two battons azure, seme of flower-de-luces or, and disposed in saltier, as says Mon- sieur Baron in his Art of Heraldry. The Earl Marshal of England carries, as the badge of his high office, (as narrated by Sylvanus Morgan in his Sphere of Gentry, lib. 4. cap. 6.) a staff, or batton, erected in pale, behind the middle of his shield of arms. And the said author tells us, that most of the chief officers of state in England carry, as the badge of their office, a staff of their dignity, or rather symbolum administrationis. For which he cites Cassaneus as follows : Datur igitur virga praetoribus, propter disciplinam. Datur principibus, propter summam regendi potestatem. Datur senioribus, in quibus sapientije munus excellit. Datur praesidibus, ad custodiam obeundam. Datur regibus, ad mansuetudinem. & clementiam exercendam. Datur imperatoribus, ad hostilem impetum coercendum atque injuriam propulsandam". (CasSANEI Sexta Conclusion Such is the dignity of the staff, that at the coronation of the Prince of Wales it is required, and at the words virgae aureae traditionem, the king delivereth into his hand a verge of gold, betokening government. With us, our Earl Marischal bears for the ensign of his high office, as matri- culated in our Lyon's Register of Arms, two battons of the Marischal of Scotland, being gules, seme of thistles, ensigned on the top with imperial crowns or, and dis- posed in saltier behind the escutcheoii of his arms. Mr Miege, in his State of South Britain, tells us, " That the last great officer " there is the Lord High Admiral, who has the management of all marine affairs, " and the government of the royal navy, with power of decision in maritime " cases, both civil and criminal. He judges of all things done upon or beyond " the sea in any part of the world, upon the sea-coasts, in all ports and havens, " and upon all rivers below the first bridge from the sea. By him vice-admirals, " rear-admirals, and all sea-captains are commissionated, all deputies for particular " coasts, and coroners to view dead bodies found on the sea-coasts, or at sea. He " also appoints the judges for his Court of Admiralty, and may imprison, re- " lease, &.C." " The sea being reckoned without the limits of the common law, and under " the jurisdiction of the Lord High Admiral, therefore the civil law is made use " of in the Court of Admiralty. The proceedings in all civil matters are accord- " ing to the civil law, that is by libel to the action, both parties giving surety " that they shall stand to the judgment of the court, and he that shall fail in the " suit pay to the other what he shall be condemned to. But in criminal matters, " such as piracy chiefly, the case is altered. For whereas the proceeding in tliis " court was, of old, according to the civil law, there were two statutes made by " Henry VIIL that criminal affairs should be tried in this court by witnesses and " a jury, and this by special commission of the king to the Lord High Admiral, " whereof some of the judges are to be commissioners. In which case the trial is " by the common law, as directed by these statutes. " The customs and former decrees of this court are there of force for deciding ■' of controversies. And there is a Court of Equity under it, for determining dif- " ferences between merchants. Though the common law reaches as far as the " low-water-mark, being counted intra corpus comitatus adjacentis, and causes " thence arising are determinable by common law, yet when the sea flows over the " low-water-mark, the admiral has also a jurisdiction there over matters done " (while the sea flows) between the low-water-mark and the land. " To the Lord High Admiral belong all penalties and amercements of all trans- " gressors at sea, on the sea-shore, in ports and havens, and all rivers below the " first bridge from the sea, the goods of pirates, and felons condemned, or out- " lawed, sea-wrecks, goods floating on the sea, or cast away on the shore, not EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 77 " granted to the lords of manors adjoining to the sea, and a share of all lawful " prizes. Also all great fishes, commonly called royal Jisbes, except whales and " sturgeons. To which add a salary of L. 7000 a-year. In short, this is so great " an office, in point oi trust, honour, and profit, that it has usually been given to " princes of the blood, or the most eminent persons among the nobility." The same author tells us, in his State of North Britain, " That the Scots never " abounded in naval force, nor seem to have affected it ; otherwise a nation of so long " standing, having such materials for building of ships, and such harbours for lay- " ing them up safe, could scarcely have been without a competency of ships of " war. This must be in part ascribed to that same humour which made them n&- " gleet walled towns, according to that of our historian and poet. Ilia pharctratis est propria gloria Scotis, &c. And a little lower, Non fossa & muris pauiam, sed JVfarte tueri. " Another reason may be, that their wars being for most part defensive, and by " land, against the several people who inhabited the south parts of the island, they " did not much apprehend the necessity of the naval force. But that they did " not altogether neglect it, is plain from their acts of Parliament, and particularly " the 140th act of King James I. by which it is ordained, " That all barons and " lords having lands and lordships near the sea, on the west and north parts, and " especially against the isles, should have galleys, and maintain them according to " their ancient tenor; and all the lands which lie within six miles of the coast " should contribute to their maintenance." " With these galleys they defended their coasts, and sometimes invaded their " enemies. But that they had other ships of war, with which they were able for- " merly to look the English and others in the face, is evident from history: For " in the reign of King James III. a squadron of the English navy, which infested " our coasts, was defeated and taken by Andrew Wood of Largo, a noted sea-cap- " tain, in the Frith near Dunbar; and he afterwards defeated Sir Stephen Bull, " with another English squadron, near the mouth of the Tay, where he took him " and his ships. And in that same reign, Andrew Barton, a Scots merchant, having " obtained letters of marque from his own prince to make war with the Portu- " guese, who had killed his father, and taken his ship, and refused to make satis- " faction, though condemned by the Admiralty of Flanders, in whose dominions " this piracy happened, the said Barton did in a few months make suflicient re- " prisals upon them with his own ships; but was treacherously, in time of peace, " surprised at the instigation of the Portuguese, by an English squadron, under " the conduct of Admiral Howard, against whom, with a much less force, he main- " tained a gallant fight, but at last was killed, and his ships taken." " The main reason why the Scots neglected improving their naval force, while " their neighbours increased and augmented theirs, seems to have been, that their " princes, when neighbouring nations increased their naval force, were either " minors, or engaged in war with England, or intestine broils at home; as hap- " pened in the reigns of King James III. IV. and V. Queen Mary, and King " James VI. during whose reign, before and after his succession to the crown of " England, the reasons not only for the neglect, but for the decay of the naval " force of Scotland, are so obvious, that it is needless to touch them." The chief court of admiralty in Scotland sits in Edinburgh, where they deter- mine such causes of piracy, prizes, £ic. as are proper to their cognizance. The office of Lord High Admiral in Scotland has, for the most part, since the union of the crowns, been in such persons as had not their residence in the kingdom, par- ticularly in the family of Lennox, and in the late King James when Duke of York. There are particular jurisdictions of admiralty hereditary in some great families, as the Duke of Argyle, who is admiral of the Western Isles, 8ic. And the Eari of Sutherland, of the County of Sutherland, and some of the neighbour- ing provinces; and the Earl of Morton is Steward, Justiciary, and Admiral of 78 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Orkney, whose deputies are at his own nomination. In our Court of Admiraltj we have a judge, two procurators, a procurator-fiscal, a clerk and his depute, and three niacers. Anciently the Romans represented their offices by figures on their medals be- fore the use of armories. Pompey had on some of his medals the prow of a ship when admiral in the wars against pirates. And Lucius Hostilms, admiral in the Punic wars, used the same mark. Juhus Caesar, upon the reverse of many of his medals, had the augurial staff, the axe, and the fasces. The Septemviri, whose ofKces were to regulate and oversee the public religious festivals, used for their marks a vessel for holding wine. And the Quindecemviri had a dolphin upon a trident. And it is the imitation of those marks of dignity on medals that hath oc- casioned the usage of particular badges and symbols in armories as distinguishing marks borne by persons in high offices. Admirals have been in use many generations past, almost everywhere, to place an anchor pale -ways behind their shields as the badge of their office. The General Admiral of the Galleys in France, according to Monsieur Baron in his Art of He- raldry, carries a double anchor erect in pale behind the middle of the escutcheon of his arms, and two battons seme of flower-de-luces disposed in saltier at the back of the shield. As in the arms of Mr Le Due de Vivonne, General des Galrees. The Lord High Admiral of England, or Dominus supremus prafectiis classis An- gUcanae, according to Sylvanus Morgan, in his Sphere of Gentry, llh. 4. cap. 6. page 85. bears an anchor erect in pale behind the middle of his armorial shield as the badge of his high office. And gives us an example thereof in the arms of James Duke of Albany and York. In Scotland our admirals carried the same symbol ; for though, as Sir George Mackenzie tells us in his Science of Heraldry, page 3. that Wood of Largo carries two ships, to show that his predecessors were Admirals of Scotland, as I mentioned before, yet this was not the badge of that office, but he only added the figures of two ships under sail to his old paternal bearing, the oak tree, to demonstrate to posterity that he was once an admiral, whereas the ensigns of high offices can be borne by none but by those in office, neither are they ordinarily borne within but without the shield as exterior ornaments thereof. 1 have seen the arms of James Earl of Bothwell, (who was Lord High Admiral of Scotland in the reign of Queen Mary) both on his seal and on other places, particularly on the roof of the Hall of Seaton, called Sampson's Hall, where he carries an anchor erected in pale, behind the middle of the shield of his arms, as the badge of his office; and the family of Lennox used the same symbol when advanced to the office of High Admiral As for the ancient practice of placing one anchor behind armorial bearings, as the badge of admiralty, Menestrier, in his Science of Heraldry, tells us. That he has seen in a manuscript in the Bibliotbeque of the Cardinal Bouillon, the arms of Lewis, a bastard of Bourbon, Count of Rousillon Admiral of France, in the year 1466, being azure, seme of flower-de-luces or, a batton sinister gules, and behind the middle of the shield an anchor pale-ways argent, with the stock or. But now, both in France and Britain, the High Admirals carry, as the ensign of their high office, two anchors disposed in saltier at the back of the shield of their arms, and the vice or rear admirals carry but one m pale behind their shield. Monsieur Baron, in his Art of Heraldry, gives us the arms of Lewis Alexander de Bourbon, a natural son of France, Count of Toulouse, Grand Admiral, &c. being azure, three flower-de-luces or, a batton sinister gules, timbred with a crown heightened with flov.'er-de-luces, and great leaves alternately, within a manteau azure, doubled ermine, and behind the shield two anchors saltier-ways. Olivarus Uredus, amongst the seals of the Earls of Flanders, gives us the seal of Albeit Archduke of Austria, who married Isabella Infanta Dutchess of Burgundy, and Countess of Flanders, daughter of Philip II. King of Spain, where both their arms are marshalled in one shield, and behind the same are two anchors placed saltier-ways, which seal they used (says our author) in their high courts of ad- miralty. The Masters of the Cross-Bowers in France were in use to place cross-bows at the sides of their escutcheons, as Menestrier observes in his Science of Heraldry, TjBho tells us, that he has seen an..instance of it in the year 1419. And. the Grand EXTERIOR ORNARIENTS. 7y Masters of the Artillery, who are now come in place of the former, carry two cannons, or great guns, on their carriages, adosse, below the shield of arms, with bullets lying beneath them, as in the arms of Monsieur Le Due du Lude, Grand Miiitre d'Artillerie, as narrated by Monsieur Baron in his Art of Heraldry. And the arms of Lewis de Crevant de Humiers, Marshal of France, Marquis of Humiers, &-C. Grand Master of the Artillery, are adorned with two battons gules, seme of tlower-de-luces or, disposed in saltier behind the shield as his badge for Marshal ; and below, as being also Master of the Artillery, two great guns mounted on three carriages adosse, as aforesaid. These figures have also been used in the armorial bearings of the Great Masters of Artillery in Germany, as the badge of that office, besides ensigns and banners which they have added to adorn their shields of arms, on another account ; ot which Sylvester Petra Sancta has given several examples in his Tessera: Genti/itiie, as that of Torquatus de comitibus, whose shield of arms is surrounded with eight ensigns, and six standards of foot and horse, marked with the arms of those trom whom he had taken them in battle ; and below the shield two brass guns or can- nons on their carriages addossc firing. Our author's words are, " Ad hsec Torqua- " tus de comitibus Dux Belli inclitus ac strenuus a Ferdinando II. cui diu milita- " vit, in nuperis simultatibus imperii, tesserae su;e permeruit, propter signa equitum " ac peditum, qua indeptus est fortissime dimicando, etiam aenea bellica tonnenta, " functus videlicet prasfectura rei tormentarite &- donatus etiam a Cajsare ideo tor- " mentis duobus : Quje ille jussit deportari in Italiam, gloris monumentum." And in the same chapter he gives the arms of the family Bonefaceorum in Spain, adorned with twelve ensigns, and below the shield four anchors, to perpetuate the memory of some notable victory by sea and land obtained by one of this family as High Admiral. It is to be observed, that badges of offices which adorn the outsides of the shield of arms, show only that the bearers are in possession of such offices ; and their issue outed of them cannot use them so, (except by a special warrant for that end) but may be allowed to use them within the shield as an armorial figure, to inti- mate to posterity that their progenitors have once been honoured by such offices, as I took notice of before, in an example hereof, in the arms of Wood of Largo. Yet the adorning crests and sides of armorial shields with ensigns, banners, and pennons, has been a practice continued hereditary in several families in France, Germany, and Italy, from the first assumer of them, and that upon several ac- counts, as trophies of valoui- and victory over their enemies, whose ensigns they place round their shields ; and being so adorned, they are transmitted to their issue, representers of their famihes, of which the said Sylvester Petra Sancta gives us several examples, in his 77th chapter, de explicatis ciica tesseras gentilitias vex- illis, amongst which is the shield of arms of the family of Colonni in Rome, adorned with eight ensigns of the Turks, marked with crescents, since Marcus Antonius of that family defeat the Turkish fleet, who designed to invade Europe, and below the shield are placed two Turks in chains, to perpetuate this notable victory. This family, besides these eight Turkish ensigns, have above them two great banners, marked with the arms of the pope and ot the empire, as constables of the church and empire. And Menestrier in his Science of Heraldry, tells us. That banners adorning arms are in some countries badges of constables, as with the same family of Colonni in Italy, and with the chief house of Clermont in Dauphine, who outwardly adorn their shields with banners seme of dolphins as heritable Constables of Dauphine. . Those whose office it was to carry the banner of their countries, have been in use to place such at the sides of their shields of arms, as the Casarinv in Rome carry four banners or ensigns purple displayed, issuing from each side of the shield, marked with the letters S. P. ^ R. on account, says Sylvester Petra Sancta, they were Vexilli feri, Senatus Populi ^le Romani. And the Counts de Vexin, who carried the oriflam of France, have two banners carried by the supporters of their arms, being lions, as Menestrier has observed ; as likewise the royal supporters of France, being two angels, holding in each of their hands a banner erect in pale. And Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, page 95, has given us the figure of the seal of James Lord Hamilton. And it is presumeable, by the posi- Vol. II. 3 B 8o EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. tion of the shield thereon, that he was the first lord of that name, and married King James II. 's daughter. The blaion or description of which seal that learned author having omitted, 1 here insert as follows. This noble Lord bears on a shield couche three cinquefoils, above the same is placed a helmet, at the back whereof issues a running leaf or, two by way of mantling, and on the top thereof is set his torce or wreath, whereout issues his crest, being an antelope's head and neck, supported by two antelopes, with one foot standing on a terrace, with their tails betwixt their hinder feet ; one of which feet stands also on a terrace, and with the other feet they support the shield ; with one of their fore feet they lay hold of the helmet, and with the other each of them embraces and bears up a banner erect in pale, and round the seal is this legend, Sigillum Jacobi Domin. de Hamylton. Again the said judicious author, page last, in his blazon of the achievement of his Majesty of Great Britain, tells us, that his supporter of the unicorn on the dexter embraces and bears up a banner azure, charged with a St Andrew's cross urgent, and the hon on the sinister, and another banner argent, charged with a plain cross, (called of St George) gules. And before the succession of King James VI. to the crown of England, 1 find by old books of blazons and paintings, that the supporters of Scotland, being two uni- corns, that one on the dexter did embrace and bear up a banner charged with the royal arms of Scotland, and that on the sinister with the said St Andrew's cross. By which examples it is evident, that this practice of supporters bearing up ban- ners is pretty ancient with us. But it is to be observed by these last instances, that the staffs of these banners are not placed saltier-ways behind the shield, as the usage is with the Italians, Spaniards, and Germans. Which method of trimming and adorning their armorial shields, though proper to them, yet is not so usual with the French and us, who commonly carry no more than two banners when they adorn their arms with these badges or symbols, and "oesides are always erected in pale at the sides of the shield, and the ensigns are displayed on the flags thereof Some also, on account of military employments, have placed ensigns round the shield of their armorial bearings, as Ferdinand de Alerson, General of the Spanish army under King Charles V. of Spain, was the first (says Menestrier, in his Science of Heraldry) that placed such symbols about the amis of his family. And the family of Andredas there has eighteen banners round the shield of their arms, disposed in saltier. And the Dukes de Alva carry ten with us upon the same ac- count. John Scott of Thirlestane, who came to King James Vs. army at Soutra- edge, with three score ten spearmen on horseback, of his friends and followers, be- ing likewise willing to go with the said king into England, when his nobles and others refused already to stake all for his service ; the king, as a reward for his loyalty, allowed him adorning his armorial shield, to take, for crest, a mural crown with six spears, which I should have observed before when treating on crowns ; as also to use, for supporters, two men in coats of mail with steel caps, holding each in their hands a spear with pennons, having small flags or banners thereat. And Alexander Leslie, who came to great honour in the wars abroad under Gustavus Adolphus King of Sweden, whom he served in the quality of a field marshal, af- ter his return home, was advanced to be general and chief commander of the Par- liament's army, and created Earl of Leven by King Charles I. who, in considera- tion of his military bravery, allowed him to take, for supporters, two warriors in armour, holding in each of their hands a banner. Yet the Germans, I observe, have more commonly these banners and ensigns issuing from the tops of their shields, and very often from their helmets and crests. As the princes of Anhalt have twelve banners, so displayed, issuing from their crests, the Counts of Mansfelt six banners, and the Counts of Solms two, having the arms of their noble feus displayed upon them. Menestrier says, in his said Science of Heraldry, that the practice of adorning shields of arms after this method in Flanders is very ancient. And in France several old families have used banners at the sides of their arms in place of supporters, on ac- count that they had right to carry a banner in the field. And the Ricosombres in Spain are dignified by the formality of the delivery of a banner and kettle, being al- most the same with knight bannerets, who were also made by the display of banners. As our lord barons and other higher degrees of nobility, who have all right to rear EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 8r up a banner in the field. And, in my opinion, may likewise adoin their arms with ensigns and banners. But this practice, as it was not so frequent in France as in other kingdoms, yet it was less n\ use with the English and us, who both had from France the science and prac?tice of heraldry. And yet some old families here in Scotland, who had right to usi supporters, have made them to carry both en- signs and banners, as in the •.■xample of the Lord Hamilton foresaid. Having treated thus far of the ensigns, badges, and symbols of civil and military offices, according to the method and usage I have met with them in armories, and of their different situations and positions in adorning outwardly escutcheons of arms ; there are others which some call politic marks of dignity and chivalry. The first are these used by the electors of the empire, who use the several figures of the im- perial regalia, which they place in quarters of their armorial achievements, to show their dignified offices in the empire. As for example, the House of Bavaria carry the imperial globe, that of Saxony the sword of honour, Brandenburg the sceptre, the House of Palatine the imperial crown, and the family of Hanover the crown of Charlemagne, being the proper badge made use of by that serene house in their shield of arms, as hereditary treasurer of the sacred Roman Empire ; and, being all figures of the regalia, they are in use to carry them before the emperor by virtue of their high olfices, as Beckinanus says. Dissert. 8. caj). 5. " Insignibus " suis seculares clinodium istud inserunt cui ratione officii portando destinati sunt." And in other kingdoms, in imitation hereof, the King of Bohemia, as principal cup-bearer to the emperor, charged the breast of the lion m his arms with a cup ; and the badge of the carpenters' axes make up the arms of the family of Amberville in France, from their predecessors being anciently honoured with the office of the king's carpenter. The badge of cups have been made use of by an ancient family of the name of Butler in England, and by the ancient house of Shaw of Sauchie in Scotland, the predecessors of both which families being of old the king's butlers in both kingdoms, and, as the particular symbol of that office, carried the said fi- gures, though now they are become the only figures that make up the arms pecu- liar to both these surnames in Britian. As also, I find by old manuscripts of bla- zons, that the family of Carnegie of old, now Earls of Southlsk., have been in use to charge the breast of the blue eagle they bear in their arms with a cup of gold, as being anciently cup-bearers to our kings. And Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, p. 3. tells us, that King Robert the Bruce having car- ried, as a private badge, three laurel leaves, with this word, Hub sole, sub umbra virens, he gave to Irvine of Drum's predecessor, who had been constantly his armour-bearer, the three holly leaves, which is a kind of laurel, and is at present the armorial bearing of that ancient tamily. But these badges of dignrfied offices, being figures that make up their several arms within the shield, and no exterior ornament thereof, which is the subject I am now treating on, I shall not insist to make farther observations upon them. I proceed next to treat on the politic marks of chivalry, being the collars and badges belonging to knights of sovereign and high orders. It was a constant max- im in all well regulated governments to give a just encouragement to merit, and that by proportioning rewards to the service done. For merit must be supposed to consist in the performance of some virtuous or heroic actions directed for the pub- lic good : And as virtue is either military or civil, so the distribution of the rewards is different, either by bestowing degrees and titles of honour, or by donations of wealth, so that, in either construction, virtue may have its proper and suitable re- ward. But the proper reward of military virtue, is honour, (to which distinct head I am now confined) which Aristotle calls the greatest of exterior goods : And being an object of a nobler ambition than the accumulation of wealth, is principally the aim of that virtue we understand by valour, which springs from more generous spirits, and hath been the constant foundation of raising men to the highest emi- nence of glory, and superior dignity. But that fame might not lose itself in an unbounded notion, it was at length thought fit to reduce honour into form and order, by investing the person meriting with some particular title or appellation of excellence, (the original of all nobility) of which knighthood, as it hath been accounted the most suitable reward to the great- est virtue, so it hath been esteemed the chief and primary honour among many 82 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. nations. The Romans held honour and virtue in that esteem, that they deified and dedicated temples to them : They made them so contiguous in their situation, that there was no other passage to that of Honour, but through the Temple of Virtue, mystically admonishing, that honour was not to be attained by any other way. In several Roman coins we see honour and virtue represented together in one re- verse ; and in one medal the face of honour so shadows that of virtue, that but a little ot It appears, honour being the more illustrious of the two ; and where we behold any person outwardly adorned with it, we are to judge hun inwardly endu- ed with virtue. In tracing the original of knighthood, we are not so vain as to say with the French, that St Michael was the premier chevalier ; yet this much we may assert. That it is as ancient as valour and heroic virtue, notwithstanding the ceremonies and circumstances of it have varied, according to several ages and nations: And, therefore, with much probability, we may derive the original of military honour trom the Trojans and Greeks ; among whom, as knights of great renown, were Hector, Troilus, ^neas, Agamemnon, &-c. But, upon a more substantial basis, we shall descend to the Romans ; among whom, in the very infancy of their mili- tar glory, a society of knights was instituted, immediately after their union with the Sabines. Romulus inrolled three centuries of knights out of the chiefest fa- milies, whom he appointed to be his life-guard, and called them celeres, from their activity and dispatch in martial affairs. Tarquinius Priscus made an addition to these centuries ; the like did Servius Tullius, who ordained, that those who should succeed in that body should be elected ex censu, viz. from a considerable and certain valuation of their estates, who had the greatest cense, and were of the most noble families, says Dionys. Halicarn. And soon after the equestrian class began to be formed and constituted one of the three orders of the commonwealth, which were ranked, according to Livy, Senatus, Ordo Kquejlris, et Plebs ; and, forasmuch as this degree is placed be- tween the patricians or senators, and the plebeians, it answers exactly to the state of our knights between the nobility and commonalty : And from this order to the height of nobility, which resided in the senators, was the way prepared; Ju- nius Brutus being the first who was raised to a senator from the equestrian order. It was a constitution as old as Tiberius's reign, that none should be admitted in- to that order unless free-born, or a gentleman for three generations; and indeed for a long time none were elected knights but the best sort of gentlemen, and persons of extraction, as was the illustrious Ma:cenas. Atavis rcgibus ortus eques. Mart. Yet, at length, through corruption of times, plebeians and freed men being too frequently received into this degree, occasioned their esteem and authority to grow less and less, till it shrunk to nothing. And when Cicero was consul, amio ah urbe condita 690, the equestrian order stood in need of re-establishment, whereupon they were then incorporated into that commonwealth in the third degree, all acts pas- sing in the name of the senate, the people of Rome, and the equestrian order. Asa mark of eminence, they l?ad the titles oi splendidi and illustres bestowed upon them, and sometimes they have been called most sacred knights. And besides other pri- vileges they had seats with the senators in the Circus Maximus ; and, by the Roscian law, sat next them in the theatres ; they had likewise a college called CoUegium Equitum ; and temples were dedicated to the goddess Fortune, under the title of Equestri Fortuna. They were allowed to wear rings to distinguish them. The which honour continued hereditary in their families, which does not with our knights. The ancientest real knights, it is most likely, were made by the first Christian kings, who appointed many religious ceremonies to be observed at the creation of such, and none were admitted to that honour, but those who had merited it by some extraordinary commendable exploits. We shall now touch upon the degrees of knighthood, which have been personal, and may be comprehended under the modern title of Equites Aurati, or Milites Simpliccs, (as distinguished from the se- veral orders of chivalry, instituted in Christendom.) In the circumstance of whose EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 83 creation, we confess nothing in the Roman ordo equestris hath place, though that might be the ground and original of the dignity, and one common end in both, namely, the pursuit of military exploits and service in the wars. Knights in Latin are called mUitfs or t-qtiites, because the design was, that none but soldiers should enjcy that dignity. The French distinguish a knight by the n^me. oi chevalier, the Spaniards by that of faxv^/^rs, ai>d the Italians by that of cavagliera, the Germans call a knight ritUr ; all of them imparting no more than one that serves on horseback. The English title Knight is derived from the Saxon cnikt, which, in that language, is no more than a servant, and, in all probability, proceeded in serving the king in his wars. Of the degrees of knighthood. First, That of the monozoHS, i. e. knight begirt with the military girdle, a custom devolved to the Germans and Gauls from an- cient times : nor do we find, among the various ceremonies of knighthood, any that hath continued so constant in practice, as the endowing with girdle and sword, marks of honour and virtue, with which the statues and portraitures of knights on their grave-stones have been adorned. For, as at this day, knights are stiled equites aurati, from the golden spurs heretofore put on at then- creation ; so were they more anciently cingulo militari donati, in respect, that when one was knighted, he was not only struck with the sword, but invested with sword and belt. adly. The Baccalaurei or Knights-batchelors are to be considered, who are in- diflerently stiled chevaliers, milites, equites aurati, and knights. This degree is truly accounted the first of all military dignity, and the foundation of all honours in our nation, and is derived from, if not the same with, that immediately preceding. For as the ceremony of a gentle touch on the shoulder with the flat side of the sword hath been since used instead of girding with the sword and belt, (especially in times of war, or in haste) as an initiation into the military order, so, on the contrary, it is not unusual, now-a-days, for the prince, at least, gladio, if not cingulo donare ; for he oftentimes bestows the sword upon the person he knighteth. The third sort, wtte: Knights-bannerets, whoso well deserved in the wars, that they were afterwards permitted to use vexillum quadratum, a square banner, whence they were called equites vexillarii, or chevaliers a banniire, from the Dutch baner- heere, lord or master of the banner. Camden conceives this title first devised by King Edward III. in recompense of martial prowess ; a recital of which dignity is mentioned in a patent, 20th Edward III. to John Copland, for his service in taking David King of Scots, prisoner. But it was much more ancient in Britain, as well as in France ; and they had particular robes and other ornaments given them trom the crown. And there is an evidence of a writ in the said King Edward III. his time for furnishing Thomas Bardolf with the robes of a banneret. This digni- ty is placed in the middle between the barons and other knights, in which respect, the banneret may be called vexillarius minor, as if he were the lesser banner-bearer ; to the end he may be so differenced from the greater, namely, the baron; to whom the right of bearing a square banner doth also belong. Other authors tell us, this order of knighthood was instituted in England in the time of King Edward I. And it is most likely that the Normans were acquainted with this order long before : But I find, by our historians, this order to have been of older standing with us ; for Sir Alexander Carron, Banneret, is said by them to have carried the banner of Scotland before King Alexander I. (who began his reign in the year 1 107) in his expedition against the rebels in Mearns and Mur- ray ; where, by the said Sir Alexander's conduct and valour, who, in the king's presence, with a crooked sword, fought valiantly, and killed many of the rebels, that king obtained a notable victory over them ; for which heroic actions he got many lands, and his name was changed from Carron to Scrymgeour, which signi- fies a hardy-fighter ; and his posterity being long afterwards standard-bearers to our kings and'constables of Dundee, got, for arms, a rampant lion holding a crooked sword. And Bannerman of Elsick, an older family than that of Scrymgeour, be- ing also baimerets, carried anciently for an armorial figure, a banner displayed, as relative to the name, which was from their office as hereditary banner-bearers to our kings, before the reigns of King Malcolm III. And Sir George Mackenzie, in his Manuscript Genealogy of the Families of Scotland, (agreeing also with our Vol. II. 3 C b4 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. historians) tells us, tbat the said King Malcolm III. who began his reign in the year 1057, hearing ot a new rebellion begun in the north parts of the kingdom, went with his army to the Water of Spey to fight against them, where, perceiving his standard-bearer, Bunnerman, to shrink, and not to show a chearful countenance, he pulled the banner trom him, and at the same time having observed the manly courage of Sir Alexander Carron, (father of the above Sir Alexander) who ac- companied him in this expedition, he gave the royal banner to him, and, after the battle, striking him with his sword, created him a knight-banneret ; he there be- having himself to the great satisfaction of that king ; for which good service he also created him and his posterity heritable standard-bearers to the kings of Scot- land ; and with this new office many fair lands were bestowed on him. This order is certainly most honourable, because never conferred but upon some heroic action performed in the field, whereas all other orders are bestowed from favour or meaner motives; for the banneret is never created, unless at a time when the king's standard is erected. In France they are said to have transmitted the degree to posterity, but in England and Scotland it dies with the person that ob- tained it. Bertrand de Guesclin, Constable of France, after the defeat he gave the English at Cockerel, where he took their General, Sir John Chandos, made knights bannerets, MeJJire Jacques le Mercier, Lord of St ^intin des Isles, and the son-in-law of the same Mercier, called Bertauld de Gastel, Lord of Vitray le Gastel. And Sir John Smith was made one alter Edgehill fight, for rescuing the standard of King Charles I. from the rebels. The Scots (says an Enghsh author) are supposed to call such a knight a bannerent, from the rending of his banner. But now these honours of the field have been of long time laid aside. As for the ceremony of their creation, I refer to Mr Segar. The badges and ensigns of knighthood among the Romans were a ring ; and in Genesis we read of Pharaoh's taking off his ring, and putting it upon Joseph's hand. Among the Germans the shield and lance were accounted the grand badges of mihtary honour or knighthood. Much hke the ancient Germans was the custom of making knights among the Irish. And Favin observes, that the shield and lance were the proper arms appertaining to French knights, which esquires, armigers, carried always after their masters. Another ensign of knightly honour is the cingulum militare, or balteus, which Varro says, is Tuscan, signifying a military girdle, which was garnished with great buckles, studs, and rings of pure gold, to show their dignity and power in military commands. Our knights were no less.anciently known by these belts than by their gilt swords, spurs, &-c. Howbeit, the use now only appears in knights of the bath. To the belt was also added a sword, not of ordinary use ; and therefore termed the sword of a knight. Another eminent badge is the golden spurs, wherewith, at the time of their crea- tion, knights were wont to be adorned ; and, to these, a little after the conquest, were added far more and greater ornaments. And several families, by the name of knight, bear for their arms the spurs on a canton. In the last place, is the col- lar, an ensign of knightly dignity among the Germans, Gauls, Britons, Danes, and Goths, among whom it was customary to wear them, denoting such as were re- markable for their valour. But, in later times, it was the peculiar fashion of knights among us to wear golden collars, composed of S. S. or other various devices; and such is the honour of knighthood, that several kings of France, England, &c. received this dignity at the time they enjoyed their other titles. And though it i* said the sons of the French king are knights as soon as they receive baptism, yet are they not judged worthy of the kingdom, unless first solemnly created ; and we else- where find that the royal heirs of Arragon were suspended from that crown until they had received the honour of knighthood. And, after the Norman conquest, the young princes of England were sent over to the neighbouring kings to receive this honour. Thus King Henry II. of England was sent to our King David, and knighted by him in Carlisle ; and Edward I. of England, at the age of fifteen years, was sent to Alphonsus XI. King of Castile, for the same dignity. In hke manner, Malcolm King of Scotland and Alexander, son of Wilham, King thereof, were knighted by John King of England, anno 1211. And our King Alexander III. by King Henry III. of England, a/ino 1252. And Magnus, King of the Isle of EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 85 Man, by the same king. All which sulliciently demonstrate the honour and esteem which was ever had for that order. As to the collars and badges belonging to knights of sovereign and high orders, being also figures used in adorning armorial shields, my reader is not liere to ex- pect a particular enumeration and description of these many and dilVerent orders in Europe, their first rise, what aie secular, and u hat religious, which would be a subject too long here to narrate ; but 1 refer my readers to the respective authors on that subject in the several kingdoms, and, particularly, to William Segar Nor- roy King at Arms, his book, intitled. Honour, Mditary and Civil, and to that ela- borate book of Mr Ashmole's Institutions of the Order of the Garter, to Andrew Favin's Theatre of Honour and Knighthood, 6i.c. Only that I may omit no ex- terior figures now used in adorning escutcheons, I siiall here mention a few of the most eminent of these high secular orders, their institutions, collars, and and how they are placed about the shield. And first, I shall begin with France, their order of St Michael, which was insti- tuted by Lewis XI. King of France, in the year 1469. And that which moved the king to call it St Michael (says Mr Segar) was the memory of the apparition of that saint upon the bridge of Orleans, before the delivery of the city besieged then by the English. But because I will not trouble my reader with fabulous accounts about its rise, I shall insert here that king's own letters patent instituting the same, which are as follows. " Lewis XI. King of France, to all that are, or shall be, greeting. Beit known, " that in regard of the perfect and sincere love we bear to the Noble Order of " Knighthood, the honour and increase whereof we most ardently desire, that as " we heartily wish the Holy Catholic Faith, our Holy Mother Church, and the " public prosperity may be maintained, we, to the glory of God our Almighty " Creator, and in reverence of the Blessed Virgin Mary, as also in honour of St " Michael, the prince and chief of knights, who fought in God's cause against " the ancient enemy of mankind, and cast him down from heaven, and who has " always secured his place, preserved his oratory, called Mount St Michael, with- " out suffering it at any time to be taken, subdued, or delivered into the hands " of the ancient enemies of this kingdom. And to the end that aU generous and " noble spirits may be excited, and stirred up to virtuous actions. " The first day of August, in the year of Grace 1469, and the ninth year of " our reign, at the castle of Amboise, we constitute, erect, and ordain an order of " brotherhood, or loving society, of a certain number of knights, which it is our " will shall be called. The Order of St Michael the Archangel, in and under the " form, conditions, statutes, ordinances, and articles hereafter set down." Then follow the statutes, which, being in number sixty-one, are too long to be here inserted. This St Michael is the titular angel and protector of France ; in reverence of whom their ancient kings were wont to solsmnize this festival-day with great magnificence, and keep an open court. Their number at first were to be thirty-six, whereof the king and his successors were chief and sovereign of this order ; but it afterwards proceeded to the number of three hundred. Their habit is doublet, hose, shoes, scabbard, cope, band, and feather, all white ; the surcoat with sleeves is cloth of silver, over all was a mantle of white damask hanging down to the ground, furred with ermine, tied upon the right shoulder, and turned up over the left, having its cap embroidered with gold, and the border of the robe inter- woven with escalops and knots of gold; the chaperon, or hood, with its long tip- pet, was made of crimson velvet. But afterwards King Henry II. of France or- dered for the future this cloak or mantle to be cloth of silver embroidered with this device on them, viz. three crescents of silver interwoven with trophies, qui- vers, and Turkish bows, seme, and cantoned with tongues of fire ; the chaperon or hood of crimson velvet adorned with the same embroidery. The same King Hen- ry ordered the Ch^mcellor of the Order should wear a cloak of white velvet, and the hood of crimson velvet. The Provost and Master of the Ceremonies, the Trea- surer, Register, and King of Arms, white satin cloaks, and hoods of crimson satin, with a chain of gold at the end, whereof an escalop of gold hangs upon the breast ; there is also an herald of arms to attend this order, called Monsieur St Michael. S6 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. The knights of this order, over all their said habit, wear the collar of St Mi- chael, which is very rich. The great collar is of gold, as it were tortille, and adorned with cockles of the same metal: or, as others say, it consists of double escalop-shells of gold, listened with round points of black silk, and long tags of gold interwoven after the manner of true lovers knots. At the end of which (hanging on the breast) is annexed an oval of gold, and there is a little rising hill curiously enamelled, on which stands the figure of St Michael combating and trampling down the dragon under his feet. The motto, Immensi tremor oceaiii. Their annual and grand festival was to be celebrated on Michaelmas-day, at the church of Mount Michael in Normandy ; but afterwards transferred to Bois de Vincennes near Paris. The great seal of this order has the figure of St Michael engraved on it, in the same manner as that which hangs at the collar. The lesser seal is three flower-de-luces, entoured with the order. I find several of our nobility to have been of this order in the reign of King James V. and Q^ieen Mary. But after the number of the knights hereof were so much increased, this order lost of its reputation ; yet it is said that the collar and robe are bestowed only upon the thirty-six. And the pendant of St Michael given to none but the supernumerary knights. This order is not quite extinct, as some writers would persuade us, but is incorporated into that of the Holy Ghost; upon the institution whereof not only care was taken to preserve this of St Michael and to rectify it, but the knights had the privilege allowed them, that if they thought fit they were capable of receiving that of the Holy Ghost, and no stranger or na- tive could be inroUed therein who had taken upon him any other order. And there- fore all the knights of the Holy Ghost first receive the Order of St Michael the evening before they are admitted into the other ; and for that reason they now frequently use the collars of both orders above their habit and mantle when they appear in their robes, and also round their armorial shields. And here it is to be observed, that when the royal armsof France are either painted, tut, or embroidered, with all their exterior ornaments, the collars of these two orders are constantly placed round the royal shield ; a figure whereof Monsieur Baron has given us in his Art of Heraldry ; where that of St Michael, as being the ancientest order, takes place, and hath its situation next the royal escutcheon ; whereas that of the Holy Ghost, though esteemed the most honourable, does but surround the collar of the said saint. Also the knights of both these orders are in use to wear both the collars, after the same manner, round the shield of their arms, and the figure of St Michael on their dexter side, when they only wear that of the dove as the badge of the Order of the Holy Ghost on their sinister. And here I give it as my opinion, though with due respect to my brethren of South Britain, that I think it most comformable to the rules of heraldry, that when the royal arms of Great Britain are set forth to pubhc view, either by painting, sculpture, or otherwise, with exterior trimmings, his Majesty, as sovereign of the orders in both kingdoms, viz. that of the Thistle in North, and that of the Garter in South Britain, ought to have his royal armorial shield adorned with the collars of both these high and most honourable orders of knighthood. And though that of South Britain be termed the most noble, yet that of ours being the more ancient, it seems reasonable to me that the same ought to be preferred, and have its situation next the royal shield, and that of the Garter to surround the other, according to the figure Sir George Mackenzie has given us in his Science of Heraldry, page 99. in a sculpture of the achievement of his then Majesty of Great Britain, agreeable to the foresaid method used in France; where, in justice, we cannot but allow those of the profession of heraldry to be well known in the said science. And all that are competent judges will also allow them to be of all nations the most regular in their marshalling of arms, and trimming of armorial shields. And here I commend the justice South Britain has done us at the union of the two kingdoms, by mar- shalling the royal banner so as to place our St Andrew's cross immediately on the royal flag on its azure field, when that of St George does only surmount the same, our white saltier serving as a field thereto. The Order of the Knights of St Esprit, or Holy Ghost, in France, has of late years taken place of all others, and been accounted the most honourable Order in that kingdom. It was instituted by King Henry 111. of France, in the year 1578, EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. S7 to unite his nobles more firmly in their obedience, to encourage them to persev'ere in the Komish religion, and to illustrate the state of his nobility. It was so called by reason he was born on Whitsunday 1550, elected, that day, anno 1573, King of Poland, and on that day, anno 1574, succeeded to the crown of P" ranee. And at the same time to rectify the abuses that were crept into the Order of St Michael, that had been given to unworthy persons, upon which acco-ant the two orders were incorporated, as is observed before. The king's letters patent being too long here to insert, I refer to Sir William Segar's book, called Honour Military and Civil. The most material of the statutes are, that there shall be a sovereign of the order, who is to have absolute authority over the brethren thereof, and all things relating to it, and that the same be no other but the King of France, and no king to exercise that authority till crowned, and on the coronation-day to take the oath of the order as follows : " We A, by the grace of God, &c. do solemnly " swear and vow on this book in our hands to God the Creator, to live and die in " the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Faith and Religion, as to every good and most " Christian king it belongeth ; and rather to die than fail at any time therein. " We swear also to maintain for ever the Order of the Holy Ghost, without suffer- " ing it to shrink, fall, or diminish, so long as it remains in our power to help it, " to observe the statutes of the said order truly and entirely, and never to alter or " change the irrevocable statutes thereof," Stc. The number of persons contained in this order is said to be one hundred knights, besides the Sovereign, or Great Master; which office is inseparable from the crown of France; and in which said number are comprehended four cardinals, five prelates, the chancellor, provost, master of the ceremonies, great treasurer, and scribe, who are called Commanders. Their anniversary grand feast is held on the first day of the new year, or first of January, but the first part of the ceremony begins always on the last day of the old year, when it was instituted ; and the place for celebratmg thereof is the church of Augustine Friars in Paris; but if the king cannot be there present, then it is to be celebrated where he shall per- sonally be, and in the greatest church, there being divers ceremonies to be observed by them in the celebration thereof, which are set down by Sir William Segar, page 88. The habit appointed for the knights of this order is a long robe or mantle of black velvet, turned up on the left side, and opened on the right, being at first em- broidered round with gold and silver, consisting of flower-de-luces, and knots of gold between three sundry cyphers of silver; and above the flower-de-luces and knots were thickly powdered flames of fire. This great mantle was garnished with a mantle of cloth of silver, covered with embroidery made after the same fashion, excepting only that instead of cyphers there were wrought doves of silver, and both these robes double-lined with a satin of orange tawny. The great collar worn over the mantle was at first composed of flower-de-luces cantoned, or counter- ed, with flames of fire, interwoven with three cyphers and divers monograms of silver; one was the letter H, and a Greek lambda, both double, being the initial letters of the king's name, and his queen's, Louisa de Lorrain ; the other two were reserved in the king's own mind. But these cyphers were taken off the collar, and the embroidery of the robes, by King Henry IV. and, for a mark of his victories, trophies of arms were interlaced instead thereof with the letter H. crowned, (the initial of his name) whereout arose flames and sparks of fire ; and, for the like reason, the H has been changed into L, both by Lewis XIII. and XIV. At this collar hung a cross, richly enamelled in the midst, whereon was figured a dove in a flying posture, as descending from Heaven, with full spread wings: And that an epigraph might not be wanting, some have attributed to it this, Duce ^ Auspice. Besides these ornaments, the knights of this order wear a black velvet cap, with a white plume; their breeches and doublets are of cloth of silver, and their hose and shoes white, tied with roses or knots of black velvet. The badges ordained to be ordinarily worn, are a cross of yellow, or orange colour velvet, like a Malta, cross of eight points, fixed on the left side of their breast, except in military expe- ditions, and then they are permitted to wear them of cloth of silver or white velvet, having on the middle of the cross a silver dove, and at the angles, or corners, rays and flower-de-luces of silver. They have a cross of the order made of pold, of VouIL 3 D 88 EXTERIOR ORNAMENT.S. eight points, (like the Malta cross) with a flower-de-luce in each angle, to be worn about tlieir necks in a blue ribbon, and to be enamelled white about the sides, but not in the middle. The Great Seal of this order is as large as the Great Seal of France. In it is represented King Henry 111. on a chair of state, with the Chancellor of the order on his right hand, liolding the Holy Gospels, and on his left the register of tlVe order, reading those oaths which knights are to take. Before the king kneels the knight, holding his hand on the Holy Evangehsts, all of them in their robes and collars of the order. On the top of the seal, in a great Hght, appears the Holy Ghost in the form of a dove, descending over the king, and about it beams of light and fiery tongues. Round the seal are these words, Heyiry III. of the name, by the Grace of God, Kiii^ of France and Pokmd, Founder and Sovereign of the Knights of the Order of the Holy Ghost. On the reverse is an escutcheon, charged with three flower-de-luces cantoned with four flames in the same manner as on the great collar of the order, and in the upper part, instead of a crown, is a dove descend- ing, encompassed, as the rest of the escutcheon, with sun-beams of gold and flames of fire. The Order of Knighthood of the Toison d' Or, or of the Golden Fleece, in Spain, was instituted by Phihp II. Duke of Burgundy and Earl of Flanders, surnamed the Good, at his marriage with Elizabeth, daughter of Portugal, in the city of Bruges in Flanders, the loth of January 1429, to perpetuate the memory of his great re- venues raised by wools with the low countries ; some say in commemoration of Gideon's fleece, or of Jacob's fleece, viz. the party-coloured and streaked fleece, after the example of Jason and his Argonauts, whose expedition to Colchos he in- tended to make his pattern by a voyage into Syria against the Turks, for the con- quest of the Holy Land, albeit it took no effect. The letters patent for the insti- tution are dated the said loth of January 1429. He founded it to the glory of the Almighty Creator and Redeemer, in reverence of the Virgin Mary, and St Andrew the Apostle, whom he elected for patron hereof, and whose festival was celebrated on that day, but afterwards translated to the first of May, by rea- son of the shortness of the days, and the fatigue aged knights would find to con- tinue in an intemperate season, and that but once in three years, unless the sove- reign otherwise pleaseth. The number of these knights at the first election were twenty-four, all gentlemen unblemished, himself and his successors to be chiefs and sovereigns of the order, which was always to be to him to whom the dukedom of Burgundy did lawfully descend, who hath in himself authority to give and be- stow this honour to whom he pleaseth ; the said Duke Phihp reserved the nomi- nation of six more knights at the next chapter. But Charles V. increased them, anno 1516, to fifty. Duke Charles and Maximilian, sons to the founder, annexed many privileges to them, which were confirmed anno 1556. And those who were to be admitted into this order were obliged to renounce all other orders of knight- hood ; nevertheless all emperors, kings, and dukes, are excepted, unto whom it is dispensed that they may wear the ensigns of this order, if they were sove- reigns of an order of their own. To this order doth belong four principal offi- cers, viz. the Chancellor, Treasurer, Advocate, and a King at Arms, called 'Toison d'Or. For their habit three different mantles were ordained them at the grand solem- nity : The first day one of scarlet cloth, richly embroidered about the lower end with flints struck into sparks of fire, and fleeces with chaperons oi the same ; and the same day, after dinner, to proceed to vespers in mantles of black, and of the co- lour of chaperons ; the day following they were to hear mass, habited as themselves thought fit ; but Duke Charles afterwards prescribed them mantles of white da- mask for that day's ceremony, and changed their cloth mantles into velvet. Lo- gan, in his Analogia Honorum, says, for habit they have a cassock of crimson velvet, and over it a mantle of the same, lined with white, which openeth on the right side, and is turned upon the left over the shoulder, embroidered round about \vith a border of flames, fusils, and fleeces, and a hood of crimson velvet on their heads. The great collar of this order is of gold, composed of double fusils or steels, placed back to back, two and two together, as if they were double B, representing EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. !k> It both ways, to signify Burgundy. And these fusils ;ire interwaven with flint stones (in reverence to the arms of the ancient kings of Burgundy of the French race) seeming to strike fire, and sparkles of fire between them, tiie device of the founder. At the end whereof hung a pendant, being the resemblance of a golden fleece, enamelled proper, which Jason won at Colchos, or as some suppose Gideon's fleece, which signifies fidelity or justice uncorrupted. And this collar or toison they are obliged, upon a penalty, always to wear, and not to make any altera- tions ; and to sell or exchange it is deemed most unlawful. To the flint Paradine ascribes the motto, Ante fa it quamflamma micet, it strikes before the fire appears : and to the fleece, Pretium non vile laboris. The jewel is commonly worn in a double chainet or mails of gold, linked together at convenient distance, between which runs a small red ribbon, or otherwise it is worn in a red ribbon alone. Charles Duke of Burgundy gave a device to the fusil in the collar, being an instrument to strike fire, called an ansil, which, with these words foresaid, Antefetit quamflamma. micet, became his device ; meaning he had power to kindle great trouble before it was perceived, which he did to King Lewis XI. of France. But afterwards was unlucky in his war against Benato Duke of Lorrain, who defeated his army, and killed himself before Nantz, who seeing Duke Charles' standard brought to him with the fusil and motto upon it, said he was an unfortunate prince, who, when he had most need to warm himself, wanted leisure to strike fire, the earth being then covered with snow. The emperors of Germany descended from Philip Archduke of Austria, Duke of Burgundy, and Count of Flanders, were the sovereigns of this order, till Charles V. gave the guardianship of it to the kings of Spain, which he performed on the 25th of October 1556, conferring it on his son King Philip at Brussels, who ascended the throne of Spain in right of his wife. When he took the collar- from his neck, and with his own hands put it over his son's shoulders, in the presence of divers of the knights, with this form, " Accipe, fill mi, quern e collo meodetraho, tibi " prrecipuum, aurei velleris torquem, quem Philippus Dux Burgundire, cognomine " Bonus, atavus noster, monumentum fidei sacra RomaiKc ecclesia;, esse voluit, " & hujusce institutionis ac legum ejus fac semper memineris : " Since which the honour of being chief of this order remains at this day in the crown of Spain. Duke Charles, son of Philip, (the first institutor of the order) as he was the second sovereign of this order, so he was the first that on his seal surrounded the escutcheon of his arms with the collar thereof, as is to be seen on his seal append- ed to several diplomas in the year 1470. As Ohvarus Uredus, in his Treatise de Sigillis Comitum Flandria, hath given us a figure thereof ; so that, as I observe, this is the oldest practice of surrounding armorial shields with the collars worn by knights of high and sovereign orders of knighthood. But how soon the like was practised in France, I have not as yet discovered. As for our usage of this me- thod in trimming the achievements of the several knights of our high orders of knighthood in North and South Britain, sure I am the former example of Duke Charles in adorning his shield of arms this way, is long prior to the practice there- of with us. His son-in-law Maximilian Duke of Austria, (son to the Emperor Frederick III.) by marrying his daughter and heiress Mary Dutchess of Burgundy and Coun- tess of Flanders, besides their other seals of arms, used also one called si'^illum se- cretum, which is appended to several evidents, upon which was a lion seiaiit, hold- ing by his right paw the shield of Maximilian, and in his left that of Mary Dutchess of Burgundy : and about the neck of the lion supporter of both these shields hung the collar of the golden fleece, with his head in a helmet grille m profile, adorned with volets, and crowned with a crown of one arch ; and the le- gend round the seal, Sigillum sec return Maximiliani y Maria Ducum Austria, Burgundice, Brabantia, Comitum Fiandria, Tirolis, &-c. And it is to be observed, their successors, when represented on their seals, enthronized, and in their robes, had the said collar about their necks. And when emperors and kings of Spain they used it round their shields of arms, as sovereigns of the order. So much then concerning the sovereign orders of knighthood abroad, and their manner of placing of collars and badges of royal knighthood round arms. Forbearing to proceed 90 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. further to give a descnption of many others in Europe, as out of my road, I shall next proceed to give a description of the orders of knighthood in Britain, beginning first with those in South Britain. Where the Knights of the Round Table may, for antiquity, challenge the first place, being an order accounted absolutely military, and founded by the valiant Arthur King of Britain, who reigned about the year of Christ 516, and who lived in such great renown that worthy knights came from all parts to his court as a seminary of discipline, to demonstrate their valour in point of arms. This gave him occasion to select out of these, and his own subjects, some say twenty-four, others a greater number, amongst whom himself was chief of the most valiant, which he united in a fellowship ; and, to avoid all controversy about precedency, caused a round table to be made, whence the order had its appellation. He ad- mitted not only Britons, but strangers ; and their qualifications were to be per- sons of nobility, dignity, and renowned for virtue and valour. The place where they were instituted was Windsor, and their time of convening was Whitsuntide. In Winchester Castle was a large round table, called (and affirmed to be) King Arthur's, or at least set up in the room of one more ancient, which was destroyed in the late civil wars, with other reliques there. The articles which these knights vowed to keep, were to be always well armed, both for horse and foot service, either by land or sea, and to be always ready to assail tyrants or oppressors, to protect and defend widows, maidens, and children, to maintain the Christian faith, &c. I forbear to relate more concerning this order, as not answer- ing my design relative to exterior ornaments, of the armorial shields, in regard I find no authentic proof what badge they bore, notwithstanding the report that King Arthur had a shield named Pridwin, wherein the Virgin Mary was de- picted. His sword and lance had also their names, one being called Caliburne, the other Irone or Rone. Neither is it remembered that this order survived the founder, but rather that it expired with him, most of these knights perishmg with him at the battle of Kamclan, now Camelford in Cornwall, where he was killed, anno 542. The next order of knighthood in South Britain, is the Most Noble Order of the Garter, or St George, which being a royal order, generally so well known, and has been treated of by so many learned writers, particularly so copiously by Elias Ashmole, who has obliged the world with a large folio on the history thereof, a little said will suffice, referring the curious to him, Peter Heylyn and others, who have wrote of it at large. It owes its original, as is confessed on all hands, to Ed- ward III. King of England and France, in the year 1350. The vulgar and more general account thereof is, that the garter of Joan, Countess of Salisbury, drop- ping casually off" as she danced in a solemn ball. King Edward stooping, took it up from the ground, whereupon some of his nobles smiling, as at an amorous ac- tion, and he observing their sportive humour, turned it off" with a reply in French, Honi suit qui mal y pease ; but withall added, in disdain of their laughter, " That •' shortly they should see that garter advanced to so high an honour and renown, " as to account themselves happy to wear it." Segar says, that King Edward dancing with the queen and other ladies of his court, happened to take up a blue garter which fell from one of them, which the king wore after about his right leg for a favour ; whereat the queen taking offence, it was signified to the king that she was displeased ; upon which he said, Honi soil qui mal y pense, i. e. Shame be to him that evil thinks. I will make of it (continues he) e're it be long, the most honourable garter that ever was worn, and thereupon instituted this or- der. Yet, in the original statutes of this order, there is not the least ground to countenance the conceit of such a feminine institution, no not so much (says Mr Ashmole) as laying an obligation on the knights companions to defend the quarrel of ladies, as some orders then in being enjoined. But that this may ap- pear, what indeed it is, a mere fable, we shall insert the judgment of Dr Heylyn, who took great pains in this particular. " This, says he, I take to be a vain and " idle romance, derogatory both to the founder and the order first pubhshed by " Pol. Virgil, a stranger to the affairs of England, and by him taken upon no bet- " ter ground than/*?«a vulgi, the tradition of the common people, too trifling a " foundation to so great a building." EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 91 The true motive w-as therefore neither the lady's garter, or King Ricliard's leathern thong, to wliich it owes its original : But King Edward being a person of consummate vntue, gave himself up to military atiairs; and being engaged in war for recovering his right to France, made use of the best martialists of the age ; and did thereupon first design (induced by its ancient fame) the restoration of king Arthur's round table foresaid, the better to invite hither the gallant spirits from abroad, and endear them to liimself; and adjudging noplace more proper than Windsor, upon new year's day, anno 1344, he issued out letters of protection for the safe gomg and returning of foreign knights, to try their valour at the solemn jousts, tilts, and tournaments, to be held there on Monday, after the feast of St Hilary following ; and royally entertained them with magnificent feasts and other princely favours, to engage them unto him ; and ordained this festival to be annu- ally at Whitsuntide, and immediately after caused erect a building in Windsor Gastle, and therein placed a table of two hundred feet diameter, where the knights should have their entertainment of diet at his expence of 100 lib. per week, which he called, The Round Table. But Philip de Valois, King of France, in emulation of this seminary at Wind- sor, set up a round table at his court, and invited knights and valiant men of arms out of Italy and Alleraagne thither, lest they should repair to King Edward 111. which, meeting with success, proved a counter-mine to his main design. He at length resolved upon a projection, more particular and select, and sucli as might oblige those whom he thought fit to make his associates in a lasting bond of friend- ship and honour: And having issued forth his own garter for the signal of battle, that was crowned with success, (which is conceived to be the battle of Cressy, fought three hours after his erecting the Round Table ;) upon so remarkable a victory, he thence took occasion to institute this order, and the garter had the pre-eminence among the ensigns of it ; whence that select number, whom he incorporated into a fraternity, are stiled Equites aiireit periscelidis, and vulgarly. Knights of the Garter. By this symbol he designed to bind the knights and fellows of it mutually unto one another, and all of them jointly to himself, as sovereign of the order ; nor was his expectation frustrated, for it served not only as a spur to honour and martial virtue, but also a golden bond of unity ; and therefore Mr Camden aptly calls it a badge of unity and concord. The garter was the only part of the whole habit of the order worn at first. And that none might believe (says Mr Miege in his State of South Britain) that the sovereign had any other design but what was just and honourable, the above motto was ordered to be wrought on the garter, Honi soil qui mal y pense. The same being put in French, because being then possessed of a great part of France, that tongue was very familiar in England. And Mr Ash- mole tells us, that when the said King Edward III. had laid claim by his title to the kingdom of France, in right of his mother, and assuming its arms, he, from the colour of them, caused the garter to be made blue, and the circumscription gold ; and, without straining the said motto, it may be inferred therefrom, that he retorted shame and defiance upon him that should dare to think amiss of so just an enterprize, as he had undertaken for recovering of his lawful right to that crown. The value of this order is much enhanced by the small number it contains, having at the first institution been appointed for only twenty-six, including the sovereign, and that number never after increased ; whereas all other orders (ex- cept our own) have been so freely bestowed, that they have lost much of their esteem by it. The patrons of this order were several, under whose protection (according to the custom of the age) King Edward III. put himself and all the knights companions, that the affairs of the order might be defended, preser\-ed, and governed. The first and chiefest which he elected was the Holy Trinity, idly. The Virgin Mary, accounted then the general mediatrix and protectress of all men. jrf/y, St George of Cappadocia, a choice martyr, soldier, and champion of Christ, in re- spect of whom the knights had the title oi Ecpiites Georgiani, St George's Knights: and the order itself came to be called the Ordo divi Saiicti Georgii, the Order of St George. And, if we may believe Harding, it is recorded that King Arthur paiH St George particular hoiiours, for he advanced his picture in one of his baij- VoL.U. 3E 92 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. ners. And, lastly. The founder added a fourth patron, viz. St Edward the Con- fessor, King of England ; and we find he was invocated by this founder, as well as St George, in any great difficulty and straits. Walsingham gives an instance at the skirmish of Calais, anno 1349, when King Edward in great anger and grief drew out his sword, and most passionately cried out. Ha St Edward, Ha St George. This order has been honoured with the companionship of eight Emperors of Ger- many, three Kings of Spain, five Kings of France, two Kings of Scotland, five Kings of Denmark, five Kings of Portugal, two Kings of Sweden, one King of Po- land, one King of Arragon, two Kings of Naples, besides divers foreign dukes and other free princes, by which the knights and noblemen of this order are raised to this pitch of greatness, as to be companions and associates with emperors and kings, a prerogative of an high nature, and a sufficient recompense for the great- est merit. And the learned Selden bestowed an high eulogy on it, in saying, that it exceeds in majesty, honour, and fame, all chivalrous orders of the world. The habit and ensigns of this most noble order are most eminently distinguish- able, and magnificent, and consists of these particulars, viz. the garter, mantle, surcoat, and hood, which were assigned the knights companions by the founder, and the George and collar by King Henry VIII. all which are called the whole habit or ensigns of the order. The royal garter challengeth the pre-eminence, for from it this famous order received its denomination; it is the first part of the habit presented to foreign princes and absent knights, and that wherewith they and all other elect knights are first adorned, and of so great honour and grandeur, that by the bare investiture with this noble ensign, the knights are esteemed companions of this order. The materials whereof is an arcanum ; as to the ornamental part of it, it was adorned with gold and precious stones, and had a buckle of gold at the end, to fasten it about the leg. This, according to Polydore Virgil. But ttre garter sent to Emanuel Duke of Savoy, anno ist and 2d Philip and Mary, was set with letters of goldsmith's work, the buckle and pendant of the same, and on the pendant a ruby, and a pearl hanging at the end. But that garter sent to Gusta- vus Adolphus King of Sweden outvied all others conferred by former sovereigns, each letter of the motto being composed of small diamonds ; and for every stop a diamond within a range of diamonds above and below on the sides of the garter, and besides other diamonds on the buckle, and about the same, to the number in all of 411. The garter which King Charles I. wore upon his leg at the time of his martyrdom had the letters of the motto composed likewise of diamonds, which amounted to the number of 412. It came to the hands of Captain Preston (one of the usurper's captains) from whom the trustees for sale of the king's goods receiv- ed it, and sold it to Ireton, Mayor of London, for 205 lib. The motto of King Charles II. was set with diamonds upon blue velvet, and the border wrought with fine gold wire, the hinge of the buckle was pure gold, and on it the sovereign's picture to the breast curiously cut, crowned with laurel, and on the back side was engraven St George on horseback encountering the dragon. At the first erection the garter was appointed to be wore on the left leg a little beneath the knee ; which usage still presides. And the placing it thus on the sepulchral portraitures of knights companions was an early custom : For, on the alabaster monument of Sir William Fitzwarin, who was interred in the north side of the chancel at Wantage in Com. Berks, 35th Edward III. he lies there with his surcoat of arms upon his breast, and the representation of a garter (but without a motto) carved upon his left leg, and the like on several other monuments. Thenceforward the practice became more frequent, and then the motto began to be cut thereon ; in so much that it is now the constant and just practice to do it whensoever the knights companions are exhibited in effigies. The second ensign is the mantle, which is the chief of these vestments which the sovereign and knights companions make use of upon all solemn occasions re- lating to the order. That this pattern was derived to us from the ancient Greeks and Romans, is not at all to be disputed, since it so little varies in fashion from their pallium or toga. This upper robe, called the mantle, which was prepared for the founder against the first feast of this order, appears to be fine woollen cloth. And the first time we discover the mantle to be of velvet, is about the beginning EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 93 of the reign of King Henry VI. which sort of silk hath thence remained unto this day. The colour of these mantles is appouited by the statutes to be blue, and of this colour was the founder's, by which, as by the ground-work of the garter, it is not improbable he alluded to the colour of the field in the French arms, which a few years before he began to quarter with those of England, and of the same co- lour were the velvet mantles in the time of Henry VI. who, though he altered the stuff, did not vary the dye. It is apparent that the blue colour was retained to King Edward IV's. reign; for when tiiis sovereign transmitted the habit and en- signs of the order to Julian de Medicis, the mantle was of blue velvet. And in the reign of Ring Henry Vlll. the mantle sent by that king to our King James V. was of blue velvet, and in the ancient form of admonition and signification ap- pointed to be spoken at the investiture of foreign princes, it is called the mantle of celestial colour. In Q^ieen Elizabeth's reign, upon what ground history is silent, the colour of foreign princes' mantles was changed from blue to purple ; for of that colour was the mantle she sent to the French King, Charles the IX. and to the Emperor and King of Denmark. Thus the purple colour came in request, and continued till about the I2th of King Charles I. restored the colour of the mantle to the primitive institution; and the sovereign and knights to honour the installati- on of the prince, afterwards King Charles II. made the first essay of these mantles, being of rich blue velvet got from Genoa. But on the 14th of January anno 12. Car. II. the mantles and surcoats of the knights companions were to be of sky- colour and crimson velvet ; the only difference of the mantles betwixt the sove- reign, foreign princes, and knights subjects is, that the two first have theirs more full and extensive with a long train, and the last have theirs more scanty. The left shoulder of each of these mantles have, from the institution, been adorned with a large fair garter containing the said motto, Honi soit qui mal y pense. And with- in this garter was the arms of St George, viz. argent a cross gules, first wrought in satin, with gold, silver, and silk, but afterwards it was more richly done on velvet. The garter fi.xed on the mantle of King Charles II. was done with large Oriental pearl. The lining of this robe was white damask, afterwards white satin, but now it is lined with taffeta: For exemplary ornament the mantle had fixed to its collar a pair of long strings anciently woven of blue silk only (called cordons, robe strings or laces) but of later days twisted round, and made of Venice gold, and silk of the colour of the robe, at each end of which hang a great knob or button, wrought over, and raised with a rich caul of gold, and tassels thereunto of like silk and gold : And at the collar was usually fixed an hook and eye of gold for its firmer af- fixing of it to the shoulders. The third ensign of the order is the surcoat, or kirtle; it owes its original to the ?//«?(:« of the Greeks and Romans, which was worn next under the ^(yra; it was called at first roba and tunica. And as the first mantles, so the first surcoats were composed of woollen cloth, and continued so till the reign of King Edward IV. but afterwards became velvet, as they are at this day, though sometimes they were blue, white, and other colours, till the reign of. King Henry VIII. that they were ordained to be of crimson velvet, and do so continue. At the institution of this order, and a long time after, the surcoat was powdered all over with little garters, embroidered with silk and gold plate, in each of which was wrought the motto, Honi soit, &-C.; besides, the buckles and pendant to these small garters were silver gilt; of these garters there were no less than 160 upon the first surcoat and hood made for the founder. But this drapery of their robes became at length quite ob- solete, perhaps when cloth was altered to velvet, and the plain surcoat hath to this day continued in use; when they were of cloth they were lined with bellies of pure minever fur, only the sovereign's was purfled with eniiine. Afterwards the prince, a duke, a marquis, an earl, had each of them five timbre of pure minever allowed to a surcoat; but the viscount, baron, baronet, and bachelor knights, but three timbre a piece. In time these furs were disused, and the surcoat came to be lined with white sarsenet till temp, Eliz. white taffeta succeeded, and that still continues. 'i he hood and cap comes in the next place to be spoken of, which, in the black book of the order, is called qapucium, and in the time of King Richard II. it is called after the French chaperon; they were anciently wore for defence of the head 94 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS, against inclemencies of weather but of later times caps and hats have supplied their place, yet is not the hood quite thrown by, since it is still kept reclining upon the back, almost like a pilgrim's hat. It was heretofore, and now is generally made of the same materials as the surcoat, and was anciently trimmed, and set off with a small proportion of garters, lined with cloth of a different colour, and such as would best strike the sight. But now with taffeta, as is the lining of the surcoat. As to the cap, which was instituted to succeed the hood, it hath been, and yet is, fashioned of black velvet, lined with taffeta; but the figure hath several times varied ; for in King Henry Vlll. his time, it was flat, in Queen Elizabeth's reign it was a little raised in the head, but in King James's time they were much more high crowned. This cap hath been usually adorned with plumes of white feathers, and sprigs, and bound about with a band set thick with diamonds; so was the cap for the installation of King Charles II. and sometimes the brims have been tacked up with a large and costly jewel. To these may be added the cross of the order, encompassed with a garter, which by the sovereign was ordained the 27th of April, ido Car. I. to be worn upon the left side of the cloaks, coats, and riding cassocks, of the sovereigns and knights companions, of the prelate, and chancellor, at all times, when not adorned with their robes. And it was not long after ere the ^lory, or star, as it was usually called, having certain beams of silver, that shot out in form of a cross, was introduced, and annexed to it, in imitation of the French, who after the same manner wore the chief ensign of the Order of the Holy Ghost, being the representation of a dove irradiated with such like beams. There remains now the co/lar and George, brought in by King Henry VIII. This collar was ordained to be of gold thirty ounces Troy weight, but not to ex- ceed it ; howbeit that collar sent to Gustavus Adolphus King of Sweden weighed thirty-four ounces and a quarter, and that of King Charles I. thirty-five ounces and an half, which, after his sufferings, fell into the hands of Thomas Harrison, one of Oliver's major-generals, and was by him delivered to the trustees for sale of the king's goods, and they in 1649 ^^"^ '^ '•^ ^^^ mint, with divers of the regalia, to set the stamp on work for the first gold that the upstart commonwealth coined. It was appointed by King Henry VIII. that this collar should be composed of pieces of gold, in fashion of garters, the ground enamelled blue, and the letters of the motto of gold ; in the midst of each garter two roses placed, the innermost enamelled red, and the outermost white ; contrarily in the next garter, the inner- most white and the outermost red, and so alternately: But of later times these roses are wholly red. And since our King James succeeded to the crown of England, there hath been an intermixture of thistles. The number of these gar- ters were twenty-six, being fastened together with as many knots of gold; nor ought the collar to be adorned or enriched with precious stones, (as the George may be) such being prohibited by the law of the order. At the middle of the collar, before pendent, at the table of one of the garters in. the collar is to be fixed the image of St George armed, sitting on horseback, who, having thrown the dragon on his back, encounters him with a tilting spear. This jewel is not encompassed with a garter or row of diamonds as in the lesser George, but in a round relief. It is allowed to be beautified and set off with diamonds and other enrichments at the pleasure of the knight companion who possessed it, and upon that score it hath been frequently adorned with variety of costly work, whereon the diamonds and other precious stones were set, to that advantage as might, upon its motion and agitation, dart forth a resplendent lustre. We come now to the lesser George of the order, and we do not find that the effigies of St George was at any time worn by the sovereign or knights companions, before the breast, or under the arm, as now used, till the 13th of Henry VIII. But then that king decreed that every knight should wear loosely before his breast the image of St George in a gold chain, or otherwise in a ribbon, the same to be fastened with- in the ennobled garter, as a manifest distinction between the knights companions and others of the nobility and knights, who, according to the mode of these times, wore large gold chains, or collars, the ordinary signs of knighthood, of which after- wards. And thus the wearing the medal or jewel, usually called the lesser George, to distinguish it from the other work at the collar of the order, first received the EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 95 injunction, and hath since been tVequently used. Tliis George was, for the most part, of pure gold, curiously w rouglit, but divers of them were exquisitely graved ill onvxes and agates, and with sucli a happy collection of precious stones, that heightened and received their beauty by the skill of tiie artificer. In contriving the tigures and history, the natural tincture of the stones have fitted them with coUnub fir flesh, hair, and every thing else, even to surprise and admiration. In this jewel is St George represented in a riding postiue encountering tiie dragon with his drawn sword. By the last article of K-ing Henry Vlll.'s statutes it was allowed to be enriched at the pleasure of the possessor, (as in the great George^ which for the most part hath been curioasly enamelled, and tiie garter about it set with diamonds: The weight and bigness of these lesser Georges, being an ounce and an half, and half quarter weight. This jewel was luiiig at a gold chain; after- wards they were worn in silk ribbons as well as gold chains, which were promiscu- ously used, and ad libitum: And so were the symbols of foreign orders, as divert coins and medals declare. The colour of these ribbons when they came first to be wore, was black. And it is reported that Robert Earl of Essex, observing in France the jewels of the Order of St Micliael and St Esprit to be worn in blue ribbons, ordered, upon his return, those ribbons whereat the George hung, to be exchanged into that colour. And in a picture of Qiiecn Elizabeth, drawn towards the declension of her reign, her lesser George is represented hanging before her breast on a blue ribbon. And King James 1. decreed, that for the future tlie said ribbon should be always of blue, and no other colour, nor in time of mourning it- self should it be changed. The manner of wearing this ribbon in time oi peace was pendent about the neck down to the middle of the breast whereat the lesser George hung ; but since, for the more conveniency of riding and action, the same is spread over the left shoulder, and brought under the right arm where the jewel hangs; but where the picture of the sovereign and knights companions are drawn in armour, there, even to this day, the George is represented as fixed to a gold chain instead of a blue ribbon, and not brought under the right arm, as exhibited on the three pound pieces of gold stamped at Oxford by King Charles I. 1643, and on a medal of Charles Count Palatine of the Rhine, dated 1645. '^'^'^ George of King Charles II. was set with fair diamonds, and, after the defeat given to the Scots forces at Worcester, was strangely preserved by Colonel Blague, one of that king's attendants, who resigned it for safety to the wife of Mr Barlow of Blarepipe- house in Staffordshire, where he took sanctuary; from whom Robert Mihvard, Esq. received, and gave it into the hands of Mr Isaac Walton, (all loyalists) and came again to Blague's possession, then prisoner in the Tower; whence making his escape, he restored it to King Charles II. Q^ieen Elizabeth, in the 9th year of her reign, ordained that the knights companions should be bound by oath to take care by their wills, that after their decease all the ornaments which they had received should be restored — the robes to the college, and the jewels to the sovereign that gave them. Thus much as to the original, ensigns, and badges of this noble or- der. And those that are desirous to have a fuller account thereof may have it at full length in Mr Ashmole's Institution of the Garter. I proceed next to speak of the arms and seals peculiar to this order, and when the foresaid symbols and badges came in use and practice in armories as an addi- tional ornament in adorning outwardly the armorial shield of the knights com- panions of this order. The arms of St George is ardent, a cross ^«/f.r. But though it be the constant practice of the French, and other nations abroad, as also with us in North Britain, that the knights of royal orders encompass the shield of their arms with the collar of their orders, yet the Knights of the Garter in South Britain do not make use of the collar of that order in adorning the escutcheon of their arms, but only the garter, that being by them esteemed its principal ensign, and sometimes having no shield of arms, the void space within the garter exhibits their arms. And very observable is the seal of Charles Count Palatine of the Rhine, wherein is a shield, quarterly, of the Palatinate and Bavaria, obscuring the lion gardant its supporter, his four S S's only appearing quadrangularly, and his h'l-ad a-top, ensigned with an electoral crown. The shield is encircled both with- in the garter and collar of that order, and is the first and only example I have met with wherein both these ensigns are jointly together, though it is very fre- VoL. II. 3 F 90 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. quent to express the collars of different orders together. Thus I have seen the arms of Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester entoured within the garter, and a collar of the Order of St Michael, the Garter, being the ancientest order, taking place next the shield, he having been knight of both these orders. And the abridger of Mr Ashmole's History of the Garter, tells us, That the funeral achievement of the late James Duke of Hamilton had the garter, and collar of the thistle about it ; but of the irregularity hereof I shall take notice afterwards when I come to the Order of the Thistle. Although this ensign of the garter was first designed in ornament to the left leg, yet it was not confined so solely thereto, but was anciently used to encircle the escutcheon of St George's arms foresaid, worn by the sovereign and knights com- panions on their mantles; who within a small space afterwards (says Mr Ashmole) used it to surround their own proper coats of arms, which their successors have re- tained as their peculiar privilege, permitting it to none but to their principal officer, the prelate of the order. The first example (says the said author) that occurs is that of Sir Francis Burley, who was beheaded Anno Doin. 1388, where, on his monument reared in the north wall near the choir of St Paul's, London, on the front towards the head, was depicted his own arms impaled with his first wife's, set within a garter, but another having the same impalement (placed below the feet) is surrounded with a collar of S S. of the same form with that about his neck. Also on the monument of Joan, wife of Ralph Neville Earl of Westmoreland, on the south side of the choir in the Cathedral of Lincoln, bare the arms of Neville, im- paled with these of Joan his wife, (who died Anno Bom. 1410) encircled within a garter, and fixed on this lady's monument, daughter of John of Gaunt Duke ot Lancaster. There is a collar of S S. placed about the square, but the paint being faded, was rendered unintelligible. But though these and other antique instan- ces be advanced by this ingenious author to prove the ancient usage of the garter's surrounding armorial shields, yet are they not so convincing documents as to establish me in the behef, that at the times foresaid the garter really was used as an exterior ornament of the shield ; for, being but old pieces of paintings, it is more probable the same has been done on these monuments long after, at least not till after the practice hereof was introduced by King Henry VIII. And besides, the said examples are not good heraldry : For Mr Sandford tells us, that no wife's arms impaled with those of her husband can regularly be surrounded with the gar- ter; as 1 shall take notice of afterwards. King Henry VIII. (according to Mr Sandford, in his Genealogical History of the Kings of England, and other learned authors of that kingdom) was the first king of England that introduced into his Great Seal the escutcheon of his arms encircled within the garter, and ensigned with a crown, as may be seen placed on either side his portraiture sitting on his royal throne. Since him all succeeding sovereigns of this kingdom have borne their arms after that manner, not only in their Great and Privy Seals, but those appertaining to their courts of justice, and generally in all matters where their arms were visible, except coins. In imitation of whom the knights companions have done the like. For Mr Sandford, in his said History, tells us, that, towards the latter end of that king's reign, the knights of that order caused their escutcheons on their stalls at Windsor to be encompassed with the garter, and these that were dukes, marquisses, and earls, had their coro- nets placed on their shields, and hath been so practised ever since. But there were in anno 21. Car. I. certain half-crowns stamped in the west ot England, containing the sovereign's arms, so encompassed, regally crowned and supported, and this was the first money whereon the royal garter appeared. After him King Charles II. having an eye to the advancement of the honour of this order, caused the irradiated cross of St George, encompassed about with the royal garter, to be publicly stamped in the centre of his silver coin, struck upon the recoinage of it. Anno 14. Car. 11. there were other medals heretofore stamped upon several occasions, wherein the garter was designedly expressed, and inclos- ing shields of their arms; as that in the year 1619, when Frederick Prince Pala- tine of the Rhine was crowned King of Bohemia, and Robert Cecil Earl of Salis- bury created Lord Treasurer, both knights companions of this noble order. More- over gold rings have been cast in form of garters ; the ground on the outside ena- 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 9,; uielled with a deep blue, thraugh which the golden letters of the motto appear- ing, set tliem oil with an admirable beauty. And it seems such rings were in vogue, since the preface to the Black Book of the Order makes mention of wear- ing the garter on the leg and shoulder, and sometimes likewise subjoins the thumb, Interdum pollice g est are. It is remarkable, that besides the Sovereign of the Most Noble Order of tlie Gar- ter, other princes of Christendom have assumed the bearing of St George encoun- tering the dragon m like posture foresaid, though not so anciently, nor upon the same grounds and foundation as do the knights of this order, probably having elected him patron and guardian of their comitries and tamilies ; such as the em- perors of Russia, the dukes of Mantua, and the counts Mansfeld in Germany, as their seals and coins plainly demonstrate. On the Great Seal of Boris, Federo- witz. Emperor of Russia, to his letters sent to Queen Elizabeth, dated at Moscow, June 12, i6d2, was a double-headed eagle displayed, having each head crowned, and bearing an escutcheon with the representation of St George upon his breast. There is another of this emperor's seals fixed to his letter, dated May 31st 159+, w'hich he also sent to Qiieen Elizabeth ; on the one side is the above-said eagle, having on his breast a sliield, charged with a horse courant ;. the reverse the figure of St George encountering the dragon with his spear. The Great Seal of Alexis Michaelowitz Emperor of Russia, affixed to his letters sent to King Charles II. 1660, hath a like eagle with a third crown situate between the two heads, and bear- ing in a cartouch-compartment upon his breast the figure of St George: which representation of St George and the dragon we find assigned for arms to Anna de Russie, daughter to Jarislaus King of Russia and Muscovia, given in espousal to Henry I. King of France, and thus blazoned, D'un St Marthe de gueules, a un homme a cheval c^ argent, tenant une lanc£ en la main, qu'il en la gueule d'un dragon renverse. The counts of Mansfeld have frequently stamped it on their coin; on one side is St George encountering the dragon with his sword, with this circum- scription, Sanct. Geo. Co. Do. de Man.; on the reverse his arms circumscribed. Mon. de Arc. Co. Do. de Man. Of these of the Dukes of Mantua we may see one of Vin- centius Duke of Mantua and Montfenat, a Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece, wherein is his effigies to the breast, and round the same, l-^inc. D. C. Dux MANT. III. MONTSERU, on the reverse St George and the dragon ; motto. Pro- tector nostra aspic. 1591. and Casal at the bottom. As to the seal belonging to this noble order, I find by the statutes of King Ed- ward III. they were to have a common seal. And this is confirmed by the statutes of King Henry V. and since named the Great Seal of the Order. The use of this is not only to seal the original statutes appointed to remain perpetually within the treasury of Windsor College, as also those copies of which each knight com- panion is obliged to conserve one, but likewise all letters of licence to any of the knights companions desirous of winning honour abroad, and all mandates and cer- tificates relating to the order. After what order the first seal was composed we have no exact relation. Poly- dore Virgil tells us, that when the founder of the order had fixed choice of St George for his patron, he represented him armed, and mounted on a horse, bear- ing a silver shield, and thereon a red cross ; but whether St George thus designed was on the real seal, or only a scutcheon of his arms, as in latter times, is uncer- tain. But this author observes, that the founder habited his soldiers in white jackets or coats, and on their breasts and backs sewed red crosses, parallel to the arms assigned to St George, as well as to the kingdom of England, put under his patronage; which arms the sovereigns of the order have ever since exhibited in their standards. But besides this common seal, King Henry V. in the ninth year of his reign, instituted a privy signet in case the sovereign should be called out of the kingdom upon weighty affairs. The intent thereof was to affix it to all acts passed by the sovereign beyond sea, to distinguish them from those of his deputies to England. King Henry VlIL's statutes ordain the making both of a common seal and signet, and direct that the arms of the order shall be engraven on each of them. The common seal used in his reign was a garter, within it a shield having the cross of St George impaling the national arms; the said shield encompas- sed With two branches hanging from the regal crown, which debruises part of the 98 EXTERlOx^ ORNAMENTS. garter ; the signet being designed after the same manner, but less. In the time of King James 1. it suffered no alteration, but only in the national arms, by ad- mitting the quarterings of the arms of Scotland and Ireland, and new fashioning the crown, omitting the suspension of the shield. There was a seal made at the beginning of the reign of King Charles I. which being esteemed too little for the grandeur and honour of the sovereign's commissions, it was afterwards decreed in ;i chapter held i8th Aprd, 13th Charles 1. that a new one should be made of a larger size, with the accustomed arms and motto, and the care thereof committed to Sir Thomas Rowe, Chancellor of the Order: Which command he executed with all due care and regard, as is manifestly evident by the nobleness of the design ; one re- presentation being St George in armour, adorned with a waving mantle, his beaver open, his helmet plumed, holding a shield of his arms in his left hand, and striking with a sword in his right ; his body mounted on a bold horse trampling a dra- gon whveh assails the champion ; the whole figure is v.'ell contracted and the sun a rock, the bones of devoured men, and a mountain in lointain. On it is cir- cumscribed. Magnum SigUlinn nobilis ordinis garterii, having the enrichments of festoons between every word placed pentagonally. The other representation is the royal garter imperially crowned, enclosing a shield of the arms of St George, im- paling the sovereign's arms, the same bordered with fret-work and other orna- ments in cartouch. In the same degree directions was given also for a new signet, the former being thought too big for letters. And this was an oval shaped, as ap- pears from its impression, which was the garter crowned, wherein was St George and the sovereign's arms impaled. And these seals were appointed to be thenceforth borne before the sovereign in all public assemblies during the celebration of St George's feast, or in other of its solemnities, by the Chancellor of the Order, in a purse of blue velvet; and comnvand was given to the said Sir Thomas Rowe to pro- vide one accordingly. On the foreside of which purse was richly embroidered (by a goldsmith) with Venice gold and silver, gold and silver purls and plates, and va- riety of Naples silks, the arms of St George impaling the sovereign's, surrounded with a garter crowned, having a very fair ruruiing work or compartment round about it. I proceed next to the officers of this noble order. The founder constituted a Prelate, Register, and Usher, and some of his successors added the Chancellor and Garter, and all of them sworn to be of the council of the order : Among these, the Prelate and Chancellor are usually nominate the principals, the other three the inferior officers of the order. The Prelate is the first and previier officer, call- ed Prelatus ordinis. And William de Edington Bishop of Winchester was the first prelate; and his successors, bishops of Winchester, continue prelates of the order to this day. The privilege of this oificer is, that, in all proceedings and cere- monies of the order, he is on the right hand of the chancellor, and has the privi- lege of marshalling his arms within the ennobled garter ; and accordingly it hath been customary to surround them, impaling his see, and has allotted him conveni- ent apartments in the castle of Windsor. The Chancellor was, by King Edward IV. the i6th year of his reign, named to be Richard Beauchamp, then Bishop of Salisbury; which office continues yet with his successors bishops of Salisbury, in consideration that the chapel of St George was within their diocese ; though this office was for many years after the Reformation by King Edward VI. discontinued, restored again anno i66g. By the said King Edward VI. 's statutes it was or- dained, that the chancellor should wear about his neck a cross of the order, with a red rose in a white, of gold, all compassed within a garland of red and white roses; and afterwards, by Qiieen Mary, they were allowed a golden rose inclosed within a garter, which he and his successors, chancellors of the order, have ever since worn daily about their necks. At first it was pendent in a gold chain, but since in a purple ribbon; and by a warrant of King Charles I. dated at Oxford, i6th De- cember 1645, it was ordained, " That the Chancellor, Sir James Palmer, Knight " and Baronet, and his successors chancellors of the order, should wear about " their necks, at all times, in honour of the said place, a 'medal or jewel of gold " enamelled, with a red rose (or such an one as we, or the rest of the knights of " the order, do, or shall hereafter wear in our collars of the said order) within a " garter of blue enamelled, with this sentence inscribed, Honi soit qui inal y pense. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. ^o " And in the reverse thereof he shall bear the escutcheon of St George, enamelled " within a garter also, in reverence to the order itself, which lie only shall wear " hanging by a light purple ribbon, or in a gold chain, as hath been acc .istomed." The chancellor of the order is seated beneath the prelate, and in all proceedings and sessions goeth and sittcth on his left hand. He hath also an habitation within the castle of Windsor, and the custody of tlic seals of the older belong to him. Next follows the Register of this order ; and who was the tirst we cannot dis- cover : but it may be presumed they were canons of Windsor, because this office was at first assigned to one of that college. Besides, the registers from the reign of King Henry V. to the beginning of King Henry VllL's reign, were all canons of this college, among whom was John Cunningham, (and the first found wa-. called so) as the fragments of a glass inscription in Glare Church near Windsor, where he was rector, attests. The first dean of Windsor constituted register of the order, was John Vesey, anno 8th Henry VIII. ; many of whose successors in this deanry have since been admitted the rather as they were canons tlian deans of Windsor. The fourth officer of the order is Garter : He wa* ordained by King Henry V. with the consent of all the knights companions, who, for the honour of the order, was pleased he should be the principal officer within the College of Arms, and chief of the heralds : The services enjoined him, relating to the order, were, in preceding time, performed by the Windsor Herald of Arms, an officer created with that title by King Edward III. much about the time of his erecting this or- der. Sir William Bruges was the first created Garter, and called in the institu- tion of his office, Jartiere Roy d' amies des Anglois. John Smert, his successor, had this office conferred on him by letters patent, under this title, Rex Arviorum de Garteria ; and John Wryth was stiled Principalis Heraldus W Officiaris inclyti or- dinis Garterii ainwrumq. Rex AngUcorum. But Sir Gilbert Dethick leaving our Heraidiis, joined Principalis Rex, which still continues. And King Henry V. and VIII. declared, that he shall be a gentleman of blood and arms, and a native of England, and that he shall be chief of all the officers of arms dependent upon the crown of England. This officer is appointed to bear a white rod or sceptre at every feast of St George, the sovereign being present, gilded at both ends, and at the top the arms of the order impaling the sovereign's arms pourtrayed on an oblong cube crowned ; but no directions are given in the constitutions either for this crown or for that ducal one on his head wherewith his effigies has been represented, and yet at all great solemnities is never used that we can discover. There was assign- ed him, by Queen Elizabeth, a badge of gold, to be worn daily by him and his successors before the breast in a gold chain or ribbon, and thereon enamelled the sovereign's arms, crowned with an imperial crown, and both surrounded with the garter. But Sir Edward Walker, when made Garter, obtained the sovereign's leave to impale therein St George's arms with those of the sovereign's ; which badge is alike on both sides. He has a house appointed him within Windsor Castle, called Garter's Tower, and has of salary loo lib. per annum. His duty, in general, is to perform, or cause to be effected, all transactions whatsoever the sovereign, prelate, or chancellor, shall enjoin him, in relation to this most noble order. The fifth and last officer is the Black Rod, who was instituted by the founder King Edward III. For the said king, in the 35th year of his reign, conferred on WiUam Whitehorse, Esq. for life, Officium hostiarii capella Regis infra castrum de IVi'idesore, with a fee of i2d. a day out of his exchequer. Anno 3d Henry IV. this office is called Officium virgarii Comitivtv de la Garter infra castrum Regis de Windesore : and in anno ist Henry V. it is stiled Officium virgarii sive ostiarii, &-C. Afterwards it hath the title, Officium virga bajuli coram Rege ad festum Sancti Georgii infra castrum Regis de IVindesore. And ever since it runs in the patents by the appellation of Virgo" B/ijuhis, llrgarius, Nigri-vergifer. But in the constitutions of his office he hath the title of Hostiarius. He is also ordained to be a gentleman of blood and arms, and native within the sovereign's dominions, and if not a knight before, he ought at his admission to be knighted, and, for the honour of the 'ider, the Black Rod is appointed chief Usher of the kingdom, and as he is so, he is called Gentleman-Usher of the Black Rod. In the reign of King Vol. II. 3 G 100 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Ch.irlesl. James Maxwell, Esq. enjoyed this office, and the said king, at a chapter held at Whitehall 5th of November 1629, decreed that the little park of Windsor should be conferred on the said James" Maxwell in right of his o.ffice, and so for ever after be annexed thereto. And in the reign of King Charles 11. John Ayton was Gentleman-Usher of the Black Rod, being both our countrymen. The en- sign and badge of this office at first was ordained, that he or his deputy should carry a black rod (whence he hath his title) before the sovereign or his deputy, at the feast of St George, within the castle of Windsor, and at other solemnities and chapters of the order, on the top of which there ought to be set a lion of England. This rod serves instead of a mace, and has the same authority to apprehend delin- quents, and such as have offended against the statutes of this noble order ; and where he apprehends any one of the order as guilty of some crime, for which he is to be expelled the order, the manner of it is by touching them with this black rod. He has assigned him a golden badge, to be openly worn in a gold chain or ribbon before his breast, composed of one of the knots, in the collar of the order, which tie the roses together, and encompassed with a garter, being alike- on both sides ; which was conferred on him and his successors, by decree in chapter, held the 24th of April, 8th Eliz. He has also a house in Windsor Castle. All those officers have particular mantles and pensions belonging to them, which the curious will find at large in Mr Ashmole's Institution of the Garter. And though they are all strictly obliged to give personal attendance to their offices, yet in case of sickness, absence out of the kingdom, or other emergent reasons, the sove- reign is pleased to dispense with them, and constitute others to officiate in their stead, who, on such occasions, wear the robe and badge of that officer whom they represent, and such deputies are sworn durante deputatione y beneplacito Regis. By the statutes of the order it is provided, that none shall be elected into the order that have not been dignified with the title of Knight. Thus King Charles I. anno 6th regni sui, designing to invest James Marquis of Hamilton with this order, conferred the honour of knighthood upon him immediately before his no- mination : And his father James Marquis of Hamilton, when elected into this noble order by King James I. the 21st year of his reign, the said king, as a dis- tinguishing mark of his favour, conferred the mantle of the order upon him, though a knight-subject, which the sovereign very rarely bestows on any but strangers. And when James Duke of York came to be elected on the 20th April, anno 1 8th Charles I. the sovereign confen-ed knighthood upon him the day before, which he received upon his knees ; and in honour whereof four other nobleman received the honour of knighthood at that time; the Earl of Car- narvon, the Lords George d'Aubigny, John Stewart, and Bernard Stewart, each supported by two knights. And thus Prince Edward, Count Palatine of tiie Rhine, and George Duke of Buckingham, being designed by King Charles II. to be admitted into this noble order, were both first knighted at St Germains in France 1649, and afterwards had the ensigns of the order sent unto them by the hands of Sir Edward Walker, Knight-Garter, who, in right of his office, invested them therewith : But in foreign princes the want of knighthood becomes no impediment. It it is also to be observed, in regard that strangers elected into this order are for the most part sovereign princes, whose affairs oblige them to abide in their own dominions, and very rarely permit them to receive personal installation, therefore they are allowed timely notice of their elections, and conve- nient time of consideration for acceptance, alTording investiture in their own coun- tries, and permitting their installations to be performed at Windsor by their proxies or deputies. In pursuance whereof it became customary for the sovereign, when he sent his letters, to send also, by way of solemn embassy, the habit and ensign of the order, with a book of the statutes ; and in case the election was ac- cepted, investiture might be received before the return of the persons by whom the habit was sent. So our King James V. who was elected 2o;h January, anno 26th Henry VIII. had notice of his election immediately sent him by the Lord WilUam H6ward, who was sent on that embassy. And the last thing to be done in the installation of a knight of this order, is the setting up the helmet, crest, sword, banner, and plate, of the new instalkd knight, over his stall in the Chapel EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. loc uf St George. To describe the manner of installing these knights, with the oatli they take, and the rules prescribed them, being too long ior this place, 1 therefore again refer those who dc^ue it to the said Mr Ashmole's fore-citcd book, where the same may be read at full length. And here 1 cannot omit to relate what the ingenious MrSandford, in his Genea- logical History of the Kings of England, tells us, and gives it for a rule, that no wife's arms, impaled with those of her husband's, can be surrounded with the garter, and so neither with the collar of any other sovereign order ; for the following rea- son. That though a husband may give his wife an equal share of his escutcheon and hereditary honours, bv impaling her arms with his own, yet he cannot place them so impaled within the order of royal knighthood, wlucti is but temporal, and which 1 allow IS very reasonable : But the garter or collar may appear on that side of the escutcheon where the husband's arms are ; and as for the instance given to the contrary, that the arms of Mary Queen of England, and those of her husband's Philip K.ing of Spain, were impaled in one shield, and surrounded with the garter, is of no force, for he was one of that order himself, and she hereditary sovereign and head of the same ; and all sovereign queens have their arms adorned as a king. Whereas I have spoke above of another kind of collar, called a collar of SS's, worn as badges of lower and inferior honour, it will not be amiss to speak a little concerning them. Wicelius informs us, from a book in the library of Fulda, where (in the life of the two brothers Simplicius and Faustinus, both senators, and who suffered martyrdom under Dioclesian) there is a description of the society of St Simplicius, consisting of noble personages in their own families, and describing the collar wore as the badge of it, says thus : " It was the custom of these persons to " wear about their necks silver collars composed of double SS's, which denotes the " name of St Simplicius ; between these double SS's the collar consisted of twelve " small plates of silver, in which were engraven the twelve articles of the Creed, " together with a single trefoil, the image of St Simplicius hung at the collar, and " from it seven plates, representing the seven gifts of the Holy Ghost. As to the " manner of their martyrdom, they were bound together by the neck to a stone, " and thrown over the bridge into the river Tyber." At what time the collar of SS's came into England is not fully determined ; but it will appear at least 3C0 years since, and worn as an ornament for women, as well as men ; for on a monu- ment in the Collegiate Church of Warwick, the figure of Margaret, wife to Sir Wil- liam Peito, (said to be interred temp. Edward 111.) hath a collar of SS's drawn about and set close to her neck ; and the like collar is about the neck of Sir Simon Burley's statute in St. Paul's, London. In the ancient creation of an esquire in England part of the ceremony was the king's putting about his neck a collar of SS's. But that the golden one was the undoubted badge of a knight, as may be instanced by many undeniable examples ; and by King Henry VIII. it was allowed that knights might publicly wear a gold collar of SS's, though since it is grown obsolete and useless. And Eavin tells us, that King Henry the V. of England instituted an order surnamed Knights of the SS's, on the day of the martyrs St Crispin and Crispianus ; for though the English historians mention nothing hereof, yet from the Chronicle of Juvenal des Ursins, wh?re he treats of the battle of Agencourt, the King of England exhorted his men to be at peace and reconciled with one another, to be civil in their march, and do their duty well ; and agreed, that those of their company who were not of gentle extraction he would make so from the fountain of honour, and give them warrants, thnt for the future they should enjoy the privileges the gentlemen of England had; and to the end they alight be distinguished from others, he granted them leave to wear a collar powdered with the letter S. And to estublish this, and show that the said collar was in much esteem in England, the kings of England since have sometimes been pictured with a collar of SS's about their arms, in like manner as the garter doth now surround them, as appears from an impression of King Henry VIII. his privy signet ; whereon his royal arms crowned are encircled with a collar of SS's, to the lower end of which are affixed two portcullisses. And our King James III. is pictured with a gold chain about his neck, which I judge should be 101 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. rather a collar of SS's, to the lower end of which hang pendent on his breast the image of St Andrew, embracing his cross with l^oth his arras. Among the variety of collars of SS's now in vogue, there are these following: The Lord Mayor of London's collar is composed of gold, having a knot (like one pf those that tie the garters together in the great collar of the order) inserted be- tween two SS's, and they again situated between two roses, viz. a white rose with- in a red, and in the middle before the breast a large portcullis, whereat hangs a most rich jewel set v»'ith large diamonds. The collars of the Lords Chief Justices of both the Benches, and of the Chief Baron of the Exchequer, are (in memory of the said St Simplicius, a senator, and consequently a gown-man) formed of the letter S, and a knot alternately, having u rose set in that part of it which falls out to be in the middle of their breasts, and another on their backs ; the five flowers of those roses are constituted of five large pearls. Those collars which appertain to the kings and heralds of arms, as well as to Serjeants of arms, having been bestowed by former kings, and renewed to them by King Charles IL to be worn upon days of solemn attendance, are composed of SS's linked together ; in the middle of the breast is a rose, at each of which hangs three small drops of silver ; but the SS's in the collars worn by the Kings of Anns are made somewhat larger than the other, and in that part lying on either shoulder is a portcullis taken in between the SS's, which are wanting in the other. The general difference of the collars appropriate to the before-named degrees is this ; knights have allov/ed them collars gilt, but esquires only silver; and there- fore in the creating of a herald, in part of that ceremony, he is made an esquire, by putting on him a collar of SS's of silver, and so is a Serjeant at arms. I think, and humbly give it as my opinion, that those gentlemen, while in pos- session of these offices, may adorn exteriorly their armorial shields with the fore- said collars, as the symbols and badges of their said offices ; by which after gene- rations may know that they enjoyed such preferments, and that in imitation of the knights companions of royal orders ; who, soon after the sovereigns of these or- ders had introduced the practice of surrounding the escutcheons of their arms with the collars of their different orders, did the like as to their arms : And as collars worn about the neck distinguish to the present generation the high rank or station of the person wearing it, so the placing them round the armorial shield becomes a cognosce to future generations, to certify them, that their predecessors enjoyed such high honour, place or post. And it is certainly the main design of heraldry, by figures and symbols, to convey to after generations distinguishing marks of per- sons and families, and to demonstrate to posterity the several degrees of honour, posts, and places deserving persons have enjoyed, and were advanced to by sove- reign princes. The next degree of knighthood in South Britain is the Knights of the Bath, so called from the solemn manner of bathing, and other sacred ceremonies used at their creation. They are commonly made at the coronation of a king or queen, or at the creation of a Prince of Wales, or a duke of the blood royal ; some allege they are of no less antiquity than the times of the Saxons. And though mention he made by W. of Malmesbury of King Alfred making his grandson Athelstane a knight, he instances no more than the purple robe, with the sword and rich belt ; yet it is apparent that when GeoflVey of Anjou, in order to his marriage with Maude the Empress, only daughter to King Henry the First of England, was made a knight at Rome, by the same King Henry on Whitsunday anno 1227. It is said by John the monk of Marmonstier, that he with 25 esquires then attending him, were bathed according to the ancient custom. But Froissart says, this order was first erected, anno 1399, by King Henry IV. of England, who, to add to the lustre of his coronation, created 46 Knights of the Bath ; and Mr Selden thinks them more ancient. But that great antiquary Elias Ashmole is of opinion, that the said king did not constitute, but rather restore the ancient manner of making knights, and judges them to be really no other than knights-batchelors; that is, such as are created with those ceremonies wherewith knights-batchelors were formerly created by ecclesiastics. At first view they look like a distinct order of knighthood, but 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 103 cannot be so accounted, because they have no statutes asiigncJ, nor arc in case ot" vacancy supphed, (the essentials of distinct orders) nor do they wear their robes beyond the time of that occasion upon whicli they were created, as chiefly the coronation of a king or queen, prince, Duke of Yoik, or the like; and besides their number is uncertain, and always at the pleasure of the king. I'avin calls theni knights of the crown, to distinguish tliem from esquires, because they wore upon their left shoulder an escutcheon of black silk eml)roidercd with three crown& of gold ; but herein he mistakes, for they never used but only a white silk lace, and the jewel they wore was made of gold, containing three crowns, with this motto, Triajuncta in uno, hanging down under the left arm at a red or carnation ribbon worn cross the body. Benjamin Smithurst in liis Britain's Glory, p. 33,. calls them Knights of the Holy Trinity, from the medal which they wear, which is three crowns, with an inscription about it which was formerly Tria nianina Jiiiuta in una : But at our K.ing James VI. his coronation in England, the word numina was left out, and so it alluded to the three kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland, which were then joined in one. They are created with much noble ceremony, and have had princes and the prime of the nobility of their fellowship. The par- ticular manner of their creation is mentioned by many authors, but most exactly described and illustrate with figures of all the ceremonies by the learned William Dugdale, Esq. Norroy King at Arms, in his description of Warwickshire; to which laborious piece I refer the curious reader. Tliese knights are in use to wear the foresaid badge for adorning of their armorial shields. And Sylvanus Morgan, in his Sphere of Gentry, lib. i. page 82. has given us a figure of the practice hereof in the arms of Sir Hugh Ducie, Knight of the Bath, at the coronation of King Charles II. who hath the escutcheon of his arms there trimmed with the said ribbon at the back thereof, tied together with a run- ning knot at the top of the shield, and hanging down, extended so oval-ways, as the same appears to surround not the top, but only the sides and feet of the shield ; and to which ribbon, at the bottom is affixed pendent the said medal oval- ways, whereon is a brunch slipped with three crowns, issuing tlierelVom, one at the top and two below, and round the same the foresaid words, Jriu juncta in lino. This- leads me to the degree of Baronets in South Britain, who seem allied to knighthood, by having granted them the addition of Sir before their names : But this gives them not the dignity of knighthood ; nor can they properly be stiled knights, until they be actually knighted : It is a modern degree of honour, and next to barons, whence the name is also derived, being hereditary in the male line; it was instituted by King James I. on the zzd day of May 161 1, and the 9th year of his reign over Great Britain. The manner of creation is by a patent under the Great Seal, the form of them being all the same, vix. to a man and the heirs-male of his body lawfully begotten, for ever ; though sometimes the honour is other- ways entailed for want of issue-male. The proem, or argument of the said patent, being for the propagating a plantation in the province of Ulster in Ireland, for which purpose they were ordained; that is, each of them to maintain thirty sol- diers in Ireland for three years, after the rate of eightpence Sterling per diem, to each soldier ; which whole sum was paid into the Exchequer at once, upon pas- sing the patents under the Great Seal of England. They have precedency before all knights, except those of the garter, bannerets, and privy counsellors, and next to, and immediately after, the younger sons of viscounts and barons. And as the addition of Sir is attributed to them, so the title of Lady is to their wives ; and they take place among themselves according to the priority of the dates of their patents; no honour is to be created between barons and baronets. At the first institution of them King James engaged that they should not exceed two hundred in number; and when the said number was completed, and any came to be extinct for want of heirs-male, there should be never any more created in their room : However, a commission was afterwards ordered to fill up the vacant places with instructions to treat with others that desired to be admitted to the same degree, which is now ob- served without any limitation ; with this provision, that they be of good reputa- tion, and descended of a grandfather, at least, by the father's side that bore arms, and have also a yearly revenue of L. looo per annum. The ground for erecting Vol. U. 3 H I04 EXTERIOP. ORNAZvlENTS. this degree was partly martial ; for though themselves were not enjoined personal service in the wars, yet, as foresaid, each baronet was to maintain thirty foot sol diers for three years in Ireland, after the rate of eightpence a-day, for the defence of that kingdom, and chiefly to secure the plantation of Ulster. And, anno idiz. King James added some new privileges and ornaments to them, viz. to knight those already made that were no knights, and the heirs hereafter of every baronet should, at the age of one and twenty years, receive knighthood ; also in the king's army royal they are to have a place near the king's standard, and they are allowed some particular solemnities at their funeral; likewise, that all baronets might bear in a canton or in an escutcheon, which theyplease, the arms of Ulster, viz. in a held argent, a sinister hand couped at the wrist, gules. Since the creation of baronets in England, there have been several made after the same manner in Ireland. There was an intention, anno 1627, to move his then majesty, that all baronets and knights-bachelors might wear ribbons of several colours, with some badge or jewel, in such sort as did the Knights of the Bath, to distinguish the one from the other : But that matter dropt. Yet though the same did not succeed in England and Ireland, it was allowed to the knights baronets in Scotland, as shall be proven afterwards. 1 come next to treat on the orders of knighthood in my own nation of North Britain. Our high and sovereign order of knighthood is the most ancient and most noble Order of the Thistle, commonly called the Order of St Andrew, and so called from the pendant of the order having on a blue roundle the image of St Andrew. It was the custom and policy of puissant princes in all ages to invite and secure to themselves persons of renown ; and such heroic spirits were encouraged with marks of honour to distinguish them from the vulgar, and amongst those persons, the more eminent, or excellent of merit were placed in a superior orb, that their glory might be the more splendid to the world ; such were King David's mighty men, the Satrapae of Persia, the orders military among the Romans, and the many institutions of knighthood in Christendom ; but of all orders, purely military, now extant, I must prefer this of St Andrew ; not only because it is of our own nation, or that none are commonly admitted into this order but peers, but chiefly for the antiquity of it, which gives it a place and precedency to all other orders now in being. As to the original of this most ancient and noble order, John Lesly, Bishop of Ross, in his History of Scotland, tells us, it took its beginning from a bright cross in Heaven, in fashion of that, whereon St Andrew the Apostle suftered martyrdom, which appeared to Achaius King of Scots, and Hungus King of the Picts, the night before the battle was fought betwixt them and Atheltsane King of England, as they were on their knees at prayer; when St Andrew, their tutelary saint or pa- tron, is said also to have appeared, and promised to these kings that they should always be victorious when that sign appeared, and the next day these kings pre- vailing over King Athelstan in battle, they went in solemn procession, barefooted, in a devout way to the kirk of St Andrew, to return thanks to God and his apos- tle for their victory, promising and vowing that they and their posterity would ever bear the figure of that cross in their ensigns and banners ; the place w'here this battle was fought retains to this day the name of Athelstan's Ford in East Lothian. But the Picts being afterwards extinguished by the valour of the Scots, they assumed the said badge. Now as to the order of the thistle, Andrew Eavin, in his Theatre of Honour and Knighthood, tells us, it was erected by the said Achaius King of Scotland, who began to reign in the year of Christ 787, on account of the famous league, offensive and defensive made between Achaius and Charlemagne King of France. But there are some, says the same author, that re- fer the Institution of this Order of the Thistle to the reign of Charles VII. King of France, when the amity was renewed between both kingdoms. And lastly, others yet later place its foundation anno 1500, which too last assertions, if true, would indeed give precedency to the Garter, the royal order of England, before that of ours of tne Thistle, seeing all judicious heralds abroad, and the learned English themselves are of opinion, that the ancientest order of knighthood takes place next the escutcheon, even though other later institutions should after become more ho- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. icr, iiourablc ; and this method has always been practised hy all civilized nations that esteem regular trimming of armorial shields; as witness the Ujagi; ni France, from whom we of Britain had the science of heraldry, and where constantly the order of St Michael, as being the eldest, takes place next the shield, wiien that of the Holy Giiost, though more honourable, yet being of a later date, doth both sur- round the same, as I observed betore. And this 1 judge has been the only reason why our brethren of South Britain hath hitherto denied our said royal order its due place next the shield in their trimmings of the sovereign's arms, or tlie arms of knights companions ot both the royal orders of Great Britain, as adjudging our or- der to be of no older standing than the reign of the said King Charles Vll. King of France, or of our o\\ n King James V. of Scotland ; whicii, if true, would in- deed make the Most Noble Order of the Garter to be of a much older date tiian ours, and so regularly and justly to claim precedency. But that the same is en- tirely false, and our order long prior to that, 1 am hopcfid to make evident by what follows. Albeit most of all our historians agree, that the St Andrew's cross, in form of a saltier argent, on a field azure, was equally used by Huiigus King of the Picts, and Achaius King of the Scots, in remembrance of the above notable victory ob- tained by tliem against Athelstan King of the Saxons, as Menenius likewise ob- serves in his Delitine ordinum equestriinn, page 1646. Yet Modius, in his fandects, (to which Andrew Favin assents) ascribes the full foundation of this order of knighthood to Achaius. Menenius describes the collar thereof thus, " Cujus insigne " seu collare ex carduis confectum preferunt gentilitia reguin arraa cuuque, hoc " addito elogio. Nemo me impune lacesset ;" and a little after, " F"uit autem " huic militiae baltheus aureus ex floribus cardui orbicellis aureis, seu nodisrubes " centibus innexi compositus & infra pfeferens imaginem Sancti Adrete Martyrii ." crucem decussatam ante se gestantis." Camerarius, in his Symbols, is of the opinion that the motto belonging to the collar was the same, which he proves by his having seen some of the deeds of King Achaius amongst the records of France. Some think that devices are as ancient as Antisthenes, who gave Cephisolode, for his device, incense burning, with the words »ux>.»^i>®- tuffns, that is to say, I please whilst I consume. But others think that devices were no older than Paulus Jovius; and yet Petra Sancta, lib. 9. Symbol. Heroic, asserts that the thistle taken by Achaius King of Scots, when he made his alliance with Charlemagne, with the words, Nemo me impune lacesset, is the ancientest device now upon record, and all praise it as very regular and pretty. But Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heral- dry, page 98. says, some think it ought to be lacessit, because the present time shows best the nature of the thing, yet lacesset has more of daring and gallan- try. In a manuscript under the hand of Sir James Balfour, sometime Lyon King of Arms, it is there said, that the motto or elogium of this order in all seals, im- presses and inscriptions, and by all authors, holds to be. Nemo me impune lacessit, and that, albeit, Paulus Jovius wrote, that Franciscus Sforza, Duke of iVIilan, took for his device a greyhound, with this motto, ^lietum nemo impune lacessit, yet Ru- celli the Italian, and Baghliour maintain, that Achaius king of Scotland was the deviser of this motto. And Paradine says expressly, that Sforza borrowed this only from the ancient and noble kings of Scotland. And as this eminent Prince King Achaius was one of the number of many others who befriended the said Charles the Great of France, in his conquests, for which they and their successors carried in their ensigns the marks of that great monarch's favour, viz. the double tressure in the armorial ensigns of Scotland, to perpetuate that memorable league begun by Achaius with Charles the Great, and that order of knighthood called the Crown Royal, which continued for many ages with the Frieslanders, also allies with Charle- magne, who ordained for the state of Friesland that the governor thereof should make knights, by the solemnities of girding with the sword, and striking the per- sons so created on the ear, that they should wear on their breasts an imperial crown as a badge of that order, as Favin relates. And Selden, in his Titles of Ho- nour, says the like, and Hancouius De rebus Fris. gives the institution of the order, dated at Rome in the year Yoz. About which time, and ii imitation thereof, our King Achaius is said to have instituted this Royal Order of the Thistle. io6 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Another instance of the antiquity of this noble order as prior to that of the garter, is, that the said Sir James Balfour had himself found among the rubbish of the ruined abbey of the monastery of Scoon (once the theatre ot our ancient kings' inaugurations) a record of the coronation of King Alexander III. written, as would appear, by the hand of Robert, then abbot of that place, bearing, that in anno 1249, the said king, a child about the age of nine years, being about to be crowned on Tuesday the 7th of May in the aforesaid year, and coming to the great church, (the place appointed for the coronation) a great contest arose amongst the nobility and clergy there. The Bishop of Dumblane, Chancellor of Scotland, and John Cuming Great Constable, maintained, that the king could not be crowned that day, in respect that he was not then made knight of the thistle, and there- fore could not be head or principle of the said order. And, to avoid further trouble, willed them all that the king's coronation should be delayed till Friday thereafter. And. on the morrow after, (says the said record) they brought the king to the Great Hall of Scoon, where they put on him oblongam togam ex viridi holo serico carditis aureis ornatum, on the left shoulder of which (continues the record) in campo ceruleo imago divi Andrea cum criice sua argentea depingebatur, which is all I can find anent the ancient usage of robes peculiar to the knights of this order, our records being either destroyed or carried off through the many disorders that happened in the kingdom. And our histories and annals have made no mention of them. At this time the Chancellor did knight the said king, the Great Con- stable girt the sword on his left side, the High Marischal put on his spurs, and William Fraser, Bishop of St Andrews, administered the oath of the order to him. And the usual oath administered to these knights, according to Licetus, a French- man, in his book De Ceremoniis, page 74. was, imo, I shall fortify and defend the Christian religion, and Christ's most holy evangel to the utmost of my power. 2rfo, I shall be loyal and true to my Sovereign Lord the King, and the brethren of this order. 3.ble Order of the Thistle has never wholly been disused or laid aside by our after succeeding kings since the days of the said King Robert the Bruce, except when the many rebellions and disturbances in the nation might occasion the same to be neglected for some time; which in some measure I shall make apf>ear, so far as I have seen, from charters, coins, seals, and other authentic documents, though not so fully as I could wish, thereby to en- gage others of my countrymen, that have more time and occasion to see and peruse unquestionable documents on this head, that thev would be pleased to Vol. II. 3 I i:o8 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. oblige the world with what they have collected thereanent, not only for the ho- nour of our nation m general, but that ot this order in particular. Now as King Robert 1. had a special regard for the honour and flourishing of this noble order, and received only the noblest and gallantest of his subjects knights companions thereof, as may appear from such of their names as I had occasion to narrate above, and whose names are all famous in the history of that King's Life, for their renowned acts of chivalry and gallantry, so I find King Robert 11. has not been forgetful of tiie same; for in a gold coin of his, also to be seen among the fuiecited Mr Sutherland's Collection of Real Coins, kept in a box in the said Advocates' Library, there is on one side the figure of St Andrew expanded on the cross of his martyrdom, and on the reverse the arms of the kingdom; and no doubt but in this king's reign there have been created new knights companions of this royal order, in room of old ones deceased, though the iniquity of the times has deprived us of sutlicient lecords to instruct the same. Yet 1 find King Robert IlL hath had his knights companions of this order, among whom I meet with Archi- bald, fourth Earl of Douglas, and first Duke of Touraine, Lord Longueville and Marshal of France, called Tynman, not for his cowardice, being abundantly gallant and brave, but tor his unfortunate success in battle, being killed at the unfortunate battle of Verneuil in France, anno 14:4, and interred in the church of St Gratians at Tours, the 20th of August this year, according to Sir James Balfour in his Peerage of Scotland. But Andrew Fa\ in, in his Theatre of Honour, describing the arms of this Archibald Earl of Douglas, whom he says was interred in St Ger- mains de Preze at Paris, calls him Knight of the Most Noble Order of the Thistle. Again 1 find King James II. retained high regard for this noble order; for on the seal of Mary, daughter of Arnold Duke of Guelderland, queen to this king, ap- pended to several writs and evidents, particularly to a charter in the lower Parlia- ment House, granted by her to Archibald Abbot of Holyroodhouse, of an annual- rent of twenty shillings, payable out ot the barony of Balernock in excambion of two acres of land in the territory of Broughton, belonging to the said abbot and convent, of the date the i6th April anno 1459, ^^ ^^'" ^^^^ a-rms impaled with those of Scotland, and placed in the arms of an angel, whose head and breast is above the shield and crown, and above the head is a cross, and on the breast below is placed a saltier or St Andrew's cross. And King James IIL as he commonly wore about his neck, pendent at a gold chain on his brreast, the badge of this order, as may be seen on all old paintings of his effigies, so he had his knights companions of this order, among whom Sir James Balfour, in his said Peerage gives us the instance of one, viz. William Sinclair Earl of Orkney, and to prove which, he tells us, he had seen an old charter, about the time of this king's reign, of the lands of Roslin in Lothianshire, given by this Earl William to his second son Oliver Sinclair, wherein he stiles himself " Willielmus de Sancto Claro Dux de Oldenburgh, Comes Or- " cadiae & Cathaniensise, Dominus de Zitland, Newburgh, Sinclair, Dysert, Rosslin, " Mussilburgh, &-c. limitum onentalium St occidentalium Scotire prefectus, Baro " de Ecford &- Cavertoun, Magnus Camerarius & Admiralus Scotias, &- nobilissi- " morum Cardui, St Michaelis, &■ Aurei Velleris eques." Neither is it to be doubt- ed but this king's grandfather, King James L after his releajement from captivity in England, being bred at that court from his infancy, and a very polite and learn- ed prince, took occasion after his restoration to introduce many of the deservedly commendable practices and customs of the Enghsh nation. And as their Order of the Garter was m high repute at that time, so it is presumable to think he also, in imitation thereof, did his utmost to raise the reputation of his own Order of Knighthood the Thistle. But however that may be, I shall not determine, having as yet found no document to instruct the same ; but I find, and have seen, that in all paintings and sculptures of the efligies of said King James 111. and IV. to show that these kings were not forgetful to honour and esteem this his sovereign order of knighthood, that of King James 111. is commonly drawn with a large gold chain about his neck, (in the same manner as collars of royal orders of knighthood are now usually worn) to which hang pendent on his breast the image of St Andrew embracing his saltier cross on his breast with both his arms. And that of King James IV. is represented holding in his hand a thistle of the like figure, as the EXTERIOR ORN/UVIENTS. ro(> same is commonly struck on our copper coin, only it is not ensigned with a crown as on the snid coin. And Balen, in his Maison de Montmorency^ lib. 2. page 3. affirms, that when King James V. went to France, anno 1535, to marry Magdalen, daughter to Fran- cis 1. King of France, among the tokens ot his love, during his abode there, he be- stowed the Order of the Bur, (as he called it) that is to say tiie Tiiistlc, not only on the French king, who did requite hun witii his Order of St Michael, but also on the CoLint de Montmorency, whom he dearly loved. And no sooner was the badge of the garter by King Henry Vlll. of England introduced to surround his armorial shield, (being tlie first King of England thiit had his arms so trimmed, as may be seen on his Great Seal in l^lr Saiidtord's Genealogical History) but our said King James V. surrounded his royal escutcheon of arms with his collar of the thistle, which I have seen having tiie pendant at it, being the image of St Andrew, hold- ing before him his saltier cross; and sometimes 1 have observed the pendant to the cjllar to be only a blue oval, cliarged with a saltier or St Andrew's cross argent. And the reason why the cross is, white in a blue field is because the cross appeared as a flash of lightning in the blue firmament. And this cross is a badge derived to us from the Picts, as 1 have observed before; but now the ordinary pendant of the collar of the thistle (which is composed of thistles, interwoven and linked with sprigs of leaves of rue, all of gold) is on a blue roundel, or oval, the image of St Andrew, his vesture of cloth of gold, with the white cross of his martyrdom on his breast, and in a circle environing the figure beautified with pearls, this epigraph written. Nemo me Impune lacesset. But the ordinary and common sign worn by the knights of this ancient and noble order is a green ribbon, whereat hung a thistle of gold, crowned with an imperial crown, within a circle also of gold bear- ing the foresaid motto. And besides, the etfigies of the said King James V. is always drawn with the said collar about his neck, with the pendant thereat hang- ing on his breast. Bishop Lesley, in his History of Scotland, lib. 9. page 193. writeth that James V. King of Scotland, in anno 1534. received the Order of the Golden Fleece from Charles V. Emperor, as also that of St Michael from Francis I. King of France, anno 1535, and that of the Blue Garter, anno 1536, from Henry VIII. King of England ; and 111 memory of these orders received, keeping open court, he solemnized the several feasts of St Andrew patron of the Golden Fleece, of St Michael of France, and of St George of England, that the several princes might know how much he honoured their orders, and held them in no mean account. And upon the same subject, he set the arms of the princes (circled with their or- ders) over the gate of his palace at Linlithgow, with the Order of St Andrew, the particular order of the monarchs of Scotland. This author's own words are, " Cujus rei ut luculentius signum toti posteritati eluceret, insignia regia in porta " Lithcoensis palatii Agenda, singulaque ordinum singulorum, simul ac divi An- " dreae ornamenta (quit sunt nostr;^ gentis propria) exquisita artifice laude cir- " cumplicanda curavit." The author of a Journey Through Scotland, printed at London in octavo 1729, tells us, page 197 That it was in the palace of Linlithgow that King James V. in imitation of the Kings of England and France, called a chapter of the worthiest amongst his nobility, and added a collar of thyme and rue to his Order of St Andrew, ordaining the thistle to be worn on their mantles, in the centre of the cross; and changed the motto from En defence, to Nemo me im- pune lacessit. But here I take occasion to correct this as a mistake of our author, for In defence was never (by what 1 ever could discover) the motto of this order, but continues to this day the epigraph peculiar to the royal crest of this kingdom; whereas the device or ditton of Nemo me, S*-c. I have shown above to be of old the motto belonging to this Order of the Thistle. The said author of a Journey Through Scotland continues to inform us. That the said king also ordered a throne ■ and twelve stalls to be erected in St Michael's church in this town of Linlithgow, for the sovereign and twelve knights of this order, where their banners were to be hung up, as in France and England : But that king's sudden death, after the battle of Solway, anno 1541 and the troubles that followed after (at the time of the re- formation, it was laid aside, being by the reformers looked on as popery) which put an end to t^is king's noble vie.vs, and indeed almost to the order itself, till King James VII. revived it in a blue ribbon, and Queen Anne restored it to the no EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. green, as I shall afterwards take notice of; but as yet the knights (says the said: author) have no chapel or hall for their banners. And 1 am informed, by knowing persons, that the arms of the said King James V. on his said palace of Linlithgow (being never there myself) is placed within the collars of the orders of St Andrew, the Garter, and St Michael, every collar taking place nearest the shield according to the antiquity of its standing, which is perfectly agreeable to the regular rules of heraldry at this day. And Mi Ashmole, in his Institution of the Garter, cap. 7. tells us, it was a great mistake committed in the marshalling these collars following, when the Duke of Chevereux affixed it over his stall at Windsor, the collars of St Michael and the Holy Ghost are placed nearer to his escutcheon than that of the Garter ; which was certainly wrong, seeing it is demonstratively evident that of the garter is much older than the other two ; and agreeable hereto, I say, it was as gross a mistake of the English painters, who, (as narrates the continuator of Mr Ashmole's History of the Garter, page 177.) on the funeral achievement of the late James Duke of Hamilton, placed first the garter next his shield, and without that a collar of the thistle about it, his Grace having been a knight companion of both these high orders, an honour very rarely granted to any subject. Now our order, by what 1 have before related, being proven by far the oldest in time, certaiuly it was very irregular to place the later Order of the Garter within, when our Order of the Thistle, being of greater antiquity, is, contrary to the rules of heraldry, placed without, surrounding the same. But 1 am hopeful the Earl Marshal and College of Heralds of South Bri- tain, as 1 doubt not but in all their armorial decisions they make it their chief care to do every thing relating to arms agreeable to the regular and just rules of he- raldrv, and conformable to the opinions of the best and learnedest heralds and professors of this science at home and abroad, so 1 do not question but they will hereafter do us (their brethren of North Britain) exact justice in allowing our most ancient and noble Order of the Thistle to possess its due place next our sovereign's royal shield, or next the escutcheons of such knights companions as shall hereafter be honoured with both these high sovereign orders of knight- hood. As our said King James V. was the first of our kings that surrounded his royal arms with the collar of the thistle, so, in imitation of him, his knights com- panions of this noble order surrounded their armorial shields with the same collar, (as these of the garter had done in England, after the example of their King Henry VIII.) An instance whereof 1 have seen in the arms of George Lord Seaton, vfho lived in this king's reign, and was created by him a knight com- panion of this noble order, whose achievement, as carved on the lining of the great, liall of Seaton house, yet to be seen, is surrounded with the collar of this order, and thereat hangs in a roundel the image of St Andrew with his cross on his breast, which I, in the year 1715, showed to my Lord Ilay, together with other curiosities in this ancient house, with which his Lordship was very well satisfied, and carried himself very civil to the house of Seaton. Now though the subjects of this kingdom, after the reformation, became so zealous in their rehgion that they disregarded this high and honourable order of knighthood, so as to have no better notions of it but that it was a dreg of popery, on which head our after sovereigns, to avoid disturbances in the nation, thought it not convenient to call a chapter thereof; yet to demonstrate their regard for the lionouv thereof, and that the memory of the same might not quite perish, they always, by propaling the symbols hereof in their arms and coins, kept up the remembrance of this royal order of knighthood, till the nation began to enter- tain better thoughts of honour, valour, and knighthood, and then King James VII. did not fail to call a chapter of this noble order, as did after him Queen Anne, as I shall hereafter narrate in its due place. Thus the seal of Mary Queen of Scotland, wife to King Francis II. hath there- on the arms of Scotland impaled with those of France, and surrounded with the collar of the Royal Order of the Thistle, with the pendant of the image of St Andrew with his cross on his breast thereat, and about the same this legend, Maria Dei Gratia Francorum IS Scotorum Regina, anno 1560 ; she had also on many of her coins this order's badge of the St Andrew's cross. And the escutcheon of I EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. iii King James VI of Scotland, and I. of England, is surrounded, tirst with the collar of the order of St Andrew, as the ancientest order, and then with that of the garter. And likewise, as to King Charles 1. the collars both of the thistle and garter were expressed in the coronation-medal he caused strike when he was crowned in Scotland anno 1633. And the royal achievement of King Charles II. is also surrounded witli the Orders of St Andrew and of the Garter ; a fair tigure whereof the curious may behold in Sir George. TVIackenzie's Science of Heraldry, in the Edinburgh edition, 1680, yu/. 99. As for King James Vll. I shall here narrate a warrant by him for a patent re- viving and restoring the Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. James Rdx, •" Our Sovereign Lord ordains a Letter Patent to be made and past under the Great Seal of his ancient kingdom of Scotland, making mention, that whereas his Majesty's royal predecessor Achaius King of Scots (of glorious memory) did institute the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, consisting of the Sovereign, and twelve Knights-Brethren, in allusion to our blessed Savi- our and his twelve Apostles, and that under the protection of our blessed Lady and his holy apostle St Andrew, patron of Scotland, the said order being insti- tuted for the defence of the Christian religion, and in commemoration of a signal victory obtained by the said Achaius King of Scots, over Athelstan King of the Saxons, after a bloody battle, in the time of which there appeared in the heavens a white cross in form of that upon which the apostle St Andrew suf- fered martyrdom ; by which apparition the Scots being encouraged, put their enemies to flight, killing the said Athelstan, with most of his followers. And it being most certain, by the general consent of ancient and modern historians, and by several other authentic proofs and documents, and records of that king- dom, that the said Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle conti- tinued in great glory and splendour for many hundreds of years ; and that seve- ral foreign princes and kings have been knights of the said order, and that the same was always had in great respect and honour in all places wherever Christian valour advanced the glory of the cross, until the unfortunate rebellion against his Majesty's royal great-grandmother Mary Queen of Scots, (of most pious and glorious memory) at which time the splendour both of church and monarchy fell together into contempt, and the Most Noble Order, with all its ornaments, and rites, and ceremonies, was extinguished, some of the brethren of that order lay- ing the ensigns thereof aside, and out of a rebellious contempt to their then sovereign lady, his Majesty's said royal great-grandmother, and others of them forced to fly into foreign countries for safety of their lives ; and w hereas the succeeding great disorders and dismal rebellions, in the reigns of his Majesty's royal predecessors since that time, hath hindered and diverted them from restor- ing the said order to its former ancient lustre, his Majesty has now thought fit, ' as a mark of royal favour and esteem of that his ancient kingdom, and of the ' desire he hath to restore it to its former splendour and reputation, considering ■ the many and seasonable instances of duty and affection it has shown to his ■ royal person, both since his accession to the crown, and in times of his greatest ■ difficulties, hath, as a lasting mark of his royal favour, and in remembrance of • the nation's duty and affection unto him to all succeeding ages, thought fit at • this time to revive the said order, of which his Majesty is undoubted and right- ' ful sovereign ; and doth hereby revive and restore the same to its full glory, ' lustre, and magnificency, as it heretofore was, with such change and additions ' as are already made, or shall hereafter be declared by his Majesty ; hereby ' giving it to twelve knights, of which (with his Majesty as sovereign) the order ' above named is to consist in all time coming, all honours, dignities, titles, pnvi- ' leges, additions, and others, which either have in time past belonged to the ' Most Noble Order of the Thistle, or which his Majesty shall declare to belong ' thereunto in time coming, as an evident proof that no dutiful or faithful service ' done by his people shall be past over without suitable return of bounty, honour. Vol. II. 3 K [o EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. and favour from him. And his Majesty ordains the said letter patent to be past under the Great Seal aforesaid, per salttim, without passing any other register or seal ; m order whereunto these presents shall be to the Director of his Majesty's Chancellary, and their deputes for writing of the same, and to the Lord High Chancellor, for causing the Great Seal to be appended thereunto, a sufficient warrant. Given at the Court of Windsor, the 29th day of May 1687, and of his Majesty's reign the third: year. May it please your Majesty. " These contain your Majesty's warrant for a letter patent to- be made and " past/ifr saltum, under the Great Seal of your ancient kingdom of Scotland,. " (for the causes above specified) reviving and restoring the Most Ancient and " Most Noble Order of the Thistle, in manner above mentioned. " MtLFORT." Whi"ch Patent or Diploma, Pro restitutione antiqui cardui ordinis nobilissimi, is dated at V\ indsor, the iptli May id'] ; but the same being never expede under the Great Seal, 1 forbear here to narrate it. James Rex, " Statutes and Ordinances of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, revived and restored by his Majesty James VII. by the grace of God, King of Scotland, England, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, Sovereign of the said Most Noble Order, for the better regulating the proceedings and solemnities thereof, in all the circumstances thereunto be- longing. " In the first place, We think fit to continue the ancient number of knights, to wit, twelve brethren with ourself, the Sovereign of the said Most Noble Order, in all time coming." " That the habits of the sovereign and brethren be a doublet and trunk-hose of a cloth of silver, stockings of pearl-coloured silk, with white leather shoes, gar- ters and shoe-strings of blue and silver, the breeches and sleeves of the doublet decently garnished with silver and blue ribbons, and surcoat of purple velvet, lined with white taffeta, girt about the middle with a purple sword-belt, edged with gold, and a buckle of gold, at which a sword with a gilted hilt, whereof the shell is to be in form of the badge of the order, and the pommel in the form of a thistle in a scabbard of purple velvet, over which a mantle or robe of green velvet, lined with white taffeta, with tassels of gold and green, the whole robe parsemee, or powdered over with thistles of gold embroidered ; upon the left shoulder of which, in a field of blue, St Andrew the apostle his image, bearing before him the cross of his martyrdom of silver embroidery. About the shoulders is to be borne the collar of the order, consisting of thistles and sprigs of rue going betwixt, at the middle of which, before, is to hang the St Andrew in gold enamelled, with his gown green, and the surcoat purple, having before him . the cross of his martyrdom enamelled white ; or if of diamonds, consisting of the number of thirteen, just the cross and feet of St Andrew resting upon a ground of green, the collar to be tied to the shoulders of the robe, with a white ribbon. Upon their heads, in days of solemn procession or feasting, where the sovereign himself is present, or his commissioner for that effect, they are to wear at these times of permission a cap of black velvet, faced up with a border of the same, a little divided before, wide and loose in the crown, having a large plume of white feathers, with a black egret or heron's top in the middle of it, the border of the cap adorned with jewels ; the sovereign's cap, for difference, to have two rows of diamonds cross the crown thereof, in form of a royal crown : the sove- reign's robes to be of a length proportionable to his royal dignity, and the badge EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. iil on the shoulder to be adorned with pearl, besides with other distinctions he shall think fit to appoint. " And we having considered that it was the ancient custom for the sovereign and knights-brethren, on their daily apparel, to wear the jewel of the order in a chain of gold or precious stones ; and that the use ot ribbons has been brought in since the Most Noble Order of the Thistle was left olf, and that chanis are not now. in use, we have therefore thought fit to appoint the jewel of the said order to be worn with a purple blue ribbon, watered or tabled. The jewel to have on the one side the image of St Andrew, with the cross of his martyrdom before him, enamelled as above said, or enriched witli precious stones on the cross and round about. On the back of which shall be enamelled a thistle of gold and green, the flower reddish, with a motto written round it, Nemo me impune lacesset. The ground upon which the thistle is to be done shall be enamelled blue. " Upon the left breast of the coat and cloak shall be embroidered a badge of proportionable bigness, being St Andrew's cross, of silver embroidery, on the middle of which a circle of gold, having the motto of the order in letters of blue, in the middle whereof a thistle of gold upon a field in blue. " The order is to have a Great Seal in the custody of the chancellor thereof, on the dexter side of the shield St Andrew's cross, and on the sinister thereof the arms of Great Britain, as they are carried by us in Scotland, encircled with the collar of the order, with the image of St Andrew hanging at it, with the motto of the order going round the seal ; on the other side the image of St Andrew , bearing the cross before him, with a glory round his headj written round, Magnum sigillum antiquisumi et nobilissimi ordinis cardui. " The Secretary shall have a mantle of blue satin lined with white, on the left shoulder of which the badge of St Andrew's cross; and upon days of solemnity his ordinary badge is to be hung in a chain of gold, being a thistle of gold, and green upon pens saltier-ways, with the motto round about, and an imperial crown upon the top. " The Lyon shall have robes and badges- upon the shoulder, conform to the secre- tary, in his hand his staff of office, and about his neck his badge with St An- dre A turned outward. " The Usiier, conform to the secretary in all things, except his badge, which is to be two sprigs of rue in form of St Andrew's cross vert, upon a ground white, upon which a thistle of gold, and round the motto, upon which an imperial crown, and in his hand the batton of his office. " Before any can be admitted to be of the Most Noble Order of the Thistle he must be a knight-batchelor. Here follows the form of the oath to be taken by all such as shall be admitted into the order of brethren. " First, I shall fortify and defend the Christian religion, and Christ's most holy evangel, to the utmost of my power. " Secondly, I shall be loyal and true to my Sovereign Lord the King, and the brethren of this order. " Thirdly, I shall maintain the honour and dignity of the Most Noble Order of the Thistle to my best power, if God let. " Fourthly, I shall never bear treason about in my heart against my Lord the King, but shall discover the same. So defend me God and the holy church. " The oath being taken by the elect knights, before any whom the sovereign shall appoint, they may actually wear the badges and other ornaments for tae first time ; and we refer it to three or more of the knights first made to draw the forms, offices, and ranks of the officers, their fees, and all other things that may any way concern the said order; and humbly to offer the same to our royal consideration, to the end we may signify our pleasure therein ; and in regard we have not as yet named a person to be chanceller of the said order, and that there is no Great Seal or Signet thereunto belonging, we do order that our Sig- net, now in the custody of our Secretaries of State for our ancient kingdom of Scotland, shall serve for any warrants or orders that we shall think fit to grant or emit, for noiiiinating any of the knights-brethren or officers, or any other thing relating to the said order, until it shall be fully settled. Tne royal chapel 114 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " of our Palace of Holyroodhouse to be the chapel of the order in time coming, " and the sub-prior, or dean or prior there, to be reader of our orders, whose badge " and ornaments shall be hereafter appointed. Given under our royal hand and " signet at our Coiut of Windsor the 29th May 1687, and of our reign the " third year. " By His Majesty's Command, " Melfor-t." Statutes of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. " It is statuted and ordained by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, Sovereign, of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, that his Majesty, and his royal successors sovereigns thereof, shall in all time commg wear the said or- der on the ribbon of the Order ot the Thistle, or other way in any manner his Majesty shall think fit. That in honour to the holy apostle St Andrew, protector of the Most Noble Order of the Thistle, his Majesty shall wear the collar of that order on the day of the feast of St Andrew, being the thirty day of November yearly ; that the knights-brethren shall wear their collars in all collar days wherever the sovereign is, and within Scotland by obhgation, whether the so- vereign be there or not ; that the collar days be the same ordinary collar days now observed by his Majesty ; that there be a secretary of the order to transmit the sovereign's orders to the knights his brethren, and that he attend his royal person for that effect. Given under his Majesty's royal hand and signet at the Court of Windsor the 29th of May 1687, and of his Majesty's reign the third year. " By his Majestfs Command, " Melfort." The Sovereign's Warrant concerning the Ribbon which is to be carried. The same whereon is to hang the Medal of the Order. " It is our will and pleasure that the ribbon on which is to be hung the medal " of the Most Ancient and Most noble Order of the Thistle, be of the colour and " watering of the pattern hereunto annexed,, as well when the same shall be carri- " ed by us the sovereign, as it is to be daily by the knights-brethren of the said " order. Given under our royal hand and Signet at our Court of Windsor the " 31st day of May 1687, and of our reign the third year. " By his Majestfs special Command, " Melfort." Commission to Sir Andrew Forrester to be his Majestfs Secretary of the Most An- cient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. . James Rex, " James VII. by the grace of God, King of Scotland, England, France, and " Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &.c. Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Most " Noble Order of the Thistle. To our trusty and well beloved Sir Andrew Forrester, " Greeting. Whereas we have thought fit to revive and restore the said Most An- " cient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle to its ancient splendour and magnili- " cence, to the end it may remain as a lasting mark and testimony of our royal " favour to our ancient kingdom of Scotland ; and whereas several officers are need- " ful for attending the service of the same, especially a secretary for giving an ac- " count of our intention and pleasure from time to time to the knights-brethren of " the said order, we have therefore thought fit to nominate, constitute, and ap- " point you the said Sir Andrew Forrester to be our secretary of that Most Ancient " and Most Noble Order, giving, granting, and disponing unto you the place and EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS . 115 office of our secretary of the order aforesaid, witli all power and authority to you to receive all fees, prolits, and perquisites, and to enjoy all privileges and immu- nities belonging, or that hereafter shall be by us declared to pertain and b^-long to the same, and generally with full power to do and perform all thiugi per- taining to the place, office, and duty of secretary of that order, and after you have taken your oath de fideli miininistratione in the said office, you are hereby authorised to carry a badge, and to wear and use all habits and distinctions, and others which to our secretary of the said order do rightly belong ; for all which this shall be your warrant. Given under our royal hand at our Court at Wind- sor, the 31st day of May 16S7, and of our reign the third year. " By bis Majesty's Ojmmn/id, " Melfort." J.i^MES Rex, The form of the Oath taken by bis Majesty's Secretary of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. " I shall bear faith and true allegiance to my Sovereign Lord the King's most " excellent Majesty, Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the " Thistle, I shall faithfully perform the duty of secretary to the said most noble " order, and will never reveal the secrets of the same. I will be true and faithful " to the knights-brethren of the said order, i will (to the utmost of my power) " maintain the honours, rights and privileges of the said most ancient and most " noble order. So help me God." • Windsor, ^ist May 1687. " Nota, That hereafter there are no papers relating to the order to be recorded " in the Principal Secretaries of State their office, in regard his Majesty's " Secretary of the order is to keep a register apart in which they are to be re- " corded." Follows the List of the Knights Companions of the Noble Order of the Thistle revived in the Reign of King James VU. and created so by bini. James Earl of Perth, then Lord High Chancellor of Scotland, George Duke of Gordon, John Marquis of Athol Lord Privy Seal, James Earl of Arran, after Duke of Hamilton, Alexander Earl of Murray, John Earl of Melfort, then Principal Secre- tary of State, Kenneth Earl of Seaforth, George Earl of Dumbarton, Sir Andrew Forrester, Secretary to the Order, Usher of the Thistle. Thus this Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle continued to flourish during the remainder of this king's reign. But the Revolution afterwards succeeding, which occasioned the said King James to retire to France, and the Prince of Orange being in his place crowned king of these realms by the revolu- tioners, they laid again aside the usage of this noble order, and their zeal for the Protestant religion occasioned them to have no juster sentiments of it than our old reformers had, who esteemed no better of this high order of knighthood than that it was a popish institution. For as the said Prince of Orange was a liero of un- questionable bravery, so he had a_great esteem of knighthood and valour, as may appear from his creating as many Knights of the Garter as has been done in any succeeding reign since ; neither is it to be doubted but he would have given as much encouragement to the honour, splendour, and reputation of our said royal or- der of knighthood during his reign as any of our preceding kings had done, had he found the humour of our nation to have laid aside all their prejudices thereto, and agreed with his just sentiments of honour: And therefore to give our said na- tion no occasion of discontent during his government, he thought it proper to lav Vol. U. 3 L ,iG EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. aside the usage of this most ancient and most noble order; so that no creation of any hlw knights thereof happened during his reign. But his successor, Queen Anne, finding this kingdom begin to have better con- ceptions of the great honour of royal knighthood, she was pleased, in the second year qf her reign, to sign a patent to be passed the Great Seal of Scotland, for again reviving and restoring our Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, whereof the tenor follows : " Anna, Dei Gratia, Scotias, Anglias, Francia: &- Hibernias Regina, fideique de- " fensor, omnibus probis hominibus ; quandoquidem serenissimus noster progenitor " Scotorum Rex Acbauis gloriosDE memorice, ordinem cardui antiquum, ac longe " nobilissimum, ex suinmo principe & duodecim equitibus constantem instituisse; " idque ad Christianee religionis tutelam, &- in memoriam insignis victoria per " e.indem ad versus Athelstanum Saxonum regem, post prselium cruentum parte " ubi dum pugnaretur, in aethere apparuit crux alba decussata ad formam illius qua " Sanctus Andreas Apostolus martyrium passus est, qui quidem antiquissimus &• •' nobihssimus ordo, non solum jn archivis nostris, & hujus regni nostri Scotiae his- " toriis, sed etiam ab exteris historiarum scriptoribus, honoritice commemoratur ; " qua; sunt authentica documenta prselustris estimationis ejus nobihssimi ordinis " generatim susceptae, sed ob continuata bella &- tumultus intestinos quae post obi- " tum Jacobi Quinti Regis successivas minoritates regiae coronae splendor, huic " multis in rebus diversique modus obumbratus fuit &- inter alia honos huic nobilis- " simae institutioni debitus, quaeque sic praestitit, usque ad tertium annum regni " regis nostri patris Jacobi Septimi, qui consideratione multiplicium ofBcii, &• afFec- " tionis judiciorum ipsi exhibitorum, per hoc, antiquum regnum nostrum, eundem " nobilissimum ordinem redintegravit & restituit, &- ob ejusdem restitutionem, nos " inter multa alia testimonia curas nostrae regiae antiqui hujus regni nostri, tam " pro ejusdem honore quam aliis quae ad idem spectant, & predicti nobilissimi or- " dinis ad justum splendorem £*- existimationem erectione, eo ut presens hoc nos- " trum seculum atque aetates futurae ad emidationem nobilem talia gratiae regia " signa discriminantia merendi, in suorum nobilium antecessorum imitationem ex- " citentur ac moventur, congruum nos nunc putamus tanquam princeps suprema " dicti nobilissimi ordinis indubitatum nostrum jus exequi. Noveritis igitur nos " redintegrasse &. restituisse, sicuti per presentes has literas nostras patentes redin- " tegvamus &- restituimus, eundem dictum ordinem, ad cranes honores, dignitates, " titulos &- privilegia, quae olim aut nunc ad eundem pertinentem, cum omnibus " aliis additamentis, quae nos aut nostri regii successores supremi principes dicti " nobilissimi ordinis, in posterum declanivimus, vel in eos conferemus, atque per " presentes has literas nostras patentes duodecim equitibus nobiscum supremo " principe ex quibus prasdictus nobilissimus ordo tempore elapso constitit, atque " in posterum constabit, & successoribus suis in dicto ordine damns &- concedi- " nius omnes honores, dignitates, titulos &- privilegia ad plenum suum vigorem, " gloriam, &• magnificentiam, prout hactenus obtinuit, vel quae in futurum ad " eundem pertinere declaravimus. In cujus rei testimonium magnum sigillum " nostrum appendi prsecepimus. Datum apud aulam nostram de St James, tri- " gesimo primo die mensis Decembris, Anno Domini millesimo septingentesimo " quarto, & anno regni nostri secundo. " Anne R." Statutes and Orders of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Xhistle, revived hy her Majesty Anne, by the Grace of God, ^ecn Locus SiGiLLi. of Scotland, England, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, Sovereign of the said Most Noble Order, for the better regulating the proceedings and solemtiities thereof in all the circumstances thereunto belonging. " In Xht first place. We think fit to continue the ancient number of knights, to " wit, twelve brethren with ourself the sovereign of the said most noble order, to " be the precise number of that order in all time coming. " That the sovereign's habit be such as they shall think fit at any time here- EXTEPdOR ORNAMENTS. 117 after to appoint. That the habit of brethren of this order be a doublet and trunk-liose of cloth of silver, stockings of pearl-coloured silk, with white leather shoes, garters and shoe-strings of green and silver, the breeches and sleeves of tiie doublet decently garnislied with silver and green ribbons, a surcoat of purple velvet lined with white talfera, girt about the middle with a purple sword-belt edged with gold, and a buckle of gold, at which a sword with a gilded hilt, where- of the shell is to be in the form of the badge of the order, and the pommel in the form of a thistle, in a scabbard of purple velvet, over all which a mantle or robe of green velvet, lined with white taffeta, with tassels of gold and gi\en ; upon the left shoulder of which, in a field of green, St Andrew the apostle his image, bearing before him the cross of his martyrdom of silver embroidery, with a circle of gold round it, upon which the motto. Nemo me hnpune lacesset, in letters of green ; and at the lower part of it a thistle of gold and green, the flower reddish; about the shoulder is to be worn the collar of the order, consisting of thistles and sprigs of rue going betwixt ; at the middle of w hich before is to be hung the St Andrew- of gold enamelled white, or if of diamonds, consisting of the number of thirteen just, the cross and feet of St Andrew resting upon a ground of green, the collar to be tied to the shoulders of the robe, and white ribbons upon their heads, on days of solemn procession or feasting, where the so- vereign is present, or has a commissioner for that effect. They are to wear at the times of permission a cap of black velvet faced up with a border of the same, a httle divided before, wide and loose in the crown, having a large plume of white feathers, with a black egrit or heron's top in the middle of it, the bor- ders of the cap adorned with jewels. " That the jewel of the said order is to be worn at a green ribbon over the left shoulder, cross the body and tied under the right arm. The jewel to have on the one side the image of St Andrew, with the cross before enaroelled, as is above said, or cut on stone, enriched with precious stones round it, on the back of which shall be enamelled a thistle gold and green, the flower reddish, with the before-mentioned motto round it. The ground upon which the thistle is to be done shall be enamelled green. " That the medal of the order be all of gold, being the St Andrew, bearing be- fore him the cross of his martyrdom, with a circle round, on which to be the motto of the order, and at the lower part of the circle between the joining of the words a thistle, and to be worn in a green ribbon as the jewel, at times when the jewel is not worn. " That upon the left breast of the coat and cloak shall be embroidered a badge of a proportionable bigness, being a St Andrew's cross of silver embroidery, with rays going out betwixt the points of the cross, on the middle of which a thistle of gold and green upon a field of green, and round the thistle and field a circle of gold, having on it the motto of the order in letters of green. " That her Majesty, and her royal successore, sovereigns of the said Most An- cient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, shall in all time coming wear the said order on the ribbon of the Order of the Garter, or otherwise in any manner that her Majesty shall think fit, and shall wear the collar of the said order on the day of the feast of St Andrew, being the thirtieth of November yearly. " That the knights-brethren of the said order shall wear their collars on all col- lar days, wherever the sovereign is, and within Scotland, by obligation, upon all days of public solemnities, whether the sovereign be there or not. " That the collar days be the same ordinary collar days now observed by her Majesty. That the collar with the St Andrew belonging to it, and the medal of the order given by her Majesty and successors, sovereigns of the said most noble order, to the knights-brethren thereof at their admission, be returned at their deaths to the sovereign. " The order is to have a Great Seal in the custody of the Chancellor thereof, having on the dexter side St Andrew's cross, and on the sinister the arms of Great Britain, as they are carried by us in Scotland, encircled with the collar of the order, with the image of St Andrew hanging at it, with the motto of the order going round the seal. On the other side, the image of St Andrew, bearing ii8 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " a cross before him, with a glory round his head, written round Magnum sigillum " antiquissimi £5" nobilissimi ordinis cardui." " That there be a Secretary of the order to transmit the sovereign's orders to " the knights-brethren, and that he attend her royal person for that effect. He " shall have, on days of solemnity, a mantle of green satin, lined with white on " the left shoulder, of which the badge of St Andrew's cross, his ordinary badge, " is to be hung in a chain of gold, being a thistle of gold and green, upon two " pens crossed saltier- ways, with the motto round about it, and an imperial crown " upon the top." " The Lyon shall have robes and badges upon the shoulder, conform to the se- " cretary, in his hand his staff of office, and about his neck his badge, with the St " Andrew turned outward. " The Usher conform to the secretary in all things, except his badge, which is " to be two sprigs of rue in form of St Andrew's cross vert, upon a ground white, " upon which a thistle of gold, and round the motto, upon which an imperial " crown, and in his hand the batton of his office. " Before any can be admitted to the Most Noble Order of the Thistle, he must " be a knight-batchelor." Here follows the Form of the Oath to be taken by all such as shall be admitted into this Order as Brethren. " I shall fortify and defend the true reformed Protestant religion, and Christ's most holy evangel, to the utmost of my power. " I shall be loyal and true to my Sovereign Lady the Queen, Sovereign of this Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. " I shall maintain and defend the statutes, privileges, and honours of the said order. " I shall never bear any treason about in my heart against our Sovereign Lady the Queen, but shall discover the same to her. So help me God. " The oath being taken by the elect knights, before any whom the sovereign shall appoint, they may actually wear the badge and other ornaments belonging to the order; and in regard we have not as yet named a person to be chancellor of the said order, and that there is no Great Seal belonging thereto, we do there- fore ordain that our signet of the said order, which is to be in the custody of om" secretary to the said order, shall serve for any warrant or order that we shall think fit to grant or emit for the nominating any of the knights-brethren or officers, or any other thing relating to the said order. " The royal chapel of our palace of Holyroodhouse to be the chapel of the or- der in time coming. " That no alteration of the habit, jewel, collar, badge, or other ornaments be- longing to the said order, or of the using or wearing of them, be offered to her majesty by any of the brethren, without a concurrence of the major part of them. ' Given under our royal hand and signet at our Court at St James's the 31st day of December 1703 years, and of our reign the second year. " A. R. " By Her Majesty's Command, " Cromartie." Sterling L-55 Money. 11 u 6 75 5 8 27 II 6 15 6i^ 5 11 I' EXTERIOR ORNAMENT.S. The Fees eippoiitiul by Her Sacred Majesty ^leen A>fNE, Sovereign of the Most An- cient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, to be paid by those who shall be admitted as Knights-Brethren of the said Order at their Mmission thereto. " Iinpr. To the secretary of the order, " To the commissioner's servants, - - " To the church fees, viz. ringer of bells, " To the usher of the order, . - . " To the Lyon's Office, heralds, pursuivants, trumpets, &c. " It is said their present fees on this head is now L. 72 Sterling. " To the queen's ushers, .... Summa L. in 2 2 A. R. " We do hereby order and require all who are or shall be admitted as Knights- " Brethren of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, to pay the " fees according to the above distribution, upon their being admitted to the said " order. Given under our royal hand and signet of the said order at our Court " of St James's the 29th day of October 1705, and of our reign the fourth " year. " This is a true copy of the statutes and orders signed by her majesty, examined " and compared with the originals, by me " David Nairn, Sec. nob. ord. carditi." The History of Europe, for the year 1704, tells us, that, on the 31st of January, the queen was pleased to sign the foresaid patent to be passed the Great Seal of Scotland, for reviving and restoring there the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. In pursuance of which patent, John Duke of Argyle was received into that order the 4th of February by her Majesty the Sovereign thereof, so were three days after John Duke of Athol, William Marquis of Annandale, James Earl of Dalkeith, George Earl of Orkney, and James Earl of Seafield. Her Majesty dispensed, during her royal pleasilre, with the ceremonies and solemnities of their instalment, as well as of all the rest of the knights-brethren ; and was pleased to give a commission to David Nairn, Esq. to be secretary of the said order, and to confer upon him the honour of knighthood. Mr Miege, in his State of North Britain, gives us a list of the knights com- panions of the Noble Order of the Thistle in the reign of Queen Anne, to the year 1711, whose names are as follows, John Duke of Argyle, John Duke of Athol, William Marquis of Annandale, George Earl of Orkney, James Earl of Seafield, William Marquis of Lothian, Charles Earl of Orrery Enghsh, John Earl of Marr, Hugh Earl of Loudon, and John Earl of Stair, Sir David Nairn, Bart. Secretary to the Order. Usher of the Thistle. And not only during the reign of the said Queen Anne the Most Ancient and Noble Order of the Thistle continued to flourish in great splendour and esteem, but her successor. King George, highly honoured the same: For Sir Thomas Brand was created by him Gentleman-Usher of the Green Rod, of the Most An- cient Order of the Thistle, or St Andrew, and Gentleman-Usher, Daily Waiter to his Majesty King George, and by patent carries, quarterly, first and fourth two battons, or rods, or, ensigned on the top with the unicorn of Scotland, as the badge of his office, and the second and third quarter of his arms is liis paternal coat; crest, a vol, v.'ith the batton of the office erected in pale: motto, Advance; and places round his arms the chain of gold, with the badge of the order pemJent, viz. on an oval ardent a St An.lrew's cross surmounted of a thistle, and round the same the motto. Nemo me impune lacessit, which he commonly wears, and behind the shield he carries two battons in saltier, to show he is actually in post, a figure whereof I have caused cut in the Plates of Acliievements subjoined to the First Vol. U. 3 M 120 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Volume of my System of Heraldry. And I see no reason but the rest of the ofticers of this most ancient order, Viz. the Secretary, Lyon, &.c. may outwardly adorn and trim their armorial shields with the collars and badges of their several offices after the like manner. King George did also create new knights com- panions of this noble order in the room of old ones deceased, viz. John Earl of Sutherland, as does also his son, who, now reigns, who, on St Andrev/'s day yearly, November 30th, goeth with the royal family to his royal chapel, and weais St Andrew's crosses in honour of that day: So that this royal order of knighthood continues still its honour and reputation at this very day, though above eight hundred and twenty years standing since its first institution by King Achaius. And besides, (which adds very much to the honour of this high order) according to the ancient and primitive institution, this order is to consist of no more than of thirteen persons, viz. the sovereign and twelve knights, in memory of our Savi- our and his twelve apostles; whereas the great increase of knights companions of many other orders has been the occasion of their ruin and disesteem. The solemn meeting of these knights of old was annually on St Andrew's day, in the church of the town dedicate to his name; during the festivity the knights were richly habited, and wore their Parliament robes, having fixed on their left shoulders an azure roundel, charged with a saltier argent, or St Andrew's cross en- filed in centre, with a crown composed of flower-de-luces or; for the ordinary and common ensigns the knights used a green ribbon, whereat hung a thistle of gold crowned with an imperial crown, within a circle of gold containing the epigraph Nemo me impune lacessit. But now they have sewed to their left breast an irradia- tion (like that of the Knights of the Garter) over a saltier silver, the irradiation charged with a blue roundel of St Andrew's cross. As also the said St Andrew's church, the ancient chapel of the order being ruined at the Reformation, which happened in the reign of Queen Mary, and besides, this noble order was laid aside, and continued so (as I observed before) till his late Majesty King James VII. re- stored it again by a patent, dated at Windsor the 29th May 1687, appointing also his chapel royal in his palace at Holyroodhouse to be hereafter the chapel of the order, instead of the said St Andrew's church which was ruined; which chapel he caused beautifully to be repaired, and fitted up by the hands of many exquisite workmen foreign and domestic, who adorned the same with the ethgies of our Saviour, his twelve apostles, and other admirable pieces of sculpture, for the greater honour and conveniency of the said royal knights. But, in December 1688, the city of Edinburgh having overpowered Captain Wallace, who was posted to de- fend the said royal palace of Holyroodhouse, they without opposition went first to the said royal chapel, and broke and destroyed to pieces all the curious workmanship therein, which had cost the said King James a considerable sum to perform, and carried several parcels of these pieces of work up to the cross of Edinburgh, and burnt them there. The author of a Journey Through Scotland, October, London 1729, page 61. tells us, " That this church, or chapel, is very neat, with the " highest roof (says he) I have seen, and the pillars as exquisite as St George's " Chapel at Windsor, with two rows of stone galleries above. King James VII. " (continues he) erected a magnificent throne here for the sovereign, and twelve " stalls for the twelve knights companions of the Order of the Thistle, or St An- " drew, all of oak, and the finest masters in carved work all over Europe employ- " ed in it. The floor was finely paved with marble, a fine organ was also erected; " but the mob, at the Revolution, pulled it all to pieces, thinking it that smelled too " rank of popery, not leaving so much as a stone of the pavement, but what they " pulled up and carried away." Yet notwithstanding hereof, her late Majesty Qiieen Anne, upon her again restoring this noble order of knighthood, by a war- rant under her royal hand and signet, dated at St James's 31st of December 1703, did again ordain and confirm her royal father's order, in appointing the royal chapel of her palace of Holyroodhouse to be the chapel of this order in time coming, and which continues so at this day. Andrew Favin, in his Theatre of Honour, lib. 5. cap 3. page 96. tells us, That the foresaid Achaius King of Scotland having won the love and alliance of the King Charlemagne, and the Most Christian Kings of France his successors, found himself to be so strong and mighty, tltat he took for his device the thistle and the EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 121 rue, and, for a motto tliereto, Pour ma defence ; because (says he) the thistle is not tractable, or easily handled without good gloves made of the hart's skin, whereby all his pricking is avoided. As giving acknowledgment thereby, that he feared nti foreign princes his neighbours, (continues he) seeing he leaned on the succour and alliance of the French. But herein this author is mistaken, for it is of verity that France has been more obliged to the valour of tlie men of our nation than any assistance they ever gave to us; yea we have suffered almost our kingdom to be over-run by the English in their quarrel, and had it not been the valour of our he- roes, who always of old assisted them, England, long ere now, had made a conquest of that kingdom; and the said author, Favin, confesses no less, as he ingeniously makes it appear in his said tifth book, by giving us a list of the many tliousands ot Scotsmen sent by our kmg from Scotland to the assistance of the kmgs of France, all led by gallant commanders; for which good service our nation received from them many vakuble privileges, and our nobility and captains sent thither were highly rewarded with the greatest honours and preferments that kingdom could give. Again, as to the motto, In defence, which this author appropriates to the thistle, as I observed before, I still judge it to be tlje motto of the royal arms, or crest assumed by King Achaius, when Charles the Great honoured the said king with the double tressure to surround the rampant lion in his arms, upon the alli- ance of the two crowns of Scotland and France, as a symbol, to show that the lilies of France should always defend the lion of Scotland. The old motto of the Order of the Thistle, viz. Nemo me inipime Incesset, being by far more proper and agreeable thereto, and Menenius also tells us, that this was the old and only motto peculiar to the Order of the Thistle. As for the collar of this noble order, which consists of thistles and sprigs of rue. The thistle, says Pliny, in his Natural History, torn. 2. page 79. have their leaves beset with prickles, they bear heads, pointed with sharp prickles round about in manner of caltrops, and the artichoke-thistle puts forth a purple flower amidst these sharp-pointed prickles, and when sodden is a great strengthener of the stomach, and if applied to the matrix of women, it disposeth and prepareth it to conceive men-children ; and Ch;^:veas the Athenian, and Glaucias especially, says the same ; as likewise these thistles causeth a sweet breath. As for the rue, although it be an herb and plant very mean, yet it is nevertheless full of admirable virtues, so that men and beasts likewise having eaten thereof, their breath only serveth to expel, and drive serpents to flight : for the said Pliny, and all the naturalists do hold, thatt he woodmartin, the weasel, and other small beasts dare be bold to graple with serpents, yea, the viper himself, after their stomachs are filled with rue. Paulus ^gineta, and all the herbalists, are of opinion, that there is not a more sovereign remedy, for such as are poisoned, to vomit up the poison, than to drink it in warm wine, and present cure has instantly ensued by this herb. And for this reason, King Achaius, to demonstrate to his enemies that he had power to make all their practices unprofitable, took these two herbs for his device, and composed them in a collar of this order, which has continued to this dav. The manner of wearing the ribbon of this most noble order in time of peace, was of later times pendent about the neck, down to the middle of the breast, where hung the jewel of the order, having on the one side the image of St An- drew, holding his cross before him, and on the reverse a thistle, or and vert, the flower reddish, with the foresaid motto round it. But since, for the more conve- niency of riding or action, the same is spread over the left shoulder, and brought under the right arm, where the jewel now hangs. But where the pictures of the sovereign and knights companions are drawn in armour, there, even to this day, the said jewel is represented as fixed to a gold chain instead of a ribbon, and worn about the neck, and not brought under the right-arm. And there is a standard of honour provided for the sovereign to measure the extraction, quality, and merit of the persim proposed to be elected of this order, lest it might chance, through the indulgence of the sovereign, this fountain of honour might be mudded by the choice of inferior and undeserving persons: for Benjamin Smithurst, in his Britain's Glory, page 43. tells us, that the knights of this order are appointed to be of the most noble men of Scotland ; and if of an- other nation, they are never chosen below nobility, as witness Charles Boyle Earl. J22 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. of Orrery, an Irish peer, who was elected by Queen Anne, a knight companion of this order ; and no doubt the sovereign's design herein was, that none should be elected of this order, unless he be worthy, upon the account of birth and arms. For it is certam gentihty does not receive its perfection in the person it was first devolved on, but is rather completed by succession: for among the Romans, though tlie father was free-born, and of the equestrian cense ; yet it was farther requisite that the grandfather should be the same, or else they could not obtain the ring, one of the symbols of the Equestrian Order, as Pliny informs us. Gentility, there- fore, hath its beginning in the grandfather, its increase in the father, and full ripe- ness in the son ; and consequently in the constitution of gentility, the father and grandfather conveying a lustre to the son, make it entire and complete ; for it is incongruous to suppose a ripeness in the son, unless there had been a former in- crease in the father. As to the objections made by some English authors, and others misled by them, against the antiquity of this noble order, seeing they carry more of prejudice than reason, I shall pass them over with silence, and the rather, that since the union these prejudices are now laid aside by them, hoping I have advanced above what will be sufficient to convince my impartial reader of the antiquity of this most an- cient and noble order of knighthood ; and if our nation had been so fortunate as to have had our ancient records and old monuments of antiquity preserved to this day, which the calamity of war and other accidents has deprived us of, we might have had fuller accounts and clearer documents to have obliged the presenfgenera- tion with concerning the same. As for the story about the commencement of this Royal Order of St Andrew, by the appearance of the cross of his martyrdom in the sky, though it may, to polite wits of this age, look like a legend, yet 1 believe it is much of a piece with what we are told by the following famous authors, viz. Euse- bius de Vit. Constant, lib. r. cap. 29. Socrates Hist. Eccl. lib. i. cap. 2. Sozomen, lib. I. cap. 3. and others, concerning the first Christian Emperor Constantine: they say, that while this Prince was (at the intreaty of the senate and people of Rome) on his march, in order to suppress the tyranny of Maxentius, and being doubtful of the success, and therefore afraid of the danger of such an expedition, he per- ceived a burning cross in the heavens, with three Greek words, which signified that this should be a sign of his victory ; and they add, that upon this assurance he caused the figure of the cross, just as he had seen it, to be set in gold upon the imperial standard, and then set forward and prospered. Now whether either or both of these miracles have been wrought by designing Providence, or if they ought to be ranked among the pious cheats of the old priests and monks, I leave it to the more curious to examine. This is certain, Constantine overthrew Maxen- tius, and Achaius defeated Athelstan. The next old order of knighthood with us was the Banrents or Bannerets, creat- ed so under the royal banner for gallant actions in the field, and seldom or never conferred but upon persons of extraordinary merit, many of whom were able, by their arms and numerous vassals, to raise, maintain, command, and lead gallantly a company of soldiers to field in time of war, under their own particular banners of their arms ; and very many of the predecessors of our old families here in Scotland have been advanced to this truly honourable degree of knighthood on the consideration of their courage and valorous exploits in times of war and battles ; so that our nation, of old, having produced so many of these gallant heroes, it would take up the subject of a volume by itself to narrate their names and heroic deeds ; Sir Robert the Bruce, Sir William Wallace, and many hun- dreds more of our nation being all advanced to this military order of knighthood, on account of their valour, and the same being but only a temporary dignity, it was bestowed on none but those, who, by their valour in chivalry, deserved it ; and the son could not succeed the father in this dignity till he had performed some valorous action to merit the same, in order to fit him for being a leader of a com- pany of men of war. Sir George Mackenzie in his Precedency, p. 55. says, " That he finds of old a " bannerent (or a ban-rent) has been with us a title higher than a baron, for, by " act 102, Parliament 7th, James I. anno 1427, barons may choose their own com- " missioners, but bishops, dukes, earls, lords, and ban-vents are to be summoned to 2. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 123 " parliament by the king's special precept ; and it is probable (continues he) " that these baa-reius were knights of extraordinary reputation who i\ere allowed " to raise a company of men under tlicir own banners ; but now it is commonly " taken for such as are knighted by the king or pnnce under the royal standard " in time of war." But 1 conceive that tliose could not now sit in Parliament upon the king's precept, the former act of Parliament being in desuetude : They have the precedency from baronets, though their wives have not, tins being but a temporary dignity, and the other an heritable.. The undoubted badge of these knights was a golden collar of SS's ; though the usage thereof is now grown obso- lete, yet 1 see no reason why those of this degree of knighthood may not, at this time, exteriorly adorn their armorial shields with such a colUr, the same being both regular and agreeable to the practice of all knights who are honoured with tlie cognosce or symbol of a collar as the badge of their dignity. The next degree of knighthood with us is the Order of Baronet in Scotland, which was erected for advancing the plantation of Nova Scotia in America, and for settling a colony there, to which the aid of these knights was designed. Tlie order was only intended by King James VI. before his death ; for in iiis lirst charter of Nova Scotia, in favour of Sir William Alexander, dated icth of Sep- tember i6zi, and in another charter granted to Sir Robert Dunbar of Locliinvar, of a part of Nova Scotia, designed the barony of Galloway, dated 8th November 1621, there is no mention made of this ordei-): so that the same was only erected by King Charles l.a/ino 1625. In the several patents granted to baronets, his ma- jesty did dispone to each of these knights a certain portion of land in Nova Scotia, erecting the same into a free barony, with great and ample privileges unnecessary to be inserted here. And moreover, for their encouragement, did erect, create, make, constitute, and ordain that heritable state, degree, dignity, name, order, title, and stile of baronet, to be enjoyed by every of these gentlemen wlio did hazard for the good and increase of that plantation : and so preferred them to that order and title, creating them and their heirs-male heritable baronets in all time coming, with the place, pre-eminency, priority, and precedency in all commissons, brieves, letters patent, naraings, and writs, and in all sessions, conventions, congrega- tions, and places, at all times and occasions whatsomever, before all knights cal- led equites aurati, all lesser barons commonly called Lairds, and before aU other gentlemen : excepting the above Sir William Alexander, his INIajesty's Lieutenant of Nova Scotia, who (with his heir, their wives and children conform) is not only excepted in each of these letters patent granted to the knights his consorts, but hkewise the charter granted to himself by King Charles I. anno 1625, did bear expressly this exception and provison ; as alsd excepting knights bannerets who should be created under the royal standard in his majesty's army and in open war, the king himself being present, and that during the banneret's lifetime only : and with precedency before all of the same order whose patents are of a posterior date. His majesty did moreover declare and ordain, that the wives of these knights, and of their heirs-male should have the precedency, as well after as be- fore the deaths of their husbands, if they should happen to survive, before the wives of all those of whom the knights baronets and their heirs-male had the pre- cedency, and even before the wives of knights bannerets before excepted, (the degree of baronet being heritable ;) and also that the children, male and female of the baronet, should take place before the children male and female respectively, of all persons of whom tlie baronets and their heirs-male had the priority : and likewise before the children of the bannerets ; and that the wives of the sons of the baronets, and of their heirs-male should precede the wives of all persons whom their husbands might precede, and that as well their husbands being dead as liv- ing. And further, hi? majesty did declare and promise, that whensoever the el- dest sons and apparent heirs-male of the baronets should attain to the age of twenty-one years, they should be by his majesty and his successors created equites aurati. or knights-bachelors, without payment of any fees or dues for the same, providing they should desire it. But here it is to be observed, that some of the eldest sons of baronets pretend to the title of knight at their majority, by virtue of this clause, without any previous desire or dubbing, which certainly is an er- ror; for if they will not be at the pains to desire of his majcity or his commis- VoL. U. 3 N. 124 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. sioner, they should not assume it : likeas, his majesty did declare and ordain, that the baronets and then- heirs-male should, as an additament of honour to tneir ar- morial ensigns, bear either on a canton or inescutcheon, in their i:p[ion, the ensign- of Nova Scotia, being argent, a cross of St Andrew azure, (the badge of Scotland counter-changed) charged with an escutcheon of the royal arms of Scotland, supported on the dexter by the royal unicorn, and, on the sinister, by a savage or wild man, proper; and, for the crest, a branch of laurel, and a thistle issuing from two hands conjoined, the one being armed, the other naked, with this ditto, Munit hac IS altera vhwit. And that they and their heirs-male should, in all times coming, have place in all his majesty's and his successors' armies in the mid- dle battle, near and about the royal standard, for defence thereof. And that they and their heirs-male may have two attenders of the body for bearing up the pall, one principal mourner, and four assistants at their funerals; and that they should be always called, intitled, and designed by the name and title of Baronet; and that in all Scotish speeches and writings, the addition of Sir, and in all other discourses and writings, a word signifying the same should be proponed to their names and other titles, and that the stile and title of Baronet should be postponed and sub- joined thereto in all letters patent and other writs whatsomever, as a necessary, addition of dignity, and that each of them shall be intitled. Sir A. B. Baronet, and his and his sons' wives should enjoy the stile, title, and appellation of Lady, Ma- dam, and Dame, respectively, according to the usual phrase in speaking and writing. And also his majesty did thereby promise, that the number of the baro- nets, as well in Scotland, as the new colony of Nova Scotia, should never exceed the number of 150, (albeit this number is at present somewhat augmented;) and did likewise declare, that he nor his successors should never create nor erect in time coming any other dignity, degree, stile, name, order, title, or state, nor should 'give the priority or precedency to any person or persons, under the stile, degree, and dignity of a Lord of Parliament of Scotland, which should be, or should be presumed to be, higher, superior, or equal to that of baronet : and that the ba- ronet should have liberty to take place before any such who should happen to be created of any such degree or order, and that their wives, sons, daughters, and sons' wives should have their places, accordingly : and that if any question or doubt should arise anent their places and prerogatives, the same should, be decided and judged according to these laws and customs by which other degrees of heritable dignities have their privileges cognosced and determined. And finally, that none should be created baronet either of Scotland or Nova Scotia, till he had first ful- filled the conditions designed by his majesty, for the good and increase of that plantation, and until he had certified the same to the king by his majesty's lieute- nant there. These patents were ratified in Parliament, and were always of this form till the selling of Nova Scotia to the French ; after which they were made much shorter. and granted in general terms, with all the privileges, precedencies, &c. of the former baronets. Mr Miege, in his State of North Britain, tells us, That knights baronets in Scotland are allowed to wear about their necks an orange-tawny silk ribbon, to which is appended, in a scutcheon argent, a saltier azure, surcharged with an inescutcheon of the arms of Scotland, and an imperial crown above the last scutcheon, encircled with this motto, Fax mentis bonesta gloria; and the learn- ed and judicious Elias Ashmole, in his Institution of the Garter, says the same : And, to confirm this, in the year 1629 his Majesty did allow these baronets a par- ticular cognizance, which will be best known by the copy of the following letter, directed by his Majesty King Charles I. to the Lords of his Privy Council of this kingdom, a copy whereof, as inserted by Sir George Mackenzie in his Precedency, page 54, I here narrate as follows. " Right Trusty, and Right Well-Beloved Cousin and Counsellor, Right Trusty " and Well-Beloved Cousins and Counsellors, and Right Trusty and Well- " Beloved Counsellors, we Greet you well. Whereas, upon good considera- " tion, and for the better advancement of the plantation of New Scotland, " which may much import the good of our service, and the honour and benefit " of that our ancient kingdom, our royal father did intend, and we since have " erected the order and title of Baronet in our said ancient kingdom, which we " have since established, and conferred the same on divers gentlemen of good EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 125 " quality : And seeing our Trusty and Well-Beloved Counsellor Sir William " Alexander, Knight, our principal Secretary of that our ancient kuigdom of " Scotland, and our Lieutenant of New Scotland, who these many years bygone " hath been at great charges for the discovery thereof, hath now in end a colony " there, where his son Sir William is now resident ; and we being most willing to " aflbrdall the possible means of encouragement that conveniently wc can to the " baronets of that our ancient kingdom, for the furtherance of so good a work, " and to the ellcct they may be honoured, and have place in all respects, accord- " ing to their patents from us, we have been pleased to authorize and allow, aa " by these presents, for us and our successors, we authorise and allow the said " lieutenant and baronets, and every one of them, and their heirs-male, to wear " and carry about their ne -ks in all time coming an orange-tawny silk ribbon, " whefeeon shall be pendent in a scutcheon ardent a saltier uzure, thereon an in- " escutcheon of the arms of Scotland, with an imperial crown above the scutcheon, " and encircled with this motto, K/.v miUis honestte gloria; which cognizance our " said present lieutenant shall dehver now to them from us, that they may be the " better known and distinguished from other persons. And that none pretend " ignorance of the respect due unto them, our pleasure therefore is, that by open " proclamation at the market cross of Edinburgh, and of all other head burghs " of our kingdom, and such other places as you shall think necessary, you cause " intimate our royal pleasure and intention herein to all our subjects. And if any " person, out of neglect or contempt, shall presume to take place and precedency " of the said baronets, their wives or children, which is due unto them by their " patents, or to wear their cognizance, we will that, upon notice thereof given to " you, you cause punish such offenders, by fining or imprisoning them as you " shall think fitting, that others may be terrified trom attempting the like. And " we ordain that from time to time, as occasion of granting or Venewing their " patents, gr their heirs succeeding to the dignity, shall offer, that the said power " to them to carry the said ribbon, and cognizance, shall be therein particularly " granted and inserted. And we likewise ordain thir presents to be insert and " registrate in the books of our Council and Exchequer, and that you cause regi- " strate the same in the books of the Lyon King at Arms, and heralds, there to " remain ad fin ur am ret memoriam; and that all parties having interest may have " authentic copies and extracts thereof. And for your so doing, these our letters " shall be unto you, and every one of you from time to time your sufficient war- " rant and discharge in that Isehalf. Given at our Court at Whitehall the 17th of " November 1629 year*." From hence I observe, that after so plain and positive a letter from his then Royal Majesty King Charles L whose will and pleasure therein is also expressly ordained by liim to be openly proclaimed, that none might pretend ignorance (and which unquestionably was done, and performed at the places needful within this kingdom) of the honourable privilege and allowance granted by his said ma- jesty to all knight baronets within tlris realm, allowing each of them and their heirs-male to wear about their necks a ribbon or collar for the greater honour of this degree of knighthood, with a pendant hanging thereto, as is fully and clearly narrated in the said letter, which his majesty authorises and allows not only for himself, but ordains his successors in the government of this kingdom to authorise and allow of the same to the said baronets and their said heirs-male, and also that succeeding generations might be certified of his positive will and order herein, or- daining likewise his said letter to be registrate not only in the books of his Secret Council and Exchequer, but also of those of the Lyon King at Arms, and heralds; and there being no other order or deed since granted (that I know of) in preju- dice hereof by any of our succeeding kings, it has certainly been wrong in our several Lord Lyons since to have granted warrants under their seals of office to these knights baronets, for carrying their arms with no other distinction for the de- gree of baronet than the bare ensign or arms of Nova Scotia, in a canton or in- escutcheon within their armorial shield. As also, it hath been no less irregular in his brethren herald-painters to have drawn and illuminate such coats of arms en- tirely contrary to the said express royal order and command ; for in so doing, as they have no royal warrant to authorise the same, so thereby they very much de- 126 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. prive the knights of this degree of the honour and privilege his said majesty was pleased to confer upon them, in relation to their armorial bearings, and as a dis- tinguishing cognosce particularly allowed by him to this order of knighthood. Yet though these practices have been continued by the Lord Lyon and his said brethren even to this time, to the great diminishing the honour allowed these collared knights by royal authority, so I am hopeful, on the considerations follow- ing, they will in time coming be pleased to rectify their mistake herein, and, in trimming for the future the armorial shields of all those gentlemen of this degree of knighthood, allow them this honour that our said royal sovereign has so ex- pressly granted unto them, to wear and carry about their necks in all time coning a ribbon and pendant, as aforesaid ; and so likewise, according to the custom and practice of all other collared knights, they may as regularly have the shield of their arms exteriorly surrounded and adorned with an orange -tawny silk ribbon, with an oval pendant hanging thereat, charged with a shield, containing the arms of Nova Scotia, viz. argent, a saltier nzure, surmounted of another shield or, charged with a lion rampant within a double tressure, counter-flowered with flower- de-luces ^w/fj-, being the royal arms of Scotland; and which last shield is ensigned on the top with an imperial crown, proper, and, within a circle, going round the said oval this motto, Fax mentis bonestce gloria. Now as this method of trimming these knights' arms is more honourable, so it is certainly more regular; for hereby the armorial shield within is freed of the in- cumbrances of a canton or inescutcheon of the said arms of Nova Scotia; by which usage very often some of the principal figures in the charge are suppressed, and not visible in order and equity to give place hereto. And when the arms of any of these knights happen to be a quarterly quartered coat, then commonly this badge of Nova Scotia is placed in surtout, by which some of the figures in four quarters of such bearings are hid and not discernible. And moreover in all minute figures and drawings of such arms, as many of the principal figures, within the shield are thereby suppressed, so the badge itself being (for proportion sake) obliged to be formed so very small, the same is very often hardly perceptible. Yet though these incumbrances do not prove so convincing and satisfactory a reason, as to cause our Lord Lyon and present herald-painters alter their former and present practice hereanent, my next consideration, to prove the irregularity hereof, is this, that though King Charles L by his first royal patents to these knights bai'onets, in the year 1625, as an additament of honour allowed by him to be borne by them in their armorial ensigns, granted them to carry within their shields of arms, either on a canton or shield, in their option, the said ensign of Nova Scotia, yet it is to be further observed, that at the same time, and on the same head, they are also allowed to trim the said badge or ensign with particular exterior ornaments, viz. the supporters, crest and motto belonging thereto, which are as expressly therein named by the said king as the badge itself. Now, if the Lyon and his said brethren, notwithstanding of this royal allowance, shall hereafter continue their old practice, in only allov^'ing these knights to carry within their armorial shields the bare ensign of Nova Scotia, as a cognosce of that degree of knighthood, then certainly, in my opinion, these knights are hereby very much wronged, and the armorial distinction granted to them by his said majesty is at the same time greatly diminished, by abstracting therefrom the proper exterior or- naments granted by the said king for adorning of the said badge or ensign; and that the said badge was ever trimmed with these exterior ornaments, according to the tenor of the said patents, is what I never saw done or performed in any of these knights' arms. My last and chief reason for altering and rectifying the foresaid practice is, that the allowance granted by his said majesty, in his first patents to the said knights, anent the ensign or cognosce allowed by him to be worn by them within the escutcheon of their arms, was at the same time disallowed, and unquestionably annulled by a posterior letter or proclamation granted by the said King Charles in the year 1629, by which, for the greater honour of these knights, and to free their armorial shields of the foresaid incumbrances, allowed them (as a distinguish ing badge of this degree of knighthood) to carry hereafter a ribbon and pendant as aforesaid : For, to continue the cognosce allowed by his said majesty to these EXTERIOR ORNAIVIENTS. 127 kniglits within their shield of arms, and to make the same an_v\vi-,c perceptible, the lield undoubtedly would require to be very large, so as to admit of a canton or shield (whicli according to the regular rules of heraldry are allowed but a suitable bounds in the field) to trim the said ensign or badge, which contains so many figures within and without the shield thereof, that the same is a suflicient coat of arms by itself, and too narrow to be wholly trimmed in a canton or shield, and in a minute figure it is almost impossible to be performed; and our said royal sovereign, very probably on this consideration, being afterwards more rightly ni- formed of the impracticableness hereof, presumably by the truly ingenious, curious, and learned antiquary Sir James Balfour of Denmiln, then Lord Lyon, (to whom our nation is much obliged for his valuable collections, many of which are now lodged in the Lawyers' Librajy at Edinburgh) wisely tiiouglit fit to alter his former grant, and by his said letter to his council, in place of the said canton, ex- pressly grants to these knights, as the badge of that knighthood, to wear a collar with a pendant as aforesaid. But if here it shall be objected, that notwithstanding of the above particular or- der, yet now the stile of the new patents, granted by succeeding kings to such gentlemen as they have been pleased to advance to this degree of knightiiood, arc- narrated otherwise, and the badge or symbol, fit and convenient for them to carry in their arms, as being a baronet, is now left to the Lord Lyon to grant as he thinks most proper. As in the patent or diploma granted by King James VIL to Sir Robert Mylne of Barnton, of the stile and dignity of Knight Baronet, dated ai Whitehall 19th March 1686, which runs thus, " Leoni porro armorum regi ejus- " que fratribus fecialibus pra;nominato Roberto Mylne cjusque hasredibus ante dic- " turn masculis insignia armorea, sen prioribus insigniis additamenta qua: apta &- " convenientia hac occasione videbuntur dare &- prescribere imperamus." To this I answer, That though the said King James, and his successors since, may have granted their patents to these knights after this method and stile, yet it is very presumable the same has been done by them through misinformation, and the ig- norance of those who composed tlie form and stile of these patents that they have been pleased to sign: For it is not to be doubted but the said King James had more regard for his father than to pass any deed under his hand contrary to hi* said father's so express will and pleasure in the above royal letter, if he had been rightly informed thereanent ; so that I cannot think this to be the real will and inten- tion of our said sovereign, but the mistake of the formalists, when it is so expressly narrated in the above-mentioned royal letter granted by King Charles L in favour of knights baronets, in manner following, viz. " And we ordain, that from time to " time, as occasion of granting or renewing their patents, or their heirs succeeding " to the dignity, shall offer, that the said power to them to carry the said ribbon " and cognizance shall be therein particularly granted and inserted." And, in my opinion, as no authority that I yet know of is more express and positive, so no badge that has as yet been made use of is more honourable, fit, and convenient, to be hereafter granted by the Lord Lyon, and his said brethren, to these knights, than the above-mentioned ribbon and pendant. The next and last degree of knighthood with us, is that of knight-batchelors. These of this degree are the same sort with those that were formerly made such by holding a certain proportion of land by knight's service, and therefore were obliged to serve the king in his wars, at their own expence, for the space of forty days, well and completely arrayed for the war. About the quantity of a knight's fee there have been various opinions, or rather it has varied according to the times, being first reckoned at L.20 per annum, and afterwards at L. 40. In Latin a knight is commonly called miles, a soldier, because they ought to be the prime of soldiers, though now very few know any thing of it. For as our kings of old did order their lands and tenements, so as one part they kept and detained in their own hands, and in them stately houses and castles were erected and made for tiieir habitation and defence of their persons and of the realm, also forests and parks were there made for their majesty's recreation ; and another part thereof was given to the nobles, and others of their chivalry, reserving tenure by knights' service. And in this manner the nobles also dissipated a great part of their lands to the gentlemen their followers to hold of them bv knights' service; and because thi* Vol. IL 3 O 128 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. tenure doth concern service in war, the tenants are therefore called milites mtlitiar : For though the word doth properly signify a soldier, and yet antiquity hath ap- propriated that name to the chiefest of military profession, and in all our old charters they are stiled milites, and never equites, yet so that miles is taken for the self same that chivalry is. And they also in other places are stiled equites, horse- men, because they were wont to serve a-horseback ; but that is now the general denomination of all knights, whereas these we are speaking of are stiled equites aurati, or knights of the gilt spurs, because they had such given them at their creation. For this reason, when a knight had committed a capital offence, it was usual publicly to arm him cap-a-pee, and placed on a high scaffold in the church, where the priest sung some funeral psalms as though he were dead, and then de- grade and deprive him of his honour of knighthood, which was done by taking off his helmet, ungirding his military belt, taking off his sword, and breaking it over his head, and hewing off his spurs with a hatchet, his gauntlets being also plucked from him, and the escutcheon of his arms was also reversed. Sir George Mac- kenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, page 78. tells us. That these who write as law- yers upon the subject of abatements of arms, do remark, that arms are diminished or lost, for murder, falsehood, oppression, false witness, and a profligate life, and that they are many several ways defaced or diminished, such as abrasion, perfora- tion. But the most ordinary way for treason is by reversing and riving, and which Far. also observes to be ordinary in case of treason, De crim. les. maj. cap. 16. which punishment is still in observance by the laws and customs of North Britain; for when any person is forfeited in parHament, the Lyon, and his brethren heralds, come in with their coats and formalities, and the Lyon does publicly tear the arms of the person forfeited ; and if he be a cadet of a family, he says, that the tearing of these arms openly shall be without prejudice to the nobleman or chief whose arms these are; after which he and his brethren go to the cross, and there he hangs up the shield reversed, turning the base or lowest point upwards; which Decian, tract, dim. lib. 7. cap. 31. asserts to be used in imitation of the old form of hang- ing traitors by the feet; • And although this dignity of knighthood had its original, and was given to men of war and prowess, yet in all successions of ages, and in all nations, the same also is bestowed on men of peace by the sovereign power to deserving persons, whereby the service of the commonwealth at home is made equal with that abroad. For as TuUy saith truly, " Parvi sunt arma foris nisi est concilium domi." But experi- ence, the faithfullest counsellor, and best mistress, hath made it manifest both in this modern age, as well as in that of TuUy, that the camp hath bred more eminent statesmen, and happily as good politicians, as the long robe ; perhaps for this rea- son, one aims chiefly at glory and honour, which easily attracts admirers and fa- vourers, the other at riches and indirect negociations, which begets envy and private enemies. He that is to receive tiiis dignity of knighthood kneeleth down before the king of his commissioner, who slightly smiteth or toucheth him upon the shoulder with his naked sword flatwise, and saith unto him these words in French, Sois Chevalier au imii de Dieu, or Sis Eques in nomine Dei, Be a knight in the name of God ; and then adds, " Advance Chevalier, rise Sir A. B. ;" the which honour does not de- scend to the posterity. For a kniglrt is not made by letters patent, or by the ki'ig's writ, as those of higher dignity, but by the sword ; for this honour is sup- posed to be given on the sudden ; and therefore is commonly done by the sword, (although the king may by his letters patent create a knight as he doth the knights baronets) which we commonly call dubbing, the old English word used for creat- ing (consecrating) a knight, from doopen, to dip, by bathing. There is also men- tion (by Mr Selden) of consecrating the sword, offering it at the altar, and receiv- ing it again from thence, as an implicit kind of taking an oath. But as in peace and great leisure these tedious ceremonies were of old used, yet it was otherwise in times of war, or in a day of battle, where hurry and throng of affairs would not permit ; and therefore, as well before the joining of battle, as after victory obtain- ed, it was usual for the prince or general in the field, in sight of the army, to give those whom he thought tit to advance to that honour, (they hvunhly kneeling be- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 129 tore him,) a light stroke with a naked sword on the head or shoulder, siiyiug as above narrated. Earls in ancient jimes had a power of knighting ; but now neither may the prince, or any other of the nobility (except those who are advanced to the high degree of commissioner to parliament) make a knight, but only the king or his said commissioner, who, during the sederunt of our Parliaments, represented his majesty's person when absent therefrom in England, or the king's lieutenant-general by his commission. No man is born a knight with us, as he may be to titles of honour by patent; and even the eldest sons and apparent heirs-male of all our baronets are ordained at the age of twenty-one years, to be by his majesty first created or dub- bed eqiiites aurati, or knights-batchelors, before they take on the title of bavonet ; yet this they now very often neglect to do, which certainly is an error. Of old, if a villain was made a knight, he was immediately enfranchised, and if a man of base birth and condition did strike a knight, he was to lose his hand. And knights in all foreign countries, says the author of Aiialogia bononan, subjoined to the new edition of Mr GuUlim's Heraldry, have ever place and precedency according to their seniority of being knighted, which privilege is denied to noblemen, for be they never so ancient in foreign countries, they shall go below as puisnes. The degree of knighthood is not only a dignity and honour to the party, but an honour to the kingdom : And therefore it hath been an ancient prerogative of the kings of this realm, at their pleasure, to compel men of worth to take upon them that degree, upon payment of a fine. But now we see by experience in these days, that none are compelled thereto, and there is so little belongs to knights now, that more need not be said of them ; for to search out what was, and has now ceased to be, is little to the purpose. By the statute made in England the twenty-fourth year of the reign of King Henry VIII. cap, 13. entitled, yln Act for Rejormation of Apparel, it was permit- ted for knights to wear a collar of gold, named the collar of SS, which no doubt became also customable here. And in regard whereof I judge it no irregularity, but rather very fit and convenient for all knights-batchelors, as a cognosce and badge in their armorial bearings, to trim and outwardly adorn their shields of arms with the said collar. So much then for placing of collars and badges of knighthood round the es- cutcheon of arms, forbearing to give a description of these many other orders of knighthood in Europe, as out of my road, since the situation and position of them in armories is after the same method as those that I have above described, except a few, which 1 shall hereafter mention ; yet before I close with the collar, it is not amiss I give my reader the following observe, that in pristine times none but kings and princes wore collars ; and therefore their use seems to be of dignity and power, as is evident from Daniel, where the Assyrian kings used this ornament. After- wards men famous for wisdom and counsel had them as a distinguishing badge, as in the example of Joseph, Gen. xli. 42. and from the proclamation of Belshazzav King of Babylon, who proposed it as a premium to him that would interpret the hand-writing upon the wall, Daniel, v. 7. And men famous for military achieve- ments had it conferred upon them, in recompense of their merits ; thus collars wereof the number of the dona et prcemia mUitaria among the Romans, and the honour of receiving them thought worthy to be consigned to posterity in marble inscriptions. From them the latter emperors received it, and we read of investing a Knight of the Holy Sepulchre with a collar at his creation ; where, as soon as the ceremony of his ordination is over, the Padre guardian kisses the new made knight, and puts about his neck (according to the mode of the ancients) a golden collar, with a cross hanging at it. Most aptly therefore have the sovereigns of mi- litary orders annexed this ornament of the collar to their habit, and conferred it on the fellows and companions who have meritoriously deserved it, in respect of their wisdom or valour. There were other ensigns of knighthood that could not go round the shield, which shall be taken notice of afterwards. I shall next a little insist on other figures made use of in adorning arms exteri- orly, by surrounding the armorial shield, which by the by were never esteemed to be particular marks of dignity, but only ornaments of the escutcheon, such as the ardelier, laqs cC amcur, and garlands. !3Q EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. And ftrst, As to the cordelier, it is a cord of many running knots, which Monsieur Baron says is an adornment only proper for wives or married women to use round their arms ; and agani the said author, in his Art of Heraldry, p. 194. describes the same thus, Conleiihe, qui entoure fecusson des femmes, or scutum funiculo variis iw.ilicato nodis cinctum, in varios funiculo implexum modos. It hath its rise from that cord used by St Francis about his body ; and Francis Duke of Bretagne, for the devotion and reverence he had to this saint, placed such a cord of that fashion round the escutcheon of his arms. And upon the same respect, Francis I. King of France placed such another round the diadem of that saint for his device, with this motto, Plus qu' autre, that is, more than any. By which it seems he would have said, that he reverenced St Francis, whose name he carried, more than any saint. And without .doubt this was (says Menestrier) the chief reason which moved him to change the old form of the collar of St Mich- ael to a twisted one like the cordelier. And at this day several prelates of the Order of St Francis make use of the cordelier to surround their arms. That which brought it in use chiefly amongst women was the great affection Anne of Bretagne, Qiieen to Charles VIII. King of France had to it, in imitation of her father Francis Duke of Bretagne ; she used always a cordelier round her arms, de- . vices, and crown ; and her daughter Madam Claudia of France, who was married to Francis I. King of France, did the same ; and Louisa of Savoy, and other great ladies, did so far imitate them therein, that the practice of placing the cordelier round arms became frequent with all ladies of quality ; and being a pretty device or rebus for widows, made it more generally frequent, to show that they have corps delie, that is, their body free and untied ; the rebus proceeding from the pronun- ciation of corps dilie, or cordelier. Secondly, As to the love -knot, or laqs d' amour, as it is in figure very like the cordelier, so it is only made use of by women, in surrounding or adorning out- wardly their arms, for Monsieur Baron, in his Art of Heraldry, page 204. narrates, that " Laqs d' amour, qui entourent les armoiries des veuves &- des fiUes ;" or, " Nodi amatorii scuta circumdantes." Before the use of the cordelier, the most part of arms, as well of women as men, were svirrounded with garlands of leaves and flowers, as the Grecians and Romans adorned their statutes with ; and they were these garlands (says Menestrier) which they called stemtnata. In many old illuminate books of arms that I have perused are to be seen sundry armorial bearings so trimmed as to have garlands surrounding the escutcheon : And in old pieces of painting, in many places with us, I have ob- served the hke practice. The last instance hereof that I met with were these of the arms of the surname of Laing, which I saw surrounded with a garland in the mansion-house of Redhouse in East Lothian. In imitation of these garlands and chaplets, those in religious orders, as well men as women, placed round their arms crowns or wreaths of thorns, to show that their profession was a state of austerities and mortification, and sometimes placed chap- lets oi pater nosters, to manifest their devotion. Anciently there was another ornament, which I observe environed shields of arms, particularly to be met with on seals formed by three semi-circles, like a tre- foil, or by four, and many times a great many more, like to a rose united together by their points. This ornament had its rise from the reverse of old seals or private seals, where the shield of arms was placed as it were upon a rose, the emblem of secrecy, being most beautiful, when least opened or spread, for which to keep any saying secret, they say, sub rosa. And in foreign books of heraldry, I have seen several figures of the whole achievements of sundry princes and dukes abroad, trim- med all within an ornament of eight semi-circles. And afterwards, and in imitation of these semi-circles Joined together like to a rose round the shield, came (in succeeding ages) the custom and practice of placing the collars of knighthood about the escutcheon, and other badges of honour that could surround it, as chains of gold, ribbons, &c. Of which before. As for the other ensigns of knighthood that could not go round the shield, and which I promised to speak to, they were either placed below the shield, as that of the order of the crescent or half-moon, instituted by Rene of Anjou, brother and heir to Lewis III. King of Naples, in the year 1464, who settled the sovereignty EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. '31 thereof upon himself and his heirs, Dukes of Anjou and Kings of Sicily. The badge or device of the order was a crescent of gold, on which tliis word los was enamelled in red letters : It imported, los en croissant, that is, praise by in- creasing; this the knights wore on the right side of their cloaks or upper gar- ments, and in their armoiies placed the same below their escutcheons ; and to this crescent were fastened as many tags of gold enamelled with red, as the knight that wore it had been present at battles, sieges of towns, and such like memorable, actions. But this order is now extinct; for princes of small power cannot lix these honours so strongly as those of greater might ; besides, the irlouse of Anjou never had quiet possession of Naples or Sicily, but were still expelled as fast as they came ill ; so that the order could not subsist, when the crown tailed upon which it was founded. Others again place the badge within the shield, as those of the Order of St John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, or Knights Hospitallers of St John of Jerusalem. Before the taking oi Jerusalem from the Saracens, certain Christian merchants of Naples obtained leave from the Caliph of Egypt to erect a small and convenient house for entertainment of themselves and countrymen, which they built before the church of the Holy Sepulchre, together with a small oratory ; to them repair- ed certain canons of the Order of St Augustine, who built another oratory, and to distinguish them from the Knights of the Holy Sepulchre, they took the black habit of the Hermits of St Augustine. Jerusalem being afterwards taken by the Christians, Baldwin I. of the name. King of Jerusalem, created them Knights of St John of Jerusalem, to entertain and lodge pilgrims to defend the Holy Land ; as also for tliat they took St John Baptist for their patron they obtained tiiat title. It was instituted, says Ashmole, anno 1092, others say, anno 1099, by Gerard a native of Thoulouse, who came to Jerusalem in the time of Godfrey of Boulogne, and built this hospital, which became the first seat of this order, and dedicated it to St John of Cyprus, Bishop of Alexandria, commonly called Joannes Elemosynarius, and the said King Baldwin I. conferred on them large privileges, permitting them arms, and instituting them to be knights, anno 1104, their duty being to fight against the infidels, being first obedient to the Patriarch of Jerusalem. Pope Ge- lasius II. or Calixtus II. anno 1120, confirmed their rule of living ; and after popes received them under the protection of the papal bce, and endowed them with ample privileges, exempting them from payment of tithes, St-c: on the breast of their ha- bit (being black) they wore at first a plain cross of white cloth, which afterwards was changed to one with eight points, to represent the eight beatitudes ; but in war they used a red cassock, bearing the white cross upon it : and in their ban- ners or ensigns they wore a crimson or red coat of arms with the said white cross upon it ; but in their monasteries they wore the black garment only. To Gerard succeeded Raymond, who enlarged their laws and institutions, and was stiled Raimundus Dei gratia servus pauperum Jesii Christi et custos hospitalis Jerusalymi- tani ; but afterwards he and his successors had the title of Great Master of the Or- der given tliem, to denote their power and authority. When they were driven out of Palestine they removed into Cyprus, and anno 1309, to the Isle of Rhodes; out of which being expelled by Soljman the Magnificent, Emperor of the Turks, anno 1522, they removed from one place to another, till at last by the munificence of Charles V. anno 1530, they were settled in Malta. At this day their Great Master has the title of Prince of Malta and Goza ; Tripoli and Goxa were granted to them in fee by the Emperor Charles V. anno 1530, under the tender of one falcon yearly to the Viceroy of Sicily. Among his privileges he seals in lead, as does the Pope and Doge of Venice ; he acknowledges the Pope for his head, and the King of Spain and Sicily for his patron, or for their protectors. In this isle they continue a bulwark to those parts, and from this their settlement are called Knights of Malta. None are admitted to this order but such as can bring a testi- mony of their gentility for six descents ; when the Great Master dies, they sutler no vessel to go out of the island till another is chosen, lest the Pope should inter- fere in their election, who being chosen, is stiled the Mo^t Illustrious and Most Re- verend Prince, the Lord Frier N. N. Great Master of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, Prince of Malta, Gaules, and Goza. These knights are in number one thousand, of whom five hundred are always to be resident in the island, the other Vol. II. 3 E 132 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. five hundred are dispersed through Christendom at their several seminaries in-Spain-; Germany, Italy, and France, and at any summons are to make then- personal ap- pearance ; these seminaries (called by them Alberges) are seven in number, one of Castile, one of Arragon, one of Germany, one of Italy, one of France in general; one of Auvergne, one of Provence, over every one of which they have a Grand Prior, who in the country where he liveth is of great reputation ; an eighth semi- nary they had m England, till the suppression of it by King Henry VIII. yet they have some one or other to whom they give still the title of Grand Prior of Eng- land ; they had at one time in several parts of Christendom no fewer than 20,000 manors. The knights of this order bear gules, a cross argent. The Lord Prior ot this Order in England was accounted the prime baron in the realm, and some here had also the addition of Great, and was stiled Prior Hospita- lis Sti Johannis Jerusalem in Anglia, and by that title was he summoned to the Parliament as a iDaron of that kingdom, and at length, tor place and precedency, was ranked the first baron ; the Knights Templars were suppressed by Pope Cle- ment V. about the year 1310, and their lands were (by a general council held at Vienna) conferred on the knights of the Order of St John of Jerusalem, called fonnnites, after knights of Rhodes, and now knights of Malta. These Knights. Templars and their successors, the said knights of St John, they had only one house or manor here in Scotland, which was the Hospital of St Germains in Lo- thian ; but this house was dissolved anno 1494, and the greatest part of its re- venues was, by King James IV. conferred upon the King's College of Aberdeen, then newly founded by William Elphingston, Bishop of Aberdeen. Torphichen, in the shire of Mid-Lothian, did also belong to the knights of this Order of St J&hn ; and Mr Crawfurd, in his Peerage of Scotland, page 86. tells us, that Sir Walter Lind- say, (a son of the Lord Lindsay) Preceptor of Torphichen, was Lord St John in the reign of King James V. And again, ihid. page 479, Sir James Sandilands, the first Lord Torphichen, being a young man of good parts, and bred a scholar, was, by the said Sir Walter Lindsay Lord St John recommended to the Great Master of the Order of the Knights of Malta, as a person well qualified to be his successor in the preceptory of Torphichen. And Mr Sandiland's travelling into those parts^ and having resided for some years at the Isle of Malta, he gave such proofs of his learning and sufficiency for the discharge of that function, that he was with all the necessary forms received by the Grand Prior of the Hospital and his chapter, to be one of the knights of that ancient military order, and inaugurated future suc- cessor to the said Sir Walter Lindsay, by whose death, in the year 1543, he was fully invested in the title, power, and jurisdiction of Lord St John of Jerusalem in Scotland, and succeeded in the possession of the revenue thereof, vdiich was very great, and spread through the whole kingdom ; so that it is hereby apparent we had our Prior Hospitalis Sti. Johannis Jerusalem in Scotia, as well as they had in England, and by that title sat he in our Parliaments as a lord or baron of the kingdom. But at the Reformation here in Scotland, the said Lord St John re- nounced popery, and embraced the protestant religion ; and having resigned the lordship of St John in the hands of Qiieen Mary, her highness was graciously pleased, in consideration of Sir James's great merit and services, to grant and dispone heritably to him, his heirs and assignees, the foresaid lordship and pre- ceptory of Torphichen, for the sum of ten thousand crowns of the sun, which he presently paid down, besides an yearly annuity of five hundred merks, which was then erected into the lordship of Torphichen, by a charter under the Great Seal, dated the 24th of January 1563. The third and last way of placing badges of knighthood in armories is behind the shield, a practice used by the Knights of the Order of Avis in Portugal. Don Alphonso Henriquez, first King of Portugal, took from the Moors, ^/;/?o Dom. 1 147, the city of Evora, and, to strengthen it, sent thither several gallant com- manders, who assumed the title of Knights of St iSIary of Evora, putting themselves under the protection of our blessed lady ; and not long after they were called d"Avis, from a castle upon the Portuguese frontiers conquered from the Moors, whither they transplanted themselves. It was confirmed by Pope Innocent III. A. D. 1204, under the rule of St Benedict, and therefore in some papal rules called of St Be- nedict d'Avis. The knights profess conjugal chastity and obedience; anno 1213, EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 1,33 they submitted themselves to the rule, statutes, and visitation of the Order of Cala- tiava. But in the time of John of Portugal (natural son to Pedro K-ing of Porta- gal) VII. Great Master d'Avis, they cast otf their acknowledgment to Calatrava, and never after submitted to thejn; and afterwards when the crown of Portugal fell into the hands of Philip II. King of Spain, this order was governed according to the statutes of Portugal. They must be gentlemen by extraction, both of the father's and m.other's side. This order still subsists, and carry for theu' badge a green cross fleury, such as the knights of Alcantara used to wear. And in their arms, place the said cross pale-ways behind the middle of their armorial shields. But to come to a close of this chapter, I shall only observe, that at present it is ordinary for persons of quality, especially women, to place two branches of palm-tree at the sides of their arms, and this ornament is the symbol of con- jugal love, v.hich the ancients did represent by the male and female palm- tiee. CHAP. xn. OF THE CajWARTiMENT. - THE compartment is that figure upon which the shield and supporters usually stand or rest, and very frequently therein is inserted the name and desig- nation of the bearer, and when the person carries more mottos or epigraphs than one, if any of them relate to the supporters or arms, then they are commonly and most properly placed on the compartment below ; but if the same is entirely re- lative to the crest, the same most regularly ought always to be placed in an escrol above it. The compartment is of no fixed form in heraldry, neither by our practice at home, nor yet abroad; for sometimes, and that very frequently, it is formed like an escrol in order to contain more aptly a second motto ; and at other times it is formed like an oblong oval, wherein either to insert the motto or designation of the person to whom the arms belong : and seeing there is no stated rule hereanent in the Science of Heraldry, it is now customarily drawn after whatever form the painters or engravers of armorial achievements think best and fittest, and which, they commonly embellish with various flourishes, foldeshes, and running .leaves, in order to adorn their work and performance. But as the compartment is neither a proper nor regular piece of armory, so neither can I say that it is very ancient ; for upon old seals there is no such thing to be seen. And in those ages when shields of arms w ere represented couche, there was no compartment needful ; for they hung always by the left corner, and the supporters belonging thereto com- monly stood on the sides of the shield, and it is to be observed did not support the same as the practice now is, but only supported the casque or hebnet placed on the top thereof. In later times, when shields of arms were erect and supported, then there was subjoined a compartment for them to stand and rest upon, which, in old paintings, were ordinarily formed like to terraces or pieces of green land with hills and turrets appearing, with flowers and trees growing out of them for the greater or- nament of the figure, as may be yet seen in some of our old illuminated books of arms ; and the like practice is also to be seen on some ancient seals. And iiere- upon our learned countryman. Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of Heraldry, page 95. took occasion to say, that though none have offered to conjecture what gave the first occasion to compartments in heraldry, yet I conceive (says he) that the compartment represents the bearers' lands and territories, though sometimes they are bestowed in recompense of some honourable action. And for an example to prove this assertion, he gives us an instance of the earls of Douglas who got the privilege of having their supporters to stand within a pale of wood wreathed, because the Lord Douglas, in the reign of King Robert the Bruce, did defeat the English in Jedburgh Forest, and that they might not escape, caused wreath and 134 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. impale in the night that part of the wood by which he conjectui'ed they might make their escape. I am much of the opinion with this great man, that such compartments repre- sented the bearer's lands and territories, and that the said wreathed pale of wood, is still used by that noble family to perpetuate that memorable action of the Dou- glas above mentioned; and which opmion will be the more confirmed by the prac- tice of this ancient house who were proprietors of Jedburgh Forest, as by their charters with their seals appended to two of them, which 1 shall here mention, (though I narrated the same before in my blazon of the arms of the family) and de- scribe according as I saw them in the custody of our late curious antiquary Mr David Simpson. William, the first Earl of Douglas and Earl of Marr, by marrying the heiress thereof grants a charter of the lands of Easter Foulis in the earldom of Marr and shire of Aberdeen, to James Montcalto, i.e. Mowat, dated at the Castle of Kil- drumy, the 12th of July 1377, to which was appended his seal, whereon is the arms of Douglas and Marr, quarterly, within a shield couche, supported by one lion, with his head in the helmet, sitting on a compartment like to a rising ground, with a tree growing out of it, and seme of hearts, mollets, and cross croslets, the armorial figures of this earl's arms, to show, very probably, that this compartment represented his lands and tenitories. The other was the charter of his grandson, James Douglas, the second Earl of An- gus, of the lands of Stukerland in the sheriffdom of Perth, granted by him to Ro- bert Imrie or Ymbrie, dated at Tamtallan the bth of May 1434; on this earl's seal hereto appended on a shield couche, is quarterly, first, a lion rampant ; second, the arms of Douglas ; third, the arms of Stewart of Bonkill and Angus ; and, the fourth, the arms of Abernethy timbred with an helmet and capehne ; and, for crest, a plume of feathers, supported on the right side by a deer, and, on the left,, by a woman in a rich habit, both standing on the shield and holding the helmet, which the woman does by the capeline ; and the whole achievement is surrounded with a pale of wood wreathed, such as that now used by his successor the Duke of Douglas, as a compartment under his armorial bearing, and on the outer circle of this seal are these words, Sig, Jacobi Comitis Anguisia Bom. de Abernethie 'iiS Jed- worth Jorest. It is probable these compartments of the Douglases do represent and perpetuate the one their feus, and the other a noble action of one of their family; yet 1 have not met with any other arms of our ancient and noble families with such special compartments, though some do represent pieces of ground for their noble feus, as on the seals of the Earls of Crawford, and the Lords of Hamilton, now dukes, as in Sir George Mackenzie's Science of Heraldry, page 95. where he hath given us two figures cut on copper, one of the seal of James Lord Hamilton, the other that of David de Lindsay, Earl of Crawford, both of whose shields of arms are couche, their supporters bearing up the helmet according to the custom of that age, and both standing on a terrace as a compartment thereto ; and several other old seals I have seen trimmed after this method; and especially this practice is to be met with in many illuminated books of blazons; but 1 have observed none of them strewed with any armorial figures (which certainly is the best method to be used for appro- priating" them to particular famihes) like that of William, first Earl of Douglas, I, just now mentioned. And, except these instances, I meet with no other examples with us, save that of the noble family of Drummond Earls of Perth, whose com- partment, as the former, is represented by a green hill, seme of caltrapes, which, with the motto of the family, viz. gang warily, is a pretty device. And the an- cient family of M'Farlane, the chief of that nan'ie, carrieth in their armorial achieve- ments a particular compartment, wavey (whereon their supporters stand) in repre- sentation of Lochsloy, being a place in the Arrochar where this clan generally ren- dezvous themselves before a battle, and on the said compartment have also the word Lochsloy, which is the M'Farlane's cri de guerre or slughorn ; as also Ogilvie of Innerquharity hath his arms trimmed and cut (in the Plates of Achievements subjoined to the First Volume of this my System of Heraldry) with another par- ticular compartment, to wit, the representation of a green hill or rising terrace, on which is placed two serpents nowed, spouting out fire, proper, and thereon his sup- EXTERIOR ORN AMEN'i'y . 135 porters doth stand, and below the same, within the said terrace, is this motto, Ter- rena pericula sperno, which is a very good device. In the English books of he- raldry I meet with no nobleman or gentleman that carry in their armorial bearings particular compartments. And yet I am still of opinion tluit compartments, of whatsoever form they be, are none of the proper parts of the achievement accounted for by any herald that 1 have met with, foreign or domestic; yet I see nothing against the usage of them, but that they may for a decorament be used by all those families who have right to carry arms, and particularly families who have for a long time possessed an- cient baronies may place them on compartments to represent their feus, and may also have the same seme of their armorial figures, if they be agreeable to such a disposition. As for the figures of creatures placed under the achievements, they cannot pro- perly be called compartments, but rather devices, as I have shown before. And their position in arn\ories is ordinarily by placing them sometimes at the sides of the shield, or below the same, and may be used by any noble or ancient family that hath right to adorn and support their arms. As for the salamander in flames, proper, which the ancient family of Dundas of that Ilk carry below their arms, and the hart's head cabossed, which Sir George Mackenzie, in his Science of He- raldry, page 88. places below the shield of the coat of Denham of old, which he there hath caused to be cut so, no doubt from an ancient seal or piece of painting- he hath seen ; and the blazing star which Captain Robert Seaton places also be- low his shield, with the motto Luceo boreale, I esteem them only but devices, and are very far from the use and nature of a compartment in my opinion. And the wild man lying in chains under the escutcheon of Robertson of Struan, which has been carried by this ancient family for a long time, to perpetuate a dutiful and loyal action performed by one of their predecessors in apprehending one of the mur- derers of King James I. cannot be rightly called a compartment, but more pro- perly an honourable supporter. For as I have shown before that the achievements of the greatest families in Europe have had but one supporter of old, and particularly amongst ourselves, which I could demonstrate by many examples from old seals, so I have also seen the royal arms of Scotland itself represented in several places v.'ith only one supporter; and, to confirm this, upon the Nether-Bow steeple in Edin- burgh, they may be yet perceived cut in stone, just standing upon the back of an unicorn, in like manner as Struan's armorial shield do upon the said wild man. Neither have I met with any special compartments upon which the achieve- ments of sovereign princes do stand, at home or abroad, taken notice of by any herald. And even these of the kings of Scotland and England are commonly formed much after the common ones used by their nobles, except only that they have frequently this difference, that out from them there issueth the badges of their dominions, viz. the thistle for Scotland, and the rose for England. The royal achievement of France is placed by some upon such a compartment, and by others on that of different forms as they think most fit and proper. And Mon- sieur Baron, in his U Art Heraldique, places it upon a plain cheque of square pieces of marble, azure and argent, on the first a flower-de-luce, and on the second the letter L, ensigned with an imperial crown. And the same author places the achievements of Phihppe de France Due d'Orleans, and Monsieur Le Due de Roquelaure, upon a plain piece of ground, as it were, without any figure upon it, like unto these compartments which I have called terraces with us. And the other achievements he gives us figures of in his said book have no compartments at all, because they have no supporters to stand upon the same ; which, in my opinion, is the only fit method I can think on for the usage of compartments in armories, and in the best foreign herald books that I have perused: when the figures of armorial achievements therein are cut with supporters, they are generally placed standing on a terrace, and when they have no supporters, I observe they have no compartm.ents at all. Which naturally leads me to suggest, that another probable reason anent the original of the usage of terrace compartments in armories, hath presumably taken its rise from which tournaments and joustings, to which none were admitted but those Vol. n. 3 Q^ t36 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. who were truly noble, or gentle by father's and mother's side, and who were obliged to expose their armorial bearings, as proofs of their noble and gentle extraction, which they at first adorned with helmet, crest, motto, mantling, and wreath, be- fore the exercise began ; so afterwards, according to Menestrier and other French writers, began from thence the rise and progressive use of supporters. The knights nobles, qualified for such exercises, had tlieir arms hung up on the barrier-trees, commonly in the open fields, near to the place of jousting, which were attended by their armour-bearer and esquires, to the end they might acquaint their masters what knight gave them a challenge to fight, which was done by touching the shield. And the said Menestrier further tells us, that these knights put their ar- mour-bearers, pages, and servants, in such dresses as they fancied, making them sometimes appear like Savages, Saracens, Moors, &-c. and sometimes under disguise, clothed with the skins of lions, bears, &c. to guard their shields of arms, and to give an account of the names and arms of those who give the challenge by touch- ing the shields of their masters. And the fields whereon these servants stood for guarding of their masters' arms, thus hung up, might induce limners and painters, that had occasion to see the same, to form from the life such figures and represen- tations thereof, with a view of the adjacent ground and field whereon these sup- porters stood, and arms hung, so as to introduce the practice of trimming, support- ed shields of arms with terrrace compartments. And John Slezer, in his Theatrmn Scotia, hath caused cut several of our nobilitys' arms that he hath made dedica- tions to therein, trimmed with rising terrace compartments, for their supporters to stand upon; yet the book, Jetc (T armories des soverains ci? estats cT Europe, in which are the prints and figures of all the achievements of the princes of Europe, hath none of them upon compartments, but two or three, and these upon very ordinary ones; so that, as I have said before, compartments depend much upon the fancy of the workman, as to their form and figure, for supporters to stand and rest upon, as will evidently appear from the great variety of compartments in the sculptures to be met with in the several treatises of heraldry, both at home and abroad. I have added this chapter of compartments, which some may think might have been omitted, in respect no herald before me hath taken notice of them as any part of this science ; yet from what I have narrated and seen thereanent from seals and old paintings, the usage of compartments I have made appear to be an ancient practice, especially with us and the French, which frees me from an objection of having omitted to speak and treat on some part and figure now in use for adorning of armorial achievements, which I think I have now almost completed. And shall next proceed to put the whole armorial trimmings, that make up a complete coat of arms, particularly of the highest ranks of nobility, under a manteaux and canopy, and the arms of the inferior ranks under cloaks or mantles; and then come to a close of the exterior ornaments now and of old made use of in adorning and beau- tifying the armorial shield. CHAP. XIII. OF MANTEAUXES AND PAVILIONS. HAVING now fully already treated of all the sorts of figures and symbols made use of exteriorly in armories, to accomplish and complete the ar- morial achievements of those of the inferior and high ranks of nobility, I shall here leave those of the first degree, under cloaks and mantles, and these of the last de- gree, under manteauxes and pavilions, wliich being the utmost embellishments of armories I now treat on, I shall conclude this my System on the Exterior Orna- ments in the Science of Heraldry therewith. The rise and original of the usage of manteauxes and pavilions in armories, as the other exterior ornaments of the shield, are supposed by the most judicious heralds to have their beginning from the ceremonials of tournaments and jou^tings. Where it is to be observed, that it was customary for the arms of the combatants to be exposed to the public view of all beholders for some time before the said ex- ercise began, and as the conveniency of the place allowed, they were exposed and EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 137 set forth upon military cioaks, carpets, mantles, tents, and pavilions. Whicli, Me- nestrier says, in old manuscripts of such exercises, were called ensigns, blazons, and covers of arms. And from a manuscript which he had from Monsieur d'Cange, they were also called by these names. And he further adds, that the heralds did cry and advertise the knights to set out their banners, blazons, and houses iVecti, or ensigns of arms, that the tournaments might be orderly. And, as 1 observed before, (when treating on supporters) of the piece of a formula of a challenge to u tournament, (out of Segar) given by the French to the English, it is there insert, that their shields of arms were to be hung up some days before the accomplish- ment of the said exercise upon their pavilions. It is probable then, that in the places and nations where arms were most in re- quest, that there the embellishments of them had their rise, and came to be placed on the most glorious ornaments, both of men and women, the same being ensigns, not only of acquired, but also of hereditary honour, as is evident by the practice of all civilized nations, in representing the greatest persons, men or women, dead or alive in their most noble habits with their arms. As for instance, the ingeni- ous Mr Sandford, in his Genealogical History of the Kings of England, gives us the effigies of Eleanor, wife to Edward Duke of Somerset, who was slain in the battle of St Alban's, in the year 1455, as represented in the window of the Col- legiate Church of Warwick on painted glass, with her mantle embroidered with the arms of her husband the duke, and on her kirtle, or under-habit, these of her own family, from which he makes an observe, from a general practice, that where- ever a woman is carved, cut out, or painted with a mantle or kirtle of arms, that these on the mantle are the arms of the husband, and these on the kirtle are the wife's paternal ones, and backs or supports it with this reason, that the husband's arms on the upper garment are as a cloak and mantle to shroud the wife from all violence, and these of her own, on her kirtle, or under garment, as being under covert. The said author likewise gives us another instance, which seems to contradict his former observe, yet more agreeable to the present.forms of manteauxes with armorial arms on the foldings, and which is an ancient example of this practice, viz. in the 322d page of his said History, he gives us a figure of Anne Neville, the wife of Humphrey Earl of Stafford, which he has there caused cut as it stood painted on the window of the Cathedral Church of Litchfield, having on her upper gar- ment, or mantle, the arms of her paternal family, being that of Neville, and no arms on her kirtle; but the arms of her husband Humphrey Earl of Stafford i^ placed on the lining of her mantle, which, being turned back, represents (says he) an exact impalement of the arms of Staff ^rd and Neville. He gives us another instance on the tomb which Charles Somerset Earl of Wor- cester caused erect for himself, (who lived in the reign of King Henry VIII. or England) and his first wife Elizabeth Herbert, daughter and heir of William Her- bert Earl of Huntingdon, and Lord Herbert of Gower, in the Royal Chapel of Windsor, where his portraiture is represented apparelled in the habit of a Knight of the Order of St George, and his wife's in that of a countess, having her kirtle em- broidered with her paternal arms, and on the mantle the arms of her husband. In several of our old illuminate books of arms here in Scotland I have seen figures of the portraitures of several of our kmgs and queens, and some of the ladies ot our higher nobility, before the reign of Q^ieen Mary, depicted thereon, the men having their armorial bearings placed in a shield over their head, and the women having on their kirtles the arms of their husbands impaled with their own, by which it would appear that we had the like practice of old here in Scotland, as well as in England ; and presumably, through the ignorance of our then herald- painters in drawing these efSgies in their books, without upper garments or mantles, where their husband's paternal arms ought to have been placed, they have im- paled them together on their kirtles to make up this escape. Monsieur Hosier, in his Genealogy of the Signieurs of Labour, speaking of Lewis de Combauld, who had followed the Constable of Bourbon in his wars, and being close at his side when he was killed in the scaling of Rome, in the year 1527, covered the bcJy of that prince with his coat of armour, which he threw ofl to hide the body of the prince from the soldiers, lest the prince's death should dis- J 38 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. courage them from the attack, which afterwards they accomplished xvith victory, by the prudence of the said Lewis, who, to perpetuate his presence of mind in that iuncture, and his brave conduct, had atter this his shield of arms enveloped with his surcoat, and, for motto, above it, these words, Ubi riu-l ibifcl. And Menestner doth also narrate the same passage. Let these instances 1 have given be sufficient for the ancient practice of placing shields of arms on cloaks, mantles, or manteauxes, and surcoats. I next proceed to consider these with their form used in latter times, as practised and represented by our modern heralds in their books of blazons, of which I met with three rash- ions of manteauxes or mantles, as they are pleased to call them ; the first are these that are trussed up on both sides square like a curtain, such as these figures Richard Blome hath given us in his Anulogia Honorum subjoined to Mr Guillmi's firth edi- tion of his Display of Heraldry, viz. in the arms of Edward Viscount of Conway, and in several of the achievements of the barons of England, which is placed above their supporters in place of the ordinary practice ot running leaves ; and in arms without supporters, gives us figures of such mantles that surround the whole shield and helmet, except the crest and wreath, which stand without the same, several ex- amples whereof he gives us, to wit, in the arms of Sir Wolstan Dixie of Bosworth, Sir Philip Matthews of Edmonton, Sir John Osborne of Chicksands, and divers others, both knights and esquires. The second fashion or form of mantles are figured, hanging down around the .shield and helmet in many plaits and foldings, like to a cloak or gown, when hanging about one's shoulders, which Sylvester Petra Sancta calls chlamys, wnbella, or palliolum. Several examples hereof the said Mr Blome hath given us in his said Treatise of Honour and Nobility, particularly in his cuts of the arms of Sir Ed- mond Bacon of Redgi-ave, Sir John Wittewronge of Rothamsted, Sir Robert Jason of Broad-Somerford, Sir John Shaw of Eltham, Sir Stephen White of Hackney, Francis Dives of Brumham, Anthony Rowe of St Martin's, and a great many more, both knights and esquires. And our learned countryman Sir George Mack- enzie, in his Science of Heraldry, page 88. hath given us a figure of such a like mantle surrounding the arms of the surname of Denhara of old, which he calls an antique mantling. Now, as these two fashions of mantles are chiefly given by the British heralds to those of the inferior rank of nobility, though the said Mr Blome hath also more irregularly trimmed several of the noble peers of England with such mantles about their helmets, (as may be seen by the many figures he hath given us cut in copper in his forecited book) so it will appear, that the French practice seems to be the same ; for Menestrier tells us, that these mantles serve as an ornament to such fa- milies, who have no title of dignity, and that their first rise was from tournaments, and were anciently used by persons of quality, especially ladies, (as I observed be- fore) who, as is yet to be seen on several ancient tombs or funeral monuments, are represented in cloaks or mantles, with their husbands' arms upon them, and on their under-garments or kirtles, with these of their own families ; which prac- tice is frequent in the German armorial bearings, and in those of Naples, as saith Menestrier. The tinctures of these cloaks or mantles are with foreigners the same with the tinctures of their arms; but with us in Britain they are red, doubled with white. Sylvester Petra Sancta, in the 8oth chapter of his book de Pallio et Tentorio in umbrante gentilitias tesseras, gives us two cloaks, (such as that I last narrated from the cuts in Mr Blome's Treatise) one of them with a ducal escutcheon placed upon it, which he calls Chlamydem sm umbellam, qua circumvolvitur icon gentilitia duntax- at ducum et principum. And this mantle is doubled with ermine, and is fit for those (says he) of the high degree of nobility. The other mantle he gives us is with- out ermine, and tells us the same is fit for commanders and captains of soldiers to use. The third and most honourable sort of manteauxes, now used both in France and Britain, are more round in their figure than the former I have mentioned, and are doubled with ermine, which envelope or go round the escutcheon : and upon the foldings or skirts of these mantles are frequently embroidered the arms of the own- 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTi,. 139 ers, that when they are brought over the escutcheon and meet, the embroidereil arms are entire as on the escutcheon within. Menestrier says, that the first use of this mantle, or manteaux, is not above 150 years since ; and the first of them he met with was that one which surrounds the arms of the Duke of Lorrain in the AUemagne armorial, and he calls such ones ducal 7ncin!eauxL-s, because none but princes, dukes, and peers of France used them, as also cardinal princes and cardinal dukes; and tells us, that Cardinal George Duke de Armagnac, Legate of Avignon, had his arms placed on such a manteaux in the year 1583. And Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarine had their arms so adorned. The use of these manteauxes or mantles is but late in England ; and the firss figures of them I have met with in the herald books of that kingdom, are to be found in the said Mr Blome's ^inalogia Hoimriim, subjoined to Mr Guillim's fifth edition of his Display of Heraldry, folio, London 1679, an example whereof he therein gives us, done on copperplate, surrounding the armorial achievements of Henry Pierrepont Marquis of Dorchester. And in other English herald books 1 have seen figures of the achievements of Henry Somerset Marquis of "Worcester, Heneage Fuich Earl of Winchelsea, and John Lord Bellasyse Baron of Worlaby trimmed with the like mantles. But the first practice of these mantles I met with in Scotland, was that of the armorial bearing of Charles Earl of Lauderdale, which was trimmed so at London, and cut on a copperplate, in imitation of these I have before mentioned, which in figure are all done in the like method and form as 1 caused cut on copper the achievements of James Duke of Hamilton, which is placed before my dedication to him of my First Volume of this System of Heraldry. But though the English, by the above examples, allow this mantle to be assumed, and carried by all degrees of their high nobility, yet this custom being not so prac- tised by other nations, in my opinion none but dukes, marquisses and earls ought to have their arms trimmed with such mantles, and none under these degrees of nobility ought to assume the same, till at least the practice hereof be more uni- versally used abroad. For this mantle is ordinarily named a comital mantle, and therefore it is irregular for lower nobility, that have not advanced to the degree of Earl, to trim their achievements with comital mantles. As also it is to be obser- ved, that anciently the coronets of earls were after the same shape and form with those of the degree of dukes, as was also their other ensigns of honour; and besides, this form of mantle is particularly allowed by a general practice to all of the degree of earl. The first appearance of this manteaux, or mantle, on funeral escutcheons with vfi in North Britain, was on that of the Right Honourable John Dalziel Earl of Carn- wath, who died at Edinburgh, and was interred at the Abbey of Holyroodhouse. in the year 1702, a nobleman of good learning, and well known in this science of heraldry. And the next I observed was on the funeral escutcheon of the last George Earl of Winton Lord Seaton, the blazon whereof I subjoin as follows. Quarterly first and fourth or, three crescents within a double tressure, flowered and counter-flowered with flower-de-luces ^«/(fj-, for the surname or Seaton ; second and third azure, three garbs or, for the earldom of Buchan, over all an escutcheon parted per pale, first gules, a sword in pale proper, hiked and pommelled or, sup- porting an imperial crown within a double tressure flowered and counter-flowered with flower-de-luces of the last as a coat of concession, second, azure a. blazing star argent, within a double tressure, flowered and counter-flowered with flower-de-luces or, as a coat of augmentation assumed by Robert, first Earl of Winton : which es- cutcheon is timbred with crown, helmet, and volets befitting his quality ; and on the helmet, in place of a wreath, is set a ducal coronet, and thereupon, for crest, is placed a dragon vert, spouting out fire before and behind, proper, charged on the wing thereof with a blazing star argent, and on the fire, out of the mouth of the dragon, are the words Sett-on, and above, on an escrol, for motto, these words, Hazard zit forivard : supporters two martins proper collared, or, and charged with crescents gules, and to the collar are chains affixed passing between their fore legs, and reflexing over their backs, and on an escrol (coming from behind the sides of the shield, and over the middle of the supporters) this epigraph. In via virtuti vitia nulla, and below, on the compartment, is inscribed this motto, Irtaminatisful- VoL.n. 3R 140 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. get honoribus. Behind the shield are placed two battons saltier-ways ^tt/i?j-, seme of thistles, ensigned with imperial crowns or, and topped witli the same crown, as the particular badge of the king's master-household ; all which are placed upon a comital manteaux gules, doubled ermine, fringed or, and upon the upper laps of the manteaux the foresaid arms. At the four corners of the achievement are placed as many devices of the family in roundels, the uppermost on the right side, being or, a crescent, increscent, and decrescent interlaced gules, and out of the crescent issueth a sword, proper, hiked and pommelled or, supporting an imperial crown proper, and on the circle going round this device these words. In adversity pa- tience, in prosperity benevolence. The second upper device on the left is almost the same with the former, only hath a garb in place of the sword ensigned also with an imperial crown, and the third as the second, and the fourth as the first, and round the foresaid achievement and devices were placed siKteen escutcheons of noble families, with their respective coronets, as the proofs of the said Earl's nobi- lity paternal and maternal. But to return, Menestrier tells us, that the presidents of the several parliaments in France, in imitation of the peers of that kingdom, are in use to place their arms also on their mantles, which they wear with their other robes in parliaments, and all solemnities, being scarlet doubled with a grey fur. But then it is to be observed, that the skirts or foldings of these mantles of theirs are not embroidered with their particular arms, in like manner as these of the dukes and peers in France, and with us, are now accustomed to trim their achievements, yet they have placed down on the left side of their mantles a gold galloon as a mark of knighthood, which is always affixed to the office. I shall next proceed to speak anent the pavilion or canopy, and then have done. Pavilion is in the nature of a tent or tabernacle, being three different names for the same thing, as derived from several languages ; they were the chief habitations of the ancient patriarchs in the first ages of the word, as may be seen in Gen. xii. 8. And such is the manner of the Tartars at this day ; some of them have no towns or villages to inhabit, but the open and champaign fields, after the manner of the Scythians. And JVIr Guillim tells us, that since tents have been laid aside for habitation, they have been rtiade use of for armies during the campaign, and came afterwards to be used in heraldry. And the family of Tenton in England bears sable a cheveron between three tents argent. But the word pavilion is borrowed from the French, and pavilions, as we generally represent them, are round at the top, and sometimes borne in coat-armour, as may be seen in the bearing of the Co.npany of Merchant-Taylors of London, whose arms are argent, a tent-royal be- tween two parliament-robes gules, lined ermine, on a chief azure, a lion passant gardant, or. Yet the noblest instance of a paviHon is, that sometimes the achieve- ment stands within a royal pavilion, as that of the Emperor and King of France ; this Sylvester Petra Sancta calls tentorium, and is, as he observes, competent only to princes, though all princes use them not. But I admire why the Kings of England did not assume as well the pavilion as the arms of France, seeing that is one of the special honours of that kingdom. And Monsieur Baron, in his Art of Heraldry, calls this royal pavilion Augustale Tabernaculum Regium scuti Tentorium. The figure of this pavilion or canopy has two principal parts, the combel and cur- tains ; the first is the hat or cover, with rays going along the top, and at the bot- tom thereof tassels hanging down ; the second are the tapestry of curtains, which are lined with ermine, and these hang down from the combel, and which last, be- ing the curtains without the combel, may be allowed to environ or envelope the achievements of elective and feuditary kings and princes, according to the opinion of some heralds; and none but sovereign princes can place their achievements un- der a pavilion, covered with a combel. That of the King of France is ordinarily given us under a royal pavilion, whose blazon thereof, according to Monsieur Baron in his r Art Heraldique, page 120, I shall here subjoin as follows in his own' words : " D'azur a trois fleurs-de-hs d'or deux, en chef &. unen pointe; I'ecu timbre d'un " casque d'or, ouvert, place de front, assorte de ses lambrequins des emaux, son " blason, &. surmonte' de la couronne imperiale Francoise ; environne des colliers " des Ordres du Saint Esprit et de Saint Michel ; tenli par deux anges vetus en EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 141 " Lfevites, tenans cliaciin une bannier &- ayant leiirs dalmatiqucs, cliarge's du " mesme blason ; le tout place sous un grand pavilion seme de France &■ double " d'hermine?, son comble rayonne d'or & somme de la couronne imperiale Fran^oisc, " garni d'un lleur-de-lis a quatre angles, qui est le cimier de France. Le cri dc " guerre est Montjoyc S. Dennis : ce saint extant le patron &- I'apostie de la, " F" ranee; le susdit pavilion attache a roritlame du royaume, qui est surnionte de " la devise ; lilia mn laborant neqiii; nent, laquelle est tiree de I'cloge que le Fils de " Dieu donne aux lis dans I'Ecriture, lui faisant faire allusion ;i la loi Salique, qui " exclude le lilies de la Royaute." riie blazon in English thus ; azure, three flower-de-luces or, 1 and i ; the shield is tinibred with a golden helmet, standing direct forward, and open in the face, adorned with lambiequins of the tinctures of the arms, and ensigned with the imperial crown of France ; the shield is environed with the collars of ihc Orders of the Holy Ghost and St Michael; supporters two angels, proper, in daU matic habits, charged with the same figures, each holding a banner, ail under a pavilion seme of France, doubled ermine ; the combel bemg of rays of gold, is en- signed with the imperial crown of France, and it again topped with four flower-de- luces, the crest of that nation ; on an escrol the cry of war, Montjoie St Dennis ; behind the pavilion is placed the royal banner or oriflame of France, and over all, on an escrol, the device ot France, Lilia nan laborant ncque nent ; which is drawn from the words of the Son of God, spoken in the Scripture of the Ulies, making an allusion to the Salique law, which excludes women from succeeding to the sove- reignty of France. The foresaid Monsieur Baron and others place the royal arms of France on a compartment, which they mention not in their blazons as we do ; they make it represent a pavement cheque, of four tracts, argent and azure on the first, the letter L ensigned with an imperial crown, and on the second a flower-de- luce or. As for the antiquity of the pavilion of France, Menestrier tells us, That Philip de Valois had it on his seals and coins of gold, for which they were called pavi- lions ; and that Philip Moreau was the first contriver of the royal pavilion ; he likewise tells us. That he has seen the arms of Cardinal Charles of Bourbon, which were supported with lions, and a crosier of an archbishop behind the shield (which was not crowned) under a pavilion seme of the cyphers of his name, surmounted of a cardinal's hat, and the curtains of the pavilion are drawn by, to let the arms be seen, by two arms, with manuples over them, holding flaming swords. The kings of Denmark, Portugal, and the Duke of Savoy, as King of Cyprus, have had their achievements under pavilions. It is thought strange that the kings of England did not assume the pavilion of France as well as their arms, nor used another of their own. Our sovereigns, equal in dignity with the greatest in Europe, have never been in use to place their arms under a pavilion, so far as 1 can learn, who, for their antiquity and long succession of 112 kings, and for their ancient use of their fixed armorial ensigns, may justly claim precedency of all the crowned heads in Europe and their armorial bearings, which have been altered and changed by others conquering them, and succession of strangers, to which abitements and mutations our sovereign ensigns were never subject, but always hereditary and entire, ; which from age to age have been adorned with all the marks of greatness then in use and since, do justly merit all the embellishments of honour that can be invented to adorn arms ; therefore, if placed under a pavi- lion, may be blazoned thus. The royal achievement or sovereign ensign armorial of the kingdom of Scot- land, or, a lion rampant j^u/fj-, armed and langued azure, within a double tressure, counter-flowered with flower-de-luces of the second, timbred with a helmet stand- ing direct forward with bars or, adorned with lambrequins or, doubled ermine, and ensigned with the imperial crown of Scotland, and thereon, for crest, a lion seiant, full-faced gules, crowned or, holding in his right paw a naked sword, proper, and in the sinister a sceptre or, both erected, and above, on an escrol, for motto. In defence. The shield is encircled with the colour of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, with the badge thereto appended, of gold enamelled azure, having the image of St Andrew surmounted of his cro^s argent, and sup - 142 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. ported by two unicorns argent, crowned with imperial and gorged with open crowns ; to the last chains affixed, passing betwixt their fore legs, and reflected over their backs or ; he on the dexter embracing and bearing up a banner of cloth of gold, charged with the royal arms of Scotland ; he on the sinister another banner azure, charged with a St Andrew's cross argent, standing on a compartment like a pavement, cheque or and a%ure ; on the first, the armorial figures of Scotland ; and on the second, the cross of St Andrew, all within a royal pavilion of cloth of gold, seme of thistles slipped proper, doubled ermine, the combel rayonne, and adorned with precious stones, and topped with the imperial crown of Scotland, over all, on an escrol, the device of Scotland, 'Nemo me impune lacesset. Sylvester Petra Sancta has placed the arms of the Archduke of Austria within a pavilion. The Doge of Venice placed above his arms an ombel, like to the gonfannon of the church of Rome, which was granted to these in that office by Pope Alex- ander III. when he fled to Venice from the persecution of the Emperor Fre- derick. How the several monarchs of Great Britain, since the union of the two crowns, have compounded and diversified their royal achievements may be seen cut on copperplate. Volume the First of this Book. CHAP. XIV. OF NOBILITY WITH ITS PROOFS, REGULARLY COUNTED AS THEY ARE PLACED ON FUNERAt ESCUTCHEONS, AND OTHER MONUMENTS OF HONOUR, WITH THE FORMS AND CERE- MONIES OF FUNERALS AMONG US. UNDER the name of Nobles are comprehended the Prince, Dukes, Marquisses, Earls, Viscounts, and Barons. And though our law doth not call any man noble under the degree of a Baron, yet some distinguish between nobiles majores, which is from the prince to the baron, and nobiles minores, which includes all under a baron to the gentleman. A gentleman of blood is one descended of three descents of nobles, viz,, of name and arms, both by his father and mother ; for gentility is not perfect in the person on whom it first devolved, but must be continued and completed by succession. Thus, among the Romans, though the father was free born, and of the equestrian cense, yet it was requisite that the grandfather should be the same, otherwise he could not obtain the ring, which is one of the symbols of the equestrian order, as Pliny informs us. Gentility then begins in the grandfather, increases in the fa- ther, and is completed in the son. The proofs of nobility therefore, of three descents, are reckoned the armorial ensigns or tesseras of gentility, viz. the grandfather and grandmother on the father's side, and the grandfather and grandmother on the mother's side, which are counted thus ; The grandson is first set down, and above him his father and mother, and above them their fathers and mothers, being the grandfathers and grandmothers of the first mentioned, who is the gentleman of three descents, as in the following Table. The Gentleman of three descents. Father. ■ Grandfather. Grandmother. [" Grandfather. Grandmother. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. H3 These four quarters are marshalled and disposed on the sides of the grandson's escutcheon, or other monu.nents of honour, as proofs of his nobiUty, and are called by the Latins, ^lartena. Tessera, vel arguvienta mbilitatis ; but the Ger- mans and Dutch call tiiem The four Lineages, on account that the son proceeds from them by four lines ; and we on the same account, though somewhat impro- perly, call them Brani:hes, for the son is rather a branch of the grandtither's, than they of him. Proofs of nobility by four descents make eight quarters, which is counted by adding a father and mother to every one of the four former; and the number of eight quarters is ordinarily used by our heralds in funeral escutcheons and other monuments of honour, in manner following, viz. The gentleman of four descents. Grandfather, Father's mother. r Grandfather. r Great-grandfather. I > ^ Grandtather's mother. r Great-grandfather. 4- I- Grandmother's mother. r Great-grandfather, 3- i. Grandfather's mother. r Great-gi'andfather. .Mother's mother. I "^ Grandmother's mother. .These eight quarters, or proofs of nobility are placed" round the escutcheon or arms of the great-grandson to show his nobility by four descents ; the paternal quarters on the right side, and the maternal on the left, which appears more plain by the following figure. Vol. U. 3S J44 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. The arms of the Great- grandson, noble by four de- scents, on both father and mother's sides. These quarters ought to be regularly placed, as in the foregoing schemes, and! 'lot ignoble, or borrowed from other families, which are forbidden by the statuM and edicts of several countries, as contrary to should be genuine and true, an(^ot ignoble, or borrowed from other tamihes, the laws of heraldry. Some countries, by their laws and institutions, require, as proofs of complete nobility, sixteen quarters, which are counted the same way as in the former scheme, by adding a father and mother to every one of the eight quarters, which may be multiplied to any number ; some' of our noble families counting their genealogies from the father and mother's side to tbe number of sixty-four quarters. The common practice of these proofs with us may be seen on funeral escutcheons, which 1 shall here describe, wjth their trimmings and other pieces o£ funeral pomp. The. funeral escutchean is in form., of a lozenge, about six feet and two inches square, on black calicoe or silk, with a border of black cloth ; in the middle of: which is painted the complete achievements of the defunct, with its exterior orna- ments, and additional marks and badges of honour finely illuminated ; and round the sides are placed the quarter proofs in the order before described, consisting sometimes of eight and sometimes of sixteen on both sides, to show that the de- funct was noble by five descents on both sides ; and on the four corners of the border are placed four mort-heads, having in the interstices of all these paintings seme of tears ; a draught, or figure, of which is exemplified in the funeral escutcheon of the most illustrious prince, John, late Duke of Athol. The quarters or symbolical proofs of nobility, being coats of arms placed on the sides of the defunct's achievements, are not timbred with helmet nor cre«t, though adorned with other marks and dignity, such as coronets, collars of sovereign i;^ (in;af>r^yki^'> EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 145 knighthoods, or the badges of high offices, which the owners of these quarters did enjoy. The escutcheon above described is commonly placed on the fore part of the house, or above the gate where the deceased lies ; and another of the same form is fixed in the chiuch or aisle over the place where he is interred ; and above that escutcheon is an hebnet, wreath, and coronet, suitable to the quality of the de- cea>ed, covered with a lonse black silk crape. A lady dying in her iiusband's lifetime has her arms impaled in a formal shield with those of her husband trimmed with exterior ornaments belonging to his quality, and may be cottised on the left with the supporter of her paternal fa- mily. A widow lady has her paternal arms on a lozenge shield, impaled with those of her husband's on the right, surrounded with la cordeliere, i. e. a belt or ward interliced with knots, which the Latins call, C'mgulum laqueatum illustrium matro- nnrum ; and by the custom of France is allowed to none below knights' wives, though our heralds give it without distinction to all gentlewomen who have right to arms. Which paternal arms may be adorned with her father's supporter and coronet, or those of her husband, and her proofs of nobility placed round the escutcheon ; and if she has had two husbands, their arms may be marshalled by way oi parti mi- coupe on the right, and her own on the left, after this manner. An unmarried lady or gentlewoman has her paternal arms likewise on a lozenge shield, surrounded with a laqs d! amour, and cotised with the supporters of her family, ensigned with a coronet suitable thereto, if descended of high quality ; and if not, ensigned with a garland of flowers, having her proofs of nobility dis- po.^ed round her arms as before. Some heralds have been in use unwarrantably to place the arms of a gentlewoman under a canopy, with curtains and a combel, vvh'ch is only due to princesses and illustrious ladies. So much shall serve for the funeral escutcheon, with the arms and quarter proofs of nobility. There are other things, besides the lozenge structure or escutcheon above men- tioned, upon which the arms or quarters of the deceased used to be placed ; such as the coffin, the canopy or pall of velvet, coaches, horses, and trumpet-banners, (which are all that are now in use with us) as also other utensils used at fu- neral solemnities, as guideons, standards, pennons, banners, bannerols, with other 140 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. badges of lionour, viz. the coronet, helmet, crest, sword, surcoat of arms, gauntlet, spurs, and otner pieces of armour, which, after the mterment, used to be hung up. on walls or pillais near the grave, as may be seen in most of our churches. And in other kingdoms they have a repository or case for containmg the cassock or surcoat of arms, above \vhich is placed the helmet and coronet, supported by the sword on the side thereof, and below are the gauntlet or spurs. Which repository is adorned with the paternal and maternal ensigns of the defunct's quarters, called by the French cabinet d'honneur, or cabinet cC.rmes, and by the Latins armurium iiuignium, in imitation of the repository used by the Romans for holding their statues, which were the signs of their nobilicy before the use of arms. Most of the funeral solemnities still U'^ed in Europe, as well as armorial ensigns,, are from the customs of the ancient Romans, and seem to represent them, either in consuming bodies of their dead, with their ensigns of honour, in pompous piles of lire, or in their custom of interring them in graves, and adorning the places with them. Another piece of funeral pomp, is called the fiery chapel, cbapelle ardente, by the Latins /)j7\7, or capella ardens, being composed of a heap of combustible matter, artificially set up in the church, after the fashion of a funeral pile ; in the middle of which, when set in flames, is to be seen a coflin (representing the true one in- terred) covered with black silk, adorned with crown, sceptre, sword, globe, and other regalia, with the ensigns of arms of the prince, there consumed ; and this royal machine of fire is allowed to none but to princes, and was so decided in the Court of Brabant, 2ist of August 1659. As for the custom of burying the bodies of princes and great men with their regalia and ensigns, Quintus Curtius tells. That the grave of Cyrus being opened by the order of Alexander the Great, there was found his shield, two bows, and a battle-axe. Chiffletius says. When the grave of Childeric King of France was opened, there were found by his body, his sword, and other ornaments, with little pieces of metal formed like flower-de-luces, bis armorial figures, which some said, represented bees, upon which they ascribe bees for the ancient arms of that king- dom, by mistake. In the grot or cave in the church" of St Stephen at Vienna, where the Austrian, family bury, the body of Albertus was found, with his sword ; upon the hilt were the arms of Austria Ancient and Modern, and on the blade those of Hapsburg; though it has been in use to bury some ensigns v/ith the defunct, yet those before ■mentioned were exposed above ground also. The hanging of churches, houses, and other places with black, upon the decease of great men, w"as customary with the Romans, who put themselves, coaches, and chariots, and other utensils, in mourning upon funeral occasions ; but as Diodor. Sicul. lib. 20. observes. The Carthaginians exceeded them in their public mournings, for they hung the walls of their city with black, and sometimes their fleet of ships, upon the death of their chief comman- ders. The same formality has continued all Europe over to this time, not only in putting mournings upon the friends of the deceased, and their utensils, but in covering the insides of their houses, burying-places, and churches, with black, some with painting, others with black cloth, and adorning them with the arms and symbolical quarters of the deceased, and other signs of death, as tears, mort-heads, and such like. There is another piece of funeral pomp mentioned by the French, which I have not heard practised with us, called the funeral belt, zona higiibris, and by the French le litre, which surrounds burying-places, chapels, and churches with- out ; and for sovereign princes may be made ol black silk, but for illustrious no- bility of black cloth, two feet in breadth, adorned with the arms and symbolical quarters of the deceased. Philibert Monet says, by the laws of France none can have this mourning-ribbon, or le litre, but those that are great lords, founders, and patrons of churches. To insist no further of funeral solemnities, now used, and originally from those of the Romans, I shall put an end with this ob- serve, I EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 147 That as arms, as ensigns of nobility, came in place of the statues and images of the noble Romans, so are they exposed in all sorts of solemnities, as the i\t)- mans had then- statues, and especially at their funerals, which were carried along with the deceased, to show his noble descent. Tacitus tells. That twenty images were carried at the funeral of Manlius, and as many at that of (^nntus ; and speak- ing of the funeral pomp of Drusus, he says. It was pleasant to biliold the statues of ^^neas, the first of the Julian family, those of the Albanian kings, next the Sabinan statues, and then those of the Claudian family, all marching in a comelv procession. And not to add other instances of carrying these statues a'* proofs of nobility, from other authors and poets, 1 shall only mention that of Horace : Esto beatus, tiinus atque imagines- Ducunt triumphales tuum. After the solemnity was over, the image of the defunct was set up before the door of his house, as we do with the funeral escutcheon of our dead, for the honour and encouragement of the femily to live nobly and virtu- ously. As to what further concerns the funeral solemnities of other nations, we must refer our reader to their respective historians that treat of these subjects, and shall conclude this chapter with a description of the funeral solemnities observed at the interment of the high and potent Prince John Duke of Rothes, Lord High Chan- cellor of Scotland, the 23d day of August 1681, according as I took the same from a fine draught and figure thereof, done with China ink^ in four large sheets of Lombard paper, which proceeded as follows. First, Two regiments, with the artillery and equipage, marched all before in a mourning posture : Next followed two conductors with crapes in their hat?, and black staves over their shoulders ; then the little gumpheon carried upright, which was of a square figure, and embatded round, carried up by a staff traversing the middle backward, being- charged with a mort-head, and two shank-bones in saltier, and, in an escrol above, Memtnto mori, which was borne by a person in a side mourning cloak and crape ; and on his left side marched another in the same dress, bearing up another banner of the like form, charged with a sand-glass set on a pair of wings, with this motto above, Fugit^ bora : Next followed fifty-one poor men in gown^ and hoods, the first bearing up a banner of a square form, charged with the duke's arms and coronet within a ducal mantle ; the rest march- ing two and two, carry up each a like square banner, by a staff traversing the middle backward, charged with the duke's arms in a shield, ensigned with his co- ronet : Next, a trumpet mounted on horseback, having the flag of his trumpet charged with the duke's whole achievement ; after followed a cavalier armed at all points, also mounted on horseback, and holding up a spear erect, with capari- sons on his horse : next, the colours of the defunct in a banner borne up by a gentleman in a mourning-cloak and crape by a staff at one of the ends ; then fol- lowed the defunct's servants, in number twelve, two and two, in mourning-cloaks and crapes : Next marched the pencil of honour, which divides in two points at the end, charged with the duke's whole armoriar bearing ; in another banner the coat of Abernethy, and in a third the coat of Leslie, each within a laurel garland, and then followed the standard of honour, charged also with the duke's entire bearing ; each of these banners are borne up by persons in mourning-cloaks and crapes, with sta\-es at one of the ends, «nd all of them fringed with the liveries and colours of the duke : Next marched the horse of war, led by two lacquies of the defunct bareheaded : Next, two close trumpets in black cloaks and crapes, the flags of their trumpets charged with the duke's arms ; after marched two pur- suivants, viz. Bute and Carrick in gowns, with their coats displayed above the same, and black side-crapes in their hats; then the great gumpheon or mort-head charg- ed as aforesaid. Next, the coat of Abernethy, surrounded with a laurel in mourn- ing, and after that the little mourning-standard, divided in two points at the end, charged with the duke's whole arms ; each of these three banners are borne up by Vol. n. 3T I4S EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. a staft' at one of the ends, by persons in mourning-cloaks and crapes: Next march- ed fourteen gentlemen of the defunct's friends, two and two, in side mourning- cloaks and crapes : Next two pursuivants, viz. Kintyre and Dingwall, in gowns sur- mounted with their coats displayed, and long crapes in their hats; then followed the spurs, the gauntlets, the croslet, the targe, the helmet, wreath, and crown, the sword, each borne upon a spear, by as many gentlemen marching after other in long black cloaks and crapes ; then the defunct's saddle or pad-horse led by two lacquies in liveries bareheaded : Next, the late counsellors of Edinburgh in num- ber twelve ; then the present counsellors thereof, of the like number, in their robes with crapes in their hats, two and two ; then the four bailies of Edin- burgh, two and two, in their robes, and battons or white-rods m their hands ; then followed the sword and mace of the city, carried by persons in gowns, with caps of permission, the sword erect in pale in the hand of the one, and the mace over the shoulder of the other ; then followed the Lord Provost of Edinburgh, walking by himself, clothed in his side robes, with his white rod in his hand; then the clergy of Edinburgh, two and two, the masters of colleges two and two, the Principal following alone, and all in their gowns, with crapes : Next, gentlemen and barons, two and two, in long black cloaks; then the writers to the signet, two and two, in the like cloaks : then the advocates of session, clerks of the council and session, and commissaries of Edinburgh, each in their gowns, marching two and two ; then the macers of session, two and two, in their gowns bareheaded, with the maces over their shoulders : Next, followed the fourteen Lords of Session in their govms, two and two ; and after marched the President by himself in his gown ; then followed the Lord Chancellor's gown, carried in the two hands of a gentleman in a black cloak ; then the officers of state who are not noblemen, viz. first the Lord Register, and Lord Justice-Clerk ; then the Lord Treasurer-Depute with a rod in his hand, and the Lord Advocate, all in their gowns : Next, followed the barons or lords, two and two, in side mourn- ing-cloaks; then the bishops, two and two, in their gowns ; then the viscounts, earls and marquisses, two and two, in side mourning-cloaks : Next, two pursui. vants, viz. Unicorn and Ormond, in black gowns surcharged with their coats displayed ; then followed two close trumpets with black cloaks, their trumpets flagged with the duke's arms : Next marched eight banners, borne up by the fol- lowing gentlemen walking two and two, viz. the first banner charged with that of the armorial arms of the Earl of Roxburgh, and borne by Thomas M'Dowall of Makerston ; the second charged with the arms of the Duke of Antragne, sur- rounded with the Order of St Michael, borne up by Sir William Hope, brother to Hopeton ; the third charged with the arms of Hamilton of Evandale, and borne up by the laird of Gilkercleugh ; the fourth charged with the arms of the Earl of Tullibardin, borne up by Mungo Haldane of Gleneagles; the fifth charged Avith the arms of the Earl of Perth, borne up by the laird of Hawthornden ; the sixth charged with the Duke of Lennox's arms, borne up by Mr William Gordon, Advocate; the seventh charged with the arms of the Earl of Rothes, borne up by Sir John Leslie of Newton ; and the eighth and last charged with the arms of the Earl of Marr, borne up by Sir John Erskine, brother to Alva : all which gen- tlemen are in black cloaks, and these, with the nobility and others above, had all black crapes in their hats : Next follows the mourning-horse covered with black cloth, adorned with the duke's arms, and led by two lacquies bareheaded ; then marches the great mourning-banner, charged with the duke's whole achievement, and borne up by the master of Newark in a mourning cloak and crape : Next follow six heralds walking two and two yi mourning-gowns or cloaks, with their coats displayed above the same ; the first, viz. Hay herald carrying the arms of Leslie within a cartouch ; the second, Albany carrying the coat of Abernethy within the like ; the third, Marchmont carrying the duke's crest, motto and wreath ; the fourth, Rothsay carrying the duke's helmet, coronet and mantle ; the fifth, Snowdown carrying the sword; and, the sixth, carrying the target; and after these heralds follow the domestics of the defunct, viz. first, two chirur- geons ; and next two secretaries in black cloaks, then two chaplains in their gowns, and then two doctors of physic inblack cloaks, and next eight lacquies of the defunct ; all which domestics walked bareheaded ; then follows his EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 149 horse and furniture fitted us for riding of Parliament, led by the duke's gentle- man of hordes bareheaded in a side black cloak ; then follows the duke's coronet, witli the cap, carried oa a velvet cushion by a gentleman in a black cloak and crape ; and next follows the two archbishops in their gowns with crapes ; then followed the Lord Lyoii in a mourning cloak, with his coat displayed above the same, carrying before hiiU the escutcheon or lozenge structure, adorned with the duke^s whole armorial bearing, supported on the dexter hand by Sir Robert Sin- clair, Baronet, and, on the sinister, by Sir Charles Erskme, Baronet, both in black cloaks and crapes : Next followed the laird of Mfldrum, as commander in chief of his majesty's forces, with his batton in his hand, supported on the dexter hand by Sir Tliomas Moncrieff, as once high treasurer, with a rod in his hand, and, on the sinister, by the usher, with his mace over his shoulder, all in black cloaks and crapes; then followed two macers of the privy council in their gowns bareheaded, with their maces over their shoulders ; then after followed the chancellor's purse and seal, borne i^p by a gentleman in a black cloak bareheaded, and, on his left-hand, the chancellor's mace bnrne over tire shoulder of another gentleman bareheaded in a mourning-cloak: Next followed the pallor the nTort-cloth, adorned with the duke's arms and these of his relations, as also with mort-heads, tears, and the initial let- ters of J. D. R. for John Duke of Rothes, ensigned on the top with his ducal co- ronet ; which pall was borne by these noble relations, viz. the Duke of Hamilton, the Marquisses of Douglas and Athol, the Earls of Airth, Buchan, Cassilis, Linlith- gow, Perth, Roxburgh, Queensberry, Tweeddale, and Tarras, the Lords Cardross, Pitsligo, and Newark ; and the canopy or pale, adorned in the same manner as the mort-cloth, was supported by the following noblemen's sons, viz. Lord Murray, Lord Charles Hamilton, Lords Lorn, Keith, Livingston, Glammis, Crichton, Ogil- vie, Yester, Boyd, Cochran, Inverury, Lord Charles Murray, Lord James Murray, Masters of Kingston, Forbes, Ross, Balmerino, Burleigh, Melvdl, and Pitsligo, be- sides several barons, knights, and gentlemen, who attended near the body to assist and relieve the noblemen in their turns, all in black cloaks and side crapes. The deep mourners follow next in gowns and hoods, two and two, to the number of twelve ; the Marquis of Montrose and Earl of Haddington, sons-in-law to the de- funct, walk first ; and there was ten lords assistants to the chief mourners in black cloaks, bearing up their trains bareheaded ; and after them follows the defunct's mourning coach drawn by six horses covered with black, and adorned with mort- heads, tears, &-C. and led by six lacquies, and a postilion, all in black, the coach- man having on a black gown : Next succeeds two trumpets and a kettle-drum mounted on horseback, followed by his majesty's troop of guards, which conclud- ed the solemnity. N.B. Roderick Chalmers, Ross herald, and herald- painter in Edinburgh, to whom we are obliged for the preceding chapter of quarters, proofs of nobility, desired us to acquaint all persons who shall please to cause make out their genealogical quarters, proofs of nobility, according to the preceding scheme, that he will mark them down in his books gratis ; his only design being to prevent mistakes that may happen when things of that nature are required of him to be done in haste. — That as he has no advantage in view by doing so, other than the pleasure of serving those, to whom he has been, or may be obliged, and that when any affair of that kind is demanded, he may be able, from his registers, to perform it with just- ticc and exactness ; he therefore expects they will not neglect the opportunity of do'iig themselves this service ; and to secure their pains from being lost, he is re- solvr-d to leave all such genealogical accounts, so given in to him, in such a pub- lic manner at his decease, as shall effectually preserve them for the use of posre ■ rity. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. CHAP. XV. OF CAVALCADES AND PUBLIC PROCESSIONS. FORASMUCH as all cavalcades, royal and public processions, and the solemnities thereof, have been always committted to the ordering and marshalling of the Lord Lyon and his brethren heralds, we shall, for the greater embellishment of this book, and satisfaction of our readers, proceed next to subjoin, from authen- tic copies, some whereof never before in print, the form and manner of the coro- nation of our kings, the royal baptism of Henry Prince of Scotland in Stirling Castle, 30th August 1594, the splendour of the riding of our Parliament at Edin- burgh, July 25th 1681, as recorded in the Books of Privy Council and Lyon Re- gisters, the solemn creation of our nobility, demonstrated in the creation of the Marquisses of Hamilton and Huntly at Holyroodhouse, 17th April 1599, &.c. whereby a brief view of the greatness and splendour of this kingdom of old will be made appear ; and shall conclude all with some observes on the office and duty of our heralds. THE ANCIENT FORM OF THE CORONATION OF THE KINGS OF SCOTLAND. In the morning, when the king is in his bed-camber, there cometh to him two bishops, two abbots, and twenty.four other churchmen, four noblemen, together with the Constable and Marischal having the battons in their hands, and with them four or six commissioners of burghs; then the king is brought forth, supported by the Marisehal and Constable, one on every side, and is brought to another room, which is the Presence, and is set under a cloth of state that is open, to de- clare that the king has not yet received the crown, which must be closed after the coronation. The kirkmen, nobility, and burghers in order, ask of the king, if he be la\vfal successor to his father, and be willing to accept the dignity of the crown ? which they all otTer to his majesty ; then must be reckoned six genealogies to whom he hath succeeded. Upon the king's granting to accept, the bishops and all the rest touch the pale, and cause it to be half covered, and say, God bless you. Sir ; and they all sing, God bless him tis he did bis forefathers. Then the Marischal calls in the Lyon King at Arms, who, with his brethren heralds, and the pursuivants, come in their coats, and sit down before the king, and there the Marischal is, by the mouth of the Bishop of St Andrew's, to swear the Lyon, S*-c. who being sworn and crowned with an open crown, and having the sword and sceptre raised by two of his brethren heialds, they come forth to the theatre where the king is to be crowned, the bishops, nobility, and burghs' com- missioners being with him. The Marischal sayeth to the Lyon, Show the king's pleasure; and he says to the people. The king is willing to accept the crown. Then the commissioners say, God bless hiin that should be king; and the people cry. Bring him to us; God bless him, and us for his cause. Then the Lyon returns with the bishops. Constable and Marischal, and the bishops acquaint the king that the people call for him earnestly to accept the crown, and to be crowned. Then the Lyon, having his crown on his head, and two heralds the sword and sceptre, the rest going before, they cry. Here comes the king; and the people an- swer, God bless him. The bishops go, one on the right, and the other on the left hand, at his out-coming. The king is in his ordinary apparel, only leaving his clothes open to the boughts of his arms, and shoulder points, and his cloak about him. The ?4arischal and Constable carry the robes. Great Seal and,spurs, which are all laid down upon a taifel, or board, before the king in the church; and then the bishop is for to preach. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. i .^ r All the ground betwixt the king's chamber and chapel is covered with blue cloth, and the churchmen sing and all the people. The king being set on his throne, the bishop asks at the tour corners of the throne, I strange if they be pleased to have their king so resting their chief. Thereafter, when they are pleased to have him, there is sung an anthem, viz. Firmetur mamis tua. Thereafter the king descends from his throne to the altar, and offering the sword, and cloak, and robes, and sayeth, Non appnrebis vacuus in conspectu Domini. Thereafter two piggs of oil are carried by the Lyon, the one he giveth to tlie Constable, and the other to the Marischal, and they give that to the bishops, who pour the same on the king's head, one on the one side, and the other on the other side, and they anoint and oil him in the boughts of his arms, palms of his hands, and the tops of his shoulders, and other places; and the bishops have their own prayers and words at his anointing. Then the Marischal and Constable take up his doublet, and put it on; the Con- stable and Marischal take up the robes, and give them to the bishops, and they put them on upon the king ; and at every piece they put on, they sing or say, and pray like unto this, Indue regem tunica justitia. When the robes are put on, the Lyon takes off his crown, and lays it down near the place where the king's crown lies, and coming to the Marischal says these words, I surrender, and command the king to be crowned, repeating six genealogies of his descent. Then the crown is put upon the king's head, and the bishop cries aloud, God bless the king; and then another cries, God bless the people and the king; and over again, God bless king and people. And when the crown is on the king's head, the king promises by oath, taken by the bishops, to be a loving father to the people, in the words thought good at that time by the bishops. But now the form of the oath is set down by special act of Parliament made by King James VI. of blessed memory, in his first Parliament, cap. 8. Then the Marischal having in his hand the obligatory oath of the people, goeth to the four nooks of the theatre, reads it to the Lyon, and he cries it out to the people, who hold up all their hands, and say all Amen. The Constable takes off the crown, and lays it down before the king, and the bishops put on the king's coat on him. Then the Lyon, by direction, calleth the roll of the whole nobility, who coming, sit down upon their knees, and touch the crown, and say thir words. So may God help me, as I shall support thee; and when they have done, they all hold up their hands, and say again, / swear, and I hold up my hand. ■ Then are psalms sung, and trumpets sounded ; the heralds, people, and all cry^ God bless and keep the king. At the out-going the king gives to be carried before him the crown, sceptre, sword, and Great Seal, by the Chancellor and other of the nobility, and so they march furth as they came in, with the Lyon and the re t of his brethren ; tht Constable and Marischal going behind to hold up and carry the king's train uf lii-^ robes. The Marischal with his own hands puts on the boots and spurs, and takes them off again, when the king goes in. AN EXACT ACCOUNT OF THE BAPTISM OF HENRY PRINCE OF SCOTLAND, August 30. 1594. The noble and most potent Prince of Scotland was born in the castle of Stirling upon Tuesday the 19th day of February 1594. Upon which occasion the king's majesty sent for the nobles of his land, and to all the capital burghs thereof, to have their advice, how he should proceed for the due solemnization of his royal baptism, and what princes he should send to. When they were all compeared, with great diligence and good will, he proponed unto them, that it was nec-ssary to direct our ambassadors to France, England, Denmark, Low-Countries, the Duke of Brunswick his brother-in-law, and to the Duke of Magdeburg, the queen's majesty's grandfather, and to such other princes as should be thought expedient. Vol. II. 3 U J 52 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Likewise, lie thought the castle of Stirling the most convenient place for the tl- sidence of this most noble and mighty prince, in respect that he was born there. As also, it was necessary, that suliicient preparation might be made for the am- bassadors that should be invited to come, for honour of the crown and country. And beside all this, because the chapel-royal was ruinous, and too little, concluded, that the old chapel should be utterly razed, and a new one erected in the bame place, that should be more large, long, and glorious, to entertam the great number of strangers expected. These propositions considered at length, they all, with a free voluntary deliberation, granted unto his majesty the sum of an hundred thousand pounds money of Scotland. Then were there ambassadors elected to pass into France, England, Denmark, the Low-Countries, and other places before mentioned ; who were all dispatched with such expedition, and their legacies took such wished effect, that first there came two famous men from the King of Den- raaik, the one Christianus Bernekow, the other Sienio Bille. These came to Leith the i6th of July. The next day after them came Adamus Crusius, ambassador for the Duke of Brunswick, and Joachimus Besseuitius, ambassador for the Duke of Magdeburg, who is grandfather to the noble Princess Anne, by the grace of God Qiieen of Scotland. Thirdly, the 3d day of August, there came ambassadors from tae states of Holland and Zealand, the Baron of Braderod, and the Treasurer of Zealand, called Jacobus Falkius. There was also a nobleman directed from England, to wit, the Earl of Cumber- land, who, even when he had prepared himself richly and honourably in all re- spects for his voyage, to come to Scotland, and divers noblemen and gentlemen of renown prepared and commanded for his honourable convoy, it pleased God tO' visit him with sickness, and, in that respect, another nobleman was chosen to supply his place, which was the Earl of Sussex, &.C. and he, in consideration of his short and unexpected advertisement, made such diligence in his voyage, and magnifi- cence for his own person, and honourable convoy, as was thought rare and rich by- all men : whereby it fell out, that betwixt the sickness of the one nobleman, and the hasty preparation of the other, the time was so far spent, that the very pre. fixed days of the baptism were sundry times delayed. And, because the am- bassador of England was so long a-coming, and the ambassadors of Denmark, Brunswick, and Magdeburg, were feared to be hindered in their voyage by the sea, by reason of the near approaching of winter, they desired daily of the king's majesty, during their remaining in Edinburgh, to have some prefixed day to be nominate and certainly kept, that immediately thereafter they might be dis- patched ; which he granted at the last, although he had divers great impediments, to the contrary. The first was, because the chapel-royal and castle of Stirhng were not fully complete m all such necessaries as \Vere requisite, although he had the supply of the greatest number of artificers in the whole country convened there, of all crafts, for that service, and his majesty's own person daily overseer, with large and liberal payment. But the chiefest cause was, the long absence of an ambassador from England, which his majesty greatly respected for many causes : And, last of all, expecting that some ambassador should l:ave come from France, which fell not out, as was looked for. But when the ambassador was come from England to Edinburgh, forthwith his majesty dispatched one of the gentlemen of his highness's chamber, to request him to repair towards Stirling the next day, with all possible diligence, (which was the 28ih day of August} because he would have had the baptism administered the day following. But neither were the pro- pmes sent by the Q^ieen of England, neitiier her ambassador's own carriages as then come; therefore the baptism was delayed until the 30th day of August, as ye^hall liear particularly hereafter. But, in the mean time, it is to be understood that all these noble ambassadors, before expressed, were honourably sustained upon the king's majesty's own proper costs, during the whole time of their residence in Scotland, save only the am- bassador of England, whose whole expences were defiayed by his sovereign the Queen of England ; and, because the rest of the ambassadors were repaired to Stir- ling, by his majesty's direction, long before the coming ol' the English ambassador, his highness bestowed the time with them in magnific banqueting, revelling, and.' daily hunting, with great honour. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. ^So The king's majesty, purposing further to dccore by magnificence this action, committed the charge thereof to the Eord of Lindores, and Mr Wilham Fowler, who by their travels, dihgence, and invention, brought it to that perfection, which the shortness of time and other considerations coidd permit. So they having con- sulted together, concluded that those exercises that were to be used for decora- tion of that solemnity were to be divided both in field pastimes, with martial and heroical exploits, and in household, with rare shows and singular inventions. The field to be used at two several days; the first to be of three Turks, tliree Christian Knights of Malta, three Amazons, and three Moors. But by reason of the absence, or at the least the uncertain presence of the three last gentlemen who should have sustained these personages, it was thoaglit good that the number of that mask should consist of nine actors, nine pages, and nine lacquies, which coming from sundry parts, and at divers times, together with the diversity of their apparel, should bring some novelty to the beholders. The place most expedient for this action was the valley, near the castle, which being prepared for that purpose, both with carrier and scafiold, after the coming of the queen's majesty, with the honourable and gallant ladies, together with her honourable ambassadors, the field being beset by the brave yonkars of Edinburgh, ■with their hagbuts, during the whole time of that pastime. Then three Christians entered the field with sound of trumpet, who were the King's Majesty, the Earl of Marr, and Thomas Erskine, (Gentleman of his Majesty's Chamber) who made up this number. A little after followed three apparelled like Turks, very gorgeously attired ; and these were the Duke of Lennox, the Lord Home, and Sir Robert Ker of Cessford, knight. Last of all came in three Amazons in women's attire, very sumptuously clad ; and these were the lord of Lindores, the Lord of Buccleugh, and the Abbot of Holyroodhouse. So all these persons being present, and, at their entry, making their reverence to the Qj.ieen's Majesty, ambassadors and ladies, having their pages riding upon their led horse, and on their left arms bearing their masters' impress or device. The King's Majesty's was a lion's head with open eyes; which signifieth, after a mystic and hieroglyphic sense. Fortitude and vi^ilancy. The words were Timcat %3 primus \S iihimus oibis. The second was a dog's collar, all beset with iron pikes ; the words were these, Offdiidit iS defendit. The third of that Christian army was a windmill, with her spokes unmoving, winds unblowing on every side, with these words, Ni sperat imimta. The second faction did carry these, a heart half in fire, and half in frost; on the one part Cupid's torch, and on the other Jupiter's thunder, with these words, lliuc amor, i/ide metus. The other page, a zodiac, and in thfe same, the moon far op- posite to the sun, with these words, ^lo remotior liicidior; that is to say, The far- ther the fairer. The third of this party carried, painted, four coach wheels, the hindmost following the foremost, and yet nevei- overtaking them, with these v/ords, ^10 rtiajis iiisequor. The last three pages bare in their targets these impresses following, a crown, an eye, and a portcullis; tlie crown betokening the power of God, the eye his provi- dence, and the portcullis his protection ; with these words, which were composed in anagram, of IValterus Scotus, the Laird of Buccleugh's name, Claustis tutus era. The second page of this party carried on his targe the portraiture of a hand- holding an eel by the tail, alluding to the uncertainty of persons or of times, with these words, Utfrustra, sic patienter. The last was this, a fire in sight of the sun, burning, and not perceived, with this sentence, Oblector lumine victus. And every lacquey carrying in his hand his master's lance; they began their pastime by running at the ring and glove, the laws whereof were these. First, That all the persons of this pastime compear masked, and in such order as they come into the field, so to run out all their courses. Secondly, That none use any other ring but that which is put up, and use no other lance but that which they have brought for themselves. Thirdly, He that twice touches the ring, or stirs it, winneth as much as if he carried away the ring. Fourthly, He that lets bis lanee fall out of his hand is deprived of all the rest of his courses. Fifibly,. 154 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. That every one run with loose reins, and with as much speed as his horse hath. Sixthly, That none after his race, in uptaking of his horse, lay his lance upoii his shoulder, under the pain of loss of that which he hath done in his course. Seventhly, He that carrieth not his lance under his arm loseth his course. Eighthly, That none until his three courses be ended change his horse, if he be not hurt, or upon some other consideration moved to change him. These laws being seen and approved by the actors, the Queen's Majesty signified unto them, that he who did lun best should have for his reward a fair and rich ring of diamonds: And he also who on that same side had best fortune in running, he should be acknow- ledged with another as fair as the first. The proof hereof being made, the vic- tory fell to the Duke of Lennox, who bringing it to his side and party had the praise and prize adjudged to himself. Thus the first day's pastime was ended, with great contentment to the beholders, and commendation of the persons enter- prisers. The second day's pastime was extended, by reason that the artisans were em- ployed in other business, who should have followed forth that invention given them : And seeing the grace of that exercise consisted in embossery, and the craftsmen apt for the same otherwise and necessarily busied, it was left off; which, if it had been brought to effect, this country had not seen, nor practised a more rare : For what by the bravery and strange apparel of the persons themselves, and by the divers shapes of the beasts that should have been borne and brought there in sight, had been commendable and wonderful : By reason that such beasts, as lion, elephant, hart, unicorn, and the griffin ; together with the camel, hydre, croco- dile and dragon, (carrying their riders) had carried also with it, by the newness of that invention, great contentment and commendation of that exercise. But, 1 say, some arismg lets impeshed this invention ; and all things were cast off that might have farther decored this solemnity, through other urgent occasions. And when all the ambassadors were convened together, and all necessary mate- rials ready, the chapel-royal of the Castle of Stirling was richly hung with costly tapestries : and at the north-east end of the same a royal seat of estate prepared for the king's majesty ; and on his right hand was set a fair wide chair, witir the due ornaments pertaining thereto, over which was set the arms of the King of France. Next thereto was a princely traverse of crimson taffeta, for the ambassador of England, and over bis head the arms of England. On the desk before him lay a cushion of red velvet : there stood attending on him two gentlemen-ushers, ap- pointed by the Qiieen of England for that present service. Next unto him sat Mr Robert Bowes, Ambassador Ordinary for the Queen of England. On the desk before him was laid a cloth of purple velvet, and cushion suitable thereunto. Then sat the ambassador of the. noble prince Henricus Julius, Duke of Bruns- wick, and befi-'re him on the desk was laid a cloth of green velvet, with a cushion of the same ; and over his head the arms of his prince. Next unto him sat the ambassadors of the Low-Countries, with a long fair cloth spread on the desk before them of blue velvet, and two cushions suitable thereun- to, and over their heads tlig arms of their countries. On the king's left hand was placed nearest his majesty the two ambassadors of Denmark, with a large broad cloth spread on the desk before them of purple vel- vet, and the arms of Denmark over their heads. Next unto them sat the ambassador of the noble prince Udalricus, Duke of Mag- deburg, with his prince's arms over his head. In the midst of the chapel-royal, within the partition, where the king's majesty, the ambassadors, and prince, with his convoy, were placed, there was a new pul- pit erected ; the same was richly hung with cloth of gold : all the pavement with- in this partition was prince-like laid with fine tapestry. Under the pulpit was another desk, wherein sat in the midst Mr David Cuning- ham, Bishop of Aberdeen, Mr David Lindsay, Minister of Leith, and John Dun- canson, one of the ordinary ministers to the king's majesty ; before whom was set a table covered with yellow velvet. And when all things were in readiness, as was requisite, there was placed a hun- 3 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS^. 15-5 Jred hagbutteers (being only the yonkers of Edinburgh, bravely apparelled) in order, betwixt the prince's outer chamber door, and the entry to the chapel-royal, on both the sides of the passage. Then the king's majesty, with his nobles and counsellors attending on him, en- tered the chape], and there sat down 111 his royal seat of state. All the ambassadors likewise were sent for, and conveyed to the prince's cham- ber of presence, where the prince was lying on his bed of state, richly decored, and wrought with broidered work, containing the story of Hercules and his tra- vels. This bed was erected on a platform, very artificially, with a foot-pace of three degrees ascending to it ; the degrees being covered with tapestry, all wrought with gold, and a large cloth of lawn covering both the bed and the degrees, which, reached forth a great space over the floor. Then the old Countess of Marr with reverence past to the bed, she took up the prince, and delivered hmi to the Duks of Lennox, who presently rendered hin\ likewise to the ambassador of England, to be borne to the chapel-royal. The Master of the Ceremonies addressing himself to a table in the said cham- ber, curiously ordered, whereon stood those ornaments of honour which were to be borne to the chapel before the prince, with due reverence delivered them to certain noblemen, according to the order appointed by his IVIajesty for the bearing thereof. In like manner, the prince's robe-royal, being of purple velvet, very richly set with pearl, was delivered to the Duke of Lennox, who put the same about the prince, the train whereof was borne up by the Lord Sinclair and the Lord Ur- quhart. Then they removed themselves to the outer chamber, where there was a fair high pall made four-square of crimson velvet attending, which was laid on with rich pasements, and fringed with gold. This i^all was sustained by four wor- shipful barons, the Laird of Buccleugh, the Constable of Dundee, Sir Robert Kerr of Cessford, knight, and the Laird of Traquair ; under the which pale were the ambassadors of England, Robert Earl of Sussex, carrying the prince in his arms, and Mr Robert Bowes, ordinary ambassador for England, assisting him. Next to them was the Duke of Lennox. About the pale were the ambassadors of Den- mark, Magdeburg, Brunswick, and the Estates. There followed the old Countess of Marr, Mrs Bowes, divers ladies of honour, with the mistress nurse. Then the trumpets sounding melodiously before, the prince and his convoy went forward, Lyon King at Arms, and the heralds his brethren, with their coat- armours in goodly order following. Next followed the prince's honours, borne by these noblemen ; the Lord Semple carrying a laver of water ; the Lord Seaton a fair bason ; the Lord Livingston a towel, and the Lord Home a low crown, competent for a duke, richly set with diamonds, sapphires, rubies, and emeralds ; who approaching near the pulpit, where these honours were received from them by the Master of the Ceremonies, and by him placed on the table before the pulpit, the noblemen retiring back to their ap* pointed places. Lastly, The pall was carried in before the pulpit, where the ambassador of Eng- land rendered the prince to the Duke of Lennox, who immediately delivered him to the old Countess of Marr, and she consequently to the mistress nurse; and all the ambassadors were then set in such order of places, as the demonstration of their armories gave notice. Without the partition were ornate forms all covered with green, whereupon were placed the gentlemen of England, Denmark, Allemagne, Flanders, and Scot- land. And as all men were thus competently placed, and universal silence made, entered Mr Patrick Galloway, one of his Majesty's ordinary preachers, into the pulpit, who learnedly and godly entreated upon the text of the 21st of Genesis. Which being done, the Bishop of Aberdeen stood up in his seat, and taught upon the sacrament of baptism, first in the vulgar tongue, and next in the Latin, to the end all men might generally understand. This done, the provost and prebends of the chapel-royal did sing the 21st psalm of David, according to the art of music, to the great delectation of the noble auditory. Then they proceeded to the action. The King arose and came towards the Vol. II. 3 X ^5^ EXTEiaOR ORNAMENTS. pulpit. The ambassadors followed in their order. The barons that carried the pall above the prhice moved towards the pulpit: The Duke of Lennox received the prince from the Countess of Marr, and delivered him to the hands of the Earl of Sussex, ambassador for England, where he was named by all their consents, Frcde- derick Henry, Henry Frederick, and' so baptized in the name of the lather, Son, and Holy Ghost, by the said names. This being done, Lyon King at Amis, with a loud voice, repeats these names thrice over ; and then after him, the rest of his brethren heralds, with trumpets sounding, confirmed the same. Then the King's Majesty, ambassadors, and all removing to their places, the English ambassador alone, withdrawing himself on the one side, was met and at- tended on by two grooms, who humbly on their knees, the one presenting a large rich bason, the other a suitable laver, replete with sweet water, wherewith the ambassador washed ; a gentleman sewer, with humble reverence, presenting him a fair towel, wherewith he dried his hands, and so forthwith returned to his place. This being done, the bishop ascended to the pulpit, where, after that he had de- livered in verse a certain praise and commendation of the prince, then he convert- ed the rest of his Latin oration in prose to the ambassadors, every one in particu- lar, beginning at the ambassador of England, and so continuing with the rest ; wherein he made mention of the chronology of each of these princes, and recited the proximity and nea-ness of blood that they had with Scotland : Concluding his oration with exhortation and thanksgiving to God for that good occasion and pros- perous assembly. In conclusion, the blessing being given, Lyon King at Arms cried with a loud voice, G(jd save Frederick Henry, and Henry Frederick, by the grace of God, Prince of Scotland. The rest of the heralds proclaimed the same at an open window of the chapel-royal with sound of trumpet. Then the king, the prince, the ambassadors, the nobles, and ladies of honour, retired forth of the chapel in such order as they entered, and repaired towards the king's hall. During their passage, the cannons of the Castle roared, that there- with the earth trembled, and other smaller shot made their harmony after their kind. In the king's hall the Duke of Lennox received the prince from the ambassador of England, and presented him to the King's Majesty, v^ho addubbed him knight. He was touched with the spur by the Earl of Marr. Thereafter, the King's Ma- jesty presented a ducal crown on his head, and then was proclaimed by Lyon King at Arms, The PJght F.xcellent, High and Mngnanime Frederick Henry, Henry Frede- rick, by the grace of God, Knight and Baron of Renfrew, Lord of the Isles, Earl of Carrick, Duke of Rothsay, Prince and Great Steward of Scotland. These words were repeated by the heralds with a loud voice at an open window f)f the hall. Then the prince was carried by the ambassador of England to his own chamber of presence, where the most rich and rare propines were there presented. Also, there were certain barons and gentlemen addubbed knights, whose names do follow in order as they were proclaimed. And first their oath. THE OATH OF A KNIGHT. I. T Shall fortify and defend the true Christian Religion, and Christ's holy evan- _!_ gel, now presently preached within this realm, to the utmost of my power. " 2. I shall be loyal and true to my sovereign Lord the King's Majesty, to all orders of chivalry, and to the noble Office of Arms. " 3. I shall fortify and defend justice at my power, and that without favour or fead. " 4. I shall never flee from my sovereign Lord the King's Majesty, nor from his highness's lieutenants in time of mellay and battle. " 5. I shall defend my native realm from all alieners and strangers. " 6. I s all defend the just action and quarrel of all ladies of honour, of all true and friendless widows, of orphans, and of maidens of good fame. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. i57 •■ 7. I shall do diligence wheresoever I hear there are any murderers, traitors, and " masterful reavers, that oppress the King's lieges, and poor people, to bring them " to the law at my power. " 8. I shall maintain and uphold the noble estate of chivah-y, with horse, har- " ness, and other knightly abuhments, and shall help and succour them of tha " same order at my power, if they have need. " 9. I shall enquire and seek to have the knowledge and understanding of all " the articles and pomts contained m the book of chivalry. " All these premisses to observe, keep, and fidlil, I oblesse me. So help me, " ray God, by my own hand. So help me God," &-c. Sir William Stewart of Houston, Knight. Sir Robert Bruce of Clackmanan, Knight. Sir John Boswell of Balmuto, Knight. Sir John Shaw of Sauchie, Knight. Sir John Murray of Ethilston, Knight. Sir William Monteith of Kerse, Knight. Sir Alexander Eraser of Fraserburgh, Knight. Sir John Lindsay of Dunrod, Knight. Sir George Livingston of Ogilface, Knight. Sir James Forrester Torwoodhead, Knight. Sir Andrew Balfour of Strathour, Knight. Sir Walter Dundas of Over-NewUston, Knight. Sir John Boswell of Glassmount, Knight. Sir George Elphingston of Blythwood, Knight. Sir William Livingston of Darnchester, Knight. Sir David Meldrum of Newhall, Knight. These names were proclaimed upon the terrace of the fore front of the castle, with sound of trumpets ; and great quantity of divers species of gold and money cast over amongst the people. These things being accomplished, the king and queen's majesties, with the ambassadors, addressed themselves to the banquet in the great hall, about eight of the clock at night ; then came Lyon King at arms, with his brethren the heralds, entered the hall before the king and queen's meat, the trumpets sounding melodiously before them, with these noblemen bearing office for the present. The Earl of Marr, Great Master Household. The Lord Fleming, Great Master Usher. The Earl of Montrose, Carver t The Earl of Glencairn, Cupper > for the King's Majesty. The Earl of Orkney, Sewer 3 The Lord Seaton, Carver T Tiie Lord Home, Cupper > for the Queen's Majesty. The Lord Sample, Sewer J This dehcate banquet being ordered with great abundance, the king, queen, and ambassadors, were placed all at one table, being formed of three parts, after a geometrical figure, in such sort that every one might have a full sight of tlie other. The king and queen's majesties were placed in the midst of the table, and on the king's right hand were set the English ambassadors, the Earl of Sussex and Ml Robert Bowes. Next them sat the ambassador from the Duke of Brunswick, ar-r' h ' ambassador from the Duke of Magdeburg. On the king's left hand, next to the queen's majesty, sat the ambassador of i58 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Denmark, and ambassadors from the states of Holland and Zealand : betwixt every one of their seats was left a good space. On the east and west side of the hall were placed two very long tables, where were set certain noblemen, ladies of honour, and counsellors of Scotland, and with them the noblemen and gentlemen of England, Denmark, AUemagne, and Flanders. And betwixt every nobleman and gentleman stranger, was placed a lady of honour or gentlewoman. Now, being thus in a very honourable and comely order set ; and after a while, having well refreshed themselves with the first service, which was very sumptuous, there came into tlie sight of them all a blackmoor, drawing, as it seemed to the beholders, a triumphal chariot, (and before it the melodious noise of trumpets and hautboys) which chariot entered the hall. The motion of the whole frame, (which was twelve feet long and seven feet broad) was so artificial within itself, that it appeared to be drawn in only by the strength of a Moor, who was very richly attired ; his traces were great chains of pure gold. Upon this chariot was finely and artifacially devised a sumptuous covered table, decked with all sorts of exquisite delicates and dainties, of patisserie, fruitages, and confections. About the table were placed six gallant dames, who represented a silent comedy ; three of them clothed in argentme satin, and three in crimson satin : All these six garments were enriched with togue and tinsel of pure gold and silver, every one of them having a crown or garland on their heads, very richly decked with feathers, pearls, and jewels, upon their loose hair, in antica forma. In the first front stood dame Ceres, with a sickle in her right hand, and a hand- ful of corn in the other, and upon the outermost part of her thigh was written this sentence, Fundent uberes omnia campi, which is to say, the plenteous fields shall afford all thmgs. Over against Ceres stood Fecundity, with some bushes of chesbols, which, un- der an hieroglyphic sense, representeth broodings, with this device, Fcelix prole diviim, and on the other side of her habit, Crescant in mille. The first importing that this country is blessed by the child of the goddess, and the second alluding to the king and queen's majesties, that their generations may grov/ into thou- sands. Next, on the other side, was placed Faith, having in her hands a bason, and in the same two hands joined together, with this sentence, Boni alumna conjugii. The fortress and nurse of a blessed marriage. Over against Faith stood Concord, with a golden tasse in her left hand, and the horn of abundance in her right hand, with this sentence. Plena heant te numina sinir. The heavenly powers do bless thee with a full bosom. The next place was occupied by Liberality, who having in her right hand two crowns, and in her left two sceptres, with this device. Me comite plura quam dabis ficcipies ; that is to say. Having me thy follower thou shalt receive more than thou shalt give. And the last was Perseverance, having in her right hand a staft', and on her left shoulder an anchor, with this device. Nee diibiiv res mutabunt, nee secundce, Neither doubtful nor more prosperous things sl^ change your state. This chariot, which should have been drawn in by a hon, (but because his pre- sence might have brought some fear to the nearest, or that the sight of the hghts aiid torches might have commoved his tameness) it was thought meet that the Moor should supply that room : and so he in outward show pressed to draw that forward, which, by a secret convoy, was brought to the prince's table ; and the w'hole desert was delivered by Ceres, Fecundity, Faith, Concord, Liberality, and Perseverance, to the earls, lords, and barons, that were sewers. Presently after the retouring of the chariot, entered a most sumptuous, artificial, and well-proportioned ship ; the length of her keel was eighteen feet, and her breadth eight feet. From her bottom to her highest flag was forty feet : the sea she stood upon was twenty-four feet long, with breadth convenient. Her motion was so artificially devised within herself that none could perceive what brought her in. The sea under her was lively counterfeit with all colours : On her fore stern was placed Neptunus, having in his hand his trident, and on his head a crown. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. i^ij His apparel was all of India cloth of silver and silk, which bare this inscription, jfunxi atque reduxi, which in sense importeth. That as he joined them so he reduced their majesties. Then Thetis, with her mace, goddess of the sea, with this device, Nunquam abero, W tutum semper te litiore sistam, which signifieth. That by her presence she shall always be careful to bring tliem into a safe shore and harbour. The Triton, with his wilk trumpet, was next to her, with this device, Velis, ventis, votis. By sails, by vows, by winds. Round about the ship were all the marine people, as sirens, (above the middle as women, and under as fishes) and these were Parthenope, Ligea, and Leucosia, who, accommodating their gestures to the voice of the musicians, repeated this verse, Unus eris nobis cantandus semper in orbe. And all the same was decored with the riches of the seas, as pearls, corals, shells, and metals, very rare and excellent. The bulk of this ship was curiously painted ; and her galleries, whereupon stood the most part of the banquet in crystalline glass, gilt with gold and azure. Her masts were red ; her tackling, and cordage were silk, of the same colour, with golden pullies. Her ordnance was thirty-six pieces of brass, bravely mounted ; and her anchors silver gilt. And all her sails were double of white tafiety ; and in her foresail a ship-compass, regarding the north star, with this sentence, ^las- cunque per undas ; which is to say. Through whatsoever seas, or waves, the king's majesty intendeth his course, and project of any arising action, Neptune, as god of the sea, shall be favourable to his proceedings. On the main-sail was painted the armories of Scotland and Denmark, with this device, competent in the person of the Prince of Scotland, En qua divisa beata efficiunt, collecta tenes : that is to say, " Behold, (O Prince) what doth make these " kingdoms severally blessed, jointly (O Prince of Hope) thou boldest and hast " together." Her tops were all armed with taffeties of his majesty's colours, gold and jewels, and all her flags and streamers suitable to tlie same. Her mariners were in number six, apparelled all in changeable Spanish taffeties, and her pilot in cloth of gold ; he alone stood at the helm, who only moved and governed the whole frame, both the ship and her burden, very artificially. The musicians within the same were fourteen, all apparelled in taffeties of his majesty's colours, besides Arion with his harp. Being thus prepared, at the sound of trumpets she approached, and at the next sound of Triton's wilk trumpet, together with the master's whistle, she made sail till she came to the table, discharging the ordnance in her stern by the way ; but because this device carried some moral meaning with it, it shall not be impertinent to this purpose to discover what is meant and propined thereby. The king's majesty having undertaken in such a desperate time to sail to Nor- way, and, like a new Jason, to bring his queen, our gracious lady, to this king- dom, being detained and stopped by the conspiracies of witches and such devilish dragons, thought it very meet to follow forth this his own invention ; that as Neptuniis (speaking poetically, and by ^ch fictions as the like interludes and actions are accustomed to be decored witlffl) joined the king to the queen ;, So, after this conjunction, he brought their majesties as happily hither ; and now, at this her blessed delivery, did bring such things as the sea aftbrds, to decorc- this festival time withal, which immediately were delivered to the sewers, forth of the galleries of this ship, out of crystalline glass, very curiously painted with gold and azure, all sorts of fishes, as herrings, whitings, flucks, oysters, buckies, lam- preys, partans, lobsters, crabs, spout-fish, clams ; with other infinite things made of sugar, and most lively represented in their own shape. And whilst the ship was unloading, Arion, sitting upon the galley-nose, which resembled the form of a dolphin fish, played upon his harp ; then began her music, in green holly haut- boys, in fine parts. After that followed viols, with voices in plain counterpoint to the nature ot these hexameter verses. Vol. IL 3 Y. i6o EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Undique conveniant, quot reges nomine Christi Gaudent, hucque suas maturent cogere vires ; Viribus hos, O Rex, opibu'^que anteiveris oranes, Ouisque suam jam posse velit tibi cedere sorlera, Regna, viros, aurum, quae te feceie potentem Omnia conjugii decorant haec pignora chari : Anna, precor foelix multos foeliciter annos, Vive, resume novos, atque annuus anni Instar eat, redeatque novo tibi partus ab ortu. Cresce, puer, sacri mens numinis imbibat imbres. Semper uterque parens de te nova gaudia captet. Scotia, quae quondam multis tcnebrosa vocata est, Lumina magna nitent in te superantia ccelum. Lux verbi, & rex, & princeps, diademata regni. Aftc iiich ensued a still noise of recorders and flutes ; and, for the fourth, a general concert of the best instruments. So this interlude drawing near to an end, in the very last courses was discovered this sentence likewise, Subinissiu adorat oceanus ; inferring, that the ocean sea, by oifenng the shapes of her treasure, hurnbly adored and honoured the sitters. And when, in this time, all the banquet was done, after thanks being given, there was sung with most delicate dulce voices, and sweet harmony, in seven parts, the cxxviii. psalm, with fourteen voices. And that being done, at the sound of Tri- ton's wilk trumpet and the pilot's whistle, she weighed anchor, made sail, and, with noise of hautboys and trumpets, retired, and then discharged the rest of her ord- nance to the great admiration of the beholders, After all which pastime and sporr, with merry and joyful repast, the king and queen's majesties, after their offices of honour and respect, place being prepared for the revels, and the persons appointed for the same discharging themselves suffi- ciently, their majesties and ambassadors went to another hall, most richly and magnificently hung with rich tapestry, where, for the collation, a most rare, sump- tuous, and prince-like desert was prepared. Which being ended, after taking leave and good-nights, they departed about three of the clock in the morning, to their night's rest. The days ensuing, so long as leisure might serve, were bestowed by the ambassa- dors in banqueting of noblemen and gentlemen of their acquaintance ; and the king in the mean time was solicitous and careful of honourable and magnific re- wards to be bestowed on either of them, which was also prmcely performed, to their great contentments. And as they were come to Edinburgh, they were all banqueted, at some time severally, and at other time together, by divers noblemen of Scotland, with great honour. Last of all, one ambassador banqueted another, for commemoration of that joyful meeting and good success. Then the king and queen's majesties came to Edinburgh, where they were in- vited by the ambassadors of Denmark unto a banquet within their ship, which lay at anchor in the river of Forth : she was so great that she could not enter the harbour. ^ Tiie banquet was very sumptuous, and the ambassadors, so joyous of their final dispatch, behaved themselves to their majesties in a kindly manner, according to the ordinary custom of their country, by propining of drink unto them in the name of their princes, which was lovingly accepted and requitted: In com- memoiation whereof, the whole artillery of that great vessel were shot in great number. The three great ships of the Estates, lying in the same road near by, made cor- respondence and resonance to the number of six score great shot. And thus con- cluded their bein ale. Then the castle of Edinburgh, for performance of the king's honour, as they perceived the ships to loose and to hoist up sail, saluted every ship, as they showed themselves in readiness by order, with a number of great cannon shot. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTSv ACT BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS HIS MAJESTY S HIGH COMMISSIONER, AND LORDS OF PRIVY COUNCIL, ESTABLISHING THE ORDER OF THE RIDING OF THE PARLIAMENT AT EDIN- BURGH, JULY 25TH 1 68 1. I. His Majesty's High Commissioner and Lords of Privy Council ordain the magistrates of Edinburgh, to cause make a lane of their citizens, in arms and best order, from the Lady's Steps to the Nether-Bow, (his majesty's foot-guards making the lane from the Nether-Bow to the palace}. IL The said magistrates are appointed to order that there be no shooting, nor any displaying of ensigns, nor beating of drums, during the cavalcade, nor any coaches to be seen within the ports of Edinburgh till the whole solemnity be over, under all highest pains. The magistrates are to cause make and place two banks of timber within the Abbey-close, for mounting on horseback, and two at the Lady's Steps, for mounting upon horseback and dismounting. in. The Constable and Marischal Guards of Partisans are to make a lane from the Lady's Steps, those of the Constable's without, and those of the Marischal'* within the house, allowing the Constable sis of his guard within doors, conform to the former practice. IV. Every member of Parliament must ride, and the absents incur fining, con- form to the act of Parliament 1662. V. Where there be double elections of commissioners neither are to ride. VI. The nobility are to ride in their robes, and with foot-mantles. VII. The officers ot state, who are not noblemen, and who have gowns particu- lar to their office, are to ride in these gowns. VIII. The whole members are to ride covered, excepting those who carry the honours. IX. The Lyon Heralds, Pursuivants, and Trumpets, ride immediately before the honours ; the Lyon in his coat and robe, chain and batton, alone ; and imme- diately before the sword, the rest, with their coats, foot-mantles, bareheaded, in their accustomed order. X. The two Macers of Council and four Macers of Session ride on each side of the honours bareheaded, with foot-mantles ; the two Macers of Council attending the crown, and the four Macers of Session the sceptre and sword. XI. The higher degree and most honourable of that degree is to ride always last. XII. Every duke is to have eight lacquies, every marquis six, every earl four, every viscount three, every lord three, every commissioner for a shire two, antl every commissioner for burghs one ; and every nobleman is to have a gentleman bareheaded to walk by him, and to bear up his train, and these gentlemen are at their entry to the house to stand without the bar. XIII. The archbishops and bishops are to ride in their gowns and tippets, with their foot-mantles, and the archbishops may have eight lacquies, and bishops three, and each of them is to have a gentleman bareheaded to walk by him, and to beai' up his train. XIV. The noblemen's lacquies may have over their liveries velvet coats with their badges, i. e. their crests and mottos done on plate, or embroidered upon the back and breast, conform to ancient custom, or their ordinary liveries. XV. The Constable and Marischal are in the morning to wait on his Majesty's High Commissioner at the palace, and to receive his orders, and from thence, re- turning privately, the Constable is to come out of his lodging on foot, and, having viewed the rooms under and above the Parliament House, puts on his robes, and, having his batton in his hand, sets himself in a chair at the entry of the close at the Lady's Steps, by the outmost of his guards, from which he is to rise and salute the members as they light from their horses, and to recommend them to the gen- tlemen of his guard to be conducted to the Marischal Guards. XVI. The Marischal is also to attend in his robes, being set in a chair at the head of his guards, and to receive the members (having his batton in his hand) a-; they enter the doors. ioz EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. XVII. The Officers of State who are noblemen, so many of them as are in the kingdom, are to ride up from the Abbey in their robes about halt an hour before the cavalcade, and to wait in the Parliament House until the High Commissioner come; and when an ordinary subject is Commissioner, the High Chancellor is to take his own purse in his hand, and to usher him betwixt the bar and the throne; but when his Royal Highness, or any lawful brother or son of the king is commis- sioner, he is to usher them from the door itself and back, XVIII. The whole Members of Parliament are to wait upon his Majesty's High Commissioner in the Guard-hall, the nobility being in their robes, and the servants and horses are to attend in the outer close. XIX. The Lyon King at Arms in his coat, robe, chain, and batten, (to whose charge the order of riding is committed^ with six heralds, six pursuivants, and six trumpets, in their coats, attend likewise. XX. How soon his Majesty's High Commissioner is ready, the Lord Register (or such as he shall appoint) and Lyon standing together, each of them having a roll in his hand, and the rolls being read, the Lyon is to call the names of such of them as are to nde, according to their order; and one herald is to cry aloud at one of the windows, and another herald is to stand at the gate, and see them do accordingly. XXI. The Members are to ride two and two, each degree by itself, at some dis- tance, without mixing with any other degree; so tnat if there fall to be an odd member of one degree, he must ride alone. XXII. The Lord Register is to make up the rolls of Parliament, both for the riding and calling in the Parliament House, conform to the rolls of riding and calling at the last Parhament, anno 1669, whereof he is to give the Lyon a just duplicate, except where there is just ground to alter the same, and the mem- bers are to ride as they are called; but if they think themselves prejudged, they may protest in the same manner as at the calhng of the rolls in the house, and may afterwards, as they think fit, apply themselves to the Parliament for remedy. XXIII. The honours are to be carried immediately before the High Commis- sioner ; the crown by the Marquis of Douglas, the sceptre next it by the eldest earl present, and the sword before it by the earl next in order, and the bearers are to nde, one by one, bareheaded. XXIV. The dukes and marquisses are to ride after the High Commissioner at some distance, conform to the former custom. XXV. The Master of Horses is to ride bareheaded after his Majesty's High Commissioner, but a little aside, when the Commissioner is the king's lawful son or brother. XXVI. The Gentleman-Usher, with a white rod in his hand, is to ride aside bareheaded near to the Commissioner, he before on the same side, and in the same manner as the Master of Horse behind in the case foresaid. XXVII. How soon his Majesty's High Commissioner ahghts from his horse, the Lord Constable is to receive him, and to attend him to the Marischal Guards, and then both Constable and Marischal are to convey him bareheaded to the throne, and are in the same manner to attend him in his return to his horse. XXVIII. The return to the palace is to be in the same manner, with these two alterations, viz. First, The Constable and Marischal ride on the High Commission- er's left and right hand with caps of permission, the Constable on the right, and the Marischal on the left. Secondly, The officers of state, who are noblemen, are not to take horse until the High Commissioner be gone, and then are to ride at some distance after the guard. AN ACCOUNT OF THE FORM OF THE CREATION OF THE BIARQtHS OF HAMILTON, AND. MARQUIS OFHUNTLY, IJth jlpril I599. In his Majesty's great chamber in the Abbey of Holyroodhouse, where the like ceremony was wont to be done, being richly hung with tapestry, five stages or de- grees of timber were erected, one for his majesty on the west side, whereon his 3 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. '(>3 majesty's chair of state was set under the pall of honour, one for the duke, one for the earls, one for the lords, and one for the knights; there was also before the throne a table covered with a cloth of gold, whereon were laid the sword, sceptre, and crown, the noblemen attending the ceremonies in their respective seats in their robes; and his majesty in his robe-royal, being placed in his chair, the queen sitting by, the Lyon King at Arms, and Master of Ceremonies, with the heralds and pursuivants in their coats, and trumpets sounding, brought in before his ma- jesty these two noblemen, viz. the Earls of Arran and Huntly, the first conveyed "by the Duke of Lennox and Earl of Marr, the second by the Chancellor and Earl of Caithness. Thereafter the Lyon asked his Majesty, If his Majesty would be pleased to promote these noblemen to further honours? his Majesty answered. Yes: Then the Lyon, Master of Ceremonies, with heralds, pursuivants, and trum- pets, conveyed them into the Green Council Chamber, where they were divested of their comital robes, and vested in the habit of a marquis, and so were again conveyed to his Majesty's presence thus: The ordinary macers that attend the Chancellor and Session making place. Master of Ceremonies. Trumpets sounding with the noblemen's colours at their trumpets. Pursuivants in their coats. Heralds in their coats. Four gentlemen, for each of the persons to be created, bearing their honours, viz. for my Lord Arran, Robert Hamilton of Goslington the pennon, Alexander Hamilton of Fenton the banner, Claud Hamilton of Shawfield the marquis's crown, John Campbell of Ardkinlass the patent ; for my Lord Huntly, John Ogil- vie of the Craig the pennon, John Crichton of Frendraught the banner, Mark Ker of Ormiston the crown, Alexander Gordon of Strathdon the patent. Lyon King at Arms. The two earls conveyed by the fore-named noblemen in their respective robes and crowns on their heads. Coming before the king, they made their reverence ; then they were led up by the Master of Ceremonies some steps, and, sitting down on their knees on velvet cushions, the Lyon made a harangue, both to his Majesty and to them, declaring to the noblemen, to promote them to that dignity, and that he desired them to fear God, and obey his power; then he took cheir oaths. That they should obey God, his Majesty, and maintain the religion then professed. Thereafter the Lyon delivered to his Majesty the patents, and his Majesty re-delivered them to the Lyon, who gave them to the noblemen, in token that they should obey God and hi- Majesty's laws. After, the Lyon delivered to his Majesty the marquisses' co- ronets, his Majesty re-delivered them to the Lyon, the Lyon put the crowns on their heads, saying, Jrjhn Marquis of Hamilton, Earl of Arran, Lord Aven, &.c. George Marquis of Huntly, Earl of Enzie, Lord Gordon of Badenoch, &.c. The same was proclaimed forth of the windows, by the heralds and pursuivants, with sound of trumpets; then were they conveyed to their seats, and placed above the earls, upon the king's left hand, trumpets sounding. The Lyon desired his Majesty to honour the gentlemen, who bore the honours, with the honour of knighthood; his Majesty consented: The Lyon caused them to sit down on their knees at the foot of all the stage; and after he had made an exhortation to them, and received all their oaths, they holding up their hands, and promising to obey all the injunctions, the Lyon presented the sword to his Majesty, who struck each of them therewith on the right shoulder, and Sir offered the spur, the Lyon first proclaiming their stiles, and after the heralds and pursuivants at the windows with sound of trumpet. I find this difference in the creation of many earls, from what is here set down, that the four gentlemen bear the honours thus; the first the pennon, the second the standard, the third the sword and belt, the fourth the crown; and, lastly, the Lyon bears the patent in a velvet bag ; and that the Lyon oifered first to his Majesty the sword and belt, and, receiving it back, put it on the person no- bihtate. As also, when the king was not present, and after his going to England, the ceremony was performed by his Majesty's High Commissioner, if there was one at Vol. U. 3 Z ' i64 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. the time, or otherwise a writ was directed to the Lord Chancellor, appointing him Commissioner tor that creation; and then the first thing that was done, after the person to be created was brought in, tlie Lyon gave the patent to the Commission- er, who gave it to the Register or Clerk of Council to be read. And I observe this in all our old creations, that if the person to be dignified was a lord formerly, he was to be conveyed in by two lords; and the ceremony of the new creation be- ing over, was conveyed to his place by two of that degree to which he was ad- vanced. The English nobility are sometimes created by being called by writ to Parliament, under the designations of earls, viscounts, &-c. which way is unknown to us m Scotland, though the king may introduce it at his pleasure. FORM OF THE KING S OATH TO HIS THREE ESTATES. I SHALL be leille and treu to God and halie kirk, and to the thre estaitts of my realme, and ilk estaite keipe, govrane and defend in their awen fredome and pri- viledge at my goodlie powre, after the lawes and custumes of the realme: The law, custume and statuts of the realme, nether to eike nor mynishe without the consent of the thre estaits: And nathing to wyrke, na uses tuoching the common profitt of the realm, but consent of the thre estaitts, the law and statuts made be my forbears, keipe and use at all points, with all my poure, till all my leiges in all thinges, swa that they repung nought aganis the faith. Swa helpe me God, and this haly doume. FORM OF THE FIDELITY OF THE PRELATES TO THE KING. I SALL be leille and treu to you my Leige Lord Schire James King of Scots, and not heir your skaith, nor see it, but I sail let it at all my power, and warn you thereof: Your counsaill heile that you shaw me, the best counsaile I can to give you when ze charge me. In verba Dei, and als help me God, and holy evangells. FORM OF THE BARON S OATH TO THE KING. I BECOME your man, as my leige king, in land, life, lithe and lime, and warld's honoure, feute and laute, agains all yat live and dee may. Your counsaille celand yat ze shaw to me, the best counsale gifand if ze charge me; your skaith na dis- honoure to heir nor see, but I sail lett it at all my goodie powres, and warn you thereof. Sa helpe me God. CHAP. XVI. OF THE OFFICE OF HERALDS. HERALDS took their rise in the world so soon as kings and princes dis- tinguished their subjects into nobles and yeomen. They are called heralds, to teach us what they were, and what they ought yet to be; the word being composed of two Teutonic words, heir and mild, which sig- nifies an old lord, or ancient sir, showing, that they ought to be gentlemen of good descent, for such were officers of arms in old times. Some derive the name from heroes, which signifies demi-gods, from whence it is likely the French word herault is derived. The heavenly heralds are angels, the messengers of the Most High God, Creator of heaven and earth. Heralds, not many years ago, have been allowed very high privileges; they were allowed free entrance into the courts of all princes and great lords; they had pov.sr to reprove the vices of noblemen, knights, and esquires; and if they did npt amend, to expel them from all honourable meetings and martial exercises. It EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 165 belonged to heralds to advertise knights, esquires, and military commanders, of the day of battle, to attend their sovereign's great standard in their best ornaments ; they were, during the time of the battle, to retire to an eminence to witness what was done on either side, and report to the king or the general, those who behaved most valiantly, and to set the same down in writing, that the memory thereof might re- main to posterity. When the battle was ended, it was their province to number the dead, to exchange prisoners of war, and commune about their ransom; to summon rebellious cities; and, in case of composition, to march before the captain or governor for assurance of his person. At jousts, tournaments, or combats, it was the otficeofthe herald to lay out the tieldof battle, and to divide the same equally to the combatants. Such as did wrong them were obliged to give full satisfac- tion, else they were declared guilty of high treason, and degraded of nobihty ; an instance of which happened duruig the minority of King James V. in the year of God 1515, the Duke of Albany regent, when the Lord Drummond was solemnly forfeited in Parliament: " Eo quod leonem armorum regem pugno violasset, dum " eum de ineptiis suis admonet," says the record ; and it was upon that lord's humble submission, and at the earnest entreaty of the Lyon, that he was restored. We shall here insert an abstract of the privileges granted in ancient times to heralds, ascribed by some to Alexander the Great, by others to the King and Em- peror Charlemagne, " My soldiers, ye are and shall be called heralds, companions " for kings, and judges of crimes committed by noblemen, and arbiters of their " quarrels and differences ; ye must live hereafter exempt from going any more " to war or military factions ; counsel kings for the best, the benefit of the com- " monwealth, and for their honour and royal dignity. Correct all matters vile " and dishonest, favour widows, succour orphans, and defend them from all vio- " lence, assist witii your counsel such princes and lords in whose courts ye shall " abide ; and freely and without fear demand of them whatsoever is needful for *' you, as food, raiment, and defrayings. If any one of them shall deny you, *' let them be infamous, without glory or honour, and reputed as guilty of high •' treason. In like manner also, take ye special care to keep yourselves from vili- " fying yovir noble exercise, and the honour wherewith you ought to come near us «' at all times. See that there be no entry into princes' courts, either of drunken " or evil speaking, flattery, babbhng indiscreetly, janglary, buffoonery, and other •' such vices, which file and shame the reputation of men : Give good example, " everywhere maintain equity, and repair wrongs done by great men to their in- " feriors. Remember what privileges we have granted unto you in recompense " of the painful travels in war ye have endured with us ; and let not the honour " we have bestowed on you be converted to blame and infamy by dishonest liv- " ing, the punishment whereof we reserve to ourself, and the Kings of France oui " successors." The society of heralds in England consists of thirteen persons, viz. three Kings at Arms, which, by their offices, are called Garter, Clarencieux, andNorroy: Garter is the first in dignity, not so much as being the most ancient, as from the superemi- nency of the order after which he is named. Clarencieux and Norroy are called Provincial Kings at Arms. Six heralds, which, by the names of their additions. are called Somerset, Chester, Windsor, Richmond, Lancaster, York. Four pur- suivants, which, in heraldry, may be called Learners, to whom are given tlie names of Rouge Dragon, Portcullis, Blue Mantle, Rouge Croix; all these by the names of Kings, Heralds, or Pursuivants, are by the kings themselves immediately, or by the marischals of the kingdom, with the king's authority, crowned with crowns, and graced with colours, attired with their coats, named by their names of additi jn, and other ceremonies created. All of them have an yearly salary out of the king's Exchequer, and by a charter from the crown are incorporate, and have many privileges conferred on them. Garter's peculiar office is to attend upon the knights of that order, advertise them of their election, call them to be installed at Wind- sor, cause their achievements to be hung upon their stalls, and to take care of the several rites and ceremonies at their burials. Of every new emperor, king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, or knight installed in this order, he challen- geth the uppermost garment he weareth that day. He also showeth unto everj 1 66 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. new baron, called into Parliament, the place wherein he is to sit among his peers, and directeth all the other ceremonies of their order. Clarencieux is King at Arms over all the east, west, and south provinces, on the south side of the river Trent. Norroy is King at Arms through the parts of the kingdom be-north the river Trent. The Lyons Kings at Arms of Scotland, by virtue of their office, and by the bounty of the kings, are freed from all manner of taxes, watchings, and wardings, &•€. He is sovereign judge, constituted by act of Parliament for punishing all usurpers of arms contrary to law. He may give arms to all persons craving the same, if they are able to ma.ntain a horse with furniture for the king's service; but with these especial restrictions, " Dummodo heretici non sint, contra fidem, ex illegitimo " toro prognati, vel ex ignobili sanguine ormndi, sed viri probi &- honesti nomi- " nis." He hath the place of precedency before all knights and gentlemen within the kingdom, not being officers of state, or Senators of the College of Justice. The Lyon in all great solemnities, as the coronations, marriages, and christen- ings of kings, queens, or their children, is vested with a long robe of crimson vel- vet, with long tassels of silk hanging down to the ground ; this robe is doubled ■with silver-coloured Spanish taffeta, and is a fee to him at such solemnities. His crown is made close, all of beaten gold, after the model of the imperial crown of Scotland, not set with stones, but only enamelled. He may wear it at all solemnities whatsoever, except at funerals and interments. His batton is of wood, coloured azure, and all over powdered with thistles of gold, which he uses principally at denouncing of war, proclaiming of peace, forfaulting traitors, pro- clamation of kings, &.C. As for the name of Lyon, given to the Scots King at Arms, it is taken from the Lion, the ancient badge of our Scots monarchs, borne by them for their arms since Fergus the first Scots Monarch, and is as ancient as since the days of Mal- colm IL and some think long before that time. The heralds, being six in number, have their precedency according to the dates of their creations. Their names of addition are altogether local, and are very an- cient. Snowdown is named from Snowdown Castle in the shire of Ross, and the resi- dence of our ancient Scots' kings. Albany is named from the whole realm, which, by the ancients, was called ^/^«, and by our Highlanders, who are the native Scots to this day, is called Albanach, This herald was in use mostly to attend upon the Dukes of Albany. Ross herald, so named from the county of Ross, which was of old an appendage of the crown. . Rothsay has his name and title from the Castle of Rothsay, or Rosay, an an- cient tesidence of our Scots kings in the Isle of Bute. Marchmont derives his title from the Castle of Marchmont, so named in our an- cient histories, now called Roxburgh Castle. Hay herald has his denomination from an island in the West Seas. As for pursuivants, they are also for most part locally denominated (Unicorn on- ly excepted) viz. Carrick, Kintyre, Ormond, and Bute. The office of Lyon King at Arms in this kingdom has been of old endued with the power of regality over all these under him ; for he holds his office of the king immediately, and that by letters patent under the Great Seal of Scotland. It was lawful for him to repledge all his under officers, for whatever cause, from the judgment of any court, civil, ecclesiastic, or criminal, the king excepted, upon his finding caution to administer justice upon them in his own court, and to punish them accordingly. And al! magistrates and others are commanded, by act of Par- liament, to be aiding and assisting to him for putting the privileges of his office in execution. He has the sole admission of all heralds, pursuivants, messengers, and macers ; bv him they are created, and from him all their patents of office, as from his maiest}''s supreme o.fficer of honour, proceed. No herald can give new arms but bv his licence and approbation, and his hand and seal must be had thereto, and all controversies among them must be determined by him and his deputes. 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 167 No herald or pursuivant could give orders for funerals or interments but by his appointment : neither could any paint arms without his licence. And all messen- gers within the kingdom are absolutely subject to his jurisdiction and command. The ancient fees paid to the Lyon and his brethren, besides many others settled on them by the royal bounty, were, at the creation of a duke, L.iooo, a marqui-. L.666 : 3 :4, an earl L.400, an arclibishop L.400, a bishop L.236 : 13 : 4; of a lord L.236 ; 13 : 4, knight baronet L.66 : 13 : 4, knight-batchelor L. 66 : 13 ; 4, all which was equally divided amongst the Lyon, heralds, and pursuivants, viz. to the Lyon four shares, to every herald two, and to every pursuivant one. But at fu- neral obsequies they are paid as they serve, without division. At the pubhcation of peace in any city, a silver bowl was the Lyon's due, or a merk of gold. Every knight that carried a banner, and every colonel of a regiment were obli- ged to pay the Lyon a mcrk in gold, and every captain a merk in silver ; for which he was obliged to register their names, surnames, and qualities, with their arms, for the preservation of their honour. Every herald or pursuivant, for each proclamation they publish concerning the state, was to have an angel of gold : And to them belongs the executing of letters of treason, &-c. for which they are paid according to paction. But as these things have, of late years, undergone several alterations, we shall insist no farther upon them : only, betore we conclude this chapter, we shall set down the several oaths taken of old by the Lyon and his brethren, by which the reader will have a more distinct view of what they several- ly were bound to perform by their offices. THE OATH OF THE LYON. " First, Whensoevir the king's majestic sail command you to doany message to any uthir king or prince, estait, or persone, that you sail doe that als honourablie and treulie as your witt and reasone can shew you, and als .-^reatlie to the ad- vantage of your said soverane lord, and trew report bring against his heighness of what ye sail do, as neir to the charge to you committit in words and sub- stance, as your reason may attain : So alway keip your self free from any maner of motione, save to such persons as you be commandit to utter your chairge unto. " Secondly, Ye sail doe your true endeavour, as God may help you, every day to be more cunning then uthers in the office of amies, so that you be the bet- ter furnished to execute with more wisdome and eloquence such charges as your soverane sail lay unto you by vertue of the office his sacred majestic heath committit unto your charge. " Thirdly, Ye sail do your full knowledge of all noblemen and gentillmen with- in this realm, which sould beir coates in the feild, in service of our soverane lord, his lieutenant, officers, or commissioners, and them with their isshewes trulia register, and such amies as they bear, v/ith their difference dew in armes to be given, and if they hold any service by knights fee, whereby they sould hold and doe the king service for the defence of his land. " Fourthlie, Ye sail not be straing to teach heraulds or pursevants, nor to ease them in such questions as they sail move to you. " Lastlie, Ye sail prom^is to registrat all acts of honor in maner and forme as they be done, so far as your cunning and power sail extend. THE OATH OF A HERALD .\ND PURSUIVANT WHICH THEY GIVE AT THEJR CREATION. " First, Ye sail swear that ye sail be trew and faithfuU to your soverane lord the king, and if ye have any knowledge, or heir any imagination of treasoane, or heir any language or word, that sould so move, or sound to the deroga- tione of his honor, stait, or heighness (which God defend) in that caise, so soon as it is possible, ye sail discover the same to the King ot Armes, who sail go with you, either to his highness or his counsell, as God sail bliss vou. Vol, IL 4 A i68 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " Also you sail swear, that you sail be conversant and serviceable to all gen- " tillmen, to do their commandments to their worship by your good counsaill " which God heath sent you. " Also you sail swear and promeis to keip the secreits of knights, esquires, and " ladies, as a confessor of armes, and not to discover them m any manner except " it be treasone against the kings most excellent majestic. " Also you sail promeis and swear, if that ye be in any place, where ye may •■' heir any language betwixt graittmen and gentiUmen, that is not worschipfull, " or profeitable, nor generous, that ye keip your mouth closse, and report it not " furth to any living bot to themselves. " Also you sail promeis and swear, that from hencefurthe you sail forsake all dis- " honest places, that ye naythir keip taverne nor aillhouse, ather by yourselvis, " wyffe, or families, but onlie apply yourselves to vertue, the studie of armes, " genealogies, search of records, moniments and antiquities, with lyk exerciss of " honour. So help you God. " Also you sole m lie promeis and swear to obey the commandments and instruc- " tions, with all uther the imployments of the King of Armes, in all matters con- " cerning honor and armes ; and also in all uthyr particulars and matters contin'd " in the several privileges of his office. So more help you God, and by the oath " you have maid." CHAP. XVII. OF PRECEDENCY. AMONGST those who are supreme, kings have the preference from com- monwealths ; and, among kings, emperors are allowed the first place ; and yet hereditary kings may debate the precedency with them when they are but elective. The French Kings have debated their precedency with the Kings of Spain for many years, till at last it was yielded in favours of the French. The King of Great Britain claims precedency to them both. i. As being king of that Isle, which was first Christian. 2. Upon his being anointed, and one of the quatuor iincti, which were before all other kings. 3. That having conquered France, he has right to all the precedency which France can acclaim. And, to Spain, the King of England was preferred in the general councils of Pisa, Con- stance, and Basil. But the King of Great Britain, as King of Scotland, may justly claim prece- deny of all these kings ; for it is a received maxim, that among those of equal dig- nity, he who first attained to that dignity is to be preferred; and the i>ing of Scotland being equal in dignity to the Kings of England, P'rance, and Spain, at- tained to that dignity before any of them. For Fergus 1. came into Scotland 330 years before the birth of Christ ; whereas it is contest by the English historian Polydore, that Egbert, the first English king, did begin his reign iioo years after our Saviour's birth. As to the monarchy of Spain, they are no older than Rodolphus King of the Romans, elected in the year 1273, by whom the House of Austria did rise to this dignity. , . . . , - , As to the now reigning Kings of France, they are only descend(jd from Hugh Capet, who usurped the throne in anno 987. And not being descended of either the Carlovingian or Merovingian races, they cannot compete with our kings, Achaius King of Scotland having been contemporary with Charles le Magne, the first of the Carlovingian race; and yet Achaius was but the sixty-fifth of the Scots Kings ; and the leagues betwixt the said Achaius and the said Charles are not only asserted by Scots and French Historians, but confessed by all strangers. And if the Christian race be allowed preference, the Kings of Scotland ought on that account to hav; the pre-eminence also ; for Donald King of Scots embraced the Christian faith in anno 199, before either William the Conqueror succeeded to England, or Hugh Capet to France, and long before Spain obeyed its ,late race of monarchs. And though it must be owned, that in the council of Constance, England and 2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 165 France were prefened to Scotland, yet, as Gothofred observes, that proceeded from the partiality of the Church of Rome, which always preferred those who were able to do them most service ; and surelj, according, to the Christian religion, as that race ought to be preferred whose title is justest, so the Scots Kings never having usurped over the people which they governed, they have a just title to precedency on that account above all others. And as to that silly and groundless pretence, that the Kings of Scotland were vassals of the Kings of England, the same is so pertinently and fully redargued by Sir George Mackenzie in his Right of Precedency, that it would be lost labour tu enter upon it in this place. The King of Sweden pretends to precedency over Denmark, though it i^ vcr_\ dubious, Denmark having likewise claimed precedency from Sweden. The Kings of Sweden have claimed precedency above all Christian princes, as being the true successors of the Gotliic Kings, who exacted tribute even from the Emperors and Kings of France. Both Denmark and Sweden claim precedency from the King of Poland, as being an elected and limited monarch. The King of Poland has claimed precedency of the King of Portugal, though it has been determined in favour of the latter. There are other sovereigns who are not crowned heads, such as Mantua, Flo- rence, Ferrara, Parma, Venice, &c. who debate their respective precedencies ; but it is not easy to determine them, some having it one time, and some at another. Commonwealths themselves have contended for precedency of any one king, on these accounts ; that they being the freest of all men, are the noblest ; and they being in effect a country of kings, ought to be preferred to any one king ; especially since their government is elder than that of kings, men having drawn themselves into societies before they either submitted to or elected kings. Some commonwealths claim precedency, as having right to kingdoms, as Venice, on account of her right to the kingdom of Corsica. Genoa has contended with Venice, but without success. The States General contend with Venice, and all other commonwealths, as be- ing the more powerful, and being a society of commonwealths. They pretend also to precedency of all the princes of the empire, as being more independent : But yet that has been decided against them by the emperor in later times. Among the princes of the empire, the electors are still preferred ; and amongst these the ecclesiastics are preferred to the laics. Next to the electors the Archduke of Austria has the precedency in the empire. The eldest sons of electors precede all other princes of the empire. Churchmen themselves have had as much bustle about precedency as any others whatever ; witness the Patriarchs of Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria, and Jerusalem. The two former claimed precedency, because their sees were the seats of the Roman and Grecian empires ; those of Jerusalem, because the chief priesthood was once settled there ; those of Antioch, because it was the first seat ot Christianity ; and those of Alexandria, as being the chief city of the east, before the building of Constantinople. The Roman Patriarch was, by the Emperor Phocas, raised above all the rest in the year 606; since which time they have raised themselves to the papacy, though it cannot be denied but even before that they had the first seat in all councils. And though it be pretended that Constantine the Great did, from Christian hu- mility, prefer the successor of Peter, as vicar of Jesus Christ, to himself, and is brought in Cap. Constantimis 14. dest. 96. as acknowledging himself to have led the pope's bridle, and, in the famous ceremonial of Rome, fol. 21. the emperor is al- lowed no higher place than the pope's footstool ; yet these things have been stre- nuously opposed by the emperors, and not pretended to in latter times by the popes themselves. Cardinals have debated precedency W'ith patriarchs, though adjudged to belong to the latter. Sixtus Quintus raised cardinals to an equal degree with kings ; and if kings be present at table, if there be but one, he is to sit after the first cardinal bishop, and if more, they sit m,ixtly with the cardinals. But this is not yielded to by princes who profess the reformed religion. jpo EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. The bishops of Scotland preceded in this manner ; archbishops, St AndreWi and Glasgow ; bishops of Edinburgh, Galloway, Dunkeld, Aberdeen, Murray, Ross, Brechin, Dumblane, Caithness, the Isles, Argyle and Orkney. Marqiiis;es in old times took place of archbishops : But, in latter times, in imitation of Eng- land, archbishops take place of all dukes and marquisses ; yea, the Archbishop of St Andrews took place of the Chancellor, by virtue of a letter from the Sovereign anno 1664. The bishops of England precede thus ; archbishops, Canterbury and York ; bishops t)f London, Durham, Winchester, St Davids, Ely, Norwich, Hereford, Salisbury, Peterborough, Carlisle, Worcester, Rochester, Landaff, Lincoln, Ban- gour, Exeter, Chichester, St Asaph, Oxford, Litchfield and Coventry, Bristol, Glou- cester, Chester, and Bath and Wells. Nobility is divided into nobiles mnjores et minores ; under the greater are com- prehended all such as are lords of Parliament ; under the lesser are comprehended knights and gentlemen; and though all these be not peers of Parhament, yet they are all peers to one another, seeing a gentleman may be married to a duke's daughter; and though noblemen must be judged by their peers, yet landed gentle- men may pass upon their assize, and a nobleman is obliged to accept of a chal- lenge from a gentleman, were duels lawful. It is doubtful whether the younger sons of dukes and marquisses are to be ranked among the nobiles majores, or mi- nores, since, on the one hand, they sit not in Parliament, and on the other they are designed Lord, and take place of many of the nobiles majores. In Scotland the king's children, uncles, and nephews only had precedency of all subjects, and no remoter degree and precedency on account of his relation to our kings. The first place, next to the king, was due to the Prince of Scotland, who was likewise Duke of Rothsay, and the King's second son was Earl of Ross. It has been doubted whether the king's uncle, &.c. has the precedency of the officers of state at the coronation, riding of the parliament, &.c. in which it was the Constable's privilege to ride upon the king's right hand, and the Marischal's on his left : But the Duke of York preceded all officers at the coronation of king Charles II. Amongst princes of the blood the last descended from the royal family has still precedency : But though this hold in the branches, yet the eldest of the same branch will precede all of that branch. The nobility of Scotland were either declared such by feudal erections, their lands being erected by the king into a dutchy, earldom, &-c. which did of itself make him a duke or earl in whose favour the lands were so erected : or else they got the patents of honour declaring them dukes, earls, &-c. and this is a much later way, none being nobilitate by patents amongst us before King James I. The third way of nobilitating with us, is by creation and solemn investiture; the whole form of which we have given in the preceding chapter, in the instance of the Marquisses of Hamilton and Huntly, anno 1599. The English nobility are sometimes created by being called in a writ to Par- liament under the designations of Earls, Viscounts, &c. which was unknown in Scotland. Precedency among Subjects is thus established both in Scotland and England. Dukes of the blood royal. Other dukes according to their creation. Eldest sons of dukes of the blood royal. Marquisses according to their creation. Dukes' eldest sons. Earls according to their creation. Marquisses' eldest sons. Dukes' younger sons. Viscounts according to their creation. Earls' eldest sons. Marquisses' younger sons. EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. iqi Barons, whom we call lords. Viscounts' eldest sons. Earls' younger sons. Barons' eldest sons. Baronets. Viscounts' younger sons. At the coronation of King Charles I. the precedency of the nobility of Scotland was ordered to be the sama with that in England ; and to prevent differences be- twixt the nobility of both kingdoms, it was ordered, that all those of the same de- gree in England should, in England, take place from all those of the same degree in Scotland : And all those of tlie same degree in Scotland should, in Scotland, take place of the English; that is to say, all the English Dukes should take place in England of all the Scots dukes, and all the Scots dukes in Scotland should take place ot" all the English dukes, &-c. In anno 1623, King James VI. settled the precedency among his officers and counsellors thus : The Lord Chancellor. The Lord Treasurer. The Archbishop of St Andrews. The Archbishop of Glasgow. The Earls and Viscounts according to their ranks. Bishops according to their ranks. Lord Privy seal. Lord Secretary. Lord Register. Lord Advocate. Lord Justice Clerk. Lord Treasurer-depute. The Lords of Session according to their admission, barons and gen- tlemen, being counsellors, according to their admission. With us the eldest sons of barons are designed masters, and the uncles of lords were called masters, probably for no other reason but that they wanted a title, and so took up this, which occasioned afterwards the word master to be given to peirsons whose names were not known. By act of Parliament 1661, the President of the Session is declared to have pre- cedency of the Lords Register, Advocate, and Treasurer-depute. The ibth of November 1729, the Lord President of the Session produced to the lords a letter from Queen Caroline, guardian of the kingdom, to the President and Senators of the College of Justice in Scotland, for settling the precedency of the courts of justice therein, which was read, and ordered to be recorded, whereof the tenor follows : ByUFr Majesty the ^leen, Guardian of the Kingdom, &-c. Caroline, R. C. R. " FORASMUCH as we have been informed, that doubts have frequently arisen between the Senators of his Majesty's College of Justice, and the Barons of his Exchequer, in that part of his Majesty's kingdom of Great Britain, called Scotland, concerning their rank and precedency ; and we are willing to prevent any uneasiness, jealousies, or disputes between the members of two bodies so highly intrusted by his Majesty, and of so great use and importance to his ser- vice, and to the good government and welfare of his people : Therefore, we do, in his Majesty's name, by these presents, appoint and ordain, that you, the Presi- dent of his Majesty's said College of Justice, shall have the first place, and on all occasions shall take rank, and have precedency of the Chief Baron of hi'' Vol. II. 4 B 192 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. " Majesty's Exchequer there ; and the said Chief Baron shall continue to take- " rank, and have precedency of the remanent Senators of his Majesty's said Col- " lege of Justice; and the remanent Senators of the said College of Justice, and the " Barons of Ills Majesty's Exchequer, shall take place of each other, accordmg to " the date of their commission or appointment to their respective offices ; that is " to say, that every Senator of his Majesty's said College of Justice, whose com- " mission or appointment to his said office is of an elder date', shall take place, and " have the rank and precedency of and above all Senators of his Majesty's said " College of Justice, and Barons of his Majesty's said Exchequer, whose commis- " sions or appointments are of a later date ; and that every Baron of his Majesty's " said Exchequer, whose commissions or appointments are of an elder date, shall in " like manner take place, and have the rank and precedency of and above all Se- " nators of his Majesty's said College of Justice, and Barons of his Majesty's said " Exchequer, whose commissions or appointments are of a later date : And if it " shall happen that the commissions or appointments of one of the Senators of his " Majesty's said College of Justice, and one of the Barons of his Majesty's said " Exchequer, shall be of the same date, then the said Senator shall take place, " and have rank and precedency of and before the said Baron. And this we do in " his Majesty's name ordain, appoint, and establish, to be the constant and unal- " teVable rule and order in this respect, from henceforth in all time coming ; pro- " vided always, that the same shall not extend to deprive any peer of his Majesty's " realm, or the son of a Peer, or any other whatsomever enjoying any of the above- " mentioned offices, and having rank and precedency by reason of such his peerage " or birth, or on any other occasion not relative to his office of Senator of his Ma- *' jesty's said College of Justice, or Baron of his Majesty's said Exchequer, from " bruiking and enjoying such rank or precedency, any thing in these presents to " the contrary notwithstanding : And so we bid you heartily farewell. Given at " at the Court at Kensington the twenty-fourth day of July one thousand seven " hundred and twenty-nine, in the third year of her Majesty's reign. By hei: " Majesty's command, HoLLES Newcastle. The Order of Baronet in Scotland was erected for advancing the plantation of NovS Scotia in Amedca, and for settling a colony there, to which the ard of these knights was designed. The Order of Baronet in England was erected for advancing the plantation of Ulster in Ireland. Barons in England are lords with us; but a baron with us is properly he who has power of pit and gallows. The old barons, or lairds, amongst us, especially where they are chiefs of clans, refuse to cede precedency to knights baronets, and much less to ordinary knights; though the others pretend, and justly, that a baron is no name of dignity, and that knights baronets have a special privilege, that there shall be no degree betwixt them and lords, except bannerets; that is, such as should be created under the royal standard in open war, the king being present; and it must be owned, that next to knights baronets, succeed knights-batchelors, and next to them our lairds or landed gentlemen ; though a laird is but the corrupt word of a lord.- Amongst such as profess sciences, the rankmg goes thus uncontrovertedly. i. Such as profess Theology. i. Such as profess the Canon Law. 3, The Civil Law. 4. Philosophy. 5. Medicine. 6. Rhetoric. 7. Poesy. 8. History. 9. Gram- mar. 10. Logic. II. Arithmetic. 12. Geometry. 13. Music. 14. Astronomy ; and among these such as are Doctors precede those that are not. Women, before their marriage, have precedency by their father; but there is this difference betwixt them and the male children, that the same precedency is due to all the daughters that is due to the eldest, though it is not so amongst the sons; and the reason of this seems to be, that the daughters would succeed all equally, whereas the eldest son excludes all the rest. During the marriage, the wife regularly participates of the condition of her hus- band; and, in France, they communicate of the husband's titles; and thus they EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. I9J say, Madam la Chaiiceliere, i\Iadam la Presidente; yet it is not so with us, wha think that offices are bestowed on husbands upon a personal account. By our law, if a woman have precedency by her birth or descent, she retains still the same, notwithstanding she marry a person of inferior dignity ; though this be contrary to the civil law, and, indeed, he being her head, it is unnatural that any part should be more honourable than the head. But it is observable, that if the daughter of a nobleman marry another nobleman, she will lose the precedency due to her by her birtli, though she would not have lost it if she had married a gentleman. After the husband's decease the wife enjoys her husband's precedency during her widowirv'; but- if she many to a- person of inferior quality, slie loses that pre- cedency; though the queen never loses her former dignity, though she marry the meanest person after the king's death; notwithstanding her bastards are not noble, as the bastards of the king are; nor does the womb ever nobilitate. By the civil law, a widow living lewdly loses her former dignity. The wives and daughters of all dukes, marquisses, earls, &.c. do take the same place that the husbands and sons do, conform to their precedency. When princes or judges intend to shun deciding of controversies concerning pre- cedency, and to preserve the rights of all the competitors, they ordain the compe- titors to precede one another by turns, and alternately. And, lest the first turn should givethe precedency, order that to be decided, by lot. 2r. They cause them enter by several doors. 3. They use round tables, or write the pretenders names in a circle. 4. The eldest of the com.petitors is ordered to precede, or according as they produce their commissions. 5. Some use to secure themselves by protesta- tions, which certainly do interrupt prescription. As to the peerage of Scotland, the best account that can be given of them at this period is the return of the Lords of Session to an order of the Right Honour- able the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, the 12th of June 1739, with which we shall conclude; and is verbatim as follows: " May it please your Lordships, " In obedience to your Lordships' order of the 12th June last, requiring that the Lords of Session in Scotland do make up a roll or list of the peers of Scotland at the time of the Union, whose peerages are still continuing, and do lay the same before your Lordships in the next Session of Parliament; and that the said Lords do, as far as they shall be able, state in such roll or list the particular limitations of such peerages. " The Lords of Session have, by committees of their own number, made all the inquiry they have been able, by searching into the public records, and examining the proper officers to whose care the keeping of them is committed, in order to give-your Lordships all the satisfaction that is in their power. And they humbly beg leave to report, " Thatafterthj^ most careful search and examination., they have not hitherto found amongst the records any roll or list of the peers of Scotland, at the time of the Union, authenticated by the subscription of the Lord Register, or of any other officer or person whatsoever; all they have been able to meet with to give satisfaction in this particular, is an unsigned writing on a slieet of paper, intitled Roll of Parlia- ment 1706, bearing, first, a list of the peers according to their rank; next, a hst of commissioners from shires to that Parliament ; and then a list of the commission- ers from burghs: and this writing, some of the officers who were then employed under the Lord Register say, was the very roll or list that was daily called over in the last Parliament of Scotland, pursuant to the constant practice of calling over the roll both of peers and commons, who sat together in one house, before the house proceeded to business; and also of collecting the voices, by calling over the rolls wlien any point was to be resolved by a question: Tliey also find that this roll or list has, ever since the Union, been looked upon as authentic, and that copies thereof, so far as concerns the peerage, have been made use of, with some additions hereafter to be mentioned, a id called over at every meeting of the peers of Scotland fo- the election of one or mire peers to serve in the Parliament of Great Britain, from tiie year 1708 down to this time. And that your Lordshi^is i(j4 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. may be able to discover whether this list agrees with that which was laid before your Lordships by the Lord Register of Scotland, in obedience to your Lurdships' order of the izd December 1707, a copy of the list of peers, as it sands in the said roll, is hereunto annexed m the Appendix, and marked No. I. " They further report, that this roll, or list of peers, which they consider as that which was de praxi made use of, and called over in the last Parliament of Scotland, in which the Union was enacted, and therefore deemed to be a true one, has suf- fered several alterations since that time, some of which are of that nature and no- toriety that they may presume to certify them to your Lordships; whereas they must content themselves, with respect to others, with stating the case so far as it appears to them, without concluding positively from what they shall so state: One great alteration they refer to is, what was made by the attainders of EARLS VISCOUNTS LORDS Marischal,' Southesk, Kenmure, Sinclair, Marr, Airly, Kingston, Burleigh Nithsdale, Carnwath Kilsyth. Duflus, Winton, Callander, by the at- Nairn. Linlithgow tainder of Earl Perth, Linlithgow, Seaforth, Panmure. of high treason, for their accession to the unnatural rebellion that was raised in the year 1715, which takes nineteen out of the said roll or list of the peerage of Scot- land. Another alteration they presume to mention, because it is certain, is the^ addition of three peers to the said list; to wit, his Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, Prince and Steward of Scotland, by the title of Duke of Rothsay, under which his present Majesty, whilst pripce, voted by list, at the election of a peer to serve in Parhament in the room of the Marquis of Tweeddale, anno 1716; and the Lords Somerville, and Colvil of Culross, who, by your Lordships' resolutions of the 27th of May 1723, were found to have right to the honours and dignity which they respectively claimed, and who, on the 31st of that month, obtained a signifi- cation of his late Majesty's pleasure, by the Duke of Roxburgh, then Secretary of State, to the Lord Register of Scotland, to place them in the list of the peers of Scotland, conform to your Lordships' resolutions aforesaid ; and they have accord- ingly voted at the succeeding elections: Taking therefore from the said roll or Hst in the appendix, the said nineteen peers attainted, and adding thereto the three peers last described, they humbly certify to your Lordship^, that the roll or list of the peers of Scotland stands at present, so far as with certainty appears to them, rhu*;.- EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 175 DUKES EARLS VISCOUNTS LORDS His Royal Hish- • Glencairn, Aboyne, Arbuthnot, Blantyre, ness the Princt ? Eglinton, Newburgh, Oxford, Cardioss, Rothsay, Cassilis, Kilmarnock, L-vine, ColvilofCulross, Hamilton, Caithness, Dundonald, Dumblane, Cranston, Buccleugh, Murray, Dumbarton, Preston, Jedburgh, Lennox, Hume, Kintore, Newhaven, Maderty, Gordon, Wigton, Breadalbane, Strathallan, Cupar, Qiieensberry, Strathmore, Aberdeen, Teviot, Napier, Aigyle, Abercorn, Dunmore, Duplin, Cameron, Douglas, Kelly, Melville, Garnock, Cramond, Athol, Haddington, Orkney, Primrose. Reay, Montrose, Galloway, Ruglen, LORDS. Forrester, Roxburgh. Lauderdale, March, Pitsligo, Kinnoul, Marchmont, Forbes, Kirkcudbright, Loudon, Seafield, Salton, Eraser, MAROUISSES. Dumfries, Hyndford, Gray, Bargenv, Stirling, Cromarty, Ochiltree, Banff, ' Tweeddale, Elgin, Stair, Cathcart, Elibank, Lothian, Traquair, Roseberry, Mordington, Halkerton, Annandale. Ancrum, Glasgow, Semple, Belhaven, Wemyss, Portmore, Elphinston, Abercromby, EARLS. Dalhousie, Bute, Oliphant, Rollo, Findlater, Hopetoun, Eraser of Lo vat. , Colvil, Crawford, Leven, Deloraine, Borthwick, Ruthven, Errol, Dysart, Hay. Ross, Rutherford, Sutherland, Selkirk, Somerville, Ballenden, Monteith, Northesk, VISCOUNTS. Torphichen, Newark, Rothes, Kincardine, Falkland, Spyuie, Eyemouth, Morton, Balcarras, Dunbar, Lindores, Kinnaird, Buchan. Forfar, Stormont, Balmerino, Glassford. , " But they dare not presume to transmit this to your Lordships as a list of the peerage of Scotland, without observing two things : First, That as they have, in exa- mining the records, met with many ancient peerages, such as Lyle, Holyroodhouse, Monypenny, Inverkeithing, and others, not entered in the said roll or list that was called over in the last Parliament of Scotland ; nay, some of them not appearing to have sat or voted for a century; as it is impossible for them to discover, so as to be able to report to your Lordships with any certainty, whether any, or which of these peerages may be extinct, or joined with other titles in the same person ; as if any person should hereafter appear, and vouch a sufficient right to any of those peerages, your Lordships would admit them, as you did in the cases above men- tioned of Somerville and Colvil of Culross: And as there may be several ancient peerages that do not appear in the said roll or list, now and for many years past, conjoined with higher dignities in the same person, which may hereafter separate, as the limitations of the succession of the several peerages may be different: So the above roll cannot be looked upon as a complete list, such as should exclude any further claims to ancient peerages duly to be made and vouched. " The second observation they humbly make, is, that though in drawing out the above roll or list they have left out such of the peers, contained in the list referred to in the Appendix, as they were warranted to leave out by legal evidence, yet they have reason, from examining the records, to think, that several of the peerages in the above roll or list are extinct, or so joined with other titles in the same person, as not to be again separable from them; though, not having absolute certainty or legal evidence of this, they could not take upon them to leave those peerages out of the roll or list which your Lordships directed them to lay before the house : But, as they take it to be their duty to give your Lordships all the Vol. n. 4 C i76 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. light they are able, under the proper guards, to prevent your Lordships from being misled, by the inforntiiition they may ofler, so far as it is imperfect, they take the li- berty, humbly to lay before your Lordships such observations, as leave it doubtful, whether the persons claiming some of the said peerages have sufficient right there- to, (ir, as lead them to think, that several particular peerages in the above-written roll or list are extinct, or joined in the same person with other peerages, not again to be separated : And they have annexed in the Appendix, No. IL copies of the words of limitation hi the several patents to which the observations refer. " MoNTEiTH. I. Then, they observe, That there is in the record of the Great Seal, in the Lord Register's keeping, a patent by King Charles L granting the dig- nity of Earl of Monteith and Strathern, anno 1631, to William Earl of Strathern, and to his heirs-male, and of tailzie ; that they find no charter altering this limi- tation ; that the Earl of Monteith appears to have sat in the Parliament of Scot- land anm 1693, but not since that time ; and that no person has, by himself or proxy, or by a signed list, attempted to give any vote since the Union as Earl of Monteith, in any election of a peer, or peers, to sit in Parliament; but whether any heirs-male, or of tailzie, of the said William Earl of Strathern or Monteith, do now exist, or whether the limitation of the succession of that peerage was al- tered by any new patent, or by any charter on the resignation of the original patentee, or his succesors, they cannot discover. " Ancrum. 2. They observe, That there is in the record of the Great Seal, in the Lord Register's keeping, a patent atwo 1633, granting to Sir Robert Ker, Knight, and to the heirs-male of the marriage betwixt him and Lady Anne Stanley, only daughter to the Earl of Derby, his second wife ; which failing, to the heirs-male of the said Robert Ker, and their heirs-male for ever, the title ot Earl of Ancrum : By the rolls of Parliament it appears that the Earl of Ancrum sat in the Parlia- ment 1681 ; but as no one has sat in Parliament since that time, or claimed a vote at any election since the Union under that title ; and, as by the said patent It appears, that, failing heirs-male of that marriage, the honours of Ancrum were ,10 descend to the heirs-male of Sir Robert, the first patentee, whose eldest son appears, by the same patent, to have obtained the honours of Earl of Lothian, if there is no male descendant of the said Robert's second marriage, the title of An- crum is, so far as they can discover, joined with that of Lothian, in the present Marquis of Lothian. " Forfar. 3. They observe. That there is in the record of the Great Seal, in the Lord Register's keeping, a patent anno 1661, granting to Archibald Douglas, and his heirs-male the title of Earl of Forfar. The last Earl of Forfar died of the wounds he received at the battle near Dumblane anno 1715 : No one has at- tempted to vote under this title since his death ; and as, by the records in Chan- cery, it appears that the Duke of Douglas is served and retoured nearest heir-male to the said deceased Earl, this peerage, so far as they can discover, is at present in the Duke of Douglas. " Dumbarton. 4. That the only patent that appears of the honours of Earl of Dumbarton is in the records of the Great Seal, and is dated in the 1675, and limits the descent to the heirs-male of the body of Lord George Douglas, the first patentee ; so that if there are no heirs-male of his body existing, and if no altera- tion has been made of this limitation, by some later charter which does not appear, the title is extinct. " Melvill. 5. That the title of Earl of Melvill is, by the original grant thereof,. anno 1690, to be found in the register of the Great Seal in the Chancery Office, limited to the patentee and the heirs-male of his body : That the present Earl of Leven to whom, and the heirs-male of his body, the honours of Leven are limited, is the heir-male of the body of the patentee of the honours of Melvill ; so that the honours of Leven and Melvill must remain conjoined in the same person, so long as there shall be male descendants of the body of the present earl. " RuGLEN. 6. That by the only patent of the honours of Ruglen, which appears, in the records of the Great Seal anno 1697, in the Chancery Office, the limitation is to Lord John Hamilton, the present Earl, and to the heirs-male of his body; which faihng, to the heirs of his body whatsoever ; that, by the decease of the late Charles Earl of Selkirk without heirs-male of his body, the title of Selkirk is now EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 1 7 7 devolved, by an express limitation in the original charter of the honour of Selkirk, anno 1688, in the records of the Great Seal in the Chancery Office, on the said John Earl of Ruglen, and will remain conjoined with the title of Ruglen so long- as there shall remain male heirs of the body of the present earl ; but as, on failure of such males, the honours of Selkuk are further limited to the fourth, fifth, and remaining sons of William Duke of Hamilton, and the heirs-male of their body, whereas the honours of Ruglen are descendible to the heirs whatsoever of the present earl's body, those titles may hereafter separate. " FiNDLATER and Seafield. 7. That by thepatent of the title of Earl of Sea- field, in the record of the Great Seal anno 1701, in the Chancery Office, the title is granted to the patentee, whilst his father the Earl of Findlater was living, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to his other heirs of taihie succeeding to him in his lands, baronies, and estates ; and by the patent of the honours of Find- later anno 1638, in the record of the Great Seal in the keeping of the Lord Re- gister, the Umitation is to the heirs-male of the body of the patentee succeeding to him in his proper estate of Findlater and Deskford. These titles are at present joined in the Earl of Findlater and Seafield ; but whether they may not hereafter separate, will depend on the form of the settlement of the succession in the estates of Findlater and Deskfo?d, the patrimony of the first Earl of Findlater, to which his patent refers, and on the form of the settlement made by the first Earl of Sea- field, of his lands, baronies, and estate. " OxENFORD. 8. That the patent creating the Viscount of Oxenford, appears in the records of the Great Seal, in the keeping of the Lord Register, anno 165 1, and is limited to the patentee's heirs-male of tailzie and provision whatsoever ; it appears by the rolls of Parliament, that the last time any person sat or voted, in virtue ot that title, was in the Convention of Estates 1689 ; since that time it does not appear that any one, on this title, claimed a vote in Parliament, or at elections, since the Union, until the election 1733, when two ditferent persons, viz. Robert Maitland and James M'Gill, claimed the title, and gave in lists ; they believe that one of these claimants, James M'Gill, presented a petition to his majesty, claiming that peerage as his right ; and that this petition having been referred to your Lord- ships, the petitioner was heard thereupon, and that your Lordships came to a reso- lution thereon in the year 1735, to which they beg leave to refer. " Teviot. 9. That the patent creating Sir Thomas Livingston Viscount of Te- viot, appears in the records of the GreatSeal in tlie Chancery Office, anno 1696, limit- ing the honours to the heirs-male of the patentee's body ; the said viscount sat in the ParHament 1704, but not since; nor has a^ny one in right of that peerage claimed a vote at any election since the Union ; and if there are no heirs-male of his body, the title is extinct. " Duplin. 10. That the patent creating Thomas Hay Viscovmt of Duplin, appears in the records of the Great Seal in the C'.iancery Office anna 1697, limit- ing the honours to the heirs-male of his body ; which faihng, to his other heirs of tailzie ; and, as there appears in the same records, anno 1704, a charter upon the resignation of William Earl of Kinnoul, of the honours of Earl of Kinnoul, to the said William during his life; and failing of him by decease, to Thomas Viscount of Duplin, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to his heirs of tailzie and provision, succeeding to him in his lands and baronies of Duplin ; under which grant the honours of Kinnoul have been enjoyed by the Viscount of Dup- lin ; these honours are now conjoined in the same person, and seem to be inse- parable. " Ochiltree, ii. That there appears no patent, so far as can be discovered on record, creating the title of Lord Ochiltree, nor has any person sat in Parliament under that title since the year 161 7, nor claimed a vote at any election since the Union in right thereof ; but whether some person may not appear, and make good a claim thereto, they cannot say. " BoRTHwicK.. 12. That there appears no patent in the records constituting the peerage of Lord Borthwick, nor does any person appear to have sat in Parliament under that title later than the year 1662. In the 1734, Henry Borthwick, at the general election of sixteen peers for this present Parliament, claimed his vote as Lord Borthwick. and gave in a list, as he has done at the several elections of single peers since the said election. In 1734 the Earl of Marchmont protested. i^S EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. That no person might be admitted to vote as pretending right to peerages by the ;itles ot" Borthwick, Kirkcudbright, or Rutherford ; but no other competitor has appeared to claim the honour of Borthwick ; but whether the right of the said Henry Borthwick, to the title of Borthwick, is good, they cannot say. •' Spynie. 13. That the patent creating Lord Spynie has not hitherto been found in the records, nor has any person sat m Parliament under that title since the year 1669, neither has any person claimed a vote in virtue thereof at any election since the Union ; but whether this peerage is extinct, they cannot suy. " Cardross. 14. That the patent creating Lord Cardross has not hitherto been found ; that the present Earl of Buchan sat in Parliament, anno 1695, as Lord Cardross : That in the 1698 the Lord Cardross claimed the honours of Earl of Huchan, and by a resolution of Parhament was admitted to sit and vote as Earl of Buchan ; that these honours are thus joined in the same person ; but whether they must remain so forever, or may separate, they cannot say as the limitation of the peerage of Cardross does not appear. " Jedburgh. 15. That the latest charter of the honours of Lord Jedburgh that has hitherto been found, is in the records of the Great Seal in the year 1670, in the Lord Register's keeping, which, on failure of Robert Ker of Fernihirst, and the heirs-male of his body, hmits the honours to William, Master of Newbattle, ■md the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to the said Master's nearest heirs- inale whatsoever ; that this Wilham, Master of Newbottle, succeeded to the honours of Jedburgh, and on that title voted in Parliament anno 1702, where his father the Marquis of Lothian also sat and voted as Marquis of Lothian, and upon his father's decease succeeded to the honours of Lothian ; and therefore, if a judgment were to be formed on what thus appears, it would be natural to conclude that the honours of Jedburgh and Lothian are conjoined in the same person ; but as it ap- pears that the present Marquis of Lothian, in his father's lifetime, voted, an?io 1712, at the election of a peer to sit in Parliament, in the room of the Earl Marischal vhen deceased, under the character of Lord Jedburgh, it is not impossible that the i'amily of Lothian may be possessed of some settlement of this peerage of Jedburgh, different from what hitherto has been found in the records. " Maderiy. 16. That they have not found the patent creating the Lord Ma- derty in the records ; that the Lord Maderty appears by the rolls of Parliament to have sat and voted anno 1669; that no person appears to have sat in Parlia- ment, or to have claimed a vote at any general or particular election of a peer or peers, after the Union under that title ; but whether the title is extinct, or joined with some other peerage in the same person, they cannot take upon them to say. " Cupar. 17. That there appears in the records of the Great Seal, in the Lord Register's keeping, the charter o:' erection of the Lordship of Cupar anno 1607, in favour of James Elphinston, lawful son of the Lord Balmerino, and the heirs- male of his body ; which failing, to his father, and his heirs-male, and of tailzie, contained in his infeftments of the barony of Balumby ; it appears from the rolls of Parliament, that no person has sat or voted in Parliament as Lord Cupar since the year 1662 ; neither has any one claimed a vote under that title, at any elec- tion since the Union ; so that if there are no heirs-male of the body of the Lord Cupar the patentee, it is likely that peerage is now joined with that of Balmeri- no, in the same person, not to be hereafter separated. " Cramond. 18. That in the records of the Great seal, in the keeping of the Lord Register, there appears a patent, anno 1628, creating Elizabeth, the wife of Sir Thomas Richardson, Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, during all the days of her life, Baroness of Cramond; and, after her decease, granting the same honours to Sir Thomas Richardson, the son of the said Lord Chief Justice, and his heirs-male ; which failing, to the heirs-male of the body of the said Lord Chief Justice, with right to vote in Parliament, if personally present, and not otherwise ; that in examining the rolls of Parliament, and the proceedings at all the elections since the Union, it does not appear that any person ever sat or voted, as Lord Cramond, or that any one offered to vote at any election since the Union,. 3 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS, 179 under that title : but, as the descendants of the said Sir Thomas Richardson, if any were, had probably tlieir residence in England, their not having claimed hitherto can be no objection to their title, if they can verify their right to it. " Kirkcudbright. 19. In the records of the Great Seal, m the keeping of the Lord Register, there appears a patent, creating Sir Robert M'Lellan, Lord Kirkcud- bright, nnno 1633, and granting the honours to liim and his heirs-male, carrying his name and arms: It does not appear tliat ever this Lord tLukcudbright, or any person in his right, sat or voted in Failiament ; but it appears f;om searching into the proceedings at the several elections of peers since the Union, that, anno 1 721, at the election of a peer to serve in Parliament, in the room of the then deceased Marquis of Annaadale, James M'Lellan of Auchlean, offered his vote as Lord Kirk- cudbright ; but that vote appears to have been protested against, as being given by a person who had not made good his title to that peerage. In the year 17^4, at the general election of sixieen peers, to serve in the present Parliament, after the the decease of the said James, without heirs-male of his body, William M'Lellan voted as Lord Kirkcudbright, and was protested against by James M'Lellan, who laid claim to that peerage, and voted in right thereof: The said William has vot- ed since that time at all the elections of single peers, without any objection; but whether his right so to do is well founded, they cannot take upon them to say. " Bargeny. 20. That the patent of the Lord Bargeny has not been met with in the records. By the proceedings in a cause wnich lately depended before the Court of Session, and which was brought by appeal before your Lordships, touching the succession to the estate of Bargeny, it appears that there is no heir-male exist- ing of the body of John Lord Bargeny, who, anno i68b, made the settlement of his estate, on which that question depended ; and no person has, at any election, since the death of the last lord, claimed a vote in right of that peerage ; but as they cannot discover from the records the limitation of that dignity, they cannot take upon them to say, whether it is extinct or not. " Abercromby. 21.' That there appears in the records of the Great Seal, in the Chancery OiRce, a patent, (inno 1647, granting the dignity of Lord Abercromby to Sir James Sandilands, and the heirs-male of his body ; but it does not appear that either the patentee, or any successor of his in that right, ever sat or voted in Parliament ; neither has any one offered to vote in right of that peerage at any election, general or particular, since the Union. " Rutherford. 11. That in the records of the Great Seal, in the keeping of the Lord Register, anno 1661, there appears a patent, granting the dignity of Lord Rutherford to Andrew Rutherford, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to whatsoever person or persons he should, by any writing under his hand, even on death-bed, appoint to succeed him. The Lord Rutherford appears by the rolls of Parhament to have sat or voted in the 1698, and Robert Lord Rutherford appears to have voted at the election of sixteen peers anno 1715 ; and in the year 1 733 at the election of a peer, in room of the Earl of Sutherland, then deceased, George Durie of Grange appeared and voted as Lord Rutherford, without any objection. At the general election the year following, 1734, the same person claimed his vote; but he was protested against by Captain John Rutherford, who laid claim to the honours of Rutherford, and gave m to the clerks his list in virtue thereof; against which the said George Dury in his turn protested ; and in the election, anno 1738, of a peer to serve in Parhament in the room of the late Earl of Morton, these two claimants renewed their protestations against each other, and tendered severally their votes ; but whether any, or which of them, has a sufficient right to that peerage, they cannot say. " Newark. 23. That the patent creating David Leslie Lord Newark, appears in the records of the Great Seal, in the keeping of the Lord Register, anno 1661, limiting the descent to the heirs-male of his body ; it does not appear by the rolls of Parliament that any one has sat or voted under that title since the year 1690; neither has any one in right of that peerage offered a vote at any election since the Union ; but whether it is extinct, by reason of failure of heirs-male of the body of the patentee, they cannot take upon them to say. " Eymouth. 24. That by a patent in the records of the Great Seal, in he Chancerv OfBce, anno 1682, the dignity of Lord Eymouth is granted to John Vol. il. 4 D i8o EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. Churchill, afterwards Duke of Marlborough, and the heirs-male of his body: Thar the iunuation ot this peerage does not appear trom the .ec.jids in Scotland to have been altered, so as to be made descendible in he .ame clianuel with his other ho- nours; and if no act of the crown, before the Uu,on, or ot ihe Pailiament of Great Britain since, has interponed, that title seems to be extinct by the fadure of heirs- male of the body of the patentee. " Glassford. 25. That no patent of the honours of Glassford has been found on record, excepting one in the year 1685, '" '^he records of the Great Seal, in the Chancery Oltice, which grants that dignity to Francis Abercromby of Fitternier, during all the days of his life. This lord does not appear to have ever sat in Par- liament; and if no different patent has been obtained of this title, from that which appears in the records, it died with him. " Having, in these observations, laid before your lordships every matter that has occurred to them, on such examination of the records, as the nature of the work, the condition of the records, and the course of the business of the court would per- mit, fit to create an opinion, that the several peerages, to which the obseiValions refer, may be either determnied or conjoined in the same person, with other titles of honour, in some cases separable, in others not; or to show, that though the titles may be subsisting, yet the right thereto is controverted, they humbly certify to your lordships, that they have not hitherto discovered from the records any reason to doubt, that all and every the other peerages, in the roll or list above ingrossed, not mentioned in these observations, are still subsisting and continuing ; though objections may lie against some of them, not hitherto discovered, and that no one, so far as they can discover, has hitherto controverted the right of the present pos- sessors, by setting up a claim to any of these peerages. " But before they leave this article, they must observe to your lordships, that though the list of the peers, first above described, (a copy whereof is in the Ap- pendix, p. 183. No. I.) was what the clerks looked upon as of authority ; yet, in copying over rolls or lists, to be made use of at several elections since the Union, they have added, but by what authority ' does not appear, two peerages, viz. that of the Earl of Solway, and that of the Lord Dingwall. The question concerning the last is of little importance, because the Duke of Orrnond, who voted as Lord Ding- wall, by proxy, at the election of sixteen peers, anno 1710, stands attainted of high treason, by an act of the first year of his late Majesty King George L But as to the first, they take it to be their duty to state the matter to your Lordships, so far as it ap- pears to them ; tobserving, that the peerage of Solway does not stand in the before- mentioned roll or list, though it appears to have been interlined in some old copies taken thereof, and entered between the title of Deloraine, and that of Hay, in the rolls that have been made use of at the elections since the Union : They made what enquiry they were able into the cause, why it did not stand in the so often mentioned roll or list, and how it came afterwards to be added ; and from that en- quiry an obvious reason appears, why that title was not entered on the roll; to wit, that as the patentee, because of his nonage, was incapable to sit and vote, so neither had any one taken upon him to present his patent in Parliament, which was usually done, and an entry made in the minutes of Parliament, of its having been so done, before the peerage was entered on the rolls of Parliament ; but as this was omitted to be done in the last Parliament of Scotland, they cannot dis- cover by what authority that peerage has, since the Union, been added to the roll of peers ; nevertheless, since it has been so added, they presume humbly to lay before your Lordships what appears to them from the records concerning it. The patent appears in the records of the Great Seal, a/mo 1706, and grants the honours of Earl of Solway to Lord Charles Douglas, now Duke of Queensberry, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to Lord George Douglas, third son of the late Duke of Qiieensberry, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to any other son to be begotten by the said late Duke of Queensberry, not suc- ceeding to the honours of Qiieensberry, and the heirs-male of such son's body. Now, as the last patent of the honours of the Dukedom of Queensberry, bearing the same date with the patent of Solway, viz. 17th June 1706, limits the succes- sion of the dignity to the heirs of the tailzie ot the estate ; and as, by the tailzie of the estate, which is recorded in the register of tailzies, the estate of Qiieensberry. is limited to the present duke, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to EXTERIOR ORNAIMENTS. i&i the said Lord George Douglas, and the heirs-male of his body ; which also foiling. to any otiier son to be begotten ot the said late Duke, ajid the henb-male ot the body of such son ; and as there is no maJe issue of the body of the said Duke of Queensberry existing, except the present duke and his suns, the title ot Sulway can never subsist separate from that of Qlleen^berry : Bui, as they l)elieve, that in certain proceedings before your Lordships, in the )ear 1720, the present Duke of Queensberry disclaimed the peerage of Solway, they must humbly leave it uith your Lordships, whether the title of Soiway is a subsisting peerage at all ; it it is subsisting, it would seem to be joined with that of Qiieensberry. " As to the othur part of your Lordships' order, which requues the Lords of Ses- sion to state in the roll or list to be laid before your Lordships, the particular limi- tations of the peerages, so far as they shall be able, they must, in place of giving your Lordships the satisfaction you expected, and that they wished to give, content themselves with laying before your Lordships the following remarks ; which will show, not only that they are not able, but also why the\ are not able to an- swer your Lordships' expectation. " First then, The> take the liberty to remark, that they cannot discover in the records any patent of honour creating a peerage, earlier than the reign of king James VI. Before that time, titles of honour and dignity were created by erecting lands into earldoms and lordships, and probably by some other method that cannot now, in matters so ancient, be with any certainty discovered : For a great many noble families appear, from the rolls of Parliament, to have sat and voted in Par- liament as lords of Parliament, though no constitution of the peerage, or title of honour under which they sat, can be now found in the records : But as the con- stitution in most ancient cases does not appear, and the chiet evidence ot the titles being hereditary is the successor's regularly possessing the predecessor's rank in Parliament, it is not possible, without hearing the allegations that may be made, and examining the evidence that may be brought by contending parties, to form any judgment of the limitations of such ancient peerages. As there is not, so far as they know, any maxim hitherto established in the law of Scotland, that can be ap- plied universally to determine the descent of peerages, where the original consti- tution, or new grants upon resignation do not appear ; and ot the difficulty that occurs in settling such questions, they lately had an instance in the case of the peerage of the Lord B'raser of Lovat, v\hich is undoubtedly subsisting ; the last lord, who sat in the Parliament 1695, dying without male issue, his eldest daughter, and after her death, her eldest son, assumed the title, having obtained before the Court of Session, in absence of the heir-male, a decreet, declaring their right thereto ; and, on the other hand, his nearest heir-male claimed it, insisting that the honours were descendible to heirs-male ; and brought his action before the Court of Session, to have it so found and declared, and to reduce and set aside the foresaid judg- ment by default : The court, where actions of the same kind had been thought competent, and as such sustained before the Union, proceeded to hear the cause ; and the parties having produced of either side all the documents they could, and having been fully heard therecm, the Court reduced and set aside the foresaid de- creet in absence, and found the titlein question descendible to heirs-male; and the defender has hitherto acquiesced. But whether this judgment is of sufficient au- thority, they humbly submit to your Lordships; having made mention of it chiefly to show, that though, when the parties interested join issue, and furnish all the light in their power towards the determination of the cause, the Court must give their opinion, yet, where no party that may be interested is bound to appear, and to produce or point out in the records, so far as they may be found there, the docu- ments that are necessary to instruct their claim, it is next to impossible for any court, or indeed for human industry, to make up a state of the interests of so many persons as fall under this observation, with any tolerable certainty. 2.dly, They presume humbly to inform your Lordships, that through various ac- cidents, the state of their records, particularly of their most ancient, is imperfect ; for, not to mention other misfortunes, it appears by an examination, to be found amongst the records of Parliament, 8th January 1661, that of the registers, which having been carried to England, during the Usurpation of Cromwell, were bring- ing back from London, after the Restoration, by sea, 85 hogsheads were, in a iS2 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. storm, shifted out of the frigate (the Eagle,) into another vessel, which sunk witii those records at sea; and lo hogsheads more of the records, brouglil doan from London at that time, lie still uno])ened in the general register-house, through some neglect of the officers to whose charge they were committed, that cannot well be accounted for ; so that, upon this separate account, your Lordships will perceive a search into the ancient records cannot give reasonable satisfaction. " ^dly,. After the practice of creating peerages by patent, the records, till of late, have been so carelessly kept, that they cannot be absolutely depended upon; patents of honour have passed the Great Seal, and yet copies of the patents so passed are not to be met with in the Register of that seal ; and of this the patents of the Lord Forrester, anno 1651, and of the Earl of Breadalbune, 1682, are instances; the first of these was duly sealed in the 1651, but not entered in the register till the year 1684 ; and the last was duly sealed in the 1682, but, to this hour, is not entered into the register; besides that of volume 57. of the Register of the Great Seal, in the keeping of the Lord Keeper, twelve leaves are lost, by some accident now unknown ; and it appears from the minute-book, that the patent of Bargeny, and several others, were passed at such time ; that they probably may have been entered in some of those leaves that are lost. " 4?Z'/y, They presume humbly to inform your Lordships, that it was a practice very prevalent in Scotland for peers to make a resignation or surrender of their ho- nours, whether originally created by patent, or by the more ancient methods, into tlie hands of the sovereign, for new grants of those honours to such a series of heirs as they intended for their successors ; and the new grants passed sometimes in the form of patents of honour only, and sometimes in the form of charters of the estates, containing a new grant of the limitation of the honours. Now, where this last was the case, it must be attended with very great labour and expence of time, to search for the titles of honour amongst all the charters of lands. " ^tbly. The practice of Scotland went still farther ; and it was usual to obtain grants of honours, not only to the grantee and his heirs-male, and of tailzie, refer- ring to the particular entail then made, but also to his heirs of tailzie whom he might thereafter appoint to succeed him in his estate, and even to any person whom he should name to succeed him in his honours at any time in his life, or up- on deathbed : Now, as it is impossible to trace through the records such nomi- nations and appointment, which in some cases may be valid, though not hitherto recorded, your Lordships will easily see, that the Lords of Session are not able to give vour Lordships any reasonable satisfaction touching the limitations of the peerages that are still continuing ; and your Lordships will further perceive the reason why, in the foregoing observations, they speak so doubtfully of the continuance of peerages, which, were they to judge only on what appears from the examination they have had of the records, they should not doubt to report to be extinct, or so conjoined \nx.\\ other titles of honour as not to be again separable. " All which is most humbly submitted, " Dun. Forbes, I. P. D." " Edinburgh, I'jth Feb. 1740. i APPENDIX. No I. ROLL OF THE PEERS OF SCOTLAND, PARLIAMENT 1706. DUKES EARLS VISCOUNTS LORDS Hamilton, Nithsdale, Balcarras, Kenmure, Balmerino, Buccleugh, Winton, Forfar, Arbuthnot, Blantyre, Lennox, Linlithgow, Aboyne, Kingston, Cardross, Gordon, Home, Newburgh, Oxenford, Cranston, Queensberry, Perth, Kilmarnock, Irvine, Burleigh, Argyle, Wigton, Dundonald, Kilsyth, Jedburgh, Douglas, Strathmore, Dumbarton, Dumblane, Maderty, Athol, Abercorn, Kintore, Preston, Cupar, Montrose, Kelly, Breadalbane, Newhaven, Napier, Roxburgh. Haddington, Aberdeen, Strathallan, Cameron, Galloway, Dunmore, Teviot, Cramond, MARQUISSES. Lauderdale, Melvill, Duplin, Reay, Seaforth, Orkney, Garnock, Forrester, Tweeddale, Kinnoul, Ruglen, Primrose. Pitsligo, Lothian, Loudon, March, Kirkcudbright, Annandale. Dumfries, Marchmont, LORDS. Eraser, Stirling, Seafield, Bargeny, EARLS. Elgin, Hyndford, Forbes, Bantr, Southesk, Cromarty, Salton, Elibank, Crawford, Traquair,. Stair, Gray, Halkerton, Errol, Ancrum, Roseberry, Ochiltree, Belhaven, Marischal, Wemyss, Glasgow, Cathcart, Abercromby, Sutherland, Dalhousie, Portmore, Sinclair, DutVus, Marr, Airly, Bute, Mordington, RoIIo, Monteith, Findlater, Hopetoun, Semple, Colvil, Rothes, Carnwath, Deloraine, Elphmston, Ruthven, Morton, Callender, Hay. Ohphant, Rutherford, Buchan, Leven, Eraser of Lovat, , Ballenden, Glencairn, Dysart, VISCOUXTS. Borthwick, Newark, Eglinton, Panmure, Ross, Nairn, Cassilis, Selkirk, Falkland, Torphichen, Eymuuth, Caithness, Northesk, Dunbar, Spynie, Kinnaird, Murray, Kincardine, Stormont, Lindores, Glassford. VoL.n. 4E 1 84 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. No II. COPIES OF THE WORDS OF LIMITATION IN THE SEVERAL PATENTS REFERRED TO. Com:tes. MONTEITH. PViUielmus Comes Taicbie lie Monteith. Carolus, &c. Volumus et concedimus quod prasfatus Willielmus Comes Taichie Ultimo ju-Hseredesq: sui Masculi et Tallie Comitatus Taichie Comites Jernie et Taichie lie Hi 1631. Stiathern et Monteith omni tempore a futuro appellentur et vocentur. Dominus Ro^ertus Ker de Ancrame Miles. Carolus, &c. Fecisse, constituisse, et creasse, dictum Dominum Robertum Comitem de Ancrame, nobis tamen ita visum est, ut dictus Titulus, &-c. immediate post ipsum, ad Hseredes Masculos inter eum et Dominam Annam Stanley unicam Willielmi Comitis de Derbie Filiam immediate descendet ; veram si Deo visum fuerit, quod Haeredes Masculi dicti Domini Roberti suaeq: Conjugis absque Hasre- dibus Masculis de eorum corporibus procreand' decesserint, tunc, et in eo casu, -1'" J™" dictus Titulus ad alios Haeredes Masculos diet' Domini Roberti Ker, eorumq: Hie- ^ ■'■^' redes Masculos, in perpetuum descendet. FORFAR. Archibaldus Douglas Filius legitimus natii maximus inter Demortuum Archihaldum Angusia Comitem, et Dominam Jeannam Wemys Procreat'. Carolus, &.C. Fecisse, constituisse, et creasse, memoratum Dynastum Archibal- brkieaT.dum Douglas, ejusq: Haeredes Masculos, Comitem de Forfar. DUMBARTON. Dynasta Georgius Douglas Filius natu tertius Demortui Gulielmi Marchionis de Douglas. Carolus, &c. Fecisse diet' Georgium, et Ha;redes Masculos, ex corpore sue, Tj^?"' Comites de Dumbarton. MELVILL. * Georgius Dominus Melvill. GuLiELMUS et Maria, &c. Nominasse, fecisse, constituisse, et creasse eundeni 8vo Apri. Georgium Dominum Melvill Comitem, &c. Comitem de Melvill, &-c. designandum. lis 1690. J)^JJJ^5 pQj-i-o^ concedimus, et conferimus, in diet' Georgium Doiainum Melviil, et Haeredes Masculos de ejus Corpore, in perpetuum, antedictum titulum Comitis, &c. EXTERIOR ORNAxMENTS. Dominiis Joannes Hamilton, Filius ntiperi Dticis ck Hamilton. GuLiELMUs, &c. Nominasse, fecisse, constituisse, et creasse eundem Dominuni Joannem Hamilton Comitem, &.c. Comitem de Ruglcn debigiiandum. Danius por- ro, conferimus in dictum Dominum Joannem Hamilton, et H;eiedes Masculos de ejus corpore ; quibus deficien', Hasredes de ejus corpora quoscunque antedictuiu 'j|'° ^r.'' Titulum, &-C. Comitis. ' ' *'' Bominus Carolus Hamilton, Filius le^itimus ordim nascendi seciindiis Gulielmi Diicis de Hamilton. Jacobus, &-c. Fecisse, constituisse, et creasse memoratum Dominum Carolum Hamilton Comitem de Selknk, &c. Ac damus, concedimus, et conferimus in eun- dem Dominum Carolum Hamilton, et Ha;redes Masculos ex ejus Corpoie ; quibus deficien', in Dominum Joannem Hamilton, Filium legitimum natu tertmm Guliel- mi Ducis de Hamilton, et Hsredes Masculos ex ejus Corpore legitime procieand' ; quibus deficien', in Dominum Georgium Hamilton, ejus Filium legitimum natu quartum, et Haredes Masculos ex ejus Corpore legitime procreand' ; quibus defi- cien', in Dominum Basilium Kamilton, Filium legitimum diet' Ducis natu quin- tum, et Haeredes Masculos ex ejus Corpore legitime procreand' ; quibus deficien' Dominuni Archibaldum Hamilton, Filium ejus sextum et natu minimum, et Ha- redes Masculos ex ejus corpore legitime procreand' ; quibus omnibus deficien', in alios Haeredes Masculos dicti Ducis de Kamilton, et in Literis suis Patentibus con- , tentis antedictum Honoris et dignitatis Titulum Comitis de Selkirk, &c. i^s i6 SEAFIELD. yacohus J'icecomes de Se afield. GuLiELMUs, &-C. Fecisse, constituisse, et creasse eundem Jacobum et Hreredes Masculos de ejus Corpore; quibus deficien', alios Haeredes Tallin sibi in Terris suis 24,0 ju Baroniis, et Statu succedend', Comites de Seafield. j-oi. Jacobus Dominiis Deskfoord. Carolus, &C. Fecisse, constituisse, creasse, et inaugurasse prasfatum Jacobum, Dominum Deskfoord, Comitem de Findlater, et dedimus et concessimus, diet' Do- mino Deskfoord suisque ha^redibus Masculis de Corpore suo legitime procreat' ipsi^omoF in Patrimonio, et Statu de Findlater et Deskfoord, succedend' Titulum, &.c Co- '"■"^■■'' mitis. '^^°- Bominus Carolus Douglas, Filius secundus Ducis de ^leensberry. Anna, &.c. Fecisse, constituisse et creasse dictum Carolum, et Haeredes Mascu- los de suo Corpore ; quibus deficien', Dominum Georgium Douglas Filium legiti- mum natu tertium diet' Ducis de Queensberry, ej usque Haeredes Masculos de suo Corpore ; quibus deficien', Filium legitimum natu juniorem procreat' seu procre- and' de corpore diet' Ducis dignitati et Statui de Qiietnsberry non succedend'.et Haeredes Masculos de ejus Corpore, Comites de Solway. 186 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. e«oM.. OXFURD. Dominus Jacobus M'Gill de Cranston M'Gill Miles Baroneius. Carolus, 8tc. fecisse, constituisse, et creasse, dictum Dominum Jacobum M'Gill de Cranston M'Gill Militem Baronetum, ejusq: Haeredes Masculos Talliae et Pro- no Apri- visionis quoscunque, Vicecomites de Oxfurd, et Dominos M'Gill de Cousland. TEVIOT. Dominus Thomas Livingston, Miles. GuLiELMUs, &c. fecisse eundem Majorem Generalem Dominum Thomam Li- DDecem- vingston, et Hceredes Masculos legitime procreates scu procreandos de suo Corpora, is 1696. Vicecomites de Teviot. Thomas Hay de Balhoiisie. GuLiELMUS, &-C. nominasse, fecisse, constituisse, et creasse praefatum Thomam Hay de Balhousie Viecomitem, Vicecomitem de Duplin nuncupan' inque eundem Dominum Thomam Hay, et Hieredes Masculos de Corpore ejus legitime procreat; quibus deficien' Haeredes ejus Talliae, Titulum Vicecomitis damns, &C. GuUehnus Comes de Kinnoul, et Thomas P'icecomes de Duplin. ^\nna, Sic. dedisse et concessisse prsedict' Gulielmo Comiti de Kinnoul, durante ejus Vita ,et quo per decessum deficiente praedicto Thomae Vicecomiti de Duplin, et Haeredibus Masculis legitime de Corpore suo procreat' vel procreand'; quibus de- ficien' Haeredibus suis Tallia; et Provisionis illi in terris et Baronia de Duplin, suc- cedentibus, antedictum Titulum, &c. Comitis de Kinnoul, Vicecomitis de Duplin, &-C. et volumus et declaramus quod hoc presens Diploma nuUo modo preejudicabit Diplomati, per quondam nostrum Fratrem Gulielmum Regem, beatae Memorias, prsedict' Thomae Vicecomiti de Duphn, concesso de Titulo et Honore Vicecomitis dedata. JEDBURGH. Robertus Ker de Fernherst. Carolus, &c. Creamus, facimus, et constituimus pracnominatum Robertum Ker de Fernherst, Dominum de Jedburgh, ac damus et concedimus ei et Haeredibus Masculis ex ejus Corpore ; qaibus deficien' Willielmo Magistro de Newbottle, et Haeredibus Masculis ex ejus Corpore; quibus deficien', diet* Magistri de Newbottle Haredibus Masculis quibuscunq: Titulum. Honorem, Ordinem, et Dignitatem Domini de Jedburgh, &c. cum prascedentia et ordine Andreae Domini de Jedburgh secundum Literas patentes dedat' 2do Febrii 1622. COUPAR. Jacobus Dominus de Coupar. Jacobus, &c. Sciatis nos dedisse, concessisse, et disposuisse Jacobo Elphinstone, FiHo legitime nostri Consiliarii Jacobi Domini de Balmerinoch nostri Secretarii ac Presidentis nostri CoUegii Justitii, inter ilium et Dominam Marjoriam Maxwel ejus EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. 187 Sponsam legitime procreat' suisque HxTcdibus Musculis de Corporc suo legitime procieandis; quibus doficientibus pra-tato Jacobo Damino de Balmerinoch ejus Patri, suisque Hicredibus Masculis et Talli:e in suo Inreotamento Ten'avum, et Ba- roniee de Balumbie contentis liKreditarie; omnes et singulas Terras, Baronias, Mo- lendina, 8tc. et nos ereximus, creavimus, et inc jrporavimus omnes prtedictas ter- ras, &-C. in unum liberum Temporale Dominium et Baroniam praefato Jacobo Elphinstone, suisq: H.xredibus Masculis et Talli;e, pracdict' Dominum et Baroniam zomoDe- de Coupar nuncupan' dando et concedendo dicto Jacobo suisque Ha.'redibus Mas- "^"^ culis priedictis, Titulum, &.c. unicis libeii Baronis, ac nostri Parliament! Domini, omni Tempore a future Dominos de Coupar nuncupandos. CRAMOND. Elizabetha Domina Richardson, et Domimis Thomas Richardson, Miles, ejus Filiiis. Carolus, &c. Fecisse, creasse, & constituisse Elizabetham Dominam Richardson, conjugem Domini Thomas Richardson, Militis, Justiciarii principalis in Foro Cau- sarum communi in Palatio Westmonasteriensi, pro toto Tempore Vitre suas, Ba- ronissam de Cramond; ac post illius Decessuin, creamus perq: Modum Succes- sionis, Dominum Thomam Richardson Militem, Filium et Hasredem dicti princi- palis Justiciarii, Dominum Baronem de Cramond. Dando, &-c. eidem post deces- sum diet' Dominae suisque Ha^redibus Masculis; quibus deficien' Haeredibus Mas- culis de Corpore diet' Domini Thoms Richardson Patris post Decessum praefat' ultimo Dominae, Titulum, &.c. Baronum Parliamenti, tenend' et habend' pra.-fat' Titulum f^j™'" Domini Baronis de Cramond, post Decessum prtefat' Dominre, cum Suffragio in Parliamento, cummodo personaliter presentes fuerint, et non aliter. KIRKCUDBRIGHT. Dominus Robert us MClellan, Miles. Carolus, &c. Fecisse, creasse, et constituisse dictum Dominum Robertum M'ClelLm, Dominum de Kirkcudbright; dand' et concedend' sibi suisq: Haeredi- bus r.Iasculis, Cognomen et Arma dicti Domini Robert! geren' Titulum Domini; 25(0 junn quoquidam Titulo, &.c. Domini de Kirkcudbright, ttos investivimus dictum l>omi- '^^s- num Robertum Hseredesq: suos Masculos antedict'. ABERCROMBIE-. Dominus Jacobus Sandilands de St Monance, Miles. Carolus, Etc. Dedisse, concessisse, et disposuisse, Memorato Dommo Jacobo Sandilands, ejusq: Ha^redibus Masculis ex Corpore suo legitime procreat' seu pro- umoDe- creand' Titulum, &.c. Domini; ac damus, &.c. quod ille ejusq: H;eredes et Succes- "^^j"" sores praedict' indignitabuntur et nominabuntur Domini de Abercrombie, omni tempore future. RUTHERFURD. Andreas Rutherfurd, Legatus Generalis. Carolus, &-c. Fecisse, nominasse, constituisse, et creasse, Dominum Rutherfurd de viz. ipsum Andream ejusque Haeredes Masculos ex Corpore suo legi- time procreates seu procreandos; quibus deficientibus, quamcunque aliam Per- sonam seu Personas quas sibi, quoad vixerit, quinetiam, in Articule Mortis ad ei succedendum; ac fore ejus Hsredes Tallin &. Provisionis in eadem Dignitate, no- VoL.n. 4F 1 88 EXTERIOR ORNAMENTS. minare et designaie placuerit, secundum Nominationem et Designalionem Manu ejus subscribendam, subsque Provisionibus, Restrictionibus, et Conditionibus, a diet' Andrea pro ejus Arbitrio in dicta Designatione expiiinendis: Ac dedisse et concessisse Tenoreq: Presentium dare, &-c. ei, ejusque antedict' dictum Titulum, jjno ja- Honorem, Dignitatem, et Gradum Domini Parliamenti, ut ua tempore fiituro vo n- tilitia ejusdem gerentem) Liberum Dominum, Dominum Glasfoord denominand' duran' omnibus su» vitae diebus. 3 The following is a Copy of the iHstrumciil taken by Mr William Wilsok, one of the Uiidcr-Claks of Sessio//, at Depositing the Regalu of Scoria. \d in the Castle of Edinburgh : And agreeable to this Description the f Halving Copperplate is^ with great accuracy, engraved. AT the Castle of Edinburgh, and within the crown-room there, bctv.ixt the hours of one and two afternoon, of the 26th day of March, in the one thousand seven hundred and seventh year of our Lord, and sixth year of the reign of her Majesty, Anne, by the grace of God, Qiiccn of Scotland, Enghmd, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith; the which day, in presence of us notaries pub- lic, and witnesses under subscribing, compeared personally William Wilson, one of the Under-Clerks of Session, Depute-Marischal, for himself, as procurator for, and in name and behalf of William Earl Marischal, Lord Keith and Altrie, isc. Great Marischal of the Kingdom of Scotland, Heritable Keeper of the Regalia thereof, viz. crown, sceptre, and sword ; and there, in presence of David Earl of Glasgow, Lord Boyle, &.c. Lord Thesaurer- Depute, who, for himself, and in name of the re- manent Lords Commissioners of Thesaury, was present to receive the above re- galia, the said William Wilson, after producing and reading a piocuratory granted by the said noble earl to him, of the contents therein, and after mentioned, dated and registrate in the books of Council and Session, on the 25th day of March in- stant, did also produce to the said Lord Thesaurcr-Depute, a schedule, signed by him, and us notaries public undersubscribing, containing an inventory and parti- cular description of the said regalia, as follows : The imperial crown of SCOTLAND is of purc gold, enriched with many precious stones, diamonds, pearls, and curious enamellings; its parts and specific forms are these, imo, It is com- posed of a large broad circle, or fillet, which goes round the head, adorned with twenty-two large precious stones, viz. topazes, amethysts, garnets, emeralds, rubies, and hyacinths, in collets of gold of various forms, and with curious ena- mellings, and betwixt each of these collets and stones are interposed great orien- tal pearls, one of which is wanting, zdo. Above the great circle there is another small one, formed with twenty points, adorned with the like number ot diamonds and sapphires alternatively, and the points are topped with as many great pearls; after which form are the coronets of our lords barons. 3/w, The upper circle isrele- vate or heightened with ten crosses fleury, each being adorned in the centre with a great diamond, betwixt four great pearls placed in the cross i and j, but some of the pearls are wanting; and the number extant upon the upper part of the crown, besides vi'hat are in the under circle, and in the cross patee, are fifty-one, and these crosses fleury are interchanged with other ten high flower-de-luces, all alternatively with the foresaid great pearls, below which top the points of the se- cond small circle. Nota, This is said to be the ancient form of the crown of Scot- land, since the league made betwixt Achaius King of Scots and Charles the Great of France, the specific form of our crown differing from other imperial crowns, in that it is heightened or raised with crosses fleury, alternatively with flower-de-luces; the crown of France is heightened only with flower-de-luces ; and that of England with crosses patee, alternatively with flower-de-luces. Our crown of Scotland, since King James VI. went to England, has been ignorantly represented by herald-painters, engravers, and other tradesmen, after the form of the crown of England, with crosses patee, whereas there is not one but that which tops the mond, but all crosses fleury, such as we see on our old coins, and these which top our old churches, these crowns were not anciently arched or close. Charles VIII. of France is said to be the first in France who took a close crown, as appears by his medals coined in the year one thousand four hundred and ninety-five, being designed Imperator Orientis: Edward V. of England, in the year one thousand four hundred and eighty-three, carried a close cro.vn, as is obsei-ved by Selden; and ovu- crown is arched thus: 4/0, From the upper circle proceed four arches ipo INSTRUMENT, 'dc. adorned with enamelled figures, which meet and close at the top, surmounted with a mend of gold, or celestial globe, enamelled blue seme, or powdered with stars, wrossed and enamelled with a large cross patee, adorned in the extremities with a great pearl; such a cross tops the church of Holyroodhouse, and cantoned with other four in the angles: In the centre of the cross patee there is a square ame- thyst, which points the fore part of the crown; and behind, or on the other side, is a great pearl, and below it, on the foot of the paler part of the cross, are these characters, J. R. 5. By which it appears King James V. was the first that closed the crown with arches, and topped it with a mond and cross patee. But it is evi- dent, nno. That the money and medals coined in the reigns of King James III. and IV. have a close crown ; and it is no less clear, that the arches of the crown were not put there from the beginning, or at the making of the crown; Because, imo. They are tacked by tacks of gold to the ancient crown, zdo. The work- manship of the arch is not so good, and there is a small distinction in the fineness betwixt the first and the last, the latter being superfine gold, and the other not so exactly to that standard, whereof trial has been made. 5/0, The tire or bonnet of the «:rown was of purple velvet; but in the year one thousand six hundred and eighty- live it got a cap of crimson velvet, adorned as before with four plates of gold, richly wrought and enamelled, and in each of them a great pearl, half inch in diameter, which appear between the four arches, and the bonnet is turned up with ermine; upon the lowest circle of the crown, immediately above the ermine, there are eight small holes, disposed two and two together, on the four quarters of the crown, in the middle space betwixt the arches, to which they have laced or tied diamonds, or precious stones: The crown is nine inches broad in diameter, being twenty-seven inclies about, and in height, from the under circle to the top of the cross patee, six inches and a half; it always stands on a square cushion of crimson velvet, adorned with fringes, and four tassels of gold thread hanging down at each corner. The sceptre. The stalk or stem of the sceptre being silver, double over-gilt, is two foot in length, of hexagon form, with three buttons or knobs an- swering thereto: Betwixt the first button and the second is the handle, of hexagon forn\, furling in the middle, and plain; betwixt the second button and the third there are three sides engraven; that under the Virgin Mary, one of the statues that are on the top of the stalk, is the letter y. Upon the second side, under St James, the letter R. And on the third, under St Andrew, the figure 5. The side betwixt y and R is engraven with fourteen flower-de-luces ; and on the side be- twixt the figure 5 and the letter y are ten thistles continued from one stem ; from the third button to the capital the three sides under the statues are plain; on the other three are antique engravings, viz. sacramental cups, antique Medusa's heads^ and rullion folliages; upon the top of the stalk is an antique capital of leaves im- bossed ; upon the abacus whereof, arises round the prolonged stem, surrounded with three statues, xst, That of the Blessed Virgin, crowned with an open crown, holding in her right arm our Blessed Saviour, and in her left hand a mond, en- signed with a cross: Next to her, on her right hand, stands the statue of St An- drew, in an apostolical garment, and on his head a bonnet like a Scots bonnet, holding in his right hand a cross or saltier, a part whereof is broke off, and in his left, elevate, a book open: On the Blessed Virgin's left hand, St Andrew's right hand, stands another statue, seeming to represent St James, with the like apostoli- cal garment, and an hanging neck superadded thereto, and upon his head'a little hat like to the Roman pileum; in his right hand, half elevate, a book open, and in his left a pastoral staff, the head is broke off, and above each statue, being tw^o inches and an half, (excepting the Virgin, which is a little less) the finishing of a Gothic niche: Betwixt each statue arises a rullion in form of a dolphin, very distinct, in length four inches, fohage along the body, their heads upward and affronted inward, and the turnings of their tails ending in a rose or cinquefoil out- ward: Above these rullions and statues stands another hexagon button, or knot, with oak leaves under every corner, and above it a chrystal globe of two inches and a quarter diameter, within- three bars jointed above, where it is suimounted with six rullions; and here again with an oval globe, topped with an oriental pearl, an half inch diameter: The whole sceptre in lengrh is thirty -four inches. The SWOR.0. The sword is in length five feet; the handle and pommel are of silver INSTRUMENT, ^c. jyr over-gilt, in length fifteen inches; the pommel is round, and somewhat flat on the two sides; on the middle of each theie is, of embossed woik, a garland, and in the centre there have been two enamelled plates, which arc broke otV; the travel =c, or cross of the sword, being of silver, ov»r-gilt, is in length seventeen inches and an half; its form is like two dolpliins, their heads joining, and their tails end into acorns; the shell is hanging down towards the point of the sword, formed like an escalop flourished, or rather like a great oak leaf; on the blade of tiie sword arc indented with gold these letters, Julius II. P. The scabbard is ot crimson velvet, covered with silver, gilded and wrought in philigram work, into branches of the oak tree leaves and acorns; on the scabbard are placed four round plates of silver, over-gilt; two of them, near to the crampet, are enamelled blue, and thereon in golden characters Julius II. Ton. Max. N. At the mouth of the scabbard, op- posite to the heck, is a large square plate of silver, enamelled purple, in a cartoucii azure, an oak tree eradicated and fructuated or; and above the cartouch the papal ensign, viz. two keys in saltier adosse; their bowls formed like roses, or cinquefoils, tied with trappings, and tassels hanging down at each side of the car- touch: Above the keys is the papal tiara, environed with three crowns, with two labels turned up, adorned with crosses. Pope Julius 11. who gifted the sword to King James IV. had, for liis armorial figures, an oak tree fructuated, which is the reason the sword is adorned with such figures, a hill and a star; which figu\es I find not on any part of the sword : if they liave been on the two enamelled plates which are lost off from the pommel, I know not ; but it is certain the Pope had such figures, as appears by these verses made by Voltoline, a famous Italian poet, as the same are mentioned by Hermanus Hermes, a German writer, who gives us these lines found in the monastery : Qiiercus, mons, Stella, formant sua stemmata, princcps; Hisque tribus trinum stat diadema tuum. Tula nans Petri mediis non llectitur undis; Mons tegit a ventis, stellaque monstrat iter. Vol. II. 4 G 'SCC' APPENDIX. GENEALOGICAL ACCOUNT OF KEITH, Marischal of Scotland ; From the Genealogical Historj of the Family, and other authorities. THE family derives its origin and descent from the Catti, a people bordering on the Saltus Hercynius ; who were the only Germans that made the first stop to the Roman conquest in the time of Augustus Cssar, till the reign of Tibe- rius his successor, when they were entirely routed under the conduct of Germani- cus, as some writers relate, particularly Hadrianus Junius in his Historia Bataviir, dedicated to the States of Holland, anno 1575. Upon which overthrow a part of the Catti submitted to the Roman yoke, to retain their possessions in their native country ; which is now under the dominion of the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel ; who, amongst his other titles, designs himself Princeps Cattorum : But the most, preferring their liberty, left their country, in order to find out an habitation where they might enjoy it. These, under their leader Battus, (as the foresaid Junius has it) accordingly fixed about the mouth of the Rhine, from whence the country was named Batavia, from their said leader ^z/aj-i Batton-have ; for have, in the old lan- guage, sfgnified what the Latins call peculium. The Catti, the above author says, built a castle on the banks of the Rhine, called from their ancient name Catienel- bogen, which is reckoned in the Hessian territories. A neighbouring people, called the Mbravii, were expelled by the same con- querors ; and, under Roderick their leader, landed at the Frith now called Mur- ray Frith, in the reign of Corbred I. King of Scots, about the 63d year of Christ, and were kindly entertained by that prince, as being very serviceable to him in his wars against the Romans, for which they were rewarded with the lands called Murray to this day. Sometmie after, in the reign of Corbredus IL surnamed Galdus, the foresaid Batavian Catti sent a colony of their number to seek habitations in the isle of Britain ; and being dispersed in a storm, some of them (whom Camden calls Catti Euchlani) were carried to the mouth of the river Thames, where they all pro- bably designed, as being the nearest coast ; and the rest were driven to the north- ern parts of Scotland, (whom Fordun calls Catti Meliboci) and landed in that part thereof now called Caithness ; which name had its rise from the Catti and the word ness, which in the old Scots Irish signifies a cape or promontory, quasi promontorium Chattorum, perhaps from the cape where they first landed : Under which name, at first, were included not only the present Caithness, but also Sutherland and Strath- 2 APPENDIX. naver ; and the inhabitants Cattl, or in the Scots Irish, Cattegh. In process of time the n;;ine ol" Caithness was restricted to the shire so presently called; and the rest were called Sutherland, from the southern situation with respect to Caithness ; As appears by Mr Bleau in his Geography, Camden, Brand, and others. However the Cdti remained possessors of these lands, and were as kindly received by the then king, to whom they were as serviceable as the Moruvii then- countrymen had been to his father, in the wars against the Romans their invaders. They continued in the possession of their lands for upwards of 900 years : In which time they spread out in several branches through the highlands, and are at this day distinguished by several surnames, such as Keith, Sutherland, Clan Mhur- rich or Macpnerson, Macgilvray, &C. under the general denomination of Clan Chattan. In the time of King Malcolm II. of Scotland, who began his reign anno 1004, Sueno King of Denmark having conquered England, and overthrown their King Ethelred, resolved to reduce likewise Scotland to his obedience; and was for a considerable time successful in his attempt, till King Malcolm obtained a singular victory over the Danes, under the command of their general Camus, a kinsman of Sueno, at Bairy, six miles from Dundee. Which victory was chiefly attributed to the valour of the Catti, under the conduct of Robert their leader ; who, besides , his good service in the battle, pursued Camus and the surviving part of the Danes, as they were endeavouring to retreat into Murray, (then in the Danish possession) and overtook and killed them two miles from the place of battle ; where Camus (a person of gigantic stature, and prodigiously strong) fell by the hand of Robert, in a single duel, Upon report of which, King Malcolm was curious to see the place, and the body of Camus; and having come up for that purpose, and there- upon commending sufficiently the valour of Robert, he dipped his three middle lingers in the blood of Camus, and therewith drew three perpendicular strokes on the upper part of Robert's shield; and having before the battle assured his soldiers that God (whose house those savages had demolished, and whose services they had despised) would grant them victory, said to those about him, Veritas vincit ; which pales and words Robert's successors have of old carried for their arms and motto, in memory of this great action. This battle was fought in the year loio. . There is mentioned by Camden in the edition 1722, col. 1257, and extant to this day, an obelisk of stone, called by the vulgar Camus-cross ; and the little village near by retains the name of Camustoun to this day. And Boethius says, that in his time multitudes of prodigious bones were digged up in the adjacent fields, with a huge stone coffin, in which were found several large bones, supposed to be those of Camus. In regard of so great service the king was pleased instantly to bestow upon Robert the honour of knighthood, and created him heritable Great Marischal of Sci^tland ; which his posterity have since enjoyed, and several lands which the king bestowed upon him (particularly some in East Lothian) were from his name and office called Keith-Marischal, and the small island in the river of Forth called Inch-Keith, &.C. The ancient name of Cbatti, or Catti, being by process of time, according to the Scots dialect, transposed to Kethi, Kejcbt, and still more lately, for softness of pronunciation Keitb : Which became an hereditary surname to this illustrious family. I. Sir Robert was married on Margaret Eraser, daughter to Simon Eraser of Tweeddale, by whom he had a son called after his own name. II. This Robert, second of the name. Great Marischal of Scotland, when Sueno King of Norway invaded Scotland, in the time of King Duncan, commanded a parr of the Scots army at the battle of Culross, where the Scots were defeated. Thereafter he, with Banquo and Macbeth, fell upon the Norwegians in their camp, and cut them almost entirely oft"; so that there was scarce so many saved as to carry off their king to his ships. Which overthrow is mentioned by all our histo- rians. He married a lady called Elizabeth Strachan, of whose parentage we have no certain account ; and was succeeded by his son, 2 APPENDIX. 3 III. Sir Robert Keith, who married Elizabeth Cuming, daughter to John Cuming, a potent m;in, who was by Alexander I. King ot" Scotland, advanced f>, im nier.is, to great honour and riclies. And laid the foundation of many great families of his name. Sir Robert was succeeded by his son, IV. Sir Patrick. Iveith Manachal, who married Maigaret iMair, daughter to the Earl of Marr : Their son V. Sir WiLLiAii Kj£ith Marischal of Scotland, with the Earls of March, Mon- teith, and Angus, encountered the English at Allerton in England; and, after a bloody battle, proved victorious, took many prisoners, among whom was King Stephen's general, in the year 1133, in the reign of King David 1. Sir William had for his wife Eliiabeth Seaton, daughter to the Earl of Winton's predecessor, who bore to him VI. Sir Robert Keith Maiischal. He, with Gilchrist Earl of Angus, went with forces against Somerled Thane of Argyle, and the other rebels, who took arms against King Malcolm IV. defeated and dissipated them. He married Elisabeth Eraser, daughter to Eraser of Twceddale» His son and successor VII. Sir Hknky Keitu Marischal, who, by virtue of his ollice, attended King William the Lion in his e.x^peJition against King Henry II. of England ; and, with the Earl of Angus, defeated the English, after the king had been treacherously surprised by a party of the enemies' horse at Alnwick. This Sir Henry granted a charter to the monks of Kelso, of the patronage of the church of Keith, in pure- and perpetual alms, to pray for the health of his soul, as in the register of Kelso, MS. He married MargaieL Douglas, daughter to William, chief of that name : His son and successor was Vtll. Sir Robert Keith Marischal. He accompanied King William and his brother David Earl of Huntingdon into England, to congratulate King Richard's safe return from the Holy Land ; and afterwards, with the Earls of Fife and Athol, led an army against the rebellious islanders, whom they defeated. He married Jean Gordon, daughter to the chief of that name. He was succeed- ed by IX. Sir WitLiAM Keith, who attended, by virtue of his office as Marischal, King Alexander II. in his progress through the northern parts of Scotland; and afterwards, with his cousin the Earl of Buchan, marched against the re- bel Gillespie, whom they took, with his two sons, who were all beheaded. He married Agnes Dunbar, daughter to the Earl of March : And was succeeded by his son X. Sir Robert Keith. He marched with King Alexander III. against Acho King of Norway, who was routed and defeated. Sir Robert married Jean Ogilvie, daughter to the chief of that name. XI. Sir John succeeded his said father; and married Margaret Cuming, daughter to the Earl of Buchan : Their son XII. Sir Robert Keith Marischal shared largely of the troubles wherewith the country was shaken after the death of Alexander III. during the wars betwixt Scotland and England. He would not comply with the English, though nearly allied to the Cumings, who were deeply engaged in that interest. He married Barbara Seaton, daughter to the Earl of Winton's predecessor, by whom he had Sir Robert, who succeeded him, and two daughters, one married to William Lord Douglas, to-named the Hardy : She bare two sons. Good Sir James Douglas, who raised the family of Douglas, and his brother Hugh. XIII. Sir Robert Keith Marischal was a most zealous defender of his country against the English. When his^brother-in-law, William Douglas, was dispossessed of his land, and cast into prison by the English, where he died in anno 1280, he sent his nephew, called afterwards Good Sir James, to France, and bred him upon his own charges ; and, when he came home, entered him upon the course of loyalty and virtue by which he and his family rose to so much honour. The Marischal deserted the then king, John Baliol, upon \vs surrendering the sovereignty of the kingdom to the English, though John Baliol gave him a new charter of his lands of Keith, Michelston, EUem, Molener, Stc. in Ubgram waneniam (as Sir James Dalrymple in his Collections) and Sir Robert Sibbald, in his History of Fife, says, " In the year 1309, Robert de Keith Marischal, and Justiciar benorth Forth, Vol. U. 4 H 4 APPENDIX. " appoints an inquest of some barons, freeholders, and others, of Fife, to determmt " a dilference betwixt the abbot of Lindures arid the town of Newburgh ; and' " theie was also present Sir Walter de Keith." The Marischal went over to King Robert Bruce's interest, and contributed his utmost endeavours to bring that brave prince to the throne. He was the chief instrumerit of gaining the battle of In- veruiy, which was the hrst ever that great prince obtained, and ushered in all his other glorious victories : For which King Robert gave him one of his own houses called Hall-Forest, and several lands near about. At the battle of Bannockburn' he commanded 500 horse, and gave the first onset, and defeat a party of English horse sent to reinforce Philip Mowbray Governor of Stirling ; which made way for that glorious victory King Robert obtained in the above-mentioned place. At the Parliament of Perth, in anno 1320, the king gave him a great part of his cousin the Earl of Buchan his lands, who was forfeited for adhering to the English interest. King Robert had a great value and esteem of Sir Robert Keith Maris- chal, in so much as he made him one of his ambassadors, first to the court of England, and then to France, in the year 1325, with the Earl of Murray, to treat with that crown upon very weighty affairs relating to the two nations; which was performed by them with honour and conduct : See Faedera Scotice, MS. of late in the Earl of Winton's possession, now in the lawyers' library : And, as Dr Aber- cromby, in his first volume of the History of Scotland, says, " Tliis Sir Robert " Keith Marischal was one of the fastest friends King Robert had. This great patriot of the nation, in a good old age, was killed fighting valiantly at the battle of Duplin, against Edward Baliol, with most part of his friends, " Cum plerisque ex familia sua nobilibus (say Boethius). Cummagno propinquo- " mm & clientium numero," (says Buchanan). And this is the reason why famihes of a later date are more numerous in their branches and cadets than the Keiths. They having been in every action, by virtue of their office of Marischal, present, and attended by their friends in every battle, the males were seldom allowed to increase to any considerable number : But this fight, on the 3d of Au- gust 1332, gave them the severest blow they ever received. This Sir Robert mar- ried Barbara Douglas, daughter to the chief of that name, by whom he had two sons, viz. John, who died before his father, and left behind him a son called Ro- bert ; and Sir William, who attended his cousin, Good Sir James Douglas, whea he went with King Robert's heart to the Holy Land. XIV. This Robert Keith succeeded his grandfather in his estate and office. He was also knighted as his progenitors; a man of great courage, and most active- m. driving Edward Baliol out of the country, and restoring King David. He besieg- ed Perth, when strongly fortified and kept out by Macduff Earl of Fife, and after three months close siege took it, and sent the Earl, with his wife and children,- pri- Mners, to Kildrummy. He married Margaret Hay, daughter to Gilbert Lord Hay, the first constable of that family. By herhe had two sons, William and Edward, and two daughters; the one married to John Maitland, predecessor to the Earl of Lau- derdale, and the other to the Laird of Drum-Irvine. Sir William, the eldest son, was one of the greatest heroes of his time ; he was present with his father when he drove the Earl of Athol from the siege of Kilblane, and afterwards killed the- Earl and most of those who were with him, taking several prisoners. And when the English sent two great armies into Scotland, under command of the Earl of- Montfort and Richard Talbot, he routed them, and took their general prisoner, anno 1337. He besieged the town of Perth, kept out by Thomas Ritter for the- English, anno 1340, and took it after a dangerous siege ; and, after many glorious exploits, he was killed at the battle of Durham, where King David was taken - prisoner by the English, anno 1346. The eldest son. Sir William, afore-men- tioned, having died childless before his father, the next Marischal was his bro- ther. XV. Sir Edward Keith. He married a lady of his own name, called, in a- charter of the eighteenth of King David's reign, Bomina Isabella Keith; but of what family she was is not known, unless it be that of Galviston, mentioned by- John Major. He had by her two sons. Sir Edward, who succeeded, and Sir John, who married Mary Cheyne, sole daughter and heiress of Reynald Cheyne, Laird of- Inverugie, Strabock, &.c. about the year 1380. APPENDIX, 5 This branch of the family contiiuicd for several generations, and carried for their arms (a^ m James Lspiia, Mat chmont- Herald, his Uluminaad Book of Avtrn), irifait, a chief paly of ■ ix pieces, ^a/cj- and or, within a bordure ingrailcd stMe. This John of Inverugie, his great giandchild, Sir Patrick K.eilh of Invenigie, married the Lord Graham's daughter, and with her had several children. The second son of that marriage was Gilbert Keith, who raanied a daughter of Ogston of Ludqu- hairn, of whoiii is lineally descended Sir William Keith, Baronet, present Gover- nor of Pennsylvania, who bears for his arms, arj.:nt, a cross croi^lct ^tche, and an escalop in fesse aza/^, on a chief ^u/fx, three pallets or; as in the Lyon Regis- ter. XVL Sir Edward Keith Marischal, the second of that name,, was by King- Robert n. created Lord Keith, about the year 1380, as appears from chiirtcrs jTJt extant in that family ; all his progenitors being made knights on account of thtir Cilice. We have no certain account whom he married; only by a note of the ini- tial letters of all the chiefu of this family, and their ladies, painted in a hall in tiie Castle of Dunotter, we find her pointed out thus, D. M. M. By her, he had Lord William, who succeeded, and Janet, who married Sir David Hanrilton, p-e- decessor to the Duke of Hamilton. XVIL William Lord Keith Marischal married Margaret Eraser, daughter and heiress of Sir John Eraser of Cowie, with whom he obtained a great Cbtate in the shire of Kincardine, and elsewhere. He made a very great figure under King David Bruce. In the year 1369 he was appointed one of the commissioners on the part of Scotbnd, to treat with the English touching a peace betwixt the two realms ; which was concluded by them, as in Rymer's Fcedera Anglia. With hi* lady, Margaret Eraser, he had three sons and a daughter; the eldest,. John, a man of great valour, was at the battle of Otterburn ; he took his father's post as Ma- rischal, he being then indisposed ; and, after James Earl of Douglas, General of the Scots army, fell in the battle, took upon him the chief command, defeated the Enghsh, and brought home with him Henry Hotspur, Earl of Northumberland, prisoner. He married a sister of King Robert III. (who, in a charter belonging to the family, yet extant, calls him, Dilecttim fiUum nostrum Joannem de Keith) by whom he had a son called Robert, who married, and left only one daughter, Eliza- beth, who married the Lord Gordon : but both he and his father died before his grandfather, William Lord Keith. The said William Lord Keith's second son was nametl Robert. I have seen a charter granted to him by his said father, and Margaret Eraser his spouse, of the barony of Strachan, in the sherifldom of Kincardine, of date loth December 1375, which ends thus, " In cujus rei testimonium sigilla nostra consimiliter sunt appensa." Upon the seal there were three semi-cirlces meeting together, and within them three shields in triangle : that on the ri girt belonged to Keith Marischal, having a, chief paly of six pieces, and on that above six cinquefoils, disposed 3, 2, and i, which was his lady's Margaret Eraser; the third shield on the left hand had other figures, which were defaced : Upon what account it was carried I know not. This seal I caused engrave on the first copperplate in my Essay on the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories, page 56. This Sir Robert married the- heiress of Troup of that Ilk, and carried for his arms these of the family, quartered with azure, a. garb betwixt three falcons' heads or. He died also before his father, and left a son, William, w-ho enjoyed the estate and honours of the family. Lord William's third son was Alexander Keith of Grandham. He commanded; the horse against Donald of the Isles, at Harlaw, in the year 141 1. Lord William's only daughter was married to Robert, Duke of Albany, brother to King Robert III. and Governor of the kingdom, who, in a charter granted by him to the said Lord William, calls him, Dilectum patrirm nostrum Willidmum de Keith ; and the said Lord's second son, Dilectum fratrem nostrum Robertum de Keith, Dominum de Troup. The eldest son of this marriage was John Stewart, who was Earl of Buchan in Scotland. Anno 1402, he commanded the Scots forces that were sent to France, where, at the battle of Bouge'e, he defeated and killed the Duke of Clarence the English General. Eor his good and seasonable services the French King created him Earl of Evereux, and Constable of France. Thereafter be was killed fighting valiantly at the battle of Verneuil, in the year 1429 ; and 0 APPENDIX. left issue only one daughter, Jean, who was married to George Seaton of that Ilk, one of the progenitors of the Earls of Winton; for which that noble family have ever since quartered the arms of Buchan with their own. WilHam Lord Keith disponed several lands to this John Earl of Buchan, whom he calls, Claris- simo nepoti nostra Joanni Scnescallo Domino de Buchan, Camerario Scotia, terras de Tmch-Fraser, Drippis, iJc. together with the office of Sheriff-Principal of Stir- ling, anno 1407. This Lord William died about the year 141a, and was succeeded by his grand- son. XVIII. William Lord Keith Marischal. He married Elizabeth Lindsay, daugh- ter to the Earl of Crawford, by whom he had four sons, R ,bert, William, John, and Alexander ; Robert married Kathenne Seaton, daughter to the Lord Seaton : he died before his father, leaving only one daughter, nmrried to the Master of Gray ; and his second son William succeeded. XIX. William, the fourth lord of this family, was, by the favour of King James II. created Earl, by the title of the ancient hereditary office in the family, anno 1455. He married Margaret Hamilton, daughter to James Lord Hamilton ; by her he had a son ijamed Wilham, and a daughter, Janet, married to Johrv Leshe, grandson and heir apparent to George first Earl of Rothes, but had no issue. XX. William, second Earl Marischal, succeeded his father in the honours and offices of the family, and a vast estate. Amidst the confusions of King James III. his reign, he acted a most wise and steady course, and so tempered his duty to that unfortunate prince, with his love to his country, that he endeavoured, by all means- possible, to preserve the person and honour of the one, and the interest of the other. He was of a calm temper, profound judgment, and inviolable honesty ; always for moderation and extinguishing divisions: and from the ordinary expression he made use of in giving counsel, he was called, hearken, and take heed. He married Eli- zabeth Gordon, daughter to Alexander first Earl of Huntly, by whom he had se- veral children, whereof one, named Alexander, got a charter of the lands of Pit- tendrum, &.C. anno 1513 ; and of him are lineally descended Alexander Keith, late Sheriff-Depute of the Mearns, Mr Robert Keith, Minister of the Gospel, pre- sently residing in Edinburgh, and Alexander Keith, Writer there. Robert, the eldest son of the said William Earl Marischal, was at the battle of Flodden, where he left Sir William Keith of Inverugie, Sir John Keith of Ludqu- hairn, with other friends killed in that battle. He married Beatrix Douglas, daughter of John Earl of Morton, by whom he had Wilham who was heir to his grandfather, and Robert Abbot of Deer, of whom was Lord Dingwall, in the time of King James VI. who carried (as in Espline, his Illuminated Book of Arms) quarterly, first and fourth Keith, second and third gules, a lion rampant argent ; supported on the dexter by a deer, proper, and, on the sinister, by a bear, proper ; crest, a deer's head and neck issuing out of the wreath : motto, Memento creatorem. Earl William's daughters were, Elizabeth, married to George Earl of Huntly ; Janet, to George Lord Glammis; and Agnes, to Sir Archibald Douglas of Glen- bervie. When John Duke of Albany, Governor of the kingdom, went to France, to re- new the league with Francis I. anno 1520, William Earl Marischal had the cus- tody of the young king, James V. in the Castle of Edinburgh ; in which trust he behaved so well during the governor's absence, that the king had, all his lifetime, a great love to him, and granted to him many charters of his lands, with great privileges and jurisdictions. To him succeeded XXI. William, third Earl Marischal, his grandchild, who was one of the greatest men of his age, for his personal parts and merits : he married Margaret Keith, daughter and heiress to Sir William Keith of Inverugie, with whom he got an opulent fortune ; and with her had two sons and two daughters. He was at the bloody battle of Pinky, anno 1547, where he carried with him all his friends and followers who were of age and fit for arms, of whom he lost severals. His eldest son WilHam, called then Master of Marischal, was taken prisoner at this battle, with the Earl of Huntly then Chancellor, and other persons of quality. The APPENDIX. 7 Master of Marischal was detained prisoner till ransomed for L. 2000 Sterling. He had to wife Elizabeth Hay, daughter to George Hay of Errol, anno 1543; died be- fore his father, leaving a son, George, afterwards Earl Marischal ; and daugh- ters, Mary, married to Sir Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk ; Barbara, to Alexander Forbes of Pitsligo ; Mary, to William Keith of Ludquhairn, and had issue. VVil liam Earl Marischal's second son was Robert, commendator of Deer, who had, by the special favour of King James the VI. that abbacy erected to liim in a tempo- ral lordship, by the title of Lord Altree. His achievement (illuminated in the book of James Esplin, Marchmont-Herald) is thus, quarterly, first and fourth oi\ a saltier and chief joules; second and third, argent, a chief paly of six pieces, gales and or ; supported on the dexter by an unicorn argent, horned and unguled or ; and on the sinister by a deer, proper : crest, a rock proper, with the motto. Watch the temptation. He married Elizabeth Lundie, daughter and heiress of Robert Lundie of Benholm, by whom he had one daughter, Margaret, married to John Erskine of Dun: So the peerage failed, and his estate fell to the family of Mari- schal. William Earl Marischal, last mentioned, attended Queen Mary upon his own charge to France, and was chosen by the Qiieen and kingdom one of the twelve peers, by whose counsel the affairs of the kingdom were to be managed. He was most zealous for the Reformation, but against all irregular proceedings in that affair. When the Confession of Faith was presented to the Parliament 156c, the Earl Marischal stood up and said, " It is long since I carried some favour to " the truth, and was somewhat zealous for the P^oman Religion ; but this day " hath fully resolved me of the truth of the one and falsehood of the other : For. " seeing (my Lords) the bishops, who, by their learning, can, and for the zeal they " should have for the truth, would, as I suppose, gainsay any thing repugnant to " it, say nothing against the Confession we have heard : I cannot think but it is " the truth of God, and the contrary of it false and detestable doctrine." Where- upon the Confession was approven and authori-ied, and the Reformation settled. Earl William's two daughters, Anne and Jane, the first was married first to James Earl of Murray, natural brother to Qiieen Mary, anno 1563, to whom she had two daughters ; the eldest of which, Isabel, was married to James Stewart Lord Doune. and their eldest son James was Earl of Murray, in right of his mother. Again, she was married to Colin Earl of Argyle, to whom she bare Archibald Earl of Ar- gyle, Colin Laird of Lundie, and two daughters. Mary, the second daughter ct" James Earl of Murray, was married to Francis Earl of Errol. Earl William's se- cond daughter, Lady Jean, was married to John Lord Glammis, to whom she had two sons, viz. John Lord Glammis, who was Chancellor of Scotland, and Sir Thomas Lyon of Oldbar, Captain of the King' Guards, and Lord High Treasurer; and a daughter, Margaret, married first to the Earl of Cassilis, and afterwards to James Marquis of Hamilton. This Earl William, by living a retired fife at Dunotter, and shunning all pub lie affairs but his own, (whence he came to be called among the vulgar, IFilIiani. of the Tower) very much improved his estate, so that at his death it was reckoned 270,000 merks a-year ; and so situate, that from the northmost part of Caithness to the English borders he could lodge still on his own ground. Mr George Buch- anan being by the Earl refused the purchase of a piece of land, said to have of old belonged to some of his relations, as is vulgarly reported in' the family, threatened revenge, which he seems to have performed by his profound silence through all hi' history of this noble family, and their heroic actions. The earl died in a good old age, the 7th of October 1581, and was succeeded in his estate and honours by his grandson. XXII. George Earl Marischal, who was, by the care of his grandfather, well brought up ; and, for the further improvement of his education, was sent abroad with his brother William, where he studied under the best masters, particularly the famous Beza at Geneva, where his brother, a gentleman of promising greatness, was ur. happily kilkd in a scuffle or tumult among the citizens much regretted, and even by Theodore Beza in his writings. After Lord George had left Geneva, he travelled through Italy, and in Germany, where he visited the Landgrave of Hesse, Prince of the Chatti, who, understanding who he was. and of his descent, received him kindly with all magnificence, as descended of the Chatti. I shall here add what Vol. II. 4 I !5 APPENDIX. Mr Smith says in his printed oration on this pojnt, for which he cites history : " Potentissimiis Plessise Lantgravius, qui adhuc inter familia; suae decora Pnnci- " pis Chattorum, (qui semel Germanico submisere) titulum retinet, Georgio " Comiti Marischallo, Germania peregnnanti, communem stirpem &. cognati- " onem officiose agnovit, &- summo studio excoluit." After seven years travel he returned to his native country with great reputation, and was made a privy coun- sellor, and his majesty's lieutenant in the north. And in the year 1589 was sent ambassador extraordinary to Denmark, to espouse Anne, a daughter of that crown, in name of Kmg James VI. in which he appeared with all the lustre the wealth of Scotland could adorn him; all or most being upon his ov/n proper charges. These who attended him were Andrew Keith Lord Dingwall, Sir Ja.nes Scrimgeour of Dudhope, Mr John Skene, the King's Advocate, and Mr George Young, Archdean of St Andrews. After this embassy, most honourably discharged by him, the king received him graciously, and esteemed him very much as a man to be relied on in the point of honour and fidehty, as appears by an act of his Maje?ty's Privy Council, of date the 25th of November 1589, where he exoners and discharges him with much thankfulness ; a part of which 1 shall here insert. " And for that the abbacy of Deer, being erected by his Majesty in " a temporal lordship, was by his highness disponed to his said cousin, and incor- " porate in h;s said earldom, in consideration of his designation at that time for the •' said service, and the exorbitant expences which the honourable discharge there- " of would crave and put him to, which now it has pleased God to etfec- " tuate by his means : Therefore his Majesty, and Lords foresaid, have declared, " and by the tenor of this present act, declare his highness's cousin foresaid, to " have honourably, dutifully, and to his greatest charges and expences, eftected " and fulfilled the cause and motive of the said erection and union specified in his " infeftment. And tliat, in the performance thereof, he has most worthily de- " served the foresaid benefit, in a perpetual monument of his said service, to him " and his forever: Promising, in that respect, in his highness's princely and in- " violable word, to cause this said discharge and declaration to be confirmed and " ratified by his highness's three estates in the nest Parliament. And ordaining, " in the mean time, this present act to be insert and registrate in the books of " of secret council, ad perpetuam rei memoriam." In the year 1593, his Lordship made a noble foundation of a College at Aber- deen, which he" endowed with sufficient funds towards the support and mainte- nance of a Principal and four Professors of Philosophy : And though other profes- sors have been since added, by the piety and bounty of other great and learned men, yet the Earls Marischal are perpetual patrons of this college, which bears their name, being the first founders. And by the seal of the college, the arms of the family are marshalled with that of the town of Aberdeen thus: first and fourth, argent on a chief, three pales ^///w, for Keith ; second and third, gules, a tower em- battled argent ; crest, the sun in his glory, with the word luceo ; and the legend rond the seal. Insignia Academ. Marischal. Abredon. The Earl being the first founder of the college, where many learned men of all professions have been edu- cate, his memory, on that account, ought to be always honoured by all lovers of learning, with that gratitude and respect which so signal a piece of service to his country and posterity deserves. King James the VI. when in England, conferred upon him the highest mark of honour of which a subject could be capable, cloth- ed him with royal authority ; so that he was High Commissioner or Viceroy to the Parliament of Scotland, anno 1609. And after he had served his king and country in many eminent stations, mostly upon his own charges, his estate being one of the best in Scotland, he died at his castle of Dunotter the 2d of April 1623, aged 70 years. This noble lord married first Margaret, daughter of Alexander Lord Home, by whom he had William his successor, and a daughter Anne, married to William Earl of Morton, idly, Margaret, daughter of James Lord Ogilvie, by whom he had Sir Robert Keithof Benholm. XXIII. Earl William succeeded his father Earl George. King Charles I. find- ing him a man of great honour and fidelity, called him to his Privy Council, where he carried himself very well in every thing relating to the crown and to the go- APPENDIX. 9 vernment, in church and state. He died in the prime of his age, the 28th of October 1635, leaving issue by Mary his wile, daughter of John Earl of Man and his lady, Mary Stewart, daughter to the Duke of Lennox and Richmond, three sons, William and George, both Earls Marischal successively, and John, who, for saving the iionoius of the kingdom from the hands of tlie English, was by King Ciuirles 11. created Knight Marischal, and afterwards Earl of Kintore, of whom immediately. XXIV. Which William Earl Marischal, in the time of the civil vnars, adhered to the king ; and upon his own charges levied a troop of horse for his majesty's service, and marclied with others for the king's liberation, in tlie year 1645J, to Preston, vihere the king's army was defeated, and he hardly escaped with his life, returned to Dunotter Castle, where, in the year 1650, he entertained King Charles II. with the Duke of Buckmgham, and other persons of quality, and aitendcd on his Maj^'siy all the time he was in Scotland, and designed to have accompanied him to England, but the king commanded him to stay at home with the Earls of Crawford and Gleiicarin, to govern the nation. And when some of the king's friends had assembled at Elliot, in Angus, for concerting measures to support the royal cause, they were surprised by a great body of English horse, and the Earl Marischal, with some ochers. sent prisoners to the Tower of London by sea; where, after ten years imprisonment, sustained with great firmness and constancy, though the English possessed* his estate, and allowed him no maintenance, except what he re- ceived from his mother the Countess Marischal, he lived t^o see the happy Resto- ration of King Charles, and to receive some reward of his merit; for the king made him first a Privy Counsellor, and afterwards Lord Privy Seal : which office he dis- charged to his death, nnno 1671. He mamed first Elizabeth, daughter of George Earl of Winton, by whom he had three daughters, Margaret, married to Sir James H .pe of Hopetoun, and again to Sir Archibald Murray of Blackbarony ; Mary, to Robert Viscount of Arbuthnot, and Jean, to George Lord Bantf. '^dly. He mar- ried Anna, aaughter of Robert Earl of Morton, but by her he had no issue. XXV. To William Earl Marischal succeeded George Keith his brother, who had oeen a colonel in Frraice ; a person of undaunted courage, a great loyalist, anrl sufferer for the royal cause. He married Mary, daughter to the Earl of Kin- noul, by whom he had only one son, who succeeded him ; and he died at Inveru- gie in the year 1694. XXVI. William succeeded his father Earl George, a nobleman of a great and active spirit, a clear and penetrating judgment, a ready wit, and easy and lovely expression, magnificent and noble in his way of living, generous and liberal, strict- ly just in his deahngs, firm to his principles, bountiful to his servants, zealous to- support those that depended upon him, compassionate and charitable to those that were in distress, a great patron of learning, and lover of the welfare of his country. He was very opposite to the Union of the kingdoms : For, besides what other reasons he might have for his opposition, he thought his family might suffer by the suppressing his heritable office of Great Marischal of Scotland ; with relation to which he entered a protestation m Parliament, before the conclusion of the Union, in these words, (which 1 take from the ingenious Mr Crawford, his Peerage of Scotland) " I do hereby protest, that whatever is contained in any article of " the treaty of Union betwixt Scotland and England, shall in no manner of way " derogate from, or be prejudicial to me or my successors, in our heritable office " of Great Marischal of Scotland, in all time coming; or in the full and free en- " joyment and exercise of the whole rights, dignities, titles, honours, powers, " and privileges thereto belonging, which my ancestors and I have possessed and " exercised, as rights of property these 700 years. And ] do further protest, " That the Parliament of Scotland, and constitution thereof, may remain and " continue as formerly. And 1 desire this my protestation to be inserted in the " minutes, and recorded in the books of Parliament i and thereupon I take in- " struments." The Earl died the 27th day of May 17 12, leaving issue by Mary his wife, daugh- ter of James Earl of Perth, George his successor, James Keith, Esquire, Lady Mary, married to John Earl of Wigton, and Lady Anne Keith, married to Alex- ander Lord Gairlies, eldest son to the Earl of Galloway. 2 xo APPENDIX. XXVII. Which George being a young nobleman of very bright parts, succeed- ed his father Earl William. His genius leading him to a military life, when he was Lord Keith, and only a youth, Queen Anne gave him a troop of horse, and then preferred him to be Captain of her Majesty's Guards ; in which post he con- tinued, till, some time after the accession of King George to the crown, his Lord- ship was removed, and his command given to another. The achievement armorial of this noble family has always been carried plain, without being composed or marshalled with any other arms, having only the pater- nal arms of Keith, upon the occasion before-mentioned, viz. argent, a chief paly of six pieces, or and gules, adorned with crown, helmet, and manthng, suitable to their quality ; and upon a wreath of their tinctures (and sometimes in place of the wreath, a ducal coronet) for crest, a hart's head erased proper, armed with ten tynes, or; supporters, two harts proper, armed as the crest : and for motto, Veri- tas vincit. Behind the shield, two battons gules, seine of thistles or, ensigned on the tops with imperial crowns placed saltier-ways, as badges of the office of High Marischal of Scotland. KEITH, Earl of Kintore. THE first of this family (as I have said before) was Sir John Keith, third son ot William Earl Marischal, by the Lady Mary Erskine his wife, daughter of John Earl of Marr, and his Lady, Mary Stewart, sister to Ludovick Duke of Lennox and Rich- mond ; who was very assisting in preserving the regalia of Scotland (the crown, sword and sceptre) from falling into the hands of OHver Cromwell. Before the Castle of Dunotter (whether they had been conveyed from the Castle of Edinburgh for security) was surrendered to the English army, they were privately conveyed forth thereof, and deposited under ground in the church of King- Kenneth, (common- ly called KineiT) about four miles distant, by some trusty persons, and Sir John went abroad, and from thence (according to concert) wrote to his friends in Scot- land, that he was safely arrived with the regalia. This letter was industriously suifered to fall into the hands of the English, who, thereupon, gave over all hopes of finding them. In consideration whereof, and of his singular loyalty and faith- ful services to King Charles II. he was, upon the restoration of that monarch, anno i66o, created Knight Marischal; which dignity is entailed upon his family, with a pension suitable to the office, and got a coat of augmentation, with the regalia, added to his paternal bearing, as in the following blazon. Afterwards his majesty called him to his council, and honoured him with the title of Earl of Kintore, Lord Keith of Inverury and Keith-hall, on the 26th of June 1677. And there- after was made Lord Treasurer-Depute, and one of the Lords of his Majesty's Privy Council, in the year 1682. In which office he was continued f-.ll the tiea- sury was turned into a commission some time after King James his accession to the throne. He married Margaret, daughter to Thomas Earl of Haddington, by whom he had William Lord Inverury, his eldest son and heir, with several others, who died without issue, and two daughters, Jean and Margaret, the first married to Sir Wil- liam Forbes of Monymusk, and the second to Gavin Hamilton of Raploch. Which William (a man of valour and entire loyalty to his death) succeeded his father in the above estate and honours. He married Katharine, daughter to David Viscount of Stormont, and had with her two sons, John, his eldest son and successor (the present Earl of Kintore) and William; and two daughters. Lady Katharine, married to David Falconer of Newton, now Lord Halkerton ; and Lady Jean, The achievement of this noble family, I have mentioned several times before, and shall here again add its blazon, viz. quarterly, first and fourth, gules, a sceptre and sword saltier-ways, with an imperial crown in chief, all proper, within an . lie of eight thistles or, as a coat of augmentation for preserving of the regalia. Se- cond and thud argent, a chief paly of six pieces, gules and or, the paternal coat APPENDIX. II of Keith ; which arms are supported by two chevaliers completely armed, with pikes in rheii huiiJs, all proper; and tor crest, an aged lady tVom tiie middle up- wards, holding in her right hand u garland of laurel, proper : motto, :^ia: amissa salva. Of the fajiily of DUNDAS of that Ilk, and their descendants. The achievement of this family, by their seals of arms, and our old records of blazons, is argent, a lion rampant gules : crest, a lion full-faced issuing out of an oak bush, proper, with the the motto, Essajez ; supporters, two lions, and below the shield a salamander in flames of tire, all proper. The first of this ancient family of the surname of Dundas, in the shire of West Lothian, was Huttred, a younger son of Cospatricius, grandfather to Cospatricius the first Earl of Dunbar or March, as is evident by comparing Dimdas's original charter, after inserted, with a charter granted by King David 1. to the abbacy of Melrose, wherein this Huttredus is designed Fi/ii/s Cospatricii ; and he goes under the same designation in other charters, granted during the said reign, wherein he is witness. This charter of Melrose is found recorded among the chartularies of that abbacy, now kept in the Library of the Faculty of Advocates at Edinburgh ; and the principal charter is in the hands of Mr James Anderson, Writer to the Sig- net, that learned antiquary. HurTRED got from his father the lands of Dundas, from whence the family afterwards took their surname, when surnames came to be used ; and they also took the arms of the family of Cospatricius Comes, to show their original, with a suitable difference used at that time, by transmutation of the tinctures, and wanting the bordure of eight roses, which was peculiar to that noble family, being given to them by our kings for tlreir maintaining the peace of the Borders. The first of the family of Home, descended of another younger son of the Earls of March, did also distinguish their arms from the chief family, by only changing the tincture of the field, as I have observed before, and in the chapter of Marks of Cadency. Helias de Dundas succeeded his father Huttred, and for establishing his right to the lands, in the manner but just about that time come in practice, he took the following charter of the same from his father's eldest brother Waldevus, son to Cospatricius; which charter I have seen, and the same is in the charter-chest of Du.ndas, and I have set down an exact copy of it as follows : " WaWevus, filius " Cospatricii, omnibus piobis hominibus suis, & omnibus amicis suis tarn futuris " quam presentibus, salutem, sciatis me dedisse &- concessisse, 8^ hac carta mea " confirmasse, Helie fiho Hutredi Dundas pro servitio dimidii militis, ilium et " hasredes suos tenendum de me ethieredibus meis in feudo et haereditate, in moris, " in aquis, in stagnis, in inolendinis, in pratis, in pasturis, cum omnibus rectis di- " visi* et pertinentiis, concedo itaque. Qiiare volo et prajcipio, ut iste prtedictus " Helias istam terram habeat e: tcneat tam quiete et taiii hbere et tarn honorifice, " ut uUus miles de barone tenet, liberius et quietius et honorificentius in tota " terra Regis Scotia. His testibus, Johanne filio Orm, Waldevo filio Baldewin, " Roberto de Sancto Michaele, Helia de Hadestandena, Wilhelmo do Coupland, " Wilhelmo de Helebet, AlLtno Dapifero, Gerhardo Milite, Johanne de Graggin." Though this charter has no particular date, as neither for the mcst part had other old ones granted about the time it was given, yet, by the granter and wit- nesses, it is known to have been in the latter end of the reign of King Alex- ander I. or in the beginning of the reign of Kmd David I. before or about the year 1 124, or at farthest before the year 1145, which was the 21st year of King David's reign ; for Waldevus filius Cospatricii, the granter, died the I2th day Vol. U. 4 K la APPENDIX. of July that year, as by the records kept in the Castle of Edinburgh, and is ob- served by Ochiltree : And that the granter was Waldevus, father to Cospatriciut Comes, and not Waldevus Comes, the son of Cospatricius Comes, is evident, be- cause had it been granted by the last Waldevus, he had been designed Comes, or ^'ilius Cospatricii Comitis, as he is in all the charters granted by King David where- in he is mentioned ; particularly in several charters granted by that king to the abbacy of Dunfermline : for his father Cospatricius was made earl in the lime of David I. And further, it is without doubt that this charter was granted at least in the reign of King David, because the granter, PValdevus, filius Cospatricii, gives a charter to the abbacy of Dunfermline of the church of Inverkeithing, wherein Heli. de Dundas is a witness, and with him Duncanus Comes, Rob. Avenel, and Johan. de Graggin ; which Johan. de Graggin is one of the witnesses in Dundas's charter, and the other persons are witnesses in charters granted by king David to the said abbacy : So that it is evident the said Helias de Dundas was cotemporary with the foresaid persons, and that his charter of Dundas was granted, at least, in the reign of the said King David. The succession of the family of Dundas from the above-mentioned Helias is lineal and uninterrupted ; for the said Helias was succeeded by his son Serle de Dundas, who is mentioned in some of the transactions of King William the Lion, who began his reign in the year 1165, as in the Collections of Alexander Baillie of Castlecary, a curious antiquary. This Serle was succeeded by his son Helias de Dundas, who is mentioned as a ■witness in a charter of Philip de Mowbray, of the lands of Inverkeithing, to the abbacy of Dunfermline, in the reign of King Alexander II. And Sir James Dal- rymple, in his Collections of the Scottish History, page 381, says. He has met with this second Helias de Dundas, mentioned in an enrolment of court, by Roger Mowbray, in the year 1229 : For the family of Dundas held a small parcel of land in Dalmeny off the Mowbrays of Barnbougle, and still hold the same off the Earl of Rosebery, as their successor. And after this Helias, says Sir James, is to be found Radulphus de Dundas, who succeeded the said Helias ; and which Radulphus is frequently a witness in the charters of King Alexander III. as in the Earl of Haddington's Collections. And the said Sir James Dalrymple says. That he has found him mentioned in Registro Calchoensi, or Chartularies of Kelso, which are now kept in the Advo- cates' Library. This Radulphus was succeeded by his son Saer de Dundas, in the year 1276 ; he is found mentioned in Prynne's History of England, in the reign of King Edward I. To whom succeeded Hugo de Dundas his son. He was succeeded by his son Radulphus de Dundas. This second Radulphus is witness to a charter, sometime in Sir James Dalrymple's custody, granted by King Robert II. to the Laird of Maclean ; which second Radulphus was succeeded by James his son ; and to this James, John his son succeeded, as appears by the charters in the present Laird of Dundas's custody. John was succeeded in his lands and estate by James Dundas his son, whose son (likewise James) succeeded to him. This last mentioned James had at least three sons, James, Archibald, and Duncan, by his first wife. In the year 1423, he was married to Christian Stewart, daughter to Stewart of Innermeth and Lorn, his second wife ; when, by charters of resignation, (as his predecessors had for- merly done) he infefted his eldest son James, and his heirs whatsoever, in all the lands then belonging to the family of Dundas, (Fingask and Dumbarnie ex- cepted), and within a month thereafter he took a charter of resignation of the lands of Fingask to himself, and the heirs-male to be procreate betwixt him and the said Christian Stewart his spouse ; which failing, to his nearest heu-s whatso- ever : And, upon his death, James his eldest son was retoured heir in special to his father in the lands of Dumbarnie, in the year 1437. This last James dying with- out children, his brother Archibald (afterwards Sir Archibald) Dundas succeeded to him in the year 1452, and was High Sheriff of the county of Linlithgow in the reigns of King James II. and III. Sir Archibald married Agnes Borthwick, daughter to Borthwick of that Ilk, (afterwards Lord Borthwick) and had by her APPENDIX. Si John Dundas his son, who, having been infeft on charters of resignation in the whole estate of Dundas, (the half of the lands of Barnton excepted) was retoured heir in special to his father Sir Archibald in the said lands of Barnton, in the year 1480. This Sir Archibald's second son was Lord St John. William Dundas, son to the said John, was served heir to him in the year 1495. He married Margaret Wauchope, daughter to Wauchope of Niddry, and had with her two sons, Sir James the eldest, and William Dundas, predecessor to the Dundasses of Diiddingston. This Sir James was served and retouretl heir to his father in the year 15 13. He married Dame Margaret Sandilands, daughter to Sandilands of Culder, now Lord Torphichen, and with her had a son, George Dundas, who was served heir to his father in the year 1554. He married twice ; first Elizabeth Boswell, daughter to Boswell of Balmuto, by whom he had Sir Walter Dundas, who succeeded, and George, who died unmarried ; and next he married Katharine Oliphant, daughter to the Lord Oliphant, by whom he had Sir James Dundas of Arniston. This Sir Walter was knighted at Stirling by King James VL at Prince Hen- ry's baptism. He married Dame Anna Monteith, daughter to Monteith of Kerse, and had with her three sons, George, who succeeded him in the estate of Dundas, William his second, and Mr Walter his youngest son. The said George, the eldest, married Elizabeth Hamilton, daughter to Ha- milton of Innerwick, and had with her three sons, Walter, George, and James. Walter, the eldest son of the said second George, married Lady Christian Leslie, daughter to the Earl of Leven, and had with her three sons, Alexander, Ralph, and Walter ; the said Walter elder, and Alexander, his eldest son, died before George the grandfather ; and Ralph, the second son of Walter elder, being prodigal, the said George the grandfather, who had the fee of the estate still in his person, did entail the same to the youngest grandson Walter ; and failing him, to his own second son George above- mentioned ; and faihng him, to the said James his third son, and their heirs-male, and to other heirs of entail ; the said Walter, the grandson, having died without issue, the above-mentioned George, the uncle, is served heir of tailzie to him. Which George married Margaret Hay, daughter to Hay of Monkton, and with her had two sons ; George, who succeeded as heir of tailzie in the estate, and has several children by Alison Bruce, eldest daughter to Brigadier James Bruce of Kennet ; and Walter Dundas his second son, who is a merchant in Glasgow. The said James Dundas, third son to the said second George, married Elizabeth Haliburton, daughter to John Haliburton of Garvock, with whom he had four sons, George, John, James, and Walter ; John, the only surviving spn, is at pre- sent advocate for the church of Scotland, and principal clerk to her General As- semblies. There was a very accurate and distinct account and tree of this family of Dun- das handed down to the death of this second George, showing not only its de- scent, the succession of the heads of the family as above, and of their issue from one generation to another, and of their alliances by marriages, both with their ladies and of their children, all which were very honourable ; but also noticing the several remarkable events that had happened to the family ; which account, by occasion of the troubles the family fell into, after that time, is now amissing ; bur it is expected the same may yet be recovered. Of the families of DUNDAS of Newliston, Philpston, and Breastmiil. DUNCAN DUNDAS, third son of James Dundas of that Ilk, by his first mar- riage, and younger brother of Sir Archibald Dundas of that Ilk, got the lands of Craigton, and thereafter the lands of Newliston, in West Lothian, from the family of Dundas, to whom succeeded his son William Dundas ; and to the said Wil- liam succeeded James- his son, and to the said James succeeded George his son, and to the said George succeeded his son John Dundas of Newliston. 14 APPENDIX. This John married Margaret Crichton, daughter to Crichton of Lugton, with whom he had Sir James his eldest son, who succeeded him in his estate of New- liston ; David his second son, to whom he gave the greatest part of the lands of Phiipston ; Mr George his third son, who got from him the lands of Morton, and a part of tlie lands of Phiipston ; and Patrick, the fourth and youngest son, who got the lands of Breastmill. The eldest son Sir James, above mentioned, succeeded his father in the estate of Newliston. He married Elizabeth Dundas, daughter to Sir Walter Dundas of that Ilk, and with her had three sons ; Sir John, who succeeded him in the lands • of Newhston ; George, the second, who purchased the lands of Dubend, and mai-- ried Oliphant, daughter to Oliphant of Kirkhill, and had with her a son, John, who died without lawful issue ; and James, the third, who was a merchant in Edinburgh, and died unmarried. Sir John of Newliston married Agnes Gray, daughter to the Lord Gray, by whom he had a daughter, named Elizabeth Dundas, who succeeded him in his estate of Newliston, and was married to John Earl of Stair. Their son and successor is the present John Earl of Stair, Viscount of Dalrymple, and Lord Newliston, whose arms I have given with those of Dundas of Newhston, in my Essay on the Ancient and Modern Use of Armories, and in the First Part of this System of Heraldry. David Dundas, elder of Phiipston, second son of John Dundas of Newliston, iiad only one son, Lieutenant-Colonel John Dundas, by Elizabeth Hamilton, daughter to Hamilton of Binning, who dying before his father without lawful issue, the said David's share of the lands of Phiipston devolved to James Dundas of Morton, his nephew, by the said Mr George his brother. The foresaid Mr George, the third son of John of Newliston, married Susanna Brown, daughter to Brown of Coalston, with whom he had four sons; James, who succeeded him in his estate of Phiipston and Morton, Alexander, William, and Patrick ; which last three all died without lawful issue. The said Jabies, the eldest, married Ehzabeth Hamilton, daughter to Hamilton of Westport, and with her he had six sons, James, George, David, William, Thomas, and Walter; James died unmarried, and his brother David succeeded to him, who having only daughters by Katharine Swinton, daughter to George Swinton of Chesters, third son to Swinton of that Ilk, was succeeded by Euphame Dundas, his eldest daughter, married to the above-mentioned Mr John Dundas, Advocate, grandchild to the aforesaid second George Dundas of that Ilk, by the said James Dundas his third son, who have had several children, of which two sons and three daughters are still living. George and Walter died without issue, and William was Brigadier in the Third Troop of Royal Horse-Guards, and died also without issue. Thomas, the fifth son of the said James Dundas of Phiipston and Morton, has now purchased the Mains of Drumcross in West Lothian, and has several sons by his wife Jean Wishart, daughter to Captain Patrick Wishart, son to Dr George Wishart, sometime Lord Bishop of Edinburgh. The above-mentioned Patrick Dundas, fourth son of the above John Dundas of Newliston, left the estate of Breastmill to James Dundas his son, who married Elizabeth Reid, daughter to George Reid, merchant, and sometime one of the baiiies of Edinburgh, with whom he had five sons, Patrick, George, Wilham, James, and John. Patrick, his eldest son and heir, married Rachel Baillie, daughter to Baillie of Jerviswood, and with her had his son James Dundas, who succeeded his fa- ther in the estate of Breastmill, and has now married Elizabeth BaiUie, heiress of Castlecary, in the shire of Stirling. George, the second, was a chirurgeon-apothecary; he married in England, and died .there, having several children. James, the fourth son, married Marion Monteith, daughter to George Monte'ith, the representative of the family of Kerse, and with her had only one son called George ; and William and John live still unmarried. I have given the arms of these families in the First Part of this System. 2 APPENDIX. Memorial yok WILLIAM DUNDAS, Esc)^ heir-male of the family of Di'>jdas OF THAT Ilk. THE author of the memorial for the present laird having omitted to take any notice of the issue of Ralph Dundas, late of that Ilk, and wholly passed over in silence Mr William Dundas, his eldest son, the lineal heiv-male and representative of the House of Dundas, from Archibald Dundas of Listen, and Agnes Borthwick, who lived in the reign of King James II. In justice to that gentleman and his family, lately returned from abroad, this memorial is offered, both to instruct his right preferable to that of the present possessor of the estate of Dundas, and account for the manner wherein he was divested of that estate, to which he might have otherwise succeeded. George Dundas of that Ilk, cotemporary with King Charles II. and eldest son of Sir Walter Dundas of that Ilk, married Elizabeth, daughter to Hamilton of Innerwick, by whom he had three sons, Walter his heir, George, father to George Dundas presently of that Ilk, and James, father to John Dundas late of Philp- ston. Walter Dundas, the eldest son, married Lady Christian Leslie, daughter to Alexander first Earl of Leven, by whom he had Ralph, his eldest son, and Walter: Their father, Walter, having deceased before George the grandfather, the fee of the estate came in the person of Ralph the eldest son. Ralph Dundas of that Ilk married Mrs Elizabeth Sharp, daughter to William Sharp of Houston, by whom he had Christian, Walter, and William, the only sur- viving child of the marriage: But the above George Dundas of that Ilk, after the death of his eldest son Walter, having taken some exceptions at the conduct of his grandson Ralph, executed a deed of tailzie of his estate, affected with several irri- tant and resolutive clauses, particularly prohibiting the heir of entail to burden the estate with debts exceeding a certain sum. Ralph Dundas incautiously incurred that irritancy; and afterwards dying, his uncle George, above noticed, insisted in a process of declarator before the Lords of Session, against William, Ralph's eldest son and heir; and, having prevailed therein, dispossessed him. From whence it appears, that though the above George Dundas wrested the estate from his nephew, by using the severity of the law against him, yet the right of primogeniture still remains with the said William Dundas and his heirs, wlio must be considered as the chief and only representatives, and lineal heirs-male of the said Archibald Dundas of Dundas, cotemporary with King James II. anno 1450. whoever be in possession of the estate. The aforesaid William Dundas married Jean Stewart, daughter to Dr Stewart, son of Grandtully, by whom he had two sons alive, Thomas, his eldest. Merchant in Rotterdam; and William, the second. Doctor of Medicine. Of the families of DUNDAS of Duddingston and Manor. WILLIAM DUNDAS, second son of William Dundas of that Ilk, and his lady, Margaret Wauchope, daughter to Wauchope of Niddry, married Marjory Lindsay, portioner of Duddingston, and with her had two sons, William and David. Wil- liam, the eldest, was many years in Sweden, married a Swedish woman, and with her had only two daughters. The eldest, Margaret, was married to Mr James Donaldson, a minister; and the second, Grissel, to Drummond of Caiiowrie. David, the second son, purchased the lands of Priestinch, and thereafter the rest of the lands of Duddingston. He married Marjory Hamilton, daughter to Ha- milton of Orbiston, and with her had two sons; James, who succeeded in the Vol. 11. 4 L i6 APPENDIX. lands of Duddingston ; and George, his second son, who purchased the lands of Manor in Perthshire. This James of Duddingston married Isabel Maule, brother-daughter to Maule of Panmure, and with her had two sons, George, who succeeded, and William, who died without issue. George of Duddingston married Katharine Monypenny, daughter to Monypenny of Pitmillie, and was succeeded by his son John, who married Anne Carmichael, only daughter to Sir David Carmichael of Balmedy, atid Anne Carmichael, daugh- ter to James Lord Carmichael, and with her had many sons; the eldest, George, who married Magdalen Lindsay, daughter to Mr Patrick Lindsay, alias Crawford of Kilbirnie, second son to the Earl of Crawford, with whom he has several chil- dren. David, the second son of the said John, was an advocate and clerk to the General Assembly : He, and all the rest of the sons, died unmarried, except John, the fifth son, who is Presenter of the Signatures in Exchequer, and has married Christian Mure, daughter to Adam Mure of Blackball, apothecary, burgess of Edinburgh. George Dundas of Manor, second son to David Dundas of Duddingston, mar- ried Margaret Livingston, daughter to Livingston of Westquarter, and had with her one son, John Dundas, who succeeded his father in his estate of Manor; he married Elizabeth Hamilton, daughter to Hamilton of Kilbrackmont, and with her had two sons, Ralph, who succeeded his father in- the lands of Manor, and mar- ried Helen Burnet, daughter to Sir Thomas Burnet, sometime physician to King William, by whom he has many children. John, the second son of the above- mentioned John Dundas of Manor, is a chirurgeon-apothecary, has purchased the lands of Wester-Bogie in the shire of Fife, and has married Elizabeth. Fergusson, daughter to James Fergusson, merchant and bailie of Inverkeithing. The arms of the family of Duddingston are given in the First Part of this System. Of the families of DUNDAS of Arniston and Harvieston. SIR JAMES DUNDAS, the first of Arniston, was second son to the first George Dundas of that ilk, and his second lady, Katharine Oliphant, daughter to the Lord Oliphant; He married first Dame Katharine Douglas, daughter to the Lord Tor- thorvvald, by whom he had several sons, who all died without issue, and seven daughters, all honouratly married : Afterwards he married Dame Mary Home, daughter to Home of Wedderburn, by whom he had two sons. Sir James, his eldest, who succeeded him in his estate of Arniston, and Robert Dundas of Harvieston his second. This Sir James was one of the Senatoi-s of the College of Justice; he first mar- ried Dame Marion Boyd, daughter to the Lord Boyd, by whom he had Robert his successor; and thereafter he married Dame Janet Hepburn, daughter to Hepburn of Humbie, by whom he had James Dundas, merchant. Doctor Alexander Dundas, his Majesty's Physician, and Captain Charles Dundas. This Robert Dundas of Arniston is also one of the Senators of the Colleye of Justice; he married Margaret Sinclair, daughter to Sir Robert Sinclair of Steven- ston, with whom he had several children, Mr James and Mr Robert Dundasses, advocates, Alexander, John, and Charles Dundasses, merchants, and Thomas Dundas. James, his eldest son, married Mary Hope, daughter to Sir Alexander Hope of Kerse, and died, leaving only one daughter, Margaret. Mr Robert Dundas, now his eldest son, is at present his Majesty's Advocate for Scotland, and has several children by his kdy, Ehzabeth Watson, daughter to Watson of Muirhouse. Robert Dundas of Harvieston, above mentioned, second son of the first Sir- James Dundas of Arniston, married first Borthwick, daughter to the Lord Borthwick, by whom he had John, his eldest son, who died without issue ; after- wards he married Katharine Hamilton, daughter to Hamilton of Preston, with 2. APPENDIX. 17 whom he had three sons, Alexander, and Walter, who died without issue, and George, the youngest, who is a chirurgeon-apothecary in Edinburgh, and has se- veral children by Anne Somerville, daughter to Mr John Somerville, sometime minister at Cramond. The above-mentioned James Dundas, merchant, eldest son of the second mar- riage to the said Sir James Dundas of Arniston, one of the Scmitois of the College of Justice, married Janet Riddel, daughter to Mr Archibald Riddel, lately one of the ministers of Edmburgh, and brother-german to Sir John Riddel of that Ilk, and has with her one son, Robert Dundas, a merchant. Doctor Alexander Dundas, his Majesty's Physician, the second son, lives still unmarried ; Captain Charles, the third son of the said iNIargaret, married Helen Dundas, daughter to George Dundas, merchant in Leith, who is after-mentioned, and has with her two sons. Captain George Dundas, the eldest, who is an officer in the royal navy, and Dr James Dundas, the second, who is a physician. Of the DUNDASSES of Kincavil, Airth, and 1VL\gdalens. THE above-mentioned William Dundas, second son to the foresaid Sir Walter Dundas of that Ilk, married Katharine Murray, daughter to Murray of Pennyland, and had with with her two sons, Mr William Dundas, Advocate, who purchased the lands of Kincavil in West Lothian, and George Dundas, merchant in Leith. The said Mr William Dundas of Kincavil married Margaret Edmonstone, daughter toEdmonstone of Ednam, and had with her only two daughters, Anne, the eldest, who was married to Lieutenant-Colonel John Erskine of Carnock, uncle to the Earl of Buchan, who hath several chUdren; and Christian, the second, who was married to James Earl of Bute, who had with her one son, Mr John Stewart. The said George Dundas, merchant, second son of the first mentioned William Dundas, married Helen Cooper, daughter to Cooper of Gogar, and had by her several sons ; John, the eldest, married Alison Burnet, daughter to Burnet, merchant in Leith, and had by her several children. William, the second son of the said George 'Dundas, merchant, married Eliza- beth Elphinston, heiress of Airth, in the shire of Stirling, and has with her several children ; he has now purchased the lands of Blair in Perthshire, near Culross, whicli he calls New-Airth. James, the third son of the said George, died unmarried. The said Mr Walter Dpndas, third son of the foresaid Sir Walter Dundas of that Ilk, purchased the lands of Magdalens in West Lothian; he married Eliza- beth Bruce, daughter to Bruce of Earlshall, and by her had two sons and several daughters. He afterwards went with his whole family to Ireland, and they still, continue there. FOULIS OF COLLINGTON. THESE of the name of Foulis, for their arms bear argent, three bay leaves, slip- ped iif/?, 2 and I. The name is from the French woxA fdiiilles, wlaich signifies leaves ; whence these of the name are of a French extract, from one Foulis, who came to Scotland in King Malcolm Canmore's time ; as Lesly, in his History, lib. 6. pag. 210. edit. Rossie, 4to, says, Reginaldus de Foulis is witness in charters in the reign of Alexander the II. The lands of Foulis in Angus belonged of old to those of this name ; of whom was descended Willi.\m Foulis, who was Secre- tary to King James the I. anno 1424, and was made Keeper of the Privy-Seal, anno 1427 ; as by the registers of the kingdom. He had a son, lis APPENDIX. William Foulis, who married Elizabeth Ogilvie, daughter to Sir Walter Ogil- vie, and with her had two sons, William and James. The last named married Margaret Henderson, daughter to Sir Thomas Henderson of Fordel, and liad a son named James, who succeeded to his uncle William, who died without chil- dren. He purchased the lands of Collington,a««o 1519. There is a commission to this James, and Adam Otterburn of Auldhame, conjunctly and severally, and the longest liver of them two, to be Advocates to the King, dated anno 1526; and in anno 1531, he was made Clerk Register during life: which commission is renew- ed by Qiieen Mary, eumo 1542. He married Katharine Brown, daughter to Brown of Hartree, and was succeeded by his son Heniiy Foulis, who married Mary Haldane, daughter to Gleneagles. There is a letter from Prince Henry and Queen Mary, presenting him to be one of the Se- nators of the Session, as soon as a place in the temporal state should happen to vaick, dated anno regnii. and 24.; which letter is in the Advocates' Library. He was succeeded by his son James Foulis, who married Anna Heriot, heiress of Lumphoy ; with her he had issue seven sons, James, who succeeded; George, the first laird of Ravelston ; and David who went to England with King James VI. and was made knight baronet 6th February 16 19, and got, by favour of the king, the lands of Inglesby in the county of York, which are possessed by his descendants to this day. The fifth son, John Foulis, apothecary, whose grandson, John Foulis, in the Sasine Chamber, is servant to Mr William Foulis, clerk, after-mentioned; and the seventh son Foulis of Ratho. Sir James, the eldest son, succeeded his father, who married Mary Lauder, a daughter of Lauder of Hatton, and relict of the Laird of Cunninghamhead; and was succeeded by his son Sir Alexander Foulis, made Knight Baronet 7th June 1634; married Eliza- beth Hepburn, relict of the sheriff of Bute. Her father was son to Riccarton, who was son to the Earl of Bothwell ; and was succeeded by his son Sir James Foulis, w-ho was eminently loyal for his Sovereign King Charles II. married Barbara Ainslie, daughter to Andrew Ainslie, one of the magistrates of lidinburgh. He was made a Senator of the College of Justice, anno i66r, and Justice Clerk, anna 1684. In which ofllces he continued till his death, the ipth of January 1688, and was succeeded by his son Sir James Foulis, who married Margaret Boyd, daughter to John Boyd, Dean of Guild of Edinburgh. He was one of the Senators of the College of Justice in the year 1674, and continued in that office till 1688 ; died 1711, and is succeeded by his son Sir James. The eldest cadet of the family of Collington was the above-mentioned George Foulis, second son of James Foulis of Collington, and his lady Anne Heriot. He was Master of his Majesty's Mint, and purchased the lands of Ravelston, and mar- ried Janet Bannatvne, daughter to George Bannatyne of Newtyle, ist June 1603. With her he had several children ; George his eldest son, and Mr Alexander a younger one, who purchased the lands of Ratho, now possessed by his grandson Alexander Foulis of Ratho, who carries argent, on a cheveron between three lau- rel leaves, vert, as many besants argent ; crest, a dove holding an olive branch in her beak, proper : motto. Pax. George, the eldest son, succeeded his father in the lands of Ravelston; he mar- ried Jean Sinclair, daughter to Sir John Sinclair of Stevenson; and was succeeded by his son Sir John Foulis, dignified in anno 1661 Baronet. He married Margaret Prim- rose, daughter to Sir Archibald Primrose of Chester, Clerk Register, and his lady Elizabeth Keith, daughter to James Keith of Benholm, second son to George Earl Marischal. Sir Archibald Primrose having purchased the estate of Dunipace, tailzied the same to Sir John's eldest son, on condition that he should bear the name and arms of Primrose. Sir John' Foulis, that he might have one of his sons to represent himself, bearing his name and arms, gave to his second son, William Foulis,, the lands of Woodhall. Sir John Foulis was Clerk to the General Regis- ter of Seasins, E.enunciations, &c. and to other particular registers, from the year 1661, to the year 1701, that he dimitted those offices in favour of his second son. APPENDIX. ^9 William Fmiiis, now of Woodhall. His father's arms were argent, on a fessc, be- tween three bay leaves vert, a primrose or ; crest, a dove volant, holding a leaf in her beak, proper : motto, Tbtire l^ jure. Sir John Foui.is of Ravelston ; his eldest son George took upon him the name and arms of Primrose, by the destination of his grandfather. Sir Archibald Prim- rose. His son Sir Archibald Primrose possesseth the lands of Dunipace and Ravel- ston, grandson of Sir John Foulis. William Fuulis of Woodhall, second son of Sir John, carries the arms of Fouhs, argent, three bay leaves slipped vert, within a bordure ermine ; crest, a flower-pot with a branch of laurel springing out of it : motto, Non deficit. CHALMERS of Gaitgirth. CHALMERS or Chambers of Gaitgirth, sometimes designed Chalmers of that Ilk, as in the Fust Volume of this Treatise, is one of the ancientest famihes in the shire of Ayr, and chief of the name ; of old, wrote in Latin, De Camera, es- pecially in our ancient records. Sir George Mackenzie, in his Manuscript of Families, says. It is more than probable that this family took the surname de Camera, when surnames first be- gan in the reign of Malcolm Canmore, from the office Camerariiis Regis, i. e. the King's Chamberlain ; and says he has seen a charter granted by King William to the abbacy of Paisley ; amongst the witnesses there is one Herbert de Camera, which, no doubt, was then his surname, and not his office ; for in King William's time, he wtio had the office of chamberlain, beside his siurname, was designed Camcrarms Regis; so it is probable the surname de Camera was occasioned by the office being anciently in this family. In the records of charters in the Parliament House, there are several granted to them of the name of Camera, as, Charta Willielmi de Camera, in the year 1369. As also to the name of Chnhner, as Charta 'Joannis Cbalmer, under the Great Seal, erecting the lands of Gaitgirth and Culreath into one barony, in the shire of Ayr, 1468. These names Camera and Cbalmer are the same ; the one in Latin, the other in English. I have seen a birth-brieve in the reign of King James VI. with the consent of his privy council, past under the Great Seul to Sir James Boyd of Trochrig, the i6th of August 1609, showing his mother, Margaret Cbalmer, daughter of Jame< Chalmer, Baron of Gaitgirth, chief of his family, and of the name, as also his pro- genitors, barons of Gaitgirth, these 500 years bygone, which is evident by authen- tic documents of the family in Latin, thus, " In prosapia, Margareta Camera filia " domini Jacobi Camerii, Baronis de Gaitgirth, familias suae principis. Qui quideni " Camerii, Baronis de Gaitgirth, ab annis jam amplius quingentis, illius noniini^ " principes claruerunt, ut ex authenticis liquet illius domus laonumentis." One of the family surnamed de Camera (as Sir George Mackenzie) went to France, and called himself Camerarius, in Latin, and in French, de la Chambre, and after his return home, in English, Chalmers. This tradition, savs he, seems to be confirmed by the flower-de-luce which the family carries in their arms. It is very probable it was granted by the King of France when John Chalmers of Gait- girth, in the year 1423, accompanied Archibald Earl of Douglas to France, who was made Duke of Touraine, and Marechal of France, by King Charles Vll. ; he quartered the arms of that dukedom, being azure, sane of flower-de-luces or, witii his own arms. And John Chalmer probably had one flower-de-luce granted to him for his valour, which the family ever since have continued. The name Ch.\lmers is since more frequently used than Camera in all their charters that 1 have seen, by which I give the genealogical account of the family. . Sir John Chalmers of Gaitgirth, s- n to the above-mentioned John, as by his charter in the year 1468. He is frequently mentioned in the records of Parlia- ment, in the year 1484, which continued to the first of October 1487. Dominus df Vol. II. M ;o APPENDIX. Gah^hth ; and is ranked amongst the barons betwixt Doj/ii/ii/s de Ker, and Domi- nus de Balcomy ; he was succeeded by his son James, who gets his sasine of the lands and barony of Gaitgirth, Culraith, and Chalmer-house, (from the last of these lands the family has been designed Chal- mers of that Ilk) as heir to his father, Sir John Chalmers, upon a precept of the Chancery, dated the ist of October 1501. He married Annabel, daughter to Cun- ningham of Caprington, a second son of the family of Glencairn. Their son and successor was Robert Chalmers, Baron of Gaitgirth, who married a daughter of Campbell r.ord Loudon, afterwards Earl ; and was succeeded by his son James, who gets a charter of confirmation, under the Great Seal, of the barony of Gaitgirth, the 6th of January 1541 ; and a charter of twenty-pound lands of 'f horny-bank, alias Chalmer-house; as also a charter of the lands of New-Park de tileiiken, in the lordship of Galloway, and stewarty of Kircudbright, the loth of August 1588 : his lady was a daughter of Fullarton of Corsbie; and was succeed- ed by his son James Chalmers of Gaitgirth, who was also infeft in Corsflet and Auldhouse- burn, as heir to his father, the 8th of May 1608. He married a daughter of Hous- ton of that Ilk. He was succeeded by his son James, Baron of Gaitgirth, Sheriff-Principal of Ayr, by commission under the Great Seal, dated the 8th of September 1632. His lady was Isabel Blair, daugh- ter to Blair of that Ilk, and with her had his son and successor John Chalmers of Gaitgirth, who married Mrs Mary Campbell, eldest lawful daughter to Sir Duncan Campbell of Auchinbreck, father and mother of the pre- sent John Chalmers of Gaitgirth, who married Mrs Margaret Montgomery, eldest lawful daughter to Colonel James Montgomery of Coilstield, second son of Alex- ander Earl of Eglinton, whose eldest son and apparent heir is Captain John Chalmers, who, during the course of the late war, served in Leieutenant-General George Hamilton's regiment abroad in Flanders. The achievement of this family is argent, a demi-lion rampant issuing out of a fesse, and, in base, a flower-de-luce sable; crest, a falcon rising, with the motto, Spero. These arms have been supported, of old, by a sagittary drawing a bow on the right, and, on the left, by a syren or mermaid, all proper ; as on the frontispiece of their house, and other utensils belonging thereto: which supporters the family has assumed when barons of Parliament, as above mentioned. There are several families cadets of this, and I shall here mention one honourable one in France, viz. Chalmers, baron of Tartas, as by his birth-brieve under the Great Seal, and the Lyon Register, descended of Chalmers of Gaitgirth, or that Ilk, carries the same with Gaitgirth, within a bordure gules, for his difference ; crest, a falcon belled, proper : motto, Non prreda sed victoria. The first of this family was one of the seven brothers, younger sons of the family of Gait- girth, or of that Ilk, who, in the year 1440, or thereabout, were forced to go abroad for a slaughter committed by them. The predecessor of Tartas continued still in Fiance, as does his issue. Other three of the seven returned from abroad, and quietly took up their residence in Stirlingshire, where the eldest of the three purchased a piece of land, which he called Chalmerston. The second purchased the lands called Ashentrees, in the said shire, which they possessed for a consider- able time ; and some of the issue of that family are there remaining at this time : and the third brother had the Mill of Guidie. From Chalmers of Ashentrees was descended James Chalmers, Advocate, who had three wives, and with each of then had issue; with the first, Margaret, a daughter of Mr Alexander Nicolson, an Advocate, he had a son, Thomas, who married Mrs Mary Cooper, daughter to Sir John Cooper of Gogar, who entailed his estate upon John, the eldest son of Mr Thomas, and his daughter; which John was ensign a considerable time in the regiment of the Scots Guards : he has two brothers in the service of the government ; those carry the arms of Gaitgirth,. above blazoned, with a suitable difference; crest, a hand holding up a pair of scales, with the motto, Firtute iS labore, and, of late, Lanx mihi clausr/s.. 3 APPENDIX. MOWBRAY. NOTWITHSTANDING of what I said of the ancient Ikniily of Mowbray ii. the Fii-st Volume of this work, whom, for want of vouchers to prove the contrary, I was obhged to conclude as extinguished in the person of the last Sir Robert Mowbray of Barnbougle, who died about the year 1675, having, through debts and other misfortunes, lost tlie remains of a very fair and ancient inheritance, and died without issue of his own body. These baronies of Dalmeny, Barnbougle, and Invcrkeithing, the paternal inheri- tance of that family, being now in the possession of Primrose Earl of Rosebery. Historians and heralds must write according to information and vouchers: when these are silent, Or hid from us, we must also be silent. Nor is the injury done to families, through silence or ignorance, imputable to us, but to the owners or con- cealers of such documents, who neglect to furnish us with suitable materials, where- by themselves and predecessors might be perpetuate to posterity. As, for instance, this old family of Mowbray of Barnbougle, &.c. whom we have in this kingdom, upon undoubted record, as valorous and honourable people above 5C0 years ago, had been left without a representative or heir-male, known to this, and probably to after generations; if I had not been very lately furnished ■with three old parchments, very clean and clearly wrote in Latin, with whole and entire seals of arms appended to two of them, belonging to John Mowbray of Cock- airny in Fife, and brought to my hands by his brother-german, Robert Mowbray, his majesty's master-carpenter for North Britain, and late conveener of tlie trades of Edinburgh. They plainly prove, that William Mowbray of Cockairny was a younger son of the family of Barnbougle, who were also at that time proprietors of the lordship of Inverkeithing, and barony of Dalmeny. The said William was born, or descended of them about the year 1460, who is the undoubted heir-male and representer of that family. I shall first give you a short transumpt of the parchments themselves, and next blazon the seals. The first is a charter granted (in the reign of King James the IV.) by Sir Jown Mowbray of Barnbougle, Knight, and lord or proprietor of the lordship of Inverkeithing, in favours of William Mowbray, his beloved father's brother, of the lands of Cockairny, in the shire of Fife, as a part of the lordship of Inverkeithing, to his heirs or assignees whatsomever, holding feu blanch, dated at Barnbougle, the 24th of September 151 1, before these witnesses, James Logan, Sheriff-depute of Edinburgh, cousin to the said Sir John Mowbray, James Mowbray, Philip Mow- bray, and John Mowbray, also cousins to the said Sir John, Patrick Sinclair, William Scougal, Thomas Gibson. Signed thus, John Mowbray, Knight of Barn- bougle. The second is a precept of sasine, granted by the said Sir John Mowbray of Barnbougle, lord of tlie barony of Inverkeithing, following on the said charter, directed to his beloved cousin, James Logan, Sheriff-depute of Edinburgh, Philip Mowbray, John Mowbray, Patrick Sinclair, AVilliam Scougal, and William Brown, and to any of them, conjunctly and severally, his bailies, to give infeftment and pos- session to his beloved uncle, William Mowbray, of the lands of Cockairny, with pertinents; in which precept he narrates the above charter. The precept is dated at Edinburgh the 25th of September 151 1, and signed thus, John Mowbray, Knight, with my hand. The third is a sasiiTe following the said charter and precept, in favours of the said William Mowbray,^ of the lands of Cockairny ; wherein the said charter and precept are faithfully narrated, written and signed by Thomas Ottir, presbyter of the diocese of St Andrews, and, by imperial authority, notar-public, dated at the principal messuage or manor-house of Cockairny, at two afternoon, or there- abouts, the 9th day of October 1511, the 14th indiction, and Sth year of the pope- dom of Julius II. before these witnesses, Robert Logan, Knight, son and heir to John Logan of Restalrig, Philip Moubray, John Moubray, James Moubray, George Hueion, (whom, by the by, I take to be the predecessor of this present Hueson of 22 APPENDIX. Braehead) Patrick Cromnoy, Alexander Newton, John Brown, Robert Brown, William Brown, John Finlaw, and James Murdo, with many others. The reader, I hope, will excuse that, for the satisfaction of all or any concerned in these sur- names, I have industriously kept in all the witnesses' names, and kept close to the orthograpliy of these times. From all which, it is to a demonstration evident, that this William Mowbray of Cockairny, and second son of the family of Barnbougle, born about the year 1460, as above, was the grandson of David Mowbray of Barnbougle, who was one of the hostages for the ransom of King James I. mentioned in my First Volume ; for that king was detained eighteen years prisoner in England, and came home in the year 1423. It was the daughter of this David Mowbray who was heiress of Barnbougle, and was married to Robert Drummond, second son to Sir John Drummond of Stob- hall, who changed his name, and bore the arms of Mowbray, and took for title their old patrimonial stile of Dalmeny ; which is plain by the legend about the seal, appended by Sir John Mowbray to the above parchments, viz. S. Johannis Mouhra de Dumain. By the old characters of this seal it appears to be cut early in the year 1400. The arms upon the seal is a lion rampant, as expressed in my First Volume, yet there is a singular addition, viz. a crown above the head of the lion, of which crown there is no mention made in any account of the arms of the Mowbrays up- on record before the year 1400 ; wherefore it is more than probable that it was conferred upon them as an additional mark of honour at David Mowbray's return from England with his prince, anno 1423, in perpetual memory of his services done for the crown in that expedition. This good action done for King James I. is not the first signal service performed by them for their country and sovereign : for I find that Roger Mowbray is among these noble patriots, dukes, earls, lords, and barons, and is the first baron who signed that incomparable piece, asserting their religion, loyalty, and liberty, directed by way of letter to Pope John XXIII. dated at the Abbey of Aberbrothick the 6th April 1320, and 15th year of King Robert the Bruce's reign. The race of the family of Barnbougle failed in the year 1675, as above men- tioned; but the race of William Mowbray of Cockairny are still in being, and pre- sent possessors of that inheritance ; from whom this present John Mowbray of Cock- airny is the undoubted heir, in a direct and uninterrupted male line. The paternal bearing of the name of Mowbray is gules, a lion rampant argent, crowned or, armed and langued azure, and has been in use to be supported by a man on the right, and a woman on the left, in fashionable habits; crest, a woman's head : motto, Audentes fortuna juvat. Robert Mowbray above mentioned, brother to the present John Mowbray of Cockairny, carries the arms of the family, with a crescent ^z//(?j' upon the shoulder of the lion ; and, for crest, a hand with a hand-saw, proper, with the motto, La bore et industria. MOODIE OF Melsetter. CAPTAIN James Moodie, late Commander of his Majesty's ship the Prince George, a son of Moodie of Melsetter, an ancient family in Orkney, upwards of 400 years standing, who have possessed several lands in Caithness since the year 1460. Captain James, for his merit and great services done to her late Majesty Queen Anne, and, in particular, for relieving the town and Castle of Denia in Spain, when besieged by the French in the years 1707, and 1708, was by her ma- jesty honoured with a coat of augmentation, which is quartered in the first and fourth place bef)re his paternal coat, as in Plate of Achievements thus blazoned, viz. quarterly, first and fourth, parted per fesse wavey; 'axst gules, a castle ensigned APPENDIX. 23 with a dacal ciown, proper; second azure, three ships under sail, proper; se- cond and third quarter, azure, ,a cheveron ermine between three pheons, argent, and in the middle chief point a hunting horn or, for the name of Moodie: which arms are adorned with manthng and hehiiet suitable to his dignity, ensigned with a naval coronet, and thereupon, for crest, is placed a lion passiint gard,int or, hold- ing up in his dexter paw a ^^.g gules, and a canton or, charged with a double eagle displayed sable ; with this motto, The reward of valour. ROSS OF Craigie. ROSS of Craigie carries or, a fessc cheque, sable and argent, between three- water-budgets of the last, as in Sir James Balfour's MSS. There is no certain re- cord how, or from whom this family had its beginning; it is certain, it was a great and flourishing family in tiie reigns of Kings Robert and David Braces; in the last of these reigns a daughter of this family was married to Sir John Drummond of Concraig, steward of Strathern, predecessor of the Earls of Perth; and there- after Drummond of Balloch married another daughter of Ross of Craigie, who was mother of John Drummond first Laird of Milnab, as in the Genealogical History of the Famdy of Perth, written by William Drummond Viscount of Strathallan. This family continued eminent till about the middle of King James VI. 's reign, when it began to decline, and was entirely ruined, and their estate carried off by many creditors in the beginning of King Charles I.'s reign. John Ross Laird of Craigie was a principal favourite to King James V. (Knox's History) and was taken prisoner by the English at Sohvay Moss. He is also men- tioned in Baker's Chronicle (by an easy mistake) John Ross Lord of Gray, instead of Laird of Craigie. They had a great estate near the town of Perth, and had in- termarriages with several honourable famihes in that country, as Drummond of Concraig, steward of Strathern, Drummond of Ballocli, Murray of Balvaird, now Viscount of Stormont, Seaton of Lathrisk, Ogilvie of Inchmartin, and many others. From this family is descended Patrick Ross of Innernethy, whose great-grand- father, Patrick Ross, Sherift-Clerk of Perth, purchased these lands. He was grand- child to Alexander Ross, second son to the Laird of Craigie. This family of In- nernethy have always carried the arms of Craigie, as appears from their seals, and on the funeral monument of the said Patrick Ross, in the Grey Friars of Perth, where the arms are very well cut, but without crest or motto. They are allied in this and the preceding generations, since their descent from that House, with the famihes of Norie of Norieston in Monteith, Moncrieft' of Easter Moncrietf, Clark of Pitteuchar, Lindsay of Evelick, Seaton of Lathrisk, Lindsay of Kilspindy, Pitcairn of Pitlour, Osburn of Peppermill, Sinclair of Balgreigie, Douglas of Strathenrie, Balfour of Denmill. Mr George Ross, Advocate, a son of Innernethie, married the eldest daughter and co-heir of Mr John Sinclair of Balgreigie, a late cadet of the Lord Sinclair, for which Mr George quarters the arms ot,Smclair of Balgreigie witli his paternal one; and, for crest, a CToss ingrailed Jitche sable, with the motto, Cruce detector. And for verity of the above descent and bearing, the Lyon King at Arms has given a patent under his hand and seal of office to John Ross, younger of Balgreigie, eldest lav/ful son of Mr John Ross of Balgreigie, advocate, (lawful son of Mr Robert Ross of Innernethie, lawfully descended of the family of Ross of Craigie, in the sheriifdom of Perth) by Anna Sinclair, his wife, eldest lawful daughter and co-heir of Mr John Sinclair of Balgreigie, lawfully descended of a second son of the Lord Sinclair, to carry two coats, quarterly, first and fourth or, a fesse cheque, sable and argent, betwixt three M'ater-budgets, within a bordure of the second, as his paternal bearing of the name of Ross; second and third, quarterly, first and fourth azure, a ship at anchor, within a double tressure. flowered and counter- VoL. U. 4 N 24 APPENDIX. flowered with flower-de-luces or; second and third azure, a ship under sail or; over all an escutcheon ardent, a cross ingrailed sable, with a crescent for difference, by the name of Sinclair, in right of his motlier; crest, a cross ingrailed sab/e: motto, Cruce delector. SPREUL OF COWDEN. IN the First Part of the System of Heraldry I have given the arms of Spreul of Cowden, with a short memorial of the family, page 437, and I shall here insist a little on the descendants of that family, which appears to have been eminent of old in the shire of Renfrew: For, in the reign of Alexander III.' Walter Spreul of Cowden, and Scnescal of Lennox, had a grant of the lands of Dalquharn in Dumbartonshire from the Earl of Lennox. The tamily continued from that time, till about the year 1622, that William Lord Cochran of Cowden, father of the first Earl of Dundonald, purchased the lands of Cowden from John Spreul, proprietor thereof. Of this family there were several branches, as the Spreuls of Ladymuir, Castle- hill and Blachairne. Mr John Spreul, a younger son of the family of Cowden, in the reign of King James IV. being bred to learning, in view of the service of the churcli, took holy orders, and was first made Vicar of Dundonald, 1507, and at the same time was one of the Professors of Philosophy in the University of Glasgow, and thereafter Rector of the said university, as in the Register of the College of Glasgow: He was thereafter advanced, by Bishop Dunbar of Glasgow, to be one of the prebends of his metropolitan church, to which the rectory of Ancrum was aii- nexed. By these offices Mr John Spreul made several acquisitions of lands; first, he ac- quired from Gabriel Semple, brother to the Lord Semple, the lands of Ladymuir, Gastlehill and King's-Meadows, and that with consent of Janet Spreul, his spouse, who was Mr Spreul's sister: Likewise he purchased the lands of Blachairn, within the lordship of Provan, and a fair lodging within the city of Glasgow; of all which he put his brother Robert, burgess of Glasgow, and John Spreul, his brother's son, in the fee, by his disposition, dated 1541, and by a charter of confirmation, under the Great Seal, 1542, in the minority of Queen Mary. Of which lands {ohn, the nephew, came to the possession, upon his uncle's death, which happened in the year 1555. Upon the Reformation he was made rector of Cambuslang, and was so designed in his infeftment of the foresaid lands, in the year 1588. He was succeeded by his heir and son John Spreul, and he by his son John, who was Provost of Renfrew, about the beginning of Charles I.'s reign ; and he again by his son Mr John Spreul, who, being bred to the law, was first made town-clerk of Glasgow, and thereafter one of the principal clerks of Session. He was succeed- ed by his son John Spreul of Blachairn, who married Agnes Spreul, daughter to Andrew Spreul of Milton. There son is Andrew Spreul of Blachairn, writer in Edinburgh, who carries the principal arms of Cowden, as representer thereof, and, out of gratitude to the memory of the above-mentioned Mr John Spreul, the canon, he adds, by way of crest, to his arms, a book expanded; with the motto, Manet in eternum. FARQUHARSON of Invercauld. FAPvCiUHARSON, a considerable clan and family in the Braes of Marr, and adjacent countrieb, m idsh called tiuniaula, deriving their descent from Shav/, APPENDIX'. 25 son to Macduff Thane of Fife, which makes them related to M'Intosh, and lias been the first arise of their being reckoned one of the clans of Chatton. Farqi'harson' of Invercauld is the chieftain of the name, wliose coat of arms I have given in my First Volume, as recorded in the Lyon Register. The imme- diate sons of the family (th;it ac(]uired lands and possessions) in order as they descended, are, Monaltrie, Brochdergo, Achriachan, and Revernis. The sons of Monaltrie, in their order, are, Finxean, Alenquhoich, Inverey, and W'hitehouse. The sons of Brochdergo are, Richaillie, Shanelie, and Alrick. The sons of Achri- achan are Camdel and Altinlairge. The sons of Revernis are Kirkton of Aboyne, Weston and Coults. The sons of Finv.ean are Kirkton of Birss and Balfour. The sons of Alenquhoich are Tom and Micras. The sons of Inverey are Achindryne and Balmurrel; and of Achindryne is TuUochcoy. WHITEFORD of Blairquh.vn. IN the First Volume, page 368, I gave the arms and alliances of the House of Whu-eford of Blairquhan, which, since, I find to have also matched with Cath- cart of Carleton; and likewise, that Sir Adam Whiteford of Blairquhan disponed to his brother Bryce Whiteford the lands of Dundaff and Cloncaird. GRAHAM OF Balgowan. GRAHAM of Balgowan, in the shire of Perth, descended of the family of Mon- trose, being a fourth son of William Lord Graham, and his second lady, Mary Stewart, daughter of King Robert III. hath been in use to carry, for arms, or, on a chief indented sable, three escalops of the first, and in the centre a martlet of the second, within the double tressure of Scotland, as a badge of their maternal descent from the royal family, and so carried by the branches descended from the above- mentioned lady, as I observed before; for crest, a dove; with the motto, Candide y secure. John Graham of Balgowan, upon account of his loyalty and assistance given to King James VI. ag-ainst the conspiracy of William Earl of Gowry, got from that ki'ig several lands belonging to that earl, viz. Nether-Pitcairnes, Craigengall, half lands of Monedy, half lands of Legelurie, and half of Codrachie-Mill, with the patronage of the kirk of Monedy, as the charter bears, the 24th day of August 1584, which I have seen. KINLOCH OF THAT Ilk. KINLOCH of that Ilk, in the shire of Fife, seems to be very ancient, and the name amongst the earliest surnames in the kingdom. Their arms are azure, a boar's head couped, betwixt three mascles or, as in Sir David Lindsay of the Mount, his Illuminated Manuscript, and in Esplin's Illuminated Manuscript. Mr Pont, in his Collections, gives the same arms, with others, viz. azure, a bishop's pall or, between three laurel leaves argent. It seems the family hath sometimes made use 26 APPENDIX. of tlie last arms, upon the 'account that one Kellach, or Killoch, was the se- cond Archbishop of St Andrews, as Mr Martin in his MS. ReUquia Sancta Andrea. This bishop built a chapel to St Anna, near St Andrews, called after him Kinkel, as Sir Robert Sibbald says in his History of Fife, page 134. There was after- wards another bisliop of St Andrews of the name of Kinloch, in the reign of Gre- gory the Great. They derive the name of Kinloch from their lands situate at the head of a loch : And in the old Scottish language kian, or kin, signifies the head : p'rom hence the surname Kinloch designed of the same. As for ancient charters belonging to this family, they are yet extant in the hands of Hamilton of Wishaw, a learned antiquary, he being in possession of the barony of Weatherby, joining to Kinloch, and a part of that old estate, which are five charters, two of which granted by Roger ^dncy Comes IVintonia: y Constabu- larius Scotia, to John de Kindcloch, of the lands of Birking, without a date: Also another charter by the same Roger Quincy to the said John de Kindeloch and his. heirs, of the lands and mill of Peclouhyn, which Myles, the son of William, gave Uthred, his grandfather; which charter has also no date; but Roger Quincy's seal is appended, with his arms, bemg seven mascles 3, 3 and i; which mascles the name of Kinloch now carrying, took their 3 from Roger Quincy as their patron or superior of some of those lands so disponed by him to them, and laid aside the old arms, the bishop's pall, above mentioned ; but bears a boar's head erased, betwixt two mascles, as it is to be seen carved upon the seat in the church of Creigh, belonging to the predecessors of David Kinloch of Conland ; and on the gate-head of their house in Lithrie, anno 1591, done by John Kinloch, son and heir to George the immediate son of Kinloch. The third charter, in the hands of the Laird of Wishaw, is that of William M'Brab to John de Kindeloch, of the lands of Collessin, and lands of Peclouhyn, having no date, and blench. Fourth charter, IVulter Oliphard, son to Walter Oliphard, to Allan son of Allan, of the lands of Cullison, and lands of Abarnethen, having no date. This charter is confirmed by King William in the year 1165. The fifth charter is granted by John Ogilvie, with consent of William Lamber- ton. Bishop of St Andrews, to William de Kindeloch, of the lands of Parbroth and Kinsleif; which lands march with Lithrie. So much for the antiquity of the family, which continued for a long time very considerable, and had a great part of the lands of Lithrie and Brunton near join- ing with Kinloch and the barony of Cruvie, about three miles distance from Lithrie. Sir Alexander Kinloch of that Ilk had two brothers; Andrew and George Kinlochs got from their father different portions of the lands of Lithrie and Brun- ton: Sir Alexander sold the town and lands of Kinloch to Balfour of Balgarvie, predecessor to the Lord Burleigh; but retained the barony of Weatherby, and built a strong house on Cruvie, being at feud with his neighbours. The greatest part of the house is yet standing. Sir Alexander having three sons, who were killed by his said neighbours and their associates, so that he had only remaining two daughters, Isabel and Jean Kinlochs. The first was married to Ramsay of Leuchars, and got with her the barony of Cruvie; she had only one daughter, who was married to Sir David Carnegie, predecessor of the Earl of Southesk, who got with her the estate of Leuchars and Cruvie. The other daughter, Jean Kinloch, was married to Sandilands of Abercromby, and he got with her the barony of Weatherby, and some other feus about it; the old writs ot which are in the hands of the above-mentioned Laird of Wishaw, possessor of these lands. Sir Alexander Kinloch of that Ilk died without male issue, so that the above- mentioned Andrew Kinloch, his brother, came to be heir-male and representer of the family of Kinloch and Cruvie. I have seen a disposition by the abbot and monks of Balmerino of the lands of Little-Kinnire, to and in favours of an ho- nourable man, Andrew Kinloch in Lithrie, for the sum of 200 merks, and for up- holding the walls of that abbacy, dated at Balmerino the 5th of May 1529; he had no sons, but one daughter, Elizabeth, who was married to Robert Paterson of Dun- mure, with whom he got with her the above-mentioned lands, upon condition that he and his heirs, with his wife, took upon them the name and arms of Kinloch ; APPENDIX. n-j which faiHng, the lands were to return to George Kinloth tlie uncle, iis by the contract of marriage. Robert peitbrmed the condition of the contract, in taking on the name of Kinloch and arms with his lady: He had a son, Andrew, who, after coming to be a man, enters into a contract with his grand-uncle George Kinloch, portioner of Lithrie, that he might freely return to the name of Paterson, and that the said George should take no advantage of him by virtue of his mother's contract of marriage. Which contract I have seen in the hands of Mr David Kinloch of Conland, in the shire of Fife, son of Mr George Kinloch, portioner of Lithrie, great-grandson of the above George, with whom Andrew Paterson of Dun- mure made the last contract; So that the said David is the heir-male and repre- senter of the ancient family of Kinloch and Cruvie. In the New Register, David Kinloch of Aberborthie, descended of Cruvie, bears azure, a boar's head erased betwixt three mascles or; for crest, a young eagle perching, and looking up to the sun in its splendour: motto, Non degcner. (L. R.) Of Inm is descended Sir James Kinloch of that Ilk in Angus. David Kinloch of Gourdie bears azure, on a cheveron between three mascles or, a boar's head erased of the field, and a flower-de-luce of the second ; crest, an eagle soaring aloft, proper : motto, Tet higher. L. R. MACKENZIE of Garloch. THE first of this family was Hector Mackenzie, eldest lawful son by a second marriage of Alexander Mackenzie, seventh Laird and Baron of Kintail, (one of the progenitors of the noble family of Seaforth) procreate betwixt him and Mar- garet, daughter of Macdonald of Morell, his second wife. This Hector, by a charter under the Great Seal granted by King James IV. dated at Edinburgh the 8th day of April 1513 years, and 25th of his majesty's reign, had the lands and barony of Garloch, Glassletter, and pertinents, heritably disponed to him and his heirs-male, for military service. He was at the battle of Flodden with the said king, and was thereafter tutor of Kintail. He married Anne, daughter to Macdonald of Moydart, by whom he had John, his eldest son and successor in the above lands, who married Agnes. Eraser, daughter to James Eraser, tutor of Lovat, and second lawful son of Hugh Lord Eraser of Lovat ; by which marriage he got the lands of Kinkell, and several others in the low country ; for which the family has been in use to quarter the Eraser's arms with their own. She bare to him several children, the eldest where- of was John Mackenzie of Garloch, who succeeded bis father, and married Anne, daughter to ^neas Macdonald of Glengary, by whom he had Alexander Mackenzie of Garloch, who married Mackenzie, daughter to Roderick Mackenzie of Redcastle. The eldest son of which marriage was Kenneth Mackenzie of Garloch, who, anno 1635, married Catharine, daughter to Sir Donald Macdonald of Slate, by whom he had no issue, and by a second mar- riage with Anne, daughter to Grant of that Ilk, by a daughter of Ogilvie Earl of Eindlater, anno 1640, he had for his son and successor, Alexander. Mackenzie of Garloch, who, in anno i6jo, married Barbara Mac- kenzie, daughter of Sir John Mackenzie of Tarbet, by whom he had one son, Kenneth Mackenzie, who succeeded his father, and, in anno 1700, married. Margaret, daughter of Sir Rorie Mackenzie of Eindon. The eldest son of which marriage is Alexander M.\ckenzie, now of Garloch, who succeeded his father, anno 1704, while an infant. The achievement of the family, as recorded in the Lyon Register, is, quarterly, fiiit and fourth azure, a hart's bead cabossed, and attired wth ten tynes, or ; se- Vol. II. 4 O -8 APPENDIX. cond and third azure, three tVasiers argent. Which shield is timbred with helmet and mantlings befitting his quality ; and, on a wreath of his colours is set, tor crest, a dexter arm, holding a garland of laurel, all proper ; with the motto, Ftr- tute et valore. Of this family are descended the Mackenzies of Balmaduthy, Letterew, and Mountgerald, and Mr WiUiam Mackenzie of Davachcairny, and John Mackenzie of Lochend, uncles to the present Garloch, who have right to carry the above- arms with suitable difterences. MELVILLE. THE surname of Melville is ancient with us, and of old designed De Mala Villa. An account of which 1 here subjoin, having omitted it accidentally in the first part of the System of Heraldry. Some say, the first of the name came from France (as Sir George Mackenzie in his manuscript.) But others, more rightly, from a gentleman who accompanied Queen Margaret, the wife of King Malcolm III. from Hungary ; as in a manuscript of the family of Melville, which I did see in the custody of Captain George Melville of Crescent-Hall. The first of the name of Melville got several lands in Lothian from King Mal- colm II. which he called after his own name. But be this as it will, the Melvilles were very considerable in the reign of King William, both for the many lands they enjoyed, and great offices they held under the crown. In the above-mentioned manuscript there is a short abstract of a charter of con- firmation by King William, to Galfrid Melville, and his son George, of some lands which formerly belonged to Macbeth, which shows their antiquity. About which time there were three considerable families of the name : As Mel- ville of Melville-Castle in Lothian, Melville of Raith in Fife, and Melville of Glenbervie, in the county of Kincardine. Melville of Melville-Castle seems to have been the principal family. Galfred de Maleville, in the reign of King William,, gave the church of Maleville to the monks of Dunfermline, for prayers to be said ^ro animabus Davidis regis, et Malcomijuni- oris, et pro animabus antecessorum meorum coram sepultura pradictorum regum : As appears from a copy of the charter, to be found in my Lord Haddington's Col- lections, in the Lawyers' Library; where there are also several other char- ters of John de Meleville, Gregorie de Melevil, and William de Melml of Melville Castle ; but the family ended in an heiress, Agnes Melville, married to Sir John Ross of Halkhead, ancestor to the Lord Ross. Fhilip de Maleville, Vicecomes de Merns, in the reign of King Alexander II. was ancestor of the Melvilles of Glenbervie. King David II. grants a charter to John Melville of the barony of Glenbervie (in Ret. R. Dav. II.) This family, in the reign of King James II. ended in an heir-female, Giles Melville, married to Sir John Auchinleck of that Ilk, by whose grandchild and heir-female, in the time of King James IV. the barony of Glenbervie went by marriage to Sir William Douglas of Braidwood, son to Archibald Earl of Angus. Melville of Glenbervie carried, argent, a fesse betwixt three crescents, gules; as also did Melville of Dysart, and Melville of Carnbie, by our old books of blazuns. The only remaining branch of the ancient family of Melville is that of Raith : The first of which was Walter de Maleville, a son of the above-mentioned Galfred de Maleville, whose successor. Sir John de Mnlevitie, in the county of Fife, is one of the barons in the Ragman Roll who swore fealty to King Edward I. of England, anno 1296. From whom descended John Melville of Raith, to whom WiUiam Scott of Balwyrie grants a charter of the lands of Pitscottie, which is without a date, date. The witnesses are Rohertus Senescalltis, Thomas Sibbald, John ofWeenu, Wil- liam of Lundon, Knights ; John of Glen, John of B: wd, and Duncan Ramsay, j^migeri. I likewise saw, in the hands of Captain Melville of Crescent-Hall, a 3 APPENDIX. 19 mutual contract betwixt the Laii-dof Werayss, and John Melville ofRuith, anent a water-gang to Schaw's mill, of the date 1420. From whom was descended William Melville of Raith, whose son and heir Sir John, a great favourite of King James V., in the reign of Queen Mary, for professing the protestant religion, lost his life in the year 1549, leaving behind liim, by his lady Helen, daughter of Alexander Napier of Meichiston, ancestor to the Lord Napier, six sons and two daughters, first, John, Laird of Raith ; second, Robert, Lord Melville ; third, Sir James Melville of Halhill, a great statesman and courtier, who wrote memoirs exactly of his own time. Fourth, Mr William, Commendator of Tongland and Kilwinning, one of the Senators of the College of Justice. Fifth, Sir Andrew Melvill of Garvock, who was steward of the household to Q^iieen Mary and King James VL The sixth son was Captain David Melville ot Newmill. The two daughters, Janet, the eldest, was married to Sir William Kirkaldy of Grange, and Margaret to Sir James Johnstone of Elphingston. The second son, Robert, was Vice-Chancellor of Scotland, Treasurer-depute, and a Lord of Ses- sion, in the reign of King James VL and by that king was made a peer, by the title of Lord Melville, in the year 1616. He was succeeded by his son Robert Lord Melville, who died without issue 1635. Tlie honour, by reason of an en- tail, came to John Melville of Raith, the great-grandson to John Melville of Raith, elder brother to Robert first Lord Melville. Which John Melville of Raith, the third Lord Melville, was succeeded by his son George Lord Melville, who, in the year 1690, was made Earl of Melville Lord Raith, was sole Secretary of State, and Lord High Commissioner to the first and second sessions of the Parliament 1690. He married Katharine, daughter of Alex- ander Lord Balgonie, son of Alexander first Eiirl of Leven, and with lier had three sons, first, Alexander Lord Raith, who died without issue ; second, David, who succeeded his father in his estate and honour ; third, Mr James Melville of Bal- garvie. Melville Earl of Melville, Viscount of Kirkcaldy, Lord Raith, Monimail, and- Balwyrie, carries, quarterly, first and fourth argent, a kss& gules ; second and third gules, three crescents within a bordure, argent, charged with eight roses of the first, supported on the dexter with a ratch-liound, and on the sinister by an eagle proper ; crest, a ratch head erased, sable : Motto, Denique ccelum. David succeeded his father in his estate and honour ; but the dignity of Leven being the elder peerage, his lordship now goes by that title, and carries the arms of the Earls of Leven and Melville. He was a long time Governor of the Castle of Edinburgh. He was, by her majesty Queen Anne, made General of the forces in Scotland, General of the Ordnance, and thereafter was constituted Lieutenant General, and Commander in Chief of all her majesty's forces in this kingdom. All which stations his lordship held till the year 1712. He married Anne, daughter of Margaret Countess of Wemyss, by whom he has George Lord Balgony and Raith, and a son Alexander.. MONCRIEF OF THAT Ilk, AN ancient family in the shire of Perth, carries argent, a lion rampant, gules, armed and langued azure, and a chief ermine ; crest, a demi-lion as the former ; supporters, two men armed cap-a-pee, bearing pikes on their shoulders proper : motto, Sur esperance, as in the Lyon Register. Which arms I gave before in the First Volume, page 68 and page 251, where this family had anciently other supporters, viz. two hons, as in Workman, a herald, his manuscript 1604 ; when Sir John Moncrief of that Ilk assisted as one of the knights, when Sir Andrew Murray of Balvaird was, with all solemnity, created Lord Scone, by Alexander Seaton Earl of Dunfermline, his Majesty's Viceroy for the time. 50 APPENDIX. This family Was of great antiquity, and had an opulent fortune in lands, called Moncrief, from which they took their surname, and was the original family of the name. There is a charter of confirmation, yet extant, of the lands of Moncrief to John de Moncrief, by King Alexander III. Which family continued since in possession of these lands, and as chief of the name, till of late, that Sir John Mon- crief of that Ilk,- Baronet, sold the estate to Sir Thomas Moncrief, one of the Clerks of Exchequer. He was succeeded in the chieftainry and honour of baronet, by his brother-german. Sir James Moncrief, colonel of a regiment of foot. Upon the death of Sir James without male-issue, the honours of the family devolved upon Sir John Moncrief of Tippermalloch, eldest son of Mr Hugh Moncrief of Tippermalloch, the famous physician, second lawful son of Sir William Moncrief of that Ilk, and Dame Anna Murray, daughter to the Laird of Abercairny ; and the said Mr Hugh married Isabel Hay, daughter to the Laird of Megginch. Her mother was married, after her first husband's death, to Hay of Keillor, afterwards Earl of Errol. The said Sir John married his cousin Nicolas Moncrief, daughter to the Laird of Easter Moncrief, descended of a second son of Moncrief of that Ilk, and had Sir Hugh Moncrief of Tippermalloch, Baronet, the chief and representer of the family of Moncrief of that Ilk, who carries the principal coat of the family as above blazon- ed from the Lyon Register. The family has not only been ancient, but very considerable in the country, be- ing allied with many great and honourable families, such as Athol, Abercairny, Oliphant, Ross of Craigie, and many others, which may be seen at length in the Genealogical History of their families. There are several cadets of this family, some of whom I shall here mention, whose arms are in the Lyon Register. Moncrief, Commissar in the king of France his army, a fourth son of Mon- crief of that Ilk in Scotland, carries the same with the chief, with a martlet for difference. James Moncrief, merchant in Edinburgh, descended of a second brother of Thomas Moncrief of that Ilk, bears argent, a lion rampant, holding in his dexter paw a rose, between two mullets gjiles a chief ermine ; crest, a gillyflower proper : motto, Diligentia cresco. George Moncrief of Reidie, descended of Moncrief of that Ilk, carries as his chief, crest, and motto, the same ; and, for difference, a red rose on the chief ermine. John Moncrief of Murnipea, descended of a second son of Reidie, carries as Reidie, with a crescent for his difference. David Moncrief of Boghall, lineally descended of Sir James Moncrief of Easter Moncrief, who was a brother-german to Sir John Moncrief of that Ilk, bears argent, a lion rampant gules, a chief ermine, all within a bordure invected of the second, charged with six crescents of the first : motto, Firma spes. George Moncrief of Sauchope, sometime Bailie of Crail, bears argent, a lion rampant gules, a chief ermine, all within a bordure indented of the second, charged with eight besants or ; crest, three ears of rye banded together, proper. Sir Thomas Moncrief, designed of that Ilk, (who purchased these lands) bears argent, a lion rampant betwixt two mullets in fesse gules, a chief ermine ; crest, a demi-lion, as the former : motto, Sur esperance, 1679. For all which see Lyon Register. GIFFORD OF BusTA. IN my former volume of this System, page 59, I mentioned the ancient name ef GiFFORD, said to have come from England to Scotland in the reign of Mal- colm Canmore ; and also of one Hugo de Gifford, a witness in the charters of APPENDIX. 31 William King of Scotland. The chief family of the name was Gifford of Gif- ford-hall and Yestei-, in East Lothian, which had for arms, gules, three bars er- mine. The family ended in four daughters about the year 1412. The eldest of them was married to Sir William Hay, Sheriff of Peebles. He got with her the lands of Yester and Gitford-hali, of whom is dcicended the present Marquis of Tweeddale, whose family has ever since quartered the Gilford's arms with their own. The other three daughters were married to Thomas Boyd of Kilmarnock, Eustache Maxwell ofTe}liiig, and another to Macdowall of Makcrston, all eminent barons. There was another family of the name Gifford of SherifF-hall, in Mid-Lothian,, which carried- tlie foresaid arms, and ended in the reign of King James 111. And of late 1 am informed that there is a gentleman's family yet extant of the name of Gifford, in the island of Zetland, now represented by Thomas Gifford of Busta, as lineally descended from, and only heir-male of the ancient family of Wetl;^rsta in that island, who has about these 200 years past carried the name and arms of Gifford, viz. gules, three bars ermine ; crest, a hart's head proper ; motto. Spare 'when you have naught ; being the same used by the Marquis of Tweeddale ; but whether the crest and motto belonged to the Giffords of Gifford-hall and Yester, I know not, but the ai-ms did, and. the same are used now by Thomas Gifford of Busta. WEMYSS Earl of Wemyss. IN my first volume of this System, page 276, I mentioned the ancient and ho- nourable family of Wemyss, and there hinted the strong tradition of their de- scent from the illustrious hero Macduff Thane of Fife ; which tradition has been universally owned and acknowledged by all our antiquaries, though they are not so certain as to the precise time of their descent. Sir RoberrSibbald and the author of the Genealogy of the Macintoshes allege. That the first of the family was a son of Duncan, the third of that name, and sixth Earl of Fife. But, that their cadency is older, appears from the charter of Joannes de Aiiuly, Miles, mentioned by me in the foresaid place, which charter mentions terram Domini Michaelis de lYeymyss, and is dated 1 1 65; whereas the foresaid Dyncan the third succeeded to his father, only in the year 1154, and died 1203 : As Mr Crawfurd in his Peerage says of the family of the earls of Fife ; so it is improbable that the first of that family could be the son of this Duncan. And therefore I think that what I have already asserted in the First Volume is most probable, to wit. That the first of them was an immediate son of the great Macduff, who, being obliged to escape Macbeth's fury, hid himself in those coves which are yet to be seen in the estate of Wemyss, and are very proper lurking places ; and from thence derived afterwards the surname to himself and posterity : for Wemyss is but the Highland word for coves : And it is ordinary still among the Highlanders (whose language and customs then obtained in Fife) to design a man from some extraordinary circumstance of his life, such as this, of his lurking in the coves. But though we cannot with certainty determine the precise time when the Earl of Wemyss came of Macduff, because the original writs of the family are lost, yet that he is truly descended of that illustrious stock, I think there are very good arguments to prove : As \mo. The constant traditon of the family, together with the propriety of the ancient monuments of Macduff's valour, such as his target and other armour, and the scull of Macbeth's head, which Macduff cut off at Lumphannon, and car- ried south with him as a trophy ; which are still preserved (as I am informed) by the family, and were probablv committed to then, ac the principal branch in the Vol. li. ' 4 P -i APPENDIX. collateral mate line, when the direct male line failed ; hence are those liiies of M*- Jolinston in his character of Macduff: Addo decus priscis mentis, monumenta vetusta Servat adhuc terum Vemisiana domus. zdo. That they have always bore the ensigns armorial of Macduff: For arms are reckoned surer marks of cadency than surnames, especially in descents of that antiquity. Before the marriage with the heiress of Inchmurtin, the barons di Wemyss bore the simple armorial of Macduff, with the marks of cadency : But then these marks were kid aside, and the coat of Glen of Inchmartin was quar- tered with their paternal coat ; and have so stood upon their seals (as you have them described by me in the First Volume) from 1423 to 1707, when David the second Earl of Wemyss, considering himself as chief of the name ot Wemyss, and true representative of the ancient Macduff, thought fit to disuse the coat of alli- ance, and to retain only the single armorial of Macduff and Wemyss ; which I have blazoned and cut in copper, in the Fourth Plate of Achievements of the First Volume ; and is thus described, or, a lion rampant gules, armed and langued trzure, supported by two lions, and a swan for crest, all proper, with, the mottO; Je pense. ^fio. A third argument of the Earl of Wemyss's descent, is the ancient holding of their original estiite of the Earls of Fife ; which, together with the other two proofs above mentioned, are a good evidence that the first of them was a son of that family, to whom the father disponed that part of his estate, to hold of himself" and his successors in the direct line, since there is not the least appearance of the estate coming from any ether hands, or that it was in any other family prior to them. But this shall be further cleared, as I come to give a particular account of the family of Wemyss, at least of the most remarkably persons of them, whom Mr Crawfurd has omitted. The first of the name I find on record is the foresaid Michael de Wemyss, in the said charter of Joa?ines de Aiiuly ; and the said Michael (as I am informed) is a witness in the charter of mortification to the abbacy of Aberbrotlrock, de terra inter Echkar \fl Kaldonar, per Thomnm filium Tmikardi; and this is confirmed by King William in the beginning of his reign, as in chartulary of Aberbrothock ; Mr Crawfurd tells of a charter of Alexander II. his reign, in the custody of the Duke of Athol, wherein Michael de Wemyss, miles is a witness, but whether he was the same Michael, or a son of his, I know not. The next we find is David re Wemyss, who was Sheriff-Principal of Fife, anno 1239 ; for in the chartulary of the abbacy of Dunfermline, there is a precept directed Domino Davidi de Wemyss, yice-cvmifi de Fife, to pay the eighth part oi the amerciaments of Fife and Fothrife, imposed in the Jastice Air at Cupar, to that abbacy, according to their rights, dated at Perth, 7th October 1239, and of the king's reign the 25th. In the chartulary of the abbacy of Aberbrothock, Domiims Hugo de Wemyss is witness in a charter by that abbot to Sir John Wishart of the Mill of Ctoeveth, , dated anno ii^i. This is all of the surname that I have seen upon record, prior to that honourable person that went ambassador for the Maiden of Norway, mentioned in the First Volume by the name of David, from all our historians that I have seen ; though I am since informed by the family that his name is Michael and not David, which my informer says is clear, by an indenture between Dominum Michael de Wemyss y Dominum Michaelem Scot de Balweerie, milites, in pnesentia Joannis BallioH Regis, apud monajleriwn de Lundores, dated 1294. This Dominus Michael de Wemyss, as my informer says, sat in the Parliament at Ayr 1315, which settled the succession of the crown, failing heirs-male of King P-obert the I. upon Edward Bruce his brother. His son David de WE^rYss succeeded him, who was one of the barons that, in the Parliament 1320, signed the famous letter to the pope. He was married first to Annabel, daughter to Sir William St Clair, probably the same that married the heiress of Orkney : for there is an authenticcopy of a APPENDIX. 33 charter signed by a notar, among the Earl of Wemyss's writs, wherein Dav'ul de Wemyss, Jilitts ii? hiercs Domini Michaelis de Wemyss, grants Domines Annabelltc, filiee Domini Gulielmi de Sto. Claro rnilitis, sponsce sua;, and to the heirs procreate betwixt them, several lands in Lochoreshire. He was married next to Marjory de Rams(iy\ daughter to Walter de Ramsay ; and there is an original charter (which was lent by the late Earl of Wemyss to Mr Simson the Q^ieen's Historiographer, but not returned) wherein K.ing Robert 1. confirms to Di'vid de IVemyss, miles, and. Marjory his spouse, the lands of Giass- mont in tenements de Kin^born, erected to him in liberam Baroniam. This char- ter is dated anno regni 23, anna Domini 13:29. It was this Sir David, and not his great-grandchild, (as Mr Crawfurd supposeth) that in an original charter, without date, (which was likewise lent to Mr Simson) is designed ftliiis et hares Domini Michaelis de IVemyss, rnilitis, wherein he makes over the lands of Raith, in the barony of Lochore, Damino Juhanni de IVemyss, avunculo sua. For Walter de Ramsay, one of the witnesses in the charter is designed Socero meo ; and Matthew de Crambeth Bishop of Dunkeld, another of them, died in 1312, and consequently long before David, the grandchild or great-grandchild, succeeded. His son Michael de Wemyss, miles, succeeded about the year 1332, who ob- tained a charter from Duncan. Earl of Fife, of Easter Monechy and Wester Dron, (which was likewise lent out to Mr Simson) wherein he is designed Filius quon- dam Davidis de IVemyss, rnilitis. This Michael, and his father David, and grand- father Michael, knights, are, all three, witnesses to a charter by Duncan Earl of Fife X.0 John deCiepban oi Caxilo'^ic. In Rymer's Fcedera there is, anno 1336, a pre- cept by King Edward III. of England to his Treasurer to deliver to Michael de Wemyss knight, coming from Scotland to our Parliament at London, Forty pounds Sterling, and to Henry de Ramsay Ten pounds. He was succeeded. by his son Sir David de Wemyss, who in 1343: is designed. David de Wemyss miles, tunc Plcecomes de Fife, as witness in a charter by Duncan Earl of Fife, to Green of Fairny ; and so hkewise in a charter by D. Helena de Maxwell, Domina de Kelly, to John Dick Strang of Easter Pitcorthie ; and this- last is confirmed by King David II. Anno Reg. 29. Anno Dom. 1358. To him succeeded Sir David de Wemyss his^son, who, in Rymer's Fcedera iJiSli is designed David de Wemyss miles, filius %3 hares Davidis de IVemyss rnilitis ; and was one of the twenty Scots heirs that were sent hostages for payment of one hundred thousand, merks Sterling, for King David's liberty. This Sir David, having no heirs-male cf his body, tailzied his estate to Sir John Wemyss of Rises, and to Isabel his wife, eldest daughter of Isabel of Inchmartin his heir-female, and to the heirs of their body ; which failing, to return to the col- lateral heir-male. And in consequence of this tailzie Sir David resigns his lands in the hands of Robert Stewart Earl of Fife, holden de pradicto suo comite, in fa- vours of the said Sir John. This resignation was solemnly made in the parish church of Wemyss, anno 1373, about two years before he died, and is recorded at more length, with the witnesses' names, by Mr Crawfurd in his Peerage of the family of Wemyss. After Sir David's death, Sir Allan Erskine confirmed some lands resigned by the said Sir David, to the said Sir John, and Isabel his wife, and their heirs; which failing, dista ternv (saith the charter) veris haredibus reverten- tnr. And by an indenture between the said Sir John Wemyss of Rires and one Duncan de Wemyss, who seems to have been the heir-male, dated 1376, the said Sir John binds himself to keep. the taibie of all the lands which belonged to um- quhile David of IVemyss, and to infeft Duncan; and Duncan is to put into the said talzie Over-Cambron; and a duty out of the mill of Methil, and he is to have Rires and Cambron fiom Sir John. And, in a!u:o 1419, the said Duncan actually got Kincaldrum froni Sir John. Whether Isabel of lachmartin-was a niece of Sir David's, or what degree of re- lation she bore to him, does not appear from any writs that I have seen. But it would seem that Sir Robert Livingston of Drumrey, or his lady, stood in the same propinquity to him, and that he was not satisfied with his disposition in favours of Sir John of Rires: For, by an instrument dated 1385, it appears that the said Sir Robert took infeftment in the lands of Wemyss, and that the Lady Inchmartin went to the House of Wemyss and tore his sasine.in pieces. And it is probable. 34 APPENDIX. that, to compose the differences, Sir Robert got the lands of East-Wemyss, (which were reckoned a third part of Wemyss-shire) and a third of the coal and salt o£ West-Wemyss, and the east half of Lochore-shire; all which I find to have gone from the family to the Livingstons of Drumrey about this time. After Sir David's death, which was before December 1376, Sir Allan Erskine, and Isabel of Inch martin, his wife, served heirs to him in the estate of Wemyss, as appears by their two daughters serving to them. And Sir John of Rires seems to have possessed it more in their right than by the disposition and resignation made by Sir David : And therefore we find by authentic writs m the Earl of Wemyss's custody, which were showed to me by Mr Mackenzie his chaplain, that after their death, Isabel, spouse to Sir John Wemyss of Rires, together with her sister Margaret, spouse to Sir John Glen of Balmuto, are served heiresses, in May 1400, to Sir Allan Erskine their father, and to Isabel of Inchmartin their mother, in the estate of Wemyss, and lands of Pitconachie, within the shire of Fife; and in June the same year they demanded of Robert Earl of Fife, a precept of sasine in these lands, which the said earl either neglected or refused to grant. And in June 1419, he pursued Sir John Wemyss of Rires (whoselady was then dead^ and the lady Glen, before the council, for uplifting the revenues of Wemyss, be- fore he, as superior, had entered them. However Sir John, in his lady's right, and the Lady Glen, are adjudged to be in the legal possession of the estate, because they had taken precept out of the King's Chapel, and presented it to the superior, anno 1401: The same ladies are retoured heiresses to their mother Isabel of Inchmartin, in the lands of Auchleven and Ardoven in Marr. 2inno 1403, King Robert IIL gives a protection to Sir John of Wemyss for the lands he had in Athol by his wife. Sir John de Wemyss got by his lady (as appears by the confirmation-charter of King Robert III. to him) the lands of Wemyss, Wester-Raith, Glenniston and Powguild, Myre-Cairny, Newton, Markinch, Nether-Cambron, Methil, TulUebreek, Wester-Tarvat, Lmerleven, Muir-Cambus, Dion, Lochore, Elcho, Strathardel and Inchmartin. Sir John having built the chapel of St Mary of Reires, and mortified lands to a chaplain anno 1404, died about anno 1428, leaving issue behind him, by the heiress Isabel, first David, his successor in the estate of Wemyss, designed David of Methil in his father's time : Second, Michael his successor in the estate of Reires, which estate went with a daughter to Arthur Forbes of Pitsligo anno 1479. Third, An- drew. Fourth, John Wemyss of Kilmany, who married Janet Wardlaw, niece to Henry Wardlaw Bishop of St Andi'ews, and got with her the lands of Lathocker and Muirton, and of him are the Wemysses of Lathocker. He left besides two daughters, the one married to Sir Andrew Gray of Foulis, and the other to Hugh Eraser of Lovat. Sir David de Wemyss, Sir John's eldest son, married Christiana de. Douglas, daughter of Sir William Douglas, February 1423 ; and, leaving issue "by her, John, his successor, and Euphame ; he died anno 143 1. Sir John was minor at his fathers death, and when scarce eleven years old was made, by his uncle and tutor Michael de Wemyss, to marry Christian, daughter to Sir Patrick Ogilvie of Auchterhouse; but he was divorced from her anno 1441, and next married Margaret, daughter to Sir Robert Livingston of Drumrey and East-Wemyss, by whom he had John his successor, designed in his father's time John of Strathardel, and Grissel, married to David Boswell of Balmuto ; he died 1502. This Sir John Wemyss married Christian, daughter to the Lord Abernethy of Rothiemay, upon whom he begot five sons and one daughter, particularly David his successor, designed in his father's life David of Dron, and Thomas, who, in anno 1545 and 1550, is designed Mr Thomas Wemyss of Winthank,. and Lord' of Session, and John, of whom was descended Henry Wemyss, Bishop of Galloway, and of the Chapel-Royal at Stirling: Sir John died 1506. And his son. Sir David de Wemyss, is retoured heir to him in IVIay 1508, who obtained a charter from King James IV. dated 28th August 1511, erecting the following lands into one barony of Wemyss, viz. the lands of Wemyss-shire, Little- Lun, Tilliebreek, Cameron-Mill, the Haugh, Dunniface, Pitconochie and West I APPENDIX. 35 Tai-vat in Fife, West-Dron, Hill-Dron, Elcho, Bathabion, Strathardel, Ardargic and Kinnaird in Perth, and Balhavel in Forfarshire. He married first Anna, daughter to Alexander Earl of Huntly, by whom he had three sons and one daughter, particularly David his successor. And next he married Janet, daughter of Andrew Lord Gray, by whom he had John VVcmyss, who got in appanage Bel- havel in Forfar, and Kinnaird in Perth: This Sir David was killed at the battle of Flodden, 9th September 15 13. And in May 15 14 His son Sir D.wip VVemyss of that Ilk is retoured heir to him; who married first Katharine daughter of Henry Lord St Clair, anno 151 1, and had by lier principally, John, his successor, and James, the first of the family of Caskieberry, of whom my Lord Burntisland was descended ; as are also Count Wemyss of Brescia, in the ter- ritory of Venice, and several other illustrious persons abroad. He married next Mav- iota Towers, daughter of Innerleith, anno 1525, and had by her Captain David Wemyss, who got of the family Strathardel in Perthshire, and Grissel, married first to David Boswell of Balmuto, and then to Patrick Kynninmonth of that Ilk. Sir David died April 1544. and was succeeded by his son Sir John, who, anno J 530, married Margaret, daughter to Sir Adam Otterburn •of Redhall, Lord Advocate to King James V. by whom he had David his suc- cessor, and four daughters, married, as in Crawfurd. He married next Janet Trail, a daughter of Blebo, anno 1558* and had by her Gavin Wemyss of Pow- guild, who married Katharine Wemyss, heiress of David Wemyss of Winthank, the son of the above Mr Thomas, of whom are the Wemysses of Winthank. He had likewise by her a daughter called Margaret, married to Andrew Ferny of that Ilk. This Sir John made a considerable figure in his time; for, in anno 1547, he,' at the head of the Fife gentlemen, (as Bishop Lesley says) defeated the English that landed in Fife, and killed seven hundred of them. And the same author tells us, that, in 1556, he, with the Laird of Calder, were sent commissioners from the three hundred barons met at Edinburgh, to the Queen Regent and Council, to dissuade them from imposing a tax, and levying of foreign troops, and prevailed. By his commission, dated the 9th January 1559, he was appointed, by Francis and Mary, king and queen, to be the Lieutenant of Fife, Kinross and Clackmanan shires, for suppressing of the rebels. He was very liberal to the nunnery of Elcho, and protected them from insults; therefore, and for a sum of money, and a yearly pension during life, they disponed to him all their rents, and made him their he- ritable bailie. He died at Elcho, January 1571, and was succeeded by his son Sir David, who married Cecil Ruthven, daughter to William Lord Ruthven, anno 1556, and had by her John his successor, styled, in his father's life, of Tullie- breck; James of Bogie, the first of the family of Bogie; David of Fingask, the first of the Wemysses of Fingask; Patrick of Rumgaly, and Henry of Wester- Fudie, the first of the Wemysses of Fudie : He had likewise five daughters ho- nourably married. Sir David died anno 1597, to whom his eldest son John, called Birkenflower, s\.\ccstdiedi; who, in anno 1574, married Margaret, daughter to Sir William Douglas of Lochleven, but died without*issue. And next, in 1581, he married Mary, daughter to James Lord Doune, by whom he had David his eldest son, married to Elizabeth, daughter to Andrew Earl of Rothes, anno 1608; but he died without issue anno 1610. Second, John his successor. Third, Cecilia, mar- ried to William Earl of Tullibardin. Fourth, Jean, to Robert Lord Colvjll. Fifth, Isabel, married to Hugh Lord Lovat. And, sixth, Katharine, married to John Haldane of Gleneagles. Tliis Sir John had the admiralty betwixt Dysait and the water of Leven disponed to him by the Duke of Lennox, anno 1610, and died, anno 1616, aged eighty-five. Sir John his successor was, by the favour of King Charles I. made a baronet, 25th May 1625, then created Lord Wemyss of Elcho, ist April 1628, and after- wards Earl of Wemyss 25th June 1633. He married Jean, daughter to Patrick Lord Gray, anno 1610, and had by her David his successor, and five daughters, married, as in Crawfurd. Anno 1630 he purchased from James Lord ColviU the barony of East-Wemyss, which went from the family to the Livingstons of Drum-- rev, from about the year 138:;, and died 22d iSfovember 1649. 'Vol. II. '^ 4 0^ 30 APPENDIX. David Earl of Wemyss succeeded, who married first Anna, daughter to Robert Lord Burleigh, by whom he had only Lady Jean, married first to Archibald Earl of Angus, and next to George Earl of Sutherland : Then Eleanor, daughter to John Earl of Wigton, by whom he had no issue. But, by his third wife. Lady Margaret Leslie, my Lady Dowager of Balgonie and of Buccleugh, he had a daughter, Margaret, in whose favour he resigned the honours of the family, and thereupon obtained a patent from the king, with the precedency of her grandfather's crea- tion, as appears by a charter, recorded in the Chancellary ad annum 1672. The said Earl David died anno 1680, and was succeeded by the said Margaret Countess of Wemyss, who, in her father's lifetime, was married to Sir James Wemyss, knight, descended of the family of Caskieberry, who thereupon was dignified with the title of Lord Burntisland for life. And, dying in 1683, left issue by the said Countess David Lord Elcho, and two daughters, married, as in Cravvturd's Peerage. Countess Margaret died anno 1705, and was succeeded by her son David, the second Earl of Wemyss, who, in March 1705, 'was made Lord High Admiral of Scotland, and admitted to the Privy Council by Queen Anne. He married first Anne, daughter to William Duke of Queensberry, anno 1697, by whom he had David Lord Elcho, who died i6th December 1715, not turned of seventeen, and James his successor: Then Mrs Mary Robinson, a rich English lady, by whom he had no issue: And last of all Elizabeth, daughter to Henry Lord St Clair, by whom he has living two daughters. He died nth March 1720, and was succeeded by his son James, the present Earl of Wemyss, who married Janet, daughter to Colonel Francis Chatteris of Amisfield, and his lady, Helen, daughter to Mr Alexander Swinton, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, a second son of the ancient family of Swinton of that Ilk, in the shire of Berwick. HAMILTON OF Olivestob. JAMES HAMILTON of Olivestob, Advocate, son and heir of Captain Thomas Hamilton of Olivestob, and Grissel his wife, daughter of Hamilton of Westport, and Anne his wife, daughter of Sir Patrick Hamilton of Little-Preston, brother to Thomas first Earl of Haddington. _ Alexander de Hamilton is designed in a charter, dated penult day of Novem- ber 1452, armiger, frater-germanus Domino de Hamilton, and was the first of the family of Westport. The said Captain Thomas Hamilton was third son to John Hamilton of Muir- house in Mid-Lothian, and Anne his wife, only daughter to Elphinstone of Inner- divot, who was a son of the I^d Elphinstone. Which John was a son of Mr William Hamilton of Bardanock, a second son of Hamilton of Boardlan, the first of which family was fourth son of Sir David Ha- milton of that Ilk. The said James Hamilton of Olivestob, male descended of Hamilton of Board- lan, carries gules, thiee cinquefoils argent, within a bordure embattled or; crest, an antelope's head couped argent, gorged and • attired gules : motto, Invia virtuti perziia. Of the rise of the ancient and principal family of KENNEDY Earls of CASSILIS, with .an account of some of their descendants. IN the First Part of this System, page 158, following Mr Crawfurd's Peerage, I brought the first of the name and family from one Kenneth, an Irish or Highland APPENDIX. 37 Scotsman, whose posterity wcie sui-named Kennedy from him; which I find to be a groundless conjecture, after better vouched information: tor 1 find those of the family to have been ancient proprietors and possessors in the baihary of Carrick, before patronimics were in use: and had their first name from that country they possessed, but afterwards changed their names from Carrick to Kennedy ; as appears by the following connection of charters from father to son, still extant. The first of whicli is a grant by Nicolauj of Carrick, son to Duncan of Carrick, to the nuns of North-Berwick, in and to the lands and church of St Cuthbert at Maybole, anno 1220, in the reign of King Wdliam; so that his father Duncan must have lived in the reign of King Malcolm IV. which began 1153. ' NiGELLL's, Earl of Carrick, grants to Rolland of Carrick, son of the above Ni- colaus of Cain ck, and to his hens, the bailiary of Carrick, to be caput totius pro- genici sues, i. e. chief of his name, and to have the command of all the men in Carrick, under the said Earl and his successors. Which grant King Alexander 111. coiifiims ; and, after him, Robert III. confirms the same grant to his family, being then called Kennedies. Gilbert of Carrick, son of Rolland of Carrick, submits a difference between him and the nuns of North-Berwick, 1285, to Robert Bruce Earl of Carrick, fa- ther to King Robert I and to Robert, Bishop of Glasgow, to which Gilbert of Carrick's seal is appended, having the very same shield of arms which the family of Cassilis carries at this day > Which shows that they had the double tressure, fletiiy and contie-fleuiy, with flower-de-luces to their arms, long before they match- ed with the royal family. In the the 17th chapter, of the Cbeveron, in the first volume, I gave the arms of the old Earls of Carrick, viz. argent, a cheveron, gules, as in the manuscripts of Sir David Lindsav of the Mount, and Sir James Balfour's blazons, both princi- pal heralds, who give the same to the old Earls of Carrick, before the M'Dougals or Bruces had that title, and who carried different arms from those. So that it ap- pears that the family of the name of Carrick were of the old Earls, and carried, argent, a. chtvtron gules ; but afterwards accompanied the cheveron with three cross croslets fitched sable ; so that they were great men anciently : And of late, by marriage with Mary Stewart, daughter to King Robert UI. Duncan of Carrick, son to Gilbert of Carrick, gives the patronage of Kirkbride in Carrick, to the nuns of North-Berwick; to which grant Malcolm Earl of Eife was a witness. - King Robert I. gave a remission to Sir Gilbert of Carrick, son of the above Duncan, for his surrendering of Lochdune Castle to the English ; and restores him to the government thereof, with the lands thereto belonging : Which, from that time to this day, continues still a part of the Earl of Cassilis' property. At this time, and a little before, they began to take the name of Kennedy, be- cause of their grant, as caput totius progeniei sua, being chief of the name men- tioned before, which tire Irish words Kean na-ty signifies ; for Kean is the head, and na of, ty the house or family, and Ken-nedy is to this day pronounced Kean- naty by the people of Carrick ; and also several charters in record have Carrick in the bosom, and Kennedy on the margin. They had taken the name of Kennity, or Kennedy, before the time mentioned ; for John Kennedy, Chancellor to King John Baliol, is mentioned in Prynne's History, and Domhius Alexander Kennedy, with several others of that name, page 652. Sir John Kennedy, son of the above Sir Gilbert of Carrick, is one of the com- missioners (mentioned in Rymer's Fadera Angliae) upon the treaty at Newcastle, for dehvering up to the Scots King David Bruce, in the year 1354. Sir Gilbert Kennedy, Sir John's son, is delivered as one of the hostages for King David, in anno 1357. King Robert II. confirms to Sir John Kennedy, son to the above Sir Gilbert, the lands of Denure, in the second year of his reign ; to which his son Sir Gil- bert Kennedy is a witness. King Robert lU. confirms to James Kennedy, son of his beloved cousin Sir Gil- bert Kennedy, the bailiary of Carrick, chief of his name, and the command of the militia in Carrick, under the Earl of Carrick, dated at Dundonald 2bth Janu- I 38 APPENDIX. ary 1405 ; where also the king gives the lands of Dalrymple to James Kennedj and Mary Stewart his spouse, daughter to the said King Robert III. These are the Earl of Cassihs' predecessors, which can easily be vouched from the- public records. Many of the eldest of these charters were put in the hands of Mr Hay of Drumboot, which he is printing in a pamphlet. KENNEDY of Bennan. Kennedy of Bennan is an old family of the name ; for John Kennedy, son of Henry Kennedy of Bennan, obtained a charter from King James II. in the year 1450, as in the general register ; which shows they were then a standing family. His successors continued in the natural possession of this estate, from father to son, until the year 1560, that Katharine Kennedy, heiress of Bennan, was mar- ried to Hugh Kennedy, second son of Thomas Kennedy of Bargeny, whose origi- nal contract of marriage is still to be seen in the possession of that family, and bears date at Bargeny the 8th of June 1560; to which contract Thomas Kennedy, elder and younger of Bargeny, subscribe their names, and M'Alexander of Dal- rcoch is a witness. The eldest son of this marriage married a daughter of Ross of Galston and Hen- ning, and his eldest son and successor, Hugh, married Margaret Cathcart, daughter to James Cathcart of Genoch, whose eldest son and heir, Hugh, married Isabel Wardlaw, niece to Sir John Wardlaw of Pitrevie : Their son is Hugh Kennedy now of Bennen. This family has claimed the armorial bearing of Kennedy of Bargeny, ever since that family was extinct, as being the last cadet of that family, which were, quar- terly, first and fourth argent, a cheveron gules, between three cross croslets fitch- ed, sahJe ; second and third azure, three flower-de-luces or, as by Esplin and other illuminate books. KENNEDY 07 Balmaclanachan. KENNEDY of Balmaclanachan, vulgarly called Earclanachan, and now Kil- kerran, hes on the south side of the Water of Girvan, in the bailiary of Carrick, shire of Ayr, and parish of Daillie. In the year 1361, John Kennedy received a charter of confirmation to these lands, dated at Dumbriton in the -p-A year of King David's reign ; as in the ge- neral register. This man's heirs male were served and retoured in common form as heirs and proprietors thereof, until Eliza'oeth Kennedy became heiress, whereby the male line was interrupted ; but she dying without issue, it was again restored in the per- son of Gilbert Kennedy her father's brother, who infeft himself as her nearest heir; at the tower of Balmaclanachan, the r6th day of June 1517. He again resigns his lands to his son George, reserving a liferent to himself, and a tierce to Ehza- beth Blair his wife, dated at Balmaclanachan the 28th of June 1538. Whereup- on his son George infefts himself, and Janet Kennedy his wife, who was daughter of Patrick Kennedy of Bargalton and Camciscan, in the lands of Balmaclanachan; The lands of Camciscan fell afterwards into the hands of Balmaclanachan, and were sold to Robert Wallace, son of Hugh Wallace of Cairnhill, by Janet Kennedy, Lady Balmaclanachan, with consent of George Kennedy her husband, and her sister Egidia Kennedy, widow of John Grierson of Lag. Two of their seals are ap- pended to the resignation, dated at Edinburgh the 5th of May 1562, and at Drum- lanrig the 4th of April 1563. This George Kennedy of Balmaclanachan bought the lands of Glenmuck, Bellimore, &-c. from John Mure of Rowallanj whose dis- position is dated at Balmaclanachan the 24th September 1551. In the year 1566, he dispones his heritable estate to his eldest son Gilbert, dat- ed at Balmaclanachan, May loth. APPENDIX. 39 Gilbert dispones his lands to his second son David, resei\ing a hTerent to liim- self and his wife Margaret jK.ennedy, daughter to Gilbert K.ennedy ot" Girvanmains, dated at Edinburgh 23d December 161 7. (Secretary's Register.) David Kenne- dy infefts himself, and Janet Kennedy his spouse, daughter to David Kennedy in Maxwelston : And in the year 1633, oif the 3d of February, at Holyroodhouse, he, with consent of his brother Oliver Kennedy, father of the late deceased John Kennedy of Craig, resigns his lands to his son David, who infefts himself, and Jean Hunter his spouse, daughter to Hunter of Hunterston. He died on the 30th of July 16S9, and was succeeded by his eldest son Robert, still alive. The arms which this family has always been in use to bear, as by their seals, and that above mentioned, are, argent, a chcveron gules, betwixt three cross croslets fitched sable, and in chief a lymphad, with a star proper in the sinister point, contained within a double tressure flowered, and for crest an anchor and cable in tne sea. Motto, God be guide. These arms are yet to be seen carved on his seal of arms, to a resignation in Chieen Mary's time, and on stone, upon the entry to the tower of Balmaclanachan, and several other places which are still standing. The tower was the mansion-house of that family before the year 15 17. KENNEDY of Glenmuck. and Bellimore. GEORGE KENNEDY of Glenmuck, &c. obtained a charter, as second son to George Kennedy of Balmaclanachan, from Queen Mary and her husband Prince Henry, dated at Dalkeith the 31st December 1565 ; as in the general re- gister. George dying without issue, Oliyer Kennedy, his brother, serves himself heir to him, anno 1605. (As in the secretary's register.) And he dispones the fee of Bel- limore and Glenmuck, &.c. to his son George, the 15th of February 1606, and is confirmed by a charter at Edinbui-gh the May thereafter. (As in the general re- gister.) And upon the 12th of July 16081 he infefts his wife Isabel Wallace in a liferent, which she renounces to her eldest son George, upon the 2d of December 1629. And he is infeft in the whole estate of Bellimore, &-c. upon the 15th of October 1633. (As in the secretary's register.) He dying without children, his brother John Kennedy succeeded, who married Elizabeth Kennedy, daughter to Doctor Hugh Kennedy, son of Hugh Kennedy of Girvanmains ; by whom he had William Kennedy of Dangar, who married Mary Kennedy, daughter to WiUiam Kennedy, third son to Oliver Kennedy of Bellimore, anno 1672. Her mother was Agnes M'Clurg, daughter to John M'Clurg of Kilmores. Bellimore and his lineal heirs-male carried arms as the eldest cadet of Balma- clanachan, with a suitable difference ; crest, an anchor drawing out of the sea by a cable, with the motto, Resurgo. MILLAR OF Temple. IN the First Part of this System of Heraldry, page 125 and 126, I gave the arms of I'v'iilne and Miller, of those which occurred to me at the time; since which time I have met with an account of a good old family of the surname of Millar of Temple and Killoch, in the sheriffdom of Ayr, and parish of Ochiltree, one of whom viz. Andrew Millar of Temple, matched with Anne Stewart, daughter of Andrew Lord Ochiltree, about the time of the reformation, by whom he had An- drew Millar of Temple, who married Elizabeth Lockhart, daughter to Lockhart of Bar; she bore to him two sons, Mr Andrew, Henry, and a daughter Mary. Mr Andrew Millar, eldest son of Temple, took upon him holy orders, and was Vol. II. 4 R 40 APPENDIX. ministei- ut Alloa, and afterwards at Girvan in Carrick ; he married first Giles, daughter to William Hunter of Drumdovv, as appears by their contract of mar- riage in the year 1629 : With her he had four sons ; Mr Andrew the eldest, of whose issue afterwards. Second son, Mr Robert, Minister of tMb Gospel at Ochiltree, who being thrust from his charge, travelled to Holland and France, and commenced Doctor of Me- dicine anno 1668. Upon his return, he was indulged in his former charge at Ochiltree, and married Grissel Cochran, daughter to Colonel Hugh Cochran, bro- thcr-german to the first Earl of Dundonald; by her he had issue, first, Mr William, Doctor of Medicine ; second, Mr John, Minister of the Gospel at Nielston, who married Janet Adam, daughter to James Adam of Kirkton, and with her had a daughter named Grissel ; third, Mr Robert, Minister at St Quivox; fourth, Hugh, and aI?o three daughters. The above Mr Andrew Millar's third son was Mr Henry Millar, who travelled abroad with his brother Mr Robert above mentioned, and studied the Oriental languages, and other useful parts of learning : Returning to London, he was help- ful to Mr Poole in his writings, and had a hand in preparing other useful books for the press : Afterwards, upon account of his learning, he was chosen governor to several young English gentlemen, and made ten times the grand tour of Europe. He died in London . 171 8. Mr Andrew's fourth son, Alexander, died at Glas- gow. The said Mr Andrew married to his second wife Agnes Spreul, daughter to Mr Robert Spreul, minister at Dalrymple, and had with her one son, Mr Thomas, who was minister at Kirkliston ; who married Jean Muir, daughter to Muir of Thorn- ton, by whom he had Mr William, a minister, who died at Barbadoes, Archibald, a chirurgeon at London, Thomas, who died young, and three daughters : the said Mr Andrew died at Girvan in the year 1648. His eldest son, Mr Andrew Millar, was minister first at Daillie, in the presbytery of Ayr, and afterwards at Neilston, in the presbytery cf Paisley ; but being thrust from his charge 1662, sold the lands which he got in heritages, being descended of the eldest son, as above. He married Margaret Montgomery, sister to David ^lontgomery of Lainshaw, now Lord Lyle, and with her had two sons and three daughters, Andrew, who died young, and Mr Pv-obert who succeeded his father, who died at Neilston 1686. Which Mr Robert Millar was ordained minister at Port-Glasgow, August 18. 1697; from which charge he was transported to Paisley, November 6. 1709. He married Elizabeth Kelso, daughter to Mr John Kelso, eldest son to Robert Kelso of Kelsoland: with her he had fourteen children, of whom nine are alive; John, Andrew, Henry, Robert, William, Archibald, James, Anne, and Elizabeth. The said Mr Robert, minister at Paisley, as now the representative of the ancient family of Millar of Temple and Killoch, carries for arms, argent, a cross moline .^ules, withm a bordure cheqiii azure, and of the first, as descended on the ma- ternal line from the ancient family of Stewart Lord Ochiltree; crest, a dexter hand holding a book open, with the motto, Felicem reddit religio. CUNNINGHAM of Glencairk.. IN the i&th chap, and page 193. of the First Volume, I treated of the Pairle, showing what it represented in armories, according to the opinion of the best writers of heraldry ; and I mentioned there, that such a figure was carried with us by the name of Cunningham, and gave the several opinions of our antiquaries and heralds anent it ; as also of the rise of the surname of Cunningham of Glen- cairn, with a short deduction of the descent of that noble family, with the seve- ral cadets of the name descended from it, and their blazons from the Lyon Regis- ter ; whence the name and family of Cunningham (whereof the Earls of Glen- APPENDIX. 4r cairn, Lords Cunningham of Kilmaurs, and their progenitors, have ever been count- ed chiefs) had their origin and rise, which, as in all other matters of antiquity, i* obscure and uncertain. 1 thought fit to give here the opinion of a learned and judicious lawyer, anent the rise of the name, anciently wrote Konijhrim, being Danish, which signifies, (according to Buchdimn and Camden) re^iiim dmiici/iiwi, i.e. king's-liome; audit is also uncertain, whether that jurisdiction, the bailiary of Cunningham, in the shire of Ayr in Scotland, has taken its designation from a person of that name, or if the persons have taken their name from the designation of these Lmds, which seems to be more probable; in respect that the whole tract of lands comprehending Galloway, Kyle, Carrick, and Cunningham, was anciently called, Cbersonesus Novan- tum, about the year Soo. In the days of Kenneth M'Alpin,, that tract of land was known under those several designations long before aay surname was used to distinguish families, tribes, or clans in Scotland, except some patronimics, as Macs ; or some agnomina, as Bane, Roy, Dow, from colour, or some other extrin- sic note, according to the Irish custom, seeing cognomina, or surnajnes, were only knovvn in Britain after the conquest of England by the Normans, about the year iroD, in so far as the surname of none of our kings of Scotland can be condes- cended upon before King Robert the Bruce. Such surnames as were used anciently by the inhabitants of Scotland, were ordi- narily taken from the designation of their lands and estates; as for those other sur- names, not from lands, they were brought in by strangers from England, France, or other countries. Whatever has been the iiame of this old family, whether ORoy a Cuning- hamo, as ancient tradition hath delivered, it is probable the Cunninghams have taken 'their surname from their possessions; because, in the ancient writs of the fa- mily of Glencairn, the heads of the family w'ere designed a Cuninghamo or Ciining- hame. I. The first upon record is, Warnebald Cunningham, Predecessor to the Earls of Glencairn, who possessed the lands of Kilmaurs, about iioo years after the birth of Christ. II. Robert, the son of Warnebald, with the consent of Richinda Barclay, his spouse, daughter and heiress to Humphrey Barclay of Garntilly, mortifies the lands of Gleaferchartland to the abbacy of Arbroath : He gives also his village of Cunningham, tlie kirk of Kilmaurs, and half a carrucate of land belonging to the said kirk, to the abbacy of Kelso ; which gift is confirmed by Richard Morville, Constable of Scotland, anno 1162. Robert is to be found likewise a wit- ness in a charter granted by Ricliard Morville, of the lands of Hermiston, to Hen- ry .Sinclair. III. Robert, the son of Robert, confirms the grant made by his father to the abbacy of Kelso. IV. Stephen de Cunningham, is one of the fifteen hostages given to King Hen- ry II. of England, for King William's liberation, anm 1174. V. Richard Cunningham is witness to a charter granted by Allan, Lord of Gal- loway, of the lands of Stevenston, Corsbie, and Monoch, to Hugh Crawfurd, the Earl of Loudon's predecessor. VI. Fergus Cunningh.\m is mentioned in the Register of Paisley. Vn. Hervy Cunningham gets a charter of the lands of Kilmaurs from King Alexander III. after the battle of the Largs, anno 1264. VIII. Edward, the son of Hervy, mortifies the lands of Grange, in Kilmar- nock parish, to the abbacy of Kilwinning. IX. GiLMORE, the son of Edward, renounces the league with France, and swears allegiance to the King of England. He had two sons, Robert and James, who got the lands of Bassenden, from whom the families of the Cunninghams of Bel- ton and Barns are descended. X. Sir Robert gets a charter from King Robert Bruce of the lands of Lam- bruchton, anno 13 19. XI. Sir William was Earl of Carrick, in right of his wife Helen Bruce, sister and heir to Thomas Earl of Carrick. 42 APPENDIX. XII. Sir William married Elizabeth, daughter and heir to Sir Robert Dennis- ton, and got with her a very great estate. He had two sons, Robert and William, Laird of Cunninghamhead. XIII. Robert gets a charter of the lands of Kilmaurs from Robert Duke of Albany, Governor of Scotland, on his father Sir William's resignation, in anm 1413. He married Janet, daughter to the Lord Montgomery, by whom he had Alexander, and WilHam of Waterston. XIV. Alexander dispones the heritable bailiary of Cunningham, to his uncle Alexander Lord Montgomery, in anno 1454. He was made Lord Kilmaurs by King James II. and Earl of Glencairn by King James III. the 28th May 1488. He married Margaret Hepburn, daughter to Lord Hailes, and sister to the first Earl of Bothwell ; and had issue by her, XV. Robert, who married Elizabeth Lindsay, daughter to the Lord Lindsay of Byres, the Earl of Crawford's predecessor. XVI. CuTHBERT married Marion Douglas, daughter to the Earl of Angus, and Duke of Douglas's predecessor, and had a daughter, Marion, married to the Lord Lyle. XVII. William, who married Margaret Campbell, heiress of Stevenston, had Alexander his successor, and Andrew, Laird of Corshill, Hugh, Laird of Carlung, and Elizabeth, Lady Cunninghamhead. XVIII. Alexander married Jean Hamilton, daughter to the Earl of Arran, Duke of Chatelherault, had William, and Margaret Lady Craigie. His second wife was Jean Cunningham, daughter to the Laird of Caprington, by whom he had Alexan- der, Laird of Montgreenan, and Jean, married to the Earl of Argyle, and after his death to the Laird of Luss. XIX. William married Janet Gordon, daughter to the Laird of Lochinvar, pre- decessor to the Viscount of Kenmure, by whom he had James, and John of Ross, and four daughters. Jean the eldest, married to Haldane of Gleneagles, after his death, to Kirkpatrick of Closeburn, and thirdly, to Fergusson of Craigdarroch ; Mar- garet, the second daughter, married the Laird of M'Lean ; Elizabeth the third, married first, Auchinames ; secondly, Craigends : the fourth, Susan, married Kil- mahew. XX. James married Margaret Campbell, daughter to the Laird of Glenorchy, by whom he had William, and John of Cambus-Keith, and six daughters; Jean, the eldest, contracted to the Earl of Cassilis ; but he married another lady, and she died on his marriage day; second, Catharine, married to Sir James Cunningham of Glen- garnoch ; third, Margaret, to the Lord Evandale, and after his death to the Laird of Calderwood ; fourth, Anne, to the Marquis of Hamilton ; fifth, Susan, to the Laird of Hatton ; and sixth, Margaret, to Kilbirnie. XXI. William married Janet Ker, daughter to the Earl of Lothian, by whom he had William, and Colonel Robert, and five daughters ; Margaret, married to Stewart of Minto ; Elizabeth to Beaton of Creigh, afterwards to Chisliolmof Crom- licks; Jean, to the Laird of Blair; Anne, never married ; Marion, married to the Earl of Findlater, and after his death to Eraser of Philorth, predecessor to the Lord Salton. XXII. William, Lord Chancellor of Scotland, married Anne Ogilvie, daughter to the Earl of Findlater, had William Lord Kilmaurs, who died unmarried; and James married Elizabeth, daughter to the Duke of Hamilton ; he died Lord Kil- maurs, v>'ithout children ; Alexander and John successive earls : the daughters were Jean, married to the Earl of Kilmarnock, Mary to Lord Bargeny, Elizabeth to the Laird of Orbiston, and Anne died unmarried. XXIII. Earl Alexander married Nicolas Stewart, daughter to the Laird of Kirkhil], a Lord of the Session, and had by her Margaret Countess of Lauder- dale. XXIV. Earl John married Mary Erskine, daughter to the Earl of Marr, and had by her XXV. William married to Henrietta Stewart, daughter to the Earl of Gallo- way, and had issue, William Lord Kilmaurs, John, Alexander, and James ; Mar- garet, Henrietta, Mary, and Catherine. The achievement of the family is argent^ a shake-fork sahle, supporters, two conies, proper ; crest, an unicorn's head argent. APPENDIX. 43 maned and horned or ; and, for motto, Over fork over ; which see in Plate of Achievements. The cadets of this family are Cunningham of Glengarnock, the first descended from Ga/fred de Cuninghamc, witness to King Malcolm IV. his charter of founda- tion to the abbacy of Bal merino. Gilbert de Coningsburg, who was one of the arbitrators in the controversy at Ber- wick betwiKt Bruce and Baliol for the crown. He renounced the league with France, and swore allegiance to Edward of England, as also his son Donald did. The cadets of his family are Skuloch, Drumquhiile, Achtarmarhar, Caddel, Quar- relton, Bellearhim, Newton, &-c. The Marquiss of Congie and Count Cunningham, in France, are of Glen- cairn. The Lairds of Polquhairn, Bonnington, Auchenharvy, Polmaise, Caprington.Cun- ninghamhead, Waterston, Craigends, Corshill, Carlung, Mountgreenand, Ross, and Cambuskeith, are from Glencairn. Ramfurly is from Fergus Cunningham, mentioned in the Register of Paisley, and the next cadet to Glengarnock. Bassenden, Belton, and Barns next to him. Aikat is of Belton. Miln-Craig from Polquhairn. Buquhan from Auchenharvy. Legland, Lochermiss CoUenen, Dalkeith, from Caprington.. Killybeggs in Ireland, and Tourlands from Cunninghamhead. Robertland, Caivncuren, Baidland, Auchenyards from Craigends. Clunbath and Hill from Aikat. Enterkin and the present Caprington from Legland. Suads from Glencairn, Birkshaw from Suads. Kirkland, South-hook, Auchinsheith from Robertland. For the arms of many of these cadets I have blazoned in the First Volume^. page 192. MACKINTOSH of i-hat Ilk, Captain of Clan-Chattan. IN the»First Volume of this Treatise, page 277, I gave a brief account of the origin of this family, with a blazon of their armorial bearings, and what at that time I knew concerning it ; but since the publishing of it I have got a full ac- count of the family sent me by the present Laird of Mackintosh, which is as fol- lows. I. The first of the family was one Shaw, second son to Duncan, the second of that name. Earl of Fife, who accompanied King Malcolm IV. in his expedition for suppressing the rebels in Murray, in the year 1 163 ; and for his good services was rewarded with many lands in the north, and made Constable of the castle of Inverness. He was commonly called Mackintosbich vie Duifh ; that is to say. Thane Macdufl:"'s son ; from which the name Macintosh became a surname to his posterity. He married Giles Montgomery, daughter to Hugh Montgomery, a favourite of the king, by whom he had three sons, Shaw, Malcolm, and Dun- can. He died in the year 1179. U. Shaw, his eldest son, succeeded his father, married Mary Sandilands, daughter to Sir Harry Sandilands of that Ilk, and had with her four sons, Malcolm, Far- quhar, William and Edward. In the reign of King WiUiam he defended the castle of Inverness against Donald of the Isles ; and for his fidelity and bravery sWas made chamberlain of all the king's revenue in the north. His eldest son Malcolm dying brfore himself without issue, he was succeeded by his second son. Vol. II. 4 S 44 APPENDIX. III. Farquhard, who married Sarah Macduff, daughter to Malcolm (the fourth of that name) Earl of Fife : He was succeeded (having no issue) by IV. Shaw his brother, William's son, who married Helena Calder, daughter to the Thane of Calder ; and by her had five sons, Farquhard, Duncan, Alexander, Shaw oig, and Malcolm. V. Farquhard succeeded his father, and married Mora Macdonald, daughter to Angus oig Macdonald of the Isles, by whom he had but one son called Angus. VI. This Angus, sixth Laird of Macintosh, in the year 129 1 married Eva, the only daughter and heiress of Giilipatrick Macdougald mc Gillichattan, Captain of Clan-Chattan, and with her got the lands of Glenluy and Locharkaik in Lochaber, with the command and chieftainry of the whole Clan-Chattan : And accordingly, from that time forward, for the space of three hundred years and up- ward, his successors, lairds of Macintosh, were designed by their stiles, Captains of Clan-Chattan ; and were, for near four hundred years, owned, acknowledged, and submitted to, (as their rightful and undoubted chief) by all the branches and cadets of the said clan, as they are by them all at this day. That they have been designed Captains of Clan-Chattan is evident from the charters and records of the family ; some of which were sent me : I shall here men- tion them with other principal ones, being in the custody of the chief of the family, which they could not adventure to transmit so long and dangerous a way. 1 took their relation for truth, for the honour of the family would not impose upon the public and me for all the matter. VII. WiLLi.MM, the seventh Laird of Macintosh, succeeded his father Angus, and was tlie first of that surname that was designed Captain of Clan-Chattan, as by a charter granted by the Lord of the Isles, of the lands of Glenluy and Loch- arkaik, to the said William Macintosh anno 1337, and a confirmation of the same right from King David Bruce, dated at Scone, the last day of February, the 29th year of his reign, anno 1359, in the which he is designed Gulielmus Macintosh, Capi- lanius de Clan-Chattan : He was the first of the family that added a galley or lym- phad, for the Clan-Chattan, to his paternal arms, the lion rampant, and a dexter hand. He married first Florence Calder, daughter to the Thane of Calder, by whom he had a son called Lachlan, and one daughter. After his first wife's death he married Margaret Macleod, daughter to Rory-more Macleod of the Lewis, by whom he had a son, Malcolm, that afterwards came to the estate and chief- tainry. Vill. Lachlan succeeded his father in his estate and chieftainry. He married- Agnes Eraser, daughter to the Lord Lovat, by whom he had a son called Farqu- hard : It was in this laird's time that the famous engagement in the Inch of Perth, recorded by all our historians, was fought betwixt the Clan-Chattan and the Clan- Kay ; tlie former being commanded in that action by one Shaw Macintosh, cousin- german to the then laird. IX. Farol'hard succeeds his father Lachlan : But being an inactive and indo- lent man, and thereby unfit to command an active and stubborn people, resigned the estate and chieftainry to his uncle Malcolm. X. Which Malcolm, the tenth Laird of Macintosh, married Mora Macdonald, daughter to. Ronald Macdonald, Laird of Moydart, and was one of the principal commanders of Donald of the Isles' army at the battle of Harlaw, in the year 1411, as Boethius records, where he commanded the Clan-Chattan, under which name are comprehended the Macphersons, Shaws, Farquharsons, Macgilvrays, ?vlacqueens, Macbeans, Macphails, Davidsons, alias Clanduy, Clarks, alias Clan- chlerich, Tarrals, &c. For his service in this action he got the lands in Brae- lochaber, with the heritable baihary and stewartry of that whole lordship, which the Clan-Chattan never had before his time, notwithstanding what is storied in the second volume of Mr Collier's Genealogical and Historical Dictionary. This Malcolm was made Governor of the castle of Inverness, by King James I. in the year 1429 : By his majesty's desire he ordered the Clan-Chattan (whom Alex- ander Lord of the Isles had seduced to his party) to desert and join the king's army, which accordingly they did, upon which Alexander's army dispersed; as ia John Major's History,. book 6. chap. 12. APPENDIX. 45 Xf. Duncan Macintosh succeeded his father Malcolm. He got a charter of the lands of Braelochaber, in the year 1466, from John Earl of Ross, and chief of all the Macdonalds : In which charter he is designed Duncanus Macintosh, consan- guineus noster, Citpitanius de Clan-Cbattan. There is a charter of confirmation, and a sasine given (upon the said lands of Braelochaber) to the said Duncan, by King James III. dated the fourth d^iy of July 147(1, wherein he is designed Dilectus mster Duncanus Macintosh Cipitanius de Clan-Chattan. He married Florence Mac- donald, daughter to tlie Earl of Ross, and load by her several children. XII. Farquhard, who succeeded him, had to wife Giles Eraser, daughter to the Lord Lovat, by whom he had but one son who died young : He was succeeded by his cousin-german XIII. William Macintosh, who married Isabel M'Niven, heiress of the- barony of Dunaughton, by whoni he had no issue. He was succeeded by his brother XIV. Lachlan Macintosh, who in the year 1520 married Jean Gordon, only- daughter and heir of line to the Laird of Lochinvar, afterwards Viscount of Ken- mure, for which the fomily has since been in use to marshal the arms of Lochin- var with their own : With her he had but one son, William, and two daugh- ters. XV. William succeeds his father, gets a charter from Q^ieen Mary, dated the- 19th July 1545, of the lands of Braelochaber, in which he is designed Capitanius de Clan-Chattan, and a commission from George Earl of Huntly, Lieutenant-Gen- eral of the North of Scotland, as his deputy, dated at Inverness the penult day of October 1544, in which he is designed William Macintosh of Dunaughton, Cap- tain of Clan-Chattan : He married Margaret Ogilvie, daughter to the Laird of Findlater, who bore to him two sons and one daughter. The eldest son XVI. Lachlan succeeded his father, married Agnes, daughter to Kenneth Mac- kenzie of Kintail, by whom he had seven sons and six daughters : His eldest son, Angus, married Lady Jean Campbell, daughter to Archibald Earl of Argyle, by whom he h-ad two sons and one daughter : He died before his father, who was succeeded by his grandchild XVII. Lachlan, son of Angus, who manied Agnes Grant, eldest daughter to the Laird of Grant. He got a letter from King Charles II. dated at Perth, the 24th December 1650, directed thus : To our Right Trusty and Well-Beloved the Laird of Macintosh, and the Gentlemen of his kin of Clan-Chattan. Besides these documents already adduced for proving the Lairds of Macintosh their title to be captains of Clan-Chattan, there are to be seen among Macintosh's papers several obligations of mutual friendship betwixt the lairds of his family and several noble -. men and gentlemen, as the Earl cf Huntly, the Earl of Argyle, the Earl of Athol, the Earl of Murray, Lord Forbes, Sir Donald Macdonald of Slate, the Laird of Macleod, the Laird of Kilravock, the Laird of Foulis, the Laird of Calder : In every one of v.'hich obligations Macintosh is designed Captain of Clan-Chattan : All our historians design them after the same manner ; as Lesley in his ninth book De Gestis Scotorum, writing of the Clan-Chattan, says, Tribus Clunchattana vulgo nuncuputa, Macintoshinna principe Macintoshio : And in his loth book he calls , William Macintosh Clancbattanice tribus ducem ; Hollinshed calls the sanie Wil- liam, head and chief of the Clan-Chattan ; and Buchanan calls him Magna inter priscos Scotos familice priiicipeni; and in his i6th book Cattance familice principem: And Sir George Mackenzie, in the 67th page of his Heraldry, speaking of Mac- intosh's arms, calls him chief of tlie Clan-Chattan. There are also several bonds of man-rent, (in the custody of the Laird of Macintosh) given by the heads of the several branches of that clan to his predecessors; the first is granted by the Mac- phersons, as well as otiiers of the Clan-Chattan, to the Laird of Macintosh, in which they acknowledge Macintosh the principal captain of the haill kin of Clan- Chattan, and obhge themselves to concur with, maintain, and defend him, against ■whomsoever shall happen to oppose him. This bond is dated the 2Sth February 1396. There is a second bond, dated the 4th of April 1609, ot the same nature, granted by the said Macphersons, and all the other branches of the Clan-Chattan, in which they give the laird of Macintosh the designation of Principal Captain of the haill kin of Clan-Chattan, according to the king's gift of chieftainry of tlic 46 APPENDIX. whole Clan-Chattan. The third bond of the same nature is of the date the tpth November 1664, subscribed by Andrew Macpherson of Ciunie, Ldchlan Macplier- son of Pitmean, John Macpherson of Inneressie, and several others ; in which bond Lachlan Macintosh of Torcastle is designed our chief. There is likewise a declaration from the Lord Lyon, in the year 1672, in favour of the Laird of Macintosh, which is as follows ; " I Sir Charles Areskine of Cambo, Knight Ba- " ronet, Lord Lyon King at Arms, having perused and seen sufficient evidents and " testimonies from our histories, my own register, and bonds of man-rent, do " hereby declare. That I find the Laird of Macintosh to be the only undoubted " chief of the name of Macintosh, and of the Clan-Chattan, comprehending the " Macphersons, Macgilvrays, Farquharsons, Macqueens, Macphails, Macbanes, " and others : And that I have given, and will give, none of these families any " arms, but as cadets of Macintoshe's family, whose predecessor married the heri- " trix of Clan-Chattan in anno 1291; and, in particular, I declare. That 1 have " given Duncan Macpherson of Ciunie a coat of arms as cadet of the said family. " And that tlfis may remain to posterity, and may be known to all concerned. " whether of the said name or others, 1 have subscribed thir presents at Edin- " burgh, the loth day of November 1672." And in full demonstration of what has been already adduced, for proving the lairds of Macintosh the only undoubted chieftains of Clan-Chattan, ever since their marrying the heiress of the said clan, the present Lachlan Macpherson of Ciunie, with the special advice and consent of his friends of the name of Macpherson, (who were the only branch of the Clan- Chattan that did at any time desert the laird of Macintosh, or disown his un- doubted right to the chieftainry) do, for himself, his heirs, and succeseors, not only own and acknowledge the Laird of Macintosh as his and their undoubted chief, but likewise disclaim and utterly renounce whatever has been (at any time past) wrote, said, or done, to the contrary ; as is to be seen in a writ to that purpose. This Lachlan, the seventeenth Laird of Macintosh, had issue by his above-named lady, three sons and one daughter. He was knighted by King James VI. and made Gentleman of the Bed-chamber to the Prince, and was succeeded by his son XVIII. William Laird of Macintosh, who married Margaret Graham, daughter to the Laird of Fintray, by whom he had two sons, Lachlan and William, and two daughters, EHxabeth and Jean. XIX. Lachl.\n succeeded his father, and married Magdalen Lindsay, only daughter to the Laird of EdgehiH, mother to the present laird ; and after her death he married -\nna Monro, daughter to Sir George Monro, and rehct of the Lord Reay. XX. Lachlan, the present Laird of Macintosh, succeeded his fatlier, and married Anna Duff, daughter to the Laird of Druramuir, the 28th April 1702- The achievement of the family of Macintosh is, quarterly, first quarter or, a lion r^ipant gules, armed and langued azure, the paternal bearing as descended of Macduff Earl of Fife ; second argent, a dexter hand couped fesse-ways, grasping a man's heart pale-ways, gules, for a notable action for the king and country ; third nzure, a boar's head couped or, for Gordon of Lochinvar ; fourth or, a lymphad, her oars in saltier sable, for marrying the heiress of Clan-Chattan : Which shield of arms is adorned with helmet and mantling gides, doubled argent, and on a wreath of his tinctures is set, for crest, a cat seiant, proper, and, for suppor- ters, two cats of the same; with the motto. Touch not the cat but a glove. .SCRYMGEOURS of Dudop. IN the First Volume of this System, page 286, I gave a short accout of the rise of the name of Scrymckour, and of the family with their armorial bearings : But I, APPENDIX, 47 not being well informed, said, That the tainily was now extinct ; whereas, by better mtbrmation, the heir-male of tailzie, as also of line, viz. Dr Alexander Scrynigeour, Professor of Divinity in the University of St Andrews, with several others of the family, are extant, and have their arms matriculated in the Lyon Re- gister, which 1 have given in the above-cited place. As to the rise of this ancient and honourable name, (wJiich the English spell Scrimzcour, and. iomti tarailies in Scotland Scrimseour') our historians agree that it was upon occasion of a signal service done the king by Sir Alexander Carron, whose name was therefore changed into Scrymgeour, ;'. e. a sharp tighter, and is the first knight we read of in our history. Buchanan places it in the reign oi'iVIalcolra III. in these words : " Hostium ibj " (ad Spceam) tantum numerum, quantum ex ilhs regionibus cogi posse nunquam " credidisset, in ulteriore ripa, ad transitum prohibendum, stare conspicatus (Rex " Milcolumbus Tertius) signifero cunctante flumen ingredi, signum ei ablatum, " Alexandro Carroiu, equiti m^tae fortituduiis dedit ; posterisque ejus is honos " habitus est, ut regium in bello vexiljum ferrent, ei pro Carrone, postea nomen " Scryniigero positum ; quod magistrum tractandorum armorum, multum sibi " ex eo studio arrogantera, ipse vera, viitute fretus, artisque ejus penitus imperitus " vicisset." Others, viz. Dr Abercroraby and Cra^'furd place this action in Alexander I. his time, anno 1 107, thus, There baying been a plot discovered against King Alexan- der I. his life, the rebels betook themselves to llight, and were pursued by the king and a part of his friends the length of the Water of Spey : the rebels had passed and swimmed the water before the king and his party came up ; upon which the king's small army made a stand, being afraid of the water, which had by this time run over all its banks ; whereupon Sir Alexander Carron, a brave and valiant knight, took the standard, and gave encouragement to the rest to follow : Wherefore he had his name changed, and a special grant from the king to himself, and the heirs- male of his body, to be hereditary stPJidard-bearers to the kings of Scotland, and' gave him for his coat of arms a part of the royal bearing, as I mentioned, ^iz. filler, a lion rampant or, armed and langued azure, with a sword in his dexter paw, proper, hiked and pommelled of the second ; and the family, to perpetuate the action, have used the motto, Dissipate. Mr Johnston, the poet, has left us the- following verses to the honour of bis memory, by which this action is very well represented. ^uM ttepidas ' Da signa mihi, superabimus amnem, Terreat an pavldos nos ftigitira cohors ? Di.xit & arreptis signis, ruit acer in hostem. Nil rapidi metuens agmina torva vadi ; Hinc decus augusto surgit sub principe, ab armis- Scrymigerae gcnti, fama decusque manent. Arma alius jactet,.nos scimus fortibus annit. Utier haud dici, raalumus esse virL Buchanan, accounting for this action, says, " Verum rex a suis retentus, Alex- " andro Carroni, Alexandri cujus supra merainimus, iilio partem exercitus dedit ; " qui, subito cum suis amnem ingressus audaciee miraculo adeo conterruit hostes, " ut passim in fugam statim se conjicerent." This name hath been remarkable in our Scots History on several other occasions; particularly Sir Alexander Scrymgeour was among the first that took the field for King Robert Bruce, and faithfully adhered to him ; in consideration whereof, when that valiant prince came to be established on the throne, he gave him sun- dry lands about the burgh of Inverkeithing : also Sir John Scrymgeour was killed at the fatal battle of Duplin, 1132. And another. Sir James Scrymgeour, Constable of Dundee, his successor, was slain in the governor's ai-my, against Donald Lord of the Isles, at the battle of Harlaw, 141 1. This family has matched with several of the most noble familes of this kingdom, as Gray, Southesk, Roxburgh, and Dalhousie ; and having flourished long in the state of barons, came to the honour of peerage in the person of Sir John Scrym- geour, Constable of Dundee, who was raised to the honour of Viscount of Dudhope Vol. II. 4 T 4a APPENDIX. and Lord Scryingeour, by King Charles I. anno 1641, and his son was made Earl' of Dundee in the year 166 1. Upon the breaking out of the civil war, he accept- ed of a command in those forces that were sent from Scotland to the aid of the English parliament against the king, and lost his life in the battle of Marston- miiir, on the second of September 1644. " A person, says one, who for the " nobleness of his extraction, and many personal endowments, deserved a better " fate." This viscount kft a son John, by his lady, daughter to Robert first Earl of Rox- burgh, who succeeded him in his estate and honours, and put himself in arms in behalf of King Charles II. and marched with him to the battle of Worcester third September 1651, after which he suftered much for his loyalty : but. living to see the Restoration, he received some part of amends, being created Earl of Dun- dee 1661. His lady was Anne, daughter of William first Earl of Dalhousie : but on the twenty-third of June 1668 he died without issue. Upon this earl's demise, the whole estates and offices should have descended to John Scrymgeour, then of Kirkton, having been tailzied to his grandlather John Scrymgeour of Kirkton, and the heirs-male of his body, by a charter of tailzie under the Great Seal, upon a resignation made personally by James Scrymgeour of Dudhope, Constable of Dundee, into King James IV. his hands, for that effect, dated at Holyroodhouse, the 25th of November 1587, in these words, " Jacobus Dei gra- " tia Rex Scotorum, omnibus probis hominibus, &-c. sciatis nos, post nostram per- " tectam ^tatem viginti unius annorum completam, et generalem revocationem " factam, dedisse, concessisse, et hac prsesenti charta nostra confirmasse dilecto nos- " tro Jacobo Scrymgeour de Dudop, Constabulario, ad nunc prreposito burgi nostri " de Dundee, suisque hseredibus masculis de corpore suo legitime procreatis seu " procreandis ; quibus deficientibus, Jacobo Scrymgeour, filio legitimo quondam »* Jacobi Scrymgeour, qui patronus (or rather patruus) erat dicti Jacobi Scrym- " geour de Dudop, suisque ha-redibus masculis de corpore suo legitime procreandis; " quibus deficientibus, Joanni Scrymgeour de Kirkton, et hieredibus masculis de cor- " pore suo legitime procreandis :" and so on to several other families, as is more fully contained in the said charter of tailzie, an extract whereof, signed by Sir Archibald Primrose, Clerk-Register, is in the hands of Dr Alexander Scrymgeour, Professor of Divinity in St Andrews, and only son to the foresaid John Scrymgeour of Kirkton. John SciiYMGEOUR of Kirkton, to whom this tailzie was made, anno .1587, mar- ried Marlon Fotheringhanie, daughter to Mr James Fotherlngham, son to the Laird of Powrie, and Margaret Lindsay, daughter to John Lord Lindsay, and Helen Stewart, daughter to John, the second Earl of Athol, by whom he had four sons, James, John, Mr Gilbert, and William, and three daughters, Magdalen, Margaret,, and Janet. James dying without male issue, his brother John succeeded him, and married Jean M'Gill, eldest daughter to James M'Gill of Rankeillor, and Anna. Clephrm, by whom he had three sons, John, Alexander, and Mr James, and three daughters, Marion, Anna, and Margaret. John dying anno 1656, to him succeeded bis son John, and married Magdalen Wedderburn, daughter to Alexander Wedderbarn of Kingennie, and Elizabeth Ramsay, by whom he left on life only one son, Dr Alexander, fonnerly mention- and one daughter, Jean. Alexander, John's brother, has no lawful issue: Mr James was minister of the Gospel at Currle, and married Elizabeth Chisholm, hy whom there remains only one son, Mr Henry Scrymgeour of Wester-Lochgelly, Wrker to the Signet, and one daughter Henrietta. Though it be thus plainly evident, that there was no just ground to. pretend, that upon the Earl of Dundee's death, the estate, £tc. fell in the king's hands as' y'tinms hivres, yet the Duke of Lauderdale had the interest with King Charles IL to procure a gift of nitimus bares in favour of his brother Hatton; and (that prov- ing insufficient to answ'er his designs) thereafter a gift of recogrrition, in opposition to all the ties of friendship and gratitude a prince could be under to his subject; for the Earl of Dundee had not only faithfully served King Charles II. and suffer- ed much for him, but also to serve him the more effectually, had brought his estate under thwe burdens upon which the recognition was founded. A most per- APPENDIX. 49 jiicious advice to a prince to forget his friend, and ruin his family in favour of a stranger. For this recognition not only precluded Kirkton from his just claim to the estate, but also deprived him and many other innocent creditors of their just and lawful debts, which, with the misfortune of having bought the countess's liferent, she dying soon after, so distressed Kirkton's affairs, that he was forced to sell his estate for the satisfaction of his creditors ; particularly the land& of Kirkton were then sold to John Scrymgeour, merchant in Dundee, whose heir retains the possession of them to this day. Moreover the above-designed Dr Scrymgeour is not only heir of tailzie to the Earl of Dundee, but is also heir of line to the original family of Dudhope, to which the earl's predecessor, the Laird of Glastre, succeeded as heir of tailzie, anno 1546: For, about the year 1525, James Scrymgeour, Constable, having no sons, only two daughters, Elizabeth and An.ne, by his lady Mariot Stewart, James Scrymgeour of Kirkton married Elizabeth, and by her had five sons, John, James, William, Tho- mas, and Alexander. Upon an agreement betwixt tlie Constable and them, he dispones to them and their heirs-male his lands of Ballegarno, in full satisfaction of all hereditary right and title they might have to the untailzied lands of Dudhope or the Constabidary, by a charter dated at Dundee, October 24. 1539, which is in the Doctor's hands. John, the eldest son of this marriage, by his lady Anne Bruce, daughter to Sir William Bruce of Earlshall, and Anne Scrymgeour above mention- ed, had three sons, John, Gilbert, and George, and three daughters, Margaret, Isa- bel, and Giles. John the eldest married Marion Fotheringham, of which marriage the doctor is heir; so that it was manifestly injurious to allege that this family was extinguished by the earl's dying without heirs-male of his own body. The achieve- ment of Scrymgeour Earl of Dundee and Lord Dudhope, is gules, a lion rampant or, holding in his dexter paw a sword, proper : motto, Dissipate. STEWART OF Phisgall. IN my First Volume in the System of {leraldry, page 48. speaking of the no- ble family of the Stewarts, I mentioned Sir John Stewart of Bonkill, second son to Alexander, High-Steward of Scotland, of whom descehded our kings of the name of Stewart. This John married the daughter and heiress of Sir Alexander Bonkill of that Ilk, in the shire of Berwick ; the arms which he carried on his seal with a (esse cheque, as Stewart, he composed with his wife's arms, surmounted with a bend gules, charged with three buckles, for Bunkle. With her lie had several sons, heads of great families in the name of Stewart, yet extant with us; which families were and are known by the fesse cheque, bend and buckles, as by the ancient Stewarts Earls of Angus : which dignity came to the Douglasses by marriage of the heiress, and ever since their match have carried the arms of Bunkle or, a fesse cheque, azure und argent, surmounted with a bend ingrailed gules, charged with three buckles of the first, for Stewart of Bonkill. The Stewarts Lords of Darnly, Earls and Dukes of Lennox, likewise descended of the said family, had buckles on the same account : and the Earls of Galloway and their progenitors-, .sometime designed of Dalswinton, and sometime of Garlics, as descended from the above Sir John and his lady, sur- mounts the fess cheque with the bend: but to leave this noble family and descent to others, with the honourable cadets whose arms I have given before, I here add in the supplement the descent and arms of the family of a cadet of 'the Earls of Gal- loway, viz. Stewart of Phisgall, the first of which was John Stewart, second son to Sir Alexander Stewart of Garlics, and his Lady Margaret, daughter to Patrick Dunbar of Mochrum. and full brother-german to Alexander Stewart, younger of Garlics, who was slain, at the surprise of the town of Stirling, by the Earl of 5° APPENDIX. Huntly and the Laird of Buccleugh, third September 157 1 : he left issue a sod, Sir Alexander, who was lather of Sir Alexander first Earl of Galloway. Which John above mentioned was commonly called Parson of Kirkmahoe, be- cause he got the patronage teinds, as part of his patrimony from his father, as appears by a liferent-tack of Larg, dated 20th March 1570, and another of the date the seventh of March 15S5, granted to him by the above Sir Alexander his father, to his well-beloved son John, Parson of Kirkmahoe, with advice and con- sent of Alexander his eldest- brother; which writs are still m the hands of the pre- sent Laird of Phisgall ; as also an original letter of attorney from Alexander Stew- art, younger of Garlies, to his beloved brother John Stewart, parson of Kirkma- hoe, to receive 500 merks, dated at Edinburgh 1570. Which John, Parson of Kirkmahoe, married Margaret Stewart, daughter to Stewart of Barclay, in the parish of Monigaff, by whom he had two sons, Alex- ander who succeeded, and John who purchased the lands of Bellimoran in Ireland, of whom is descended the present Captain Stewart of Bellimoran. Alexander succeeded his father John, and married Sarah, daughter of Dunbar of Machremore, and the same laird was married to the said Alexander's sister. This Alexander was the first purchaser of the lands of Phisgall, in the sherift- dom of Wigton in Galloway, he had with his lady seven sons, Alexander who suc- ceeded ; Second, John, who continued in the Larg, he married a daughter of Captain Ste« art of Bellimoran, with her he had several sons, Anthony, Andrew, Archibald, and George, who died a colonel in the third regiment of Foot-Guards. Third son was William of Livingston, he married Sarah, sister to Sir James Dunbar of Mochrum, whose representative is Colonel John Stewart, now of Stewart- field in Teviotdale, his eldest son. fourth, Francis, who died an ofRcer in the Guard d'Escosse in France. Fifth, LuDivicK, killed by Ohver's troops from England at the bridge of Pal- neur in the parish of Monigaff. Sixth, James in BeUiquhair. Seventh, Anthony of Balsmith, who commanded a troop of horse in Duke Hamilton's engagement for King Charles I. The above mentioned Alexander, the eldest of those brothers, had to wife Wardlaw, a niece of the Laird of Enterkin, by whom he had John his eldest son and successor, William, merciiant in London, who married a daughter of Sir Samuel Lul;e in Bedfordshire ; Robert and Thomas who died abroad. John succeeded his father in the lands of Phisgall, married Agnes, daughter to Pro- vost Stewart of Wigton, and his wife, daughter to Sir David Dunbar of Baldon, and with her he had many children; Alexander who died young, David who died com- missar of Wigton, Thomas who died young, Robert a lieutenant in his Majesty's Royal Navy, who died before his father, and William who now represents his fa- ther, Laird of Phisgall, James, now guidon in his Majesty's second troop of Horse_ Grenadier Guards, and John who died young, and also seven daughters. The arms which the family of Phisgall used to carry for many years, are to be seen n their grave-stones of their burial place at Glasserton, viz. or, a feiie cheque azure and argent, surmounted with a bend ingrailed gules ; and in the sinister chief point a buckle of the last, to show their descent as above ; and, for crest, a demi-lion, holding in his dexter paw a buckle or, with the motto, Suffibulatis, majores sequor, approven of, and recorded in the Lyon Register. M'DOWALL OF Freugh, IN my former Volume of this System I gave a full account, from the evi- dences then seen, of the ancient name of M'Dowall, of which are three families in Galloway of note, and one in Teviotdale, who claim their descents from the old t APPENDIX. 51 Lords, of Gallowav, and carry the arms as a tessera of their descent : the account of these are in page 284, and the two following pages; and there are several other families descended from them. But I have received since, from Patrick M'Dowall of Freugh, a memorial ot his descent, subscribed by his hand at Castle M'Dowall, the I5tli November 1723, in my cubtody, for which he produces several vouchers ; the purport whereof 1 shall here communicate, together with what observations I have discovered from other hands. This represents that Fergus, heir of the Dovallian line, by^some historians de- signed Prince of Galloway, had two sons, Gilbert the eldest, whose eldest son Dun- can was made Earl of Carrick, and Ethred, father of Rowland, Father of Allan Lord of Galloway, from which Ethred, (as I observed in my former Volume) Garthland, by his information, claims his descent. The earldom of Carrick, in Gilbert's family, sometime after ending in an heiress, ■who married with Robert Bruce Earl of Annandale, father to Robert Bruce, com- petitor with Baliol, and afterwards King of Scotland. Then the representation of the family of M'Dowall Earl of Carrick, fell to Gil- bert, second son to the said Earl, from whom Freugh derives his descent, and from whence the name of Gilbert became frequent and peculiar to several successors of this family. I observe Sir James Dalrymple in the Preface to his Collections from Fordun, says, " That Gilbert of Galloway died anno 11 85, and that King Wil- " liam gave to Gilbert's son Duncan the county of Carrick, and King Alexan- " der IL renewed the grant with the title of Earl of that name. He was succeed- " ed by his son Neil, and he, by Martha Countess of Carrick, married as above." And this author says farther, page 363, from Rojer de Hoveden, " That Gilbert of " Galloway was younger son of the said Fergus, and that the said Ethred was eld- " est son." But the above memorial urges, that the said Gilbert Earl of Carrick was eldest son of the said Fergus ; as Buchanan in his Chronicles plainly asserts, page 246, in the eighth book of it, translated in English, anno 1693, revised by J. Fraser in these words : " Whilst William was King of Scotland, Fergus Prince of Galloway •' left two sons, Gilbert and Ethred: King William, to prevent the seeds of discord " betwixt the two brothers, divided their father's inheritance equally betwixt them; " but Gilbert, the eldest, took this highly amiss, and discorded with his second bro- " ther Ethred as his rival, whereupon Gilbert was made Earl of Carrick ;" and Buchanan there also cites William of Newbury, the English writer, to have record- ed the same, as in page 247, adding, " That Allan, grandson of the said Ethred, " was made Lord of Galloway;" and, as 1 observed in ray former System, page 161, in the reign of the said King William, anno 1183, Henry Kennedy assisted Gilbert, eldest son of Fergus, Prince of Galloway, in his wars. There is no doubt the said Gilbert was designed of Galloway, as eldest son and heir of it, till he was made Earl of Carrick ; therefore Freugh claims being heir-male of Gilbert Earl of Car- rick, in default of issue-male of Duncan and Neil Earls of Carrick ; the barons oif Dowalston being the next heirs-male. This claim Freugh fortifies by divers adminicles following, viz. The designa- tions of the lands possessed by his ancestors, viz. Dowalston, ?mm Dovallus of Gal- loway, mentioned in my farmer Volume ; which barony (as also that of Ravinston, with that of Stephens Kirk *, Freugh, Urril, and Lochronald, and others) have been, and most part of them are in possession of his family, who sometimes de- signed themselves of Dowalston, of Ravinston, and also of Freugh; which descent, from the earls of Carrick, is claimed by no other of the name, (as Freugh repre- sents) and from which title his predecessors were secluded by Edward Bruce, bro- ther to King Robert, then created Eari of Carrick. And it is also observable, that no other family of the name ever had the designation of their lands from the name : and in the barony of Dowalston there is a large fresh water lake, and a pleasant isle in it, whereupon, of old, was built a castle, the ruins whereof bears marks of great antiquity, and is said, by tradition in that country, to have been the seat of the old family. And, as I observed in my former Volume, I have seen a charter granted to a pre- decessor of the family of Freugh, by King James IIL anna 1473, upon the resigna- * jNow called Stonny-Kirk. E. Vol. II. 4 U 52 APPENDIX. tion of Gilbert M'Dowall, then designed of Ravinston, to Gilbert M'Dowall his son, wherein several lands are contained, with the advocation, donation, and patronage of the parish of Stephen's Kirk, which appears to have been in the family for seve- ral years before, albeit older evidents be lost by the calamities mentioned formerly ; which lands and patronage are contained in other later charters ; but, it is obser- vable, this church is the burial-place of this family, and the parish within which their mansion-house and many of their lands lie ; and is also the burial-place of Garthland's family, where his mansion-house and lands also are ; and is also M'- Dowall of Logan's burial-place, whose lands lie in the next adjacent parish : And this honorary grant from the crown (of the patronage in this family) does import, that it has been the principal and considerable family, that grant being many years before the Reformation. I have by me an extract of a public protest, taken by the Laird of Freugh against the Laird of Garthland, under the hand of Robert Ker, notary-public, dated the 22d of April 1721, protesting against the said Garthland, or any other of the name, claiming precedency or chiefship; and also against a pretended bond of man-rent, mentioned in Garthland's memorial of his family, inserted in my former Volume ; which protest contains divers weighty reasons, and condescends upon vouchers to show, that James M'Dowall of Freugh had to lady, Florence, sister to Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland, they having no male issue alive, their daughter Margaret, sole heiress, married a gentleman of the name, and her near i-elation, neither of whom having attained to majority, the said Garthland, uncle and tutor to her, (for his consent to the said marriage allenarly) did extort from them a paper containing several illegal and prejudicial obligations, which were still after opposed by them. And though such a bond were real, the bond produced has neither witnesses nor seal, which were necessary qualities, valid in all such writs at that time ; yet these were discharged by divers acts of Parliament, and highly punishable, though they were esteemed in those days not at all as a mark of vassalage, but as mutual con- tracts of defence amongst clans : And, as to Garthland's claim of precedency, up- on his great-grandfather John being made knight-batchelor by King Charles, and his grandfather James knighted by Oliver Cromwell, neither of these give any real title to chiefship or precedency. And, for my vindication, I must beg my reader's pardon, to complain of a piece of injustice done me by Garthland, or his doer ; for, upon production of that al- leged bond of man-rent, together with the other of Logan's, mentioned by me in the same place, I was threatened with a protest if I refused to mention them in the said Volume, which I could not condescend to, unless they were recorded in pub- lic register, where they may be patent to all the lieges, as vouchers of what 1 was to advance ; but I was prevailed with, (upon promise that they should be record- ed) albeit it be not yet performed, nor safe for them to record it, as it appears. Freugh has sent me an account of the names of his predecessors since the year 1445, the vouchers whereof I have also seen in the hands of his doer Mr Robert Fullarton, Writer to the Signet, one of which was Gilbert M'Dowall, Baron of Dowalston and Ravinston, who also had the seventeen merk land of Stephen's Kirk, (wherein the house of Freugh lies) the ten pound land of Urril, and ten pound land of Lochronald, with the patronage of Stephen's Kirk, these being a part of the lordship of Galloway, and the twenty merk land of Barjarg,- a part of the earldom of Carrick. He was succeeded by Gilbert M'Dowall his son, who was succeeded by a third Gilbert his son (who was remarkable for his valour and loyalty, and died in the battle of Flodden) and was succeeded by his son Fergus, who had for his lady Janet Kennedy, sister to Gilbert Lord Kennedy, then made Earl of Cassilis ; which Fergus was killed in the battle of Pinky, and was succeeded by his son James, who was infeft in the foresaid lands and patronage by a precept forth of the Chan- cellary, which bears these words, " Fergusius M'Douall de Freugh obiit ad fidem " & pacem sub vexillo nostro, in campo belli apud Pinkincleugh, pater Jacobi " M'Douall nunc de Freugh." The said James was succeeded by John M'Dowall his son, who, dying without heirs, was succeeded by his sister Margaret, heiress foresaid, who married John M'Dowall of Downdowall, her kinsman, who were succeeded by John M'Dowall APPENDIX. 5.^ their son, who, during Oliver Cromwell's Usurpation, signalized himself by his op- postion to the usurper's forces in Galloway, where many of them were cut off, and he never yielded obedience; and thereupon the EngHsh took all his papers and goods which they could reach, and burnt his old house and fort of Freugh, car rying hmiself prisoner to England, detaining him there, till, by a happy strata- gem, he made his escape a little before King Charles 11. his restoration. The said John was succeeded by his son Uthred, who was likewise remarkable for his valour, being commander of horse with the Earl of Cassilis in England, where he received several wounds in the king's service, and was afterwards com- missioner for the shire of Wigton, in the first session of the tii-st Parliament ol' King Charles II. in which station he continued to his death. He was succeeded by Patrick his eldest son, and he, by his eldest son Patrick, present Baron of ISI'Dovvall and Freugh, so designed in a charter I have seen under the Great Seal, uniting all his lands in one barony : The apparency of which suc- cession is in the person of John M'Dowall his eldest son ; so that 1 am obliged to say 1 have seen documents for a succession of eleven generations from the foresaid Gilbert, anno 1445, to the said John, now heir apparent. It is to be noticed, that any variation which may appear betwixt this account and what was inserted in my former Volume, concerning Freugh's predecessors' names, or proper places of succession, was occasioned through his mistake, by want of some of the vouchers now produced. It is also observable, that, by a writ past betwixt the foresaid James M'Dowai-l of Freugh, and the said Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland, dated the 26th of June 1559, which I have seen in the said Mr Fullarton's hands, wherein several other gentlemen of note are concerned and nominate, the said Freugh is designed first. and before Garthland ; at which time the order of placing names by claim of dis- tinction was very much noticed : And I have seen several writs wherein Freugh's predecessors have the epithet of honourable men, which, in those days, was only granted to considerable persons that were not nobilitate. It is also very observable, that, by charters and sasines produced to me, and irt the hands of the said Mr FuUanon, it appears, that Thomas M'Dow^all of Garth- land, two of the name of Uthred, and Sir John and Sir James, held as vassals of the foresaid family of Ravinston, their superior, for the space of 157 years succes- sive, from 1479 till 1636, for some lands ; and no doubt they held them in the same manner many years before, though the former vouchers are not yet found. Garthland neither condescends upon, nor produced to me any charter of his lands holding of the crown, but only a charter granted by Archibald Douglas, then Lord of Galloway and Annandale, to the said Thomas M'Dowall of Garthland, anno 1413, as in his memorial in my former Volume, whereby it appears they held their lands as vassals of a subject only. Freugh also represents, that Garthland cannot produce any document or vouch- er for his predecessors having any precedency or chiefship ; but ever since the be- fore-mentioned heiress of Freugh, their niece and pupil, they have been grasping at it, and by the before-mentioned indirect means took advantage of her, and her then designed spouse ; he in furore amoris, and they mutually in love, the said bond of man-rent was obtained, and other groundless alledgeances since founded thereon, though contrary to law, and neither then (though the family fell in troubles, by their predecessors being killed in the king and country's service) nor now owned, but is renounced and disclaimed on all occasions. This family bears for their coat of arms the lion rampant, crowned and collared with a broken crown, (in memory of their predecessor Dovallus having killed Nothatus, and setting Reutberus the rightful king on his throne) as in Plate of Achievements in my former System, with helmet, maiitling, and supporters, and others suitable to their quality. There were several old cadets of this family, and some of them extinct : Those remaining are Mr Andrew M'Dowall, Mr Thomas, James, Alexander, and Chai-les M-Dowalls, men of estates and other interests in the kingdom of Ireland, and Uthred M'Dowall of Hackburn in the shire of Roxburgh, and Captain William M'Dowall of Stratfordhall in Buckinghamshire in England, and Mr WilHam M'- Dowall, brother-german to the present Freugh, and Mr William M'Dowall, mer- 54 APPENDIX. chant in Stranraei : all which cadets of this family do bear the coat of anus of the family, with their different marks of descent ; as particularly the above Wil- liam, brother-german to the present Patrick M'Dowall of Freugh, and son to the above Patrick, and their mother Barbara Fullarton, daughter to FuUarton of that Ilk, an officer in the army in time of war, and now, in time of peace, a principal officer of his majesty's customs in Scotland, carries, as I am informed, his pater- nal arms of Freugh, and by way of addition, for ditference, on a dexter canton, a part of his maternal coat, viz. an otter's head, and all within a bordure, char- ged with seven boars' heads erased, to represent his marriage with Jean, a daughter of Gordon of Schirmers, descended of Gordon of Lochinvar; and the number seven is chosen by him to represent his being a seventh son. DOUGLAS OF BoNj EDWARD, AND DOUGLAS of Tympyndzan-. IN the First Volume of this System of Heraldry, page 78, I gave the arms and rise of the ancient family of Douglas of Bonjedward, from the paintings of th? Genealogical Tree of the House of Douglas (in Glenbervie's custody), which makes the first of this family to be a third son of William Earl of Angus, and brother of George Earl of Angus, who married the daughter of Sibbald of Balgonie, some- time treasurer of Scotland ; and that this family of Bonjedward carried only the paternal coat of Douglas, ,with a larabel of three points gules, in the collar point of the shield. There is a charter granted by Isabel Countess of Marr to Thomas Douglas the son of John, and Margaret Douglas, his spouse, of all the lands of Bonjedward, as bounded in the charter, which is confirmed by Robert Duke of Albany, Earl of Fife and iVIonteith, Governor of Scotland, his charter of the date the 24th of Oc- tober 1407, the second year of his government. The family of Tympyndean is as follows, I. George Douglas of Bonjedward, with consent of James Douglas his eldest son and apparent heir, gives dileclo filio meo Andreee Douglas, all and haill the lands of Tympyndean, with its pertinents, lying within the territory of Bonjedward, regality of Jedworth Forest, and shire of Roxburgh, as the charter dated at Bon- jedward the ist of July 1479, '^° which his seal of arms is appended, having only a plain shield, a man's heart, (not crowned) and on a chief, three stars (the arms of Douglas) vv^ithout any difference or additional figure, .the legend round the seal S. Georgii Douglas ; and the same day, month, and year befoie mentioned, by a precept of sasine, Andrew Douglas is infeft in the above lands, and was after suc- ceeded by his son II. Archibald Douglas of Tympyndean, who married a daughter of Peter Marshal in Lanton, and got with her some lands there, as by a precept of sasine, dated the 15th of June 1517, wh^ch the family possesses still. Their son and suc- cessor was III. Andrew ; he married Katharine Gladstanes, eldest of the three heiresses portioners, daughters of William Gladstanes of Lanton, with whom he got several lands there, which the family of Tympyndean still possesseth. IV. Andrew Douglas of Tympyndean succeeded his father Andrew, and mar- ried Margaret TurnbuU, daughter to Gavin Turnbull of Ancrum-miU, as by their contract of marriage, dated the loth of December 1562. V. Stephen succeeded his father in the above-mentioned lands, and, by contract of marriage, 20th May 1595, married Jean, daughter to Andrew Halyburton of Muirhouselaw, and was succeeded by his son VI. John of Tympyndean ; he married Mary, eldest daughter to William Douglas -of Bonjedward, the 4th of April 1632. Their son VII. William succeeded, and married Alison, daughter to John Turnbull of Minto, and his lady, Elizabeth, . daughter of Sir Gilbert Elliot of Stobs, and Mai- APPENDIX. 5.S garet, daughter to Sir Wultev Scott of Harden, as by contract of marriage 27th July 1655. Their son, VIII. John Douglas of Tympyndean, married Euphame, daughter to Williana TurnbuU of Sharpelaw, and of Christian, daughter of William Ker of NewtoPv whose mother was a daughter of Sir Archibald Douglas of Cavers, the 6th of December 1679. Their son and successor is tiie present IX. William Douglas of Tympyndean ; he married Jean, daughter to Thomas Rutherford of that Ilk, 22d of February 171 8, who carries, as I am informed, tho arms of Douglas, quartered with these of Gladstones. SCOTT ov Thirlestane. AS for the origin and rise of the surname of Scott, it is as uncertain as all other matters of antiquity, especially surnames, which could not be older than iioc, when surnames began with us. The first of the name to be met with is one Uchtred Jilius Scott, amongst the witnesses in a charter of King David I. to the abbacy of Selkirk. He might have been the first of the surname of Scott, as Sir James Dalrymple observes in his Collections, page 354. There is one Herberttis Scotus, in the foresaid king's reign, witness in a charter oi Robert Bishop of St Andrews to the abbacy of Holyroodhouse. There is a charter by King William, IValtero filio IValteri Scoti of the lands of Alrethes. In the Re- gister of Kelso, fol. 57 and 6^, Ricardus Scotus is to be found in the reign of Alexander II. HlHielmus Scotus is witness in a charter of Walter II. Senesaillus Scotia to the abbacy of Paisley, fol. 10, concerning the church of Dundonald. In the chartulary of the priory and convent of Coldingham there is to be found Chnrta Patricio Scoto de terris in Riston comparatis a domino regc, post forisfacturam tintecessorum ejusdem Patricii, before the year 1273. I have given a short account of several ancient and honourable families of the name of Scott, in the First Volume of this Treatise, page 86 and c^6, amongst whom is Scott of Thirlestane, anciently designed of Houpayslay, or Eskdale; and I shall here again subjoin the descent of this family, with its branches and inter- marriages, as far back as I am informed. I. The first I have met with of this family was Arthur Scott of Houpayslay, or Eskdale, who married a daughter of Maxwell of Terreagles, thereafter Lord Herries, and now Earl of Nithsdale. He was succeeded by his son II. Robert Scoft of Houpayslay, (commonly called Robert of Eskdale) War- den of the Middle-Border betwixt Scotland and England. He married a daughter of Somerville Lord Somerville, and with her had issue III. Sir William Scott of Houpayslay who succeeded, and married Janet, daughter of Gladstanes of Cocklav/; and he was succeeded by his eldest son IV. Sir Walter Scott of Houpayslay, knight, who married a daughter of Douglas of Cavers; she bore to him three sons; the eldest was Abbot of Melrose, the second David, and the third Adam Scott of Hassendean. V. David succeeded his father in the lands of Houpayslay, and, by the favour of his eldest brother the abbot, got the lands of Thirlestane, from which, ever since, the family took their designation. He had to wife a daughter of Scott of Roberton, with whom he had Robert, who succeeded Walter, commonly called Hardy Watt, who was killed, at the battle of Pavia, and James, who went to Ger- many. VI. Robert Scott, first designed Laird of Thirlestane, who married a daughter of Johnstone of that Ilk, now Marquis of Annandale, with whom he had five sons; John, who succeeded ; second, Scott of Hundleshope, in the shire of Tw;eeddale, of whom is descended the present Captain David Scott of Hundleshope, whose arms are recorded in the Lyon Register, and blazoned in the First Part of this System, and Plate of Achievements ; third, Scott of Dry hope; fourth, Scott of Mountbenger; and, fifth, Scott of Bowhill. Vol. IL 4 X 56 ^PJ'ENDIX. VII. John Scott of Thule.aane succeeded his father Robert, a gentleman of singular parts, and of an entire loyalty to King James V. who, for his ready ser- vices, was honoured by that king with a part of the royal bearing, and other suitable figures to timbre his shield of arms; and, to perpetuate the memory of his seasonable services to that king, there is an order granted to the Lyon Herald and his deputies, under the hand of his Majesty and Secretary, Sir Thomas Erskine of Brechin, to record in .their books: The principal of which I have seen, now in the custody of the present Sir William Scott of Thulestane, baronet, inserted in the First \'^olume of this System, page 96. This John Scott of Thirlestane married a daughter of Scott of AHanhaugh, and with her had four sons; Robert, who succeeded; second, Simon, called Long- .) Ibidem, (y) Ibidem, (r) Ibidem, (j) Anstis's History of the Order of the Bath. (0 Charta penes Dominum Joannem Anstruther, (k) Ibidem, (.v) Ibidem. Vol. U. 4 Z 64 APPENDIX. into Engkirid, and was taken prisoner at the battle of Worcester; for vvliich hi. estate was sequestrated, until the Restoration of the King in 1660. He inanied Christian, daughter of Major-General Lumsden of Innergelly, who served with honour in the wars of Germany, under the command of Gustavus Adolphus King of Sweden, by whom he had Sir William his heir. Sir James Anstrutuer of Audrie, an Advocate and Principal Clerk to the Bills. He married Katharnie, daughter of Skene of Halyards, by whom he had Philip Anstruther, colonel of a regiment of foot in his majesty's service, and a daughter. Christian. Sn- RoBHRT Anstruther of Balcaskie, the third son, was married to the heiress of Kinnear, in the county of Fife. He married, to his second wife, Jean Monteith, heiress of Wrae in Linlithgowshire, by whom he had six sons and two daughters. First, Philip, an advocate, and one of the principal clerks to the bills. Second, William, a captain in Brigadier-General Preston's regiment; he was killed in 1715, when General Willis attacked the rebels at Preston, and forced them to surrender. Third, Robert, a Captain in Colonel Anstruther's regiment. Fourth, George, a lieutenant in the same regiment. Fifth, John, who died young, and Alexander, who died an ensign in Brigadier-General Preston's regiment. His eldest daughter. Christian, is married to Sir John Henderson of Fordell, and Jean, to James M'Gill of Ranlieillor. His third wife is Marion Preston, daughter to Sir William Preston of Valleyfield, by whom he has Charles, and several daughters. Sir Philip Anstruther had to his fourth son Sir Philip, who was a captain in the Earl of TuUibaidin's regiment. He married Elizabeth, daughter to, and co- heir of, James Hamilton of Mountainhall. He died in 1722, and left Philip, a captain in Colonel Anstruther's regiment. Christian, married to Sir William Weir of Blackwood, Jean, and Elizabeth. Sir Alex.\nder Anstruther, the youngest son, is one of the Principal Clerks to the Bills. He married Jean Leslie, eldest daughter and heir, both to the estate and honour, of David Lord Newark, by whom he has William. Leslie, David and Alexander Anstruthers, and several daughters. Sir Philip died in 1702, and was succeeded by his eldest son Sir William. He was chosen member of Parliament in the year 1681, when the Duke of York was his Majesty's High Commissioner, and joined with other patriots in opposing the arbitrary measures that were taken at that time. He heartily concurred with the Revolution, when he saw our religion, laws, and liberties, in danger of being over- turned. Soon after the Revolution he was constituted, by King William and Q^ieen Mary, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, and one of the Commissioners of the Court of Justiciary, and some time after was made one of his Majesty's most honourable Privy Council and Exchequer. He exerted himself with a great deal of zeal in promoting the union with England, with a design to get the suc- cession to the crown settled upon the illustrious House of Hanover. He died in 1711, and left by Lady Helen Hamilton, his wife, daughter of John Earl of Had- dington, one son, John. Sir John Anstruther of Anstruther was chosen member of Parliament in the year 1703, and hath been returned a member of Parliament ever since the union, except the first session, when the representatives for Scotland were chosen by Par- liament. He gave convincing proofs of his zeal for the Protestant succession in the present illustrious family, by his behaviour in the British Parliament before the year 1714, and by his serving as a volunteer, with other persons of quality, when, the rebellion broke out in 1715. In January 1717 he married Lady Mar- garet Carmichael, eldest daughter of James Earl of Hyndford, who died in 172 1, leaving three children, Helen, John, and James; this James died soon after his mother. A younger son of the family of Anstruther entered into the French service, and settled in that kingdom, v/here their posterity still remain; but at what time this happened is very uncertain. The arms of the family are to be seen blazoned in the First Volume, page 2.01. ?.nd are engraved in. the Plates of Achievements, Plate IX. 3 APPENDIX. BIRNIE OF THAT Ilk. Mr. JOHN BIRNIE of Broomhill, great-grandson and representative of William Birnie of tliat Ilk, has beside him a Seanachie's tradition of that family written. That in the year of God 838, or thereby, Alpine King of Scots, with many of his prime men, being taken prisoners in battle by the Picts, and thereafter murdered in cold blood, and the King's head, in a base manner, set on a pole in one ot their chief cities, Kenneth II. his son, a brave prince, soon raised an army to be re- venged on the actors of so barbarous a murder. All his followers were desperate and resolute, and had many conflicts several days together, amongst whom was one Birnie, (an Irish word, and signifying in English bright^ so called, because of his glittering armour, with his two sons, who having already several times signalized themselves, yet one evening pressing furi- ously into the thickest of the Picts, were all three, with several others, surrounded and made prisoners. Night by this time putting an end to the fight, they had each of them one leg put fast in a pair of stocks to prevent their escape, till the Picts had more leisure to put them to death. The father knowing very well what would come of them, advised the cutting off of each of their legs; which done, they made a shift to return to their own men; and at the next battle, fatal to the Picts, they were observed to behave themselves with a new courage, wherewith the loss of their legs had animated them. The fortune of the Scots at length prevailing, this King Kenneth, in his just revenge, laid not aside his arms, until he had extirpated the whole nation of the Picts. Their possessions he divided amongst his men, as they best deserved, and upon Birnie he bestowed a barony of land near Elgin, in the shire of Murray, yet bearing his name, and which his posterity enjoyed for a long time thereafter, and gave them for their arms, gules, in resemblance of the late bloody battle, a fesse, the mark of honour, betwixt the how and arrow in full draught, the most an- cient arms then in use, and the three legs couped at the thigh, in perpetual remembrance of their valour ; as to be seen among the Plates of Achievement in Vol. I. PL 7. This estate continued in their possession till about the latter end of the civil wars, in the minority of King James VI. the last whereof was the above William, who married Margaret, daughter to Eraser of Philorth, and, after Birnie's death, was, by Q_iieen Mary, made Mistress of the Mint. He left of issue only one son, Mr William Birnie, who, at age, and after three years study abroad, was, upon the 28th of December 1597, presented by King James VI. to the church of Lanark, and made by hir., -i^.^ h member of both the Courts of High Commission : In which parish, because of the several quarrels and feuds amongst the gentlemen, he not only learnedly preached the gospel, but was obliged many times, as he well could, to make use of his sword. He married Elizabeth, a brother's daughter of Lindsay of Covington, and had issue, John, a merchant, who died without heirs- male; James, a merchant in Poland,^ and after secretary to John Casimir King of Poland, who had no male issue; and Robert, Mr William's third son, who was also, by presentation from King Charles I. of the date the 23d of November 1643, made minister at Lanark. He married Christian, daughter to Dr Patrick Melvin, Professor of the Oriental Languages at St Andrews, of the family of Raith. Tnis Christian was so good a proficient in the Hebrew language, that she was able to English it in any part, even without points. They had of issue one son, the above Mr John, and a daughter, Janet, married to Mr John Irvine of Saphock, whose son, Mr Alexander, now of Saphock, advocate, is the true heir-male and representative of the family of Drum, and married Barbara, daughter to Dundas of that Ilk. Mr John Birnie married Jean, daughter to James Hamilton of Broomhill, Bishop of Galloway, second son of Sir James Hamilton of Broomhill, baronet; the bishop's eldest brother being John Hamilton the first Lord Belhaven. He had issue the 66 APPENDIX. present John Birnie of Broomhill, Mr Alexander, an advocate, and Isabel, married to George Muirhead of Whitecastle. IRVINE OF Drum. THE name and family is very ancient. Some antiquaries bring the name Ere- ■vlne, now written Irvine, from the Celto-Scythic word Erin-vine or Fein, which signifies a stout •westland man : For Erin, in the old Gaelic or Welsh, signifieth ivest ; and J'ine or Fein, a resolute and worthy man. Ireland is at this day called Erin, both by its ancient inhabitants and those of Albion, because its situation is west from Albion. When the colonies of the Gauls came from the west coasts of Spain, and seated themselves in the east coasts of Erin, and in the west hills and islands of Albion, then the Erevines came to both these islands. The Silures of South Wales were of these colonies, as Tacitus affirmeth : And the Brigantes, both of Albion and Erin were of the same. Those among them in Albion, called Erevines, had their seat in that part of the country now called Cunningham ; they gave their name to the river, and to their own habitation, at present called the town of Erevine or Irvine. The chief of them was Ahthane of Dule, an honourable title of old. John Major de Gest. Scot, lib. 3. cap. q. relateth that Erevine, the Abthane, married the only daughter of King Malcolm II. who began to reign anno 1004. He sayeth this Malcolm " fi- " liam unigenitam habuit h^redem quam nuptui tradidit Eryvino Abthano " de Dule, id est, Senescallo regis in insuhs ad colligendos regios proven- " tus. " Some of this family went to the south, and took up their dwelling upon the river Esk, at present called Castle-Irvine or Irvine-Hall ; by marriage the eldest of the family there got the lands of Bonshaw, which they as yet possess. King Robert the Bruce, when he fled from Edward Longshanks, came to Bon- shaw, and took thence the eldest son of the family, Sir William Irvine, to wait on him : He made him his Secretary and Armour-bearer ; and, because of his remark- able fidelity to him in all adversities, this king gave him the lands of the Fo^ rest of Drum ; and, he himself having carried as a private badge three laurel- leaves, with these words, Sub sole, sub umbra virens, he gave to this William, Drum's predecessor, for arms, three holly leaves, which is a kind of laurel, with the foresaid motto. Sub sole, sub umbra virens. Thus the armorial bearing of the family is argent, three holly branches, each consisting of as many leaves proper, banded together giiles. The supporters are two savages wreathed about head and loins with hollies, bearing battons in their hands. This is vouched from the charters of the family, and by Sir George Mackenzie in his Book of He- raldry. Sometime thereafter the Laird of Drum married the daughter of Sir Robert Keith, Knight Marischal, whom he had by Margaret Hay, daughter to Gilbert Lord Hay, first Constable of that family. This Sir Robert Keith was killed at the battle of Durham, anno 1346. The son of this Drum, Sir Alexander Irvine, commanded the Lowland forces at Harlaw in 1411, killed with his own hand Maclean, a chief commander of the Highlanders, and was there killed himself; as Hector Boethius relates, saying, That he was ob prtecipuum robur conspicuus. His brother, named also Sir Alex.^ndkr, succeeded, and was one of the Com- missioners sent by the Estates of Scotland to treat anent the ransom of King James I. and to bring him home ; as Hector Boethius and Drummond of Haw- thornden testify. John .Major, in his History, lib. 6. cap. 12. sayeth. He was. knighted by this king in his second Parliament holden at Perth: His words are, APPENDIX. 67 " Ecfuitem auratum militari balteo praecinxit ; " there he reckonetli this family «' inter veterum familias." This Sir Alexander married a daughter of the Lord Keith Knight Marischal, by whom he had Alexander, and another son, to whom he gave the lands-- of Red- mire and Whiterigs in the Mearns, holding as yet of Drum. From this second son are descended the Irvines of Lenturk. Alexander married Abeniethy, daughter to the Lord Salton, by whom he had Alexander Irvine of Drum, who married Katharine Forbes, daughter to the Lord Forbes : By her he had three sons, Alexander, Richard of Craigton, from whom are descended the L"vines of Hilton, and Henry, and a daughter Lady Wardes. Alex.\nder married Allardice, only daughter to Allardice of that Ilk ; by whom he had a son, Alexander, and two daughters ; one married to Balbegno, and another to Fraser of Muchil, the predecessor of the Lord Fraser. Alexander married Elizabeth Ogilvie, daughter to the Laird of Findlater, who was killed at Pmky, anno 1547. He left six sons and three daughters ; Alexan- der, William of Ardlogie, Robert of Tillilair, from whom Fortry is descended, Gilbert of Cullairly, who had three sons, Alexander, Gilbert, and John of Murthill, James, Knight of IVIalta, ordained by the Great Master, Prior of the Order in Scotland, and was to have been created Lord Torphiclien, had he submitted to the Reformation, and John the sixth son. The daughters were, Janet married to Gordon of Abergeldy, Elizabeth to the Laird of Meldrum, and the third to Arnadge. P>om John of Murthill, now mentioned, are descended the Lwines of Murthill and Cults. Alexander, the eldest, married Lady Elizabeth Keith, daughter to the Earl Maris- chal, by whom he had live sons and four daughters. The eldest married to Ury, the second to Keith of Craig-Inverugie, third to Ogilvy of Boyne, and the fourth to Menzies of Pitfoddels. The sons were, Alexander, the eldest, second Robert of Fornet or Montcoffer, extinct, third James of Brucklaw, the predecessor of Sa- phock, fourth William of Bealty also extinct, and the fifth John of Ardtamford, the predecessor of Crimond and Ardtamford. That this J.ViMES was the third son, and John the fifth, is instructed by the two original charters granted by Drum, their father, to them, the one dated 5th Febru- ary 1598, and the other 27th March 1602, in the custody of Mr Irvine of Saph- ock, which serves to rectify a mistake in the First Volume, page 395. Alexander, son of this Drum, married Marion Douglas, daughter to the Earl of Buchan. He had two sons, Alexander and Robert of Fedderet, and five daughters ; eldest Lady Banff, second married to Urquhart of Leathers, third to Douglas of Glenbervie, fourth to Ogilvie of Innerquharity, and the fifth to Graham of Morphy. Robert, the second son, married Campbell, daughter to Glenorchy. He had two sons, Alexander and Robert, and two daughters, one married to Gordon of Gight, and the other to Fraser of Strichen. Alexander married Lady Eliza- beth Ogilvie, daughter to the Earl of Fmdlater : Both he and his brother Robert died without male issue. This Drum mortified four bursaries to the Grammar- school of Aberdeen, at L. 80 Scots each ; to the university there, four of philo- sophy at L. 100 Scots, and two of divinity at 200 merks each. His lady endowed an hospital for relief of poor widows: Of all which Drum is patron. His eldsst son, Sir Alex.ander Irvine, was Sherift-Principal of Aberdeen ; he married Magdalen Scrymgeour, daughter to Dudhope, Constable of Dundee, and had five sons, Alexander, Robert, James, Charles, and Francis ; the four younger died without issue ; and six daughters, Marion married to the Viscount of Fren- draught, Anne to the Earl of Aboyne, Ehzabeth, Jean, Isabel, and Marga- ret. Alexander married Lady Mary Gordon, daughter to the Marquis of Huntly, and had by her three sons, Alexander, Robert, and Charles ; and four daughters, Mary maiTied to Patrick Count L?she of Balquhain, Margaret to Menzies of Pitfoddels, Jean to Irvine of Murthill, and Henrietta to Pitcaple. By a second marriage he Vol. II. e, A 68 APPENDIX. upon record, made me think that I would have been wanting to the public, and many families all Europe over, should I not have given a more particular de- duction threof. Gentilitian, or family names, are but of late, which obliges me to go back to former ages. The Ptolemies, Fahli, Bruti, and Ciceros were so called on different accounts ; but the noblest rise of surnames was from the arms under which they and their ancestors had performed glorious achievements {a), which, after the wars, they retained. Thence it is a clear proof of a noble descent, when the name is taken from these bearmgs (i), amongst the most divine and heroic, whereof we find the Horns, and that glory (r), honour, beauty, and empire, are by them symboli- zed {d). They were the sacred and royal badges of the gods and heroes {e). Jupiter, Y't'O, Sospita, Pan, and other deities, distinguished themselves by these ; and, up- on their first appearance upon the brave Frretor's head, he was by the soothsayers saluted king(/). Bacchus thdt mighty conqueror carried the horns in his crest and banners, and therefore was called Corniger. Alexander King of Macedon no sooner fancied him- self the son of Jupiter, than he clapt the horns in his crest and coins, as conqueror of the eastern and western empires, and was foretold by the prophet {g), by the goat with the horns, and the asra from his conquests was called dalcarnaim pr horned (Z»). Pyrrhus, the bravest of all his successors, perpetuate this heroic bearing to his descendants (i), who, in the wars with Hannibal, left Eprus, joined the Romans, and from their arms, as Bacchus and Alexander formerly, were called Cornuti, Cor- nigeri, and Cormificii, and afforded generals, consuls, praetors, and other magistrates to that glorious republic. The using the same name and arms is an uncontested proof of cadency and descent. These of the Cornuti, and those of the surname of Horn have been always the same (^k) ; for upon the fatal division of the empire to Constantine's sons, we find them blazoned (/), " Duo cornua venatoria rubra in parma lutea, quae in summo *' instar lunae fiectuntur duphci circulo margo circumdatur." By the two horns representing the eastern and western empires, by the two circles, insinuating, that ■although they were divided in the persons of two emperors, yet they continued (jue and the same, to which they had a Minerva added (jn), in token of their wis- dom as well as valour. Frequent mention is made by the Roman and other historians of the Cornuti, and great actions by them performed. It was they who, under the brave Julian, retrieved the sinking glory of Rome at the battle of Strasburg against the united Germans. " Cornuti enim (says " an eye witness) («) usu armorum diu assueti gestu terrentes barritum civere " nrma armis corpora corporibus obtrudebant," whereby they stayed the flying army, and obtained a glorious victory. It was also they who supprest the usurpation of Sylvanus against Constantius : " CcEsis custodibus (writes the same author) (o) regia penetrata Sylvanum extrac- '• tum asdiculo, quo exanimatus confugerat densis gladiorum ictibus trucidarunt." Besides, what is writ of the Cornuti in general, we have upon record many great men of that name. Sextus Coinutus, an illustrious senator, asserted the Roman liberty against Cinna and Marius, and in that bloody proscription was saved by the fidelity of his slaves (/)), in taking the body of a slaughtered plebeian, putting their master's clothes upon him, with his ring on his finger, rolling all in blood,, bringing in the satellites to see their slaughtered lord, sending the ring to Marius, thereby to get the promised reward, giving the funeral pale, whereby all farther enquiry was laid aside, and he escaped to the Gauls. Julius CfEsar, in his greatest danger, did animate his fainting army by telling them, after his loss at Dyrachium, that Q^iintus Cornutus (or Cornuficius) was- (a) Juris, prud. per page 112. {h) Pasch. lib. 10. 4. (0 Psal. cli. 89. ver. i;. {J) Psal. 92. ver. 10. (e) Span. d. U5. num. pag. 4C0. (/) Val. Max. lib. 5. cap. 6. § s. {g) Dan. cap. 8- ver. 21. (*) Alfran. cap. 1. § 6. d. aeris. (0 Plut. in vita Pyrrh. (Q Alicat. par. lib. 5. cap. 13. (/) Grajv. Thf:. ant. Rom. pag. ]8:8. (m) Ibid. pag. 1830. (n) Ammian. Marcel, lib. 18. cap. 12. (0) Lib. 1 1;. cap. I'l ip) Pint, in vita Marii. APPENDIX. 69 coming with two legions to their assistance, to whom, after Pharsalia, the finish- ing of tlie civil war was committed ; he put an end tiiereto with a great deal of glory (1/) and in memory thereof built Cornutum, (now Presburg) the capital of Upper Hungary. He arraigned Brutus, as Agrippa did Cassius, for Caesar's mur- der (.). Augustus Cajsar did owe the preservation of his army in Sicily to Lucius Cor- nutus, who had that island for his province, which being reduced to great straits by the shipureck of Augustus coming to their relief, yet he made a brave retreat in the face of Pompey the younger's ai-my. He was consul with Sextus Pompeius, Augustus' near kinsman (s), and repaired the buildmgs consecrated to Diana at Rome (r). There was another brave republican, Quintus Cm-nutus, or Cornuficius, who, with Brutus and Cassius, stood for the senate against the Triumvirs, and received into Africa his province all that fled thither; but after he had done all that was pos- sible for his country's liberty, finding his army dispirited, he disdainfully called them Gidkati Lcpoies (/(), and died on bis sword ; it was to him that Cicero wrote his 17, 18, 10, and 22 epistles. There are several coins still extant, bearing the effigies and inscription of ^t/itiis Cornutus Ati^ur Ifl Imperator (t»^. Tacitus {yj) affords us another noble Roman and lover of his country, Cecilius Cornutus, who had been prator among the Gauls, and in that time, by his justice and liberality, had gained a great ascendant over that nation. He was accused by Tiberius, as having advanced great sums of money to make them revolt ; but rather as undergo a trial before a prince where virtue was a crime, according to the then heroic custom, he made choice of a voluntary death. There was another Cornutus sent over from Boulogne by Julius Caesar with the British ambassadors, to discover the coimtry and inhabitants ; Echard calls him Corneo (x). They were not only famous in the state for arms and government, but also for learning. vEneas Cornutus fell under Nero's displeasure for saying he had writ too much ( v) ; he criticised Virgil (z). And there was another no ways inferior to Livy for history ; and in what esteem a third was, appears from Persius's 5th Satire ; a fourth wrote mythology, or the history of the gods ; and the learned Cornuficia did show that poesie and letters were not denied her sex. By the way, I must notice why the herns, the most honourable of all the an- cient bearings, should be pointed to a certain kind of men, as a badge of their misfortunes; and I find (laying aside the story of Andronicus, and venison sent to his favourite ladies, the horns whereof the husbands next day affixed to their gates, to show the favour they were in with the emperor, and the curious Acteon with the bathing Diana) (i?) the jest to have arisen from Lucius Cornutus, a tribune in the Roman army, who being suspected of an intrigue with a lady, from whose lodg- ings being called suddenly, he, by an unlucky mistake, clapt the husband's hel- met on his head, thinking it his own, wlio, not dreading the consequences, fol- lowed with that of his guest with the horns ; and both appearing in the army thus dressed, occasioned an huzza ; the confusion on both sides was great ; the casques were with mutual blushes returned ; the story spread, as scandals do, and gave rise to the calling all such good-natured husbands Cornuti, and their assistants Cornuficii, and the continuing that byname with that branch of the family, a thing very usual among the Romans (i). Having given a short hint of the Cornuti, whilst the state of Rome remained under consuls and emperors, with the succeeding Goths they continued in good friendship ; but Attila and his barbarous Huns having wasted Italy, the Cornuti were obliged to shift, some whereof retired to the islands in the Adriatic Sea, and with other noble Romans founded the city and republic of Venice ; others lurked in Italy, a third joined Meroveus King of the Franks, but the greatest part (?) Caes- Com. de Bell. Ale.t. (r) Plut. in vita Bruti- (j) Dion. Cass. pag. 245. (/) Suet, in vita.. Augas. (a) Vos. de nat. art. p. 35. {y) Patin. fam. Rom- pag. 93. (w) Lib. 4. cap. 8. (*■) Vol. I. page 307. {y) Dion. Cas. page 250. (k) Aul. Gel. lib. 2. cap. 6. (a) Span. d. us. num. page 202. {J/] Cartr. Hist. Rom. vol. 13. page 93. Vol. II. 5 B 70 APPENDIX. associated with Thorismund King of the Goths, and for some ages shared in- tiieir fortunes. This once-united Gens or tribe being thus separate, could not but receive an al- teration in their surnames, according to the humour and languages of the several nations with whom they had associated, yet still they retained the paternal and fa- mily arms. In the State of Venice, where lofty and sonorous names were affected, from de C'jrnu they assumed de Cornaro; of which house the three branches are St Maurice, St Paul, and Calle, brothers to the renowned Queen of Cyprus; they are a size of nobility above all the families in that state, and carry themselves so high, tliA many daughters have become nuns, lest they should be obliged to change their own most noble name with that of a husband (c); they have been Doges, and borne the greatest offices both in church and state. In Italy they retain the name de Cornu or Corneo ; of which tha-e are several great families still extant ; and frequent mention is made (rf) of the brave Ascanea de Cornu, to whom the victory of Lepanto and preservation of Malta against the Tuiks in a great measure was owing. He had a hand in all the exploits performed by Don John, both in Africa and the Low Countries. In France they are Lords of Villeneuve, near Montreiiil, and retain the name de Cornu \2 Cormttus. They were famous in the gov/n ; Gautier de Cornu, anno 1223, was Archbishop of Sens, and great Eleemosynary to Philip Augustus. Gilon de Cornu. was also an archbishop, and attended St Louis to the holy wars. The Sees of Chartres and Ncvers were also filled by two of his name (<°). As to the fourth and greatest part of this once-united clan, which associated with- the Goths, horn signifying the same thing in the Sclavonian, Gothic, German, Dutch, and British languages, that cornu did in the Latin, they assumed the surname of Horn, but still retained the paternal arms without the least altera-, tion. The Goths having retired to Sweden, the Horns seated on the Maese, and built the city and Castle of Horn on that river, Horn in North Holland, Hornburgh in the Lower Germany, with a great many other towns and castles, of which, although at first they had the sovereignty, yet since many of them iiave been wrested from their first founders, of whom they retain now no more than the name and arms. Christopher Butkins, in his Trophies Brabantia, writes thus : " The House of Horn '• is the most ancient and illustrious of the seventeen provinces ; and for its anti- " quity, power, and high alliances, deserves to be placed among the sovereign " states, it being certain that the lords of that house have possessed their estates,. " without any dependance or homage to any other prince, and were absolute so- " vereigns of the country on the Maese, and as such did coin money with their " own impressions, which do still pass current in the county of Liege." Gille, a Monk of Arvile, in his Annals of the Bishops of Liege, writes the his- tory of this noble family from the year 1701, " That Conrade Count de Horn asso- " ciate with the Bishop of Liege, Earls of Namur and Luxemburg, for keeping " the peace of the country, but excuseth his not going further back, because some " years before that time, the Normans, by a barbarous eruption on the Maese, burnt •' down churches, records, and monuments, whereby the memory of preceding ac- " tions might have been transmitted to posterity." This illustrious and independent house lost their sovereignty anno 1106, by William I. associating with the neighbouring princes agamst Henry V. who, by his imperial power, had divested the Duke of Limburg of the Dutchy of Brabant, vind given it to Godfrey Duke of Lorrain, which they thought of bad example; and although at first the success was doubtful, yet, in the end, victory inclined to the imperial side, whereby the count, after a siege in his own town of Horn, was obliged to capitulate, and buy his piece at the rate of his independency, and, from a free and absolute prince, became a feudatory of the Roman Empire. The Counts of Horn, as Knights of the Golden Eleece, do bear (/) " Tria cor- (c) Burn, Let. from Florence. (-y against the T.urtis, and in his own country, and, after signal ser- vices done to the Spanish Monarchy, he died at Brussels of the wounds he had re- ceived at Ramillies. This most illustrious family is presently represented by Maximilian Emanuel Prince and Count dc Homes Onacourt, Count of Bassigne, Hautkirk Balliul, &c. He was born at Brussels the 3 rst of August 1695, and is married to Lady Charlotte Mary Bruce, only daughter to Robert Earl of Elgin arid Aylesbury, a male branch of the royal family of the Bruces by the Countess Sanau, in a second marriage, and is short of none of his noble ancestors. They have matched with the imperial and greatest families in Europe. Gerard, the first Count dc Homes was married, anno 1306, to Emergard, daughter to the Emperor Albert, William VI. to Elizabeth of Cieves, whereby Theodore, their son, succeeded to great estates : his grandchild, M) Orig. & Increment. Famillfe Arbuthnot, MS. (y) Charta iio. lib. 1 4. in publicis Archivis ad annum 1 505. (r) Orig. & Increment. &c. (j-) Charta in publicis Archivis, (/) Charta 334. lib. 21. in publicis Archivis facta Andrese Arbuthnott in Pitcarles, & Roberto Arbuth- nott, ejus filio & hferedi apparenti, de omnibus & singulis terris, & villa de Littil Futhes, cum suis pcrtinen- tiis jacent. in baronia de Stratoun, infra parochiam de Kinneff, apud Edinburgh, Maii 8. 1556. («) Spotis- wood's Church History, lib. 6. page 335.. (x) Orig. & Increment. (_)-) Ibidem. (a) Charta 294. lib. 14. in publicis Archivis. (i) Continuation of the History of the Family of Arbuthnot, MS. (c) Charta 2^9. lib. 22. in publicis Archivis, ad annum 1542. (J) Continuation of Principal Arbuth- not's History", MS. (f) Charta penes Comitem de Panmure, etiam Charta 604. lib. 13. in publicis Ar- chivis facta per Thomam Maul, feodatorium baronia de Panmure, cum consensu & assensu charissimi pa- tris sui Robert! Maule de Panmure, honorabili mulieri Isabella Arbuthnott prsefati patris sui sponss, dc terris de Glaster & Skryne, anno 1551. APPENDIX. 85. anil had issue. This James Arbuthnot of that Ilk died in the flower of liis age in the year 1521 (,A)i ^nd was succeeded by his son, XIV. Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk, the third of that name, who was a per- son of great note in the reign of King James V. from whom he obtained a char- ter, dated at Edinburgh, January 27. anno 1528 {g), whereby the king gives him, " totam et integram nostram salmonum piscariam super le seashore, subtus villam " de Innerbervy, inter le mouth aqurc de Innerbervy et locum de Halgreen, &.c." He married, first, Erskine, daughter to Erskine of Dun {b), an ancient family in Vicccomitatu de Forfar, by whom he had no surviving, issue. After her decease he maiTied Lady Christian Keith (/), daughter to Robert Lord Keith, (son and heir apparent to William Earl Marischal) by Beatrix his wife, daughter to John Earl of Morton (^k) ; as evidently appears by a charter under the Great Seal, in the Public Records, granted by King James V. " Dilectis nos- " tris Roberto Arbuthnott de eodem, et Christiana; Keith sua; sponsae, de terris de " Petquorthy et Caldcoats, &-c." dated at Strivelin, February 13th 1535 (/). By this lady lie had four sons ; first, Andrew, his successor ; second, John Arbuthnot of Mandynes ; third, Alexander Arbuthnot of Pitcarles (;/;) ; fourth, Robert Ar- buthnot, who, being a younger brother, dedicated himself to the service of the church, and, after spending some years in France, with great application to his stu- dies, was, by his father, upon his ret^urn, presented to the parsonage of Arbuthnot, which he enjoyed until his death (/z): as also several daughters; first, mar- ried to Clephane of Carslogie, iti Vicecomitatii de Fife ;. second,. to Straiten of Lauriston, in Plcecoviitatu de Kineardin; third, to Sym- mer of Balyordie, an ancient family in the shire of Forfar; fourth, to Strachan of Brigton (0). Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk married to his third wife Helen Clephane, daughter to George Clephane of Carslogie, a very ancient family in the shire of Fife (/»), by whom he had, first, David Arbuthnot of Findowry ; second, James Arbuthnot of Blackstone; third, Hugh Arbuthnot of Auchterforfar (y) ; as al- so several daughters ; first, married to Mortimer of Cragievar, in I'icecomitatu de Aberdeen ; second, married to Ogilvie of Balfour, in Jlcecomitatu de Forfar (;) ; third, married to Ramsay of Barnyard's; fourth, to Ogih'ie of Balnabeth (r). He himself died October 15th anno 1579 (/), and was interred amongst his ancestors in the burial-place of the family at Arbuthnot, being succeeded in his estate by his son, XV. Andrxw Arbuthnot of that Ilk, w ho, being a very frugal and industrious gentleman, considerably augmented his old paternal inheritance, by several new acquisitions; such as the baronies of Arrat, Pitforthie, &c. (u). There is a charter in the public records, granted by Q^ieen Mary, " Dilecto et fideli suo Andrea " Arbuthnott, filio et haei-edi apparent! Roberti Arbuthnott de eodem, de baronia " de Arbuthnott, cum le mains, castro, et fortalitio de Arbuthnott, &c. una cum-. " piscaria in aqua de Bervy, et piscariis in faucibus aqu?e de Innerbervy infra " maris fluxum," &c. (.v) He married Elizabeth, daughter to Sir Robert Car- negie of Kinnaird, who was ambassador from the crown of Scotland, to the court . of England and France, and ancestor to the Earl of Southesfc, as appears by a charter {a) in the public records, granted by Queen Mary, "■ Andreje Arbuthnott " feodatario de eodem, et Elisabetha; Carnegy ejus conjugi, de terris de Fidde^, " Collistoun, Mutelaw, &-c. datum September 24. anno 1553." By the above lady he had three sons ; first. Sir Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk, his sucessor; second, James Arbuthnot of Arrat (Z>), who married Livingston, daughter to Livingston of Dunipace, an ancient family in Vicecomitatu de Strive- (/) Continuation of the History of the family of Arbuthnot, IVTS. {_g) Charta 202. lib. i8. in publicis Archivis. (A) Continuation of Principal Arbuthnot's History, &c. (i) Charta in publicis Ar- chtvis, ad annum 15,^;. (f) Ibidem ad an-ium 1506. (/) Charta 257. lib. 27. in publicis Archivis. (m) Continuation of Principal Arbuthnot's History, &c. («) Ibidem. (0) Ibidem. (/>) Charta 4. lib. 32. in publicis Archivis, de terris de Auchtirforfar, facta dilecto nostro Roberto Arbuthnot de eodem, et haeredibus suis masculis inter eum et Helenam Clepan sponsam suam legitime procreatis seu procreandis,. quibus deficientibus Roberto Arbuthnot, filio dicti Roberti, Arbuthnot de eodem, &.c. datum apud Edinb. 7. Septembrls, A. I>. 1573. (?) Charta in publicis Archivis. (r) Continuation of Principal Arbuth- not's History, (j-) liiidem. (;) Ibidem. (;/) Tliis appears from several charters in the public records, (x) Charta 106. lib. 21. in publicis Archivis, data apud Perth, 26 die mensis Junii anno 1553. (a) Char- ta 174. lib. ;i, in publicis Archivis. (A) Ciiartu in publicis Archivis. Vol. II. ^ F 86 APPENDIX. tin, by whom he had Sir Robert Arbuthnot of Arrat, who succeeded to the estate of Arbuthnot upon his uncle's decease, and James, tutor of Arbuthnot; third, Patrick Arbuthnot of Chapelton (c): As alio a daughter, Elizabeth, married to Eraser of Dores (d). He died in a good advanced age, March 6. 1606, and was succeeded by his son, XVI. Sir Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk, who, being a person of great talents, both natural and acquired, was highly in favour with his sovereign King James VI. who had aways a very great opinion of Sir Robert's parts and integrity, as will evidently appear by the following letter, which is here subjoined, as I copied it verbatim fiom the original (f), directed thus, " To our trusty and well-beloved the " Laird of Arbuthnott." The tenor of it follows : James R. " Trusty and weill-beloved we greit you weiU. Whereas we have licensed the " General Assembly of the Church of that Kingdome, to be kept the last Tuesday " of July nixt, at our burgh of Linlithgow, as weill for composing of the present " differences in the same, as for some order to be taken with this greit incress and " growth of papists within that kingdome: To the effect therefore that all things " maye be dewly ordered, and in decent form proceidit into : And knowing that " your presence there maye doe much good, we are to desyre you earnestly nowaye " to be absent from that assembly ; and by your councel and advice, to furder ^' the pacifying of all question that is presently in the church, and to assist such " courses, that sail be proponed for suppressing of contraire professors. Wherein " nowaye doubting, bot your oune zeale and affection to the treuth professed sail " be motives sufficient, and ye sail also therewith gayne our special thanks, ac- " cording as ye will learne more particularly from our right trustie cousing and " councellor the Erie of Dunbar, whom we have sent with special creditt, as our " commissioner to that meiting. And so we bid you farewel. From our Courte " at Greenwich the 14. of Junii 1608." He married Lady Mary Keith (/), daughter to William Lord Keith, (son and heir apparent to William Earl MarischaL) by Elizabeth his wife, daughter to George Earl of Errol (^), by whom he had no issue; so that upon his decease, which happened in the year ^615, the estate of Arbuthnot devolved upon his ne- phew, XVII. Sir Robert Arbuthnot of that Ilk (A), eldest son to his brother James Arbuthnot of Arrat, as is above mentioned. He being heir apparent to an old family of an opulent fortune, was carefully educated by his uncle suitable to his quality; for, after having gone through the course of his studies in his native country, he was sent, for his further improvement, to visit France and other fo- reign limgdoms, from whence, after some years abode, he returned with the cha- racter of a very polite and well accomplished gentleman, and made a very con- siderable figure amongst the barons in several of King James VI. and King Charles I.'s Parliaments ; with both which monarchs he was so much in favour, that it is very probable he would have raised his family considerably, had not an im- mature death untimeously snatched him away in the flower of his age, to the great regret of all his friends and acquaintances. He was twice married; first, to Lady Margaret Keith (/), daughter to George Earl Marischal, and niece to his (c) Charta 190. lib. 40. Arch. pub. facta praedllecto nostra Andrese Arbutlinot de eodem in vjtali redditu, ac Patricio Arbuthnott suo filio juniori, &c. quibus deficientibus Jacobo Arbuthnott de Aratt, &c. de totis& integris villa & terrisde Magdalen-Chapel, nuncupat. le Chapiltoun, apud Halyrudehouse, 2j die Februarii, A. D. 1594. etiam Charta 24. lib. 42. facta Andreae Arbuthnott de eodem, & Pa- tricio Arbuthnott suo filio legitimo natu minimo, de terris de Nether- Pitforthies, apud Halyrudehouse, 20. die M.irtii anno 1 597. {d) Continuation of Arbuthnot's History, {e) Original Letter in anno l6o8, by King James VI. to the Laird of Arbuthnot, penes Vicecomitem de Arbuthnott. (/) Charta 193. lib. 47. in publicis Archivis, facta dilecto nostro Domino Roberto Arbuthnott de eodem, militi, & DominEB Mariae Kleth ejus sponsa;, de terris de Cowlie, &c. apud Edinb. 7. die mensis Januarii anno "^("^i- ig) Charta in publicis Archivis, ad annum 1553. (A) Charta 54. lib. 48. Arch. pub. facta Roberto Arbuthnott de Arrat militi, de baronia, castro, & fortalitio de Arbuthnott, apud Edinb. 9. die Januarii, A, D. 1610. (0 Charta in publicis Archivis. I APPENDIX. S7 tiade's lady. But she dying very soon after, without issue, he married, secondly, Margaret Fraser, daughter to Simon Lord Lovat, by Jean Stewart his wife, daugh- ter to James Lord Doune, by whom he had four sons; first, Su" Robert Arbuthuot of that Ilk, his successor, afterwards Viscount of Arbuthnot ; second, Andrew Ar- buthnot of Fiddes ; third, Alexander Arbuthnot, a young gentleman of great loyalty and courage, who was slain valiantly fighting in defence of his king and country at the fatal battle of Dunbar, September 3. 1650; fourth, Simon Arbuth- not of Catherlan: As also three daughters; first, Jean, married to Sir Alexander Burnet of Leys ; second, Margaret, to Sir Alexander Carnegie of Pittarrow ; third, • Janet, to William Rait of Halgreen. He died March 1^. anno 1633 {k), and was succeeded by his eldest son, ■ XViU. Sir Robert Ak.buihnot of that Ilk, who being a person of exemplary loyalty, obtained fust the honour of knighthood .(/) from his sovereign King Charles I. and was afterwards, by the special favour of that monarch, advanced to the peerage of this realm, by the title of Viscount of Arbuthnot, and Lord Inver- bervie, by letters patent, bearing date November 16. 1641 (ni). He married, first,. Lady Marjory Carnegie, daughter to David Earl of Southesk, by whom he had Robert, his successor, and a daughter, Margaret, married to Sir John Forbes of Monymusk in Vicecomitatu de Aberdeen ; and, after her decease, he married Ka- tharine, daughter to Hugh Lord Lovat, by whom he had Alexander Arbuthnot of Knox, and a daughter, Anne, married to William Forbes of Ludquhairn in Pice- comitatu de Aberdeen; tuid dying in the year 1659 («), he was succeeded by hir son, XIX. Robert Lord Viscount of Areuthnot, who married first Lady Elizabeth Keith, daughter to William Earl Marischal, by Lady EHzabeth Seaton, his wife^ daughter to George Earl of Winton, by whom he had Robert, who succeeded him in his estate and honours, and a daughter, Margaret, married to Sir Thomas Bur- net of Leys. He married, secondly, Katharine, daughter to Robert Gordon of Pitlurg and Straloch, by whom he had, first, Mr John Arbuthnot of Fordun; se- cond, Mr Alexander Arbuthnot, one of the Barons of his Majesty's Exchequer in Scotland, who afterwards changed his surname to Maitland, upon the account of his marriage with Jean, eldest daughter and sole heiress to Sir Charles Maitland of Pitrichie; third, Mr Thomas Arbuthnot: As also three daughters ; first, Katharine, married first to Mr Robert Gordon of Clunie, and again to David Riccart of Ric- carton; second, Anne, married to Mr John Horn of Westerhall, advocate; third,. Helen, married first to John Macfarlane of that Ilk, and afterwards to Mr John Spottiswood of that Ilk, advocate; and all of them had issue. This lord died ia. the year 1684, and was succeeded by his son, XX. Robert Viscount of Arbuthnot, who married Lady Anne Sutherland, only daughter to George Earl of Sutherland, by Lady Jean his wife, daughter to David Earl of Wemyss, by whom he had Robert, his successor, and John, the present Viscount ; as also four daughters, Jean, Anne, Mary, and Margaret; and dying in the y?ar 1692, he was succeeded by Iiis eldest son Robert Viscount of Arbuthnot, a nobleman pf great parts and expectation, who, to the great grief of all his relations, was untimeously snatched away by death, in the year 1710, unmarried. Upon whose decease both the estate and honours went to his bro- ther, XXI. John, present Lord Viscount of Arbuthnot, who married Jean, daughter, to William Morison of Prestongrange. Of the surname of PETRIE. SEVERALS of those of the surname of Petrie in Scotland do bear the same arms with those of Ireland, from whom they seem to have been descended, parti- (/f) Continuation of Principal Arbuthnot's History, MS. (/) Cliarta in publicis Archivis (m) Re- gister of Patents in the Chancery Office, (n) Frasei's History of the Family of Lovat, MS. 88 APPENDIX. cularly in Vicecom. Moravien. And thus Major Ludovick. Petrie, some time Town-Major of Gibraltar, bears gules, a bend or, between two escalops argent, within a bordure ingrailed; crest, a cross cxoii&l fitch e: motto, Fides. CRAWFURDS of Auchinames. THAT the Crawfcrds were barons of the extensive barony of Loudon, ancT Heritable Sheriffs of Ayr, ever since the days of King Alexander II. is evident from the chartulary of Kelso in the Lawyers' Library ; and that the ancient fa- mily of Auchinames in Renfrewshire were lineally descended of Sir Ranald Craw- furd of Loudon, sheriff of Ayr, will be evident beyond exception from what I am to offer. This family were, from their very first descent from the family of Loudon, possessed of the twelve pound land, of old extent, of Auchinames in Renfrewshire, and the fourteen pound lands of Corsby, the six pound lands of Manock and Gills, the five merk lands of Auldmuir, and the five merk lands of Whiteside, all in the shire of Ayr, being thirty-eight pounds and one merk of old extent; all which knds were in the possession of Thomas Crawfurd of Auchinames, grandchild of Sir Ranald Crawfurd of Loudon. This Thomas lived in the days of King Robert III. and is witness to the resig- nation of the lands of Fulton, to the monks of Paisley, in the year 1409. As this gentleman was possessed of a very fair estate, so he was zealous to bestow a part of it upon these uses which were then judged to contribute most to the promoting of piety, and procuring salvation both to his own soul and the souls of his near rela- tions; as appears from the original charter, yet extant, in the custody of the family of Auchinames, whereof this is an exact copy. " Universis Christi fidelibus, ad quorum notitiam presentes literEE pervenerint, " Thomas de Crawfurd dominus de Auchinamys, salutem in Domino sempiter- " nam. Noveritis me pro salute animae mese, et animarum uxorum mearum, et " animse Reginald! de Crawfurd avi mei, nee non pro salute animarum patrum ',' et matrum nostrorum, predecessorum, hteredum et successorum nostrorum, et ** animarum omnium fidelium defunctorum, dedisse, concessisse, et hac present! " charts mea confirmasse, in puram et perpetuam elimosinam, Deo et sanctissima- " matri suse Marite, semper Virgini, et omnibus Sanctis, totam terram meam de " Lyimernocht, et duas mercatas terras de Glentayne, cum omnibus suis pertinen- " tiis, et asiamentis quibuscunque, et tres mercatas annui redditas quolibet anno « percipiendas, per equales portiones, ad terminos debitos et consuetos, de terris « meis de Cakachant de Corbar, et de totis terris de Auchinamys, ad sustenta- " tionem unius capellani, qui pro tempore fuerit divina celebrantis, et pro perpetuo " celebraturi ad altare S.inct;e Mariae Virginis, in ecclesia. parochial! de Kilbarchan, « vel in capella in ejusdem ecclesise cemiterio construenda ; tenendas et habendas- " dicto- capellano qui pro tempore fuerit, et successoribus suis, in puram et per- •« petuam elimosinam, adeo hbere, pacifice, quiete, honorifice, sicut aliqua terra " elimosinaria in regno Scotia conceditur vel concedi potest. Volo etiam et sta- " tuo quod capellanus dictas cappellanias, vel capella; niinistrans vel ministraturus, « qui pro tempore fuerit, etedem capellae, vel capellania' in propria persona mini- « strat, et personaliter residiat in eadem, et quid non poterit illam cum alio quon- « dam beneficio ecclesiastico in simul retinere, immo quod per acceptationem se- " cundi beneficii, ipsa vacare sentiatur, ipso facto, et quod dictus capellanus, tan- « quam sacerdos parochialis vel prodefunctis, vel aliter qualitercunque nullatenus " celebrare permittatur; quid si facere atemptaverit, hoc ipso facto ab omni jure " quid in dicla capella vel capellania habuerit, sit privatus, et ad eandem in pos- « terum, nuUo modo valeat presentari, nee sibi per quendam de eadem provider!. " Item volo et statuo quod quoties hujusmodi capellanus, per me, haeredes et assig- «« natos meos presentatus est, et per diocesianum, vel sede vacante capitulum « Glasguensem, admissus et institutus. in hujusmodi capella vel capellania, cedere APPENDIX. 89 " vel decedere contingat ad me, hsredes meos, et assignatos meos ejusdem presen- " tutio, et ad loci diocesianum admissio et collatio pertineat, vel sedo vacante capi- " tulum Glasgueiisem; et si ego, hieredes inei, aut assignati, ad dictam capellani " vel capellanum, personam idoneam, ut premissum est, infra quatuor menses a " tempore vacationis,"et notitiai presentare detulerimus, loci diocesianus, vel sede " vacante capitulus Glasguensis, eandem negligeiitiam nostram supplendo de per- " sona idonea providebit, ita tamen quod per liujusaiodi provisionem diocesiani,, " vel sede vacante capituli Glasguensis mihi, hreredibus meis, vel assignatis, cum " alias vacaverit, nullum omnino prejudicium generetur; et si contingat me, ha;- " redes meos, vel assignatos meos, contra istam coarcessionem meam et ordina- " tionem, in toto, aut in jiarte venire, obligo me, hxredes meos, et assignatos " meos, in quadraginta libras sterlingorum solvendas fabrica; ecclesije Glasguensis " toties quoties esse continget, nomine pena;, et nihilominus per censuram ecclesi- " asticam, ad haec omnia facienda, a loci diocesiano, et sede vacante capitulo Glas- " guensi, compelli, et coerceri valeamus; et ut ista ordinatio et concessio mea firma " valeat in p^rpetuum et inconcussa ma-nere, volo pro me, hwredibus meis, et " assignatis, et consensio ut perdecanum et eschactorem Christianitatis de Ruglen, " qui pro tempore fuerit, dicta capellu vel capellania, singulis annis semel visite- " tur, vel sicpius, si per me, haredes meos, vel assignatos, cum instantia fuerint re- " quisiti. In cujus rei testimonium, huic presenti charts, perpetuaz meje- sigillum " meum est appensum, coram his testibus, videlicet, venerabili in Christi patre " Matheo miseratione divina episcopo Glasguensi, Joanne Symple de Elzotston, " Roberto Symple, Malcolmo de Calbrat Domino de Grenok, Joanne de Crawfurd " fratre meo, cum multis aliis."' This mortificattion is confirmed by King Robert III. in the twelfth year of his reign, at Arneall the 2-4tbof October iaoi, by a ratification under his Privy Seal. To Thomas Crawfurd succeeded Archibald his son, who obtained a charter from James 1. upon the resignation ,of his father, in that king's hands, of the third part of the lands of Auchinames, and a third part of the mill thereof to the said Archibald, and his heirs-male ; which failing, to Friskyn Crawfurd, second son to the said Thomas, and the heirs of his body ; which failing, to the said Thomas himself, and his heirs-male whatsomever, holding ward of the prince and steward of Scotland. This charter is 4ated ia the list year of King James I. his reign, 1427. The next I met with is Robert Crawfurd of Auchinames, who was twice mar- ried ; first, to Margaret Douglas, daughter of George, Master of Angus, and sister to Archibald the great Earl of Angus, who married King James IV. his Q^ieen, who was daughter to Heny VII. of England ; and the said Robert had by her only one daughter, Margaret, married to Semple of Nobieston. He next married Marion Houston, daughter to Houston of that Ilk, by whom he had three sons, James, Henry, and Robert. He grants a charter in favour of his said three sons, dated 23d February 1483, and confirmed by King James III. 2^th February 1483 : and, in the year 1484, June 18. the said Robert of Auchinames gives sasine to his son James of the whole lands of Auchinames, with a reservation of his own liferent. He was killed with King James IV. at the battle of Flodden, 9th Sep- tember 1513. To him succeeded James Crawfurd of Auchinames his son, who obtains a char- ter from James Campbell of Loudon of the lands of Corsby and Munock, holding of him, dated July 12. 1498. He resigns in the hands of William Cunningham, Master of Glencairn, the whole lands of Corsby and Manock for new infeftment of Thomas Crawfurd his son, and his heirs-male, the 20th of October 1535; and that same day Thomas Crawfurd his son is seised in the lands of Corsby and Manock. He gives a charter to William Wallace of Craigie of the lands of Whit- side. November 4. 1526. To him succeeded Thom.«, his son above mentioned, who, in the year 1539, October 2d, obtains a gift and disposition from King James V. of the non-entries of the lands of Auldmuir; which lands are said to have continued in non-entries tor the space of 100 years, viz. from the death of Thomas Crawfurd of Auchi- names. He married Marion Montgomery, daxighter to the Laird of Hazlehead Vol. II. 5 G 90 APPENDIX. and had by her John, William, and Patrick, all Lairds of Auchinamcs. To Tho- mas succeeded John Crawfiud his son, who is Laird of Auchinatnes in the year J 544, as appears by an instrument of apprising taken by Marion Montgomery, lelict of Thomas Crawfurd of Auchinames, the id of December 1544. He mar- ried Giles Cunningham, daughter to WiUiam Cunningham, second Laird of Craigends, but by her he had no succession. He was killed at the battle of Pinky loth September 1547. To him succeeded William Crawfurd of Auchinames, his brother, who obliges tumself to relieve the Laird of Gadgirth of twelve score merks, due to the Laird of Auchinharvie for the lands of Corsby and Whiteside, as appears by an instrument dated May 8. 1558. He married Annabella Chalmers, daughter to the Laird of Gadgirth, and by her had James. This James succeeded and married Lady Eliza- beth Cunningham, daughter to William Earl of Glencairn. She is seised in the lands of Corsbie, November 10. 1579. He died in November 1582, leaving only one daughter, Jean, of whom afterwards. To him succeeded Patrick Crawturd of Auldmuir, his uncle, who is seised in the lands of Auldmuir and Whiteside, as heir to the said James his brother-son, April 13. 1585; and in April 11. 1586, he intents a process of recognition a- gainst Malcolm Crawfurd of Kilbirnie, of the lands of Manock and Gill in the parish of Dairy, which the said Malcolm and his predecessors held ward of the said Patrick and his predecessors. The process of recognition is founded upon this rea- son ; because the said Malcolm had disponed more than the half of the said lands, without the consent of the said Patrick his superior. This controversy is by King James VL committed to the cognition of Mr John Skene, Mr John Learmont, Mr William Oliphant, Mr Oliver Colt, lawyers, as appears by the king's commis- sion to them, April 11. 1586. He gives a sasine of the lands of Whiteside to Hugh Montgomery of Hazlehead, May 24. 1588 ; he married I'raser, daughter to the Laird of Knox, and by her had William, who, in his fa- ther's lifetime, married Margaret Houston, daughter to Sir Patrick Houston of that Ilk. Their contract is dated October 10. 1587 J by her he had Patrick, who nicceeded his grandfather. The above-named Jean came to be heiress of the lands of Corsbie, the estate of \uchinames having descended to Patrick of Auldmuir, as heir-rfiale, uncle to James Crawfurd of Auchinames last mentioned, whose grandchild, Patrick Crawfurd of \uchinames, married Jean Crawfurd, heiress of Corsby, by which the ancient estate of Corsby and Auchinames were re-united. This Patrick, left behind him six sons ; eldest, William, v/ho is seised in the twelve pound lands of Auchinames, as heir to his father Patrick, May 12. 1649 ; lie married Anna Lamont, daughter to Sir Colin Lamont of Ineryne, and Bar- bara Semple his spouse, daughter to the Lord Semple. Second son James, Writer to the Signet, and father to Patrick, Counsellor of Law at London. Third, Cap- tain Robert of Nethermains. Fourth, John. Fifth, Patrick. Sixth, Mr Hugh, Minister of Cumnock, and grandfather to Hugh Crawfurd of Garrive. To Wil- liam succeeded Archibald his only son, who married Margaret Porterfield, daughter to John Porterfield of that Ilk, and had William and three daughters, viz. Anna married to James Bruce of Poufouls. Jean married to Patrick Crawfurd, merchant in Edmburgh. Margaret to James Young of Killicanty. William, in his father's lifetime, married Helen Burnet, daughter to Sir Thomas Burnet, physician to King William, and had only one daughter, Helen, married to Patrick Edmonston of Newton. The estate of Auchinames is at present in the possession of Patrick Crawfurd above mentioned, who has a numerous male issue by Jean Crawfurd, daughter to Archibald of Auchinames. The armorial bearing of the family of Auchinames is ardent, two spears saltier- ways, betwixt four spots of ermine : the motto is, God shaw the ri^bt. APPENDIX. HOPE OF Craighall. IN my First Volume, p. 218, by mistake I bring Sir Thomas Hope of Craig- hall's grandfather from Holland, whereas it is certain he came from France in tlje retinue of Queen Magdalen, King James V. his first queen, and his name was John, said to be descended of the families des Houblons in Picardy, (in Scots)- Hops. He married in France Bessie Cuming, a Scots lady. His son Henry re- turned to France, and married at Paris Jean De Ton, who was mother to this Sir Thomas. Sir Thomas, besides the four son/? I formerly mentioned, had two daughters, viz. Mary Hope, married to David Lord Cardross, grandfather to the present Earl of Buchan, and Anne Hope, married to Sir John Erskine of Alloa, His eldest son. Sir John, married Magaret Murray, daughter to Blackbarony, and had by her Sir Thomas of Graighall, and Sir Archibald Hope of Rankeillor, one of the Lords of Session and Justiciary; Elizabeth Hope, married to Sir George Mowat of Ingliston ; Mary married to Mr William Gordon of Earkton ; Bethia married to Sir John Harper of Cambusnethan, advocate ; Margaret, married to Sir Robert Pringle of Stitchel ; and Anne, married Haty Hope in Holland, descended of a younger son of John Hope and Bessie Cuming, naw a flourishing family there.. This was the occasion of my mistake ; Agnes the sixth, m.arried to William Gault a famous Turkey merchant in London. Sir Thomas, son to Sir John, married Sir John Ayton of that Ilk's eldest daugh- ter, and had one only son. Sir Thomas, who married Sir William Bruce of Kin- ross's daughter, and had by her three sons. Sir William, Thomas, and John ; Sir William died unmarried ; his brother Sir Thomas succeeded him, and afterwards his mother to the estate of Kinross, and carries now the name of Bruce-Hope ; his brother, Colonel John, is present Governor of Bermudas. FERGUSSON of Craicdarroch.. I HAVE given before in the First Volume the arms of Fercusson of Craigdai- locb out of the Lyon Register ; but since, I am certainly informed, that the same arms, as in the Lyon Register, together with the arms of Katharine Cunningham, daughter to the Earl of Glencairn, are above the door of the old house of Craig- darroch. The Fergussons of Craigdarroch seem to be of very old standing in the parish of Glencairn, and sheriffdom of Dumfries, and that, without claiming the antiqui- ties of other families, into which they are either thrown by accident or purchase, and have been numerous in their descendants, several families deriving their origi- nals from them ; and, notwithstanding of the depredations from the Border, to which that place was frequently liable, and the burning of the house of Craig- ^ darroch, I have seen some old remains of its antiquity : The first is a charter that '-is extant in the hands of the present Laird of Craigdarroch, which is granted by John of Crawford, son to the Laird of Dalgemock, to John Fergusson Dominus de Craigdar- ioch, his cousin, pro sua consilio et auxilio, of the mill of Dalmacallan and Jedburgh, in the barony of Glencairn in the shire of Dumfries ; which charter is without date, but the witnesses, who are all very well known, give us a very near view of the time : the witnesses being thus inserted in the charter, Sir John Stewart, father, Laird of Dalsvvinton, Sir Walter Stewart, Sir John Stewart, Sir Allan Stewart, his sons. It is agreed by historians, that this John Stewart of Dalswinton lived in the reign of David Bruce, and that he was taken prisoner with him at the battle of Durham in the year 1346, and that the foresaid Walter Stewart's only daughter and heir was, in the year 1396, married to John Stewart, son to Sir William- Stewart, sheriff of Tweeddale, descended of the house of Damly. It is to be 92 APPENDIX. observed, that this charter is backed by a hand above a hundred years old, and tlie figure 25 ib marked upon it, which seems to infer, that twenty-four preceding papers have been all lost. The next is a curious old charter in English, granted by John Crawfurd of Dalmacallan in Glencairn, to Jonkine Fergusson Laid of Craigdarroch, confirming other two charters, viz. one granted by John Huck- tlionson of Crawford, cousin to the foresaid John Crawfurd, of the four merks worth of land of Jedburgh, to the said Jonkine Fergusson, and another charter granted by John Crawfurd, the foresaid John Crawford's son, to the said Jonkine Fergusson of the mill of Jedburgh ; to the which charter of confirmation the said John Crawfurd appends his seal at Craigdarroch the 6th day of July, the incarna- tion of our Lord 1398 ; which charter is backed by the foresaid old hand, and figured twenty-eight: and in the 12th of January 1727, it has been in the hands of that great antiquary. Sir James Daliymple of Killoch, and was registrated at that time as a probative writ. The next is a sasine under the hands of Thomas Lockhart, notar-public, for infefting John P'ergusson of Craigdarroch, as son and heir to Mathew Fergusson of Craigdarroch, dated the last day of April 1484. From which John Fergusson of Craigdarroch I have seen a complete progress, from father to son, to the present Alexander Fergusson of Craigdarroch, who was mar- vied to Anne Laurie, daughter to Sir Robert Laurie of Maxwelton, and Jean Riddel his lady ; with which Anne Laurie he has these children, James, Robert, and Jean Fergussons. The said Alexander was chosen member of Parliament in the year 1 71 7; by the contracts of marriage and other documents, it appears they have been honourably married to the families of Glencairn, Morton, Lag, Gadgirth, and Balmaghie, and that oftener than once. THE surname of Lawson is of good antiquity in Scotland. I find, in Mr Hay's collections, mention of Richard Lawson, a landed gentleman, who was canon of St Giles' Kirk in Edinburgh, and Laird of Grotehill, who gives the said lands to Walter Scot, baxter, with the consent of the magistrates of Edinburgh, about the year 1370. The oldest family I have met of this name is LAWSON OF HuMBiE. I. WiLLi.AM Lawson of Humbie is the first of this family I read of, whom I find to be upon the service of Thomas first Lord Somerville, as heir to his father, March 1. 1406, as says the Genealogy of Somerville in manuscript. IL William Lawson of Humbie, his son ; I suppose he is the same person that .Dr Abercromby, in his Martial Achievements, Vol. IL p. 501, mentions to be one of these appointed as plenipotentiaries to meet with King Henry the VIL of Eng- land's commissioners, not only to conclude a truce, but also a marriage between our King James IV. and the said Henry's eldest daughter, Pqncess Margaret, anno 1495. This the Doctor clearly documents out of Feed. Aug. torn. 12. p. 572, and the same Mr William (says the Doctor, ihid. p. 506, out of the next p. 573 of the forecited Fad. Ang.) was appointed one ot the conservators of a seven years truce oetwixt the two kingdoms of Scotland and England, which was concluded last of September 1497. III. Richard Lawson of Humbie, his son, has a charter of Gilchranston, lying in the barony of Salton, and shire of Edinburgh, on resignation of John Tarbat of that Ilk; this is dated anno 1505, as says Scotstarvet in his Collection of Abbre- viates of Charters. He died (as says the Chancellary Records) the 24th of August iV. Robert Lawson of Humbie his son, he is one of those heros who signed a bond at Hamilton, May 8. 1569, to stand by their sovereign Queen Mary, with their lives and fortunes against her rebellious subjects, as says the author of the 2 APPENDIX. 93. life of Qiieen Mary, printed at Edinburgh in octavo 1725, p. 202. This Robert died February 14. 1581, as says the Chancellary Records. V. John Lawson of Humbie, his son ; the Council Records say he was cautioner that John Ramsay of Dalliousie shall not invade Richard Abercromby of Polton ; and the Chancellary Records say he |married Elizabeth Ballenden, daughter to ; which Elizabeth died in July 1630, and he himself in March 1598. VI. Sir James Lawson of Humbie, his son, was served heir to his father March 4. 1607, as says the Chancellary Records ; and Alexander Garden, in his Scottish Worthies, says, he was a Gentleman of his Majesty's Chamber, a gallant youth in the way of honour, but was unfortunately drowned beside Aberdeen,, in a standing, lake, called the Old Water-gang, riding over rashly, not having knowledge of the- ground. This happened anno 1612 ; upon which accident the fore-cited Mr Gar- den composed the following poem. Whose mind's so marbled, and his heait so hard, And who of steel ivhose stomachs are so strong. That would not, when this huge mishap was heard, To th' utmost note of sorrow set their song : And elevate their voice and woes alone, The highest strain ot any troubled tone. To see a gallant, with so great^ gi^acfi) So suddenly unthought on, so o'erthrown, And so to perish in so poor a place, By too rash riding in a ground unknown. The flinty fates, that but all pity prove. Would both to mourn and miseration movej Yet shall this death the defunct not disgrace, Nor to his praise prove prejudicial, Since men of greater rank have run like race. And lost by like misfortunous fate and fall : For Fergus, Dowgal, and King Donald, drown'dj. And they all three kings of this realm crown'd. VII. John Lawson of Humbie, his son, was served heir to his father Sir James; May 25. 1637, as says the Cancellary Records. The estate of Humbie went after to the Hepburns, and this family is now ex- tinct ; but probably the following Mr Richard Lawson, Justice-Clerk, has been a son, or descended of a son of the same. LAWSON OF Heiriggs, Lochtulloch, Boghall, and Cambo. I. MR RICHARD LAWSON of Heiriggs, it is presumable, was a son of the house of Humbie. He was made Justice-Clerk about the year 1488, and one of the coun- sellors appointed for managing the affairs of King James IV. during his minority, anno 1490, as says Dr Abercromby in his- Martial Achievements, vol. ii. page 496, whicli he instructs out of the Black Acts, fol. 87, He was also appointed one of the plenipotentiaries to meet at Coldstream with those of England, for prolonging the truce, which was agreed to the 21st December 1492, ibid, page 498. This the Doctor documents out of Feed. Angl. torn. 12. page 467. And again he was chosen one of the commissioners appointed to meet at Ayton with the English commissioners, for a treaty, anno 1497, ibid. p. 505. This the Doctor also in- structs out of the said Feed. Angl. p. 673. Moreover in Scotstarvet's Collection of Abbreviates of Charters, I find this Mr Richard gets a charter of a tenement of land in Edinburgh, which pertained to Henry Tait, bastard; this is dated i8th February 1491. And there is in the present Cairnmuir's custody an instrument of sasine of the fourth part of the lands of Cambo, in favours of this Mr Richard. Vol. II. 5 H 94 APPENDIX. Lawson, upon a precept of sasine granted by George bishop of Dunkeld, following upon a resignation by Janet Baillie and John Gifford her husband. This is dated the i6th January 1500. There is also a charter of alienation granted by Andrew Graham of Knockdollian and Cairnmuir, to the said Richard and Janet Elphin- ston his spouse, of the seven merk land of Cairnmuir. This is dated the 27th April 1500, and the sasine following thereupon is of the same date ; and George, bishop of Dunkeld, his precept of sashie following thereupon is dated the loth November that same year ; and afterwards the said Andrew Graham of Cairn- muir grants another charter, in favours of the said Mr Richard and his spouse, of the lands of Cairnmuir, to be holden of the granter, which is dated 17th June 1503 ; and his procuratory of resignation of these l^nds, in favours of the said Mr Richard and his spouse, is dated the same day ; and the said Andrew's precept of sasine following hereupon is dated the next day ; and the instrument of sasine fol- lowing upon the foresaid precept is dated the 26th September thereafter; and John Earl of Morton confirms all, by his charter dated 17th September 1503 ; and upon the 12th June this same year, this Andrew Graham grants an obligation to Mr Richard, containing warrandice for the entry of the said Andrew Graham his heirs to the Earls of Morton, upon the decease of him and his successors. This is dated the 1 8th June 1503. Scotstarvet, in his Staggering State, says, that this Mr Richard purchased also a good estate near the Burrow-Loch, as also the lands of Boghall. ^ This Mr Richard Lawson died about the year 1508. He married Janet Elphin- ston, daughter to . I find in the fore-cited Collection of Abbreviates of Charters by Scotstarvet, mention of a mortification granted by this Janet, (therein designed relict of Mr Richard Lawson of Heiriggs} whereby she mortifies to a chaplain in St Giles's Kirk in Edinburgh, founded by Alexander Lauder, Provost of Edinburgh, with consent of Robert Lawson, her son, seven merks yearly out of a tenement in Edinburgh, and 10 lib. out of Cramond Regis, conquest by her from Janet, daughter and one of the heirs of William Baillie of Cambo. By this marriage Mr Richard begat with his said lady three sons, viz, \st, James his successor; 2d, Richard; and 3^, Robert Lawson, both successively lairds of Cairnmuir ; of whom afterwards. IL James Lawson of Heiriggs, &c. his eldest son and heir ; there is in the pre- sent Cairnmuir's custody a precept of dare constat granted by this James, in fa- vour of Mr Patrick Lawson, as heir to Richard, his brother-german, in the lands of Cairnmuir. This is dated the 5th November 1526, and the sasine following hereupon is dated the next day thereafter. This James married Janet, daughter to — Liddel of Lochtulloch. Scotstarvet, in his Collection of Abbreviates of Charters, mentions a charter wherein this James, (which he by mistake calls Robert) son of Mr Richard Lawson of Heiriggs, gets with Janet Liddel, heiress of Lochtulloch, (whom he was to marry) the lands of Lochtulloch, Boghall, Star- daills, and Denyss, lying in the barony of Bathgate and shire of Renfrew, and the same is provided to their heirs, which failing, to her heirs, dated 1507. III. John Lawson of Heiriggs and Lochtulloch, his son ; there is {penes Cairn- muir) an instrument of sa<:ine of the lands of Cairnmuir in favour of this John, son and heir to James of Heiriggs, upon a precept of clare constat granted by Ro- bert Graham of Knockdollian, dated 15th December 1556, and the sasine follow- ing hereupon is dated the ist of February 1556. There is also a precept of clare constat granted by the said Robert to tliis John, of the ten pound land of Cairn- muir. This is dated i6th May that same year; and there is another precept of clare constat by ditto to ditto in the said lands, dated 19th December that same year ; and there is a charter granted by the fore-cited Robert Graham of Knock- dollian to this John, of the lands of Cairnmuir, dated 13th April 1584, and the sasine following thereupon is of the same date, which are confirmed by John Earl of Morton the i6th of that same month. This John married Christian, daughter to Sir William Livingston of Kilsyth, by whom he had two sons, Sir William and John, who succeeded each other in the estate of Boghall, and a daughter, Katharine, who was married to Mr James Primrose, ancestor to the Viscount of Primrose, as says Mr Crawfurd in his Peer- age. APPENDIX. 95 rV. Sir William Lawson of Lochtulloch and Boghall, his son. There is in the present Cairnmuir's charter-chest a chnrter of the lands of Cairnmuir, granted by John Graham of Knockdolhan, to VVilham, son and heir served and retoured to John his father. This is dated ytli December 1594, and the sasine following here- upon is dated 29th July 1595. There is also an instrument of sasine of the lands of Dundryon, in the barony of Inverleith and shire of Edinburgh, granted in fa- vour of this William, on a charter granted to him by Sir George Towers of In- nerleith, dated 12th of December 1607: and there is a charter granted by Wil- ham Earl of Morton of the lands of Cairnmuir, in favour of this William Law- son of Boghall, holding blench, upon a decreet before the Lords of Session, dated the last day of December 1607, and the instrument of sasine following heieupon is dated izd August 1608. There is also a precept of sasine upon a retour by Alexander bishop of Dunkeld, in tavour of this Sir William Lawson of Boghall, as heir to John Lawson of Lochtulloch, his father, of the fourth part of the lands of Cambo, dated last of January 1609 ; the sasine following hereupon is dated the 15th April thereafter. 1 find also in the Council Records that this Sir William and Hamilton of Bathgate, are ordered to find caution not to assault each other. This happened ^/nno 1607 ; and he and Hamilton of Innerwick are char- ged by the Lords of Privy Council to keep the peace, 25th June 1608. Scotstar- vet, in his Staggering State, says, " This Sir William dilapidate and put away " most of his fortune before his death, and went to Holland to the wars." He died in May 162S, as says the Chancellary Records. V. John Lawson of Boghall is served heir to Sir William his brother, the i8th April 1629, as narrates the Chancellary Records. Not^. All the foresaid families of the surname of Lawson being now extinct, and their estates possessed by other families, the only remaining family in Scotland (of any long standing) of this surname, is Lawson of Cairnmuir, who undoubtedly is chief of the name ; an account of whose family follows. LAWSON OF Cairnmuir. I. RICHARD LAWSON of Cairnmuir was second son to Mr Richard Lawson of Heiriggs, &-c. Lord Justice-Clerk, (as is narrated before) and his lady Janet Elphinston. There is in the present Laird of Cairnmuir's custody an instrument of sasine of the lands of Cairnmuir, given by the said Mr Richard, propriis manibus, to this Richard his son, which is dated the 10th of October 1504 : And there is a charter granted by the said Mr Richard and his said spouse, to this Richard their son, of the said lands, dated i8th March 1507; but it seems he had died soon after without issue, and was succeeded in his fortune by his brother Ro- bert. II. Robert Lawson of Cairnmuir, his brother, third son to the foresaid Mr Richard Lawson of Heiriggs, Justice-Clerk. There is {penes Cairnmuir^ a precept of dare constat, granted by Andrew Graham of Knockdollian in favour of this Robert, as heir to Mr Richard, his father, in the lands of Cairnmuir. This is dated the 23d April 1510, and the sasine following hereupon is dated the last of that same month. This Robert married Janet, daughter to William Baillie of Cambo, by whom he had James his successor, and Richard Lawson. III. James Lawson of Cairnmuir his son. There is a precept of dare constat by Robert Graham of Knockdollian, in favour of this James, as heir to Robert his father in the lands of Cairnmuir, which is dated the 9th May 1521, and the sasine following hereon is dated the i8th June thereafter. This James married Veitch, daughter to Veitch of Dawick,, by whom he had two soos^ George his successor, and Patrick of Borland. 2 5,6 APPENDIX. IV. George Lawson of Cairnmuir, his son, had also the estate of Borland. There is in the present Cairnmuir's custody an instrument of -sasine in favour of this George, as heir to Patrick Lawson his brother-german, on a precept of dare con- stat granted by John, son and heir to James Lawson of Heiriggs, with consent of his tutors. This is dated 5th July 1553, and which sasine is dated the 8th of that ■«me month; and there is another sasine of the lands of Cambo, in favour of this George, on the foresaid precept of the same date. He is retoured heir in ge- neral to Richard Lawson, his father's brother, 5th September 1554. There is a reversion granted by Mr WiUiam Crichton, parson of Eddleston, to this George Lawson of Borland, of an annualrent of twenty merles Scots forth of the lands of Cammock, for payment of twelve score ten merks, dated 5th May 1556. And there is another reversiorf granted by John Carkettle of Fmgland to this George of the lands of Cambo, for payment of forty pound Scots, dated April 1558. There is moreover a precept of sasine by John Lawson, immediate superior of the lands of Cairnmuir, with consent of his curator, in favours of this George, son to James Lawson, as heir to Mr Patrick Lawson his uncle, upon a retour before the regality of Dalkeith, dated 25th June 1558 ; and, besides, there is a reversion granted by John Stewart of Traquair, to this George Lawson of Borland, for payment of forty shillings Scots, dated 16th October 1558. There is another reversion granted by John, son and heir to sometime Manchane, burgess of Edinburgh, with consent of his cura- tors, to John Stewart of Traquair, of an annualrent of twenty pound Scots, granted by the said John Stewart, with consent of this George Lawson of Borland, his su- perior, forth of the lands of Cairnmuir, for payment of 300 merks Scots, This is dated anno 1562. This George married daughter to by whom he had James his successor. V. James Lawson of Cairnmuir his son. There is (^penes Cairnmuir) a charter by George to this James, his son and apparent heir, of the lands of Cairnmuir, which is dated 1560, and the sasine following hereupon is dated 7th July 1582. There is also an mstrument of resignation of the said lands by John Stewart of Traquair, in the hands of the said George his superior, in favour of this James, dated 21st July 1565. There is another charter granted by Mr Mark Ker of Prestongrange to this James, of the lands of Skiprigg, dated the 4th June 1582, and the sasine hereupon is dated the 14th of the same month. His father gives him another charter of the lands of Cairnmuir, to be holden of John Lawson of Heiriggs, his superior, which is dated 3d July 1582, and the said John of Heiriggs confirms the same by his charter, dated the next day after, and the charter of con- firmation under the Great Seal, confirming the charters following, viz. a charter by John Earl of Morton to Robert Graham of Knockdolhan of the lands of Cairnmuir, dated 26th March 1584; charter by the said Robert to John Lawson of Loch- tuUoch, of the said lands, dated 13th April 1584; charter by the said LochtuUoch to George Lawson of Cairnmuir, of the said lands, of the same date; and a charter by the said George to this James his son, of the said lands, and dated nth Sep- tember 1584, and the royal charter of confirmation of them all is dated 2d January J584. There is also a charter granted to this James by his father, of the lands of Cairnmuir, in implement of a contract betwixt them, dated May 27. 1584, and this charter is dated the i ith September that same year, and the sasine followmg hereupon is dated the 8th of February 1584. This James married Elizabeth, daughter to William Scott of Mountbeugar, by whom he had Mr James his successor. VI. Mr James Lawson of Cairnmuir his son. He gets a charter from his father of the lands of Cairnmuir, and fourth part of Cambo, in implement of his contract of marriage with Elizabeth, daughter to Gilbert Brown of Hartrees, which is dated May 20. 1619, and the sasine following hereupon is dated July 6. 1622; and there is in the present Cairnmuir's custody a chart?.- of confirmation of the foresaid charter granted by Sir William Lawson of Boghall, dated July 10. that same year. There is also a charter granted by John Lord Stewart of Traquair, of the lands of Cairnmuir, to this Mr James in liferent, and James his son in fee, to be holden blench of the said Lord, dated 12th September 1631, and the sasine following hereupon is dated the 7th of November thereafter. There is also an instrument APPENDIX. 07 ofsasine in the lands of Ingraston and Maidenhead, with pasturage upon Blyth- holni, and the muiv adjacent, lying in the parish and barony ot Linton, and shire of Peebles, as principal, and the lands of Ormiston, in the parish ot Innerliethen, in warrandice, in favour of this Mr James of Cairnmuir and his said spouse, following upon a contract betwixt them on the one part, and the commissioners for John Earl of Traquair, then out of the kingdom, on the other part; this is dated the last of July 1650. This Mr James gets a disposition from the Earl of Truquair and Lord Linton, of the lands of Ligraston and Maidenhead, which is dated the 23d Dec'-mber 1653 ; and the charter of alienation of tlie said lands, as for the princi- pal, and the lands of Fingland, in the barony and paristi of Newlands, in warran- dice, is granted by John Earl of Traquair^ and John Lord. Linton his son, to the said Mr James, tlie said day, and the sasine hereupon is dated the 21st of February 1654. This Mr James was appointed one of the committee of Parliament for Peebles-shire, for putting the kingdom in a posture of defence, February 15. 1659, as is narrated in the rescinded acts of Parliament. This Mr James married Ehzabeth, daughter to Gilbert Brown of Hartrees, by whom he had James his successor. VIL James Lawson of Cairnmuir his son.. There is {penes Cairnmuir) a charter granted by his father to him, upon his contract of marriage with Isabel Muirhead, of the lands of Ingraston and Maidenhead, as principal, and the lands of Fingland, in warrandice thereof, to be holden of the disponer: this is dated May 4. 1655: Besides there is a tack of the teinds of Cairnmuir betwixt this James and the Earl of Tweeddale, which is dated the 12th March 1679. I find in the Council Re- ■cords this James is convened before the Lords of Privy Council in June 1684, for not dissipating conventicles on his ground ; and he was after a prosecutor of the episcopal ministers anno 1689. He married Isabel, daughter to John Muirhead of Linhouse, by whom he had- John his successor. VIII. John Lawson of Cairnmuir his son. There is in the present Cairnmuir's charter-chest a procuratory of resignation of the lands of Cairnmuir, Ingraston, and Maidenhead, granted by James Lawson of Cairnmuir in favour of himself in Ufe- rent, and this John, his son, in fee, which is dated the 13th July 1682; and the in- strument of resignation hereupon is dated the 19th of the same month and year ; and the charter granted upon both by John Earl of Tweeddale, in fiivour of this James, and this John his son, of the said lands, is dated the same day ; and the sasine upon this charter is dated December 3. 1685. This John gets also a dis- position in his favour from John Law, of the lands of Netherurd and Bryandland, which is dated December 22. 1699, and the sasine following hereupon is dated 26th January 1700 ; and the said John Law resigns the foresaid lands of Bryandland in the hands of Anne Dutchess of Buccleugh, in favour of this John of Cairnmuir, as bears the instrument of resignation, dated January 28. 1701, and the charter fol- lowing thereupon, to be holden feu of the said Dutchess, is dated January 28. 1 701. There is a tack of the teinds of Cairnmuir betwixt this John and William Earl of March, which is dated May 7. 1700. This John Lawson of Cairnmuir married Barbara, daughter .to Sir John Clerk of Pennycuik, by whom he had John his successor. IX. John Lawson, the present Laird of Cairnmuir, &c. His son was served heir to his father in general before the bailies of Edinburgh, as bears his general retour, dated the 6th of October 1705; and he was served heir in special to his said father in the lands of Cairnmuir, Ingraston, and Maidenhead, as principal, and the lands of Fingland, in warrandice, before the Macers of Council and Session, as bears his special retour, dated 29th January 1719; and upon said service there is a precept of dare constat by William Earl of March of the haill above lands, in his favour, as heir to his father, as said is, dated 19th March 1 719, and the sasine following thereupon dated 27th March 1719; and also he has an instrument of resignation of the eight prebend lands of Netherurd, and mill and mill-lands thereof, in liis favour, which is dated 13th November 1707; and the charter of resignation of the said lands, granted by Anne Dutchess of Hamilton in his favour, is dated the sane day; and the sasine following thereupon is dated the 9th of De- cember thereafter. Vol. IL 5! t)i APPENDIX. This present Cairnmuir hath married Elizabeth, daughter to Bryce Semple of Cathcart, by whom he hath a son to succeed him named Richard. M'DOWALL OF Logan. LOGAN would have rested satisfied with what is recorded of his family by Mi Nisbet in his System of Heraldry, Part IL page 284. but that in this Appendix there is a long chapter concerning M'Dowall of Freugh, wherein a clamr of chief- ship is set up by Freugh, which was never before heard of, and Mr Nisbet (if it is his performance) seems to favour his pretensions : Wherefore, that falsehood may not be imposed for truth, Logan shall make some few observations upon this sub- ject, which indeed is of itself most trifling; but since Freugh has flattered himself with such idle amusements, justice must be done to those whom he would other- wise thereby injure. » And, in the first place, Freugh has no warrant- or authority to use arms, the- same having never been matriculated in the Lyon Register, nor to be found in any collection of arms ; so that 1 cannot see how he can pretend to carry arms at all, and much less to be chief of the name. All the voucher of his arms is, that they are said to be cut on a window-board and bed, which he pretends belonged to the old House of Freugh ; but as these are no authentic evidence of such arms, so it were a kind of miracle, if they had been preserved, when that House of Freugh v.'as burned by the English, as he here affirms it was: It is likewise surprising, that, since by the old law and custom writs were sealed with the granter's seal, and not subscribed at all till the act requiring also the subscription, par. 1540, cap. 117, none of the old writs that instruct the long series of his ancestors bear their arms upon their seals : It is therefore incumbent upon Freugh, in the first place, to show by what authority he bears arms at all, for the antiquity of his fa- mily must principally appear from the arms they have right to bear. It is plain, from the several acts of Parliament concerning the power and office of the Lyon King at Arms, act 127. Par. 1592. p. 1672. act 21. that he and his brother heralds were to visit the arms of the whole noblemen, barons, and gentle- men, borne and used within the kingdom, and to matriculate them in their books and registers, and to fine in L. 100 all who shall unjustly usurp arms, and to escheat and forfeit all such goods as shall have unwarrantable arms engraven on them ; and letters of publication are directed to be execute at the market crosses of the several royal burghs, head burghs of shires, stewartries and bailieries within the kingdom, charging all who make use of any arms or signs armorial, within the space of one year after the said publication, to bring or send an account of what arras or signs armorial they are accustomed to use, and whether they be descended of any family, the arms of which family they bear, and of what brother of the family they are descended, with testificates from persons of honour touching the verity of their having and using these arms, and of their descent, to the effect that the Lvon King at Arms may distinguish the said arms with congruent differences, and matriculate the same in his books and registers, and give arms to virtuous and well deserving persons ; and it is statute, that the said register shall be respected as the true and unrepealable rule of all arms and bearings in Scotland. It is therefore most certain, that if the family of Freugh had at the time of these acts been entitled to wear arms, or any pretensions to noble descent, they would have taken the benefit of these acts, as the family of Logan did, by getting then- arms marticulate in anno 1676, which, Mr Nisbet observes, Part U. p. 284. are found in the Lyon Register the same as at this day : Wherefore Freugh's using ar- morial bearings or arms must be an usurpation, they not having been matriculate, and his fancy of being descended of Gilbert Earl of Carrick vain and groundless ; and whether Gilbert was elder or younger brother to Ethred, grandfather to Allan Lord of Galloway, is no matter to Freugh, who does not seem to have any interest APPENDIX. oa m that noble family, or otherwise he was bound to vouch his descent and title to carry anii^, as is directed in the foresaid acts: Nor indeed was ever Gilbert Earl ofCarrick, but his son Duncan, who married the heiress ot Carrick, and there- upon changed his name from M'Dowall to Carrick, if credit is to be given to his- torians ; Buchanan, p. 363, and Sir James Dalrymple, p. 363, informs us, that Gilbert was Ethred's younger brother, and most barbarously murdered him. What is further advanced by Freugh is hardly worth noticing ; that Dowallton, which he pretends belonged to his predecessors, was the ancient residence of the Lords of Galloway, is without foundation; for it is well known, that all the places, town-lands, and even hills in Galloway have Irish names, which was their language till within Lhese 150 years, and this town-land, which is far from being a baiony, was known to have been called formerly Belielochquhan (i. e. Lochtown, from a lych there) till of late (as the story goes) one M'Dowall, a natural soil of Garth- land, lived there, who being a notorious thief and a robber, that little town-land had Its name afterwards from him. Sir George Mackenzie tells us, page 3. sect. 11. that M'Dowall is known to be among the ancientesr surnames of Scotland, because he bears a lion collared with an open crown about his neck, in remembrance of Dovallus his predecessor killing the tyrant Nothatus, who lived many years before Christ. Mr Nisbet owns the same, Fart II. p. 282 and 283, and likewise that the arms of the old Lords of Gal- loway were iKure, a lion rampant anient, collared with an antique crown or ; now, these aie the very arms used M'Dowall of Logan at this day, and are record- ed the same in the Lyon Register, and neither Garthland nor Freugh, nor any other family of the name use these arms, which are the same with these of the old Lords of Galloway ; and therefore it may justly be concluded that Logan has the best pretensions of being the true and lineal heir-male of that family, for his arms being simple, without addition of any other figure, is one great argument of his being chief of the family. It is true Mr Nisbet, page 283, pretends to instruct from Camden in his Bri- tannia, that Henry I. King of England gave a grant to Fergus Lord of Gal- loway, for some special services, of having the lion crowned ; after which that fa- mily had the lion crowned, neglecting to have it collared only with an open crown. But, in thzfrst place, this is a plain mistake, for Camden says no such thing. His words are, page 741. " Gallovidia hcec suos olim principes &- Dominos habuit " quorum primus qui annalium monumentis celebratur erat Fergusius regnante " Henrico primo in Anglia, cai pro insignibus erat leo argenteus erectus &• coro- " natus in parma cerulea ;" where it is plain Camden only tells us, that Galloway of old had its own princes, of which Fergus was the chief, who lived in the time of Henry I. and carried the arms there described, but does not in the least men- tion any grant from Henry King of England in favour of Fergus, for changing his arms from a lion collared with an open crown to a lion crowned ; and it were absurd to imagine, that a Scots peer would have applied to the King of England for any such purpose, and would have been directly against the foresaid acts of Parliament, and indeed were contrary to the nature of the thing, since all honours and armorial bearings must proceed from the proper sovereign ; nor is there any evidence of the Lords of Galloway ever having changed their arms in the foresaid manner ; and Camden's account of Fergus's arms must be corrected by our own' historians and authors, who inform us, that the family bore the lion collared with an open crown. In the next place, though the Lords of Galloway had changed their bearing to a lion crowned, yet that could not alter the case; for, as to Garthland, though in- deed at present he bears the lion crowned, yet formerly he bore the lion gorged with an open crown, standing upon a rock in a water, or sea in base ; Nisbet, Do. page 283; and therefore he cannot plead from his new bearing any antiquity : and as to his old arms, since they have such additions, it cannot be supposed that he represents the principal family in competition with Logan, who has no addition: and as to Freugh, it has been already observed that his arms are without any au- thority, though he. to make sure work, has assumed the lion crowned with an im- perial crown, and likewise gorged with an antique crown, supported by two wild , ioo APPENDIX men, Nisb. Part II. page 285. But this is all usurpation, for the pretended sup- porters were taken up by the present Freugh at his own hand. This leads to another strong proof of Logan's being chief of the name and fa- mily ; it is that he not only carries simple arms, the same with these of the old Lords of Galloway, but likewise uses supporters. Now it is most certain, that the right of using supporters is hereditary with us to the lineal heirs and representa- tives of families, bat not proper to the younger sons or collaterals, unless they be- come represeiitatives of the family, as Mr Nisbet observes, Part IV. p. 33. And Sir George Mackenzie, cap. 31. plainly informs us, that all our chiefs of families and old barons in Scotland may use supporters, and have prescribed a right to it ; and he further observes, that de jure barons may use supporters, for as such they were members of Parliament with us of old, and never lost that privilege, though, for their conveniency, they were allowed to be represented by two of their num- ber for each shire ; and, therefore, such as were barons before that time may have supporters as well as lord barons : The consequence whereof is, that when the fa- mily of Logan used supporters, they were owned to be the chief of the name, in place of the ancient Lords of Galloway, and was one of these barons that had title to sit in Parliament, which it is plain Garthland and Freugh were not, since they never used supporters, according to Sir George Mackenzie's foresaid reasoning. Garthland has owned, Nisbet, do. page 283, that in these days he held his lands of the family of Douglas ; the oldest charter he produces, anno 1413, being-from them, and so could have no claim as a baron to sit in Parliament ; whereas all Logan's old charters are from the sovereign. As to the pretended bond of man-rent by John M'Dowall of Logan, to Uthred. M'Dowall of Garthland, anno 1593, mentioned by Nisbet, Part II. page 283 it is plainly spurious, null, and contrary to law, and the nature of the thing, and so no legal claim can be founded upon it : For, in the first place, it wants the ordinary solemnities requisite at the time, since all writs of importance behoved to be sealed, as well as subscribed, by the laws then in force, act 80. Pari. 1579. Now this writ is not sealed at all, and the pretended subscription to it is not the- subscription of the said John M'Dowall, as appears by comparing it with his other subscriptions to uncontroverted writs. Next, such bond of man-rent were against an express statute, act 43. Pari. 1555, which declares all such bonds null, and discharges the granting or taking the same in all time coming, under severe pe- nalties ; so that it cannot be presumed such bond was given or taken ; more espe- cially, if it is considered, in the last place, that such bond was inconsistent with the circumstances of the parties at the time. Garthland held several lands ward of Logan, and was thereby liable to attendance upon Logan, liis superior, at head courts, and to mihtary services inherent to such holdings, which was incompatible with Logan's performing the attendance and service, mentioned in that bond to Garthland his vassal. And the learned Craig informs us, that the services due by a vassal to his superior are expressed with us by man-rent ; and the duty of the superior towards his vassal by that of maintenance (Craig de Feudis, lib. 1. dieg.^ II. sect. 1.) ; and therefore it were self-contradictory that such bond of man-rent should have been granted by Logan, the superior, to Garthland, who was his ward vassal at the time in several lands. And further, Logan's using supporters before tliis writ, plainly shows that Garthland could never set up pretensions of chiefship at that time. And it is more than probable the first of the name of M'Dowall of Garthland was a younger son of M'Dowall of Logan, and that he got, as his patrimony, the lands of Elrig, &c. which he held of Logan for several hundreds of years, and thereafter resigned them in the hands of Logan his superior, ad remanentiam ; and that the family of Garths land first had the name of M'Dowall, by his marrrying the heiress thereof, being formerly of the name of Garth, which Mr Nisbet observes. Part I. page 29, was an ancient family in Galloway. Mr Richard Hay, the Antiquarian, states the question upon this head betwixt the families of Logan, and Garthland ; and though he declines giving his judg- ment, yet it is plain from the reasons and documents set forth by him, that Logan must have the preference ; and therefore his certificate upon: that subject is here- to subjoined. APPENDIX. FOLLOWS MR RICHARD HAV S CERTIFICATE. '- I MR Richard Hay, Antiquarian, by these presents certify. That having per- used several old writs and documents belonging to the Honourable Laird of Lo- gan in Galloway, the following observations occur as plain : " imo. That the lands of Logan, constantly designed in the old rights Duminuin- de Logan, were held origmally blench of the crown by the predecessors of the pre- sent Laird of Logan, as is clearly demonstrated by a charter of King James IV. to Patrick M-Dowall of Logan, the 21st of January 1504. " Ilia, That the lands of Airick, Myroch, and Balnagown, still designed in the said writs, jaccnt. in Doiiiinio de Logan, and are a live merk land, long before, the year 1466, were held by Uthred M'JJovvall of Garthland, and his predeces- sors, of Patrick M'Dowall of Logan, and his predecessors in warda et relievio reddendo; inde annuatim ties sectas curia: ad tres curias capitales, isc. as appears from a charter of contirmation of the said lands to Andrew M'Dowall, upon the resignation of the said Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland, in the hands of the said Patrick M'Dowall of Logan his superior; which resignation is dated at Logan the 8th of December 1466, as also from a precept of the chancery, anno, lino Jacobi, which I take to be King James IV. in the year 1488, directed tO' Patrick M'Dowall of Logan, superior, for infefting Uthred M'Dowall of Garth- land, in the said lands of Airick, &c. wherein it is declared that the said Uthred' M'Dowall, his grandfather, died last vest and seised therein; and likewise in a- charter of Patrick M'Dowall of Logan to Margaret Kennedy, daughter to Hugh Kennedy of Girvanmains, for her liferent as Lady Garthland, dated at Wigton the 1st of March 1549. From all which it is evideut that Garthland's pre- decessors got these lands from Logan's, to be held of them in capite, which) they did till anno 1645, ^^'^ they sold the property to Logan as they now re- main. " y,io. That the Lairds of Logan have been in use of wearing supporters to their arms, whereof 1 have seen two instances, there being a lion supporting their es- cutcheon upon their seal, anno 1549, and one other on their seal 1594, the other sides being defaced. " Having likewise perused several old writs and documents belonging to the Honourable Laird of Garthland, amongst which a charter from the Douglasses, Lords of Galloway, to Garthland's predecessor, in the year 141 8 ; as also a bond of man-rent alleged to be granted by John M'Dowall of Logan to Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland, together with all the arguments adduced by the said two honour- able gentlemen, for supporting the rights and prerogatives of their two respec- tive families, I think it difficult to judge, nor can I determine which of the two is to be reputed chief and head of the M'Dowalls, who are undoubtedly the re- presentatives of the old Lords of Galloway, until such time as clearer docu- ments and more pregnant reasons be offered by each of the respective parties. In witness whereof I have subscribed thir presents at Edinburgh, the 22d of March 1722, written by David Tullideph, apprentice to Mr James M'Euen, bookseller in Edinburgh, before these witnesses, Alexander Nisbet, Esq; pro- fessor of heraldry, the said Mr James M'Euen, and the said David, writer hereof." Mr RICHARD HAY. Ja. M'Euen, w'itness. David Tullideph, witness. Alexr. Nisbet, witness. Vol. it. 5 K APPENDIX. KELSO OF THAT Ilk in the county of ayr. ALL antiquaries agree, that the most ancient surnames are local with a de be- fore them, and have been assumed by the proprietors when fixed appellations be- came hereditary : Thus the ancient possessors of the lands of Kelsoland, in the bailiary of Cunningham and sheriffdom of Ayr, took a surname from their own lands, according to the common custom of others amongst us. But that the antiquity of the family of Kelso may not be asserted without a sufficient document, we find that the Kelsos of this race were very early possessed of these lands from the chartulary of the abbacy of Paisley («}, to which they were benefactors. John Kelso, Dominus de Kelsoland, as he is designed, flourished under King Robert IL the first of our kings of the Stewartine line, who came to the throne in tlie year 1370 (i), and was allied by marriage with a lady of the noble family of the Livingstons of the house of Callendar, the progenitors of the Earls of Linlithgow, by whom he had a son, yobn de Kelso, who was his successor in his estate. This John de Kelso, the father, " Dominus de Kelsoland, cum confessu " Joannis de Kelso, filii sui et haeredis apparentis et Elizabethae Livingston, spousa; " Joannis senioris," gave, " Deo et ecclesie sancti Maria: et sancto Jacobo de Pas- " let, terras suas de Langlebank, inter terras de Kelsoland et Largs, pro salute ani- " marum suarum antecessorum et successorum suorum in perpetuum (<;}." This moitification bears date the 5th of January anno dom. 1403, the 30th year of the reign of King Kobert lU. This last John was succeeded by Thomas Kelso of Kelsoland, who is designed, in a charter granted by King James IL the fourth day of September 1444, under the Privy Seal, " Loco magni sigilli, tanquam senescallum Scotias Thoma? de Kelsa " de Kelsoland, nepoti et haeredi quondam Joannis de Kelso de Kelsoland," upon his own resignation (d). This Thomas Kelso of Kelsoland was aUied by marriage with the ancient family of the Boyles of Kelburn, progenitor of the present Earl of Glasgow; which family at the same time intermarried, and made a double alliance with the family of Kelsoland. He was succeeded by John Kelso of Kelsoland his son, who, I think, was allied by marriage with the Stewarts of Fynock, who was a brother of the House of Bute {/), and had Thomas Kelso of Kelsoland his son, who has a charter under the Great Seal of King James V. as Prince and Steward of Scotland, wherein he is designed 7z//ofj; haeredi 'joannis de Kelso de Kelsoland. This charter is dated in the year of our Lord 1521 (/). It does not appear to me when this gentleman married, but he left a son to succeed him, viz. Thomas Kelso of Kelsoland, who was infeft in his estate, and heir to his father, the loth of November 1536 (^). He married Jean Eraser or Frissel, a daughter of the ancient family of the Frissels of Knock in the shire of Ayr, and left issue, Archibald, his son and successor, and a daughter Giles, who was married to Hugh Crawfurd of Cloverhill, and had issue. Archibald Kelso of Kelsoland, son and heir of Thomas Kelso of Kelsoland, was infeft as heir to his father the loth of November 1567 (/j). He married Margaret Stewart, daughter of James Stewart of Ardgowan and Blackhall, by Janet his wife, daughter of George Maxwell of Newark, by whom he had David 'his successor, and a daughter married to John Stewart of Ascog, and had issue. David Kelso of Kelsoland was infeft in the lands of Kelsoland, as heir to his father, the 2d of November 1601 (z). He had Archibald his eldest son, who mar- ried Sarah Brisbane, daughter of Matthew Brisbane of Roslin, but had no issue ; (o) The chartulary or register of the abbacy of Paisley, now in the custody of the Right Honourable the Earl of Dundonald. {b) Buchanan, Boethius, Lesley, and our other historians. (f) Chartulary of the abbacy of Paisley before cited, from whence the author of this memorial drew this note. (d) Sign- ed inventory of the writs and charters of the lands of Kelsoland, which the author has in his hands. {/) Charta in publicis Archivis, ad annum 1445. (/) Signed inventory of the writs of Kelsoland, in the hands of the author of this memorial, (f) Ibidem, (h) Ibidem. (;) Ibidem. APPENDIX. 10.^ she was afterwards married to Sir William. Mure of Rowallan. He was succeed- ed by Robert Kelso of Kelsoland, who was infeft in the estate of Kelsoland in the year 1613 (1^). This gendeman having no issue of his body, sold his estate, in the year of God 1624, to Patrick Shaw, second son to John Shaw of Greenock. He mar- ried Jean Montgomery, daughter of Adam Montgomery of Broadston, and sister to Hugh Lord Viscount Montgomery of Airds, of the kingdom of Ireland ; but he dying without issue, was succeeded by his nephew Hugh Shaw of Kelsoland, who sold the lands of Kelsoland to the heir-male of the House of Kelsoland, Robert Kelso of Halrig, anno 1632 (/). He married Osburn, daughter of John Osburn, Provost of Ayr, and had John Kelso, late Surveyor of the Customs at Port-Glasgow, and William Kelso of Dalkeith, Writer to the Signet, who mar- ried Mary, daughter of John Dunlop of that Ilk, by Antonia his wife, daughter and sole heir of Sir John Brown of Fordel, and has William Kelso of Dalkeith his son and heir, who carries the coat of arms of the ancient family of the Kelsos of Kelsoland, of which he is undoubtedly the heir-male and representative. ACCOWE OF THE PEDIGREE AN'D DESCENT OF WILLL\M COPL-\ND CI-' Colli ESTON. TO clear which, it is fit to relate the circumstances that the kingdom of Scot- land was in with her neighbouring nations of France and England, as follows : Edward III. King of England, pretending right to the crown of France, he, in prosecution of the same, sent over an army into France, where his valiant son prince Edward, commonly called the Black Prince, gave the Frencli a great overthrow at the battle of Cressy. Thereafter, anno 1346, King Edward sat down before Calais with a strong army and besieged it ; to divert whom, Philip King of France, knowing the city to be of great importance, sent his ambassadors to Scotland, to persuade King David in performance of the old league and alliance that was betwixt France and Scotland, to denounce war against England ; to which King David too easily consented, and, by his proclamation, ordered all his subjects who were fit to bear arms, betwixt sixty and sixteen years of age, to attend his host, out of whom he raised an army of sixty thousand men, in which army there were two thousand men at arms of noblemen and 'gentlemen ; and upon the 6th of October 1346, King David with that army entered Northum- berland, burning and destroying all before him. Upon which Q_Lieen Philippa, wife to King Edward III. came down to tlie North of England, and caused Percy Earl of Northumberland, who was then English Governor and Warden of the East Borders, (with the assistance of the bishops of York and Durham, and all the English noblemen in the North of England) gather together all the forces he could to join these forces she had brought down with her, and which her hus- band King Edward had sent her over from the siege of Calais, where he still continued : and the English and Scots armies meeting, they fought a cruel battle at Neville's Cross, near to Durham, upon St Luke's day, being the i8th of Octo- ber, and year foresaid, where the Scots army received a lamentable overthrow, the greatest part of the nobility and gentry being either slain or taken prisoners j- King David himself fighting vahantly, was taken prisoner by John Copland, Esq. in Northumberla'id, who, before he could take and disarm the king, had two of his teeth struck out by the king's gauntlet. Immediately after tlie battle, John Copland conveyed Mng David to his castle of Ogle; and being ordered by Queen Philippa to deliver up his royal prisoner to her, he absolutely refused it, and sent (i) Signed inventory of the writs of Kelsol.ind, in the hands of the author tf this memorial. (/) Ibidem. The inventory of the writs oat of which this account is drawn, anil were in the 163S- given up to Pvobert Kelso of Halrig, 104 APPENDIX. her a very resolute answer, to wit, " That as for the King of Scots he would b& " answerable for his safe keeping, but would deliver him to no body except to his' " Sovereign Lord the King, or his express orders." Whereupon Q_iieen Philippa complained to King Edward who was lying then before Calais. John Copland being commanded to repair thither by King Edward, gave such a modest and loyal answer to the complaint given in against him, that King Edward ordered L.50G Sterling a-year to be settled on him and his heirs for ever; and until the grant of land was settled on him and his heirs, he had L. 500 yearly paid him oat of the customs of London, and those of Berwick-upon-Tweed; and it appears upon record, that John Copland was then made a knight banneret Stow's Chro- nology, page 243. Sir John Copland being returned mto England, and being or- dered to deliver up his royal prisoner to the Qiieen, who was then at York, he guarded him thither from his own castle of Ogle with twenty thousand men, con- bistirig of his friends, tenants, and the militia of the Northern shires, and de- livered King David up to the Queen, and at the same time made his excuse be- fore her and the council in so dutiful and discreet a manner, that they were all very well satisfied with his conduct in that affair. Sir John Copland shortly after- wards had several lands assigned him near to VVooler in Northumberland, which do bear his surname to this day, and got likewise lands in Cumberland near to Keswick, where are the Copland Fells, and the Copland Isles, and lands about Donnghadee in Ireland. King David continued prisoner in England for the space of ekven years, until he was ransomed for one hundred thousand merks. Sterling;, and, in the mean time, tlie English overran and possessed themselves of the coun- tries of Merse, Teviotdale, Lauderdale, Ettrick Forest, Tweeddale.Eskdale.Nithsdale, Annandale, and Galloway, the length of Cockburnspath and Soutrahills on the east, and, on the west, the length of the head of Clyde ; and the English at that time strongly garrisoned almost all the fortresses in Scotland, esiiecially Roxburgh and Hermitage. Copland of Collieston, being descended from Sir John Copland, bears for his arms, quarterly, first and fourth quarters, guiles, thi-ee mullets or ; second and tiiird, argent, a shak^fork j-aZ>/if ; crest, a horseman in armour brandishing a sword: motto, Vici. Which arms have been so borne by him and his predecessors of a long time. The above memorial is vouched by Hector Boethius, and Buchanan's History of the Kings of Scotland, and by Tyrrell, Echard, Baker, and Drake, and other his- torians of those times. BORTHWICK Lord Borthwick. THE first of this ancient and noble family came from Hungary to Scotland, in the retinue of Queen Margaret, in the reign of Malcolm Canmore, anno Domini 1057. Thomas de Borthwick is mentioned in a charter of Robert Lauder of Quar- relwood, in the reign of King Alexander II. In the reign of Robert III. Sir William Borthwick. got the lands of Catkune, which he called after his own name Borthwick. Sir IVilUam de Borthwick ob- tained a charter from Robert Duke of Albany, upon a resignation of Walter Scott, of the landsof Toftcoat in the shire of Selkirk. (Had. Collect.) Sir Wilham Borthwick deeodem, miles, got a charter from King James I. 1430, of the Lands of Borthwick, with a licence to build a castle, as the charter bears, " ad construendam arcem in " illo loco qui vulgariter dicitur le Motte de Loquharrat intra vicecomitatem de " Edinburgh." (Had. Collect, p. 76.) He built the castle of Borthwick after the Hungarian form, in remembrance of his origin, and it is an extraordinary building: the walls thereof being so thick as to admit a room to be taken out of the thickness. I APPENDIX. J.05 The hall is so large and high of the roof that a man oil horseback may turn a spear in it with all the ease imaginable. There is, in the burial place of the family, two fine large statues of marble of one of the lords of Borthwick and his lady, with smaller statues of their children. This family was dignified with the title of Lord Borthwick in the beginning of the reign of King James 11. as appears by a charter from the said king, dated Ja- nuary 8. 1458, registered in the records of Parliament. The tenor whereof fol- lows. " JACOBUS, Dei Gratia, Rex Scotorum, omnibus probis hominibus totius terras *' suae, clericis et laicis, salutem. Sciatis nos dedisse, concessisse, et ha?c present! " carta nostra confirmasse, dilecto consanguineo nostro Willielmo Domino Bortii- " wick, omnes et singulas, terras de Glenegle, cum pertinentibus, jacentes infra " vicecomitatem de Berwick ; quajquidem terrae, cum pertinentibus, fuerunt di- " lects nostrs Mariotse de Pringle haereditaria3, et quas eadem Mariota, noa vi " aut metu ducta, nee errore lapsa, sed sua mera et spontanea voluntate, in sua *' pura viduitate, in manus nostras, apud monasterium sanctae crucis de Edin- " burgh, per fustum et baculum sursum, redidit, pureque, simplicter resignavit, ac " totum jus et clameum, que in dictis terris cum petinentibus, habuit, seu habere " potuit, pro se et hasredibus suis, omnino quiete clamavit, in perpetuum, tenend. " et habend. dictas terras de Glenegle cum pertinentibus, predicto Willielmo " Domino de Borthwick, et haeredibus suis, de nobis, hasredibus et successoribus ♦' nostris, in feodo et hsreditate, in perpetuum, per omnes rectas metas suas anti- " quas et devisas, prout jacentes in longitudine et latitudine, cum omnibus et sin- " gulis libertatibus, commoditatibus, et asiamentis, ac justis pertinentibus suis " quibuscunque, tam non nominatis, quam nominatis, ad dictas terras, cum per- " tinentibus spectantibus, seu quovis modo juste spectare valentibus, in futurum, " et adeo libere, quiete, plenarie, integre, honorifice, bene, et in pace, in omnibus " et per omnia, sicut dicta Mariota, aut predecessores sui, praedictas terras, cum " pertinentibus de nobis, aut predecessoribus nostris, ante dictam resignationem " nobis inde factam, liberius tenuit seu possidet, tenuerunt seu possiderunt, faci- " endo inde annatim dictus Willielmus et haeredes sui nobis, haeredibus et succes- " soribus nostris, servitia de dictis terris debita et consueta : In cujus rei testimo- " nium, presenti cartse nostroe, magnum sigillum nostrum apponi prscipimus. " Testibus reverendis in Christo patribus Georgio episcopo Brehinen. cancellario " nostro, Thoma episcopo Gandidaecasie nostri secreti sigilli custode, dilectis con- " sanguineis nostris Jacobo Domino Livingston Magno Camerario nostro, Thoma " Domino Erskin, Patricio Domino le Graham, Willielmo de Moravia de TuUi- " harden, et Magistro Joanne Arrois, Archediacano Glasguen. Secretario nostro. " Apud Edinburgh, octavo die mensis Januarii, anno Domino millesimo quad- " ringentesimo quinquagesimo octavo, et regni nostri vicesimo secundo." The Lord Borthwick, in the Parliament 1469, holden at Edinburgh by King James III. present, is ranked before the Lord Abernethy, and after the Lord Hali- burton. In the Parliament 1471, he is the fourth lord of Parliament ranked im- mediately before the Lord Glammis. The following charters are to be found in the Records of Parliament. Charter of apprising William Lord Borthwick of the lands of Lochwarret. [2d Charter King James III. id Book, No. 34.] Charter William Lord Borthwick of the lands and moat of Lochwarret, Mid- dleton, and Buteland, lands of Borthwick, Legerwood, and Heriotmuir. [3d Charter King James V. 28th Book, No. 157.] Charter of confirmation John Lord Borthwick of the lands of Cublavv, Over- Lugats, Nether-Lugats, Gilraerton, Over-Shiels, and Nether-Shiels. [4th Charter by Queen Mary. 30th Book, No. 226.] Charter of confirmation William Lord Borthwick of the lands, lordship, and barony of Borthwick, the moat of Lochwarret, lands of Middleton, Heriot, and Heriotmuir. [5th Charter by King James VI. 33d Book, No. ^^.'] Vol. 11. 5 L io6 APPENDIX. Charter John Lord Boithwick of the lands and barony of Heriotmuii, and Kirk-lands of Lochwarret. [6j:h Charter by King James VI. 46th Book, No. 359.] Charter John Lord Borthwick of the lands and barony of Heriotmuir. [7th Charter by King Charles L 57th Book, No. 338.]. The family of Borthwick formerly possessed a very great estate, besides a great many superiorities of lands, besides whole closes in several of the largest towns in Scotland ; as for instance, in Edinburgh, Borthwick's Close belonged to the Lord Borthwick, whose family has been very great in former times; but I cannot here be particular about what offices or employments the lords of this name did bear under the different reigns to which they were cotemporary, not having seen any of the original writs of the family. But it appears by the honours on the es- cutcheon in the burial-place of this noble family, that it has been very illustrious in its alliances. The last lord of this name, John Lord Borthwick, was married to Lady Elizabeth Ker, a daughter of the Marquis of Lothian ;. he died soon after the Restoration. William Lord Borthwick, as superior of the lands of Nenthorn in the shire of Berwick, grants a charter to his second son, Alexander Borthwick, upon the resig- nation of James Wilson ; which instrument of resignation is dated June the 27th 1495 ; but the charter is so much torn that the sense of it cannot be well con- nected ; and in the instrument of resignation of the said lands are these words : " Super quibus omnibus et singulis Alexander Borthwick, filius dicti Wilielmi " Domini Bprthwick, a me notario publico sibi fieri petiit hoe presens public. ** insti umentum, acta erant hsc infra burgum de Edinburgh, in hospitio dicti ♦' Domini Borthwick, hora quarta post meridiem, vel eo circa, sub anno die mense " indictione et pontificat. Supra presentibus ibidem Alexandro Borthwick fratre " dicti Domini Borthwick, magistro Thoma Greenlaw vicario de Arth, cum di- " versis aliis testibus," &c. John Lord Borthwick, son of William Lord Borthwick, grants sasine of the lands of Scholle and Compasslack to William Borthwick of Soltray, son of Wil- liam Borthwick of Soltray, his cousin-german, son of the said Alexander Borth- wick of Nenthorn ; which sasine is dated May the 20th 1550, and is to this purpose : " Nobilis et potens Dominus Joannes Dominus Borthwick, ad instantiam honora- " bilis viri Wilielmi Borthwick de Soltra, filii et haeredis quondam Wilielmi Borth- ♦' wick de Soltra sui patris, ad omnes et singulas terras de Scholia et Compasslac, '• cum suis pertinentibus, jacentes in dominio de Waddaill, et vicecomitatu de " Edinburgh, et ibidem prefatus Wihelmus Borthwick, quoddam prsceptum sa- " sinse dicti Domini, ut supra subiens sigillo pergameno scriptum, &c. Joannes " Dominus Borthwick et Dominus superior terrarum subscriptarum, &-c. quia " mihi clare constat per authentica documenta, quod quondam delectus meus " consanguineus Wihelmus Borthwick de Soltra, pater Wilielmi Borthwick laterii " presentium, &-c." The said William Borthwick redeems his lands of Nenthorn, that were wadset to Helen Heriot, daughter of James Heriot of Trabrown, as appears by the instrument of renunciation, dated May 7. 1582, in favour of the said WiUiam Borthwick, who had several sons ; the eldest, whose name was Wil- liam, designed of Johnstonburn, was a colonel in the Swedish servi&e under Gusta- vus Adolphus ; the second, whose name was Alexander, was factor for his brother during his absence abroad in Sweden. Major William Borthwick, eldest and only son of the said Colonel William Borthwick, raised a company of men in defence of his Majesty King Charles L The said Major Borthwick had several sons, the eldest of whom was Colonel WilHam Borthwick of Johnstonburn, who changed his own regiment, under British pay, for a Dutch regiment, with the present EarL of Stairs, then Lord Dalrymple, and was unforunately killed at the battle of Ra- millies ; he died, and all his brothers, without issue. Alexander Borthwick. in Johnstonburn, second son of William Borthwick of Soltray, had several sons, the eldest whereof was William Borthwick of Mayshiels or Pilmuir, who married a daughter of Mr Henry Stewart, advocate, a younger son of the family of GrandtuUy, by whom he had Captain Henry Borthwick of Pil- muir, whose son, Henry Borthwick of Mayshiels, is the nearest heir-male and re- presentative of the family of the Lord Borthwick. APPENDIX. ro7 John Borthwick. of Newbyres, descended from the Lord Borthwick, married Margaret Borthwick, one of the daughters of Johnstonburn, who had two sons to him, to wit, James and John Borthwicks; the said James Borthwick, one of the sons of Newbyres, married a daughter of Murray of Blackbarony, who had to him a daughter called Elizabeth, who was married to the Earl of Haddington and Melrose, and had to the said Earl two daughters ; the eldest was married to Lord Lindsay in Fife, and had to him John Lindsay Earl of Crawford, Lord Treasurer of Scotland, and a danghter who was married to Scot of Ardrose ; and, after the death of the said Lord, she married my Lord Boyd, and had to him one son and six daughters ; the son was married to a daughter of the House of Wigton, but died without children; the eldest of the six daughters was married to Morison of Prestongrange, the second was married to Sinclair of Stevenston, the third was married to Dundas of Arniston, the fourth was married to Sir William Scott of Martin, the fifth married to Morison of Dairsie, and the sixth daughter died unmarried. The foresaid second daughter, procreate betwixt the foresaid Earl of Haddington and Ehzabeth Borthwick his lady, was married to the Lord Ogilvie, no.v EarLof Airly, and had three sons, and one daughter, who was married to Urquhart of Meldrum. The Lord Borthwick bears co-gent, three cinquefoils sable, supported by two angels, winged or ; crest, a negro's head couped : motto, ^n conducit. Borthwick. of Mayshiels, as descended of my Lord Borthwick, the same as he, but charges the shield with a heart proper ; crest, an eagle essorant, proper :^ m.otto. Nee deerit operi dextra; as in the Lyon Register 1673. ERASER Lord Lovat. SOME antiquaries of no small name assert, that the noble family of the Era- sers are of a French origin ; others again say, that they are one of our great Scots families that assumed the surname of Fraser from the figures in their arms, the fiases, when surnames began to be hereditarily fixed amongst us : Be this as it will, it is plain fro4n authentic vouchers, that are still preserved, that, in the reign of King Malcolm IV. they are passest of many lands in the south, in the county of Tweeddale and elsewhere, and were high sheriffs of the shire of Peebles, then designed vicecomes de Traquoqueir. In the time of King Alexander II. they are then spread into many numerous- and noble branches ; Sir Simon Fraser was the liead of the family ; one of his younger brothers was the celebrated Bishop Fraser of St Andrews, who was one of the Lords of the Regerycy of Scotland, after the death of King Alexander III. and another was Sir Andrew Fraser, High Sheriff of the county of Stirling, so much celebrated in the history of those times. This Sir Simon Fraser, Lord of Oliver Castle, the father, and Sir Simon the younger, his son, are both mentioned amongst the magnates ScoticE in the Feedera Anglite, in the great transactions of settling the crown after the death of the young queen, called the Maid of Norway, 1292. They were both noble patriots, and we may venture to say the son surpassed all others in his time, for valour, magnanimity, and true fortitude ; our historians mention, that, but with a handful of brave reso- lute Scotsmen, he defeated three several bodies of the English, far surpassing him in number, in different battles, in one day at Roslin muir near Edinburgh, for which they extol him to the very skies, as the greatest patriot of his country, next to the famous Sir William Wallace the Viceroy ; and indeed he had the same fate with Sir William ; for, in the course of the war, falhng into the enemies' hands; he was, by order of King Edward I. sent prisoner to London, where he was execut- ed as a traitor, in the very same manner that Sir William Wallace, his faithful Achates^ was, for no other crime, but resolutely persisting in the defence of the hberties and independency of his country, when they were so eminently invaded by our powerful neighbours on the other side of the Tweed. This gallant hero loS APPENDIX. left behind liim a son, . who was taken prisoner by the English with his father, but being too young to have been concerned in the war, his life was spared ; but, to put him out of the way, and to do all they could to extinguish the memory of his glorious father, they sent him over to France, where he fought in behalf of the English, and being long unheard of, and supposed dead, his two sisters shared their father's great estate betwixt them, being married into the families of Biggar and Yester, v^hich gave occasion to the Marquis of Tweeddale and the earl of Wigton to quarter the coat of arms of the Erasers in their acliievements to this time. At length Sir Simon Fraser liearing of the great merit and good success of King Ro- bert the Bruce, he found means to disengage himself from the English service in France, and came over to Scotland, and joined the loyal party, to whom he could not fail to be most acceptable, for the memory and merit of his father. Now it was he claimed his estate, which, as has been said, was divided betwixt his two sisters on the supposition that he had been long dead. But it seems Sir Patrick Fleming and Sir Hugh Hay being unwiUing to part with so great an estate, which they had so long possessed, and thought their own, and the king as unwilhng to dis- oblige two men who had such a stock of merit with their sovereign. Sir Simon Fraser, that he might be no occasion of embroihng the government, that was not very firmly established, did so far prefer the peace of his country to his own in- terest, that he acquiesced, and left his estate in the hands of his brothers-in-law. However, the gracious king, to make him all the amends he well could, in lieu of his estate in the south, gave him the lands and barony of Kinnell in Forfarshire, and many others in Inverness-shire, which had mostly been in the crown ever since the forfeiture of Sir John Bisset, for being alleged accessory to the murdering of the Earl of Athol in the 1244, Scotichron. King Robert I. likewise married him to his niece, a daughter of William Earl of Ross, by Lady Matilda Bruce his sister, and gave him the three crowns, arms of concession, as a mark of his alliance with the royal family ; so that the three crowns were never the Bissets' arms, as is ignorantly pretended by those who would set up a female succession in the family of Lovat. This Sir Simon Fraser, ever after this, commonly called the Knight of Kinnell, was little inferior to his father for valour and loyalty ; he stuck firm to King Robert all his life long, and was no less eminent and conspicuous in his l6y- alty to his son King David II. For, on the breaking out of the war in the young king's minority, on the invasion of Baliol, he, with other patriots, took the field in defence of their rightful sovereign, and fought with great valour at the battle of Duplin. He had also a great hand in taking and sacking the town of Perth, which was then in the enemies' hands, but had the misfortune to lose his life the year thereafter in the fatal battle of Halidonhill, in the year 1333, as Buchanan says. This noble person left behind him a son named Hugh, who, by the bounty of King David, when he came to reward the sons of those who had lost their lives in his service, had the barony of Lovat ; for, by this title, Hugo Fraser Dominus lie Lovat does homage to the Bishop of Murray for a fishing in the river of Forn, which he held of that See, anno 1367. But there is no voucher that he married any heir-female of the Bissets : For, in the reign of Alexander III. Sir David de Graham, and Patrick Graham his son, have then the lands of Lovat, and not the Bissets, who were, as all our historians agree, expelled the country long before this time ; so we see how vain and groundless an imagination it is to place a female succession of the Bissets in this noble family, as a precedent forsooth to divert the succession out of the channel of heirs-male in the House of Lovat, in which it did ever run, to estabhsh the succession to the honours in an heir of line ; but of this enough in a memorial of this kind. He married Isabel, daughter of Wemyss of that Ilk, by whom he had his son and heir Hugh Fraser Dominus de Lovat, that is. Lord or Laird of Lovat ; for it is fit to know, that the appellation of lord or laird in our old stile is one and the same ; and John, a second son, who was the first of the Frasers of Knock in Ayrshire, of whom most of the prime gentry in those parts are collaterally descended. He had also another son, of whom is descended the fa- mily of Foyers and its cadets. This Hugh is designed Dominus de Lovat, and Hugo Frisale de Lovat, his son, was one of the hostages for the ransom of Ki"hg James I. as is vouched by the Fcedera Anglia in the 1423. But it is plain he was no peer, nor had we any lords of Par- APPENDIX. 1C5 liament, as distinct from other barons, who held of the crown in capite, before the reign of King James I. This Hugh Fraser Lord of the Lovat, as he is called, that is no more than Laird of Lovat, in the 1416 married Janet, sister of William of Fenton, Lord or Laird of that Ilk, by whom he got a great estate in land in Inverness-shire. The mar- riage articles are in the old Scots language ; the parties contracting are designed Hutcheon Fraser Lord of the Lovat, and William of Fenton, Lord of that Ilk : But that this was no more than laird or proprietor of these estates is plain ; for, in the 143 1, when King James I. ratifies the contract under the Great Seal, he says, " Sciatis nos vidisse cartam Hugonis Fraser de Lovat, &• Willielmi Fenton " de eodem :" So that it is clear that neither the parties are in the rank of lord's of Parliament, but only of ordinary barons. This Hugh died about this time, and was succeeded by his son Alexander Fraser of Lovat. He died without issue-male in the 1430, and was succeeded by Hugh Fraser of Lovat his brother, as he is designed in the re- tour, as heir to Alexander Fraser of Lovat his brother; the voucher is in Hadding- ton's Collections. This Hugh is the first lord or peer of this noble family : but whether he was raised to be a lord of Parliament by King James II. or James HI. is not so clear ; for we must knov/ that the lords of Parliament, about this time, were not created by letters patent, as in after times, but by the king's naming the person to be raised and advanced to the honour, to be a Baron and Banrent of our Sovereign Lord's Parliament. That this Hugh is the first Lord of the House of Lovat, is plainly vouched from the public archives in the Parliament-house ; for there is a charter confirmed by King James III. ratifying a charter by Hugo Dominus Fraser de Lovat, ac Baronix de Kinnell, to John Stirling, of some part of the barony of Kinnell, in the year 1476, of which the Lord Lovat was superior ; which is sufficient to instruct, that the fa- mily of Lovat were then, and might have been before, in the rank and quality of lords of Parliament. This noble lord allied by marriage with the House of Glammis, the ancestor of the Earl of Strathmore, by whom he had tW'o sons, Thomas, his heir, and Alexander, of whom is descended the family of Faraline, and its nume- rous branches. Thomas Lord Fraser of Lovat, who is invested in his estate as heir to Hugh Lord Fraser of Lovat his father, in the year 15QI. He allied by marriage with the family of Huntly, by whom he had a son, Hugh, his heir, William of Kilbokie, and James of Belladrum, whose male issue are spread into many branches of Erasers in Inverness-shire. He married again with the house of Gray, by whom he had a son, who was the first of the Erasers of Brackie and Kirkhill. Hugh, the next Lord Lovat, married Anne, daughter of James Grant of Ereuchie, Laird of Grant, and had Hugh his heir apparent, who died without issue. He married to his second wife Anne, daughter of David Ross of Balnagovvn, heir- male and representative of tlie ancient and illustrious family of the Earls of Ross. Ot this marriage he had Alexander his heir, and William of Struy, of whom are descended several of the families of the Erasers in Inverness-shire. He had also another son, of whom is descended the family of Relick, of which Fraser of Gort- leg is a branch. This Lord Hugh was slain in a bloody conflict betwixt him and the M'Donalds, at a place called Lochlochy, the 15th of July 1544, of which Buchanan makes mention, and speaks of the Erasers with great honour, as a fami- ly that, upon all occasions, had merited highly of their country. Alexander Lord Lovat married a lady cf the Campbells, of the illustrious House of Argyle, and had Hugh, his heir and successor ; and of his younger sou Thomas, tutor of Lovat, are several families of the Erasers lineally come, particu- larly the families of Strichen and Ardachie. Hugh the next Lord Lovat married Ehsabeth, daughter of John Earl of Athol ; her mother was the Lord Fleming's daughter ; she was afterwards Countess of March, and last of all Countess of Arran. She bore to the Lord Lovat a son Simon Lord Eraser of Lovat, who was in a high degree of favour with King James VI. Upon the death of the Earl of Athol, his uncle, in the 1594, when that dignity became extinct, on the failure of the heirs-male, this lord had the ofiiT of the title of Earl of Athol. but he declined accepting of the honour, as a Vol. IL ' .5 M no APPENDIX. sinking of his own title of Lord Lovat, which he could not think ot ; and, upon that, the title, honour, and dignity of Earl of Athol was, de novo, conferred on the Lords Innermeath, as being a Stewart, and originally of the same blood with the Earls of Athol, as the letters patent bear, still extant m the archives. This noble lord married first with a lady of the House of Kintail, by whom he had Hugh the next lord of the family. He married next Jean, daughter of James Lord Doune, paternal ancestor of the present Earl of Moray, by whom he had two sons, of whom two different branches of the House of Lovat are descended, viz. the fa- milies of Inneralachy and Brae. Hugh Lord Lovat matched with the Earl of Wemyss's family ; her mother was the Lord Doune's daughter, and sister to the Earl of Moray, by whom he had Hugh, Master of Lovat, who died before his father, but left a son by his wife, who v.as General Leslie's daughter, the first Earl of Leven. Hugh, who succeeded his grandfather, married a sister of the Earl of Cromarty, by whom he had Hugh, who married the Marquis of Athol's daughter ; but dying without issue- male the 14th of September 1696, the title, honour, and dignity of Lord Lovat, according to the uniform practice and descent of ancient lord barons, devolved on his great uncle, Thomas Lord Eraser of Lovat, second son to Hugh Lord Lovat, and Lady Isabel Wemyss his wife aforesaid. He married with the family of M'Leod of that Ilk, by whom he had fourteen children, ten of whom died young ; his eldest son, Mr Alexander Eraser, died in his 25th year, universally lamented, being one of the brightest, and every way best accomplished young gentlemen that ever this noble family had at any time produced ; Simon Lord Lovat, Mr John Eraser who died a batchelor in the 1716, and a daughter Sybilla, Simon the present Lord Lovat, succeeded his father in the honour upon his death in 1698. His lordship has acted and suffered much for his country and family ever since his accession to the honour ; so that he may well be called the rebuilder of his house, and the restorer of his family, which is one of the things in the world he has most at heart. He married Margaret, daughter of Lodovick Grant of that Ilk, by whom he has two sons, Simon, Master of Lovat, and Mr Alexander Eraser ; also two daughters, Janet and Sybilla, and a son and a daughter dead of the same marriage. MORAY OF Abercajrny. IN the First Part of this work the armorial bearing of Moray of Abercairny was, by a mistake, wrong inserted ; for the cheveron, which shows their alliance with, and descent from, the old Earls of Strathern, is not carried between the tliree stars, (their paternal coat) but is quartered with it ; as they are to be found re- corded in the Lyon Office, where they stand thus matriculate, viz. Moray of Aber- cairny carries two coats quarterly, first and last azure, three stars argent, within a double tressure counter-flowered or, second and third or, two cheverons gules, above the shield an helmet befitting his degree, with a mantle gules doubling argent, and on a wreath of his colours is set for his crest an earl's crown surmount- ed of a star of twelve rays argent, and, on an escrol above, this motto, Suns tncbe, and in another below, Tanti talem genuere parentes, supported by two eagles proper. For understanding the reason of this bearing, we are to observe, that Sir John Moray of Drumshergard, a son of the ancient House of Bothwell, (of whom in the First Volume, page 249) married Mary, daughter to Malise Earl of Strathern, with whom he obtained the lands of Abercairny, Ogilvie, Glensherop, &.c. as was also observed in the First Volume, page 250. APPENDIX. lit This Sir John Moray of Drumshergaid, the direct paternal ancestor of the present Aberciiirny, had, by Mary his wife aforesaid, three sons, Sir Maurice, Sir Alexander, and Walter. Sir Maurice Moray of Drumshergard, being a person of much merit, was a great flivoLtrite of King David II. as appears, among other instances, from this which follows. Joanna Countess of Strathern, the only daughter and sole heir of Malise Earl of Strathern, the uncle of Sir Maurice Moray, having married the Earl of Warren, an English lord, was by that means drawn into a conspiracy against King Robert I. for which she was forfeited, and the earldom of Strathern for some time vested in the crown. But King David II. King Robert's son, in consideration of the great service of Sir Maurice Moray (who, upon failing of the issue of Earl Malise, his mother's brother, had now the sole right of blood to that earldom) reversed the forfeiture, and conferred the earldom of Strathern upon the said Sir Maurice Moray, who was accordingly, with great solemnity, girt with the sword of the said earldom, on the 9th of February, anno 1343, t^pud cns- trum puellarum; as Sir James Balfour from the records of King David in- forms us. Sir Maurice Moray, now Earl of Strathern, accompanying his master King David in his second expedition into England, was there slain at the battle of Dur- hajn, on the 17th of October 1346, and, leaving no issue of his own body behind him, his brother Sir Alexander Moray of Drumshergard succeeded to his paternal estate, and the earldom of Strathern returned again to the crown ; for, as Sir James Balfour observes, it was given to him and his heirs-male to be begotten of his own body, " quibus deficientibus," that the said earldom should return to the crown, " in eo statu et integritate quo earn reliquerat Malisius quondam Erneval- " lensis comes." This Sir Maurice, upon his accession to the Earldom of Strathern, and in right of his mother, quartered, with his paternal coat, the arms of the old Earl of Strathern his uncle, viz. or, two cheverons gules ; and his brother Sir Alexander Moray, who succeeded him in his paternal estate of Drumshergard, Abercaivny, &-C. had the same right of blood to the earldom and arms of Strathern which his brother Sir Maurice had, with this additional merit, that his brother the Earl had been killed in the king's service at the battle of Durham ; but the king hav- ing been long detained prisoner in England, after that unfortunate battle where his Majesty was taken prisoner, Sir Alexander Moray had not so ready access to put in for so just a claim, and this gave Robert Earl of Carrick, Lord High Stew- ard of Scotland, and afterwards King, time and opportunity to apply to King David his uncle, for the estate and earldom of Strathern, which his Majesty was pleased to bestow on him. However, Sir Alexander Moray retained in his bear- ing the arms of the old earls of Strathern, for the reasons above mentioned, and which his successors in the House of Abercairny do carry to this day, as may be seen dehneated in the Plate of Achievements. There is likewise another mistake in the First Part of this work, page 249, by which the author makes John Moray of Ogilface, who grants a charter to the convent ef Holyroodhouse in the year 1409, with his seal appended, bearing a fesse between three stars, 2 and i, to be the paternal ancestor of Sir Robert Moray of Abercairny. It is like the resemblance of the titles of Ogilvie and Ogilfae has led our au- thor into that error ; for I am well informed, that John Murray of Ogilfae, who granted the charter, and carried the arms above mentioned, was k distinct branch fif the Morays, and is now extinct ; whereas the ancestor of the deceased Sir Ro- bert Moray of Abercairny, at the date of the charter, is distinctly known by ano- ther name than John, and by the titles of Drumshergard, Abercairny, and Ogilvie, and none of that family, whose succession is clearly documented, and is still extant in the person of William Moray of Abercairny, ever carried their arms with a fesse, as mentioned by our author. APPENDIX. CORSANE OF Meikleknox*. THIS surname and family have it handed down from age to age, that the first of their ancestors, in Scotland, was an Italian gentleman of the Corsini family, who came into this realm with an abbot of New-Abbey, or Ditlce Cor, in Galloway, about the year 1280. This abbey was founded by Dornagilla, one of the three daughters and co-heirs of Allan Lord of Galloway, and wife to John Baliol Lord of Bernard-Castle, and mother to John Baliol, who was sometime King of Scotland ; she founded also the Franciscan monastery at Dumfries, in anito 1262. Among many other instances that might be given of this ancient name and family of Corsanes, appearing from authentic vouchers, this is one : Sir Alexander Corsane is witness to a charter granted by Archibald called the Gmn or Austere Earl of Douglas, to Sir John Stewart Laird of Gryton, of the lands of Cahe ; though the charter is without date, yet it must necessarily have been before. the year 1400, when the granter of that charter died. The principal family of Corsane was designed of Glen, which, in the reign of King James IV. went off with Marion, the daughter and only child of Sir Robert Corsane of Glen, by marriage to Sir Robert Gordon, who thereupon assumed the title of Sir Robert Gordon of Glen, and came to be designed of Lochinvar by the death of Sir Alexander his elder brother, who was slain at the battle of Flodden in anno 1504. And of that lady descended lineally the barons of Lochinvar and viscounts of Kenmure. Sir John Corsane, an early cadet, and next heir-male of this family of Glen, settled at Dumfries, where he increased in riches and honour, and had a lineal succession of heirs-male for eighteen generations ; and that they were all of the name John, has been constantly asserted by that family. Some of their brethren were eccleijastics, particularly Dominus Thomas Corsanus, (designed perpetual vicar of Dumfries) in a charter granted by him for some church-lands in Dumfries, dated anno 1408. That there were so many generations of that family, appears as well by other vouchers, as by an excellent inscription on the funeral monument of John Corsane, Provost of Dumfries, in the reign of King James VI. who was the thirteenth in order descended from the said Sir John Corsane inclusive, in a direct masculine course of succession. This John Corsane was married to Janet Maxwell, one of the Lord Maxwell's family, who bore him several children, particularly John, his eldest son and heir, afterwards called Mr John Corsane, and Marion, who was married to Stephen Laurie of Maxwelton, ancestor of Sir Walter Laurie of Maxwelton, baronet. He was member of Parliament for the burgh of Dumfries in the year 1621, when the five articles of the Perth assembly received the sanction of a law. Having in his younger years executed the inferior offices of the magistracy in Dumfries, he was provost of the said burgh forty-five years, died when he was aged seventy-five years and an half, in anno 1629, and was buried with eleven of his grandfathers, as appears by the said funeral monument erected to his memory that same year, by Mr John Corsane, advocate, his son and heir ; upon which, with his coat of arms, are many excellent inscriptions, in commendation of his learning, justice, and other good qualifications ; of which the following are a specimen : JOANNES CORSANUS. f ascibus in nostra urbe, senex, reliquoque juventa Functus honore, sub hoc clausus atro tumulo. * The heir-male of this family is John Corsane, Esq. of Daluhat, in the parish of Glencairn and shirq of Dumfries. E, APPENDIX. XI J ANAGRAMA. An sanus, Cor. senio > Sanus et in sutnraa fueras, Corsane, juventa, Sinus et in summo, Cor. fueras senio. Corde tuo saiio, praecras dum, sive juventa, Seu senio, res liasc publica sana stetit. JOANNES CORSANUS. EPITAPHIUM. Ter tria fiitales et bis tria lustra sorores Dimidiunique JEvo contribuere tuo. Ter tria civiles humerum circumdare Faces Lustra, dedit Sopliise gratia digna tuae. Ter tribus ac binis, tandem prognatus eodein Et lare, Corsanis contumularis Avis. The said John Corsane being dead, as above, was succeeded in his lands and' heritage by the said Mr John Coisane, advocate, his son, who a considerable time before had married Margaret Maxwell, one of the daughters and co-heiresses of Robert Maxwell of Dmwoody, a branch of the family of Maxwell, by whom he had issue. John, his eldest son and heir, Helen, who was married to Herries of Mabie, and several others. With the said Margaret Maxwell, his spouse, he got the lands of Barndennoch, and being well pleased with the amenity of its situation, after he had put his son John in possession of the lands of Meikleknox, he some- times designed himself Mr John Corsane of Barndennoch. He was a very rich man; for besides his country estates in Nithsdale and Galloway, it is credibly re- ported he had a third part of the burgh of Dumfries, and lands thereto belonging, either in property or superiority, which vouchers, still extant, confirm: And, in- deed, there are many old houses there which yet bear the arms of the family, and some of them are quartered with the arms of the families with which he and his predecessors were matched. He was a considerable time provost of Dumfries, about the time of the civil wars, and afterwards, when that place was attacked by the royalists, which cost him dear. He outlived his said son John Corsane of Meikleknox, and died in a good old age, ai/no 1671. The said John Corsane married Jean Kirkpatrick, daughter to Sir Thomas Kirkpatrick ot Cioseburn, by whom he had several children ; John, his eldest son and heir; Charles, who was a captain in King Charles U. his army, and, being in the garrison in Tangier, was wounded by the Moors in anno 1684; thereafter he was advanced to be a colonel, married an Irish lady, and died abroad without issue; Margaret, the eldest daughter of the said John Corsane, was married to James Grierson of Larglanglee, a son of Sir Robert Grierson of Lag, and had several sons and daughters. The said John died before his father, as above; but his widow, Jean Kirkpatrick, lived till the year 1696, having that part of his fortune, by which he was designed, as her jointure. The said John Corsane of Meikleknox married Marion Maxwell, daughter to James Maxwell of Tinwald, (branched from an immediate son of the illustrious fa- mily of Maxwell) by his wife Elizabeth Gnerson, one of the daughters of the said. Sir Robert Grierson of Laij; they had several children, John, his eldest son and heir, Agnes, spouse to Mr I'eterRae, minister of the gospel at Kirkbride, and others, who died unmarried. The said John Corsane died February 2. 1680, and was suc- ceeded by his son John, who was then but eight years old; and Marion Maxwell, his widow, died 5th November 1697. His said son, John Corsane of Meikleknox, married, but died without any issue, 19th September 1717; however his wife being with child brought forth a son some months after iiis decea^e, which was also called John, and made the eighteenth- heir-male of that family of Corsane, by a lineal course of succession. Vol. II. 5 N 4 14 APPENDIX,. This child having died in February 1721, the right to that estate devolved on the said Agnes, who had t'.velve children, whereof nine came to the age of men and women. Robert Rae, her eldest son and heir apparent, is, by his mother's special destination in anno 1731, with the special advice and consent of the said Mr Peter Rae her husband, to succeed to- his maternal ancestors, and to assume the surname of Corsane, and the arms of the family of Meikleknox, which he hath done. She is the only heir of line, now alive, to her uncle Robert iVIaxwell of Tinwald. Blazon. — The ancient armorial bearing of Corsane of Meikleknox, in the stew- artry of Kirkcudbright in Galloway, is urgent, on a fesse azure, a savage's head erased, distilling drops of blood, ajid pierced through with two darts, disposed in saltier, points downwards, all proper, betwixt three mascles in chief, and as many mullets in base, gules; supported by two soldiers, armed cap-a-pee, each of them carrying a target on their sinister arm, and both girded with swords ; he on the dexter embracuig and holding up a spear, erected in pale, ensigned on the top with a lion's h^ad erased, looking to the left; and he on the sinister bearing up another spear also erect in pale, and ensigned with an eagle, all proper, and both standing on a compartment: Above the shield an helmet befitting his degree, with a mantle ^///^j, .doubled argent; and on a torce, or wreath, of his colours, is set, for crest, an eagle crowned with an antique crown, and looking up to the sun in his glory, all proper; and, for motto, on an escrol above all^ these words, Pramium virtutis gloria. A GENEALOGICAL ACCOUNT OF THE FAMILY OF CHALMERS OF BaLNECRAIG AND Cults. THIS ancient family of Balnecraig (still existing in the shire of Aberdeen) bears for their armorial arms argent, a demi-lion rampant, issuing out of a fesse gules, with a flower-de-luce in base of the last ; and, for crest, an eagle in a rising posture, proper ; with the motto, Spero. For instructing the said arms to be the particular coat of this family, they, at this day, remain to be seen both cut on stone on their burial place, and carved on wood on their seat within St Nicholas's Church of Aberdeen, whereon is also insert- ed two ancient inscriptions ; the first whereof is, " Hie jacet providus & honorabilis " vir Alexander de Camera de Murthil, prepositus hujus burgi de Aberdeen, qui " obiit octavo die mensis Octobris, anno Dom. 1413." The other is " Alexan- " der de Camera consulis ejusque familiffi multorum saeculorum prosapia ho- " noribus, que conspicus requietorium &• cathedra, 1313." Which arms and inscriptions are proven to be cut on the foresaid places, by the notorial attestation of Robert Thomson and Walter Cochran, notars-public, as is clear from the ori- ginal copy (which I did see) subscribed by them at Aberdeen the 12th November 1730- But though the arms of this family be cut on their seat in the said church, adorned with all suitable exterior ornaments, to which are added supporters, viz. two angels, yet, on the consideration that the House of Balnecraig is of greater an- tiquity than the usage of supporters in arms, it is more probable to think that this addition has been but a fancy of the carver to decore his work, seeing the oldest books of blazons we now have that are extant, though the above arms of this family be therein recorded, yet nothing of supporters is to be found as proper thereto. As to the original of this surname of Chalmers in the north of Scotland, it is most probable that they are a branch of the clan Cameron, from the affinity of both their arms : And besides. Sir George Mackenzie, in his Genealogical Manu- script of the Famihes of Scotland, tells us, " That one of this clan going to France, APPENDIX. 11- «■ put his name in a Latin dress, by designing himself Cdmcrnriiis, which in French " IS De la Chambre, who, upon liis return to Scotland, according to our dialect, " was called Chalmers; wliich tradition, says the said Sir George, is the more coii- " fumed by the flower- de-luce earned in base in their arms ; which addition their " predecessor has no doubt got when in France, for some meritorious action done " there." Again, as to the rise of the name Cameron, it hath certainly had its beginning from an accidental note, particularly that their predecessor hath hud a wry no^e ; for in the Irish tongue this name signifies as much: and from such accidental notes the custom was, and is at present, in the Higiilands of Scotland, to assume sur- names taken from particular marks in the face or body of the principal chieftain, or leader of their clan, in imitation of the old Roman surnames, Caesar, Balbus, Naso, 8ic. There are others again that derive the origin of this name from the designation De Camera, or office of Chamberlain ; but that those of the surname of Clialmers in the North have their name and descent from the clan Cameron, and those in the South from the oflice of Chamberlain, will clearly appear by wliat follows. For in respect the ancient descent and origin of families cannot be so well found out by surnames, as by their armorial bearings, (as all judicious antiquaries allow") arms being of greater antiquity than surnames, it is then demonstratively evident, that Chalmers of Balnecraig in the north, and that of Gadgirth in tlie southwest of Scotland, are two distinct families, and descended from a different stock and race of progenitors ; for though both these families retain the same name, yet by their arms it appears they are descended of different ancestors, on the account there is not one figure in the arms of the one that corresponds with the arms of the other; for the clan Cameron carry two fesses gules for their arms, and Balne- craig, as a descendant therefrom, bears one of these fesses agreeable in tincture ■ also; which figure, being generally taken by heralds to signify the military belt, or girdle of honour, denotes the valour of their ancestors; whereas the arms of Gadgirth are quite different, as will appear by the following blazon thereof, as it stands recorded in the oldest register of arms in Scotland, authorised by Sir David Lindsay of Mount, who was Lyon King at Arms to King James V. and confirmed to be the true register of arms for Scotland, by the said King in council, the ori- ginal copy being now in the Lawyers' Library at Edinburgh, ot which coat the blazon follows, viz. two coats, quarterly, first and fourth azure, a mullet argent; second and third azure, a fesse cheque, argent and gules. And it is further to be observed, that in the Register of Arms belonging to the present Lord Lyon of this kingdom, the cadets of Gadgirth's family are tliere also matriculated with the said quartered coat, only distinguished with suitable differences. From hence I infer, that, forasmuch as in those shires where the Great Steward of Scotland had interest of old, most of the families, then re^identers there, were in use to chequer the figures in their arms from the Great Steward's fesse cheque, upon the account of patronage, who, being all vassals, did the same to show their dependence on him; and Gadgirth's predecessors being unquestionably one of nis vassals, his lands lying in the shire of Ayr, where he had interest, it has been on that account he hath assumed, and still carries the said fesse cheque ; and probably being one of his chamberlains, his descendants hath afterwards taken the surname De Camera, or Chalmers. And certainly this name De Camera has led Sir George Mackenzie into the mis- take of narrating that Gadgirth's predecessor v>as descended of the clan Cameron, from the affinity of the name De Camera. And, besides,- gives him the particular arms of Balnecraig, on the account (no doubt) that he had never seen any docu- ments to instruct that family's antiquity. But to prove the same, I proceed nexf to narrate the authentic charters following. And, first, there is a charter still extant, granted by Andrew Garviehaugh of Caskieben, to Robert Chalmers, and Helen his spouse, who was aunt to the said Andrew, of the lands of Belode, Balnecraig, and Telanchsyn, with their pertinents, and a half merk of silver out of the mill of Lunfanan yearly, to be holden by him and his said spouse, and the lawful heirs of their body, in feu of the Earl Murray, for a pair of white gloves at Pentecost yearly, at the manor of Caskieben, if asked; n6 APPENDIX. and if it happen that the said Robert and Helen die without lawful heirs of their body, in thai case these lands, with their pertinents, are providea U> the said Ro- berts heirs whatsoever. This is dated at Aberd .en the &th August 1357. And which charter is confirmed to the said Robert Chalmers, (wherein he is designed of Kintore) and to Helen Garviehaugh his spouse, by Isabel Randolph, daughter and heir to John Randolph Earl of Murray, Lord Annandale and Man. From this charter of confirmation I observe, that the said Robert Chalmers was a gentleman of an estate of his own, to wit, the lands of Kintore, before ever iie got the lands mentioned in the above charter ; so that it cannot be doubted but his predecessors were of a much older standing in the north parts of this kmg- dom than the date of the above charters ; neither is it to be thought that the said Andrew Garviehaugh would have so much preferred his aunt as to dispone hib said lands, failing her and her issue, to the said Robert Chalmers and his heirs whatsomever, if he had not been both a man of merit and a fortune ; that he was the first, the foresaid charter demonstrates in the onerous cause of granting it, viz. " Pro bono et fideli conciJio, et auxilio suo mihi impenso et impendeudu :" and that he had a fortune, the confirmation whereof designs him Laird of Kin- tore. The above Andrew Garviehaugh was also a gentleman of a good descent, be- ing son of Sir James Garviehaugh, who had from the great Sir Thomas Randolph Earl of Murray, a charter of the lands of Belode, Balnecraig, Cloychock, and Ta- lanchsyn, with their pertinents, and half a nierk of silver yearly out of the mill of Lunfcinan, which is sealed with the said Earl's seal at his regality of Murray ; but though it hath no date, yet it is well known when the said Earl flourished, being one of King Robert the Bruce's generals. All which original charters 1 saw and perused, and are still extant in the custody of Roderick Chalmers, Ross-Herald, a descendant of this ancient family. But not having seen more sufficient documents to trace down the descendants of the House of Balnecraig to this present, I shall only narrate what Baihe Skeen hath inserted in his Survey of Aberdeen, which is printed there in octavo, anno 1685, where, in his Catalogue of the Provosts of that city, page 246, is set down that Willielmus dc Camera (son of the aforesaid Robert of Kintore and Balnecraig) was Provost of Aberdeen in the year 1392, and several years after, as is clear from the oldest court-book of that city, which is in Latin, and dated anno 1398 ; also William Chalmers was likewise provost there, a?ino 1404. And Thomas de Camera bore the same character, anno i^iz, and many years after. And Alexander Chal- mers was hkewise provost there in the year 1443, and for sundry difterent years after, even to anno 1595, at which time he is designed of Murthill : and besides in the public registers 1 find a charter granted by Alexander Chalmers of Balne- craig to Henry Forbes, of the lands of Thomaston and Fullarton, with an annual- rent of five shillings out of the king's lands of Kinkell and Diss, in the thanage of Kintore and shire of Aberdeen, to be holden blench of the king for a silver penny. This is dated at Aberdeen the 7th of April, and confirmed at St Andrews 1st March 1535. I next proceed to the family of Cults, an early cadet of Balne- craig. The genealogy of tliis family of Cults I shall set down as I find it narrated in the principal Litera Prosapiue, granted by King Charles IL to Mary Margaret Urrey, dated at Edinburgh 17th June, and sealed with the Great Seal the 9th September 1669, finely wrote on vellum ; as also from a genealo;^ical tree of this family il- luminate, and approven by Sir Charles Erskine, Lord Lyon, and whereto his sub- scription and seal of office-is aifixed at Edinburgh the 26th January 1669, to which Joseph Stacy and John BosiUie, heralds, are subscribers ; both which authentic do- cuments are also in the custody of the foresaid Mr Chalmers, Ross-Herald, which I persued, and have farther supplied from authors and records of unquestionable credit, as follows : And first, Alexander Chalmers of Cults, a son of the House of Balnecraig, mar- ried Agnes Hay, daughter of the Earl of Errol, by whom Alexander, his succes- sor, who married Janet, daughter to John Leslie of that Ilk, by vifhom Alexander Chalmers of Cults and Methlick in Aberdeenshire, who married Elizabeth Doug- las, daughter to Glenbervie, by whom Thomas of Cults and Methlick, who is serv- APPENDIX. ri7 ved heir to his said father Alexander, before tlie sheriff of Aberdeen, in the yc:ir 1505 as appears by the original retour still extant in the custody of the said Mr Chalmers, which I saw : this Thomas married Mary Menzies, daughter to Pitfod- dels, by whom Alexander. There is a precept of sasine in the public register, granted by Thomas Chalmers of Cults, to Alexander his second son, for iafefting him in the haill lands of Cults, and mill thereof, wit li the pertinents, lying in the parish of Tarland and shire of Aberdeen, to be holdea in ward by him and his heirs-mule. This is daied at Aberdeen the Bth May, and confirmed at Edinburgh the 27th of the said month, anno 1549; he was also Laird of Strichen, as is evident from a charter granted by Alexander Chalmers of Strichen to Thomas, son to Alexander Eraser of Philortli of the Mains of Strichen, with the mill thereof, to be holden ward; this is dated at Faithlie, 6th December 1558, and confirmed at Edinburgh 2d August 1559. This Alexander married Helen Rait, daughter to Halgreen, by whom Alexander Chalmers of Cults, who married Janet Lumisden, daugiiter to Cushnie ; for proof hereof there is a precept of sasine granted by Alexander to this Alexander his son, and Janet Lumisden his spouse, upon the lands of Cults and mill thereof, dated 9th February 1565 ; the sasine following, thereupon is dated 24th May 1566 : This Alexander was Provost of Aberdeen, anno 1567, as the said Bailie Skene narrates, ibid. By this marriage he had two sons, first, Gilbert his successor, and Air William, minister at Boyndie, of whom after. As to the eldest son, Gilbert Chalmers of Cults, there is a charter under the Great Seal, confirm- ing a charter granted by his father to him, of the lands and mill of Cults, with the woods called Bogs, all lying in the parish of Tarland, and shire of Aberdeen, dated 4th November i6oi, with a precept also under the Great Seal, for infefting the said Gilbert in the said lands, which he afterwards sold to Lesmoir, as is confirm- ed by a sasine in favours of Sir James Gordon appearand of Lesmoir of the lands of Cults, comprehending the other lands therein insert, follovting upon a charter by Gilbert, son of Alexander Chalmers of Cults. The charter is dated the 29th January, and the sasine the istof February 161 2. This Gilbert married Elizabeth Eraser, daughter to Dores, by whom Alexander Chalmers of Cults, who married Janet, daughter of James Irvine of Drum, by whom Alexander of Cults, who mar- ried Marjory, daughter of Robert Lumisden of Cushnie, advocate, by whom only a daughter, Marjory Chalmers, who married John Urie of Pitfichy, by whom a son, Sir John Urie, who was a captain abroad,, where he married Mary Magdalen, daughter of Christopher Sebastian van jaxheim of Exlabrun in Germany, by w horn a daughter, Mary Margaret Urie, Lady Lamont, who is the person that procured the foresaid litera prosapia. This Sir John Urie coming afterwards to Scotland with the magnanimous James Marquis of Montrose, was made his Lieutenant-general, anno 1643, and, some days after the Marquis's execution, was himself beheaded at the Cross of Edinburgh for his loyalty, anno 1650. I next proceed to speak of Mr William Chalmers, second son to the above Alex- ander of Cults, Provost of Aberdeen. He was the first legally establirhed minister at the kirk of Boyndie (in the shire of Banff" and diocese of Aberdeen) after the Re- formation, and married Elizabetii, daughter of Mr William Chalmers (of the same family of Cults) minister of Skene, near Aberdeen, by whom four sons, all clergy- men, viz. first, Mr William, minister at Fettercairn in the Merns, who married Elizabeth, daughter to Barclay of Towie, by whom two sons, Mr William, minis- ter at Glammis in Angus, and Mr James, minister at CuUen in Banffshire. He was sent to England by the episcopal clergy in the north of Scotland, who took tlie oaths at the Revolution (yet were molested by the kirk judicatories) to solicit their affairs at court, and was introduced to her late Majesty Q_iieen Anne, by Dp Compton then Bishop of London, immediately after her accetlion to the crown, to whom he presented an address from his brethren, which was graciously received ; and besides, she settled a pension on him of l^. 100 StexWng per annum, that his being there might be no expence to his constituents, who were necessitate to have one always upon the spot, to represent their case from time to time, as emergen- cies required, in which station he continued till his death. The second son of Mr William Chalmers, minister of Boyndie, was Mr James, parson of Paisley, of whom hereafter. His third son was INJr John, minister of Peterhead in Aberdeenshire, who, married Mary, daughter of Keith of Whiteriggs, Vol. 1L 5 O Ii8 APPENDIX. sheriff of Mcrns, a near relation of the family of the Earl Macischal of Scotland^^. and had issue. He was chaplain to John Earl of Middleton, commissi ^ner to the first Parliament after the Restoration of King Charles II. and both he and his bro- ther Mr James had the honour to preach several times before that great senate. Mr William's fourth son was Mr Patrick, who succeeded his father as mmister of Boyndie : (His said father and his grandfather Mr William Chalmers, minister at Skene, are subscribers to the address of the synod of Aberdeen to his majesty's high commissioner.) This Mr Patrick married Anne, daughter of James Ogiivie of Raggell in the same parish, by whom two sons and a daughter ; the eldest, Mr James, is present rector of Lamarsh and Wickham, St Paids, both in the county of Essex in England. He married first Mary, daughter of Peter Bulteel, merchant of London, gentleman, and widow of Richard Daniel of Colchester, and, secondly, Susanna, eldest daughter of John Edwards, Esq. of Walthamhall in Essex, by whom a son, Henry, and a girl, Rachel Katharine, both promising children. Mr Patrick's second son died a youth at the Marischal College of New Aberdeen ; and his daughter was married to George Ogiivie of Newrain. Mr James Chalmers, second son to Mr William, Minister at Boyndie, was first one of the professors of philosophy in the Marischal College of New Aberdeen ; in which employ he acquitted himself both with honour and applause; and here, in this station he was about anno 1650, when King Charles 11. made his first attempt to. recover his just rights to the government of these kingdoms, for he being a man both of great learning and good address, he employed his utmost endeavours in doing his majesty considerable service in that critical juncture of affairs, God having blessed him with a particular dexterity in managing negotiations of such importance j and of his indefatigable industry herein, and unshaken loyalty, this king was so sensible, that he distinguished him upon all occasions, while at Aberdeen, with par- ticular marks of honour, and especially once, when he v.aited on his majesty, as soon as he entered into his presence, he was received with these words, (not usual from a sovereign to a subject) God save you Mr Chalmers, which the king expres- sed in the audience of many then present. And some years after, entering into holy orders, he, for his bright parts, was presented to the kirk of New Machar, alias New Kirk, within seven miles of Aberdeen, but not continuing there long, he was translated afterwards to the Kirk of Cullen, (where his nephew, Mr James Chalmers, was afterwards incumbent.) During his ministry here, preaching once at his kirk on Jotham's parable, Judges, chap. 9th, in the time of Cromwell's usurpation, where was a company of his soldiers then quartered in that town, ia his discourse on the same, he gave them so great offence that they carried him pri- soner to Elgin, where he continued confined some time, till allowed to return again to his charge at Cullen, whereof he was in actual possession at the Restora- tion ; for 1 find him one of the subscribers (then designed minister of Cullen) to the humble address of the Synod of Aberdeen to his Majesty's High Commissioner John Earl of Middleton, against the murder of King Charles I., subjects taking up arms against the supreme magistrate, delivering up the King at Newcastle, act of the West Kirk, and other rebellious practices; which address is dated at the King's College of Aberdeen the i8th April 1661 ; but, after episcopacy was estabhshed in Scotland in the year 1662, I find he was advanced to the kirk of Dumfries, and for confirmation hereof, and the passages above, there is an act of the Lords of Secret Council in his favour, dated nth of December 1662, and registrate in their council books, viz. " The Lords of Secret Council taking to their consideration, " that Mr James Chalmers, late Minister at Cullen of Boyne, and now Minister " at Dumfries, has been at a great deal of charges and pains in pursuance of his " Majesty's interest and government, both in church and state, have therefore or- " dained, and by these presents ordain, that the present year's stipend, anno 1662, " due to the late minister of Dumfries, be paid to the said Mr James Chalmers, " and that the heritors, feuars, farmers, tenants, possessors, and others liable, make " ready and thankful payment of the same to him, or any having his order; and, " if need be, ordain letters of horning to pass thereupon as effeirs : And this is " without prejudice to the said Mr James of the said year's stipend 1662, due to " him from the parish of Cullen." Mr James was some years after this advanced to- the parsonage of Paisley in Renfrewshire ; and so much was he in the estima- APPENDIX. irgi. «on of the said King Charles, that he was nominated by him to the bishoprick of Orkney, and the conge d'elire sent down from court, in order to his election, buft dying at Edinburgh before he could be consecrated, that See was tilled with another bishop: He lies buried in the Chalmers's tomb in the Grayfriers Church-yard there; he married first a daughter of Mr William Scroggy, bishop of Argyle ; and, se» condly, Elizabeth, sister to Robert Petrie of Portlethin near Aberdeen, who wa* Provost of that city from the year 1664 to 1671, by whom two sons, first, Mc James, Minister of Kirkpatrick-Fleming, the second. Captain Charles. Captain Charles Chalmers, his second son, possessed the estate of Portleth a, which belonged to his uncle Provost Petrie ; but afterwards he sold the ame o Thomson, now of Portlethin. He was admitted writer to the signet i6th Octobes 1704; but leaving that employment, betook himself to the military, and was for sometime a Captain in the .Scots Guards, which commission he sold 1714 ; but be- ing engaged afterwards in the memorable year 1715 to employ his valour at the battle of ShenfTmuir, was there killed, and lies buried at Dumblane in the bury- ing place of Mr Chisholm of Cromlicks, within the church there. He married first Jean, daughter of Alexander Boog of Bumhouses in Berwickshire, by whom two sons, Roderick, of whom after, and James, picture-drawer ; which family of Boog of Burnhouses is of good antiquity in the said shire, as is clear from the authentic documents following ; for I find in the public registers, a charter granted by King James IV. in favours of John Boog of Burnhouses of the said lands of Burnhouses, Uthcrstone, Oxendean, Harcarse, Risybrigs, lying in the earldom of iMarch and shire of Berwick, dated at Edinburgh the 23d January 1490, Anno Regni 2,tio; there is also another charter by the said king, in favour of Archibald Boog his son, of the foresaid haill lands, confirming the atove charter granted to his father, which is dated 6th May 1491: This Archibald's son was John Boog of Burnhouses, who had a son John, as is instructed by the special retour of John Boog as heir to John Boog his father, of the whole foresaid lands. This is dated the iSth January 1546; and which John was grandfather to the above Alexander Boog, whose daughter married Captain Chalmers ; Captain Charles married, secondly, Helen, daughter of Alexander Young. Bishop of Edinburgh, and by her had issue also. Roderick Chalmers, Captain Charles's eldest son, is present Ross-Herald, and herald-painter in Edinburgh ; and hath married Mary, only child of George Wil- son, gentleman, by whom several sons, viz. Charles, George, James, Roderick, and Alexander. SIBBALD OF Balgonie, and LUNDIN or Balgonie, now represented LUNDIN OF Drum. FROM the documents we have seen, and herewith produced, we are of opinion that the Sibbalds of Balgonie is one of the ancientest as well as one of the best allied families in the kingdom. Donatus or Duncanus Sibbahl seems then to be settled in the county of Fife, and doubtless is proprietor of the lands of Balgonie ; for we find him witness to that charter by Rogerus de ^tincy Com:- de IVinton, i. e. Winchester in England, to Seyer de Seton, one of the progenitors of the Earl of Winton. The charter is without date, a thing very usual at that time, but must be before the 1246, that the Earl of Winchester died. The same Duncanus Sibbald, in the 1251, is mentioned in a bull of Pope Innocent IV. referring the cognizance of a complaint made to his Holiness by the priory of St Andrews, that the Bishop of St Andrews had introduced into one of the churches, that of right belonged to them, the Order of the Blessed Trinity, for the redemption of captives. The same Dona- tus Sibbald is witness to another charter by the forenamed Rogerus- de ^lincy Conjla- bularius Scotia, Adamo de Seton, de Marit^igio hceredis Allani del Fauside. Then we meet with Walterus Sibbald, one of the ancestors of the house of Balgonie, whose son David, called ^//«j- PValteri Sibbald, who had a charter from Malcolm Earl of Fife, which must be before 1256 that the granter died. I have seen a charter in I 123. APPENDIX. the custody of the Earl of Vfemyss, to Sir John Wemyss, Knight, of the lands oi Camburn, granted by Robert E:irl of Fife and iVlonteith in the 1374, to winch, among other witnesses, there is dominus Johannes Sibhnld, 7niles. And in another charter by Isabel Countess of Fife, disponing the whole earldom of F"ife to Robert Earl of Monteith in the 1371 ; the. original charter of this I have seen, dated the penult of March 1371. There is a charter under the Great Seal by Robert Duke of Albany, Earl of Fife and Monteith, Governor of Scotland, Johnnni Sibbald de Ba/^ony, of the lands of Rossie ; he had Sir Andrew Sibbald of Balgonie his heir and successor, and a daughter Elizabeth, who was married to George Earl of Angus: By this lady he had Archibald, the heir of that illustrious house, whose grandson and successor, Ar- chibald Earl of Angus, by Margaret Q_iieen Dowager of Scotland, daughter of Henry VII. of England, h- had gne daughter, the Lady Margaret Douglas, who who was married to Matthew Earl of Lennox, whose eldest son, Henry Lord Darn- ly. Earl of Ross, and Duke of Albany, married Mary Q^iieen of Scotland, who was declared King of Scotland, wliose only child was James VL of Scotland, the first monarch of Great Brirain-: So that of this ancient family of Sibbald of Bal- gonie, not only the royal family of Great Britain are descended, but most of all the crowned heads in Europe, who have intermarried with that serene house. Sir Andrew Sibbald of Balgonie, son and heir of Sir John Sibbald aforesaid, executed the office of High-ShenH' of the county of Fife, in the 1457, as appears from Rymcr, and he is designed lUcecomes de Fife, in the year 1466, in the re- cords of Parliament. He left one daughter, liis heir, Helen, who married Robert Lundin, second son to Sir John Lundin of that Ilk, by Dame Isabel Wemyss his •wife, of the House of Wemyss in Fifeshire, whose ancestor of the House of Lundin, from many authentic deeds still extant, was IVilliam de Lundin, as he is called, son-natural to King William of Scotland, commonly called the Lion, and married the heiress of the ancient family of Lundin, or Lundoniis, of which surname and family was Thomas de Lundoniis Hostiarius Scotia, and Comes Athoha, in the reign of Alexander II. anno 1246. So by marriage of the heir-female of Sibbald of Balgonie, that estate came to be transferred to the Lundins; and upon that ac- count the family of Lundin of Balgonie quartered the coat of Sibbald with their paternal arms, and is still the same way carried by Lundin of Drum, the heir- male and representative of the House of Balgonie. Robert Lundin of Balgonie, and Helen Sibbald, aforesaid, his wife, heiress of Balgonie, had a son, Sir Robert Lundin of Balgonie, who was in high favour with King James IV.; and being a gentleman of parts and reputation for integrity, he was preferred to be Lord High Treasurer of Scotland, upon the removal of the Abbot of Paisley, Dr George Shaw, from the office, anno ii,C)-i, and he held the Treasurer's place for the space of five years, even till his death in the 1502, as from authentic documents 1 have seen and perused. His wife was a daughter of the Lord Lindsay of Byres, the ancestor of the present Earl of Crawford, as from the MS. History of that noble family I have seen, by whom he had a son, Andrew Lundin of Balgonie, and two daughters, Elizabeth, who was married to John Lord Lindsay, of whom the House of Crawford and Lindsay are descended, and Euphame to William Melville of Raith, and^ had issue, of whom, from authentic documents I have seen, is the Eari of Melville and Leven descended. Andrev/ Lundin, the third of the line of the Lundins of Balgonie, was, from the Records of Parliament I have seen, Sherift" of Fifeshire in the 1506, and, for what I see, held the office till the 15 19 it was given to the Lord Lindsay. Ihe writs of the family of Balgonie being now in other hands, we have no document to vouch to whom this gentleman, Andrew Lundin of Balgonie, was married, but he had his son and successor, vix. James Lundin of Balgonie. This is vouched from a deed I have seen granted by Andrew Lumisden, son to Thomas Lumisden of Conland, of the lands ot Wester- Conland, to and in favours of James Lundin of Balgonie, anno 1528. He was suc- ceeded by his son and heir Robert Lundin of Balgonie, who added to his own estate, which was then one of the greatest in the shire of File, the lands and barony of Conland, by the mar- liage of Margajet Lumisden, the heiress tbeieof, whose ancestor, Johannes dt APPENDIX. izi Lumsden, is llcecomes ck Fife, as fiom an authentic deed I have seen in the Re- gister in the time of the regency of Robert Dukeof Albany ; and, it is remarkable, the Duke Regent, who was the second son of King Robert II. calls this Johannes Lumsden, consanguineus situs. From that time the f miily continued to flourish till the time of Queen Mary, that Andrew Lumisden, son and heir of Thomas Lumis- den of Coniand, left only one daughter, his heir, Margaret, whc3, as hath been said, was married to Robert Lundm of Balgonie, for there is a sasine 1 have pe- rused of the barony of Coniand, in favour of this Robert Lundin of Balgonie, in the year 1544. Further, there was another voucher in my hand at the drawing of this memorial, a renunciation by Mr Thomas Lumisden of the lauds of VVescer- Conland, in favour of an honourable lady, Margaret Lumisden, spouse to Robert Lundin of Balgonie, ann-) 1564. By this lady he had issue, Robert, his successor in the barony of Balgonie, James, who was provided to the lands of C^onland, but he died without issue, and the lands of Coniand came to a third brother, Andrew Lundin, the ancestor of Michael Lundin of Drum, by whom the male heir of this ancient family was preserved : He had also a daughter, Margaret, who was first married to George Halket of Pitferran, and again to Mr William Lundin of that Ilk, and had issue, as is evident from vouchers presently in my hands. R0BEH.T Lundin, son and heir to the foresaid Robert, and the sixth of the line in succession of the Lundins of the House of Balgonie, succeeded his father. I have seen him designed witness to a contract of marriage betwixt Sir Michael Bal- four of Burleigh, and Margaret, daughter of Mr William Lundin of that Ilk, dated the I2th of July 1591 ; he was afterward the first Lord Balfour of Burleigh. This Robert Lundin of Balgonie manned Margaret, daughter of David Boswell of Bal- muto, as from a voucher I have seen, and had a son in whom the family failed, and a daughter, Agnes, who was married to William Graham of Claverhouse, great-grandmother to Lieutenant-General John Graham of Claverhouse, thereafter Viscount of Dundee. Robert Lundin of Balgonie, son and heir to the former Robert, was the last of the House of Balgonie, for he had no male issue, and he alienated his estate to Alexander the first Earl of Leven, who was designed of Balgonie, till he was raised to the honour of an earl in the year 1640. The family of Balgonie thus failing in the lineal succession, the representation of this ancient House comes to Lundin of Drum, as we have said. The predecessor was Andrew Lundin, younger son to- Robert Lundin of Balgonie, by Margaret his wife, daughter and heir of Andrew Lumisden of Coniand ; to vouch this there is a sasine 1 have perused of the lands, of Coniand by Robert Lundin of Balgonie, Margaret Lumisden his wife, in favour of Andrew Lundin their son, in the 1578. This gentleman, Andrew Lundin of Coniand, was umch with King James VI. and in a good degree of favour. He went up to England with the king, when he succeeded to that crown, on the de- cease of Queen Elizabeth, anno 1603, where he speht most of his own estate, ai well as what he had by the king's bounty, so that the barony of Coniand was ap- prised from him by Sir Michael Arnot of that Ilk. He married Elizabeth Brown, daughter to the Laird of Fordel, whose mother was a daughter of Sir David Bos- v/ell of Balmuto, by whom he had David his eldest son, and Andre^v Lundin of Kirny, the second son. Which David went into the army in the time of the civil war, and being a gen- tleman of courage, prudence and industry, he rose to be a captain; and withal, being a frugal man, he redeemed the lands of Over and Nether-Drums, a part of the estate that his father had wadset and mortgaged ; and upon that he took the title and designation of Lundin of Drum: and he also purchased a fourth part of the lands of Freuchy, and he got also a considerable estate in and about Falkland, by the marriage of Elizabeth, daughter and heir of George Paterson, a grandson of the House of Dunmore in Fife; by her he had issue, George, his successor; Ro- bert, the second son, was first a captain in the Earl of Dumbarton's regiment, and then, by his merit, he rose gradually till he got the command of a regiment in the reign of King William, and was sometime Governor of Londonderry in Ireland, anno 1689: and though he fell under some suspicion, as favouring the giving the town to King James, while his army lay before it, yet it was without ground, and he had his conduct approver! by the English Parliament, and was afterwards, in Vol. II. 5 P J2 2 APPENDIX. the reign of Queen Anne, commissary-general in the army, and was at the battle ot Almanza in Spain, and died about the end of her majesty's reign; he left a son who is at present a captain in the army. George Lundin of Drum, the next of the line, married Isabel Arnot, daughter of Sir Michuel Arnot of that Ilk, baronet, and had issue by her, John, his eldest son, who, after he had passed the course of his studies at the university of St An- drews, went into the army, and had a commission in the Earl of Dumbarton's regiment, and was slain at Sedgemoor in the engagement against the Duke of Monmouth ; a very hopeful as well as a rising young man, but was snatched away in bis twenty-fifth year, universally regretted by all who knew him, or heard his character; Michael, the second son, who became his father's heir, and is the present Laird of JDrum; the third son, David, who was a captain in the war in Ireland, and died with the character of a very brave man. Michael Lundiv, now of Drum, married Sophia, daughter and co-heiress of James Lundin of Drum, elder, and lias James, his son and apparent heir. The armorial bearing of this family of Lundin of Drum, as representing the Lundins of Balgonie as heir-male, and the ancient family of Sibbald of Balgouie as heir of line, is, quarterly, first and fourth ardent, a cross moline ^ules, by the sur- name of Sibbald ; second and third, argent and gules, in place of six argents and gules, on a bend of the last three escutcheons of the first; crest, a cross moline gules: motto, Justitia. ABERCROMBY of Birkenbog. THE surname of Abercromby, like others of great antiquity, is local, taken from the lands of Abercromby, in the county of Fife, which was the ancient possession of this family. The Abercrombies of that Ilk were very considerable gentlemen. Thomas Abercromby of that Ilk, in the reign of King James II. was one of the Lords of Session, or what at that time was a committee of Parliament, who were from one Session to another appointed for the administration of justice, anno 1457. He left a son, Thomas, his successor in the barony of Abercromby, and a daughter, Margaret, who was married to Maule of Panmure. And from this Thomas the line of the family continued till the reign of King Charles I. anno 1649, that Thomas Abercromby sold the barony of Abercromby to Sir James Sandilands of St Monance, who was created Lord Abercromby in the year 1647. The most ancient cadet of this family of Abercromby of that Ilk, was the Aber- crombies of Birkenbog, in the shire of Banff, whose predecessor was Humphredus de Abercromby, a son of the House of Abercromby, who obtained a charter and grant from King Robert the Bruce, of the lands of Harthill and Ardun pro homagio 13 servitio suo, as the charter bears, which is still extant in the custody of Sir James A,bercromby of Birkenbog, baronet. It is without date, but appears to have been about 1315, the 7th year of the king's reign, immediately after the battle of Ban- nockburn, when that immortal monarch began to reward the loyalty and valour of such of his subjects as had served him hitherto with merit and fidelity. This Humphrey Abercromby of Harthill was succeeded by Alexander de Abercromby, who acquires from Patricius Hay, dimidiam partem terra: de Ardhuienyn, to be held of him and his heirs in feudo 13 hiBreditate'r. to the deed the granter's seal is ap- pended, and the witnesses are Domino JVillielmo Episcopo Aberdonensi, Domino David Fleming, militi, Jobanne de Periston. The charter is granted in the reign of King David II. To this Alexander succeededanother Alexander de Abercromby, designed of Pitmithen; and to him succeeded his son and heir Alexander Abercromby of Pit- mithen, as is vouched by a precept out of the Cliancery by King James III. for investing the said Alexander in the lands of Harthill, Pitmithen, Pitmachy, Hal- ton and Ardoun, in Comitatu de Garioch. The instrument of sasine is dated the 4th of August 1484, the 35th year of the king's reign. Then succeeded James Aber- APPENDIX. 12 i cromby of Ley and Birkenbog, who is also designed of Pitmithen. He was mar- ried to Margaret Ogilvie, daughter of Sir James Ogilvie of Findlater and Deskford, and was slain with King James IV. at the battle of Flodden. He was succeeded by George Abercromby of Pitmithen, his son, who, by Christian his wife, a daugh- ter of Barclay, of the Barclays of Gartlay, had James his son and heir, who succeeded him, and married Marjory Hay, a daughter to William Earl of Errol. Alexander Abercromby succeeded to James, and married Margaret, daughter of Leslie of Pitcaple, who was again succeeded by Alexander his son, who married Margaret Leslie, daughter of William Leslie of Balquhain, by whom he liad James Abercromby of Birkenbog, and Alexander, who was Laird of P'itternier, father of Alexander Abercromby of Fitternier, who, by Jean his wife, daughter of John Seaton of Newark, had Francis Abercromby of Fitternier, who was by King- James VIL created Lord Glassford for life, in regard that liis children by his wife, Anne Baroness of Semple, were to succeed to the honours of Lord Scniple; of which marriage is descended the present Hugh Lord Semple. The Lord Glassford had a younger brother, Patrick Abercromby, M. D. who wrote the Lives of the Scots Warriors, in two volumes, with great exactness and ingenuity. The above James Abercromby of Birkenbog was succeeded by Alexander Abercromby of Birkenbog, who was falconer to King Charles L He married Elizabeth Beaton, daughter to Beaton of Balfour, by whom he had Sir Alexander Abercromby, ba- ronet, John Abercromby of Glasshaugh, Walter Abercromby of Braconhills. Sir Alexander married, first, Jean Urquhart, of the family of Urquhart of Cro- marty, and after her Jean Sutherland, of the family of Kilminity; and, lastly, Elizabeth Baird, daughter to Sir James Baird of Auchmeddan, chief of that name; by which last lady he had Sir James Abercromby of Birkenbog, and Alexander Abercromby of Tullibody, who succeeded to his cousin George Abercromby of Skeith (who was an ancient cadet of the family of Birkenbog) in the lands of Tilhbody. Of the Family of MELDRUM. THE oldest writs of this family being lost, it cannot be condescended on at what particular time it had its rise ; but Hector Boece in his History mentions the sur- name of Meldrum, amongst others, to have begun in the reign of King Malcolm Canmore ; and it is not improbable it has been taken from the name of the lands, as was usual at that time. We meet with severals of this name in the charters of King William the Lion, and of Alexander the H. and IIL There is a perambulation of the lands of Cleish in Fife, per Micbaelem de Montealto iS Philippum de Melgedrum, tunc Justiciarios Scotia, Anno 1252, {penes Lindsay of Dowhill), and Alexander de Meldrum is witness in the resignation of the lands of Beethwald by John de Strathern, anno 1278. (See First Vol. of this Heraldry, page 331.) We find also in Rymer's Fcedera Anglice, Vol. V. pages 618, 625, and 657, several letters of safe conduct, granted by Edward the HI. King of England, in the years 1348 and 1349, to the ambassadors of Scotland, who came to treat about the redemption of King David Bruce, then a prisoner in England, and IMUielmus de Meldrutn is named as one of the said ambassadors. The said William Meldrum got a charter from King David Bruce of the lands and lordship of Meldrum, dated at Dumbritton the loth day of October' 1353, and his descendants in the male line continued to enjoy the said estate until the reign of King James I. when William Meldrum of that Ilk dying, left by Elizabeth his wife, daughter of the Earl of Sutherland, only one daughter named EUzabeth, who was his successor, and married William Seaton, brother to Alexan- der fijTst Earl of Huntly. 3. 124 APPENDIX. The said William Seaton of Meldrum was killed in the king's service at the battle of Brechin, fought betwixt his brother the Earl of Huntly and the Earl of Crawford, May i8. 1452, and his son Alexander Seaton was served heir to Eliza- betli Meldrum his mother, April 20th 1456. Alexander Seaton of Meldrum married Murriel, daughter of Sutherland of Duffus, ancestor of the Lord Duffus, by whom he had a son named William. William Seaton of Meldrum married Elizabeth, daughter of Leslie of Wardis, by whom he had a son named Alexander. Alexander Seaton of Meldrum was served heir to his grandfather in the lands and lordship of Meldrum, as then called, July 15. 151 2, and married Agnes, daughter of Gordon of Haddo, ancestor of the Earl of Aberdeen, by whom he had William, his successor, and Alexander, who was Chancellor of Aberdeen, and Vicar of Bethelny. He married, for a second wife, a daughter of Leith of Barns, by whom he had Seaton of Blair. William Seaton of Meldrum was served heir to his father January 13. 1533, and married Janet, daughter to Gordon of Lesmoir, by whom he had Alexander his successor, John Seaton of Lumphard, and William Seaton of Slatie ; and mar- rying afterwards Margaret, daughter to Innes of Leuchars, he had by her Mr George Seaton of Barra, Chancellor of Aberdeen, and James Seaton, who was the first of the family of Pitmedden, now represented by Sir William Seaton, baronet. This William Seaton of Meldrum granted a procuratory of resignation, dated fanuary 24. 1533, for resigning his lands in the king's hands, for new infeftment to himself and Janet Gordon his spouse, and the heirs procreate betwixt them ; which failing, to his nearest lawful heirs and assignees whatsomever ; and upon this resignation charter and sasine followed : also the said WiUiam Seaton granted a charter, dated January 19. 1556, to Alexander his eldest son, and his heirs and assignees whatsomever, of the said lands and barony, to be holden of the king, upon which a charter of confirmation and infeftment followed ; so, it is to be observed, that hitherto the succession continued settled on heirs what- somever. Alexander Seaton of Meldrum married Elizabeth, daughter of Irvine of Drum, by whom he had one son named Alexander, and afterwards he married Jean, daughter of Abernethy Lord Salton, and had two sons, John and William ; also two daugh- ters, Margaret married to Chalmers of Balbithan, and Isabel to Erskine of Pitto- drie. This Alexander Seaton of Meldrum granted a charter, dated December 3. 1584, to Alexander his eldest son, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to his heirs-male and assignees whatsomever, of his said lands and estate of Mel- drum, to be holden of the king, with a reservation of his own liferent ; and there- upon a charter of confirmation under the Great Seal was expede, and infeftment taken ; whereby the ordinary course of succession in the heirs of line was al- tered. . Alexander Seaton, younger of Meldrum, married, anno 1584, Christian, daughter of Michael Eraser of Stonnywood, ancestor of the Lord Eraser, and dy- ing before his father, anno 1590, left only one daughter, named Elizabeth, who married, anno 1610, John Urquhart of Craigfintry, son to the Laird of Cromarty, and commonly designed Tutor of Cromarty, by whom she had Patrick Urquhart of Lethinty, Adam Urquhart of Auchintoull, Walter Urquhart of Crombie, James Urquhart of Old-Craig, and one daughter married to Eraser of Easter-Tyrie ; and after the death of the Tutor of Cromarty, the said Elizabeth Seaton married Alex- ander Eraser of Philorth, afterwards Lord Salton, by whom she had Alexander, Master of Salton, grandfather to the present Lord. She was served heir in gene- ral both to her father and grandfather, March 19. 1617; but the succession to the estate of Meldrum, devolved, in the terms of the last settlement, upon her uncle John Seaton, who was eldest son of the second marriage, to Alexander Sea- ton her grandfather. John Seaton of Meldrum married Lady Grissel Stewart, daughter of the Earl of Athol, but died without issue, anno 1619, and was succeeded by his brother. WiLtiAM Seaton of Meldrum married Anne, daughter of Crichton of Fren- draught, ancestor of the Viscount of Frendraught, but had no issue ; and esteem- APPENDIX. 12^ mg it just and reasonable that, as the estate of Meldruni came to the name of Seaton by a marriage with the heir-female of Meldrum of that Ilk, and that the course of succession continued settled in the heirs of line for a long time, it should in like manner descend to his eldest brother's daughter and her heirs, rather than go to an heir-male at a greater distance ; and therefore, anno 16^5, he entailed his estate, failing heirs of his own body, to his grand-nephew Patrick Urquhart of Lethinty, eldest son of the Tutor of Cromarty, by Elizabeth Seaton his niece ; and he did accordingly succeed thereto. Patrick. Ui<.<^'har.t of Meldrum was born anno 161 1 ; he liad not only his house of Lethinty plundered, but suffered several other hardships for his loyalty to his Majesty King Charles I. He married Margaret, daughter of James fust Earl of Airly, by whom he had John, who died unmarried, Adam liis successor, James Urquhart of Knockleith, Dr Patrick Urquhart, Professor of Medicine in the King's College of Aberdeen, and Captain Alexander Urquhart, who was killed in tlie king's service anno 16S5 ; also one daughter, Elizabeth, married to Sir George Gor- don uf Gight„and afterwards to Major-General Thomas Buchan. The above- named Lady M&rgaret Ogilvie had the honour to save her brother's, the Lord Ogilvie's, life, who made his escape in her clothes from the prison at St An- drews, anno 1646, the very night before he was to have been executed with Sir Robert Sputtiswood and others, who suffered at that time for their loy- alty. Adam Urquhart of Meldrum was born anno 1635, and in his younger year<, wlien his eldest brother was alive, served long abroad as a soldier, and, after his return to his own country, he had the honour to serve his Majesty King Charles II. as Cornet, and then as Lieutenant of that Independent Troop of Horse com- manded by his uncle the Earl of Airly ; and was thereafter made Captain of the said troop in room of the said Earl, in which station he continued till his death, anno 1684. He married, anno 1667, Mary, daughter of Lewis Marquis of Huntly, and sister of George first Duke of Gordon, by whom he had John, his successor, James Urquhart of Byth, Adam and Lewis, both churchmen in France ; also three daughters, Mary, a nun at Dieppe in Normandy, Elizabeth, married to David Ogil- vie of Clova, and Anne, married in France to Sir Florence O'Donogh an Irish gen- tleman, and an officer in the King of France's Gens d'Aims. The said Lady Mary Gordon, after Meldrum's death, married James Earl of Perth, then Lord High Chancellor of Scotland, and, after the Revolution, went to France with her husband, where she lived till the year 1726. John Urqi^hart of Meldrum married Jean, daughter of Sir Hugh Campbell of Calder, by whom he had Adam, who died unmarried, and William ; also four daughters, Mary, married to William Menzies of Pitfoddels, Jean, to Alexander Stewart of Auchluncart, Elizabeth, to William Forbes of Edinglassie ; and Anne, to Charles Gordon of Blelack. He died anno 1726, in the 59th year of his age, and was succeeded by his son. William Urqithart of Meldrum married Mary, daughter of Sir William Forbes of Monymusk, by whom he has several children. The arms of this family, as matriculate in the Lyon Register, anno 1673, are thus blazoned ; two coats quarterly, first and last argent, a demi-otter issuing forth of a bar, waved sable, crowned or, second and third or, three crescents within a double tressure, counter-flowered gules, above the shield and helmet, answerable to the degree, mantled gules, doubled argent ; next is placed on a torse or wreath, for a cre't, a boar's head erased or, and, for a motto, on an escrol above the crest, Ter mare \i! terras. Vql. U. .5 (^ APPENDIX, SCOTT OF Balwyrie. I SHALL not insist in giving an exact genealogy of this family, though, no. doubt, among the ancientest in the kingdom, but rather choose to be particular in those evidents which make them often conspicuous in their services to their country. Uchtredus filhis &o«,and Herbertiis Scotus, are mentioned in the reign of David L as witnesses in the cliarters of the abbacies of Selkirk and Holyroodhouse : And though these persons are not designed, yet it is certain, from the following evi- dents, they were of his family. Ex Lib. Dumfenn. fol. 96.. verso, " Cum mota esset controversia inter Willum Dei Gratia Abbatem et Conven- " turn de Dumferlyn ex una parte, et Ricardum de Balverii ex altera, super tota " terra de Balverii cum pertinentiis suis, quam idem Abbas et Conventus illicite " alienatam asserebant, et earn revocare nitebantur, per Hteras Domini Papae, ad " Abbatem de Lindovis et Scon, spontanea voluntate renunciantes omni actioni « super ilhcita alienatione, &c. concesserunt eidem Ricardo et haredibus suis in " peipetuum totam dictam terram de Balverii, cum suis rectis divisis et pertinen- " tiis, &-C. et cum omnibus aliis libertatibus quas antecessores sui in eadem terra " habuerunt." The date of this writ is determined by that of the Pope's letters ; for it is expressly marked, " Litera; Gregorii datae Lateran, 6 Idus Junii, Pontifi- " catus anno imo, et Domini nostri 122,1. Ex eodem Lib. Dumfermliensi, Fol. 86. reeto. " Michael Scotus et Margareta ejus sponsa, omnibus, &-c. Noveritis Universi- " tas vestra nos, Divinte remunerationis intuitu, et pro salute animarum anteces- " sorum et successorum nostrorum, cum Duncani nostri hasredis, dedisse et con- " cessisse, &-c. Deo et Ecclesise Trinitatis de Dumferlyn, &.c. totam terram de " Gaskimeenimfin juxta Vueth, cum omnibus assiamentis ad earn pertinen- " tibus, &c." This charter is ratified by Margaret his lady, daughter to Duncan de Pyraes, and all of them confirmed at Scoon by King Alexander, 22d April 1231. What I remark from these charters is, that they were a standing family at that time, and, without any stretch, may be supposed to have existed in the reign of Malcolm Canmore, when surnames first took place. About this time was born the famous Michael Scott of Balwyrie, whose writ- ings to this day sustain their character ; he was (says Dr Mackenzie, Vol. I. of his History of Scots Writers) one of the greatest philosophers and linguists of his age, Symphorianus, Camperius, Roger Bacon, and Cornelius Agrippa, praise him for his knowledge in the stars and physical matters ; but his too great curi- osity that way made the vulgar look on him as a magician, though it is observable in all his writings, none speak more respectfully of God and religion than he does. His son dnd successor. Sir Michael, was no less conspicuous in his way than his father ; he is one of the Equites Fifenses Illiistres sent by the guardians of the kingdom to bring home Margaret the Maid of Norway. Edward of England writes in his favour to the bishops of St Andrews and Glasgow, &c. the foresaid guardians, to grant him or his family, when it should fall, their ward and marriage, as the recompense of his labour, " in recompensa- " tionem laboris, quern Michael Scotus, pro communi utilitate prsedicti regni, APPENDIX. 127 ' eundo ad partes Norwagioe, pro filia regis Norwagia; Domina Scotiae et inde in ** tenam ScotiiE conducenda," says the Record. Feed. AngUtr, Tom. II. p. 533. Btichan. Historia. He IS chosen and named, per Dominum Joannem de Baliolo, with several others, to judge in the controversy about the succession to the crown. Ibidan, Tom. II. P- 553- , . The tamily was no less active in successive reigns ; for I find at the storming of the town of Berwick, under the command of Thomas Earl of Angus, Sir Andrew Scott of Bahvyrie, with five gentlemen of note, lost their lives. Aber- cromby's History, Vol. II. Hector Boet. Book 15. This happened, «««o 1355. ^fi/io 1432, Michael Scott of Balwyrie is sent as hostage ex parte Jucohi regis y in place of Robert Logan, and on that account obtains the King of England's safe conduct. Fad. Angliae, p. 510, 512. Anno 1 51 1, Sir William Scott of Balwyrie is sent ambassador by James IV. to Henry Vill. of England, along with Archibald Earl of Argyle, John Lord Drummond, Robert Lauder of Bass, John Ramsay, and Mr James Henderson. Ibidem, Tom. XIll. p. 305. Anno 1513, He is with John Lord Drummond Commissarius Regis to the Court of England. Ibidem, p. 346. He was taken prisoner at Flodden, and sold a great part of his estate to raise his ransom ; the contract of sale is in Had. Col. p. 542. Anno 1524, In indent ura treugarum Scotice. The Counsellors and Commissaries of the Right Excellent, S^c. James King of Scots, are Gilbert Eaj'l of Cassilis, Lord Kennedy, William Scott of Balwyrie, knight, and Ma- Adam Otterburn, to which indentures they set their seals at Ber- wick, 4th September 1524, and the c/W/f cz/fo Conimissariorum Scotice is subscribed by them 5th September 1524. Anno 1525, In the confirmation of peace he is again named with several others; and in 1526, he is one of the commission to treat of peace and war. Anno 1528, He is one of the commission for the last time, and first named, with Mr Adam Otterburn, and Andrew Ker of Ferniherst, predecessor to the family of Lothian : When this Sir William died is uncertain. Anno 159Q, J.\.MES Scqtt of Balwyrie is knighted at the coronation of Anne Queen of Scots. The direct line ended in his grandchild Colonel Walter Scott, who died in Flanders, in the reign of King Charles II. A little before his death he sent over to Sir John Scott of Ancrum, baronet, the seal of the family, along with a letter acknowledging him the nearest male relation of his family, being lineally de- scended from Andrew Scott of Glendoick, a younger son of that Sir William whom we have mentioned, so often employed with a public character in the seiwice of his country : Which Andrew married Euphame Blair, daughter to Blair of Balthy- ock, by whom he had Alexander, who married Margaret Ogilvie, daughter to Ogilvie of Inchmartin, ancestor to the Earl of Findlater, who bare to him George, married to Katharine Moncrief, daughter to Moncrief of Rhind, brother to Mon- crief of that Ilk ; by her he had Patrick Scott, father to the above Sir John, by Elizabeth Simpson, daughter to Simpson of Monturpie in Fife, now e.xtinct. Sir John Scott was married to Elizabeth Scott, daughter to Francis Scott of Mangerton, by whom he had Sir Patrick Scott his eldest son, and issue several sons and daughters. Sir Patrick had by his lady, Margaret Scott, daughter to Sir William Scott of Harden, Sir John his eldest son, and several sons and daughters. Sir John is married to Christian Nisbet, daughter to William Nisbet of Dirleton-, and has by her, Patrick, William, John, Walter, and Christian Scotts. All which is documented by sasines and contracts of marriage, in the hands of Sir John Scott. APPENDIX^. BAILLIE OF Lamington. MR ALEXANDER BAILLIE of Castlecairj, who was a very learned aim quarian, having with great care and ingenuity examined into the origin of the surnanne of Bailhe, was of opinion that it was the same with Bahol, and that the family of Lamington was a branch of the illustrious House of the Baliols, who were Lords of Galloway in Scotland;, and John Baliol, Lord of Galloway, was once King of Scotland. He had an uncle Sir Alexander Baliol of Cavers, who was Great Chamberlain of Scotland in the reign of his nephew King John, anno 1292, by Isabel his wife, daughter and heir of Richard dc Chillam, widow of David de Strathhogy Earl of Athol, by whom he had a son Alexander de Baliol, who was not so submissive to the English, after the abdication of King John his cousin, as might have been expected, but was in the interest of his country ; for which, falhnp: into the hands of the enemy during' the v/ar, he was imprisoned in the Tower of London, by order of King Edward II. But upon security given by his father, and two gentlem.en of the Lindsays, he was enlarged (rt). He had another son, I mean the Lord Chamberlain, named William, who was designed IVilliam de Baliol, who had the lands of Penston and Carnbrue in the barony of Bothwell, which are the anciente^t possessions the family of Lamington had; he, after the abdication of his cousin and namesake Kinj,- John, fell in with great zeal with other patriots in the defence of the liberties of their country, against the encroachments and inva- sions made on it by the English, which rendered him so obnoxious to King Ed- ward I. that by act of the Parliament of England, he was fined in four years rent of his estate (i) in the year 1297. It is the same William de Baliol, as he is designed, who gets a charter from King Robert the Bruce of the lands ')f: Penston, which were his own before (c). The William de Baliol who gave in pure alms to the Monks of Newbottle, licentiam formandi stagnum in terra de Carnbrue. This deed is confirmed by his superior Williebnus de Moravia, miles, Domiims de Bothwell, to which he appends his seal (rf). The lands of Carnbrue being a very ancient possession of the family of Lamington, it is an argument that docs not want its own weight, that they are of the family of the Baliols ; that this William de Baliol is then possessed of these lands as early as the time of King Robert the Bruce, and may be sooner, and they continued in the lamily till they were given off to a younger son, who was the ancestor of the Bahois or Baillies of the House of Carphin. The fore-mentioned Mr Baillie of Castlecairy, who was a very learned and ingenious antiquaiy, was of opinion that 5fl//o/ was the Latin at that time for Bailie; and that Bailie \n English is the very same that Baliol is in Latin. The first time that ever the surname is found Englished, that has been observed, was, that this gentleman, Wilham Baillie of Lamington, being among other Scots men of quality, taken prisoner at the battle of Durham with King David Bruce in the. year 1346; in the list of the captives he is designed William Baillie (f). This gentleman was, after his releasement, made a Knight by King David Bruce in the year 1357 (/"} ; and having married the eldest daughter and heir of the renowned and ever justly celebrated patriot and hero Sir William Wallace Governor of Scotland, and General of the Army (^), under King John, with whom he got the barony ot Lamington : and so far as the History of Sir William Wallace can be depended on, it vouches this marriage and aUiance : for the author, Mr Blair, tells us ex- pressly, that Sir William's daughter was married to a squire of the Baliols' blood, and that way got the barony of Lamington, which had formerly belonged to those of the surname of Braidfoot, whose heir-female of that name was married {a) Rymer's FcEclera. (J)') In the deed in Rymer he is designed William de Baliol. (c) In the old rolls of King Robert. (). Sciatis nos quandam cartam di- " lecti nostri Roberti Crichtoun de Sanquhar militis factam et comessam, dilecto " nostro Roberto Charters de Amysfield, de uno annuo reditu viginti librarum " usualis moneta; regni nostri, annuatim levan. de omnibus et singulis terris ba- " roniae de Sanquhar, cum pertinen. jacen. infra vicecomit. nostrum de Dumfreis, " de mandato nostro, visam, lectam, &.c. Apud Edinburgum decimo nono die " mensis Octobris, anno Domini millesimo quadringentesimo sexagesimo quarto." IV. " Alia charta confirmationis dicti Roberti (r), de tresdecem mercatas terrarunv de Langniddrie, anno 1463." Carta confirmationis Roberto Charters de Amysfield. " Jacobus, Dei gratia, rex Scotorum, &c. {d'). Sciatis nos quandam cartam di- '^ lecti nostri Alexandri Campbel de Corswoul factam et comessam, dilecto nostro " Roberto Charters de Amysfield, omnibus et singulis terris suis de Dalruskane. " cum pertinen. jacen. infra vicecomit. nostrum de Dumfreis, de mandato nostro •' visam, lectam, &-C. Apud Edinburgum quinto die mensis Aprilis, anno Do- " mini millesimo quadringentesimo octuagesimo primo, et regni noetri vicesimo " primoJ' Carta confirmationis Roberto Charters de Amysfield. " Jacobus, Dei gratia, rex Scotorum (f). Sciatis nos, nostrique consilii dominos, " clare coguoscentes et ^considerantes quandam cartam quondam serenissimi patris {a) 7th Book, Ta. III. No. 107. (b) 7th Book, Ja. III. No. 120. (0 7th Book, No. no. (), eldest daughter to Sir James Douglas of Drumianrig, by Margaret Douglas, daughter of George, Master of Angus. This Lady was married to John Charteris of Amisfield, about the year 1530, in the reign of King James V. and in the year 1553, there is a charter granted by Qvieen Mary in favour of Sir John and the said lady, of the ten-pound land of Dalruskan, as noted in the 7th ch'arter of this memorial. The third lady mentioned in history is Lady Margaret Fleming, third daughter to John first Earl of Wigton, by Lady Lilias Graham, daughter to John Earl of Montrose. This lady was married to Sir John Charteris of Amisfield, about the 1610, in the reign of King James VI.; and in the year 1617 there is a charter granted by King James Vi. in favour of the said Sir John and the said Lady Mar- garet, of the lands and barony of Kirkmichael, &c. as noted in the loth charter of this memorial. The fourth lady mentioned in history is Lady Katharine Crichton, second daughter to William first Earl of Dumfries, by Euphame Seaton, daughter to James Seaton of Touch. This lady was married to Sir John Charteris, younger of Amisfield, about the year 1633, in the reign of King Charles I. And there is a charter granted by King Charles 1. in favour of the said Sir John and lady Ka- tharine, and the heu-s-male of their bodies, of the lands and barony of Amisfield; &-C. erecting the village of Amisfield into a burgh of barony, with several privileges, such as weekly markets, yearly fairs, &c. as in charter 1 2. of this memorial, con- taining also a tailzie in favour of heirs-male, and in case of an heir-female redeem- able from her for payment of 10,000 merks Scots. The records of this kingdom being carefully searched, and thexe being no other family of the name of Charteris before the first mentioned Robert, great-grand- father to Robert, in whose favour the first charter on record is granted, it may be reasonably conjectured, that all the gentlemen of that name have sprung from the honourable family of Charteris of Amisfield, whereof there are some mentioned in rlie records, viz. I. Charter in favour of Thomas Chakteris (c), of the lands of Halton, Pit- morthie, and Craigamore, lying in the barony of Lumphynhanan, in the shire of Aberdeen ; and of all and hail the lands of Kinfauns and Pitfundy, lying in the barony of Kinfauns, in the shire of Perth, upon the resignation of Sir WiUiam Charters of Cragmore, his father, dated 15th June 1487. , 1. Charter in favour of Andrew Charteris, (designed) Provost of the burgh of Perth (d), of all and haill the barony of Cuthillgourdy. 3. Litera Magistri Johannis Chartems Capitaneo de Gahtoun terrarum de Len- ftn {e). 4. And in the same book of King James IV. there is a charter of confirmation in favour of John Charteris, of the lands and barony of Cuthillgourdy. 5. As also in the same book there is a charter of confirmation in favour of An- drew Charteris of the lands of Forgundefuy. 6. Charter in favour of John Charteris of the the lands and barony of Cuthill- gourdy. 7. Charter in favour of John Charteris of Kinfauns (7") of the lands of Golk- ton, Ribno and Tullihou. 8. Charter of confirmation in favour of Alison Charteris of the lands of For- gundemy (^). 9. Charter in favour of John Charteris of Cuthillgourdy {hi) of the lands of Drumnockqushiel and Drumquhasheil; and another charter in his favour of the lands of BaUatheis, with the fishings belonging thereto ; as al$o contains the lands' called the Mains of Kinclevine. ih) Peerage, page 416. (f) 5th Book, K. Ja. III. (), had a son, Thomas Stewart of Banchory and Grandtully, his heir and successor, who by his wife, daughter of had a son, Alexander. This Thomas comes to be designed of Grandtully ; for there is in the public registers a charter under the Great Seal, Thomce Stuart de Gairntully, of a part of the lands of Comrie in the year 1452 {q). This same Thomas Stewart is sub- stitute in an entail of the estate of the Lord Lorn, and is designed his consanguineus : For vouching this, there is a charter under the Great Seal by King James II. di- lccto consanguineo suo Joanni Domini Lorn, of the estate and lordship of Lorn^ and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to Walter Stewart his brother- german, and the heirs-male of his body ; v/hich faihng, to Allan Stewart his bro- ther ; which failing, to William Stewart his uncle ; which failing. Domino Jacobo Stuart militi ; which failing, Tboma Stuart comanguinco suo, who is the same Tho- mas Stewart of Grandtully, and to the heirs-male of their bodies respective, of the whole estate and lordship of Lorn, in the 1452 aforesaid; and that very same year, 1452, there is, we say, a charter under the Great Seal in the public records (?) Thoimt Stuait de Gairntully, of the half of the lands of Comrie which formerly be- longed to Angus Menzies, and were resigned by him. This Thomas Stewart of Grandtully, son and heir of Alexander Stewart of Banchory, who was a son of Sir John Stewart of Lorn, the second of the line and succession of the House of Grand- tully. By Agnes, daughter of Sir William Murray of Tullibardin, his wife, he had a son, Alexander Stewart of Grandtully, the third in the line and succession of the family : This is vouched and instructed from a deed in the custody of Sir George Stewart of Grandtully, which I have seen, whereby Alexander Stewart of Grand- tully is served and retoured heir in special to the deceased Thomas Stewart of Grand- tully, his father, in the lands of Banchory, lying within the sheriffdom of Clack- manan, and is of the date the 14th of June of the year 1462 (j). This Alex- ander Stewart of Grandtully married Matilda Stewart, sister to Andrew Lord. Evan- («) Charta penes Dcminum Georgium Stuart de Gairntully, Baronetum, marked No. i. in the inven- tory of his writs, (n) Charter in the hands of Sir George Stewart, I have seen in the writing this me- morial. (/>) I have seen a charter in the custody of the Countess of Errol, by Joannis de Haia de Til- libothy, Joannis de Logy domino ejusdem, in 1368, the father of this John de Haia in 1419. (y) In the registers of the Great Seal in the Archives, (r) Charter under the Great Seal in the public archives- to Thomas Stewart of Grandtully. (r) Service as heir to Thomas Stewart of Grandtully his father. I APPENDIX. «5.« dale anJ grandclulJ to Muiduch Duke of Albany by James his son (t). There is in the custody ot" Sir George Stewait of GrandtuUy, and lying before me at the drawuig up this memorial, a charter granted by Alexander Earl of Huntly as su- perior of the land'* of Tillibody, " dilecto consanguinco suo Alexandre Stuart de " Gairntully et Macildae Stuart spons;€ su;c," of the lands of Banchrys " in vice " comitatu de Clackmannan :" 'I'lie charter is dated at Badenoch the lOth July, ^;ino 1469 (;/). By the foresaid Matilda his wife he had a son, who was his heir. VIZ. Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy, who was served and retoured heir in special to the deceast Alexander Stewart of GarndtuUy, his father, in the lands of Banchrys, pursuant to a precept forth of the Chancery, dated the 26th of January 1488, still extant in the custody of Sir George Stewart, baronet, which I have seen and perused. This Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy married Agnes, daughter to Sir William Murray, and sister to another Sir William Murray of TuUibardin, ancestor to his grace the> present Duke of Athol (v), by whom he had only one daughter, Eli- zabeth Stewart, his sole heir : she is designed EHzabiftha Stuart Doinina de Gairn- tully, when in the 1532 she gives a charter, with consent of Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy, her husband, out of the lands of Banchory, to Alexander Shaw of Sauchie, the original of which I have seen in the custody of Sir John Shaw of Greenock and Sauchie, baronet. This lady, Elizabeth Stewart of GrandtuUy, by the foresaid Thomas Stewart her husband, had a son, Thomas Stewart, whom she calls filius suits et htsres ap- parens, when she dispones him the fee of several parts of her estate, which is confirmed by a charter under the Great Seal in the pubUc registers; but he dy- ing without issue, and his mother quickly thereafter, she was succeeded in the estate of GrandtuUy by her cousin-german Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy. This point of the succession of the House of GrandtuUy is instructed incontrovertibly by a precept out of the Chancery, for serving and retouring of Thomas Stewart de Gairntully in the lands of Banchory, " tanquam legitimus et propinquior h?eres •' quonda.n Elizabetha; Stuart, filia; et hsredis quondam Thomie Stuart de Gairn- " tuU, fili:e patrui sui :" This is of the date the loth of February 1542 (w). This Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy, so succeeding his cousin-germain, married Elizabeth Stewart, daughter of John, the second of that line of the Earls of Athol (x), and dying in the year 1575, left issue Sir Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy, his eldest son and heir, who was one of the Gentlemen of the Bed-chamber to his majesty King James VI. ( v)- He married Grissel, daughter of Sir Laurence Mercer of Aldie and Moncloar, as appears from several different deeds I have seen in the hands of Sir George Stewart of GrandtuUy ; but he died without issue, and was succeeded by his brother Sir William Stewart, who was from his youth bred up at the court of King James, before his accession to the crown of England : He was first designed of Banchry, lands which he acquired from Sir Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy, his bro- Ther-german. He had the honour to be attending on the king his master from the palace of Falkland to the town of Perth, in the memorable 5th day of August i6oo, when John Earl of Gowrie, and Mr Alexander Ruthven, his brother, attempt- ed to embrue their hands. in the sacred blood of their sovereign: In his majesty's happy preservation Sir William Stewart of Banchory was eminently instrumen- tal (z), which his majesty King Charles I. had the goodness fully to set forth in tiie narrative and preamble of a charter to him of his estate, under the Great Seal, in the public records, in the year 1637, which I have seen. Sir William Stewart of Banchory went to England with the king, who soon thereafter promoted him to be one of the Gentlemen of his Majesty's Bed-Cham- ber; and, getting into a high degree of confidence and favour, he came quickly to (0 Historical deduction of the deceiidants of IMurdoch Duke of Albany M3S. penes me. (a) CharU penes D. Gemgius Stuart, baronet, (v) Ibidem ad annum 1523, uhich I have seen. («i) Charta penej D. G. S. de Gairntully. (v) Charta in publicls archivis ad annum 1552, and the Lord Ochiltree's Col- lections, MSS. penes me. ( j') Grant to him in the records of the Great Seal, and so designed. (2) This is vouched both from writs I have seen in G.urntuUy's hands, and from several charters and documents In the public records. T^oL. II. 5 Z 154 APPENDIX. acquire the lands and barony of Strathbrand, from whence he took his designation, and is so designed, and Gentleman of our Sovereign Lord's Chamber in 1606, in several charters of lands under the Great Seal in the public archives which I have seen. He succeeded his elder brother, Sir Thomas, in the estate of Grandtully, and continued in high favour with King James till his death in the year 1625. Sir William Stewart of Gairntully was no less esteemed by his Majesty King Charles than he had been by his father King James ; for he continued him in the Bed- chamber, and always treated him with peculiar and distinguishing marks of his royal favour: witness the charter he had from the crown, of his estate in the 1637, we formerly noticed, wherein his long and faithful services are very remarkably taken notice of and set forth. He married Agnes Moncreif, daughter of Sir John Moncrieff of that Ilk, a very ancient family in the shire of Perth, by Jean his wife, daughter of Mr John Spence of Condie, Lord Advocate to Queen Mary and King James VI. (a), by whom he had four sons, viz. Sir Thomas Stewart of Grandtully his eldest son. Sir WiLLi.\M Stewart of Innernytie, the second son, who married Crichton, co-heiress of Innernytie, and had issue, John Stewart of Innernytie his son and heir, who married Jean, daughter of James Lord Lindores, and had by her a son, his heir, John Stewart of Innernytie, who married Mary, daughter of Sir James Mercer of Aldie, and had one daughter, Anne, married to David the present Viscount of Stormont. James Stewart of Ludd was the third son, whose male issue is failed, but of an heir-female of him is sovne, and descended the Menzieses of Culdares, &c. Mr Henry Stewart, Advocate, the fourth son, the paternal ancestor of Sir George Stewart, now of Grandtully, baronet. Sir Thomas Stewart of Grandtully succeeded his father Sir William in his great and opulent estate: He married Grissel, daughter of Sir Alexander Menzies of Weem, (son of Sir James Menzies of Weem, and Dame Barbara Stewart his wife, daughter of John Earl of Athol) by Dame Margaret Campbell his wife, daughter and co-heir with her sister the Lady Bargeny, of Alexander Campbell of Carcko, Bishop of Brechin, brother to Sir James Campbell of Ardkinlas, by Helen his wife, daughter of George Clephan of Carslogie, by whom he had John Stewart his son and heir, and eight daughters. Jean, the eldest, was married to Colonel Sir James Mercer of Aldie, and had issue. Marjory, the second, to David Fotheringham, son and heir apparent of Mr John Fotheringham of Powrie, and had issue. Grissel, the third, to Sir John Drummond of Logie-Almond, second son to John second Earl of Perth, and had issue. Anne, the fourth, to James Seaton of Touch, and had only one daughter, who was married to James Moir of Leckie, and had issue. Cecil, the fifth daughter, was married to Stewart of Arntillie, but had no issue. Margaret, the sixth, to Campbell, son to Campbell of Lawers, and had issue. Helen, the seventh, to James Crichton of Ruthven, and had issue. Elizabeih, the eighth and youngest, to David, the second Lord Newark, and had issue. John Stewart of Grandtully, son and heir of Sir Thomas Stewart of Grandtully, succeeded his father. He was a fine gentleman, and a great encourager and pro- moter of learning, and a kind and bountiful patron of learned men : He died a batchelor on the 5th of March 1720, upon whose demise, John Stewart of Inner- nytie, his heir-male, by virtue of the investitures of the estate, would have suc- ceeded to the estate of Grandtully, but he being attainted of high trea&on, by an act of the Parliament of Great Britain, for his accession to the rebellion in 1715, Grandtully upon that made a settlement of his estate upon certain heirs of entail, in virtue of which, there being no heir-male existing of Innerny tie's body, nor of any other (a) Ptnes Sir George Stewart. APPENDIX. 155 tolliiteral heir-muk- nearer than Sir George Stewart of Balcaskie, baronet, lie ac- cordingly succeeded to the estate of Crandtully on his cousin's death in the year 1720 aforesaid. Sir George Stewart of Grandtully's ancestor was Mr Henry Stewart, Advocate, fourth and youngest son of Sir William Stewart of Grandtully, by Dame Agnes Woncrief, his lady, aforefaid ; being a younger brother he was bred to the law, and was an Advocate before the Court of Session : He married Mary, daughter ot Colin Campbell of Aberuchill, second son of Sir James Campbell of Lawers, and uncle to John fust Earl of Loudon, who was Lord High Chancellor in the reign of King Charles L and IL; by whom he had issue Sir Thomas Stewart of Balcaskie, his son and heir, and a daughter, Marjory^ who w'as married to William Borthwick of Pilmuir, grandfather to Henry, now Lord Borthwick. Sir Thoimas Stewart of Balcaskie, being also bred to the law, was promoted to be one of the Senators of the College of Justice, and by letters patent, bearing date the 2d of January 1683, he was created a baronet : He married Lady Jean Mac- kenzie, daughter of George Viscount of Tarbet, and after Earl of Cromarty, Lord Register in the reigns of King James VIL and King William, and Justice-General and Secretary of State in the reign of Q_iieen Anne, by whom he had two sons, the foresaid Sir George Stewart of Balcaskie, who succeeded by virtue of the said en- tail to the estate of Grandtully, as is heretofore remarked in the memorial, and Co- lonel John Stewart, the second son, who married his first cousin, Elizabeth, daugh- ter of Sir James Mackenzie of Royston, baronet, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, and has a son, John Stewart. Which Sir George Stewart, now of Grandtully, baronet, is married with Dame Agnes Cockburn, daughter of Sir Archibald Cockburn of Langton, baronet. MEMORIAL OF THE ANCIENT FAMILY OF EDMONSTONE, MORE PARTICULARLY OF THE House of Duntreath. THE surname and family of Edmonstone is of very great and eminent antiquity; some are of opinion they are originally extracted from the illustrious family of the Counts d'Egmont in Germany ; others again conjecture, from the identity of the arms of the surname of Edmonstone with those of Seaton, that they are of the same stem and origin with them ; for it is a received maxim among heralds, that arms, or armorial bearings, are surer marks of the same blood and kindred than even sur- names, especially in descents of greater antiquity: But waving this, we may ob- serve, for the antiquity of the Edmonstones, what our learned antiquary Sir James Dalrymple has considered to have been the original ancestor of this family, viz. that one Edmumius, or Admiinduj, a person of note in the reign of King David L who is witness to the charter granted by that prince of the lands of Riddel, Wal~ te/o de Riddle, militi (b), got from the same king lands in Laudonia, now the shire of Edinburgh, which, according to a humour and custom of men calling their lands after their own name at that time, he called Admonston, or Edmonston, and trans- mitted it as a surname or hereditary appellation to his descendants. This conjec- ture of the learned and ingenious author is supported, and in some measure con- firmed by a charter of mortification in the reign of King Alexander IL OTmo 12 12, by IVi/lie/mus de Crai^millar, filius Henrici de Craigmillar, whereby he gives in pure and perpetual alms to the church and monastery of Dunfermline, " quandam " Tostumterre in Craigmillar, in australi parte qui ducit de villa de Niddreif ad " ecclesiam de Libberton, quas Henricus de Edmonston de me tenet (c). It w ould be foreign to the design of what is intended by this memorial, to give a regular fi) Appendix to Sir James Dalrymple's Collections. () IbidciE.- (9) Charta penes D. Duntreath. (r) Ibidem, (j) Ibidem. (0 Ibidem, (a) Ibidem. APPENDIX. i6i Archibald Edmonstone, the present Laird of Duntrcath, married Anne, daugh- ter of David Lord Cardross, and sister to the present Earl of Buchan, and had only one daughter, Miss Katharine Edmonstone. He married daughter to Mr John Campbell of Mamore, son to Archibald Earl of Argyle, and uncle to his grace the present Duke of Argyle, by whom he has Archibald Edmonstone, Esq. his eldest son, and apparent heir. And Campbell Edmonstone, Esq. &c. I shall conclude this memorial by adding the arms of the family ; and this I judge the more necessary, because Mr Nisbet has neglected to insert the coat-ar- morial of Edmonstone of -Duntreath, out of the register of the Lyon Office, though it is there recorded. To supply that neglect, I shall blazon it as follows : or, three crescents, within a double tressure, flowered and counter-flowered, gules. This addition they bear of the double tressure, as a mark of their descent from the royal family, just in the same manner as that honorary addition is borne by the Earls of Strathmore,andCassilis,and Graham of Fintry. The supporters are two lions rampant, gules; crest, a swan's head and neck issuing out of a ducal crown. Motto, V'irtiis auget honorcm. Memorial for the family of STEWART of Burray. THE title of Lord Evandale having become extinct by the death of An- drew Lord Evandale in the 148S, without heirs-male. King James IV. in the 1499, honoured Andrew Stewart of Morphy, the said lord's grand-nephew, with the dig- nity of a lord of Parliament de novo, by the title of Lord Evandale {w^. He mar- ried Margaret Kennedy, daughter of Sir John Kennedy of Blairquhan, in the shire of Ayr, by whom he had issue, Andrew Lord Evandale, who, by act of Parliament, got his title changed from Lord Evandale to Lord Stewart of Ochiltree, in the 1543, of whom descended the line of the Lords of Ochiltree. Sir Henry Stewart, the second son, enjoyed many honourable offices in the reign of King James V. He married the Queen Dowager, widow of King James IV. and daughter of Henry VII. of England; upon which he was created Lord Methven5th September 1528 ; the family failed in the male line in the 1595. Sir James Stewart of Beith, the third son, in the 1534, got from the crown the keeping of the Castle of Doune, with the stewartry ot Monteith, and was slain by the Edmonstones of Duntreath in Dumblane, on the 15th of May 1547 (.v). Andrew Lord Evandale had besides these three sons a daughter, Barbara, who was married first to Sir James Sinclair of Sanday, knight, and again to Roderick M'Leod of the Lewis : By Sir James Sinclair she had no issue but a daughter, who died without children. By Roderick M'Leod she had a son, Torquill, who, at the age of twenty -four, perished at sea, and Janet M'Leod, of whom afterwards. This Barbara feued the estate of Burray from the bishop of Orkney. But to return to Sir James Stewart of Beith : He left issue three sons. Sir James, Mr Henry, and Archibald Stewart of Burray, who was sometime Provost of Edin- burgh, and died without issue (j), and a daughter who was married to Sir Robert Crichton of Cluny. Sir James Stewart, the eldest son, was first Commendator of St Colme, and by (w) Charta in publlcis archivis ad annum 1499, terrarum de Morphy-Frissel, Andrese Domino Evan- dale, et MargaretiE Kennedy sponsae suEe. (.v) Charta in publicis archivis ad annum 1547. (j) Specialie Retornatus ultimo August! 1588, penes Dominum Jacobum Stuart de Burray. Vol. U. 6 1 62 APPENDIX. King James VI. wa), there is an agreement in the 1226, between Andrew, then bishop of Murray, and David, son of Duncan, umquhile Earl of Fife, whereby the bishop cedes his right to the patronages of several churches to him, and in lieu thereof he grants to the other, " predicto episcopo, et suis successoribus advocationem omnium aliarum eccle- {f) Chartulary of the Abbey of Dunfermline in the Lawyers' Library at Edinburgh, (g) Ibidem. (A) Chartulary of Arbroath in the noble library of the noble family of Panmure. (i) Excerpts from Fordun. (^h} Buchanan. ("/) Fordun, speaking of the death of Patrick Earl of Athol, says, his estate <-ame to his aunt matertera defuncti. {m) Rymer's Fcedera, ("«) Fordun. (0) Balfour's Collections, title Athol in Bibloth. juridica. ("/_) Ibidem. APPENDIX. 109 " siarum m feudo suo dc Struthbolgy, et terris ad easdem ecclesias pertinentium." This David dc Sirathbolgy had a son, John de Strathbolgy, who having married Adda, the daughter and heir of David Earl at" Athol, as is heretofore observed, was cinctiiJ gladio Comitatus ^-Jtholie. He, as Earl of Athol, and Adda Countess of Athol, his wife, confirm a deed of the lands of Inmeth to the monks of Cupar, " quas David Comes Atholie pater Addae Comitiss* Athole" had formerly given to that monastery, and they then jointly ratify and confirm the deed in the 1284 («). He was succeeded by David de Stratbbolgy Earl of Athol, his son, who married an English lady, Isabel, daughter and co-heir of Richard de Chilum, a great fortune in England ; and dying in the 1284 (Zi), was succeeded by John de Stratbbolgy Earl of Athol, his son (c), who was amongst the earliest of those patriots who resorted to King Robert Bruce when he first exerted the regal power in 1306, and was at the battle of iVIethven. After that he retired with the queen to the castle of Kildrummy, which being some time after taken by a detachment of the Eng- lish army, with the Prince of Wales at their head, he was made prisoner with two of the king's brothers ; they were carried up to England, and indicted of high treason against King Edward I. of England, on pretence that they had sworn allegiance to him as Direct and Superior Lord of Scotland, and being found guilty, they were condemned, and suffered accordingly at Westminster, anno 1308 (rf). He left behind him a son, David de Strathbolgy Earl of Athol {e), who, for the merit and memory of his illustrious father, was taken into a great degree of favour with King Robert I. and was made High Constable of Scotland. This is clear, and vouched from a charter granted by that prince to the convent of Aberbroth- ock, whereby he erects the lands of Tarves into a free regality ; the charter bears date the 26th of February 131 1 (/) : Upon this I see that King Edward recalled a grant he had made him of the lands of Suraerton, because he then adhered to his enemy Robert Bruce, as he calls our glorious and immortal deliverer King Robert I. But this earl having a considerable estate in England, gave him an attachment to that kingdom, so he revolted from his allegiance to his native sovereign, and went into England, where he had grants of lands, manors, and pen- sions, to a considerable value (^). King Robert was loath to use him with rigour, being in hopes he might reclaim him to his duty, for it was full five years before he disposed of tiie constabulary to SirGilbertHay, and more before everhe gave any grant out of his estate to any of his friends whatsoever Qj) : And it is observable that King Robert had such a tenderness towards the Earl of Athol, that he did not give away his estate, till after the peace with England was concluded at Nor- thampton, in the year 1327 (/), whereby it was provided by an article of the treaty, that no Englishman should henceforth possess any lands, titles, or estate, out such as would reside in that kingdom, and renounce their allegiance to the crown of England, by which all the Scots who adhered obstinately to the English interest were forever exiled, and among others this David de Strathbolgy Earl of Athol. This, doubtless, heightened his resentment against Scotland, so that in the minority of King David Bruce he commanded a body of English troops, in support of Edward Baliol's claim and title to the crown, and in that service he was slain at the battle of Kilblane, in 1335 {k). He left issue by Jean his wife, eldest sister and co-heir to John Cuming of Badenoch (/), David his son and heir, who being outed and deprived of his estate here, was summoned to Parliament as an English baron, and used the stile and title in England as Earl of Athol ; his male issue failed, and his two daughters were heirs to his English estate: Elizabeth, the elder, was married to Sir Thomas Percy, knight, son to Henry Lord Percy, and ( fl ) Coll. Title Athol, by Sir James Balfour of Kinnaiid, Lord Lyon King at Arms, in Bib. Jurid. (4) Rymer litera excusatoria pro Alexr. Balielo ab Alexr. rege Scotis. (r) Dugdale's Baronage of England. {d) History of Scotland. (e) Duijdale's Baronage of England. ( /") Register of the Abbacy of Aberbrothock, in Bib. Panmure. Q) Rymer's Foedera Ang. {h) The Ch'arter of the Constabulary of Scotland to Sir Gilbert Hay is dated the i 2th of November 1316, as from the original I have seen, and have a copperplate of it. (;') Rymer's Fuidera Anglife, ad annum 1327. (^) His- tories of Scotland, and Rymer's Foedera, where John of the Isles gets a gift of a part of the ward of David his son from the King of England. (/) Dugdale's Baronage of England. Vol. n. ? D I7Q APPENDIX. Philippa, the younger, to Sir Ralph Percy, a younger son of the same Henry Lord Percy {a). David Earl of Athol having refused to renounce his allegiance to England in the 1327, as is already observed in these memoirs, King Robert did then be- stow the earldom of Athol upon a nephew of his own, Sir John Campbell of Moulin. JOHN CAMPBELL Earl of Athol, Was the son of Sir Neil Campbell of Lochow, by the Lady Mary Bruce his- wife, daughter of Robert Earl of Carrick, and sister to King Robert L (6) ; and- being a gentleman of virtue and merit, was, by the King his uncle, rewarded with the earldom of Athol, upon the exile of David de Strathbolgy, the former Earl of Athol, as hath been said. The erection charter is not extant in the public archives, but there are two authentic deeds of his as Eai-1 of Athol, which I shall here insert. The first is a charter granted by King David IL " Roberto de Ersken " militi domino ejusdem," of an annuity out of the borough mails of Dundee, to- gether with the lands of Pitcarach, then in the crown, by the demise of John Campbell Earl of Athol (c). The other deed is a charter granted by " Johannis " Campbell comes de Athole domino Rogero de Mortuo mari terrarum de Bil- " landre, &.c." and this charter is confirmed and ratilied by another charter un- der the Great Seal of King David IL (rf). But the grant of the earldom of Athol most certainly has been limited to the heirs-male of his body, since upon his death we see it fell back to the crown, and being at the sovereign's disposal, was meritoriously bestowed, by King David, upon Sir William Douglas of Liddis- dale. WILLIAM DOUGLAS Earl of Athol, Was the sou of Sir James Douglas of Louxion, knight, who being in all respects- a hero, and having performed many great and eminent services towards his sove- reign and his country, in the time of King David II. of which all our histories are full, he had a grant from that prince of the earldom of Athol. The leai-ned his- torian Mr David Hume of Godscroft says, that the charter in his time was in the register, and takes particular notice of the precise date, which he says was the i6th of January 1341 {e). He was before that time designed Dmninus vallis de Lydall, and is witness in a charter granted by " Jacobus de Douglas dominus loci, " ejusdem Jacobo de Sandilands, et Eleanora; de Bruce sorori suee, de tota baronia " de WestCalderin liberam maritagiam" (y}. This William Douglas of Liddis- dale, who had the earldom of Athol, made it over to Robert the Great Steward of Scotland, Earl of Strathern, and died without issue-male in the 1353 {g}. He had got the barony of Dalkeith by the marriage of Margaret, daughter and heir of Sir John Graham of Abercorn, and which he made over to Sir James Douglas his nephew (/&), and his estate of Liddisdale went to William the first Earl of Douglas. Although the lands of the earldom of Athol were in the person of Robert the Great Steward of Scotland, and Earl of Strathern, both before and after his acces- sion to the crown, by the name of Robert II. yet I have never once seen him de- signed Comes Athole ; the reason I conjecture he made no grants out of the earl- dom, resolving, it would seem, to keep it still entire, as a part of the patrimony of {a) Sir William Dugdale's Baronage of England. (A) Sir James Dalrymple's Collections, and with these several other authentic documents concur, (c) The Eail of Haddington's Collections from the Registers, while he was Register, in the Lawyers' Library, {c! ) The ingenious Mr Nisbet in his Treatise of Heraldry, page 294, says, he had seen the charter in the custody of Rait of Halgreen. (f) In his History of the femily of the Earls of Douglas and Earls of Angus. Mr Home says, in his History, that the charter was in the Register, page $<), i6th of January 1341. (/) Charter I haye seen in the hands of the Lord Torphichen. (f) Rymer's FcEdera Angliw, ad annum 1353, mentions him then dead, {h) Charter in the Rolls of King David in the Register. APPENDIX. 171 die crown : But after the accession of his son King Robert III. to the sovereigntyi in the 1390, he gave tlie earldom of Athol to Duvid Earl of Carrick, Prince and Stei\ard of Scotland, his eldest sou. who thereupon, in several charters both in the public register and also in private hands, designs himself David Comes de Carrick y Athole, ac senescallus ^otiue ; and that even after he was created Duke of Roth- say by the king his father, by solemn investiture in Parliament, the 30th of April 1390 ((^\ and he kept the title of Earl of Athol till his death on Easter- day of the year 1402 {b), and thereupon the king resumed the earldom of A.thol, and quickly after bestowed it upon his brother Sir Walter Stewart of terechin. WALTER STEWART Earl of Athol, Strathern, and Caithness, THIS prince was the younger of the two sons which King Robert II. the first of our kings of the Stewartine line, had by his royal consort Queen Euphame, daugh- ter of Hugh Earl of Ross: he obtained the great barony and estate of Brechin in Forfarshire, by the marriage of Margaret, daughter and sole heir of Sir David Barclay of Brechin (<:), and upon that he is designed Bomimts de Brichen (d) ; after the death of the Duke of Rothsay his nephew, his brother King Robert cre- ated and invested him, as the manner was, in the honour and dignity of the Earl of Athol, per cincturam gladii comitatus. The precise date of the creation I have not seen in any voucher that has come in my way : but on the 5th of June 1403, he is designed IValtcnis Comes de Athole, in letters of safe conduct by the King of England, allowing him to come into his dominions the length of St Tho- mas of Canterbury, with a retinue of a hundred persons in his company. I presume it has been, as was usual at that time, to pay devotions to the shrine of Thomas a-Becket, who was canonized by the Church of Roms; though, in truth, he appears to have been a right turbulent man. Upon the death of David Earl of Strathern, without heirs-male of his body, the Earl of Athol succeeded to the estate of the eavldom of Caithness, and likewise assumed the title of Cornes Ca- tbanice, as well as AtboVue: To vouch this there is a passport or safe conduct from the Crown of England, permitting IValterum Stuart Comitem de Airhole l^ Caith- ness to come into England, the loth of April 1421 : It was to concert measures towards the restoration of his nephew King James 1, (f) ; to which, to do him justice, he contributed with all possible zeal ; and how soon the restoration was effected, he was in the highest favour without any outward diminution on the king's part that was visible, till the day of his death. He was Great Justiciary of Scotland (/), and the king strove to heap favours on him ; for quickly after his restoration he gave him the earldom of Strathern for life (^) ; much about the same time he resigned the earldom of Caithness in favour of Allan Stewart his second son, who thereupon was invested in the honour, and the earldom provided to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to return to his father ; which actually happened, on his death without issue, in 1428 ; for he was slain at the battle of Innerlochy that year, leaving no child behind him ; so the earl- dom of Caithness returned to his father the Earl of Athol again ; and upon that I find him in an authentic original deed, in the custody of the Lord Gray, which I have seen, wherein he is designed JValtenis Comes Palatinus de Strathern, Athole li Caithness, of the date the 8th of September 1438. I have ever thought this Earl of Athol one of the very worst of men ; for no favour could oblige him, nor courtesy tie him to his duty; for the king, his ne- phew, had done all that was possible that way ; but such was the perverseness ot his own natural disposition, that all the favours and honours the king had in a manner pursued him with could make no impression on him, though it appears that the king had no suspicion of his infidelity to himself, for he not only employ- (rt) Fordan and the Chartulary of Murray. (A) Liber Episcopatus Dunblanen. MSS. penes Mr Ker. {c Chjrter in the register of charters, and are printed in Mr Hay's Collectio.i of Charters. {J) Ry- mer's Foedera Anglia;. (f) Ibidem ad annum 1 42 1. {/) Decreet pronounced by him at Foulis in the hands of the Laird of Abercairny. (^) Charter in the register. 172 APPENDIX. ed hiiri' in the public transactions of the greatest importance, but also in the offi- ces of nearest trust about his royal person : but, monstrously wicked as he must have been, what in all the world could induce him to contrive the murder of his nephew and sovereign, who had by his bounty and favoui- made him so great, that the king himself on the throne was only greater than he. It could not possibly be the view of succeeding to the crown, for the king had a son of his own, and his elder brother of the full blood, the Earl of Strathern, had issue, though they were females, who were a bar in his way to the succession ; nor can it be imagin- ed that he had any notion that he had a nearer title, or a preferable right to the crown than the king, for he well knew that Lady Elizabeth Mure was his father's first and lawful wife, the king's grandmother,' and that the children of that marriage did seclude from the succession the issue he had by the Earl of Athoi's mother, who was but the king's second wife; this could never be his view ; for the estates of parliament, upon his father Robert II. 's coming to the crown, had by a very solemn deed recognised the right of succession in favour of all the three sons he had by his first wife, as his lawful and undoubted heirs and succes- sors ; and it was but in failure of these that the crown was to descend to his bro- ther the Earl of Strathern, and him as the issue of the king's second marriage al- lenarly in failure of his three elder brothers (a), John Earl of Carrick, who came to the crown by the name of Robert III., Robert Duke of- Albany, and Alexander Enrl of Birfhan. Bat what black views he had God only knows. Yet certain it is that he en- tered into a most helHsh conspiracy to murder his sovereign and nephew. The principals concerned with him in this most wicked machination were, Robert Graham, a son of the House of Kincardine, and his own grandson Robert, Mas- ter of Athol, who was of the Red-chamber to the king, and so had the more easy access to the court unsuspected; they drew in one Christopher Colquhoun, and Robert Chalmer, burgess of Perth, to concur with them, and some lower people who depended on them, to commit the regicide, which, in short, they found means to execute, while the king lay at the convent of the Carthusians near the town of Perth, the 12th day of February 1438 (b) ; the earl and his accomplices were all quickly apprehended and brought to justice, and he suffered the pains of law due to such an unnatural regicide, in a most exemplary manner famous over all Europe. The particular tortures he underwent are in all our histories, and for that reason I do not judge it necessary to transcribe them here. However, I may here remark, that this Earl of Athol at the very last did an act of justice to Sir Thomas Maule of Panmure, who was his wife the Countess of Athol's nearest heir, for, just before he went out to his execution, he emitted a judicial declara- tion, importing, that the baronies and lordship of Brechin had been held by him in courtesy of his wife Dame Margaret 'Barclay, daughter and heir of Sir David Barclay of Brechin (r), and that the right to that estate after himself did belong to the said Sir Thomas Maule of Panmure, in right of his grandmother Marion,, only daughter of Sir David Fleming of Biggar by Jean his wife, daughter of Sir David Barclay of Brechin ; Sir Thomas accordingly laid claim after the Earl of Athol's death to the lordship of Brechin ; but that being by the ministry in the minority of King James II. adjudged to be included in the Earl of Athol's forfei- ture, Sir Thomas recovered only the lands of Hedderwick, Jackston, and Stoddock- muir, with Leuchlands, part of the lordship of Brechin, in Heu of the whole, though the family afterwards recovered the whole barony, and was one of the subaltern ti- tles of the family of Maule, when they were raised to the peerage of Earl of Pan- mur. Upon the death of the Earl of Athol, the earldom of Caithness, together with the honour of Co?nes Cathania, was, by King James II. erected to his great favourite Sir George Crichton of Cairns, et suis assignatis, anno 1452 (rf), and the title and earldom of Athol to his uterine brother Sir John Stewart of Balveny. C), and had issue. Catharine to Niel Stewart of Bruicli, but had no issue (/). Isabel to Alexander Robertson of Struan, elder (/^), and had issue. to Donald Robertson of Struan, younger, but had no issue. M.\RjoR.y to Sir Colin Campbell of Glenorchy, ancestor to the Earl of Breadal- bane (/), and had issue. (fl) Many authorities concur in tViis. both in the writs of the respective families^ and the Registers- {b^ Ealfoiu-'s Collections in Bib. Jurid. (c) Life of Gavin Bishop of Dunkeld, and Dr Miln's Lives of the Bishops of Dunkeld, in Bib. Jurid. {d Crlkction of State Letters of King James IV. in the Lawyers' Ltbrary, and of i.ite published by Mr Ruddiman, (t>) Lives of the officers of State. (/. Bishop Spottiswood's List of the Bishops of Caithness. {g\ Writs of the House of Gray, and in the rei,isters. h Gen. Gordonic. (/) Tiis lady is set down by Sir James Balfour in the number of the daughters of this Earl o; Athol. I^k > 1 have seen a charter to them in the IJ05, and also in Si'- James Balfour's List. (/) Genealogy ol the House of Glenorchy, and that of the House of Athol. 3 APPENDIX. r77 Margaret to Sir William Murray of Tullibardin, the ancestor of the present Duke of Athol («). Anne to John Earl of Lennox, whose son, Matthew Earl of Lennox, was regent to his grandson King James VL in his minority: So this way we may observe, that all those princes that are descended of our King James VL and the first mo- narch of Great Britain, have the blood of the Stewarts of the House of Athol run- ning in their veins. This John Earl of Athol died on the 19th of September 151 2 (Zi), and was in- terred in the Cathedral Church of Dunkeld, his estate and honour devolving on hrs son and heir John, the secot>d of this line, Earl of Athol : He married Mary, daughter of Colin the first Earl of Argyle, who was Lord Chancellor in the reign of James IV. (r). by whom he had two sons, John, his heir, and Sir James Stewart, who had no suc- cession (d); also he had several daughters: [anet, the eldest, was married first to Alexander, Master of Sutherland, son and heir-apparent of Adam and Elizabeth Earl and Countess of Sutherland {e}, and had issue; next to Sir Hugh Kennedy of Girvanmains (/), and had issue; after that to Henry Stewart, the first Lord Methven, brother to the Lord Ochil- tree, and who had been formerly married to Margaret Queen Dowager of King James IV. (^) and had issue to him also; and, last of all, she married Patrick Lord Ruthven (/j), but had no issue. Helen, the second, was married to John Lord Lindsay of the Byres (/), the paternal ancestor of the present Earl of Crawford and Lindsay. Elizabeth, the third, to CoHn Mackenzie of Kintail(;^), predecessor to the Lords Kintail and Earls of Seaforth, and had issue. Jean, the fourth, to James Arbuthnot of that Ilk, ancestor of the present Vis-- count of Arbuthnot, and had issue (/). Isabel, the fifth, to James Herring of Lethendy and Glascuine, in the county of Perth, and had issue (;;j}. John, the third of this line of the Earls of Athol. Of this Earl, it is remarked by the history, that he lived like a sovereign prince, and had his degrees of gen- tlemen about him: He was famous for his great hospitality, and his magnificent way of living. In the summer of the year 1529 he had the honour to entertain King James V. the Queen Dowager, and the pope's nuncio, or resident in Scotland for the time, at a hunting in Athol, for three or four days, in all the grandeur of a king, and was served, says the author, in every respect as well and as great as if he had been in any of his own palaces. The historian, from whom I take this, is Mr Lindsay of Pitscotty, an ingenuous, plain, honest gentleman, whose history is not long ago published ; so the account of this grand entertainment I shall give in his own words. " The next summer the king past to the Highland to hunt, and took with him " his mother Margaret Queen of Scotland, and an ambassador of the Pope who " was in Scotland at the time : The Earl of Athole, hearing of the king's coming, " made great provision for him, in all things pertaining to a prince ; that he was " as well served and eased with all things necessary to his estate, as if he had " been in his own palace at Edinburgh. For I heard say, that this noble earl " gart make a curious palace to the king, to his mother, and to the ambassador, " where they were so honourably eased and lodged as they had been in England, " France, Italy, or Spain, concerning the time and equivalent for their hunting " and pastime, which was budded in the midst of a fair meadow, a fair palace of " green timber, wind with great birks, that were green both under and above, " which was fashioned in four quarters, and in every quarter and nuke thereof a (a) Writs as well as Balfour's Collections relating to Athol. {/>) Holinshed's History. (<") Exact Account of the Matches and Alliances of the House of Athol, supported from writs 1 have seen. (4 Sir John Scott's Memoirs of the Scots Statesmen, MSB. (0 Writs of the House of Sutherland, and in the registers. (/) Ibidem. (^) Writs in the registers and elsewhere I have seen, (h) Mr Knox's History. (/) Charter to them in the register in 1526, and other authorities. (i) Ibid- (/) Ibid, (m) Ibid. Vol. IL 6 F 178 APPENDIX. " great round, as it had been a block-house, wliich was lofted and geisted the " space of three house height ; the floors laid with green sharets, medvvarts, and " flowers, that no man knew whereon he zeid, but as he had been in a garden. " Further, there were two great rounds in ilk side of the gate, and a great port- " cullis of tree, falling down with the manner of a barrace, with a draw-bridge, " and a great stank of water, of sixteen foot deep and thirty foot of breadth. «' And also this palace was hung with fine tapestry and arresses of silk, and " lighted with fine glass-windows in all airths ; that this palace was costly decored " with all necessaries pertaining to a prince, as it had been in his own royal palace '' at home. Further, this earl gart make such provision for the king and his " mother, and the ambassador, that they had all manner of meats, drniks, and •' delicacies, that were to be gotten at that time in Scotland ; that is to "say, all " kind of drink, as, ale, beer, wine, both white and claret, Malvasy, Muskadel, " Hippocras and aquavitae. Further, there was of meats, wheat-bread, main- " bread, ginge-bread ; with fleshes, beef, mutton, lamb, veil, vennison, goose, grice, •' capon, coney, cran, swan, partridge, plover, duck, drake, brissel-cock, and " pawnies, black-cock, and muir-fowl, capercailies : and also the stanks that were '« round about the palace were full of all delicate fishes, as salmonds, trouts, " pearches, pikes, eels, and all other kind of delicate fishes that could be gotten •' in fresh waters ; and all ready for the banquet. Syne were there proper stew- " ards, cunning baxters, excellent cooks and potingars, with confections and ♦' druggs for their desert ; and the halls and chambers were prepared with costly •' bedding, vessel, and napry, according for a king ; so that he wanted none of " his orders more than he had been at home in his own palace. The king re- «• mained in this wilderness three days and three nights at the hunting, and his '« company, as I have shown. I heard men say, it cost the Earl of Athole every " day, in expences, a thousand pounds. The ambassador of the Pope, seeing this " great banquet and triumph made in a wilderness, where there was no town near " for twenty miles, thought it a great marvel that such a thing could be in Scot- " land, considering that it was named The arse of the world by other countries; " that there should be such honesty and policy, and especially in the High-land, " where there was but wood and wilderness. But most of all, the ambassador " marvelled to see, that when the king departed, and all his men took their leave, '• the Highlandmen set all this fair palace in a fire, that the king and the am- " bassador might see it. Then the ambassador said to the king, I marvel. Sir, " that you should thole yon tan- palace to be brunt, that your grace has been so " well lodged in. Then the king answered the ambassador, and said, It is the " use of our Highlandmen, though they be never so well lodged, to burn their " lodgings when they depart {a)." This noble hospitable earl married first Grizel, daughter and at length sole heir of Sir John Rattray of that Ilk, {b), a very ancient family in the county of Perth, by whom he had only one son, his heir, John, Master of Athol, and six daugh- ters, Margaret, the eldest, who was married to John Grant of Freuchie, the Laird of Grant (<:), and had issue. Jean, the second, to John Otterburn of Reidhall, son and heir of Sir Adam Otterburn of Reidhall, who was Lord Advocate to King James V. {d), and had issue. The lineal heir of this family is Alexander Hamilton of Innerwick^ Esq. the third, to the Laird of Balfour {>'). the fourth, to Wood of Balbigno, in the county of Forfar (/). Elizabeth, the fifth, was married to Wilham Stewart, at that time son and heir- apparent of Thomas Stewart of Grandtully {g), and had issue. (a) History Pitscotty, page 147. {h) Charta in poblicis archWis. (f) Charta penes Grant, I have 5een, in 1555, and likewise from the Registers of Parliamem in 1565. (). This Sir Friskin de Moravia is witness, together with Sir Malcolm de Moravia, in a charter I have seen (r), granted by Malise Earl of Strathern to Annabella his sifter, of the lands of Kin- cardine, which is confirmed by King Alexander II. at Selkirk, the 28th of June, the 22d year of the king's reign, that is the year of our Lord 1233. This Sir Malcolm Murray is by some thought to be brother to this Sir Friskin Murray of Duffus, witnessing the Earl of Strathern's charter with him. Others again think he was uncle to this Sir Friskin, son to Sir IVilliam de Moravia oi Duifus; how- ever this be, he is very early branched from the stem, and is uncontrovertibly the original ancestor of the most noble and illustrious family of the Murrays of Tulli- bardin. He has for certain had a considerable estate in the county of Perth ; for ill I he 36th of Alexander III. he, dominus Malcohnus de Moravia, miles, vicecomes de Perth, is witness to a charter granted by Malesius comes de Strathern, domino Malcolmo de Logie fdio quondam domini Malesii senescalli de Strathern de terris de Catintulloch ; to the charter Alexander comes de Buchan justiciarius Scotia is a wit- ness {d). By an account of the family I have seen, drawn up in the year i6oo, and to give it the greater authority, it makes mention of some charters and writs of the family that 1 found exactly corresponding when I had the honour to peruse the Duke of Athol's writs of the family of Tullibardin in the 1711; I say this draught of the family mentions that Sir Malcolm de Moravia, the certain and un- ijontroverted ancestor of the House of Tullibardin, got the lands of Gask and others in the county of Perth, by the marriage of the daughter and heirof.S»- Gilbert de Gask. I have seen myself this gentleman mentioned in ancient writs, in the charter-chest of the family of Abercairny, and that Sir Gilbert had a sister called Issenda, who was Countess of Strathern; so much however is most certain, that Gask was very anciently in possession of the family of Tullibardin, and some- times they used that title. Sir David Murray, one of the ancestors of the Duke of Athol, is designed David de Moravia de Cask, in a charter by Euphemia Comitissa de Strathern, to Luke Stirling, one of the ancestors of the family of Keir of the lands of Rattcrn, in the 141 1 {e), and he is designed by the title of Gask, by our learned historian Dr John Major, as one of those illustrious persons who were knighted by King James I. for the greater splendour of his coronation at Perth, anno 1424. As we are certain, from undoubted vouchers, that Sir Malcolm Mur- ray had an estate in Perthshire, in the reign of King Alexander II. that he exe- cuted the office of High-sheriff there in the reign of King Alexander III. so we are as sure from unquestionable records, charters in the family, that he gave to Sir IVilliam de Moravia, his son, WHUelmo de Moravia fdio suo terras de Lama- hude, by a charter which is in the hands of his Grace the Duke of Athol (/), An- dreas Episcopus Moravia, Willielmus de Hayia de Locherward ^5* Michael de Weems, militibus, being witnesses thereto. The charter is without date, as is very usual in the more ancient deeds, but it must be before the 1244 that, from the Chronicle of Melrose, this prelate, Andrew Bishop of Murray, died. This same noble and illustrious person, Willielmus de Moravia, miles, filius quondam domini Malcolmi de Moravia, militis, got and obtained the lands and estataof Tullibardin, in the county of Perth, by the marriage of Adda, daughter of Maine Senescal de Strathern, by Mauriele, his wife, daughter and heir of Congal Jilius Duncani, Jilii Malcolmi. There is, in the custody of his Grace the Duke of Athol, a charter of King Alexander II. under the Great Seal, ratifying and con- lirming a former deed and grant by Robertas comes de Strathern, Congal Jilio Dun- cani, filio Malcolmi de illis terris in villa de Chacherlanuch qua dicitur Tullibardin, and bears date the 3d of April, the 20th year of the king's reign, that is the year i^a) Chartulary of Murray. (A) Ibidem. (f) In the hands of the Duke of Montrose. () Ibidem. (/-) Writs belonging to the family of Boswell of Balmuto I have seen, (j-) Rymer's Foedera. (t) Writs I have seen in the hands of Laurence Oliphant of Gask. APPENDIX. iSg his grace the Duke of Athol by that prince ('<), " Dilecto nostro ac familiari mi- " liti Willielmo de Moravia de Tillibardme, pro suo tideli servitio nobis impenso " senescalliam nostram comitatus de Strathern, ac dominii de Balquhidder." This charter of the stewartry of Strathern and lordsliip of Balquhidder is dated the 1 8th of January 1482. In the first ParUament of King James IV. anno 14^8, we find him sitting as a member ; for we may remark, that although the smaller barons were dispensed by an act of King James I. from personal attendance in Parliament, (v) anno 1427, yet the greater barons, even under the degree of lords of Parliament, were not, but sat there in virtue of their baronies ; for though these great barons came but seldom to Parliament, yet there was no law excluding them, but that they might take their seats there whenever they had a mind, even though they were not called by the king's writ or general precept. In the parhament 1492 he got a special act in his favour, ratifying the grant formerly made to hmi of the stewartry of Strathern, which I have seen in the archives of the family. And in 1495 we find him concerned in a treaty with the English, anent the keeping of a good understanding betwixt the two realms (uy). In the 1507, Sir William Murray being by this time grown aged, the king grants to his well beloved and familiar knight, as he designs him. Sir William Murray of TuUibardin, a full exoneration in regard of his great age, dispensing with his attendance, or coming either to courts, or even to the king's host itself. He married Katharine, daughter of Andrew Lord Gray (v), by whom he had John his eldest son and heir apparent, who married Elizabeth, a lady of the fami- ly of the Crichtons ( j) ; but died without issue in the hfetime of his father. William, the second son, who was the heir of the family. Sir Andrew, the third son, who got a fair estate in marriage with Margaret the daughter, and sole heir of James Barclay of Arngosk and Kippo, and was the ancestor of the Murrays of Bal- vaird, now dignified with the title of Lord Balvaird, and Viscount of Stormont (z), David Murray of Strathgeth {aa). He had also two daughters, Christian, who was married to George Lord Seaton, ancestor to the Earls of Winton, and had issue {h¥). Elizabeth to Thomas Stewart of Grandtully, and had issue (rt). He died in the 1509, and was succeeded by William his son and heir, whom 1 have seen designed " filius et heres quondam domini Willielmi Murray de Tilli- " bardine," in a charter under the Great Seal, anno 1510 {b). He married Margaret, daughter of John Earl of Athol (t}, by whom he had William his eldest son, and the heir of the family. Andrew. David. And a daughter, Helen, married to Alexander Seaton of Parbroth (d), in the county of Fife, and had issue. Which William, in 1542, takes a charter, under the Great Seal, of his estate to himself, and Katharine Campbell his wife in conjunct infeftment, and a new in- vestiture of his whole fortune, under the Great Seal, to himself in liferent, and to William his son and heir apparent in fee, and to the heirs-male of his body, which failing, to Alexander and James Murrays his sons, and to the heirs-male of their bodies respective ; which failing, to Andrew Murray, brother-german to "William Murray of TuUibardin, and to the heirs-male of his body; which failing, to David Murray, brother to the said William also, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to William Murray, son to David Murray of AHcht, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to David Murray of Ochtertyre, and to the heirs- male of his body ; which failing, to Alexander Murray of Struan, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to John Murray of Wallaceton, and the (a) Which I have seen !n the charter-chest of the family, (u) Black acts of Parliament, (lu Fojdera AngliiE. (r) Charta penes ducera de Athol. ( v) Charter to this John Murray, son and heir apparent to Sir WiUam Murray of TuUibardin, and to his lady, under the Great Seal in the public records in 1485. (a) Charta penes vicecomitem de Stormont. {aa) Charta in archivis. (bh) Ibidem, (a) Charta penes Sir G<:orge Stewart. (/) Charta penes ducem de Athol ad annum 1510. (f) Ibidem. (). Upon the murder of King Henry by the Earl of Bothwell, he was one of the barons who, with great zeal and forwardness, went into an association for the de- fence of the young prince King James VI. and to pursue the Earl of Bothwell, and to bring him to justice for the execrable fact he had committed on the king's father ; and perhaps he was not the less keen in prosecuting that wicked earl, that he had the honour to be second cousin to King Henry the murdered prince ; but his keenness for the safety and preservation of the young prince did not influence him to behave in any way undutifully towards the queen his sovereign ; for an author of great worth and credit at that time (0), says, speaking of the Laird of Tullibardin, " That he always retained a dutiful respect to the queen's majesty, and " only entered into the association for safety of the young prince, and punishment •' of the king's murder." Though the Laird of TulHbardin, the comptroller, was in great friendship and confidence with some of those who went all lengths against the queen, yet he could never be prevailed on to concur with them in one single act that was derogatory to her honour, dignity, and safety ; but when the queen was forced to fly out of the kingdom, and the government established in the person of her son the prince, he submitted to that authority, and kept the comptroller's place long after. He was of the Privy Council to the regents (p) : Upon the death of the Earl of Marr the Regent, who was his brother-in-law, in the 1572, he, and Sir Alexander Erskine of Gogar, commonly called Master of Marr, were appointed governors to the young king, and joint keepers of the castle of Stirling, where the king resided and was brought up ; and he discharged the office to the universal ap- probation of the whole kingdom, till the 1578, that the king took upon himself the sole administration. How soon the king constituted a new Privy Council he {f) In publicis archivis. (f) Charter under the Great Seal in the records ad annum 1538. {g) Ibi- dem, charta in the charter-chest of Rosyth, which I have seen the note of. fh) Charta in archivis. (i) Ibidem, (k) Charta penes dora. Abercairny. (/) Charta in pub. arch, (m) Mr Keith's Col- lections, (n) Charta in RotuUs, and Mr Keith's Collections, {o) Sir James Melvil's Memoirs of his own time, (fi) Records of the Council in the Signet Office. APPENDIX. tpi was one of the number, in which he contiiuied till his death, on the 15th March 1583 (). LiLiAS, the second, to Sir John Grant of Freuchie, the Laird of Grant, and had issue (c). (y) Charta in cancellaria S. D. N. regis ad annum 1584. (r) Charta in publicis archivis ad annum 154^. (s) Charter of the lands of Letterbanachy, in the custody of James Murray of Abercaimy. (;_) Ibidem ad annum 1604. (a) Charta in archivis. (v) Acts of Parliament IJip?. (w) Creations of the Nobility, MS. (.v) This charter I have seen in the hands of James Murray of Abercaimy. ( v) Creations of the Nobility from the Records. (?) Creations of Nobility in my own hands, (a) Charta penes ducera de Athol, and Lieutenant-General Drummond's History of the Drummonds, in my own custody, MS. (i) Penes ducem de Athol. it) Charta in publicis archivis. 192 APPENDIX. Margaret, the third daughter, to James Haldane of Gleneagles, and had issue (a). Catharine, the fourth daughter, was married to David Ross of Balnagowan in Ross-shire, the heir-male and representative of the ancient earls of Ross, and had issue (b). William, the second earl of Tullibardin, while he was a young man, being happily in the town of Perth on the ever memorable 5th of August 1600, when John Earl ofGowrie, and Mr Alexander Ruthven, his brother, attempted to lay vio- lent hands on the sacred person of the king their sovereign ; upon their being both slain, the citizens of Perth hearing that the Earl of Gowrie, who had been their provost at the time, was slain, rose in a tumult, and in all probability, con- sidering their numbers and the ferment they were in, would have cut the Court in pieces, if the young Laird of Tullibardin, who was accidentally in town that day, had not interposed with his retinue, and his friends carried off the king and all with him safe to Falkland. For this most signal and meritorious service, the Laird of Tullibardin got the sheriffship of Perthshire, that had heritably belonged to the House of Ruthven the Earls of Gowrie, and has mostly continued in the family of Athol ever since that time. This William, the second Earl of Tullibardin, made a very noble alliance by marriage, for his Lordship married the Lady Dorothea Stewart, eldest daughter and heir of line to John the fifth Earl of Athol, of the Stewartine line, by whom he had only John his son and heir, and a daughter, Anne, who was married to Sir John Moncrief of that Ilk, then an ancient considerable family, as any in all the county of Perth. This Earl of Tullibardin laid before his Majesty King Charles I. the claim and title his lady, the Countess of Tulhbardin, and his children, had to the honour and dignity of Earl of Athol ; setting forth. That the countess was the eldest daughter, and heir of line and at law to the deceased Earl of Athol, her father ; That the family of Innermeth, who had got the title of Earl of Athol upon the demise of her father, were now all extinct, and out of the way, and therefore she conceived that she was well entitled to her father's dignity : The king received the petition very graciously, and told the Earl of Tullibardin, That since it was plain The former earls of Athol were all extinct in the male line, that it was but just and reasonable that the dignity of Earl of Athol, which had so long and so gloriously flourished in the race of the Stewarts, in whom he himself had a relation in blood, should be revived and established in the person and descendants of the lady, who was the heir of line and at law, and gave his royal word the thing should be done : But as the Earl of Tullibardin was to do his lady and children justice, so as to have the title and honour of Earl of Athol brought in to them, so he did not think but that he ought to take care to do all that was possible for him to pre- serve the honour of Earl of Tullibardin, as a distinct and separate dignity, that was not to be immerged or consolidated into that of Earl of Athol, how soon that honour came to be vested in his son, who would become heir both to his father and mother in their respective dignities and peerage ; this the earl represented to his majesty so effectually that it was agreed and concerted that he should re- sign and surrender his own title and peerage of Earl of Tulhbardin in his majesty's hands, in favour of his brother Sir Patrick Murray, Knight of the Bath, and one of the Gentlemen of the Bedchamber, and who himself had a good share of favour, and had acquired the estate of Tullibardin from his brother. Accordingly Wil- liam Earl of Tullibardin did surrender, on the first of April 1626 (c), the title, honour, dignity, and precedency of Earl of Tulhbardin, in order that it might be, de novo, conferred on Sir Patrick Murray aforesaid ; but in the interim, before the several different deeds and patents could be got perfected and expede, the Earl of Tullibardin died, which brought all these transactions for some time to a stand; but that just and excellent prince, King Charles, well knowing the intention of the (a) The contract I have seen in Gleneagle's hands, It is dated the 26th January 1600, the portion is 9000 merks of the realm of Scotland. (.b) Account of Balnagoivan I have seen, (c) Chartaincan- cellatia S- D. N. R- ad annum 1626- APPENDIX. ixjs parties in the whole transaction, and that it was intended that both the peerage ot Athol and Tulhbardin should be distinctly represented, therefore his majesty was graciously pleased to acknowledge that William, the deceased Earl of TuUibardin, had resigned his title of honour of Earl of TuUibardin in favour of his brother Sir Patrick Murray, and which he is moved in justice to confer upon him : Accord- ingly a patent is expede the Great Seal, creating him Earl of TuUibardin, bearing ddte the penult of January 1628 (rt), and to his heu-s-raale whatsoever : But the kmg, who regulated his whole conduct by the maxims and principles of conscience and honour, having done justice to Sir Patrick Murray, in giving him the title of Earl of TuUibardin, conform to the intention of the resignation, he very quickly after that did justice to his nephew John Murray, son and heir of the deceased William Earl of TuUibardin ; for he was soon after invested in the honour, title, dignity, and peerage of Earl of Athol. The preamble of the patent is very noble, and reflects great honour on the patentee ; for his majesty narrates that the honour and dignity of Earl of Athol had continued successively in the line and posterity of John Earl of Athol, who was uterine 'brother to the king's illustrious ancestor Kmg James II., to the deatii of John the fifth Earl of Athol, the patentee's own grandfather, whose eldest daughter, Dorothea Countess of TuUibardin, was mother to him. the king's predi/crtus consaii^uiiifus, as he is pleased to term the patentee, Johannes Murray nunc creatus Comes Atb'Aie. The narrative goes on declaring that his majesty was moved purely from principles of honour and conscience to give, ratify and confirm to the earl, the title of Earl of Athol, and that in truth in the very strongest terms that could be devised, to express his right as heir of line to his maternal ancestor John the first Earl of Athol, who had that peerage con- ferred on bun by his brother King James II. For all these reasons, " Nos de " novo," says the sovereign, " damus, concessimus, et contulimus tenoreque pre- " sentiam damus concedimus et conferimus prefato Johanni Murray, nunc Comes " Athohe, prefatam dignitatem comitatus Atholie, et haeredibus suis, &c." The patent bears date at Whitehall the 17th of February 1629 (6). This noble earl continued a loyal and quiet subject during the peaceable time of the reign of King Charles. At the first rupture, when the troubles began in the 1639, he attached himself to the king's side with great firmness and fidelity ; he raised his Athol men to the number of eighteen hundred or two thousand men, declaring his intention was to support the honour and dignity of the crown ; and that he would oppose every measure, or whatever party, he judged were driving things to lessen or eclipse the lustre of it, or were making undue and illegal stretches, on whatsoever pretence, of lessening or invading the sovereignty in any branch of its inherent power. But all jealousies and animosities being, at least seemingly, composed by tlie king's own presence in the Pari. 1641, partiesof both sides laid down their arms, and seemed to outvie one another who should express their loyalty and duty most to his majesty, who had removed all their grievances, and settled every thing to the desire of their hearts. The Earl of Athol died next year after this, annu 1642 ; his death was looked on as a very great loss to the king's service, consider- ing that he left his son very young, a mere child, in no capacity of heading his men, or leading them on to action, a thing the Highlanders have at all times been fond of: And if we but consider what great matters the Marquis of Montrose did with but a small number of the Athol men, that resorted to him from principle, when he set up the king's standa,i-d and declared for his majesty, what, in a rea- sonable conjecture, yea what wonders might have been performed, if all the Athol men had been drawn together, and appeared in the field with their own master and chief the Earl of Athol at their heard ? But this by the by. John, the first of the line and race of the Murrays Earls of Athol, left issue by Jean his wife, daughter of Sir Duncan Campbell of Glenorchy, aunt to John the first Earl of Breadalbane, John his eldest son and heir, thereafter Earl and Mar- fa^ Patent in the Chancery Office at Edinburgh, ad annum 1628, bearing that the honoir had been resigned by the deceased Earl of TuUibardia his brother, the first of April 1626. {b} Patent recordc^i ■;B the Chancery office at Edinburgh. Vol. n. 6 K 194 APPENDIX. quis of Athol, Mungo Murray, who was Lieutenant of his Majesty's Guards at the Restoration ; he died unmarried, and was interred in St Giles's churcli at Edin- burgh, at che tomb of John Earl of Athol, who died Lord Chancellor in the 1579, where the honours that were hung up at his funeral are still to be seen by the curious. The Earl of Athol had also one daughter, Anne, who was married to her first cousin James Earl of TuUibardin, who was the son of her uncle Patrick Earl of TuUibardin, who had that honour, as we have heretofore observed in this memorial, conferred on him by King Charles L This Pa- trick Earl of TuUibardin married Dame Elizabeth Dent, an English lady, by whom he had issue Jajies, his son and successor in the honour, and a younger son, William Murray of Redcastle, who being in the king's army at Philiphaugh, was taken prisoner, and suffered at St Andrews in the 1646 (rt). He w-as a lively young man ; he was much regretted by all ranks and all parties ; for he was of great expectations, and was not above eighteen years of age at his death : His brother got his estate, who, it is reported, pressed his death very indecently : but it was observable, that though he had at that time two sons that died so quickly after other, that many remarks were made on it ; for though he had two wives, first his cousin the Earl of Athol's daughter, and after that Lilias, daughter of Sir John Drummond of Machany, yet he left no child to inherit his fortune, but died without issue on the the 26th of January 1670 (1^), and his estate and honour devolved to the Earl of Athol as his nearest heir. John, the second earl of the line of the Murrays Earls of Athol, succeeded his father in the honour while he was very young : but being bred up in the principles of loyalty and fidelity to the crown and the royal family, in all the dis- tress it was then under, he stuck to it with the most firm, unshaken, and inviolable fidelity. In the year 1653, when the Earl of Glencairn set up the king's standard in the Highlands, the Earl of Athol resorted to him, and brought 2000 of his men to the camp; and though he was now scarce eighteen, he endured the fatigue and ill ac- commodation the army was unavoidably exposed to with the vigour and resolution that could have been expected from the most veteran soldier among them; and both the Earl of Glencairn, who was the first general, and the Earl of Middle- ton, who afterwards had the command of the army, always acknowledged and declared afterwards, that if it had not been that the Earl of Athol was among them, and the support his country afibrded them, they should have starved for want of provision and forage, and their keeping so long together was m.ore owing to the Earl of Athol than to all the other great men that were among them. Upon the happy Restoration of King Charles II. anno 1660, the Earl of Athol's merit and loyalty being so eminent and conspicuous, could not well fail of being highly rewarded and considered, as it well deserved : He was firet named one of the new Privy Council, and acted as principal master of the king's household in the absence of the Marquis of Argyle, at the solemnity of the Parliament vvhich sat down at Edinburgh the first of January 1661 (f). Qiiickly after that, getting into a high degree of favour with his majesty, and in the most entire conridence and friendship of the Earl of Lauderdale, then the sole Secretary and Minister tor Scotland, his Lordship, the Earl of Athol, was made and constituted Lord Justice- General in place of the Earl of Cassihs, who had been named to the office, but de- clined to accept, because he could not bring himself up to take the oaths enjoined oy law, anno 1663. The earl rising still more and more in favour and confidence both of the king and the minister, he was preferred to be captain of the guards on the demise of the Earl of Newburgh, anyio 1670, and one of the Extraordinary Lords of the Session. In the 1672 the Earl of Athol, without parting with any of his other offices, was made Lord Privy Seal, then void by the death of the Earl of Dun- fermline: But his majesty thinking all these great employments were not enough to reward the merit and services of the Earl of Athol, therefore his majesty was (fl) Bishop Gutlirie's Memoirs. (V) Letter in the hands of the Laiid of Abercairny. (c) Manu- script History of these times in my hands. APPENDIX. 195- graciously pleased to raise him to a higher degree and title of honour ; so he was created Marquis of Athol bv letters patent, bearing date the 1 7tli of February 1676(^0- As the Lord Athol had been in a long and firm friendship with the Secretary, the Earl of Lauderdale, so he was a great support to the other in keeping his court, and having so deep a root with the king. Lauderdale had now possessed all his friends with a notion, that was at first believed by them all, that the people in the western shires were in a state of rebellion, and were to be reduced by a su- perior force; for this end he got the king to write to all the chiefs in the High- lands to raise their men to march to the west; among others the Marquis of Athol raised 3000 of his Athol men; the Earls of Breadalbane, Marr, Perth, Strathmore, &-C. raised such as depended on them, which in all amounted to an army of 8 or 9000 men, who were to be let loose in the west on free quarter as if they had been in an enemy's country. The Lord Athol actually went to the west, and was named one of the committee of council that were to give the necessary orders to the army: But his lordship quickly perceiving when he came to tlie west how he had been deceived, and the state of that country so dreadfully misrepresented, that they were so far from being in any degree of rebellion that they were in a state of perfect quiet, that by no single circumstance it could appear to him that any rebellion was intended, when he had examined as far into the bottom of things as was possible, while he remained in that part of the country : So his Lordbhip be- ing of himself a noble, generous, free-hearted man, he would be no longer a party in so violent an administration, nor could he endure to see such havock made in any part of the kingdom where he himself was a subject. So upon this he fell off from Duke Lauderdale, and joined with Duke of Hamilton, the Earl of Perthj and ten or twelve of the nobility, with about 150 gentlemen of quality, who went up to London to complain of the violence and illegality of the administration.^ But thvjugh the king saw the Lord Athol, yet he would not disgrace the Duke of Lauderdale, much less punish him for what he had done. The Marquis of Athol, having so many places in so small a country, had raised a great clamour, so to stop that, now that he was upon the side that were the patriots, and set up to be the protectors of the liberties of Scotland, he quit the Justice-General's place, which was given to Sir Archibald Primrose of Dalmeny in the 167B; and he kept the Privy Seal and his other posts and offices, without any visible diminution in his majesty's favour, till the king's death in the 1685. Upon the accession of his Majesty King James VIL to the throne, the Marquis of Athol had still a good share of favour, for he had a great deal of merit with the new king, since he had gone with great zeal into the act of Parhament in 1681, declaring the hereditary right to the crown in the legal lineal course of the suc- cession in favour of his Majesty Vifhile he was Duke of Albany and York; so his Lordship the Marquis of x\thol was continued Lord Privy Seal and his other offices. Upon the inva^ion of the Earl of Argyle the Marquis was thought the fittest person the council could pitch on to make head against him; for that end they ordered him to raise so many of his vassals and dependants as l>e thought necessary to march into Argyleshire, to prevent the progress the Earl might have in making levies amongst his friends and vassals there. To give the Marquis the greater authority, it seems, to .execute any orders he might receive from his Ma- jesty, or the council, he was made Lieutenant of the shires of Argyle and Tarbet.. In this memorial I will pursue this matter no farther; the fate of the Earl of Argyle, and the suppressing that rebellion, is so well known that I can add nothing- to the relation of them that are in so many printed books, and in our acts of Par- liament so fully set forth. Qi^iickly after this the Marquis of Athol was invested with the power of Justiciary in Argyleshire, to try and bring to justice such as had been concerned m the re- bellion: But considering the attachment and dependence the Highlanders have upon their chief, and the heads of their clans and tribes, w'hich no man living knew better than his Lordship, so little blood w'a; shed, and but few examples^ •"(j) Patent recorded in the Chancery. 196 APPENDIX. made, and the few executions that were, were done by his two deputes in the office, tlie one a gentleman ot Athol, and the other a gentleman of the shire of Ayr. Soon after the affair of the Earl of Argyle was over, the Marquis of Athol went up to wait on the king; he was most graciously received, and his majesty was pleased to express his sense of his lordship's services in the most obliging expres- sions and words that have proceeded from a prince to a subject. In this gale of favour, if the Marquis had not been firm and inflexible in the point of his religion, which he could not sacrifice to the pleasure of any mortal, he might have been the first minister for Scotland, and all others in a dependance on him, and have ruled as absolutely as ever the Duke of Lauderdale had done before him. Though the king found the Marquis was not to be wrought on in the matter of his religion, yet in all other things, knowing his loyalty and duty was superior to all temptations, he placed an entire and unsuspected confidence in his Lordship, for he was one of the Secret Committee to whom the administration was chiefly committed, and the confidence lodged («), till the end of that reign. In the 1687 ^^^ Majesty was graciously pleased to revive the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of St Andrew, called the Thistle, that had gone mto desuetude from the time that Queen Mary had fallen in her troubles : The Order was to consist of twelve knights and the sovereign, in imitation of our blessed Saviour and and the twelve Apostles ; they were all the king's particular favourites and confidants that were first mstalled; of the number the Maiquis of Athol was one; his com- panions, the other knights, so many of the number as were filled up, were George Duke of Gordon, James, then Earl of Arran, the late Duke of Hamilton, James Earl of Perth, the Lord Chancellor, John Earl of Melford, the Secretary, Alexander Earl of Murray, Kenneth Earl of Seaforth, George Earl of Dumbarton, General of the Forces: The Revolution came on so soon after that the full compliment of the knights were never filled up. After the revolution of the government, that the throne was filled by the Prince and Princess of Orange, the late King William and Q^ieen Mary, the Mar- quis of Athol retired from all public business, and spent the rest of his time at some of his fine seats in the country all his life after. He died the 6th of May 1703, in the 70th year of his age. He was interred within the vestry of the Old Cathedral Church of Dunkeld, where a sumptuous and magnificent monument of black and white marble is erected over his grave. The effigies of the Marquis, and the Lady Marchioness of Athol, his lady, in bust, are on the two great Co- rinthian pillars that support the tomb: There are also placed the probative quar- ters or branches, as they are called, of the Marquis on the right pillar, and the Lady Marchioness on the left pillar. On a tablet of black marble there is an in- scription containing the several offices the Marquis passed through, and the most material steps of his life. Sixteen of the coats of arms of those illustrious families, eight on the paternal side, and other eight on the maternal line, did compose the escutcheon of John Duke of Athol ; and being so very noble and illustrious, the publishers of this posthumous work of Mr Nisbet judged this escutcheon was the most proper in- stance they could fall upon for illustrating a funeral escutcheon; and accordingly they have caused engrave a copperplate of his Grace the Duke of Athol's scutcheon in that part of the work that treats of funeral solemnities, with all the proper and congruent trimmings of his ducal dignity, as the supporters, the helmet, the mant- ling, and the crest, and motto of the family of Athol, which the reader may be pleased to peruse m this Appendix; the eight on each side of the escutcheon are IS follow : (n) Balcarras's Memoirf, MS. penes me. APPENDIX. Marquis of Athol, Earl of Derby, Earl of Bieadalbane, Duke de Tremouille, Stewart Earl of Athol. Earl of Oxford, Lord Sinclair, Prince d'Orange, Earl of Perth, Earl of Cumberland, Lord Ruthven, Duke de Montmorency, Earl of Gowrie, Earl of Exeter, Cockburn of Ormiston, Duke de Montpensicr. The Marquis of Athol married a lady of the most noble illustrious rank and' quality of any in Europe, I mean of a subject, the Lady Emelia Stanley, daughter of James Earl of Derby, of the kingdom of England, by the Lady Charlotte, his wife, daughter of Claud Duke de Tremouille, a duke and peer of France. By this most noble alliance and match Sir William Dugdale, in the Baronage of England, takes notice that the Earl of Derby's children are related in blood and kindred by the mother to the Houses of Bourbon and Austria, to the Kings of Spain and France, the Duke of Savoy, the Prince of Orange, and to most of the. crowned heads in Europe ; and now that all the descendants of both sexes of James Earl of Derby, and Emelia Countess of Derby, his wife, are worn out, and extinguished at the writing of this memorial, excepting the children and descen-. dants of the Lady Marchioness of Athol, all that great and uncommon race of i«oyal and illustrious blood centres in the descendants of the Marquis of Athol, and the Lady Emelia, his wife, aforesaid, who were John, their eldest son, and the heir of the family, thereafter Duke of Athol. Charles Earl of Dunmore, the second son, who was raised to that honour by King James VU. Lord James Murray, the third son, who was designed of Doually, and, as a baron, represented the county of Perth in the House of Commons of Great Bri- tain. Lord William Murray, the fourth son, who having married Margaret, the only daughter and sole heir of Sir Robert Nairn of Strathurd, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, and one of the Commissioners of Justiciary, was upoa that created Lord Nairn for life, and the fee of the honour to descend to the Mar- quis of Athol's son, who should marry the Lord Nairn's daughter («). Lord Edward Murray, the fifth son. Lord MuNGo Murray, the sixth son, who died in that glorious expedition of Scotland to Darien, anno 1697. Lady Emelia, the only daughter, wae married to Hugh Lord Eraser of Lovat, and had issue. John, Marquis, thereafter Duke of Athol, succeeded his father in the estate and honour of the family, which were raised higher in the person of his Grace the Duke of Athol : his Grace was a man of great parts, but far greater virtues; of "a lively apprehension, a clear and ready judgment, a copious eloquence, and of a very considerable degree of good understanding. In the lifetime of his father the Marquis, he came early into the revolution, and soon declared for the Prince of Orange. The merit of this service, together with the relation his Lordship had the honour to stand to his Highness in blood, soon brought him into a degree of confidence and favour that was very particular. He had the command of a regiment of foot, but his genius being more adapted to the cabinet than the field, his Majesty King William was pleased to make him one of the Principal Secretaries of State, in conjunction with Mr Ogilvie, after- wards Earl of Seafield and Findlater, aiino 1696; much about the same time he was created a Peer by the title of Earl of Tullibardin (i), by letters patent, bearing date the 27th of July 1697, and named Pligh Commissioner to represent his majesty's person in the sixth session of Parliament, which sat down at Edinburgh the 8th of September the year 1697 aforesaid, wherein I see it remarked that every (a) Charta in publicis archivis. (A) Patent recorded in the chancery office. Vol. IL 6 L. 1^8 APPENDIX. thing the court asked was granted, and all acted with great unanimity (c) : but the Earl of Tullibardin being a person who had the honour and prosperity of his country much more at heart than any private consideration of his own, and by this time clearly perceiving, if he continued in the ministry, that he behoved to enter into measures that would bring his country into a slavish dependence on England, and give way to ruin the national project of the African Company settled at Da- rien, he would go no farther on with the court ; so he laid down all his public posts and employments, and retired from the scene. I have been well assured, from persons I could well trust, and had no design to impose on me, that it was not the disappointment the Earl of Tullibardin met with in recommending a friend of his to a high post, that was the root of his disgust at the court ; that arose from another consideration ; it was the scheme he saw laid down of bringing us in- to a dependence on England, as we have observed ; and that which brought it sooner on was the king's disowning the African Company, from which it was ex- pected great riches would flow into the kingdom; and this sruck him as a gene- rous patriot, who preferred the honour and interest of his country to any regard of his own concerns; and he stood at a distance from the court so long as King William lived. Upon the accession of her Majesty Queen Anne to the throne of these realms, no man in the nation was more overjoyed to see one of the race of Stewarts wearing the crown than the Earl of Tullibardin : her majesty was graciously pleased to bring him to the Privy Council, and to make his Lordship Privy Seal(rf) in place of the Duke of Queensberry, who was named Commissioner to the new Parliament that was indicted to sit down on the 6th of May 1703, wherein he did the Qiieen so acceptable service, that to countenance and reward his consum- mated merit, her majesty was graciously pleased to create him (being now Mar- quis of Athol by the demise of his father) Duke of Athol, by letters patent bear- ing date the third of April 1704 (f); and soon thereafter his Grace was elected and installed one of the Knights Companions of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Or- der of the Thistle. His Grace did not long continue Privy Seal; for the next en- suing year her majesty having thought fit for her service to change her ministry, the Duke of Athol was removed from his office, and the Earl of Rothes got the Privy Seal, In the Parliament 1706, when the Treaty of Union came to be considered, his Grace the Duke of Athol argued vehemently against the whole frame of it, as contrary to the fundamental laws and the whole constitution of our government, which he thought the Parliament had no power to alter. In the progress of the debates on this subject, he spoke and argued with such force and strength of rea- soning, that made a very great impression on all those who heard him, and creat- ed in all people a very high esteem of him. The topics from which his Grace the Duke of Athol drew the arguments against the Union, were the antiquity and and dignity of the kingdom, which were now offered to be given up : they were now departing from an independent state, and going to sink in a dependence on England ; what conditions soever might be now speciously offered as a security to them, they could not expect they should be adhered to, or religiously maintained in a parliament where sixteen peers and forty-five commoners could not hold the balance against above an hundred peers, and five hundred and thirteen commoners : It was visible that the nobility suffered a great diminution, if not a forfaulture by it ; for though they agreed that the Peers of Scotland should enjoy all the other privileges of the Peers of England, yet the greatest of them all was denied them, which was sitting and voting in the House of Lords, and their being restrained to sixteen, to be elected by the rest at every new Parliament. In debating almost every single article, his Grace spoke against them with great boldness, and so much caution, that though he provoked the courtiers extremely, no advantage could be taken against him ; and though every question was carried in favour of the treaty, yet his Grace, to exoner his own conscience, and to leave behind him to posterity {c) History of the times. () Charta penes Vicecomitem de Stormont, etiam chaita in Rotulii Reg. Pari, (q) Charta in publicis archivis, ad annum 1547. ("r) Ibidem, ad an- num I S84. (s) Spottiswood and Calderwood's Ecclesiastical Histories. {!) Rotul. in Cancellaria, S. D. N. R. (tt) Chaita penes Vicecomitem de Stormont. {v} Charta in pubUcis archivis. :-4 APPENDIX. self in liferent, and to Andrew IMurray, his son and heir apparent in fee, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to David Murray his broiher-german, and the heirs-male of his body, and, in failure of these, to Roben IVIurray his brother-german, and to the heirs-male of his body ; and these failing, to Patrick Murray their brother-gemian, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to David Murray, portioner of Airdeth, his uncle. The charter is expede the Great Seal the 26th of September 1560 («). In this substitution it is pretty odd, that Sir Andrew Murray of Arngosk. strikes out his uncle William Murray of Letter- baiiachy, and his issue-male out of the succession, who was elder than David Mur- ray of Airdeth, whom he substitutes directly and immediately after his own bro- thers : But we see, that some time after this, in a subsequent settlement of the estate of the family, justice is done to David Murray, son of William Murray of Letter- banachy, and he is reponed in his due room and right of succession before the issue- male of his uncle David Murray of Airdeth. This Sir Andrew Murray of Arngosk married Margaret, daughter of John Crich- lon of Strathurd, an ancient and considerable family in the county of Perth ; her mother was a daughter of the Lord Ruthven's family, who were afterwards Earls of Gowrie (6), by whom he had Andrew his son and heir, and one daugh- ter, Anne, who was married to Sir Mungo Murray the second Viscount of Stor- mont, but had no issue. To this Sir Andrew Murray of Arngosk succeeded An- drew, his son and heir, who was the first of the family that relinquished the desig- nation of Arngosk, and used the title and designation of Balvaird. He took an investiture of his estate, and is stiled Andreas Murray de Balvaird, fdius H hares quondam domini Andreae Murray de Arngosk, militis. He provides his whole estate to the heirs-male of his ov/n body, and failing these to Sir David Murray of Gos- pertie, Knight, his Majesty's Comptroller, his uncle, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to Robert Murray his uncle, and the heirs-male of his body ; which failing, to David Murray of Balgonie, his father's cousin-'german, son of William Murray of Letterbanachy ; and failing his heirs-male, to another cousin-german of his father's, Mr WiUiam Murray of Airdeth. This charter'bears date the 8th of May 1604 (c). This gentleman was heir apparent to the Vis- count of Stormont, both in his estate and title of honour. He married Margaret, daughter of Sir William Monteith of Carse, by Dame Helen Bruce, his wife, of the House of Airth : But he died without issue in the month of September in the year 1624, so that his estate devolved to his uncle, David Viscount of Stor- mont, who was served and retoured heir-male to his nephew some short time there- after. Sir David Murray, the first Viscount of Stormont, was, from, his youth, bred at the Court of King James VI. He was first made Cup-bearer to his Majesty, in which employment he soon rendered himself very gracious to his master, inso- much, that in a few years he was preferred to be Master of the Horse, and Captain of the Guard, and being knighted, was made Comptroller of the Royal Revenue in the 1599, upon the removal of Sir David Home of Wedderburn from the of- fice (d). In this station he served his majesty with great diligence, fideHty, assi- duity, and apphcation. He had the honour to be attending on his majesty from the palace of Falkland to the town of Perth, on the memorable 5th of August i6oo, when the Earl of Gowrie and his brother Mr Ruthven, by an unparalleled attempt, thought to have embrued their hands in the sacred blood of the king : This wicked design was, by a happy providence defeated, just when it was upon the very point of being executed. In his majesty's happy preservation Sir David Murray, the Comptroller, was highly instrumental. At the same time he did the court a piece of exceeding acceptable service ; for when the town of Perth were all in an uproar and tumult upon the kiUing of the Earl of Gowrie, who was their Provost, he had the chief hand with his friends in composing the citizens, in quelling the tumult, and carrying ^the king and the court safe back to Falk- land (f). (a) Charta penes Viceconiitem de Stormont, ac etiam in publicis arcliivis. (b) Ibidem, (c) Ibidem, ad annum 1604. (ance, in the quality of lieutenant-general ; as also the honour he " hath not only done to his private family, but his country in general, by his " glorious actions performed among foreign nations, both in peace and war, with " equal valour and success, upon the public theatre of France, Italy, Germany, •' and the Netherlands, and likewise the loyalty and constancy with which he " hath always adhered to us, and with what zeal and readiness he ever stood affect- " ed toward the serving of our cause ; and therefore raises him to the honour and " dignity of Lord Rutberfurd, and to his heirs and assignees whatsomever, and " that under wlwt provisions, restrictions, and conditions, the said Lord Ruther- " furd shall think fit." The patent is dated at Whitehall the loth January 1661. General Rutherford was made Governor of Dunkirk, which he enjoyed till it was sold to France; upon that he v^'as raised to the honour of Earl of Teviot, by let- (c) First Vol. Nisbet's Hist, {h) Chaita in rcgistro. (c) Charta in registro. appendix:. 2ir rers patent, bearing date the 2d of February 1662 Qi), and the honour is limited to the heirs-male of his own body. Soon after that he was made Governor of Tan- gier, where he died on the 4th of May 1664. The Earl, leaving no issue of his own before he went over to Tangier, made his latter will and testament, dated at Portsmouth the 29th of December 1663(1^), wherein he conveyed his estate and dig- nity of Lord Rutherford to Sir Thomas Rutherford of Hunthill, a very remote re- lation, merely on account of the name, who accordingly enjoyed the honours of Lord Rutherford, as did also liis two brothers. Lord Archibald and Robert, in course of succession; and all of them having not only died without lawful issue, (upon which the heirs-male of the famdy of Hunthill became entirely extinct) but also having incurred the irritancies contained in the Earl's disposition of the honours in their favour, the said honour, title, and dignity, of Lord Rutherfurd, in conse- sequence of the above-incurred irritancies, legally devolved on John Durie of Grange, the Earl's grand-nephew, and heir of line and provision, served and retour- ed 167 1, and are accordingly possessed by his son, George, the present Lord Rutherford, served and retoured heir of line, tailzie, and provision, to that noble Earl in his title and dignity of Lord Rutherford, in 1733. George Lord Rutherford married Mrs Margaret Ogilvie, only child of Captain David Ogilvie of the Scots Guards, by whom he has issue, David, Master of Rutherford, and a daughter. Agatha. Of the ancient and honourable family of CAMPBELL of Glenorchy, NOW DIGNIFIED WITH THE TITLE OF EaRL OF BREAD ALBANE. THIS noble family derives it original from Sir Colin Campbell of Glenorchy, second son of Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochow, ("ancestor to the Duke of Argyle) by the Lady Marjory Stewart his wife, daughter of Robert Duke of Albany, Earl of Fife and Monteith (c), second lawful son of Robert II. King of Scotland, and Governor of the Kingdom during the reign of King Robert III. his brother, and the minority of King James I. his nephew. Sir Colin was provided by his father to the barony of Glenorchy ; which estate he enlarged by several considerable acquisitions of his own, confirmed to him by grants from the king. Upon his father's death he became tutor-in-Iaw and guardian to his nephews, the sons of his eldest brother; which office he executed with great fidelity. To Colin, the eldest, afterwards created Earl of Argyle, he procured in marriage Dame Isabel Stew- art, his lady's second sister,and one of the daughters and co-heirsof John Lord Lorn ; and Dame Mariota Stewart, the third of these co-heirs, to Archibald Campbell, ano- ther nephev/of his, from whom the old branchof the Campbells of Otter are descend- ed ((f). After the execrable and unnatural murder of that excellent prince King James I. Sir Colin Campbell of Glenorchy, who had the honour to stand nearly related to him in blood, was very active and diligent in searching for and pursuing ths regi- cides, and was so successful in this undertaking, that he very soon apprehended and brought to justice two of the most notorious of the assassins, Christopher Col- quhoun and Robert Chalmer, who had been drawn into that hellish conspiracy (/?) In the registers of Parliament. (i) Extract of the latter will and test.raient of the Earloi^ Teviot, Lord Rutherford, out of the register of the prerogative court of Canterbury, dated 29th of De- cember i66j. (c) For instructing this descent there is a charter granted by Robert Duke of Albany, liilecto filio suo Duncano Campbell de Lochow, militi, of the lands of Minstry, on his own resigna- tion, penes ducem de Argyle, in the foundation-charter of the collegiate church of Kilniun, by Sir Duncan Campbell the knight of Lochow, anno 1445, Colinus Campbell de Glenorchy, filius meus, is a Tlie charter is in the register. (t baronet of the family. 'Ihad, Jean, married to Duncan Stewart of Appin, by whom he had only one da; gtlier, Margaret, married to Ale.\ander Campbell of Loclmell, by whom she was mother to Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochnell. Fourth, IsABELL, married to Robert Irvine of Fedderet, son to Sir Alexander Ir- vine of Drum, by whom he had two daughters, his heirs ; the one was married to Gordon of Gight, and the other to Thomas Fiaser of Strichen. Fifth, JuLiANE, married to John M'Lean of Lochbowie. Sixth, to Robertson of Lude. to Robertson of Fascalkie. to Toshach of Monivand. ta Campbell of Glenlyon. Sir John Campbell of Glenorchy, the fourth baronet in this lionourablo family, wai a gentleman of good parts, and great honour and integrity, which gained him universal esteem. He married Lady Mary Graham, daughter of William Earl ot Monteith, Strathern, and Airth, Lord Justice-General in the reign of King Cliarles I. by Agnes his wife, daughter to Patrick Lord Gray ; and by the said Lady Mary he had issue one son, John, who was afterwards created Earl of Breadalbane; and a daughter, who was married to Sir Alexander Menzies of Weem, Baronet. After the death of his fir^i lady he married Christian, daughter of John Mushet of Craighead in Mon- teith, by whom he had several daughters, of whom are descended Archibald Campbell of StonenelJ, present Sherifl" of Argyle, the family of M'Naaghtan of that iik. Campbell of Aiids, Campbell of Ardchattan, and several others. Isir John Campbell, the fifth baronet in the tamily of Glenorchy, having, dur- ing the times of the usurpation, testified his duty and lojalty to his exiled sove- reign King Charles II. by his counsel, and the assistance he gave to the forces that appeared for his majesty in the Highlands, under the command of Lieutenant Ge- neral Middleton, as well as by using his utmost endeavours with General Monk, to declare for a free Parliament, which was judged the most effectual way tor re- storing the king ; he was for these services, and other considerations, taken into the king's favour and confidence. He served in Parliament as representative of the shire of Argyle, in which he zealously concurred with other royalists in re- scinding tiie acts, that had been made during the war, limiting the royal preroga- tive, and restoring things to the same state they were in before the king's affairs were embarrassed. Sir John Campbell was a man of great penetration and judgment; he acquired from the Earl nf Caithness the whol'C estate of the earldom of Caithness ; an.i that earl likewise resigned his honours in the king's hands, in favour of Sir John Campbell after his own death ; accordingly, upon his demise, Sir John was created Earl nf Caithness, by letters patent under the Great Seal, granted to him and his heirs-male, 28th June 1677 («) ; which title, in the year 1681, he exchanged, by his n'ajesty's appr(>bation, for that of Earl of Breadalbane, taken from his paternal estate (b). His Lordship was m great favour with King James VII. one of his Privy Council, and a faithful adherent to his interest while any hopes of serving him remained : But these views being disappointed by the revolution, and he, out of aifection to his country, desirous to have the peace ot it settled, he submitted to the nei*' goveriiment, and undertook to use his endea- vours to prevail with the heads ni' the clans to lay down their arms. This gave a handle to his enemies to chalknge his conduct, and even to arraign him in the Parliament 1695 ; but the bare laying open his transactions defeated rheir designs, and sufficiently vindicated his maiia'rement fr-mi all the aspersions and calunmies injuriously tb own out against it, and most unjustly defend-.-d by Bishop Buinet, who, as he l.aJ no opportunity of co nin? at the truth of this matter, was never very anxiou^ 11 discovering it, when it did not serve his turn. But as this is not a proper place to enlarge on things of this nature, it shall be no farther insisteii iIl^ («) Charta in canccUarla. (.h) Ibidem ad annum 1681. Vol. XL 6 Q^ 2i8 APPENDIX. though it can be evidenced to conviction; and King William was so sensible of the injustice done to the Earl, that he resented the hard usage he met with from his ministry. His Lordship was a sincere lover of his country, and his zeal for the ho- hour and independency of it, which he conceived greatly prejudged by the treaty of Union, induced him to act in concert with those wiio were in arms in 1715 ; but, by reason of his advanced age, and the firm adherence of his son the Lord Glenorchy, now Earl of Breadalbane, to the government, he was not included in the attainder which was pronounced against the other noblemen and gentlemen, who were embarked in that unfortunate design. His lordship married first the Lady Mary Rich, daughter of the noble and va- liant Henry Earl of Holland in England, by his Lady Elizabeth, daughter and heir of Sir Walter Cope of Kensington. This Henry was son of Robert Earl of Warwick, by the Lady Penelope his wife, daughter of Walter Earl of Essex, who was ambassador and plenipotentiary in the treaty of marriage between King Cliarles L and Henrietta Maria, daughter of Henry IV. of France. He was Cap- tain of the Guard, Groom of the Stole, General of the Horse, in the first expedi- tion to Scotland in the 1639, and Knight of the Most Noble Order of the Garter. He suflered for his loyalty with the Duke of Hamilton, by the same pretended court of justice that had proceeded against the king in the 1649. By Elizabeth Countess of Holland, daughter and heir of Sir Walter Cope of Kensington, he had Robert Earl of Warwick and Holland; and, besides the Earl of Breadalbane's lady, he had three other daughters, the Lady Frances, who was married to WiUiam Lord Paget, Lady Isabella to Sir James Thynne of Longleate, ancestor to the pre- sent Viscount of Weymouth, and Lady Susan to James Earl of Suffolk : By the above Lady Mary P.ich the Earl of Breadalbane had two sons, Duncan, who died unmarried; and John Lord Glenorchy, who succeeded him in his honours and estate. After her death he married Lady Mary Campbell, daughter of Archibald Marquis of Argyle, Countess Dowager of Caithness ; by whom he had a son Mr Colin Campbell, who died unmarried. He had likewise a daughter, Lady Mary, who was married to Archibald Cockburn of Lanton, who has left by her two sons and a daughter. The eldest of which sons is the present Sir Alex- ander Cockburn, Baronet. John, the second Earl of Breadalbane, is Lord Lieutenant of the county of Perth, and one of the sixteen peers who represent Scotland in the British Parliament. His Lordship married first the Lady Frances Cavendish, the eldest daughter, and one of the co-heirs of Henry Duke of Newcastle, by which he became allied to many great and noble families in England ; for the Duke had another daughter married to the Earl of Thanet, another to the Earl of Clare, created Duke of Newcastle, a third married to the Duke of Albemarle, a fourth to the Earl of Sunderland, who was Secretary of State in the reign of Queen Anne, to whom she had a daughter, Countess of Carlisle ; but the Lady Frances Cavendish died with- out any surviving issue. His Lordship married a second lady, Henrietta, daughter of Sir Edward Villiers, knight, fourth son of Edward Viscount of Grandison, who was brother to George the great Duke of Buckingham, the favourite of two succeeding monarchs, (James VL and Chales L) Her sisters, who were all nobly married, Barbara to John Viscount Fitzharding, Anne to William Earl of Portland, Elizabeth to George Earl of Orkney, Mary to William Earl of Inchiquin, and Katharine first to the Marquis de Pizzare, a French gentleman, and afterwards to William Villiers, Esq. a relation of her own. The Lady Frances Villiers, wife of Sir Edward Vil- liers, was dau,a;hter of Theophilus Howard Earl of Suffolk, by the Lady Elizabeth Hume, his wife, daughter and co-heir of George Earl of Dunbar, Lord High Trea- surer of Scotland in the reign of King James VL Sir Edward Villiers was, by King William, created Earl of Jersey. By Henrietta Countess of Breadalbane the Earl has had issue, 1st, John Lord Glenorchy, his only son and heir apparent; and two daugh- ters. Lady Charlotte Campbell, a young lady of great beauty and extraordinary accomplishments, who died unmarried universally lamented ; and APPENDIX. 219 Lady Henrietta Campbell, who, in 1736, was appointed one of the Ladies of the Bed-chamber to their Royal Highnesses the Princesses Ameha and Carolina ; in which honourable station her ladyship still continues. John, Lord Glenorchy, son and apparent heir of the said John Earl of Breadal- bane, in the year 171 8 was made Master of the Horse to the Princess Royal of Great Britain: and in the 1720 sent Envoy Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the King of Denmark : In which honourable office he continued till the death of his Danish majesty in 1730. In 1725 his Lordship was created one of the Knights of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath, upon the revival of that order, which has been long in desuetude. In the 1727 his Lordship was elected member of Parliament for the borough of Saltash, in the county of Cornwall; which place he still represents. His Lordship, in 171 8, married the laiy Amabell de Grey, eldest daughter of Henry Duke of Kent, by Jemima his lady, daughter of the Lord Crew ; by whom he had one son, Henry, who died in his infancy, and one daughter called Jemima ; who, by the death of her grandfather, the Duke of Kent, ni the year 1740, succeeded to his Grace's estate, and to his title of Marquis Grey, as likewise to ths barony of Lucas of Crudwell. Her Ladyship is married to the honourable Philip Yorke, eldest son and heir apparent of the Right Honourable Philip Lord Hardwicke, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain. His Lordship afterwards, in i 730, married Mistress Arabella Pershal), grand-daughter and heiress of Sir Thomas Pershall of Sugnall, in the county of Stafford, Baronet, a very ancient and honourable family ; by which marriage his Lordship now enjoys a considerable estate in that county ; and by the lady he has two sons, George, Master of Glenorchy, and John Campbell, Esq. The armorial achievement of the noble family of Breadalbane is blazoned on the 31st page of the First Volume of this System. SHANK OF THAT Ilk. SHANK of that Ilk was a very ancient family in Mid-Lothian, where, to this day, it gives name to a plentiful fortune. Murdoch Shank, who was an immediate son of Shank of that Ilk, settled in Kinghorn in Fife, and got lands there in the reign of Robert Bruce, arino 1319- By a charter of confirmation (^anno 1360) of the mortification of a chapel and hospital in Kinghorn, the lands of Robert Shank are mentioned as part of the boundaries of said chapel and hospital ; the bounding clause of the charter is as follows ; " Nee non dare, concedere, et hac piKsenti carta mea confirmare, et in " contemplatione, et intuitu pro perpetuo, Deo et gloriosissima; A'lariie Virgini, " et Sancto Jacobo, et omnibus Sanctis, in supplementum sustentationis miserabi- " liuni personarum, et pauperum in dicta hospitali comniorantium, at pauperum " in ea. casta fide ; tres missas celebrari in perpetaum, pro salute animarum patris " msi et matris meas, et anrecessorum et successorum meorum, fundum et terram " super quibus diet, capella et hospitalis aedificat. erant in omnibus boundis suis, " viz. fiuinen maris ex parte australi, et terras Roberti Schank, ex parte occiden- " tali ei boreali, et terras meas propria'> ex parte orientali." The account of that family settled ,n Fife is as foUoweth : Robert Shank was married to Isabel Irvine, who had a son by her, John Shank, married to Kirkaldy ; who had a son by her, Henry Shank, married to Christian Melville, daughter to the Laird of 3 220 APPENDIX. Raith, infeft and seised in the year 1442 ; who by her had a son, Martin Shank, manied to Alison Boswell, daughter to Glassmont Boswell, in the year 1482 ; who by her had a son, Martin Shank, married to Bessie Lochore, and infeft anno 1520 ; who had by her a son, Henry, married to Bessie Balfour, daughter to John Balfour of Ballovv, in the year 1565; who had by her a son, Henry Shank, married to Janet Cunningham, daughter to Robert Cunningham of Woodlield, in the year 1609; who by her had a son, Martin Shank, married to Christian Reedie, daughter to John Reedie, shipmaster in Burntisland, anno 1640 ; who by her had a son, Henry Shank, married to Agnes Balfour, daughter to Alexander Balfour in Bal- garvie, anno 1669, who by her had two sons, Martin and Alexander; Martin mar- ried to Margaret Downie, daughter to Thomas Downie, merchant in Edinburgh ; who by her had a son, Alexander, who is presently possessed of the lands mentioned in the fore-cited charter, and is married to Mary Burnet, daughter to Mr Jonn Burnet, late minister at Monymusk in Aberdeenshire, of the ancient and honour- able famdy of Leys Burnet. This gentleman bears the same arms that the ancient family of Shajik of that Ilk bore, which by Sir David Lindsay his Manuscript Heraldry is gules, on a fesse urgent, a hawk's lure of the first, betwixt a cinquefoil in chief, and a falcon's leg or shank, chased and belled in base, of the second, with helmet and mantling suit- able ; on a wreath of colours is set, for his crest, an eagle, in a rising posture, of the field : motto, on an escrol above, the word Spero. Alexander Shank., Esq. takes the designation of Castlerig, that being the name of those lands in Fife which belonged to his ancestors. GORDON OF GORDONBANK. JAMES GORDON of Gordonbank, in the sheriffdom of Berwick, eldest lawful .ion of James Gordon of Newtack, was second son of John Gordon of Avachie, who was a cadet of Gordon of Straloch, now of Pitlurg, in the shire of Aberdeen, bears azure, on a cheveron betwixt three boars' heads couped or, a hand grasping a sheaf of arrows, proper, all within a bordure of the second, charged with eight crescents, gules ; crest, a dexter hand issuing out of a cloud, grasping a sheaf of arrows paleways, all proper : niotto, Legibiu IS annis. OGILVIE OF Barras in the shire of Kincardine. THE ancient progenitors of this family were heritors of the lands of Balnagarro in Angus, and the first of them seems to have been a son of Ogilvie, who first purchased the lands of Innerquharity, by a charter of confirmation, dated at Tam- tallan the 8th October 1455, granted by George Earl of Angus, Lord of Liddisdale and Jedworth Forest, confirming a charter granted by Alexander Lord Ogilvie of Auchterhouse, and Sheriff of Angus, with consent of Walter Ogilvie his brother, TO their cousin Andrew Ogilvie, brother-german to John Ogilvie of Innerquharity, of the lands of Balnagarro and Chapelton, with the pertinents, lying within the regality of Kirrymuir, and sheriftdom of Forfar, dated at Auchterhouse the penult day of August 1455. The lands now belong to Sir John Ogilvie of Innerquharity, and these charters are in his custody. This Andrew seems to have been cousin- gennaii to the Lord Aiichterhousc, and to tlie foresaid Walter Ogilvie, who was the first Lord High Treasurer of Scotland. See Crawfurd's Oilicers of State, page 537- , And indeed they appear to have been a long time inheritors of that place : However, Williuin Ogilvie, second son to the last Laird of Balnagarro of that race, whose mother was the only daughter and child of Ogilvie of Kallouv, who was son to the first Lord Ogilvie ; I say, this William Ogilvie married Katharine Strachan, daughter to Strachan of Bridgeton in Angus, and niece to Strachan of Thornton in Merns, and his eldest brother being dead, William came to the Merns with Margaret, daughter to the Lord Ogilvie, who was married to the Earl Marischal, to whom he was a near relation by his mother, and brought the re- mains of the price of the estate of Balnagarro, which his father sold, and laid ii in the Earl Marischal's hand, for which the Earl gave him a wadset-right upon the lands of Lumgair, about L. 50 Sterling of yearly rent. George Ogilvie, his only son, married Elizabeth, daughter to Mr John Douglas of Barras, by Jean, daughter to Eraser of Dores. This Mr John was fourth law- ful son to William the tenth Earl of Angus, and third of that name, by Giles, a daughter of Sir Robert Graham of Morphy, the said Earl's other three sons being Wdliam his heir, Sir Robert of Glenbervie in the Merns, and Mr Gavin of Bridgeford, ancestor to the present heiresses thereof. The foresaid Earl was son of Su' Archibald Douglas of - Glenbervie, and Agnes, daughter to Robert Lord Keith, eldest son to William the second Earl Marischal, grandchild to Sir Wil- liam Douglas of Braidwood, and Elizabeth, sole heiress of Sir James Auchinleck ol ^iknbervie, and great-grandchild to Archibald the sixth Earl of Angus, and first of that name, who was Chancellor of Scotland, and commonly called Archi- hiild Bell the Cat, and Elizabeth, daughter to Robert Lord Boyd. George's con- tract of maniage is in the custody of Sir William, his great-grandchild, and bears date the last day of January 1634. He purchased the lands of Barras from the eldest son and heir of Sir John Douglas, his brother-in-law, at the earnest desire of Mr Douglas's nearest relations, as appears by a writ under their hands, in Sir William's custody. ■V^iLLiAM Earl Marischal, in the time of the usurpation, being by King Charles IL and Committee of Estates intrusted with the care and keeping of the house and castle of Djnotter, in which were lodged, among other valuable things, the ancient monuments of the kingdom of Scotland, viz. the crown, sword, and sceptre, he looked out for a man of fidelity, loyalty, and courage, to be governor and lieutenant of that fort, and pitched upon George, afterwards Sir George Ogilvie of Barras, as a person having these qualifications, (in which neither he nor his prince were deceived), wherefore he gave him a commission for that elVect, which bears date at Stirling the 8th day of July 1651, and which is subjoined to this memorial. No. i. In the executing of which commission he showed to the world that his fidelity and loyalty were impregnable, and his courage undaunted ; for he looked with great disdain and contempt upon the threatcnings, and large and fair promises of the rebels, and kept out that castle as long as it was in his power, and after all the other castles in the kingdom were given up to the Usurper's army, as is evident from two letters, and a summons by the commanders in chief of the enemy's army, and the governor's answer to these letters, all subjoined, No. id, 3d, 4th and 5th. The reason that the governor said in his answer. No. 4th, that he had his commission from the king and none else, probably was for the safety of the Earl Marischal's person, and preservation of his houses; yet after perusing the letters subjoined. No. jtii, 8th, 9th and loth, he might be allowed to s.iy, that although he had his commission first from the Earl Marischal, (who was then prisoner to the rebels) he then had it from his majesty. The governor at last would not surrender the castle (even when he was not able to hold it out) but upon honourable terms, which were made betwixt him and Colonel Thomas Mor- gan, who, with a considerable body of the Usurper's army, lay at the Black Hill of Dunotter bombarding and cannonading the castle, by order of General Richard Dear. Vol. n. 6 R ;;: APPENDIX. Among tlie capitulations betwixt tlie governor and Colonel Morgan, dated the 26th Mav 1652, there was one, which would appear inconsistent with the governor's character, to wit, that he should deliver up to the colonel the above-mentioned ho- nours of Scotland, if in the castle; and, if not, to give a good account of them. Now, for the vindication of that gentleman's character, it will be necessary to give a short genuine account, what was become of these ancient monuments, and liow by a good providence they were kept out of the hands of the rebels in the time of the usurpation, and, after the restoration, delivered safe and entire to his Ma- jesty King Charles II.; in which account there shall be nothing insert but what is sufficiently documented by the original papers subjoined. Captain George Ogilvie of Barras, being governor of the castle of Dunotter, us is said, did carefully preserve the foresaid regalia, some papers belonging to his majesty, the registers of the church of Scotland, James 1. Duke of Hamilton's papers, and the monuments of the University of St Andrews, and did faithfully restore them all to the ri'ght owners, or others having their commission, as appears by the Earl Marischal's receipt for the king's papers, subjoined No. 6th. Alexan- der Lord Balcarras, his receipt for the church registers, in virtue of a power from the commission of the kirk, a letter from Anne Dutchess of Hamilton to the go- vernor, and her servant's receipt, and a letter frorn the University of St Andrews, and their servants receipt ; all which are registered in the register of probative writs, at Edinburgh the 6th of March 1701. The king's papers were, before the surrender of the castle, packed and sewed up in a girdle of linen by the, governor's lady, and the same put about the middle of Anne Lindsav, her relation, afterwards wife to Doctor Willocks, minister at Kem- noe in Aberdeenshire, and after that manner conveyed out of the castle, and saved from the enemy. As to the regalia, the governor and his lady preserved them with extraordinary care while in the castle; but at last, seeing a powerful army at the gates every day bombarding the fortress, and having little or no hopes of relief, notwithstand- mg the king had their comfortless circumstances much at heart, as appears by a letter from his majesty, written with his own hand, under Lieutenant-Geneial Middleton's cover, delivered to the governor by Sir John Strachan, both w^hich letters are subjoined. No. 7th and Sth: They consulted betwixt themselves how to pre- serve these ancient and royal monuments, in the event that through want of assistance the castle should be either taken or surrendered. About which time the Lord Bal- carras wrote the governor to deliver the honours to Sir Arthur Forbes, ancestor to the Earl of Granard in Ireland; and the Earl of Loudon, Chancellor, wrote him likewise to get the honours transported to some remote and strong castle in the Highlands, conform to their letters registrate in the register of probative writs, at Edinburgh the 6th of March 1701, and hereto subjoined. No. 9th and loth. But the governor not having the trust from these lords, and fearing, that, in the way they proposed to carry off the honours, they might fall into the enemy's hands, the governor and his lady contrived and made up a letter, as if from the honour- able Mr John Keith, the Earl Marischal's brother, and afterwards Earl of Kintore, (who was then abroad) directed to the governor, and bearing, that he was safely arrived at Rotterdam, with the crown, sword, and sceptre of Scotland, to be delivered to his Majesty King Charles 11. ; which letter, if the castle was either taken or sur- rendered, was to be dropped, in order to fall into the enemy's hands; and the go- vernor and his lady agreed that the regalia should be conveyed out of the castle to some private and secure place, of which place he was not to know for some time, for fear, that in case he fell into the hands uf the rebels, he might by torture be obliged to divulge the place : And the way that the governor's lady fell upon to transport the regalia was, to cause Christian Fletcher, spouse to Mr James Grainger, minister at Kinnessc, go to Stonehive, the next burgh, and buy a quantity of flax, which being put on her servant's back, she and her servant came through the ene- my's camp just before the siege, telling, she wanted to go into the castle to speak to ihe governor's lady, which they permitted, and promised her and her servant a safe regress ; which happening, the governor's lady (without the knowledge of her hu band) packed up the crown, sword, and sceptre, in the burden of flax, that Mrs Grainger's servant maid had carrying upon her back, and so dismissed them, with APPENDIX. >2.t orders to cause liiJe iho icg.ilKi under ground, ia the kirk of Kiancsse, but to l;;kj special care that they shoukl be well wrapped up in clean linen, and the same frequently renewed, because it could not last long under ground ; the value ct which linen, and all otlier charges anent preserving of tiic regalia, with a suitable reward for pains, was paid by the governor to Mr Grainger and his wife. This was a very great trust by the governor's lady to Mrs Grainger, and most faith- fully executed by that worthy gentlewoman, and her worthy and reverend husband the minister of Kinnesse ; within which parish the governor had an estate, and hi.s manor-house, whereby his lady had good opportunity to know that the minister and his wife were persons deserving of trust, otherwise, let the event be what it will, she could not have answered to have given them such a trust. Soon after, the governor was necessitated to surrender the castle to the Usurper's army, as is said, wlio looked upon their getting into their custody the honours of our ancient kingdom, a much greater advantage than the possession of tliac house, and, upon their disappointment, would of consequence be much chagrined. Short time after the surrender of the castle the above letter fell into the enemy'.^ hands, which was tliought would contribute to the preservation of tlie royal me- nu.nents, and to the peace and safety of the governor, his lady, and family. But when the Usurper's officers had searched tlie castle, and did not find the re- galia, they were much more out of humour than before they had got the possession of that fortress ; and so it appeared by their treatment of the governor and his lady, which was the cause of the death of the last. They required the governor, upon his word of honour, to perform that article of capitulation, at the surrender, of delivering up the regalia, or to give a good ac- count of the same ; and he, without breach of honour, told, that he did not know where they were, but had seen a letter, bearing, they were carried abroad to his Majesty King Charles II. to which they gave no credit. Thereafter they exa- mined his lady, who asserted they were carried abroad to the king, to which thcv gave as little trust; so their next course was, at one time, to threaten the governor and his lady with torture, and, at another time, to promise them large rewards; to give an account of the honours ; neither of which were prevailing arguments with tuch loyal and worthy persons. After which the governor's estate was sequestrated, and he and his lady both confined prisoners to a room in the castle for the space of a whole year ; during which time they v.-ere not allowed the use of a servant, but treated with the hardest usage, until the loth of January 1653, that Sir Robert Graham of Worphy gave a , bond to present the said Captain George Ogilvie and his lady, true prisoners to the then governor of Dunotter, when called for, under the failzie of L. 2000 Sterling, by which they were obliged not to go above three miles from their own house: At last, upon James Anderson of Uras giving a bond for L. 502 Sterling more, tiiey were allowed six \''eeks to go about their lawful business; the governor, after his lady had told him that she had trusted the honours to Mr Grainger and hi^ wife, it seems, became suspicious, and wrote a letter to Mr Grainger, which oc- casioned the honest minister, in vindication of his fidelity, to write the answer sub- joined, No. nth. And according to it the governor came and took home with him the sceptre; but, it seems, gave a receipt for the whole, and took Mr Grainger's obligation to to deliver the crown and sword upon demand, which is subjoined No, 12th. Whether the minister was afraid to be baulked of his reward, or if any other was insisting to have these jewels, to whom he might produce the governor's re- ceipt, is unknown. After the Restoration he sent up his son, the late Sir William Ogilvie of Bar- ras, to London, to get his majesty's directions what to do with the regalia, who gave in to his majesty a petition to that effect, and was ordained to deliver them to the Earl Marischal of Scotland; which petition and deliverance are subjoined No. 13th. How* soon this order came to Captain George Ogilvie, the late go- vernor's hands, he delivered up the regalia, to wit, crown, sword, and sceptre, to William Earl Marischal, entire, complete, and in the same condition that he had received them from his Lordship, conform to the Earl's holograph receipt subjoined No. 14th. 124 APPENDIX. As Captain George Ogilvie and his lady had acted a very dutiful and loyal part in preserving of the honours, for about the space of eight years, and thereby suf- fered not only great hardships in their persons, but also a great loss of their means, they were not altogether left unrewarded by his majesty, who, by patent dated 5th March 1661, made Captain George Ogilvie a knight baronet, and gave warrant to the Lord Lyon to matriculate his coat of arms in the Lyon Register, conform to the blazon underwritten: In which, for his signal service to the king and country, he is allowed to bear a crowned thistle, the royal badge of Scotland, and got for his motto, Praclarum regi Si" regno servitium. His armorial bearing is blazoned thus, argent, a lion passant gnrdant gules, crowned with an imperial crown, and gorged with an open one, both proper, holding in his dexter paw a sword, proper, defending a thistle vert, (in the dexter chief) ensigned with a crown or, with the badge of knight baronet, by way of canton in the sinister chief; crest, a demi-man armed at all points, proper, holding forth his right hand; and on an escrol the foresaid motto. His majesty likewise, by a charter dated 3d March 1662, granted by him in favour of the said Sir George Ogilvie upon the lands of Barras, changed the holding of the said lands from ward to blench; which charter is ratified in Parlia- ment the nth of August 1679, in which patent, charter, and ratification. Sir George's services above-mentioned are specified as the onerous causes; to whom succeeded his only child, Sir William Ogilvie, v.ho was three times married ; first, to Margaret, daughter to Forbes of Leslie, and relict to Turing of Foveran, both in the shire of Aber- deen ; secondly, to Marjory, daughter to Rait of Halgreen, by whom he had one daughter, Margaret, married to Ogilvie of Pilmuir; thirdly, to Isabel, daughter to Sir John Ogilvie of Innerquharity, baronet, by whom he had David, his heir, Mr William, Helen, and Jean Ogilvies: Mr William married Mary, daughter and heiress of Gordon of Braichly, and relict of Mr Isaac FuUarton, advocate, by whom he has one daughter, named Margaret; Helen married Lindsay of Pitscandly; and Jean was Lady Carsbank. Sir David Ogilvie was three times married; first, to Susanna, daughter to Scott of Benholm, by whom he had the present Sir William, and a daughter named Katharine, married to Hercules Taylor, younger of Burrowfield, in Angus; se- condly, to Jean, daughter to George Ross of Clochan of Aberdeen, merchant, by whom he had three daughters, Isabel, Elizabeth, married to Peter Anderson of Bourtie in Aberdeen, there, and Mary; thirdly, to Anne, daughter and co-heiress to Mr John Guthrie of Westhall, a cadet of Guthrie of that Ilk, by whom he had five children, David, James, Anne, Margaret, and Susanna. His eldest son and heir. Sir William Ogilvie, has been twice married ; first, to Elizabeth, daughter to Barclay of Urie, by whom he had two sons, David and John ; and his present lady is Anna, daughter to the above Mr Isaac Fullarton, by whom he has akeady three daughters, Mary, Susanna, and IsabeL No. I. Commission William Earl Mariscral to George Ogllvie of Barras, to be Governor of Dunotter Castle. Forasmuch as the King's Majesty and Committee of Estates have entrusted the care and keeping of the house and castle of Dunotter to us William Earl Marischal, and have allowed forty men, a lieutenant, and two Serjeants, to be entertained within it, upon the public charge; therefore, we do hereby nominate George Ogil- vie of Barras to be our lieutenant for keeping of the said house, and gives unto him the sole and full power of the command thereof, and of the men that are to be entertained therein for keeping thereof, under us, with power to him to bruik, en- joy, and exerce the said place, with all fees, dues, and allowances belonging thereto, APPENDIX. 225 as fully, in all respects, as any other lieutenant in such a case may do. In witness whereof, we have subscribed thir presents at Stirhng the 8tli July 1751. Marischall. Archibald Primrose, witness. William Keith, witness. Alexander Lindsay, witness. No. 2. Overton's Letter to the Governor. Gentlemen, I HAVE power to demolish your own, and the remainder of my Lord Marischall's houses in thir parts, except you timeously prevent the same, by giving up the castle of Dunnottar to the use of the state of England, upon such terms as other gentlemen of honour have heretofore (when the forces of this nation were more significant) accepted. You may observe this season, which the most significant persons of your nation close with, by putting their persons and estates under our protection: You may likewise consider how imprudent, at least improvident, a part It may be reputed in a time of pacification, for your arms to be the only an- tagonists to an army, whose arms God Almiglity hath hitherto made successful against your most considerable citadel ; I dare not promise you the hke oppor- tunity for good terms in future to come off upon, as is ready upon speedy capitula- tion at present to perform, who rests. Your humble servant, R. Overton. Stonhyve, Novem. %th 1651. Directed, To the Honourable Governor of Dunnottar Castle, and to the rest of the Gentlemen there. No. 3. Button's Letter to the Governor. Honoured Sir, Whereas you keep Dunnottar Castle for the use of your king ; which castle doth belong to the Lord Marischall, who is now prisoner to our Parliament of England ; these are to advise and require you, in their names, to surrender the said castle to me for their use ; and I do assure you, by the word of a gentleman, that you shall have very honourable and soldier-like conditions : If you refuse this offer, then, if any thing shall happen to you, contrary to your expectations, by the violence of our soldiers, blame yourself and not me; for I may tell you, that the Lord hath been pleased to dehver unto us many stronger places by storm than that is, since our unhappy difference hath been, and I doubt not but the same God will stand by us in our attempts in this. I desire your speedy answer, and shall rest, Sir, Y'our very humble servant, Tiio. Dutton.. Stonhyve, Novem. nth 1651. Directed thus, For the Commander in Chief of Dunnottar Castle, these No. 4. The Governor's Letter to Dutton, in answer to the above two Letters. Honoured Sir, Whereas you \m I'e that I keep the Castle of Dunnottar for the use of the king's majesty, which house, as you say, doth belong to the Earl Marischall, you Vol. n. 6 S 226 APPENDIX. shall know that I have my comtnission absolutely from his majesty, and none else ; neither will I acknowledge any man's interest here, and intends, by the assistance of God, to maintain the same for his majesty's service upon all hazard whatsom- ever. I hope you have that much gallantry in you as not to wrong my Lord Marischall his lands, seeing he is a prisoner himself for the present : Whereas you have had success in former times, I attribute it to the wrath of God against us for our sins, and to the unfaithfulness of those men who did maintain the same, none whereof you shall find here, by the Lord's grace, to whom I commit myself. And am. Sir, Your very humble servant, George Ogilvie. Dunnottar, Nov. 22. 1651. No. 5. Lambert's Summons to the Governor. Sir, Being desirous to avoid the effusion of blood, and the destroying of the country, r have thought fit to send you this summons to surrender up the castle, with the provisions of war thereto belonging, in my hands, for the use of the Parliament of the commonwealth of England. If you shall hearken hereto with speed you shall have conditions for yourself, and the soldiers under your command, as may befit a roan of honour, and one in your condition. I expect your speedy answer. And am. Sir, Your servant, Lambert. Dundee, "Jan. 3d 1652. Directed, For the Governor of Dunnottar Castle. NTo. 6. Receipt Karl Marischal to the Governor of Dunotter, for the King's Papers. We William Earl Marischal grants us to have received from George Ogilvie, sometime governor of Dunnottar, some papers belonging to the king's majesty, which were in the Castle of Dunnottar the time of his being governor there, in two little coffers ; which papers, consisting to the number of eight score sixteen several pieces, whereof there are four packets sealed, and one broke open : Of which papers I grant the receipt, and obliges me to warrant the said George at his majesty's hands, and all others whatsomever, by this my warrant, signed, sealed, and subscribed at London the first day of December 1655. Marischall. No. 7. The King's Letter to the Governor, ^i Gentlemen, Assure yourselves I am very careful of you, and sensible of your affections to me. Give credit to what this bearer shall say to you, and observe any directions you shall receive from Lieutenant General Middleton : You shall shortly hear from me again, and I would have you find some way frequently to advertise me of your condition, which I shall take all possible care to reheve. Charles R. Paris, 0.6th March 1652. APPENDIX. 227 No. 8. General Middleton's Letter to the Governor. My Dear Friend, I AM SO overjoyed that you in this time do behave yourself so gallantly, that I shall be most desirous to do you service : The particulars I remit to the bearer, my cousin and yours, to whom give trust, since he is particularly instructed from him, who shall rather perish than be wanting to his friend, and v?ho in all condi- tions is, and shall be yours, J. M. No. g. Lord Balcarras's Letter to the Governor. Sir, You are now, I believe, hardly in expectation of relief; and ye know how much it concerns not only the kingdom, but yourself in particular, that the honours be secured. I shall therefore again desire you, by virtue of the first warrant which you saw, and of this likewise which I have lately received, and now send you in- closed, that you deliver them immediately to the bearer Sir Arthur Forbes, whose receipt of them, under his hand, I do hereby declare shall be as valid for your ac- quittal and liberation, as if you had it under the hand of your atfectionate friend to serve you, Balcarras. Duffies, nth October 1651. Postscript, I shall not now repeat the arguments I used to you at Dunnottar; if they were strong then, I am sure they are much more now, for the condition of business is much altered since. I say no more, but remem- ber what 1 then spoke to you as your friend. Directed, For tlie Governor of Dunnottar. No. 10. The Chancellor's Letter to the Governor. Sir, Your letter of the last of October came to my hand upon the 9th of Novem ber instant ; and the ParUament being appointed to meet here upon the 12th day, I stayed the bearer, in expectation that I might return you the Parliament's an- swer and orders ; but the Parliament not havmg met, and there being no meeting of the Committee of Estates, I can give you no positive advice nor order ; but 1 conceive, that the trust committed to you, and the safe custody of these things under your charge, did require, that victual, a competent number of honest and stout soldiers, and all other necessaries, should have been provided, and put in the castle, before you had been in any hazard ; and if you be in good condition, or that you can timely supply yom'self with all necessaries, and that the place be tenable against all attempts of the enemy, I doubt not but you will hold out ; but if you want provisions, soldiers, and ammunition, and cannot hold out all the as- saults of the enemy, which is feared, and thought you cannot do, if you be hardly pursued, I know no better expedient than that the honours of the crown be speedi- ly and safely transported to some remote and strong castle or hold in the High- lands ; and I wish you had delivered them to the Lord Balcarras, as was desired by the Committee of Estates, nor do I know of any better way for preservation of these things, and your exoneration; and it will be an irreparable loss and shame if these things shall be taken by the enemy, and very dishonourable for yourself. I have herewith returned your letter to the Lord Balcarras, hearing he is still in the north, and not to come to this country. I have written to Sir John Smith to furnish you the remainder of the victual you wrote he should b^ve given you ; if he be in the north you will send it to him, but if he be gone home to Edinburgh, I cannot help u ', 228 APPENDIX. so having given voli the best advice I can at present, I trust you will, with all care and faithfulness, be answerable, according to the trust committed to you, and I shall still remain Your very assured. and real friend. Loudon, Cancellarius. Finlarge, Novem. i^th 1651. Directed thus, For my much respected friend, George Ogilvie, Governor of Dunnottar. No. II. Mr James Grainger's Letter to the Governor. Sir, I HAVE received yours, and before it came to my hand, I had secured the things you know of, upon the night time, and am persuaded, though any army should come they could not be the better; so that there needs no fear: As for myself, my neck shall break, and my life go for it, before 1 fail to you ; yet some little difficulty makes me loth they should be transported as yet, vvhilk shall be fully made known to you at meeting, whilk, 1 desire, shall be on Monday once a day; and if you be loth to come here, send me word and I shall come to you : But, for the business itself, fear no more nor if they were in your house presently ; tor I trust he who hath preserved them in my custody till this day will preserve them in safety till they go as ye yourself desires ; so, till meeting, I continue Your real and true Friend and servant, , J. Grainger, Kinnesse^ July zist 1C60. To his honoured and loving friend, the Laird of Barras elder. No. 12. Mr James Grainger's Obligation to the Governor. Whereas 1 have received a discharge from George Ogilvie of Barras, of the ho- nours of this kingdom, and he hath got no more but the sceptre ; therefore I obHge myself, that the rest, viz. the crown and sword, shall be forthcoming at de- mand, by this my ticket, written and subscribed this same day. I received the discharge the 28th September 1C60. J. Grainger. Mo. 13. Petition by the Goveriior's Son to the King, with his Majesty's Deliverance thereon, anent the Regalia. TO THE King's most excellent Majesty, The Humble Petition of William Ogilvie, Son to George Ogilvie of Barras,. Sheweth, That whereas your petitioner is sent up here by his father, to give your ma- jesty notice, that his said father hath had, and still preserves the crown, sword, and sceptre of Scotland in his custody, long before the English possessed the castle of Dunottar, with great hazard of his life, and long and strait imprisonment, which, occasioned the death of his wife : and in respect of your petitioner's father his APPENDIX. 229 great interest with these honours, he could not desert that great charge to come here and attend your Majesty himself. Wherefore he hath sent your petitioner to have your Majesty's particular order, in relation to the foresaid honours. Whitehall, September i%th 1660. ** His Majesty ordains the petitioner's father, to deliver his crown, sceptre, and " sword to the Earl of Marischal of Scotland, and get his receipt of them. " Lauderdale." No. 14.. The Earl Marischal's Receipt for the Regalia. At Dunnottar the 8th day of October 1660, I William Earl Marischal grants me to have received from George Ogilvie of Barras, the crown, sword, and sceptre, the ancient monuments of this kingdom, entire and compleat, in the same condi- tion they were entrusted by me to him, and discharges the foresaid George Ogil- vie of his receipt thereof, by this my subscription, day and place foresaid. Marischali.. Of the family of CALDER. THE destruction of our ancient records has not only been an irretrievable loss to the nation in general, but also to many particular families : the memory of many heroic achievements performed in service of the country, and of many no- ble famihes who deserved well of it, are thereby buried in oblivion, while the rise and origin of many great and powerful families is either wholly left in the dark, or, at least, rendered doubtful and uncertain : It is for this reason, and some others which shall be hereafter noticed, that the family of Calder, though anciently dignified with the highest titles of honour then in use in this kingdom, and still in an opulent and flourishing condition, are not able to trace themselves back to their first original, nor condescend upon their founder. The first account history gives of the Thanes of Calder is about the year 1047, during the usurpation of Macbeth : Amongst several nobles v/ho became victims to the cruelty and avarice of that tyrant, Buchanan enumerates the Thane of Nairn, whom Boetius and Holinshed design Thane of Calder. This mistake of Buchan- an, (who perhaps took too much upon trust) has probably been occasioned by rea- son of the vicinity of the chief seat of the family of Calder to the town of Nairn, a considerable part of their estate lying within that county ; but there is great rea- son to believe that the family had been of a considerable standing previous to that period, and before they attained to that degree of grandeur and honour they are then represented to have been placed in. The next Thane of Calder we find on record is Hugo de Cadella, who was very instrumental in the restoration of King Malcolm Caiimore, and liberally rewarded by that generous prince {a); but it is not evident what relation he was to the for- mer Thane : however, there is good reaNon to believe that it was very near, and it is highly probable he was his son. We are assured, that, amongst other acts of gratitude and justice. King Malcolm restored the posterity of such as had suffered by the tyrant's cruelty to their predecessors' estates, from the names of which many ancient families, among whom that of Calder assumed their surnames (6), a custom (a) Home's history of the family of Douglas. {b) Buchanan, Dr Abercromby. Vol. n. 6 T 230 APPENDIX. then introduced by that wise and pohtic prince, with a view to put an end to tlie violent feuds that then raged in the country. To this Hugh succeeded his son Gilbertus tie Cadella, who in the year 1104 got a charter from King Edgar of the lands of Calder, Stc. which is said to be still ex- tant in the Lawyers' Library at Edinburgh. He was succeeded by Alexander, his son, who discovered a conspiracy of the Macdonalds, Murrays, and Cumings, to assasinate King Alexander I. at Bell-Edgar, in his expedition to the North (c); for which good service, this prince, on his return, confirmed to him the thanedom of Calder, Stc. in the 11 12. • After this Alexander there is nothing found on record concerning the family of Calder for three generations; only in the year 1230, Helen, daughter to the family of Calder, was married to Schaw Macintosh of that Ilk (d). In the year 1260 mention is made of Dovendalus, or Donald, Thane of Calder, who is said to have valued the barony of Geddes at L. 24 Scots per annum, and that of Kilravock at L. 12 Scots, from which some judgment may be formed of the value of lands at that time. He was succeeded by his son William, whose daughter Finvola was married to William Macintosh of that Ilk, and he was succeeded by his son Thomas, who adhered to the interest of King David Bruce, against Edward Ba- liol ; and for his fidelity and good services to that prince was knighted by him ; and was slain in battle fighting against the Cumings, who sided with Bahol about the year 1350 (f). He left behind him a daughter, Jean, who was married to Hugh Eraser, Land of Lovat, and a son who succeeded him. William, Thane of Calder, who was murdered by Sir Alexander Rait of that Ilk about the year 1380, and the lands of Rait were given to the Thane of Calder's heir in consideration of his father's murder. William succeeded his father, concerning whom we have nothing memorable. There is yet extant a charter anent settling the marches of their lands betwixt him and Hutcheon Rose of Kilravock, dated the 29th December 1408. He was suc- ceeded by his son Donald, who, in anno 1430, obtained a charter of confirmation of the thane- dom of Calder, and heritable sheriffship of the shire of Nairn, from king James I.(/), and enlarged his former estate by several new acquisitions. He had two sons, Wil- liam and Hutcheon, or Hugh; Hutcheon attended Alexander Earl of Huntly in his expedition against the Earls of Crawford and Douglas, then in rebellion against the king; and Huntly having routed the forces of these two Earls at the battle of Bre- chin, anno 1452, Hutcheon, being too eager in the pursuit, was taken prisoner by the enemy, and brought to Finhaven, whither Crawford had fled; but he being alarmed, while at supper, with the news of Huntly's being at hand in pursuit of him, fled with such precipitation, that, among several other prisoners who made their escape, Hutcheon was one, and carried off" the silver cup out of which Craw- ford drank, which he presented to Huntly at Brechin as a sure evidence of Craw- ford's flight ; for which service Huntly, upon his return home, gave him the lands of Asswanly, and George Duke of Gordon gave to his successor a massy silver cup gilded, whereon the history of this action is engraven to preserve the remem- brance of it (^). From this Hutcheon is descended the family of Muirton, the present Sir Thomas Calder of Muirton being a great-grandchild of the family of Calder of Asswanly *. (r) MSS. History of the family of Macintosh, {d) MSS. History of Kilravock's family, (f) Boe- •ius. (f) Chatta penes D. de Calder. {g) History of the family of Gordon. * " Sir Thomas Calder of Muirton is a great-grandchild of the family of Calder of Asswanly, but " the Calders of Asswanly are not descended from Hutcheon, second son of Donald Thane of Calder, nor '- has the grant of the lands of Asswanly any reference- to the battle of Brechin, which was fought on " the 1 8th May 1452, twelve years subsequent to the date of the grant of the foresaid lands of Asswanly, " as appears by a Charter of Confirmation from the ting, dated at Edinburgh 8th July 1450, of the grant " of the lands of Asswanly, by Sir Alexander Setonne, to Hugh Calder, son and heir of Alexander Calder, " and to his spouse Elizabeth Gordonne, dated at Elgin the last day of August 1440. '• Witnesses thereto, George Earl of Avendale, Sir George Crichton of Blackness, Sir George Haiiburton, " Joha Dunbar, Alexander Dunbar, and John Stewart, Alexander Bannerman and Patrick Calder, Shield- APPENDIX. 23 r The before named Donald Thane of Calder was succeeded by his eldest son William ; in a charter of confirmation granted by Alexander Earl of Ross to Sir Walter Innes, of the lands of Aberkerder, dated 22d February 1438, he is a wit- ness, and is designed flllliehnus de Calder, his father being then alive in anno 1450; he went with William Earl of Douglas to the Jubilee at Rome {u). He had three sons, John, William, and Alexander, the last of whom, or another brother, whose name is not handed down, went, with several other Scots gentlemen, to assist Charles VII. of France against the English; and from him is descended the family of i)if/« Campagiia in Thoulouse in France (A). To the said William succeeded his eldest son John, who died without issue, and was succeeded by his brother William, who was the last Thane in Scotland, that title having fallen into desue- tude, through introducing the new title of Earl, which is said to have come in place thereof; however he obtained the thanedom and other lands belonging to him erected into a fee barony in the 1476, and declared to lie within the shire ot Nairn, notwithstanding they lay in diiferent shires (r). He married Marjory Suther- land, daughter to the Earl of Sutherland, by whom he had issue, AVilliam, his eldest son, John, Alexander, and Hutcheon, and a daughter, Elizabeth, married to Evan Macintosh, son to Macintosh of that Ilk: William, the eldest son, inclining to the church, upon the 29th April 148S renounced his right to the estate, which the father entailed to his second son John and his heirs, who, in virtue thereof, was infeft in the 1493, and the father being then aged, yielded the estate to him, and retired. This John married Elizabeth, daughter to Hugh Ross of Kilravock, aiino 1492, and died the year following, leaving his wife big with child of two daughters, Janet and Murriell; Janet died young, and Murriell succeeded to the estate in vir- tue of the entail made by her grandfather. Archibald, the second Earl of Argyle, and Hugh Ross of Kilravock, uncle to the said Murriell Calder, being appointed tutors dative to her by King James IV. anno 1494, Kilravock delivered up the young lady to Campbell of Innerliver, who had come to Kilravock in the year 1499, with sixty men to carry her to In- verary, to be educated in the family of Argyle. But, in their way tlilther, they were pursued by Hutcheon Calder her father's brother, and a body of men who came up with them in Strathnairn, whereupon Inverliver sent her away with one of his sons, aixl a few men, and with the rest gave the Calders diversion, till he was sure she was at a considerable distance ; and when he had got clear of the Cal- ders, with some loss on both sides, he followed and conducted her to Inverary, where she was educated, and, in anno 1510, married to Sir John Campbell, the Earl of Argyle's second son, by his Countess Elizabeth, daughter of John the first Earl of Lennox, to whom the Earl gave the lands of Lochow. After this marriage. Sir John Campbell continued his own surname, and did not assume that of Calder, as is frequently done by those who marry heiresses, whereby he seemed rather to found a new family, than to continue an old one, which so exasperated the heirs- male^ and relations of the name of Calder, that they had constant feuds and skir- mishes with the Campbells of Calder for a considerable time, and carried off" all the ancient writings belonging to the family, which are since either lost or de- stroyed ; and this, in a great measure, has occasioned the original transactions of the family of Calder to be in so much obscurity. But to return. Sir John Campbell of Calder had issue by Murriell Calder, six sons, viz. Archi- bald who succeeded him, John, bishop of the Isles, of whom are descended the families of Inverstrigan and Ardchattan ; Donald, of whom the family of Kirkton, Sonchan, and Balnabie; Duncan and William, who had no issue, and Alexander " Bearers. The original charter is m the possession of Rear-Admiral Sir Robert Calder, and grandson of " Sir Thomas Calder." " Edinburgh, aglh September 1802." [This note was of the above date affixed by Admiral Sir Robert Calder, Baronet, to a copy of the former edition of this work in the Advocates' Library, from which it is here copied. £.] (fl) Dr Abercromby's history, (i) Lesley in vita Jacob. IL (c) Charta penes D. de Calder. :32 APPENDIX. of Flynes, ancestor to the families of Moy and Torrich, and as many daughters ; Katharine, married to James Lord Ogilvie, thereafter to the Earl of Crawford ■ Jean, married to Alexander Lord Lovat ; ___married to Ross of Balna- gowan ; married to Urquhart of Meldrum ; Isabel, married to M'Dougall of Rary ; and married to of Folly. Sir Archibald succeeded his father Sir John ; he married Isabel, daughter to Grant of that Ilk, by whom he had a daughter, who was married to Grant of Glen- moriston, and a son who succeeded him. Sir John, who was a very accomplished gentleman ; he was tutor to Archibald Earl of Argyle, which office he discharged with so much integrity and fidelity, as procured him the malice of the enemies of that noble family, who caused murder him at Knipach in 1592. He married jMarion, daughter to William Eail Maris- chal of Scotland, by whom he had five sons, John, who succeeded him, Alexander, Archibald, and William, who all died without issue, and Cohn, ancestor of the family of Dell in Isla, and two daughters, Margaret, who was married to Sir James M'Donald of Isla, who was chief of that ancient and heroic name, and Beatrix, who was married to Campbell of Glenfauchin : Besides these. Sir John had a na- tural son, (as is thought, by a lady of quality) named Donald, who proved a very fine gentleman, and was active in prosecuting his father's murderers, several of whom were brought to condign punishment. He was created a K.night Baronet of A'6^'^ Scotia by King Charles L by the title of Sir Donald Campbell of Ardna- nuirchan, and married Macintosh's widow; but dying without issue, left his estate to George, tutor of Calder, his brother's son. Sir John Campbell had likewise two natural daughters, Jean, married to Dallas of Cantray, and Euphame, married to James Campbell of Auchindown. Sir John Campbell, eldest son to the former Sir John, first married Anne, daugh- ter to Sir Duncan Campbell of Glenorchy, great grandfather to the present Earl of Breadalbane, by whom he had six sons, viz. John, who succeeded him, Colin, who married Elizabeth, daughter to Brodie of that Ilk, George, who was tutor to his nephew Sir Hugh Campbell of Calder, and married the Captain of DunstafT- nage's daughter, of whom are descended the famihes of Airds and Odomore, and Robert, Alexander, and Duncan, who all died without issue ; and one daughter, Jean, who was married to Dunbar of Grange. After the death of his first lady. Sir John married Margaret, daughter to William Earl of Angus, by whom he had one son, James, v.'ho was married to the widow of Sir Donald Campbell of Ardna- murchan, but had no issue ; and one daughter, Mary, who was married to Alex- ander Campbell of Sinderland : but soon after his second marriage, King Charles I.'s wars coming on, he zealously adhered to the royal interest, for which he was for- feit by Oliver Cromwell, and obliged to retire to France until the Restoration ; but his son Sir John, being in the fee of the estate before the forfeiture, retained pos- session of it. After the Restoration he returned home, and built a handsome cha- pel at the house of Calder, and being then old, retired to Muckairn in Argyle- shire, where he died, and was succeeded by his eldest son Sir John, who married Elizabeth, daughter to Sir Thomas Urquhart of Cromar- ty, by whom he had a son, Cohn, who died in his youth, and two daughters, Jean, who was married to William Lord Forbes, and Christian, to Dunbar of Til- linach. He was succeeded by his nephew Sir Hugh, eldest son to Colin, second son to Sir John Campbell, and Anne, daughter to Sir Duncan Campbell of Glenorchy, and EHzabeth Brodie his spouse ; he married Henrietta Stewart, daughter to James Earl of Murray, by whom he had four sons, Alexander, who succeeded him. Sir Archibald of Clunies, who mar- ried Anne M'Pherson, on child of Duncan M'Pherson of Clunie, chieftain of that name, by whom he has issue : and Colin and George, who were both captains in Queen Anne's wars, and there slain, leaving no issue. Sir Hugh had also four daughters, Margaret, who was married to Hugh Ross of Kilravock, Jean, mar- ried to Urquhart of Meldrum, Sophia to Brodie of Lethen, and Anne to M'Lean of Lochbuy. Sir Alexander succeeded to his father Sir Hugh ; he married Elizabeth Lort, daughter to Sir John Lort of Stackpoole in South Wales, by whom he had issue, I APPENDIX. 2S3 John his successor, and two daughters ; Susanna, married to Sir James Campbell of Auchinbreack, and Anne, married to PMmund Merris ot" Esq. John Campbell, now ot" Caldcr, Esq. married Mary Price, daughter to Lewis Price of Gogarthan in South Wales, Esq. by whom he has issue. He is master of an opulent fortune, present member of Parliament for the county of Pembroke, and one ot" the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty ; and it is expected will make an appearance not unworthy of his ancestors ; his children will succeed to the estates of Calder, Stackpoole, and Gogarthan. Before finishing this account of the family of Cakler, it will not be improper to observe, that though none of the family of Calder were created baronets, yet, since the marriage of Sir John Campbell with the heiress of Calder, each of the repre- sentatives of the family (except the present) have had the honour of knighthood conferred upon them, for their personal merit. BOTHWELL Lord Holyroodhouse. THE surname of Bothwell must needs be exceedingly ancient; for it cannot be a questiont hat it was taken from the great estate and lordship of Bothwell, in the county of Lanark, by the ancient proprietors, when surnames were assumed among us, and transmitted as hereditary, to difference and distinguish persons and families from one another : It is very presumable, yea highly probable from some presumptions, that the Oliphards, once a great family, and powerful, got the barony of Bothwell, by marriage of an heir-female of the surname of Bothwell, as soon as the reign of King Alexander IL («) and which, from certain documents and vouchers in the next succeeding reign, came to another heir-female, who mar- ried Sir Andrew Murray, who, upon that, is designed Dominus de Bothwell jfiis- titiaritis ac Panitarius Scotice {by. However, the family of the surname of Both- well, it is most certain, continued in the male line ever after this : For vouching this, there is a charter still extant in the rolls of King David IL in the public ar- chives, " Dilecto consanguineo suo (the king's cousin, as he does him the honour " to call him) Johanni de Bothwell de decem solidis Sterlingorum et quatuor chal- " dris farinas, nobis debitis de Thanagio de Darvon in vicecomitatu de Bamtf, pro " omnibus vitie sua: diebus." The charter is dated at Dundee, the 31st July, the 37th year of his reign, that is, the year of our Lord 1369. The same prince gives another charter to the foresaid John Bothwell, " Dilecto consanguineo suo omnes " terras Parci nostri de Inchbuthell, jacen. infra vicecomitatum de Bamff, pro " vita sua. Apud Edinburgh decimo nono die Mensis Aprilis, anno Regni nostri " quadragesimo primo 1371." The family of the Bothwells at length came and fixed their residence in the city of Edinburgh, where they had a very considerable estate in lands, so that they grew up to be among the greatest burgesses of any other wljatsoever, both with regard to opulency and reputation, and allied with many of the first families in the kingdom, as will evidently appear from the sequel of this memorial. Since the family of Bothwells came to Edinburgh, I have not seen writs, or any other documents, carrying back the family of the Bothwells farther than the reign of King Jair.es HI. that Richard Bothwell, the ancestor of this family, was provost of that city (c), and executed the office with great discretion in a very turbulent time. He married Elizabeth, daughter of William Somerville of Plain (rf), in the county of Stirling, who was the second son of William Lord Somerville (f), by whom he had two sons and a daughter, Mr Francis his eldest son, who carried down the line of his progeny ; and Mr Richard Bothwell, who, being bred to the {a) Chartulary of the Episcopal See of Glasgow, (i) Ibidem, (c) Charta peaes Dominura Holy- ruodhouse. (var in the Holy Land carried on by the Chris- tians against the Saracens, that the armorial bearing of the Berkeleys makes it Very probable they were of the number of those zealots who put on the cross, a-; is positively asserted by Camden. Upon John's death he was succeeded by his son III. Robert de Berkeley, who, as is already observer^, consented to the agreement between his father and the abbot, and the monks of Aberbrothock, being succeed- ed by his son IV. Hugh de Berkeley, who obtained a charter from King Robert Bruce, upon Westerton, being lands lying near to the above-mentioned mill of Conveth ; which charter Nisbet asserts to be registrate in the chartulary of Melrose, his son's name being V. Alexantder de Berkeley of Mathers, who by marrying Katharine, sister to William df Keith Marischal of Scotland, obtained the lands of Mathers, which he added to his paternal estate, vouched by a charter, dated anno 1351, granted by the said IVilliam de Keith, with consent (as the charter words it) of Margaret my wife, to Alexander de Berkdcy, and Katharine my sister, his spouse, and the longest liver of them two, and the" heirs-male of their bodies ; my lands of Mathers, " datum apud mansum capitale nostrum de Strathekin die Martii inventione " sanctre crucis, anno 1351, coram test, reverendo in Christo Patr. Dom. " Phihppo, Dei Gratia Episc. Brechin, Dom. Willielmo eadem gratia Abbato de "■ Aberbrothick, David de Fleming, Willielmo de Liddel militibus, Johannes de " Seton, et aliis. This charter of Marischals being repeated verbatim, is confirmed by King David Bruce, at Perth the i8th day of March, and 21st of his reign, " coram test._ " Roberto Seneschallo nepote nostro (the first king of Scotland of the name of " Stewart) Tho. Seneschall comite de Angus, Tho. de Moravie panacri nostro " Scotias, Roberto de Erskine, et Tho. de Falside militibus." This original charter from Marischal, with the original confirmation thereof by King David Bruce, are both in the custody of the present Barclay of Urie. Upon the death of this Alexander he was succeeded by his son VI. David de Berkeley of Mathers, who, by all the accounts we have, married Seaton, daughter to the same John de Seaton, who witnessed the preceding charter from Marischal, to his father : their son's name being VII. Alexander t'/c Berkeley of Mathers, by the tradition of our fiimily he married Helen Graham, daughter to Graham of Morphy ; their son being VIII. David de Berkeley of Mathers, ^\^ho. as is supposed, built the castle called the Keim of Mathers, where the family, for their better security, lived for a while during some troublesome times. By all the accounts we have, he mar- ried Elizabeth Strachan, daughter to Strachan of Thornton, then an ancient and flourishing family in the Merns ; who bore to him IX. Alexander Barclay of Mathers, v.'ho is the first of our family whose name we find, both by old evidents and by his own subscriptions, spelled as we now do, viz. Barclay, by a charter granted to him by 'William Earl Marischal, Shentf-prin- APPENDIX. 239 cipal and High Constable of the shire of the Merns, wherein he terms him Dilecto coiuangulneo nostra, i. e. To our beloved kinsman Alexander Barclay of Mathers, and Katharine his wife, (this was Katharine VVishart) dated anna 1483 ; which charter we have in the family. As he lived to old age, so upon his son's marriage he put him in possession of the old estate, reserving Mathers to himself during life : As he was reputed a scholar, and something of a poet, so to him are ascribed the verses made by a laird of Mathers, and given as advice to his son and suc- cessors, which as worthy I insert. GifFthou desire thy house lang stand, And thy successors bruik thy land ; Abive all things live God in fear, Intromit nought with wrangom gear ; Nor conquess nothing wrangously. With thy neighbour keep cliarity. See that thou pass not thy estate, v. - Obey duly thy magistrate : Oppress not, but support the puire. To help the common vveill take cuire. ' ■ , • Use no deceit, mell not with treason. And to all men do right and reason : Both unto word and deed be true. All kind of wickedness eschew. Slay no man, nor thereto consent, Be nought cruel, but patient. ' ■ Allay ay in some guid place. With noble, honest, godly race r Hate huirdome, and all vices dec. Be humble, hjunt guid companie. Help thy friend and do nae wrang. And God shall cause thy house stand lang. It appears, by the above document, he married the already-mentioned Katha- rine Wishart, daughter to Wishart of Pittarrow, a family for a long time of great eminency in the Merns ; some of them having been high or principal sheriffs thereof, being so designed in several of our ancient papers : She bore to him, X. D.tviD Barclay of Mathers, who married Janet Irvine, daughter to Irvine of Drum, then one of the most considerable families in the shire of Aberdeen. This our marriage with Drum's daughter we have vouched by several documents in the family, viz. an ancient manuscript, wrote anno 157S, intitled, Genealogy of the Barons of tlye Merns, (in which are inserted the above verses) as also by charters upon the lands of Falside and Slains, in the Merns. Hfs eklest son was XI. Ales-ander BaR-CLay of Mathers, vouched by the genealogy of the barons of the Merns, old charters, &c. to liave married Marjory Auchinleck, second daughter to James Auchinleck, Laird of Glenbervie, who was son to John Auchin- leck ni Auchinleck in Angus, and who, by marrying the only daughter of that same sheritf, John Melville, that was killed by the barons of the Merns, obtained the estate of Glenbervie. This same James Auchinleck leaving no children but two daughters, the eldest being married to Sir William Douglas, second son to the famous Earl of Angus, called Bdl the C 't ; by this mai-riage came the Douglasses first into the estate of Glenbervie in the Merns, and from whom are descended the Earls of Angus and Dukes of Douglas. This Alexander Barclay sold the lands of Slains and Falside in the Merns to Andrev/ Moncur of Knapp, to whom he granted a charter of these lands, to be holden of himself and his heirs, dated anna 1497 ; which charter we have in the family, as also a conveyance of the lands, all writ and snbscribed with his own hand at Edinburgh the 17th day of March 1497, in which he obliges himself to bear the said Andrew Moncur harmless, both from his mother, the above Janet Irvine, (these lands being,_ as it seems, part of h,;i jointure) and from a contract he nad 240 APPENDIX. entered into with Sir James Auchterlony of Auchterlony and Kelly, for a marriage between his son George and Auchteilony's daughter. It was this same Alexander Barclay, who, being superior of the lands of Durn in the shire of Banff, granted to Sir James Ogilvie of Deskford, predecessor to the Karl ofTindlater, a precept of clnre constat, as heir to his grandfather Sir James Ogilvie of Deskford, for infefting him in the lands of Durn : The original of which precept, with our seal and arms appended, bearing date the 29th April f5io, at Kirktonhill, the seat of the family of Mathers, is in the custody of Sir James Dunbar of Durn, who favoured us with a copy. This Alexander's son's name being XII. George Barclay of Mathers, who married Marjory Auchterlony, daugh- ter to the above-mentioned Sir James Auchterlony of Auchterlony and Kelly, then a considerable family in the shire of Angus ; their son's name being XIII. David Barclay of Mathers, who married first Mary Rait, daughter to Rait of Halgreen, by whom he had George who succeeded him ; and had for his second wife Katharme Home, by whom he had John, to whom he gave the lands of Johnston in the Merns ; as is evident by Barclay of Johnston's first charter, dated anno 1560, and the genealogy of his family in his own custody. Barclay of Balmakeuan is a cadet of Johnson's family. FuUarton of Kinnaber married a daughter of this David Barclay, whose eldest son, as above, was XIV. George Barclay of Mathers married first Mary Erskine, daughter to Sir Thomas Erskine of Brechin, who was Secretary of State to King James V. of Scot- land; he, or his immediate successor, exchanged the estate of Brechin for that of Pittodrie in the shire of Aberdeen, his posterity continuing there a flourishing family : For his second wife he married Margaret Wood, daughter to Wood of Bonnyton in Angus, who bore him a son, Alexander, to whom he gave the lands of Bridgeton and Jackston in the Merns, whose lineal heir-male, is George Bar- clay, merchant in Banff. His eldest son by Mary Erskine succeeding to the estate, his name being XIV. Thomas Barclay of Mathers, who married Janet Straiton, daughter to Straiton of Lauriston in the Merns, a family eminent both for its antiquity and greatness, extinguished only in our age; 'this Thomas Barclay died before his iather, leaving only one son behind him, XVI. David Barclay of Mathers, great-grandfather to the present Barclay of Urie, born anno 1^80. He married Elizabeth Livingston, daughter to Livingston of Dunipace : He was called a very polite well-bred man ; but by the easiness of his temper, and lining much at Court, he brought himself into such difficulties us obliged him to sell the estate, first Mathers, after they had kept it near 300 years, and then the old estate, after they had kept it upwards of 500 years. He had a daughter, Anne, first married to Douglas of Tilliquhally.by whom he had a daugh- ter, grandmother to the present Hog of Raymore ; her last husband was Strachan, afterwards bishop of Brechin. He had also several sons, John and Alexander, both dying young and unmarried. Colonel David, of whom more afterwards, Robert, Rector of the Scots College at Paris, and James, captain of a troop of horse in his brother David's regiment, killed at Philiphaugh, also unmarried, as they all were, except his son the above XVII. Colonel David Barclay of Urie, who purchased the estate anno 1648. He was born at Kirktonhill 1610, belonging to his father, upon the old estate, upon some of which the servitude had been granted by Humphry, &-c. to the abbot and monks ofsAberbrothock, as is already mentioned ; part of which they had all along retained until the year 1651, as appears by a fitted accompt, attested by Wishart notar-public and clerk, at the oversight of the Viscount of Arbuthnot, Sir Robert Farquhar of Manie, and Sommers of Balyordie, between the Colonel as representing his father David Barclay of Mathers, on the one part, and John Barclay of Johnston, as having had the management of Mather's affairs for twenty years, on the other part. His decision bears date at Bervie and Kirk of Benholm, . from the 21st to the 26th day of May 1651. As hath been already observed, he purchased Urie, anno 1648, from William Earl Marischal, being designed in all the conveyances of the lands of Urie, Colonel Da- 3 APPENDIX. 241 »id" Barclay, lawful son of David Barclay of Mathers; as he is also in his own contract of marriage, dated at Bog of Gight (now Castle-Gordon) and Gordon- b.ton, the 24th day of December 1647; ''^"'^ likewise in his sister Anne's contract of marriage with her last husband Strachan, afterwards Bishop of Brechin, dated at Aberluthnot the 21st day of May 1649, written by the above John Barclay of Johnston, and subscribed by David Barclay of Mathers, her father, and Colonel David Barclay, her brother, consenters, they being so designed in the paper. Both these contracts of marriage, as also the fitted accompt being in the custody of the present Barclay of Urie, his grandchild. He married Katharine Gordon, daughter to Sir Robert Gordon of Gordonston, second son to tlie Earl of Suther- land, and second cousin to King James the VI. of Scotland, and I. of Great Bri- tain, by his grand aunt Lady Helen Stewart, sister to Matthew Earl of Lennox, be- . ing t-lie said Sir Robert's grandmother, his mother being Lady Jane Gordon, daugh- ter to the Earl of Huntly. Katharine Gordon bore to him three sons, Robert, John, and David, and two daughters, Lucy and Jean ; David and Lucy died unmarried ; Jean was married to Sir Ewen Cameron of Lochiel, to whom she bore eight children, who were all married ; John married in East-Jersey in America, and hath left children. The eldest, XVIII. Robert Barclay of Urie, born anno 1648 ; he was the author of the Apolo- gy in behalf of the people called Quakers, (which he presented to King Charles II.) with whom he joined himself about the 19th, and wrote the Apology in the 27th year of his age. He married Christian MoUison, daughter to Gilbert Mollison, merchant in Aberdeen, by whom he left seven children behind him, three sons, Robert, David, and John, and four daughters, Patience, Katharine, Christian, and Jean; he died in the 42d year of his age at Urie, the 3d of October 1690. All his seven children being at this time alive, now about 50 years since he died, this being wrote anno 1740. His second son, David, settled in London, married first to Anne Taylor, daughter to James Taylor, draper there, and afterwards to Priscilla Frame, daughter to John Frame, banker in London, having children by both the marriages. His eldest son, James, being also married, and hath children. His third son, John, settled in Dublin, married Anne Stretell, daughter to Amos Stre- tell, merchant there. His daughters, Patience and Katharine, married to Timothy and James Forbesses, sons to Alexander Forbes of Aquorthies in the shire of Aber- deen, and merchants in Dublin. His third daughter. Christian, married Alexan- der JafFray of King's-wells in said shire. His youngest, Jean, married Alexander Forbes, son to John Forbes of Aquorthies, in the same shire, merchant in London. The eldest son, XIX. Robert Barclay of Urie, born anno 1672; he married EHzabeth Brain, daughter to John Brain of London, merchant, by whom he had two sons, Robert and David, and three daughters, Mollison, Elizabeth, and Katharine ; his son, David, settled a merchant in London, married Mary Pardoe, daughter to John Pardoe of Worcester, merchant. His daughter, Mollison, married John Double- day, son to John Doubleday of Alnwick Abbey in Northumberland; Elizabeth married Sir William Ogilvie of Barras in the Merns. His eldest son, XX. Robert Barclay of Urie, born anno 1699, married one Cameron, daugh-- ter to Sir Ewen Cameron of Lochiel, by whom he has four children, tliree sons, , Robert, David, and Ewen, and one daughter, Jean. His eldest son, XXI. Robert Barclay of Urie, born 1 731-2. Their armorial bearing was formerly three cross patees with a cheveron, and a . mitre for a crest. But the present Barclay of Urie, anno 1725, after the example of Struan Robertson, threw out the cheveron, as being by some thought a mark of cadency : though, as Sir George Mackenzie observes in his heraldry, it was an- ciently esteemed an ornament ; so their present bearing is azure, three cross patees in chief, ardent, with a dove and olive branch in its mouth for a crest. In an escrol above, Cedant anna, and below, In hac vince. As extracted from the Lyon's books, 1725. Vol. 1L 6 Y APPENDIX. CARNEGIE OF Ballindarg. CARNEGIE of Ballindarg, his predecessor, was Carnegie of Gallery, now in the possession of Mr Fullarton : Thomas Carnegie, the representative of that fa- mily, married Margaret, eldest daughter of Alexander Carnegie of Bearhill, near to Brechin ; their only son was John Carnegie, Provost of Forfar, who purchased the lands of Ballindarg from Walter Lord Torphichen ; he married Elizabeth, daughter to John Dickson, merchant in Forfar, their son Robert Carnegie of Bal- lindarg, by his wife Agnes, daughter to Michael Gray of Turfbeg, was father to the present Robert Carnegie of Ballindarg, who is married to Anne, daughter and heiress of John Carnegie of Kinnell. Ballindarg's predecessors also were pos- sessed of the lands of Kirkton ot Aboyne, now the property of Farquharson of Finwean. Which Robert Carnegie's coat of arms is matriculated in the registers of the Lyon Office, and is thus blazoned, viz. or, an eagle displayed azure, holding in his dexter talon a thistle, proper ; crest, a dexter arm vambraced, proper, holding an escutcheon azure, and thereon a St Andrew's cross argent; and, in an escrol above, this motto, Loyal in adversity, and in another below, Balenherd. James Carnegie of Kinnell was second son to Sir John Carnegie of Boysack, and Margaret, daughter and only child of Erskine of Dun, by his first wife, a daughter of the Lord Spynie ; which James married Anne, eldest daughter to Sir David Ogilvie of Innerquharity ; their son John Carnegie of Kinnell married Anne, daughter and heir of Archibald Auchinleck of Balmanno ; their only child Anne Carnegie of Kinnell is married to Robert Carnegie of Ballindarg, as above. Sir William Auchinleck of Balmanno married Janet, only child of Sir Robert Bruce of Clackmanan, by Janet Wardlaw, daughter to the Laird of Torry, his first wife ; their son, Archibald Auchinleck of Balmanno married Anne, daughter to Arnot of Woodmiln, whose only child and heir, Anne Auchinleck, was married to John Carnegie of Kinnell, and their only child and heir to both, Anna Carnegie, is married to the said Robert Carnegie of Ballindarg. Michael Gray of Turfbeg was the second son of William Gray of Hayston, by Elizabeth, daughter to Paterson of Dunmure; he married Jean, daugh- ter to John Smhh of Glasswall; their son William married Mary, second daughter to Sir David Ogilvie of Innerquharity, and their son, Mr William Gray, is a clergy- man. N. B. The Grays of Hayston, thereafter designed of Inverichty ; the Grays of Invergowrie, thereafter designed of Braikie, and the Grays of Bullion, were three brothers by a second marriage, sons of the Lord Gray. Of the family of MENZIES of that Ilk, or of Weem. IT is the misfortune of this family that most of their ancient writs were con- sumed when their mansion-house was burnt in the beginning of the sixteenth cen- tury (a), whereby it is rendered the more difficult to discover the antiquity of it, seeing most of our old records were destroyed by King Edward I. when he over- run Scotland ; and that writers and historians have left this, among the many other ancient and noted families in Scotland, mostly in oblivion. (a) Charta in pub. archiv. Baroniffi de Menzies, in favorem D. Robeiti Menzics de eodem, militis, anno 1510. APPENDIX. 243 ITie origin of tliis family, first called Mttymers, or Mijneis, afterwards Md^iws or Mengues, and now Menzies, according to the corrupted pronunciation and va- rious ways of spelling, in the different periods of time in which they got their char- ters and grants, cunnot, for the reason above mentioned, be now well discovered, though it is generally thought that they are of foreign extract, and that the sur- name is originally the same with that of Manners in England, which came over at the conquest, and were seated in Northumberland, and other parts in the north of England, in the reign of K-ing Henry II. about the 1 1 70 ; and that soon after the con- quest there were of this name in Scotland, Boetius and others affirm, and mention Mcnzies as a surname in the reign of King Malcolm Canmore, when surnames were first used in this kingdom (Z>). I. The first of this name that is to be met with in any private grants or records in Scotland, is one Anketillus de Maynoers, who lived in the reign of King William the Lion, and is a witness, among others, to the donation (c) made by IViUielmus de Vetcre Ponte to the abbacy of Holyroodhouse, of the lands of Ogleface((/), " pro salute Domini mei Regis Willielmi et Regime Emergarda;." II. The next person of this name, and not improbably the son of the former, is RoBEK.Trf(fMEYNERS,knight,whoflourishedinthereignof King Alexander II. and who, upon the accession of King Alexander III. to the crown, was promoted to the office of Lord High Chamberlain of Scotland (?) ; and in that character, as well as one of the barons, called Magnates Scotice, was employed in several embassies to Eng- land, which he discharged with great honour and commendation CfJ- This Ro- bert granted a charter CgJ of the lands of Culdares, " Mattha:o de Moncrief pro " homagio et ser^itio suo ;" the seal of which charter is quite entire, and the arms resemble those of the old family of Manners in England (hj, of which the family of Rutland is descended ■ and this helps to support what is said before concerning the affinity betwixt the two surnames ; the witnesses to this charter are, among others, David de Meyners, and Thomas de Meyners ; and which Thomas is a wit- ness to the confirmation of the kirk of Melville, to the Monastery of Dunfermline, by Gregorius de Melvil, anno 1 25 1 (i). The above Robert died in the year 1266 (I), and left a son, III. Sir Alexander de Meyners, Knight (/), who was one of those worthy pa- triots, who stood firm to the interest of their country after King Alexander III. his death, in opposition to the violent oppressions of King Edward I. of England, and for which he was thrown into prison by King Edward, as appears from Rymer's Feed. Vol. II. p. 728, where a fifty merk land of old extent is allotted for the sub- sistence of his wife and children, anno 1296. This Alexander got the lands Weem and Aberfeldy in vie. de Perth, from John de Strathbogy Earl of Athol C'"0^ father of David, who was Constable of Scotland in the beginning of King Robert I. his reign. He was also possessed of the lands of Durisdeer in vie. de Dumfries, and which he resigned {nj in favour of his brother-in-law James, third son of James* High Steward of Scotland ; but v»'hich he afterwards got back, and King Robert I. granted a charter (oj of the barony of Durisdeer fpj, to the said Alexander : " Tenend. eidem Alexandro et iEgidis Senescalla?, sponsae suk, de nobis," &-c. This Alexander is a frequent witness in King Robert I. his charters, and particu- larly he is a witness to the grant (qj made to Gilbcrtus de Haya, of the office of Lord High Constable of Scotland, the ninth year of the king's reign, anno 1315 ; and it is observable he is inserted in the charter before Sir Robert Keith, Marischal of Scotland ; from which it may be supposed that at that time he enjoyed some (b) Abercromby's History, King Malcolm Canmore's Life, (f) Charta mine penes D. Robertum Menzies hujus familia principem. (//) Ogleface in vie. de Linlithgow, (e) Crawfurd's Officers of State. (/) Rymer's FcEdera Angliae. {g) Charta nunc penes Dom. Robertum Menzies. (A) The family of Manners bore of old or, two bears azure, and a chief gules, and the seal at the forefaid charter is, or, one bear azure, and a cliief _fa/«. How Mr Nisbet, Vol. L p. 68, comes to distinguish betwixt the arms of Menzies of that Ilk, and Menzies of Weem, is not known ; and it is certainly a mistake, for the fa- milies are, and always were the same, (^i) Cartul- Dunfermline, (k} Fordun's Scotichronleon. (/) Charta penes Dominum Robertum Menzies; whereby John Earl of Athol grants the landi of Weem, &c. Dom. Alexandro de Meyners, filio et hsercdi quondam Dom. Roberti de Meyners railitis. (m) Ibidem. (/;) Stewart's history of the Stewarts, p. 52. (0) Charta in pub. archivis, (/)) This barony is after- wards called Enach, in all the subsequent rights, {f/) Charta penes Comit. de Etrol. 244 APPENDIX. place of considerable rank, otherwise he never would had the preference of the Marischal. Alexander left issue by the above Egidia, or Giles Stewart, only daughter of James High Sceuard of Scotland (rj. IV. Sir Robert de Meyners his successor, who got in his father's lifetime from Robert de Bruce, Dominus de Liddisdale, the lands of Fernauchie and Gowlantine, in the abthanage or Lordship of Dull, vie. de Perth fsj, from his father Sir Alex- ander, wherein he is designed his son and heir, a charter ftj of the foresaid lands of Weem and Aberfeldy, and from David de Strathbogy, Earl of Athol and Constable of Scotland, the lands of the thanage of Cranach, in vicecomitat. predict, fit J. The first of these charters is confirmed by King David II. anno 1343 C^'J '■> and the se- cond by Robert, Steward of Scotland, and Lord oi Kt\\o\(wJ ; thereafter the said Robert got a charter (^.vj from Duncan Earl of Fife, whereby he grants to him, consanguineo nostra, the lands of Edramuckie and Morinch Desewer, in vie. pnedict. and this is likewise confirmed by the said King David II. anno 1343 CyJ- This Sir Robert married Margaret de Oiiyotlj fyvj, one of the daughters and heirs-por- tiouers of Sir David de Ouyotb, Knight. This lady in her widowity, with consent ot yobn de Meyners, her son and heir, gave (a_) to the monastery of Dunfermline, " Totam terrain meam de Pilkfuran (Pitferran) me jure hcereditano contingentem ;" and which charter was confirmed by King David JI. mino 1360 f AJ : She Hkewise in her widowity gave to her consanguineiis Richard Evioth the lands of Busey in vie. de Perth ; and which was also confirmed by the said King David in the 23d year of his reign, ad annum 1362 C^J- Of this marriage there were two sons, John the heir of the family, and Alexander de Meyners, de Fothergill (d) ; and of which Alexander, who, by his wife Janet, got lands in the shire of Aberdeen in the north (e), it is reckoned the family of Pitfoddles, and others of the name in that country are descended. V. John succeeded to his father Sir Robert, in the whole lands before mention- ed ; and, further, got a giant from King Robert II. (f) by which his majesty gave to him and his heirs, " Ilium annuum redditum octo solidorum nobis debitum, sive " exeuntem castri, Wardae ratione, de terra de Vogry, inira vicecomitat. de Edin- " burgh." So that it would appear, though there is no document extant to instruct it, that at that time the family was possessed of the barony of Vogrie, otherwise there was no necessity of granting them a discharge of the castle-ward duties payable out of these lands : By Christian his wife (g), John left a son VI. Robert de Meignes, who got charters from King Robert II. of the barony of Enach (/j) in the shire of Dumfries, the barony of Vogrie in the shire of Edin- burgh, the half of the barony of Culter in the shire of Lanark, and the lands of Ceres in the shire of Fife, proceeding upon his father John's resignation, and, as he was still alive, his liferent is resei-ved (2). This Robert left a son, David, his successor, but what other children he had, or to whom he was married, is un- certain. VII. Sir David de Mengues, knight, succeeded to his father Robert in the above lands, and as the bulk of his estate lay then in Perthshire, he did, conform to a charter granted by King James I. anno 1436, excamb the barony of Vogrie, in vice, de Edinb. with the barony of Rawer, in vice, de Perth, which the king disponed to him and his heirs (k) ; and as ihese lands were a part of the lordship (r) Stewart's Hist, of the Stewarts, p. 52. (s) Charta penes Dom. Robertum Menzies. {i) Charta penes eundem. (a) Ibidem, (n) lb. (ui) lb. (a-) Ibidem. (_)>) Charta in pub. archivis. (^^0 Ouyoth, Uyoth, or Evioth, the same name, and which family, afterwards called Evioth of Busey, was of consi- derable note, and subsisted till the reign of King James VI. that Colin Eviot of Busey was forfeit for Cowrie's conspiracy. (a) Chart, of Dunfermline. (^h) Charta in pub. archiv. (c) Ibidem, {d) In the charter granted by the before-mentioned Sir Alexander to Sir Robert his son, Alexander de Meyners de Fothergill is called his grandchild, (c) Chart, penes, Mr George Crawfurd, by which Euphemia do- mina de Ross, filia et hasres Willielmi Comitis de Ross, confirms, as superior, a charter granted by Janet de Meyners, Domina de Fothergill, to Alexander Meyners her husband, of the lands of Fcchelly in the barony of Kinedicard, and shire of Aberdeen, dated pth March 1381. (/_) Charta in pub. archivis. C^) Cont. penes D. Robertum Menzies, betwixt the said John and Robert his son and heir, anno 1395, whereby Robert becomes bound to dispone to Christian de Meyners his mother, the liferent of the lands of Culter. (h) This formerly called the barony of Durisdeer. (i) Charta in pub. archiv. {i) Charta in pub. archiv. APPENDIX. 245; of Dull, wherein Q^iieen Jean was secured for jointure, her majesty ratified (/) the charter of excambion, and past from all claim she might have to the barony of Rawer. This Sir David was one of the hostages for King James l.'s ransom (in), and is the same who, in that reign, was employed in several embassies to the crown of Denmark, and made Governor of the Orkneys, which then belonged to the King of Denmark («). He married Marjory Sinclair, sister of Henry Earl of Orkney (o), and was by the Earl left sole tutor to Wdliam Sinclair his son and heir: Of this marriage Sir David had a son, John, his successor. Sir David was married a second time to one whose name was Helen {/;). In the end of his days he gave himself up to a religious life, and became a monk of the Sestertian order in the monastery of Melrose. He made several donations to religious houses ; he gave the lands of Newkhill in Lanarkshire to the monks of Kelso, in pure alms, " pro " salute Jacobi Regis et Jeana; Reginae " (17), which the king, by his charter 25th January 143 1, confirmed {>■). He gave also to the monastery of Melrose (/) the third part of the lands of \Volfclyde, in the barony of Culter and shire of Lanark, " pro salute Domini Regis Jacobi, et Joannas Regin;B, et pro salute sui, &-c." and which donation is confirmed by the king (t) in July 143 1 ; and he likewise gave to the abbacy of Dunfermline anno 1412, " pro salute animas mea;, et ani- " marum parentum meorum,&ic. unu'iiannuum redditum sex librarumet undecim " solidorum, mihi annuatiin de terris de Luscer-Evioth, debitum, et per me, et " predecessores meos hucusque per manus Balivi, qui pro tempore fuerit pra " Muskilburgh receptum, &-c." And which charter the said Sir David afterwards, 22d May 1438, with consent of 'John de Mengues, his son and heir, confirms, " Charitatis mtuitu, ac pro salute animarum nostrarum, et animarum Marjoriae et " Helenas uxorum mearum, &c." {u). Sir David left likewise another son, but of which of his marriages is uncertain ; his name was Cudbert (a-) ; he got a feu grant of part of the barony of Enach from John his brother (y), and it is reckoned that the family of Enach (z), and others in Dumfries-shire, were descended of him. VIII. John de Mengeis succeeded his father Sir David, and got grants from the crown of all his lands, proceeding upon his father's resignation («). He married Janet Carruthers {b), daughter to Carruthers of Holmains ; he had three sons, George, who married Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Duncanson of Struan (c), sans issue. Sir Robert his successor, and John, the ancestor of the family of Culter- allers (rf). IX. Sir Robert, the second son, was, in the year 1487, retoured heir to John, his father, in the haill lands before mentioned ; it was in this Robert's time that the mansion-house of the family was burnt, which induced the sovereign to give him a new grant of his whole lands and estate, and to erect all of them into a free; barony, to be called the Barony of Menzies ; the words are, " Dilecto nostro Ro- " berto Menzies, de eodem, militi, pro bono et gratuito servitio, et quia intelli- " gimus quod ip.sius Roberti carta; et evidenciae tempore combustionis sui loci de: (/) Ratlficatio penes D. Robertum Menzies. («) Rymer's Fuedera. (n) ForfeJ Wstoria Otcadensis. (5) Com-nission of Baillery by Marjory to Jobn her son and heir, and nomination by Heniy Earl of Orkney, wherein the Eirl calls S'r Du-id his brother-in-law, both penes de Robertum Menzies. ( /) ) Donation to the monastery of Dunfermline above mentioned, pro salute animarum M.irjori^B et Helence uxorum mearum. {q) Chartulary of Kelso. (r) Charta in pub. archiv. (,r) Chartjiary of Melrose. (0 Ciarta in pub- archiv. (u) Chartulary of Dunfermline, {x) Reversion of the lands of Auchintinsel and Duncrule in the barony of Enach, granted by the said Cudbert to John de Meignes, his brother- german, anno 1472. {y) Constat, per said Reversion, {jz) It is to be observed. That be- fore this period there are IVJenzieses of Enach mentioned ; but then these were always the eldest sons of the family of Menzies, they were so stiled till they got the estate ; the predecessor of the present family of Enach was, in the 1603, called Menzies of Boltachan ; for at that time Adam Menzies of Boltachaii got the superiority of Enach from Menzies of that Ilk; Charta in pub. archiv. : ad annum 1603, and from- thii Adam is Captain Charles Menzies, the representative of that family, lineally descended, {a) Char- ta in pub. archiv. in the reigns of King James I. and II. (b) Mr George Crawfurd has the voucher of this marriage. {c^ Charta in pub. archiv. in favour of the said George and Elizabeth daughter of Robert Duncanson of Struan, proceeding upon John de Meignes the father's resignation, ad annu n. {d) Charta penes Robertum Menzies de Culterallers of the lands of Cultcralleis granted by Sir Robein Menzies, knight, to John Menzies meo fratri germano, anno 15 10. Vol., II. G 7, 246 APPENDIX. " Weem, per malefactorcs combust, et destruct. fuevunt, &c." (e). This Sir Robert married Margaret Lindsay', daughter of Sir David Lindsay ot Edziell (/), and left issue three sons, Sir Robert his successor, Wilham Menzies of Roro, ances- tor of the family of Shian (^), and Alexander (Z)), and a daughter, Margaret, mar- ried to William Robertson oi: Struan (/). X. Sir Robert, in the year 1520, was retoured heir to his father in the estate of Menzies (k) ; he married first Christian Gordon, eldest daughter of Alexander Earl of Huntly, by Jean Stewart, daughter of John Earl of Athol (/), by whom lie had Alexander his successor; and afterwards he married Marion Campbell, daughter of Archibald Earl of Argyle (;«) ; but of this last marriage there does not appear to have been any issue. XI. Alexander, anno 1557, was retoured heir to his father in the above estate of Menzies («) ; he married first Janet Campbell, daughter of Sir James Campbell of Lawers (0), by whom he had a son, James ; and afterwards he married Katha- rine M'Ghie (p), by whom he had three sons, George, Mr James, the ancestor of the family of Culdares, and Thomas (q). XII. James succeeded Alexander his father, and married Barbara Stewart (r), eldest daughter of John Earl of Athol, by Jean, daughter of John Lord For- bes (j) ; he left two sons, Alexander his successor, and Duncan Menzies of Comrie (t) ; likwise two daughters, Helen, married to James Beaton of Me- gum (?/), and Grizel, married to Mr James Grant of Ardmilly, brother-german to John Grant of Freuchie (v), ancestor to the Laird of Grant (w). XIII. Alexander, afterwards Sir Alexander, was in the year 1588 retoured heir to his father James (x). He married, first, Margaret Campbell, daughter of Sir Duncan Campbell of Glenorchy (y), s/ins issue ; thereafter he married Elizabeth, daughter of Sir John Forrester of Garden (z), by Margaret, daughter of John Earl of Wigton, by whom he had a son, John (a), who died without issue, and Duncan, who succeeded to his brother. Sir Alexander afterwards married Marjory Campbell, daughter of Alexander, Bishop of Brechin [b), of which last mar- riage he had seven sons, Alexander Menzies of Rotmell, of whom there are de- scendants still alive; William Menzies of Carse, of whom there are likewise de- scendants ; Thomas Menzies of Inchaffray, Robert Menzies of Classic, George, Da- vid, and Mr Archibald, who was a Writer to tlie Signet ; but of these five there are no descendants alive (r). He had likewise of this marriage four daughters, Helen, married to Sir James Campbell of Lawers (d), Grissel, to Sir Thomas Stewart of GrandtuUy {^), Margaret, to Colin Campbell of Bowhastle, second son to the Laird of Glenorchy (/), and Jean, married to Alexander Robertson of Lude (^). (e) Charta in pub. arcliiv. 1 510 before mentioned. (_/") This Sir David had another daughter mar- ried to Ruthven of that Ilk, ancestor of the Lord Ruthven. (^) Assignation granted by William Menzies of Roro to Sir Robert his father, 8th March 1 5 20. (A) Alexander had a son, John, who got, 7th July 1546, a charter of Tegramuch from his uncle Sir Robert ; he is called Joanni filio Alcxandrl Menzies fratris mei. ( z') Con. of Mar. penes Dom. Robertum Menzies. (^t) Retour penes eundem. r/) Con. of Mar, byway of indenture betwixt Sir Robert Menzies, knight, in behalf of Robert the son, and the Earl in behalf of his daughter, 22d Nov. i <;o3. (;«) Con. of Mar. penes eundem, 8th Decern. 1526, Janet Countess, of Athol, Sir John Campbell of Calder, and Archibald Campbell of Skipnach, are burden-takers for the bride, and oblige them to pay 600 nierks of tocher. («) Retour penes eundem. (0) Con. of Mar. penes eundem. (/>) Con. penes eundem. (y) Latter-will and testament of Alexander Menzies of that Ilk, penes Jacobum Menzies de Culdares. (r) Con. of Mar. penes Dom. Robertum M'-nzics. (,r) Stewart's History of the Stewarts' family of Athol. (/) Charta de Comrie penes Dom. Robertum Menzies, of this family of Comrie is lineally descended Captain John Menzies. (a) Discharge of Tocher, penes Dom. Robertum Menzies. (v) Con. of Mar. penes eundem. (ui) The Lairds of Grant, till of late, were called Grants of Freuchie. (.v) Retour penes Dom. Rober- tum Menzies. (y) Genealogy of the family of Glenorchy. (a) Charta in pub. archiv. ad annum 1603. (a) The above cliarter 1603, wherein John, eldest son and heir of the said Sir Alexander, procreated betwixt him and Elizabeth Forrester, is provided to the fee of the estate. (/>) Contract of mar. penes Dominum Robertum Menzies. This Marjory had a sister, Margaret, married to Sir John Hamilton of Litterick, ancestor to the family of Bargcny. Craw. Peerage. (c) Test, of Sir Alexander Menzies,. penes Dom. Robertum Menzies. (i^J Contract of mar, penes eundem. (c) Ibid. (/) Ibid, (f) Ibid.. API^ENDIX.. ^47 XIV. DuNC.\N succeeded to his father, and was, in the 1624, retouvcd heir to John .'lis brother, in such parts of his estate as he died in tlie fee of (,•;). He married fean Le':hc. >>nly daughter of James, Master of Rotlies (/)), by Kalliarine, daughter of Patrick Lord Diummond; of which marriage Duncan had three sons, Alexander,, h'- accessor, Robert, who died witliout issue, and W'ilham (<), who was killed at th ■ battle of Worcester; and five daughters, iNIarjory, married to Trotter, m^iciiant in Portugal {d), Jean, married to Mr Robert Campbell of Finnab (c), Eli- zabrrh to xVlexander M'Nab of that Ilk {/■), Margaret, to Alexander Stewart of Toss (^), and Helen, who died unmarried (/»). • XV. Alexander succeeded to his father Duncan, and was created a Knight Ba- ronet 2d September 1665 (/) ; the words of the patent are, " In memoriam revo- " cantes multa praclara servitia nobis, nostrisque ilhistrissimis progenitoribus, " per dilectum nostrum Dominum Alexandrum Menzies de eodem, equitetn au- " ratum, ejusque praedecessores, pnestita &. peracta, et gravia damna iis iilata. " Quinetiam, eum esse philarchum & principem clarae familia; cognomine Men- " zies„ in hoc regno nostro Scotiae, Sj-c." He married Agnes Campbell (,(), eldest dau.;Uter of Sir John Campbell of Glenorchy, by Mary, daughter of William Earl 01 \irth and Monteith (') ; of which marriage he had two sons, Robert, his heir, a: ! Captain James Menzies, who is still alive (-n) ; and three daughters, Susan, married first to Lord Neil Campbell, second son to Archibald Marquis of Argyie, and afterwards to Col. Alexander Campbell of Fiiinab ; Jean, married to Mungo Can obeli of Netherplace, and Emilia to Thomas Fleming of Moness. XVI. Robert Menzies, Fiar of Menzies, for his father Su- Alexander survived hiin, made an early appearance at the late revolution, and had not fate cut him off in the flower of his age, would have made a considerable figure, he being a gentleman of great parts and influence. He married Anne Sandilands, daughter of Walter Lord Torphichen, by Katharine, daughter of William Lord Alexander eldest son of William Earl of Stirling. He died in the year 1691, leaving issue two sons. Sir Alexander, his heir, and James, who died young sans issue ; and two daughters, Christian, first married to Patrick Stewart of Eallechan, and after- wards to John Farquharson of Invercauld; but of neither of these marriages are there issue surviving; and Katharine married to John Menzies, M. D. of the fami- ly of Culterallers, of whom there is issue. XVII. Sir Alexander, son of the said Sir Robert, who succeeded to the estate after his grandfather's death, married his own cousin-german, Christian, daughter of Lord Neil Campbell, by Susan Menzies his second wife, by whom he left Sir Robert his successor, and a daughter, Christian, who was married to William Macintosh of that Ilk, Esq. but of whom there is no surviving issue. XVIII. Sir Robert succeeded his father, and presently enjoys the estate of his an- cestors, he is married to the Lady Mary Stewart, eldest daughter of James Earl of Bute, by Lady Anne Campbell, daughter of Archibald Duke of Argyie. The armorial bearing of this family is argent, a chief gules ; crest, a Saracen's head erazed, proper; supporters, two savages; and moito. Will God I shall. (a) Retour. (4) Cont. mar. (c) Duncan's Latter-will. (//) Disch. of Tocher, penes eundem. (f) Con. . raar. penes eunde n. (/) Ibid, (g) Ih'i. {h) The Tesiament above mentioned. (/) Patent penes Dom. Robertum Menzies, et in puj. archiv. {t) Con. mar. penes eundem. (/) Genealoijv of the family of G'lenorchy. ("i^ Capt,in Menzies .carried Anna Campbell, .daughter to Lord Nell Campbell bv Lady Vcr Ker his fii't r.-i'e, an:t has Issue four sons, John, Jrmie-, Neil, and Duncan, and several daughtt'rs, one married to Jities Stewart of Killichassj', one to Robert Fleming of Moness, and one to Lieutenant Tohn^ M-iCenzie of Kincraig, &c. 3 24b. APPENDIX. VANS OF Barnbaroch. THE leariied antiquary and historian Sir James Dalrymple (a) observes, That die anciegt surname of Vans, in Latin charters called de Fallibus, is the same with the name of Vaux in England, and is one of the first surnames that appears there after the conquest. One of the family came to Scotland in the time of King Da- vid I. ; and in the reign of his grandson and successor Malcolm IV. mention is made of Philip de Vedlibus, who had possessions in the south on the border ; and soon after that we find the family of the lal/ibus or Fans, proprietors of the lands and barony of Dirleton in East-Lothian. 'Joannes de Vallibus, Dominus de Dirletoun, gave in pure and perpetual alms to the Episcopal See of Glasgow, dece7n marcas de firmis terra: Slice de Golyn (6); dated apud Edinburgh i8th April 1249; which is ra- tified by King Alexander IIL the 4th of June, the 29th year of his reign [c). He was succeeded by Sir Alexander de Vallibus his son, who is designed filius Joannis de Vallibus, militis, who exchanges the annuity out of the lands of Golyn, given to the Metro- poHtan Church of Glasgow by his father, for the same ten merks to Ise uphfted out of his mill of Haddington. The deed bears date at Glasgow, i^tio Kalendas Decembris 1267 {d). He was succeeded by ^.nothev Joannes de Vallibus, Ikiminus de Dirletoun, who ratifies and confirms to the church of Glasgow the deed of Sir John his grandfaiher, dated in Capitulo Ecclesia Glasguen. the 8th of February 1305 {e). The family of the Vans, or de Vallibus of Dirleton, flourished down in the male- line till the reign of Robert IL that it came to terminate in an heir-female, who was married to John Halyburton, son to Sir Walter, and brother to another Sir Walter Halyburton of that Ilk, who thereupon assumed the title, and carried the arms of the Vanses, viz. argent, a bend azure, in his achievement, and which was borne quarterly in the arms of the Lord Halyburton of Dirleton, so long as the family subsisted. There is a charter ffj granted by Henricus de Sancto Clara, Comes Orkadice, ac Djminus de Roslyn, Jacobo de Sancto Claro Domino de Longfor- macus, dated the 22d of June 1384, to which there are witnesses, Thoma de Ers- kine de Dun, Georgia de Abernetijy de Saiilton, Waltero Haliburton de eodem, et Jo- anne de Haliburton de Dirletoun, militibus. This Sir John Halyburton of Dirleton, by the heir-general of the family of the Vanies of Dirleton aforesaid, had a son, Sir Walter Halyburton of Dirleton, who succeeded his uncle in the estate and ba- rony of Halyburton, and is upon that designed in several authentic deeds still extant (jr). IVat'-i us de Haliburton, dominus ejusdem, et de Dirletoun; and, as the family of Halyburton carried the arms of the Vanses quartered with their own, so for some time did ail the three families that married the daughters and co-heirs of Patrick the last Lord Halyburton of Dirleton carry the coat of arms of the Vanses of Dirleton, quartered in their several achievements, viz. the Lord Ruthven, who was afterwards Earl of Gowrie, the Lord Home, and Kerr of Faudinside. The only remaining heirs-male of the ancient family of the Vanses of Dirleton were the Vanses of Barnbaroch, in the county of Wigton, who carry the bend for their arms, the principal figure of the coat of the Vanses, and charge the bend with a mullet, intimating that they were a younger son of the House of Dirleton. But now, since they represent the principal family, by the rules and maxims that are hid down in heraldry, they may strike out the mullet, the brotherly difference, and- wear and carry the bend-simple, as they have done for some centuries. The original ancestor of the Vanses of Barnbaroch, who was a younger son of the Vanses of Dirleton, got the lands of Barnbaroch from the Earls of Douglas, while they had the lordship of Galloway, which might be soon after that Sir Archi- (a) Appendi.x to the Collections relating to the Scots History. {h) Excerpts from the Chartulary of Glasgow in the Lawjiers' Library. (r) Ibidem. U) Ibidem, U.) Ibidem, (f) Penes Dom. Robert. Sinclair de Longformacus, Baronet, {g) Writs in the hands of the Earl of Buchan. APPENDIX. 249 bald Douglas got that great lordship in the reign of King Robert II. that we find him desigiied, from authentic and clear vouchers, Domi/ius Giiluidia:; and even after the ijSS, that he comes to tiie succession of the earldom of Douglas, he stiles \mr\se\t' Copies de Do!/j[/as, fic Dominiis G(i/u/ili,v(,;), as did also his successors ; for, although the Vanses of Barnbaroch had been long vassals to the luirls of Douglas, yet, what by tiie teuds that were common in the more ancient times, what by Other accidents that have befallen the archives of other ancient famihes, as well as this of the Vanses of Barnbaroch, they have no charters in their custody preceding the reign of K.ing James U. for then they have a charter granted by IVillielmus Comes de Douglas, vi" Domiiius Galuidia, dilecto armigeirj suo Roberto I 'mis, dc tcrris de Bainglass is' Banibarroch, and many other lands, hitredibus stiis Isi assijf/uitis, data 26th January 145 1 (i); which charter is ratified and confirmed by a charter under the Great Seal, the 13th of August the same year. But, though the family of Barnbaroch have no older charters now in their custody, yet it is plain and e\ ident, that the Vanses of this house had subsisted long before that ; for a younger brother of the family, Mr George Vans, Dean of Glasgow, was Secretary of State to King James II. (c). This Robert Vans of Barnbaroch, aforesaid, was succeed- ed by Blanse Vans of Barnbaroch, his son and heir; and he had also a younger son, George, Bishop of Galloway. There is a charter by King James II. to Blanse Vans, son and heir apparent of Robert Vans of Barnbaroch, of the lands of Barn- glass and Barnbaroch, &.c.; in the resignation of his father the lands are provided to the heirs-male of Blanse nominatim; and failing these, to several other collate- ral heirs-male carrying the surname of Vans. The charter is dated at Kirkcud- bright the 8th of March 1458 {d); this was when the sovereign came to have the lordship of Galloway in the forfeiture of the Earl of Douglas. This Blanse was succeeded by Patrick Vans of Barnbaroch, his son, who has a charter of conjunct infeftment to himself and Margaret Kennedy, his spouse, of several lands which he held of the crown in the 1498 (^e). He was succeeded by Alexander Vans of Barnbaroch, his son and heir, who resigns the lands of Kirkwonask in favour of xvlr Patrick Vans of Westraw, as from the instrument in the resignation, still extant, dated the nth June 1508 (/). This Alexander Vans of Barnbaroch was succeeded by John Vans of Barnbaroch, his son and heir, who had a grant by charter from Patrick Vans of Whitehalls, of the lands of Dunjargan, dated the 9th of August 1535, which is confirmed by a charter under the Great Seal of King James V. bearing date the 3d of February 1537. He married Janet Kennedy (^_), daughter to the Earl of Cassilis, and had Alexander, his successor, and Patrick, who succeed- ed his brother in the estate. This Alexander Vans of Barnbaroch married Euphame, daughter of Sir John Dunbar of Mochrum; but he dying without issue-male, was succeeded by his brother nnd heir-male, Mr Patrick Vans of Barnbaroch, who was a gentleman of reputation for parts and integrity. During the heat of the civil war this gentleman was solicited with the greatest earnestness by the two contending parties; those who appeared for the young king, and both the oueen herself, and the regents who supported the young king, wrote him letters of solicitation to come over to their side, judging it of no small consequence to which of the parties he attached and joined himself: However, he sided with the king's party, and was thereupon named one of the Privy Council and Exchequer, and one of the Senators of the College of Justice in the 1582 {b). In the 1587 he was joined in commission with Mr Peter Young of Seaton, in an embassy to Denmark, where he discharged his negociation with ho- nour and success. Upon his return he made the first proposal to the king of the Princess of Denmark, as a proper spouse for his majesty; and when the king went (fl) Charters in the public records. {b) Charter in the charter-chest of the family. (c) Lives of Officers of State. (d) Charter in the charter-chest of the family. (f) Charter under the Great Seal in the records. (^f) Writ in the archives of the family, {g) Historical and Genealogical Account of the family of Cassilis, JVISS. (h) All this appears from original letters still preserved in the family. Vol. n. 7 A ,30 APPENDIX. to Denmark in person to espouse the princess, he had the honour to attend liis majesty to Upsal, where the marriage was happily solemnized ; at which time he got a charter of his estate in liferent, and the patronages of the churches of Wig- ton and Colmonell, and Kirkcowen, and to John Vans, his son and apparent hen-, jn fee, dated at Upsal the last of November 1589, which is confirmed by the Scottish Parliament; and in the preamble to the charter Sir Patrick's great merit and services are very honourably set forth {a). This Sir Patrick Vans of Barn- baroch married Katharine Kennedy, daughter to the Earl of Cassihs, by whom he had Sir John Vans, his son and heir, who was of the Privy Chamber to King James VI. ; and, being in a good degree of favour with that prince, he had a grant of the estate of Longcastle in Ireland, of considerable value; and upon that, in his father's lifetime, he was designed by the title of Longcastle. He married Mar- garet, daughter of Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland (b), and had by her Patrick, his son and heir apparent, who married Grissel, daughter of John Johnstone of that ilk, then Lord Hartfield, ancestor to the present Marquis of Annandale, by Margaret his wife, daughter of Sir Walter Scott of Buccleugh(t), ancestorto the present Duke of Buccleugh, by whom he had John, his son and iieir apparent, in whose favour Sir John, his grandfather, resigns the fee of the whole estate, dated the 30th of Ja- nuary 1640 (^). The same Sir Patrick Vans of Barnbaroch, with consent of his father. Sir John Vans of Barnbaroch, provides his second son, Alexander Vans, in the lands of Barqnhanny, by his charter dated the 15th of February 1640 (e). This Sir Patrick Vans of Barnbaroch was succeeded by John Vans of Barnbaroch, his son, who married Grissel, daughter of John M'CuUoch of Myrton: but he dying without is.ue-male, was succeeded by Cap- tain Alexander Vans of Barquhanny, his brother-german. He married Margaret, daughter of William Maxwell of Monreith, by whom he had Colonel Patrick Vans of Barnbaroch, who was member of Parliament for the burgh of Wigton, and the districts thereof. He married, first, Jean, daughter of Sir James Campbell of Lawers, by whom he had Patrick Vans, Esq. his eldest son, and a daughter, Agnes, who was married to James Brown of Carsluth, now both alive. He mar- ried, next, Barbara, daughter of Patrick M'Dowall of Freugh ; and dying on the 27th of January 1733, left issue, by his wife foresaid, two sons, John and Alex- ander, and three daughters, all yet alive ; Barbara, Anne, Elizabeth. The armorial bearing of this ancient family is ardent, a bend azure, as in the First Volume of this work: The author has only there taken notice of the crest and mottb, which is a lion rampant, holding in his dexter paw a pair of balances, proper: But from the attestation of two gentlemen, of undoubted credit and re- putation, the coat of arms of the family, as it stands engraved on the old House of Barnbaroch, is supported by two savages, with clubs in their hands, and wreathed about the middle with laurel : crest and motto as in the First Volume. M'DOWALL OF Freugh. IT is agreed on by all our modern antiquaries, that all the familiesof the M'Dowalls are branched from the great Lords of Galloway, who appear to be great men as soon as we have the authority of charters or records to rely on. Mr Nis- bet, in his Treatise of Heraldry, or some other in his name, has made a kind of dissertation on the three families of the M'Dowalls in the county of Wigton : But it is obvious this is done in such a manner, that sometimes it would seem the author is not serious, and has rather embarrassed than cleared up the origin either (a) Charter in the custody of the family, (i) Ibidem, charter under the Great Seal to Sir John Vans of Barnbaroch, and Margaret M'Dowall his spouse, 12th March 1608. (c) Collections relating to the family of Johnstone, MSS. ( the charter are IVillielnius de Douglas, nepos to the Earl of Douglas the granter, Thomas AfCullocb, Fergusiiis M-Djuall, Alexander Gordon, Johannes Keith, militibus, all knights, Alexander Cairnys prtrpositus Ecclesiie de Lincludin, Johan- nes Gordon, IVillielmus Senescalli, W aliis. The charter wants a date, as was then very usual ; but that which will fix it very near, and clear up the precise date, is a dispensation from the Pope for Elizabeth, the daughter of Sir John Stewart, afore- said, to marry Alexander Stewart of Torbane, a brother of the House of Darnly, notwithstanding they stood within the degrees of consanguinity in blood, pro- hibited by the laws and canons of the church. This deed is dated in the 141 1, and goes far to clear the date of the former charter (rt). Now, admitting that all the three families competing, Freugh, Logan, and Garthland, should claim this dominus Fergusius MDouall to be their own ancestor, yet it is plain, from these following vouchers, that he is the predecessor of the House of Freugh; the argu- ments brought to support this allegation are submitted to the judgment of every impartial man, whether Freugh has not most to say on this point. \mo. Neither Garthland nor Logan, the other two competing families, have a Sir Fergus as the head of their families at the time; for, in the 1413, the name of the Laird of Garthland, when he got the charter of his estate from the Earl of Douglas, his name is not Fergus, but Thomas M'Dowall (/!>), and his son's name is Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland, in the 1426. As this Sir Fergus M'Dowall is clearly not the ancestor of the House of Garthland, so ido. Neither is he the ancestor of the House of Logan; for how soon the family of Logan have writs and charters in the fourteenth century, the name of their an- cestor is Patrick M'Dowall of Logan {c). But that no objection may remain, as if this Sir Fergus M'Dowall were the ancestor of the M'Dowalls of Makerston, Freugh urges, 3«io, That from the records, to which he refers (rf), he is able to show, that the name of the head of the family of Makerston is not Fergus, but Dougall M'Dou- gall of Makerston from the 1400, and above twelve years downward : So that Freugh conceives himself so well entitled to this Sir Fergus, that he contends, and on very rational grounds, that he is his own ancestor, and can be no other's. Although Freugh, as is already hinted in this memorial, has not the remotest thought to run down the antiquity or the lustre of any of the other families of the M'Dowalls, he only intends to vindicate himself from the aspersions thrown on his family in this Appendix, though he does not well know from whom ; he thinks he is, at least, entitled to an antiquity as high as any other family of the M'Dowalls whatever, and to a perfect equality of rank; and he has no view of carrying his pretensions any further, though he might urge that his family seems to have been considered in ancient times as superior to the other two in quality, because the House of Freugh had the patronage of the parochial church, where at that time they all had their chief seats of residence; Garthland has it still, and all the three have the burial-place of their families at the church of Stonnykirk. A patronage, we may observe, was a noble dignity in a family in times of popery ; it was highly esteem- ed, because the patron was to be named in all the masses said in this church; and it is a maxim among antiquaries, that a patronage was always given to the fa- milies of the greatest eminence of rank in the parochial district. As far as this argument can go, it is with the family of Freugh ; for when the lordship of Gal- loway came to be vested in the crown, by the attainder of James, the last of the race of the Earls of Douglas, in the 1455 (f), the Jus patronatus Si' advocationl ecclesiae de Stonny-kirk is given and bestowed on Gilbert M'Dowall of Ravenston and Freugh (/). ia) The charter to Sir John Stewart by the Earl of Douglas, I have seen under the hand of the cele- brated antiquary Mr David Simpson, Historigcapher for Scotland, taken out of the Earl of Galloway's charter-cbest. (4) The original charter cited by Mr Nisbet, and is exact enough. (f) Charter by Patrick M'Dowall of the lands of Aldrich, &c. in 1454. () One in Garthland's custody, and another in Vans of Barnbaroch's. (r) Charter I have seen in the hands of Freugh. {d) Still extant in the family of Freugh. {e) Ibidem. (/) Ibidem, (g) Ibidem. (A) Charta penes Freugh. (/') Ibidem, (f) The ori- ginal marriage-articles are still extant in the charter-chest of the family of Freugh ; the marriage portion is 400 merks. (/) Ibidem, [ra) The contract and dispensation is still e-xtant in the writs of the fanjily. («) Writs ot the family, ad annum 1577. Vol. II. 7 B i54 APPENDIX. a gentleman of her ow-q blood and kindred, wbo, they say, was an heii-maie ol her own family, John M'Dowall, apparent heir of Dowalton : However this be, the right of tlie blood, and all the claims of the fatiiily, were vested in the lady her- self, and transmitted to her posterity. The lady was a great fortune : But tht; maiTiage was not brought about till the lady and her future husband were obli- ged, so soon they should be duly vested in all the rights of the family of Freugb.^ to part with, and denude themselves in favour of her uncle and tutor Garthland, of the patronage of the church of Stonnykirk, and some other valuable considera- tions ; though these conditions might be somewhat hard of digestion, yet the young lovers, being in furore amorii, went in to them; so the marriage was solem- nized i'j). Soon after that they resigned the " Patronatus Ecclesice de Stonykirk " Uchredo M'Douall of Garthland," which has been ever since continued down iu his family ; though we see it origmaUy flowed from the family of Freugh to them, who had it directly from the crown in the reign of King James II. The heir of the marriage was John M'Dowall of Freugh, his maternal ancestor, who is served heir to James M'Dowall of freugh. and had all the rights that were in him vested in his person. In the time of the Usurpation he was a high royalist, and main- tained the king's interest in the worst times, with inflexible firmness and fidelity. He was very terrible to the English forces in Galloway, when they ventured out in small parties from their head-quarters, or their garris-ons ; they, in their turn, took severe revenges, and burnt his house and fort at i>eugh, took himself pri- soner, and carried him to England : But he happily made his escape, and got safe to Scotlai>d. ilis lady was Margaret, daughter of Sir Patrick Vans Lord Barnha- coch, one of tJie Senators of the College of Justice ip), by whom he had Uehred bis son and heir, Fergus, a younger son, who went to Ireland, whose lineal heir is John M'Dowall of Bellytragh, Esq. of the county of Cavan. UcHR-ED M'DowAU. of FVeugh was served heir to his father 31st July 1669 (q) ; he, as his father had been, was a firm royalist, and had several military commands in the king's service, both in Scotland and in Ireland. Upon the happy turn of the Restoration, he was chosen a member of the first Parliament, called by King Charles, fiar the county of Wigton 1661, though he did not run violently into the measures of the court in setthng of Episcopacy, and in annulling all the acts of the foiTnex times. He married Agnes, daughter of Sir Patrick Agnew of Lochnaw, liereditary sheriff of Wigton (r) ; by whom he had Patrick his son and successor. Uehred, the second son, a nian of figure and business in the way of trade andmer- chandiz£ at Edinburgh, was a hailie there. Alexander, bred to the law, was an advocate before the Court of Session : He died without issue. Partick M'Dowall of Freugh was served and retoured heir to his father the 26th FeiMTuary 1670 (j-), and succeeded to a right opulent estate. His principles led him to join in the rising at Bothwell, as a hkely mean to retrieve the oppres- sions his country groaned mider. When the design was broke by the defeat of the party, it came soon to be known he had been among them ; so he was first ex- cepted out of the indemnity (?). Soon after that an indictment of high treason was brought against him before the High Court of Justiciary {?/). The trial was soon dispatched ; for it was proven that he was seen marching at the head of three or four hundred of the rebels at Sanquhar and Hamilton-muir, where the engage- ment was : so that he was attainted (v). Captain Graham of Claverhouse, a ris- sing favourite, had an eye to his estate, and had got the promise of it as soon as it should be confiscated ; so he, with great eagerness, saw the sentence of forfeiture punctually executed, as the law directed ; the tearing out his coat of arms out of the hooks of heraldi-y, and tlie throwing them over the cross of Edinburgh with sound of trumpet, as a part of the ceremonial, was not omitted. This is the rea- son why the armorial bearing of the house of Freugh may not be in the registers of the Lyon Office ; so when Freugh's attainder was taken ofi'at the Revolution, and (0) Marr'u^e-artic)es beHvixt John, M'Dowall, apparent heir of Dowalton, and Mary M'Dowall, daugh- ter and heiress of James M'Dowall of Freugh, in ihc year 1583, penes John M'Dowall de Freugb. ■( p) Cbarta penes Freugh. ic) Ibidem, (r) Ibidem, (j) Ibidem. (/) Act of indemnity published im- mediately after the defeat at ^athwell 1679, in the records of council, (a) Journals of Justiciary. ('.>) Ibi- Hem : Joiarnalsof Justiciary. 2 ATPEECDIX. 355 his son i^tored, he had no other way left to ascertain, with any cKactness, -vrhat had been the armorial beaaing of his ancestor, but by obserring nicely what was cut out on his hoQse, and graved on his fanaily utensils : This he did, and got the arms and the whole achievement, used and carried by his ancestois, attested by some gentlemen of honoar and probity, and others conversant in matters of that kind. The original attestation is extant ; an exact copy taken froni it is here subjoined. " We undersubscribers do hereby certify and declare, that we have often seen " and viewed the coat of arms of the ancient family of Freugh, which had been " born by them, handsomely cut on a window-broad, which was saved when the " house of Freugh was burnt by the English. This broad we have often seen, " and noticed in the house before it was last burnt by accident. And we have " also seen the same coat of arms cut out on an old wainscot bed, viz. a lion " rampant, crowned with an imperial crown, and an open crown about his neck, " with a lion's paw, holding a dagger pointed upward, for the crest ; the helmet " with mantling ; and for supporters, two savages, having each a laurel crown " and girdle, holding a flaming dagger in one hand pointing upward, the motto " above in a folding scroll, I'lncen vel mori, and below upon another. Fro Deo " et Rege et Fatrin. The said coat, by the initials, was cut out by G. M. D. ♦• for Gilbert M'Douall of Freugh, anno 1475, upon the coat of arms on th€ bed " was J. M. D. for James M'Douall of Freugh, anno 1543. In testimony of the " verity of the above written declaration, these preserrts are certified, and signed " by Mr William M'Douall of Mye, -writer hereof, Mr Robert Gordon cf Park, *' with Matthew Torbane in Ardwell, and John Blair in Kirkmagil, both joiners, " dated at Stonykirk the 26th January 1 720." Matthew Torbane. Will. M'Douall. John Blair. Rob. Gordon. Freugh, the gentleman who was attainted, after his party were broke at Both- well, found means to make his escape, and got into England, where he Hved con- cealed foT some short time ; after that he got home to his own country. His mis- fortune and unhappy situarion sunk deep irrto his heart ; for he quickly fisll into an apoplexy, of which he died on the 13th of January i68o {w), and was interred in the church of Kirkcowen, where part of his estate lay. He left issue by Bar- bara his wife, daughter of James Fullarton of that ilk, one of the ancientest fami- lies in all the shire of Ayr, and can best vouch their antiquity, Patrick, his eldest son and successor, William M'Dowall, Esq. a younger son, who was an officer in ttie army in the war with France, and after the peace was put into a place in the Customs. Patrick. M'Dowall of Freugh was restored again to his father's forfeiture, which by act of Parliamerrt was repealed (.v), and he restored to his estate, honour, and fame. I am well informed he was a gentleman of good parts and learning, chiefly in antiquities and the history of families : Some of his performances in that way I have seen, that are both correct and exact, far beyond what could be expected from a gentleman who lived mostly in the country, made the study an amuse- ment, and had not searched and gone through records and offices : Withal he minded chiefly the recovering of his family from the great debts under which it was sinking, by the misfortune of his father, which was raised up again by his great management. He married Margaret, daughter and at length one of the co- heirs of William Haltridge of Dromore, Esq. of the county of Down in Ireland, by whom he had only one son who survived him, John, his heir and successor, and a good many daughters, that brought a rery honourable alliance to his family. The brevity of this memorial will not allow to enlarge on, and being recent. He died on the 15th of October 1729, and was succeeded by his (lu) Mem. Patiick M'Dowall of Freugh, in ihe family, (t) Act of Parliameat 1690. aj6 APPENDIX. John M'DowAtL of M'Dowall and Freugh (y), who is acknowledged by all that have the honour to be known to him, to be a generous open-hearted fine gentleman. He has married a lady of high quality and rank, Lady Betty Crich- ton, daughter of Colonel WiUiam Dalrymple of Glenmuir, brother to the present Earl of Stair, by his lady Penelope Countess of Dumfries, in right of her own tlood, by whom he has a numerous hopeful issue, viz. Patrick, his eldest son and heir apparent, William, Stair, John, Crichton, Penelope, and Margaret, being seven yet alive. Of the family of the MUIRHEADS of Lachop, now represented by Muir- HEAD of BrEAX)ISHOLM, AS THE HEIR-MALE. THE family of Muirhead of Lauchop, or Muirhead of that Ilk, has been always reputed one of the ancientest families in all the shire of Lanark. It is not known how soon they had the lands ot Muirhead, that being past all memory, and their first original charters have had the fate of many others, to be lost : Their house of Lauchop was indeed burnt down by the Earl of Murray's friends, the regent ; because the then Laird of Lauchop sheltered his brother-in-law, James Hamilton of Bothwelhaugh, at his house, when he fled from Linlithgow, after he had killed the regent in 1569 ; and by that sudden unexpected shock they lost most of all the old evidents and charters of the family. The surname de Morehead or Muirhead is, like other surnames of the greatest antiquity, local, taken from lands, from whence either the proprietor took a deno- mination, when fixed hereditary surnames became customary, or took an appella- tion from the lands as soon as he obtained them ; for it is a maxim amongst anti- quaries, that it is a sufficient document of an ancient descent, where the inha- bitant has the surname from the place he inhabiteth. So much is certain for the antiquity of the surname and family of Muirhead, that they have been fixed in the barony of BothweU before the reign of King Alexander II. that David de Oli- phard or Olipbant, was Dominus Baronia de Botbwel ; for they never wore any part of the arms of their superiors, as arms of patronage, for the Oliphants had crescents. As the Muirheads had not the arms of their superiors, the Oliphants, neither had they any part of the bearing of the Murrays, who succeeded to the barony of Bothwell, by the marriage of the heir-female ; for it is well known the armorial figures of the Murrays were three stars ; for the double tressure was but an addition to the original arms. As they wore no part of the arms of patronage of the Murrays, who indeed were great men, Panitarii Scotice, neither had they any thing in their armorial bearing like the great and illustrious family of the Douglasses, who in the reign of King Robert II. became superior lords of the whole great barony of Bothwell, dominum baroniae de Botbwell, by the marriage of Daine Jean daughter and sole heir of Thomas de Moravia, Do?ninus de Botbwel, ac Panitarius Scotiae (z). The truth is, the family of the Mairheads must have been a set of people, that since they never assumed the arms, or any part thereof, from their respective superiors or over-lords, as was very usual, the presumption must be, that they were seated a family, and fixed there, before the Oliphards had the barony of Bothwell ; and that they were the liheri tenentes Regis et Coronae, before the crown gave the superiority of the Baroiiia de Botbwel to the Oliphards ; and so we may rationally, and without stretching things, conclude, that the Muir- head family were fixed, and proprietors- of the lands of Muirhead, as far back as (y) The family of Freugh have their charter from the crown, creeling their estate into a barony, tht fearony of M'Dowall. (k) Liber Dunblanen. MSS. penes meipsum. APPENDIX. 257 the reirn of King Willium, ov sooner for wkat wc know, evL-n up to the tinrc that surnames began to be taken up, ajid men began to call themselves after their own laiuls; which is agreed was nut the custom generally gone into before the reign of King Da\aJ I. {iiino 11 22. The tradition goes, and as I had it from a learned and curious antiquary, who was also a gentleman of great reputation and integrity («), tiiat the Laird of Muir- head of that Ilk, de Muirbead, as I have often found them designed, in the time of King Robert II. got the lands of Lauchop and other*, for assaulting and killing a great robber that infested all that part of the country, by violent ravages and depredations, which he carried to a very insuflerable degree ; so tliat at length the government were obliged to take notice of him ; and, by a public act, notified, " That whosoever should apprehend, kill him, or bring him to justice, should be " rewarded with such aad such lands." His name, tiie tradition tells us, was Bertram de Sljotts ; he was a terror to every body that resided near him, or who had occasion to pass east or west through those parts where he lurked and had his haunts. The Laird of Muirhead, at the time, was a bold, daring, intrepid man ; he did not surprise him in his lurking places, but with a few in his company, to whose courage and valour he could well trust, came up, and, in the day time, attacked him in that valley on the east side of the kirk of Shotts, when, after a pretty smart encounter, the Goliah Bertram was slain on the place. The Laird ot Muirhead cut the head off this robber, which he carried straight to the king, who immediately, in the terms of the proclamation, ordered him a charter and infeft- ment of these lands, that were then or soon after called Lauchop, and gave him, as an additional honour to his arms, the three acorns in the seed, on the bend dexter; for crest, two hands supporting a sword in pale, proper ; and the motto, Auxilio- Dei, which is borne by the family to this day (6). When the Lairds of Muirhead came of course to be vassals to the Earls of Douglas for their estate in the barony of Bothwell, the tradition is. That beinggallant brave men, they were mightily aiding and assisting to them, not only in the public wars in the defence of the country against invasions from England, but even in the lesser feuds and scrapes they were, as was customary, engaged in against other great families, which were some- times carried far, and much blood shed on both sides ; it was in reward, they say, of these services to the Hause of Douglas, who were also Lords of Galloway, that the Lairds of Lauchop had tirst the feu from them of the lands of Daldenan, Clon- ard, &c. (cj, which thsy continued to possess in feu and assedation from the crown, after the forfeiture of the House of Douglas ; and it is reported their estate was by far greater and more considerable in Galloway than it was in the county of Lanark. The first charter I have seen of any note concerning this ancient family, is a a deed granted by Archibaldus Comes de Douglas, Dominus Galovidice et Bothwel^ dicto scutifero sua IViUielmo de Muirhead, of his lands of Muirhead, in baronia de Botbwel, in the 1393 (rf). Being a gentleman of mettle and spirit, and who seems to have had a turn for business, he had the honour of knighthood conferred on him by King Robert IIL for we find him designed, in no less an authority than the learned Mr Rymer in the Fcedera Angliae, Dom. IVUlielmus de Mairhead, miles. This same noble gentleman had the honour, in the 1404, to be employed with Sir David Fleming, whom the king calls consanguineus suus, to treat with the King of England, Henry IV. or his Commissioners, concerning the redemption of the Earls of Fife and Douglas, who had been both taken prisoners at the battle of Homildon in Northumberland, two years before (£■) ; impowering them also to (a) I mean my most worthy frieiid William Hamilton of Wlshaw. (A) Mr NIsbet's Heraldry, page 438, intimating, that he went out in the strength of God to vanquish that robber, who was a pest to the country, (c) Assedation in 1517 from the crown, Daldenan Joanni Muirhe.td, filio et hseredi quondam Joannis Muirhead, who was Jlain at Flodden ; and another feu or tack to him in the exchequer rolls, Joanni Muirhead, fiiio et h;eredi Joannis Muirhead de Bullis, de Clonard. (d) Note of this charter in the genealogy of the family I have seen, (f) Rymer's Fffidera, ad annum 1402. Vou IL f C i5« APPENDIX. conclude a tiuce or peace (/). The commissioners of both kings met at Ponte- fract, and, on the 6th of July 1404, agreed to a truce, which was to commence on the 20th of that month, and to last till Easter the next year ; as also, that during that interval of time, a congress should be held at Handerstank, in order to a more complete and satisfying treaty ; but an unlucky unforeseen event, the seiz- ing the prince going to France, diverted them from pursuing the measures that had been laid down. This Knight of Muirhead of the House of Lauchop, married Dame Jean Hay, daughter of Sir William Hay of Locharret, ancestor of the Lords of Yester, and of the Earls and Marquisses of Tweeddale {^), by whom he had IVillielmus de Muir- head, Dominus de Lachop, in 1445 {b). Dr Andrew Muirhead, who being from his youth bred up with a view to the service of the church, and taking holy orders, was first rector of Cadyow ; and after that rising in reputation for his piety, learning, and mtegrity, was preferred to the Episcopal .See of Glasgow on the demise of the ever memorable Bishop Turn- bull, on the third of September, in the year 1454 (/). It must have been upon the knowledge, as well as the fame of the consummate merit of this worthy pre- late, that either the canons or prebends pi the chapter of the Episcopal See were induced to elect, or the king to conform the choice of a successor, even so regu- larly and duly elected, according to the canons of the church, to Bishop Turnbull, as Dr Muirhead. They seem to have been very just in their choice, for he had not been long in the See, when the greatest honour was done him that could be thought of, (not by any private deed, but by a public national act of the estates of Parlia- ment) to testify the esteem they had of his character ; for, on the death of King James II. he was named, in the 1460, one of the Lords of the Regency, in whom the power of the sovereignty was lodged, till the young king should be of age. The Bishop's colleagues in that important office were, the Bishop of St Andrews, Bishop Kennedy, the Bishop of Dunkeld, Dr Lauder, the Earl of Orkney, the Lords Boyd, Graham, and Kennedy (/^); and it is acknowledged, to the honour of their memory, that they ruled the kingdom to their great glory, and the infinite advantage both of the king and people, and that with uninterrupted harmony and unanimity. One of the first things, it seems, the governors thought fit to do for preserving the peace and tranquillity of the nation, was to come to an accomniodation with England, and to treat upon a truce (/). Accordingly a commission is issued out in the name of the young king in the 1462, authorising Bishop Kennedy of St Andrews, Bishop Muirhead of Glasgow, the Abbot of Holyroodhouse, Mr Archibald Crawfurd, Mr James Lindsay, the Provost of Lincluden, the Privy Seal, the Earl of Argyle, the Lord Livingston, the Lord Hamilton, the Lord Borthwick, the Lord Boyd, Sir Alex- ander Boyd of Duncow, to meet and treat with the commissioners of the crown of England, in order to negociate a truce. Accordingly they met at York ; and, on the 19th December agreed to the following conditions (w) : " That it should last " from the i6th day of December, by land and fresh water, to the last day of Oc- •' tober next coming ; and from the first day of February next, till the same last " day of October, by sea : Secondly, That James King of Scotland shall give no " assistance to Henry, late calling himself King of England, or his adherents, dur- " ing the aUiance or truce : Thirdly, That Edward King of England shall give " no countenance or protection to any traitors or rebels to King James: Fourthly, " That in regard James Earl of Douglas was become liegeman to King Edward, " he, or such other Scotsmen, shall enjoy the benefit of the truce: Fifthly, That if " Henry, late called King of England, or any other his adherents, shall become " liegemen to the said King James, they shall, in that case, have the benefit of " the truce as all his other liegemen." (/) Rymer's Foedera Anglic, ad annum 1404; and some part of this is taken notice of by our own historians, particularly my worthy learned friend Dr Patrick Abercromby, in his second volume of the History of Scotland, page 222. {g) Manuscript History of the House of Tweeddale in the family of Tweeddale. {h) Note of the History of the House of Lauchop I have seen, (i) Obituary of the Episcopal See of Glasgow in the Chartulary of the Bishopric in the Scots College at Paris, 1 have seen. (h) Buchanan and Abercromby, and the other histories. (1) Rymer. The ambassadors, 2d June 1460, are the Bishop of St Andrews, Bishop of Glasgow, with a retinue of 30 persons in his company. {m^ Rymer's Fadera, and Dr Abercromby from him, page 390. APPENDIX. 2s<> The very prospect of so long a calm put the bishop upon executing the more immediate offices of his function ; for after this he made several regulations in the chapter of the See, and founded the vicars of the choir that had not been in his church before, J'undator vicariir. choiii in ecclesia Ghis^nicii. (a), as he is called. He also adorned and beautified the cathedral, and appears to be a benefactor, espe- cially in the northside of the nave, where, on the roof, there is still to be seen and viewed, by the curious, his coat of arms, the acorns on the bend surmounted of the salmon fishing, the cognizance of the Episcopal See, and adorned with a mitre exquisitely graved : but the virtues, goodness, and merit of this good prelate could not be confined within so narrow bounds as his own diocese, and the public could not surter themselves to be deprived of his services, however usefully he might be employed in his own station as a bishop in the church; for in the 1468, an embassy to Denmark being judged necessary, not only to cultivate a firm friend- ship betwixt the two nations, but also to treat with King Christiern of a marriage betvvixt the young king and the princess,i the only daughter of that monarch; in an embassy of this importance, none was judged more proper than the Bishop of Glasgow. There were joined with our prelate the Bishop of Orkney, the Lord Evandale, the Chancellor, the Earl of Arran, Mr Martin Wan the king's almo- ner and confessor, Gilbert Rerrick his own arch-deacon of Glasgow, David Crich- ton of Cranston, and John Shaw of Hallie. A prosperous gale carried them quickly to Copenhagen, the capital city of Denmark, where, on the 8th of Sep- tember, the marriage was agreed to on the following terms : " First, That the an- " nual of Norway should be for ever remitted and extinguished : Secondly, That " King Christiern should give 6o,coo florins of gold for his daughter's portion, " whereof lo.oco should be paid before her departure from Denmark; and that the " islands of Orkney should be made over to the crown of Scotland, by pledge, for "• the security of the remainder, with this express proviso. That they shall return " to that of Norway after complete payment of the whole sum : Thirdly, That " in case of his dying before the said Margaret, his spouse, he should leave her in " possession of the palace of Linlithgow, and castle of Doune in Monteith, with all " their appurtenances, and the third part of the ordinary revenues of the crown, " to be enjoyed by her during life, in case she should choose to reside in Scotland: " But, Fourthly, If she rather inclined to return to Denmark, that, in lieu of the *« said liferent, palace, and castle, she should accept of 120,000 florins of the Rhine;. " from which sum the 50,000 due for the remainder of her portion being deduced " and allowed, the islands of Orkney shall be annexed to the crown of Norway " forever. Fifthly, That she shall in no case or event be allowed to marry an Eng- " lishman, or any subject within the jurisdiction of England (Zi)." For some time after the arrival and coronation of the Queen, Bishop Muirhead seems to have meddled much in those transactions, more than was merely consistent with his character; but confined himself to the more private duties of his function and office in ruling his clergy, and diffusing his charity and beneficence through his diocese. More particularly about this time, in 1471, he founded, near to the precinct of his episcopal palace at Glasgow, an hospital, which he dedicated to the honour of St Nicholas. The place where the divine service was, is of fine aisler work of a Gothic form, and the windows supported by a buttress betwixt each of them; upon the front, over the door, is the bishop's arms surmounted of the salmon-fish, and a crosier or pastoral staff behind the shield. By the foundation I see it was to con- sist of twelve old men, who were provided with all necessaries for their support and sustenance; and also a priest to celebrate divine service at the canonical hours of devotion, that they might be freed from worldly avocations in the decline of their age, and in a better condition to prepare for another world, now that they were on the brink of eternity. The foundation subsisted till after the reformation that the payment of the revenue went into desuetude ; so that at this time there are not above four maintained in it: however it still retains the name of Bishop Muirhead's Hospital, and St Nicholas's Hospital, and is a noble monument of its illustrious founder. Opposite to the hospital he built and devoted a house or manse for the (a) Chartulary of Glasgow, (b) Torfceas's History of the Oikne^f 26o APPENDIX. priest or preceptor, upon which there is still to be seen the bishop's arms, the cro- sier behind the shield, with the three acorns on the bend: but whilst this excellent prelate was thus busied in the offices of piety, beneficence, and humanity, to his distressed fellow-creatures, he was again called to act in a more public sphere and capacity; for, in the year 1472, King Edward IV. of England being no sooner re- settled on the English throne, but to fix the Scots nation the more to his interest, he proposed a match betwixt some fit persons of the two royal families, as a good step towards a lasting friendship; and as King James III. did not seem averse from it, so, in this view, our prelate Bishop Muirheadof Glasgow, Bishop Spence of Aber- deen, the Earls of Argyle, Crawford, and Caithness, the Lords Hamilton, Borthwick, Seaton, Darnly, David Guthrie, the Lord Register, and Duncan Dundas, Esq. were named as Commissioners : but though they received their respective commissions in August 1471, yet they did not meet till the next year 1472, when, on the 20th of April, it was agreed, that the present truce should be observed till the month of July 1483 (a); but the bishop did not see the expiration of it; for, in about six months after the conclusion of the peace he had been so highly instrumental in bringing about, he died at his palace in the city of Glasgow, on the 20th of November 1473(6), and was interred in the choir of the Cathedral Church, under, no doubt, a noble monument, suitable to the magnificence of so great a prelate, but has been swept clean away at the Reformation, with the rest that were within that stately edi- fice. The death of so good and excellent a man w^as certainly an irreparable loss; for, who knows, and I am sure it is very likely, but that if our prelate had not been in his grave before the unhappy after-part of this reign, he might, in his great and consummate wisdom and prudence, have been happily instrumental in allaying the heats, rancours, and animosities, that afterwards broke out and ended in so dismal a catastrophe. The Bishop had a younger brother, as I take it, who was educated to the church, Mr Udastus Muirhead, who, after he was in orders, was made Dean of Glasgow, a benefice then both of great dignity and revenue, for he was a prebend in the chapter of the Episcopal See of Glasgow, and Rector of Cadyow. He was a gentleman of figure and character for learning; for he was on the 27th of October in the year 1476, elected Rector of the University of Glasgow (r); but whether be rose to any higher station in the church, or died in his rectory, I have not been able to discover. There was a daughter of the House of Muirhead of Lauchop, called, as it is handed down, Janet Muirhead, who, for her great beauty, was commonly called the Fair Maid, or, the Bonny Lass of Lechbninach, who was married de Jacto privately, sed non de jure secundum canones, to Gavin Hamilton, son to Sir James Hamilton of Cad- yow, and brother-gennan to James Lord Hamilton. The marriage, they say, was private, and the parties inter grades a jure prohibitos, within the degrees of consan- guinity prohibited by the canons or laws of the church ; and a previous dispensa- tion had not been obtained from the Pope before the marriage, and the children so procreate ex occulto et clandestino matrimonio, were looked on as spurious. Hovvever, this lady bore four or five sons, and after that he left off cohabitation with the gentlewoman, and went into orders, and came to be Provost of the Collegiate Church of Bothwell, of the Earl of Douglas's patronage, and is in that office as soon as the year 1453 {d). He does not indeed call his children his own sons, when he dispones the lands of Orbiston to the eldest, Mr Robert Hamilton, whom he designs Cancellario Glasguen. that is. Rector of Campsie, and then to Thomas Hamilton, Canon of Dunkeld ; and failing him, to John Hamilton their carnal brother; and failmg him, to Archibald and Gavm Hamiltons, all brothers to one another, in the 1468 (f). Of John Ha- milton, the first layman in the charter, is descended the Hamiltons of Orbiston, Hagg, Bothwellhaugh, Innermadden, Aikenhead in Monkland, Fergusly, Kilbrack- mont, Monkland, Dalziel, Neilsland, &.c. But to return to the House of Lauchop, we may observe, that (a) Rymer's Foedera Anglije, ad annum 1471. ("i) Obituary of several of the great men and mem- bers of the chapter of Glasgow in the chartulary of that See, MSS. at Paris. (O Writs of the CoUege of Glasgow belonging to the Faculty I have seen, {d) Rymer's Foedera. {e) This charter is afterwards confirmed under the Great Seal in the public archives. APrEXDIX. :i63 William MuiRHEADot"L;iiichop, the elder brother of the Bishop oFGlasgow, mar- ried Mariota Haiuihon (.v), daughter of Hamilton of by whom he had John, who was the lieir of the House of Lauchop; and a younger Dr Richard Muirhead, who was, by the care of his uncle the Bishop of Glas- gow, bred to the service of the church; and, getting into orders, was preferred to the deanery of Glasgow, which was a benefice both of considerable dignity and re- venue, being the first member of the chapter of the Episcopal See of Glasgow, who had the second vote, next to the bishop himself. The Dean being a person of learning, merit, and integrity. King James IV. was pleased, from a confidence in his abilities and sulliciency, to make him Lord Clerk-Register of Scotland, or Clerk and Keeper of his iNIajesty's Council, Registers, and Rolls, the 21st of June 1489 (/'), upon the removal of Dr Alexander Inglis, Archdeacon of St Andrews (r), Elect of Duiikeld. He held this great office, huving the charge of the whole registers of the kingdom in his custody, for the space and time of five years, till the 1493, that he resigned in favour of Dr John Frissel, or Fraser, Dean of the Royal College Church at Restalrig (rf). The removal of the Dean of Glasgow, Dr Muuhead, does not seem to have flowed from any disregard or dislike to his conduct in the ad- ministration of his great otfice, but rather to do him the greater honour; for while he was the Clerk-Register, it was concerted in Parliament, that certain great men of the clergy, as well as of the laity, should be sent to several different courts to solicit for a consort to the young king their master, which was a matter of the last consequence to the kingdom, the king being then nineteen, and the only person of his family. The persons employed were Robert, Bishop of Glasgow; this was Bishop Blackadder, thereafter the first archbishop of that See, Bishop Elphinstone of Aberdeen, the Earl of Bothwell, the Earl of Morton, the Lord Glammis, WiUiam, Prior of St John of Jerusalem in Scotland, Lawrence Lord Oliphant, and our Dean,. Mr Richard Muirhead, Dean of Glasgow (e). They were to go to the courts of France, England, Castile, Arragon, Sicily, &c. But it was a while after this that the king's marriage with the daughter of England was completed, in which the Archbishop of Glasgow was the great and happy instrument; and it appears to me more than probable, that his dean, Dr Muirhead, had a share in that great transac- tion that has had such mighty effects, and laid not only the foundation of the union of the crowns, but also of the two kingdoms in our own time. Dr Muir- head, by his prudent conduct and just administration in his office while Clerk- Register, procured a general esteem, and he had got so much into the king's con- fidence and favour that he preferred him to be Secretary of State in the 1495 (/),. in place of Dr Inglis, the Archdeacon of St Andrews, who was both Secretary and Clerk of the Register, Secretariiu, ac Clericus Rotulorwn et Ri'ghtri Regis Scotiae, as he is designed. The great abilities and eminent qualities of the Dean of Glas- gow, in this high station, coming to be more and better known and displayed, in the necessary discharge and dispatches of his office, the king was pleased to make him one of his Privy Council. This appears from an instrument taken within the Cathedral Church of Glasgow, where the king was present on the loth of Decem- ber 1502, when he was obhged, as was usual, to give his oath to observe the late treaty with England, before a great many of the nobiUty and gentry of both na- tions; among whom were Ricardus Muirhead, Decanus Ecclesia Glasgtiensis, dicti- que Regis Scotorum, Consiliario et Secretario (^). The king's marriage quickly fol- lowing on the peace, with the Princess Margaret, eldest daughter of King Henry VII. pursuant to an article of the agreement, the queen's jointure was (a) Note of the Genealogy of the House of Muirhead. (A) Charta of that date that he is in the Register's Office, Clericus Rotulorum & Registri, ac Concilii Clericus. (c) Charta in archivls. l^d) This year 1403, 2^th June, is the precise year that Mr Frisle, the Dean of Restalrig, is made Register, and is so designed in the Fredera Angliie, in a treaty with the English, and also in the registers of the Great Seal in the archives, (f) Rymer's Fcedera Anglise, the 14th June 1491. {f) In a commission to go to England, 8th July 1494, among others there is the Archdeacon of St Andrews, Secretarium ctiam Clericum Registri Jacobi Scotorum Regis, and this Dr Muirhead is in the office then. { g\ Rymer't FcEdera Anglix', ad annum 1502. Vol. U. 7 D 262 APPENDIX. settled on the 4th of May 1503 (rt), to which there are witncbsts, Archibald Tari of Argyle, Ma^ister Hospitii, Master of the Household, Andrew Lord Gray, Jus- titiatio nostro, says the sovereign, Magister Ricardus Midrhead Decano Glasguen. Secretario nostra, Gaviiio Dunbar Decano Moravien. Clerico nostrorum Rotulorum et Registri (/>). As the Secretary, Dean Muirhead, has been a learned man in that which was more peculiar to his own profession of theology, so he has been well known in the civil and canon law, insomuch that he was made one of the Lords of Council and Session by King James IV. anno 150?., who were the ordinary judges of law and equity before the institution of the College of Justice, which did not commence till the next succeeding reign, anno 153a. There is a decreet still extant, whereby a service of John Lord Somerville, as heir to William Somerville, his father, is re- duced, because his father had been vested and seised in the half of the lands of Gilmerton, proceeding on a charter from. Malise Earl of Monteith, who had no right either in property or superiority to the said lands (c). The Dean of Glas- gow, in the extract, is mentioned among the rest of the Lords. He continued Secretary for about the space of eleven years, without any interruption, or the least visible diminution of favour from his prince, till his death in the 1506, that Dr Patrick Panter, then Rector of Fetteresso, and Preceptor of the Maison Dieu Hospital at Brechin, afterwards the learned Abbot of Cambuskenneth was prefer- red to the office (rf). But to return to my subject, the memorial of the House of Muirhead, John Muirhead of Lauchop and Bullis, the next in the line and course of succession in this ancient family, was tacksman and kindly rentaller, or rather feuar of many of the crown lands of Galloway, which he possessed till his death, that he was slain fighting by the side of his royal master King James IV. in canipo belli de Nor- tkumhtrland, sub vexillo Domini Regis, as it is generally called in many records, and which is well known was the battle of Flodden, which was fought the 9th of Sep- tember 1513 (f); and it is certain that the possessions of the family of the Muir- heads were at this time as valuable as those they had in Clydesdale or Lanarkshire. This gentleman left issue by Margaret, his wife, daughter of Patrick Lord Hep- burn of Hailes, and sister to Patrick Earl of Bothwell (/), John, his son and heir (^), who married Margaret Borthwick, daughter to the Lord Borthwick, then an opu- lent noble family as any in all the kingdom in the rank and quality of Parliamen- tary barons {h), and had James, the heir of the House of Muirhead and family of Lauchop, who married Jean, daughter of John Lord Fleming (/), ancestor to the present Earl of Wigton; by whom he had two sons, James Muirhead of Lauchop, the heir of the family, and John Muirhead of Shawfoot, a younger brother, who was a feuar under the Archbishop of Glasgow, Archbishop Dunbar {k), of whom is descended the Muirheads of Bredisholm, in the county of Lanark, who, since the deathofCaptainJamesMuirheadof Lauchop, in the endofthei738, withoutanymale issue of his body, is now the lineal lawful heir-male of the House of Lauchop; and the undoubted chief and representative of the ancient family of Muirhead is John Muirhead of Bredisholm, who, though lie wore in his arms a crescent before, as a mark of cadency, intimating his descent, as a second brother, from the stem and root of the family, yet now he may lay it aside, as he has a just title to do, seeing, as heir-male, he represents the principal family. This James Muirhead of Lauchop had also a daughter, Margaret, who was married to James Hamilton of Woodhall, Captain of Arran, and had issue (/). (a) Rymer's Fcedera Angliae. {h) Ibidem, (c) In the original decreet, among tlie lords there is Mr Richhtd Muirhead, Dean of Glasgow, Secretary. ( 1500, 1501, 1502, 1503, &c. rcj/ifrt/W till his death. In the chartulary of the writs of the college of Glasgow, in I 51 2, Dean Muirhead is de- signed venerabi/is memorise, which imports he was dead some time before, (c) Rolls of the Exchequer in the- rejis'ers. {f'l Draught of the descent and lineage of the Muirheads of Lauchop, MSS. {g) Ticks from the crown to John Muirhead, son and heir of John Muirhead, in 1517, in the Ex- cheqiip- Rolls. (A) Biithbrieve in the registers of the Great Seal. (/) Birthbrieve to a gentleman de- scended of the Haust of Lauchop, in the registers of the Great Seal in the public records, {i) The Ge- nealogical Draught of the Muirheads of Lauchop, MSS. (/) Charta penes Joan- Crawfiird de Jordaa- iiill, ad annum 1539, and 1540. APPENDIX. 263 This Ja.mes MuiRHEAD, the younger of Lauchop, married Janet, daughter of Alex- ander Raillie of Cavphin («_), an ancient family of the Bailhcs, as far back as the reign of King David 11., in the county of Lanark, l)y whom lie had a son, the heir of the family, viz. James Muiruead of Lauchop, who being linked in friendship, blood, and affinity with the Hamiltons, did stick firm to Queen Maiy when she fell in her troubles ; for how soon that misfortunate princess tiad found means to make her escape out of the castle of Lochleven, where a party of her undutiful subjects had shut her up, and came to Hamilton, this loyal gentleman repaired with his friends and followers to her standard, how soon it was set up, and marched to the battle of Langside, in order to recover and restore her to her liberty and sovereignty ; but that attempt proving unsuccessful, by the defeat of the army on the 13th of May 1568, he was forfeited by a Parliamentary attainder for that dutiful and loyal appearance (^b) : However, he still continued in the queen's interest, and did some pieces of very acceptable service on that side : It is confidently reported, and I believe there is no ground to doubt the truth of the fact, that the Laird of Lauchop, being a bold and intrepid man, received and sheltered James Hamilton of Botiiwelhaugh the night he fled from Hamilton, after he had shot the Earl of Murray, the Regent, at Linlithgow, the 29th of January 1570. The next day he went along with Mr Ha- milton himself; but the party who were sent to pursue him, hearing he had stopt at the house of Lauchop, they first rifled it, and then set it on fire, and burnt it to the ground ; and perhaps the regent's party were not a whit less set on in their re- sentment, that the Lady Lauchop was sister to Bothwelhaugh, who had slain their master, and whose death they were seeking to revenge. The forfeiture continued on the family of Lauchop till the general act of pacification amongst the two con- tending parties came to be finally settled on the 23d of February 1573, at Perth ; whereby, in pursuance of an article of agreement, it was declared and decerned, " That the sentences past be doom and forfaulture in Parliament, or anie other " sentence past before the Justice-General or his deputes, since the 15th day of " June 1567, shall be of no avail, force, strength, or effect in all time coming." In this act there are a long roll of persons who had been engaged in the rebellion against the young king, who are all now remitted and restored ; and among the rest this gentleman, James Muirhead of Lauchop (c), was one. He married Janet Ha- milton, daughter of James Hamilton of Bothwelhaugh, who was a brother of the House of Orbiston fdj, by whom he had issue James, his successor, and a younger son, Thomas Muirhead of Johnston, who married Elizabeth Hamilton, daughter of Hamilton of Bathgate (nre now turned out to be the iien-in;ile ol the fumily of Lauchop tliemselves. Their predecessor then, as we heretofore took notice of, was Jolin Muirhead of Shawfutte, second son of John Muirhead of Laueliop by Jean his Wife, daughter of John Lord Fleininj;;. Tliis gentleman, by his discretion, con- duct, and prudence, in the managing his affairs, acquired a competent estate with- in the barony and regality of Glasgow, in vassallage of the archbishops of that See. His first wife was Elizabeth, daughter of Crawfurd of Ferni, a right ancient fami- ly (rt) in Lanarkshire, that had subsisted from the time of K.ing Robert 111. (A) in the county of Lanark, near to Rutherglen, and after that, Jean Oliphant, daugnter of Sir Alexander Olipiiant of Kelly, in the county of tife, the first cadet and branch of the family of Oliphant (c). His son, also of the name of John, allied with the Oliphants of Kelly ; and being, as his father, a gentleman of spirit, and application to frugality, he ac(|uired from Archbishop Spottiswood the lands of Bredisholm, which is confirmed by a charter under the Great Ssal the first of March 1607 (), who was sprung lineally from Sir William Hamilton, younger son to Sir David Hamilton of Cad- yow (i), ancestor to the Duke of Hamilton. The lady's mother was Margaret, daughter of Sir Alexander Hamilton of Innerwick, by whom he had James, the eldest son and heir, George Muirhead of Stevenson in Bothwell, whose male issue is extinct ; he had also one daughter, Elizabeth, who was married to Patrick Ha- milton of Neilsland, and had issue. He married to his second wife Grissel, daughter of James Hamilton of Westport, near Linlithgow, descended from the Hamiltons of Silvertonhill, widow and relict of William Cochran, son and apparent heir of Alexander Cochran of Barbachlay in the county of Linlithgow (k), by whom he had one daughter Margaret, who was married to James Hamilton of Aikenhead, in the shire of Lanark (/), and had issue. He married to his third wife Bessie, daughter of James Crawfurd of Kipbyre in Lanarkshire (rn), by whom he had two daughters; Lilias, who was married to James (a) Genealogical draught of the Muitheads. (i) Writs of the House of Ferm. (r) Writs of the House ef Oliphant, in the custody of Laurence Oliphant of Gask. (d) Charta penes Bredisholm. («■) Acts of Parliament. (_/) Original contract ye: extant in Bredisholm's hands, (g) Contract and marriage ar- ticles in the custody of Bredisholm. (A) Ibid. (/) Charta in archivis', ad annum 1407. (,f) Ibid-. (l) Ibidem, (m) Charta penes Bredisholm. Vol. n. 7 E 265 APPENDIX. Hamilton of Blantyrefarm. and had issue ; and Anne to John Stark of Auchinvole and Gartsherry, and hand issue. JAMES MuiRAEAD of Bicdishohn was a very worthy gentleman, well esteemed, a person of great goodness, uprightness, and integrity, he married a lady of a noble extraction, as we see some of his ancestors had done before him, viz. Mrs Helen Stewart, daughter of Alexander, fourth Lord Blantyre. Her mother was Margaret, only daughter of John Shaw of Greenock, and of Helen his wife, daughter of Sir John Houston of that Ilk, by whom he had James, who died in the hfetime of his father, John his successor, William and George, both bred to the practice of the law, Walter, who all three died unmarried. He had also two daughters, EuPHAME, the eldest, who was married to Archibald Grossett of Logic, and had issue. Margaret, to John Stark of Auchinvole and Gartsherry, and had issue. John Muirhead, now of Bredisholm, since the demise lately of Captain James Muirhead of Lauchop, is now the heir-male, and of consequence the chief and re- presentative of the family of Lauchop ; which I may venture to say, is one of the most ancient families in all Lanarkshire. He married Lilias, eldest daughter of James Hamilton of Aikenhead ; but as he has no issue, and but little hopes of any, iiis nephew, by his eldest sister the deceased Lady Logie, Walter Grossett of Logic, Esq. is his presumptive, if I may not call him his apparent heir, who, in that event, is to assume the arms of Muirhead, the simple coat, as his uncle now bears it, which probably he may think fit to marshal in the first and fourth quarter of his armorial achievement. Since there is then apparently so natural a connection betwixt Mr Grossett of Logie and the Muirheads of Bredisholm, I shall here but just touch a little at the origin and progress of that name in a very few words. I concur in my opinion with those who think the surname and family of Grossett to be of a French extraction, and of a family of eminency there, Grosier, and who bear the same armorial figures in their arms as those of the surname of Grossett do; the variation is very little ; and the identity of one and the same armorial bearing is the very surest mark of blood and descent, as the heralds observe. It is an agreed point amongst the heralds, that the besants were acquired by those who had signalized themselves in the crusades in the Holy War against the infidels. That the ancestors of the Grossetts of Logie are but lately extracted from France is most certain. Captain Alexander Grossett came over from France, and served King Charles I. in the army, and had the reputation of a gentleman of honour, virtue, and probity. After the war was at an end, he settled in Scotland, and died there, leaving behind him a son, Alexander Grossett, Esq; who purchased the lands of Logie near Dunfermhne ; but being high in the presbyterian principles, and those people being much depressed in the late times, that he might freely enjoy the ex- ercise of his religion, he retired over to Holland, where he died, leaving issue by Christian Cochran his wife, of the ancient family of the Cochrans of Barbachly, who can, by well vouched documents, carry up their pedigree to the time of King David II. if not further, only one son, his heir, Archibald Grossett, Esq. who married Euphame, eldest daughter of James Muirhead of Bredisholm, in the county of Lanark, and of Helen his wife, daugh- ter of Alexander Lord Blantyre, by whom he had three sons, Walter Grossett of Logie, Esq. Collector of his Majesty's Customs, Salt-duty, and excise, at the port of Alloa, in the county of Clackmanan, and one of the Justices of the Peace of that shire ; Captain Alexander Grossett, the second son, is Captain in General Clayton's regiment ; James Grossett, Esq. the third son, is a merchant at Lisbon in Portugal, a gentleman of reputation, and a rising young man that way. The armorial bearing of Grossett of Logie is azure, three stars or mullets dis- posed fesse-vvays, argent, and in base of the stars as many besants or, of the se- cond ; which coat he may carry, on the event of his uncle Bredisholm's death, in the first and fourth quarter of the achievement of that family. ■z67 Of the family of DUNDAS of Fingask, formerly designed of that Ilk and Fingask.. AS the former memorial of the family of Dundas of that Ilk, inserted in this Ap- pendix, contains several assertions, for which no document is adduced, and some of them contrary to fict ; and deduces the succession of the family since the reign of King James II. from a collateral branch, and not the lineal heir, thereby insinu- ating that the present Laird of Dundas is the representative of the ancient family, in prejudice of the family we now treat of, which undoubtedly is so ; they have thought proper to publish a genuine account of the family, vouched by charters and other authentic deeds, the originals whereof are either in their own custody, or to be found amongst the public records of the nation. Some account is given of the family of Dundas in the First Volume of this System, page 275, where Mr Nisbet, from the similitude of the armorial bearing, and other arguments, attributes their original to Cospatricius, Earl of Dunbar and March, .^ ho came to Scotland with King Malcolm Canmore, and was by that wise and discerning prince rewarded with the lands of Dunbar, and many others in Lothian and the Merse. I. Waldeve, son to Cospatrick, about the year 1124, grants to Helias, son of Huthred (fiis brother) the lands of Dundas, to be holden of him, as mentioned in the copy of the original charter in Sir James Dalrymple's Collections, page 382, and another copy of the said charter, taken from the original, is engraven in cop- perplate, in Mr James Anderson's beautiful Collection of Ancient Scots Charters, lately published by the learned Mr Thomas Ruddiman. II. Serle de Dundas is the next found to succeed about the year 11 70, and after him another III. Helias de Dundas, who is often mentioned in the reign of King vUesander II. anno 1220. IV. RuDOLPHUS de Dundas is afterwards in possession of Dundas, and found often witness to the deeds of the abbot of Kelso, anno 1256 («). He was father to V. Saer. de Dundas, who was one of the persons of rank mentioned in Rag- man-Roll, who swore fealty to Edward King of England, anno 1296, and was obliged to repeat the submission twice ; first for his lands in Lothian, and again for his lands of Fingask in Perthshire (b'). VL Hugh de Dundas is often found as companion to the hero Sir William Wal- lace, anno 1299. To whom succeeded another VII. Saer de Dundas, who was slain at the battle of Duplin, fighting against Edward Baliol and an English army, anno 1332 (c). To him succeeded VIII. Jacobus de Dundas, of whom we have discovered nothing remarkable. He was father to IX. Joannes de Dundas, whom we find disputing his right to the islands in the Forth opposite to the Queensferry, with the Abbot of Dunfermline, who pro- ceeded against him with the highest censures of the church, before he could oblige him to desist from his claim: but that matter being some way accommodated betwixt them, he was absolved from the abbot's sentence of excommunication in 1342 (rf). Afterwards, upon his own resignation of the lands of Fingask, he obtained a new charter thereof from King David II. ()." By the said EHzabeth Bruce, daughter of Sir David Bruce of Clackmanan, and Janet his wife, daughter to Sir Patrick Blackadder of Tulliallan, he had issue, first Archibald his heir, second, Robert, third, Tliomas of Findhorn- (c), and two daughters, Nicholas, married to Alexander, Lord Commendator of Cul- ross, ancestor to the Lord Colvil, to whom she had issue : Margaret, the second daughter, married to William Ker of Ancrum, their grandson was created Marquis of Lothian ; she married, secondly. Sir George Douglas of Mordington, to whom she had Sir George Douglas, and a daughter, Martha, married to Sir James Lock- hart Lord Lee ; their issue were General William Lockhart of Lee, Sir George of Carnwath, and Sir John of Castlehill, and several daughters. XIV. Archibald Dundas succeeded his father ; he married Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Colvil of Cleish, ancestor to the Lord Ochiltree, by whom he had issue William, his eldest son, Archibald and Robert. In anno 1582 he entered into a contract of marriage with his son William and Dame Margaret Carnegie, eldest daughter to Sir David Carnegie ; and by her mother, Elizabeth Ramsay, she was co-heiress of Colluthy and Leuchars, whereby these lands and the barony of Fin- gask is provided to the heirs- male of the aforesaid marriage, agreeable to the old infeftments, with the lands of Coates, Knightspotty, &c. but, there being no issue XV. Archibald Dundas, his second brother, succeeded, and was, upon the 8th of February 1606, served heir in general to Alexander Dundas of Fingask, his grandfather, at Perth, before William, master of Tullibardin, sheriffof that shire [d). (0 Contract of marriage in the Earl of Linlithgow's charter-chest. {«) Rymer's Fuedera Angliae, ad unnum 1484, &c. (x) Page 275. ( y) Specialis retornatus penes Dundas de Fingask. (n) Original contract penes eundum. (A) Charta in publicis archivis Lib. 22. No. 292. {(c) Charta ibid. (//) Ge- neralis Retornatus penes Dundas de Fingask. APPENDIX. 271 And, ill anno 1609, he took a new charter of the lands of Fingask from the King {, ). He married Jean, another daughter of the foresaid Sir David Carnegie, father to the Earls of Soiithesk and Northesk, by his second wife, Euphame, daughter to Sir John Wemyss of that Ilk, ancestor to the Earl of V\emyss, by whom he left issue Sir John Dundas, Robert, and six daughters. He married a second time Giles, daugh- ter to Sir Laurence Mercer of Aldie, by whom he had Laurence, predecessor to Mr Laurence Dundas, Professor of Humanity in the University of Edinburgh; and, dying in 1624, was succeeded by XVL Sir John Dundas of Fingask, his eldest son, who was knighted by King Charles I. unno 1633. His loyalty to his sovereign, and his near relation to th'j: g:;.-at Marquis of Montrose, induced him to expose his life and fortune in the royal cau-e, whereby the latter was much diminished. He married first, Anne, daugh- ter to Sir William Moncrief of that Ilk, without issue; and, secondly, Margaret, daughter to George Dundas of Dundas, by his wife Elizabeth, daughter to Sir Al- exander Hamilton of Innerwick, by whom he left issue, XVIL John Dundas, his only son and heir, who married Magdalen, daughter to AUardice, son to Allardice of that Ilk, and his wife, daughter to Sir Thomas Burnet of Leys, by whom he left an only son, Thomas, and three daughters. And, secondly. He married Mary, daughter to Sir Michael Arnot of that Ilk, without issue. XVIII. Thomas Dundas, presently of Fingask, married Bethia BaiUie, daugh- ter to John Baillie of Casdecary, and Margaret, daughter to BaiUie of Mannerhall, by whom he has three sons living, viz. Thomas, married to Anna, daughter to Mr James Graham of Airth, Judge of the High Court of Admiralty of Scotland, by Mary Livingston, daughter to Alexander Earl of Callender, and his lady, Anne Graham, daughter to James Mar- quis of Montrose. Laurence married Margaret, only daughter to Alexander Bruce of Kennet, by Dame Mary Balfour, daughter to the Lord Burleigh. William, presently in the army. The armorial bearing carried by Dundas of Fingask is, argent, a lion rampant gules ; supported by two lions rampant, gules ; crest, a lion's head full-faced, crowned with an antique crown, looking over a bush of oak : motto, Essayez ; and the same arms, distinguished by a crescent, are used by the above-named Lau- rence Dundas. N. B. Since the above was printed, I have seen the retour of" Archibaldus " Dundas, filius et hseres quondam Alexandri Dundas de Fingask," in the register of Perth, einno 1547. Charta Confirm. Davidis zdi Regis Scotortm, infavorem Joannis de Dundas, Baronis de Fingask. " DAVID, Dei Gratia, Rex Scotorum, Omnibus probis hominibus totius terne SUE, Clericis et Laicis, salutem. Sciatis nos dedisse, concessisse, et hac prjcsenti charta nostra confirmasse dilecto et fideli nostro Joanni de Dundas, filio et haeredi Jacobi de Dundas, totam et integram Baroniam de Fingask, cum pertinen. jacen. infra vicecomitatum de Perth. Qusquidem Baronia cum pertinen. fuerunt died Joannis hareditarie, et quas idem Joannes, non vi aut metu ductus, nee errore lapsus, sed mera et spontanea voluntate sua, in manus nostras per fustim et baculum sursum reddidit, pureque simpliciter resignavlt, et totum jus et cla- meum qux in praedicta Baronia cum pertinentiis habuit, vel habere poterit in fu- turum. Tenen. et haben. eidem Joanni et haeredibus suis, de nobis et ha:redi- bus nostris, in feodo et ha^reditate, per omnes rectas metas et divisas suas, cum omnibus et singulis commoditatibus, assiamentis, et justis pertinentiis quibus- cunque ad dictam Baroniam spectantibus, seu quoquo modo in futurum juste spec- tare valentibus, adeo hbere, quiete, plenarie, integre, et honorifice, bene et in {e) Charta in publicis archivis. Lib. 46, No- 398. ^72 APPENDIX. " pace in omnibus, et per omnia, sicut prajfatus Joannes diet. Baroniam ante dic- " tam resignationem nobis inde spectan. liberius tenuit, sive possidet. R ddendo " inde nobis et h;credibus nostiis idem Joannes et heeredes sui unum Denarium " Argenti apud Pentecosten, nomine alb;e firmne, pro omni alio servitio secularly " exactione sen demanda quae per nos vel haeredes nostros ad dictam Baroniam in " in futurum exigi poterit vel requiri. In cujus rei testimonium pnBsenti cartse " nostrse nostrum prascepimus apponi Sigillum. Apud Edinburgh, Becimo Octavo " DieMensis Februarii anno Regni nostri tricesimo quixito 1364." Chart a Confirm. Jacobi imi Regis Scotorum, in favorem Jacobi Dundas de eodem, Baronis de Fingask, ejusque conjugis. " Jacobus, Dei Gratia, Rex Scotorum, Omnibus probis hominibus totius terrae '•' sux, Clericis et Laicis, salutem. Sciatis quod concessimus dilecto et fideli nostro, " Jacobo de Dundas de eodem, totam Baroniam de Fmgask cum pertinen. jacen. " mfra vicecomitatum de Perth. Quae quidem Raronia fuit dicti Jacobi hteredi- " tarie, et quam idem Jacobus, non vi aut metu ductus, nee errore lapsus, sed sua " mera et spontanea voluntate coram testibus in manus nostras per fustim et bacu- " lum sursum reddidit, pureque simpliciler resignavit, ac totum jus et clameum " qua; in dicta Baronia cum pertinen. habuit, aut habere potuit, pro se et haeredi- " bus suis omnino quietum clamavit in pepetuum. Tenendum et habendum dic- " tam Baroniam cum pertinen. prasdicto Jacobo de Dundas, et h^redibus suis mas- " culis de corpora suo, ex Christiana Stewart, sponsa sua, legittime procreatis aut " procreandis ; quibus forte deficientibus, veris legittimis et propinquioribus h;e- " redibus dicti Jacobi quibuscunque, de nobis et hjeredibus nostris in feodo et " hxreditate in perpetuum, per omnes rectas metas suas antiquas et divisas in bos- " tis, planis, moris, maresiis, viis, semitis, aquis, stagnis, pratis, pascuis, et pastu- " ris, molendinis, multuris, et eorum sequelis, aucupationibus, venationibus, pis- " cationibus, turbariis, et carbonariis, cum curiis et earum exitibus et eschetis, " cum fabrilibus et brasinis, ac cum omnibus aliis et singulis libertatibus, commo- " ditatibus et assiamentis, ac justis pertinentiis quibuscunque, ad pradictam Baro- " am cum pertinen. spectantibus, seu juste spectare valentibus, quoraodo libet in " futurum, adeo libere, quiete, plenarie, integre, et honorilice, bene et in pace, in " omnibus, et per omnia, sicut dictus Jacobus aut aliquis praedecessorum suorum " prasdictam Baroniam cum pertinen. de nobis seu praedecessoribus nostris ante dic- " tam resignationem nobis inde factam, liberius tenuit seu possidet. Reddendo " inde nobis et hseredibus nostris dictus Jacobus et haeredes sui masculi de corpora " suo et Christiana Stewart sponsa sua legittime procreati seu procreandi ; quibus " forte deficientibus, veri legittimi et propinquiores haredes dicti Jacobi quicun- " que, annuatim unum Denarium Argenti ad festum purificationis beatae Marias " Virginis, si petatur, nomine albae firmae tantum ; pro omnibus servitiis, exac- " tionibus secularibus, aut demandis, quae de dicta Baronia cum pertinen. exigi " poterint seu requiri. In cujus rei testimonium presenti cartae nostrae Magnum " Sigillum nostrum praecepimus apponi : Testibus reverendo in Christo Patre " Joanne, Episcopo Glasguen. Cancellario nostro, Magistro VVillielmo Pont pras- « posito Ecclesice Collegiatae de Bothwell, nostri secreti Sigilli Custodi, Thoma de " Myrton, Decano Glasguen. Joanne Forrester Camerario, Waltero de Ogilvy " Thesaurario Regni nostri, Militibus. Apud Edinburgh, XXIV. Die Mensis « Maii, anno Regni nostri XXIV." APPENDIX. C-7J Of URCUJHART of Cromarty and Meldrujf. THE surname of Urquhart is of great antiquity, and the family of Cromarty was always e-.;ec;iicd the liist and principal family of that name : taey enjoyed not only the honourable office of hereditary sheri.f-principal of the shire of Cromarty, but the far greater part, if not the whole, of the said shirc did belong to them, either in property or superiority, and they possessed a considerable estate besides in the sliire of Aberdeen : But many of the .old papers of this tamily being lost, and the rest of tnem in the hand^ of those who now possess that estate, the particu- lar time and manner of its rise cannot be tixjd with any certainty ; and, therefore, without taking notice of such accounts as are only founded upon tradition, we shall go no farther back than we find clear documents from charters and rctours still extant in the puolic records. There is a charter of confirmation granted by King David II. confirming a char- ter granted by Hugh Earl of Ross, Lord of Philorth, to Adam Urquhart, Sheriff of Cioinarty, and iiis heirs, of tHe lands of Fochesterday in Buchan, (now called Fishery) and baihaiy of Kinnedder. And another charter of confirmation by the said King David, confirming a charter granted by David Lesly, Lord of Philorth, to John Urquhart, son of Adam Urquhart, sheriff of Cromarty, and his heirs, of the said lands of Fochesterday ; both which charters are dated December 8, in the 40th year of the said king's reign, which was anno 1368 ; and by this it seems clear, that Cromarty was a family of note at this time ; and not only enjoyed the lands and estate of that name, but also the office of sherifl-principal of the said shire. I. The said Adam Urquhart of Cromarty married Brigida, daughter of Fleming of Cumbernauld, ancestor of the Earl of Wigton, by whom he had John, his suc- cessor above mentioned. II. John Uh^l-hart of Cromarty married Agnes, daughter of Sir Alexander Ram- say of Dalhousie, ancestor of the earl of that name, by whom he had William. III. Sir William Ui^qukart of Cromarty was knighted by King Robert HI. and married Susanna, daughter of Forbes of that Ilk, ancestor of the Lord Forbes, by whom he had two sons, William and Alexander. IV. William Urquhart of Cromarty married Elze, daughter of Sir Alexander Forbes, second Laird of Pitsligo, ancestor of the Lord Pitsligo ; but having no issue-male was succeeded by his brother. V. Alexander Urqlihart of Cromarty married Katharine, daughter of Sir James Ogilvie of Deskford, aiicestor of the Earl of Findlater, by whom he had Thomas, and several other children ; and of one of his younger sons was d';scended Colonel John Urquhart, who served many years in Sweden with great applause. VI. Thomas Urquhart of Cromarty married Helen Abernethy, daugliter of the Lord Salton, by whom, it is said, he had twenty-five sons and eleven daughters ; seven of the sons were killed at the battle of Pinky, which was fought on the loth of September 1547, in C)iieen Mary's minority; and of another of his sons is de- scended the family of Newhall, now represented by Captain David Urquhart, only son and heir of Colonel Alexander Urquhart of Newhall, deceased. It is uncertain at what precise time the family of Burdsyards cam; olf the family of Cromarty ; but it is highly probable it was long before this time ; for although the first charter we see in the public records, in favour of Alexander Urquhart of Burdsyards, is in jthe reign of King James V. yet it is certain that family have much older papers in their charter-chest. On the death of this Thomas he was succeeded by his eldest son VII. Alexander Urquhart of Cromarty, who was served and retoured heir to his father the 21st March 1561, in the lands of Fishery and others , and married Beatrix, daughter of Innes of Auchintoull, an old family in BaniTsliire, by whom he 'lad .Valter, and Johy Q quhart of Craigfintray, coinmonly called Tutor of Cro- marty, with several other children. Vol. II. 7 G ^74 APPENDIX. VIII. Walter Urquhart of Cromarty was served heir to his father the nth of April 1564, and married Elizabeth, daughter of Kemieth Mackenzie of Kintail, ancestor of the Earl of Seaforth, by whom he had Henry. IX. Henry Urquhart, younger of Cromarty, died before his father, leaving by Elizabeth, his wife, daughter of Ogilvie of Banff, ancestor of the Lord Banff, one son named Thomas. X. Sir Thomas Urquhart of Cromarty was served heir to his father on the 13th of April 1603, and to his grandfather on the nth of May 1607 ; he, was knighted by Kmg James VI. anno 1617, and married Christian, daughter of Alexander Lord Elphinstone, by whom he had Sir Thomas, and Sir Alexander Urquhart of Dun- lugus, with several daughters, one of which married Campbell of Calder, and ano- ther Abercromby of Bnkenbog, Sir Thomas Urquhart of Cromarty was knighted, in Whitehall gallery, by his Majesty Kmg Charles 1. on the 7th of April 1641, and was afterwards a great suflerer for his loyalty to that distressed prince, and his son King Charles II. be- ing taken prisoner at the battle of Worcester, and his estate sequestrated by the rebels. He lived to see the happy Restoration, and died soon after, having never married ; and his brother, Sir Alexander Urquhart of Dunlugus, having married his own cousin, a daughter of the Lord Elphinstone, had several daughters, but no male issue; so this branch failing, and the male descendants of Walter being now extinct, we must return to his brother. John Urquhart of Craigfintray was born anno 1547; and, after the death of his brother and nephew, was tutor to his grand-nephew Sir Thomas, by which desig- nation of Tutor of Cromarty he was commonly known; he managed his nephew's affairs to great advantage, and also acquired a very handsome estate himself. He lived to a great age, and died at his own house of Craigston, which he had built many years before, upon the day of 1631, having been three times married ; first, to a daughter of Gordon of Cairnborrow, relict of Meldrum of Men, by whom he had John, his eldest son, with several other children; one of his daughters being married to Gordon of Buckie, and another to Sir Alexander Gor- don of Clunie. Secondly, he married Jean Abernethy, daughter of the Lord Sal- ton, relict of Alexander Seaton of Meldrum, by whom he had no issue. And, thirdly, he married, anno 1610, Elizabeth Seaton, only daughter and heir of Alex- ander Seaton, younger of Meldrum, and grandchild of Alexander Seaton, whose relict he had formerly married, by whom he had Patrick Urquhart of Meldrum, Adam Urquhart of Auchintoull, Walter Urquhart of Crombie, James Urquhart of Oldcraig, and one daughter, married to Eraser of Easter-Tyrie. John Urquhart of Lathers, eldest son to the said John Urquhart of Craigfintray, married a daughter of Innes of that Ilk, an ancient family in Murray, and died soon after his father, on the day of in the same year, 1631, leaving one son named John. John Urql^hart of Lathers married his own cousin-german, a daughter of the -;aid family of Innes ; and dying on the day of 1634, left a son, named John, then an infant, who, upon the death of Sir Thomas Urquhart of Cromarty, and his brother, without male issue, came to represent the said family, and was- knighted by King Charles II. ; and his mother having married the Lord Brodie, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, had by him James Brodie of that Ilk, grandfather to the present Lord Lyon. Sir John Urquhart of Cromarty married daughter of George, second Earl of Seaforth, by whom he had two sons, Jonathan and Captain Kenneth, which last died, leaving no issue-m.ale. Jonathan Urquhart of Cromarty married Jean, daughter of James, second Marquis of Montrose, by whom he had one son named James ; and the affairs of the family now falling in disorder, the estate cam.e to be sold, and was purchased by Macken- zie Viscount of Tarbet, who thereafter was created Earl of Cromarty. Colonel James Urquhart, representative of Cromarty, served both in Spain and Flanders with great applause; he married Anne, daughter of Rollo of Powhouse, in Stirlingshire, and died on the 3d of January 1741, leaving only one daughter named Grissel; so all the male descendants of the Tutor of Cromarty, by his first marriage, being failed, we must now return to the eldest son of his last marriage. APPENDIX. 275 Patrick Urquhart of Meldium was born anno 1611 ; he had not only his house of Lethendy plundered, (where he hved before lie succeeded in right of his mo- ther to the estate of Meldrum) but also suffered several otlier hardships for his loyalty to his Majesty King Charles I. He married Margaret, daughter of James first Earl of Airly, who had the honour to save her brother the Lord Ogilvie's life, who made his escape in her clothes from the prison at St Andrews, anno 1646, the very night before he was to have been executed, with Sir Robert Spottiswood, Lord President of the Session, and others who suffered at that time for their loyalty. And by this lady he had issue John, who died unmarried, Adam, his successor, James Urquhart of Knockleith, (who married Margaret, daughter of Eraser of Tyrie, and had one son. Captain John Urquhart of Craigston, of whom afterwards, and two daughters) Dr Patrick Urquhart, professor of medicine in the King's Col- lege of Aberdeen, (who married Elizabeth, daughter of Dr Andrew Muir, his pre- decessor in office, by whom he had Dr James, Dr Alexander, and William, with several daughters) Captain Alexander Urquhart, who was killed in the king's ser- vice, anno 1685, r.nd one daughter, Elizabeth, married first to Sir George Gordon of Gight, (which family she heired by a daughter) and afterwards to Major-Ge- neral Thomas Buchan. Adam UK.k>ynAiiT of Meldrum was born anno 1635, and in his younger years, when his elder brother was alive, served lopg abroad iis a soldier; and, after his re- turn to his own country, he had the honuur to serve his Majesty King Charles IL as cornet, and then as lieutenant of that independent troop of horse commanded by his uncle the Earl of Airly, and was thereafter made capt.iin of the said troop in room of the said Earl; in which station he continued till his death, which hap- pened at Edinburgh the icth day of November 1684. He married, anno 161^7, Mary, daughter of Lewis Marquis of Huntly, and sister of George, first Duke of Gordon, by whom lie had John, his successor, James Urquhart of Blyth, (who married Jean, daughter of Porterfield of Comiston, by whom he had two sons, James Urquhart, now of Blyih, and Adam, and three daughters) Adam and Lewis, both churchmen in France; also three daughters, Mary, a nun at Dieppe in France, Elizabeth, married to David Ogilvie of Clova, and Anne, married in France to Sir Florence O'Donogh, an Irish gentleman, and an officer in the King of France's Gens d'Arms. The said Ladv Mary Gordon, after Meldrum's death, married James- Earl of Perth, then Lord High Chancellor of Scotland, and, after the Revolution, went to France with her husband, where she lived till March 1726, and died at St Germains in the Soth year of her age. John URQLiH-\K.r of Meldrum married Jean, daughter of Sir Hugh Campbell of Calder, by whom he had Adam, who died unmarried, and William, his successor; also tour daughters, Mary, married to William Menzies of Pitfoddels, Jean, to Alexandei Stewart of Auchluncart, Elizabeth, to William Forbes of Tilliorey, and Anne, to Charles Gordon of Blelack: He died at Aberdeen the 17th of November 1726, in the 59th year of his age. William Urqi'hart of Meldrum married Mary, daughter of Sir William Forbes of Monymusk, by whom he has now Uving two sons, William and Keith, and three daughters ; Jean, the eldest, married to Captain John Urquhart of Craig- ston, only son of James Urquhart of Knockleith, before-mentioaed, and has seve- ral children, and the other two daughters, Mary and Elizabeth, are both young and unmarried. And now, by the death of Colonel James UrquJiart, representative of Cromarty^ without male issue, the said Wilham Urquhart of Meldrum falls to represent the said family. The arms of this family, as now matriculated in the Lyon Register, are or, three bears' heads erased gules, langued azure, supported by two greyhounds, proper, coloured gules, and leished or; above the shield a helmet befitting his degree, with a mantle gules, doubling argent; and on a wreath of his colours is set, for his crest, a demi-otter issuing sable, crowned with an antique crown or, holding betwixt his paws a crescent gules (being the armorial figure^ of Meldrum of that Ilk, and Seatoa of Meldrum) ; and, in an escrol above, this motto, Per mare cs" -76 APPENDIX. terrar, and, in another below, these words, Mean, speak, and do iveH, being ancient motto of Cromarty. SOMERVILLE of Camneth.vn, or Cambusnethan, in the County of Lanark. Mr NISBET, the author, in his First Volume, page 256, observes, that one eminent fa:nily of the name of Somerville, was the Somervilles Barons of Camne- than, or Cambusnet'iiaii: The tirst of which (says he) was Su- John Somerville, son of John Lord Somerville, by his second wife Mary Baillie, a daughter of La- mington ; but that he had not seen the arras of that family in old books, and says little more about it; however, the following account of the family of Camnethan, with evident documents of the truth of it, came to our hands since the death of the author. Sir John was born anno 1463, and was first designed of Quothquhan ; but after his father provided him in the large barony of Camnethan, and a considerable part of the estate of Carnwath, in the county of Lanark, beside the ten-merk land of the manor of Roberton, with the lands of Kingledore, in the county of Peebles, he was designed of Camnethan, or Cambusnethan. He married Elizabeth Car- michael, daughter of William Carmichael of Balmeady, b^ his wife Elizabeth Sib- bsl'id. Countess Dowager of Angus, mother of Archibald Earl of Angus, commonly called Bell the Cat: She bore to him Sir John, his heir, William, who got for his portion the lands of Tarbrax, and three daughters; Margaret, married to the Mas- ter of Montrose, eldest son of William the first Earl of that title, Elizabeth, to Robert Dalziel of that Ilk, ancestor to the Earl of Carnwath, and Helen, to Robert Boyd of Kilmarnock, who was created Lord Boyd, ancestor to the Earl of K.il- mai-nock, each of whom had issue: And besides these, Sir John had two law- ful sons, Michael and James, who are witnesses to a charter granted by the Lord Somerville to Chancellor of Shieldhill, his vassal, dated 12th September 1508; but whether these had issue, or were married, does not appear. As Sir John was a great favourite of King James IV. so with him he lost his life at the fatal battle of Flodden, anno 1513, as appears by the retour of his son and successor, John, the second Laird of Camnethan, who was served heir to his father, and infeft in his estate, anno 1515. This gentleman was much attached to the Dou- glassian faction, (being first and second cousin to the then Earl of Angus, grand- son of Be/l the Cat) in the minority of King James V. and, as he appears to have been a man of great courage as well as power, so he was a great support to that interest, even when it was upon the decline; -for vi'hen John Duke of Albany, Re- gent of the kingdom, had gone into France, and had committed the administration of public affairs to seven deputy governors, viz. Anthony Darcy, a Frenchman, the Earls of Angus, Arran, Argyls, and Huntly, Andrew Forman, Archbishop of St Andrews, and James Beaton, Archbishop of Glasgow, Chancellor of the kingdom; and that Darcy was put to death by the Humes, Arran, by the assistance of Beaton, endeavoured to grasp at the management of all public affairs, and got himself actually chosen chief of the deputy governors, and began to oppress Angus and the Douglassian faction ; then Sir John Somerville, of whom we are now speaking, appeared for Angus, and gave Arran and his faction abun- dance of disturbance ; particularly, Buchanan tells us, that when a contro- versy happened between Andrew Ker of Ferniherst and the Earl of Ana,u}, the Hamiltons took part with Andrew, more out' of hatred to the Douglas than the justice of Andrew's cause, and that both parties were preparing to decide the con- troversy by the chance of a battle, this Sir John Somerville attacked the Hamil- tonian party, under the command of James, Arran's natural son, slew five of the faction, took above thirty of their horses, and put the rest to flight. Buchanan's words are, " Igitur cum sub diem conventus, in majores. quam pro re de qua con- " tendebatur, aleam certarainis sese utrique pararent, Joannes SomervaUius, Dou- APPENDIX. 277 " glassianaj factionis, juvenis nobilis &• magni animi, Jucobum Arrianrc coinitis " riliiim nochani, in itinere aggiessus, quinqu^ coinituin ejus occidit, reliquos fii- " gavit, supra trigint.i equos cep;t," page 420. Kdinb. edii. 1727. 1. 14. ch. ir- And Hume of Godscioft gives much the same account of this action in his History oi the Douglasses. Besides, m the affairs of which Buchanan gives us the history in tlie following chapter, this Sir John SomerviUe was the chief and prmcipal actor; to wit, when a convention was indicted at Edinburgh, 2gth of April 1520, and a great number of western Peers of the Hamiiionian faction came to tnat place, and in their private councils had determined to appreiiend the person of the Earl of Angus ; and, if. order to accomplish that end, had shut up the whole ports of the city: Tliis Sir John was the chief of these eighty brave men who drove Arran and Beaton out of the city, killed seventy-two of their party, and obliged that Earl and his bastard son, with several others, to save their lives by making their escape through the North-Loch, through which Sir John himself pursued them, although it appears that the Hainiitonian faction was very numerous ; for after Angus found himself master of the city, he emitted a proclamation, forbidding any person to appear armed in the streets, except those of his own party, but liberty to all such as should desire it to depart w ithoiit harm from the tov.'n; no less than eight hurKlred of those who had been beat from the streets, marched out in one body. Buchanan's words are, " Abierunt autem iino agmine, piteter eos qui fugam prcEceperant," (/. f . over the Nortli-Loch) " equites plus minus octingenti, majore cum ignominia quani " damno." And that Sir John Somerville was the chief commander in this ac- tion, is vouched not only from the history of the family of Camnethan, penes Lord Somerville, but likewse from the records of parliament ; for, as such, he alone of all the eighty, was forfeited by the Parliament holden at Edinburgh, April 7. 1522, (notwithstanding of a remission he had formerly gotten) and his estate given to the Earl of Arran, Hugh Lord Somerville, and Sir James Hamilton of Fynart, Arran's already-mentioned bastard son ; but he was restored again to his estate and honour by the Parliament holden at Edinburgh August 3. 1525, whilst Arran, Somerville, and Sir James opposed it with all their interest ; which restoration- was confirmed by the king himself at the age of fourteen years, 2ist June 1526. The truth of which is vouched from the records of Parliament of the above dates. Sir John married Margaret Graham, daughter of William Earl of Montrose r Their contract of marriage, and likewise that of the Master of Montrose with Mar- garet Somerville, Sir John's sister, already mentioned, are both dated at Glasgow, loth July 1510. By her he had two sons. Sir John, the heir of his family, and Wil- liam, who got for his patrimony a forty-shilling land in the Netherton of Camne- than ; and likewise two daughters, Nicolas, the eldest, first married to John Lord Fleming, ancestor to the Earl of Wigton, and had issue, and next to George Earl of Rothes, whose first lawful wife she was, and to uhom she bore Andrew, heir of the earldom, another son who was the father of the first Lord Lindores, and a daughter, Agnes, married to William Douglas of Lochleven, afterwards Earl of Morton, to whom she bore (besides male) seven daughters, called the Perches of Lochleven, married into the families of Argyle, Home, Errol, Oliphant, Wemyss, Firullater, and Glammis, now Strathmore ; Sir John's other daughter, Margaret, was married to Johnstone of Westerhall. Jtle died, anno 1543, and was succeeded by his son John, the third of the family of Camnethan ; this gentleman was much in fa- vour with King James V. He married, first, Katharine, daughter of William Car- michael of Meadowflat, who (because he was Captain of the castle of Crawford) is most frequently designed in history Captain of Crawford ; by her he had two sons and two daughters, James, his successor, and Robert, who had for his portion the lands of Overcaldlaw ; Katharine, the eldest daughter, married to Cockburn of Skirling, near Biggar, then a very considerable family ; and Agnes, the younger daughter, married to Gavin Hamilton of Netherhillies, without the consent of her parents, and, for that reason, disowned by them. Katharine Carmichael died anno ri;^o, and Camnethan took for his second wife, Katharine, daughter of John Mur- 'VoL. IL T ri ayb APPENDIX. ray of Falahall, Sheriff of the Forest, ancestor to Murray of Fhiliphaugh, by Margaret his wife, daughter of Patrick Hepburn, first Earl of Bothwell, by whom he had a numerous issue, namely, John Somerville, who was first provided in the fee of the lands of Drum, half of Gilmerton and Gutters, then in possession of the family of Camnethan ; but after they returned to my Lord Somerville's family, John was, in lieu of them, provided in the lands of Potterhall, and several others within the barony of Cam- nethan; Patrick, the second, got the lands of Green; William, the third son, went abroad, and took orders in the church of Rome; and Thomas, the fourth, of whom IS descended Mr William Somerville, minister of Hawick. Besides these sons he had four daughters by Katharine Murray, to wit, Helen, married to Sir John Skene of Curriehill, who was Lord Register in the reign of King James VI. and ambas- ■^ador for that prince to several foreign courts, and had a numerous issue; Nicolas, married to Walter Stewart first Lord Blantyre; Jean, married to James Dunlop of that Ilk ; and Margaret, married to Adam Whiteford of that Ilk, or of Milton; and they all had issue. This John Somerville is the person who, with many of the peers and principal gentry, signed the bond of association in favour of the prince, when Queen Mary, his mother, gave in a demission of the crown and government, as is mentioned by Mr James Anderson in his Collections relating to the History of Queen Mary: He is likewise the same from whom the Earl of Arran borrowed a sum of money, by a mortgage upon his lands, immediately after the death of the Regent James Earl of Murray, (as Buchanan tells us, lib. 20. c. 6. page 601, Edinburgh Edit.) his words are, " Caede Proregis vix dum divulgata. Jacobus Hamiltonius, oppositis " pignore agris Joanni Somervillio Camnethanio, pecuniam accepit, &-C." To him succeeded Sir James, his son and heir, the fourth of the family of Camnethan, who married, nnno 1561, Margaret, eldest daughter, and one of the two heirs-portioners of Archibald Hamilton of Raploch, and by her had Sir John, his heir, and two daugh- ters ; Margaret, first married to Gilbert Lord Somerville, and had issue, who are all extinct; and next to Sir James Muirhead of Lauchop, and had issue; and Mary, married to Cleland of that Ilk, and had issue. To Sir James succeeded his only son JoTtN, the fifth Laird of Camnethan; he married, anno 1597, Mary Hamilton, daughter of Sir James Hamilton of Evandale, and by her had three sons, John, James, and Patrick, and a daughter, Mary, who made a clandestine marriage with Mathew Stewart of Muirhouse, brother to the Laird of Minto. Sir John, the eldest son, married Hamilton, daughter of Sir Robert Hamilton of Silvertonhill, and by her he had only one daughter, married toSir James Kincaid of that Ilk. This gentleman. Sir John Somerville, was designed of Kersewell; for, dying before his father, he never came to be Laird of Camnethan. But Sir James, second son to Sir John the fifth Laird, succeeded to his father and elder brother, and was served and retoured heir to them, anno 1620, and anno 1623 married Helen Hamilton, daughter of Sir John Hamilton of Bargeny, and sister to the first Lord of that title, by whom he had two sons. Sir John and James. This gentleman had entertained the Marquis of Montrose, his kinsman, for three or four nights at his house at Camnethan, as he went through Clydesdale to Fhiliphaugh, his little army being quartered in the country thereabout, for which he was fined in L.io,ooo Scots by the Council of State. He was a most profuse and extravagant man; for, in his own Hfetime, he sold off his whole estate (which was the most con- siderable belonging to any gentleman in the shire of Lanark) in fifteen or sixteen different parcels, some to be holden of the crown, and others of himself, and thus brought his family to ruin ; Sir John, his eldest son, having no posterity, James, the younger, became the representative of the family, who married Isa- bella Drummond, only child of Alexander Drummond of Kettleston (a cadet of Drummond of Carnock) by Helen Fairly, daughter of Sir Robert Fairly of Braid; by whom he had two sons, William Somerville of Corhouse, and Hugh Somerville of Inverteil, Writer to the Signet. 3 APPENDIX. C79 William, the eldest, married Violet Baillie, daughter and heires'5 of John Bail- lie of St John's Kirk, by Martha Lindsay, eldest daugliterof Su- William Lindsay of Covington, by whom he had James Sotnerville of Corhouse, and George, both un- married, and s.-veial daughters, of whom Isabella is married to Wilham Inglis of Eastshiel, DoLtor r'.' Medicine. Hugh, the s cond son, married Agnes Gibson, daughter of Sir Alexander Gib- son of Pentlund. one of the Principal Clerks of Session, by whom he has two daughters, Helen, married to Mr James Geddes. yoimger of Rachan, Advocate, and Isabella, married to Mr Hugh Dalrymple, Advocate, second son of Sir David Dalrymple of Hailes, Rart Advocate to Queen Aone and King George I. who is now designed Mr Hugh Murmy Kynninmond of Melgum and Kynninmond. and has issue. SCOTT OF HORSLIHILL. CAPTAIN ROBERT SCOTT of Horslihill, or, on a bend azure, a star be- twixt two crescents of the first ; and, for ditference, a sword in pale, proper, in the dexter chief ; crest, a lion's head erased, proper : motto, Pro patria. The fiist of this family was Adam Scott of Tushilaw, descerided of Scott of Houpayslay. a brother of Buccleugh. Adam was succeeded by bis son, Robert Scott of Tushilaw; his son was Walter Scott of Midhope; his second son, Robert Scott, portioner in Hawick, who was father to William Scott of Horslihill. He was succeeded by his son Robert ; and he, by his son Francis, who was father to the present Captain Robert Scott of Horslihill. SCOTT OF SCOTSTARVET. THE family of Buccleugh, of which the Scotts of Scotstarvet are descended, was originally seated in the west; their ancient estate was Murdiston in the county of Lanark, which they possessed, at least as early as the reign of King Alexander II. (■/). Walter le Scott de Miirthockston was one of the gentlemen of Clydesdale who went into that submission that was by fraud and force imposed on the nation, by Edward I. of England, upon pretence of his being Supreme Lord over the kingdom of Scotland, in the 1297 ; as is vouched from Prynne's History in that record commonly called The Ragman-Roll. The estate of Murdiston continued with the Scotts till the reign of King James II. that Walter Scott of Murdiston did exchange those lands with Thomas Inglis of Manor, for his part of the lands of Branksholm, the lands of Branshaugh, Goldilands, Whitelaw, White- rig, Todshaw, and Todholes : The charter of excambion is still extant in the cus- tody of Alexander Inglis of Murdiston, which Mr Nisbet says, in his Treatise of Heraldry, he had seen (6); it bears date at Edinburgh, the 23d of July 1446. Sir David Scott of Buccleugh, his son, made a very great figure in the time of King James HI. both in peace and war : By his lady, who was a daughter of the (a) Historical narrative of tlie family of Buccleugh, MSS. in my hands, vouched from the chsrtularv. charters, and other documents of antiquities, {b) Page 83 and 86. oS'o APPENDIX. Somerville family (r), he had several sons; Sir Waher, the eldest, (from whom a lineal descent in the house of Buccleugh is continued), Sir Alexander Scott, who was Rector of Wigton, and Lord Register in the reign of King James ill. from the 1483 till the 1488, that he lost his life, with the king his master, at the un- happy field of Bannockburn C^J- A third son was Robert, of whom the Scotts of AUanhaugh, Haining, and Scot- starvet, descended ; to vouch which there is a charter granted by the foresaid Sir David Scott of Buccleugh, rfi/ff/s^'w siio R'jherto Scott, of the lands of Whiteches- ter, &c. in the year 1483 {e) ; I see it observed by a gentleman of the surname of Scott, in an Essay on the family of the Scotts, published in the 1688 (/), that this Robert Scott was the only younger son of the family of Buccleugh of whom any lawful male issue remained ; and consequently his descendants, now after the failure of heirs-male in the duect line, are the heirs-male of that illustrious family. One of his sons was Sir Alexander Scott, who is designed of Hassen- den {g) ; he was slain with King James IV. at the battle of Flodden [b) ; he had also the lands of Haining, at least in fee ; for it was a common thing in those days for the father and the eldest son to have different titles and designations, more especially in the father's lifetime, as might be the case here. A younger son of this Sir Alexander Scott's, Wilham Scott, was designed of Deloraine, from a patri- monial estate he had of his own (.') in the south in Teviotdale ; his son, Sir Alex- ander Scott, was bred to the law, and being eminent in practice, and a man of candour, diligence, and assiduity, was made Vice-Register of Scotland in the 1534 {k). He had a brother, Mr James Scott, who was bred to the church, and after taking holy orders was preferred to the provostry of Corstorphine, a benefice both of considerable dignity and revenue. While Mr Scott provost of Corstor- phine, he built a house or manse for himself and his successors in office, near to tills collegiate church, on which he placed his coat of arms, the star and crescents on the bend, as borne by the House of Buccleugh, which is still to be seen ; and this is a further confirmation of his descent from the Scotts of Buccleugh, for the heralds lay it down as a maxim that the same armorial bearing is the most sure evidence of the same descent. Mr Scott, being a man of learning and integrity, got into the confidence and favour of King James V. who made him Clerk to the Treasury ( /) ; and, from a regard to the memory and merit of the old Register, Sir Alexander Scott, to whom the provost of Corstorphine is called Comanguineus (m), his majesty was pleased to prefer him to be one of the Senators of the College of Justice, on the spiritual side of the bench (tz), where he sat and discharged his office with learning and inte- grity till his death in the 1563 (0). The provost of Corstorphine took care to breed a nephew of his own, Mr Robert Scott, afterwards of Kmghtspotty, (nepos suus exfratre) as my voucher calls him (/)), to the law, in which he soon became so eminent a practitioner, and acquired such a character for integrity, that he was made one of the two Principal Clerks of the Session (9). In that station he be- haved with such an universal reputation, that, upon the demise of Mr James M'Gill of Nether-Rankeillor, the Lord Register, it was thought that no body could fill that place better, or deserved it more ; and it was at that time beheved, that the First Clerk of the Session had a right to supply the vacancy when a Re- gister died ; so the thing was resolved on : but when is was proposed to Mr Scott liimself, by a singular modesty he absolutely declined the offer [r). Mr Hay, the (a) Manuscript before cited of the noble and illustrious family of Buccleugh. . {d} Lives and charac- ters of the Lord Registers, in the Second Volume of the Officers of State in Scotland, MSS. in my hand, (f) In the hands of his Grace the Duke of Buccleugh. (/) Captain Walter Scott, printed in the year 1688. (f) Ibidem. (A) Dr Abercromby's Martial Achievements of the Scots nation. (/) Captain Walter Scott's Genealogical and Historical Essay on the surname and family of the Scotts, published in the 1 688, quarto, which is in several hands, particularly in the library of the family of Panmure. (k) Original writs in the custody of David Scott of Scotstarvct. (/) Writ under the Great Seal, in the custody of Mr Scott of Scotstarvet. (m) The fore-cited writ. («) Memoirs of the College of Justice, prefixed to Mr Forbes's Decisions, and the fore-cited diploma in the custody of Scotstarvet, under the Great Seal, {o) Ibidem, (p) The deed under the Great Seal, in Scotstarvet's custody, so often cited in this memorial, (y) Sir John Scott's Account of the Directors of the Chancery, MSS. (r) Sir John Scott of Scotstarvet, in his Staggering State of the Scots Statesmen, en the Directors of the Chancery, MSS. in. the custody of David Scott of Scotstarvet, his great-grandson, and in several other hands. APPENDIX. i^i Clerk of the Council and Diiectov of the Chancery, was not so scrupulnus, for he accepted of the Register's place very cheerfully, and the other was prevailed on to be Director of the Chancery. His gift to the office, under the Great Seal, is in the registers (r), bearing date the 17th of October 1579. He discharged the duty of his olTice \vit!i greater diligence and exactness than had been practised by his predecessors ; for whereas it had been the custom to leave the collecting of all writs to the clerks, the Director only signing in course, he read over every tiling him- self before he attested it ; and in that his grandson, Sir John Scott, when he came to be Director of the Chancery, followed his example : By his place ho became ex- ceeding rich, and at his death had more money on land security than any other man at that time, so far as I have been able to discover. He married first Elizabeth Sandilands of the House of Galder(/),by whom he had a sun, Mr Robert Scott, liis apparent heir, who died in the lifetime of his father. He married afterwards Elizabeth Scott, who survived him, and was long his re- lict («) ; by her he had a son, Mr James Scott of Vogrie (v), who Was one of the writers or clerks in the Chancery, and of w horn several persons of distinction are descended. The Director, Mr Scott, growing old, with the consent and approbation of the King's Majesty, resigned his office in favour of his eldest son, Mr Robert Scott, who thereupon was confirmed in it, by a gift under the Great Seal the 5th of March 1585 (iv), during life, //o omnibus diebus vitissua, with a power of deputa- tion. But the old man wisely apprehending that his son might happen to die before himself, got it so ordered that he should in that case return to the office ; the thing fell out so ; the young Director died in his father's lifetime, the 23d of November 1588 (.v). He left behind him an only son, John Scott, by Margaret his wife, daughter of Alexander Acheson of Gosford ( y), in the county of Had- dington, ancestor to Sir Arthur Acheson of Markethill, Baronet of Scotland, who has an opulent estate in the county of Armagh in Ireland : His great-grand- father. Sir Archibald Atcheson of Glencairn, was one of the Senators of the Col- lege of Justice, and one of the principal Secretaries of State in the reign of King Charles I. and died in those offices in the year 1634 (z). Upon the death of Mr Scott, the young Director of the Chancery, his father, the old man, was restored to his office: but worn out with grief and old age, he found himself unable to under- go the fatigue of it; and therefore resigned in favour of a gentleman of his own name, Sir William Scott of Ardross, his lady's son by a former husband ; but he took an obligation of Sir William, to resign in favour of his grandson, John Scott, afterwards Sir John Scott of Scotstarvet, whenever he came to be of age {a). He died on the 28th of March 1592 (5), and was succeeded in his estate by his grand- son and heir, John Scott of Knightspotty, not then full seven years old. During the minority, Sir William's obligation was lost, by which means it cost Sir John afterwards some trouble and expence before he could have right done him. This great man. Sir Johk Scott of Scotstarvet, proved an honour to his family and country. He was born in the year 1586, and as, from his very childhood, he discovered a more than ordinary genius for letters, his friends, who had the care of his education, gave him the best his country could afford. He went through a course of philosophical studies at St Andrews, and took his degree of Master of Arts. After that, though he was heir of a great estate, and the only son of his fa- ther, he went into a close course of study, not only of the civil and canon law, (j) In the archives at Edinburgh. (t) Registers of the Heralds' Officers at Edinburgh, in the hands of !\Ir Roderick Chalmers. (u) Charters and infeftments, both in Scotstarvet's hands and in the Chancery, ivhere her liferent is reserved, (v') Charta penes Scotstarvet, and Nisbet's Heraldry, where he has inserted the arms of this branch of the family as a younger son of the Scotts of Knight- spotty, which was the first Director's stile and title. {w) Charta penes David Scott de Scotstarvet. (x) Retour, in the archives of the family of Scotstarvet, of John Scott to Mr Robert Scott, his father, in the lands of Knightspotty, in the shire of Perth, and regality of Abernethy. {y) The Heralds' Books at Edinburgh. (2) Sir James Balfour of Kinnaird's Annals, in the Advocates' Library at Edinburgh. MSS. (a) Sir John Scott of Scotstarvet's own account of the matter in MSS. in his State of the Scots Statesmen. (J>) Charta penes David Scott de Scotstarvet, ad annum 1592. Vol. n. 7 I 2 82 APPENDIX. but also of the municipal law of the kingdom. This led him to look far into our history and records, by vhich he came to understand our wliole constitution as fully, if not moie so than any man of his tmie. He quickly attamtd a great reputation for learning, and was, through his whole life, a man of strict and exemplary virtue, equalled by few, and excelled by none of his contemporaries m any of those qua- lities that enter into the composition of a great and good character. He was a bountiful patron to men of learnmg, and they came to him from all quarters ; so that his house was a kind of college. Such a character could not long be concealed, the fame of it reached the Court, and induced the government to employ him as a man that would add strength and lustre to the administration. His title to the Di- rector's place being well known, Sir William Scott was wrought upon to resign in his favour; thus he came to be possessed of that office his father and grandfather had so long enjoyed. With all the passion he had for learning, he was not inattentive to the interests of his family, but managed them always with the greatest regard, both to justice and humanity. When a gentleman of his relation, Inglis of Tar- vet, was by the necessity of his affairs obliged to sell his estate, Sir John bought it, but he would not leave him without house or home ; and therefore very ge- nerously gave him, for a consideration far below the value, the lands of Knight- rpotty, that he might have a place of retreat in his declining age. Having finished this transaction, he expede a deed under the Great Seal, erect- ing and incorporating the lands and estates of Inglis-Tarvet and Wemyss-Tarvet into a new barony, to be in all time thereafter called the barony of Scotstarvet. The charter of erection is of date the nth of September 1611 (c). When King James VI. was in Scotland in the year 1617, he had the honour to be presented to his majesty, who had much discourse with him upon some parts of our constitution, in which he gave the king great satisfaction, and showed himself well versed in that study. It was at this time he was knighted, and the king ordered him im- mediately to be added to the Privy Council; in which station he continued till the end ot that reign. King Charles I. upon his accession, was graciously pleased to renew his commission as Director of the Chancery, which, the narrative bears, his royal father had before given him for life {d). He was soon after named one of his Majesty's Privy Council ; and, in consideration of the great and faithful services done to the crown by his father, grandfather, and others of his predecessors, for many years past, in the office of Directors of the Chancery, as the narrative bears, his Majesty gave the directorship again to Sir John himself, and to James Scott, his son, for their joint hves, by a commission under the Great Seal, dated at White- hall the 5th of April 1628 (e). I have not been able to learn the precise time of Sir John's promotion to be one of the Senators of the College of Justice; nor whe- ther it was before the troubles began, though I have reason, I think, to believe it was : But it is a thing much for his honour, that when the Session was new model- led by the king, with consent of Parliament in the 1641, he was one of the judges who were then continued in their offices, which they were to hold r/rf vita?n aut cul- pam (f). He discharged the duties of that station with gravity, learning, and great ability, till the year 1651, that Cromwell dissolved the courts of justice, and overturned the whole constitution : upon this Sir John not only lost his place in rhe Session, but was also turned out of the Chancery on pretence that the office depended on the College of Justice (^) : but this was a mere pretence. Deprived thus illegally of all his offices, in which he had served his country with universal approbation, he was more at leisure to employ himself in the advancement of learning, and the doing honour to his country in that way. He made a collection of all the Latin poems that had been lately composed by his countrymen, which, at his own expence, he caused publish at Amsterdam in anno 1632, in two decimo- sexto volumes, on a fine type, under the title of, BelicicK Poetarum Scotorum hujus avi illustriuin. The learned Dr Arthur Johnston dedicates them to Sir John thus : (f) Charter under the Great Seal in the archives of the family of Scotstarvet. (). And, upon the 28th Oc- tober 1608, he was infeft in the lands of Polkemmet, &c. upon another precept issued out of the Chancellary in his f ivour as heir to John Shaw of Polkemmet, his father (•) ; and, in finno 1615, upon his own resignation, he obtained a char- ter from King James Vi. erecting the haill lands into the barony of Sornbeg, (fl) Charta in publicis archivis. {/?) Buchanan, and Torfaus's History of Denaiark, p. 191. (c) Char- ts in publicis archivis. (•/) Caarta ibijcii. (<•) Charta penes Comitem de Duiidonald. (/) CharU ia, publicis archivis. (^3 Ibidem, (_b) loidem. {^i) Charta in publicis archivis. Vol. II. 7 M 294 APPENDIX. whereupon he was infeft {k) ; and, in 1620, he granted a charter to his son Patrick at his marriage, of the foresaid lands of Polkemmet. And the said Patrick. Shaw of Sornbeg, as heir served in special to the foresaid John Shaw his father, 25th August 1631, was also infeft in the foresaid lands of Sornbeg, Chapleton, Duncanrigs, Goldnng, Stc. which he rc-igned in favour of John his son, and John his grandson, who were infeft under the Great Seal anno 1699 (/). He, the said Patrick, married Duiham, daughter of Durham of Duntervie, by whom he had the said John Shaw of Sornbeg, his son, who, i-/nno 1651, married Isabel Boswell, se- cond and one of the four daughters of David Boswell of Auchmleck, by whom he had John Shaw of Sornbeg, who married Marion Kennedy, daughter to Kennedy of Kilhenzie, by whom he had Captain John Shav; of the Scots Royal Regiment of Foot, his eldest son and heir, now with that corps in the expedition in America, serving his country, who was served heir in special to his said father and grandfather in the foresaid lands, anno 1720. — Alexander Shaw, writer in Edinburgh ; two daughters, Anne, mar- ried to Graham of Drynie ; and Catharine, married to Mackenzie of Suddie, both which gentlemen reside in the shire of Ross. The armorial achievement of the family of Shaw of Sornbeg is, azure, three mullets in fesse, betwixt as many covered cups argent ; crest, a dexter hand pro- per, holding a covered cup, argent : motto, / mean well. N. R. It may not be improper here to observe, that the author of the Historical Remarks on Ragman's Roll has committed a mistake, in supposing the family of Sauchie to succeed as heirs to that of Hayley, with whom they had no manner of connection ; and he had no reason to form this sup- position: The only information he had concerning the family of Hayley, being from that of Sornbeg, who communicated to him the original char- ter granted by James, Great Steward of Scotland, to that family, as him- f^elf ingenuously acknowledges. Memorial of the ancient Family of Riddell of that Ilk, Baronet ; showing their Antiquity, Descent, and Alliances, jrom the Reign of King David I. to the pre- IT is the received opinion among the modem antiquaries, that the surname and family of Riddell or Rydal is derived from one of those Normans that came over to England with William the Conqueror («) ; and, by the the gift of that prince, got many great and considerable estates and lordships in that realm. The surname seems to' be local to Riddell, which denotes its antiquity. Geoffrey Riddle, in the seventh of King Henry I. of England, being, says a great and learned antiquary and historian (;/), ^.n eminent and learned person, up- on that great controversy then happening betwixt Osbert, at that time sheriff of Yorkshire, and the church of St Wilfred at Rippon, touching the privilege of sanc- tuary there, whereof the sheriff would not allow, was, by special commission, em- ployed together with Robert Bishop of Lincoln, Ralph Basset, Roger de Mescbines, and Peter de Valoines, to hear and determine therein, who gave judgment for the church ; and, not long after this, growing famous for his knowledge in the laws,. (*) Charta in publicis archivis. (/) Ibidem. [m) Inquiry i William Dugdale's Baronage of England, torn. i. page 1$^, into the Origin of Surnames. («) SI.- APPENDIX. 295 .was soon thereafter constituted Great Justice of England. But, in the cicth of that reign, upon the return of King Ilenry out of Normandy, where Prince VVil- hain, his eldest son, had, says my learned author, " ni testimony of the people's " obedience, received their homage and fealty by his father's appointment, being " in the ship with the prince, and other of the king's children, and diverse of the *' nobility, they were cast away at sea and perished ( .)), anno 1 120 (9)." He left issue by Geva his wife, daughter of Hugh the first Earl of Chester (). one sole daugh ter his heir, named Maud, married to Richard Basset, son of Ralph Basset, Justice of England ; which Richard, being also Justice of England, had by her, two sons, Geoffrey, who assumed the surname of Rydal, of whom the English barons Rydal descended, who are traced down, in the baronage of England, by Sir William Dugdale, to which I must refer. But though the fiht of the name came over to England with the Duke of Nor- mandy, yet it was not long after that the Riddells came to Scotland ; for, in the reign of our King Alexander I. when David, that king's brother, was Princeps Cumbria, he caused an inqiilsitio, an inquiry, to be made " de possessionibus ecclesia; *' Glasguensis auxilioetinvestigatione seniorum hotninumetsapientiorum totius Cum- bria." To this deed of inquisition tlicre are many great witnesses ; and, among others, Gervasius Riddell, Hugo de Morvih, Walterus de Lindeseyia, &c. Sic. (1). 1 am of opinion, that this Prince David, in the lifetime of his brother, and while he was prince, or Conies Cuinbrice, as he is sometimes called, having got acquaintance with the sons of some of the Norman gentlemen, who had shared in the conquest of England, gave them possessions, and settled them in estates in Cumberland ; and when he came to the crown of Scotland, by the name of David 1. anno 1122, he conferred other estates, and offices on them: >"or we find the same Gervasius Rid- dell is witness to several cnarters by this King David; particularly to one granted to the Prior of Coldinghani, wherein Le is designed Gervasius I'icecomes de Rox- burgh (t). It cannot oe a question, but t.\\2X Walterus de Riddell is the son and successor of Gerva.''ius tie Riddel/, who is, for a great while, an ordinary witness in King David's charter^ («). There is a charter by that king to himself, " Waltero " Riddel de terris de Lilisclve &■ dimidium de Escheco &- Wittune (x), per suas " rectas divisas tenend. & habend. sibi &- hseredibus suis de nie &- haeredibus meis, " in feoda 'if- h^reditate, per servitium unius miJitis, sicut uiais baronum meorum, " vicinorum suorum. Tesnbus, Andrea Episcono de Cataneis, WaltCi'o filio Allani, " Ricardo de Morevila, Alexandro de Seton, Alexandio de Sancto Martiuo, Vv^al- *' tero de Lmdeseyia, David de Vuet, et Nicolao Clerico, apud Scoon." The tran- tumpt of this charter I have seen taken before " Andreas Dominus Gray Justi- *' tiarius supremi Domini nostri Regis ex parte australi aqua: de Forth. Apud " Jedburgh quarto die Novembris 1506" (j). Bat this IValterus de Riddell ha- ving no issue, was succeeded in his estate by his brother Dominus AnskitUle de Riddell. This is vouched, and nobly instructed by a bull of Pope Adrian IV. (z), which I have seen, and runs : " Adrianus Episcopus, servus servorum Dei, Anski- " tille Riddell militi, salutem & Apostolicam Benedictionem, sub Beati Petri & " nostri protectione. Suscepimus specialiter ea quas Walterus de Riddell testa- " mentum suum ante obitum suum faciens tibi noscitur reliquisse, viz. Villas de " Wittuness, Lilisclve, Brachabe, &■ cetera bona a quibuscunque tibi juste col- " lata, nos authoritate sedis Apostolicas integre confirmamus. Datum Beneventi " septimo Idus Aprilis." The jirecise year our of Lord is seldom in ancient bulls: But this must be betwixt the jear 1154, that he came to the papacy, and the 1159 that he died. There is another bull of Pope Alexander UI. who succeeded Pope Adrian, I have (/>■) Ibidem, I mean Dugdnle's Baronage of England! {q) Sir James Dalrymple's Appendi.K to his- Histerical Collections. (r) Dugdale. (j') This inquiry i\ito the possessions of the See of Glasgow is in the Register of the bishopric, and the e.xcerpt published by Sir James Dalrymple. {t) Sir J imes Dal- rvmple's Collections from the original ivrits of the priory of Coldingham, belonging to the Chapter of Durham. («) Ibidem, his Collections, p. 548. («) Penes Sir Walter Riddell, baronet, and these lands are now the barony of Riddell. It is the only one of King David's I have seen granted to a laic, (j.) This transumpt I have s.;en -n the custody of Sir Walter Riddell of that Ilk, baronet, (-z.) Ptnes-. cundem Dominum Walterum Riddel de eodem. 296 APPENDIX. seen, to this same Sir Amkhille de Riddell, of all that his brother had left him by tes- tament, and confirming an agreement betwixt him y Huchtredum Sacerdotem, anent the tithes of the lands of Lilisclve, by the mediation of King Malcolm IV. («). This Sir Anskitille de Riddell was succeeded by Walter de Riddell liis son, the next in the line of succession of this most ancient family. Hugo de Riddell, who is co- temporary with him, must be a younger brother. He, Hugo de Riddell, is witness in a charter of cotifirmatiun by King Malcolm, to the abbacy of Kelso, aimo ji^g{l>). The same Hugo de Riddell is Dominus de Cranston, who is to be found in the registers of Kelso, as a donator to that abbacy of the foui th part of Cran- ston, afterwards called Little-Preston, now Prestonhall (c). From this Hugo de Riddell the lands were called Cranston-Riddell, and he is to be found in the charters of King Malcolm, and King William his brother, and successor, in the registers of Kelso., Scone, and the extract from the registers of Glasgow (7 burgh, at ilie R'-'stonuion of King Charles II. and lie expressly says, that IVultcr (h- Ricide'il, to whom the bull is directed, was the son ot" Sir Anskitillc Riddell ; for when Sir James Dalryniple saw this bull, that worthy learned author ingenuously teils us, tiiat the name ot" the son of Sir Anskitille was worn out: But he supposo it to be Walter, there remaining, adds he, " Above the hole in the parclinieiir, " some strokes of a diub'e /(', as the initial letter for IValterus, which no doubt it is; and when Mr Crawfurd saw it, fifty years, or more, before Sir James perused it, the name JVuItenis might be clearer, aiid more perceptible and legible than afterwards: But tlii> by the bye. To IVaitrriu dc RiilJill, the proprietor of the estate of Riddell, in the reign of Iving William, succeeded PatrUhis, designed ite Riildell, which 1 think, implies tiiat he was the head of the tamily. He, Patricias de Ridddl, gives to the monks of Melrose, " Partem terrac in territorio de Wittune, pro salute animx> Domini Wil- " lielmi Regis Scotiic(rt). He gives moreover to the convent of Melrose, and to the monks serving God tliere, another part of "Wittune, " Usque ad terrain quam " Willielnuisde Riddeli dedit Matildae Corbet uxori sudc in Wittune." The deed is expressed to be made. Pro salute Domini mei Alexandri Rfjis Scotia: (6), which must be after the 1214, that our King Alexander U. came to the throne. One of the wit- nesses to the charter is JVa/tirus de Riddeli Jilius meus (c). He had also another son named JVillielmusde Riddeli. To Sir Patrick de Riddeli succeeded ITalter de Riddeli hisson. There is a donationand mortification hy R-jbertusde Buccleuxb,proanima Ans- kitille de Riddeli, mei, Domini x3 pro animahus Patricii de Riddeli, ii Walteri de Riddeli Dominorum rneorum, of lands held of them in Wittune (<•/). There is another donation by IValterus de Riddeli, Jilius l^ hteres Patricii de Riddeli, whereby ad petitionem, says he,Jilii mei isi hieredis, ^ Isabel uxoris suce, he ratifies to the monks of Melrose, ilium bovatum terrae, which IViltielmus Parsona de Hunam pmx based a IVillielmo Cocko, testibus Dom. Patricio Je Riddeli patre meo, that was his father-in-law, IVilli- elmo fdio meo i^ haerede, Patricio filio meo, IVillielmo nepote meo (f ). Moreo\er a subsequent deed and charter to this abbacy confirms that to IValterus de Riddeli. William, his eldest son, succeeded ; tor there is a donation to the abbot and con- vent of Melrose, by Isabella, " uxor Willielmi de Riddeli de alia bovata terne in " territorio de Wittune, quam pater meus, Willielmus Parsona de Hunam emit a " Gaufredo Coco." He expresses her deed to be made " Pro salute anima; Do- " mini Patricii de Riddeli, &• Walteri filii ejus, & Willielmi sponsi mei." To which there are witnesses Dominus Patricius de R'ddell, IValterus de Riddeli Jilius meus, lyillielmus de Riddeli sponsus meus, Willielmus Jilius noster, Patricius Jilius Walteri de Riddeli (/J. So we see this last writ instructs four successive descents in the family, which is much in an extrinsic voucher, and a great deal in re tarn an- tiqua, for supporting the antiquity of the family. This Willielmus de Riddeli, the head of the family of Riddeli, is the same person who, in the register of Melrose, is witness in a charter granted by Joannes de Vesci Witlielmo de Sprouston de nova terra de Mow {g). Willielmus de Riddeli, the son of the former William de Rid- deli, in the reign of David II. as I conjecture, is in the quality and rank of a knight, miles, when he ratifies and confirms certain lands that Adam Dunelm, that is Durham, his vassal, held of him, which he then sold to the monastery of Melrose, in W"ester-Lilisclve(/j). The next in the line of succession in the principal family of Riddeli, Riddeli of that Ilk, is ^lintin de Riddeli de Wittune, who is the first that the charters of the family that are nov/ extant begin with, in the custody of Sir Walter Riddeli of that Ilk, baronet ; though I think he can scarcely be the immediate son of the last-mentioned Sir William; he may, indeed, without any stretch in chronology, be his grandson; but he is very plainly and clearly the successor and lineal heir to all those ancient barons of Riddeli who had the lands and estate of Wittuness, Brachabe, and LiUsclve, from King David I. And this gentleman, Qiiintin Rid- (a) Chattulary of Melrose, of which there are tuo, one belonging to the Earl of Haddington, and a lesser one to the Lawyers at Edinburgh. (i) Ibidejn. {c) Ibidem. {d) Ibidem. («•) Ibidem. (/) Mr Nisbet in his Treatise of Heraldry, from the chartulary of Melrose, p. 375. (^) Char- tulary of Melrose. (A) Charta penes Dom. Walt. Riddeli de eodem. Vol. II. 7 N 298 APPENDIX. dell, being found vested in that very estate, it cannot remain a question but that he is heir to them, and their lineal legal successor: For George Rutherford, bailie to the said Q_i.nntin Riddell of VVittuness, by an inquisition, hnds him duly vested in the estate of Riddell, in his court at Wittuness, the 4th of July 1421 (rt), vi'hich was the 14th year of the reign of King James I. I could not vouch, from the writs of the family of Riddell, to whom this Qiiintin was allied in marriage: But he is in a particular friendship and confidence with the Rutherfords; so perhaps he was allied with them ; but this I offer no otherwise than as a conjecture, for it will bear no more. He, QuiNTiN Riddell of Wittuness, the Laird of Riddell of that Ilk, was suc- ceeded by James Riddell of Wittuness, his grandson : This is vouched from his service in the charter-chest of the family of Riddell (i), whereby, on the 4th of May 1471, at Jedburgh, an inquest of very honourable gentlemen find, " Qj^iod " Jacobus Riddell de eodem, & legitimus & propinquior hi«res quondam Qj^iin- " tini Riddell, sui avi ;" it is in the lands of Roxburgh, as well as in the other estates he died vested in. This gentleman. Jacobus Riddell de eodem, directs a pre- cept to his bailiff, for infefting WiUiam Davidson, his vassal, in the lands of Heath- bands. He was succeeded by John Riddell of that Ilk, his son : There is a precept directed from James, Arch- bishop of Glasgow, for infefting John Riddell of that Ilk in the lands of Lilisclve, which he held of that See in 15 10; and another precept from the next succeeding archbishop to the same effect (t), anno 1518. This is the Laird of Riddell, who knowing the value of his original charter from King David I. of the estate of Rid- dell, which is indeed so ancient, as I have never seen any other from this king to a laic but itself; and by its high antiquity, even then, hkely to deface, and the writing to wear out, so, to preserve so valuable a monument and record of his fa- mily, he applied by petition to the Lord Gray, Justice-General be-south Forth, to have the original charter transumed, and which was accordingly done in a jus- tice-air held at Jedburgh, as has been formerly observed in the preceding part of this memorial, anno 1506. This same Joannes Riddell de eodem grants a precept for in- fefting Patrick Earl of Bothwell, as heir to Patrick Earl of Bothwell, his father, in a part of the lands of Lilisclve, anno 1534, which he held of the Laird of Rid- dell (rf). He left behind him several sons, Walter, his heir and successor. John Riddell designed of Robbine (f). William Riddell, a third son CfJ- Walter Riddell of that Ilk succeeded his father, to whom he is served heir anno 1588 {g). He married , daughter of Sir George Ramsay of Dalhousie, ancestor to the Earl of Dalhousie {h), and had a son, his heir, viz. Andrew Riddell of that Ilk, who has a charter of his estate under the Great Seal, filio et haredi Walteri Riddell de eodem, dated the 4th March 1591 (/). Tliis gentleman married, first, , daughter of Sir James Pringle of Gala- shiels {k) ; and had issue, Sir John, his eldest son, the first baronet of this most ancient family (/). William, of whom are the Riddells of Newhouse, and James Riddell of Mayboll (;n). He married to his second wife, Viola, daughter of William Douglas of Pompherston, a very ancient family of that name in Linlithgow- ■ihixeCnJ ; by whom he had a son, Walter Riddell, the progenitor of the Rid- dells of Haining in Teviotdale, which, in our own time, ended in an heir-female, Mrs Magdalen Riddell, who was married to Mr David Erskine of Dun, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, and had issue ; he had also several daugh- ters, Margaret, who was married to Robert Rutherfoal of Edgerstone, ancestor to Sir John Rutherford of that Ilk foj ; another to Sir James Scott of Goldielands; and a third daughter, Isabel, who was married to Robert Kerr of Cavers (pj, of whom that family is descended; and the youngest to John Baillieof St John's-Kiik in the shire of Lanark, of whom Somerville of Corhouse is the hneal heir. (a) Charta penes Dora. Walt. Riddell de eodem. {b) Charta penes Dom. Walt. Riddell de eodem, I saw the writs fvom the originals, (rj) Ibidem. (^J) Ibidem. (.) Ibidem, (/■- Ibidem. (^ Ibidem. (/.) Ibidem. (/) Ibidem. (^) Memorial of tl.e family of Riddell, from the wrus of the family tranbmit- ed to me. (/) Ibidem. (ni) Ibidem. (fj) Ibidem, and the Registers of the Heralds. (o) Ibidem. (/)) Memorial of the House of Riddell, and other authentic vouchers confirming it. I APPENDIX. 209 Su- John Riddell, the tiist baronet in the family, created the 20th of March 162S, was married to Agnes, daughter of Sir John Murray of Blackbarony, by Duma Margaret, his wife, daughter of Sir Alexander Hamilton of liinerwick, the first and most ancient branch of the illustrious House of Hamilton. This alliance brought a great many relations to the house of Riddell ; for the lady had a sister. Dame Elizabeth Murray, who was married to Sir Robert Kerr of Ancrum, created Earl of Ancrum in the 1633 : she was liis first lady, and was mother to William Earl of Lothian, who was Secretary in the time of King Charles I.;. Dame Marga- ret Murray, another sister, was married to Sir Robert Halkct of Piiferran, and had issue. iSIary, married to Patrick Murray of Philiphaugh, and had issue ; and Isa- bel, married to Sir Patrick Scott of Thirlestane, and had issue; , married to Sir James Douglas of Colphople ; and , married to Veitch of Dawick. Sir John Riddell had issue by his lady, Dame Agnes Murray, Sir Walter, his heir and successor. Sir William Riddell, Governor of Dusburgh in Holland, John and Thomas who were Captains in the service of the States of the United Pro- vinces; he had also a daughter, , who was married to Sir Thomas Kerr of Cavers, and had issue. He married to his second wife. Dame Anne Anstruther, daughter of Sir Wil- liam Anstruther of that Ilk, by whom he had only one daughter, who was married to David Barclay of Cullernv, one of the ancientest families in all the county of Fife 00- Sir Walter Riddell of that Ilk, the next baronet in the family, married Dame Janet Rigg, a lady highly extolled for piety and all the graces that could_adorn the sex. She was the daughter of ^very worthy man, William Rigg of Aitherny, who liad a great estate both in the shire of Fife and near Edinburgh : but he was richer in good works (/?}, as from a manuscript of his life (c). He was a great supporter of the presbyterian clergy, especially in the city of Edinburgh, in the opposition they made to the violent efforts the court and the bishops made in pressing conformity to the five articles of Perth assembly, ratified by act of Parliament 1621. By this pious lady, Sir Walter Riddell of that Ilk had issue. Sir John Riddell of that Ilk, his heir and successor, who married Helen, daughter of Sir Alexander Mor- rison of Presrongrange, by Dame Jean Boyd, daughter of Robert Lord Boyd; by her he had Sir Walter Riddell of that Ilk, Bart, the present representative of this ancient family, who married Mrs Margaret Watt, daughter to John Watt of Rose- hill, Esq. and have issue five sons and three daughters, and a daughter married to Hary Nisbet, son and heir apparent to Sir Patrick Nisbet of Dean, Bart, and had issue. The second son of Sir Walter Riddell of that Ilk, and Dame Janet Rigg, was Mr William Riddell, who was bred to the profession of the law, and was an Advocate betbre the Court of Session, where he served long with reputation and integrity ; he acquired first the estate of Friershaw, and is the ancestor of that branch of the family, designed Riddell of Glenriddellin Drumfries-shire. He mar- ried Elizabeth Wauchope, eldest daughter of Captain Francis Wauchope, only bro- ther of John Wauchope of Niddry, a ramily of higher antiquity than many others in the county of Edinburgh where they reside. The lady was sister toMajor-GeneralJohn,and Major-Gen;ral Francis Wauchopes, two officers of great name and high reputation for conduct, courage, and valour, as any two oflicers of their profession that belonged to the foreign service: Upon the Revolution both of the brothers went over to France to follovv" the fortunes of their master King James VII.; they had high commands in tl;e French and Spanish ser- vice, which they still maintained with great honour and reputation fdj. There was one thing ve;y remarkable of the two General Wauchopes, viz. That the eldest bro- ther, though he was in as many public and more private engagements as an officer of distinction, he never received a wound, nor had his blood so much as once drawn, till he was killed in the war in Catalonia, where he commanded the foot. And of his younger brother General Wauchope, he was almost wounded in every battle he (a) Memorial itortiaid of the family of Glenriddell. (i) Mr Dnviil Caldenvood gives him in his his tury, toward the erd, a high chaiacter. [c) Memoirs of Bailie William Rigg of Aitlierny. (/) Memo rial of Riddell of Glenridjle. 30C APPENDIX. was engaged in ; yet died in his bed, Governor of Cagliari in Sardinia, in the Spa^ nish service. By Mrs Elizabeth Wauchope, Mr William Riddell, Advocate, had issue, Walter Riddell of Glcnriddell, his son and heir, who married Catharine, eldest daughter of Sir Robert Laurie of Maxwelton, by whom he has two son<;, Robert Riddell, apparent heir of Glenriddell, who is married to Jean, daughter of Alexan- der Fergusson of Craigdarroch, and has issue one son, Walter, and three daughters. John Riddell, the second son, who is of Grange in Fife. He married Helen, daughter of Sir Michael Balfour of Denmiln, and has issue, two sons and two daughters. Mr Archibald Riddell (the third and youngest son of Sir Walter Riddell of that Ilk, and Dame Janet Rigg) was one of the Ministers of the Gospel at Edinburgh, who had issue, Walter Riddell of Granton, captain of a man of war, who died without issue, and Doctor John Riddell, Physician at Edinburgh; his son is John Riddell, Writer to the Signet, who married Mrs Christian Nisbet, daughter of Sir John Nisbet of Dean, Bart, and has issue. F I N I S. HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS FRYNNE'S HISTORY, so FAR AS CONCERNS- THE SUBMSSION AND FEALTY SWORN BY THE GENERALITY OF THE SCOTS NATION TO KING EDWARD I. OF ENGLAND, IN 1292, 1296, 1297, b'r. COMMONLT CALLED THE RAGMAN-ROLL. THE submission and fealty of the Scots nation was very universal, and' taken through different places of the kingdom ; the first I take notice of is on the 7th of July 1292 (rt), those who swore to King Edward of England, viz. Fergus Mac- dowald, Dougal Macdowyl, Del Count de Wigtoun : These two gentlemen are of the fa- mily of the Macdowals, or Macdouals, or Mncdowyles. There are four families of the surname of M'Dowall, who all claim and set up for independency on one another ; they all agree they are descended of the most ancient princes or barons, iS Domini Galluidie, or de Galveyin; the name is a patronymic, called after the proper name of Doual, or Dougal, their common progenitor, which must be as old as the reign of King David I. since there is none of the old family of Galloway of that name, since that Ulgerick and Dovenald, the two prime leaders of the Galvegians, were killed at the battle of Allerton in the 1 138. Some modern critics are of opinion, though it is but conjectural at best, that the race of the M'Dowalls are sprung- from Thomas, called Macduallan, son to Allan Lord of Galloway, in the reign of King Alexander II. and from him they are denominated Macduallans, that is the offspring- and descendants of Thomas, the son of Black, or Du Allan : None of all the families of the M'Dowalls have any very ancient writs. Makerston lias a charter of the ba- (a) Prynne's History, page 649, Vol. IL 7 O i HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS rony of Makerston, Yetham, &c. to Fergus M'Dougall, or M'Dowall, on the re- signation of Margaret Fraser, his mother, in the rolls of King Robert II. anno 1373. Garthland's first charter is in 1413, by Archibald Earl of Douglas, Dominus Galiu- die 'c? AnnandaUe, Thome Macdowal, of the lands of Garthland. Logan produces a charter in 1453, to Andrew M'Dowall, of several lands which Uthred M'Dowall of Garthland held of him. And Freugh has a charter of the lands of Ravenston, to Fergus M'Dowall of Freugh, who had married the heiress of Gilbert Maclelland of Ravenston, and to Fergus M'Dowall, his son and heir apparent, in the 1445. These documents are all the M'Dowalls can produce, to vouch their respective antiquity ; for the two gentlemen here in the Ragiiian-Roll, all the three families in the shire of Wigton claim them to be their ancestors. William de Murrcff de Dnirhsar^ard; whose son, Dominus Joannes de Moravia, Domnus de Drumsargaid, obtained the lands of Ogilvie, Abercairny, and Glen- sherop, by the marriage of Mary, daughter of Malise Earl of Strathern, and is the well known ancestor to the moit ancient and honourable family of Abercairny, in the county of Perth, where they had long nourished, and still continue in lustre; who, as an heir of line of the ancient Earls of Strathern, carries, quarterly, first and fourth Murray ; second and third a cheveron, surmounted of another, for Strathern, and is the coat-armorial of James Murray of Abercairny, who is the lineal heir of this WiUielmus de Moravia, de Drumsargard. Roger de Methfen; this gentleman had the estate of Methven, and is a frequent witness to charters granted in the time of King Robert I. to several of the an- cientest families in the county of Perth, and is designed Rogerus de Methfen, miles (a). There was a small family designed of Methven, of whom was Dr John Methven, who was Vicar of Edinburgh, and Register in the reign of King James II. Of the same race of people was Paul Methuen, Esq. once Secretary of State, who owns his extraction from Scotland, and from the Methvens. Gilchrist More is the same gentleman that was son to Reginald More, designed of Craig, i. e. the Craig of Rowallan, and brother to Sir Adam Mure of Rowallan. Hew de Ralstoun; this is the ancestor of Ralston of that Ilk, a family of anti- quity in the county of Renfrev/, as far up as the reign of Alexander 111. and give out as the tradition that they are descended of a son of the Earls of Fife. But how the tradition is vouched I cannot say; but their arms do not favour that, for they do not wear the lion rampant, the arms of the Earl of Fife, but three acorns on a bend, intimating, that they are of the same race and stock with those of the surname of Muirhead. John Senescal de Jedwitb ; he, in the opinion of a very great antiquary {b), was the same John Stewart who is, in other places of this fealty, designed frater ger- mamis Jacobi Senescalli Scotiae, grandfather to King Robert II. and was the root of the Stewarts of Bonkill, and the same brave gallant man that was slain in the service of his country at the battle of Falkirk anno 1298. He had many sons, of whom sprang a great many illustrious branches of the serene race of the Stewarts. Sir Alexander Stewart, his eldest son, designed of Bonkill (c), was, upon the for- feiture of the English family of the Umfravilles, created Earl of Angus in the 1327. Sir Allan, another son, was the stem of the noble family of the Stewarts of Darnly, from whom flowed the Earls and Dukes of Lenjio.x, which failed in the 1672; to whom his Majesty King Charles II. succeeded as his nearest and lawfid heir-male () Mr David Simpson Historiographer of Scotland. (c) Dr John B;irbour's L'fe of King Robert I. {_d) Tne King's Retour in the Chancery. (f) Char- tulary of Kelso. ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 5 successor, in the ruignof King Robert IIL married his eldest son and heir apparent to Marietta Stewart, only daughter and lieir of Sir Walter Stewart of Dalswintoii, anno 1397; of this double race of the Stewarts is the Earl of Galloway, as he is also of an heir-female of another brother, as we have observed in this criticism. iniliam de Miirreffde Tbolybaidiae; this is the ancestor of the most noble and illustrious family of Tullibardin, in the county of Perth, tliat were an early branch of the Riurrays of the House of Duffus, the root of all the Murrays. The family was first raised to the honour of the peerage in the 1604, created Earls of Tullibardin in 1606, Marquis of Athol anno i6-j6, and Duke of Athol in 1703. John de Montgomery is designed del Conte de Lanerk, and the same gentleman that comes to be designed de Eglishnn" in the barony of Renfrew; but at that time, and long afterwards, in the county of Lanark, till the reign of Robert IIL he is designed del Count de Lnneik, to distinguish him from Murtbak de Montgomery del Conte de jiii\ who was the progenitor of the Montgomeries of Stair. Alex- ander Montgomery, chevalier, was his son and heir in the 1357, and is Domintts de Eglishame, as Sir John de Montgomery de Egushmne, his son, in the 1388, who obtained the great barony of Ardrossan and Eglinton, by the marriage of Elizabeth, the daughter and sole heir of Sir Hugh Eglinton of that Ilk, one of the two great Justiciaries of Scotland, in the reign of King David II. cinno 1361, by Giles, or Egidia, his wife, daughter of Walter, Great Steward of Scotland, and sister to King Robert II. These facts are all vouched from the original writs of the lands and estate of Bonnyton in Edinburgh-jhire, which this lady gives to Alexander Montgomery, her second son, in the 1387, with consent of John Montgomery of Ardrossan, her eldest son, whose son and heir, Alexander Montgomery, is intitled Domintis de Ar- drossan, in the 1453, when he gives the lands of Lochlebo, &.c. in the barony of Renfrew, to George Montgomery his son, to be held of him and his heirs Dominis de Ardrossan: Which is confirmed by a charter under the Great Seal, I have seen thus (/). This Alexander de Montgumery Domiuus de Ardrossan was the first Lord of Parliament of the House of Montgomery nominated and invested in that newly introduced honour, by King James I. in the 1427 {g). Hugh Lord Montgomery was raised to the honour of Earl of Eglinton by King James IV. anno 1506, whose heir and successor is Alexander Earl of Eglinton. Reginald More de Craig, that is of the Craig of Rowallan, who had Sir Adam, of whom the ancient r.nd honourable family of Rowallan. Reginald was his se- cond son, who, in the 1329, was Chamberlain of Scotland ; of whom the Muirs of Abercom, by the marriage of the heir of the great family of the Grahams. The direct male line of this house of the Muirs ended in an heir-female, Ellen, who married Sir William Lindsay of Byres, in the reign of King Robert II. anno 1371. He was the direct ancestor of the Lord Lindsay of the Byres, and the pre- sent Earl pf Crawford ; who, till they came to enjoy the title of Earl of Crawford, by the attainder of Lodov.'ick Ear! of Crawford, anno 1644 (A), carried in their coat-armour the three stars in chief of the fesse cheque, as the composed coat of Lindsay and Muir. Thomas de Montgomery, and Murchau de Montgomery del Count de Air, I take to be the other great family of the Montgomerys of Stair in King's-Kyle, of whom, through a series of heirs of the Montgomerys, that barony came to be heri- tably transferred to the Dalrymples, the ancestors of the present John Earl of Stair. Halter ftz Gilbert de Hamildon ^ most of OUT modem antiquaiies, following the sentiments and opinions of a very learned antiquary, and a very worthy ingenious gentleman, Mr Hamilton of Wishaw, think that this great man, designed patro- nymically, v.as the ancestor of his Gracie the Duke of Hamilton. I have some difficulty about it myself, how he came to take or assume tile surname of Hamil- ton, or where that place lay : for it is not the barony now, and for many centuries bypast, called Hamilton ; for at this time, anno 1292, it was then called Baronia {f) In the har.Ci of S:r Hugh Montgomerv of Skelmorly, the sime George being his ancestor.. {g) He is inter Dominos Parliament! 1429 in the records. (h) Rccinded zc's cf Parliament. 4 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS de Cadiow, and was crown lands, and where our kings in these ancient times had a seat ; as is clear from the many charters that are dated apitd Cadiow. That that barony was in the crown in the time of King Robert 1. is evident from a charter granted by that monarch, " Fratvibus Prsdicatoribus de Glasgow, de " annuo redditu viginti mercarum Sterlingorum, debito et exeunte de Baronia " nostra de Cadiow." It is true that King Robert, after this, gives Waltero filio Gilberti Baroniam de Cadiow ; but no otherwise designed them patronymically, IValterus flius Gilberti, who is the sure and certain ancestor of the most noble and illustrious family of Hamilton ; but whether he be the same individual great man with the former Walter fitz Gilbert de Hamidlon is more than 1 can say, since the son of Sir Walter, the son of Sir Gilbert, does not use any surname, but is called Dowinus David filius Walterifilii Gilberti 7iiilitis, when he mortifies to the Chapter of the See of Glasgow a certam annuity out of his barony of Kinniel, anno 1361. His son David, Dominus David, filius Davidis, filii Walteri, filii Gilberti, in the 1375, in a charter in the rolls, designs himself dt Hmnyldon. There has been something extraordinary in their resuming the surname of Hamildon, if they be descended of IValttr fitz Gilbert de Hamildon, that I cannot account for ; and 1 am sure, that at the same time the second Sir David Hamilton of Cadyow assumes or resumes the surname of Hamilton, Johannes filius Walteri, as he calls himself, his uncle, takes the surname of Hamilton, and the designation of Fingleton and Rosa- ven ; and his brother. Sir Alexander Hamilton, in the 1387, has a charter from the crown of a part of the lands of Innerwick, and to the heirs to be procreated be- twixt him and a noble lady his wife, Elizabeth, daughter and co-heir of Thomas Stewart Earl of Angus, of whom Alexander Hamilton of Innerwick, Esq. is the lineal descendant, who carries the composed coats of Hamilton and Stewart, to perpetuate the memory of that illustrious alhance, the three cinquefoils betwixt the fesse chequi of the Stewarts. Robert Cruck de Tmgaldston was at that time the head of an ancient family of the Crucks, who had the lands of Crucksfie, >. e. Cruxston, Nielston, and Fingle- ton, all in the barony of Renfrew ; which lands came in the reign of King David U. by marriage to the Stewarts of Darnly, and to the Hamiltons of Fingleton and Preston, esteemed the first and most ancient cadet of the House of Hamilton, which failed in the person of Sir William Hamilton, who died at Exeter in No- vember i688, soon after the Prince of Orange's expedition to Great Britain, where he had a considerable command in the prince's army. June I. 1292 (i). The Lords of the Regency of Scotland then swore fealty, and made their respective submissions to King Edward I. as direct superior lord of the kingdom of Scotland, or the Guardians of the Realm, as they were called, viz. William Fraser, Bishop of St Andrews ; he was Chancellor of Scotland, ^ whom a full account may be seen in the Lives of the Chancellors of Scotland, published by Mr Crawfurd. Robert Wishart, Bishop of Glasgow ; this is the noble celebrated prelate that did so many glorious acts of patriotism for retrieving the Hberties and independency of his country, when they were very near swallowed up, and on the very brink of ruin, by the encroachments the King of England, the mighty Edward I. had made, so very unjustly, upon a free people, to which the domestic divisions and animosities of contending parties had not a little contributed, and gave him the handle to form his project of subjecting the whole kingdom to him, as their Sove- reign and Liege Lord, as he so frequently called and stiled himself. Duncan Earl of Fifie ; this was Duncan the eleventh Earl of Fife, who was slain in 1298, at the battle of Falkirk. Alexander Cumine Earl of Buchan, the same who was Great Justiciary of Scot- land, in the reign of King Alexander III. but he died in the 1289, which weaken- ed, in a great measure, the concord that was formerly among the great men, the Guardians. (_/) Prynne's History, page 507. I ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 5 Jmnes, the Great Steward of Scotland, lived through these times of disorder and confusion that ensued; his conduct was much liker the willow than the oak; and died in the 1309. His son, IFa/tcrus Senescallus, or Steward of Scotland, was tlie father of Robert IL the first of our kings of the most serene race of the Stew- arts. Sir John Citmine of Badenoch, senior, was the last in the commission of the re- gency ; he was the ne.xt to the rank of the Cjrnites, one of the great harones. His family was the root and stem of all the great, numerous, and powerful families of the Cumins. Upon the death of the yoimg (;)iieen Margaret of Scotland, anno 1290, he set up a claim for the crown; his compjtition was founded and derived from a very remote source, fron Bethock, daughter of K.ing»Donald, whose daugh- ter, Hexilde, was married to Sir William Cumin, Chamberlain to King VVdliam : but the claim was really so idle that he soon dropt his title, and laid aside his pretension in favour of John B;iliol, who, to say the truth, had the hcredita/y right to the cro.vn been as fully established by law as it has been since, no question he had the better title of any other of the claimants. He left issue by Marjory, his wife, daughter of John Baliol of Harcourt, sister to John King of Scotland, John Cumin of Badenoch, who was slain for his perfidy and treachery by King Robert the Bruce, in the church of the Minorites at Dumfries, on the loth of February 1306. In him ended the great family of the Cumins in the male succession. He left a daughter, who was married to D ividdc S:,atbbol^y, Earl of Athol, who, if there be any that can lay a well-founded claim to be descended of this lady, they are the heirs of line of the royal race of the Haliols, and the heirs in blood to Margaret, the eldest daughter of David Earl of Huntingdon, the root of the roval family of Scotland, that failed in the mascuHne line of King Alexander IIL The ingenious Mr David Hume of Godscroft, and a learned polite writer in every thing but in that of history, which does not at all seem to have been his talent, has, in his His- tory of the House of Douglas, a dissertation on the right of the family of Douglas, as being heirs to the old Baliol family, of which I may venture to say there is scarce one true word. Our author, MrPrynne, remarks, that along with the Guardians, the Custodes Scotia, that gave their oath of fealty to King Edward of England was Brianus filius Allani, if any be descended of him I can say nothing. Then Marcus Sodoreruis Episcopus, that is the Bishop of the Isles, whom my author says was " ipsius Regni Cancel- " larius," meaning of Scotland. " Ac nobilis vir Robertus de Brus, Dominns " vallis Annandie :" This is the noble person who competed with Baliol for the crown, in right of his mother Isabel, the second daughter of David Earl of Hunt- ingdon, grandfather to King Robert I. Jjbannes de Baliol, Dominus Galuidie, This is that John Baliol who competed for the crown, and actually obtained it by the determination of King Edward of England, anna 1292, of whom our histories are so full that I cannot think it necessary to add any thing more in these critical observations. Patricius Dunbar Comes Marchie ; He was the first earl of the old noble family of the Earls of Dunbar, who take the title of C.jnies J^I treble: He, at this time, was one of the claimants for the crown : but his title was not well founded ; for he was only come of a natural daughter of King William, and was more for show than any reality that could be in his claim. From him the great and noble Earls of March descended, till they were attainted in Parliament, in the reign of King James I. anno 1434 {k~). Dovenaldus Comes de Mar is that Earl of the House of Marr that was called Grat- nack or Gratney, the import of which I do not know. Donald Earl of iVIarr, his son, was one of the Guardians of Scotland in the nonage of King David II. and was slain at the battle of Duplin anno 1332. In Thomas Earl of Marr the male line of the family failed, and it came to Margaret Countess of Douglas and Marr, his sister, and to James Earl of Douglas, her son, and upon his de nise to Isabel Dou- glas, his sister, whose husband, on her resignation, was invested in, the earldomof Marr, (h) Acts of Parliament. Vol. IL 7 P 6 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS " cinctus gladio comitas," as the ancient custom was ; but he havhig no lawful issue, he surrendered the fee of the earldom to Sir Thomas Stewart, Comes, Earl of Garioch his son ; and failing his heirs male, to which it is limited, it is to fall to the clown {a), which actually happened; for Thomas Earl of Garioch, the fiar of the earldom, died before his own father, without any issue, so that upon the Earl's death, in the 1436, according to the settlement of the estate, it came to the king; not in virtue of any right, as is pretended by some of our historians, as being de- scended in blood from the ancient Earls of Marr, whose daughter King Robert the Bruce married, but because the descent of the estate in the limitation of tiie charter earned it so. I beheve that Robett Lord Erskine and Robert Lyle of Duchall were heirs of 'blood and line to Lady Isabel Douglas, Countess of Mair: But she had given her estate to her husband, Sir Alexander Stewart, and he liad prtivided it to the crown in failure of the issue male of the Earl of Garioch his son, which happened, as we have said, in the year 1436, so that King James I. came very lawfully and legally to the possession of the earldom of Marr, contrary to what is asserted by some of our historians : But I will carry this remark no fur- ther. Johannes Comes de Buchan : This was the next great family of the Cumins of the House of Batlenoch, he was Constable of Scotland, and Jasticiarius Galuidie. He was inflexibly attached to the English interest in the time of King Robert the Bruce, and strenuously opposed all the struggles he made for recovering the liber- ties of his country ; for which he lost his estate in Scotland, and brought ruin oq his family, and died a banished man in England. Johannes Comes Atholie is the next in the list. This noble Earl, though he had been in the English interest, yet he was one of the few of the nobihty who joined King Robert the Bruce, when he set the crown on his head in the 1306. But in the course of the war, falling into the hands of the enemy, he was by order of the king of England sent prisoner to England ; and though, it is remarkable, he was of the blood royal, and allied to the English Monarch himself, yet so inex- orably was he set on rage, to revenge any attempt a Scotsman, of whatsoever qua- lity, that durst attempt any thing to controul his conquest over Scotland, that he ordered him to be executed with the rest of the prisoners. All the favour he had, if it was a favour at all, was, he was prefeired to a higher gallows than any of his countrymen ; so it may be well said he died a martyr for his country and the li- berties thereof. His son, David de Strathbolgy Earl of Athol, was once in high fa- vour with King Robert, who made him High Constable of Scotland ; but after that, in the 1312, he revolted to the English, and was a strenuous and indefatigable worker of all the michief to his country that ever fell in his way, or was in his power : so his family was forfaulted, and the earldom of Athol was given to Sir William Douglas Lord of Liddisdale. After the Earl of Athol, the next in the roll is Gilbertus Comes de An^us; he was an Englishmen of the surname of Umfraville ; he was forfeited and lost his estate in Scotland by an article of the peace concluded with England a7mo 1327. It was agreed that no Englishman should henceforth possess any lands in Scotland, but such as should reside in that kingdom, and renounce their allegiance to the crown of England ; by which all the Scots in the English interest were for ever exiled : and then king Robert, to reward the merit of one of his own loyal and well-deserving subjects. Sir Alexander Stewart of Bonkill, gave to him the earl- dom and honour of Earl of Angus. Malcolmes Comes de Levenax or Lenax. The first ancestor of the family of Len- nox I find from any voucher of authority that 1 could well depend on was, Ayk- frith or Egfrith, an Enghsh Saxon Lord, cotemporary with King Canute and Edward the Confessor, was Lord of Dent Sadbergh. &-c. in Yorkshire (bj, he was also seigneur of the baronies of Askrig, Holtby, Marnck, Burgh, llkton, Newton, Tanfield, Wath, Melmerby, Normanby, &-c. all in the same county (c). He died pro- ber in the register of King James I. (i) Thoresby Ducatus Leodiensis, page 71. (f) Extra, ulgo vocat. Domesday Book, in Registro Honoris de Riclmiond, Appendix page 57. ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. ; bably in t!ie latter end of EJwaid the Confessor, anno 1065, and was succeeded by his eldest son Arkyll or Arkill (c). Chevalier, as he is called in old records (d), he was posses- S3r not only of the above baronies, but also of the lands of Hackforth, Hornby, Laybrun, Brumpton, Cathorp, &.c. (e). He had also a very great estate in Nor- thumberland, beuig called by Otdcricus I'itiiH;, a cotemporary writer, the most powerful man in Northumberland, &.c. " Arkyllus Nordanhymbrorum potcntissimus " cum rege concordiam fecit, cique tilium suum obsidem tradidit(y}." He married Sigrida, daughter to a powerful baron in Yorkshire, Kilveitftlius Li^^ti/fi, by Ecfnda his wite, daughter toAldwinus, Bishop of Durham; for the celibacy of the clergy had not then obtained either in England or among us (j^). By her he had, first, Cospa- trick, who married the daughter oi D'llpbinus Jilius Tor/mi, by whom he had a son, Cvjspatrick, who was cotemporary with Simeon Dunelmensis. His posterity probably ended in an heir-female, to whom Monsieur Adjin de Stavelay was heir (/>). Arkyll, after he had fought stoutlv for two years for the honour, liberties, and indepen- dency of his country against William the Conqueror, was constrained at last, in the beginnmg of tiie year 1068, to submit to that victorious prmce, and gave up his son, Cospatrick, as an hostage for his fidelity, who being young, was not con- cerned in the rebellion of his father, by which means he kept a good deal of his father's estate («'), who was forfeited and banished the latter end of that year up- on the suppression of the Yorkshire Insurrection, in which he bore a considerable share, as is mentioned by the above cited Oid,-riciis lltalis. " Eeodem tamen an- " no, Arkyllus inter rebelles fuit Eboracenses, quibus profligatis, a conquestore in " exilium actus est (k)." Upon his defeat in England, he, with many other great men who had opposed the conquest, fled to Scotland to King Malcolm 111. who that very year having married Margaret, sister to Edgar Atheling, the true and li neal heir of the English crown, received all the Saxon exiles with open arms, gave them estates in Scotland, and other rewards suitable to their birth and merit, of which our Arkyll had his share. It is uncertain at what time this great man died; but it is very clear and evident he was succeeded in his Scots estate by his son Alwjne, or as he is designed in our most ancient and earliest vouchers, Alwynin Mncarkyll, or, Alwynus fiUus Arkyll (/) : he appears soon in the reign of King'Da- vid, being witness with Constantinus Cotn^s de Fyfe, in a confirmation by King Da- vid to the monastery of Dunfermline, which behoved to be before the 1128, that his son Earl Gilemichael is that year witness to the foundation of the abbey of Holyroodhouse, Abbatia Sancte Crucis d; Edinburc (;«}. He is also witness to very many ot the royal charters by King Malcolm IV. and was seemingly in the same high degree of favour he had been with this king's grandfather. He seems to be in a good degree of confidence with Kmg William the Lyon ; but the truth is, I cannot precisely determine whether it was by King Malcolm IV. or his brother King William, that he had the large and far extended territory of the Levenax or Lennox erected into a comital dignity; yet sure we are, that if it was not by King Malcolm, it was very early in the reign of King William, who came to the throne in 1 1 65 : it is as uncertain the time of his demise; but it has bee soon after his creation to be Comes de Levenax. He left behind him two sons, Alwiiie, his succes- sor in the earldom, and Eth, or Etbus, as it is rendered in English Hugh, who is witness in a charter of the lands of Meybotbel in Carrick, granted by Dtincinus filius Gilbertii filii Fergusii, who himself was afterwards Comes de Cunick, to the Monks of Melrose («) ; although this charter has no precise date, yet, by the Chro- nicon de Melross, it appears to be in the 1193 (■) As to the posterity of this Elh, I have found nothing certain, unless Dovenald U fitzMich.iel Mire de Levenax, after- wards mentioned in this roll, be come of him; but this we olfer as a conjecture, and no more. (f) Extra, ex libra vulgo vocat. Domesday book, in Registro Honoris de Richmond, appendix page 57. (),The original was in the cus- iody of the late Viscount of Kilsyth. ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. c See of Glasgow, and abbacies of Paisley, Arbroath, and Kelio (a). The last men- tion that 1 have found of hi;n is in the 1250. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Walter Lord Hi^;h Steward of Scotland, ancestor to the royal family of Stewart (i); by whom he hid only one son, Malcolm, /i/w Maldwini Comitis, Lord of the Len- nox, who died before his father anno 124S C^J ; and so was never Comes de Leve- nox, but was father to Malcolm IL of that name, and the fourth Earl of Lennox. He obtained a charter from King Alexander IIL erecting to him and his heirs a large tract of grouird in liheram H'^aiennam, a free forestry, dated " apud Kyntore, " anno 1272, sexto die Julii (dj." He is freq^uently mentioned in the second volume of the Fvedsra, anno 1284 (f). He died probably in or about I28q, and was succeeded by his only son Malcolm, the third of that name, and the fifth Earl of Lennox, who was the faithful Achates of King Robert L and had the honour to srick firm to his master in all the adverse fortunes that befel him, when all his other subjects deserted bim. Sir Gilbert Hay and Sir James Douglas only excepted. He was one of the Scots earls who invaded England in 1297 (/) ; and, after a great many dangers he had undergone in defeiice of his country, he was at last slain fighting gloriously in the defeixe of the liberties thereof, at the battle of Halidonhill, near Berwick, July 19. 1333 {j). He was succeeded by his son Donaldus, Comes de Lennox, who is one of the Comites et Magnates Scotia, wha grant a commission to divers plenipotentiaries to treat anent the ransom of King David n. anno 1357 (/>). He died in 1372. This Donald Earl ot Lennox was the first instance that I have ever observed that broke in upon the old feudal constitution, and altered the succession, if it was never so remote, from an heir-male to an heir of line and at law ; for he altered the ancient investitures of his estate, that from the beginning of our law had been \miformly limited to heirs-male of him that first received the feu ; and, instead of suffering his estate and the honour, for these at that time were inseparable, to go in the ancient channel to his cousin and nearest heir-male, Malcolm Macfarlane of Arroquhar, the ancestor of the Laird of Macfarlane, he settled it on his daughter, Margaret, and Walter, the son of Allan of Foscelyne, her husband, and their heirs; which accordingly Duncan Earl of Lennox enjoyed, who was their son, till he was attainted, and suffered, as in cases of treason, for being accessory to the treason of the Duke of Albany, his son-in-law, in 1427 : so the heir-male of the most ancient race of the Earls of Lennox is Walter Macfarlane of that Ilk ; and, as such, wears the principal arms of the family, the cross ingrailed betwixt the- four roses. The next great man that made his submission in the Ragman-Rol!, is IValterus Comes de Monteith, who was a Stewart by blood, and brother to the Great Steward of Scotland, and came to be C-^mes de Monteith, in right of a lady the heiress, his wife. He left the surname of Stewart, and his sons assumed the name of Mon- teith, and were spread into seveial noble branches as the Monteiths of Rusky, and the Monteiths Lords of Arran, Dominiis de Arran li Knapdale(i), as we see them de- signed. The race of those Earls ended in an heir-female, who married Sir John Graham, who thereby became Earl of Monteith. He was executed in England after the battle of Durham, by a special commission from the crown of England for that effect (k), anno 1346. By his heir-female the earldom came to Robert Stewart, the second son of King Robert IL who, upon that, was Comes de Monteith, after that Earl of Fife, and then Duke of Albany. He was regent during the captivity of King Jamc: L from the 1406, till his own death 1419. Oi Johannes Cumine, Dominus de Bndenoch, and Jacobus Senescalh/s Sootier, we have already treated. (a) Chartularies of Glasgow, Paisley, and Arbroatli. (i) aiartulary of Paisley. (f) Autogra- phum peues-Ducem de Montrose, (i/) Chartulary of L'^nnox. (c) Rymer, ut supia. (/) Walsing- liara," Matthew Westminster and Henry Knighton. (/) Henricus de Knighton, inter decern scriptore" Anglia:. (A) Rymer, tcm. 6. p. 43. (/) In the Registers, (f) Focdera Angliie. Vol. IL 7 Q^ 10 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS Next to them is recorded J'VUUelmus de Soiilis, and Joj^nnes de Soiilis. I take them to be brothers; the eldest, WilHam, is Dominus de Lydisdale; they were great men in the south ; but inflexibly all attaclied to the English side, for which they lost their estate, that, by gift and donation of the crowji, came to Sir William Douglas, son to Sir James Douglas de Laudonia, of whom our histories are full, by the designation of Dmiinus Fallis de Lydal; and, for his bravery, distinguished by the title of the Flower of Chivalry. Willielmiu de Sancto Claro\ I take this gentleman to be a branch of the Sinclairs: but neither the families of Roslin nor Kermiston. Radulpbusde Hauden, i. e. Haldane, orHaden, of that Ilk, was a very ancient fa- mily in Teviotdale, now extinct. The heir of line was married to John Haldane of Lanrick. Gleneaglesis very justly reputed an ancient funily; they have a char- tei; from King William, " Rogero de Hauden, de tota terra de Frandie in Glen- " dovan, per rectas divisas suas, in feodo &■ h;';veditate. Testibus Mattheo Epis- " copo Aberdonen. Comite Duncano, Comite Gdberto, Ricardo de Preb;nda, Phi- " lippo de Valoniis Camerario meo, Willielmo Cumine, Johanne de H:isting, Ma- " lisio fratre Comitis Gilbert!, Malcoimo filio Comitis Duncani, ^A'illieimo de " Valens, David de Hayia, Alexandre filio Thori, apud Clacmanan." The family rose gradually to be one of the most considerable in the kingdom, chiefly by mar- riage. Sir Smion, one of the heads of the family, got an estate in Perthshire, by the marriage of a lady, who was named Matilda de Arnoits, L e. Arnot. In little more than a century after that, Jolm Haldane, son and heir apparent of Sir Bernard Haldane of Gleneagies, got tlie fourth part of the earldom of Lennox, by the marriage of Agnes Monteith, daughter and co-heir of Robert Monteith of Rusky, :ind of Elizabeth, one of the daughters of Duncan, the last of the race of the Earls of Lennox. He was in high favour with James III. who gave him charters of a part of the earldom of Lennox, with some specialties, intimating, that his lady. Dame Agnes Monteith, was a co-heir to her grandfather, as I apprehend. He was sent ambassador to the crown of Denmark ; he was sheriff-principal of the shire of Edinburgh; and, in the 1482, with George Lord Seaton, Alexander Ramsay of Dalhousie, and Robert Logan of Restalrig, are made joint captains, chieftains, keepers, and governors of the town- of Berwick, and to defend it against the in- vasion of our old enemies of England. James Haldane of Gleneagies, his son, in the 1 8th of King James IV. is made Keeper of the King's Castle of Dunbar, and is allowed to take out brieves from the Chancery, for serving him as one of the heirs of Duncan Earl of Lennox, 1473. He had a long and tedious suit at law with the Lord Darnly anent the superiority of the Earldom of Lennox ; and when these disputes came to be settled and adjusted, then he assumed the quarter- ed coat of the House of Lennox and Monteith, in the second and third quarter of his achievement, which is still borne by his lineal heir Mungo Haldane of Glen- eagies without a^y variation. In the same deed of submission there is Pntricius Graham, who is the head of the Kincardine family, the illustrious ancestor of his Grace the Duke of Montrose, who were raised to be Earls of Montrose by King James IV. in 1505, Marquis by King Charles 1. in the 1644, and Duke by Queen Anne in the 1706. After Fatricius de Graham there is Thomas Randulphi; this is that great patriot Sir Thomas Randolph, nephew to King Pvobert I. by whom he was afterwards me- ritoriously raised to the dignity of Earl of Murray, Lord of Annandale, and of the Isle of Man, whom all Scots historians, ancient and modern, extol above all others, for warlike honour and glory, next to King Robert himself. He died Governor of Scotland in the minority of King David II. anno 1331. The historians seem to have an emulation, and vie with one another who can do most honour to the va- liant and ever renowned Earl of Murray, and transmit his fame to posterity, with the praise and merit he so highly deserved. His son, John Earl of Murray, a hero like himself, was slain at the battle of Durham, anno 1^46, with this circumstance of regret, that he left no issue to inherit the virtues of their noble progenitors, from whom they derived so much honour along with their blood. Alexander de Baliollo Camerarius Scotiae, in the same roll of fealty. He was Baron of the barony of Cavers in Teviotdale. He was a son of the Baliol family, ON THE JIAGMAN-ROLL. ' ii ♦ ■ and i-; designed Baron of Cavei-s in many authentic voucliers in Rynier and the chartnlaries, as may be seen by more vouchers in the Life of Alexander BuHol o;' Cavers, Chamberlain of Scotland, in the Lives of the Ollkers of State, p. 266. Johannes Sinescalli; this is John Stewart of Bonkill, and in other places of this record, where he made his submission to the King of England, frater germanus Jacobi Senesc'/l/i Scotiae. IVilliehniis C'lmine, who is of Kilbride, in Lanarkshire, whose son, John Cumin, was forfeited for adhering to the English, and the barony of Kilbride was given by King Robert L to his grandson Robert, Steward of Scotland, afterwards King- Robert 11. Robert in. in the 1404, gave the barony of Kilbride, JaccM Senes- callo filio suo.naturali, who is designed D'lminus dc Kilhrydc, in several charters and other deeds I have seen, to which his seal is set, the lion of Scotland, within the ttessure, as in the royal bearing, within a bordure cheque of the Stewarts (;'/). His issue failing, the lands fell back to the crown, and became a part of the prin- cipality. Ingelrrimus de Umphravlh was a branch of the Umfraville family that were Englishmen, but possessed of a great estate in Angus, and elsewhere,- which they lost, because they would not renounce their allegiance to England, and turn honest Eicotsmen. In the rolls of King Robert 1. there are charters of land granted by that prince, upon the narrative, that the lands had formerly belonged, and forfeited to the crown, by the attainder of Ingelramus de Umphravile. IWliehmis de Moravia de Tollybardine; this is the ancestor of the House of Tul- libardin, now arrived to the dignity of the dukedom.of Athol; of whom already in these remarks. Radulphus de Craijufordex this is the same gentleman whom we find in another place of this record intitled, Reginaldus de Crawford, del Cjiite de Air, and who is Vicecomes de Air. "He was the head of the great and ancient family of the Craw- furds of Loudon, whose ancestor, Reginaldus de Crawford Vicecomes de Air, anno :tZ20, was the first of the name who was bavon of the barony of Loudon, which he j>rocured by the heiress of Jacobus de Loudon, in the reign of Alexander 11. or may he sooner. Hugh de Crawford, his eldest son, is designed Hugo fdius Rcginaldi de Crawford, who, with his father and other great persons, is witness tg the charter by " Wal- " terus Senescallus ScotifE, Deo &- Beat:e Maria? de DalmuUin, de terris &• pastura " de Druraelly." He had also, by the grant of " Allanus filius RoUandi de Ga- *' louyeia, pro horaagio et servitio suo terras de Monoch per divisas suas," which is ratified by a charter of King Alexander II. " apud Cadichow, ultimo die Mali " anno legni nostri duodecimo," i. e. 1226 (^b). The same Hugo de Crawford is one of the Magnates et Barones Scotiae who put themselves into the protection of the King of England, in the commotions that then happened, 1255. He had ano- ther charter from the great Constable his superior, " de tota terra de Crosby," which is still enjoyed by his descendants the Crawfurds of Auchinames (c). To this first Hugo de Crawford succeeded his son the next B/iro de Loudon, who is de';igned Hugo de Craizford, filius Hugonis d^ Crawford., when he gives by his charter, " Reginaldo fratri suo certas terras, quas ille tenuit de Domino Rogero <' Comite Wintonie." He, Hugo de Crawford, settled a contest with the Abbot of Kelsa, " cum consensu Alicie sponsas sure," to which he, Dominus Hugo, appends his seal ; and because Reginald, his son, had not a seal of his own, he uses the seal Domini Simonis Fraser, anno 1271 (^/). He, Reginaldus de Crawford, was l^icecomes de Air, in the competition for the crown betwixt the Bruce and the Baliol; and when matters came to a crisis, in the event of that contest, no Scotsman ever acted the part more of a firm and inflexible patriot than Sir Reginald Crawfurd, or was more firm in asserting, with zeal and intrepid courage, the liberties of his country; so that he was an eye-sore to the English, and all that were in their interest through the west. True it is, that at the first breaking out of the war, he was carried down with the stream of complying with England, and gave his (fl) In the hands of the Laird of Eamock. (^b) Penes Comitem de Loudon, (f) Ibidem, {fl") Char- tulary of Kelso. 12 HISTORICAL AND GRlflCAL REMARKS oatli oi" fidelity, as most others did, to the victorious King Edward ; but honestlv- apprehending that obligation to be of no force, he joined with the very first oi' those v-'orthy patribts who set up to recover and redeem their sinking liberties. The general ol' the English forces pretending and suing for a truce, it was inti- mated to Sir Reginald Crawfurd; he and his friends, suspecting no treachery, since they had all the assurances the faith of man could give for their security. The Barns at Ayr was the place of meeting; but he was no sooner entered mto the place, than, without so much as the form of justice, he and Sir Allan Mont- gomery were presently put to death, and executed as traitors to the King of England; tiiis was in the year 1297. He left a son and heir, named Sir Ronald, or Reginald, called Sir Ronald the younger, who was just such another patriot for the defence of the liberties of his distressed country as his father had been. He was among the first of his countrymen who joined Sir William Wallace, and was with him in all the dangers he was expo«ed to, till he laid down his commission. Sir Ronald Crawfurd was among the first who resorted to King Robert, when he set. to recover the lost liberties of his country, as well as to maintain his own right; but being quickly after that detached with a party into Galloway, with two of the king's brothers, Thomas and Alexander Bruoes, they were attacked by a strong party of the enemy, under the command of one Duncan M'Dowall, who defeated Sir Ronald and the two Bruces, and were all three sent to London prisoners, where they v/cre condemned to death and executed in the 1306 (a), without respect ei- ther to their merit or quality, which lays a great load on the memory of that king, who could destroy and cut off such men, Vthose only crime was, they were strenu- ous supporters of the liberty and independency of their country. This gallant man left only one daughter, his sole heir. Dame Susan Crawfurd, who married Sir Duncan Campbell, son to Sir Donald Campbell of Red-Castle, whereupon they have an investiture under the Great Seal of the great estate of Loudon to them and their heirs; which failing, to the lady and her heirs, though part of the char- ter (b) runs thus, " Robertus, Dei gratia, &c. Sciatis nos dedisse, St concessisse " Duncano Campbel, militi, omnes terras de Loudon &- de Stenston cum perti- " ncntiis, in Cuningham, prasdictis, Duncano & Susannae sponsae suje hsreditarie " contingentes ratione dictae sponsae tenen. &• haben. eidem Duncano &- Susanna; " sponsffi sucE &- eorum hxredibus inter ipsos legitime procreatis, in unam inte- " gram hberam baroniam, &-c. Si vero contingat prcedictum Duncanum in fatis " decedere, nullo hserede relicto superstite inter ipsum £t pra;fatam Susannam le- " gitime procreate, volumus quod praedicts terra; cum pertinentiis ad praefatam " Susannam &• propinquiores hccredes suas sine aliqua contradictione revertantur; " apud Penycook quarto die Januarii anno legni nostri duodecimo." The next after Sir Reginald Crawfurd is Henricus de Sancto Claro: This was the heir of the great family of the Sinclairs of Roslin, who not only overtopped the other families of the Sinclairs who were equal to them in antiquity, but most of the noble famihes in the kingdom, for they were Earls of Orkney and then of Caithness : The last great man of the fa- mily broke his estate, in a great measure, by passing by his eldest son in the suc- cession, and giving the fee of the earldom of Caithness to one of his sons by a second marriage, and the rest of his estate to another son of the same marriage: But, after the father's death, the brother, who got the earldom of Caithness, kept the estate he had got ; but the other brother. Sir Oliver Sinclair of Roslin, having, it seems, a thorough conviction in his own conscience of the injustice his father had done to the eldest brother, generously gave him back the estate of the fa- mily in Fife ; after which Sir Henry Sinclair, son of Sir William Sinclair, the eldest son, became, as the act of creation bears, and which is an act of Parliament, chief of the blood, and heir to his grandfather, and is created and nominated in all time coming to be Lord Sinclair, mm 1458. Ot this noble lord the Sinclairs' fa- mily are the lineal heirs, and consequently chief of the illustrious family of the Earls of Orkney and Caithness. The records, after Sir Henry Sinclair, miles, adds Cteterique Barones Regni Scotia. (a) He left a daughter. This passage is from Dr Mackenzie. [b) Charta Comitis de Loudon. I ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 13 On the 5th of July anno 1291, the author remarks that " Nobilis \ir Willicl- •' ma' de Duuglas in capella manerii Domini VValteri tie Lindsay apvul Thurston, " ven t St lidelitatem fecit Domino Regi Angliie, ac superiori f*. dirccto Domuio " Regni Scotiie," before and in presence of Antiiony, Bishop of Durham, and Allan, Bishop of Caithness, who was then Chancellor. This is the famous Sir William D'>u.:^las of tiiat Ilk, Dominus ejiisdem, as 1 see him designed. It is true this brave gallant man fell off from the English again ; but the truth is, he was forced to make a second form of submission to the K.ing of England, though it was much against the gram with him; suspecting he was n€ver true to them, tliey imprisoned him in Berivick, where he died, anno 1303. He was happy in two noble sons, Sir James, Lord, or Djininus de Dyji^las, and Sir Archibald, another hero, who was Guardian of Scotland in the minority of King David the Bruce, and lost his life at the battle of HahdonhiU in the 1333. It is a common mistake that he was ever Dominus Gduidie, or had any pretence of a title to it, it was another Sir Archibald Douglas that got the Dominium G iluidie from King David, in the 1371. The gentleman, in whose chapel at Thurston Sir William Douglas gave his oath of fealty and submission, was Sir Walter Lindsay of Thurston and Craigie, a very ancient tamily of the Lindsays, which, in the days of King Robert IL by the heir-female of John Lindsay of Craigie, came to Sir Hugh Wallace of Riccarton, of whom flowed the 'Walhues of Craigie, who carry the coat of Lindsay in the first and fourth quarter of their achievement. On the 8th of July the King of England being in Castro ptiellarum, that is the castle of Edinburgh, there swore allegiance to him Alum, Abbot of the Monastery of Holyroodhouse, near Edinburgh, ^ Dominus Ricardus Frisel ; who this gentle- man is I cannot say, the noble surname of Eraser were then so numerous, if he be not the proprietor of Makerston, which came to the Erasers by marriage of the heir of the Corbets; but as to this I dare not be positive. At the castle of Strivelyn, (Stirling), July 12. swore Mlliam, Bishop of Dumblane, and Midise Earl of Strathern. He was a very loyal patriot, and had a son, Malise, who was his successor in the honour, and was that Earl that was forfeited by Ed- ward Baliol, as the pretender to the throne of Scotland, in 1332, and the earldom of Strathern, as far as his gift and donation could go, was bestowed on the Earl of Warren, an English lord, who thereupon is designed Comes de Strathern Ifl Comes de Surry (a). But it is certain he never was forfaulted, I mean the Earl of Strathern, by any legal king of Scotland: However, though he left several daugh- ters by his lady, who was heir of the earldom of Caithness, yet none of them succeeded him in his dignity of Cjmes de Strathern ; it came to his nephew Sir Maurice Murray of Drumsargard, who, in sundry deeds, authentic vouchers, and records, is designed Mauritius de Moravia, Comes de Strathern; but he being slain at the battle of Durham, the honour went no farther in that race. Galfride de Moubray. or Godofridc Moubry, was Baron of the baronies of Dal- meny, Barnbougle, and Inverkeithing ; he, and his friends the Mowbrays, in those times, were sometimes in the interest of their country, and sometimes on the English side; sometimes forfeited for their disloyalty, sometimes restored again, through all the reign of King Robert L and a part of his son's David IL ; at last they turned loyal and got back their estate, and were great barons, by the title of Barnbougle, and Domini de Innerkeithing . The direct male of this great tamily of the Mowbrays of Barnbougle subsisted till King James V.'s time, thnt Sir John Mowbray of Barnbougle left a daughter, his heir, who married Robert B irton, son to Sir Robert Barton of Over-Barnton, by Dame Elizabeth Crawfurd his wife, who, "by act of Parliament, changed the surname to Mowbray. In this line the House of Barnbougle lasted till after the restoration of King Charles IL The heir-male, and the true representative of the great Lords of Barnbougle, and Domini B ironle de Innerkeithing, is the branch of the Mowbrays of Culcairny in p'ife, in the barony of Inverkeithing; their ancestor, from the original charter of the lands, I have seen, is granted by Sir John Mowbray of Barnbougle, to William Mowbray ',a) Rymer and Dugdale. Vol. IL. 7 R. i^ HIITORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS patruo suo, his father's brother, in the 1511, from whom, in a very distinct and accurate progress, is lineally coaie Robert Mowbray, now of Culcairny. Wdlleimus de Rothein; that is plainly the name of Ruthven, who were a great family, and an ancient house, and had long continued in Perthshue: Their ances- tor was a great man, Suanits Jiliits I'bori, who had a patronymic name before they Took the name of Ruthven ; they rose to be peers in the 1487, and to be Earls of Gowrie in 1581, and fell by that execrable attempt the two brothers made to have bereaved King James of his life, at the Earl of Cowrie's own lodging m the town of Perth, the 5th of August 1601; for which, by act of Parliament, the surname Avas discharged, and the 5th of August appointed for ever to be a day of thanks- giving for his Majesty's merciful deliverance. On the 17th June at Dunfermline, then severals gave their oath of allegiance and submission to King Edward 1. Ridulpbus abbot of Dunfermline, y Nubilis Vir Dominus Andreas Fraser. This was another branch of the great and splendid House of the Erasers of Olivei-Castle, and Sheriffs of Tweeddale : This Sir An- drew was Sheriff of Stirling, and Djtninusde Touch, which afterwards came to the Hays of Tullibody, and by marriage of Egidia, daughter and heir of John Hay of Tullibody, that estate came to Alexander Seaton of Gordon, the first who was, in the reign of King James II., invested in the honour of the Earl of Huntly, 1449: By this lady he had a son, Alexander Seaton, who in many deeds extant is de- signed " lilius et haeres apparens Alexandri Seaton de Gordon ;" he gave to his eldest son the estate of Tullibody, Touch, and the barony of Gordon in the south. He kept the surname of Seaton, and quartered the arms of Hay with those of Seaton, of whom, in a lineal course of succession, is the present Seaton of Touch. The first Earl of Huntly took the fancy to change his name from Seaton to Gor- don, and got the estate and the honour of the earldom of Huntly limited to him, and the heirs-male of his second marriage, with a lady of the House of Crichton. His lineal heir, flowing from the second marriage, is his Grace the Duke of Gordon. Willielmus de Hayia, I have very probable grounds of conjecture, is the ancient family of the Hays of Naughton in Eife, which came afterwards to the Crichtons by marriage, from whose heirs the estate was purchased by Mr Peter Hay of the Hays of Megginch in Perthshire. Andreas de Moravia ; There are so many great men of the name of Murray at this time that it is hard now to distinguish them. Who this gentleman precisely is, I cannot say. Next to him is Constandnus de Locbore, Vicecomes de Fife ; a very learned author says, he was Vicecomes de Fife in 1290, and had his residence in that county ; the estate of the Lochores of that Ilk, in the reign of King Robert I., went by mar- riage to Adam de Valoniis, whose heritage, in the succeeding reign, came to heirs- female. The eldest was married to Henry Waidlaw of Tony, and that way got the estate of Wester-Lochore ; the second to Roger Boswell, the ancestor of the Boswells of Balmuto, and got mat way the estate of Auchterderran, Glassmont, and Muircambus : the third daughter, and heir of Lochore, was married to Sir Andrew Livingston of Drumray and Easter- Wemyss, and got that way the half of Auchterderen. 19th July, In capella de Kingborn, Dominus Jjhannes de Moravia, wlio is Murray of Drumsargard, of whom is come the Murrays of Abercairny. Michael Scott. This is the ancestor of the once great House of the Scotts of Bal- wyrie in Fife, who were surpassed by few families there, eithei for antiquity or grandeur. They were come of Sir Michael Scott, in tlie reign of King Alexander II. who is witness to the charter by that prince to the abbey of Kinloss («}. He got the estate of Balwyrie by the marriage of the heir of Richard de Balweiry, and had that famous knight Sir Michael Scott of Balwyrie, who, with Sir Michael Wemyss,. w'as sent to bring over from Norway the young Qj.ieen Margaret, the grandchild of Kmg Alexander III. He, or his son, another Sir Michael Scott of Balwyrie^ ( ]three parts, and the estate along with it, by three daughters, viz. Mary, who man-ted Sir David Graham, knight, a brother of the Kincardine family, who is on that design- ed Dominus de Loveth (f). The second, Cecilia de Bisseth, was married to Sir Ml- liam de Fenton, and is designed Dominus de Beufort (d), and is the same person that swears the fealty to King Edward. Elizabeth, the third daughter of Sit John Bisset, was the wife of Sir Andrew de Boscho, Dominus de Redcastle ; and had a daughter, Maria de Boscho, as she is called, who is designed Domina de Kilravock ; which lands and estate she brought to her husband, Hugh de Ross, from the south country, as from his armorial bearing, the water-budgets ; of whom is come Hugh Ruse of Kilravock (e). Simon Freshele, i. e. Fraser, for what I know, may be one of the noble ancestors of the Lord Fraser of Lovat. They seem to have had right to a part of the estate that was the Bissets', and after them the Grahams', though I have found no Fraser expressly designed of Lovat till the 1367, that Hugo Fraser, Djminus de Loveth, does homage to the Bishop of Murray, for lands and fishings tie held of the See on the water of Forn. I cannot see when precisely this noble family came to the peerage; they might be promoted to the honour by King James I. after the 1430; yet we have no positive voucher, that I have seen, that this great family are in the quality of peers, till the time of King James III. anno i^'j'2,. The lineal heir- male of this noble family, to this day, inherits the estate and honour of his illus- trious ancestors ; and may they enjoy them, by an uninterrupted race and line in the ancient channel, to latest posterity. On the 24th of July, the whole community of the burgh of Perth made their submission ; and the same day in ecclesia fratrum prtedicatorum, the convent of the Gray-Friars, Andreas Abbas de Cupro, Maria Regina de Man, et comitissa de Stratbern. This lady was the daughter of Alexander de Ergadia, Dominus de Lorn, and widow of Reginald, King of Man. ' Her relations were all deeply engaged in the English interest; she was the second wife of Malise Earl of Strathern: This IS the same lady, as I conjecture, who, long after this, in the 1320, entered into a conspiracy against King Robert the Bruce ; for which this lady, and several of her accomplices, were attainted. This 1 take to be the story, ill vouched, of a daughter of the Earl of Strathern, that was married to the Earl of Warren, air English lord, for which she was forfeited. Of this part of the traditional story there is not one true word ; for the Earl of Strathern, at this time, was never for- feited by any lawful authority ; for no man whatsoever was a more dutiful loyal subject to king David ; and for his being forfeited by the usurper Edward Baliol, and the earldom given by him to the Earl of Warren, had no eftect, and he continued in the full and peaceable possession of his estate ajid dignity till th& end of his life. ("fj Chartulary of Murray, and. Kilravock's wnts. (d) Ibidem. (■<>_) Ibidem., 3 ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 17 Johannes Camhrun, who in otlier deeds is designed Dominus de Balygrenoch ; but what connection there is betwixt hini and the Cainerons of Lochiel I cannot say, and shall not ofter my own conjecture. Thomas Abbas de Scoon, et pntseiuc Dovenalde Comite de Mur ; this is the Earl of Marr, as we observed, who was slain afterwards at the battle of Duplin. Malise Comes de S'rathcin ; this was Earl Malise, called the elder, who died in 1300, and left the loval Earl Malise, the last of the race: J he earl that we re- marked was forfeited by Edward Baliol, but never by King David, as some through mistake have asserted. He died without issue-male ; and though he had several daughters, Isabel, who was married to the great fa:nily of the Sinclairs, yet upon his death the title of honour did not descend to heirs of line, but was given by the crown to a nephew of his, by his sister, Sir Maurice Murray of Drumsargard, ■who is Comes de Strathern, from the 1343 (a), till his death at the battle of Dur- ham, three years after. I can assign no reason why his heirs of line and at law did not succeed upon the total failure of the males of the first of the family, who received the feu : but it cUn be no otherwise accounted for, than that the dignity of Strathern, being a very ancient feudal honour, it was limited only to males; and, in failure of these, as has been the case here, xht feudtim, the feu, the hereditary honour, reverted to the crown ; and, being in the disposal of the sovereign, it was disposed of to the nearest relation of the family that was a male, though he was not the heir-male. The 23d of July those gave their oath of fealty, John de Ergadia, flius nobilis viri Alexandri de Ergadia; this was the great Lord of Lorn, who was deeply en- gaged in the English interest, being of the kindred and aUiance of the Cumins of Ba^denoch: However, afterwards they turned better and more loyal subjects to the Brucian kings, and came to enjoy their estate peaceably. Eugene, or Ewen, of Lorn, left an heir-female, who, in the time of King Ro- bert IIL was married to John Stewart of Innermeth, knight, son and heir of Sir Robert Stewart of Shanbothie and Innermeth, who, upon this, we find in authen- tic vouchers, is designed Johannes Senescallits de Innermeath, Dominus de Lorn, anno 1407 {b). July 29th, the King of England being in the castle of Edinburgh, there did ho- mage to him John, Abbot of Newbottle, Walter M agister Domus de Ballincreif; what was the nature of this House, I cannot say. Ralph, master of the House of Soutra, or " Magister Domus de Soutray, & eodem die & loco." Alexander, Prior of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem; of which I can give no more than the common account of the order, which is not necessary here; " Brian preceptor " militiae Templi in eodem regno." The account of the Templars is so well known that I need say nothing of them here. On the 1st of August, at Berwick, there did homage to King Edward Henry Ep'tscopus Aberdeen. His name was Cheyne, of the House of Inverugie, and ne- phew to the great Cumin of Badenoch: Li the heat of the war he fled to England, but afterwards made his peace with King Robert, who allowed him to return to the exercise of his function, which he exerced to his death in 1328. Robertas Episcopus de Ross; he is not insert regularly in Archbishop Spottiswood's list; I think the learned reverend author has not placed him in the succession right ; for he, Robertus Episcopus de Ross, in 1290, who, with others of the clergy, ad- dress the King of England for a marriage to be contracted betwixt the prince his son and Margaret the maid of Norway, the young Queen of Scotland, anno 1290; and, with him, there did homage, nobifis vir IVillielmus Comes de Ross. This Earl made a considerable figure after this, in the struggles we had with the English, for the liberty and independent rights of the crown and kingdom of Scotland. His fa- mily allied with the Bruces the Earls of Carrick ; his lady was sister to the king, which made the Earl of Ross a firm and faithful friend to King Robert. PViUielmus de Moravia, miles; this I take to be the same great and illustrious person who, in the same record, in another place, is designed D minus de Bothwel ; (a) Charter of the Earl of Sutherlands. {b) Rymei's Foedera Angliat. Vol. IL 7 S i8 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS for that family still retained, after tlicy came to settle in the south, a great estate of land in the north, in the shire of Murray ; for the same persons, in many in- stances, swore in different counties where their estates lay. Divid de Graham; this is for certain the Sir David de Graham, designed Dominui de Loveth, who is brother of Sir Patrick Graham of Kincarduie, and that got Lo- vat by his wife Mary, one of the co-heiresses of Sir John Bis^et of Lovat; both he and Patrick his son, in the fagy, are mentioned in the chartulary of Murray: But how Lovat came from them to the Frasers, vyho are proprietors of it in King- David Bruce's time, 1 cannot say. The 4th of August, then did homage to the King of England Henry Abbot of Arbroath, isl Bominus David de Torthorald, miles ; this was a south-country family of note, which c»ne to the Carlyles by marriage, who rose to be lords of Parlia- ment in 1473, in King James III. his time. This peerage of Carlyle is represented by William Carlyle of Locharthor, who is lately served heir to his predecesssor Mi- chael Lord Carlyle, who died in the 1579; I believe the service was carried on in view to claim the peerage : But the gentleman has not as yet lodged any petition with the king, setting forth his claim and title to the dignity, to which he is the undoubted heir-male in a lineal course of succession. The 13th of May 1296, in a renunciation of all the former confederacies of the nation with the crown of France, is Patrick de Dunbar Comes Marchie: This earl is the first of his noble family that left the title of Comes de Dunbar, and took that ai Cmes Marchie. In this ticklish time the earl was not much fixed to any side, sometimes appearing for his country and her liberties, and sometimes serving the interest of the King of England very strenuously. Gilbertus Comes de Angus, of whom we remarked before. He was an English- man of the name of Umfraville, that was forfeited, because he would not become ■A true honest Scotsman. Jacobus dictus Senescallus Scotia. This was the Great Steward of Scotland, who died in the 1309, and was the grandfather of King Robert II. See it from a French copy page 649. On the 15th of May 1296, Dominiis Johannes Senescallus, pradicti Domini Jacobi Germanus. This was Sir John Stewart of Bonkill, of whom I have given some account already, and of his illustrious descendants. Thomas de Somervile, Chevalier. This is the same gentleman that we find from authentic documents designed Domims de Linton, making donations out of that ba- rony to the abbacy of Melrose. He is one of these glorious patriots that stood so firm to the interest, and for the honour of Scotland, when so many others made very wide steps of defection. He was in high favour with King Robert the Bruce, when he came to the crown, which he well deserved. This is a Norman family that came to England with the Conqueror, and from thence they came to Scotland with King David I.; and Carnwath was their first estate, out of which Willielmus de Somm^rvill makes donations to the See of Glasgow. Sir Thomas Somerville of Carnwath was Justice-General in the 1431, in King James I.'s time, and is one of the Domini Parliamenti, first introduced into our constitution of the peerage by that prmce antio 1427; for before his reign we had no other set of nobles but the comites and the barones, which included all that held of the crown by tenure in libera baronia. James, the present Lord Somerville, is the heir of this noble fa- mily, who got the honour revived in his person, by a decree of the House of Peers of Great Britain in 1721, after the honour had lain dormant and been waved for the space of an hundred and three years, from the 1618. Die decimo apud Edinburgum, venit Dominus J'ViUielmus Douglas, miles. This is the brave patriot Sir William Douglas of that Ilk, who had stood long at a distance from complying with the English, at last submitted ; but I am apt to believe, he and many others never meant to keep these forced oaths, by which they did not think they were bound; for he soon after showed he had the same inclinations to redeem and relieve his country from thraldom and slavery as he had done before. I have some further remark upon him in these critical observations. Along with Sir "Wil- liam Douglas tirere was Sir Walter Logan, who is said to be the ancestor of the once great House of the Logans of Restalrig near Edinburgh. Our historians mention ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. ip a- descendant of his, that went over to the Holy Land with King Robert tlic Bruce'b eart, for which they wore a man's heart in their arms. They turned om to be a great family, and alhed with a daughter of King Robert IL 1 have seen a charter by Kmg Robert IIL Roberto Logan, militi, dilecto frcitri suo, of the lands and barony of Grugar, which continued long in their family: Robert Logan of Restal- rig was forfaulted in the i6cq, five years after his death, upon the confession of one Sprot, a notary at Eyemouth, who produced a train of letters that liad past be- twixt Restabrig and the two brothers of the House of Gowrie, in relation to the conspiracy for seizing on tlie King: This odd process is in every body's hand ; this prosecution was said to be drawn on chiefly by a great man in high favour, and in a great oiBce, who was promised Logan's estate when it should be confis- cated. July 12. Robert us Mtischam. I take this to be Muschamp, a name found both in our history and the Enghsh. Johannes de Callentar, miles. This is the head of the ancient family of the Callenders of that Ilk, in Stirlingshire, of whom 1 have seen many vouchers: The first deed that 1 have seen is a charter by " Malduinus Comes de Levena.x, Mal- " colmo filio Duncani de terris de Glaswel cum Eva sorore sua, &- Carrucatam 8^ " dimidiam CaiTucata; terrx in Kilynsyth, cum jure patronatus Ecclesia; de Mo- " nyabroch,"' dated on St Laurence-day 1217, confirmed by King Alexander IL the second year of his reign («). There is a charter by Alexander IL the 26th of August, the 25th year of his reign, " Malcolmo filio Duncani de terris de " Glentarvin, Monyabroch, Kilsyth, Glasswell," which he had by the grant of the Earl of Lennox, " & terras de Calynter," he had from the king " in liberam " warenam,'' in a free forestry. To this deed IValterus filius AUani Senescallus ac Justiciarius Scotue is a witness in the 1246. This Malcolm was succeeded by Alum de Calleriter his son, who has taken his name, as was usual, from his own estate; for ther'e is a renunciation by Johannes de Kinross, miles, Aluino de Calenter, of any right he had to the lands which his father, Malcolmus Thanus, i. e. Do- minus de Calenter, had been infeft in, dated in 1257; to which deed David de Graham is a witness: Patrick de Callcndar of that Ilk was forfeited for being of the party of Edward Baliol, by King David IL upon which Sir William Living- ston got the estate of Callender by a charter the loth July 1347; but to fortify his title in case of any after game, he married Christian Callender, the gentleman's daughter who had been forfaulted ; for there is a charter by King David, " Do- *' mino Willielmo de Livingston &• Christianie de Callendar sponsK sue," of the lands of Kilsyth, narrating, that it was at the desire of Sir Robert Erskine, in re- gard that Patrick of Callender, father to the said Christian, had the best right thereto, and which had come to the king's hands, by decease of Margaret, daugh- ter of Robert De la Val, an Englishman, he having got them from Malcolm Earl of Wigton. I see this Robert De la Val that he had also the lands of Dalziel, and that he forfeited them; for there is a charter by King David IL " Roberto Senes- " callo de Shandbothy de terris de Dakiel &- de Modcrvile nos contingentes, eo " quod haeredes quondam Roberti De la Val, contra fidem &- pacem nostram in " Angha comraorantur," 20th March, 33d of the king's reign. Dominus IVillielmus de Rutbven. This is the Ruthvens of that Ilk, of whom al- ready. Dominus IVillielmus de Gordino, miles. I take this to be Gordon latinized, a branch of the House of Gordon in the South. 13th July, Malisius Comes de Strathern. Of whom already. I'Valterus de Corrj, miles. This was the family of Corry of that Ilk in Annan- dale, which continued a family till King James V.'s time, that it came to the Johnston's, a son of the House of Johnston by marriage, for there is a charter by King James V. Johanni Johnston de eodem.- The succession is limited to the heirs- male of his body ; and failing, to Robert Johnston his brother-german ; and fail- ing his heirs-male, to Adam Johnston of Corry his brother-german, 1542. Of this Adam is come the Johnstons of Girthhead in Annandale (b). (a) Writs of the House of Kilsyth I hav; seen. (*) Char: .r In the Register of the Great S;al. lo HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS Dominus Michael de PVeems, miles. This is Sir Michael Wemyss of that Ilk, through mistake by our historians called David, who, with his neighbour Sir Mi- chael Scott of Balwyrie, " equites Fifani illustres, St summne prudentiae apud suos illis " temporibus habiti," were sent by the states of the kingdom to bring over from Norway Margaret the young Queen of Scotland, who died in her way at the Orkneys, which gave rise to the competition for the crown by the Bruce and the Baliol. In testimony of this honourable embassy, there is still preserved in the Houseof Wemyss a silver basonof an antique fashion, which Sir Michael Wemyss got from Eric King of Norway at the time; and that it was Sir Michael, and not Sir David Wemyss, that had the honour to be employed, there is an indenture at the monas- tery of Lindores, in 1292, " inter Dominum Michaelem Weems de eodem, militem, " ex una parte, &- Dominum Michaelem Scot de Balweary, militem, ab altera^ in " pra;sentia Johannis Dei Gratia Regis Scotorum." < 2 2d July ylpiid Sanctum Joharuwm de Perth, Robertus de Camburn, Dorninvs de Balegrenach, miles. Who this gentleman, the Laird of Balegrenach, is, I dare not say; but I conjecture his heiress came to be married to some of the Murrays of Touchadam, and there is the tradition of it. Johannes de Hayia. The truth is the name of Hay is now so very frequent, I cannot tell what this gentleman is. Hugo de Uire. This seems to be the same name with that of Hurry, or Urie, of which there was a family entitled Pitfichy in Aberdeenshire, which has lasted a long while there, and had been very well allied to the best famihes in the North. General Hurry that had been so long against the king in the Parliament service, and afterwards turned so eminently for the king, and suffered the next day after the execution of the great Marquis of Montrose, was the last heir of the family. He had two daughters, his heirs, the one married to Archibald Lament of that Ilk, ;;nd the other to Dr John Hamilton, Parson of Leith, and Bishop of Dunkeld, at the Revolution. Ibidem, says the author, 25th July. Johannes de Moncrief, Chevalier. This is the family that were the Moncriefs of that Ilk, a family of good antiquity. There is a charter of confirmation yet ex- tant of the lands of Moncrief, Johanni de Moncrief, by King Alexander III. The House of Moncrief continued in the possession of the estate till King Charles II.'s time, that Sir John Moncrief of that Ilk sold the estate of Moncrief to a gentleman of his name, Sir Thomas Moncrief one of the Clerks of Exchequer, though the blood and chieftainry is in Moncrief of Tippermalloch, who is the heir-male of the family of Moncrief, whose grandfither was Mr Hugh ^toncrief of Tippermalloch, the famous physician, and he was the second son of Sir WilHam Moncrief of that Uk by his lady, who was a daughter of the ancient family of Abercairny. Robertus Camburn de Balnely: This is another Camburn; but what the sur- name afterwards turned out to be, or if it is the same with Cameron, I cannot say ; 1 leave that to those who are better acquainted with the etymology of the Irish language, who can best judge of those matters. Alexander de Abernethy : This I take to be the same Sir Alexander Abernethy of Balinbrigh, of whom we have said already. Apud Cluniacenses, 17th July, Dominus Archihcddus de Livingston, miles, no doubt is Livingston of that Ilk, whose ancestors appear as early as the time of King David. This family subsisted till the la:t Bartholomew Livingston of that lik was slain at the battle of Flodden, and his sisters were co-heirs. In the reign of King David II. Sir William Livingston of Callender was a brother of the family, and Sn- Andrew Livingston of Drumray was another branch. He got the estate of Easter- Wemyss in Fife, by marriage of one of the co-heirs of the estate of Wemyss of that Ilk. The last Sir Robert Livingston of Easter- Wemyss v/as slain at Flod- den, and left a daughter, Margaret, his sole heir, who married Sir James Hamilton of Fennart. He, with consent of his wife, exchanged the estate of Drumray in Dumbartonshire, with the lands of Crawfordjohn, with Lawrence Crawford of Kil- bimy, 27th January 1529. JJjannes de Strivelyn, miles : This is the knight of Glenesk, which estate, in King David II.'s time, came to Katharine Stirling, daucrhter of Sir Alexander Stilling of Glenesk, who was married to Sir Alexander Lindsay, sen to Sir David ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. zr. Lindsay of Cvctwford, whose son was Daviil ilie first Earl of Crawfoid, an/io 1390. Anothei- of the co-heiis of Gleiiesk is married, to Duncamis de AiboUfi, who I be- lieve is one of the ancestors of the House of Struan Robertson. 6th July, Hui;o de Mornvia : This was the forebearer of the Murrays of Coubin, whose name at that time is Hugh, and a brother of the House of DuHus, as from his original cjiarter I have seen (a). 7th July. Apud Ftrriil, IVillidnius Fraser,filiiis quondam Alexandri Fraser. The name of Fraser, like the Hays at that time, are so numerous and so frequent that you can scarce distinguish them. I cannot, with any sort of probability, plate this gentleman to any of all the families of the Erasers, whether Tweeddale, Touch, or the north country Erasers, I cannot say. 7th Junii, Witnesses to King John's renunciation of the kingdom of Scotland, in castro Biichenen coram Antonio Episcopo Diinelm. that was Bishop Beck of Dur- ham, who is Attor'ney for the King of England, where he made a solemn, and, as I believe he was forced to call it, a willing surrender and resignation of himself, his whole kingdom of Scotland, his royal dignity, with all heritages, rights, and appurtenances thereto belonging; as also, of all his lands, possessions, and goods, moveable and unmoveable, whatsoever : the Bishop receiving them in the name of King Edward ; thereupon poor King John was no more considered as king. was sent with his eldest son to the Tower of London, where he lived at the discre- tion of his conqueror, forought I can see, till his death ; for though he had abandoned and abdicated his kingdom and his subjects, yet they would not desert him, and made ' many struggles and efforts to regain him his crown ; for when Sir William Wal- lace was chosen guardian of the kingdom, it is in nomine prceclari principis Jobannis Dei Gratia Scotoriim Regis; and this was in 1299,. more than three years after he had abdicated the throne, which was vacant, as to him : So inflexi- bly loyal were the Scots in those days to their abdicated prince, fancying, it seems, that nothing could dissolve their allegiance to him. There are witnesses to the surrender Johannes Cumine, Doniinus de Badenocb, who is John the tather, who was King John's brother-in-law, and by his after-conduct appears to have been a right good man ; happy had it been for his son he had traced the steps of his father, he had not come to so dismal an end as he met with, as the reward of his treachery and perfidy to so great a prince as he had laid a plot to destroy, I mean King- Robert L But God Almighty preserved him to be the great and happy in- strument of dehvering the nation from slavery, and the yoke of a foreign power. Dominus Brianus fiUus Allani. This being a patronymical designation, I cannot tell who he is. Alexander Kennedy, Clerk and Chancellor of the kingdom of Scotland, " ad hoc " testibus vocatis e"t speciahter rogatis," as the instrument bears. Eodem die, apud Monross, coram serenissimo principe Domino Edwardo Rege Anglia, nobilis vir Johannes Cumine Comes de Bttchan : This was the second branch of the great family of the Cumins, and the third earl. He was, as all the rest of his kindred, much in the English interest, though he was Great Justiciary of Scot- land. He was forfeited for adhering to England in the reign of King Robert L He had an heir-female, who was married to Sir Henry Bellamont, an Englishman, who, in that right, called himself Comes de Biichan. He came in with Edward Baliol ; and, in the Parliament held by him, mention is made of this earl. But the earldom of Buchan remained in the crown of Scotland till King Robert IL gave it to his son Alexander Lord of Badenoch 1387. Dovenaldiis Comes de Marr ; cf whom already. Dominus Herbertus de Macus-ucell, miles : This is the head of the noble family of Maxwell, whose ancestors had borne great and high offices. The House of Max- well and Nithsdale are the descendants of this great man ; for whom see the. Peerage. (a) In Kilravock's Collections, Vol. IL 7T iz HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS Doininus Johannes de Moravia is without doubt Sir John Murray of Drunvsar- gard, the ancestor of the House of Abercuirny, who was doing his homage for lands he held in different shires. Dominus Alexander Kennedy, Canonicus Glas^uen. This is the same gentleman that was Chancellor to King John ; of whom before. Dominus Nicolaus de Hayia : This is the head of the illustrious family of the Hays Earls of Errol. He was the first of the House of Errol who added a territorial title to his name ; Nicolaus de Hayia, Dominus de Errol, when by his charter and deed he confirms " illam bovatam terra; in Carse monachis de Cupro, quam habu- " erunt ex dono Rogeri filii Bauderici, uno cum annuo redditu, quem dicti mo- " nachi mihi reddere solebant, de dicta terra." Sir Gilbert Hay of Errol was his son, who was made High Constable of Scotland by King Robert I. anno 1316, on the attainder of David de Strathholgy, Earl of Athol. The family were nominated and invested in the degree of Lords" of Parliament, by King James I. anno 1429, and Earls of Errol 1455 (Vz). Dominus Johannes Sinclair de Herdmanston : This is a very ancient family of the Sinclairs, who have long possessed these lands, of which I have seen transumpts of the original charters, one granted by " Ricardus de Morville, Constabularius Re- " gis Scotorum, Henrico de Sancto Claro," of the lands of Herdmanston, which, if granted soon after the death of Hugh his father, must be in the 1162. Among the witnesses are Robertus fdius Warnehaldi, and Godofredus de Ross, two of the vassals of the constables within his barony of Cunningham. The same great man, Ricardus de Morville, Constabularius Scotia, gives to the same Hcnricus de Sancto Claro another charter of the privilege of Edmond and G\Va&m\c'hd.e\, filii bonde, and of their sons and daughters, and all their descendants, for three merks. There is another charter granted to this very ancient family o^f the Sinclairs, by " VVillielmus de Morvile, Constabularius Scoti:e, Henrico de " Sancto Claro," of the lands of Carfiae, of which I say there is a notorial tran- sumpt taken by John Sinclair of Herdmanston anno 1434. The next of the line of the family is Allanus de Sancto Claro, who is seemingly the son of Henry, who had a charter of confirmation by " Rolandus, filius Uch- " tredi, Allano de Sancto Claro," of his predecessor William Morville's charters; which charters are still preserved in the custody of a noble person, the lineal heir of the family. The next of the family, and the first that used the territorial designation of Do- minus de Herdmanston, is the Joannes de Sancto Claro Doininus de Herdmanston men- tioned in this record, who now swears an oath of allegiance and fealty to the King of England. The next of this race of the Sinclairs is Sir Mlliam de Sancto Claro, Dominus de Hermiston, who was one of those noble and glorious patriots who sided with the_ immortal deliverer of Scotland, King Robert the Bruce, who, for the merit of his valiant and heroic services at the famous and decisive battle of Bannockburn, got from the king a sword, on the broad side of which these words were engraven in French, Le Roy me donne, St Clair me porte ; which, I have been told by the gentleman who should have known it best, was preserved as a monument of the valour of this gentleman. So much to the honour of the family till within these hundred years or less {h). This Sir William Sinclair of Herdmanston allied in marriage with the other ancient but far more powerful family of the St Clairs of Roslin, who in truth exceeded most other families in the kingdom for grandeur and wealth. By this noble lady he had a son the heir of the family, John Sinclair of Herdmanston, who was uterine brother to Margaret, Countess of Marr and Angus ; for, in the 1389, I have seen a charter (c) by the Countess, in which there is Joannes de Sancto Claro de Her- miston f rater noster, and Joannes de Haliburton Dominus ejusdem witnesses. It was (a) In a charter to Walter OgUvie of Deskford, 9th October 1 455, et Williel. Domino Keith Mares- callo, is not Comes Mariscal. (h} Dr Matthew Sinclair of Herdmanston. (c) Penes ducem de Douglas. ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. -3 :his John St Clair of Herdiuanston that married Elizabeth, the daughter and sole heir of Sir Patrick de Folwartb of Pohvarth, and had Sir \Villiam St Clair of Herdman- ston, whose son and heir-apparent, John Sinclair, by Katliarine his wife, daughter of Sir Thomas Plume of that Ilk, had an investiture of the barony of Polwarth, ntmo 1444. Itwas this John Sinclair of Herdinanston who, in the 1434, took the notorial transumpt of thecharterby I li/Ziamtie Mjr'-jile, comuihle, to Henry de Saricto Claro, his predecessor, of the lands of Carfrae, formerly mentioned: but he dying without issue- male, there arose a dispute and a question in law, anent the right of succession to the estate, betwixt his two daughters, the heirs of line and at law, and his brother Sir Wil- liamSinclair, his heir-male («). At length, by the mediation of their common friends, the matter was settled and composed, the heir-male got the ancient family estate of Herdmanston,and the heirs-female got the estates of Pohvarth and Kimmergham. Marion, the eldest, was married to Sir George Hume of Wedderburn, and Mar- garet, the other, to Sir Patrick Hume his brotlier, who got with her the barony of Polwarth, which gave ground to both these families to quarter the coat of Sinclair with their paternal bearings of Hume. From this William Smclair of Herdmanston, the heir-male, the House of Herdmanston came and continued, in a direct male suc- cession, till it came to be united with the family of St Clair, in the reign of King Charles IL Sir John Sinclair of Herdmanston married John Sinclair, his eldest son, fiar of Herdmanston, to Mrs Katharine Sinclair, only daughter and sole heir of John Lord Sinclair, and had a son, Henry Lord Sinclair, succeeded his grandfather in 1677 ; and had the honour established to him and his heirs-male. Andreas de Charteris is next to Herdmanston in our i-ecord : This was most cer- tainly, and can be authentically vouched, the head of the ancient family of the Charteris of Amistield, in the south in Dumfries-shire. In ancient charters the family are, in Latin, designed de Carnoto, as may be seen in the chartulary of Kelso; but that has been the latinizing the name ; for, even in very ancient deeds, when Carnoto is Englished, it is called Charteris. This Andreas de Charteris was Baron of Amislield even at this time ; for after this gentleman had made his forced submission to the king of England he retracted it again, for which he was forfeited by King Edward L ; for Sir V/illiam Dugdale, in his Baronage of Eng- land, mentions a gift to an English gentleman of the lands of Amistield in Scot- land, which was in his hands by forfeiture of Andrew Charteris 1296. IMlliam de Charteris is one of those barons who, in the 1306, did homage to the King of England, for the lands he held in the county of Dumfries, and ap- pears to be the son of the former Andrew, who had submitted as his father had done to the invader of the liberties of his country: But whatever submission he made to the king of England he did not think that binding on him, for he turned eminently to King Robert the Bruce. He seems to be the same IMllielmiis de Charteris who, with Walter de Perchys, resigns the " medietatem totius baronice " de Witon in vicecomitatu de Roxburgh, in favorem Henrici de Wardlaw ;" upon which he had a charter under the Great Seal, to be seen in the rolls. This does very authentically establish the great antiquity of the House of Amisfield, which, from authentic vouchers, can be deduced from those times to our own days. The representative of the family was Colonel Francis Charteris of Amis- field, whose only daughter is Janet Countess of Wemyss. Alexander de Airth : This was an ancient family in Stirlingshire, that continued long in lustre there ; they had the baronies of Airth, 'Carnock, and Plain, which, in the reign of King James L came to heirs-female, and, by marriage, to the Bruces, Drummonds, and Somervilles. H//^o de Riddel, miles : This is the ancient House ofRiddell of that Ilk, that have been a family, from authentic vouchers, from King Malcolm IV.'s time, or King David l.'s days, from writs I have seen. Dominus Nicolaus de Rutherford is the ancestor of the Rutherfords of that Ilk, who came to be designed Domini ejiisdem in King Robert II. 's time. They were a family of reputation, and held the most part of their estate of the Earls of Dou- glas. The family split betwixt an heir-male and heirs of line, in King James IV.'s (<2) Registers of Parliament, 24 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS reign. Rutherford of EJgerston was the heir-male, and now represents the pnr. ci]xil oriniiial family ; and the Earl of Traquair is the heir of line, who carries the arms of Rutherford in liij achievement. Ri-idulphtis dc LgUnton, miles, was the ancestor of the House of Eglinton, which ended in an heir-female, Elizaheth, the daughter and the heir of Sir Hugh Eg- linton of that Ilk, Justiciai-y of Lothian, in the reign of King David II., who was married to Sir John IMontgomery of Eaglesham, predecessor of the Earls of Eglin- ton, who on that account quarters the arms of Eglinton with, his own. name of Montgomery. John de Etphingston : This is the ancestor of the ancient family of Elphinstone of that Ilk. Alexander de Elphingston, his son, got the lands of Airthbeg from Agnetta de Airtb matre sua : Then Alexander Elphinstone, Dominus ejusdem, ex- changed the lands of Airthbeg with Alexander, son of Sir Adam More, in 1362. He had his successor. Sir William Elphinstone, Dominus ejusdem, who gets a char- ter from Sir William Lindsay, Dominus de Byres, of the lands he held of him. The descent is limited to the heirs-male of his body; and, in failm-e of these, to Alex- ander, Norman, and James, his brothers, and their heirs-male, anno 1399. His son Alexander, designed Dominus ejusdem, was slain at the battle of Piperden in 1437. -^^^ '^^"'- ^ daughter, Janet: whereupon there arose a great competition anent the succession to the estate, betwixt her and Henry Elphinstone, of Pitten- dreich, which, in the 1477, was settled by solemn arbitration. The heir of line married Sir Gilbert Johnston, a brother of the House of Johnston, who was after- wards slain at Flodden, and he got the estate of Elphinstone in Lothian, and was the root of the Johnstons of Elphinstone. The heir-male, Henry Elphinstone, got all the rest of the estates, Pittendreich, Airthbeg, Strickshaw, &c. all the estate that was held of the Lord Lindsay, of which he had a charter in the 1477, to himself in liferent, and to John Elphinstone his grandson, and heir of the de- ceased James Elphinstone, his eldest son ; and failing his heirs-male, to Andrew Elphinstone, his own son, who is afterwards designed of Selms. John, the grand- son, got a charter under the Great Seal, in the 1508, erecting the lands of Airth- beg into a barony, called baronia de Elphingston. Sir Alexander Elphinstone of that Ilk, his son, rose to high favour with King James IV., who raised him to be a peer, viz. Lord Elphinstone, anno 1511. He personated the king at the battle of Flodden, where he was also slain. Charles Lord Elphinstone is lineally come of this first lord. Godofrediis de Ardrossan : This was the ancestor of the old House of Ardrossan in Cunningham, who seem to have been the ancient possessors, as far back as sur- names began. Arthurus de Ardrossan is witness to a charter' Hugoni de Crawford de terris de Mo- nock, in 1226. Then Fergusius de Ardrossan, who I take to be the son ot the former, gets a charter erecting his own estate, and the estate of William Ker, and Richard de Boyle, which is the lands of Kersland and Rysholme, who were his vassals, " in unam integram & Hberam baroniam, baroniam de Ardrossan," as trom the charter in the rolls of .King Robert the Bruce. His estate came by his heir-female to the Eglintons of that Ilk ; both the estates came to centre in Sir John Montgomery of Eagleshame. 13th July Dominus Johannes de Strivelyn de Moravia. This I take to be the Stiiiings of Glenesk, which came by marriage to the Lindsays. Normanus de Lescelyne, i. e. Leslie; who I take to be the first of the Leslies that settled in Fife, of whom is come the House of Rothes; they got Banbregh by the heiress of an Abernethy, for which they quarter their arms. Johannes de Glenesk. I suppose this is the Glenesks of that Ilk, of whom I can- not say any thing, or how they ended. Alexander de Straiton is without doubt the Straitens of Lauriston, who were a good family in the Merns; but they are now decayed, though some Straitons, par- ticularly Straiton of Kirkside, are standing, and are come of Lauriston. Gilbertus de Hayia is, I apprehend, the same noble person that is at that time head of the family of Lochquharrat. It was this Sir Gilbert Hay of Lochquharrat, who, with Sir Alexander Seaton and Sir Neil Campbell, entered into a solemn association, anno 1308, to defend the liberties of their country, and the right of ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 25 King Robert the Bruce, against all mortals, French, English, and Scots. The Marquis of Tweeddale is the lineal heir of this great, noble, and heroic person. Jacobus lie MakvUle. This is the branch of the Melvillcs, as I take it, who came to be intitled Melville of Glcnbcrvie, of whom were come the Mclvilles of Cairnbie and Dysart, of whom again issued the two learned divines of tiie name of Melville, Mr Andrew and Mr James Melvilles, of whom our ecclesiastical histories are so full, and were so zealous for the pre^byterian scheme of discipline. The House of Glenbervie came to an heiress in the time of King James II. who was married to Sir James Auciiinleck of that Ilk, in Kyle, by whose grandchild and lineal heir, Elizabeth Auchiuleck, tlie barony of Glenbervie came by marriage to Sir William Douglas, son to the Earl of Angus, of whom is lineally descended the Duke of Douglas. The 17th July Duncanus de Fretidrau_ght. This is a great barony in Aberdeen- shire, which from the Frendraughts came to the Erasers, a branch of die House of Lovat; Jacohus Eraser Dominus de Frendraiight, in 1404, mortifies liis lands of Cambeston, in baronia de Lessuden, to the monastery of Melrose («); by hjs heir- female it came to Alexander Dunbar, son to Thomas Earl of Murray, whose son, James Earl of Murray, having no lawful issue-male, his eldest daughter, Janet, brought that barony to Sir James Crichton, son to William Lord Crichton, wlio was invested in the honour of Earl of Murray, after the forfaulture of Archibald Douglas, his brother-in-law, in 1451. But he gave over the esstate of the earldom, and relinquished the title of earl(/(); Wdliam Lord Crichton, their son, being, forfaulted in 1483, the barony of Frendrauglit came to James Crichton his son, en the resignation of Janet Duubar the Countess of Murray, his grandmother,. 1492. Patricuis de Berkley. The surname of Barclay was then so numerous that they are not easily distinguishable; for there are several Barclays in the North, and in Fife, and there is Hugo de Barclay, who in 1284 is Justiciarius Laudon'ue. I take hini to be the Barclay who had "the half of the barony of Crawfordjohn, and came to be promiscuously designed Dominus dimidire partis baronia de Crawfurd-John, and Bominus baronia de Kilbirney i^ de Lady-Land, which, in the 1471, came to the Crawfurds by marriage, of whom are the House of Kilbirny, now Viscount of Garnock, who carries the coat of Barclay impaled at first, but now quartered with Crawfurd. Hugo de la Hay. What Hay this is I cannot say. Reginaldus le Chein. The Cheynes were great men; there is Reginaldus de Chein, Chamberlain, and Reginald le CJjein, filius; their barony of Inverugie came, by a co-heiress of them, to a son of the Keith family, and by another co-heiress came the barony of Duft'us to a son of the Eajl of Sutherland, of whom sprung the Lord Duftus. Johannes filius Herberti de Macuswell. This is John the son of Sir Herbert Max- well of Carlaverock, of whom already in the Maxwell family. IVillielmus de Monte Alto, miles. This is the surname of Mowat, of which the principal family is reputed to have been Mowat of Balquhollie in Aberdeenshire. There were also two families in the west, Mowat of Stanehouse in Clydesdale, and Mowat of Busbie in Cunningham, both families of good respect, and well allied ; but they are now both decayed, the last but about a century ago. Robertas de Walyhop, i.e. Wauchope. There was an ancient familyof this surname, designed of Coulter, of which lands they had charters from King Alexander II, which came to the Cumins by the marriage of an heiress. I have not seen writs to connect the Wauchope's of Niddry-Marischal with them; but when they came of them I caimot say. Robertus le Falconer is doubtless one of the ancestors of the House of Halkerton, who have charters to vouch the antiquity ot their family, as far up as the days of King William; for which see the Peerage of Scotland. They were made lords in 1647. (a) Chartulary of Melrose. {b) Manuscript out of the Library of Culross. Vol. U. 7 U i6 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS 19th July, Commiinitas villa de Aberdeen, etiam Willielmus de Mof-nvla, miles. Whether this be the IVillielmus de Mjravia de Drumsargard, or the Willielmns de Moravia, miles, de Ttdlibardin, 1 daie not venture to say. Dominus Johannes de Maleville, miles. This is thought, upon good presump- tions, to be the other family of the Melvilles of Raith, in Fife, of whom a line may be deduced, till they came to be Earls of Melville in 1690, and the dignity is con- joined with that of Earl of Leven, in the person of Alexander, the present Earl of Leven and Melville. 2 2d July, jipud Bamff, D. Thomas de Torthorald. This seemingly is another branch of the Torthorald family, of whom already. Apiid El^in in Moravia, there swore fealty to King Edward Robertits Episcopus GUtscuensis. This is the celebrated Bishop Wishart, who acted so gloriously the patriot; and though he swore fealty to the conqueror, yet he did not think that oath binding upon him, for no sooner did the Earl of Carrick set the crown on his head but he gave him all possible countenance and support. He mightily ani- mated his countrymen to shake off the English yoke, by his preaching and ex- ample ; in the course of the war he was taken prisoner in armour, as the King of England represents to the Pope ; and if it had not been for disobliging his Holiness, he would certainly have put him to death. He was sent first to the court of Rome, and from thence to England, where he remained a prisoner, till he was re- leased and exchanged for English prisoners, after the battle of Bannockburn, He survived all his disasters, and died in 1316. Nobilis vir Alexander Comes de Monteith. He was the second earl of this line, who were Stewarts by blood, though Monteith by surname, of whom see the Peerage of Scotland. Johannes de Monteith, Dominus de K?iapdale iH de Arran, in King David's time, 1 apprehend was come of a younger son of his. Dominus Thomas de Soulis. This is for certain a branch of the Soulis of Liddis- dale, who were forfaulted for treason in King Robert L's time, and their estate came to Sir flllliam de Douglas, designed in many deeds Dominus vallis de Lides- dale. Johannes IMshard. There were two very ancient families of the name, Wishatrt of Pittarrow, and Wishart of Logic ; Pittarrow is said to be the root of the family ; yet Logic is so ancient, that they have a charter from Gilbertus de Umphravile comes de Angus in 1272. The lands of Conveth were in ancient possession of the Wisharts of Pittarrow. In the chartulaiy of Arbroath there is a charter by the abbot to Sir John Wishart of the Mill of Conveth, in the 1242, to which Dominus Hugo de Weyms is a witness. I have seen a long and well vouched descent of the House of Pittarrow. James Wishart of Pittarrow was Lord Advocate and Clerk of Justiciary to King James IV. Mr George, his second son, was our first martyr for the Protestant re- ligion at the breaking out of the Reformation. Sir John Wishart of Pittarrow was a zealous reformer, and was Comptroller of Scotland under Queen Mary 1567. He •was succeeded by his nephew by his brother, in whose Hne the family ended in King Charles L's time. Gervasius de Rate is the ancestor of the Raits of Halgreen, which is reputed an ancient family in the Merns. Alexander de Ergyl, of whom already, and Nicolaus de Soulis, militibus. This is the name of the head of the family of Soulis, in the south, and Lords of Liddisdale, long ago worn out. There is a tradition that Kilmarnock in Cunningham belong- ed to them, and that the Boyds came to it upon tlieir forfaulture, though they were but the vassals. Bahols are barons of Cunningham. Burgenses de Elgin, et Allanus de Murriff, of whom I can give rro account ; but Allan being a name among the Murrays of Coubin, I presume it might be one of them. They ended in an heiress, who was married to a gentleman of the name of Kinnaird, who was the ancestor of these Kinnairds of Coubin, who, little more than a century ago, if so much, lost their estate, by its being blown over with sand from the sea, in one night, as I have heard. 28th of July, Dominus Johannes de Sancto Michale : Who this is I know not, if it be not Carmichael, who in some deeds, it is said, are called St Michael. Dominus Robertus de Normanville. This is a very ancient family of the Norman extraction, and were very ancient among us. In time they came to be Barons of ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 27 Gargunnock in the shire of Stirling, the name came to be called Norvel ; there is none of them remaining now, but the heir of entail of Mr George Norvel of Bog. hail, near Bathgate in Linlithgowshire. Dominus j4dam de Gordon, miles, one of the ancestors of the illustrious House of Gordon. Of whom there is a particular history, to which I refer. JMllielmtis Dictus IViseman. 1 never heard of any body of the name but mean people, excepting a minister lately at Monkland, who adopted a son of one Cross, and left him his means and estate. Alexander de Hately is no doubt the ancestor of an ancient family in the Merse, styled of Mellerstane, but some time ago extinct. Jacobus Jilius Godofredi de Ross Senior, and Jncohus fiUus Godofredi de Ross Junior. These are two of the ancestors of the Rosses of Tarbet in Cunningjiam, the ancestors of the Lord Ross of Halkhead, who made a great figure in tlie wars that ensued on Kmg John's abdication. SirGodefride, the son, called ////uj-, to dis- tinguish him from his father, who was in action with him, were brave gal- lant men, and firm friends to King Robert, in whose reign he was a while Fice- comes de Air: SirGodefride, a third of them, made a great figure under King David, whose brother, Sir John Ross, had a charter from Robert Karl of Strathern, his consanguineus, of the lands of Hacket, which lie in haronia de RinJ'rew, anno 1367. The elder branch failing in the reign of King James III. the two Houses of Tarbet and Halkhead came to unite and centre in one family; they attained to be Lords in 1500. Their lineal heir-male is George Lord Ross. Robertus de Turnbulye. This may be the surname of TurnbuU ; but the origin of the name, according to the account that is given, is of a later origin. The tra- dition is, that one of the name of Rule turned a bull by the head, and wrung off" his neck, that was pushing violently at King Robert I. while he was hunting in the forest of Callender, then called the forest of Cumbernauld ; for which he was called TurnbuU, and got for the merit of that service the lands of Bedrule in Teviotdale. This seems the more probable, because there is a charter granted by King Robert the Bruce, Willielmo dicto Turnbiil, of several lands, and is extant in the rolls. The TurnbuUs came to branch out into two different families. Turn- bull of Bedrule and TurnbuU of Mmto ; of the first was Dr William TurnbuU, Secretary to King James H. and Bishop of Glasgow. He died in 1452. 29th July, John Wysbard del Mernis. This is for certain the Wishart of Pit- tarrow, of whom already. Andreas, filius Godofredi de Ross. This was, as is conjectured, the ancestor of the Rosses of Henning, and Galston, and Mongreenan. Alexander de Hogston. There was a family designed Hog of Hogston as low down as in the reign of King James HL I have seen a charter of alienation by Alexander Hog of Hogston to Sir Alexander Hume of that Ilk; but 1 cannot positively say that this gentleman here and these other people are the same : it is only a conjecture. Rudolpbus de Kinnaird is the ancestor of the Kinnairds of that Ilk, of whom, on the title of Lord Kinnaird, in the Peerage. 5th August, A[>ud Arbroth, Marcus de Clypan is no question the predecessor of the family of the Clephans of Carslogie in Fife, reputed a right ancient family. He seems to be the same Marcus de Clyphan who is witness to several charters yet extant, granted about that time by Alexander de Abernetby, out of Banbrcght. I have seen a copy of a charter by " Duncanus Comes de Fife, Johanni de Clephan " et haeredibus suis, de terris de Carslogy tenend. adeo libere sicut David de " Clyphan pater ejus et praedecessores tenuerunt. Testibus Dominis Alexandro " de Abernethy, Michaele de Weems, David de Weems, Hugone de Locliore, " Johanne de Ransay, Willielmo de Ramsay, et Henrico de Ramsay, cum multis " aliis." I take this to be Duncan the last Earl of File, and before the battle of Durham in 1346. The family is still existing. Waherus Abbas de Paslytb. He succeeded one William in the office, and was succeeded by another Roger Abbas de Paslyth in 1312. Adam Abbas Sancte Crucis, who succeeded to Radulphus in that place, Pat. Abbas de Cumbuskenneth, Gilbertus' Abbas de Kylinross, that is Culross, otherwise designed Abbatia Sancti Servant, or St Serff its patron saint, H^illielmus Abbas Sancti Ed- 2iJ HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS ivardi de Balmerinoch, founded by Queen Emergarda, mother to King Alexandes II. anno 1229, and planted with monks of the Cistertian order that came from the abbacy of Melrose " Radulphus Abbas de Dunferniling, Andreas Abbas de Cu- " pro, Johannes Abbas de Newbottle, Thomas Abbas de Lindoris, Bernard Abbas " de Kilwmning, Bnanus Abbas de St Colme, Johannes Abbas de Jedworth, Wil- " lielmus Abbas de Dryburgh, Patricius Abbas de Melrose, Ricardus Abbas de " Kelso, Henricus Abbas de Arbioth. Malyse Conte de Strathern, John Conte de " Buchan, Alexander Conte de Montieth, Jacobm Senescal de Escope, Malcolm *' Conte de Levenax," of whom we have given some account already in these remarks. WUiiam Conte de Sutherland, who seems to be the same Willielmus Jilius Williel- jni Comitis de Sutherland, who lived in the reign of Alexander 111. of whom the Earl of Sutherland derives his descent. There is a writ by Archibald, Bishop of Murray, narrating an ancient controversy, " inter venerabiles patres, praedeces- " sores nostros, Gilbertum Willielmum et Walterum bonae memoriae, Episcopos " Cathaniae, ex parte una, et nobiles viros Willielmum clarae memoriae, et Willi- " elmum ejus filium, Comites Sutherlandiie," dated x. Cal. Octobris 1275. On this voucher, &.C. the Earls of Sutherland found their claim of declarator of pre- cedency against the Earls of Crawford, Errol, and Marischal, all earls ranked before them in the rolls of Parliament. The case was remitted by the Parhament to the Court of Session, to be determined by them, and the action is yet depend- ing. If this debate be revived, it would be managed with great learning and exactness, being the concern of some of the most ancient and honourable famihes )n the kingdom, wherein many curious questions would arise to be debated and determined. Johannes de Strivelyn de Muriff. This is the same gentleman designed formerly de Moravia. IVilliam de Muriff, Si-gnior de Sothwel. This is the great Lord or Baron Baro de BothiDtl in the county of Lanark ; they were a branch of the original family of the Murrays of Dufius. His father was Walterus de Moravia, designed Jilius Wil- lielini de Moravia, who got first a footing in the west, by the marriage of the heir-female of the Oliphards Domini de Bothwel, in the reign of Alexander II. His son was this gentleman mentioned here in our record, and is Dominus de Bothwel. He gave " capiralo Glasguen. patronatum Ecclesia; de Wolston^ ac Rectoriam " ejusdem terrie." Andreas de Moravia, frater suus, is a witness to the deed, and has been his brother's successor in the barony of BothweU, and the noble patriot that was conjunct guardian of Scotland with Sir William Wallace, and was slain- at the battle of Stirling in 1297. His son. Sir Andrew Murray of Bothwell, was Fanitnrius Scotite, and Guardian and Regent of Scotland in the minority of King David, and died in that high office. His son, Thomas de Moravia, was Do- minus de Bothwel, and Panitarius Scotiee, who died in England, an hostage for the ransom of King David in 1366, and left a daughter, Jean, who was married to Sir Archibald Douglas, Dominus Galuidie, who came to be Earl of Douglas atino 1388. Murray of Abercairny is the male representative of this ancient great family of the Rlurrays of Bothwell. Nicol Camhel, 01 Neil, is the head of the family of Lochow, and the same noble person who afterwards fell in so zealously with King Robert Bruce, as did also Sir Colin his son, who is designed Colinus Jilius Ntgelli Cambel, militis, who got " pro homagio et servitio suo totam terrani de Lochow et terram de Ardsceodinis, " decimo Februarii, anno regni regis nono, A. D. 1316." The family have risen ever since to all the steps and degrees of nobility that can be attained ; and, to- do the family justice, for the most part they have been a race of noble loyal pa- triots, with few exceptions. They came to be Lords of Parliament by King James I, in 1427, earls in 1458, marquisses in 1641, which was reduced by the attainder of the Marquis of Argyle, restored to the honour of earl in 1663, and raised to the rank of dukes in 1 701. Johannes de Cullentyr is one of the ancestors of the Callenders of that Ilk; which, estate came to the Livingston family, by mar.iage, in the time of King David LI. as we have remarked more fully. 3 ON THE RAGMAX-ROLL. -y ^■llcxander Friselc. This is for certain Sir Alexander Fraser of Cowic, who was a man in the highest favour with K.ing Robert Bruce, was his Great Chamberlain, and his brother by marriage, and one of the greatest heroes about him. See a full account of him m the Lives of the Chamberlains by Mr Crawfurd. Patrick Conte de la March et dc DJ.ibar. He was the tirst Earl of the Dunbars who took the title of Earl of March; 1 take it to have been a new creation to the dignity. Aylmer ds Hauden. This was the family of Haldane of that Ilk in Teviotdalc, for this is not the name of the ancient honourable family of Gleneagles at this time. They subsisted till the last age before this, and ended in an heiress. Thomas de Colvyle, in ancient charters designed ^/c Cy/i'/Vt,-; and, for certain, a Norman family, and came to Scotland in King David I.'s time. They were once English barons, as is evident from Sir W^illiam Dugdale's Baronage of England. The family had great possessions, both at Oxnam in Teviotdale, and the great ba- rony of Ochiltree in Ayrshire, in the west. The direct male line failed in an heir of line, much about this time when this submission was made, who was married to Sir Reginald Cheyne of Inverugie. Robert Colvil of Oxnam was the heir-male at the time, and is baro baronuv de Ochiltree \n 1324 («). They kept the title mostly of Oxnam till King James I.'s time, that they assumed the designation of Ochiltree, and were among the greatest barons below the degree of lords of Par- liament in the kingdom. Sir William Colvil of Ochiltree died in 1502, and left two daughters his co-heiresses; Margaret, who had no issue, and Elizabeth, who married Patrick Colquhoun, nephew to the Laird of Luss; and had a daughter, Frances Colquhoun, who was co-heiress of Ochiltree, and was married to Robert Colvil of Cleish, ancestor to the Lord Colvil of Ochiltree, raised to that honour in the 1651. The barony of Ochiltree was acquired from the co-heiresses, by the heir-male, Robert Colvil of Hilton, whose son. Sir James Colvil, exchanged Ochil- tree with Sir James Hamilton of Finnart, for the barony of Easter- Wemyss. His grandson. Sir James Colvil, was created Lord Colvil of Culross anno 1609; whose grandson, James Lord Colvil of Culross, died without issue after the 1635, and the honour was not after this claimed till the 1721, that James Colvil of Kin- cardine, the heir-male, to whom the dignity in the tirst patent was limited, peti- tioned his Majesty King George L setting forth his title; and which being referred in course to the House of Peers, his claim was admitted, and an order directed to the Lord Register, to inrol him in the list of the peers, conform to his patent, which was done accordingly. Stephen de Kilpatrick is the ancestor of a very ancient family, the Kirkpatricks of Closeburn in Nithsdale. They have very good vouchers for their antiquity. In the chartulary of Kelso there is to be met with " Stephanus Dominus Vills de " Closeburn, filius &- hsres Domini Ade de Kilpatrick," who comes to an agree- ment \v\X.h the abbot of Kelso, anent the convent's right to the church of Close- burn; it is dated " die Mercurii, proxima post festum puriiicationis beats Mariae " Virginis, 1278:" But the family have older evidences than this, a charter from King Alexander IL Jvoni de Kilpatrick de terris de Closeburn, formerly pertaining to his predecessors. Roger de Kilpatrick, called by Buchanan Rogerus de Cella Patricii, was one of those who attended King Robert L to Dumfries, when the perfidious Cumin was then slain in the church. Thomas, his son, had a charter from the same king, narrating his lather's merit, and his own services, of the lands of Redburgh, in Dumfries-shire, dated at Lochmaben the 4th January, the 14th year of his reign. There is an exact and complete series of the family from this time downward to the present Sir Thomas Kirkpatrick of Closeburn, baronet. Thomas de Torthorald. There are several of the name in this record ; they iiad Torthorald, which came to Umphrey de Kilpatrick, ancestor to Closeburn, in King Robert Bruce's time, and from them, by marriage, to the Carlyles, who kept it long in their family. Fergus Macdougal. This is one of the M'Dovvall people, who are of the family of Galloway, but which of them I cannot say. (a) Great Chartulary of Melrose. Vol. n. 7 X p HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS Dougal Macdongal, del Conte de Wigton; of whom already. Alexander de Bunkill, the Baron of Bonkill, whose heiress married the ancestor of the Stewarts Earls of Angus. The name is not worn out to this day, though but mean people, which shows it was a surname. Richard le Scot de Murthockston. This is the ancestor of the great House of Buccleugh, now advanced to the height of honours a subject is capable of: It is generally said this gentleman was son to Sir Michael Scott, and that he married the heiress oi .Murthockston in Lanark. They were barons of Murdiston till King fames II.'s time, that Sir Walter Scott of Murdiston made an excambion of his lands of Murdiston and Hartwood, in the barony of Bothwell, and shire of Lanark, with Thomas Inglis of Manor, for his lands of Branksholm, Branshaugh, Goldy- tands, Chihitelaw, Quhiterigs, Todshaw-hills, and Todshaw-wood, dated at Edin- burgh the 23d July 1446, which I have seen. The family of Buccleugh rose high upon the fall of the House of Douglas, and got several of their lands as the reward of their valour against them at the battle of Arkinholm. Though they were great barons, yet they did not attain to the peerage till the reign of King James VI. in •the 1606. In 1619 the family were made earls, and they arrived to the honour of a duke in the 1663. Andreas de Livingston, one of the Livingstons of that Ilk, of whom we have said already. William de Murreff de Drumsargard seems to be of the same race of Murrays with those of Bothwell ; for the barony of Drumsargard lies near to Bothwell, on the other side of the river of Clyde. This Willican de Moravia de Drumsargard is made mention of, not only in this record, but frequently in Rymer, about this time. There is no question can be made but that Sir John de Moravia de Drumsargard was his son, since he is designed by the same local and territorial title, who, in or about the 1299, or 1300, married the daughter of Malise Earl of Strathern, and got with the lady the lands of Ogilvie, Abercairny, Glensherop, as from the char- ter I have had the honour to peruse in the possession of James Murray of Aber- cairny, the lineal heir of this marriage, and the representative of that family. IVillielmus de Douglas, the same gentleman that stood long at a distance from the conqueror of his country, and the invader of her liberties, but at length sub- mitted. Alisandre de Strivelyn del Conte de Lanerk. This, from vouchers which cannot be called in question, is tlie head of the family of the Stirlings of Calder, near Glasgow, which continued in good repute till King James V.'s time, that it came to the House of Keir in 1535, James Stirling of Keir being contracted to Janet, daughter and heir of Andrew Stirling of Calder. Of the Stirlings of the House of Calder are come the Stirlings of Craigbarnet, the Stirlings of Glorat, the Stirlings of Law, the Stirlings of Ballagan, the Stirlings the barons of Achyll, whose lineal heir is William Stirling of Halbertshire. William fitz Thomas le Noble. The surname is of great antiquity. There is a charter in the hands of the Duke of iMontrose, by Radolphus le Noble, and Thomas le Noble, his son, of the lands of Tlviston, i. e. Eliston, in Edinburghshire, to Sir David Graham, and Agnes sponsa sua, confirmed by King Alexander II. the 5th year of his reign, 1253: For many centuries there is no mention of any of the surname till 1467, that the Nobles of Ferm had a charter of the lands of Ferm, now called the Coates, above Rutherglen. Their title is now Ardarden, above Dum- barton ; but if there be any relation in blood or descent of the Nobles of Ardarden, from the ancient Nobles of Eliston, I cannot say. JVilliam dc Ross seems to be a south country Ross of the House of Tarbet. Henry de Moravia ; who he is I know not. WiUielmus Fraser; another branch of the Frasers, I can give no account of. Joannes de Strivelyn de Carse. This is the ancestor of the Stirlings of Alva and Carse, of the same family with the Stirlings of Calder, as from ancient deeds I have seen vouched in the chartularies of Cambuskenneth and Glasgow". A suc- cessor of his, Sir John Stirling of the Carse, was a mighty great compiler with the English, in favour of Edward Baliol, and is the same John Stirling whom Sir Willliam Dugdale mentions was a peer of England, and called by a writ of sum- mons to the Parliament there. He left a daughter, the heir of his estate in Scot- ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. S^ iand, who manied John, son of Sir Walter Monteith, the ancestor of the once great iaiiiily of the Monteitbs of Carse. Sir William Monteith of Carse sold his estate in the 163 1 to Sir William Li^ingston of Kilsyth, and lie again in 1638 to Sir Thomas Hope. Gilchrist More is the ancestor of the Mores of Polkellie, who, I think, is the stem of the Mores, and an ancienicr family than Rowallan, and came to Sir Adam Muir of Rowallan, by marriage of Janet More the hen-ess, in the days of King Davtd n. Hii^o de Kelso, the ancestor of the Kelsos of Kelsoland, not long ago extinct. Fergus Fostersoii, I conjecture, were the old Forresters of Skelmorly, of whom few are now remaining. William Ker. This, without so much as a question, is the ancestor of the an- cient family of the Kers of Kersland. This is vouched from the lands 'iS te?ievien- titm IVillielmi de Kers in Dairy, which are erected into a free barony by King Robert L in favour oi Fergusius de Ardrossan, one of the ancestors of the House of Eglinton, to whom they were vassals till of late. The family was in good re- putation, and allied with the best and the greatest families in the west. The male line of the House of Kersland failed in Robert Ker of Kersland, in King James VL's time His heir-female was married to the renowned and valiant Captain Thomas Crawfurd of Jordanhill, son to the Laird of Kilbirny, whose eldest son, Daniel Ker, assumed the surname of his mother's family, and got the estate of Kersland; whjse great-grandson, another Daniel Ker of Kersland, died without issue, being sii in at the battle of Steenkirk anno 1694. Crawfurd of jordanhiU is heir-male and of provision. Robert de Ross I take to be a branch of the Rosses of Tarbet, that were heritors of the lands of Fairly in Cunningham, from whence they took their name. Donald ftz Gilbert, who this is 1 cannot say. Thomas de Gilhagy. There were some of the name, w^o were long vassals to the bishops of Glasgow, in the barony of Glasgow, and came to have the lands of Ken- nieinll and Craigs in heritage, though they are now out of the estate. Patrick de Ogilvill, that is Ogilvie, the ancestor of the ancient and numerous family of tiie Ogilvies, who are derived from a younger branch of the Earls of Angus; and having got the lands of Ogilvie in Angus, from whence they took their surname. 1 he chief and principal family was Ogilvie of that Ilk, and some- times designed of Powiie, but nowe.xtinct. AH the other great and noble families of the Ogilvies are branched from the House of Ogilvie. William de Gourlay de Bagally. Of this surname are the Gourlays of Kincraig in Fife, who are reputed an ancient family. Robertas de Bethune. This is for certain the ancestor of the House of Balfoui"; of whom before. David de Brichen. This is the Lord of Brechin. He was the son of William de Brichen, son of Henry de Brichen, natural son of David Earl of Huntingdon in England, and Earl of Garioch in Scotland, brother to King William the Lion, who carries on his seals the picture of a man on horseback, and, on his arm, a shield charged with three piles, issuing from the chief, and conjoined at the points in base. The same seal of arms is used by this Henry of Brechin, his natural son, to whom he gave the barony of Brechin, from which he took his surname. He is witness to several charters still extant, wherein he is called Henricus de Brichen, Jilitts Comitis David. William de Brichen, his son, is designed Willielmus de Brichen, fttius Henrici de Brichen, filii Comitis David, (a) David de Brichen was his son, who is found here in the Ragman-Roll, and was long on the English side during the war : But after the battle of Inverury he turned eminently to King Robert the Bruce, whose sister he married, and ever afterwards continued eminently loyal. David de Bticben, his son, was one of the Barones Regni Scotia, who in 1320 V. rote that bold letter to the Pope, in behalf of King Robert and the independency of Scotland; but the year after, 1321, he was unhappily made privy to the con- f piracy framed by the Countess of Strathern and the Lord Soulis, against the king (fl) Foundation by him of the Maison Dieu Hospital at Brechin, confirmed by King James IIL anno 1477, when the original is transumed. y_ HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS his uncle; for not discovering of which he was tried at the Black Parliament, and suffered death for the same, to the universal regret of the people, being, says the gieat Mr Buchanan, " Omnium aetatis sui ju\enum &- belli &- pacis artibus longe «' primus." The haill lands he possessed at his forfeiture, the great barony of Brechin, the barony of Rothiemay, the lands of Kinloch, and part of Glenesk, were all given by K.ing Robert to Sir David Barclay of Cairny-Barclay in Fife, of whom the Earls of Panmure were the lineal heirs, who place the arms of Brechin and Barclay in the third quarter of their shield. H'illiam de Boseuik, i.e. Boswell, a very ancient surname; and though their original estate seems to have been in the south, where they are first to be met with, yet, in process of time, they grew up to be one of the powerfullest families in Fife; they got a part of Lochoreshire by marriage of an heiress, and also got Balmuto, &-c. by one of the heiresses of VVemyss. The Boswells of Balmuto, as they were one of the most opulent families in Fife, so they made the best and most honourable alliances of any in all that shire: The family of Auchenleck in Kyle, in Ayrshire, branched from Balmuto in King James IV.'s time; and a younger son of them possesses the estate of Balmuto, though the right heirs of the family be still existing, though stript of much of the lustre ot their ancestors ot the House of Balmuto. Thomas del Cbaiteris del Conte de Roxburgh is one of the ancestors of the House of Amisfield, of whom we have touched a httle at already. Adam le Hoip. This gives a fair antiquity to the surname of Hope, of whom, beside the Earl of Hopeton, there are several other gentlemen, beside two in the quality of the baronetage, Sir John Hope-Bruce of Craighall, and Sir Alexander Hope of Carse. Johan. le fitz Jobati. de Ainsley. This was the family of Ainslie of Dolphing- ston in the south, of whom there is mention in records since the Jameses' time ; it came to an heiress in Jjmes IV.'s time, who married Sir Andrew Ker, a brother of the House of CessforcT, the ancestor of Ker of Littledean, who carries Ker and Ainslie in his shield of arms. Aybner de Rutherford, one of the progenitors of the Rutherfords of that Ilk in the south, of whom already. John le Setiescall de Jedwith; if this be not Sir John Stewart of Bonkill, as is generally agreed by our antiquaries, it must be a very ancient branch ot the Stewarts: But I conjecture it is Sir John of Bonkill, the same cAled. J'rater ger- manus Jacobi Senescalli Scotia, swearing submission to the English for different lands he held in different counties. There is in the 1323 a John Setwscal de Jed- with, bailie to the abbot of Kelso, whom we reckon was Sir John's youngest son, and one of the Earl of Galloway's progenitors. Roger Corbet. This is apparently the Corbets of Makerston, that plainly are come of the Dunbars, the Earls of Dunbar, which came to the Erasers by marriage. In the reign of King Robert I. we find mention in the chartulary of Melrose, of Dc- nunus Laurentius Fraser, Dominus de DrurnelyJer, who had also Makerston. The barony of Makerston, in the time of King David II. came to the heiress, Margaret Fraser, who married Dougal M'Dougall, as he is called, whose son, Fergus M'Dougall, had a charter of the barony of Makerston, on the resignation of his mother in the records. There was of the same stem another family of the Corbets, designed of Hardgray, in Annandale, though several centuries past they have re- sided in Clydesdale, in the regality of Glasgow. I have seen an original charter in the possession of the Duke of Douglas, by Thomas de Corbet, Dominus de Hardgray Jonmii de Corbet, filio suo, of the lands of Limekills, in Annandale, in 1405, con- firmed by the Earl of Douglas. They failed lately in the person of Mr Hugh Cor- bet of Hardgray, who left some daughters, co-heiresses of his estate; Barbara, married to John Douglas of Mams, and again to Sir Mungo Stirling of Glorat, and the other to James Douglas of Mains. Thomas le Johnston : This is the ancestor of the Johnston family ; some of our antiquaries are of opinion that they are come of the same tribe with the famous Thomas Ranulphi Camerarius Scotia, in the reign of Alexander III. in 1273, who was father to Thomas Earl of Murray, Dominus VaiUs Annandie et Mannie : I have 2 UN THE RAGMAN-ROLL. J3 not seen the surname before this time : They turned out to be a very great family on the border, and were a race of brave and warhke men, and of great power and authority. Another of their ancestors, Gilhotus de Johnston, had a charter of several lands in the reign of King Robert the Bruce. Another Sir John Johnston is mentioned in the Fcedera Anglia, in the time of King Robert IlL and made a great figure in the transactions on the border. Adam Johnston is the fust of the family in King James L and IL's time that 1 have found designed de eodem, or of that Ilk. John Johnston of that Ilk was a conservator of the peace with England in 1457 ' ^""^^ Adam Johnston of that Ilk in King James IV. 's reign. He died in 1501. His successors are to be seen in the Peerage. Thomas de Cockburn ; the ancestor of the Cockburns, who were very ancient vassals to the Earl of March ; Cockburn of Langton was the principal family of the name; Alexander Cockburn, ^a^^r, as he is designed, got the estates of Lang- ton, and Cariden in West-Lothian, by the heir-female of the great family of the Weaponts, whose arras they carry ; he had Alexander Cockburn of Langton, the lieir of his family, and John his son, ex prima uxore, who married Jean, daughter and heir of John Lindsay of Ormiston, of whom came the Cockburns of Ormiston ; Alexander Cockburn of Langton, the father, had to his second wife Margaret, daughter and heir of Sir John Monfode of iJraidwood in Lanarkshire, by whom he had Edw ard, a son, the ancestor of the Cockburns of Skirhng, a family of good account, of a fair estate, though it is now extinct ; Alexander Cockburn of Lang- ton, the younger, called 7?//i/j, was Keeper of the Great Seal under King Robert IL and ilL by whom he was made Usher to the Parliament, Ostiarius Parliamenti; which office the family still exercises. Henry de Foderinghay, i. e. Fotheringham, who no doubt is the family of Powrie. The name is as ancient as the reign of King William. I have seen a charter in the hands of the Marquis of Tweeddale to the Giffords of Yester, to which David de Foderinghny is a witness, and his seal is appended to the deed ; ermine, three bars, the same arms that Powrie still wears. I have seen another charter under the Great Seal, " Thomae Foderinghame filio Henrici de Fodering- "■ hame de terris de Baluny infra vicecomet. de Forfar," upon Henry the father's resj.^iiation, dated at Dunkeld the i6th of October, anno regni nostri septimo, 1378, the seventh year of the reign of Robert IL In the subsequent reign of Ro- bert lIL John B'otheringham acquired the lands of Wester-Powrie, which belonged to Malcolm de Pourie, to be held of John Ogilvie of that Ilk, baron of Easter-Pow- rie. There is a progress I have seen of the House of Powrie down to the pre- sent time, well Vouched with their intermarriages and alliances. irdliam de Murriff de Tillibardin. The ancestor of his Grace the Duke of Athol, of whom before. Reyna/d de Craivford del Cont de Air. This may be either Sir Ronald Craw- furd of Loudon, of whom vie. have spoke before, or his uncle Reginald Crawfurd. who got the lands of Kerse from his nephew, of whom came the Crawfurds of the House of Kerse, and the cadets of that ancient family. Malcolm de Ergadia Frere, Sir Alexander de Ergadia. This is a brother of the great House of Lorn, and may be the Bishop of Argyle, who is designed Martin de Ergytbil Ergadiensis Electus, recommended to the Court of Rome by the King of England to be institute in the See. This is but a conjecture. Duncan Cambel del Isles: I cannot positively say who this gentleman is; he is not any of the heads of the Lochow family ; for that is not the name of them, but Colin and Neil ; it may be the father of Sir Donald Campbell of Redcastle ; I have seen the original charter granted by Djvenaldi/s Cumbel Duncano Cambel, militi, filio sua de terris Rubri Castri in Angus, to which Dmiinus IVdlielmus de Keith and Dominits Willielmus Lindsay, Rector de Air, are witnesses. I take the date to be about the 1300 or thereabout. It was he that married the heiress of Loudon. Sir Andrew Campbell of Loudon, his son, alienated these lands to Sir Robert St-vvart of Innermeth, as from a charter of confirmation in the registers. John de Mmtgomerv, of -.vhom before, the ancestor of the Hoiise of Eaglesham and Eastwood. Vol. IL 7 Y 34 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS Rejnald More de Craig. This is Rowallan, of whom we have taken notice be fore. Marjory Cumin Dame de Gordon. This is the lady of Sir Adam Gordon of that Ilk in the Merse, Sir Adam the elder, or pater, as he is designed. But of what family of tlie Cumins she was, being then so numerous, I cannot say. Duncan Jitz le C'jnte de Mar. This is a younger son of the House of Marr, who I think was the root of this branch of the family, who had the lands of Cas- kieben, which came to the Johnstons of Caskieben by marriage. The family kept that estate till within these fifty years or thereby. Ayhner de Haudeii. There were at this time two families of the Haldanes, Haldane of that Ilk, and Haldane of Gleneagles, who were even then considerable barons, and swore fealty for lands they held in Perthshire. He was grandfather by the line of the family to Sir Bernard Haldane of Gleneagles. The House of Gleneagles have vouchers for instructing their antiquity beyond most other fami- lies in Perthshire. Thomas de Boys. This is a surname that was peculiar to a family in Angus, designed of Panbride, of which the learned Hector Boethius or Boece, that wrote the History of Scotland, was a son. Bernard Fresar : That is the same with Fraser, may be a son of Sir Bernard Fraser, who is the head of the family in the reign of Alexander III. IVilUam Fraser is another Fraser ; but who he is precisely I cannot say. Nicol de Preston is the ancestor of the ancient family of the Prestons, designed of that Ilk and of Craigmillar. They were very ancient proprietors of the barony of Preston, and got Craigmillar by the purchase of Nicol Preston from John de Capella in 1374 («). They continued a great family till the time of the Restoration of King: Charles II. that Sir George Preston of Craigmillar sold the estate to Sir John Gilmour. Wtlliam de Sydserf, who must be the ancestor of the' Sydserfs of that Ilk, in the east country, whose successors I think have lately been designed Sydserff of Ruchlaw. Of them was Mr Thomas Sydserf, who was Bishop of Galloway at the 1638, was deprived of his bishoprick, and survived the restoration of episcopacy at the king's return, and died Bishop of Orkney in the 1662. James de Newton, may be the Newtons of that Ilk, a family in the east coun- try, of whom I have seen no voucher for their antiquities; though I suppose they are for all that an ancient family. Walter de Wedderburn : It seems to sound like a local surname, and taken from lands so called, though there is no vestige that ever the barony of Wedderburn in Berwickshire was theirs. 1 have seen a charter in King James I.'s time, Willi- elmo de Wedderburn, of lands he had of Robert Blackadder of that Ilk ; they came to be considerable burgesses of Dundee. The first charter I see they have of a land estate is by Patrick Lord Gray of the lands of Hilton and Wester-Craigie, to David Wedderburn and to Elizabeth Lawson his spouse, confirmed in the 1552 ; but they have, the same David and his aforesaid wife, a former charter from the Lord Gray, of the half of the Mains of Huntly, in the 1542. They came to be stiled of that Ilk and Easter-Powrie, and another family of Gosford. Eylmer de Hauden : This is the same gentleman who is designed del Conte de Edinburgh, and who is the Baron of Gleneagles, who had lands in that county. Richard de Airtb : Airth of that Ilk in Stirlingshire, that ended in heirs-female in King James I.'s time, married to Drumirond and Somerville, &-c. yohn ie Napier, who I suppose is the ancestor of the Napiers of Wright's-houses, near E.dinburgh, who were an ancient family ; for the Napiers of Merchiston began but to make the great figure they did in King James IPs time ; of them is the Lord Napier descended. Thomas Cambel : I cannot say who this gentleman is. Serle de Dundas is very clearly the ancestor of Dundas of Dundas,"who can well, and by authentic vouchers, carry up their antiquity to the days of King David I. Tliat the first of their family, Helias Jilius Hucbtredi, got the lands of Dundas (a) Charter in the Register. ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 35 from WahU-Jiis filius C)sp itricii, pro servitio dimidii militis ; from the lands it is very plain he took his surname. They had also the barony otT"'ingask in Perth- shire, very anciently, which they held of the crown in libera bnronia, though they held Dundas but of subjects, to whom the Seaton family succeeded in King Ro- bert L's time. I have seen a line of succession, well vouched, of the family, till James Dundas of that Ilk, in King James L's time, that he had charters both of his barony of Fingask and his la ids of Dundas, from their resj>ective superiors the king and the Lord Seat n, to him and his wife Christian Stewart, and to James, tlieir son, in fee («}, and who actually succeeded to the estate on the demise of his father, to whom he is served ami retoured "■ tanquam legitimus &■ propinquior " hasres quondam Jacobi Dundas de eodein, patris sui" (A). Tliis James Dundas of that Ilk, the younger, being allied in marriage with the Lord Livingston, who was the great minister in the minority of King James IL deeply engaged him in all their politics, and- that great man, having taken some bold steps in the administra- tion, they came afterwards to be quarrelled, and the opposition being strong against him, he and his friends who had stuck to him were all forfeited by a Parliamen- tary attainder; and, among the rest of his friends, the Laird of Dundas (c), in the 1449, and the lands of Dundas and Echline were given to the Earl of Douglas: But soon after this the Lord Livingston and his friends being mostly restored, the Laird of Dundas was restored to all the crown could give him, that was the barony of Fingask in Perthshire, of which we find his son, Alexander Dundas of Fingask, invested, and in full possession of, anno 1466 (^/J: And, to show that he was the heir of James Dundas of that Ilk, his father, his seal, with the other arbitrators, is appended to the deed, bearing the plain, simple, original arms, the lion rampant; of whom Thomas Dundas of Fingask is the lineal heir. We shall only further stay to observe here, that the estate of Dundas stood vested in William i'.arl of Douglas, and James Earl of Douglas his brother, till his attainder in Parliament on the 9th of June 1455 (e), when the said estate v/as forfeited to the crown. It was towards the end of that same year given by the king to Archibald Dundas of Liston, a gentleman of the family, likely, of whom is come the later Lairds of Dun- das; but it is clear and evident as the sun at noon, that the Dundasses of Fingask are the true heirs-male of the ancient Lairds of Dundas, preceding the reign af King James II. and so are well entitled to wear the principal arms of the family,, as their ancestor wore them simple and plain in the 1466. J'jhan. de Crawford is the next in the record to Serle de Dundas. The truth is^ the surname of Crawfurd is then so frequent that it is hard to distinguish them from one another, John being a frequent name of the House of Kerse, it is pro- bable this jr>hannes de Crawford may well enough, in the chronology, be the son of Reginald Crawfurd of Kerse, uncle to Sir Reginald Crawfurd of Loudon, who was put to death by the English at Ayr in 1297. However this is but a con- jecture. Aleyn JValles. This I take to be the second branch of the family of Wallace who were of Achencruive, of whom Sir Duncan Wallace of Achencruive and Sun- drum, in King Robert II.'s time, who, having no issue, tailzied his estate to James Sap.dilands, Allan Cathcart, and Robert Colquhoun, and to their heirs. R'jbert Boyt, i. e. Boyd, a.nA Dictns Boyt, is to be found in a charter by Sir John Erskine, of the lands of Halkhill, in ii62(/). No doubt he was the predecessor of that noble patriot Sir Robert Boyd, who, for the merit and valour of his services to King Robert I. got the lands of Kilmarnock in 1314, ov whom is descended in a lineal course of succession the Earl of Kilmarnock. Maurice de Arncaple is the ancestor of the Lairds of Ardincaple in Dumba'ton- shire; who were designed Ardincaples of that Ilk, till King James V.'s time, that Alexander, then the head of the family, took a fancy and called himself Alexander Macaulay. of Ardincaple, from a predecessor of his own of the name of Aulay, to humour a patronymical designation, as being more agreeable to the head of a clan than the designation of Ardincaple of that Ilk. {a) In the Registers. (V) Penes Dundas de eodein. (c) In the Registers, etiam- penes Dundas ds Fir;j;ask. {d ] Solemn Arbitration betwixt the abbots of Cupar aiiQ ArbioEih, penes Dundas de Fin. gasli. (f) Black Acts of Parliament. (/} Penes C. Glasgow. 1 36 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS Johannes de Johnston, one of the ancestors of the House of Annandale, of whom before. Arthur de Galbrait. This was once a considerable family in the Lennox. The iurname signifies, in the Irish language, as I am told by those who are most con- versant in that language, the brave stranger. The first I have seen is Gillespick Galbrait, who is witness in a charter by Malduin Earl of Lennox, to Humphrey Kirkpatrick, of the lands of Colquhoun. The same Earl Malduin gives a charter to Maurice, son of this Gillespick, of the lands of Baldernock, KiUearn, &c. They came to be designed Domini de Gartconnel. IVillielmus de Galbraith, Dominus de Gartconnel, in the reign of King Robert III. had three d mgTiters, one married to John Hamilton, a son of the House of Cadyow, the predecessor of the Hamiltons of Badernoch and Bardowie, another to Nicol Douglas, a cadet of the Douglasses of Dalkeith, as is said, of whom the Douglasses of Mains, Barloch, and Keyston, in Dumbartonshire, and the third to a brother of the Logans of Restalrig, of whom came the Logans of Gartconnel and Balvie, now extinct. Walter Spreid; he is, in other deeds, designed Si'iiescallus Comitis de Lennox. They came to be proprietors of the lands of Dalquhern and Covvden, in Renfrewsliire, and subsisted till King James VI. 's time. The Spreuls of Blachern and Milton iay they are of them, and Blachern wears the principal arms. Grejorie Sinclair. This is generally said to be the progenitor of the Sinclairs of Longformacus in the south, originally a brother of the Sinclairs of Roslin. This is supported by a charter which 1 have seen by Henricus de Srincto Claro conies Or- cadice W dominus de Ros/yn, wherein he firmly and faithfully obliges himself to infeft his well-beloved cousin carissimo consanguineo suo, J icobo de Sancto Claro, Domino de Longformacus, in a twenty-merk land. The obligation is dated at Roslin the 2 2d of June 1384. Another James Sinclair, son of the former James Sinclair of Long- formacus, gets from Henry Earl of Orkney Dominus de Sancto Claro y de I'allis de Nyth, an annuity of twenty merks. to be uphfted out of the lands of Lenny, dated the 20th February 141 8 («). From David Sinclair, sou of this James Sinclair of Longformacus, is the family come, as from a lineal succession of them I have seen : The family is now in the quality of baronets, as is Sir Robert Sinclair of Stevenston who is come of them. Walter de Congleton is doubtless the ancestor of the Congaltons of that Ilk in East-Lothian. I have seen the name in a charter by Patrick Earl of March, of the lands of Stanypath, in the 1316. Henricus Ker. This being a south country gentleman, I take him to be the root of the Kers of Samuelston, who appear by that title as soon as the 1402. George Ker of Samuelston died without heirs-male in King James IV. 's time, and left one daughter. Dame Nicolas Ker, who carried the estate of Samuelston to her husband Alexander Lord Home. By the heir of line of the family these lands came by marriage to John Hamilton of Samuelston, natural son to the Earl ot Arran. Walterus de Berkeleya I conjecture to be one of the ancestors of the south country Barclays, who are barons of the half of the barony of Ciawfordjohn in Lanarkshire, which they had obtained by the marriage of one of the two heirs-female of Johannes, Jilius Reginaldi de Crawford, in the reign of King Alexander III. After this we find David Barclay, 7niles, dominus dimidiae baroniae de Crawford- J/bn, in the reign of King David II. anno 1357 : Sir Hugh, his son, had also the barony of Kilbirny in 1397, and is so called, and dominus dimidiae baronice de Crawford-John. His grandson, John Barclay de Crawford- J jhn, as he is designed in 1456, and de Kilbirney in 1471, had only one daughter, Marjory, his sole heir, who married Malcolm Crawfurd of Greenock, the ancestor of the present George Crawfurd Viscount of Garnock, who, through the Barclays of Crawfordjohn is heir of line of the Crawfurds of Cravs'fordjohn. The House of Kilbirny kept the ba- rony of Crawfordjohn till the 1529, that Laurence Crawfurd of Kilbirny exchanged these lands for the estate of Drumry in Dumbartonshire, with Sir James Hamilton of Finnart, and Dame Margaret Livingston his wife, who was the heiress both of Drumry and of Easter-Wemyss. (a) Charters I have seen- ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. 3 7 Henry de Laudere, i. e. Lauder. After this we find Robertas de Lnwder pater, and Roberttts de Lawder Jilius, who was Justiciary under King David IL As his heir and successor Sir Robert Lawder de Edrington, Dominus de le Bass, was Jus- ticiarius Laudoniae in the reign of King James L Lauder of Hatton appears to be come of them in the days of Robert IL Robert de Fmsyde seems to be of the Fawsides of that Ilk, near Dalkeitli, \vho were great men about the Stewarts after they came to the crown ; they sold the estate m King James VL's time. Johan. de kl}ttlawe, i. e. I think Whitelaw, the Whitelaws of that Ilk, near Dunbar, who were long a family of credit and reputation. The eldest daughter and co-heir of Patrick Whitelaw of that Ilk married Sir Alexander Hamilton of Innerwick in King James Vl.'s days. Some male branch of them, it would appear, recovered the estate of Whitelaw, and designed themselves of that Ilk; it came lately, in our own time, to a second heiress, who married a gentleman hom the ^^•est, of the name of Burnside. of the Buruiides of Gavinburn, near Kilpatrick, who retains his own name. Gilbert de Drummond. This is the ancestor of the Drummond family, while they .were possessors of the lands of Drymen, or Drummon, in Lennox, of whom the Earls of Perth ; for which see the Peerage, where an account of their antiquity, alliances, oflkes, &-c. are fully described. Piers de Cockbiirn. This seems to be the root of the Cockburns of Langton, Ormiston, and Clerkington, of whom the rest of the Cockburns are come.^ Norman de Lescelyne, Chevalier. This is the Leslie of Rothes family, whose name at that time is Norman; of whom already. Roger de Crawford del Lonte de Mir. This is for certain the family of the Craw- furds that were sometimes designed of Cumnock, and sometimes of Tarringin ; and had also the the lands of Crawfordston in Nithsdale. The direct male branch of them ended in King James XL's time, and Crawfordston came to Sir Robert Criciiton of Sanquhar, some apprehend, by marriage ot the heiress: But I see no voucher, unless it be the tradition, that is not much to be depended on, nor ought to be carried far where there is any plenty of better vouchers: So much however is certain, that Roger Crawfurd of Boughs, Daleagles, &c. was, in the reign of Ro- bert II. anno 1387, brother to Edward Crawfurd of Tarringin; and that he found- ed the once great House of the Crawfurds of Drongan, of whom came another considerable family of the Crawfurds of Liffnorris. I have seen Sir George Craw- furd ot Liffnorris, in the 1630, served heir to his predecessor's brother, Edw'ard Crawfurd of Tarringin. Of them all the Crawfurds in Kyle are come. Robert de Graunt must be the ancestor of the family of Grant. They say them- selves, that a little after this their family came to an heiress, who married a gen- tleman of the name of Stewart, who assumed the surname of Grant, of whom they are descended, and is designed del Conte de Fife. Henry le fitz Annand. Henry de jinnandia seems to be his son, who gets a char- ter from King Robert I. of the lands of Sauchie, in the shire of Clackmanan, by his charter I have seen, dated at Peebles decimo die junii, the i8th year of his reign, i.e. 1324. The family, in King James I.'s time, came to two heirs-female; Mary, who was married to James Shaw of Greenock, and Margaret, to William Brown of Coalston; for there is a charter by King James I. '• dilecto &- fideli suo Willielmo " Brown, de totis &• integris media parte baronias de Sauchy, infra vicecomitatum " de Clacmannan, totis &- integris media parte de Gartquher, jacen. infra vicecomita- " tum ejusdem, totis &- integris terris de Fynlory, jacen. infra vicecomitatum de " Kynross, totis &- integris mediae partis terrarum de Achindrane, jacen. infra " vicecomitatum de Air: Qusequidem terrae fuerunt Margarets de Annandia ha;- " reditarie." The lands so resigned are limited to the heirs of her and her hus- band ; which failing, " Joanni de Schaw, filio &. hseredi Jacobi de Scliaw, scuti- " ferl nostri, sexto Aprilis, anno regni nostri vicesimo sexto," that is 1431 (). The family attained to be Earls of Mor- ton in tue 1551, on the fall of the regent Morton ; but that dignity being restored to the Douglasses of the House of Lochleven, the family of Maxwell was in lieu ef the fomer dignity, made Earl of Nithsdale. Sir Richard Fruser is some of the south country Erasers of the House of Tweed- dab, who are designed sometimes in old writs Vicecomites de 2'ravockquair, which I take to be the sheriifship of Peebles ;. to his name is added del Conte de Drunu /rise. J nn^s de Lindsay is well known to be the ancestor of the great family of the Li.ids lys of Dunrod. It was he that assisted iving Robert L to dispatch the per- fidious Cumin in the church of Dumfries, ilis heir and successor, John Lindsay of Dunrod, gets charters from Ring Robert 111. when he was Earl of Carnck, of the Mains of Kilbride, which is confirmed by the king his father in the 1374, in the registers I have seen ; they became a great family, and had a vast estate, both in the shu-e oi Lanark and Renfrew, where the lands of Dunrod lie. They con- tinued till King James Vl.'s time, that Alexander Lindsay of Dunrod falling in bloodshed, and having killed the laird of Leckie of that Ilk, his estate visibly melted away, and he suftered a great reverse of fortune ; for he, who had once so great an estate, came to beg his bread amonj^ his friends before he died, as I have been credibly informed by old people, who knew him in the decline; of his age,, in that poor situation. The family of Dunrod is represented by William Lindsay late of Blackholm and Balquharage, who bears the arms. Sir jrllexander de Lindsay is the ancestor of the Lindsays of Barnwell and. Craigie, or a branch of them. Allan de Moreff, del Conte de Forres, is a. north country Murray of the House of Duffus and who came to be designed of Coubin. Sir Dovenald Cambel, del Conte de Dunbarton ; I see no other Sir Donald Camp- bell at the time, but Sir Donald who is of Redcastle, and the same noble person who gives the half of the barony of Redcastle to Sir Duncan Campbell of Loudon, his son, and is the Dovenaldus Cambel who is one of the Barones Regni Scotice who write the memorable letter to the Pope, in the 1320, anent King Robert the Bruce, and the independency of Scotland. Sir Willi, an de Rotbwcn, i. e. Ruthven, the ancestor of the Ruthvens of that Ilk, of whom came the Earls of Cowrie ; of whom before. Sir Archibald de Livingston ; of whom before. Sir Ntcol de Graham, del Conte de Litbgow, is, as I think, that branch of the Grahams of Abercorn that I think came afterwards to the Mores by marriage of the heiress. Thomas de Dahiel, the predecessor of the Dalziels of that Ilk in Lanarkshire ; the name is ancient and local ; how thev lost the estate of Dalziel I cannot say, but likely by forfeiture : They were given by King David Bruce, " Malcolmo " Fleemmg, mditi, quod ipsi habeant teneant et possideant baroniam de Lanzie, " baroniam de Kilmaromck, et omnes terras suas baronis de Dalziel, et omnes " alias terras quas de nobis tenet in capite, in liberam warrenam in perpetuuni, " apui Castram de Kildrummy, vicesimo die mensis Junii, anno regni nostri " tertio decimo, 1343" {b). The estate of Dalziel came next to Robertas de la Fal, but not Dalziel ; tor there is a charter by the same King David II. " Roberto " Senescallo de Shandbothy de terns de Dalziel et de Modervile infra vicecomi- C<7j Dtcreet of Parliament in the Registers. (l>) In the hands of Mr Hamilton of Daliiel. 48 HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REMARKS *' tatum de Lanerk, nos contingentes pro eo, quod haeredes quondam Roberti de " la Val, militis, contra fidein ct pacem nostram in Anglia commorantur, tenend, « et liabend. eidem Roberto et ha.'redibiis suis in liberam baioniam, adeo liberum " :;icut quondam Malcolmiis Fleemmg et Robertus de la Val eandem tenueiunt." The charter under the Great Seal is dated the 20th of March, the 33d year of the kuig's reign, i. e. 1363 («). 1 think the heirs of Sir Robert de la Val have been restored to the barony of Daiiiel and Moderville, which, by two co-heiresses, came to Sir Duncan Wallace and J'ihn de Nisbet, who, in a writ I have seen (6), are designed Domini participes bnronice dc Daiziel : that imports that they were heirs portioners of the estate ; Sir Duncan W.illace gave his part baronice de Dnlziel et de Modervile, failing heirs of himself and his second wife, as I take it, Kleanora de Bruce, Comitissii de Cur- rick ; she was Countess Dowager of Carrick, and herself a daughter of Sir Archi- bald Douglass, sister to William first Earl of Douglas, and widow of Sir James S .a.lilands of that Ilk. He provides the estate of Daiziel to Sir James Sandiiands, his lady's son; the charter from the crown is dated in the 1374 {c). Sir James S;i;idilands of Calder alienated the barony of Dalziel to George Daiziel, son of Sir IV.lliam de Daiziel, which is confirmed by a charter under the Great Seal, 5th July, the 5th of Robert II. 1395, by the charter proceeding on Sir James Sandi- lands' resignation, whom the king calls his brother, being married to his sister. The estate is limited to the heirs-male of George de Daiziel, the receiver of the charter, and to the heirs-male of his body ; which failing to the heirs-male of Sir Witliam de Dulziel, his father, whatsoever. From this gentleman descended the following series of the lairds of Daiziel, who were raised to be Lords Daiziel in 1628, and in 1639 Earl of Carnwath. I shall just stay so much longer on this remark as to observe that the other half of the barony of Daiziel, that was John Nisbet's part, laid the foundation of the Nisbets, called barons ot the half barony of Daiziel and Moderville {d), that were a good family and subsisted till King (.'harles l.'s time. Of this branch of the Nisbets, of the ancient family of the Nisbets of .hat Ilk, flowed the Nisbets of Dean, being descended of Adam Nisbet, a son of the ba-rns of Daiziel, who came to Edinburgh a merchant in King James IV.'s tinv'.g^ S.r Patrick Nisbet of Dean, baronet, informed the author of these Remarks., David Moreff] Parsona Ecclesite de Botbwel. This is a, clergyman perhaps of the House of Bothvvell, who were then of the same surname, and was long before the founding the College Kirk of Bothwell by the Earl of Douglas in the. 1398. Robert de Ciininghavie : This is Cunningham for certain, and the same noble person who had a charter under the Great Seal from King Robert the Bruce, of the lands of Lambrochton, and is the ancestor of the noble family of Glen- cairn. Walter fitz Gilbert de Homildon is the same great man that is mention- ed before in this record, and on whom we have made remarks and some critical observations before. All that we shall add here is, that he must be a very considerable person, and possessed of an estate in different places, when he is swearing fealty to the King of England at different counties ; though by the by he seems to have a special relation to the shire of Lanark. Alisundre Scot de Perthick : From writs I have seen he had the lands of Per- thick-Scott, that is, the lands of Scotston in Renfrewshire, which from him came to Nicolaus de Strivelyn de Busbie; and, by his daughter and heir, to John Semple,, ;i brother of the House of Elliotston, whom, in the 1409, I have found designed; Lord ot Perthick (e). By his daughter and heiress the estate came to Sir Walter Stewart of Arthuily, son to Sir William Stewart of Castlemiik, who I see so de- signed in a charter in 1439, in the register, and another in the Lord Ross's hands. He had two daughters, the one married to William Park of that Ilk, and again to William Cunningham of Craigends, sen to Alexander first Earl of GIencairn„, (o) Ibidem, (4) Penes Hugh Crawfurd, Writer to the Signet in Edinburgh, mentioned in the Life- of Sii John Lyon of Giammis, Chamberlain, [c) Penes Daliic!. ( 83, 84 Earl of Loudon 4, 49 Earl of Lundie 35 Earl of Breadal- bane - - 5°> 84 of Glenorchy 83, 84 of Otter - 83 Gary Baron of Hunsdon 72 Viscount of Falkland i o 7 Callender of that Ilk - 51 Carnegie Earl of Southesk 21, 42, so Earl of Northesk 21 of Kinnaird 50 Caithness, Earl of - 84 Catzenel-bogen - 105 Canterbury , Archbishoprlck of 40 Carrick, Earl of - 6 Cairncross Arch, of Glasgow 39 Cadwallader King of England 95 Cameron Bishop of Glasgow 39 Caraffa, Tiberius - 23 Carmichael of that Ilk 13 Portioner of Lit- tle Blackburn - ib. Castile and Leon, King of 30, 43, 86, 87 Carron, Sir Alexander 69 Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle 1 4 Earl of Devonshire ib. Cecil Earl of Salisbury ib. Challons - 105 Chalon Prince of Orange 55 Page. 25 Charles IL K. of bastards Chatto Chaumont, Viscount of 46 Chester, Earl of 18, 59, 76 Churchill Duke of Marlbo- rough Cheyne of Duffus Chisholm Cibo Prince of Massa Clark, Sir John Clarence, Duke of Clarges, Anne Clusis, Robert de Clermont, Tallart Count of - 67 19 ib 68 72 24. 94 67 65 Clifford, Lord Earl Cumberland of Frampton Cliffords of Kent Clifton Cobham, Lord of Sterbury of Blackbury of Billockly Cochran of that Ilk Earl of Dundonald ib. Compton E. of Northampton 66 Comesing Vise, of Cozerans 9 Combet, Nicol Cornwall, Earl of - 7 Constable Vise, of Dunbar 108 Crawfurd of Loudon 3 of Cartsburn 10 of Henning 39 ■ — Abbot of Holyrood- house - - ib. Duke of Montrose 83 Crichton, Lord - 80 Cumin - - - 30 of Rowallen - 61 Earl of Buchan 79, 80 of Coulter - 79 Cunningham of Brownhill 16 D Dalrymple Earl of Stair 36 Dampetra, Lord 7, 8 Danes conquer England 88 Denmark - 84, 85 Dietz - - 105 Digby Earl of Bristol 1 5 Douglas - - 3, 53 , Earl and Duke of 3, 44, 45,52. 7'>77>79> 82 Earl of Morton 79 of Whittinpham 4 Earl of Ormond 3 Earl of Marr 45, 82 of Pitsligo 53 D.of Queensberry69,82 of Liddesdale 78 Earl of Buchan 79 — Earl of Angus 82, 83 Earl of March 80 I Page. Douglas Earl of Murray 82 Duke of Touraine Lord of Galloway Drummond, Lord of Carlowrie 82 ib. 80 16 Duniblane, Bishoprick of 40 Dunbar Earl of March 9, 80, 82 Arch, of Glasgow 39 Dunfermline, abbey of 88 Dundas of that Ilk - 3 of Newliston 36 Edward I. K. of England 7, 89 I. and II. K. of Eng- land - - . ^o II. and III. K. of England 44, 61, 91, 92, IV. and V. K. of England . . pj VI. K. of England 96 the Confessor K. of England - 61, 88 Edinburgh, Bishoprick of 40 Edgar Atheling comes to Scotland - . 88 Eiden, Jacob Van - 69 Elizabeth O. of England 34, 97 Elizabeth, Princess - 103 Elphinstone, Lord - 19 Lord Balmerino ib. England, Kings of, their vari- ous arms from 88 — 97 Erskine Earl of Marr 21,49, 52, 70,79,80, 81, 82, 85 Earl of Kelly 21, 70, 73 of Cambo 42, 71 Lord Cardross 57, 79 E. of Buchan 64, 79, 80 Lord Dirleton Vise. of Fenton - - 70 Sir Thomas 73 Evercux - - 81 Fairholme of Craigiehall 36 Falconbridge, Lord - cj Fergus I. King of Scotland 97 Ferrara, Lord of - 60 Fife, Earl of - - 76 Finch Countess of Winchelsea 72 Flacourt, Lord - ^y Flanders, Earl of 7, 29, 51, 76, Fleming . _ ^p of Biggar - 78 Earl of Wigton 49 of Barrachin 59 Forbes Lord Forbes J3 of Warterton - 18 of Tolquhon 18, jj Lord Pitsligo r 3 of Riras - ib. Forrester of Carden - 16 of Denoven ib. INDEX OF SURNAMES, ^c. Page. Foulis, Lord - 48 of CoUiiigton - 21 France, King of 30, 3 5 , 9 1 to 94 when the sons there- of differenced their amis 5,6, Frazer - 19, 30, 77 of Bro.idland - 15 of Philorth IJ, 53 Lord Lovat - 19 of Ohvevcastle 5 I Bishop of St Andrews 38 Frederick, Piiiice - 102 Fullerton of that Ilk - 14 of Crai-jhull ib. Hamilton of Wliitlaw of Bangour of Orbiston Galloway -■ — Bislioprick Garden of Leys Mr James 4 J, S2 40 ib. - 42 45' 76 11.93 Garter King at arms Garioch Gaunt, John of Genoa George St - - 61 George K. of Britain 60,101,102 Prince of Wales, now also King thereof 102 Gilford of Yester - 5 1 Glen of Inchmartin - 53 Gloucester, Duke of - 11 Gloucester, Earl and Duke of 24, 27. 95 Glasgow Bishoprick 39 Gordon M. of fiuntly 13, 52, 81 Earl of Aberdeen 69 Duke of Gordon 83 Earl of Aboyne 13, 69 Gray Lord Gray - 49 Grey of Groby - 95 Graham - - 76 E. and D. of Mon- trose - - 18, 83 of Inchbraikie 1 8 Earl of Strathern and Monteith Greig of Ballingrie Grafton, Duke of Guiles, Earl of Guthrie of tliat Ilk H. 30,85 10 25 46 49 Hall of Fulbar. - 59 Hamilton L. and D. of Ha- milton 10, 15,49,52,59,83 Earl of Arran 83 Earl of Abercorn 7 E.of Haddingtonio,64 Earl of SelkiVk 52 of Reidhouse 10 of Pries.field ib. of Ladylands ib. of Torrence ib. of Westbuin ib. Page ■5 - ib. ib. Herries of Cousland , Lord Hastings Earl of Pembroke 44 Hay Eari of Errol 13, 31, 64 of Yester Earl of Tweeddak 16, 51 Earl of Kinnoul 7 1 Viscount of Duplin ib. of Seaficld - 13 of Fuddy - - ib. , William, Bailie of Edin. 16 Henry, Prince - 81 Menneburg, Prince of 31 Henry II. King of England 89 III. & IV. 8,90,93 V. &VL 93,94 vn. 95,95 VIII. 62, 96 Hepbuni of Humbie 21 of Waujjhton ib. Herring of Gilmerton 5 — of Lethendy - ib. of Carswell - ib. Holstein _ - 85 Holland Duke of Exeter 1 1 Earl of March 5 1 Home L.andE.of Home3,2i,5i of Wcdderburn 21,51 Earl of Mardimont ib. of Alton - 53 Commendator of Jed- burgh - - 39 Hope of Cragiehall - 9 of Rankeilor ib. Houston of that Ilk 58 Howard D. of Norfolk i6, 30, 96 Earl of Suffolk 16 Earl of Berkshire 1 5 Baron of Escrick ib. Hungary, King of - 61 Huntingdon, Earl of 6, 76, 87 James I. K. of Scotland IV. VI. 87,100,: Jardine of Applegirth Innes of that Ilk Joceline de Lovaine Johnston - - _ Marq. of Annan- dale - - 19, Irvine of Drum of Kingoussie Keith Earl Marischal 19, 30, 39 of Arthurhouse - 19 Kennedy Earl of Cassilis 8 a Page. Kennedy of Ardistenshire 66 Kent, Earl of 11,85,93 Kendal, Baron of - 18, 59 Ker of Cessford - 21 of Littledean - ib. Earl of Roxburgh 57 Marquis of Lothian 64 Earl of Somerset -• 73 Kirkpatrick - - 19 of Closcburn 19, 9i>- Lancaster,Earl andDuke of 7, 1 1 12,93 Landel Lord Landel - 51 Langres, Bishop and Duke of 38 Leon . - . King of - 86 43 ,87 Laon Bishop of - Leicester, Earl of 18 38 . 59 Lennox 81 Lendon, Captain Robert 6q Lesly Earl of Rothes - 30 44 of Balquhan of Findrassie 5 "3 Lidderdale, Thomas 10 Liddel of Balbennie 48 Liddesdale 82 Linlithgow 64 Lindsay Earl of Crawford 44, 49 of Kinnettles - 50 Little of Over-Libberton 57 Livingston of Callender - 34 of Calder - 39 E. of Linlithgow 51, 57.64 London Bishoprick - 40 Long-cspee E. of Salisbury 24 Lorn - - 74, 83 Lucy, Lord " - 55 Lusitania, King of - 76 Lunenburgh - - 102 Lundin of that Ilk 10, 12 of Auchtermemy 10 of Baldester - 12 Lundic of that Ilk - 24 Lyon Lord Glammis, Earl of Strathmore - - 49 Lyle Lord Lyie - 52 M. Macartney of Auchinleck to M'Gilchrist of Northbar ib. M'Dowall of Loni - 83 MaitlandE. of Lauderdale 63, 69 Malcolm Canmore King of Scothnd - 88, 98 II. K. of Scotland 08 Malta Knights thereof Manners Ear! of Rutland INDEX OF SURNAMES, Wc. ManiKi Page. 3' Mary Queen of Scotland 34, 35, 73 of England - 3S) 96 Marr Earl of Marr 19, 44, 45, 52. 79 March, Earl of Maule Earl of Panmure 4, 9, 46, 7<5, 79 , Lord, in France 46 Abbot of Joinville 46 Archdeacon of Lothian 4 8 of Balumbie of Kelly of Boath of Melgum in Sweden and Den- mark of Guildie of InncrpefTer of Pitlivie and Ar- douny ... of Balmakelly of Balumbie March, Count de la Maxwell Ear! of Niddcsdale of Pollock of Auldhouse Mcdicis Duke of Tuscany 68 Medici, Peter - - 23 Mentz, Arch, and Elector of - - - 38 Mirandula, Prince of 60 Michael, St John of - 78 Modena, Duke of . 60 Moline, Nicolas de - 66 Montgomery E. of Eglinton 57 ■ of Lainshaw 52 Monk Duke of Albemarle 67 Montrose - . 83 Montague Earl of Sandwich 15 Monteith of Kerse - 15,19 ■5 of Millhall — , Earl of ■ MoiTtealto, William de - 48 Mortimer Earl of March 94 , Roger - 78 Mowbray Duke of Norfolk 7 1 Murray Duke of Athol - So Earl of Annandale 70 Viscountof Stormontr 21 Lord Bothwell 45, 82 of Tullibardin - 2 1 Mowat - - - 45 Monmouth, Duke of - 25 Montacute Earl of Salisbury 52 Monthermer - - ib. Mussini Earl of Senlis - 41 Mennensi - . 03 Nairn of Sandford of Scgden of Langside Page. Naiper - - - 15 of that Ilk - ib. Namur, Marquis of - 29, 76 Nassau Prince of Orange 41, 55. 105 Navarre, King of 43, 86, 92 Nevil, Richard . 52 Northumberland, Duke of 25 Norfolk, Duke of - 71 O. Ogilvie of that Ilk Ogilvie Lord Ogilvie Ogilvie Earl of Airly Ogilvie of Banff Ogilvie of Lintrathan Ogilvie of Aucherhouse - Ogilvie of Innerquharity Ogilvie of Inchmartin Ogilvie of Findlater Ogilvie of Barras Ogilvie of Boyne Oliphant Lord Oliphant - Oliphant of Cask Oliphant, Writer Oldenburg, Earl of Orange Orange, Prince of 41, 55, Palatine, Elector - 2;, Parma, Duke of Parr, Queen Parr Marq. of Northampton Pepdie of Dunglass - 21, Percy Lord Percy Percy E. of Northumberland Peverel, William Poissy, Lord of Poland, King of - 67, Polwarth Portugal, King of - 9, i Preston Lord Dingwall Preston of Formartin Prussia, King of Ramsay . . _ Ramsay of Auchterhouse Ramsay of Wyliecleugh Ramsay of Dalhousie Ramsay Vise, of Haddington Ramsay Earl of Holderness igrave, of Ranken of Orchard-head Randolph Earl of Murray 6g, Roteslakie, Baron of Rheims, Arch, and Duke of Richmond, Earl of Page. Richard I. King of England 90 Richard II. 61 Richardson Lord Cramond 70 Roet - - . II Rocceilli, Prince of - 23 Roche, Lord of - 26 Rony, Lord of - 46 Ross Earl of Ross - 30, 81 Ross Lord Ross - 58 Ross of Ballnall and Cars- creuch - - 36 Ross Bishoprick - 39, 40 Rutherford of that Ilk 50 Ruthven Earl of Gowrio 70 S. Salisbury, Earl of - 24, 72 Salisbury Bishoprick - 40 Sancti Marci, Duke of 23 Sandilands of that Ilk - 71 Sandilands Lord St John ib. Sandilands Lord Torphichen ib. Sandilands of Calder - ib. Saxony - - - 102 Saxony, Duke of - 22, 40 Saxons conquer England 80 Say, Lord - - 72 Savoy, Duke of - 66, 84 Scott Duke of Buccleugh 5 Scott of Bevelaw - ib. Scott of Sinton - 10, 16 Scott of Harden - ib. Scott of Thirleton - ib. Scott of Thirlstane - 69 Scott of Highchester - 16 Scott of Galashiels - 10 Scott of Wooll - - 16 Schomberg, Duke of - 14 Scotland, King of 87, 97 Scrymgeour - - 69 Scrymgeour Constable of Dundee - - 48 Segrave, Lord - - 31 Semple Lord Semple - 58 Seaton LordSeaton 18,35,69,85 Seaton E. of Winton 57, 64, 69, 99^ Seaton Viscount of Kingston 64 Seaton of Barns - 1 8 Seaton of Touch - 50 Seymour Duke of Somerset 73 Shaw of Sauchie - 39 Shaw of Bargarran . 59 Shaw Abbot of Paisley - 39 Shovel, Sir Cloudsly - 72 Sicily, King of 60, 87, 104 Sinclair Lord Sinclair 84,106 Sinclair Earl of Orkney 80,. 84 Sinclair of Deskford - 53 Sinclair of Roslin - 84 Sinclair of Polwarth - 2i Somerset, Duke of 3.4, 96 Somerset, Duke of Beaufort 12, 26 INDEX OF SURNAMES, \s< Page. Somerset Earl of Worcester Soulis, Lord Spain, King of 9, 35, 84, Spar - . - Spence of Wormiston Spigelberg, Earl of Spruel ... Strathern - - 30, Strathern, Earl of Stanhope, Sir Edward Stephen King of England Stewart - - 30, Stewart, King Robert Stewart Earl of Murray 12, Stewart D. of Richmond 12, Stewart Duke of Berwick Stewart Earl of Strathern Stewart Earl of Buchan 45, 66, 79, Stewart Duke of Albany 45, Stewart Earl of Traquair Stewart Lord Loni 50, 79, Stewart E. and D. of Lennox and Richmond 66, 79, Stewart Earl of Athol 78, Stewart E. of Caithness Stewart E. of Angus Stewart E. of Monteith Stewart E. of March Stewart E. of Marr Stewart E. of Fife Stewart Lord Brechin Stewart Lord Darnly 81, Stewart Lord Doune Stewart of Appin Stewart of Bonkill Stewart of Innermeth Strachan of Carmylie Suabia - - 60, 87, i Suffolk, Duke of Sussex, Earl of Surrey, Duke of Sutherland, Earl of Sutherland of Duffus Sutherland of Torboll Swinford, Sir Otes Sweden, King of 84,85 T. Torotte, Lord Torquati Tour, Count de la Treves, Archbishop of Turnbull Bishop of Ross U. Uarbon, Peter LTdney of that Ilk Udney of Auchterallan Udney of Coultercallan Urre Vol. II. Page. V. Valoins Lord Panmure Vendosnie Verinandois, Count Vere E. of Oxford D. of he- land Vianden - - i Villiers D. of Buckingham Villeroy, Duke of Viles of Ferrara Venice . . - Voisins, Lord - 46, Voyer de Poullny W. Wacken, Baron of Wallace of Ellerslie \\'al!ace of Craigie Walker WalJrum Waller of Gromebridge Warwick Warwick, E. and D. of 52 Wemyss E. of Wemyss Wemyss of Rires Wernegeroda, Earl of Widvill Earl of Rivers William the Lion K. of Scot land - - 84 William the Conqueror of England William II. of England Winton Wishart Worcester Earl of - 12 Wood of Largo Wood of Balbegno Worcester, Bishoprick - Wosemale, Baron of Young, Peter . . 66 York, D.of 7, 51, 52,85,94, 103 Alphahetical Index of the Figures and Terms of Blazon, Part III. ABATEMENTS of honour 28 Annulet - - - 15 Arms, a definition of them i, 2 Arms, Lyon King of, an act in his favour . . 2 Arms, how differenced - ib. Arms composed - 19 Arms of bastards, an act there- anent - - - 24 Arms, how to compose and marshall - - 29 Arms on account of marriages and othccs - - 32 Arms, how women ought to carry tlicm - - 33 Arms on account of offices and employment - 37 Arms of alliances - 42 Arms of adoption and substi- tution " " 5? Arms, with an act hcreanent 54 Arms of prescription, custom, and statute of certain places 5 7 Arms of patronage - 58 Arms of gratitude and affec- tion - - -Co Arms of religion - 61 Arms, general and special con- cessions of arms - 63 Arms feudal, or arms of dig- B. Badges of Britain, France and Ireland - - 100 Bastardy marks thereof 24 to 28 Bastard bar - - 25 Batton ... a Bishops' arms do not descend 62 Bordure - - 9 to 13 Cadency, marks thereof i to 29 Cheveron - - 13 Churchmen's arms - 20, 37 Cross - - - 100 Dignities, arms of - 74 Dominion, arms of - 80 Ente or ingrafting 104, 106 F. Fesse - - 105 Feudal arms - 74 Flower-de-luce - i ir Genealogical Pennon 107 H. Heralds - - - 42 INDEX OF SURNAMES, i^c Page. ingrafting Lambel or Label 6, 7, Lyon King at Arms, an ac in his favour M. Marshalling Marshalling by coupe and parti - - - 107 Minute differences - 14 104 Page. Partitions for marshalhng of arms - - 104 Parted per pale - - 20 Pale ... ,05 Pretension, arms of - 84 Quartering arms - 20, 42 S. Sahier, parted per - 104 Seals, of ancient ones 29, .^o, 3 1, 33. 34. 35.48, 5'. 75. 87. 89 Seals of the Kings of Engbnd 89 to 98 Seals of the Kings of Scotland 98 Seals of the Kings of Britain 99, 100 Standards of Scotland and England - - loi Tiercing - - 106 Tinctures, anent altering them 3 ,4 Tressure, double 60, 6^, 98 Union arms of Scotland and England - - i Women, their honour 33, 72 Tbe Contents of the Chapters, Part III. CHAP. L of additional figures, or marks of cadency 1 Chap. IL of composing and marshalling of arms - 29. INDEX OF THE SURNAMES, COUNTRIES, FAMILIES AND PERSONS, WHOSE ARMS ARE MENTIONED IN MR NISBET'S STSTEAL OF HERALDRY, PART IF. fr ' 't fr8<' Page. ABBEY of Paisley 59 Abbey of Holyrood- house - ib. Abercromby - - 21 Abercromby of Glassoch ib. Abercromby, Lord of 179^ 187 Achaius K. of Scotd. 40, 1 05, 1 20 Adrian IV., Pope - 60 Ayton of that Ilk - 21 Albert Archduke of Austria 5 8 Alexander the Great - 10 Alexander King of Scotland 62 Alexander II. 12, 28, 31 Alexander III. 41,106 Alexander Earl of Stirling 22 Alexander of Boghall - ib. Allan of Galloway, Constable of Scotland - ij Andrew, Commendatorof Jed- burgh . - - 59 Angus, Earl of - 12, 45 Anne Queen of Britain 53 Anne Queen - - 109 Anjou, Duke of - 23 Ancrum, Earl of 1 76, 1 84 Apollo - - 53 Archbishoprickof St Andrews 58 Archbishop of St Andrews 58,61 Archbishop of Canterbury 61 Argyle, Duke of 20, 6^ Armenia, King of - . 23 Arbuthnot Viscount of Ar- buthnot - - 21 Arbuthnot of Fiddes ib. Arbuthnot of Findowrie ib. Athol, Earl of - 33, 46 Austria, Archduke of - 39 Aurelian the Emperor - 37 Aventinus - - 10 Bavaria, Duke of Baliol, John, K. of Scotland ';4 Balfour of that Ilk 18 Bahraves of Carnbody 22 Barclay of Towie 32 Basa ■iO Bannerman of Elsick - «3 Bargeny, Lord of '79 Reatson of Kilrie 21 Beaufort D. of Somerset 37 Beaufort, Henry W Beauchamp of Kiddermmster 49. Bethune of Balfour 18 Beaton, Cardinal 3'; Bourbon in France 20 23 , Duke of 24 .25 Page. Borthwick Lord Borthwick 35 , Lord of - 177 Bohemia, King of - 39 Bonkill - - - 21 Brandenburg, Duke of - 3 Brissonius, President of the Parliament of Paris 6n Brunswick, Duke of 3 IQ Bruce Earl of Elgin 19 33 of Skelton IQ of Airtli 33 ib. , King Robert - TOf) Burgh Earl of Ulster 2(5 Buckingham, Edward Bagot Duke of 66 Burgundy, D. of 7, 24, 25 31 Burnet - - - 66 Cad wallader K. of England 26, 3 6 Catti ... 21 Castile and Leon, King of Cathcart Lord Cathcart Carnegie Earl of Southesk Earl of Northesk Campi in Placenza - 21 Calder of Liniger - 21 Carey Viscount of Falkland 33 INBLX OF SURNAMES, l3\ Cnmpbell Duke (if Argyle _^4 Carmichael E.irl of Hyndford ib. Cannse, battle of - 54 Cardinals' Habit - 57 Cardinal Ricblieii - ;S, 60 CamillcdeNcuvilledoVillc- roy Arclibishop and Earl of Lyons - - 5S Canterbury, Archbishop of Oi Cameron,. John, Bishop of Glasgow - - 5S Cardinal W-azarine - 60 Carron, Sir Alexander 84 Cardross, Lord of - 178 Cecil, William, L. Burleigh 53 Chancellors of France - 19 Charles VI. K. of France 35, 36 VII. 42 II. K. of Britain 42, 43 I. 6s, 67 60 Chester, Earl of 46 Childeric King of France 146 Christians - II Clanchatton 23 Clare Earl of Gloucester 26 Clarence, Duke of - 38 44 Clara Eugenia Infanta of Spain 5 8 Cockburn of that Ilk - 19 Colonni - - - II Colouna •9 Constantine, Emperor 24,3 7, 122 60 Conqueror of Frierton - 21 Combauld, Lewis of - 137 Comte de Cosse 65. Corvinus, Marcus 10 Cornwall, E. and D. of 44 ,46 Cranston of that Ilk 3" Craniond, Lord of 178, 187 Crawfurd 22 „e 1 — ,1 — i,:n ib. of Filbimic ib. , Archibald, Abbot of Holyroodhouse 59 Craw of Heugh-head >9 Crichton Earl of Dumfries 33 Cromwell, Oliver 60 Cunningham E. of Glencairn 18, Cumin, John il Earl of Buchan ^i Cuming Constable of Scotland 6<> Cupar, Lord of - 178, 186 Cyprus, King of 41 Cyrus's Grave 146 Dalmahoy of that Ilk 32, 65 Dalziel of Carnwath 18,139 Dauphin of France - 41 of Vienne - 42 David I. K. of Scotland 1 2 Denmark, K. of - 79 Page. Denia town and castle thcre- •of in Spain - - 53 Deskford, Lord of 177, L85 Douglas E. and D. of 1 2, 23, 3 i, 33. 3». '33 , Sir James - 1 2 of Rcilliousc - 32 Earl of Marr - 1 2 Earl of March 34 Earl of Morton - 33 Dukeof Oueensberry 34 of Cavers - 2 1 , Archibald E. of 56, 108 Drummond E. of Perth 25, 33, 38. 134 Lord Madcrty 33 of Hnthornden 2 1 of Blair - ib. of Innermay - ib. Dunbar, Earl of 14, 19, 31 of Wcstfield - 32 Dundas of that Ilk 20, 25, 32, 34 Duirbar, Earl of - 67 Dumbarton, Earl of 176, 184 Durham, Bishop of - 46 Duplin, Viscount of 177, 1 86 Edgar of Wadderly - 32 Edinburgh - - 73 a tournament tlicre 28 Edward Ironside K. of Engd. 39 III. and IV. K. of Eng- land 13, 24, 26, 34, 36, 44 III. King of England 55 VI. ib. , Prince - ib. V. & VI. Kings of England - 36, 40 Egebert K. of England 39 Elphinston Lord Balmerino 21 Lord Elphinston 33 of Craighousc 22 Ely, Bishop of - - 46 Emperor's Crest - )6 and cry of war 24 England, Kings of, their crest 16 their device - 25 tlieir cry of war 23 their supporters 35 their crown 39 Evrol, Earl of - 67, 63 Erskine Earl of Marr 34 Earl of Kelly 30, 47 Viscount of Fenton 47 , Sir Alexander of Cambo - - 66 Eymouth, Lord of 179, 188 Fabius Maximus - 54 Farquharson of Invercauld 32 Felix in Piedmont '- 2J Fergus I. King of Scotland 40 Fierlundtz, Simon de 4 Fiery cross 24 Fife, Malcolm Far! of 67 Findl.iter, Favl of 1 -■- Fisher 42 Flanders, Earl of 7, 14, 24 31 Fothcringham of Powric 30, 32 Forbes Lord Forbes 34 Forrester 22 Lord Forrester 16 Forfar, Earl of - 176, 84, France, Kings of, their crest 16 23 their device 24 »35 ti.eir crown 3'> Francis I. King cf France ^> Frazer, William, Archbishop of St Andrews ss Frederick I. Emperor 60 III. Emperor 24 Fullarton of tliat Ilk 32 Garter, the Order the Gaunt, John of George King of Britain 1 1, German Emperors crown Gloucester, Duke of Glasgow, Bishoprick thereof Glassford, Lord of 180, i Gordon of that Ilk , Duke of Graham Earl of Monteith of Nctherncss Grant . - - of that Ilk Grand Signior Gray Lord Gray - 21, Greeks - . - Grimaldi Prince of INIonaco Guise, Duke of I-l. Haddington, Earl of I Inig of Bemerside Halyburton of Pitcu Hamilton, Duke of Hannibal Ilainault, Count Hay Earl of Errol Hay Constable of Scotland Henry IL King of France III. K. of England VL VII. 25, 26, 28: VIII. 26,36,40, 56. 3°. INDEX OF SURNAMES, b\ Page. Ilenvy IV. V. VI. VII. and VIII. Kings of England - 36 Hercules - - - 10 Henies, Lord - - 33 Holyroodhouse Abbey 11, 3 i Homager Kings - 54 Home E. of Home 16, 18, 23, Earl of Marchmont 33 of Wedderburn 1 8, 20, 3 2 Hotman - - 24 Howard Duke of Norfolk 1 7 Earl of Surrey - ib. J.imes I. K. of Scotland 25, 51, 64, 65 30,40,42,68 40,59 28, 33,40 56, 64, 107, 1 10 II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. 111,36,65 Jardine of Applegirth 19 Jedburgh, Lord of 178, 186 24 John King of England Johnston M. of Annandale 1 9, 22, 34 lolus - - - 54 Jove - - ib. Julius Caesar - - 10 Jupiter Animon - ib. Innes of that Ilk - 20, 32 Irvine of Drum - 30,32 Keith Earl Marischall 16 Earl of Kintore 34 Kenmure, Viscount of 33 Ker E. and M. of Lothian 16, 35 Earl of Roxburgh ib. 33 Kirkpatrick of Closeburn 18, 32 Kinnaird, Lord - 33 Kinderton, Baron of -51 ICinnoul, Earl of 177, 186 Kirkcudbright, Lord of 1 79, 1 87 Lancaster, E. and D. of 25, 26,44, Lauderdale, E. and D. ot Lauder of Fountainhall Leicester Trotius Lennox, Duke of Leslie E.irl of Ross Earl of Leven Earl of Rothes — , Alexander 7. 15. 46, 55 18,139 22 60 24,63 31 34 ib. Page. Lyons, Arch, and E. thereof 58 Livingston E. of Linlithgow 16 Viscount of Teviot 34 Lockhart, Sir William 60 Macfarlane of that Ilk 1 34 Mackenzie - - 23 M. of Seaforth 21,33 Earl of Cromarty ib. M'DuffEarlof Fife - 7 M'Dowall Baron of Lodvica M'Kay Lord Rae 21, 34 W'lntosh of that Ilk 2 1 M'Pherson - - ib. Maderty, Lord of - 178 Maleanus, Lodovick 3 1 Malcolm M'Kenneth King 50 Malcolm II. K. of Scotland 61 Malcolm Canmore K. of Scot- land - 61, 64, 67 IL and III. Kings of Scotland - 45 March, Earl of 1 4, 1 9, 26, 3 1 , 3 8 Man- Earl of Marr 12,31 Martyr - - - 24 Mars - - - 10 Mary Queen of England 26, 36 Maud Queen of England 39 Maule Earl of Panmure 34 Maxwell Lord Maxwell 22 of Pollock - 32 Maximilian II. Emperor ctf Germany Mazarine, Cardinal Melville, Earl of 16, 176, 184 Milan, Duke of - 23 Minerva - - 10 Moodie, Captain J Monteith, John Ci of , Earl of Montrose, Earl of g, E. - 65 176, 184 67 Montmorency, Lord of 24, 35 Moncrief of that Ilk 30, 32 Montgomery, Earl of - 5 Earl of Eglinton 34 of Lainshiw ^ 2 Monypenny of Pitmilly 42 Mortimer, Roger - 26 Morville Constableof Scotland 6g Moses - - - 55 Mowbray Earl of Nottingham 15 Earl Marshall ib. D. of Norfolk '5-17 25, 30 Mowat of Easter-Foulis 3 1 Murray, Randolph Earl of 14 Earl of Annandale 34 Earl of Tuilibardin ib. Viscountof Stormont ib. of Touchadam 3 2 of Polmaise ib. Page. Murray, Andrew, Governor of Scotland - - 65 My-pont in Burgundy 21 34 N. Naples Naves - - - 22 Nevers - - - 20 Newark, Lord of 179, 188 Nisbet of Dean - 32 77 Ochiltree, Lord of Ogilvie of Barras - 22 Earl of Find later 33 of Innerquharity 134 Oliphant Lord Oliphant 34 Olympus, Mount - 54 Oxenford, Viscount of 177, 186 Palatine of the Rhine Patriarch, Roman 56, Perth, Earl of - 25, Philip II. King of Spain Phocas Emperor of Rome Pitcur, Laird of Poland, King of Pollock of that Ilk Pope's arms Pope of Rome Julius II. Innocent IV. Adrian IV. Sixtus Quintus i John - - ( Preston of Craigmiller 1 8, ; Proteus - - - 1 Protest taken by William Wil- son upon delivering up the Regalia - - ^ Quincy Earl of Winchester 15 Randolph Earl of Murray 14, 3 1 Ramsay Viscount of Hadding- ton, Earl of Holderness 18, 22, 33>47 Richard I. King of England :2 II. and III. 26, 36, 40 II. King of England, the first that erected a ba- ron by patent 49, 50 INDEX OF SURNAMES, "dc. Page. Richlieu, Cardinal 58, 60 Ribcauniont, Eustache dc 49 Robert Bruce K. of Scotland 14, 40, j8, 65, 68, io6 Robertson of Stnian 135 Robert II. and III. Kings of Scotland 31,33,42,108 Rochhead of Craigleith and Innerleith ■ - J 9 Roderico Fernando Bishop of Jaen - - 59 RollandjConstabkof Scotland 14 Romans - - 53 Roman Emperors' Apotheosis 54 Roman Patriarch - 60 Roman Diadem - 37 Romans, King of 7, 39 Ross L. and E. of Ross 19, 31 Rothes, Earl of - 22 his funeral - 147 Ruglen, Earl of 176,185 Ruthven Earl of Gowrie 34 Rutherford, Lord o£ 179,187 Sardinia, King of - 41 Savoy, Duke of 25, 41 Saxony, Duke of - 8 Shaw, Geo., Abbot of Paisley 59 of Sauchie 59, 81 Scotland, Kings of, their crest 16 , arms of - 141 cry of war - 23 device - 24 supporters 34 crown - 39 18, 80 19, 22 12, 22 Scott of Thirlestane D. of Buccleugh Scrymgeour of Dudop ScrymgeourConstableof Dun- dee - - - 83 Seafield, Earl of 177,185 Seaforth, Marquis of 21 Seaton - - 15,110 Earl of Winton 15,23, 32, 38, 46 E. of Dunfermline 16, 34 of Touch - 1 9 Segnies Chancellor of France 62 Seignior, Grand - 54 Selkirk, Earl of 176,185 Sinclair - - - 14 of Herdmanston ib. Skene of that Ilk - 32 Solway, Eari of - 185 Somerset, Earl and Duke of 25 Somervel Lord Somervel 18, 32 of Cambusnethan 3 1 Southesk, Earl of 6^, 8 1 Soulis, Lord - - 65 Spain, King of - 33, 39 Spynie, Lord of - 178 St Andrews, Archbishop of 5 8,6 1 Stewarts, family of - 64 Vol.. u. Steward of Scotland Stewart - - - Earl of Carrick Earl of Lennox Earl of Athol Earl of Buchan 1 7 E.of Galloway 17,21 Earl of Fife and D. of Albany - 17,44 Earl of Murray 1 7 Lord Ochiltree Earl of Traqualr of Phisgall Lord Kyle Lord Blantyre Duke of Rotlisay Strathern, Earl of 31, Page. 65 de 46 Strachan, Comes Palat Str.ithmore, Earl of - 18 Sturton Lord Sturton 19 Sutherland, Earl of 12,21,33 Sweden, King of 38, 39 T. Tercys, Arch, of Tarragon 23 Thcbans - - 54 Teviot, Viscount of 177, 186 Thoulouse, Counts of 19 Tristan de Saladzes Arch- bishop of Sens - 59 Tuscany, Duke of - 41 Touraine, Archibald Duke of 56 Tweeddale, Marquis of 20 Ulster, Earl of Ursini in Italy 26, 38 19.34 Valois, Duke of - 43 Vandeput - ■ - 42 Venice, Doge of - 41 Vere Marquis of Dublin 45 Earl of Oxford 2 1 Wallace, Sir WiUiain 12 Wales, Prince of 13, 42 Watson of Sauchton 22 Wemyss Earl of Wemyss 16 William King of Scotland 14 the Conqueror 39, 50 II. King of England 39 Wimbry Lord Talboys 5 i Winchester, Earl of - 15 Winton, Earl of 65, 139 Wood of Craigie - 32 Page. Widvillc Earl Rivers 37,40 Wood, Andrew, of L.irgo 77 Y. York, Duke of 25, 42 Zingi Emperor - 1 1 Index of the Figures and Terms of Blazon in Mr Nisbet's System of He- raldry, Part IV. ABBOTS - - 58 Abbesses - - - 59 Abatements of honour 128 Acorns - . . 54 Admiral of France - 58 of England 76, 78 of Scotland 78 badge of the office 78 Affronte - - 58,66 Almoner - - 66 Anchors - - 58 Angels - 57, 58, 59 St Andrew - - 58 St Andrew's cross - 66 Archbishops - - 58 Adantides - - 27 Achievement royal of France under a pavilion 140,141 Achievement of Scotland 141 Baron ... 48 spiritual and temporal, by tenure,by writ, by patent 49 to 53 manner of erecting one by patent 50, 52, 53 his robes, title, privi- lege, and coronet 50, 53 eldest son has no par- ticular title - ib. called tilulati in Na- ples and Lombardy 49 majores and minores 49, 5°. 5'. 61 of the cinque ports and exchequer - 51 coronetjsignaturethere- anent - - 51 Banner of the church 57 Badge of office 57, 58, 62, 63, 64, 65,66,78 INDEX OF SURNAMES, l^c. Page. Batton - 64, 65, 66 Buttelarius - - 65 Banners - 80, 81 Badges - - - 11 of dignified offices in the empire - - 80 of cup-bearer in Scot- land ... 81 of knighthood 8j, 92, loi, 103 of the usher to the or- der of the thistle up of knights bannerets 122 of knights baronets 123 124. 125 of the order of the crescent - - 130 of the knights of Malta - - 131 of the knights d'Avis 132 Baptism of Prince Henry 1 51 Black hangings - 146 Bonnet . - - jj Buttoned - - - 62 Cartouches Casque Canting arms Cap, baron's Cap of State Cap, ducal Cartouch oval Cardinal's hat cloa^hing 26 47.56 55 ib. 56 57.59 ib. creation and prece- dency - 57, 59, 60 Cavalcades - - 150 Capelines . . 7 Chnplet of pearls 49, 5 1 Chapeau - - 55, ^6 Cheveron • - j8 Churchmen's precedency 169 Chaplet of flowers - 59 Chanters - lb. Cherubims ib. Chancellor of Britain and Scotland _ 61 -; his oflice, pnvi- leges, and precedency 61, 62 ^ of France 62 his cap, crest, and mantle - - ib. Chamberlain of France ib. of England ib. his office, power and privileges - ib. ' of Scot.,lusotfice 63 fees and prece- dency - 62, ^4 Chief Justice of England 63 Cinque ports, barons of 5 1 Clareiicieux - - 5^ . ■',-■, kijig at arms 165 Couche shields Contourne Cottises ... Coronet, viscount's Coronet, baron's Count palatines Coronet, baron's, king's sig- nature thcreanent Coronets of the nobility, the circles all of one form Coronet of a lord in France Corona muralis, castrensis, navalis, triumphalis, ova- lis, obsidialis, civica,oliva- lis, populea Cordelier - - 1 Compartment their orig'mal 135 140 Comble Coronation of the kings of Scotland '5° Commonwealths, their pre- cedency - - 169 Cord knotted of abbots 59 Composition - - 60 Commanders of religious or- ders - - . ib. Cordeliere - - ib. Court of king's bench 63 exchequer in Scotland and England - 64 Constable, Lord High 66 Comes Stabuli - ib. Constable's report anent his privileges - - 6c) badge of his office in England - - 69 in Scotland ib. in France ib. Crosier - - 5S, 59 Crown of thorns - 59 Crest of cimier 3, 10 to 21 Cries of war - - 23 Crowns and coronets 37 to 48 Crown of Scotland - 40 Creation of Viscounts 47 of Barons 49, jo, 52 Crowns, their origin from the Romans - - 53 Crest - - 53,55 Crown open or antique 54 , Turkish - ib. of Doge of Venice ib. Crest of England - 55 Crown, papal - - 56 Cross-staff - 58, 66 Creation of the Marquisses of Hamilton and Huntly 162 Crown, the Lyon King at Arms - - 166 Curtains - - 140 Deans Diadems Diademate Disposed in saltier Dukes their creation their 1 Dux or Duke Dukes Page. 59 37 ib. 6s, 66 44 ib. - 45 55 60 Earl - - 45>46 Ecclesiastics inferior 59 Elder sons of nobility, their titles - - 47 Emperors, their precedency 168 Ensigned - 64, 65 Erection of a baron by pa- tent 48,49,50,51,52 Ermine - 51, 56, 62 Escutcheon - 142 women's 145 Exterior ornaments i, 2 Exchequer, Barons of 5I) 64 , Court thereof, in Scotland and England 64 Familiar counsellor - 64. Feuilles - - - 7 Fiery cross - - 23 Fiery chapel - 146 Forester, the King's, in Scab land . - -66 Fretted - - 62 Funeral belt r 146 G. Garlands of laurel - 37 Garter, King at Arms 48, 5 1 53. 165 Garland " " 53 Gentility, its rise and perfec- tion - - 122, 142 Grass - - - 54 Green hat - - 58 H. Hachemcnts - 7 Hat - - 55 ~. — red one of the cardi- nals - - 57, 58 green of Archbishops and Bishops - 58 black of abbots - 59 of piothonotaries ib. Helmets - 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 Helmet - - 53, SS INDEX OF SURNAMES, b-c. r. Heralds, their rise, privileges, &c. society in England in Scotland Hiked Highlander Hood Viscount's Baron's - -, Horns . . - Holy Ghost, order thereof Hooked heads Household, master of, in Scot land - r - in England Hounds, grey Hunting horns I. Imperial crown - 38 Images carried at funerals 147 Jove - - 54 Joustlngs - - 2, 28 Justice-General of Scotland 63 his jurisdiction and court - - 64 ~- ■- of Argyle,and the Isles - - ib. Keys - - 57,63 Keeper of the Great Seal 61 King's thane - - 49 King at Arms, Garter, 48, 51, 53 King's Bench - - 63 Kirtle . . - 137 Kings, their precedency 168 Knotted cord " - 59 Knight Marischal in Scotland 73 Krighthood - - 82 Knights, Roman - 83 •^ Christian - 82 MonozOiis - S3 Baccalaurei - ib. Baiini-rcts - ib. of St Michael 85 of the Holy Ghost 86 of the Golden Fleece 88 of the Round Table 90 of the Garter ib. of the Bach 102 of the Thistle 104 Baronets in England 103 Bannerets in Scot>83 Pendant 58,62 Petit Oris 62 Pilgrim's bourdon 59 Pope's bull - 56 shield lb. crown 57 keys . ib. supporters ib. Pommelled 64 Portcullis pursuivant 25 Powdered 64,65 Precedency 168 Prxfectus Prxtorii - 64 President of tlie Parliament in France 62 by cap and m .ntle ib. Priors and provosts 59 Primates 58 Privileges of Viscoiuit 48 Processions 150 Professors of sciences. their precedency 172 Proiile - 58 Prothonotaries 59,60 Purse, Chancellor's 62 R. Radiant crown 37 Rebuses - i/i INDEX OF SURNAMES, ^c. • ■ Page. Red hat - - 57> 5^ Regne or triple crown 57 Regalia of Scotland 1 89 Return of the Lords of Ses- sion ancnt t\e Peerage of Scotland - - 173 Riding tlie Scots Parliament 161 Rings - - - i8 Robes of a Viscount 48 of a Baron 49, 50, 52 Rochet - 57 Roll of the Peers of Scot- land - - 175, 183 Romans, origin of crowns in arms from them - 53 Royal Order of France 58 crowns - 39 Rouge dragon pursuivant 26 Salmon . . j8 Saltier-ways 57, 58, 62, 63, 64 65, 66, 67 Scots Cowl - - 55 Seals 12, to 18, 30 to 33 of the Kings of Eng- land - - SS Archibald E. of Doug- las - - - 56 John Duke of Albany 56 of the Order of Knight- hood - 86, 88, 89, 96 S6 Seal of the Pope ■ Archbishop of St An- drews - - 58 Bishop of Glasgow ib. James Lord- Hamilton 79 of Andrew Commenda- tor of Jedburgh 59 Senescallus - - 65 Seme . - - 66 Shield, of the - - J Signature ancnt a Baron's co- Slughorns - - 23 Spiritual Barons 49, 50, 51 Staff 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 64, 65 Standish - - 65 Statutes of the Order of the Thistle - 112,220 Sterns of ships or gallies 53 Supporters - 12,27 Supporters, the Pope's 57 Page. Suppressed - - 64 Surcoat, Viscount's - 48 Sword - - 64 Symbola administrationis 61 Tassels - 58,59,60,61 Tasselled - - 62 Telamones - - 27 Temporal Barons 48 to 53 Tenents - - - 27 Thane - - 48, 49 Thane, King's - ib. Thistles - 64, 65, 66 Thimbrum or tymbrum 10 Tiara papalis - - 56 Timbre - 2, 3, 4, 1 1 Titles of the elder sons of the nobiUty only by courtesy 47 Barons' eldest son has no particular one - ib. of a Viscount - ib. Title of Baron is general to all Lords of Parliament 49 Titulati Barons, called so in Naples and Lombardy ib. Torce - - 9) 53 Tournaments 2, 3, 1 1, 28, 29, 38 Traverses - S7> 5^ Treasurer of England 65, 66 of Scotland ib. Trefoils - - 57 Trimmings - i Trinoda necessitas - 49 Turban - - - 54 Tournaments - 135, 136 Valvasores, majores and mi- nores - - - 49 Veneur, Grand, in France 66 Verge - - - 49 Viscounts, their coronets, titles and privileges, robes and creation - 47 Viscount - - 46 Volets ... 8 Voles - - - 13 Z w. War, cries of Women their precedency 172 Wreaths - 54, 55 Wreath - . 9, 10 23,24 The Contents of the Chapters^ Part IV. CHAP. I. concerning the ex- terior ornaments of the shield, with several addi- tional trimmings - i Chap. n. of the helmet or casque . . . , Chap. in. of the ornaments of the helmet called man- tlings, lambrequins, hache- ments, volets, &c. 6 Chap. IV. of the wreath or torce . . . p Chap. V. of the crest or cimier i o Chap. VI. mottos, cries of war, and devices - - 20 Chap. VII. of supporters 27 Chap. VIII. of diadems and crowns, their ancient and modern forms - oy Chap. IX. of the cap of State 55 Chap. X. of ensigns belonging to Ecclesiastical dignities 56 Chap. XI. ensigns of civil and military offices, and other politic offices of dignity and chivalry - . gj Chap. XII. of the compart- ment - - 133 Chap. XIII. of manteauxes and pavilions - 13(5 Chap. XIV. of nobility, with its proofs regularly count- ed as they are placed on funeral escutcheons, &c. 142 Chap. XV. of Cavalcades and public processions 150 Chap. XVI. of the office of heralds - - 164 Chap. XVII. of precedency 168 INDEX OF SURNAMES, \£c. THE CONTENTS OF THE PARTICULylR FAMILIES IFHOSE GENEALOGT IS INSERTED IN THIS APPENDIX. Page. KEITH, Earl Marischal i Keith Earl of Kiiitore lo Dumlas of that Ilk, with the cadets thereof 1 1 to 17 Foulis of Colliiigton 17 Chalmers of G litgirth 19 Mowbray of Barnbougle 21 Moo(iie of Melsetter 22 Ross of Craii,!e - 23 Spreul of Cowden - 24 Farquharson of Invrrcauld ib. Whiteford of Ulairquhan 25 Griham of Balj^owan ib. Kinloch of that Hk ib. Mackenzie of Garloch 27 Melvilio Earl .-^f MdviUe 28 . Moncrief of that Ilk 29 G^Tord of Busta - 30 AVcmyss Earl of Wemyss 3.1 Hamilton of Olivestob 36 Kennedy Earl of Cassilis ib. Kennedy of Bennen 38 Kennedy of Balmaclanachan ib. Kennedy of Glenmuck and Bellimore - - 39 Millar of Temple ib. Cunningham E. of Glencairn 40 Macintosh of that Ilk 43 ■ Scrymgeour of Diidop 46 Stewart of Phisgall - 49 M'Dowall of Freugh 50 Douglas of Bonjedward and Tympyndean - 54 Scott of rhirlestane 55 Cumin of Coulter - 56 Inglis of Sc L-^onards 57 Ma.farl?nc of that Ilk 58 •Anstruther of that Ilk 61 Birnie of that Ilk - . 65 - Irvine of Drum 66 Pringle or ! '.on-Pringle of Ga- lashiels and Whitebank 68 Page. 69 73 75 78 79 Horn, surname of S..mcrvillo L. Somer^Mlle Sfwart of Ar.lvorlich Chancellor of Shiekdiill Macfarlanc of Kirkton Arbuthnot V. of Arbuthnot 80 Petrie, surname of 87 Crawfurd of Auchinamcs ^ 88 Hope of Craighall 91 Fergusson ot Craigdarroch ib. Lawson of Humbie - 92 Lawson of Heiriga, Lnchtul- loch, Boghall, aud Cambo 93 9S 98 Lawson of Ca' M'Dowall of Logan Kelso of that Ilk - 102 Copland of Collieston 103 Corthwick L. Borthwick 104 Fvazer Lord Lovat 107 Moray of Abercairny - iio Corsan of Meikleknox 112 Chalmers of Balnecraig znA Cults - - 114 Sibbald of Balgony, and Lun- din of Balgony, now repre- sented byLun«lin of Drum 1 19 Abercromby of Birkenbog i 22 Meldrum, family of , Scott of Balwyne ' Baillie of Lamington j Hay of Ranfield and Inch- nock Lockhart of Cleghorn ; Charteris of Amisfield I Leslie of Findrassie ■ Banneriiian of that Ilk ] Renton, Sir Thomas I Roberton of that Ilk, and of I Earnock Stewart of Lorn and Grand- tully Pago. Edraonstone, particularly of Duntreath - - ijj Stewart ot Burr, iy - 161 St Clair of Koslin 163 Campbell ol SKerrington 166 Atliol, the Earls, Marquisscs, and Dukes of 167 to 202 Stormunt, Viscount of 202 Rutherford Lo-.l Rutherford, and Karl of leviot 209 Campbell ot Gleiiorchy, now Earl of Breailalbane 21 1 Shuikot that Ilk - 219 Gordon ol Goidoivbank 220 OgiUy of Barr,is - ib. C.ilder, fannly of - 229 Botliwell, Lord Holyrood- house - 233 De Berkeley, family of, or Barclay, formerly of Ma- thers - - 236 Carnegie of Ballindarg 242 Mcuzicsof thatllkjorotWeemib. Vans ot Barnbaroch 248 M'Dowall of Freugh 250 Muirhead of Lachop 256 Dundas of Fmgask 267 Urquhart of Cromarty and Meldrum - - 273 Sonierville of Camnethan 276 Scott of Horslinill - 279 Scott of Scotstarvet ib. Scott of Es'vdale & Houpay- slay, now of rhirlestane 286 Cumungham of Bandalloch 288 Edmonswne of Duntreath 290 Garthshore of that Ilk 291 Shaws of Hayley and Sorn- bcg - - - 292 Riddel of that Ilk - 294 (NDEX OF SURNAMES, ^c. INDEX TO THE REMARKS ON THE RAGMAN-ROLL. Page. A. ALEXANDER de Aber- nediy - - I5> 20 Henry Epis. Aberdeen 17 CoiTuiiuiiitas Villae dc Aber- deen ... 26 Nicol de Achethlec 41 Alexander de Airth 2-; Alysandre Aikmaii - 38 Richard de Ainli - 34 Johan.le Fitz, Johan. de Ain. sley - - 32 Alsyndure de Allardyss 45 Comes de Angus - 6 Johannes I'riorde St Andrerc 15 Jlcnricus de Anstruther ib. CJilbertus Comes de Angus 18 imon de Oriock Ilewc de Oir Waltcrus Abbas de Paslyth 27 Community of Perth 16 Piers de Pitcairn - 38 Nicol de Preston - 34 Ralstoun Tho. Randulphi Dom. Adam de Ratrief Gervasius de Rate Thomas de Ralphiston lamsay: John and Adam de Robert de Ramsay Thomas de Ramsay HtiRo de Riddel Williel. de Rothein Robertas Epis. de Ross Jacobus filius Godofredi de Ross, sen. and jun. Andreas filius Godofredi de William de Ross Robert de Ross Sir William de Rothwen Ancirew Fitz Godofrede dc Page. D. Williel. de Ruthven 19 D. Nicolaus de Rutherford 23 Aylmcr de Rutherford 32 Robert Russel - - 43 Nicol de Rutherford ib. Michael Scott - - 14 Thomas Abbas de Scoon 1 7 Richard le Scott de Murthock- 3° William de Schaw Fergus del Schaw - 46 Alisandre Scott de Pcrthick 48 Senescal de Jedwith - 2 James, Great Steward of Scot-- land, or Senescallus Scotis 5., 9. '8 Johannes Senescalli 11,18 Jacobus Senescal de Escope 28 Jolin le Senescal de Jedwith 32 John le Senescal Chevalier 38 D. Johannes Sinclair de Herd- manston - - 22 Wililam de Muriff Signior de Bothwel - - 28 Grcgorie Sinclair - 36 Johan. Skeen, Pat. de Skeen 44 Willielmus de Soulis 10 Johannes de Soulis - ib. Ralph Master of the House ofSoutra - - 17 Thomas de Somervile 18 D. Thomas de Soulis 26 Nicolaus de Soulis - ib. Walter Spreul - 36 Willielmus de Sancto Claro 10 Henricus de Saneto Claro 32 Earl of Strathern - 13 Mahse Comes deStrathern 17,19 Johannes de Strivelyn 20 D. Johan. de Strivelyn de Mo- ravia - - - 24 I 3 Page- Alex, de Straiton - ib. Malise Conte de Strathern 28' Johannes de Strivelyn de Mu- rliF - - - ib. Alisandre de Strivelyn 30 Joannes de Strivelyn de Carse 30 William de Strivelyn 43 William Coi.te ue Sutherland 2U Henry de Swinton - 42 William.de Sydserff - 34 D. David Torthorald 18 D. Thomas de Torthorald 26 Thomas de Torthorald 29 Robertas de Turnbulye 27 Hugo de Urre - 29 Ingelramus de Umphravile 1 1 Robert de la Val W. Johan. Waleis de Overton 43 Nicol de Walleis - 4a Adam le Walys - ib.. Aleyn Walles - - 3^ Robertas de Walyhop 25, Walter de Wedderburn 34; D^ Michael de Weems 20 Wishart,. Bishop of Glasgow 4 Johannes .Wishard - 26 Willielmus IJictus Wiseman 27 Johannes de Whitlawe 37 John W yshurd del Mernis 27 Johan. Wyscard — 4^, I'loU ■Jg3£ LA. Tl^ .^/^ Seal of/^/vr^ jJHauL jtjaran of Jamrau-e rvha ai/e:r \,ytr llilham, liio/joniDa) ro Hx \ut ^§ \ -'A "'•4 /u//ccj-/r//:ijm (nu! /('/(/ .yinioi \ hinl^ a, L iLuid /i /.tr'.iriJi yt- KtUa^ h at tJiai Ilk ^ A-D-857- ^ -^ / Gn7Aum of Bala a, ,-n \ I \< ^■S~l~ZrT:. ///y///// //ofMeidriini ^te^- g^^i%^ ■ 'm Ji/i,i//ApA Jiar. fA)(^ri/ C/i'i.^ hv?^ l/n/aAarte/-y3i///i (^v'Mr/<'7y o/i^S?ii/y/n-/rf'M,i7,n ^Vnr,<-K^''/ ^<'ru/ (]iU'r;rcUu/,'/yW/,r,i c '//.['//wa 'J/)r(7ir/(fs^ /u/i/ccvi J . 'L/Ai^7?f(r,' 7\e7iA'/i Kef'. ^^/M7n'/7\7i/ ji'tf^L/j Jlric/A. , frcM'a/i/.//cn>art ^a^(/cmi//' Ben ' JoAn /W'^HA\>rvi-rj/-'// ^^ ^^^^^^"W^^ LjearaeHalderihrru:.- L niruraioriS